HERE DESIGN ANDREW COCKE PRINCIPAL 201 I STREET NE WASHINGTON DC 20002 703.655.0156

N E W TA I P E I C I T Y M U S E U M O F A R T SJust as New Taipei City is a link between the urban landscape of Taipei and the rugged, mountainous countryside, our design for the for the New Taipei City Museum of Contemporary Art is a bridge between the historic Yingge and the natural landscape along the Yingge River. The design is inspired by the deposits of sandstone that fi ll the riverbed and lay exposed much of the year. We believe that the experience of art is like crossing a river, stepping from stone to stone, sometimes across a great expanse, a leap of the imagination, until we fi nd ourselves on the far shore, transcendent.

Top: View from Yingge train stationAbove: Site elevation

Wind-driven passive cooling system

B2 B1B 1F 2F 3F

Top: Aerial perspectiveAbove: Site elevation

Water-driven passive cooling system

Top: Habitat RestorationAbove: On-site Stormwater Management

Top: Landscape Planting ConceptAbove: Site Circulation

AU RO R A M U S E U M P L A Z A & C A N O P YWith the addition of a new museum by architect Tadao Ando, the need for public space that matched the modernity of the museum addition and of urban Shanghai was paramount. The new public plaza is a visual bridge between the classical style of the existing Aurora building and the new museum, and utilizes a clean and modern palette of materials that refl ects the aesthetic of the new museum, while responding to the existing building’s architecture and color scheme. The canopy structure is an ephemeral expression that transcends the idea of a traditional canopy, elevating it to public art. The canopy effortlessly cantilevers out from the existing building as an all glass structure– a major work of public art, yet ‘invisible’ to allow the museum to take center stage. The project was completed in 2012, but typical of China, bears only little resemblance to our design intent.

Entry canopy at Aurora Plaza & Museum

Entry canopy study models. Clockwise from top left: Voronoi study with random column locations, planar quad panel study, side elevation, gaussian curvature study for optimizing planar quad panels, steel superstructure. Entry canopy, rear entrance Cafe garden (above) Generative Wall

C H U N G L I B R I D G ETogether with Taiwanese engineer, Skye Design proposed this radical cantilevering pedestrian bridge. The form is inspired by the unusual root structure of a native lily pad that grows only in northern Taiwan and is native to the this pond. Designed using parametric techniques we created dozens of variations to study ways to frame views from the lily preserve to an existing amphitheater across the pond all while optimizing for structural feasibility and price. This project represents our best effort to date to use Grasshopper as a programmable parametric tool to solve fundamental architectural problems, allowing us the freedom to design without losing sight of the practical constraints on the project.

Bridge deck and boardwalk

Parametric piling locations

Lower Deck (above)View from lily preserve through bridge opening toward amphitheater

V I RG I N I A M U S E U M O F F I N E A R T S E X PA N S I O Nwith RMA+SMBW

The expansion of the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts is the joint work of Rick Mather and Associates of London and the Richmond fi rm, SMBW architects. The building was designed with a forty foot tall frameless insulated glass window at one end of the atrium, and laminated glass beams supporting the atrium room all designed by glass engineers Dewhurst & Macfarlane. When DMP was unable to complete the design, SMBW designed a frameless glazing system with an interior stainless steel structural fi n. I was responsible for the detailing of this glass wall system.

Parking garage entry

Outdoor cafe Street entry (above)Entry courtyard (below)

Structural glass wall Fire-rated glass enclosed bridges Floating atrium roof CafePermanent collection gallery

C A M P B E L L H A L L A D D I T I O Nwith William Sherman & SMBW architects

The University of Virginia School of Architecture’s expansion comes at the end of a protracted search for a world class architect who could survive scrutiny of the University’s conservative Board of Visitors. With the threat of deaccreditation, the school chose two professors to design two additions, and SMBW was hired to complete CDs and CA. The south wall features an active louver system and light shelves that throw light deep into the inner offi ces.

