msc final

50
1 Chemical and Biological Engineering Department MSc in Environmental and Energy Engineering Algae Screening: Spirulina sp. Name : Christine Ho Registration no : 130111904 Supervisor : Prof. Will Zimmerman Date : 27 th August 2014

Upload: christine-ho

Post on 16-Apr-2017

18 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MSc Final

1

 

 

 

 

Chemical  and  Biological  Engineering  Department  

 MSc  in  Environmental  and  Energy  Engineering  

 

Algae  Screening:  Spirulina  sp.  

 

   

Name       :   Christine  Ho    Registration  no     :   130111904    Supervisor     :   Prof.  Will  Zimmerman    Date         :   27th  August  2014        

Page 2: MSc Final

2

 

Abstract  The objective of this study was to evaluate the growth of blue-green algae Spirulina sp.

using the method airlift loop bioreactors to cultivate the algae. In airlift loop bioreactors, the

medium was supplied with CO2 nutrient by bubbling it to the medium at 30 minutes per day.

Its growth rate was compared without the presence of CO2 sparging. Besides that, the

Spirulina was tested with different concentrations of copper and acetaldehyde to determine

how well the Spirulina adapts in different growth conditions. Heavy metal copper is toxic to

microalgae but results shows that Spirulina could adapt in the tested concentration of 2 mg/L

and 5 mg/L over the span of 11 days. Spirulina adapts well with addition of acetaldehyde in

concentration between 100-150 over the span of 12 days. Therefore, it is suitable to

remove heavy metal of copper at and treat flue gas from industry emission that contains

acetaldehyde at the tested concentration range. Flask cultures were also used to compare

different culturing methods without CO2 bubbling. It shows that photosynthesis and growth

was inhibited when the same copper concentration was added in flask and resulted in cell

death. Spirulina added with acetaldehyde remains a linear growth and had a higher specific

growth rate when compared with ALB culture. It is concluded that, there is a difference on

how Spirulina cells react on different culturing methods and parameters such as pH will

affect the growth.

Page 3: MSc Final

3

 

Table  of  Contents  Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 2

1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5

2. Background ....................................................................................................................... 6

3. Project overview ............................................................................................................... 6

4. Objectives and Research Hypothesis ............................................................................... 7

5. Chemical Analysis Procedures ......................................................................................... 8 5.1 Chlorophyll concentration determination ....................................................................... 8 5.2 Protein determination .................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Dry weight determination .............................................................................................. 9

6. Biochemistry of CO2 Fixation ............................................................................................ 9

7. Effect on Spirulina Growth .............................................................................................. 11 7.1 Effect of pH ................................................................................................................. 11 7.2 Effect of Light Intensity ................................................................................................ 11 7.3 Effect of Mass Transfer ............................................................................................... 11 7.4 Effect of Mixing ............................................................................................................ 12 7.5 Effect of CO2 concentration ......................................................................................... 13 7.6 Effect of O2 accumulation ............................................................................................ 13

8. Mass Cultivation of Algae using ALB .............................................................................. 14

9. Metal Adsorption ............................................................................................................. 15

10. Copper Toxicity on Algae ............................................................................................ 15

11. Wastewater Treatment using Microalgae .................................................................... 16

12. Algal Biomass Harvest and Drying .............................................................................. 17

13. Experimental Methods ................................................................................................ 18 13.1 Materials ...................................................................................................................... 19

13.1.1 Microalgae ........................................................................................................... 19 13.1.2 Medium Recipe .................................................................................................... 20 13.1.3 Copper (II) Sulphate ............................................................................................. 21 13.1.4 Acetaldehyde ....................................................................................................... 21

13.2 Main Apparatus ........................................................................................................... 22 13.2.1 ALB ...................................................................................................................... 22 13.2.2 Spectrophotometer (DR2800) .............................................................................. 23

13.3 Experiment Settings .................................................................................................... 24 13.3.1 Experiment Setting for ALB .................................................................................. 24 13.3.2 Experimental Setting for Flasks ........................................................................... 24

14. Experiments ................................................................................................................ 25 14.1 Experiment I: Growth Rate of Spirulina (Flask Culture) .............................................. 25 14.2 Experiment II: Reaction of Spirulina with Acetaldehyde ............................................. 25

14.2.1 Flask Culture ........................................................................................................ 25 14.2.2 With ALB .............................................................................................................. 25

Page 4: MSc Final

4

 

14.3 Experiment III: Reaction with Heavy Metal, Copper (II) Sulphate ............................... 26 14.3.1 Flask Culture ........................................................................................................ 26 14.3.2 With ALB .............................................................................................................. 26 14.3.3 Preparation of Copper concentrations ................................................................. 26

14.4 Microflotation ............................................................................................................... 27 14.5 Preliminary Experiment for Metal Adsorption .............................................................. 27

15. Results and Discussions ............................................................................................. 29 15.1 Initial Observation ....................................................................................................... 29 15.2 Flask Culture compare with ALB ................................................................................. 29 15.3 ALBs Comparisons ..................................................................................................... 31

15.3.1 Control groups ..................................................................................................... 32 15.3.2 Spirulina with added acetaldehyde ...................................................................... 33 15.3.3 Spirulina with added CuSO4 ................................................................................ 33

15.4 Flask Cultures ............................................................................................................. 33 15.4.1 Spirulina with added CuSO4 ................................................................................ 33 15.4.2 Spirulina with added acetaldehyde ...................................................................... 35

15.5 Specific Growth Rate .................................................................................................. 37 15.6 Further Discussions .................................................................................................... 42

16. Limitations ................................................................................................................... 45

17. Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 45

18. Future works ............................................................................................................... 46 18.1 Determine the Protein content .................................................................................... 46 18.2 Reaction of acclimatised Spirulina with Acetaldehyde ................................................ 46 18.3 Microbubbles ............................................................................................................... 46

19. Acknowledgement ....................................................................................................... 47

20. Reference .................................................................................................................... 48

Page 5: MSc Final

5

 

1. Introduction  The aim of this research is to investigate a sustainable and environmental friendly method to

treat wastewater using algal biomass. The algae species Spirulina has yet to be studied in

the Chemical and Biological Department, Sheffield. Therefore, there is an interest to

investigate more about this alga. Spirulina is an unbranched, helicoidal, filamentous

freshwater blue-green algal or also known as a cyanobacterium (Belay, et al., 1993). It is

commonly sold as a food supplement due to its rich protein content. Recently there is more

emphasis on Spirulina for its benefits to industrial applications.

The waste gases such as carbon dioxide and acetaldehyde are emitted from biological

processes and industry, these gases affects the environment adversely as acetaldehyde is a

toxic organic pollutant and carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. Algae are known to be able

to treat flue gasses. It is an ideal solution as carbon dioxide emitted will be used as

feedstock to algae growth and it can remove acetaldehyde and produce biomass for biofuels.

This project aims to screen and study Spirulina acclimation on acetaldehyde for

acetaldehyde removal in flue gas treatment.

There is a global concern regarding the release of heavy metals to the environment. Metals

such as cadmium, zinc, copper, lead and mercury are commonly detected in industrial

wastewaters. These metals are non-biodegradable and cause adverse effects to the aquatic

life. It is necessary to treat these wastewaters before discharging them.

There are chemical methods from aqueous solution such as precipitation, electrolysis, ionic

exchange, filtration and evaporation (Nalimova, et al., 2005). However, these methods are

uneconomical, low efficiency in heavy metal removal and require slag burial. Biological

methods are able to metal detoxify and remove heavy metals from the aqueous solution.

Adsorption process is known to be an effective method to remove heavy metal ion. Algae,

plant wastes, bagasse fly ash and recycled coal fly ash are known absorbents. (Hui, et al.,

2005, Wan Ngah & Hanafiah, 2008, Gupta & Ali, 2000). Microorganisms are able to

accumulate a wide range of heavy metal concentrations and convert it into inactive form.

From the technical review, it was reviewed that Spirulina is an effective adsorbent in heavy

metal ions removal. It is also easy to culture and an inexpensive method.

   

Page 6: MSc Final

6

 

2. Background    The method chosen to cultivate Spirulina is a novel method that was introduced in the

University of Sheffield. There are advantages of using this method, which is to save energy

and to save cost for large scale of algae biomass production. So far, this method has not

been done with this algae species in this department. Therefore there is an interest to study

and conduct this experiment. This method uses an airlift loop bioreactor (ALB) which has

CO2 being bubbled from the bottom of the reactor via a ceramic diffuser. This method was

chosen because it is able to grow algae at a faster rate as to compare to conventional

methods such as open pond and tubular reactor. In theory, the circulation, mixing and mass

transfer that occurs in the airlift loop bioreactor is able to enhance the algae growth.

3. Project  overview  The aim of this project is to do algae screening for Spirulina algae. All the screenings were

done in ALB and flask culture to compare its effects on Spirulina growth and its

acclimatisation tendency.

The first screening is to study the effects of CO2 enriched bubbles on the growth of Spirulina

algae in an ALB and compare it with a controlled ALB without any enriched CO2 bubbles

being supplied to its growth medium.

The second screening is to test Spirulina with an organic contaminant. The organic

contaminant chosen for this experiment is acetaldehyde. The Department of Chemical and

Biological Engineering, Sheffield has conducted several experiments regarding the reaction

of acetaldehyde with different strains of algae. However, all these are marine algae strains

and a freshwater cyanobacterium was not studied before.

