mrs submissions (volume 6 of 6)

April 2016

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

Submissions 463 – 628

Volume 6 of 6

City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe,

Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove



Submissions 463 - 628

Volume 6 of 6

City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe,

Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove

April 2016

Disclaimer This document has been published by the Western Australian Planning Commission. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the government, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. © State of Western Australia Internet: www.wa.gov.au Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission, 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 2506 Perth WA 6001 MRS Amendment 1210/41 - Submissions 463 – 628 Volume 6 of 6 File 809-2-1-91 Pt 2 Published April 2016 Internet: www.planning.wa.gov.au Email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 655 19000 Fax: (08) 655 19001 National Relay Service: 13 36 77 Infoline: 1800 626 477 This document is available in alternative formats on application to Communications Services.

Introduction to Metropolitan Region Scheme major amendments The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for keeping the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) under review and initiating changes where they are seen as necessary. The MRS sets out the broad pattern of land use for the whole Perth metropolitan region. The MRS is constantly under review to best reflect regional planning and development needs. A proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the MRS is regulated by the Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for public submissions to be made on proposed amendments. For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section 41 of the Act), the WAPC considers all the submissions lodged, and publishes its recommendations in a report on submissions. This report is presented to the Minister for Planning and to the Governor for approval. Both Houses of Parliament must then scrutinise the amendment before it can take legal effect. In the process of making a substantial amendment to the MRS, information is published as a public record under the following titles: Amendment report This document is available from the start of the public advertising period of the proposed amendment. It sets out the purpose and scope of the proposal, explains why the amendment is considered necessary, and informs people how they can comment through the submission process. Environmental review report The Environmental Protection Authority must consider the environmental impact of an amendment to the MRS before it can be advertised. Should it require formal assessment, an environmental review is undertaken and made available for information and comment at the same time as the amendment report. Report on submissions The planning rationale, determination of submissions and the recommendations of the WAPC for final approval of the amendment, with or without modification, is documented in this report. Submissions This document contains a reproduction of all written submissions received by the WAPC on the proposed amendment. Transcript of hearings A person who has made a written submission may also choose to appear before a hearings committee to express their views. The hearings proceedings are recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts of all hearings are reproduced in this volume.

Alphabetical Listing of Submissions

MRS Amendment 1210/41


Submission Number

Submitter Name

48 Abzalov, Aygul 137 Albrecht, Marina 308 Aldrovandi, Jill 309 Aldrovandi, Riccardo 128 Allan, Ken & Dot 189 Allan, Sarah 447 Allerding and Associates (act on behalf of landowners Harman Nominees

Pty Ltd) 446 Allerding and Associates (act on behalf of landowners Two Twenty

Investments Pty Ltd & Dion Nominees Pty Ltd) 398 Anglican Church, Diocese of Perth 120 Annear O.A.M., Anne 355 Armstrong, Patrick H 337 Art Deco Society of WA (Vyonne Geneve) 44 Artelaris, Spiro & Penelope

138 Artelaris, Steve (Steve Artelaris Architects) 587 Ashford, Max 184 Asphar, Florence E 365 Asphar, Ian 145 Auer, John 433 Australian Urban Design Research Centre 175 Auto Management Pty Ltd 30 Backhouse, Lisa M

132 Bagshaw, Anthony & Ann 468 Bailey, Carolyn 119 Bailey, Mark 440 Balfe, Michael 441 Banfield, Tim & Gemma 17 Barker, David

228 Barron, Steve 419 Barrymore, Geoffrey 211 Bartel, Matt 385 Basson, E J & R M 32 Beamish, Marjorie (Flamenco Holdings Pty Ltd)

124 Bellson Pty Ltd ATF Brady Property Trust 47 Bennett, Pamela

576 Bennett, Pia 75 Bennett, Samuel 63 Bentley, Marjorie R 62 Berden, Matthew

165 Bishop, Luke 13 Blackburne Property Group (on behalf of The Owners of St Quentins

Apartments) 282 Blackwell & Associates Pty Ltd (Tony Blackwell)

470 Blackwell, Emmet 416 Blackwood, Beth (on hehalf of the Presbyterians Ladies' College) 459 Blair, Alison 294 Blanchard, Serverine (Co-Manager of Allegro Pizza) 114 Blight, Nicole 361 Blumann, Siobhan 92 Boehm, Peggy R

190 Bogue, Kevin & Marion 520 Bond, I L 50 Bowra & O'Dea - Funeral Directors

195 Boyd, A G 202 Boyd, L 384 Boyland, Father Peter (Parish Priest, Anglican Parish of Christ Church

Claremont) 68 Boyle, Peter & Celia

109 Boyle, Rafeena 484 Brake, Anne 59 Bremner, Mark

399 Brescacin, Danny (on behalf of his parents) 323 Brooker, Jacinta 201 Brooks, Y 327 Brown, Carolyn 31 Brown, Russell & Sally (Belregis Pty Ltd)

270 Brown, Sherri 322 Bruns, Maurits 580 Burns, William 329 Burrows, Amanda 91 Butcher, Luke

378 Butler, David & White, Justine 219 Calcutt, Julie 430 Cant, Ryan 49 Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd (on behalf of BP Australia Ltd)

390 Carles MLA, Adele (Member of Fremantle) 163 Carr, Emma 452 Carter, Jacqui 45 Carton, Romilly

522 Caslleden Family 262 Catelli, Anna & Maria 429 Challen, Michael B 523 Charlecraft, Henry 12 Charlesworth, Kate

153 Chartres, Margot (owner Violet Pilot) 155 Cheffers, Freya (owner Violet Pilot) 453 Cheffins, Jane & Pete 574 Cheffins, Peter 110 Cheung, Carol 310 Christy, Julie-Anne 223 Churack, Danielle 77 Churley, Julie

180 Clancy, Robyn L 103 Claremont Baptist Church (Ian Simms) 203 Claremont, Town of

95 Clark, Donald (on behalf of the Landowners of Seaview Lane Strata Lot 52/100 Stirling Hwy, North Fremantle)

579 Clune, Anna 212 Cmielewski, Cecelia 581 Cock, Daniel 369 Connor, Tony 100 Cook, Bruce 568 Cooper, Katey 284 Cooper, S P & G R 273 Cotton, Sandra J 577 Courtney, Liam 341 Cowell, Wendy 89 Craig, Daniel

391 Cranfield, Richard L J 332 Cromag Pty Ltd 498 Cropley, Cecily 491 Cropley, Peter 386 Croudace, Michael 387 Croudace, Susan 487 Crugnale, Gianpaolo (Gage Roads Construction) 415 Cullity, Dr Marguerite 93 Cunningham, Lesley

111 Cunningham, Tom & Bryant, Peri 115 Currie, Rachel 121 Curtis, Jackie 280 Dagg, Alan & Jennifer 72 D'Angelo, Marissa

388 D'arcy, John L 346 Date, Russel 141 Davidson, David K 232 Davidson, Ron & Dianne

6 Davies, Denise 3 Davies, Xian-Li

253 Davis, Christopher 382 Davis, Dr Neville J 252 Davis, Mary 373 Daw, Ian T 396 Daw, Trevor A (Chairman of the Forrest Grove Villas Body Corporate on

behalf of the Forrest Villa owners) 420 Day, Brenna 485 Day, Robert 191 D'Cress, Brian G 288 de Caux, Christian 104 Dean, Allan & William 28 Deejay Nominees Pty Ltd (Durack & Zilko Lawyers on behalf of)

272 Deighan, Dorothy H 566 Demissie, Bayoush 331 Department of Transport, Main Roads WA & Public Transport Authority 286 Desforges, Jonah & Danielle 519 D'Esterre Family 81 Dobra, Wendy & Max

277 Dodd, Marilyn 423 Donovan, Kim S & Payne, Carl D (Twine Court Pty Ltd)

55 Douglass, Tony (on behalf of Empire City Superannuation Fund) 237 Drayton, Roslyn 254 Dreyfus, Michele 313 D'Souza, Father James (Parish Priest Cottesloe/Mosman Park) 139 Dutry, Danicia 394 Dwyer, Bryan & Nyree 358 Eastwood, David 436 Eidsvold. Jaimie 502 Eldon, Lisa 255 Eldred, Sara 267 Elsey, Richard 23 Elton, Sophie

474 Evans, Glenn 207 Farnsworth, Kate 351 Faye, Bridget 178 Fearis, Neil 583 Ferguson-Thomas, Susan 210 Ferrari, Robert 431 Ferrell, Margaret 181 Ferrell, Walter J 596 Findlater, Kate & Brendon 489 Finn, Kirsty 243 Fiocco, Suzanne & John

4 Fire & Emergency Services Authority of WA 135 Flack, Ian 136 Flack, Jacqueline 345 Fleming, Hamish 404 Fletcher, Paul F 87 Flynn, Amber

257 Forarty, Cain 438 Ford, Patrick 244 Forma, Ann 98 Forrest, David & Nedela, Janis 19 Freind Investments Pty Ltd (Clayton Friend, Director on behalf of) 8 Fremantle Ports

84 Fremantle, City of 307 Galan-Dwyer, Bianca 242 Gamblin, Paul 336 Gardiner, Leigh 25 Gare, Robert C & Kathleen L

595 Gay, Marlene M 269 Gerard McCann Architect (on behalf of the owners Lot 51 Stirling Hwy,

North Fremantle) 206 Gilchrist, Sylvia 584 Glass, Stuart 401 Glassby, Cathie 353 Glegg, Trevor 479 Godden, Alison & Andrew 35 Godlonton, Heath Sanderson & Sasha

226 Goodlich, Mary-Ann 570 Goodridge, Phillipa 214 Goodwin, Clare 506 Grant, Barbara

505 Grant, Randall 260 Green, David 261 Green, Janet 558 Green, Russell 559 Green, Shirley 389 Greenway, Claire 427 Greg Rowe and Associates (act on behalf of owners Ortona P/L & Don

Russell Holdings) 445 Greg Rowe and Associates (act on behalf of owners Yat-Wing Liu &

Precious Holdings Pty Ltd) 458 Griffin, Scot & Clare 82 Groves, Norman John 67 Hall, John D & Penuel K 43 Hall, Lorraine & Geoff

409 Hamersley, Vicki & Simon (property held in the name of LF Rural Nominees Pty Ltd)

76 Hammond, L 9 Hams, Simon D D

362 Harper-Meredith, Karri 54 Harriott, John F

408 Harris, Daphne 134 Harvey, Clare 186 Hasluck, Sally A 162 Hatton, Damien 172 Hawkes, E 371 Hay, Cameron 71 Hayes, Bruce

333 Heagney, Karen 412 Health, Department of 301 Heard, Kent 421 Herbert, Serina 381 Hewitt, Maxwell E (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community

Association) 350 Hill, Richard & Schell, Fleur 147 Hills, Lisa J 340 Hills, Neville F 483 History Council of Western Australia (Dr Lise Summers, president) 572 Hopkins, Alexandra 74 Hopkins, Philip & Mary

511 Hos, Joanna 503 Hoskings, Janet 57 Hotchkin Hanly Lawyers (on behalf of Euro Form Constructions Pty Ltd)

276 House, Kate 357 Howe, Jim 10 Howe, Peter M

321 Howieson, Jill 379 Hume, B 196 Hunter, J M 197 Hunter, W 342 Hutchison, June 225 Hyndman, Trish 20 Imani, Dr Pedram 64 Independent Cinemas Pty Ltd

11 Indigenous Affairs, Department of 113 Ioppolo, Gary

1 Ioppolo, James 463 Jackson, Andrew (on behalf of all owners of Greenough Home Units) 131 Jeffree, Marjorie G V 377 Jelovsek, Francesco 39 Jeta Pty Ltd

241 Johnson, Jill 300 Johnson, Josephine 235 Johnstone, Graeme 231 Johnstone, Klara 424 Jones, Alex 289 Jones, Bryn 383 Jones, Peter F 518 Jordan, Ray 216 Joyce, Fletcher J 338 Kaesehagen, David 170 Kain, Anthony 393 Keely, Dr Nicholas 352 Keen, Michelle 108 Kelly, Simon 168 Kennedy, Dorothy 274 Kenny, Judith 204 Kent, Jack 205 Kent, Louis 125 Kidd, Paul 209 King, Natasha 158 Kleinig, Richard 221 Knutson, Barry 493 Kohan, Kimberley 591 Kotsoglo, Imogen 339 Kowald, Brian 588 Kruit, Michael 169 La Fontaine, Monique 348 Lane, Glendon 349 Lane, Jennifer 293 Lane, Richard 188 Langmead, Rex A (representing Langmead Investments P/L in trust for the

Langmead Familty Trust) 33 Leach, Jeffery & Helen

215 Leah, Ann 375 Leahy-Kane, Jane 14 Lee, Shirley C L

466 Leighton, Chris 271 Leondro Mika 83 Leslie, Benjamin & Oliver, Nicole 46 Lim, Tanya Fong

496 Line, Wendy 38 Ling, Kendrick

599 Litis, Desi 586 Llewellin, Michael 578 Loe, Louise 302 Lopresti, Frank (on behalf of the owners of 176 Stirling Hwy, Nedlands)

482 Lorenz, Anita 27 Lund, Wayne

562 Lushey, Robert A 126 Lyndon, Angie 367 Lyons, Christopher 557 Lyons, Emma 60 MacDougall, Sonya Lee

258 MacGill, Gerard (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association) 85 MacGowan, John & Charmaine

291 MacKay, Sharon 504 MacKie, Maggie 151 MacLeay, Shayne 112 MacLeay, Travis 299 MacNeill, Ron 359 Maher, Ingrid 356 Mair Property Securities Ltd (on behalf of all the owners of 525 Stirling Hwy,

Cottesloe) 585 Malacari, Luke S 217 Maley, Kirsten 573 Maloney, Bruce 246 Mannolini, Amanda; Gerrish, Laurence & Connolly, Anne-Maire 142 Mansell, Vanya 65 Martinick, Dirk

171 Martino, Bianca 368 Marwick, Susan 130 May, Sarah 249 McCormick, Jonathon R 179 McGechie, David & Ada 592 McGowan, Claire 571 McGown, Michael (on behalf of Kirsten Maley) 575 McKean, Andrew 594 McKenzie, Ian 473 McNab, Sandy C 461 Meehan, Pamela 230 Mellor, Edward 229 Mellor, Thomas 354 Meredith, David 56 Merks, Kristy

501 Metcalfe, Chris 517 Mian, C 192 Mignot, Belinda A 563 Miller, Todd 316 Milliner, Andrew 315 Milliner, Jessica 24 Mines and Petroleum, Department of

140 Monk, Anthony & Shirley 450 Monro, Caroline 360 Monro, Victoria 53 Morgan, Sue

303 Moriarty, Bruce 41 Morris, Dr Christina (Appollonia Nominees, Cottesloe Dental)

500 Morton, Keith 70 Mosman Park, Town of

582 Moulden, Deanne 457 Muir, Gregory 600 Mullen, Kate 476 Mulvena-Trinder, Brendan 495 Murray, David 413 Murray, John (Creation Landscape Supplies) 494 Murray, Lisa 101 Mussared, Helen A 372 Musto, Ken & Lyn 486 Nairn, Pam 26 Nardone, Rocco A (for Conpec Pty Ltd)

292 National Trust of Australia (WA) 29 Naughton, Paul

183 Nedlands Electors Association (Inc) 123 Nedlands, City of 462 Neil, Anne & Tepper, Steve 347 Newson, Alan & Barlow, Johanna 182 Nguyen, Thai Duy 434 Niblett, Dylan 222 Nichol, Colin 567 Nicholls, Scott 437 Nicholson, Charlie 52 Nikakhtar, Loghman

298 Nikolich, Amanda & Goran 236 Nixon, Bruce & Handcock, Karen 99 Nomet Pty Ltd

516 Nottage, J 314 O'Connor, David 187 O'Dea, John 256 Officer, Meg 296 O'Keefe, Joe 418 O'Loughlin, Edmond (on behalf of Geraldine O'Loughlin) 213 Orchard, Stuart 512 O'Reilly, Alexandra 513 Oria, Conrad 90 Orly, Tammy 34 Ou, Zhiliang

561 Owenell, Ben 560 Owenell, John 467 Owners of Brookwood, 396 Stirling Hwy (Andrew Bremner) 263 Owners of Terrara (Strata Plan 1275) 233 Palmer, Narayani 428 Palmer, Richard D 320 Paparone, Jack 319 Paparone, Romaine 278 Parmentier, Brice 247 Paterniti, Robert & Sue 295 Paterson, Alistair 564 Paterson, Eleanor 480 Paterson, Jennifer A 266 Paton, Mary-Anne 364 Pattison, Cate & Giles 156 Paulik-White, Dr Georgie