South additionLouver Detail (right)

Photos by William Sherman

Ra p p a h a n

no c k R

i v e r

B U T C H E R R E S I D E N C EThis project for a weekend house on a bluff above the Rappahannock river in the foothills of the Blue Ridge was designed to meet LEED Platinum ratings. Because the clients wanted the house to be camoufl aged in the dense forest, we chose to use untreated wood for the siding and louvers. After exploring numerous types of wood, we discovered a “heat-treating” process that allows any wood to weather without sealant or preservative for up to 30 years.

The overhang on the south side is designed to provide full shading in the summertime while optimizing wintertime passive solar heating, including a loop in the hydronic heating system to cycle that heat throughout the house. The house is also designed to take advantage of natural ventilation: as air rises from the cool river below it is scooped beneath the large deck and channeled into the interior and then exhausted through clerestory windows on the north side.

Southeast facade

Site section

Ground fl oor planSecond fl oor plan

Living RoomMaster Bedroom Dining Room Kitchen

E N T RO P Y H O U S ELocated in a 19th century textile mill complex, this former steam plant was to be converted into a single family residence. Taking advantage of historic tax credits, the project had to respect the scale and character of the surrounding historic neighborhood, without confusing the existing historic structure with new construction.

The existing concrete and brick exterior remains completely intact while the private spaces are wrapped inside a cloud of perforated aluminum. As this cylinder of steam rises up and twists through the existing opening in the roof, it modulates the light entering the space through a narrow slot between the metal skin and the concrete roof. The bright surface of the aluminum skin makes a glare screen for the darker, private spaces inside. And refl ections from the outer surface keep the public spaces evenly lit and reduce the potential glare from the large, north facing windows.

Construction sequence

Toolpaths for plywood ribs

open living room Top: Above mezzanineLeft: Below mezzanine

B AY S I D E T R A I L , P O R T L A N D M A I N E : S E AT I N G S C U L P T U R EOur winning entry for this public art competition for a series of benches along the Bayside Trail in Portland, Maine’s burgeoning arts district. The two-mile long Bayside Trail follows the converted railroad bed serving the city’s former industrial neighborhood. Our design, inspired by the undulating ridge line separating the bay and harbor sides of the city, relies on extensive digital and parametric design and fabrication techniques to marshal the complexity of thousands of unique parts. We have developed a parametric system by which we quickly generate an infi nite variety of bench shapes to respond the contingencies of any site or program. Working with fabrication partners, Centraal Steel in the Netherlands and CW Keller in New Hampshire we are in the fi nal stages of design development and expect to start fabrication and installation in the summer of 2013.

Site A

2" x 1" CNC CARVED OAK SLATS(OF VARRYING LENGTHS)

NOTCHED AND SCREWED TO TUBE(UNIQUE SLATS CODED FOR EASY REPLACEMENT)

1 1/2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZEDBENT STEEL TUBE

3/8" x 2" GALVANIZED STEEL STANCHIONNOTCHED AND WELDED TO RECIEVE STEEL TUBE

4' DEEP, GALVANIZED STEEL GROUNDSCREW FOUNDATIONS.

R CORE DRILL EXISTING PAVING FORMINIMAL EXCAVATION OF EXISTING SOILS

Site B

Feature dimensions

Top: Table for socialism, Interim Offi ce of Architecture,in the collection of SFMOMAAbove: Cast glass and stainless steel wall, Lundberg Design with John Lewis

Top: Leather lounge, Lundberg DesignAbove: Table for socialism, Interim Offi ce of Architecture,in the collection of SFMOM

Top: Torch cut steel table, Lundberg DesignAbove: TV Tree, Torch cut steel beam and plate, Lundberg Design

