phosphonato-phosphinito peri-substituted naphthalenes
TRANSCRIPT
www.elsevier.com/locate/ica
Inorganica Chimica Acta 358 (2005) 1719–1723
Note
Phosphonato-phosphinito peri-substituted naphthalenes
Petr Kilian, Alexandra M.Z. Slawin, J. Derek Woollins *
School of Chemistry, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, UK
Received 17 June 2004; accepted 9 September 2004
Available online 7 October 2004
Dedicated to Professor F.G.A. Stone, in recognition of his towering contribution to inorganic chemistry
Abstract
Nap[P(E)(OMe)2][P(H)(O)(OMe)] (Nap = naphthalene-1,8-diyl, E = S, Se) were synthesized and fully characterised including
crystal structure analyses. They show repulsive interactions of phosphorus functionalities with hydrogen atom of phosphinite moiety
placed in the peri space, the distortion of naphthalene backbone is comparable to that observed in 1,8-bis(phosphonato) naphtha-
lenes. The conformational isomerism resulting from the restriction of the cogwheel rotational motion about the C–P bonds is
observable by NMR.
� 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Organophosphorus; Strained molecules; Peri-interactions; Phosphorous; Steric crowding; Synthesis; X-ray structure
1. Introduction
Recent interest in the chemistry and structure of
peri-substituted naphthalenes stems from their unusual
peri-region bonding geometry, imposed by the stiff
naphthalene-1,8-diyl backbone [1–5]. We have per-
formed a comparative synthetic and characterizationstudy of a series of 1,8-bis(dimethyl phosphonito)
naphthalenes and their congeners, the series included
phosphonato-phosphonites 1 and 2 [6]. These served
as precursors for phosphonato-phosphinite esters 3
and 4, whose syntheses and full characterization
including X-ray structure determinations are reported
here. The presence of reactive P–H bond in the primary
phosphinic esters 3 and 4 makes them potentialsynthons.
The ester 4 was obtained as a major product on at-
tempts to purify selenated derivative 2 by flash chroma-
0020-1693/$ - see front matter � 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ica.2004.09.019
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1334 463861; fax: +44 1334
463384.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J.D. Woollins).
tography on silica. We expected the mechanism of such
a transformation to involve hydrolytical cleavage of
phosphonite ester, followed by tautomeric change to tet-
rahedral phosphinite (Scheme 1). To verify this hypoth-
esis we hydrolysed the phosphonito derivatives 1 and 2
in THF as a solvent, which gave phosphonato-phosphi-
nite esters 3 and 4, respectively, in good yields, confirm-ing the proposed reaction sequence. The hydrolysis of
phosphonites is known to be rapid in acid media and
slow under neutral or basic conditions [7], in our case
a complete conversion to 3 and 4, respectively, was ob-
served by 31P NMR after 24 h without any acid
catalysis.
As expected, the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of 4 is a
simple AX system with very small magnitude of 4J(PP)2.2 Hz. 1 Interestingly, the 31P{1H} spectrum of sulfur
congener 3 (D8-toluene, 109.4 MHz, 25 �C) shows a
more complicated pattern. Thus the higher-frequency
1 The high frequency signal has a symmetric set of 77Se satellites,1J(PSe) = 875 Hz.
Table 1
Crystallographic data for 3 and 4
Compound 3 4
Formula C13H16O4P2S C13H16O4P2Se
Crystal habit colourless prism colourless prism
Crystal system triclinic monoclinic
Space group P�1 P2(1)/c
Unit cell dimensions
a (A) 9.830(1) 12.933(2)
b (A) 12.261(1) 11.446(2)
c (A) 13.093(2) 10.645(2)
a (�) 78.719(2) 90.00
b (�) 78.684(2) 106.362(3)
c (�) 72.660(2) 90.00
Z 4 4
R (F2 all data) 0.0481 0.0298
wR (F2 all data) 0.1031 0.0644
PP
E
1 E = S2 E = Se
POMe MeO
MeOE
POHOMe
OMe
H2O
-MeOH
PMeO
E
PHOMe
O
3 E = S4 E = Se
MeOMeO
MeO
Scheme 1.
