pre-hospital rapid sequence intubation
DESCRIPTION
Pre-hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation . Dr Peter Sherren Senior registrar Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pre-hospital care The Royal London Hospital and Greater Sydney Area HEMS. Objectives. Why? Who? How? Evidence. Introduction. Controversial/Territorial/Evocative topic! - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Pre-hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation
Dr Peter Sherren
Senior registrar Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pre-hospital care The Royal London Hospital and Greater Sydney Area HEMS
Objectives•Why?•Who?• How?• Evidence
Introduction• Controversial/Territorial/Evocative topic!• Early appropriate airway control central to
good trauma care• Why not bring a hospital level of care to the
roadside?
Why?• Like haemorrhage, airway compromise is a
significant cause of preventable deaths• Hypoxia common on scene in trauma. Stochetti et al. J
Trauma 1997
• Hypoxia and hypercarbia associated with increased morbidity and mortality in TBI. Sherren PB et al. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2012
• ETI is gold standard in hospital• Patient and pathology have no respect for
geography
How? - Intubation without drugs or sedation only
• Successful ETI of trauma pts without drugs ~ mortality 99.8%. Lockey D et al. BMJ 2001.
• Low success rates in patients with reflexes intact (5-30%)
• ETI with sedation• Still a low success rate• ↑Secondary brain injury• ↑Mortality
SOLUTION = RAPID SEQUENCE INTUBATION
(RSI)?
Components of RSI
• Preoxygenation• Premedication• Rapid induction of Anaesthesia• MILS ± Cricoid• Rapid onset neuromuscular relaxation• Ideally no BVM ventilation• ETI and confirmation• Maintenance of Anaesthesia and paralysis
Components of RSI
• Preoxygenation• Premedication• Rapid induction of Anaesthesia• MILS ± Cricoid• Rapid onset neuromuscular relaxation• Ideally no BVM ventilation• ETI and confirmation• Maintenance of Anaesthesia and paralysis
Drug assisted definitive airway control
Minimising time from induction to ETI
Decreased gastric insufflation
Decreased risk of hypoxia and aspiration
Controversies • Optional Premedictions
• Sedate to preoxygenate (midazolam vs ketamine)• Opioid (Fentanyl 1-3mcg/kg) to obtund hypertensive
response to laryngoscopy and ICP spikes• Fluid/blood bolus in hypovolaemic• Atropine in paeds
• Induction agent? (much lower doses in hypovolaemic)• Midazolam (0.3mg/kg)• Propofol (1.5-2.5mg/kg)• Thiopentone (3-5mg/kg) Reconstitution, SVR issues• Etomidate (0.3mg/kg) 11β/17α hydroxylase inhibition• Ketamine (1-2mg/kg) CLOSE TO IDEAL AGENT
Controversies • Optional Premedictions
• Sedate to preoxygenate (midazolam vs ketamine)• Opioid (Fentanyl 1-3mcg/kg) to obtund hypertensive
response to laryngoscopy and ICP spikes• Fluid/blood bolus in hypovolaemic• Atropine in paeds
• Induction agent? (much lower doses in hypovolaemic)• Midazolam (0.3mg/kg)• Propofol (1.5-2.5mg/kg)• Thiopentone (3-5mg/kg) Reconstitution, SVR issues• Etomidate (0.3mg/kg) 11β/17α hydroxylase inhibition• Ketamine (1-2mg/kg) CLOSE TO IDEAL AGENT
Controversies• Neuromuscular blockade
• Suxamethonium (1.5-2mg/kg) – Rapid, familiarity and obvious fasciculation end point but dirty drug• Rocuronium (1.2mg/kg) – Rapid, improved side effect
profile and prolonged safe apnoea time
• Cricoid pressure - poor evidence & ↑ Difficult intubation. Harris T et al. Resuscitation 2010
Bottom line• Generally right drug, at the right time, at the
right dose………
• Pre-hospital=high risk → Simplified evidence based Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
• Remove individual practice in high risk environment, improve CRM and reduce human error
Not controversial• Pre-hospital environment is no excuse for low
standards of care• Rigorous training, simulation, assessment and currencies• Trained operator and assistant• AAGBI standard of monitoring (ECG, NiBP, SpO2, waveform
ETCO2)• Quality control/assurance as part of good clinical governance
• Preoxygenation• Non-rebreath mask or BVM ± PEEP valve• Nasal cannula oxygen 15L/min. PreO2 + DAO• Consider OPA/NPAx2/SGA
Still not controversial• MILS - remove C-collar• Maximise 1st pass
intubation success• Control your environment • 360 degree access• Optimise position • Use bougie for all cases• Standardised equipment and
techniques• Formalised failed intubation
and oxygenation drills
Who?