335 Pauling, Glenn 265 Paxton, James F 88 Pearce, Cameron

149 Pedro, Zamia 425 Peppermint Grove, Shire of 66 Petrides, Peter

218 Phillips, Dodie 118 Phillips, Jenny 51 Philpott, Martin & Mary

220 Pickles, Carol 410 Pieniazek, Jan & Cecilia 200 Pinkster, Lauren 597 Pinto, E 185 Pisano, Ngarie & Giglieto 465 Pittaway, Janine & Brown, Stewart 403 Planning Solutions (on behalf of Amana Living) 426 Poland, Greg 227 Pollard, Helena 166 Porter, Clare 287 Pratt, Brian & Gillian 590 Prindiville, T 208 Pritchard, Georgina 328 Ptolomey, Brendon (AAPI Certified Practising Valuer) 312 Pyvis, Sally 251 Quayle, Monica 106 Rae-Frae, Ama 78 Ramdas Tampi & Pamela Hendry

161 Ramsay, Rob 159 Randall, Brooke 370 Rattigan, Annabel 451 Rattigan, Graeme 569 Redgrave, Sian 167 Reed, Sandra 144 Rees, John (Mosman Park Veterinary Hospital) 297 Reeve, Thomas & Valerie 18 Reid, Sarah M 37 Remmerswaal, N

477 Revell, Kerry 58 Richardson, Gavin

598 Ridley, Ben & Dietrich, Jessica 593 Ridley, Cate 129 Rigg, Jeremy 157 Riley, Jim 454 Rippingale, Kelly 443 Rivalland, Virginia & Daniel 407 Roberts, Giles 193 Roberts, Lynn 411 Roberts, Peter; Strauss, Caroline; Wood, Anne & Lankester, Keith 435 Roberts, Tom 133 Robinson, John 514 Rogers, Joanna

5 Rogers, John 238 Rogers, Steve

515 Rogers, Steve 127 Rosenstein, Jennifer 173 Runco, Mario & Mary 160 Russell, Glenn 400 Ryan, Gary 326 Sambrailo, Christian 565 Savill, Julie 79 Savoy Management Pty Ltd

510 Scott, Elizabeth 40 Seng, James Cheah Kit (Duomark on behalf of the owners)

488 Shaw, Jeni 432 Shepherd, Melissa 290 Shepherd, Pip 380 Showell, John A 22 Simpson, John & Marie-Louise

275 Skipworth, Ric & Tish 490 Sluga, Lena 259 Smith, Deonne 250 Smith, Keith & Elizabeth 281 Smith, Roland 344 Smith, Sophie 343 Smith, Stewart 448 Socha, Pauline M 21 South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Council (SWALSC)

107 Spencer, David 234 Stansfield, Judith 69 State Heritage Office

414 Staude, Anita 442 Steffen, Thomas & Franscesca 248 Stirling, Kim 116 Stokes, Amy 366 Stone, Noel T 509 Stoner, B 80 Subiaco, City of

481 Sullivan, Andrew 279 Sullivan, Jane 224 Suttar, Craig 97 Swan River People Native Title Holders

330 Sweetman, Lorraine 456 Swift, Omega 499 Swiney, Tracey 469 Tambasco, Serena 15 Tan, John Tiang Tong

283 Tapp, Aimee 285 Taylor, Annie 240 Thayne, Nell 334 The Fremantle Society 94 The Landowners of Stirling Heights - SP5036

102 The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Perth 154 Thomas, Jacinta (Manager Violet Pilot) 521 Thompson, M O 148 Thompson, Stephen 174 Thorpe, John

122 Thorpe, Susan 444 TPG (on behalf of Rhys Edwards, owner Nedlands Post Office) 397 TPG (on behalf of the landowners Amhurst Enterprises Pty Ltd and John

Fountain as trusteee for the John Fountain Family Trust) 439 TPG (on behalf of the owners CITI Fiedlity Nominee Co Pty Ltd) 497 Tregonning, Anne 492 Trishs' Place (Antiques) 245 Truscott, Kate 449 Tucak, Layla 478 Tucak, Michael 146 Tulloch, Alastair (Councillor) 376 Turner, Stacey 96 University of Western Australia (Professor Paul Johnson)

471 Unknown 524 Unknown 525 Unknown 526 Unknown 527 Unknown 528 Unknown 529 Unknown 530 Unknown 531 Unknown 532 Unknown 533 Unknown 534 Unknown 535 Unknown 536 Unknown 537 Unknown 538 Unknown 539 Unknown 540 Unknown 541 Unknown 542 Unknown 543 Unknown 544 Unknown 545 Unknown 546 Unknown 547 Unknown 548 Unknown 549 Unknown 550 Unknown 551 Unknown 552 Unknown 553 Unknown 554 Unknown 555 Unknown 556 Unknown 601 Unknown 602 Unknown 61 Vasudavan, Dr Sivabalan (Sole Director of Lola Management Pty Ltd) 16 Victoria Creek Pty Ltd

198 Vidulich, K M 199 Vidulich, M

86 Vigano, Anthony J 152 Vujic, Tara 164 Vujic, Tijana 507 Wall, Jon 472 Wallbridge, Philip 239 Walsh, Aiden 143 Walsh, Brett 317 Walsh, Jane 318 Walsh, John 402 Walter, Peta (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association) 422 Walton, Haylee 306 Warrall, Ian

2 Water (Swan Avon Region), Department of 363 Water Corporation 177 Watson, Nevin J 264 Weber, David 460 West, Carly 455 West, Michael 105 Wheeldon, Chris 176 Whelans WA Pty Ltd (on behalf of owners Gull Properties) 268 Whelans WA Pty Ltd (on behalf of owners WA Flour Mills Pty Ltd) 508 White, Rolf 374 Whitley, John 417 Wickenden, Kyele J 589 Wilkinson, Kate 395 Williams, Simon & Jill 325 Willis, Jane 475 Willson, Hayley E 73 Wilson, Kerri

117 Wilson, Stacey 150 Wilson, Tracey 464 Woods, Trent 405 Woollett, Sara 305 Worrall, Charlotte 304 Worrall, Karen 36 Yau, Bonnie

311 Yeaton, Jeff 392 Yeo, Veronica J 406 Yu, Lawrence 42 Yuen, Julie (for Weng Hoong Nominees Pty Ltd) 7 YWB Pty Ltd

194 Zevis, M A & A C 324 Zuvela, Peter

Late

Submissions Name

623 Adams, Pete 612 Bekkevold, Sacha 620 Bell, James 622 Berrovic, L 608 Caddy, Stephen M 626 Cottesloe, Town of

627 Crandell, J D 606 Evans, George M 624 Evans, Susan 625 Gow, Peter 621 Graeme Robertson Group 610 Hood, Libby 614 Lane, Gary 613 MacRae, Jenna 611 Merride, Christopher 609 Nolan, Clint 607 O'Driscoll, Nanette 618 Owenell, Helen; Willing, Suzanne & Bennett, Christine (Busatti) 604 Page, Jane & Gilmore, Mike, Jane, Tom & Elea 615 Rowe, Jacqui 628 Shell Company of Australia, The 603 Silove, Dr Kym 605 State Development, Department of 616 Unknown 617 Unknown 619 Wright, Timothy (Wrightfeldhusen Architects)

Submissions

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Resen/ation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submissio 463L <

Name 9f7.U wtn(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address . / !. .4 444*4 . Postcode

Contact phone number 47?. Email address ..i r r -t

Tips for completing a submission: o Use headings or nu bers to separate different topics and issueso Includ property addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

/fx frTT fhCJct Grri ,

turn over to complete our submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone ho has made a writte submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to spea at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment re ort.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I o not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would refer my hea ing to be con ucted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

ermitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or ma ing its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclose to thir parties.

a All hearings are recorded an transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and table in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Signature ... Date 7 P-'ZO i Z_

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - hltpVAvww.planning.wa.gov.au

MRS PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1210/41

SUBMISSION FRO 114 STIRLING HIGHWAY, NEDLANDS

1. Introduction

This submission of objection is made on behalf of the owners of Greenough Home Units(GHU) at 114 Stirling Highway in Nedlands.

2. P operty context

GHU is a circa 1930s substantial red brick and tile t o-sto ey block of six han some artdeco apartments, located on the SE corner of Stirling High ay and Louise Street,opposite the both State and local heritage-listed Peace Memorial Rose Garden.

Nedlands, Claremont, Cottesloe and Peppermint Grove have retained number ofmaisonette-style older and some slightly younger apartment buildings, reflecting thehistorical evolution of the highway and weste suburbs; in Nedlan s notably inproximity to the UWA. In the locality of GHU, for example, are other apartments at 112(Lot 152) Stirling Highway adjacent to the east, 115 Stirling Highway opposite on the NEcorner of Martin Avenue (Lot 415) and 119 Stirling Highway (Lot 418) nearby on thenorthern side of the highway also opposite the Rose Garden park.

These large residential buildings contribute significantly to the urban context, character,heritage and amenity of their neighbourhoods and, importantly, already achieve theobjectives of present-day planning in terms of medium density housing, mixeduses/activity and fostering public transport.

Such character apartments are rel tively scarce in terms of architecture, inner-arealocation nd lifestyle, hence are sought- fler and steadily increasing in value. Many arcowner-occupied due to their uniqueness rather than being rental accommodation. Mostare well-maintained, with renovations common, nd this established housing stock canbe expected to continue to exist for years to come.

In addition, these properties tend to contain very mature trees including Gums, Jarrahsand Tuarts and established gardens contributing attractive greenery along the highway.The presence of long-standing residential development, trees and gardens is adistinguishing feature of Perth's older highways, including Stirling, Canning and GreatEastern Highways, which contrasts with other commercially-rede eloped main roadsthat create a harsh environment with little greenery - the retail/showroom/office stripthrough part of Claremont i an exception to the strong residential character andassociated greenery through Nedlands and Cottesloe/Peppermint Gro e.

i

GHU is classified and listed in the City of Nedlands Municipal Heritage Inventory (MHI)as a higher-o der Category B place as follows:

STREET STREETNUMBER

WARD PLACE NAME BUILDINGTYPE

MlREFNO

CAT. MlSTATUS

StirlingHighway

114 Melvista 'Greenough" ResidentialFlats

N1b B Ml

Recognising t is, in recent yea s the owners of GHU have expended considerablefunds on external concrete, painting and plumbing maintenance to preserve the integrityand appearance of the roperty.

It must be noted that in the SKM SHAG Concept Design Report March 2009, in theBuildings of Interest table on page 9, entry 18, Commercial Property, 112 StirlingHighway, is in error in two respects:

1. 112 Stirling Highway is residential property, being a two-storey block of fourperiod apartments, immediately east of GHU which is 114 Stirling Highway.

2. That period apartment building is not local heritage-listed - it is GHU at 114Stirling Highway which is on the City of Nedlands MHI.

These mistakes need to be rectified and the correct information taken into account inrelation to the amendment proposal.

The Peace Memorial Rose Garden o posite GHU is a landmark ark for the district andhighway, and is described in the State Register of Heritage Places as:

A commemorative rose garden comprising formal rose plantings, hard and softlandscape elements, that was built over a period of years from 1948 to the early1960s to the design of architect WG Bennett, and later modified in the 1970s and1980s. It is rare as one of the earliest, and the largest and best known,commemorative rose garden in Western Australia, dedicated to those who died inWorld War Two and to peace.

A roper appreciation of the heritage context of the locality and western suburbswarrants a more sophisticated approach to reconciling transport and landuse/development planning than embraced by the basic MRS amendment method,which in this enlightened and participatory age is somewhat archaic.

3» Unacceptable impacts on GHU and other p operties

The indicated land equirement of 142sqm from this medium density multiple dwellingsresidential property (Lot 151), comprising the full width of the highway frontage to adepth of 5.4m, plus a corner truncation of a similar depth along Louise Street, is

2

considerable and would have a major detrimental impact on GHU in the following ways(as echoed in impacts on other properties):

• The loss of land area in terms of ownership and outdoor space.• The loss of grounds/gardens in terms of building curtilage and setting.• Insufficient separation from the highway physically, visually and acoustically - the

loss of a highly desirable buffer from tr ffic vibrations, noise and fumes, as wellas a safety buffer from vehicles.

• Increased security risk and vandalism (as experienced) by bringing the publicfootpath much closer to the building, being far too close for comfort.

• C using the introduction of high, solid boundary walls to protect properties fromall of these impacts, contrary to the planning p inciple of interacti e open-aspectfrontages and which would bo an extra cost imposed on o ners.

• The resultant discor ant built form and urban design, entailing forced reducedsetbacks, diminished front yards and abrupt interfaces, all detracting from eachproperty and the streetscape.

a The o erall loss of character and amenity by the insensiti e treatment ofproperties.

The proposed approximately 15% land-take from GHU is excessive and comprisescrucial front setback breathing space from the high ay. Loss of the road widening areafrom the property would result in a high ay frontage separation distance of only some2.7m from the new bounda y to the building and e en less allowing for steps and eaves.This would severely affect the utilisation and menity of the entry porches and frontrooms of the apartments closest to the highway and bring the entire traffic impact of thehighway closer to all of the apartments. It may lso require removal of one of the threelarge trees defining the front gardens to the property.

Likewise, the loss of land from and impacts on all other properties as indicated in theproposal is untenable. In Nedlands, for example, this includes the Peace MemorialRose Gar en, C ptain Stirling Hotel, Windsor Theatre and so on, all being significantheritage places. The historic North Fremantle town centre would be destroyed, too.This complete loss of land f om effective utilisation and of character-defining buildingfabric would rob the localities of their special qualities and the high ay of its particularappeal.

4. Basis of amend ent proposal

It is emphasised that the tenor of the documentation promoting the proposedamendment is biased and deficient in the following ways:

-» It attempts to sell the proposal as a good news story hereby the reservationwould be greatly reduced, which is onl one facet of a complex situation,

o It is preoccupied with a claimed transport engineering solution and bypasses thewhole land/use development side of the equation, when that is pivotal the matter.

3

° This narrow technical an quantitative view ignores the qualitative planningimplications for built form, urban design, character, heritage an amenity - itdoes not represent a thorough and balanced cost-benefit analysis.

® In the Amendment Report the Sustainability Appraisal section is superficial andgeneralised.

9 It suggests that certainty will arise from a defined land requirement, yet admits touncertainty given the long term outlook with no implementation programs.

o The Changes Plans are inherently complicated and potentially misleading to laypersons. Note that the legend notation: (a) not now affected by reservation, isambiguous as it could be interpreted to mean either not at present or not underthe proposal - this should be clarified in all MRS amendments.

5. Transport critique

In relation to the transport rationale for the proposed road requirement the followingobservations are made:

° The Stirling Highway Activity Corridor Phases 2 & 3 Concept Design ReportNovember 2010, in page 4 states: Directions 2031 supports the principle ofactivity corridors, and the intensification of residential development wherea propriate along their length] however, the amendment proposal would erodethat by land-take and the destruction of buildings.

a It is axiomatic that perceived bigger and better roads generate traffic growth,soon becoming self-defeating and dysfunctional.

° For Stirling Highway, increasing the idealised reservation width and compositionwas wrong. Instea , the end-state reservation should be based on an advancedp blic transport system which dramatically reduces cars; and whereby cyclistsand pedestrians can be catered for in less space yet a safer and more attractiveenvironment.

9 The proposal represents road design overkill, with an intensification andelaboration at intersections which is likely to backfire.

o The Amendment Report in page 4 states: In the future, as transport planning andtech ology dev lops, the detailed design may be modified of improved. Thecarriageway plans are a guide, not a definitive plan. Future road planning by therelevant State authority may vary the present design based on best practice.This highlights the folly and in eed futility of endea ouring to define and securean ultimate reservation over such a long timeframe.

0 The design criteria are contradictory and the suggestion of decision-makingconsistency across LGAs is misguided. For instance, Claremont isacknowledged as constrained whereby the road standards are modified, so whynot elsewhere? Adaptive design is applied only to State-level heritage-listedproperties, when that is valid for all heritage properties. MRWA is state to beopposed to street trees and traffic calming, despite greening and effective trafficmanagement being intrinsic to activity corridors. Edge-of-footpath landscapednature strips are proposed (creating a public maintenance and watering

demand), but wo ld be scant compensation for the magnitude of trees andgardens lost to road widening from so many private and public properties - it isironic that the objectives of the SHAGS and proposed MRS Amendment includeproviding for greening of the highway, which the existing residential developmentand parklands along the road already eliver, but that the intended landacquisition and road widening would result in the very loss of this vital element ofsustainability.

• Research has found that bus priority measures can be counter-productive, and inthe case of Stirling Highway, the mixture of such measures, together with othertr ffic influences, means that the fairly small gains to be made by beefing-upintersections is not worthwhile as it is doubtful there would be much improvementfor long.

« The activity corridor boulevard concept is flawed, because Stirling Highway is nota scenic route such as a coastal or riversi e road, nor is it a grand city approachroad or a central city artery lined by he vily-populated tall office/resi entialbuildings. The road will always be a combined through-route and districtdistributor.

° The proposed ear laneways would simply displace traffic problems,concentrating traffic t intersections and side roads and shifting traffic impactsinto residential neighbourhoods, as well as depriving business of frontage accessand parking - crossovers behave to calm traffic.

