neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer
DESCRIPTION
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer, dr. Hilman Tadjoedin, Sp. PD, KHOM - Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine – Dharmais National Cancer CentreTRANSCRIPT
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Hilman Tadjoedin
Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine,School of Medicine – Dharmais National Cancer Centre
Presented at HUT – RSKD, Audiotorium RSKD, November 9th 2010
Introduction :
• In the past 10 years : strategy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) → surgery +/- RT : great interest in cervical cancer (CC).
• Cispatine-based CT previously untreated locally advanced CC : high response rate.
• Few cases bulky early stage (IB - IIA ) : are included; long-term survival and complications are unknown due to short follow-up.
Introduction :
• Sardi et al : interim analysis of a prospective (including : sizable number of bulky stage IB).
• Unfortunately the design has been criticized :
1. Criteria of bulky
2. Lack of stratification of prognostic factors
3. Using 2 or 3 modalities → concern of overtreatment
• The course of PVB (cisplatin,vinblastin and bleomycin) is attractive in short recycling time → minimizing the possible accelerated repopulation of cancer cells.
Percentage of total Dollars by scientific area spent on Cervical Cancer FY 2002
Cervical Cancer mortality rates by country : 1970 - 1998
• Between 1988-1991 : bulky mass CC, treated at CGMH, with PVB neoadjuvant CT.
• Fifty-nine evaluable pts. : 51 (HT) vs 8 (definitive RT).
• Overall clinical response : 81,4%, CR : 18,6%.
• Clinical response to CT, not different by : stage, histologic type, tumor size, level of squamous cell antigen or DNA ploidy; but tumor with high DNA indices (DI) > 1,3 higher clinical response rate.
• Five-year survival rate pts. with HT : 80,3%, 1 vs 8 survived; 7 pts. → poor clinical response : 2 node meta’sand 3 died; 4 pts. dettered HT for poor response died.
• This study : the value of DNA flowcytometry in predicting chemosensitive.
Discussion :
• Confirmed preliminary results → high objective RR : 81,4% & acceptable acute toxicities.
• In this series : clinical response to CT wasn’t different by :
1. stage : IB or IIA
2. histologic type : squamous / non
3. tumor size : 4-7 cm
4. level of SCC antigen
5. courses of CT
6. DNA ploidy
• However : tumors with DI (DNA Index > 1,3 higher clinical RR, than with ≤ 1,3.
Discussion :
• Residual tumor size and grade of histological response : significantly related to clinical response, while :
1. Parametrial extension
2. Lymph node status weren’t.
3. Lymphatic permeation
• Clinical estimation of residual tumor size is generally adequate, but those tumor cells in :
1. Lymphovascular space
2. Lymph node ˂ CT sensitive vs primary site
3. Parametrium
Discussion :
• Combination CT : Cisplatin & 5-FU → applied at The Norwegian Radiumhospital for treatment of recurrent cervical carcinoma, overall RR : 49%.
• Initial reports have demonstrated : short term results with surgical downstaging and improved resectability.
• Median overall and DFS was not reached, actuarial 5 year survival rate : 73% vs 67%.
• In our study : the number of pts. with LN (+) relatively low (bulky mass).
• The occurrence of recurrent disease in the pelvis indicates that neoadjuvant CT is able to extinguish distant metastasis.
Discussion :• To compare the efficacy and toxicity of NAC → HT
with those RT alone with bulky early-stage CC (phase III).
• DFS & OS : didn’t different significantly.
• Overall clinical response (OCR) after NAC : 86,2% (24,6% CR & 61,6% PR) ; pathologic CR : 3 pts (4,6%).
• Phase II : OCR → 24,2% CR & 60,6% PR; pathologic CR : 2 pts.
• Hence : once NAC applied → definite surgical approach to radically remove should be undertaken as the first priority.