presenteeism survey - enterprise for health · dr. med. olaf tscharnezki efh – management...

40
Dr. med. Olaf Tscharnezki Dr. med. Olaf Tscharnezki EfH EfH Management Conference Management Conference 30 30 31 October 2008 31 October 2008 London London Presenteeism Survey Presenteeism Survey Business case Business case and missing link and missing link

Upload: hoangmien

Post on 03-Apr-2019

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Dr. med. Olaf Tscharnezki Dr. med. Olaf Tscharnezki EfHEfH –– Management ConferenceManagement Conference

30 30 –– 31 October 200831 October 2008LondonLondon

Presenteeism SurveyPresenteeism Survey

Business case Business case

and missing linkand missing link

Health / Health / IllnessIllness ProductivityProductivity

5%certified ill

0%

20%

uncertified ill

25%Ø krank / Ø Au(unhappy well)

50%(happy well)

40 – 60 %50 - 80 %

60 – 100 %80 - 100 %

100 %

Rote Zahlen: Schätzungen von Prof. Neukirch 04.02.07

page 3

Relation: Absenteeism - Presenteeism

Productivity -Thief Presenteeism

27,000 lost days per year*

*days per 1,000 employees

Productivity LossesRelation: Presenteeism / Absenteeism

Absenteeism(known)

Source: HDP 2007

Presenteeism(unknown)

Quelle: HDP

page 4

The Greatest Health-RelatedProductivity-Thieves (days per 1,000 employees)

Productivity -Thief Presenteeism

Which Health Issues areThe Greatest Productivity Thieves? (in days per 1,000 employees and year)

Headaches

Allergies

Sleep

Stress

Depression

Back pain

Digestion

Colds

Arthritis

Hypertension

Influenza

Diabetes

Asthma

AbsenteeismPresenteeism

Source: HDP 2007

Productivity loss per 1,000 employees:

27,000 days per year!

0

page 5

Effects from Basic Intervention

P/A-Management

Gain of 2,700 daysper 1 ,000 employees and year (=10% of total losses)

Quelle: HDP

page 6

Only one part of the affected persons are interested

Only one part of the interested persons get really active

Only one part of the active persons becomesuccessful enough

Only one part of the successful persons showlong-term effects

Prognosis-Model

2.700 Days

P/A-ManagementQuelle: HDP

page 7

Win-Win-Situation

P/A-Management

• Ability to perform• Motivation• Well-being• Quality of life• Employability• Disease prevention

• Productivity gain:at least 10% of lost days

• Effects occur within short time• Positive ROI• Corporate identity: caring

company• Advantages for recruitment

and with aging workforce• Existing worksite health

promotion programs are being backed up

Profits for the Company Benefits for the Employees

Quelle: HDP

Total Loss (conservative): ~ 7 Millionen €

0 € 200.000 € 400.000 € 600.000 € 800.000 € 1.000.000 € 1.200.000 € 1.400.000 € 1.600.000 €

Stress

Poor Sleep / Insomnia

Depression

Other health conditions

Neck- / Back Pain

Colds

Headaches

Allergies

Arthritis

Digestion

Influenza

Asthma

High Blood Pressure

Diabetes

Loss in €

Absenteeism Presenteeism

Business caseBusiness case

Missing linkMissing link

• EAP

• New placement

• Relax oasis

• Company sports (fitness)

• Disability management

• Family service

• Network of specialist

ProblemsProblems

Absenteeism / PresenteeismAbsenteeism / Presenteeism

SolutionsSolutions

• Headache

• Allergy

• Sleep disorders

• Stress

• Depression

• Back pain

• Gastritis / digestion

• Flu

• Diabetes / Hypertension

Management Summary Management Summary –– First results First results

1. High participation rate (>50%)Issue is important, there is interest and emotional pressure.

2. Vitality Index of our people is below average

3. Business case: Productivity loss of 21 days/employee/year (after corrections)

- ca. 7 Mio Euro- ratio absenteeism / presenteeism: 1:3

4. Main issues:- stress, sleeping disorders, depression (50% of total loss!)- musculoskeletal-system

5. Target groups met!- 1,400 downloads of specific info material- EAP – more consultations reported- problem solving takes place.

6. We know now, which problems our people have and what they wish, which help and way of helping they would like

VISIONVISION:: Zero Burnout 2010Zero Burnout 2010

• Mentally healthy organisationMentally healthy organisation

•• Marriage of productivity and quality of lifeMarriage of productivity and quality of life

Strategy of managing the soul/stressStrategy of managing the soul/stress

• encouraging participative management

• redesigning the working environment

• redesigning the tasks

• analysing work roles and establishing goals

• including the employee in career development

• establishing flexible work schedules

• building cohesive teams

• providing social support and response

• establishing fair employment policies

• sharing rewards

Primary preventionPrimary prevention (being proactive!)(being proactive!)

Cultural change (What can I do to make work easier and smarter?)Cultural change (What can I do to make work easier and smarter?)

Strategy of managing the soul/stressStrategy of managing the soul/stress

• prompt detection and management of experienced stress

• increase training awareness

• work/life style modification skills

• scoping skills

• improve relations techniques

Secondary preventionSecondary prevention (early detection)(early detection)

Damage limitation the Damage limitation the „„BandBand--AidAid--ApproachApproach””

•• ResilienceResilience::organisation will not change but continue to be stressfulorganisation will not change but continue to be stressfulthe individual has to develop and strength resilience to stressthe individual has to develop and strength resilience to stress

Strategy of managing the soul/stressStrategy of managing the soul/stressTertiary preventionTertiary prevention (treatment, rehabilitation, recovery)(treatment, rehabilitation, recovery)

• EAP