mulmur township council agenda wednesday...
TRANSCRIPT
MULMUR TOWNSHIP COUNCIL
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 1ST, 2017
1.
INFORMATION ITEMS (Agenda Items #7.4 – 7.14 are on the web site only)
7.4 Resolution from the Town of Erin supporting in principle the WDGPH and the Province
of Ontario in their implementation of a proactive inspection policy for dental practices.
7.5 Resolution from the Township of Oro Medonte on the Ontario’s wildlife damage
compensation program.
7.6 Resolution from the Town of Amherstburg on concrete barriers on Highway 401.
7.7 Resolution from the Municipality of Neebing regarding proposed changes to the process
for the approval of land under the conservation land tax incentive program.
7.8 Resolution from the Ontario Small Urban Municipalities Executive Committee
concerning the Patients Fire Act.
7.9 Correspondence from the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services
regulation made under the Police Services Act to amend the O.P.P. billing model.
7.10 Correspondence from Finley McEwen Vice President of the Mansfield Ski Club on their
amendment and site plan applications.
7.11 Correspondence from the Township of Melancthon on their NDCC Board of
Management appointments.
7.12 Correspondence from Sara Fodaro on the raising of chickens.
7.13 Correspondence from Sylvia Jones, MPP for Dufferin-Caledon on the goal of Bill 141: to
require the Minister of Environment to report instances of sewage bypasses.
7.14 Correspondence from SWIFT announcing that Middlesex County has joined as a full
member.
4
8
10
13
16
19
22
25
28
33
34
52
71
83
88
91
Page
2
3
5
8
11
13
30
35
36
38
40
150
t/ TOWN OF ERIN
5684 Trafalgar Road
Hillsburgh, Ontario N0B 120
www.erin.ca
Glerk's DepartmentTel: (519) 855-4407, Ext.233
Fax: (5'19) 855-4281
E-mail: dina. [email protected]
September 28,2017 , ir .a¡ Þarla.l: ii ,'; ri,1'' id
Mayor Paul MillsTownship of Mulmur758070 2nd Line E.
Mulmur, ON L9W 0G8
Dear Mayor Mills
We wish to advise you that at our Regular Council Meeting held on September !9,2017, our Council passed thefollowing resolution requesting your support;
Resolution #L7-3LO
Moved By Councillor Duncan
Seconded By Councillor Smith
Whereas the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health unit (WDGPH) currently can only on a complaint basis
carry out infection control inspections and are not authorized to routinelv inspect places where regulated
dental practices operate to investigate incidents of infection control (hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV)
Be it resolved that Council herby supports in principle WDGPH and the Province of Ontario in
their implementation of a proactive inspection policy for dental practices similar to the food premises(restaurant) inspection program or at a minimum enact a proactive "random" dental practices inspectionpolicy/protocol.
ln addition be it resolved that Council direct this Resolution be forwarded to the City of Guelph, County ofWellington, County of Dufferin and the local tier municipalities within those two Counties for support. TheResolutions of support to be forwarded to:
Nicola Mercer
Medical Officer of Health & CEO - Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health
Manager of Aids and Hepatitis C
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Ïerm Care
Ted Arnott MPP - Wellington-Halton Hills
Liz Sandals MPP - Guelph
Sylvia Jones MPP - Dufferin-Caledon
Carried
The Town of Erin Council thanks you for your consideration of this matter
Sincere
Dina
Clerk
undy Dipl.M cMo
2
Township af
Via Email P *¡ t t t! I Le r'itugt:, fr ;rr:ifi¡(' þ uî t t yt:
August 24,2017
Kathleen Wynne, PremierLegislative Building, Queen's ParkToronto ON M7A 141
Re: Ontario's Wildlife Damage Compensation Program
Dear Premier Wynne,
At its meeting on August 9,2017 the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte adoptedthe following motion pertaining to the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and RuralAffairs, Ontario's Wildlife Damage Compensation Program:
"Be it resolved
1. That the Ontario's Wildlife Damage Compensation Program Guide from theOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) and presented byCouncillor Jermey be received.
2. And Whereas Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte recognizes that TheOntario Wildlife Damage Compensation Program (OWDCP) provides compensationto eligible producers whose livestock andior poultry have been injured or killed as aresult of wildlife predation or whose bee colonies, beehives and/or beehive-relatedequipment has been damaged as a result of wildlife predation.
3. And Whereas livestock producers are passionate about caring for their animals,creating a sustainable environment for future generations and providing high-qualitylivestock to represent the industry.
4. And Whereas the Municipal lnvestigators are appointed by the Municipality toconduct a thorough investigation ensuring that all relevant evidence is documented
5. Now therefore be it resolved that the Township of Oro-Medonte respectfullyrequests that the Province:
a) expand the OWDCP to include evidence of partial carcass'to allow eligibleproducers to process legitimate claims; and
148 Line 7 $outlrûro-Medonie, ON LOL 290
F: (7t5) 487-2171F: (705) 487-0133 www.0ro-med0nte.cã3
Township aJ
Pro¡¡d Heritnge , H,xtitittc Future
b) rely more heavily on the opinions of the Municipal lnvestigator, as they areexperienced, familiar and knowledgeable with the Municipality's producers, asthey continue to process genuine and valid applications.
6. And That correspondence be forwarded, under the Mayor's signature, to thePremier, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, the Ontario SheepMarketing Agency, the Beef Farmers of Ontario and Ontario municipalities requestingtheir support."
We respectfully request your consideration and support of Council's resolution of thismatter and thank you in advance for your time.
Sincerely,
Mayor Harry Hughes/so
Cc Hon. Jeff Leal, Minister of Agriculture, Food and RuralAffairsJennifer MacTavish, General Manager, Ontario Sheep Marketing AgencyBeef Farmers of OntarioOntario MunicipalitiesTownship of Oro-Medonte Council
148 Line 7 SouthOro-Medonte, ON LOL 2ä0
P: (7CI5) 487-2171F: (705) 487-0133 wl,Vvtr. O rO -m g d o n te. c a4
Ç[e {nrp¡¡nIi¡n qf €lir:
'Qlwn qfÂmftürrtbug
October 20,2017 VIA EMAIL
The Honourable Kathleen WynnePremier of OntarioLegislative Building, Rm 281Queen's ParkToronto, ON M7A-1A1
Dear Premier Wynne:
RE: Goncrete Barriers on Hiqhwav 401
At its meeting of October 1}th,2017, Amherstburg Town Council passed the following resolution:
Resolution # 20171010-916 - That Administration BE DIRECTED to send a letter to allmunicipalities, local MP's and AMO, in support of concrete barriers on Highway 401.
Best Regards,\
.\
Tammy FowkesDeputy Clerk
cc: Taras Natyshak - MPP, EssexTracey Ramsey - MP, EssexOntario MunicipalitiesAssociation of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)
encl. Barriers on Highway 401- Municipality of chatham-Kent Resolution
Website: www.amherstburg.ca27I SANDWICH ST. SOT]TH, AMHERSTBIJRG, ONTARIO N9V 2A5
Phone: (519) 736-0012 Fax: (519) 736-5403 TTY: (519)736-98605
office af tñe %.ayr/ (V,o
WnØ Q" rtope
315 Kjng Street WestrP.O. ßo4640
Cfiatliam, Aúørio1ç9vl5K8
(efepfrone: 5 19.43 6.3 2 19
Ç a^4!Ì,1a. : 5 1 9.4 3 6. 3 2 3 6
f,mai{: Qgnd17{ape @ c{tøt fíøm' Êg nt. ca
frLuni cíp ø {iry af C ñ et fr ørn-7{e nt
September 22,2017
The Honourable Kathleen WynnePremier of OntarioLegislative Building, Rm 281Queen's ParkToronto ON M7A 141
Dear Premier Wynne:
RE: Barriers on Highway 441
As Mayor of The Municipality of Chatham-Kent, I am providing this letter insupport of a resolution passed by Council at its council meeting held onSeptember 18,2A17, as follows:
"WHEREAS, there continue to be serious ongoing concerns regarding tratficsafety on the 401 through Chatham'Kent from Tilbury through to Elgin County.
WHEREAS, there have been numerous serious and fatal collisions that haverequired the closing of the 401 , impacting the safety of residents on detour routeswith increased heavy truck traffic.
