national dissemination and consensus building conference...
TRANSCRIPT
Climate Change & Agriculture in Moldova:
National Dissemination and Consensus Building
Conference
Dr. William R. SuttonSenior Agricultural and Resource Economist
The World Bank
Chisinau, Moldova
April 12, 2011
Background, Summary Findings, and Objectives
Main Topics
1. Overview of Regional Program on Reducing
Vulnerability to Climate Change in
Agricultural Systems
2. Summary of projected impacts of climate
change on Moldova
3. Summary of the Menu of Adaptation
Options
4. Conference overview and objectives
Overview of the Regional Program
• Objective: to enhance the ability of Europe and Central Asia
countries to integrate climate change adaptation into
agricultural policies, programs and investments
• Key output: menu of adaptation measures for the agriculture
sector – including crops, water resources, and livestock.
• Timeframe: 3-year program (2009 – 2011)
• Resources: grants from World Bank, BNPP (Dutch), TFESSD (Danish)
• Partners: Ministries of Agriculture and Environment; Hydrometeorological Services; local and international agricultural research institutions; farmers’ associations; agri-business; development partners
• Beneficiary Countries: Albania, Macedonia, Moldova
Uzbekistan
Special Features of the Program
Strong country participation, capacity building
Cross-sectoral
Combines quantitative (economic) and qualitative (stakeholder, expert) analysis
Rigorous modeling, including water
Multiple agricultural sub-sectors
Recommendations for both national and agro-ecological zone (AEZ) levels
Focuses on identifying “Win-Win” measures
Moldova Should Start Developing and Implementing Adaptation Responses Now
Program Workflow: Where We Are Now
Engage key
stakeholders for
feedback on the
Draft Note
Finalize Country
Note
Consultation and
Awareness
Raising Workshop
National
Dissemination and
Consensus Building
Conference
Evaluate potential
adaptation strategies
Low data availability
FAO-CSSWB model
with CGE or
Ricardian approach
High data availability
DSSAT/APSIM
model with CGE
Undertake model
suitability assessment
based on available
data sources
Develop Draft
Country Note
Desktop
literature review
Agree on information
gaps and needs for
additional analysis +
identify project partners
Regional
Knowledge
Exchange
Develop a draft Menu
of short-, medium-,
and long-term
adaptation options
Impact
Assessment
Menus of
Adaptation Options for
four ECA countries
Finalize Country-
Specific Menu of
Adaptation
Options
Stakeholder
consultations
Moldova Should Start Developing and Implementing Adaptation Responses Now
Program Workflow: Where We Are Now
Engage key
stakeholders for
feedback on the
Draft Note
Finalize Country
Note
Consultation and
Awareness
Raising Workshop
National
Dissemination and
Consensus Building
Conference
Evaluate potential
adaptation strategies
Low data availability
FAO-CSSWB model
with CGE or
Ricardian approach
High data availability
DSSAT/APSIM
model with CGE
Undertake model
suitability assessment
based on available
data sources
Develop Draft
Country Note
Desktop
literature review
Agree on information
gaps and needs for
additional analysis +
identify project partners
Regional
Knowledge
Exchange
Develop a draft Menu
of short-, medium-,
and long-term
adaptation options
Impact
Assessment
Menus of
Adaptation Options for
four ECA countries
Finalize Country-
Specific Menu of
Adaptation
Options
Stakeholder
consultations
Potential Impacts of Climate
Change on Moldova’s
Agriculture:
Challenges for Crops and Water
Resources
ECA’s Climate is Already ChangingTemperatures Are Expected to Increase,
Precipitation Is More Uncertain
Extreme Events Will also Become More Frequent
ECA’s Climate is Already ChangingClimate impact on rainfed crop yields is severe, for
irrigated crops less negative without water constraints
Changes in Moldova’s crop yields by 2040s, medium impact scenario
Irrigated/ Rainfed Crop Northern Central Southern
Irrigated
Maize -8% -6% -9%
Wheat -14% -30% -34%
Alfalfa -7% -13% -18%
Grapes -4% -3% -5%
Apples 0% 0% -3%
Vegetables -5% -9% -13%
Rainfed
Maize -9% -3% -10%
Wheat -36% -38% -45%
Pasture -17% -22% -19%
Alfalfa -13% -18% -12%
Grapes -4% -3% -2%
Apples -2% -4% 3%
Vegetables -9% -13% -9%
ECA’s Climate is Already ChangingBut water modeling predicts increasing
deficits for irrigationMean Unmet 2040s Monthly Irrigation Water Demands: All Moldovan Basins
ECA’s Climate is Already ChangingAfter accounting for water constraints, projected impacts on irrigated crop yields are more severe