In summa y, the proposal is not truly a sustainable transport option and is limited to aro d engineering lan premised on an outmoded resumption of pe petual andexponential motor vehicle domin nce. That is, given the compared to what test it ismerely more of the same.

The imaginative and credible alternative is to overhaul an reinvent the currentcarriageway in a more efficient, effective, economical and sustainable fashion as anurban planning str tegy satisfying land use/development and transport (especi llypublic transport) objectives and creating a functional and attractive activity corridorcapitalising on the existing urban context.

6. Planning critique

The SHAGS initially promised an innovative, holistic approach to integrated landuse/developrnent and transport planning, incorporating urban design and form-basedcodes, but that has boon abandoned in la sing to the traditional MRS amendmentprocess. This standard approach is both disappointing and un ise, for the follo ingreasons:

o Road widening is a crude and unbalanced notion as a basis for addressing theland use/development and transport conundrum. It favours a transport conceptat the expense of land use/development considerations, being devoid of apalatable and agreed land use/development vision for all parties to work towards.

5

0 The Concept Design Report in page 21 states: Full upgrading of Stirling Highwayto the proposed road design concept is anticipated to be a long term project,potentially beyond current planning horizons. This long term horizon for landacquisition and the absence of funding or construction programs (until ready tooll at some distant point in the future and maybe never) means that protecting

existing built form/fabric and stimulating good land use/development outcomesalong the route is negatively affected.

0 The touted certainty of an ultimate reservation actually cements urban blight fordecades, by defining land-take, sterilising land from use/development andimpacting detrimentally on properties - in terms of space, use, enjoyment,amenity, maintenance, renovations/extensions, value and (re)developmentpotential.

0 It transfers the burden of transport planning issues from the public roadway toprivate properties. This is essentially inequitable and an easy way out or lazysolution bowing to the status quo of car dominance, rather than revamping thee isting roadway and putting public transport ahead of private vehicles.

o The focus. of road engineering design property-by-property overlooks thecumulative impact of the envisaged carriageway, which through Nedlands, fore ample, proposes to wipe out extensive tracts of established property frontages,heritage fabric, landmark buildings, local character and greenery.

a The identification of selected buildings of interest does a disservice to the factthat all existing buildings are contributors to land use, built form and activity alongthe highway. To highlight only key heritage properties fails to recognise thepresence, character and habitation of all buildings as pre-existing phenomenaand urban fabric to be respected and worked with. To dismiss the approximately1750 local heritage-listed properties makes a mockery of the WAPC s ownheritage policy manifesto.

® The Amendment Report in page 6 describes that Directions 2031 involves theconcepts of activity corridors to accommodate medium-rise higher-densityhousing and of encouraging reduced vehicle use, and that in this connection thedraft Central Metropolitan Perth Sub-regional Strategy identifies Stirling Highwayas a key dwelling growth area supporting urban infill. But the amendmentproposal runs contrary to this outlook for residential densification and transit-orient ted development by impacting directly and unconscientiously on thefoundation urban form and fabric along the highway.

© By the lengthy time the so-called ultimate becomes possible the environmental,sustainability, socio-demographic, economic, transport and planningcircumstances will have changed, while in the meantime land use/developmentalong the highway would be kept in limbo and severely blighted.

© A fundamental failing of the MRS regional road reservation method is thedecades of uncertainty and blight it has generated along blue and red oadsthroughout metropolitan Perth over time. Not one such road has undergoneentire land acquisition and redevelopment in the manner envisaged by theSHAGS, nor is that ever likely to occur - it is just a dream. A new paradigm isnecessary.

6

7. Conclusion

Fundamentally, as the SHAGS has been delayed and not undergone publicconsultation, proceeding with an MRS amendment proposal has put the cart beforethe horse and aborted an orderly and proper planning process. Rather than theSH GS being the means to the formulation of a strategy for the highway, it seemsthat study may now be deployed in an attempt to shore-up the road design and land-take proposal.

The WAPC website describing the SHAGS refers to its purpose and principles,including: providing belter amenity (or residents; consideration of streetscapo,character and setbacks; creating a desirable stre tscape a d roadside environme t retention of character and sufficient building setbacks; ensure the existing characteris protected; and planning based on local character. The mendment proposal doesnot respond to these sound planning imperatives.

It is tragically clear that the amendment proposal goes against this grain bysuperimposing a road engineering design as if it were a magic wand that will givebirth to a wonderful activity corridor, hen in fact the implications of following thatpath will stifle the life out of the highway and its hinterland as we kno it today andlead to an extended period of urban blight.

In conclusion, a much more sensible, practical and tangible strategy woul be totransform the current roadway by comprehensive upgrading, revolutionary publictransport (eg light rail) and complimentary land use/development, to achieve win-wingains more quickly and cost-effectively, and with superior urban design and amenityoutcomes.

8. O erall objection

Finally, given all of the above, and noting the amount and merits of similar conce sand objections reported in extensive press coverage on the proposal, the owners ofGreenough Home Units do not support the proposed MRS Amendment or anyproposal for road widening affecting GHU or other properties along Stirling Highwa .

Andrew Jacksofr- For and on behalf of the owners of Greenough Home Units(Owner, Strata Secretary & Town Planner)

25 July 2012

7

Submission 464

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 5 JUL 2012

The Secretary F|LE jro .M 8Western Australian Planning Commission [

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC):

Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261 to 267along Queen Victoria Street.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads(PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to

accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the totaldemolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria

Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads wouldhand to Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the

works proposed in the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road andStirling Highway is zoned Local Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4,reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops,cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

Trent Woods

8 Hope Street, White Gum Valley 6162

S bmission 465

23/7/12

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERT WA 6001

Amendment 1210/41 - Rationali ation of Stirling HighwayReservation (WAPC): Increasing t e existing Prima y egional oa sreserv tio m North Freman le)

Dear Sir/Madam

We the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and todemolish buildings 261 to 267 along Queen Victoria St eet, North Fremantle.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment, which canachieve a significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of NorthFremantle.

The City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west,making use of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requeststhe WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west inthe vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside therail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in thevicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and he beach.

A particul rly destructive roposal is th fo he wideraisig of the P ima yegional Roa s (P R) Rese vation in Queen Victoria Street at its

inte section wit Stirling Highw y to accommo ate a bus priorit lane. Ifimplemente , t is p oposal oul result in t e tot l demolition of thedouble storey, heri age listed s ops from 261 to 267 Queen VictoriaSt eet.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roadswould hand to ain Roads the res onsibility for this por ion, enabling them toundertake he works proposed in the amendment. Queen Vic oria Street betweenTydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's LocalPlanning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing evelopmen as a'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant andentertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of trafficlanes to single each way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use therou e an he present lack of bus bays contribute to this calming. I is thus highlyanomalous that facilita ing bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at he enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

This sec ion of North Fremantle is effectively a town centre enjoyed for itsheritage and cultural values. To remove it and increase traffic would be todestroy a community and he reason why people choose to live in Nor h

Fremantle and surrounds. I is a charming and vibrant centre, creates a sense ofcommunity and place. It would be a crime to remove what the residents ofFremantle hold so dose to their hearts. And importantly, is avoidable as far morethoughtful and appropriate opportunities to calm traffic and encouragepedestrians and public transport are available.

Janine Pittaway and Stewart Brown

23 July 201219 Forrest Street, Fremantle WA 6160Ph 94333568 / 0418911796


Form 41


Rationalisation of Stirli g Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWeste Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submissio §S

Name

Address

.c .I.i.::; (PLEASE PI NT CLEjARLYj j t (PLEASE PRINT CLfeARLY)

, ....k 5>.A. C?. P6gtcod

Contact phone number Q. . . - Email add ess

Tips for completing a submission: J i/'- V S- l ,o Use headings or numbers to se arate different to ics and issues o Incl de roperty addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more s ace to com lete your submission

Submission i fi

1 Q . ( . ~ ~?. 7\ r.

.4? i r. i. o.

S. . ......0. .

. pa w i<-J TA . . .. rr.

H C- ft

... Q.G .S -.pGv. Or:. i.

V l X.XXXp. P rr.....' .Q5.. liX rf. P .

.fo . .... O ? r ...

) . rS T . >r «< ! ?VA rr i. ... c.

A... A.

t rn over to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submissio on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your

ritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the propose amendmenthether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.


D No, I do not ish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


i will be represented by:


or

A spokesperson

Contact telephone nmriber (business hours): TP1Name of spokespersonContact telephcPostal address

1 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general ublic may attend your resentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominate by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)


o The W PC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may esubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of t e WAPC assessing submissions, or making Its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and publishe as public records should the Governor approve t e roposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by ggrlonfs) making the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received y the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late sub issions will OT be consi ered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website - tfp://www.pIannin<j.wa'.gov.au

Submis io 46?

Planning and Development Act 2005

Section 41 mendment (Substantial)

Submission


Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vation

By

Owners of Brookwood, 396 Sti ling High ay

This submission is made on behalf of the Owners of Brookwood, 396 Stirling Highway,Claremont. The subject property comprises eighteen 2 bedroom apartments.

While the concept of the proposed rationalisation may improve the vehicular andpedestrian flows along Stirling Highway, the Owners do not believe that all possible optionsto achieve this objective have been fully explored.

In its current format, the proposed Amendment (1210/41) will significantly alter theamenity of Brookwood and will result in the demolition of a number of garages and aportion of an apartment block that comprises 6 residential units.

Without a full understanding of compensation for the loss of property and the impact onvehicular egress and access to Brookwood via Stirling Highway, the Owners cannot supportthe Amendment in its present form.

The Owners of Brookwood welcome consultation with the appropriate WAPC Officers todiscuss the proposed Amendment.

Council On Behalf of the Owners of Brookwood

Please Contact:

David Smallwood: Mobile 0429 983023

Andrew Bremner: Mobile 0407 382 457

From:Sent:To:Ce:Subject:Attachments:

[email protected], 27 July 2012 1:21 PMmrs

David & Penny; Marina Goff; Yvonne HarwoodSUBMISSION: Amendment 41 - Rationalisation of Stirling HwyMRS Amendment 121041.docx

To Whom It May Concern,

Please find below and attached a submission relating to MRS Amendment (1210/41).

Regards,

Andrew BremnerMobile: 0407 382 457

To Whom It May Concern,

Please find below and attached submission relating to MRS Amendment (1210/41).

Regards,

Andrew BremnerMobile: 0407 382 457

Planning and Develop ent Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

By

Owners of Brookwood, 396 Stirling Highway

This submission is made on behalf of the Owners of Brookwood, 396 Stirling Highway, Claremont.The subject property comprises eighteen 2 bedroom apartments.

While the concept of the proposed rationalisation may improve the vehicular and pedestrian flowsalong Stirling Highway, the Owners do not believe that all possible options to achieve this objectivehave been fully explored.

In its current format, the proposed Amendment (1210/41) will significantly alter the amenity ofBrookwood and will result in the demolition of a number of garages and a portion of an apartmentblock that comprises 6 residential units.

Without a full understanding of compensation for the loss of property and the impact on vehicularegress and access to Brookwood via Stirling Highway, the Owners cannot support the Amendmentin its present form.

The Owners of Brookwood welcome consultation with the appropriate WARC Officers to discussthe proposed Amendment.

Council On Behalf of the Owners of Brookwood

i

Please Contact:David Smallwood: Mobile 0429 983023Andrew BrenTner: Mobile 0407 382 457

Submission 468

From:Sent:To:Subject:

carolyn bailey <[email protected]>Friday, 27 July 2012 1:36 PMmrs

rationalisation Stirling highway 121041 at North Fremantle

My name is Carolyn Bailey22 Ainslie Road North Fremantle, 6159I also own 1/4 John Street North Fremantle,6159Mobile number 0449601136

I have read much about this amendment and would say I agree mostly with the North FremantleCommunity Association.

Of course we have to plan for more traffic, however bowling over heritage buildings to achieve thiswhen there is vacant government land to west all the way along the railway line just seems to missabout 30 years of planning theory.

There is no need to make Jackson street a cul de sack if the main traffic flow is moved west to newroad system built along side the railway track. This leave the people who live in North Fremantlewith their small town free to flourish with heritage building left in place. Why privilege a road oversense of place?

I saw a Fremantle Councillor speak about this and believe the City of Fremantle have objected toany option which calls for the bulldozing of heritage building and sense of place to provide for abus lane. Of course I support this objection.

Use the land along side the railway to provide for more traffic and if land needs to be taken thenland can be taken from industry not the town centre.

Build the new bridge that has been talked about and talked about to link with new roads so the newbridge can be built to fit with new road.

Build the road as a bridge if need be but leave the town centre and heritage buildings be.

I would consider my preferences best represented by Andrew Sullivan either as an individual orspeaking for the City of Fremantle.

i

Planning and Development Act 2005 ;Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41


Rationalisation of Stirling Highway eservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth A 6001

Submission 469

Name 5 IA lM(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address H AYjCLfKf-1 Postcode .. .9.!.9.

Contact phone number J, Email address

Tips for completing a submission:s Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant® Attach additional nu bered pages if you require more s ace to complete your submission

Submission

.\. .uJy ..Pr...!Qavc. Ci ao'rvt.,c\ fcxjncL.

/. .'AA .. fc ... .. .l ... is... jwls.Qc.. o.-£.. S b' Px.g..x

. .A ri x;fx. . ..:.6.! j.. .I.xu ..pAt PQ. . ...??j...br /S

. Sr. .'A' u .. y.. J£. Ai ... . k. Q 2.c .. .Q n i.. ..CWP S....

,. b:t'x.. kv.o i. p.. xp.i. 1.1. du.. . e;l.. x!©Y.SrP. ... . .... . pfe.

. I.i. .. A. . t . i v.I .. .xl pe .. .ip.. Iwj. . yxp.c mJ.. M. n d w.

. M. .(>: v£[... i .. X i .. P acti .. .!£... .. .ckQ. d. ,.. h«P.t As....

. .Sccfeii .ci... n lx/. ...i.w\.C &p. xSs... .4£ .... (JiSS

. i9 MQ(l cfcs... .d t P P). ...G:v. ...

i ciiaAJ6U/.. .. Y J... (ppC .l 1 . .;.. .. .fe. x£f

b.e .. . .. [tA cypmy ci.. ptp ddo.. i.U'kj... . Str . . .s.. \cIm &

.o. < i .... ki iv

. 1 y.a .. ;a (;u W .f...dU5.. IldcditiX ayMi cim. .<£.$9. y

. ii/. . .. i d o< ... .a .../. ffll. £... A A/

oMl ... p . .vte.. f x fe/c.. ... A

tu(n over to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.



No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I will be epresented by:

IZl Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson


S would p efer my hearing to be conducted in:

[Zl Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORd Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along ith all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are simila ly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertise closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - hU ://w\wv.planning.\va.gov.au


For 41



OFFICE USE ONLY


Submissio 47©

Name .... ! (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address 3>... S±. v. Jj.vnfc.. . Postcode

Contact phone number. Eniail address

I ips for completing a submission: .o Use headings or numbers to separate diff ent topics and issueso Include pro erty addresses and s ecific location descri tions where relevant<> Attach additional n mbered ages if you require more s ace to com lete your submission

Submission

1 (Zf .'f. ri'o.., '.ify/ !W. .

_ 6 re.q u reM e ,v. dif.

k' A-ilS..(l.d'rfl t f H .\.i. s . - O'-..til . a „ J Ka§ S41

Ics&Jrtv&i . f4...Y... 4 (yj A if. rS .&f. r.... ... f .u . .

Qjjum, ,,d\c-.fecr. r .-...A $kwv/ .. .- ?....

„(X ( drft 5 k,( At i QP.& .....f d) fe frLl Stl C

b . I.tv d f.h'ff.f-:. ( r . ? 44 .

/f /.??.. A>.cv-. d.<r. d/o. r. ddy v/rfr..... k ?:h?rifa O i

lo±<i 4 ?a b.dd.dd. ....< d..

5 lolC 'vf'tfi <? . jdTC.k'C i'rffddfr:: Vfl-fKf f .'r- /A? /. I .V...! .45.

/. hc.4: Attm.'S V.c/ ... . 7... .c! .<f r;-;T. fivfe .L' CrQ dXihb.\ .fe.5....

4o A

>r l .4 4.4 t4. ifk f.r . 5 '..5

W ,/L t.fe jCft-nj... .... /..c .t!!..... l j . ( a- a . .... . r

U-y l. c<) P(j Af S.. .'4.1

fr C -.

/ OcSii L . yr yT~/ a: . t.

turn over to complete your submission

earing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not co pulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Fur her information on submissions and hearings is included i ppendix E of the amendment report.

MPlease choose one of the following:


OR

Q Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


LJ Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact tele hone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

E Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORdl Private (only the people nominate by you or the hearings committee will be



o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act f992 and as such, submissionsmade to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.


j \. . Io All earings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along wit ail written submissions, are

tabled in Parliament and published as public recor s should the Go ernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by ersonfs) makinci the submission

. j ,. . ¦ , ,

Signatu e .. .6?.'. Date . . 1. J.2.O.) .2.