THEREFORË BE lT RESOLVED that council pass a resolution calling on theprovincial government to install said barriers and that the mayor draft a letterhighlighting the above concerns, and that both the motion and the accompanyingletter be circulated to the: Premier of Ontario, The Honourable Kathleen Wynne,The Minister of Transportation, The Honourable Steven Del Duca, and thesurrounding municipalities on the 401 corridor from Windsor to London.
AND BE lT RESOLVED the petition as drafted by concerned residents ofChatham-Kent with the help of the MPP for Chatham-Kent-Essex be madeavailable for signing until Sept 27th at all of our municipal service centers beforebeing forwarded to the MPP."
Cont'd.
Çor íusiness interests, cfiec{out utu¡w.inues\cÇca/ø6out-invest-c-Ãfø-message-.f'rom-ouranalor or www.cñatñam:Ê.gnt.ca6
September 22,2417Page 2
Thank you for your time and attention to th¡s important matter. We would greatlyappreciate a face-to-face meeting with you about this issue. Should you requ¡refurther information, please do not hesitate to contact my office directly [email protected] or by telephone at 519.436.32't9.
Sincerely,
Randy R. Hope, rlCËOMunicipality of Chatham-Kent
The Honourable Steven Del DucaMinister of TransportationFerguson Block, 3rd Flr.77 Wellesley St WToronto ON M7A1Z8
Municipalities within Counties of Essex, Elgin and Middlesex
C
7
ìt{ù iÈ .
Rosalie Evans,
Solicitor-Clerk
Erika Kromm.
Treasurer, Deputy Clerk
-.;¡-¡.!ËååjË:if :gs'. ^*
.r, . "
THE CORPORATION OF THE
4766 Highway 61
Neebing, Ontario P7L 085
TELEPHONE (807 ) 47 4-5331
FAX (807) 474-5332
E mail - [email protected]
Munrcrpality of Neebmgiê.' fi:'::
'
=*,:ä,i¿':",::"s,i;ft,î:l
Mike McCooeye
üüPY ,.,,,J::;:fi
ii. ii r,.:i.l
1
I1
!i
October 14,2017
The Honourable Kathleen WynnePremier of OntarioLegislative BuildingQueen's ParkToronto, ON M7A 141
And
Northwestern Ontario MunicípalAssociationP.O. Box 10308Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6T8
Honourable Minister Kathryn McGarryMinistry of Natural Resources and ForestryWhitney Block, 6th floor, Room 663099 Wellesley St. WestToronto, Ontario M7A 1W3
Thunder Bay Dístrict Municipal Leaguec/o Beth Stewart, Secretary-Treasurer343 Parker Road, R.R. #1Kakabeka Falls, ON POT 1W0
and
and
Re: olution Reoardi Proposed nqes to the for the lofLand under the Con rvation Land ax lncentive qram
Dear Sirs and Mesdames:
Please be advised that, at its regular meeting held Octob er 4, 2017, the Council for TheCorporation of the Municipality of Neebing passed the followíng resolution:
Applicants seeking to have their lands included for consideration under theConservation Land Tax lncentive Program ("CLTIP") provide information to theProvince as part of the application process, including zoning and official planinformation.
A recent review by the Municipality of Neebing revealed that the information providedby applicants is not reviewed with the Municipality for accuracy or further clarification.The Municipality requested information under the Freedom of lnformation andProtection of Privacy Act, relating to certain applications within Neebing, anddiscovered that at least one applicant had mis-interpreted official plan designationsas zoning provisíons in its representations to the province.
Townships of Blake, Crooks, Pardee, Pearson and Scoble
8
Municipalities in which the subject lands exist are finan^¡ally impacted by theProvínce's apprc is of CLTIP applications, yet the Mu ,cipality has no voice in the .-
approval process.
The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry reserves the right to inspect thesubject properties as part of the approvals process. Given the number of CLTIpapplications province-wide, the Municipality doubts that many (if any) inspections areactually physícally undertaken. The local government would have current andaccurate knowledge of any property within its jurisdiction, and would be able torecognize any issues that might be picked up if the property were actually inspectedby Provincial representatives.
ACCORDINGLY, BE lT RESOLVED THAT the Council of The Corporation of theMunicipality of Neebing respectfully requests that the Province change the applicationprocess under the CLTIP to provide that applications, together with supportingstudies, maps and/or other information, will be circulated for comment to themunicipality in which the subject property exists;
AND FURTHER THAT the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Neebingrespectfully requests that the Province further change the application process underthe CLTIP to require the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry to take theMunicipality's comments into consideration when processing the application;
AND FURTHER THAT this resolution be forwarded to the Thunder Bay DistrictMunicipal League with a request that it be considered for support and fonvarded tothe Northwestern ontario Municipal Association for support;
AND FURTHER THAT this resolution be circulated to the Premier, the Minister ofNatural Resources and Forestry, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario andOntario municipalities who have previously supported Neebing in its efforts to havethe CLTIP revised in a manner that promotes fairness to the local order ofgovernment.
We look fonryard to receipt of your favourable repty
Yours truly,
ql{'*^oRosalie A. EvansSolicitor-Clerk(Per Consent Agenda Resolution#2017-10-224)
Association of Municipalities of Ontarioand the municipalities on the enclosed listing, each of whose Councils is as concernedabout the CLTIP program's impact on local government as is Neebing's council
cc
Townships of Blake, Crooks, Pardee, pearson and Scoble
9
Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula56 Lindsay Road 5R.R. # 2Lion's Head, OntarioNOH 1WOAttention: Ms. Standen, Clerk
ïownship of Dawson211Fourlh StreetP.O. Box 427Rainy River, OntarioPOW 1LO
Attention: Mr. Giles, Clerk-Treasurer
Township of Baldwin11 Spooner StreetP.O. Box 7095McKerrow, OntarioPOP 1MOAttention: Ms. Young-Lovelace, CAO/Clerk-Treasurer
Township of RyersonR. R. # 1, 28 Midlothian Road,Burks Falls, OntarioPoA 1C0Attention: Ms. Kosowan, CAO/Clerk/DeputyTreasurer
Township of Mulmur758070 2nd Line EastMulmur, OntarioLgV OG8Attention: Ms. Vroom, Deputy Clerk-Treasurer
ïownship of Burpee and MillsR.R. # 1
Evansville, OntarioPOP 1 EO
Attention: Ms. Bailey, Assistant Clerk
and Norfolk CountyCounty Adminístration Building,50 Colborne St. S.Simcoe, OntarioN3Y 4H3Attention: Ms. Boughner, Tax Collector
and Township of MorleyP.O. Box 40Stratton, OntarioPOW 1NOAttention: Ms. Desserre, Clerk-Treasurer
and Town of Minto5941 Highway 89Harriston, OntarioNOG 1ZOAttention: Mr. White, CAO/Clerk
and Township of ArmourP.O. Box 53356 Ontario StreetBurk's Falls, OntarioPOA 1C0Attention: Ms. Whitwell, ClerkAdministrator
and Tarbutt Township and Tarbutt Additional27 Barr Road SouthDesbarats, OntarioPOR 1EOAttention: Mr. Martin, Clerk
and
and
and
and
and
ïownships of Bfake, Crooks, Pardee, pearson and Scoble
10
Ontario Small Urban Municipalities Executive Committee - Resolution October 14,2017
WHËRSAS the Provincial Government has passed the Pal¡enfs Fit'st Act, which is to help patìents
and iheir families obtain better access to a more local and better integrated health care system;
ANÐ WHERËA$ the Province has stated a commitment io improving the patient experience and
delìvering higher-quality health care;
ANÐ WHHREAS the Pruvince wìshes to improve local cnnnections between hospitals; primary
care providers; inter-professional health care tearns; public health; and home and community car€
to en$ure a better patient experience and improved transitions between services;
ANÐ WHERËA$ the Province wishes to improve accor.rnlability to better ensura the people of
Ontario have access to care when ihey need it;
ANÞ WHËRÊA$ the omall and rnedium sized hospitals located throughout Ontarìo pravide vital
core hospital services, including acute care inpatient, emergency, diagnostic and surgical
services;
AND WHEREAS the continued delivery of those core services at Ontario's small and medium
sized hospitals is crucial to the long-term sustainability and economic vitality of Ontario's smaller
communities;
NOW THEREFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ONTARIO SMALL URBAN
MUN¡CIPALITIES EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
1 That the Province of Ontario be requested to ensure that the changes being implemented
to Ontario's health care delivery system:
i.1 . Maintain appropriate funding to continue the provision of the full range of core
hospital services, including acute care inpatient, emergency, diagnostic and
surgical services, that are provided by Ontario's small and medium sized hospitals.