Changes in Moldovan irrigated crop yields, medium impact scenario, 2040s
Crop Northern Central Southern
Maize -8% -6% -9%
Wheat -14% -30% -34%
Alfalfa -7% -13% -18%
Grapes -4% -3% -5%
Apples 0% 0% -3%
Vegetables -5% -9% -13%
Adaptation Options to Increase
the Resilience of Moldova’s
Agriculture
ECA’s Climate is Already ChangingBenefit-cost analysis for rehabilitated irrigation
infrastructure for crops in the central AEZ
* These results assume that the crops were rainfed before the irrigation infrastructure was rehabilitated
ECA’s Climate is Already ChangingNational level adaptation options
identified•Strengthen inst. capacity and policies to improve farmer’ access to drought, heat and pest tolerant plants and livestock breeds from nat’l and internat’lsources, improved production technologies and farm advisory services
• Improve water resource mgt and infrastructure (on-farm water use efficiency irrigation, drainage)
•Support hydromet, mass media and private sector information providers to make timely weather forecasts available to farmers to reduce risks
•Improve access to crop insurance for adverse climatic events such as hail storms
• Implement national policies to develop market infrastructure for agro-food processing and whole sale market in Chisinau and the regional markets
• Extend farmers’ access to financial resources and create incentives to adopt adaptive measures into a focus on soil and moisture conservation technologies and drought-tolerant horticultural crops
Options Identified for the Northern Agro-Ecological Zone
• Rehabilitate irrigation
infrastructure, increase irrigation
efficiency and drainage systems
•Promote soil conservation tech.
Such as minimum till, mulching,
efficient fertlz. use, plastic mulching
•Improves access to higher yield and
drought-tolerant plant varieties,
livestock breeds and mgt systems,
developed locally and internationally
• Improve access to info & training
for farmers for wide-scale adoption
of technologies
• Promote forestry and agro forestry
in areas prone to soil erosion and
degradation and promote
greenhouses and plastic tunnels
Options Identified for the Central Agro-Ecological Zone
•Encourage specific farming
systems: crops, livestock or
horticultural-based production,
based on the compatibility of
natural resources
•Improves access to higher yield
and drought-tolerant plant
varieties, livestock breeds and
mgt systems, developed locally
and internationally
•Rehabilitate irrigation
infrastructure and improve water
collection ponds
•Train farmers on improved on-
farm water use efficiency and soil
moisture conservation
technologies
Options Identified for Southern Agro-Ecological Zone
•Support access to improved
varieties which are tolerant to
biotic /abiotic hazards
(almonds, walnuts, grapes,
peaches, apricots)
•Rehabilitate existing irrigation
infrastructure, build small-scale
H2O storage and improve on-
farm water use efficiency
•Encourage specific farming
systems - crops, livestock or
horticultural-based production
systems based on the
compatibility of natural
resources
•Improve access to information
and new technologies
Summary of Key Findings
Moldova already affected by climate change
Climate change will accelerate in the future
A “business-as-usual” approach will result in losses in some cases, missed opportunities in others
There are practical adaptation measures that can be taken to increase resilience
Many adaptation measures are “Win-Win”
Benefits are greater the sooner adaptation measures are implemented, so it is important to start now
Conference Overview and
Objectives
Today’s Program
1. Present methodologies and results of
draft Impact Assessment and Menu of
Adaptation Options
2. Break-out session to discuss options and
build consensus on priorities at the agro-
ecological zone (AEZ) level
3. Discuss national adaptation priorities
4. Decide on overall recommendations,
conclusions and next steps
Operational impacts thus far: What else can be done in Moldova?
Albania: Integrating recs. into new irrigation and drainage project
Starting preparation of new GEF project to pilot other recs.
Uzbekistan: Integrating recs. into new ag. competitiveness project
Proposing to pilot recs. in new GEF project
Moldova: Can integrate recs. into new ag. competitiveness project
Component on ag. adaptation in DRMAP project
Macedonia: Recs. feeding into Water and Green Growth Strategies
Approach being replicated in the Caucasus
www.worldbank.org/eca/climateandagriculture