FA B R I C AT I O N S

EOS Wine Barwith Interim Offi ce of Architecture

A R P L 6 01 D E S I G N T E C H N O L O G Y S T U D I O : PA R A M E T R I C D E V E L O P M E N T SArchitects increasingly fi nd themselves struggling to navigate a rising tide of information, buffeted on all sides by changing market conditions, lower profi t margins, faster schedules, more complicated programs, and more demanding clients. We have already arrived in a future where architects must fi nd ways to harness these winds and currents if they are to remain in control of their design process. In the last decade, parametric design has been concerned with either expediency in the documentation process (Revit) or the elaboration of complex surfaces (Grasshopper, Generative Components, Digital Project), but these tools are capable of helping architects solve much more common and historically intractable problems. In this studio, I asked students to harness one of the most opaque documents in the design process: the developer’s real estate proforma, to help them understand the cost/benefi t implications of their design decisions in real time. Using a combination of Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, and Excel, students developed multiple techniques to quickly design fl oorplates for a mixed-use tall tower. Students developed parametric tools to control and value unit size, view orientation, solar orientation, and mixture of residential unit types. These could be reconfi gured to quickly regenerate a detailed proforma enumerating costs and profi ts for the entire development. Students could easily update their input data to refl ect changing market conditions and reconfi gure their fl oorplates to accommodate changes in the real estate market or the construction industry.

15’

11’4”

15’

RENTAL COST DETAILS MIXED USED

Floor # Use # of Units # of Bedrooms Gross Floor Area Vertical AreaFloor CommonArea Factor Floor R/U Load Factor

Usable Area (SquareFoot)

Basic RentableArea (Square Foot)

FloorCoefficient

OrientationCoefficient Rent Per Sq. Ft/ Mo. Monthly Rent Per Unit

Total Annual Rent forUnit Type

1 Retail 1 N/A 140,683.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 129,046.56 140,268.00 0.00 0 3.25$ 455,871.00$ 5,470,452.00$2 Retail 1 N/A 140,683.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 129,046.56 140,268.00 0.00 0 3.25$ 455,871.00$ 5,470,452.00$3 Commercial 1 N/A 140,683.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 129,046.56 140,268.00 0.00 0 3.69$ 517,238.25$ 6,206,859.00$4 Commercial 1 N/A 140,683.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 129,046.56 140,268.00 0.00 0 3.69$ 517,238.25$ 6,206,859.00$5 Commercial 1 N/A 140,683.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 129,046.56 140,268.00 0.00 0 3.69$ 517,238.25$ 6,206,859.00$ $

703,415.00 2,075.00 645,232.80 701,340.00 2,463,456.75$ 29,561,481.00$

6 Residential 1 0 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 23,164.44$ 277,973.33$7 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 23,164.44$ 277,973.33$8 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 23,164.44$ 277,973.33$9 Residential 1 2 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 23,164.44$ 277,973.33$10 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 23,164.44$ 277,973.33$11 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$12 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$13 Residential 1 3 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$14 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$15 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$16 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$17 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$

116,448.00 4,980.00 102,550.56 111,468.00 285,694.81$ 3,428,337.68$

6 Residential 1 1 12,277.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 10,913.04 11,862.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 29,580.86$ 354,970.35$7 Residential 1 1 12,277.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 10,913.04 11,862.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 29,580.86$ 354,970.35$8 Residential 1 1 12,277.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 10,913.04 11,862.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 29,580.86$ 354,970.35$9 Residential 1 1 12,277.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 10,913.04 11,862.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 29,580.86$ 354,970.35$10 Residential 1 1 12,277.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 10,913.04 11,862.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 29,580.86$ 354,970.35$11 Residential 1 1 12,277.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 10,913.04 11,862.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 30,989.48$ 371,873.70$12 Residential 1 2 12,277.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 10,913.04 11,862.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 30,989.48$ 371,873.70$13 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$14 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$15 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$16 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$17 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$

134,459.00 4,980.00 119,120.68 129,479.00 331,220.83$ 3,974,649.90$

6 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 36,760.37$ 441,124.43$7 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 36,760.37$ 441,124.43$8 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 36,760.37$ 441,124.43$9 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 36,760.37$ 441,124.43$10 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 36,760.37$ 441,124.43$11 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 38,510.86$ 462,130.35$12 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 38,510.86$ 462,130.35$13 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 38,510.86$ 462,130.35$14 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$15 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$16 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$17 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$18 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$