1.2. Do not negatively impact access to hospital and other health care services and the
overall quality of care in Ontario's smaller communities.
1.3. Recognize the unique and important role that small and medium sized hospitals,indudìng both single and multi-site facilities, have in promoting economicdevelopment and creating sustainable communities in Ontario.
That the Province of Ontario be requested to ensure that appropriate capital funding is
provided to Ontario's small and medium sized hospitals so that short and long-term capitalplans are implemented efficiently and effectively without the requirement for excessive
funding from Ontario's small and medium sized municipalities.
That the Province of Ontario be requested to ensure that Ontario's capital planning
process for hospitals leverages the significant municipal investments made in local
infrastructure; respects the importance of municipal plans and policies; and recognizes
the following items as key factors to be evaluated by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term
Care:
3.1 Land use planning legislation and policies, including but not limited to, the PlanningAct, R.S.O. 1990, C. P.13, the Provincial Policy Statement,2014, and local and
regional Offìcial Plans;
3.2 Community economic impacts'of any long-term plans for hospitals;
3.3 The ability to raise the funds required for sustainable hospital services;
3.4 Operational and cost impacts of any long-term plans for hospitals on both the lower
and upper-tier levels of government, including cost implications on EmergencyMedicai Services (EMS): water treatment services; sanitary sewer services; transitservices; etc., and
3.5 Direct impact.on local health care service providers.
That this resolution be circulated to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO);
member municipalities of the Small Urban Municipalities Executive Committee; membermunicipalities of the Rural Ontario Municipal Association; the Ontario ProgressiveConservative Party; the Liberal Party of Ontario; the New Democratic Party of Ontario;and the Green Party of Ontario.
2.
3.
4.
11
Municipal MattersOntario Small Urban Municipalities resolution regarding sustainable hospitals. Sustainable provincialoperating and capital funding is required to ensure that changes to Ontario's health care delivery systemdo not negatively impact smalland medium sized hospitals.
12
Ministry of Community Saletyand Correctional Services
Office of the Minister
25 Grosvenor Street18th FloorTofonto oN M7A 1Y6Tel: 4 1 6-325-0408Fax: 41 6-325-6067
ocT 0 5 2017
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
Min¡stère de la Sécur¡té communautaireet des Services correctionnels
Bureau de la m¡nistre
25, rue Grosvenor1 8" étageToronto ON M7A 1Y6Té1.: 416-325-0408Téléc. : 416-325-6067
Cntâr¡ù
MC-2017-2Ã13BY e'mail
Mayors and Heads of Council
Marie-France LalondeMinister of Community Safety and Correctional Services
Regulation made under lhe Police Services Act lo amend the
Oníario provinciat Potice (OPP) billing model has been filed as:
O. Reg. 363117
I am pleased to advise you that the regulation that amends the OPP billing model to exclude
certain structures/prop"rty codes ¡Oenit¡eO from the Commercial and lndustrial (C&l) count was
approved and filed. fhe rägutation is O, Reg. 363/1 7.The amendments exclude properties from
the OPP billing calculation within the following categories:
. Passive renewable energy structures, e.g., wind turbines, solar facilities;
. Structures where there are rarely any interactions with the public, owner or a
representative/employee and do not typically contr¡bute to policing requirements, e'g',
communication towers, billboards;. structures that are considered to be part of a larger infrastructure system, e.9., tunnels,
bridges; and. Fedãral or provincial parks, or in some cases, vacant properties Such aS vacant
federally/provincially owned lands.
This amended list of structures/property codes will now be used to calculate your 2018 base
service billings for proactive policinþ Oy tne OPP. You may access the regulation through e-laws
under the followin g li nk: https://wvw. ontario. callaws/reoulation/1 40267
your 2018 Annual Billing statement has been provided to your cAo, to give you time to prepare
for the changes in advañce of the January 1 , 2018 implementation date'
Through the June 2017 online survey and the August 2017 Technical Tables, the ministry was able
to receive feedback that has been incorporated inlo the regulation amendments. Through our
review, broacler concerns about the overall OPP billing model were also ra¡sed'
As a result of your feedback, my ministry will now turn its attention to the five-year review of the
OpP billing módel, with review recommendations to be finalized by the end of 2019.
lz13
Page 2
During the review process, municipalities will have the opportunity to provide input on the billingmodel, which will help inform recommendations for potential changes to the model. I look forwardto working with you in the months ahead.
Marie-France LalondeMinister
c: Municipal Chief Administrative Officers
Association of Municipalities of Ontario
Municipal Clerks
14
OPP 2018 Annual Billing StatementMulmur Tp
Estimated cost for the period January I to December 31, 2018
Please refer to www.opp.ca Ío¡ 2018 Municipal Policing Billing General Informafion summary for further details.
Cost per
Property Total Gost
$$Base Services Propertv Counts
Household 1,722
Commercial and lndustrial 45
Total Properties 1,767 191 .35 338,1 15
Calls for Service
$150,757,055
0.1087o/o 163,806
Overtime
Contract Enhancements (pre-201 5)
Court Security
Prisoner Transportation
Accommodation/Cleanin g Services
Total 2018 Estimated Gost
201 5 Year-End Adjustment
2016 Year-End Adjustment
Grand Total Billing for 2018
2018 Monthly Bill¡ng Amount
(see summaries)
Total all municipalities
Municipal portion
(see summary)
(see summary)
(per property cost)
(per property cost)
(see summary)
(see summary)
92.70
12.99
2.19
4.77
22,953
3,870
8,429
Year Over Year Variance (estimate for the year is not subject to phase-in adjustment)
2017 Estimated Gost per Property
2018 Estimated Cost per Property (see above)
Gost per Property Variance (lncrease)
304.00 537,172
(13,567)
2,359
300.39
304.00
3.61
525,964
43,830
OPP 201.8 Annual Billing Statement Lof 'J.4
15
OPP 2018 Annual Billing StatementMulmur Tp
Notes to Annual Billing Statement
l. Municipal Base Services and Galls for Service Costs - The costs allocated to municipalities are determinedbased on the costs assigned to detachment staff performing municipal policing activities across the province. Astatistical analysis of activity in detachments is used to determine the municipal policing workload allocation of alldetachment-based staff as well as the allocation of the municipal workload between base services and calls forservice activity. For 2018 billing purposes the allocation of the municipal workload in detachments has beencalculated lo be 57.4o/o Base Services and 42.60/o Calls for Service. The total 2018 Base Services and Calls forService cost calculation is detailed on the Base Services and Calls for Service Cost Summary included in themunicipal billing package.
2. Base Services - The cost to each municipality is determined by the number of properties in the municipality andthe standard province-wide average cost per property of $191.35, estimated for 2018.
The number of municipal properties is determined based on MPAC data. Please note the property counts in the2018 annual billing are in accordance with the Ontario Regulation 267114 revisions addressed in 2017. Thecalculation of the standard province-wide base cost per property is detailed on Base Services and Calls for ServiceCost Summary included in the municipal billing package.
Please note the revision of the property counts increased the Base Services cost for the municipality byapproximately $¿SO.
3. Calls for Service - The municipality's Calls for Service cost is a proportionate share of the total cost of municipalcalls for service costs calculated for the province. A municipality's proportionate share of the costs is based onweighted time standards applied to the historical calls for service. The municipality's total weighted time iscalculated as a percentage of the total of all municipalities.
4. Overtime - Municipalities are billed for overtime resulting from occurrences in their geographic area and a portionof overtime that is not linked specifically to a municipality, such as training. Municipalities are not charged forovertime identified as a provincial responsibility. The overtime activity for the calendar years 2013, 2014,2015 and2016 has been analyzed and averaged to estimate the 2018 costs. The costs incorporate the 2018 salary rates anda discount to reflect overtime paid as time in lieu. The overtime costs incurred in servicing detachments for shiftshortages have been allocated on a per property basis based on straight time. Please be advised that these costswillbe reconciled to actual2018 hours and salary rates and included in the 2020 Annual Billing Statement.