1720 P. Kilian et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 358 (2005) 1719–1723
signal consists of a doublet at d 91.2 [P1; 4J(PP)1.7 Hz
was read from spectra]; however the low-frequency sig-
nal (d 25.2, P9) is an unresolved multiplet, probably aris-
ing from superposition of several doublets with small
magnitude of 4J(PP). We ascribe this NMR behavior
to hindered cogwheel-like rotation of the phosphorus
functionalities about the P–C bonds, giving rise to sev-eral rotamers observable on the NMR time scale. In-
deed, similar NMR behavior was observed in
phosphine oxide Nap(POCl2)(PCl2) [8] and phospho-
nium salts Nap(PPh2)(PRPh2)+ (R = Me, benzyl) [9].
Poor resolution of signals of rotamers 3 at temperatures
studied (188–373 K) prevented quantitative analysis of
the system. The signal of proton directly bonded to
phosphorus in 1H NMR spectra appears as doublet cen-tered at d 8.69 (in 3) and 8.76 (in 4), the magnitudes of1J(HP) found (616 and 613 Hz) are as expected for a
pentavalent phosphorus environment. The diastereo-
topic methoxy groups of phosphonate moiety in both
3 and 4 are anisochronous in both 1H and 13C NMR
spectra. We observed some changes of 1H chemical
shifts of these in a variable temperature study, however
even at 373 K the system was still far from coalescencetemperature.
Fig. 1. One of the two independent molecules in asymmetric unit of 3
in the crystal. Naphthalene H atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected
bond lengths (A) and angles (�): P(1)–C(1) 1.813(3) [1.824(3)], P(9)–C(9) 1.804(3) [1.819(3)], P(1)–S(1) 1.936(1) [1.924(1)], P(9)–O(9)
1.477(2) [1.480(2)], the P(9)–H(9) distance was set to 1.25A ; P(1)–
C(1)–C(10) 126.8(2) [124.9(2)], P(9)–C(9)–C(10) 126.1(2) [128.5(2)],
C(1)–C(10)–C(9) 126.7(3) [127.5(3)]. Values in square brackets are for
second independent molecule in asymmetric unit.
Compound 3 crystallizes with two independent mole-
cules of similar geometry in the asymmetric unit (Figs. 1
and 3, Table 1). It displays twisted naphthalene geome-
try, resulting from clearly repulsive interaction between
the phosphorus functionalities. The P� � �P nonbonding
distance of 3.57 A (3.53 A in the second independent
molecule) found in 3 is significantly longer than that ob-
served in the parent compound 1 (3.31 A) and compara-ble to that observed in Nap[P(S)(OMe)2][P(O)(OMe)2]
(3.59 A) [6]. The displacements of P atoms from the
mean naphthalene plane were quite different for the
two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit
(0.75 and �0.93 vs. 0.71 and �0.72 A), also the P(1)–
C(1)� � �C(9)–P(9) dihedral angles were relatively different[42.9� and 36.5�] in the two independent molecules,
although very similar splay angles 2 19.6� and 20.9� wereobserved. The molecules adopt the conformation with
the burden of the peri-region strain accepted by
H(9)� � �S(1), H(9)� � �P(1) and P(1)� � �P(9) contacts, thesereaching 92–94% of their respective sum of Van der
Waals radii. 3 There is no conformation dictating attrac-
tive 3c–4e interaction as indicated by the non-linear
arrangements of atoms [e.g., P(9)–H(9)� � �S(1) angle is
129�] [10].The geometry of the molecule 4 in the crystal (Figs. 2
and 3, Table 1) is also defined by the repulsive interac-
tion of its peri-substituents, the nonbonding P� � �P dis-
tance in 4 is 3.52 A (93% of 2 · rVdW). Despite only
moderate atom size increase on transition from sulfur
to selenium there are significant changes in the geome-
tries of 3 and 4. The differences in alignment of the
peri-substituents in 3 and 4 are illustrated in Fig. 3. Fur-thermore, the molecule of 4 shows less out-of-plane dis-
2 Splay angle = [P(1)–C(1)–C(10)] + [P(9)–C(9)–C(1)] + [C(1)–
C(10)–C(9)] – 360.3 Following values of Van der Waals radii were used in calculations:
rVdW(P) = 1.90, rVdW(O) = 1.52, rVdW(S) = 1.80, rVdW(Se) = 1.90,
rVdW(H) = 1.20 A.