169,768.00 5,395.00 137,661.44 164,373.00 420,671.99$ 5,048,063.93$

8 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 38,914.97$ 466,979.63$9 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 38,914.97$ 466,979.63$10 Residential 1 0 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 38,914.97$ 466,979.63$11 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 40,768.06$ 489,216.75$12 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 40,768.06$ 489,216.75$13 Residential 1 1 15,156.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 13,561.72 14,741.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 38,510.86$ 462,130.35$14 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$15 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$16 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$17 Residential 1 1 9,704.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 8,545.88 9,289.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 24,267.51$ 291,210.15$

134,072.00 4,150.00 119,528.24 129,922.00 333,861.94$ 4,006,343.33$

6 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 38,914.97$ 466,979.63$7 Residential 1 3 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 38,914.97$ 466,979.63$8 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 38,914.97$ 466,979.63$9 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 38,914.97$ 466,979.63$10 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.05 0 2.38$ 38,914.97$ 466,979.63$11 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 40,768.06$ 489,216.75$12 Residential 1 1 16,020.00 415 0.08 1.09 16% 14,356.60 15,605.00 0.10 0 2.38$ 40,768.06$ 489,216.75$

112,140.00 2,905.00 100,496.20 109,235.00 276,110.97$ 3,313,331.63$

Totals 1,370,302.00 24,485.00 Avg. 1.09 1,224,589.92 1,345,817.00 4,111,017.29$ 49,332,207.45$

Gross Building Potential Income 54,690,864.64$

Tower 4

Tower 5

Plinthe

Tower 1

Tower 2

Tower 3

DEVELOPMENT COSTSBuilding/ Program Summary RateTotal Rentable Square Footage 1,345,817.00Total Gross Square Footage 1,370,302.00Total Common Square Footage 24,485.00Total Lot Area 163,079.00

Building Loss (Usable/ Rentable) 10%Maximum FAR 10Maximum Lot Coverage 100%

Total Land Value 28,035,200.00$ 28,035,200.00$

Hard Costs Rate Measurable Units Cost Per Square Foot Total Costs

Construction Hard Costs (Base Building) 180.00$ Per Square Foot of Total Gross Area 246,654,360.00$Total Below Grade Parking (per space) 40,000.00$ Per Space 2,091.35$ 83,654,048.31$Construction Hard Costs for Tenant Fit up (allowance) 125.00$ per SF rentable commercial space 80,654,100.00$Site Development Hard Costs (demo) 0.60$ per SF of site area 97,847.40$Gross Hard Construction Cost 411,060,355.71$

Premium Cost for "Green" Construction 7.00% Hard Construction Costs (BB) 17,265,805.20$Land Carry 8.00% 12 2,242,816.00$Approval Fees/Misc. Permit Fees 5% per Cubic Foot of Structure 68,515.10$

Total Hard Costs 430,637,492.01$

Soft CostsArchitecture & Engineering 7% of Hard Construction Cost 28,774,224.90$Contractor Fees* 14% of Hard Construction Cost 57,548,449.80$Legal (Estimate) 100,000.00$ total 100,000.00$Use and Occupancy Certificate 93,628.24$ plus $17 per unit 93,628.24$LEED CertificationBuilding Permit 190,932.50$ 12 Months 190,932.50$Appraisal & Title 0.25% of Hard Construction Cost + $? 1,027,406.27$Marketing 0.10$ per Rentable Square Foot 6,109.26$Taxes during Construction 0.3% of Hard Construction Costs 1,027,650.89$Insurance during Construction 0.40$ per Square Foor of New Construction 96,935.20$Total Soft Costs 88,865,337.06$

Loan Origination Costs permanent loan amountDeveloper Overhead 3% Hard and Soft Costs 14,997,770.78$Contingency 5% Hard and Soft Costs 24,996,284.64$

Total Development Costs, Excluding Interest and OperatingReserve for Lease Up 587,532,084.49$

Estimate Construction InterestPermanent Loan 214,717,167.17$Construction Interest 7.0%Construction Period 28 monthsAverage Draw 40.28%