5. Court Security and Prisoner Transportation - Municipalities with court security responsibilities in localcourthouses are billed court security costs based on the cost of the staff required to provide designated courtsecurity activities. 2018 costs have been based on 2016 security activity. These costs will be reconciled to actual2018 hours and salary rates.
The municipality has been allocated $2,971 in Court Security and Prisoner Transportation grants to partiallyoffset the 2018 costs. The grant will be paid in two installments, February 125%l and September 175%1 2018,See Court Security Gost Summary, (if applicable), for further details.
6. Year-End Adjustments - The 2015 and 2016 adjustments account for the variance between totalAnnual BillingStatement estimated costs and Reconciled Year-end Summary costs. All costs in the Annual Billing Statementshave a salary component and due to the delay in the settlement of the 2O'l5to 2018 OPPA Uniform and CivilianCollective Agreements, all were subject to reconciliation. Overall, the estimate of the cumulative impact of generalincreases on salary rates was slightly less than final settlement for the two year period (0.22o/o). The salary ratereconciliation impact on the cost of Base Services and Calls for Service costs of the municipality is minimal. Themost significant year-end adjustments are resulting from the cost of actual versus estimated municipal requirementsfor overtime, contract enhancements and court security. These costs are reconciled considering not only salary andbenefit rate updates but also the extent of service provided during the year.
OPP 2018 Annual Billing Statement 2oîL4
16
OPP 2018 Estimated Base Services and Galls For Service Cost SummaryFor tho Period January 0l to Decembêr 3'1,2018
Total Base ServicesSalaries and Benefits and Base Calls for
Base Galls for Service Serv¡ces ServiceUniform Members (Noter)
-
OPP 2018 Estimated Base Services and Calls For Service Cost SummaryForthe Period January 0l to Decembor31,2018
Notes:
Total Base Services and Call for Service Costs are based on the cost of salary, benefit, support and other directoperating expenses for staff providing policing services to municipalities. Staff is measured in full-timeequivalent (FTE) units and the costs per FTE are described in the notes below.
1) Full-time equivalents (FTEs) are based on average municipal detachment staffing levels for the years 2013through 2016. Contract enhancements, court security, prisoner transportation and cleaning staff are excluded.
ïhe equivalent of 88.04 FTEs with a cost of $13,753,104 has been excluded from the Base Services and Callsfor Service to reflect the average municipaldetachment FTEs required for provincially-mandatedresponsibilities eligible for Provincial Service Usage credit.
Salary rates are based on weighted average rates for municipaldetachment staffing by rank, levelandclassification. The 2018 salaries incorporate the January 1,2018,1.75o/o generalsalary rate increase set in the2015 to 2018 OPPA Uniform and Civilian Collective Agreements. The benefit rates are based on the mostrecent rates set by the Treasury Board Secretarial, (2017-18). Statutory Holiday Payouts, Shift Premiums, andBenefit costs are subject to reconciliation.
FTEs have been apportioned between Base Services and Calls for Service costs based on the current ratio,57.4o/o Base Services : 42.60/o Calls for Service.
2) Support Staff Costs and Other Direct Operating Expenses for uniform FTEs are calculated on a per FTE basisas per rates set in lhe 2017 Municipal Policing Cost-Recovery Formula.
OPP 2018 Estimated Base Services and Calls for Service Summary 4of14
18
2018 Calls for Service Billing SummaryForthe Period January 1 to December 31,2018
Mulmur
(Nore I ) (Note 2) {Noto 3)
Calls for Service Count
2013 2014 2015 2016 Four YearAverage
2018Average
TimeStandard
Total We¡ghtedTime
% of TotalProv¡nc¡al
Weighted Time
201E Est¡matedCalls for Serv¡ce
Cost
Galls for Service BillingWorkgroups
A B C=A*B
Druq Possession 5 2 I 4 6.3 25 0.0016% $ 2,389
Druos 1 1 34.4 17 0.0o110/o $ l.6i'0Operat¡onal 143 188 131 164 157 3.5 548 O.o344o/o $ 5'1,922
2
Other Criminal Code Violâtions
142
6 2 I 4 7.8 33 0.00210/o $ 3,142Propertv Cr¡me Molat¡ons 49 46 38 78 53 6.8 359 o.02260/o S 34,002
Slatutes & Acts 20 2A 30 24 26 3.2 82 0.00510/o $ 7,735
Traffic 83 97 84 102 92 3.4 311 o.01e6oÁ $ 29,489
Violent Criminal Code 13 't1
482
1'l
t32 tL91
14 12 1e% $ 17
Total I ,f84 1.728 0.1O87o/o t 163.806
Provincíal Totals 389,097 382,989 365,41 366,389 375,979 1,590,416 100.0000% $ 150,757,055
Note 1)Note 2)Note 3)
Showing no decimal places, for billing purposes the exact calculated numbers have been usedShowing 4 decimal places here, for calculations I decimal places have been usedCosts rounded to 0 decimals
OPP 2018 Calls for Service 5ummary 5 ol 1"4
19
2018 Calls For Service DetailsFor the Galendar Years 2013 to 2016
Mulmur TpCalls for Service Count
Calls for Service Billing Workgroups 20L3 2014 2015 20t6Four Year
Average
Grand Total 452 532 431 519 483.s0Drug Possession 1 5 2 I 4.0()
Drue Related Occurrence '): 2 0 3 1.50Possession - Cannabis 0 2 2 5 2.25Possession - Cocaine 0 1 0 0 0.2s
Drugs 0 0 t 1 0.50Trafficking - Cannabis 0 0 1 0 0.25Traffickine - Cocaine 0 0 0 L 0.2s
Operational L43 188 131 Læ 156.s0Accident - non-MVC - Commercial 0 0 0 1 0.2sAccident - Non-MVC - Others 0 0 1 0 0.25
Accident - non-MVC - Residential 0 0 0 1. 0.25Alarm - Master Code 0 4 4 0 2.O0
Alarm - Others 0 3 4 4 2.75Animal - Bear Complaint 0 0 L 0 0.2sAnimal - Dog Owners Liability Act 0 0 2 3 'J,.25
Animal - Left in Vehicle 0 0 0 1. 0.25Animal - Master Code 0 1 0 2 0.75
Animal - Other 3 8 6 5 5.50Animal Bite L 1, 1, L 1.00Animal Iniured 2 5 L 4 3.00Animal Rabid 0 1" 0 T 0.s0Animal Stray 2 5 0 1 2.00
Assist Fire Department t 3 1. 2 L.75Assist Public 26 40 2L 31 29.50
Compassionate Message 0 0 2 0 0.50Distressed / Overdue Motorist 1" 1" 0 0 0.s0Dogs By-Law L t 0 0 0.50Domestic Disturbance L3 L2 11, T7 13.25
False Fire Alarm - Buildine 0 0 0 T 0.2sFamilv Dispute 77 1,2 13 6 12.00
Fire - Buildine 2 1. 0 2 1,.25
Fire - Other 0 0 0 2 0.s0Fire - Vehicle 2 2 1 0 L.25
Firearms (Discharge) By-Law 2 0 0 L o.75
Found - Household Property 0 t 0 0 0.25
Found - L¡cense Plate 0 0 0 1 0.2sFound - Machinerv & Tools 0 0 t 0 0.25Found - Others 1" 1. 2 0 1.00
Found - Personal Accessories 0 2 0 2 1.00Found Property - Master Code 3 6 3 0 3.00lnsecure Condition - Building 1 2 0 0 0.7s
Lost - License Plate 1 7 L 0 2.25
Lost - Others 1" 0 0 1: 0.50Lost - Personal Accessories 2 2 0 0 1.00Lost - Radio, TV, Sound-Reprod. Equip. 0 0 0 1 0.2s
OPP 2018 Calls for Service Details 6of14
20
2018 Calls For Service DetailsFor the Calendar Years 2013 to 2016
Mulmur TpCalls for Service Count
