no money. no mission.uthscsa.edu › cpshp › cseproject › uthscsa som revenue...revenue cycle...

20

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • No money. No mission.

    --Sister Angela Claire Moran

  • Our CS&E journey:

    •Initial CS&E project: Reduce inappropriate (by ACR criteria) CT and MR imaging studies at the MARC by 10% within three months--Delayed by software interface and acquisition issues.

    •Second CS&E project: Reduce turnaround time of MRI reports @ UHS--Derailed by personnel issues

  • Genesis & Overview

    Financial instability of the radiology department

    29 FTE radiologists performing the work of 39 FTE

    Radiologist compensation well below the academic meanand far below community standards

    Substantial opportunities for improved departmental (and SOM) cash flow without increasing the clinical workload

    Other clinical departments employing same EPIC billing processes/ASB teams would benefit

    Spirit of cooperation (and aligned financial incentives) with UHS partner

    Strong support from both UT and UHS administrations

  • Parallel & Interacting RC PATs:

    UTHSCSA SOM (ASB)

    UHS

    Established & led by Lowell Glassburn, Administrator, Department of Radiology

  • Team Members:• Marti Pons – Chief Revenue Officer• Roger Valdez – Manager, Department Relations, Provider

    Enrollment and Insurance Follow-up• Susan Hilgers – Director of Information Systems• Andrew Krecek – Sr. Director, Information Technology Services• Pam Glasscock – Sr. Director, Clinic Business Operations• Santiago Delgado – Team Leader, Follow-up• Noel Duano – Sr. Medical Record Coder• Lowell Glassburn – Administrator, Radiology• Adam Ratner – Deputy Chair Radiology

  • Increase revenue for all departments

    of the SOM Clinical Practice by a

    minimum of 2% by December 31st, 2010.

    Aim Statement

  • $21,127,977

    $18,353,313$14,806,746

    $11,494,047$8,644,570 $7,515,689

    $3,440,021 $3,409,497 $2,993,224

    $9,947,196

    20.8%

    38.8%

    53.4%

    64.7%

    73.2%

    80.5%83.9%

    87.3%90.2%

    0.0%

    10.0%

    20.0%

    30.0%

    40.0%

    50.0%

    60.0%

    70.0%

    80.0%

    90.0%

    100.0%

    $0

    $20,000,000

    $40,000,000

    $60,000,000

    $80,000,000

    $100,000,000R

    ev

    en

    ue

    lo

    st i

    n $

    Categories

    Pareto Chart showing categories for Denial

    Total Chargeslost due to

    denials:$101,732,282

  • $0

    $5,000,000

    $10,000,000

    $15,000,000

    $20,000,000

    $25,000,000

    Practice

    Radiology

    Comparison of Denials between UTHSCSA SOM Clinical Practice vs. Radiology

  • $53,668,248

    $10,021,057 $9,224,380 $6,224,316 $3,417,831 $2,960,869 $1,676,875

    58.7%

    69.6%

    79.7%

    86.5%90.2%

    93.5%95.3% 96.6%

    0.0%

    10.0%

    20.0%

    30.0%

    40.0%

    50.0%

    60.0%

    70.0%

    80.0%

    90.0%

    100.0%

    $0

    $50,000,000

    $100,000,000

    $150,000,000

    $200,000,000

    $250,000,000

    $300,000,000

    $350,000,000

    $400,000,000

    $450,000,000

    Se

    p 0

    9 -

    Ap

    r 10

    Revenue lost

    Pareto chart showing Write-off categories

    ControllableWrite-offs = $91,502,142

  • $0

    $10,000,000

    $20,000,000

    $30,000,000

    $40,000,000

    $50,000,000

    $60,000,000

    practice

    radiology

    Comparison of Controllable Write-offs between Practice and Radiology

  • Initial Intervention - Timely Filing

    • Low hanging fruit

    • CareLink

    • 42% Radiology

    • 21 % Practice

    • Not receiving notification of status change

    • Automated File Available

    • Implemented end of April 2010

  • 0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    •Radiology•42%

    Practice21%

    CareLink Denial Impact

  • $0.00

    $200,000.00

    $400,000.00

    $600,000.00

    $800,000.00

    $1,000,000.00

    $1,200,000.00

    $1,400,000.00

    •Practice Denial Charges•Monthly Average

    $574,702

    CareLink Denial ChargesMonthly Average

    $123,042

    Monthly Denial Charges

  • $0.00

    $20,000.00

    $40,000.00

    $60,000.00

    $80,000.00

    $100,000.00

    $120,000.00

    $140,000.00

    $160,000.00

    $180,000.00

    Monthly Denial Charges

    •Radiology Denial Charges•Monthly Average

    $74,335

    CareLink Denial ChargesMonthly Average

    $31,442

  • Projected Return on InvestmentTimely Filing

    CareLink Only Intervention Data

    • 20-Month, Monthly Average Collection on Charges = 20%

    • Practice $123,042: 20% = $24,608

    • Radiology $31,442: 20% = $ 6,288

    • Estimated collection for no other denial categories = 80%

    • Practice $24,608 : 80% = $19,686 monthly

    • Radiology $6,288 : 80% = $ 5,030 monthly

    • Can’t Stop There:

  • Moving ForwardRevenue Cycle Enhancement

    Should Never Stop!

    • UHS Revenue Cycle Enhancement

    • Already in Place

    • Interventions

    • Timely Filing

    • Pre-Authorizations

    • Medical Necessity

    • Many other areas to improve

    • Communication

    • Missing Required Info

    • Provider Enrollment

    • Credentialing

    • Medicare

  • Questions?

    No Money!

    No Mission!