professor liz reymond & dr leyton miller - metro south palliative care service - resolving...
TRANSCRIPT
Resolving system and facility barriers to advance care
planning across a Queensland Hospital and Health Service
Prof Liz Reymond & Dr Leyton Miller, Brisbane South Palliative Care Collaborative
2016 Advance Care Planning Conference, Sydney
Background
• Metro South Hospital and Health Service District (MSH)
– various unsynchronised projects across 6 public hospitals
– QIP ACP funding
• State wide strategies
– Clinical Senate: End-of-life initiative
– Statewide strategy for end-of-life care (2015)
• National initiatives
– “A national framework for advance care directives” (2011)
Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council
– “End-of-life care in acute hospitals”(2013) Aust. Commission
on Safety and Quality in Health Care
MSH End-of-Life Strategy
• The vision: in MSH, quality end-of-life care is a
routine health outcome when such care is
chosen by consumers and supported within core
healthcare practice across primary, secondary
and tertiary settings.
TodayBeginning of
Time
Percentage
Risk of Dying
0
100
50
Timeline
Individual’s lifetime risk of death since time began
Reframing end-of-life care
Advance Care Planning (ACP) Objectives
• Embed ACP into routine clinical care
dependent on:
- public acceptance
- clinical culture change (mostly medical)
Assumption: Advance care planning is a process that
ideally occurs within a primary healthcare setting
which benefits patients, families and
secondary and tertiary healthcare providers and is
supported by the hospital and health service.
Key elements of the MSH ACP implementation programme
• Governance and partnerships (PHN, GPs, RACFs)
• Development and use of standardised processes
and documentation – AHD, EPOA(H), Statement of
Choices informal advance care plan
• Raising public awareness of end-of-life issues
• Clinician education and cultural change across all
environments of care
• Interfaced communication systems to allow flow of
information between private homes, GP practices,
residential aged care facilities, QAS and hospitals –
the Viewer
Statement of Choices
Raising public awareness: Community engagement
Since January 2015:
• Over 200
presentations
• Reach over:
– 4000 community
members
– 350 RACF staff
– 320 GPs
www.mycaremychoices.com.au
MSH QIP-ACP outcomes for Oct 15 – Feb 16
Advance Care Planning: Completed Statement of Choices –
CPR Preference
Do not want CPR: 989 Want CPR: 182 Other: 31
Advance Care Planning: Completed Statement of Choices –
Preferred Place of Death
Home: 224 Hospital: 180 RACF: 402 Undecided: 396
Uptake of MSH SoC Across Queensland
• Central West HHS
• Darling Downs HHS
• Gold Coast HHS
• Mackay HHS
• MN HHS
• Sunshine Coast HHS
• Townsville HHS
• West Morton HHS
• (Children’s Hospital in
preparation)
• Blue care (RACF and
community)
• PresCare
• Home Instead
• Southern Cross Care
• St Vincents Healthcare
• Mackay PHN
What?
• Clinical lead – director of service + ACP CNC
• Before-after exploratory mixed-methods analysis
– 7 components to overcome barriers to ACP
• Procedures, forms, tools & resources
• Training and seminars
• Data tracking systems
How?
• Normalise ACP in tertiary hospital general medicine unit
– Develop, implement, explore effects of ACP
• Pre-program and post-program audit of ACPs
• Measure number of ACPs in eligible patients
• Staff questionnaire surveys – perceptions, training, resources
Evaluation?
Barriers to ACP
1. You JJ, Downar J, Fowler RA, et al. Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients and Their Families: A
Multicenter Survey of Clinicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):549-556. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7732
Barriers to ACP
Components of ACP program
• Identifying patients eligible for ACP
• Preparing patients and family for ACP
• Initiating ACP discussions
• Facilitating ACP discussions
• Recording and accessing ACPs
• Training staff in ACP
• Tracking and feedback systems
• General Medicine Service
• ‘ACP-eligible’
– Prognosis < 12 months
• SPICT Tool
• Surprise Question
• RACF
Identifying patients eligible for ACP
SPICT Tool• 2 or more indicators of deteriorating health
• Any clinical indicators of advanced conditions2. Highet G, Crawford D, Murray SA, Boyd K. Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): A mixed methods study.BMJ
Supportive & Palliative Care. Published online First: 25 July 2013 Doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000488 www.spict.org.uk
Surprise question
‘No’ is the answer to this question:
“In light of all you know about this patient, would you be surprisedif he/she was to die within the next 12 months?”