Calls for Service Billing Workgroups 20L3 20t4 201s 20L6Four YearAverage
Lost Propertv - Master Code 0 L 0 0 0.2sMedical Assistance - Other 0 L 0 1 0.50Missing Person - Master Code 0 0 1 0 0.25Missine Person L2 & older t 7 L 2 2.75Missins Person Located L2 & older 3 2 3 2 2.s0Missins Person Located Under 12 2 1, 0 0 0.75Neighbour Dispute 7 3 9 L0 7.25Noise By-Law 1) 0 0 0 0.25Noise Complaint - Animal 2 0 0 0 0.50Noise Complaint - Master Code 0 7 0 T 0.50Noise Complaint - Others 5 5 1. 2 3.25Noise Complaint - Residence 1 4 3 5 3.25
Other M unicipal By-Laws 1 4 1. 0 1..50
Phone - Master Code 0 't 0 2 0.75Phone - Nuisance - No Charses Laid 3 3 1 4 2.75Phone - Other - No Charges Laid 7 1. 0 0 0.50Phone - Threaten¡ng - No Charges Laid \ 0 0 0 0.25Sudden Death - Natural Causes 3 6 L 4 3.s0Sudden Death - Suicide 0 1 0 0 0.2s
Suspicious Person TL 10 13 13 tL.75Suspicious vehicle 15 13 1,4 18 L5.00Traffic By-Law 0 L L 0 0.s0Trouble with Youth 2 1 5 5 3.25Unwanted Persons 2 L 'J. 2 1.50
Vehicle Recovered - Automobile 0 0 0 L 0.25Vehicle Recovered - Trucks 0 0 0 L 0.25
Operat¡onal 2 142 151 132 120 136.2591L call - Dropped Cell 0 0 1 3 1.00
911 call / 9L1 hang up 76 77 54 50 64.2591"1 hang up - Pocket Dial 4 6 5 2 4.25
False Alarm - Accidental Trip 21) 20 28 20 22.25False Alarm - Cancelled L9 22 8 L6 1,6.25
False Alarm - Malfunction 16 t7 13 1.L L4.25False Alarm - Others 2 4 L3 12 7.75False Holdup Alarm - AccidentalTrip 0 0 1. 7 0.s0False Holdup Alarm - Malfunction 0 0 I 7 0.s0Keep the Peace 4 5 8 4 5.25
Other Cr¡m¡nal Code Violations L 6 2 8 4.25Animals - Crueltv 0 0 1, 0 0.25Bail Violations - Fail To Comply 0 1 0 3 1.00Breach of Probation 1. 0 0 0 0.25
Child Pornography - Possess child pornography 0 I 0 0 0.2sCounterfeit Money - Others 0 0 L 0 0.2s
Disturb the Peace 0 0 0 1 0.2sObstruct Public Peace Officer 0 0 0 L 0.2sOffensive Weapons - Other Offensive Weapons 0 0 0 L o.25Offensive Weapons - Other Weapons Offences 0 2 0 1 o.75
OPP 2018 Calls for Service Details 7 ofL4
21
2018 Galls For Service DetailsFor the Calendar Years 2013 to 2016
MulmurTpCalls for Service Count
Calls for Service Billing Workgroups 20L3 20L4 20L5 20t6Four YearAverage
Offensive Weapons - Prohibited 0 1 0 0 0.25
Trespass at Nisht 0 1, 0 0 0.25
Utterins Counterfeit Monev 0 0 0 T 0.25
ProperW Crime Vlolations 49 46 38 78 s2.75Break & Enter 15 9 8 34 16.50
Break & Enter- Firearms 0 0 0 1 0.2s
Fraud - False Pretence Over 55,000 0 0 0 1 0.25Fraud - False Pretence Under 55,000 1 1, 0 0 0.s0Fraud - Forgery & Utterins 7 0 0 0 0.2s
Fraud - Fraud through mails 7 0 0 0 0.25
Fraud - Money/property/security Over 55,000 I 0 0 1 0.50
Fraud - Monev/prooertv/securitv Under S5,000 3 0 L t 'J,.25
Fraud - Other T 4 1. 2 2.00
Fraud - Steal/Forse/Poss./Use Credit Card 1 7 0 0 0.50
ldentity Fraud 0 0 1 0 0.25
lnterfere with lawful use, enjovment of property 0 0 L L 0.50
Mischief - Master Code 9 6 7 L3 8.75Mischief Graffiti - Non-Gang Related L 0 0 0 0.25Personation with lntent (fraud) T 7 0 0 0.s0Possession of Stolen Goods under 55,000 0 t 0 L 0.s0Property Damage 1, 4 2 t 2.00
Theft from Motor Vehicles Under 35.000 0 1 3 T t.25Theft of - All Terrain Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2.00
Theft of - Automobile 0 0 0 T 0.25
Theft of - Construction Vehicles 0 0 0 1. 0.25Theft of - Trucks 0 0 0 1 0.2s
Theft of Motor Vehicle 7 I 1 L 1.00
Theft Over 35.000 - Master Code 0 0 0 L 0.25
Theft Over 55,000 - Other Theft 0 0 L 0 0.2s
Theft Over 55,000 - Trailers 1, 0 0 0 0.25
Theft Under 55,000 - Bicvcles 0 L 0 0 0.25Theft Under 55,000 - Boat (Vessel) 0 0 0 L 0.2s
Theft under $5,000 - Building 0 0 2 L o.75
Theft Under 55,000 - Farm Equipment 0 0 0 1, 0.25
Theft Under 55,000 - Gasoline Drive-off 2 3 L 2 2.00
Theft Under 55,000 - Master Code 0 0 0 1 0.25
Theft Under 55,000 - Other Theft 5 10 5 6 6.50
Theft Under 55,000 - Persons 0 0 1. 0 0.25Theft Under S5,000 Shopliftine 2 1. L 0 r".00
Willful act / Omission likely to cause mischief 0 0 0 2 0.50
Statutes & Acts 20 28 30 24 25.50Custodv Dispute 1 t 0 0 0.s0
Family Law Act - Custodv/Access order 7 0 0 0 0.2s
Landlord / Tenant 6 2 5 5 4.50
Mental Health Act 5 I 3 3 4.75
Mental Health Act - Attempt Suicide 0 1, 2 L L.00
Mental Health Act - No contact with Police 0 0 L 0 0.25
OPP 2018 Calls for Service Details 8of14
22
2018 Calls For Service Details' Forthe GalendarYears 2013 to 2016
Mulmur TpCalls for Service Count
Calls for Service Billing Workgroups 2013 20L4 20L5 20L6Four YearAverage
Mental Health Act - Threat of Suicide 1 4 1 5 2.75Mental Health Act - Voluntary Transport 0 0 3 1 1.00Trespass To ProperW Act 6 12 15 9 10.50
lraffic 83 97 84 LO2 91.50MVC - Others (Motor Vehicle Collision) 1 0 2 't 1.00MVC - Personal lnjury (Motor Vehicle Collision) 9 1.4 72 L0 77.25MVC - Prop. Dam. Failed to Remain (Motor Vehicle Collision) 0 4 3 3 2.50MVC - Prop. Dam. Non Reportable 4 8 10 17 9.75MVC - Prop. Dam. Reportable (Motor Vehicle Collision) 68 7T 57 71 66.75MVC (Motor Vehicle Collision) - Master Code 1 0 0 0 0.25
Violent Crlminal Code 13 11 1t 14 t2.25Aggravated Assault - Level 3 0 7 0 0 0.2sAssault - Level L 4 5 5 5 4.75Assault Peace Officer 1 0 0 0 0.2sAssault W¡th Weapon or Causing Bodily Harm - Level 2 2 0 0 0 0.s0Criminal Harassment 2 3 0 1 1.50Forcible confinement 0 0 1" 0 0.2slnv¡tat¡on to Sexual Touchins 0 0 0 \ 0.2sManslaughter 0 0 0 t 0.25Mischief - Cause Danger to Life T 0 0 0 0.25Other Assaults / Admin Noxious thing 0 0 7 0 0.2sRobbery - With Threat of Violence 0 0 0 T 0.25Sexual Assault 1 1 2 2 1.50Sexual lnterference 0 0 0 L 0.2sUtter Threats - Master Code 0 0 0 \ 0.2sUtter Threats to Person 2 1 2 1 1.50
OPP 2018 Calls for Service Details 9of14
23
)
OPP 20L8 Calls for Service Details LO ol L4
24
OPP 2015 Reconciled Year-End SummaryMulmur Tp
Reconciled cost for the period January I to December 31,20'15
Base Services Propertv Counts
Household
Commercial and lndustrial
Total Properties
Calls for Service
Total all municipalities
Municipal portion
1,665
43
1,708
$138,204,918
0.1065%
Cost per
Property
$
200.91
86.20
8.58
2.02
4.80
ActualTotal Cost
$
343,154
147,224
14,651
3,450
8,198
Overtime
Gontract Enhancements (pre-201 5)
Court Security
Prisoner Tra nsportation
Accommodation/Cleanin g Services
(see summary)
(see summary)
(per property cost)
(per property cost)
Total 2015 Reconciled Cost
Year Over Year Variance (estimate for the year is not subject to phase-in adjustment)
2014 Reconciled Cost per Property
2015 Reconciled Cost per Property (see above)
Gost per Property Variance (lncrease)
302.50 516,677
290.51
302.50
11.99
2015 Billed Amount (530,2441
201 5 Year-End Adjustment (see note) (13,567)
Note:
The Year-End Adjustment above will be included as an adjustment on the 2018 Annual Billing Statement. This amount is beincorporated into the monthly invoice amount fo¡ 2018.