The third screening is to test Spirulina as biosorbent with a heavy metal. In this experiment,

different concentrations of copper (II) sulphate will be used. Spirulina is known to be a very

efficient biosorbent and different concentrations of copper are used to test its adsorption

efficiency.

 

 

Page 7: MSc Final

7

 

4. Objectives  and  Research  Hypothesis  Based on the literature review conducted, investigation on the points below was carried out.

• The growth Spirulina algae using ALB novel method

• The difference of Spirulina growth with and without enhanced CO2 supply

• The growth of Spirulina when added with copper (II) sulphate

• The acclimatation of Spirulina when added with acetaldehyde

• Compare the growth rate of Spirulina in different growth conditions

Hypothesis:

• The bubbling of CO2 in to the algae solution enhances its growth rate

• The copper (II) sulphate is adsorbed by the Spirulina

• Spirulina solution will acclimatized in the addition of acetaldehyde

   

Page 8: MSc Final

8

 

5. Chemical  Analysis  Procedures These are the methods and procedures mentioned by Vonshak (1997, p.214-215) to

analyse the Spirulina in further detail. The optimum growth conditions are at 35 ℃ and pH

9.8. The Spirulina cultures can be preserved for more than 6 moths on solidified medium

using 1.2-1.5 % of agar and kept at low light of 10-20 µμmol  m!!s!! and 20℃. However, the

cultures must not be heavily contaminated by bacteria.

5.1 Chlorophyll  concentration  determination  The chlorophyll content of Spirulina can be determined by take samples of 5 ml from the

algal suspension and centrifuges for 5 minutes at 3500 rpm and the supernatant is then

discarded while the pellet is kept. Alternatively, using a Whatman GF/C filter at 25 mm

diameter to filter it and re-suspend the sample in 5ml methanol and ground it in a glass

tissue homogenizer. The samples are then incubated in water at 70 ℃ for 2 minutes and

centrifuged; the clear supernatant is used for the chlorophyll measurements. The factor for

Spirulina is 13.9.

𝐶ℎ𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑙𝑙  𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛  (𝑚𝑔𝑚𝑙

) = 𝑂𝐷!!"  !"×13.9                                                  (1)

5.2 Protein  determination  The pellet taken from chlorophyll measurements could be used to determine the protein

concentration by drying it with gentle stream of air or N2. The pellet is added with 2 ml of 0.5

N NaOH and incubated for 20 minutes at 100  ℃. The tubes were covered to prevent

evaporation. The supernatant is kept after centrifuged and 2 ml of hot 0.5 N NaOH at 70 ℃  is

added to the volume. The mixture is well mixed and centrifuged again and combines with

supernatant. For colour reaction, 0.1-0.5 ml supernatant is used and 0.5 N NaOH to a final

volume of 1 ml. BSA is used as a standard in the range of 50-200 mg.

Reagents preparations for colour reaction:

A : 2 % Na2CO3

B : 0.5% CuSO4.5H2O

C : 1% Na-tartarate

D : A (48 ml) + B (1 ml) + C (1 ml)

The reagents are well mixed and prepared fresh each time. D (4 ml) is added to the 1 ml

sample for 10 minutes before adding 1 ml of Folin-Ciocalteus reagent diluted with water at

1:1. The absorbance reading was taken at 660 nm after 30 minutes.

Page 9: MSc Final

9

 

5.3 Dry  weight  determination  Sample of 25-50 ml from algal suspension is weighted and filtered through a Whatman GF/C

filter 47 mm in diameter was dried in an oven for 2 hours at 105  ℃ in a glass petri dish. 20 ml

of acidified water that pH 4 is used to wash the samples to remove the algae from insoluble

salts. After drying, the filter is cooled in a desiccator for 20 minutes before re-weighing.

6. Biochemistry  of  CO2  Fixation    The overall reaction of photosynthesis is when CO2 is converted into glucose with the help of

ATP by carboxylase activity of enzyme RuBisCo in Calvin Cycle.

𝐶𝑂! + 𝐻!𝑂 + 𝐿𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 → (𝐶𝐻!𝑂)! + 𝑂!                              (2)

In cyanobacteria, the photosynthesis depends on RuBisCo; which has a low affinity for CO2

(Moroney & Somanchi, 1999). Microalgae are able to overcome the problem of CO2 diffusion

by accumulating  HCO!!, which diffuses through the membrane slower than CO2. The enzyme

carbonic anhydrase is used to catalyse the CO2 for RuBisCo.

𝐶𝑂! + 𝐻!𝑂 → 𝐻𝐶𝑂!! + 𝐻!                                      (3)

An increase in pH occurs due to CO2 uptake in photosynthesis, however when pH increases,

the CO!!! increases while HCO!! and CO2 decrease which inhibits photosynthesis due to lack

of CO2. Buffer solutions such as HEPES or acid addition are normally used in culture

medium to maintain pH at a certain level.

However, for ALB experiments neither buffer solution nor acid were added because the daily

CO2 dosing into ALB was able to neutralise the pH. The location of RuBisCo for

photosynthesis type in cyanobacteria is in the carboxysomes and it has the ability to

concentrate CO2 (Moroney & Somanchi, 1999).

 

 

 

 

 

Page 10: MSc Final

10

 

 

 

Figure 1: Carboxysomes and pyrenoids in different photosynthetic organisms. (A) Electron

micrograph of the cyanobacteria Anabaena; (B) green alga C. reinhardtii; (C) diatom

Amphora; (D), Immunogold labelling of the pyrenoid of C.reinhardtii with and anti-Rubisco

antibody. Bars = 0.5 𝜇m. Cs=Carboxyme; Py=pyrenoid (Moroney & Somanchi, 1999)

Page 11: MSc Final

11

 

7. Effect  on  Spirulina  Growth  There are a many parameters that will affect the algae growth such as light intensity,

temperature, pH, growth medium, cultivation methods, and contaminations and so on.

Microalgae cultures are susceptible to contamination by other species of microalgae, viruses,

bacteria, fungi and protozoa. The effects can alter the cell structure of microalgae and

reduces its yield. However, impurities in culture are normally acceptable if microalgae

biomass is used for biofuels, waste treatment, biofertilizers and CO2 fixation (Pandey, et al.,

2014).

7.1 Effect  of  pH  For, pH, it could be a limiting factor which affects the metabolic rate of microalgae,

physiological growth and biomass production (Fagiri, et al., 2013). Spirulina is grown in huge

quantity is tropical and subtropical water source which have pH of up to 11. According to a

few journals, the optimum pH for Spirulina growth is between pH 9-10. With increased pH,

the environment will prevent auto inhibition effect on cell growth.

7.2 Effect  of  Light  Intensity  However, even though continuous supply of light promotes photosynthesis, prolonged light

exposure to high light conditions to green plant tissues will lead to photoinhibition of

Photosystem II (Bladier, et al., 1994).Thus, a decrease in yield and the rate photosynthesis

in light saturated conditions. Fluorescent lights are widely used, however new full-spectrum

fluorescent bulbs are able to close to natural light. According to Andersen (2005),

incandescent lighting should be avoided. By increasing light intensity does not means an

increase algae growth, it may be harmful to algal cells. Cultures are commonly illuminated at

30-60 𝜇𝑚𝑜𝑙  𝑚!!𝑠!! (Andersen, 2005).

7.3 Effect  of  Mass  Transfer  Hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics are important factors in factors in algae

cultivation including the overall mass transfer coefficient (kLa), mixing in reactor, gas bubble

velocity and gas holdup. The kLa depends on a few factors such as the type of sparger,

design of reactor, temperature and liquid viscosity of medium. Mass transfer coefficient for

liquid-gas film theory is presented in Figure 2. From the equation (4), mass transfer rate is

proportional to the difference between two concentrations at the interface and interfacial

area.

𝑁! = 𝐾!𝑎(𝐶! − 𝐶!)                      (4)  

Page 12: MSc Final

12

 

Figure 2: Interfacial dynamics of mass transfer for gas exchange (Al-Mashhadani, et al., 2012)

 

7.4 Effect  of  Mixing    The design of the reactor needs to have efficient mixing mechanism to retain algal cells in

suspension, ensure high cell concentration, evenly distribute nutrients, thermal stratification,

and lower probability of photoinhibition and improve gas exchange.

It was reported that mixing at induced turbulent flow in open pond system would result in

high yield of algal biomass when its nutrients and environmental condition are optimum

(Ugwu, et al., 2008). It is also known that algae productivity is higher in mixed culture

compare to unmixed under the same parameters. A proper mixing can prevent photo-

sharing in culture. Mixing can be done directly by bubbling air into the airlift system. In open

pond system, paddle wheels are used to induce turbulent flow, in some photobioreactors

have baffles for mixing in algae culture and in stirred tank, impellers were used.

Mixing can be improved by increasing aeration rate, however at high aeration rate; it could

also cause shear stress to algal cells. Therefore, fine spargers were used to produce smaller

bubbles and reduce shear stress and increase gas dispersion. However, poor mass transfer

rate can occur by reduction in contact surface when bubble coalesce during bubbling and

form interface between the liquid medium, gas and the wall of the reactor. When gas

flowrate increases, the bubble diameter and gas bubble velocity increases. The baffles are

installed inside reactors to increase gas dispersion.

Page 13: MSc Final

13

 

7.5 Effect  of  CO2  concentration  Algal cells can only tolerate CO2 up to a certain concentration and once exceeded, CO2 is

detrimental to the algal growth. Environmental stress cause by high CO2 reduces its

capacity for algal cells for carbon sequestration and culture pH will decrease due to

formation of high amount of bicarbonate buffer (Kumar , et al., 2011). Biomass productivity

increases with increasing CO2 % (v/v), however, this is only applicable to certain percentage.