PMeO
Se
PHOMe
OMeO P
MeOP
OMeSe O
- MeOH
Scheme 2.
Fig. 3. The molecules of 3 and 4 viewed approximately along the
central C(10)–C(5) bond to illustrate the extent of naphthalene ring
twisting, out-of-plane and in-plane displacements of phosphorus
functionalities and their mutual orientation.
Fig. 2. The molecule of 4 in the crystal. Naphthalene H atoms are
omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (A) and angles (�): P(1)–C(1)1.809(2), P(9)–C(9) 1.812(2), P(1)–Se(1) 2.0841(7), P(9)–O(9) 1.457(2),
the P(9)–H(9) distance was set to 1.25A; P(1)–C(1)–C(10) 127.3(2),
P(9)–C(9)–C(10) 130.8(2), C(1)–C(10)–C(9) 127.7(2).
P. Kilian et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 358 (2005) 1719–1723 1721
tortion than molecule 3, to balance this there is more
crowding (sub Van der Waals contacts) in the peri-
region and more pronounced in-plane distortion in 4.
Thus in 4 the distances of phosphorus atoms from the
naphthalene mean plane are 0.37 [P(1)] and 0.65 A
[P(9)]; the P(1)–C(1)� � �C(9)–P(9) dihedral angle is
24.2(1)� and the splay angle is widened to 25.8�. Thesub Van der Waals contacts are displayed by all atoms
facing the H(9) atom e.g., O(11), P(1) and Se(1), theseX� � �H contacts reach 88–92% of
PrVdW, very short is
also O(11)� � �P(9) contact (86% ofP
rVdW). Despite
these short contacts, O(11), P(9) or any other atoms in
4 are not involved in any approximate linear arrange-
ment for possible 3c–4e interaction.
In short, we have shown that the phosphinite func-
tionality in 3 and 4 aligns with the hydrogen atom bear-
ing the burden of the steric strain, the distortions ofnaphthalene backbone are comparable to other conge-
ners with tetrahedral phosphorus geometry such as
bis(phosphonates).
The MS (EI+, 70 eV) spectra revealed the tendency
of 4 towards the cyclisation, accomplished by elimina-
tion of MeOH. Whilst at probe temperature of 180 �Cthe base peak at m/z 299 (M–Se + H) was observed, at
higher temperature (250 �C) the spectrum was domi-nated by peak at m/z 346, probably stemming from
bridged product after elimination of methanol
(Scheme 2).
Contrary to 4, the base peak in EI-MS spectrum of 3
is assignable to C10H6PS(OMe)2 fragment – a product of
P–C bond breakage, relaxing the crowding in the peri-
region of naphthalene.
2. Experimental
2.1. Preparation and characterisation of 3
The solution of 1 (0.17 g, 0.49 mmol) in THF (5 cm3)
and water (0.05 cm3, excess) was stirred for 24 h and the
volatiles were evaporated in vacuo. Resulting oil wasdissolved in hot hexane/toluene, which after cooling af-
forded pure 3 as colourless crystals. Yield 0.13 g (80%).
M.p. 103–105 �C. C13H16O4P2S: Calc. C, 47.3; H, 4.9.