OPP 2015 Reconciled Year-End Summary LL oI L4
25
OPP 2015 Reconciled Year-End Summary t2 of 74
26
OPP 2016 Reconciled Year-End SummaryMulmur Tp
Reconciled cost for the period January I to December 31, 2016
Base Services Prooertv Counts
Household
Commercial and lndustrial
Total Properties
Galls for Service
Total all municipalities
Municipal portion
1,696
49
1f45
$143,993,462
0.1068%
Cost per
Property
$
193.63
88.17
15.05
2.12
4.76
Actual
Total Cost
$
337,884
153,856
26,256
3,699
8,306
Overtime
Gontract Enhancements (pre-2015)
Court Security
Prisoner Transportation
Accommodation/Gleaning Services
(see summary)
(see summary)
(per property cost)
(per property cost)
2015 Reconciled Cost per Property
2016 Reconciled Cost per Property (see above)
Cost per Propertyr Variance
Total 2016 Reconciled Gost 303.73
Year Over Year Variance (estimate for the year is not subject to phase-in adjustment)
302.50
303.73
(lncrease) 1.23
2016 Billed Amount
201 6 Year-End Adjustment (see note)
Note:
The Year-End adjustment above will be included as an adjustment on the 2018 Billing Statement. This amount will beincorporated into the monthly invoice amount Íor 2018.
530,002
(527,6441
2,358
OPP 2016 Reconciled Year-End Summary 13 of 14
27
OPP 2016 Reconciled Year-End Summary 14o'Í 14
28
o.P.P.Ëb
OntarioProvincialPolice
Policeprovincialede I'Ontario
Municipal Policing BureauBureau des services policiers des municipalités
777 Memorial Ave. 777, avenue MemorialOrillia ON L3V 7V3 Orillia ON L3V 7V3
Tel: 705 329-6140 Té1. : 705 329-6140Fax: 705 330-4191 Téléc.: 705 330-4191
File Reference: 612-20
September 27,2017
Dear CAO/Treasurer,
Please find attached the OPP municipal policing 2018 Annual Billing Statement package.
ln accordance with information communicated to all municipalities in Fall 2016 regarding thedelays in the settlement of collective agreement salary rates, this year's billing packageincludes statements for the year-end reconciliations of both the 2015 and 2016 calendar years.Final cost adjustments calculated as a result of the 2015 and 2016 annual reconciliations havebeen included as adjustments to the amount being billed to the municipality during the 2018calendar year.
The current uniform and civilian collective agreements are in effect for years 2015 through 2018and include a 1.75o/o annual general salary increase, effective January 1,2018. This rateincrease has been incorporated into the 2018 Annual Billing Statement.
The property counts used for the calculation of the 2018 Base Service cost excludes certaincommercialand industrial (C&l) property counts (i.e. wind turbine, solar properties) inagreement with O. Reg. 267/14 revisions addressed this year in consultation with municipalities.ln total 5,330 (0.047o/o) C&l properties were removed from the 2018 count for the province.
The final reconciliation of the 2018 annual costs will be included in the 2020 Annual BillingStatement.
For more detailed information on the 2018 property count description update and the 2018Annual Billing Statement package please refer to resource material available on the internet,www.opp.calbillinqmodel Further, the Municipal Policing Bureau will be hosting webinarinformation sessions in October. An e-mail invitation will be fonruarded to the municipalityadvising of the session dates.
lf you require French versions of this communication or have questions about the Annual BillingStatement material please email OPP. MPB. Financial. Services. [email protected].
Yours truly,
M.M. (Marc) BedardSuperintendentCommander,Municipal Policing Bureau
29
Fro m : Fi n I ey M c Ewe n tmdljgllt SJ.ät1;glLeåQ.ffiU¡l,çA û1 1
Sent: September t,2Ot7 3:27 PM
To: Paul Mills <pqi"f lss)rnulmur.ca>; Earl Hawkins <ghawlç[email protected]>Cc: Tracey Atkinson <1,_a-Ikj"n-s"p-nffi_mi¡_|m-g"l,Sä>; Gary Walters <6a.ry-Sce_da$ril|c*.>; Dave Morrison(daveQmarlqfisldslsdi;l:,çrxn) <-d-ave.@ ryd-{rsf ie ldslsi"rlv þ,ççn:>Subject: Mansfield Ski Club bylaw amendment and Site Plan applications
Greetings from Mansflreld Ski Club! This email is to give you a brief update on the aboveapplications which were submitted to Mulmur Township back at the end of 2015. We are hopingyou might share it with council and let us know if you have any questions. I have copied theemail to Gary Walters and Dave Morrison, President and General Manager respectively.
We are pleased to report that we submitted an amended functional services plan to Tracey and RJBurnside, the consultant retained by Mulmur Township, on August 10 and we have asked thatthe first portion of our application be brought before council in the fall. The revised servicingplan captured additional study work requested by the province and others to ensure that the PineRiver had capacity to accept waste water flows generated by the proposed project. While thestudy work was expensive and time consuming, we remain committed to maintaining the highestenvironmental standards and we believe the report demonstrates the capacity exists and a generallevel of acceptability by the province.
We have also included an option in the study to detain waste water flows in an existing wetlandon the property to address perceptions held by a few local residents about the waste water. MOEdo not recognize detention as having any environmental benefït and this option carries extra costbut we are prepared to commit to it at the site plan stage.
Should the bylaw amendment be approved by council, following the expiration of any appealperiod we would then follow up with further submissions to complete the Site Plan approvalprocess, ideally late this year. We are of course anxious to advance the project as thecompetitive challenges facing the club are as great as ever.
Please let us know if you have any questions about the application.
Thank you.
Finley McEwenVice President, MSC
30
h
II
MANSFIELtrIS}<I GLU
t\
31
32
'.- -ti^..o
@I-ANDSCAPÊ BUFFER PL.AÀÍTING
PARKING FOR RESIDENTS
EXISTINGMANSFIELD SKI CHALET -PTAZA/ SKATING AREA TAND FIRE PIT I
-'-'7I
-,4 WASTEWATERTREATMENT
BLOCK. l_ STAGKEDTOW}¡HOTES
RETAININGWALL
BLOCK-2STACKED TOWNHOIIES
_ BUILDING'ALOFTS PLUSCOilITIERCI,AL RETA¡L
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
,.- _ BLOCK-3STACKED ÎOWNTþüES
BLOCK.4STACI(ED TOUNHOTIES
-- CLUBGENERALPARKING
TREE BUFFER PLANTING
ENI-ÙANCED GRASS SWALE
INFILTRATION ÏRENCH
_. STORi/NA/ATER BLOCK
LANÐSCAPE PLANTING
BLOCK-6STACKED
AMENITY PTAZAC/w FIRE PfTAND PERC€IA _-
BLOCK.SSÏACKED TOU'IIHOICS
iø: \i
CLUB GENERAL PARKING
ÐfiERNAL BYfASS SWALE
GARBAGE ENCLOSURE
-t
30,RETAIL AREA
945.0m'?