Table 1 shows that at lower CO2 % (v/v), higher CO2 is sequestered in a three-stage serial

tubular photobioreactor for Spirulina. In aqueous environment, the dissolved CO2 exist in

equilibrium with H2CO3, HCO!    !     and  CO!    !! which concentration depends on pH and

temperature. According to Carvalho et al (2006), microalgal cells prefer the uptake of HCO!    !

over CO2 despite being a poor source of carbon when compared to CO2.

Table 1: CO2 sequestration capabilities for Spirulina sp. (Adapted from Kumar, et al. (2011)

Algal species % CO2 at influent (% v/v) % CO2 sequestered

Spirulina sp 6 53.29

12 45.61

 

7.6 Effect  of  O2  accumulation  During photosynthesis, water is split to oxygen and hydrogen ions in photosystem II reaction

(Figure 3). Oxygen trapped in the liquid culture is known to reduce photosynthetic efficiency

and causes toxic effect such as photo-bleaching. Therefore, an effective method to strip

oxygen from accumulation is required in reactors with poor gas exchange system. One of

the main disadvantages of using tubular photobioreactors is its inefficiency to strip O2 due to

its long tubular structure (Ugwu, et al., 2008). Stripping O2 from algal cells is a challenge that

ALB design has manage to improve on. As O2 accumulation inhibits the algae growth.

Page 14: MSc Final

14

 

Figure 3: Photosystems in chloroplast (Pearson Education, 2005)

8. Mass  Cultivation  of  Algae  using  ALB  From the experiment, high algal growth was obtained when operated at laboratory scale. In

order to apply this method in industry and to mass produce algae, a scaled up ALB is need.

However, there are challenges in up scaling ALB to pilot scale such as difficulty in providing

light source evenly, maintaining optimum temperature, proper mixing and ensure good mass

transfers. With larger a reactor, the cost of building and maintaining will also increase.

There are other additional modifications that are needed such as thermal insulation to

maintain optimum temperature, additional light source surrounding the reactor and within the

reactor. The pressure drop for the diffuser will be higher due to a higher and bigger ALB and

it will reduce its efficiency to produce bubbles at high transfer rate. The mixing mechanism

may not be effective and consideration of adding impellers to ensure a high algal biomass

yield may be needed. As volume of reactor increases, the productivity of the algal biomass

yield decreases (Ugwu, et al., 2008).

One of the main concerns is also the availability of land mass area for cultivation sites. For

Spirulina cultivation, it is not ideal to culture in outdoors as the UK weather is below its

optimum growth rate temperature unless it is insulated to maintain a certain temperature.

The temperature ranges from 1℃ to 21 ℃ in the UK (Met Office, 2014).

Page 15: MSc Final

15

 

9. Metal  Adsorption  Metal ions can be immobilized by functional groups that belongs to the proteins, lipids and

carbohydrates on the cell wall of the organism (Fang, et al., 2011) Cyanobacterium are

known to be good biosorbents for heavy metals in bioremediation. Spirulina is an effective

biosorbent and its adsorption of copper ions was discussed.

Based on the experiment conducted in Fang et al, (2011), the amount of copper ion being

adsorbed by Spirulina could be determined by adding Potassium nitrate into medium as a

supporting electrolyte. And its samples were taken from the mixture and shake for 2 hours

before centrifuging it. The centrifugation occurs at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes and the

supernatant was analysed by flame atomic absorption spectrometry.

Within this OD range it is shown that algal cells had sufficient time to adapt to copper.

Spirulina tolerance to Copper is related to the sorption by cell walls and secretion of metal

excess into the culturing medium and its conversion into the form inaccessible for cells.

(Nalimova et al, 2005).

As copper concentration in medium increases, so does the intracellular content. When

CuSO4 was added initially, its cell content increased rapidly and gradually decreases after a

few days. Copper accumulation in Spirulina cells had a biphasic character; firstly, Cu2+ was

absorbed by cell walls rapidly and binds within the cells; secondly was releasing as reduced

Copper, Cu+ in to the medium (Nalimova, et al., 2005).

10. Copper  Toxicity  on  Algae  Addition of copper affected the photosynthesis and growth rate. Copper is a micronutrient for

growth, metabolism and enzyme activities for cyanobacteria but not at high concentrations

(Cid, et al., 1995). The range of concentration depends on the microorganism tolerance to

heavy metals, pH of nutrient medium, presence of chelating agents and cell density

(Nalimova, et al., 2005). As the copper concentration increased in the medium, a decreased

in pH was observed. The toxic effect towards Spriulina is on its growth and cell death. The

cell walls of algae have functional groups such as aminic, carboxylic, thiolic, sulphydrylic and

phosphoric group that are potential for metal binding (Solisio, et al., 2006). The biosorption

intensity depends on ligands, its distribution on the cell wall and affinity for ions.

Page 16: MSc Final

16

 

There are studies conducted that shows that toxicity of metals such as copper for instance

decreases with decreasing pH (Franklin, et al., 2000). As pH increases in medium, the

number of negatively charged sites on the algal surfaces also increased (Crist, et al., 1988).

The interaction between metals and algal surfaces involves electrostatic bonding, which may

result in increased toxicity and metal adsorption. And in the author’s (Franklin, et al., 2000)

experiment, Copper was significantly more toxic to Chlorella sp. at pH 6.5 as to compare to

pH 5.7.

11. Wastewater  Treatment  using  Microalgae  Discharging wastewater to aquatic environment which contains high nutrient such as

nitrogen and phosphorus may cause eutrophication and phytoplankton blooms. It is a

serious environmental problem due to pollution and affects the marine life. For instance, the

beach in Qingdao, China was covered by thick layer of green algae due to industrial pollution

(Guardian, 2013). It suffocates marine life by blocking sunlight from entering the ocean and

absorbs oxygen in the water. Removal of nutrients and toxic metals from the wastewater to

an acceptable limit is needed. Microalgae are able to remove toxic metals, nitrogen and

phosphorus efficiently. In wastewater treatment microalgae utilizes the nutrients from

wastewaters reduce eutrophication.

Lau et al. (1995) did a lab scale batch experiment to remove nutrients from the primary

settled municipal sewage. The author used the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris to remove

nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewaters at inoculum sizes

between  1×10!  cells  ml!!  to  1×10!  cells  ml!!. The results show that the higher algal density

is able to remove over 90 % of NH!    ! and 80 % of PO!  ! over the span of 10 days. However,

the residual concentrations show a negative correlation effect on cell numbers and

chlorophyll content of the cultures. The efficiency of nutrient removal from wastewater is

directly related to the physiological activity of algae growth.

Microalgae were grown as immobilized and free cells to compare its ability to remove

nitrogen and phosphorus in batch cultures in urban wastewaters. Results from Ruiz-Marin et

al. (2010) shows that immobilized systems are better as it could facilitate separation of

biomass from treated wastewater. However, in terms of nutritional value of biomass it does

not represent advantages over free-cell system.

Page 17: MSc Final

17

 

12. Algal  Biomass  Harvest  and  Drying  The process of biomass harvest is by removing algae from growth medium. This process

can contribute to 20-30% of the total cost of biomass (Pandey, et al., 2014). Selecting the

harvesting methods depends of the properties of microalgae, its cell density, size and the

desired final product.

The common techniques to harvest algae biomass are sedimentation, flocculation, flotation,

filtration and electrophoresis. The main process in harvesting biomass is to separate

microalgae biomass from growth medium and remove excess medium and maintaining

biomass concentration. A way to reduce the total cost of biomass is by introducing the

microflotation method. This technique uses microbubbles for separation process and was

develop in the University of Sheffield.

For instance, it was observed during experiment that algae in ALB settled at the bottom after

a day due to gravity. If harvesting is required when algae is widely distributed in the reactor

the sedimentation method would not be time effective. The microflotation method is fast and

able to separate up to 99% of algae and medium within half an hour. This would reduce

production cost significantly.

Algal biomass is dried to produce desired products such as fuel, food, drug, feed, 𝛽-carotene

and polysaccharides. The drying process dehydrates the biomass and extends its shelf life.

The common methods to dry algal biomass are spray drying, drum drying, freeze dying and

sun drying (Pandey, et al., 2014).

   

Page 18: MSc Final

18

 

13. Experimental  Methods  For the extent of this experiment, emphasis on Spirulina specific growth rate and optical

density was carried out. The experiment was carried out for a month. Spirulina was grown in

closed-batch system in four ALBs. Each ALB has the capacity of 3 litres.

The experiments were carried out in Kroto lab in The University of Sheffield at room

temperature(22 ±  2℃). The growth mediums were added to the ALBs and mixed with

deionized water using 1:1 ratio. 10 ml of inoculated Spirulina were added into each ALB. The

experimental was set-up as shown in 13.3.1.

Each ALB consist of,

Growth medium : 1.25 litres

Ionize water : 1.25 litres

Algae inoculum : 10 ml

The ALBs were connect and supplied with enriched 5% CO2 supply. The CO2 supply was

bubbled in to the ALB for 30 minutes every day to provide feedstock for the algae. To study

the growth rate, the optical density of the mixed solutions was measure using a

spectrophotometer. The wavelength was set to 595 nm as this is the recommended

wavelength for algae.