Estimated Construction Loan Interest $14,538,142

Total Project Cost Before Operating Reserve 602,070,226.01$

Estimate of Operating ReserveGross Potential Rent 3,162,655.67$ monthlyLease up Period (Months to reach stabilized occupancy) 8 monthsAverage Occupancy during Lease up 70%Estimated Rent during Lease up 17,710,871.77$Estimated Operating Expenses during Lease up 6,137,879.41$NOI During Lease up 11,572,992.36$Construction Interest During Lease up 10,020,134.47$

First Year Operating Reserve Required (1,552,857.89)$

Total Project Costs (without Public Contribution) 600,517,368.12$*Contractor fees are a markup of subs, but due to unknown cost, it will be double architecture & Engineering fees.**Building Commisioner Fees are included into Premium cost for Green Construction ($.75 for Gross New Construction SF)

Total AreaPer Sqaure Foot of Total Gross Area

Buildable Site Area

MeasurableTotal AreaTotal AreaTotal AreaTotal Area

Rezoning Requests "C 0" Districts 14,252.00$ 2,186.00$ 10% 18,081.80$Site Plan Approvals & Admendment Final Site Plans 9,506.00$ $37 111.00$ $56 4,371.00$ 10% 44,092.36$Site Plan Approvals & Admendment Final Façade Plan Review 548.00$ 10% 602.80$Use Permits 8,303.00$ 10% 9,133.30$

Variances or Use Permits Variances 3,350.00$ 670.00$ 302.00$ 10% 4,754.20$Admin review Permits & Requests Landscape Plan 585.00$ 10% 643.50$

Permit for Signs 107.00$ 1.25$ 125.00$ 732.00$Permit for Temp Signs 107.00$ 1.25$ 125.00$ 357.00$

Zoning Compliance Letters Letter to DMV 528.00$ 10% 580.80$Varification of Compliance 329.00$ 10% 361.90$Special Agreement Letters 2,186.00$ 10% 2,404.60$Buildability Letter 329.00$ 10% 361.90$Determination Letter 329.00$ 10% 361.90$Sink Letter 29.00$ 10% 31.90$Zoning Ordinance 10.00$ 10% 11.00$

Additional Building Permits By Right Development 220.00$ 111.00$ 10% 15,430.35$All Site Plan Projects 548.00$ 220.00$ 10% 60,841.29$New Parking Structures and 220.00$ 111.00$ 10% 30,640.70$Footing & Foundation & Exca 56.00$ 10% 61.60$Demolitions Plans By Right 111.00$ 10% 122.10$Demolitions Plans Site Plan 1,093.00$ 10% 1,202.30$Swimming Pools 56.00$ 10% 61.60$Decks and Fences 56.00$ 10% 61.60$

Total Permit Fees 190,932.50$

Certificate of Occupancy Master Certificate (A) 2,186.00$ 17.00$ 10% 26,138.80$Shell and Core (+150,00 sf gr 2,733.00$ 10% 3,006.30$

Certificate of Partial Occupancy (A 3) over 2,000 sf gross area 548.00$ 10% 38,547.14$(b) apartments & Hotels 439.00$ 22.00$ 10% 24,904.00$

Other Certificates of Occupancy Parking Structure 548.00$ 56.00$ 10% 548.00$Swimming Pools (Flat Fee) 220.00$ 10% 242.00$Parking Lots (Flat Fee) 220.00$ 10% 242.00$

Total Permit & Certificate Fees 93,628.24$

Absorption RateUnit Demand Scale Total # of Units

Total Project Units Building unitsAvailable Units Community ScaleLess Vacancy Community Scale

Lease Up Period 8 Months

Construction Loan Interestmonth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

draw amount $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470total loan draw $7,668,470 $15,336,941 $23,005,411 $30,673,881 $38,342,351 $46,010,822 $53,679,292 $61,347,762 $69,016,232 $76,684,703 $84,353,173 $92,021,643

loan interest $44,733 $89,465 $134,198 $178,931 $223,664 $268,396 $313,129 $357,862 $402,595 $447,327 $492,060 $536,793