Found: C, 47.7; H, 4.8%. Crystals for X-ray work were
obtained from hexane/toluene. IR (KBr tablet, cm�1):
m = 3052, 2998w (mAr–H), 2946m, 2840w (mC–H), 2440w(mP–H), 1493m, 1232, 1221 (mP@O), 1195s, 1042 and
1017vs (m(P)–O–C), 811vs, 791vs, 774m (mP–O–(C)), 664s,632s, 446s. Ra (sealed capillary, cm�1): m = 3070m,
1722 P. Kilian et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 358 (2005) 1719–1723
3051s (mAr–H), 2949m, 2842w (mC–H), 2444m (mP–H),1554vs, 1328vs, 927m, 891m, 557vs. NMR (CDCl3,
298K): 1H (300 MHz): d = 3.46 [d, 3H, 3J(HP) = 12.3
Hz, H12], 3.64 and 3.79 [2 · d, 2 · 3H, 3J(HP) = 13.6
Hz, H11], 7.48–7.59 [m (complex), 2H, H3 and H7],
7.94–8.01 [m (complex), 2H, H4 and H6], 8.28 [ddd,1H, 3J(HH) = 7.3, 4J(HH) = 1.4, 3J(HP) = 19.3 Hz,
H2], 8.46 [ddd, 1H, 3J(HH) = 7.2, 4J(HH) = 1.4,3J(HP) = 15.1 Hz, H8], 8.69 [d, 1H, 1J(HP) = 616 Hz,
H9]; 13C{1H} (75.5 MHz): d = 52.6 [d, 2J(CP) = 6.1
Hz, C12], 53.6 [d, 2J(CP) = 6.6 Hz, C11], 54.2 [d,2J(CP) = 7.2 Hz, C11], 125.3 [d, 3J(CP) = 17.1 Hz, C3],
125.6 [d, 3J(CP) = 12.7, C7], 129.0 [dd, 1J(CP) = 148.2,3J(CP) = 2.8 Hz, C1], 129.4 [dd, 1J(CP) = 129.4,3J(CP) = 2.8 Hz, C9], 130.7 [dd, 3J(CP) = 11.1 and
10.0 Hz, C5], 134.7 [dd, 2J(CP) = 12.2 and 10.5 Hz,
C10], 135.1–135.4 [m (overlapped), C8, C4 and C6],
136.6 [dd, 2J(CP) = 11.1, 4J(CP) = 1.1 Hz, C2];31P{1H} (109.4 MHz): d = 27.9 [unresolved m, P(9)],
90.6 [P(1); 4J(PP) �1.7 Hz], for the interpretation of
the spectra see text; assignment of 13C and 1H NMR
spectra was made with help of 31P, 1H{31P}, H–HDQF COSY, H–C HSQC, H–C HSQC TOCSY and
H–P HMQC experiments. MS (EI+): m/z 330 (M+),
315 (M–Me), 283 (M–OMe–O), 251 (C10H6PS(OMe)2base peak), 189(C10H6P2H).
2.2. Preparation and characterisation of 4
Compound 2 (0.41 g) was subjected to flash chroma-
tography on silica gel using ethylacetate as eluent. The
product from column was further purified by recrystalli-
zation from hexane/toluene yielding pure 4 as pale yellow
crystals, some of them were suitable for X-ray work.Yield: 0.137 g (35%). M.p. 95–96 �C. C13H16O4P2Se:
Calc. C, 41.4; H, 4.3. Found: C, 41.7; H, 4.1%. IR
(KBr tablet, cm�1): m = 2974w, 2949m, 2837w (mC–H),1498m, 1226s (mP@O), 1202s, 1020 and 997vs (m(P)–O–C),
809s, 789s, 770s (mP–O–(C)), 607s; Ra (sealed capillary,
cm�1): m = 3075m, 3030w (mAr–H), 2951m, 2840w (mC–H),2447w (mP–H), 1559vs, 1334vs, 891s, 547vs, 352m.