The results obtained from the experiments were recorded and discussed in the later section

of this report. Along with the ALBs, Spirulina was also cultured in Erlenmeyer flasks to

compare the effects on growth rate in different methods of culturing algal. The CO2 dosing

was done at the same time of the day each time and its OD data was recorded for a more

consistent data.

While taking the OD reading, the cuvettes were wiped dry at the outer surface and gloves

were worn to ensure the surface is clear. This is to ensure that the light scattered through

the sample suspension is accurate. A new dropper was used to collect samples for each

ALD and flask each time to limit possibility of contamination. To prevent contamination

during experiment, microsol solution was used to wash and clean the ALBs thoroughly in

order to kill bacteria and ensure it is sterile before starting the experiment.

Page 19: MSc Final

19

 

Before taking the OD reading, thorough mixing was ensured in ALB culture mediums

through CO2 bubbling. For flask cultures, the flask was swirled thoroughly to ensure uniform

mixing.

Lab coat, safety goggles and gloves were worn throughout the experiment duration. When

acetaldehyde was added into ALB, safely mask was worn and the lab window was opened

for ventilation. As acetaldehyde may cause health hazards if inhaled for prolong period. At

the end of the experiments, the algae mediums from ALB were collected and stored in 1 litre

duren bottles for algal biomass harvesting using microflotation.

13.1 Materials  

13.1.1 Microalgae  

Brief description of microalgal species,

Domain : Bacteria

Phylum : Cyanobacteria

Class : Cyanophyceae

Order : Oscillatoriales

Genus : Spirulina

Figure 4: Light micrograph of Spriulina shows an open helical shape. Bar at the bottom left

represents 20 um (Vonshak, 1997)

Page 20: MSc Final

20

 

13.1.2 Medium  Recipe  

The media recipe used was BG 11 (Blue-Green Medium), which is for freshwater algae and

protozoa (Stanier, et al., 1971). The following medium was prepared in the Department of

Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Sheffield. The medium was made up to 1 litre with

deionized water. The pH was adjusted to 7.1 with 1M NaOH and the medium was

autoclaved for 2 hours at 15 psi to sterilize the medium. Some algae died when inoculated

into full-strength culture. Therefore, is a good precautious to use a diluted for cultivation. In

this experiment a 1:1 ratio of medium to water was used.

Table 2 : Media recipe for BG11

Stocks per litre

(1) NaNO3 15.0 g

per 500ml

(2) K2HPO4 2.0 g

(3) MgSO4.7H2O 3.75 g

(4) CaCl2.2H2O 1.80 g

(5) Citric acid 0.30 g

(6) Ammonium ferric citrate green 0.30 g

(7) EDTANa2 0.05 g

(8) Na2CO3 1.00 g

(9) Trace metal solution: per litre

H3BO3 2.86 g

MnCl2.4H2O 1.81 g

ZnSO4.7H2O 0.22 g

Na2MoO4.2H2O 0.39 g

CuSO4.5H2O 0.08 g

Co(NO3)2.6H2O 0.05 g

Medium per litre

Stock solution 1 100.0 ml

Stock solution 2-8 10.0 ml each

Stock solution 9 1.0 ml

Page 21: MSc Final

21

 

13.1.3 Copper  (II)  Sulphate  

The copper used in this experiment is copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (CuSO4.5H2O)

purchased from Sigma Life Science. It is in crystal salt form and needs to be dissolved prior

using it. It is over 98% purity.

Figure 5: Copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate

13.1.4 Acetaldehyde    

According SEPA (2011), acetaldehyde is a reactive substance that is mainly used as an

intermediate in the synthesis of other chemicals. It has a fruity smell at low concentration but

an unpleasant pungent smell at high concentrations. It is a volatile organic compound (VOC)

that evaporates easily and is flammable. Acetaldehyde is also toxic when applied externally

for prolonged periods, an irritant, and a probable carcinogen (U.S EPA, 1994).It has the

chemical formula of CH3CHO. The acetaldehyde purchased for this experiment is from Fluka

Analytical at over 99.5% purity.

   

Figure 6: Acetaldehyde Lewis structure      

Page 22: MSc Final

22

 

13.2 Main  Apparatus  

13.2.1 ALB    

Each ALB has a capacity of 3 L and by using the same ALB in Ying, et al. (2013), the

dimension of the ALB is 285 mm in height and 124 mm in diameter. Each ceramic diffuser

has a diameter of 78 mm and a pore size of 20 𝜇m. The gas draught tube is 170 mm in

height and diameter of 95 mm, it is hung 30 mm above the diffuser. The ceramic diffuser is

able to dose fine bubble of size 600 𝜇m. The bubble size produced is 30 times larger than its

pore size. The ALB (Figure 7) has gas draught tube inside its reactor to promote

recirculation for the bubbles and to increase mass transfer time and retention time. There is

a different design between the ceramic diffuser in ALB Control 1 and Control 2 as shown in

Figure 8. The rest of the ALB diffusers are the same as Control 2.

 

Figure 7: Structure of a 3 litre airlift loop bioreators (Ying , et al., 2013)

Figure 8: Ceramic diffuser of ALB : Control 1 (Left), Control 2 (Right)

Page 23: MSc Final

23

 

13.2.2 Spectrophotometer  (DR2800)    

This spectrophotometer was used to measure OD (Abs) of the algae in the ALBs at

wavelength 595 nm to investigate the growth behaviour for the algae in different screenings.

This was done by taking samples (2 ml) and inserts it in cuvettes. The OD of a material is a

logarithmic ratio of the radiation falling upon a material, to the radiation transmitted through a

material.

𝐴! = − log!"𝐼!𝐼!

                                     (5)

𝐴!= absorbance at certain wavelegth of light

𝐼!= Intensity of the radiatian (light) that pass through material

𝐼!= Intensity of radiation before passes through material

The purpose for measuring OD is to analyse the cell concentration. OD increases as

microalgae particles increases in suspension. The spectrophotometer measures the turbidity

of particles present in a suspension. In a spectrophotometer, a specific wavelength was

initially chosen and a cuvette filled with deionized water was used to calibrate the machine

so that the absorbance is calibrated to zero. During this process, a beam of light passes

through the water sample and the light intensity was transmitted and scattered as it passes

through the sample compartment where the cuvettes were inserted. While measuring the

algal suspension, the greater the scattered of light detected indicates that smaller light

intensity passes through the sample compartment. Thus, the sample is more turbid and

indicates the particle concentration in the suspension. The particles represent microalgal

cells.

Figure 9: Basic principle in a spectrophotometer in measuring optical density from

suspension

Light  source   Light  intensity  

Sample  compartment    

Light  transmi4ed  sca4ered     Detector  

Page 24: MSc Final

24

 

13.3 Experiment  Settings  

13.3.1 Experiment  Setting  for  ALB  

As shown in Figure 10, the ALBs are connected to the CO2 supply. Each of the connecting

pipe has an adjustable valve to adjust the flowrate of the CO2 entering the ALB. The

fluorescent lamps are adjacent to the ALBs. The spectrophotometer is in between the CO2

gas cylinder and the ALBs. The flowrate of each ALB is maintained at about 0.7 L/min which

is within the optimum range for algal culturing.

Light source is needed as a nutrient supply to promote photosynthesis for the growth of

algae. Constant light source were supplied to the ALB by using two circular lamps (28 W

each) and a tubular lamp (33 W). The fluorescent lamps were switched on constantly to

promote a linear growth of algae through the process of photosynthesis.

CO2 gas cylinder contains 5% CO2 , 95% N2 at 200 bar pressure.

 

Figure 10: Experiment set up for ALB

13.3.2 Experimental  Setting  for  Flasks  

Erlenmeyer flasks were used ranging from 500 ml to 250 ml, depending on the amount of

medium used. The flasks were located beside a light source (florescent lamp) to gain

nutrient for cell growth. The OD was taken at the same time when OD from ALB cultures

was taken. Both of the experiments were running adjacently.

Page 25: MSc Final

25

 

14. Experiments  

14.1 Experiment  I:  Growth  Rate  of  Spirulina  (Flask  Culture)  In order to cultivate Spirulina algae, a growth medium was made using the medium recipe

(BG-11) described in 13.1.2. The medium was mixed with deionized water at 1:1 ratio.

Growth medium : 200 ml

Deionized water : 200 ml

Inoculated algal : 50 ml

These ingredients were mixed in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask. The OD was recorded by taking

samples (2 ml) and measured in spectrophotometer. The OD is recorded over the span of 12

days using the equation (1) and was plotted as OD against time. Its OD was compared with

ALB to determine the relation when fine bubbling dosing is added.

14.2 Experiment  II:  Reaction  of  Spirulina  with  Acetaldehyde  

14.2.1 Flask  Culture  

The two Erlenmeyer flasks were used to test acetaldehyde with 150 ml of growth medium

added in each flask. One was made as a control and the other one was tested with

acetaldehyde with an initial concentration of 10 𝜇𝑙. The concentration was further increase to

20 𝜇𝑙 to observe the adaptability of Spirulina towards acetaldehyde. The amount of

acetaldehyde added was based on the scaled down amount of acetaldehyde added into

ALB.

For instance,

𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒  𝑖𝑛  𝐴𝐿𝐵𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒  𝑖𝑛  𝐹𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑘

=𝐴𝑐𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑑𝑒ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑒  𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑒𝑑  𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜  𝐴𝐿𝐵  𝜇𝑙

𝑥                      (6)    

x= Amount of acetaldehyde needed to be added into flask culture (𝜇𝑙)

14.2.2 With  ALB  

The algae were grown in the ALB for 3 weeks before acetaldehyde was added into the ALB.