Construction Loan Interestmonth 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

draw amount $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470total loan draw $99,690,113 $107,358,584 $115,027,054 $122,695,524 $130,363,994 $138,032,465 $145,700,935 $153,369,405 $161,037,875 $168,706,346 $176,374,816 ##########

loan interest $581,526 $626,258 $670,991 $715,724 $760,457 $805,189 $849,922 $894,655 $939,388 $984,120 $1,028,853 $1,073,586

Construction Loan Interestmonth 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

draw amount $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470 $7,668,470total loan draw $191,711,756 $199,380,227 $207,048,697 $214,717,167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

loan interest $1,118,319 $1,163,051 $1,207,784 $1,252,517 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

total interest paid $14,538,142average draw $86,483,303 40.28%

per unitper 5,000 sf Total Fees

Total FeesTotal Fees

Total Fees

Excluding DES Fees

Total FeesTotal FeesTotal FeesTotal Fees

for 1st Subsection

per 10,000 gross sf

per unit

for additional 100 sf (x5)for additional 100 sf (x2)

Use Permits Including NewConstruction of a Building

Excluding DES Fees

AutomationFees Notes

Total FeesTotal Fees

Total Fees

Total FeesTotal FeesTotal FeesTotal FeesTotal Fees

Building Permit & Occupancy Fees Section Base fee Add fees

per 100 sf of commercial per residential unit Per Commercial Unit

DES FeesAdd fees Add FeesNotes NotesNotes Total

per 10,000 gross sfper 5,000 gross sfper 5,000 gross sf

Total FeesTotal FeesTotal FeesTotal FeesTotal Fees

Total FeesTotal Fees

Total Fees

per sf over 100 sqper sf over 100 sq

Total FeesExcluding DES Fees

Additional Subsection

RatiosBldg Common Area 20,000.00 estimateBldg R/U Ratio 1.02Rentable Area 1,366,118.70R/U Ratio 10%

Vertical AreaMain Elevator Lobby elev: 27.1 sf x8 per floor 216.8

stair: 52.9 sf x2 per floor 105.8freight: 36 sf x1 per floor 36pipes: 50 sf per floor 56.4

415

Floor R/U Ratio = Floor Rentable Area / Floor Usable AreaBasic Rentable Area = Usable x Floor R/U RatioBLDG R/U Ratio = Building Rentable Area / (Building Rentable Area Basic Rentable Area of Building Common Area)Rentable Area = Basic Rentable Area x Building R/U RatioR/U Ratio = Floor R/U Ratio x Building R/U RatioRentable Area = Usable Aea x R/U Ratio

Tenant Space

RestroomsVertical Area

Floor Common AreaElevator lobbiescorridorsBuilding Common Area

Mech/ Elec. Closets/ Janitor…

Exercise Rooms, Print, Mail…Building Common Area

Floorplate Divisions

Building Mass Divisions

Block Divisions

Spring/Fall Equinox insolation Summer Solstice insolation Winter Solstice insolation

1 Bedroom generator

Rent generator by view orientation

Excel Export

grasshopper evolution

Unit Type # of Units $ SF/Mo. Avg. SF Per Unit Avg. Monthly Rent Avg. Yearly Rent Total Rentable SF Total Monthly Rent Total Yearly Rent % of Bldg Gross SFStudio - $2.75 550 $1,555.00 $18,660.00 0 - - 52%1-Bedroom - $2.85 675 $1,990.00 $23,880.00 0 - - 26%2-Bedroom - $2.30 1135 $2,620.00 $31,440.00 0 - - 12%3-Bedroom - $2.00 1285 $3,075.00 $36,900.00 0 - - 10%

