pore-size dependence of ion diffusivity in dye-sensitized solar cells yiqun ma supervisor: dr. gu xu...
TRANSCRIPT
Pore-size Dependence of Ion Diffusivity in Dye-sensitized Solar Cells
Yiqun Ma
SUPERVISOR: Dr. Gu Xu1
• Background and introductionI. Dye-sensitized solar cellsII. Mass transport in electrolyteIII. Problem: pore-size dependence of ion diffusivity
• ExperimentalI. Device fabrication and pore-size variationII. DC polarization measurement
• Results and discussionI. Unification of two opposite viewsII. Unexpected surface diffusionIII. Significance of results
• Conclusion
2
Outline
• Electrochemical cells utilizing dye molecules to
harvest sunlight
• First published in Nature in 1991
• 7% overall power conversion efficiency was
achieved, now has exceeded 12%
• New generation solar cell with possible low cost and
high stability
3
Introduction to Dye-sensitized Solar Cells
Oregan, B.; Gratzel, M., Nature 1991, 353 (6346), 737-740
• Monolayer Dye molecules for light absorption High surface area required mesoporous structure gives rise of 700 times of nominal surface area
• Working electrochemical Junction formed at the interface
4
Mesoporous TiO2 Thin Film
TiO2
DyeI-/I3
-
5
Device Physics of Dye-sensitized Solar Cells
Mass transport of ions Bottleneck of performance
FTO
6
Three Possible Mechanisms of Mass Transport
Kalaignan, G. P.; Kang, Y. S., J. Photochem. Photobiol. C-Photochem. Rev. 2006, 7 (1), 17-22.
•Concentration gradient
Diffusion
•Electric field
Migration
•Mass movement
•Due to temperature difference etc.
Convection
dominant mechanism in DSSCs
In standard DSSCs, the mass transport rate is determined by the diffusion of minority ions (I3
-) i.e. [I3-] <<[I-]
• Diffusion is pore-size independent when λ<0.1 (λ = rmolecule/rpore)- Based on the short mean free path of inter-molecular collision in
liquid : = +• (ε: porosity; τ:tortuosity)• Tortuosity: ratio of the length of the curve (L) to the distance
between the ends of it (C)
7
Two Conflicting Views from Literature:A) Pore-size Independent Diffusion
Karger, J.; Ruthven, D. M., Diffusion in zeolites and other microporous solids. : Wiley: New York, 1992; pp 350-365.
A B
L
C𝝉=
𝑳𝑪
• Frequently observed impeded diffusion in much larger
pores (λ ≈ 0.01)
• In this case ion diffusivity heavily depends on pore diameter
8Mitzithras, A.; Coveney, F. M.; Strange, J. H., J. Mol. Liq. 1992, 54 (4), 273-281.
40nm
• Possibly due to the surface interaction or bonding mechanisms
• Decreases effective free pore volume
Two Conflicting Views from Literature:B) Pore-size Dependent Diffusion
• Remains controversial in dye-sensitized solar cells
• Yet critical in estimation of the limiting current and
design of efficient devices
• Because various fabrication processes lead to pore
shrinking
I. Dye loading
II. TiCl4 post-treatment
9
Debating in Dye-sensitized Solar Cells
1. Coating of Pt on FTO glass by heat
treatment of chloroplanitic acid
(H2PtCl6)
2. Deposition of TiO2 thin film by
screen printing process
3. Sealing the cell with Surlyn film as
spacer(25μm)
4. Injecting electrolyte (I-/I3- redox
couple in acetonitrile) from the hole
at the top10
Experimental:Device Fabrications
Injection hole
To focus on ion diffusion, a modified version of DSSC is fabricated
• TiCl4 post-treatment is widely used in DSSC fabrication
• Chemical bath which forms TiO2 on top of TiO2 mesoporous
film by epitaxial growth – growing overlayer with the same
structure
• Reduce recombination rate and improve charge injection
from dye molecules to the CB of TiO2
• Also reduce average pore size of TiO2 film
11
Pore-size Variation by TiCl4 Treatment
12
Pore-size Variation by TiCl4 Treatment
Ito, S.; Murakami, T. N.; Comte, P.; Liska, P.; Gratzel, C.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Gratzel, M., Thin Solid Films 2008, 516 (14), 4613-4619.
