-n losses from urea associated with humic acid … · contact: [email protected] 1 – luiz de...

1
University of Sao Paulo Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture The unburnt sugarcane harvesting in Brazil produces large amounts of trash on soil surface, hindering the incorporation of fertilizers into the soil. When urea is the source of N, the NH 3 losses can reach 20 to 40 % of N applied over the trash blanket. This study aimed to quantify the NH 3 losses from urea-N applied in two forms: soluble urea (SU) and soluble urea + humic acid (SU + HA), and under two conditions: with and without sugarcane straw on soil surface. NH 3 -N LOSSES FROM UREA ASSOCIATED WITH HUMIC ACID APPLIED ON BARE AND COVERED SOIL JOSÉ MARCOS LEITE 1 ; EDUARDO MARIANO 1 ; PAULO R. C. LAZZARINI 1 ; PAULO C. O. TRIVELIN 2 Contact: [email protected] 1 – Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil 2- Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE MATERIAL AND METHODS High C/N raio (around 100) Straw: 10 to 30 Mg ha -1 Extraction of HA Sugarcane straw NH 3 collector system Extraction of NH 4 + -N Plots in the laboratory Analysis by FIA (NH 4 + -N) RESULTS NH 3 COLLECTOR SYSTEM: The foam absorbers used were previously soaked in 30 mL of orthophosphoric acid (0.5 mol L - 1 solution with 5 % glycerol - v/v). TREATMENTS HA + UR + STRAW application of HUMIC ACID + UREA in covered soil SU + STRAW application of SOLUBLE UREA in covered soil HA + UR application of HUMIC ACID + UREA in bare soil SU application of soluble urea in bare soil 0 75 150 225 300 375 450 525 600 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Cumulative losses of NH 3 (mg collector -1 ) Days after fertilizer application HA +UR + STRAW SU + STRAW HA+UR SU ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONCLUSIONS Cumulative losses of NH 3 -N (mg collector -1 ) Covered soil Bare soil Mean HUMIC ACID + UREA 471.4 Bb 361.9 Ab 416.7 b SOLUBLE UREA 395.1 Ba 249.1 Aa 322.1 a Mean 433.3 B 305.5 A 369.4 NH 3 volatilized (% of N applied) Covered soil Bare soil Mean HUMIC ACID + UREA 64.1 Bb 49.2 Ab 56.7 b SOLUBLE UREA 53.8 Ba 33.9 Aa 43.9 a Mean 58.9 B 41.6 A 50.3 Means in each column and row followed by the same lowercase and capital letter, respectively, are not significantly different by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05). Fertilizer application The higher NH 3 -N volatilization in the treatments with straw must have been favored by the higher urease activity in plant tissues than in soil. The use of soluble urea associated with HA did not reduce the loss of NH 3 -N.

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: -N LOSSES FROM UREA ASSOCIATED WITH HUMIC ACID … · Contact: jmleite@cena.usp.br 1 – Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil 2-

University of

Sao Paulo

Center for

Nuclear Energy in

Agriculture

The unburnt sugarcane harvesting in Brazil produces large amounts of trash on soil surface, hindering the incorporation of fertilizers into the soil. When urea is the source of N, the NH3 losses can reach 20 to 40 % of N applied over the trash blanket. This study aimed to quantify the NH3 losses from urea-N applied in two forms: soluble urea (SU) and soluble urea + humic acid (SU + HA), and under two conditions: with and without sugarcane straw on soil surface.

NH3-N LOSSES FROM UREA ASSOCIATED WITH HUMIC ACID APPLIED ON BARE AND COVERED SOIL

JOSÉ MARCOS LEITE1; EDUARDO MARIANO1; PAULO R. C. LAZZARINI1; PAULO C. O. TRIVELIN2

Contact: [email protected] 1 – Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

2- Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

MATERIAL AND METHODS

High C/N raio (around 100)

Straw: 10 to 30 Mg ha-1

Extraction of HA Sugarcane straw

NH3 collector system

Extraction of NH4

+-N

Plots in the laboratory

Analysis by FIA (NH4

+-N)

RESULTS

NH3 COLLECTOR SYSTEM: The foam absorbers used were previously soaked in 30 mL of orthophosphoric acid (0.5 mol L-

1 solution with 5 % glycerol - v/v).

TREATMENTS

HA + UR + STRAW → application of HUMIC ACID + UREA in covered soil SU + STRAW → application of SOLUBLE UREA in covered soil HA + UR → application of HUMIC ACID + UREA in bare soil SU → application of soluble urea in bare soil

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Cu

mu

lati

ve lo

sse

s o

f N

H3 (

mg

colle

cto

r-1)

Days after fertilizer application

HA +UR + STRAW

SU + STRAW

HA+UR

SU

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative losses of NH3-N (mg collector-1) Covered soil Bare soil Mean

HUMIC ACID + UREA 471.4 Bb 361.9 Ab 416.7 b SOLUBLE UREA 395.1 Ba 249.1 Aa 322.1 a

Mean 433.3 B 305.5 A 369.4

NH3 volatilized (% of N applied) Covered soil Bare soil Mean

HUMIC ACID + UREA 64.1 Bb 49.2 Ab 56.7 b SOLUBLE UREA 53.8 Ba 33.9 Aa 43.9 a

Mean 58.9 B 41.6 A 50.3 Means in each column and row followed by the same lowercase and capital letter, respectively, are not significantly different by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05).

Fertilizer application

The higher NH3-N volatilization in the treatments with straw must have been favored by the higher urease activity in plant tissues than in soil.

The use of soluble urea associated with HA did not reduce the loss of NH3-N.