new media and public health

22
Sandra Mullin Senior Vice President, Policy and Communications, World Lung Foundation

Upload: alexanderlin-li

Post on 13-Mar-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

new media and tobacco control

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: new media and public health

Sandra Mullin Senior Vice President, Policy and Communications,

World Lung Foundation

Page 2: new media and public health

I Tweet Therefore I am What is social and new media?

Who is accessing it, using it?

Why is it useful for tobacco control?

Page 3: new media and public health

Communications Spectrum

Broadcast Television

Radio

Interpersonal Counseling

Peer relationships

Page 4: new media and public health

Communications Spectrum

Characteristics flexible

Responsive Two-way

Reaches few

Characteristics Inflexible

Impersonal One way

Reaches masses

Broadcast

Interpersonal

Page 5: new media and public health

Communications Spectrum

Adapted from Thomas R. Frieden. A Framework for Public Health Action: The Health Impact Pyramid. American Journal of Public Health. April 2010, Vol 100. No. 4

Audience/ Potential Impact Individual Population

Resources / Cost Resources

Individual Effort

Interpersonal

Broadcast

Page 6: new media and public health

Websites

Online Ads

Email Marketing

Mobile

“New” Media

Social Media Opportunity

Interpersonal

Broadcast

Social Media

High effort High Impact

Page 7: new media and public health

Exercise: Mapping Social Media

Interpersonal

Broadcast

High effort High Impact

1 3 4 5 6 8 2 7

Audience/ Potential Impact

Resources

Individual Effort

Page 8: new media and public health

Many channels, one message

Online

Print

Out-of-home

Page 9: new media and public health

New Media- Defined by challenges

Challenge: Limited evidence

Build on messages and strategies that we know work in established channels – i.e. TV

Beware of old pitfalls, and new ones: ie. Humorous messages, bells and whistles, “shiny things syndrome”

Grow the evidence base

Challenge: Limited reach

Population level BCC campaigns require reach

Agenda setting: Policy change, social mobilization

Prompting secondary conversations / social media as expression of social norms

Page 10: new media and public health

Global access and consumption is changing

Page 11: new media and public health

U.S. - Changing consumption habits

first

recorded

decline

Page 12: new media and public health
Page 13: new media and public health
Page 14: new media and public health

Explosive growth of new media

116.1

76.2 67.6

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Per

10

0 in

hab

itan

ts

Developed

World

Developing

Mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 inhabitants, 2000-2010*

71.6

30.1

21.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Per

10

0 i

nh

abit

ants

Internet users per 100 inhabitants, 2000-2010*

Developed

World

Developing

*Estimates The developed/developing country classifications are based on the UN M49, see: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/definitions/regions/index.html Source: ITU World Telecommunication /ICT Indicators database

Page 15: new media and public health

Internet and Mobile Phone Use

Internet users per 100 inhabitants

Country 2000 2009

USA 43.08 78.00

Poland 7.29 58.97

Brazil 2.87 39.22

Turkey 3.76 36.40

Russia 1.98 29.00

China 1.78 28.90

Mexico 5.08 28.30

Viet Nam 0.25 26.55

Thailand 3.69 25.80

Egypt 0.64 24.26

Ukraine 0.72 17.00

Pakistan 11.30

Indonesia 0.93 8.70

Philippines 1.98 9.00

India 0.53 5.12

Bangladesh 0.07 0.38

Mobile subscriptions per 100 inhabitant

Country 2000 2009

Russia 2.22 163.62

Ukraine 1.67 121.06

Poland 17.56 117.68

Viet Nam 1.00 111.53

Philippines 8.31 100.26

Thailand 4.90 97.33

United States 38.03 90.78

Brazil 13.31 89.79

Turkey 24.28 83.91

Mexico 14.14 76.20

Indonesia 1.79 69.25

Egypt 1.94 66.69

China 6.73 55.52

Pakistan 0.21 52.18

India 0.34 43.83

Bangladesh 0.20 32.32

Page 16: new media and public health

Facebook Usage by Country

# Country Users Penetration

1 United States 155,701,780 50.19%

2 India 43,497,980 3.71%

3 Indonesia 43,061,840 17.72%

4 Brazil 37,913,320 18.85%

5 Mexico 32,031,340 28.48%

6 Turkey 31,247,120 40.16%

7 United Kingdom 30,249,340 48.52%

8 Philippines 27,593,300 27.62%

9 France 23,594,340 36.43%

10 Germany 22,600,660 27.47%

Source: http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-statistics/

Page 17: new media and public health

Reasons to invest in social media and new media for tobacco control

Powerful anecdotal examples of advocacy impact

Generates media interest

Easy to test, easy to measure usage (friends, followers, retweets, etc)

Organizing and advocacy tool, quit reminders – mobile sms

Can be an amplifier to social marketing campaigns using mass media

Important synergizer

Page 18: new media and public health

The Tobacco Industry is using new and social media to attract the next generation of smokers and skirt regulations.

Page 19: new media and public health

Example: Quit Buddy, ACS

Page 20: new media and public health

Example: NYC DOH Pouring on the Pounds

Page 21: new media and public health

Some social media limitations and unknowns Rapid transformation of media landscape, we have to

keep up, catch up in tobacco control

There is more we don’t know than know about the impact of social media to change hearts and minds for behavioral change communication.

We need to develop an evidence-base and models.

We still need good content to drive people to websites, television so must think of social media in an integrated way.

It’s not free –need people power to make it relevant, meaningful.

Page 22: new media and public health

[email protected]

worldlungfoundation.org/presentations

Follow us on Twitter: WorldLungFdn Friend us on facebook.com/WorldLungFoundation