- In HD pts: odds of dying within 1 yr in “no” group 3.5 times higher than “yes” group3
- In cancer patients: odds 7.0 times greater4,5
Sensitivity 69%; Specificity 84%; PPV 84%; NPV 69%
Preparing patients and family for ACP
• Resource folders, posters and other visuals in the wards
• Attaching ACP brochure, ACP form and tracking form to bedside charts of all ACP eligible patients
• Making ACP resources available in Gen Med OPD for discharged ACP eligible pts who missed out on discussion
• Reminders about outstanding ACP eligible pts in rapid checklist morning rounds and nurse handover rounds
Initiating and Facilitating ACP discussions
• Dedicated ACP facilitator– patient screening; introductory discussions; assistance in identifying SDMs and
convening family meetings
• Regular reminders and encouragement– Feedback on capture of eligible patients
• Ongoing education and review– Standing agenda item for unit meetings
– In-service training/workshops/seminars
• Flagging ACP eligible pts in Patient Flow and highlighting on journey boards
Monitoring and feedback of ACP
Recording ACPs
• Statement of Choices
– Based on RPC
• Standardise conversation
• Recognition by doctors
• Patients with or without
capacity (Form A or B) Statement of Choices
Storing and accessing ACP
• Attach copy of ACP to discharge summary
• ACP form to accompany patients being transferred to RACFs
• ACP is flagged under ‘Alerts’ in iEMR/HBCIS/ERIC systems
• Uploaded to QH-wide ‘The Viewer’– Document accessible across Qld Health
• Central repository – Metro South Health Office of Advance Care Planning
Results - Prevalence of ACP
• Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH) 2008:
1% (22/2195) charts had some documentation of EOL care1
– 50% (11) had AHD
• 36% (4) incorrectly signed or witnessed
• 36% (4) conflicting requests
• PAH 2014:
50 consecutive deaths of patients (mean age 71 ±13 years):
– Only 1 had AHD
– Only 3 had EPOA
– 1 in 4 did not have ARP (NFR) at time of death
AuditsPre-program Post-program
n = 166 n = 215
1 documented ACP (0.6%) 89 documented ACPs (41%)
26 declined (12%)
Missed or declined ACP
• 215 ACP-eligible patients
– 100 not approached• discharge before clinical teams had opportunity to engage (63%)
• patient and/or family unsuitable to participate in ACP (26%)
• patient approached but failure to submit tracking form with details (11%)
– 26 declined• capacity constraints in engaging in ACP (15, 56%)
• desire not to discuss ACP (4, 16%)
• aware but considered prognosis not bad enough to warrant ACP (4, 16%)
• aware but felt family was already familiar with care preferences (2, 8%)
• no understanding of ACP (1, 4%)
Staff Surveys
35.6%
54.2%
Staff Surveys
ACP – Everyone’s business or specialised?
• 94.6% - Health professionals lack the time to fully undertake ACP
with patients and families.
• Significant drop when CNC absent
• Education and specialist knowledge
• ACP is everyone’s business but needs support of a specialist
Analysis up to July 2015
ACP facilitator away/part-time
CNC absence on ACP
Advance Care Planning Redlands Hospital - Occasions of Service
0
50
100
150
200
250
Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
Future developments
• Integration into EHR
• Follow-up study of outcomes of patients with ACPs
• Roll-out to other units within PAH
• Links with MS HHS-wide EoL program
• Improve flow information to community (GPs, RACFs, QAS)
Acknowledgements
• Dr Ian Scott
• Nala Rajakurana
• Dr Darshan Shah
• Prof Elizabeth Reymond
• Dr Michael Daly
• Dr Jeff Rowland
• Medical and nursing staff Internal Medicine, PAH
• Metro South Office of Advance Care Planning
References1. You JJ, Downar J, Fowler RA, et al. Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients and Their Families: A Multicenter Survey of Clinicians.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):549-556. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7732
2. Highet G, Crawford D, Murray SA, Boyd K. Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): A mixed methods study. BMJ
Supportive & Palliative Care. Published online First: 25 July 2013 Doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000488
3. Moss AH, Ganjoo J, Sharma S, et al. Utility of the “Surprise” Question to Identify Dialysis Patients with High Mortality. Clinical Journal of the American Society of
Nephrology : CJASN. 2008;3(5):1379-1384. doi:10.2215/CJN.00940208.
4. Moroni M, Zocchi D, Bolognesi D, Abernethy A, Rondelli R, Savorani G, et al. The “surprise” question in advanced cancer patients: A prospective study among general
practitioners. Palliat Med. 2014;28(7):959-64.
5. Moss AH, Lunney JR, Culp S, Auber M, Kurian S, Rogers J, et al. Prognostic significance of the “surprise” question in cancer patients. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(7):837-40.