An initial amount of 100 𝜇𝑙 were added into the ALB every day for a span of 3 days and its

optical density was being monitored.

After noticing there was no significant decline in OD, the acetaldehyde amount was increase

to subsequently 150 𝜇𝑙 and 200  𝜇𝑙.

Page 26: MSc Final

26

 

14.3 Experiment  III:  Reaction  with  Heavy  Metal,  Copper  (II)  Sulphate  

14.3.1 Flask  Culture  

The algal was tested with different concentrations of copper (II) sulphate. Three 250 ml

Erlenmeyer flasks were used. Each flask consist of 150 ml of algae medium, One was set to

be a control with no copper (II) sulphate and the other three flask were tested with

concentration at 2 mg/L and 5 mg/L. The OD was measured and monitored for 7 days at

wavelength 595 nm. The Spirulina’s growth behaviour was studied and analysed.

14.3.2 With  ALB  

The 2.5 litre ALB was tested with 2 mg/L of copper concentration initially for 4 days and

subsequently increased to 5 mg/L. To determine the adaptability of the Spirulina as higher

concentration of copper were added. The concentration was increase when there was no

significant decrease in OD value.

14.3.3 Preparation  of  Copper  concentrations  

The preparation for Cu concentrations at 2 mg/L and 5 mg/L were done by using the

equations below for pre-experiment calculations.

𝐶!𝑉! = 𝐶!𝑉!                                    (7)

𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 =𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒

                     (8)

C1 = Concentration of CuSO4 at 1 g/L

C2 = Concentration of CuSO4 desired in ALB/flask

V1 = Volume of CuSO4 required to reach desired concentration

V2 = Volume of ALB/flask

An initial concentration of 1g/L was made by measuring 1 g of CuSO4.5H2O solid using a

highly sensitive weighing balance and mixed with 1 litre of deionized water until it is

dissolved. The Copper solution was then being customized further into different

concentrations by adding different volume of Copper in different flask and ALB. A 500-

5000  𝜇𝑙 pipette was used to obtained higher accuracy measurements.

Page 27: MSc Final

27

 

Table 3: Amount of CuSO4 at 1 g/L added into ALB to achieve desired concentraton

Desired Concentration

(mg/l)

Amount inserted into 2.5

litre ALB (ml)

Amount inserted into 150

ml flask (ml)

2 5.0 0.3

5 12.5 0.75

14.4 Microflotation  Microflotation is an important process in culturing algae. It is an economical and effective

way to harvest algae biomass. Metallic salts were used to coagulate the algae into flocs. The

microbubbles were produced using a fluidic oscillator and diffused into the ALB. After 30

minutes, there was a clear separation between the algae biomass and its growth medium.

The algae biomass is then harvested by draining the medium by opening a valve at the

bottom of the reactor.

14.5 Preliminary  Experiment  for  Metal  Adsorption  The following experiment was carried out to determine the copper adsorption in Spirulina.

The aim was to determine the tolerance of cyanobacterium to copper for accumulation in this

heavy metal in its algal cells.

The experiment was carried out in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask. 150 ml of Spirulina with an

initial OD of 0.04 and 2 mg/L of copper was added to the flask. The absorbance for copper

used is 650 nm. The OD was monitored for 2 hours for any changes in OD with reading

taken every 15 minutes. The results showed that there were no changes in OD.

This method was proven to be not feasible due to failure to show the relation of copper being

adsorb in Spirulina. There are several factors why the experiment did not succeed such as

low density of Spirulina could not adsorb copper at that concentration. The suspension was

not separate and perhaps spectrophotometer was unable to detect its optimal wavelength.

An improvement would be to use a filter paper first to separate the algal biomass before

taking its OD or centrifuged the suspension beforehand and test it. A higher algae

concentration should be used as it has higher tolerance to copper toxicity.

The Langmuir adsorption model can be used to quantify the amount of adsorbate (copper)

adsorbed on an adsorbent (Spirulina) as a function of concentration at a specific

temperature. The Langmuir equation can be use is in linearized form as Ce/qe plotted against

Ce, a straight line shows that sorption is a monolayer.

Page 28: MSc Final

28

 

The process of metal biosorption is fast and equilibrium could be reached within an hour.

The overall adsorption process is best described by pseudo-order kinetics (Keskinkan, et al.,

2004); the process was done using aquatic plants, which contains the process of biosorption

and bioaccumulation. The biosorption binds the metal and is initially fast and a reversible

process. The bioaccumulation is a slow, irreversible and ion-sequestration step. According to

Keskinkan et al. (2004), pH value at slightly below 6 is suitable for metal adsorption by C.

demersum at slight acidic environment and equilibrium was achieved within 20 minutes of

contact time. The kinetics of adsorption can be separated to stages of mass transfer,

sorption of ions onto sites and intraparticles diffusions.

Pseudo second-order equation (Keskinkan, et al., 2004):

𝑡𝑞!=

12×𝐾!×𝑞!! +

𝑡𝑞!                                    (9)

qe =mass of metal adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g)

qt =mass of metal adsorbed at time t (mg/g)

K’ =pseudo second-order rate constant of adsorption (g/mg min) (copper = 0.183 g/mg min)

   

Page 29: MSc Final

29

 

15. Results  and  Discussions  

15.1 Initial  Observation  Initially, the growth medium’s colour was transparent due to the minute amount of inoculum

(10 ml) being inserted into the ALB (2.5 L). After two weeks of CO2 bubbling, the medium

started to show visible Spirulina growth. It was deduced that only small amount of inoculum

was required to grow algae due to its fast growing tendency. The growth medium used was

suitable in this experiment as there was an increased in OD over time. Another possible

explanation could be also due to the CO2 supply had lowered the pH level, and affected the

growth rate initially. As the suitable pH to grow Spirulina is pH 9. The pH was tested after

CO2 bubbling and all four ALB medium had an average of pH 5.9. The acidic environment

due to the bubbling had inhibited the Spirulina growth. Therefore, by stopping dosing of

enriched CO2 for 4 days into the ALB, it enables the medium pH to increase to pH 9 which is

the ideal range to grow Spirulina and the green algal were visible in the ALB.

Even though same amount of inoculum were inserted into the ALBs, however the growth

rate differs. It is possible that the diffusers and pressure drop of each ALB had affected the

Spirulina growth rate. The cultivation of microalgae through bubbling enriched CO2 into the

ceramic diffusers in ALB has a gas transfer efficiency of only 13%-20% (Ying et al. 2013).

The CO2 supply enhanced the algal metabolism rate and acts as a buffer solution to

neutralize the increased pH due to Spirulina growth. As Spirulina OD increases, it is visual

that the colour of the culture became denser and dark green colour. The light source

became a limiting factor to the culture in ALB. As time passes and Spirulina continues to

grow, photo-shading will occur in the microalgal cells.

15.2 Flask  Culture  compare  with  ALB  Based on the Experiment I results, it is deduced that the growth rate of Spirulina is faster in

the ALB as to compare to the cultivated Spirulina in a flask. Despite that the flask culture had

a higher OD initially, the ALB control group manage to surpasses in Spirulina growth as

shown in Figure 11. A linear growth was observed in all three cultures. This is due to the

continuous photosynthesis reaction from the 24 hours light source being supplied. The

enriched CO2 supply enhances the growth rate of Spirulina due to high mass transfer rate of

CO2 dosing. The flask result indicates that without the enhanced CO2 bubbling, microalgae is

still able to grow but at a slower rate. It can still receive nutrients from CO2 from the

atmosphere through simple gas diffusion from the medium surface.

Page 30: MSc Final

30

 

 Figure 11: Optical density of Spirulina compared between control groups of ALB and flask

Table 4: Optical density reading taken in the span of 12 days at absorbance 595 nm

Day Control 1 Control 2 Flask Culture

0 0.04 0.06 0.09

1 0.07 0.05 0.10

2 0.15 0.09 0.11

5 0.28 0.14 0.16

6 0.37 0.18 0.14

7 0.37 0.23 0.13

8 0.38 0.26 0.18

9 0.39 0.28 0.23

12 0.57 0.37 0.30

   

0  

0.1  

0.2  

0.3  

0.4  

0.5  

0.6  

0   2   4   6   8   10   12  

Op#

cal  den

sity  (A

bs)  a

t  595  nm  

Time  (days)  

Flask  

Control  1  

Control  2  

Page 31: MSc Final

31

 

15.3 ALBs  Comparisons    The Spirulina algae were cultured simultaneously and its reading was taken at the same

time to ensure a consistent data collection. Even though the flowrate the flowrate of CO2

being bubbled into the each ALB was different and may be the limiting factor of the

difference of Spirulina growth in each ALB.