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT e considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa. ov.au

Submissio 471

2 6 JUL 2012

| o Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existingPrimary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261 to 267 alongQueen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a significantlyreduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the o portunity to relocateStirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the high ay alongside herail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improveconnectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. Ifimplemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ain Roadsthe responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. QueenVictoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local Centre’ under Council’s LocalPlanning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a main street’, with small scaleshops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the iormous c sj of heritage buildings and their local functions.

ii._ IName:

Signed:

Submission 472

From:Sent:To:

Philip Wallbridge <[email protected]>Friday, 27 July 2012 3:33 PM

Subject:mrs

Stirling Highway activity corridor study Submission

Dear Sir/Madam,I would like to make a wr tten submission to the Stirling Highway Activity Corridor Study

(SHACS). As I am a resident of Loftus Street in Nedlands this submission relates specifically tothe study that effects the area between Claremont and the Crawley Campus of the University ofWestern Australia (UWA), but points can be taken to be a general response to the whole study.

Form 41 Infomration

Name Philip WallbridgeAddress 42 Loftus Street, Nedlands, WA. 6009Contact Phone Number 04 35492754E-mail address [email protected]

I do not wish to speak at the hearings.

Submission

Changes to the reserve.

As the Stirling Highway reserve north of Claremont is reducing in area I have no objection to thechange in the reserve boundaries north of Claremont.

Effect on Road Redesign on Existing Buildings.

As the Stirling Highway reserve north of Claremont is reducing from the area created in 1963 thenthe majority of properties have changed hands under the larger reserve size, and so I have noobjection to the road redesign on e isting buildings. My one objection to the road redesign as iteffects existing buildings is that I hope that it has minimal effect on the Claremont BaptistChurch. I hope that the road redesign can be managed without altering the building, which is setback from the current kerb. I also hope that the size of the churches tennis court can bemaintained.Claremont Baptist Church have been worshipping in the present building since before the 1963reservation was created and they should be given all assistance should they have to permanently ortemporarily relocate or make structural changes to their building.

Road Design; Provision of Facilities for Public Transport

The road design should be done to allow the easiest installation of tram rails and catenarypylons. The political will in the future may lead to a tram line from Perth to Claremont alongStirling Highway to compliment the Perth-Fremantle rail line and the refurbishment of the roadshould allow for this at a future date.The bus provision north of Claremont should also allow for the fact that under the currentTransPerth bus timetable two buses (102 and 103) travel along the Highway at the same time everyhalf an hour at the weekend. This requires either bus bays to be designed for two buses or forTransPerth to alter their bus timings.

i

Road Design; Provision of Facilities for Cyclists

The main p ovision for cyclists are the bike lanes running along the edges of the road. These are ave y welcome addition as Stirling Highway is an easier road to cycle along than currentlyrecommended parallel roads such as Bedford Road. They will hopefully stop car drivers fromovertaking as close as they currently do. The drains need to be implemented to be narrower orRusher than they currently are so that cyclists are not pushed to the edge of the cycle lane wherethey will come into conflict with cars.The design at some junctions of the bus lane being to the left of the bike lane is a potential troublespot. These would require buses to wait for all cyclists to pass before crossing the cycle lanefollowing a red signal, and to be provided with blind spot mirrors to protect cyclists that may nototherwise be seen.

Stirling Highway is currently difficult to cross orthogonally on a bicycle (e.g. from Dalkeith toKarrakatta) north of Claremont. For the four miles between Bayview Terrace and Hampden Roadthere is only one light controlled crossing of Stirling Highway, the one at Dalkeith Road. It is verydifficult and dangerous to attempt to cross Stirling Highway by bicycle at any other point duringpeak periods.I object to the road design unless provision such as bicycle only light controlled crossings areplaced on Stirling Highway north of Claremont to make crossing this impenetrable banier safer.It is also currently difficult and dangerous to turn right whilst cycling along Stirling Highway andthe road design does not appear to improve this situation. Turning right will consist of crossing twolanes of fast moving traffic, one at a time, before waiting in the central median before quicldycrossing the opposite lanes from a standing start. This is dangerous, especially at night. It isnecessary to cross Stirling Highway as it has many shops, etc, such as two IGA s and a library on itas well as being a main medium distance car route. The situation could be improved by makingparallel roads more cycle friendly and creating more opportunities to safely cross Stirling Highwayorthogonally, which would allow safe Hook turns.I object to the road design unless better provision is made for cyclists wishing to turn right acrossthe Highway.

Road Design; Provision of Facilities for Pedestrians

Stirling Highway north of Claremont is currently impenetrable for pedestrians and the road redesigndoes not improve the state of affairs. The road needs to be crossed by pedestrians as the residentson both sides of the highway need to be able to get to the shops, libraries, bus stops and friends thatare located on the opposite side of the road. In the current road redesign there are only two safe,light controlled crossings in the four miles from Hampden Road to Bayview Ter ace, those at LochStreet and Dalkeith Road. The road redesign expects septuagenarians and mothers with prams toquickly twice cross four lanes of fast moving traffic.Light controlled crossings, bridges or subways should be provided to allow pedestrians to safelycross Stirling Highway. Crossings would have little effect on medium distance traffic were theyphased with other lights on the Highway to let platoons through unrestricted. They would alsoprovide more defined gaps in the traffic for cyclists to swerve across the car lanes for right tu s.I object to the road design unless better provision is made for pedestrians wishing to cross thehighway.

I am available to appear before a planning commission hearing should that be desired.

Yours Sincerely,Philip Wallbridge

2

uojssjiuqns .mo ejQ|duioo oj .isao lurq

'G i 'ij'"'' "y+il' ' ' 'ti'Z'i LLo '' " £v .'o)S 'yen :2' /

C I~m a~f-/ - 3 a JrWi/. J oJ S ¦¦ tty.1 i) i )p t >~j) A rify'i vi

say "r<y6i y< "" v y>ryy / >' 'yy i ij"d" zw"''myiJ

jr ? Yng "3' '$ \kl V y d "y 'd 'y "li -7 ' 5a " " o' 7'/ ''' c 5 7 zO 7 " '

-V ziJrll viiyf ji? ~ .no J'd//7 VoQ <XL

i /i G(j yyiiii > 'dy a dm c 'j m' " 'dy 77/}/ 7 ? yry

i. ii ? "jxtd yyd <? 1 / "yyai 'xm'-' Hid ay dd ' Xc yi'iy' ' ' iii : / iPdiP J'ii/''' 'i/i 7Z ''' yd " "

7 i7j>; y'j P/ ' ' 'ppidyd j "" dni 'PPwXpd i if 7v/ ' i 'yipf/j " "

' ia'j'Pd''' ji/ii''' "*' i '/i\' Tidp" "d> ht' wodig' ""i/o dm dKAppU.' ' ' , "'

3 id <5X3.2 P'- 'i " "> i'd/d 3 Pf!''' S 's yoi i>/A ' YPXo ' "" p' ' SiSV

CXss? yp&'' ' "5 7a -' • "PiliV'' '?-i/v'''' ' iXTDP/' y<7'''' 'PadPa ' Pdup/'

:'&ytiy''" dy'id'iti'hi "7 ' 175" yaldi i'''Pd/nyp

yy/li. / ydny i ibn/p/p J p, l/i)PfP y tpVoy pyiid'jdip ''oliddy f

uojssjiu nsuoissjwqns jnoA ejajdiuoo o) aoeds ajouu ombej noA / sefied pajequinu leuowppe yoeyv o

jueAeisj sjeqM suoitduosep uopeooi opioads pue sassejppe Apodojd epn/oui osanssi pus sojdo) luajajjip 9}BJBdas o) sjaquinu jo sBwpeeq asf] o

oissiujqns e Bupeidujoo joj sdi±

>>& "fd ' ' }y 'mPld • sssjppe HBUig * q -jol ' 'yfi ''' JQqwnu ©uoqd bjuoq

0poajs° "pyy uidyo i) iPop'' "iwypyj'yx'' g"/''' SS0JPPV(A1MV310 XNia 3SV31d)

avmo w dydy idy "ii h yy y s ibn

t " -••• •-- i

£l yoissi iqjiiis

1-009 VAA L|l-i9d9032 Beg psijoon

uojssiuiujoQ fiuiuueid UB!|BJ)snv ujajse/wAjb}0jo8s :o_j_

A1NO asn 30Hd0

uoiiB/uasay AeM BjH Biii|.!|jg jo uo|jBS!|Buoi)By

tWOLZl JAiaiupuauiv aujaqog uoiBay UBji|odo.ija[/\i

uoissi uqns

IP UJJOJ(iBj UBjsqns) lUQUipueiJu if uoj ag

SOOZ V }U0U.ido|9A0Q pue Binuueid

Hea ing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not co pulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.



Ef Mo, I do not wish to spe k at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please com lete the following details)

I will be represente by:

C Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson


I would p efer my hearing to be conducted in:

C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORE Pri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

ermitted to attend)


a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the W PC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are ecorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by personfs) making the submission

Signature Date /.7 771

Note: Submi sions MUST be received y the ad ertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considere .

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning.and De elopment Act 2005Section 41 mendment (Substantial)

Form 41



OFFICE USE OfILY


Submissio 474

Name . (PLEASE PRfWT CLEARLY)

Address Postcode ...

Contact phone Bnaila d s -

Tips for completing a submission: .o C/se headings or numbers to separate diffetent topics and issuesa Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where rel vanto Att ch dditional numb red ages if you re uire or space to complete your su is ion

Submission

f, P cc . . . .. . ¦

2, t crr i tOtzS/ X*.. . aO.. .k r. .-?? .. . .bUlkX.t ..

. .Ah fOti . ,

3 . K 2 (ri?Ff i.. . .... . r..

IS.... >£X>?;.. y r ).tJ&Gx... r!.l/ftM** .. .. ofk.S A .M...1

. f& '.. .rk...

I * I1JU &L U .. . .

tAr/y - .. ±t ... 6 J. -

&Tlc'rk$. X r... f X .. C&Q. r.. . . ?&$£.. j sx. xo.

t„ . jfJtT? Sh&ttT ...a....u J MS..'....

.... for&Xfa.'khS... ..t... v

7-„ 7r £u/(. ir . XitQ? . ,3...( k.4<r?!;.< ...i .

0. .MH&Mt- r

( f > jke. /L s G&Lo £i ii tM&cdd. fXi-- LXXXr.. af~..

I



Anyone who has made a ritten submission on the amendment may personally presen t e basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if t e below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compul ory. Yourwritten submission will e consi ered in determining the recommendation for t e proposed amen mentwhether you nominate to speak at t e earings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in A pendix E of the amendment report.


No, i do no ish to speak at t e hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form an sign)

OR

H Yes, I wish to spea at the hearings. ( lease complete t e following details)

I will bo re resented by: „

E] Myself- My telephone number (business hours):

o

CD A spokesperson

Name of spokes erson: Contact telep one number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer m hearing to be conducted in:

£21 Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)ORPrivate (only the peo le nominated by you or the earings com ittee will be


You should be aware that

« The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may esu ject to applications for access under the act.

q In the course of t e APC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that sub ission, ma be disclosed to thir parties.

° All hearings are recorded and transcribe . ie transcripts of all hearings, along with alt written sub issions, aretabled in Parliament and pu lished as pu lic records should t e Gove or .approve t e propose amendment. TheWAPC reco mendations are similarly ublished in a report on sub issions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by personfsf makin the submission

[ote: Su missions MUST be received by the ad ertised closing date, being close offufSiftess (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT e consi ere .

Contacfs: Telephone - (08) 6551 000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website - ttpV vww.ptanning.wa.gov.au

- Planning and Development Act 2005 _Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amen ment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Hig way Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 475

6LITACElU. WLLSon . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address ...7j).7. X&.....V7 . Postcode ..,6/M.3

Contact phone number... 0AZ7.0.02.. 7? Email address .. (id jl. j.

Tips for com leting a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate diffe ent topics and issueso Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant0 Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

. ... Qp.p. . i.7 Sc .-C .. i.%.

of..... &tir:( )pj.. i.hfh p.../.. .&4n.r.. v&ky... ifat.... dafructioi .. ..cff... Mv. tp

.U&iM...k fiJ.diMS.......ifaoie....w. u.&k. CQft rs' w/d...rfe..

.. .. . .( / ...

Lh... .f&tf.ti Jdsr.,... /. .dcdz z. Z7i#st... .th.t... /.osx... of.../Uc?f. l. ..twcjf.

h(Mt MW.Y.mow.ly.. .d& .d Jj'.np.... effec .. ..M... .Hog... si.c.

cm i ....!... Xee. ..m.. fioinxt. ../ ... f vvj.dh yp... heJ/ x.. A&.oi. .. v.

.Zd ii.lt... ...Mb..i/.c/y...c/e hwyi/'.Qki...ii.Xed .....lx.....hcXty.

(ieihoM/J .... P jfa... M . .&... MJio.bi J.... Kep ufc jx. h Zm

0l._. 'cu/.i. .fl . .Jo.. .tiua.cc .. .h... mg.. Jr/.S... .. Mg.

.. ( . .. f... Such.. 0.oJ/ h..a. /.... .Moj.os.. ..uomJ .. . .t?gUu....f . icr... ..Sfi.f/f...

.0{/)J..... Xuffo J-O- tf OiM.q... .bou rty tftxXYip.. . Asix.... E mHic .

..it....} ...UiJw ti.. C MCi .e...m&Jl..a J.... ftpg...fay.../m w.i/.aJlao.u..

. .CP.tiAi.olex.... .m x. .. Xi b.M s.8 lo . tfw.g/Jly.v ....X ...J:....

. .gr&J... almlJ-. ... w.p.. pee s.... rJ. .../..

tu n over to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-co mittee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticke . This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is inclu ed in Appendix E of the amendment report.


m Mo, 1 do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

1 will be represented by:


or

A spokesperson _ _ - • -


1 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:





« The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the APC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or makin its report on these submissions, copies of oursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and ublished as public records should the Governor approve the pro osed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personlsl makin the submission


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - htt .VAwwv. lanning.wa.gov.au


Form 41



OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWes e Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submissio 476

Name ..

Address .IM ...,$.b. Poslcode i £,005

Contact phone number . A.l .. . LT.O.. Email address bdCwOoj 'Tb tti vA-

Tips for completing a submission: -

• Use headings or numbers to separate diffe ent topics and issues» Incl de roperty addresses and specific location description where relevant

Submission * ,ffac/? additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

I.. . .O.ffip.S'C. .. , s5.. .-Ht.b... . Or .. \ \q .'A

. .dbfei,'o. \c?4c4....W...-Hit.., /i/i

..M x... 0.4..

....lh.W )A. ...<?....A?..5 ...4 s. , . o lijq

..AS., q....toca.l.. ic\ vi .c\/. . .4 .J o > p

.. ? r.4i ... .4..fe l.Yii?]....Ao .., ) Sic .}Mcl.cji}c9d . jp #5.

..../. rr.. Jo.. . .b k bb c fr A. ayhMh; yi

...Ac q.(?$ .k..ih...c\ iy.... a d. fdAMex e M Vi.l

... b.h. k.t.t .Mc /frp....W \<?l..b .. C{.

turn over to co plete our sub ission

Hearing of-submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-co mittee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in detennining the recommendation for the propose amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on subm ssions and hearings is include in Appendix E of the amendment report.


H No, I do not wish to spea at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, i wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete ti e following details)



or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hou s): Postal address:

1 would p efe my hearing to be conducte in:

Public (members from the genera! public may attend your presentation)




« The WAPC is subject to t e Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

° In the course of t e WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may e disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded an transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament an published as public records should he Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliamen .

To be signed by person(s) making t e submission

Signature Date .. |. . j.) P.

Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (03) 6551 900; Fax - (03) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; Website - http://www.p!anning.wa,gov.au


Form 41

Submission[ etropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: Secretar Western Australian Planning Commission Submission 477Locked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Name . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .. .Y Y L . ?.... Postcode . r rA.

Contact phone number .V . Email address . . rr ...ft-V . A

Tips for completing a submission:• Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuese Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pag s if you require more s ace to compl te your submission

Submission

. \ ° ,L>; .?r: . 1 . : . ' e .9ec.\ .. . . y>.

....

tu n over to complete your sub ission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the belo 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.



Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR



Myself ~ My telephone number (business hours):

/

or „ !i ifV

A spokesperson '~ • tf . iV ,'s -' €-4

V ''-1


I would refer my hearing to be conducted in:

0 Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OR0 Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

a All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go ernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly ublished in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.