Unit Type # of Units $ SF/Mo. Avg. SF Per Unit Avg. Monthly Rent Avg. Yearly Rent Total Rentable SF Total Monthly Rent Total Yearly Rent % of Bldg Rentable SFStudio 276 $2.75 471 $1,512.00 $18,144.00 130,048 $231,020.00 $2,772,241.00 31%1-Bedroom 84 $2.85 756 $2,546.00 $30,552.00 63,503 $270,057.00 $3,240,689.00 15%2-Bedroom 24 $2.30 1145 $3,030.00 $36,360.00 27,474 $184,869.00 $2,218,423.00 7%3-Bedroom 24 $2.00 1542 $3,561.00 $42,732.00 37,013 $103,299.00 $1,239,592.00 9%Commercial 1 $3.67 31203 $1,374,180.00 $16,490,160.00 31,203 $114,515.00 $1,374,180.00 7%Retail 2 $3.70 28400 $1,260,966.00 $15,131,592.00 56,800 $210,161.00 $2,521,932.00 14%Totals 411 346,041 $1,113,921.00 83%

Unit Type # of Units $ SF/Mo. Avg. SF Per Unit Avg. Monthly Rent Avg. Yearly Rent Total Rentable SF Total Monthly Rent Total Yearly Rent % of Bldg Rentable SFStudio 269 $2.75 490 $1,572.00 $18,864.00 131,753 $242,138.00 $2,905,652.00 31%1-Bedroom 96 $2.85 744 $2,478.00 $29,736.00 71,390 $234,503.00 $2,814,039.00 17%2-Bedroom 34 $2.30 1042 $2,797.00 $33,564.00 35,431 $142,427.00 $1,709,129.00 8%3-Bedroom 16 $2.00 1356 $3,221.00 $38,652.00 21,702 $188,315.00 $2,259,780.00 5%Commercial 1 $3.67 34248 $1,508,292.00 $18,099,504.00 34,248 $125,691.00 $1,508,292.00 8%Retail 2 $3.70 31361 $1,392,450.00 $16,709,400.00 62,723 $232,075.00 $2,784,900.00 15%Totals 418 357,247 $1,165,149.00 83%

Unit Type # of Units $ SF/Mo. Avg. SF Per Unit Avg. Monthly Rent Avg. Yearly Rent Total Rentable SF Total Monthly Rent Total Yearly Rent % of Bldg Rentable SFTower Commercial $3.67 19602 $78,177.00 $938,124.00 411,648 $1,641,725.00 $19,700,700.00 82%Commercial $3.67 32845 $1,446,480.00 $17,357,760.00 32,845 $120,540.00 $1,446,480.00 7%Retail $3.70 29171 $1,295,178.00 $15,542,136.00 58,341 $215,863.00 $2,590,356.00 12%Totals - 502,834 $1,978,128.00 100%

Building Total Rentable SF Total Monthly Income Total Yearly Income % of DevelopmentRT East 346,042.00 $1,113,921.00 $13,367,057.00 25.64%RT West 357,247.00 $1,165,149.00 $13,981,792.00 26.47%Com Tower 502,834.00 $1,978,128.00 $23,737,536.00 37.26%Totals 1206123 $4,257,198.00 89%

RENTAL SUMMARY - TOTAL DEVELOPMENT

RENTAL SUMMARY - RESEARCH

RENTAL SUMMARY - RESIDENTIAL TOWER EAST

RENTAL SUMMARY - RESIDENTIAL TOWER WEST

RENTAL SUMMARY - COMMERCIAL TOWER

A R P L 6 0 2 C O M P R E H E N S I V E B U I L D I N G D E S I G N 2 01 2 : N AT I O N A L B U I L D I N G L A BThe graduate level Comprehensive Building Design Studio draws on the advanced skills of the second-year graduate students. As the director of the Comprehensive Building Design Studio, I conceived this project for the National Building Laboratory--an annex to the National Building Museum--in consultation with curators at the NBM and the NYAIA Technology Committee. The jury cited my studio’s winning design by Christian Chute, Daniel Bertuso, Michael Boyd, Zainab Behbehanni, and Kaloyan Yordanov for its aesthetic ambition tightly integrated with cutting edge, high-performance passive design. The team made the bold and risky decision to incorporate a south-facing glass facade. They tuned the slope of the double skin curtain wall to admit low-angle sun for passive heating in the winter while substantially blocking high-angle sun in the summer. Using advanced CFD analysis, they were able to show that the double curtain wall would passively exhaust warm air out of the building without excess heating in the habitable spaces, even in Washington’s humid summers. The penthouse level is shaped to create deep overhangs to drive predominant summer winds through the double skin and to create negative pressure on the north side of the building to draw air through the double skin from above and exhaust it out of the building.