Table 5: Optical density of Spirulina at 595 nm in ALB

Day Control 1 Acetaldehyde Copper Control 2

0 0.04 0.17 0.11 0.06

1 0.07 0.21 0.27 0.05

2 0.15 0.32 0.39 0.09

5 0.28 0.45 0.46 0.14

6 0.37 0.55 0.58 0.18

7 0.37 0.61 0.66 0.23

8 0.38 0.63 0.67 0.26

9 0.39 0.65 0.74 0.28

12 0.57 0.71 0.78 0.37

13 0.66 0.70 0.82 0.43

14 0.74 0.73 0.85 0.48

15 0.80 0.80 0.76 0.53

19 0.96 0.73 0.72 0.62

20 1.01 0.71 0.85 0.63

21 1.03 0.57 0.87 0.68

22 1.10 0.46 0.92 0.70

23 1.02 0.45 0.78 0.76

Page 32: MSc Final

32

 

 

Figure 12: The growth comparisons between control groups, Spirulina added with

acetaldehyde and Spirulina added with CuSO4 over the span of 23 days in ALBs

15.3.1 Control  groups  

The growth of Spirulina in Control 1 exceeds Control 2 by approximately 25 %. Figure 12

shows that a linear growth on both controls. Two sets of control were used to provide

consistent data, however Spirulina in Control 1 has a significantly faster growth rate. There

are various factors that could contribute to a difference in growth such as CO2 mass transfer,

O2 accumulation and proper mixing in ALB. When difference of growth concentration is

higher, a higher mass transfer rate is deduced. It could be said that mass transfer rate in

Control 1 ALB is higher or diffusion of CO2 gas into medium was more efficient due to evenly

distributed bubble size.

0  

0.2  

0.4  

0.6  

0.8  

1  

1.2  

0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23  

Op#

cal  den

sity  (A

bs)  a

t  595nm

 

Time  (Days)  

Control  1  

Acetaldehyde  

Copper  

Control  2  

100  𝜇𝑙    150  𝜇𝑙  

2  mg/L  5  mg/L  

200  µμl      

Page 33: MSc Final

33

 

15.3.2 Spirulina  with  added  acetaldehyde  

A fixed amount 100 𝜇𝑙 of acetaldehyde was added daily from Day 7 to Day 12. After

monitoring that there were no significant changes in algal growth. The dosage was increased

to 150 𝜇𝑙 from Day 12 to Day 15. The growth rate decreased the most when 200 𝜇𝑙 were

added daily from Day 19 to Day 22 as shown in Figure 12.

Spirulina was able to acclimatise to the addition of 100 𝜇𝑙 and 150 𝜇𝑙 from Day 7 to Day 12.

However, when 200 𝜇𝑙 were added on Day 19, there was a rapid decreased in OD indicating

that the growth rate of Spirulina decreases. The high concentration of acetaldehyde may

have affected the photosynthesis rate and inhibited growth. It is shown that at this

acetaldehyde concentration, it is toxic to Spirulina.

15.3.3 Spirulina  with  added  CuSO4  

The ALB that was added with 2 mg/L from Day 12 to Day 15 and subsequently to 5 mg/L

from Day 19 to Day 22. When added with CuSO4, the growth of Spirulina was affected and

growth rate slowed down as some algae cell growth were inhibited. As presented in Table 5.

However, the OD did not reach a plateau as to compare with the flask culture (Figure 14)

The Spirulina OD was the highest initially but was surpassed by Control 1 at Day 15. As to

compare to Control 1, growth was reduced by about 20 %.

15.4 Flask  Cultures  

15.4.1 Spirulina  with  added  CuSO4  

After a day, it was noticed that the colour of the growth medium for 2 mg/L and 5 mg/L

turned from lime green to pale green colour in Figure 13. The sponges were used to prevent

the medium from contamination such as dusts and bacteria from contacting with the medium.

It shows that the OD decreased initially and remained plateau after that, which indicates that

the Spirulina’s growth was inhibited. A pH meter was used to measure the pH of the three

flasks and it was observed that the pH readings at Day 3 were presented in Table 6.

Table 6: The pH and colour obseration of the flask cultures when added with CuSO4

Spirulina with added CuSO4 pH Colour observation at Day 2

Control 9.2 Lime green

2 mg/L 6.7 Pale green

5 mg/L 6.3 Pale green

Page 34: MSc Final

34

 

Figure 13: The colour difference of medium between the 3 flask cultures after a day

It shows that at pH was below the optimum growth range for Spirulina could not survive as

To determine whether the concentration of algae was a limiting factor, another set of

experiment was conducted at CuSO4 concentration of 2 mg/L in the flask. The starting OD

was at 0.57 abs, which was higher by more than two-folds compared to first experiement.

The culture medium colour changes from vibrate green to almost colourless over the span of

3 days. Even at a higher algal concentration, the algae growth was inhibited. This could be

explained that the Spirulina only can growth within certain range of pH and the pH was

proven to be too acidic for Spirulina to survive. On the contrary, in ALB Spirulina was able to

survive despite lower pH reading was measured.

Only the control group showed an increase in OD, the rest of the flasks that were added with

different concentrations of CuSO4 had inhibited Spirulina growth. The flask cultures could not

acclimatise at the selected CuSO4 concentrations. However, the same concentration was

added into the ALB and the results indicated that the Spirulina was able to acclimatise at the

given concentration and still increase in OD. Despite having a gradual growth, the growth

rate of Spirulina with added CuSO4 was still lower as to compare with the two ALB controls.

Page 35: MSc Final

35

 

Table 7: Optical density for Spirulina at different CuSO4 concentrations

Day Optical density at 595 nm (Abs)

Control 2 mg/L 5 mg/L 2 mg/L

0 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.57

1 0.27 0.22 0.23 0.53

2 0.28 0.24 0.23 0.53

3 0.36 0.23 0.23 0.49

 

Figure 14: The effect of CuSO4 on Spirulina growth

15.4.2 Spirulina  with  added  acetaldehyde  

Both OD of Spirulina control and with acetaldehyde were recorded and presented in Figure

15 and Table 8 for over the span of 10 days. The results show that the Spirulina with added

acetaldehyde had a slightly slower growth rate than the control. The growth rate of Spirulina

was inhibited by an average of 15% when added with acetaldehyde.

10 𝜇𝑙 of acetaldehyde were added on Day 0 to Day 2. The amount was increased to 20 𝜇𝑙

and added on Day 6 till Day 10. The Spirulina was able to acclimatise despite the increased

amount of acetaldehyde. The pH was taken using a pH meter and reading shows that the

control was pH 9.5 and the Spirulina with added acetaldehyde was pH 9.3. Both pH reading

were within the optimum range for Spirulina growth.

0.2  

0.25  

0.3  

0.35  

0.4  

0.45  

0.5  

0.55  

0.6  

0   1   2   3  

Op#

cal  den

sity  (A

bs)  a

t  595  nm  

Time  (Days)  

Control  5  mg/L  2  mg/L  2  mg/L  

Page 36: MSc Final

36

 

For a scaled down version of comparison between ALB and flask culture, the 20 𝜇𝑙

acetaldehyde in flask (150 ml) was a higher dose as to compare to 200 𝜇𝑙 (2.5 L) in ALB.

However, there were no observations on growth declining. The pH was the limitting factor in

this experiment.

Figure 15: Comparison between control and Spirulina added with acetaldehyde

Table 8: Optical density data of Control and Spirulina added with acetaldehyde

Day Control Acetaldehyde Acetaldehyde added

0 0.22 0.22 10 (𝜇𝑙)

1 0.23 0.22 10 (𝜇𝑙)

2 0.27 0.25 10 (𝜇𝑙)

6 0.45 0.42 20 (𝜇𝑙)

7 0.48 0.53 20 (𝜇𝑙)

8 0.56 0.52 20 (𝜇𝑙)

9 0.61 0.57 20 (𝜇𝑙)

10 0.65 0.60 20 (𝜇𝑙)

0.1  

0.2  

0.3  

0.4  

0.5  

0.6  

0.7  

0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  

Op#

cal  den

sity  (A

bs)  a

t  595  nm  

Time  (Days)  

Control  

Acetaldehyde  

10  μl      

20  μl      

Page 37: MSc Final

37

 

15.5 Specific  Growth  Rate  The growth rate of Spirulina is through simple cell division. Its specific growth rate (𝜇) is

calculated using the following equation (Vonshak, 1997):

𝜇 =ln 𝑥! − ln 𝑥!𝑡! − 𝑡!

                         (10)

Where 𝑥! and 𝑥!  are biomass concentrations and at time intervals 𝑡!and  𝑡!.

The specific growth rate (𝜇) was plotted between the four ALBs and compares. It can be

seen that initially growth rate was high and it gradually decreases. It could be due to

photoinhibition when concentration of algal biomass increases. The negative values indicate

that the concentration measured had reduced and there were no algal growth during this

period.

Figure 16: The specific growth rate for the ALBs over the span of 23 days.

-­‐0.3  

-­‐0.1  

0.1  

0.3  

0.5  

0.7  

0.9  

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16  

Specific  grow

th  ra

te  (𝜇

)  

Data  frequency  in  23  days  

Control  1  Acetaldehyde  Copper  Control  2  

Page 38: MSc Final

38

 

 

Figure 17: The comparison between addition of CO2 dosing and without it across 12 days.

10 % error bar added.

Figure 18: Specific growth rates between ALBs over the span of 23 days. 10 % error bar

added.

0  

0.05  

0.1  

0.15  

0.2  

0.25  

0.3  

ALB  1   ALB  2   Flask  

Specific  grow

th  ra

te  (𝜇

)  

Control  groups  

0  

0.02  

0.04  

0.06  

0.08  

0.1  

0.12  

0.14  

0.16  

0.18  

Control  1    Acetaldehyde    Copper    Control  2  

Specific  grow

th  ra

te  (𝜇

)        

ALB  

Page 39: MSc Final

39

 

Figure 19: Specific growth rate between control and added CuSO4 in ALBs. 5 % eror bar

added.