TiO2 film on FTO/Pt glass
1. Immerse for 30 mins2. Rinse with DI water3. Anneal at 450oC for 30 mins
Hot Plate
0.1M TiCl4 aqueous solution at 70 oC
TiCl4 treated TiO2 film with smaller pores
TiCl4 + 2 H2O → TiO2 + 4 HCl
13
BET Characterization
Sample Number of TiCl4 treatments
Average pore diameter (nm)
Porosity ε
A 0 20.91±1.83 0.616±0.018
B 1 16.92±2.32 0.497±0.010
C 2 11.33±2.57 0.404±0.014
D 3 7.97±1.7 0.339±0.008
E 4 5.7±1.35 0.287±0.006
14
BET Characterization
15
Pore-size Distribution
Curves follow more or less the
normal distribution
Distribution shape remains
almost unchanged after
treatments
Average pore diameter
decreases
Error bars of pore diameters are
obtained from the FWHM valuesSample A, C and E underwent 0, 2 and 4 times of TiCl4 treatments respectively
• Mass transport limited current
- In this case, diffusion limited current
• IV curve will reach plateau at limiting
current value
• In this case, the current will increase
after the plateau
- Charge injection from the TiO2 to electrolyte
16
DC Polarization Measurement
I
V
Ilim
Ionic diffusion
Charge injection starts
VT
• The DC measurement was conducted in Dark
• First consider neat electrolyte between two electrodes
• Assuming diffusion layer thickness = cell thickness, and
(since the current flow is independent of x)
• General equation of diffusion limited current
• F is the Faraday constant, c is the I3- concentration and n is
the stoichiometry constant which equals to 2 for I-/I3- redox
couple17
Model Construction
• Continuity of current in the device:I = 2F = 2FDbulk (1)
• The conservation of I3- ions:
c[εt + (l – t)] = ε t+ (l – t) (2)• Combine (1) and (2) with boundary condition c0=0:
= 4Fc (3)
18
Model Construction
Kron, G.; Rau, U.; Durr, M.; Miteva, T.; Nelles, G.; Yasuda, A.; Werner, J. H., Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2003, 6 (6), E11-E14.
t = 12 μm; = 25 μm
19
DC Measurement Results
a) IV characteristic of control sample without TiO2 thin film;
b) Typical IV curves of samples A to E after 0 to 4 times of TiCl4 treatments respectively
Sample Ilim
(mAcm-2)DTiO2
(10-5cm2s-1)Deff
(10-5cm2s-1)Tortuosity()
A 35.25±1.25 0.747±0.038 1.22±0.09 1.05±0.09
B 24.80±0.60 0.513±0.016 1.03±0.05 1.24±0.06
C 21.10±0.45 0.437±0.012 1.08±0.07 1.18±0.08
D 16.67±0.35 0.343±0.009 1.01±0.05 1.26±0.06
E 10.33±0.50 0.207±0.011 0.721±0.055 1.78±0.13
20
DC Measurement Results
DTiO2: ion diffusivity in matrix
Deff: effective ion diffusivity normalized with porosity: tortuosity calculated from , expected to range from 1.2 to 1.8*
21
Surprising Pore-size Dependence
A
BC
D
E
D – E: Pore-size dependent region, Deff heavily depends on pore diameters;
B – D: Pore-size independent region, almost forms a platform;
Transition:Critical point of transition is located at 5 – 7 nm;
A – B: ? What is going on here?
22
Two Opposite Views Are Now Unified……
Distinctive Regions of each diffusion modeI. Pore-size dependent region• < 5 – 7 nm• Significant steric hindrance
effect of pore walls.
II. Pore-size independent region• > 5 – 7 nm• Negligible collision between
liquid molecules and pore walls
Observed in DSSCs for the first time!
Pore-size dependent
Pore-size independent
BC
D
E
• λ value at the transition ≈ 0.1 (550pm/5nm), which bears
remarkable agreement to the theoretical prediction
• The range of pore-size independent region(>5-7nm)
suggests fabrication processes of DSSCs will NOT cause
transition of diffusion behavior
• Not likely those processes will impede ion diffusivity
significantly
23
……by the Critical Point of Transition
24
Significance of Our Results
Pore Size
Smaller• Large interfacial
Area for efficient light harvesting
• May impede mass transport rate
Larger• High mass
transport limiting current
• Not enough interfacial area
Our results suggest the minimum pore-size without
hindering the diffusion.
The balance between mass transport of electrolyte and
interfacial area can be optimized
• The tortuosity in A ≈ 1(unrealistic) Other diffusion mechanism is involved
• Surface diffusion⁻ Hopping mechanism of surface-adsorbed
molecules between adsorption sites. ⁻ Suppressed by the surface modification after
TiCl4 treatments⁻ Act as a passivation process and decrease the
number of available adsorption sites
25
Unexpected Rise from B to A
TiO2
I3- I3
-
Surface diffusion
A
B
• Both pore-size dependent and independent diffusion were
observed under the same scheme by altering the average pore-
size of TiO2 matrix.
• The critical point of transition was located in the range of 5 – 7
nm. Thus standard fabrication processes will not cause transition
of diffusion mode.
• Surface diffusion mechanism was observed in untreated TiO2
and suppressed after the surface modification of TiCl4 post-
treatment.26
Conclusion
• Dr. Gu Xu
• Dr. Tony Petric and Dr. Joey Kish
• Dear group mates: Cindy Zhao, Lucy Deng
• Mr. Jim Garret
• Dr. Hanjiang Dong
• NSERC
27
Acknowledgements
28
Thanks for the attention!
Any questions?