NMR (CDCl3):1H (300 MHz): d = 3.46 [d, 3H,
3J(HP) = 12.3 Hz, H12], 3.63 and 3.80 [2 · d, 2 · 3H,3J(HP) = 14.1 Hz, H11], 7.49–7.60 [m (complex), 2H,
H3 and H7], 7.93–8.01 [m (complex), 2H, H4 and H6],
8.27 [ddd, 1H, 3J(HH) = 7.3, 4J(HH) = 1.4,3J(HP) = 19.8 Hz, H2], 8.43 [ddd, 1H, 3J(HH) = 7.3,4J(HH) = 1.4, 3J(HP) = 15.0 Hz, H8], 8.76 [d, 1H,1J(HP) = 613 Hz, H9]; 13C{1H} (75.5 MHz): d = 51.2
[d, 2J(CP) = 5.8 Hz, C12], 53.0 [d, 2J(CP) = 6.3 Hz,C11], 53.6 [d, 2J(CP) = 7.7 Hz, C11], 123.9 [d,3J(CP) = 16.9 Hz, C3], 124.3 [d, 3J(CP) = 12.4, C7],
128.2 [dd, 1J(CP) = 125.2, 3J(CP) = 2.2 Hz, C9], 128.7
[dd, 3J(CP) = 11.6 and 9.4 Hz, C5], 129.2 [dd,1J(CP) = 131.0, 3J(CP) = 2.5 Hz, C1], 133.1 [dd,2J(CP) = 11.9 and 10.8 Hz, C10], 133.6–133.7 [m (over-
lapped), C8 and C4 or C6], 133.9 [dd, 4J(CP) = 3.6 and
1.9 Hz, C4 or C6], 135.1 [dd, 2J(CP) = 13.0, 4J(CP) = 1.1
Hz, C2]; 31P{1H} (121.5 MHz): d = 29.1 (d, P9) and 97.1
[d with 77Se satellites, 1J(P,Se) = 875 Hz, P1],4J(PP) = 2.2 Hz, measurement of non-decoupled 31P
NMR confirmed magnitude of 1J(PH) = 613 Hz;77Se{1H} (51.5 MHz): d = �222 [dd, 1J(SeP) = 875,5J(SeP) = 15.4 Hz]; Assignment of 13C and 1H NMR
spectra was made with help of 31P, 1H{31P}, H–H
COSY, H–C HSQC, H–C HMBC and H–P HMBC
experiments. MS (EI+, probe heated to 180 �C): m/z
346 (M–MeOH), 331 (M–MeOH–Me), 299 (M–
Se + H, base peak), 284 (M–Se–Me + H), 237 (Nap-
P2O3H), 189 (NapP2H).
NMR numbering scheme for 3 and 4
PMeO
E
PHOMe
O
3 E = S4 E = Se
MeO 1
2
3
45
6
7
8
910
11 12
1
99
.
2.3. Structure determinations
All data were collected at 125K on a BrukerSMART CCD diffractometer equipped with Oxford
Instruments low temperature attachment, using Mo
Ka radiation (k = 0.71073 A). All refinements were
performed using SHELXTLSHELXTL (Version 5.10, Bruker
AXS, 1997). Full details of the structure determina-
tions of compounds 3 and 4 have been deposited with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as
CCDC Nos. 234409 and 234410.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can
be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
j.ica.2004.09.019.
References
[1] For recent examples of diphosphorus peri-substituted naphthalene
derivatives see: M.I. Bruce, P.A. Humphrey, S. Okucu, R.
Schmutzler, B.W. Skelton, A.H. White, Inorg. Chim. Acta 357
(2004) 1805.
P. Kilian et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 358 (2005) 1719–1723 1723
[2] J. Omelanczuk, A. Karacar, M. Freytag, P.G. Jones, R. Bartsch,
M.Mikolajczyk, R. Schmutzler, Inorg. Chim. Acta 350 (2003) 583.
[3] T. Mizuta, T. Nakazono, K. Miyoshi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 41 (2002) 3897.
[4] V.W.-W. Yam, C.-K. Li, C.-L. Chan, K.-K. Cheung, Inorg.
Chem. 40 (2001) 7054.
[5] V.W.-W. Yam, C.-L. Chan, S.W.-K. Choi, K.M.-C. Wong,
E.C.-C. Cheng, S.-C. Yu, P.-K. Ng, W.-K. Chan, K.-K. Cheung,
Chem. Commun. (2000) 53.
[6] P. Kilian, A.M.Z. Slawin, J.D. Woollins, Dalton Trans. (2003)
3876.
[7] D.E.C. Corbridge, Phosphorus – An outline of its Chemistry,
Biochemistry and Technology, third ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam,
1985, p. 236.
[8] P. Kilian, A.M.Z. Slawin, J.D. Woollins, Inorg. Chem. 43 (2004)
2252.
[9] A. Karacar, V. Klaukien, M. Freytag, H. Thonnessen, J.
Omelanczuk, P.G. Jones, R. Bartsch, R. Schmutzler, Z. anorg.
allg. chem. 627 (2001) 2589.
[10] For examples of such interactions see W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi,
Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon 177 (2002) 1833, and references
therein.