DateSignature

Note: Submissions MUST be received b the advertise closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://vAvw.planning.wa.gov.au

Attachment to Submission form Section 41 Amendment (Substantial) Form 41Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation


Name: Kerry RevellAddress: 47 Waroonga Road, Nedlands WA Postcode: 6009Contact phone number: 08 9386 4459 Email address: kcc rovfilKc biq Qnd.com

Submission

I have read the available MRSA documents describing the history and rationale for theStirling Highway amendments and commend the seeking of strategies to improve thesafety and ambience for all users of Stirling Highway - pedestrians, cyclists, publictransport users as well as motorists, but am concerned that some of the proposedamendments seeking an increase to the road reservation are done at the expense of thelocal heritage, community history and social diversity currently found along the StirlingHighway corridor.

I am writing to lodge my objection to the proposed increase in regional reservation over twoproperties in particular and additionally, to its general application along sections of StirlingHighway from Broadway (Subiaco/Nedlands) to Queen Victoria Street (North Fremantle).

Objections to the proposed amendment:

(1) I am co-owner of property Lot 61 (Strata Unit 2 / No. 592) Stirling Highway, MosmanPark and am writing to object to the proposed amendment to increase the regionalreservation over the above property and similar increase in regional reservation affectingnearby shops along Stirling Highway in the vicinity of Glyde and Stuart streets, MosmanPark.

(2) I am a long term parishioner of the heritage listed Christ Church Claremont, locatedcorner Stirling Highway and Queenslea Drive, Claremont and am writing to object to theproposed amendment to increase the regional reservation over the above property,affecting both the Stirling Highway and Queenslea Drive boundaries.

(3) I am writing to object to the proposed increase in regional reservation over thenumerous shops and other buildings, including a number of heritage-listed buildings andmonuments along the affected length of Stirling Highway from Broadway(Subiaco/Nedlands) to Queen Victoria Street (North Fremantle).

Rationale for objections:-• Faulty premise that the very costly road works resulting from increasing the regional

reservation will result in a significant reduction in vehicular accidents.Most accidents cited in the Stirling Highway Activity Corridor Phases 2 & 3

MRSA Submission attachment - Kerry Revell 1/3

Concept Design Report' (November 2010) are listed as occurring at intersections asa result of rear end crashes. These types of vehicular accidents are subject tooccurring whenever traffic is slowed or halted eg at traffic lights, when there isindecision about turning or when there is inclement weather, irrespective of roadwidth and number of lanes or presence of dedicated turning lanes. Driver attentionissues will continue to be a principal factor even if additional turning lanes areprovided and in fact, may be more so, due to driver assumption of having a clear runalong the highway.

» Resulting loss of safe pedestrian passageway at additional points where theincrease to the road reservation will result in current verge will be resumed eg. ChristChurch Claremont, at corner of Stirling Highway and Queenslea Drive. Whilstfootpath access will still be available, there will be the loss of the currently availableverge to act as a buffer to the highway vehicular activity. Whilst this is already thecase in some sections of Mosman Park and North Fremantle, to promote anadvantage of the proposed increase in regional reservation is the improvement topedestrian safety is misleading.

o Christ Church Claremont is a heritage listed church of significance and patronage tothe local and wider Anglican community. The church is used frequently for baptisms,weddings, funerals and other celebratory services by the wider Perth and WAAnglican community. Christ Church maintains a Memorial Garden, allowing theimposition of ashes as an alternative to the oft anonymity of the larger cemetery. Thecurrent space surrounding the church and Memorial Garden helps promote a senseof peace and sanctity to this area. Maintenance of easy access to the front entry ofthe church, and adequate room for those attending weddings and funerals to gathercomfortably on the paved area at the front of the church (Queenslea Drive) isimperative for the church to be able to provide these important pastoral services tothe community.This access will be significantly impacted upon if the proposed increase in regionalreservation is acted on, with resultant loss of the current car parking baysimmediately in front of the church on Queenslea Drive. Similarly, the loss of theverge, and resultant encroachment of Stirling Highway to within close proximity tothe side wall of the church and Memorial Garden, will impact upon the function,service and ambience of this widely recognised and highly regarded building andsacred space.

q Impact on the social fabric of the various local communities situated along StirlingHighway. Stirling Highway, particularly south of Loch Street, through the Claremonthub and then south of McNeil Street Peppermint Grove, reflects the typical HighStreet character of groups of shops and businesses lining the highway. Heritagelisted buildings and monuments, and other buildings and green space regarded oflocal significance, have been retained overtime and help to give distinctive presenceto each local government community.Whilst there are some off-highway shopping strips and centres, for the smallercommunities of Mosman Park and North Fremantle in particular, these high street'shopping precincts are of social importance to the local communities.Some sections are undergoing rejuvenation, whilst for other sections development isin a state of limbo due to the ongoing uncertainty as to the outcome of the StirlingHighway study.

MRSA S bmission attacliment - Kerry Revell 2/3

Whilst the available reservation is quite limited in some sections of the southern halfof Stirling Highway, this should not be seen as a negative, but rather adding to theindividual character of the village communities that bound this section of thehighway. Such close proximity of built environment to the highway, with subsequentslowing of traffic, is a feature of many British and European towns and cities, soughtafter both as places of residence and for visiting by tourists.

Plans also show proposed removal of several pedestrian 'level crossings in theCottesloe/Mosman Park section. Whilst safety is always an issue at level crossings,the reduced accessibility to other parts of the community should be seen as anotherknock at the social fabric’ of local communities and should be avoided wherepossible.

As with Christ Church, there are a number of other heritage listed buildings andmonuments (eg. Claremont Council Chambers and RSL Memorial) and others oflocal interest along Stirling Highway that are subject to removal or beingsignificantly impacted upon by the proposed amendment to increase the regionalreservation. It is hoped the significance to both the local and wider communities ofsuch buildings and their currently available surrounding open space will berecognised by the Western Australian Planning Commission.

Suggestions for alternative traffic management strategies:-

1. Consider utilising adjacent railway reserve where appropriate - lots of alternativesavailable.

2. Liaise with local schools to consider increased flexibility to start/finish times andalternative approaches for student drop-off to reduce the current bottle-neck that occurs atstart and finish of school day.

3. Liaise with local councils and the Minister for Planning, so that additional applications forincreased density is reviewed strategically, so that it does not add significantly to thealready overloaded local traffic.

4. Consider local traffic calming approaches including educating public about courtesy andpatience on the roads.

5. Remember the value of historical sites and points of interest as traffic calmers and withequal rights to exist as vehicular traffic

Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. If able, I would be ahppy to speakto this submission, as per details on the attached Submission form.

Kind regardsKerry Revell

MRS A Submission attachment - Kerry Revell 3/3

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment1210/41

- R tionalisation of Stirlin Highway Reservation

Panel Hearing

Kerry Revell 18.10.2013

SUBMISSION 477Tabled at the Hearings 18/10/13

• Co-owner Pizza ExpressUnit 2/592 Stirling HighwayMosman Park

• Long term parishionerChrist Church, cornerQueenslea Drive and StirlingHighway Claremont.

• Long term owner residentof Nedlands and member ofCoN Access Working Group• ci commo mty ocus

Objections to the proposed amendment to increase the regional reservationI

• affect on the two propertiesaffect to t e general Stirling Highway corridor (Claremont - North Fremantle)

- impact to the history, the ambience and social fabric of the community

- - ¦ . "l*1

Rationale for objectionsFaulty premise that costly road works resulting fromincreased regional reservation will result in significantreduction in vehicular accidents

Potential loss of safe pedestrian passageway

3 Continued consideration for poor urban planning thatresults in increased vehicular traffic and discourages useof public transport

Expectation that established structures and amenitiesshould be jeopardised to allow for highway expansion

Potential loss of what other communities value

Christ Church - 10O+yearsMost significant heritagelisted building on south sideof Stirling Highway

Used by local and widerAnglican community forbaptisms, weddings, funeralsand other celebratoryservices

Safe, easy access required

-frail, elderly, disabled-prams and young children

Room to congregate-weddings, funerals andSunday services- part of pastoral care

Safe and inviting, but at risk if

removal of Queenslea Driveparking

Concept Design Report 2010- State heritage listed church

and rectory- loss of land, almost no setback- redesign landscaped area

- does not addressthe impact to the function,ambience and social value ofchurch to wider community

Christ Church - most significantAnglican church for weddings inPerth. Income for church andwider community.At risk if parking is removed.

Additional risk if parking baybecomes left-hand turn lane/dedicated bus lane- Limo drivers will park andobstruct traffic flow

Loss of verge buffer both sides-impact upon function, servicesand ambience of church

Impact on Memorial Garden-sense of peace and sanctity

Loss of sacred space

Environmental problems caused byshift of Stirling Highway closer toChurch-noise, vibrations, fumes

-windows will need to be closed-ventilation and heat problems

Pizza ExpressProposed increase to Stirling Highway reservation

- Most of property would be resumedProposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Amendment

Increase in land requiredfor road purposes

I No.592 (Lot 61) Stirling Highway, Mosman ParkProposed area required 271 m2

subject to survey

STUART STREET

Pizza Express- demolished if Highwayreservation increased- loss of viable rental property

Part of a broader loss ofcommunity character andamenities

Current proposedamendment -

- Loss of Stuart-Glydehigh street precinct- Loss of the ‘face’ ofMosman Park- Loss of community

111

MObT I WKUi tHD,, T'

el .1,TCsif >.i * ,f -Ps.

Walkability vibrant urban life

ircrffm

kc'k'!U 1

|P r. 1!

See submission Town of MosmanPark for details re. proposals foralternative traffic management

Alternative traffic management strategiesMosman Park:-

- Road and railway reservations to thewestern side of Stirling Highway

- Reduction in speed limit from 60km to50km in identified areas

Alternative traffic management

strate ies - Stirling Highway

Use of adjacent railway and road reserves whereextension of Highway reserve required

Reduce speed limit at approaches to urban precincts

a Modify traffic signals to be more responsive to traffic flowLiaise with local private schools to encourage flexiblestart times and drop-off arrangements

Consider local traffic calming approaches includingeducating public about courtesy and patience on roads

Remember the value of historical sites and points ofinterest as traffic calmers and with equal rights to existas vehicular traffic

Jeff Specks on recent visit to Perth

The secret to a thriving city is its walkability

Walkable urban places have economic,social, health and environmental benefits

US author and City PlannerThe Walkability Mandate

4*

PortaTfSaBEI-exist. We ju?and respectfu


Form 41

SubmissionIVletropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41



OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 478

Name Michael Tucak(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address 44 Railway Street, Cottesloe Postcode ..

Contact phone number .9?.6363 5778 Email address .

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to com lete your submission

Submission

PLEASE REFER TO THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM.







OR

H Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


0 Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

0 A spokesperson



0 Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OR0 Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



° The WAPC is subject to the Freecfom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions madeto the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

i o be si ned by person(s) making the submission

27 July 2012Date



Addendum o Form 41 - Metro olitan Region Scheme Amendmen 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vatio "

F om: Michael Tucak, 44 Railway Street, Cottesloe WA 6011 (PH: (08) 6363 5778)

SUBMISSIO

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on Metropolitan Region SchemeAmendment 1210/41 (Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation). I do believecommunity input in this process is vital, and essential to obtaining the best result.

GENERAL

1. I firstly want to acknowledge all of the work that has gone into the SHACS process to date, and what seems on the whole to be a well prepared and dulyconsidered approach to current and longer term challenges for Stirling Hwy. Iwould hope this and others submission can build on all this work to date andlead to an even more balanced and improved outcome for all stakeholders. Iecho in this regard the comments in the Amendment Report (Rationalisationof Stirling Highway Reservation) that change must be well planned and wellmanaged and hope that all submissions made will be considered to lead to aproductive review and further positive improvement of Amendment 1210/41.

2. My submission focusses solely on Queen Victoria Street North Fremantle. I doin general terms support the Amendment as it relates to the road areas northof Jarrad Street in reduction of the road reserve to Stirling Street/QueensleaDrive. I will abstain from comments on other parts of Amend ent 1210/41.

3. I am a Cottesloe resident (a few blocks from Stirling Hwy, on Railway Street)and regularly travel by bus or train to Queen Victoria Street orth Fremantle,to meet friends and family, socialise and conduct business. I have done so inrecent years, as well as back to the late 90s and the renewal of that precinct.

4. I am also heavily involved in the creative industries in Western Australia andI believe the Queen Victoria Street village represents a key hub for a rangeof creative industry activity, as well as related social and community activity.

5. My submission is therefore made both as a resident and a business person. Iagree with the nature of other submissions that I am aware of that deal withthe unique special nature of Queen Victoria Street village and community.My submission focusses on the ability to preserve this aspect of our city butat the same time achieve the goals of the rationalisaton of the road reserve -I believe this can be achieved and result in best case" or win win outcome.

SUBMISSION

6. In essence, I consider Amendment 1210/41, as it relates to Queen VictoriaStreet, can be easily improved to better balance the competing concerns orinterests of (a) long term requirements for Stirling Hwy and (b) equally validlocal area concerns or interests, to reach a better outcome in this process

(and provide a greater level of clarity and certainty for future road planningand orderly land use planning", which is the goal of the amendment process).I would propose an alternative general approach to Queen Victoria Street toallow the Commission and other stakeholders to improve the Amendmentand make it more acceptable, and build on the excellent work already done.

7. I believe that in improving the Stirling Hwy road reserve for transport or roadpurposes, the impact on community and social should be minimised as muchas possible. The Amendment Report states it is also necessary to set asideland for conservation and recreation", and I believe that the Queen VictoriaStreet village already currently provides a valuable effective recreation andconservation (of both local area history and built or other heritage) area andit should be 'set aside in its current form without impact from road purposes.The land use or zoning should be preserved 'as is (ie no different use) as thiscan in fact still meet the Amendment's goal to give priority to improving theexisting physical road environment" by preserving this unique local area in abalance of long term regional functionality of the highway" with local spaces.

8. The current focus of the Amendment (various forms of transport movement)should properly include the non-vehicle based uses for the relevant areas -community interaction, recreation and their benefits, and ongoing growth ofthese with a community. These elements are also key to sustainable progressand should be central to the amendment process as a further bottom line .

MODIFICATION TO ME DME T

9. I therefore submit that the road design at Queen Victoria Street / JacksonStreet intersection be reconsidered to provide a better balance of interests. Ibelieve that adaptive design to minimize impact on State heritage property"can be equally applied to other local area heritage and amenity, whether thatbe local area heritage inventory or other local uses. The challenge presentedto this design is in fact an opportunity for an innovative, 'best case' outcome,

rather than the requirements of road design coming at the cost of local uses.Future modifications should begin from a starting point of preservin a localarea not removing it now before final designs are established - instead, thereshould be only as minimal an effect as possible in this Amendment, and if anadditional reservation is required should design not be able to meet the needof the local area in the future, then a localised specific amendment can occur.

10. This is particularly the case in light of the unknown nature of the Curtin Aveextension plans, for which there are currently two future options. Whilst it isstill unclear what requirements there will be for linking Stirling Hwy over to aCurtin Avenue extension, the reservation over Jackson Street should remain

unaffected, and only be extended once finalised Curtin Ave plans do exist.The land use and urban design of Phase 2 of'SHACS should be informed andled by this Phase 1, by prioritising land use opportunities consistent with thepreservation of what Queen Victoria Street already offers - an existing, fullyfunctional village or town centre that meets the trends of a developing cityaround it. This area is already a land use opportunity" that does not need tobe created, but can be easily enhanced and developed in a positive manner. Ibelieve that any modification of Queen Victoria Street should wait until otherplans for Curtin Avenue are clearly known, both for efficiency and for clarity.

11. Further to this, Queen Victoria Street is already an area of urban infill" thatis consistent with the goals of Directions 2013 and beyond" and an ac ivitycentre" that allows "Transit Oriented Development" around high frequencybuses and a nearby train station, linkable by a suitable corridor, either beingStirling Hwy or any rear laneway approach taken up towards Alfred Road.In particular, Queen Victoria St already matches "Development Control Policy1.6 (Planning to Support Transit Use and Transit Oriented Development)",which "promotes higher densities and mix of uses around high frequencypublic transport nodes and encourages non-car modes of transport around

major public transport nodes . I personally travel to and from Queen VictoriaStreet using the bus straight down Stirling Hwy, or catch the train, walkingfrom North Fremantle Train Station to Queen Victoria Street on Stirling Hwyor the current 'rear laneway behind the old public school. I believe QueenVictoria Street already provides a model on which to implement DC 1.6 policyand should be preserved, with its own intrinsic heritage and 'real history, asan in-tact, 'organic' area, rather than being deconstructed and built afresh.

12. Queen Victoria Street already has immediate scope for the "enhancedultimate road design" required by the Amendment Report, avoiding problemsof pollution etc if it is kept as an area of efficient transport movement" witha minimal traffic flow. Queen Victoria Street's village can itself make publictransport a more attractive option as the best way to get to that destinationand form part of a wider goal of encouraging public transport use in Perth -but at the very least any "enhanced ultimate road design" should not comeat the cost to the local area itself, rather the design should fit the local area.In particular, designs that minimise unnecessary traffic through this area willbe both achievable and popular and let the existing reservation be unaltered- that is, no widening of Queen Victoria Street for bus lane at Jackson Street.