Summer solar chimney optimizationWinter passive solar heating optimizationWater jet-cut metal screen above Mount Vernon Square entry

Summer site shadingWinter site shading

Summer facade shadingWinter facade shading

Winter passive heating mode

Spring/Fall passive ventilation mode

Summer passive ventilation mode

Winter Wind Summer Wind CFD analysis of summer passive solar ventilation

Geothermal radiant cooling (and heating) with variable refrigerant fl ow cooling system and energy recovery ventilators at the point of entry dehumidify incoming air while capillary mats provide sensible cooling (and heating) without interrupting passive ventilation. Lobby (above), K Street facade (below) Atrium with water jet-cut metal screen

A RC H 4 0 2 C O M P R E H E N S I V E B U I L D I N G D E S I G N : N AV Y YA R D I N F O R M AT I O N K I O S KThe Comprehensive Building Design Studio demands that students deploy the full range of technologies available in contemporary practice and bridge the gap between form and function. From advanced free-form modeling in Rhino to building information modeling in Revit to advanced sustainable analysis in Revit and Ecotect, to advanced CFD simulation and analysis with VirtualWind, this undergraduate team, Alex Zondlo, Gina Longo, Michael Mastriano, and Mike Large, working closely with EYP sustainability director Les Taylor, deployed an array of technologies on their design for an information kiosk in Washington’s burgeoning Navy Yard neighborhood. While many of these technologies remain unknown to all but a few of the world’s most advanced design fi rms, these students have already used them to understand their design in unprecedented detail and sophistication and are equipped to become early leaders in an increasingly technical profession.

Summer solstice noon Summer solstice 4:30 Winter solstice noon Winter solstice 4:30

Wind/water fl ow diagrams

Average summer wind fl ow analysis

Structural glass facade detail

A RC H 2 0 6 / 517 I N T RO D U C T I O N T O D I G I TA L D E S I G N & FA B R I C AT I O NThrough a series of lectures and hands-on exercises built around the canonical works of digital design, this class examines techniques developed by Greg Lynn, SHoP, Offi ce dA, FOA, Gehry, as well as pre-digital techniques by Saarinen, and proto-digital works by Utzon and Arup in order to provide students the basic digital techniques on which they can build in their studio courses. DD&F is also the fi rst formal and systematic introduction to the laser cutter, 3D printer, and CNC router and modeling software, Rhinoceros.

A RC H 2 0 6 / 517 D I G I TA L D O C U M E N T S , A R P L 4 21 / 6 21 B U I L D I N G I N F O R M AT I O N M A N AG E M E N TAfter teaching several semesters of the legacy Digital Documents course, little changed from the Autocad era, I was asked to develop a new course that would teach students the very latest BIM techniques. In this course I ask students to model and document geometrically complex buildings like Zaha Hadid’s Landform One, or OMA’s Villa Dal’Ava that force students to use Revit in unconventional ways. Curved, sloped, free-form walls and roofs will prepare students to bend Revit to any design challenge, particularly the formal demands of high-performance sustainable design. I incorporate readings and discussions about the broader role of BIM in contemporary practice and the modern AEC industry so that stu-dents are prepared to become early leaders in a BIM savvy offi ce. The course also forms the technical foundation of Catholic University’s Comprehensive Building Design Studio.

Landform One by Zaha HadidModeled by Patrick Keeney

Villa Dal’Ava by OMAModeled by Benjamin Holsinger

A RC H 31 2 / 61 2 , A R P L 5 5 5 : B I M & T H E PA R A M E T R I C M O D E LThrough a combination of lectures, class discussions and hands-on tutorials, this course teaches students the fundamentals of parametric design. We use rule-based systems in nature as a metaphor for applying rules to design problems. The class began by teaching both advanced techniques in Revit and Grasshopper, but has evolved to focus on Grasshop-per and some basic scripting.