• Impending or actual failure of airway patency• Failure of airway protection• Oxygenation or ventilation failure• Injured patients who are unmanageable or
severely agitated after head injury• Humanitarian indications• Anticipated clinical course
So we think pre-hospital RSI has a place, but who should be doing it?
↓
A TRAINED AND COMPETENT TEAM
Physician-paramedic team• Good medical
experience• Anaesthetic
experience• Doctor ≠ pre-hospital
RSI competent!• Additional pre-hospital
training • Cost• Availability
Double Paramedic or paramedic/air crewman
• At home in the pre-hospital environment
• Experienced++• Infrastructure and
governance needed• Infrequent occurrence
for those purely working out of hospital; skill maintenance issue
Do paramedics want to do it?
• 99 London HEMS paramedics were asked if they felt RSI should be part of experienced UK paramedic’s practice (courtesy of Prof D Lockey)
• 65% said yes pre-term at London HEMS• Only 32% said yes on completion of their term working
for HEMS
• Isolated to London HEMS?
Success rates of pre-hospital RSI• Physician/paramedic team• 99.4% London HEMS (348/350) Mackay CA et al. Emerg Med J 2001
• 98.8% London HEMS (397/402) Harris T et al. Resuscitation 2010
• 99.5% GSA-HEMS (185/186) Bloomer R et al. Emerg Med J 2012
• 99.1% SAMU France (685/691) Adnet F et al. Ann Emerg Med 1998
• 100% Germany (342/342) Helm M et al. Br J Anaesth 2006
• Paramedic• 97% MICA Victoria (152/157) Bernard SA et al. Ann Surg 2010
• 96% Auckland rescue helicopter (~280) Tony Smith
• 86.7% San Diego (281/209) Davis DP et al. J Trauma 2003
Are failed intubations an issue?• Yes, but.... • Can’t Intubate Can’t Oxygenate much worse• Failure to detect an oesophageal intubation or misplaced
ETT is much worse• Undetected oesophageal intubations during RSI should
really be a ‘NEVER’ event• Continuous ETCO2 monitoring reduces UNDETECTED
misplaced intubations from 23.3% to 0%. Silvestri S et al. Ann Emerg Med 2005
Waveform capnography/ETCO2
• 209 RSI, 627 historical controls• Mortality - RSI vs control, 33% vs 24% (p <0.05)• Good outcome – RSI vs control, 57% vs 45% (p <0.01)• High rates of hypotension, hypoxaemia, hypercarbia• Low intubation success• Longer scene times• Training issue?• Use of ETCO2 not universal
• 312 pts RCT• MICA paramedics with ETCO2• Midazolam/Sux• 97% success rate, 5 oesophageal intubations recognised• Favourable outcome - 51% pre-hospital RSI compared 39%
controls (p <0.05)• 13 lost to follow up, 1 more +ve outcome in control group
would result in NS result
• Prospective RCT by Careflight, awaiting publication• Physician/paramedic vs standard care• 338 recruited over 6yrs, needed 510 pts• -ve primary outcome (GOSE 6 months)• High cross over between groups• When ASNSW physician/paramedic team added to
careflight team data -> improved odds of survival at discharge (p-0.02)
Pre-hospital RSI is here to stay, so how do we make it safer?
PRE-HOSPITAL RSI↓
KEEP IT SIMPLE↓
STANDARDISE PRACTICE (equipment, techniques and drugs)
↓AVOID HUMAN ERROR
↓IMPROVE CRM
Standard Operating procedures
Standardised pre-hospital drugs
• Pre-drawn drugs• Ketamine 200mg/20ml• Suxamethonium 100mg/2ml (x2)• Midazolam 10mg/10ml• Morphine 10mg/10ml
• Spare Ampoules• Rocuronium 50mg/5ml (x2)• Fentanyl 500mcg/10ml (x2)• Midazolam 15mg/3ml • Ketamine 200mg/2ml (x5)
In hospital level of monitoring and Kit dump
Challenge response checklist
Quality assurance and clinical governance
Training and simulation
Summary• Pre-hospital RSI is indicated in certain patients• High risk intervention that needs to be
delivered in a quality assured manner• Pre-hospital RSI done badly is worse than
standard management• Some evidence for a morbidity and mortality
benefit
Questions?