13. Other road reserve requirements can also clearly be reduced significantly inthe Queen Victoria Street precinct as it does not form part of Stirling Hwy. Ialso believe that this approach can also be taken to the modifications to theactual road reserve on Stirling Hwy off to the east of Queen Victoria Street.

14. Queen Victoria Street is therefore able to be used as a leader and best casefor sustainable journeys" "sustainable behaviours in .. the journeys peoplemake , walking, cycling and the use of public transport"). Similarly, from asocial viewpoint, Queen Victoria Street already offers social benefits and doesnot need an improvement in amenity, landscaping or streetscape, nor better

access to public transport" as at present it already delivers all those things. Itallows "safer pedestrian movements" for "healthier lifestyles" and is now as

an area of "containment" where residents live closer to work" (with "reduced

travel needs and improved quality of life"). The potential destruction of a keycorner of Queen Victoria Street and the detrimental flow-on effect down intothe village would actually work directly against leading to opportunities forredevelopment and improvement... to promote Stirling Hwy as a community

asset rather than a barrier" (as promoted by the Amendment Report), whichcan "bring new residents and businesses to Stirling Hwy"). In more simpleterms, Queen Victoria Street currently represents a unique jewel" in how itworks alongside Stirling Hwy, and this should be preserved, not restricted.

15. Equally, Amendment 1210/41 is an opportunity to give certainty to a precinctby protecting it properly and allowing business and landowners to invest in orsupport redevelopment consistent with the above community and social goalsand doing so by allowing urban design that complements a road reservation.I believe it presents an opportunity to provide certainty of the reservation toattract new or relocated residents and new or expanded businesses" as it is.

16. In particular, I note the properties on the corner of Queen Victoria Street andJackson Street that will become subject to the road reservation would appearto have been built well before the 1963 road reservation, and Stirling Hwyitself has for a considerable time also deviated around Queen Victoria Street.

17. Ironically, Queen Victoria Street already provides the very things required byDirections 2031" in "priorisiting public amenity, pedestrians, cyclists and

public tra sport users over private car journeys", and now the main threat toit would seem to be the competing priority of ad acent private car journeys.

18. The preservation of Queen Victoria Street in this way will not affect or reducethe consistency of planning on the Stirling Hwy road reservation, as this areais clear and distinct from the Stirling Hwy route as a unique parcel or enclavethat does not need to be affective of anywhere else on the road reservation.

It can as noted above be seen as a component of the 'rear laneway approach

to access and be preserved in its entirety away from the Stirling Hwy route.

In conclusion, I agree that as this is the first time an 'ultimate road design'will be reached, and therefore we do need to 'get it right'. It is not only the'rare opportunity' for Stirling Hwy, but also for Queen Victoria Street itself. Ibelieve the overall approach may be sound, but details need to be improved.

Planning and Devc-ioprnciit 2QQ5Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme.' Amend ent 1210/41


iVt ICUEECrtl?

I ii Stipctery Weste Airtti liiin PtamurgComreisslon l Bag 20061 eitl VA6001

Submission 479

Name t lA 5 u-i (iei . i\/in r Attc rsu.r •'.le/v ri

A dress / A U<_ |_s S (. $ f £ (- f\C (_ A.\(i( >i Pos!«)cJe 010

Contact hene number 0 O (( \l 2 3 4 'l:? f;maB address itrc i V {jcdd & <fjr'fv . <VWt

'jjlJSAif ¦:;f: .Tirii'ctl''?, 3 SirfefltSS.'or?• 6 ss .leerj/ ys iv ti / iMS to separate dttfete d iinpfes and /si es> I cItMls propp/ty kltvssss and spaofi - Iti atitxt dcs riptkma «*sr» fetevant

AKsert edi/i'f/iv/asr n.vmfjcred psyes if you . ey. .v.'e won? s ew to op;, dele y f WA -ntssian

Submiss on

We refer to iiic proposal 1o rat onalize Ihc Stirling Highvray Reservation, anti in particular the pail lhaicio tes n ex ra lar.eon Stirling Highway allowing westbound tra fle to turn north int Veuciusc andWalter streets. In our submission, that part of he proposal should not proceed for the following reasons;

(1} We otiose to move our young family to the street and area b cause of the beautif l h ritage houses,the quiet family friendly community and to b within waking distance of Ro e Par & local schools.W a previously li ed on a busy road in Claremont and ade the ecision to mov to a quietand safer street as we started ou famil . The rice wo aid reflect d this prestige. Ibis proposalnot only devalues our investment an quality of lifestyle but it dev lues th im ortance of he it ge

it in our local community.

(2) We b lieve tho opos traffic changes ould hav a devastating im act on theco munit aspect of this heritage precinct. The stre t in this herita e ar a areho e to many young families and l erly resi ents, it ould no longer be safe forour children to l y i th street, ride their hikes or alk to the ark if traffic asdi ecte into the street by a turning lane fro Stirlin Highway, Likewise therewould be increas d anger for the eld rly.

(3) The streets in this heritage p ecinct were never des gne for large amounts oftraffic to pass th ou t em. They er built a residential streets for a gro ingco u ity o er one un re years ago when mi le clas family ho es ererequi ed.

(4) Any widening of the streets would ruin the beautiful tree line str etscapeo and thisis on of the att ibutes that makes this heritage r cinct so desirable whic tolive.

(6) Ihe hertlage precinct atregdy experiences S certain amount of through traffic andparking issues as there are busi esses along Stirling Highway th t attract tr ffic &tru ks as well as non-residence parkin s esult of the no Town Centre an special events such as the Royal Show and music concerts. The To n of Claremontimpose parking restrictions uring t ese times an the local polic atr l the areafor ee ing motorists etc. Traffic increases durin thes t s in articular renoticeable an tole ated for the short period that they run. It is n part because ofthese experiences that v e do not wish to experience any permanent trafficincrea es to Vaucluse Street.

To summari e our submission, there a ea to be no emonstrated need for motoristsaccess to alter or Vaucluse Streets to be enhanced by the creation of an a itionaltr ffic l ne. We f el the roposed rationalization of the Stirling High ay Reservationshould make provision fora continuous edian strip from Loch St eet to Loura Avenue,whose junction with Stirlin Highway are currently bot controlled by t affic Sights.Shi$ wo l not only aximize pedestrian safet and minimize disturbance to the streetshi the Heritage Area, but woul also enhance traffic flo along the hi hway bet een thetwo j nctions.

tum over to co plet our submission


Anyone who has mace a written submission on the amendment may personaliy present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-co mittee of the WAPC if the belo 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your

itten ubmission will bo considered in determining the reco mendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you no inate to speak at the heari gs or n t

Further information on submissio s and hearings is inclu ed in pendi E of the ame dment report

Please choose one of the following;r~~~-

D No, l do not wish to s eak at the hearings (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Q Yes, I wish to sp ak at the hearings (Please co plete t e following etails)


I Myself - My telephone number (bu iness hours):

or

ij A spokesper on

Ma e of spokesperson Contact telep one nu ber ( usiness hours) Po tal ad re s:

1 wo ld prefe my hearing to be con ucted in:

11 Public (me bers from the gene al public m y attend your presentation}

OR[ ! Private (only the people nominated by you or the heari gs com ittee will bo

ermitted to attend)

You should be a are that.

» The PC is subject to the t toedom ot tnf wfncition Act 1992 and os such, submissions marie to thoWAPC may hosubject f> applications for acc ss under the a t

« In the course of the WAPC assessing submis ions, or rooking its re ort 0*1 the e submissions, copies of yours bmission o trie substance of that submission, oy be discl sed to third parties.

« All hearings ore r corded arxl transcribe . 1 ho transcripts f all hearing , al ng with all written ubmissions, sicto ted m Parl ment ond publi fved as p blic records should the ove or approv the propose amendment The

A C recommendations are similarly publishe in a eport on submissions and ab e in Parlia ent

To be si ned bv parsonfs) maki o the submission

Sig ature Date 'll.

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, bei g close ofbusiness (Spm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submis ions ill NOT be considered-

CuixsHS TcIc Sorie (3$686190% fa* (08)«SS1 !XK)1; Ci-iail iivsigpbnnirej\s-atjuv.au, Wicbnifo tttpJtoHMp mmgv&Qo*.m>


Form 41

Submissio Metropolita Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisa ion of Sti ling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Name . £v yy vfe ...f$><2A

Address Im £Y}i Postcode .. P.i.O

Submission 48©

?

Contact phone number .%. . :! " ..Emaj| address e

Tips for completing a submission: ....® Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where elevanto Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

. V- d. e.

tu over to com lete your sub ission

ES:

/ • - • • -

Anyone ho has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-compiittee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will pe consi ered in determining the recommen ation for the propose amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amen ment report.



OR

Yes, I wish to s eak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C] A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal a dress:

I would refer y hearing to be conducted in:

E] Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREZ] Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

per itted to attend)

You shoul be aware that:

o The WAPC is s bject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In t e course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursub ission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament an publishe as public records should the Governor approve the roposed amendment. TheWAPC ecommendations are similarly ublishe in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personfs) makin the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received the advertise closing date, being close ofusiness (Somf on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considere .

Signature Date

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:// vwv.pIanning.wa. ov.au

P GE 0SwibmissSosi by Jemiifer Asm Paterson

28 Gongdon Street, Cla emont 6C51©

Attachm nt to Form 4i

Met opolitan Regios Scheme Am ndment 1280/41

Ratio alisa ion of Stirli g Highway Reservation,,

I do WOT approve of the Amendment affecting the Stirling Hi hway Reservation forthe following reasons:

• The proposed 2.0m Mediart in some areas is not an effective way forpedestrians to cross a bus highwa . Of course the me ian may be up to5.5m in some a eas, but these pedestri n refuges for inform l crossings arenot effective when crossing tr ffic. From personal ex erience, it is qui efri htening when walking two children plus third in p m to wait on thepedes rian refu e for traffic to s fely clear. We live on Congdon Street,Claremont and do not take the bus towards Fremantle when ravelling, s itis too dangerous to cross without pelic n crossing o stoplight with m small children in hand. One slip nd they re into the on oing traffic.Therefore we drive.

® The proposed bike lanes re not sufficient to encourage safe and regul rcycling. These bike lanes do not follow worldwide best practice as exhibitedby Berlin, [htt ://ww .theage.com. u/victoria/drop-speeds-ditch-hel ets-cycling-experts-s y-2OI20529-lzg64.html] Where speeds exceed 3Qkm/h,there shoul be physical b rrier bet een c r lane and bike lane. Ag in,from experience, I do not feel comfortable on Stirling Highway with myyoun children on their bikes or even my husband riding to work- even'

here there re bike lanes now or in those proposed for future. Thereforewe tend to drive these short distances.

° The improved pedestrian verge is appreciated, however this could beccomplished with green vegetation in areas to. create a buffer from the

traffic.® I am DEEPLY concerne abou the heritage sites up for emoli ion based on

this amen ment Pictorial e i ence has NOT been rovided by thegovernment showin the streetscapes that would be effected. I referpartic larl to NEGATIVE consequences that would be affect orthF emantle on Queen Victoria Street, Claremont at Bay View Terrace, theAlbion Hotel at Cottesloe, and the NEW G ove Library in PeppermintGrove.

° I see a lot of green space as I drive dail round the Western Suburbs withkids in tow. I would ask the State Go e nment to use world recognized bes practices nd think outside of our current tr ns ort tion patterns to i proveour communities. Wha abou ll the g een land lon the railway -particul rly at North Fremantle - to use for increasing cycling rou es andpe estrian routes? A radic l proach would be to drop the train line an pu a new road on top of that, so that the town ce tres alon StirlingHi hwa may bustle with storefronts, pedestri ns, an community life.

Submissio [ay'|es,8B l e& nn Paterson PAGE 2,

20 Cotigdon St eet, Claremont 6011®

Attachment to Fo m 41

Met opolita legioD Scheme Am ndment 12 fl @/41

Rationalis tion of Stirling Highway Reservation.

° Finally, I IMPLORE Planning WA o take a look at what is working - peopleare flocking to the Queen Victori Street strip for burgers, drinks, creativeshops; the Grove library is packed with all ages a all hours, centred by athriving cafe th t is much in dem nd; the Albion has been a hu e gatheringplace in the Cottesloe village; m ny heritage buildin s along Stirling Hi hwaydd to the streetscape of our bustling communities. R ther th n talcing an

aerial photo of hat needs to be enlar ed, look at the stre t level and seewhat is being used most (established buildin s) and what isn t (unused greenspaces). I com letely object to this rationalization that ives us the SAMEnumber of car lanes and only adds medians and bike lanes that are not bestpractice and wiii not increase walking, cycling, and public transportation inour quickly growing city.

Let us look outsi e our borders to see what is working around the world - not justfor now, but to plan the best Perth for future generations. Use our current wealthas a St te to m ke Perth a world-class city.

From:Sent:To:Subject:Attachments:

Jennifer Paterson <[email protected]>Friday, 27 July 2012 3:41 PMStirlingHighway; mrs; Yap, Kristina27 jul 12 Jennifer Paterson Submission for MRS Amendment 1201/41122707 Jennifer paterson submission MRS amend 121041.pdf

Importance: High

Please ensure that my attached submission is included in the review of the MRS Amendmentrelated to Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation.

Kind Regards.

Jennifer Paterson

address:PO Box 184Claremont, WA 6910AUSTRALIAhome: (08) 9467 6006mobile: 0412 527 526

i


Form 41

SubmissionMetro olitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41


OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 481

Name .. . . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) . A .

dd nf A ePVW:Ti-fest, 1 ?11, '2 a m tf(\?{(e(S l - S ollivj n I, Lo AT

Contact phone number..| L j.j. ..D. Email address

Tips for completing a submission:» Use headings or numbers to separate different topics an issues¦> Include property addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevant» Attach additional numbered pages if you require more s ace to complete your submission

Submission

. I... Ar . O p(?. £.Eri?.. . :Xfe\. .f 9 ./v .1D. . r .G .... J. a . . Trl .....

o! !.y A Mr. .rP v. ... i /vr ..xxT&...

.<pe ( ... . . . . /vr. . +. -.

.! N . X\ > . P.P.... .T . tf S. ad... .P.l.Tl.0d

. .(H1.. ,Q\£d.. BP A rD.d.d. .'... A . .. U AP :pT7p'± > . C,.... .... f.T-

.. Cr -AEc.V. >. II d... .. f.{ f. .o . I ....id .. . .1 U-te .r-

. ....$¦., P. ..1 fiLAd..rw UL .tt.r B. S... -):|Y.. AY-.. IA S •

. vy. .id .ou ... . . . .... EA d-A .0... . N.€ a/ uAd.A-r... . Xld A.

. \ d.lCo... Stl S... .Tc?. d... .i y .... Ad. o... .33A r... J.d... A .Ls).

i/Vovj la?. ... .X). fe .yXXX . .d... .3dr . P.O. (VI . a . la a-. . .v.i. .i Sri :X?r

.. .. : tiA- up. .GArc.r. ...:5Pi id. e.$: .tes.

1; A... U6JU r... ;3 .. .3Mr... AA!, UEd .'.A.U P.... .A&P

Ad.LTEG... Q TX... .X UU . Ad .XtE... .AP£.A. ...ds.. . TLpl dLf

. UPi T.LyE.PX......lA p.AG :...: d....E. re... .ua


Ul)T -D f A.o tprp E-S-iftL 'TttC AU6i M T oP S-TUL Wt, AW <1ttouU? b (be, toCArV rS) U ' DTe- j/L£ IULO£L1A Ttt vicirJi rf OT M cr &e S1-. - bnD


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee ofthe WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E ofthe amendment report.

Please choose one ofthe following:

No, I do not wish to spea at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom ofthe form and sign)

OR

M Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by: , , „ q o

2 Myself- My telephone number (business hours):. ..\ ."p ?.. ..

or

A spokesperson




ORE Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



« The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be J.subject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making ts report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Gove or approve the proposed a endment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) makin the submission

DateiJo \


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; Email-mrs@planning. a.go .au; Website - http://wmv.planning.wa.go .au

mrsFrom:Subject:Attachme ts:

FW: MRS Amendment 1210/41 Submission Andrew SullivanAndrewSullivan001.pdf

Importance: High

From: Andrew Sullivan rmailto:[email protected]: Thursday, 26 July 2012 6:46 PMTo: StirlingHighwaySubject: MRS Amendment 1210/ 1 Submission Andrew Sullivan

Please find attached my submission on the MRS Amendment 1210/41 -Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation.