65o.oml
N/A
1,596.0m¿
RES. AREA
1 260 ôft
1 ?OO ôr
972.4m¿
9?2.4m¿
809.2m'
649.4m)g72.4m2
972.4m2
7SC?m
NO. OF RES.
UNIIS
72
15
1)
10
8
!212
93
BLDG. ARÊA
530.omr
650 Om'z
286 omr
2A6.om?
238.0m?
191.0m¿
286.0m?
286.0m2
2 8s3 om2
BUILDING'A'BUILDING'B'
BLOCK-1
BLOCK.2BLOCK-3
BLOCK4BLOCK.5
BLOCK6
TOIAL
1,th uru*oa'
33
\\\\\
\
\
\
\\
PREIIMINARY BUILDIÑG STAIßTICS RÊFÊR TO LANDSCAPE AÑD ENGINEERING PúNS FOR INFORMATION ASRELA'TED TO iHE REMAINDER ÔF IHE SIIE
IHIS DRAW¡NG IS NOI FOR CONSTRUCÍION AND IS TO BE RÊAD INCONJUNCTION WIIH ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERINGDOCUMENIATIÔN
su¡LDtNG AREAs AND DtMENsroñs SHOWNj!_!IAN A.R€ pRELt^íiÑ;Ñ.----AND APPROXIMAIE
e BLD.G No. OF RES. RETA|L
AREA RES. UNITS AREA AREA
I
!I
I
I
{\\\-,,*-"'-\ l"ì¿$*I
\
\
I\
\
BUILDING'ABUILDING'8'
ó30.0 ñ2 l2ó50.0 m2 l5
1,260.0m2 915.0621,300.0 m2 ó50.0 m2
\
BLOCKI 286.0 m2 12 972.4ñ2 îloELOCK-2 28ó.0m2 12 972.4ñ2 n/oBTOCK-3 238.0 ñ2 ì0 809.2ñ2 n/o8IOCK4 l9l.0m2 8 649.4ñ2 n/oBLOCK-s 28ó.0û2 12 972.4n2 n/oAIOCK-6 28ó.0ñ2 12 972.4m2 ñlo
'c --7-
ÌOTAL 2,853.0 m2 93
,e"
7,908.2 ß2 1 ,59ó.0 ñ2
þúù, t
v/t
1'/Ilr.I\
¡ o\/:ì
Ã"i" /lc
I
I.\tòi\,*î*
.JI
I
I
F ,r
-)c<
BLOCK-B \
J1:r'
srt
\g
\
a--_1¿
'jt\Ë
\t
\r.."'
t-\*
\ \.å \å
gb'2
{ ,a\c
"+VG îsçli[sçl;MANSFIEI.D SKI CLUB
Arcl¡tecturol Concepl Slle ?lonAddrs: ó282¡3 lslhSIDEROAD, MUL¡/UR, ON, t-9V 3M6þd:æ17.æ.03 \lr-
i
l
,iìé
- O- +s'o
\
\
\
.i'""
----f/
--)-- 7^:r$r
72rooôrosræilôroôìÒ, Onlorb, Co.ooo
MóJ 2RAr.¡¡¿.588.ó3l0F: 4ló S8.ó32l
wwvenlù\gro!p.coñ
34
Terry Horner
From:Sent:To:
Denise Holmes <[email protected]>
Tuesday, October 10,2017 9:30 AM
Terry HornerNDCC Board of ManagementSubject:
Hi Terry,
At the meeting of Council held on October 5,2017, Council appointed the following persons to the Board
1. Debbie Fawcett2. Bert Tupling3. Clayton Rowbotham
Mr. Tupling's and Mr. Rowbotham's appointments are pending receipt of a complete resume or CV
Councillor Dave Besley was appointed as the Council Representative.
Thank you
Regards,
Derwírte/Ho1'4442'Y
ffi,eft ffircir.* {$" f t{)lrî}ç$, Jåiìdflf I {i:îsf Åd¡:'¡i*tî*trx{îve ü$'f'ì*erfflf*rk $ î*w*shî¡t *f ru¡f el;rn*theln I
c$hç:i¡¡:eg$::::*!r¿¡1g{i¡*¡¡4ar-q}rjìþip,*iìi *:þ"1: 59li-$Ê$."$5ãS q:xt *.*.}å $ SX: $1$-$å$-å1.}.S } www.melancthontownship'ca $
¡S ftease consíder thø environmønt befors printíng this e-mait Th¡s message (including attachments, if any) is ¡ntended to be confidential
ãísobly for the addressee. lf you received this e-mail ¡n error, please delete it and advise me immediately. E-mail transm¡ssion cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free and the sender does not accept liability for errors or omissions.
1
35
Dear Council,
My name is Sara Fodaro a resident resigning in Mansfield Ridge, after calling into the Township
of Mulmur regarding the possibility of raising my own chickens, it has come to my attention that
the residents in Mansfield Ridge (zone four) are zoned as a no zone. It was to my surprise that
this is something that council is looking into changing, and possibly allowing for there to be
chickens kept on the estate lots. I am unable to make the October 14th meeting due to my sister's
wedding but I would still love to voice my opinion/support through this email.
The city of Toronto has also been working on a plan for backyard chickens and last month they
came to a decision; a pilot project. The rules and regulations implemented along with the pilotproject I believe should be the same for our area, with these in place I believe it would work wellin our area. While comparing to Toronto and the approved neighbourhoods I strongly believe
that this pilot project would thrive in our area, especially considering our lot sizes, the distances
between neighbours, and the ability to provide a healthier environment compared to Toronto &their cramped spaces. Furthermore, chickens are no strangers to our area as we are surrounded by
farms in our area which carry livestock, and other goods.
Personally, the rules and regulations that Toronto has in place, such as inspectors, the banning ofroosters, and a max of four laying hens per a household is perfect. The inspections would ensure
that the environment for the chickens is healthy, they're living quarters are safe and clean, withenough room for them to wander without ending up on other residents' property or on the street
which could be potentially dangerous. Also, with inspectors and inspections it would ensure that
coups are properly located to reduce noise and smell, which could be a disruption to neighbours
daily lives. For when the hens die, I believe there should be rules on the process if a hen were to
die, or if a family decides the chickens are no longer a fit with the home, and where the hens
should go.
Along with any livestock, there is a risk of disease and cleanliness that people womy about. Inorder to prevent disease, and the spread of disease, we could tap on the shoulder local farmers foradvice on the best practices that they do to ensure the safety of their animals.
As a community, we believe in supporting our local community, eating local, and living ahealthy lifestyle. I believe this is a great way to get a community like the Mansfield Ridge more
involved in more traditional practices that are healthier for not only our bodies but for the
environment.
In conclusion, having estate lots we have more than enough room to keep them in a safe and
healthy environment, while having respect for our neighbours. If we allow for this, and
implement rules & regulations that each community members must follow, overall, I trulybelieve this is a great idea and will be providing experiences for a community and teaching the
younger generations that live in the Ridge skills that they have never been exposed too.
Without a doubt, I believe this would be very beneficial to our area.
Regards,
36
Sara Fodaro
18 Jeffery DrMulmur, ONL9Y 3H7
37
I ffi i.rî*,Ï;".Ontario
LEGISLATIVEASSEMBLY
Sylvia Jones, MPPDufferin-Caledon
Room 443, Legislative Building
Toronto, 0ntario M7A1AB
Tel: 41 6-325-1 B9B
Fax: 41 6-325-1 936E-Mail: [email protected]
October 17,2017
Mayor Paul Mills and CouncilTownship of MulmurMulmur, ONL9V 0G8 t
Þ"^,(Dear Mayor Mills and Council,
Please find enclosed a letter to the Minister of Environment regarding your resolution in supportof Bill 141: The Sewage Bypass Reporting Act, 2017.
Thank you for your support. Your resolution joins a growing number of municipalities across
Ontario that support the goal of Bill 141: to require the Minister of Environment to reportinstances of sewage bypasses.