 

Figure 20: Specific growth rate between control and added acetaldehyde in ALBs. 5% error

bar was added.

-­‐0.05  

0  

0.05  

0.1  

0.15  

0.2  

0   2   5  

Specific  grow

th  ra

te  (𝜇)  

Copper  concentra#on  in  medium  (mg/L)  

Copper  

Control  2  

-­‐0.8  

-­‐0.7  

-­‐0.6  

-­‐0.5  

-­‐0.4  

-­‐0.3  

-­‐0.2  

-­‐0.1  

0  

0.1  

0.2  

0   100   150   200  

Specific  grow

th  ra

te  (𝜇

)  

Amount  of  acetaldehyde  added  (𝜇l)  

Acetaldehyde  

Control  2  

Page 40: MSc Final

40

 

Figure 21: Specific growth rate between control and added acetaldehyde in flasks. 5 % error

bar was added.

Figure 22: Specific growth rate between control and added CuSO4 in flasks. 10 % error bar

was added.

-­‐0.05  

0  

0.05  

0.1  

0.15  

0.2  

0.25  

10   10   20   20   20   20   20  

Specific  grow

th  ra

te  (𝜇

)  

Acetaldehyde  added  into  flask  (𝜇l)  

Control  

Acetaldehyde  

-­‐0.1  

-­‐0.05  

0  

0.05  

0.1  

0.15  

0   2   5   2  

Specific  grow

th  ra

te  (𝜇

)    

Copper  concentra#on  in  medium  (mg/L)  

Page 41: MSc Final

41

 

Figure 17 clearly shows that with CO2 sparging, the specific growth rate is higher by about 2

and 1.5 folds. All three groups started at low OD of 0.04-0.09 Abs at 595 nm.

For Figure 18, each measurement, the initial and final values of algal concentration were

used over the span of the whole experiment duration. The overall specific growth rate of the

algae in ALBs with 10% error bars was inserted. This calculation method is least accurate

compare to calculating each specific growth rate per day and compare. Therefore, error bars

with a higher percentage were used. The specific growth rate is the highest in Control 1 and

followed by Control 2, Copper and Acetaldehyde. The growth rate of the control groups was

higher because it was not inhibited by toxic chemicals.

In Figure 19, the ALB Copper specific growth rate was compared with Control 2 to able to

see a clearer difference when Spriulina was added with heavy metal. It shows that despite a

gradual increase in OD the 𝜇 decreases upon addition of copper and have negative  𝜇. In

Figure 20 the ALB Acetaldehyde shows a positive growth rate with added of acetaldehyde

except when the dose was increase to 200  𝜇𝑙. Error bar of 5% was inserted.

In Figure 21, the acetaldehyde acclimation of when 𝜇 between ALB and flask were

compared, the flask has a higher specific growth rate than ALB. Which indicate that pH is the

limiting factor. The pH in flask was closer to the optimum range. Another explanation could

also be that the OD in ALB is 3 folds higher than flask, and with populated density, growth

rate decreases.

As seen in Figure 22, the OD value showed little or no increase when added with copper

concentration and the 𝜇 were all negative over the span of 3 days. The error bars at 10%

were added. At the same CuSO4 concentration (2 mg/L) added but with different initial OD, it

showed that specific growth rate with higher OD has a more negative 𝜇. The population

density is higher when higher OD is detected. A negative specific growth rate indicates that

there is a decline in growth rate algal cells.

To have a better comparison on 𝜇, Control 2 was chosen to compare the 𝜇 along with ALB

Copper and ALB Acetaldehyde instead of Control 1 because its initial 𝜇 value was closer to

the two ALBs 𝜇  value than Control 1. The average 𝜇 for both Control and Acetaldehyde in

flask were similar over the span of 10 days. The amount chosen at 10 𝜇𝑙 and 20 𝜇𝑙 to be

added in flask was because it is a scaled down value from the added acetaldehyde amount

in ALB.

Page 42: MSc Final

42

 

15.6 Further  Discussions  By connecting ALB with fine-bubbling CO2 (600 𝜇m), a high mass transfer rate of CO2

dissolution and O2 stripping was achieved. When photosynthesis occurs, O2 was produced

as a by-product in the algal cells and it inhibits the uptake of CO2. By stripping the O2,

Spirulina had a higher growth rate as to compare to the flask culture. Another reason for

having a higher growth rate in ALBs than flask cultures is because of its ability to have pH

control. After CO2 dosing, the ALBs were able to maintain at low pH at 5.9 due to the as CO2

is acidic. However, the next day the pH increased to pH 8 in the culture. This cycle ensured

that the pH was kept within a desirable range and not a limiting factor to the Spirulina growth.

In the flasks cultures, pH in the medium increases as Spirulina grows and may affect the

growth rate by getting slower if it increases beyond the optimum pH range.

In CuSO4 Spriulina experiment, the pH measured in the flasks (pH 6.7, pH 6.3) were higher

than the ALB (pH 5.9); the copper might be more toxic to Spirulina in the flasks. Copper may

interfere with cell permeability or the binding of essential metals, it may transport into the

chloroplast and react with –SH enzyme groups and free thiols, disrupting enzyme active

sites and cell division (Cid, et al., 1995). Therefore, the Spirulina did not survive in the flasks

culture as photosynthesis and growth were inhibited due to copper toxicity.

In the ALB, the concentration-respond curve for CuSO4 was flat over the range of 2 mg/L to

5 mg/L indicating that this is still within the threshold level for Spirulina as it had minute effect

on its growth rate. It is possible that this flat area of the concentration-response curve may

be due to detoxification of Copper by algal cells. In certain freshwater algal species such as

Chlorella fusca is able to produce organic substances that reduce the bioavailable copper

concentration if it is released extracellular in sufficient amounts (Franklin, et al., 2000).

Therefore, the Spirulina in ALB was able to reduce the copper concentration. The heavy

metal accumulation in its cells affects the Spirulina growth.

For flask culture control, there were absences of CO2 supply as nutrient and also an

accumulation of O2 over time which explains the slower growth rate compared to ALB control.

Before bubbling, the algal cells were settled down at the bottom of the ALB. The

accumulation of algal cells reduces its total surface area over volume and its exposure to

light source. During bubbling, the algal cells were thoroughly mixed and it minimized the

tendency of algal cells to accumulate and also increases its surface area.

Page 43: MSc Final

43

 

As the optical density increases, it is observed that the colour of the culture became denser

and a dark green medium was observed. Spirulina concentration increases, the growth rate

slowed down towards Day X onwards as to compare to initial growth rate. As the

concentration increases, the algal cells did not received the same amount of light and CO2

source as initially due to its saturated environment. Algal growth increases proportionally

with light intensity when it is below saturation point, at above saturation point, photoinhibition

may occur.

Erlenmeyer flasks were used instead of ALB even though growth of Spirulina could be

carried out in ALB without any CO2 supply. However, Spirulina algal particles tend to settle

at the bottom of the ALB after a day; there were constraints in measuring the OD as the ALB

without gas bubbling was too bulky to ensure a thorough mixing manually before taking its

OD reading.

There are very few research has been done regarding methods of acetaldehyde removal

from flue gas using microalgae. The mechanism of how acetaldehyde reacts in microalgae

cells is still unclear. Similar experiment was done with a different algae strain Chlorella sp. in

the same department and it showed that the growth rate of Chlorella increases when added

with acetaldehyde. Different algal strains will have different reaction towards this toxic

pollutant. The decrease in OD for Spirulina at 200 𝜇𝑙 is due to acetaldehyde toxicity and

inhibition in photosynthesis.

It was suggested by Slatyer, et al. (1983) that acetaldehyde can be used as an inhibitor in

experiments designed to separate electron flow through the photosystems from the fixation

of CO2 and N2 in cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindria. In the author’s experiment,

acetaldehyde concentration of 50 mM prevented cell growth in the cyanobacterium and

resulted in death. There was no significant effect of acetaldehyde on CO2 fixation. A study of

acetaldehyde toxicity was conducted by Brank and Frank, (1998) on freshwater green algae

Chlamydomonas reinhardti. The lowest values of toxicity are 23 mg/L obtained as the 2-hr

EC5 in photosynthetic inhibition.

One of the theory may be that acetaldehyde is converted to acetate to provide as a nutrient

for Spirulina growth. Therefore, Spirulina was able to grow continuously. However, there is

no further research regarding this mechanism. It is known that at anaerobic conditions,

pyruvate degradation in green alga Chlorogonium elongatum forms acetate and ethanol

(Kreuzberg, 1985) as shown in Figure 23.

Page 44: MSc Final

44

 

 

Figure 23: Scheme of the proposed formate dermentation pathway for anaerobic pyruvate

degradation in C. elongatum (Kreuzberg, 1985)

Page 45: MSc Final

45

 

16. Limitations  Ideally, this method is able to cultivate Spirulina successful. However to mass produce

Spirulina poses challenges such as scaled up ALB to pilot-scale for industry application. The

cost analysis needs to be conducted to determine if this method is cheaper and sustainable

compare to conventional culturing methods for large scale production. The microflotation

methods were unable to be carried out in the lab due damages in the reactor used for

microflotation. The parameter used was not the optimal values. Therefore, there is a need to

adjust it so that the culture medium in ALB is able to maintain at pH 9 and temperature of

35  ℃ to compare if growth rate would be significantly higher.