Regards

Andrew Sullivan

Andrew Sullivan Architect2/133 High Street (Mall) FremantlePO Box 509 Fremantle WA 6959Tel: 4-61894333398Fax: 4-61894333397Mob: 4-61407447972Em: andrew.sullivan(Q)v7mail.com

T] please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

1

Planning and Development Act 2005SectSof 4 Amendment (SubstantSaS)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme mendment 1210/41

Rationalisatio of Stirling Highway Reservation

l o: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Commission

. Locked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

OFFICE USE ONLY

Su mission 482

Na e Z_(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Postco e 30(0

Contact phone number. {?.&. ??. -£>. Email address. Vr. .4 4

77ps for completing a submission:° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include pro erty addresses and specific iocation descri tions where relevant9 Attach addition l nu bered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

S bmission

I roppsed reduction n the reseryefor.Stjrlinig Highway is tothe SHACS Jan for the fpjjovvina reasons;

be welcomed, but I oppose

1.

2.

4.

5.

Ihe !a ias pro osed will resujtjn.a swathe destruction alonci the Highway

Jth.der plitjon and t isjsjnsuppprtabJeand unnecessar . Theculturai, social and"

18 unsustainab eVynetnerthe.[anesareforbjcyc!e1.busprvehjcJe.

• ™Pi .0..is. airn st ineyitable .going to be a form of plannings!isnt1.w|th.prpp.erty.pwnersabuttingjhe highway, reluctant to spend moneyr ajntaming or re airing stmctures which .are.targeted for dem there

|s.np..c!eartimeljneA5radua.l.degra.datignoft.hea of these structuresmi.qhtreasonabl be.expected...P.ro ertyya!ues.wilJbeaffecte.d..and businesses will sufferbecause.ofthe. uncertaint ..

I eSHACS Janjs.i!l.thgught out and. ac ward thinking. The pro osed pedestrian.r&as could weH accp.mrnodate footpath,, b jf designed properly as

l?. dQnp in. .ities.pyerseas {notably.Berljn. see attached.j.mage , and do not’need tobe pn .the ighwa .

X e.busjanes. need tp.te redesigne andbus.rputes.altered.if possible to minimisetnejm ctofspace. such as’iight’raileQy!d.. econsidered,.and also thou rai] reserve ;nso'me ~ Jbe swathe ofdestructipn.pian is sjmp[y untenable

tu overt© complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee ofthe WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is inclu ed in Appendix E ofthe a endment report.


e No, I do not is to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the for and sign)

OR

O Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


C Myself - y telephone number (business hours):

or

CD A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:., ;


D Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORCD Private (onl the people nominated by you or the hearings co mittee ill be


You should be aware that: •

o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WA C assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursu ission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

s All hearings are recorded and transcribed.Yhe transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parlia ent and publishe as public records should the Gove or approve the proposed amendment. TheWAP reco mendations are similarly published in a report on sub issions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ne by person(s) makin the sub ission

. Signature.... ........ Date.

Note: Submissions MUST be receive by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]/a.gov.au; Website - http:/Avww.p!anning.vva.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Subs anti l)

Form 41


Stirling Highway

USE ONLYOFFICE

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Commission469 Wellington StreetPerth WA 6000

Submission 483

Name: Dr Lise Summers, President, Histo y Council of WesternAustralia.

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address: PO Box 1619, West Perth Postcode: 6872

Contact phone number: Email address: [email protected]:[email protected]

Sub ission (Please attach additional pages if required. It is preferred t at any additional information be loose rather thanbound)

Introduction

The History Council of Western Australia is the peak body for history in the

State, representing the concerns of history associations and organisations,

and individuals interested in history.

The Council has a number of concerns relating to the proposed amendment to

Stirling Highway reserve and the impact that will have on the history of the

streett which, as dentified in the amendment proposal and associated

documents, has been the main connection for the State and the colony

between Perth and Fremantle since colonisation. Because of this history the

street is fronted by a number of heritage precincts and structures.

The documentation identifies that sites are protected at municipal level and

on the State Heritage Register, and pays particular attention to sites that are

in the latter category. However, because a site is not listed on the Register

does not mean that it is not of State significance, merely that the significance

of the site has not yet been fully assessed. The History Council is concerned

that sites of State significance may be damaged or destroyed without a full

and proper assessment. Preparation for changes to the road reserve or

implementation of the scheme must include a full assessment of affected

sites, and provide for a conservation plan to be developed prior to any work

being undertaken. Given recent history, these conservation plans should be

put out for public consultation and discussion as an early part of the approval

process.

Of particular concern are the effects of the proposed amendment on the

visual amenity and character of heritage precincts at Nedlands, Cottesloe,

Claremont and North Fremantle. The Concept Design Report identifies, for

example, that the Police Station at Claremont will be significantly affected by

a proposed bus lane and 5.1 metre verge. As verge widths have been

reduced elsewhere in the proposal, particularly in Claremont, the History

Council would strongly recommend that consideration be given to the way in

which the verge width could be reduced both here and at other heritage sites,

and the bus lane moved. While the Council is cognisant of health and safety

factors, it believes that public amenity includes consideration of the heritage

significance of this and other structures affected by the proposal.

Similarly, the proposed amendment will significantly impact on the setting of

several heritage sites, such as Christ Church at Claremont. The Church is a

recognised and well used venue for christenings and weddings, and the

reserve along the street contributes to its sense of place, as well as providing

a buffer zone for people gathered outside waiting for the arrival or departure

of the bride, etc. Again, consideration of public amenity at these sites should

include the historic and heritage significance of the sites, as well as visual

amenity, and the effect of the increased proximity of heavy traffic on the

fabric of the buildings.

It is believed that other submissions will focus on the impacts on heritage

precincts, particularly at North Fremantle. Heritage protection is something

that we, as a State and a community, should commit to fully, so that we can

take pride in and more fully understand the society and culture in which we

live.


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally presentthe basis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing.The comments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining therecommendation for the proposed amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D.


LJ Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)


° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPCmay be subject to applications for access under the act.


° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment.The WAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the sub nissiora

Signature Lise Summers Date 27 July 2012

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on Friday 27 July 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.


mrsFrom:Subject: FW: Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41Attachments: Amendment submission Stirling Hwy.doc

From: president(5ihistorvcouncilwa.ora.au rmailto:[email protected]: Friday, 27 July 2012 9:21 AMTo: StirlingHighwayCc: [email protected] : Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

The SecretaryWeste Australian Planning Commission140 William StreetPerth WA 6000

Please find attached a submission from the History Council of Western Australia. Thissubmission is being sent electronically, in accordance with the Electronic Transactions Act.

Lise Summers, PhD

PresidentHistory Council of Western Australiaw w.histo vcouncilwa.o g.au

l


Form 41



OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Commission SubllfliSSIOil 48 1Locked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Name T fh. . Yr , (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address ....(/ .C. .Q D _ V H. F ic Postcode ...hiS.

Contact phone number Email address .<Sr. 0

Tips for completing a submission:° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

I'M Jji I L t o- j -v cj d yvo

U< *

rW\ATp Fl>P?4 T>'F .l 'J'7i io '-Y\ CC Y LV v \r ;.C- i | h SL-iJLU- ill j Vx,

, j&JL. . y y . . f Cr F j'd I VyJx

y .. hy... sd ? ?.v rL.vy y. .yy f . yf ly lLdAv

u c l .f. oyyty dc Lty, y jd/fy7y\

tcrl Jlr..( .V .V.2d. V. dy.v9yif(!y.. ? y cL ry- -S--- C -Y\dy djAj-iJl &p Al d/ C -fH-fistv- x f - v y j

K)cA of~ ' c trj - -

yy.&L ...&J &y -..yi?.v.k . a x f h qMjjl

<ho .yy r.. by.iJk P.. kh iyy/yfiyk.'... f \ Q 7 9./I 'if v JL/vy?i jiy-y py(Ahd .. (i.y y. ..fa.uJl. jfakD .. y dc . .yyfayyy.. .. fyikClx Mi y yiyy. !f:rh !ysl ,t £ ••

. y±. . 3 vS. h turn o er to complete your submission

y c(Xt ( /C/kfi-d y 1 d C t. t (Fq/vvy/ a\5 -/

/ [ ffiJL J KcL/) fMJL (x) I2J1JI M /pdA,i O 1 3 l <2 yjtsC- l x- A/L l

U3 . ljkyyx tXJULc i n h o- i &K. ixrvdt

< /'v/ \ j -Q,C. {- .A, b-i-l JkQ. h'( W /) Q CO h A ly A' . .v " / J¦ S O J p<i / ~X b(\- ir ...

/ /tv j) /f / v . OV' j QrxcO-v' 2-Ol t[ JL l/VYV j& c. O yx

tjrKjLs nt Axk ¦• ( t v i f.e. ' O . ,

v i/v | ( - o bcQsi'x cl ly; /l(iv (jKi,

/'\ -x. i,C Ir \_ \A. ) t JxL-A. . " ) - 7 - i O ' 'W by\_ (-, <h) .

- V, A AjiA) (X r\,<x , a c. v C.-0 iXxL. & \J ?ri f v

/ V > .Q.J - j' V i/Y xJ

l cxJ - o-X/ Ax i vA/

- 13-\0 zt/y Vj MaM) g y aJi Ql-ArtY l r 'J .

. w g it qay- r/ rt- - _ fo., / v

L xUL' Sh b fl iA/l /,\ 2. v i AYrxtz c j SLo gi-Q

(K-

iYvA- V

/ ji (ho

lA i (K. gJgt-A

Ko r~ v' ClTi , g /'

hlla h 'AM/y yX) . i-L. t C i-\/) vC v-v /¦'

d (C O /V - O-'i t 'v { 1j

"j Q/ . OO A.lhL .y htlxCL f i vs /- s ( v \7 i:\ l AA j /KJ j dsA

fvxa j&Y, I bex ilvOCs (SLy '-O

]/\ -V'JL-(J ,, C,Q A CVl/o ~L<7'-, v_J 6- tt

C jyjA- 0 vfi-o'V v/ i- . O Qj} ' X-c{.. ;.' C >VA 0 6 j ff i ,

¦ / Vl\ / ) L . V &. / (j. hv {J IL % h\o\ ta - - Clf} ._. 3on_ f, c\ A - 0 n - / » ¦ l i-

LO

W

AX l-Sl YVi jML/ rx\ji-'r>\fa&l j- l -

/}< p i vv <; djoh iAA.-/ (y v so,

/ S

\~xinj 4 tfl li a ,

vyfxO j/yvd f\« A- /c. . c j!K/o{ ( A- bfi c5> -o. / 'flv Aj

& cJ . olg ( lV'Y a Q AJJAyx \Ji J& A JjI yY X 'IgD

Jh vA Axj . /1/W V i ot - a nJh' /D w a ./o i ( A(5t jL I'Vo u , .5 | '0' ] VQ f- /'V- 'i>' ci. rvAj YVxYA i x.Q v\l

o i v xs u - - jqJL& b i'v x k t '/Ko./v v C yO ifc'J t >A. /.), jl xxo {/I

y(.l/) l) / /i'\' (Q'jo vf t'V-x v - -l/j cj i/V vO.' - V"v ¦ '- • /V.AjL h.0 f < /W i

aj L . • I VWL. .- ./c 10 (c ./ (M-

ir

V





e Mo, do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR




or

A spokesperson









o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along ith all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.


Signature Date oH o'? U

Note: S bmissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Email-mrs@ lanning.wa.go .au; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Submission 8>5

QUEEN VICTORIA STREET TO MCCABE STREET - Stirling Highway RoadReservation

The Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation Amendment Report 1210/41 is to becommended in trying to provide more efficient bus and bike transport. There are, however, anumber of problems with the proposal as it currently stands, both in the implementation and someof the philosophy behind the proposal. These should be addressed before a final plan is produced.

HERITAGEStirling Highway passes through several areas of social and cultural significance. Many significantsites are already very close to the road and any extension of the reservation (and eventually the roaditself) will reduce the heritage value of these places. The size of the planned road rese ve is verywide and pays no respect to the existing built enviromnent. If implemented as planned it will esultin many demolitions of important local buildings, or buildings will have the road reserve start attheir front doo step. As it stands the effect on heritage outweighs the benefits.

North Fremantle is a particular issue, with little space to widen the reserve and several significantbuildings. The reserve here needs to be narrower, and needs to recognise the local traffic conditions

While some features, such as bike paths, should be consistent for safety reasons, all intersections donot need to be identical. Design should recognise varying traffic flow patte s and density indifferent parts of the highway. In North Fremantle there is less traffic feeding into the highwaybecause there are fewer people living in the area. There is also little potential for growth sincedevelopment has already taken place or is restricted by the railway line.

A narrowe road with a reduced speed limit could be used here, as is proposed for Claremont.Because the distance between Jackson St and Alfred Rd is short, traffic usually moves slowlybetween the two sets of lights anyway.

BUS LANES and RIGHT HAND TURN L ESBuses should have priority over cars, but this does not mean there needs to be an extra lane. Atintersections one of the car lanes could be used for buses. This situation currently exists at most busstops, where cars travelling in the outside lane wait for the bus or move around it. Also, adding righthand turn lanes is for the benefit of cars only - not buses. As such, these two features willencourage the use of private cars, rathe than public transport. Surely this is not the intention? It isthe addition of two extra lanes at each intersection that creates the widest points in the road and themost problematic parts of the reservation.

TRU C TIONSPotential future road truncations in North Fremantle at three intersections with Stirling Highwayseem pointless. They require more land to be reserved and more heritage buildings demolished.Truncations are planned for intersections that have been closed for many years and are not likely toeve be opened. There are also highly engineered intersections planned for roads that carry littlepeak hour traffic. There are already enough entrance points onto the highway from the east, giventhat future development between the highway and the river is limited.

BICYCLE L NESThe provision of bicycle lanes is a very necessary part of future planning. Two lanes on StirlingHighway and the future Principal Shared Path (PSP) along the railway line will mean this area iswell served. The proposed design has two on-road cycle lanes, requiring a significant idth of road.Grade-separated cycle paths have been shown to be much safer than on-road lanes, particularly

when the lane will be frequently crossed by turning traffic and buses. A single two way grade-separated path could potentially educe the need for some width in the reservation while increasingsafety.

Furthermore, the Principal Shared Path must be completed as soon as possible to meet currentcycling needs without waiting for the finalisation of this proposal.

CONCLUSIONIt has been shown that building more roads does not solve traffic congestion. More roads increasecar use. Increasing the road reserve has been presented as a plan to increase bus and bike use, butthere are elements which will actually increase car use. By taking buses out of car lanes and givingcars right-hand turn lanes we are accommodating the cars. Ideally, bus and bicycle lanes should beadded at the expense of cars and the speed limit should be reduced over most of the highway.

Robert Day36 Staton RdEast Fremantle 6158

Submission 486

SUBMISSIONRATIONALISATION OF STIRLING HIGHWAY ROAD RESERVATION

In 2010 the Dept of Planning produced Directions 2031, a blue print for the sustainable growth

of Perth. Greater density, leading to greater use of public transport was to be encouraged while

seeking to retain the built heritage and the cultural, historic and social values of our

communities. The amendment to the Stirling Highway Reservation however completely ignores

these values of the districts associated with Stirling Highway between North Fremantle and

Clare ont. These are historic districts that are busy meeting and shopping places for locals as

well as people who live outside the area.

The Draft Amendment recognises the value of reducing the Reservation in Nedlands and parts

of Claremont to provide certainty to land owners. An increased reserve from North Fremantle to

Claremont will however introduce great uncertainty in those com unities. Properties in

reservations are often not renovated or improved and businesses live in limbo, unsure whether it

is worth investing in a location which may not be long term. Any advantages from better bus and

bike use of Stirling Highway will be outweighed by the social effects and the loss of builtheritage in the communities affected.

NORTH FREMANTLE

The population density of areas around Stirling Highway in Mosman Park and beyond will

increase in future years because of government planning. I travel this route quite often. There

is little congestion in North Fremantle compared to Claremont and since the. suburb is an old

area with small blocks and many heritage listed buildings there is not the potential for growth.

Modern high density residential development has already taken place on those areas which were

available. North Fremantle does not need these changes to the road plan.

FUTURE TRANSPORT

This rationalisation does not take into account the likely future transport picture.

Directions 2031 tells us that private car use accounts for 57% of daily trips, and that with Perth s

rapidly increasing population this proportion must decrease and ublic transport use increase.

Generally, people drive their cars because it is quicker than using the bus. Any changes to

Stirling Highway need to make it less attractive to drive a car (slower) and more attractive to

catch a bus or train (quicker).

For example, rather than add e tra bus lanes or right hand turn lanes, cars should be reduced to

one lane to allow buses priority access at traffic lights or intersections.

BICYCLE LANES

Bicycle transport should of course be encouraged and the Principle Shared Path along the

railway line will eventually be continued on. This should be sufficient for the area so that on¬

road lanes will not always be necessary, e.g. along the highway south of Jarrad St in Cottesloe

where space is limited. The proposed route is so close to the road, and parallels it exactly, that

cyclists could easily move between the PSP and Stirling Highway. This separate path will also be

safer than riding on the road, even in a dedicated lane.

CONCLUSIONThis amendment will have a devastating effect on North Fremantle, and also severely impact

Mosman Park, Peppermint Grove, Cottesloe and parts of Claremont. The highway was the main

route along which people first lived and built when these old suburbs were first established.