SincerelY'
Dufferin-Caledon
Deputy Leader of the PC Caucus
svl
38
Ontar¡oLEGISLATIVEASSEMBLY
Sylvia Jones, MPPDulferin-Caledon
October 17,2017
Room 443, Legislative Building
Toronto, 0ntario M7A1AB
Tel: 4i 6-325-1 B9B
Fax: 41 6-325-1 936E-Mail: sylvia. [email protected]
Hon. Chris BallardMinistry of Environment and Climate Change1lft Flo;r, Ferguson Block77 Wellesley Street W'estToronto, Ontario M7 A 2T 5
Dear Minister Ballard,
I would like to congratulate you on your recent appointment as the Minister of the Environmentand Climate Change. As you may be aware on July 2ft,I sent a letter to your predecessor, theHon. Glen Murray, regarding the bypassing of sewage and my private members bill The SewageBypass Reportíng Act, Bill l4l.
If adopted, Bill 141 would require the MOE to publish sewage bypasses to the public assoon as possible, but no longer 1úiran 24 hours after the bypass was reported. Bill 141
would ensure that residents are aware of instances of sewage bypasses and can make safeand educated decisions about how they use their local waterways.
Mr. Murray had expressed his general support for Bill 141. Further, a spokesperson for theMinistry of Environment was quoted in the London Free Press saying:
"We are looking at developing a provincial approach that requires real timereporting of bypasses and overflows. The public should be (made) aware ofpotential impacts to water quality following public storms."
In addition to being generally supported by your predecessor, I have recently received aresolution in support of Bill l4I from the Township of Mulmur. Given thismunicipality's support of greater government transparency with water and sewerinfrastructure, I ask that you commit to implementing the provisions of Bill 141.
J MPPDufferin-Caledon
Cc: Township of Mulmur
39
Terry Horner
From:
Sent:To:Subject:
Middlesex County joins SWIFT with a $784,000capital contribution...
SWI FT < info=swiftnetwork.ca @ mai I 1 56.atl6 1 .mcsv.net > on behalf of SWI FT
< i [email protected] >
Wednesday, October 25,2017 3:23 PM
Terry HornerMiddlesex County joins SWIFT with a $784K capital contribution
Viriw {Þirì tìíI*¡il jU ïc:-¡."-lii.*rvs{:f
$ç¡.¡ll':Wegt*rn . Ini*gr*t*d . Fibrg " T*chn*å*gy
Southwestern Ontar¡o is Committed toBuilding Broadband for Everyone
The Southwestern lntegrated Fibre Technology (SWIFT) Network continues to gain
momentum and gather support with Middlesex County's decision to join SWIFT as a full
member. Middlesex County formally joined SWIFT at yesterday's Council meeting with a
commitment of over $784,000 in capitalfunding. This valuable addition means that SWIFT
now represents the combined connectivity interests of all 15 members of the Western
Ontario Wardens' Caucus lnc. (WOWC) as well as ihe Town of Caledon, City of Orillia,
City of Windsor and the Niagara and Waterloo Regions.
"We see our investment in SWIFT as a significant investment in Middlesex County's
Economic Development that will produce growth and opportunity that will benefit our
County for decades," said Don Shipway, Middlesex County Warden.
By joining SWIFT, Middlesex is investing in a collective broadband initiative that is working
to improve ultra-high-speed fibre optic lnternet access for more that 3.5 million Ontarians
1
40
across approximately 350 communities. This partnership follows $180 million in combined
investments by the federal and provincial governments and over $17 million in investments
by municipalities across the region.
"We are pleased to celebrate the commitment of all 15 WOWC's capital partners who are
working together to address southwestern Ontario's critical connectivity challenges," said
Gerry Marshall, Board Chair at SWIFT. "The more sites we have committed to the network,
the more influence we will have with service providers and the more competitive the
resulting network bids and build will be for participating members'"
The WOWC is a nolfor-profit organization representing 15 upper and single tier
municipalities in southwestern Ontario. This includes Brant, Bruce, Chatham-Kent, Ëlgin,
Dufferin, Essex, Grey, Huron, Lambton, Middlesex, Norfolk, Oxford, Perth, Simcoe, and
Wellington. Collectively, the municipalities represent more than 3 million residents in
approximately 300 communities and almost half a million square kilometres of territory,
more than 90% of it rural.
"southwestern Ontario faces a $4 billion infrastructure deficit when it comes to fibre-optic
connectivity," said Geoff Hogan, Chief Executive Officer at SWIFT. "To prosper in today's
global economy, we need to work together, as a region, to accelerate fibre diffusion to both
our rural and urban communities. By investing in the expansion of broadband
infrastructure, we are removing barriers to economic development and ensuring that every
member community has access to the tools they need to grow their economies from
within."
For more information about Middlesex's investment in SWIFT, please contact Bill Rayburn,
Chief Administrative Officer at Middlesex County, at {:i.'.,:'llìlii:,. ..:ji¡.
About the SWIFT lnitiative
The SWIFT lnitiative is based on the principle that everyone deserves access to high-
speed lnternet. For this reason, SWIFT is building an affordable, open-access, ultra-high-
speed fibre-optic regional broadband network for everyone in Southwestern Ontario,
Caledon and Niagara Region. By developing a long-term infrastructure plan, SWIFT is
helping our region compete, connect and keep pace in a changing digitalworld. SWIFT
membership is open to any community or organization in southwestern Ontario that needs
connectivity to any of its locations. Members receive benefits of our significant
procurement expertise, including aggregated demand, negotiated rates, and support in
2
41
prepar¡ng RFPs for broadband services. As a buying group, SWIFT will ensure greater
competition between telecom service providers which will lead to better services at lower
prices in all of our member communities.
ln addition to leadership from the county members of the Western Ontario Warden's
Caucus and investment from the federal and provincial governments, the Town of
Caledon, City of Orillia, City of Windsor and the Niagara and Waterloo Regions are also
supporting the project. Non-municipal members include Chatham Kent Lambton
Administrators Group (CKLAG), Connecting Windsor-Essex (CW-E), Georgian College,
Grey Bruce Health Services, Saugeen First Nation, and the Stratford Economic Enterprise
Development Corporation. SWIFT has also received letters of support from the Chippewas
of Kettle and Stony Point First Nation, the Chippewas of the Thames First Nation and
Walpole lsland First Nation.
ln May 2017, SWIFT launched a two-stage Request for Pre-Qualification. Through this
process, 28 service providers were pre-qualified. SWIFT is now working on finalizing the
details for the final Request for Proposalwhich will be circulated within the coming months.
For more information about the procurement process and to stay up to date on how SWIFT
will build broadband for everyone in Southwestern Ontario, Caledon, and the Niagara
Region, please visit Wççl¡¡"s.jn'ilii:9,1W*t!i.ç* and sign-up for the mailing list
at¡glv¡n¿.tyr-r|3q*i-W_*tk¿Ai,¡_r;¡f leiçt.
SWIFT is also currently requesting information from users across the region about their
current lnternet service. To complete the survey, please visit w-vr**.;.,*vr'lfl¡tq!¡¡¡i¡¡k,**ls!¡l!l::.ì:i
For more information about SWIFT, please contact
Media Relations
Tammy McQueen
Communications Manager
q{$Äïy- il}tiìli.¿íì*@ $winr.giwË4L-üfl
226-256-1640
Membership Enquiries
Adriana Dekker
Stakeholder Relations
* qi r; ;,:r r: a "$ *3k e i' i€ *u¡íft neitr¡* lk. * *t
519-914-1308 ext.3
3
42
/ \ /t\\,;ì
To learn more, please visit our website:
n¡¡ruw¡ " sm¡i íisr ntwç: r k. *aJs u s
Do you want to keep receiving notices about our procurement process or
bidding opportunities? Or would you rather only receive general news
and updates? Click the red button above to update your subscription
settings to make sure you only receive the information you need and
want.
Connect with SWIFT and follow along as we build #broadbandforeveryone. Use
the links below to visit our website and find us on Facebook and Twitter.
Q raceuoor ffi w"o"it*Twitter
Copyright @ 2017 Southwestem lntegrated Fibre Technalogy lnc., All rights reserued.
Thank you for opting in to receive news about the SouthWestern lntegrated Fibre Technology project. We
promise never to spam you and you can unsubscribe from this list at any time. For more information about
SWIFT please visit www.swiftnetwork.ca
Our mailing address is:
Southwestern lntegrated Fibre Technology lnc.
789 Broadway Street
Wyoming, Ontario NON 1ï0
Canada
Add us to your address book
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update vour preferences or unsubscribe from this list.
4
Update your subscription settiftgs today
43