17. Conclusions  

For ALB experiments, the result from this study demonstrated the feasibility of cultivating

Spirulina sp. in the three different growth conditions. Spirulina sp.could adapt well in all three

culture mediums (control, acetaldehyde and copper) in ALB with no lag phases observed

except when higher concentration of acetaldehyde was added. The high acetaldehyde

content could not support a productive algal growth by inhibiting photosynthesis system.

Algal growth was significantly enhanced in ALB because of its additional nutrient from CO2

bubbling and also a thoroughly mixing from bubbling enables high mass transfer rate of

dissolved CO2 to medium. The copper ions were able to be removed efficient by Spirulina

growth as there was no inhibited. The pH conditions and nutrients were able to sustain a

linear growth despite copper toxicity in cells occurs.

For flask cultures, the copper concentrations were proven to be toxic for Spirulina which

resulted cell death after one day. The acetaldehyde on the other hand, was shown to have

little effect on the growth for Spirulina.

The ALB method using fine bubbles was proven to be a successful method to cultivate

Spirulina for fast growth rate. It also shows that Spirulina is able to grow in this lab conditions

by using diluted growth medium and constant light exposure that promotes linear growth.

Page 46: MSc Final

46

 

18. Future  works  

18.1 Determine  the  Protein  content  It is known that Spirulina is rich in protein source. There is an interest to study if the addition

of copper and acetaldehyde will affect the protein content. This experiment could be done

using the chemical procedure to determine protein mentioned in Vonshak (1997).

18.2 Reaction  of  acclimatised  Spirulina  with  Acetaldehyde  The experiment will be conducted in two ALBs with Spirulina that was previously cultured

with addition of acetaldehyde. One ALB will act as a control and the other one will be added

with acetaldehyde at 100  𝜇𝑙. In theory, both growth rates would be at the same. As the

Spirulina has already acclimatised in that particular concentration, it should not affect its

growth rate.

18.3 Microbubbles  Another interest is to compare the growth rate when microbubbles (300  𝜇m) is used instead

of fine bubbles. The ALB will be connected with a fluidic oscillator to produce microbubbles.

The pH and temperature measured in ALB was lower than the optimum conditions.

Therefore, there is an interest to compare if there is a huge difference in the growth rate and

adaptability for copper and acetaldehyde in optimum conditions and the current condition.

Page 47: MSc Final

47

 

19. Acknowledgement  First and foremost, I would like to thank Prof. Will Zimmerman for giving me the opportunity

to be a part of this research group. Indeed it was a privilege, I have learnt so much for the

past year and I have developed a deeper understanding about this topic. I would like to also

thank Dr. James Hanotu for guiding me throughout this research project and pushing me

when I needed it. And to Mr. YuZhen Shi for helping me with my experiment by going

through the trouble of preparing the growth mediums, setting up and acquiring the Spirulina

algae. The little conversations that we had were very helpful towards my understanding

about algae and the culturing techniques. To Mr Tom Holmes, who was always in the lab

and provided me with advice and help on the spot. To my dear friends and course mates,

whom encouraged me to persevere and try my best during this period, I thank you very

much for the support. Lastly, thank you The University of Sheffield and especially the people

in Chemical and Biological Engineering department, thank you for making my time as a

student here nothing but wonderful.

   

Page 48: MSc Final

48

 

20. Reference        Andersen, R. A., 2005. Algal Culturing Technique. 1st ed. London : Elsevier.

Belay, A., Ota, Y., Miyakawa, K. & Shimamatsu, H., 1993. Current knowledge on potential health benefits of Spirulina. Journal of Applied Phycology, Issue 5, pp. 253-241.

Bladier, C., Carrier, P. & Chagvardieff, P., 1994. Light stress and Oxidative Cell Damage in Photoautotrophic Cell Suspension of Euphorbia characias L.. Plant Physiol., Volume 106, pp. 941-947.

Brack , W. & Frank, H., 1998. Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a tool for the investigation of toxic effects in the photosynthetic apparatus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., Volume 40, pp. 34-41.

Carvalho, A. P., Meireles, L. & Malcata, F. X., 2006. Microalgal Reactors: a review of enclosed system designs and performances. Biotechnol. Prog, Volume 22, pp. 1290-1506.

Cid, A., Herrero, C., Torres, E. & Abalde , J., 1995. Copper toxicity on the marine microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum: effects on phoyosynthesis and related parameters. Aquatic Toxicology, Volume 31, pp. 165-174.

Crist, R. H. et al., 1988. Interaction of metals and protons with algae. Environmental Science Technology, Volume 22, pp. 755-760.

Fagiri, Y. M. A., Salleh, A. & El-Nagerabi, S. A. F., 2013. Impact of physico-chemical parameters on the physiological growth of Arthrospira (Spirulina platensis) exogenous strain UTEXLB2340. African Journal of Biotechnology, 35(12), pp. 5458-5465.

Fang, L. et al., 2011. Binding characteristics of copper and cadmiun by cyanobacterium Spirulina. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 190(1-3), pp. 810-815.

Franklin, N. M., Stauber, J. L., Markich, S. J. & Lim , R. P., 2000. pH-dependent toxicity of copper and uranium to a tropical freshwater alga (Chlorella sp.). Aquatic Toxicology, Volume 48, pp. 275-289.

Guardian, 2013. China's largest algal bloom turns the Yellow Sea green. [Online] Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jul/04/china-algal-bloom-yellow-sea-green [Accessed 25 August 2014].

Gupta, V. & Ali, I., 2000. Utilisation of bagasse fly ash (a sugar industry waste) for the removal of copper and zinc from wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 18(2), pp. 131-140.

Hui, K., Chao, C. & Kot, S., 2005. Removal of mixed heavy metal ions in wastewater by zeolite 4A and residual products from recycled coal fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 127(1-3), pp. 89-101.

Page 49: MSc Final

49

 

Keskinkan, O., Goksu, M., Basibuyuk, M. & Forster, C., 2004. Heavy metal adsorption properties of a submerged aquatic plant (Ceratophyllum demersum). Bioresource Technology, Volume 92, pp. 197-200.

Kreuzberg, K., 1985. Pyruvate degradation via pyruvate formate-lyase (EC 2.3.1.54) and the enzymes of formate fermentation in the green alga Chlorogonium elongatum. Planta, Volume 163, pp. 60-67.

Kumar , K. et al., 2011. Development of suitable photobioreactor for CO2 sequestration addressing global warming using green algae and cyanobacteria. Bioresource Technology, Volume 102, pp. 4945-4953.

Lau, P. S., Tam, N. & Wong, Y. S., 1995. Effect of algal density on nutrient removal from primary settled wastewater. Environmental Pollution, 89(1), pp. 59-66.

Met Office, 2014. UK Climate Summaries. [Online] Available at: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries [Accessed 24 August 2014].

Moroney, J. V. & Somanchi, A., 1999. How Do Algae Concentrate CO2 to Increase the Efficiency of Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation. Plant Physiology, Volume 119, pp. 9-16.

Nalimova, A. A., Popova , V. V., Tsoglin, L. N. & Pronina, N. A., 2005. The Effects of Copper and Zinc on Spirulina platensis Growth and Heavy Metal Accumulatio in Its Cells. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 52(2), pp. 229-234.

Pandey, A., Lee, D. J., Chisti, Y. & Soccol , C. R., 2014. Biofuels From Algae. 1st ed. San Diego: Elsevier.

Pearson Education, 2005. Pearson Benjamin Cummings. [Online] Available at: http://legacy.owensboro.kctcs.edu/gcaplan/bio/notes/07_08aPhotosElectronFlow_L.jpg [Accessed 20 August 2014].

Ruiz-Marin, A., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G. & Stephenson, T., 2010. Growth and nutrient removal in free and immobilized green algae in batch and semi-continuous cultures treating real wastewater. Elsevier, 101(1), pp. 58-64.

Slatyer, B., Daday, A. & Smith, G. D., 1983. The effects of acetaldehyde on nitrogenase, hydrogenase and photosynthesis in the cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindrica. Biochem. J., Volume 212, pp. 755-758.

Solisio, C. et al., 2006. Copper removal by dry and re-hydrated biomass of Spirulina platensis. Bioresource Technology, Volume 97, pp. 1756-1760.

Stanier, R., Kunisawa, R., Mandel, M. & Cohen-Bazire , G., 1971. Purification and properties of univellular blue-grean algae (Order Chroococcales). Bacteriol Rev, 35(2), pp. 171-205.

U.S EPA, 1994. Chemical Summary For Acetaldehyde. [Online] Available at: http://www.epa.gov/chemfact/s_acetal.txt [Accessed 13 August 2014].

Page 50: MSc Final

50

 

Ugwu, C. U., Aoyagi, H. & Uchiyama, H., 2008. Photobioreactors for mass cultivation of algae. Bioresource Technology, Volume 99, pp. 4021-4028.

Vonshak, A., ed., 1997. Spirulina: Growth, Physiology and Biochemistry. In: Spirulina Platensis Arthrospira: Physiology, Cell-Biology And Biotechnology. London: Taylor & Francis, p. 43.

Wan Ngah, W. & Hanafiah, M., 2008. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: A review. Bioresource Technology, 99(10), pp. 3935-3948.

Ying , K., Gilmour, D. J., Shi , Y. & Zimmerman, W., 2013. Growth Enhancement of Dunaliella salina by Microbubble Induced Airlift Loop Bioreactor (ALB)—The Relation between Mass Transfer and Growth Rate. Scientific Research, Volume 1, pp. 1-9.