Although not marked on the carriageway plans there are many historic buildings on local

municipal heritage lists which will be either resumed or lose their front yards.

The carriageway concept and subsequent land requirement is a rolls royce design that favours

cars and takes little account of the existing built environment. The days of demolishing our

significant buildings for road construction should be long gone.

Pam Nairn

36 Staton Rd,

East Fremantle 6158

Ph: 0414-966-489

Submission 487

From:Sent:To:

Subject:

Gianpaolo Crugnale <[email protected]>Friday, 27 July 2012 4:23 PMmrs

Stirling hwy comment part 1 - 488 Stirling Hwy Peppermint Grove

I write this email in two parts as I understand that submission closing is today. I will email part 2with attachments in the next week.

I have recently purchaed Property address affected 488 Stirling hwy, peppermint grove. Theproperty is at the lights with Stirling hwy and Jared street.

Access to site is very difficult as the traffic lights do not allow for safe entry or exit. The laneway torear of block is narrow.

Under the local town planning scheme I am required to be setback 6m from south and eastboundary due to adjoining residential land and height restrictions. Only the front section of theproperty where it adjoins a commercial property so no restrictions there. Therefore by resuming theland, the potential to develop or use the site is estricted.

Having a resumption of 12m g eatly reduces the land use and development opportunities.

12m resumptions does affect the amenity and ability for me to use the property.

As mentioned I will email part 2 with more diagrams.

My contact number is 040 88 99 880

Thank you

Gianpaolo CrugnaleGage Roads ConstructionPo box 1067, Osborne park BC 6916

i

Ad ition toSubmission 48

From:

Sent:To:Subject:Attachments:

Gianpaolo Crugnale <[email protected]>Monday, 14 January 2013 1:31 PMmrs; corporateMRS Proposed Amendment 1210/41 - Pt 2Plan Indicating MRS Rationalisation Impact.pdf; GR PTY LTD LT 140112 490STIRLING HWY - MRS AMENDMENT 1210-41.pdf

Dear Mr Neil Thomson & Mrs Marija Bubanic

Thakyou for your letter dated 19 December 2012.

Please find enclosed further information as outlined in my email dated 27th July 2012 and furtherconcerns on the proposed road widening. The road widening really concerns me as it greatlyaffects the amenity and working/development use of my property.

If you require any further information please contact me on 9385 4000 or 0408 899 880.

Kind regards

Gianpaolo CrugnaleOwner: 490 Stirling Highway, Peppermint Grove

i

Your Ref# 809-2-1-91 PT2 (RLS/0248)

Western Australian Planning Commission140 William StreetPerth WA 6000Attn: Mr Neil Thomson

Dear Mr Thomson

Thankyou for the opportunity to comment on the MRS Proposed Amendment1210/41 and in par icular the property located 90 Stirling Highway, PeppermintGrove which is greatly affected by this amendment.In additional to my email dated 27 July 2012,1 would like to further add thefollowing notes:1. Refer to attached diagram of the site which outlines the current building and its position.

2. Please note the building is a heritage listed property.

3. We have to date spent approximately $500,000 in refurbishment and upgrade of the building

and this work is underway at present. This work was required as the building has not had any

maintenance done for many years and is in urgent need of repair and restoration.

4. As you can see the Stirling Highway road widening greatly affects the site and reduces its

functiuoning amenity. The front portion of the site is where the main income is derived and

where the value exists in the property.

5. I also have tenants in the building who are under long term leases with further options.

6. The tenants have chosen to rent here because of its high profile and visibility along Stirling

Highway and from Jared Street, Cottesloe

7. The front portion allows me to build over the laneway should I choose to re-develop. Due to

setback restrictions to the rear I am unable to maximize the building area within the setbacks

8. Construction below ground for car parking would be costly and therefore the value is being

able to build above ground.

9. Access to the site is only via the crossover which come off the traffic lights. No other entry is

possible.

10. Exit from site is not safe and requires a strategy and further discussions with Main Roads WA.

11. Alternate access is not available and this is the only access possible to the site.

12. The current building is a heritage building which we are restoring.

13. The current Town Planning Scheme [TPS] advises that building setbacks need to be 6m off the

side and rear boundaries when the site adjoins a residential zoning.

14. In addition the current TPS also has height restriction formulas which also impact the

development potential. Obviously if the 12.2m is set back then the ability to gain maximum

potential from the land is restricted.

Gage Roads Pty Ltd AB : 1 05 117 5 66490 Stirling Highway, Peppermint Grove, WA 6011

3 Tel: 9385 4000 Fax: 93 85 4600 ob: 0408 899 880 Email: [email protected]

15. The site adjoins a residential area to the side and rear limiting the amount of area I can build

on. The MRS proposal to widen Stirling Hwy means that the property is affected greatly as the

development potential and usable area is greatly reduced. The front portion of the lot adjoins

a commercial area and therefore has a zero setback.

16. The rear portion of the existing building adjoins a residential area and if we chose to demolish

the building then we would have to set back the building by 6m.

17. There are vast tracts of land adjoining the railway line which should be utilized to reduce the

impact on Stirling Highway.18. One of the main bottlenecks with Stirling Hi hway is around the schools at school drop off and

pick up times. The commission should consider additional lanes and traffic management at

these points to assist in the traffic flow.

Should you require further information please do not hesitate to contact me

Kind regards

Gianpaolo CrugnaieGage Roads Pty LtdOwner 490 Stirling Highway, Peppermint Grove

Gage Roads Pty Ltd ABII: 1 05 117 5 66490 Stirling Highway, Peppermint Grove, WA 6011

u Tel: 9385 4000 Fax: 9 85 4600 Mob: 0408 8 9 880 Email: gip@ ageroadsgroup.com.au

S bmission 488

Subject: FW: Stirling highway amendment

From: Jeni rmailto:iecaiast(5)iinetnet.aulSent: Wednesday, 18 July 2012 3:01 AMTo: corporateSubject: Stirling hig way amendment

Hi

I am writing to you strongly opposed to the above mentioned amendment in North Fremantle. I cant fill out

the forms as my printer isn t working so cant copy them.I have been a lover of Fremantle my whole life. I call myself a Freo girl. I am also in the music industry.What you are planning to do is not only destroying the culture in Fremantle which is world renowned andloved , but you are also threatening the livelihood of myself and many wonderful people I know. Peopleneed entertainment, that is the truth, and it seems you keep trying to take it all away. And you sit back andwonder why the crime rates are up, why people are living in despair, more people are depressed thanever...you are taking away peoples release, their outlet from their working week. I have met people from allaround the world, who love the culture within the very venues your amendment is threatening. I don t

even know if you realise what you are doing. Do you just sit in your office during the week and think ofthese rtidiculous ideas without actually oing out there and seeing what it is you are thinking of destroying.?Maybe you just don't care, but me and a lot of people do, and we'll do whatever it takes to stop this fromhappening. We are the taxpayers, and we don't want this.

Jeni

l

Submission 489


corporateWednesday, 18 July 2012 10:38 AMmrs

FW: Curtin Avenue / Stirling Highway extension plan

From: kirsty finn rinailto:[email protected],au1Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2012 10:32 AMTo: corporateSubject: Curtin Avenue / Stirling Highway extension plan

Why not build a large parking zone or multi-storey car park a little further out from the proposedareas of expansion and increase the amount of public tr nsport (An issue that will in itself cut do nthe number of vehicles used in built up areas)? Commonly known as "Park and Ride".This way it would save the hassles created by road closures during the infrastructure proccess, anddoes not impact on the continued existence of any heritage buildings (which is one of the thingsFremantle is famous for). Heritage buildings are disappea ing at a ridiculous rate, and makes it lookas though Weste Australia does not care about heritage at all

l

Submission 490

DEPARTME T OF PLANNING

2 6 JUL 2012


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(W PC): Increasing the e isting Primary Regional Roads reservation in WorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.

North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.

In addition, it is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiatives thathave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.

I believe the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment

It is unthinkable that heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of motor vehicles, when other viable options exist.

The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings play a vital role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport infrastructure.

Date TN ICB L2

Submission 491


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highw y Reser ation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in WorthFremantle)





I believe the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.



Submission 492


OLPARTMF'W OF PLANNING

2 6 JUL 2012

FILE \Z L' *a;

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highwa Reser ation(W PC): Increasing the existing Prima y Regional Roads reser ation in No thP emantle)


orth Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for ehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Signed T / isVI Pl- QC (/? VW

Date¦ / / /y2 i-/ l fC Q

Submission 4§3


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE £1$ I


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(W PC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in WorthPremantle)








Signed

Date

Submission 494

department of planning

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highw y Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing P imar Regional Roads reser ation in Wort Fremantle)








Signed -~7

A. M. V v t xA

CFca(L

Submission 495 ng

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE IZIS |


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highw y Reses-vation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in WorthFremantle)





I believe the North Fremantle proposal should be remo ed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.



Signed

Date

SuhmissioGi 496

DEPARTMENT OF PLA NING

I he Secretary

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE LS >

Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(W PC): increasing the existing Prima Region l Roads reservation in WorthFremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social acti ity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, si ply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Signed

Submission 4®


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reser ation(WAPC) lncreasing the existing Primary Region LRoads reser fation in Wortlx. .Fre antle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversit of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.

In addition, it is also completel contradictory to the traffic calming initiatives thathave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.


It is unthinkable that heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded to.facilitate the needs of motor vehicles, when other viable options exist.


Signed

Date

Submission 498

J DEPARTMENT of PLANNING

I 15 JIJL 2012I file laQU 8


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation(WAPG): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction or heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.


I belie e the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.



Submis ion 499

DEPARTMENT OF PLAN ING

2 s JUL 2012.

The Secreta Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reser ation in NorthFremantle)








Signed _

Date

Submission iOO

DEPARTMENT OF PLA NI G

25 JUL 2012

FILE l gThe SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - ationalisation of Stirling Hig way Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in Wort F emantle)








Signed

Date


2 5 JUL 2012

FI LE | Q A L]


Re: mendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation{W PC): Increasing the exist ng P ima y Regional Roads eservation in WorthFremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social acti ity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Submission i©2


2 5 UL 2012

FILE


Re: mendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway eservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads rese ation in NorthFre antle)








Signed

Date C?/ - v • fZ

Submission 503

department of planni g

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE YL.I j - .


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reser ation(W PC): Inc easing the existing Primary Region l Roads ese vation in Mori P emantle)





I believe the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment



Signed

Date /. i

p-/ MA ' e-

w/ - &1 y

Submissio 50


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Ra ionalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in Wort Frem ntle)








Signed

Date


Form 41



1 2 SEP 2012

file

R tionalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation


OFFICE USE ONLY

SUBMISSION NUMBER

505

Name(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address rA T'. ,. . . T.pTr.'rF.P. P' 'rrP.. Postcode .Pi

Contact phone number Email address

Tips for completing a submission:® Use headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issues

Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant® Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

C T '.£ fr. ...V:0:yp o a

v roL_F a.yySAy .,..... .v.'?.r .. . r.LSr. 5. .Pfl.' Poser.iy.p, E(rr. r':jc

if . .Atr ASe; -yajA - -Fvc. .'0.c .yrO t y ty ;.y c GP fV' a,

.g-o ct c c. /yTy .0 0 a c ad \ r g- a "fc> c. a >cCo

P't ft r f t G G O | e ft C.Vi. V .y y r iD CL' v Fo ,

(D) v Gr 0 A.<? C. aftT.t O . Go eD. ... y 1.00. .ID.N ,£;OS. .GiGG.G 'Ae N.n' d <S . jPj'O VCTy jG)G S 1 ....O fy.... o F.... . F?l D.'T'. Y.y?.\

) is \ r pnopo sc?> 7 ? t A gagas,. . T-yA Pi q mclO Qyce-.y 70.jcvoa/ -t

a.g o sg ....TryAF. .o 7 -ra rcl ,V D. ).S Ff.V.?:.a?.AD.... 11'7' '" .E. ...yp. C "... D ... U-A5 ftG.Pe.A cc K < 'T pF 'T\ .JS.G-e..

'gDyT y? fL.y.SrJ ) 7

(Do ftTi) rL. \ c, y < ) 8 . .D yycc O , A GcyDy f5. cyTy.. EvP ft. : . .y .

So 'T\o iA3, :

! y P Ly O ii P'0 S u C 'Tpy.y.y Py T. :t. .' \? 'pL.yC.y.C.M. | S I 2. 79 rR. t ,

- C.F H ;o ohA H e P\ ¦ 1 r C-GF :f \ 'Trf C V2

O feG t Q A l_ S T( ( . rlrft. y. .... & .;. A- ... Ft? ...&£... ;.'. T.v? AFf .

F. .. Yb A.F! A. ft.F ' .V* 9... C. PFY >. . ft .ft SA S FT 1.9:9 .. 99 ;o c ... R.A. F... . 22... .ftb.''' fe A £<L

G. F F CT ,-4 O P- dc A m, j iG \ Y .







OR




o

A spokesperson



EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.


To be signed by person(s) making the s bmission

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Submission 505

Hfi t NT of law mc

2 5 JUL 2012


Re: Amendmen 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPG): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reser ation in NorthFremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, si ply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Date ¦ 1' / 2-


Form 41



1 2 SEP 2012

FILE - L | Cl L l/)


To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag-2506Perth WA 6001

OFFICE USE ONLY

SUBMISSION NUMBER

506

Name . ! , (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .. .. .Q>U(2. J£. h Q H.... fr/.\ . Oil ; p bs t c'o d e

Contact phone number.. .9. Email address . .TA'/T:-.. FF.kT. .b T . .c -vct ' Ccf-i

Tips for completing a submission:» Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues® Include roperty addresses and specific location descnptions where relevant® Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

Jr. h.. yk\ .A kf. ?? FT FT tP A.Lt .* . yH-fiPylc. T'. t hi

. t. «.irf-SJj.Z-...(/.£ Ik.....b .del.r .,9m&(....W. rk.y.... bw P t. erfiS..„.

.&!>.bf\! lI?..Th.T.-w.It A ATf.QE\T. Ck.\i\... S:t~.C A,P... T lb. O.K fb..C

.77r? ,<A... .Vk\ fle i .S- ... C CC s A. (To c i OX C 00=..... .M( cp.M.O.. rl.lkk, ....~*.h'. Ir k.V.T

.. .dCjiz... ir&.... . gfhcLi... M i. ) i .Cv\CHJ!, i-. . Q.h... fTt fpM.Qj... .(S . .I .T.o r .XO .. .-Aj? ES p~

. W...(?.<? w t. . .O....dRrffik . j?. m.. : ?....

... M.(Pk< q U cv -,1 .. lx or? c ' l ( (LfJ 'J

0 ' 1J k 0"

tu n over to complete your submission





Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


S will be represented by:


o

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours):Postal address:

n

I ould prefer my hea ing to be conducted in:

Public (members

ORfro the genera! public may attend your presentation)

Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)






Signature Date P.. .9..\. PSP. 'Z

/Note: Form IVIUST be recei ed by close of business (5pm) on 1 OCTOBER 2012.


Submissio 506

D PARTMENT OF PLAN ING

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE El | QThe SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling ighway Reservation(W PG): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthP emantle)








Date D 7

Submission SO

department of plan ing

2 5 JUl 2012

±102


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the e isting P imar Regional Roads reservation in No thFremantle)








Su mission S B


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads eservation in Wort Fremantle)








Signed

Submission 509


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE ) . ,|Q 2 ?


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisa on of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social acti ity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Date 3!r) I l t'

Submission 510

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ;

2 5 JUL 2012

file 02


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - ationalisation of Stirling Highway eservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)








Signed0 iM

Submission 51 i

department of pl nning

2 5 JUL 2012

I FILEThe Secretary ¦Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stil ling Highway eservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in Mo thFremantle)








3 Ca /1

Submissio 512.


2 5 JUL 2012

FILEThe SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highwa Reserv tion(W PG): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads eservation in No thFremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, ataii times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Signed

Date

(V Glf a ®1 feJU

-l|;j iG a -s fi( \ (e,i>S

Submissio 513



2 5 JUL 2012

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vation(WAPC): Inc easing the existing Primary Regional Roads rese vation in WorthPremantle)








Signed

Dated y T &S -73 7 , /- 7

S bmissio 51


2 5 JUL 2012

FILEThe Secretary 1 Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the e isting Primary Regional Roads reservation in No thFremantle)

I s rongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.







Date 7 • / f .

Subm ssion 515


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPG): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day nd night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, si ply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





/

Submission 516


2 5 JUL 2012

pileThe SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in HorfhFremantle)








Signed.

Date

Submissio 51?


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE fe. IS jojTi


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthPremantle)








Date % I l l~ j £1, I o1 ,

Submission 518


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE S \ 2Ml

The SecretaryWestern Austral;Locked Bag 250PERTH WA 600

Re: mendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthPremantle)

! strongl object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.



In addition, if is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiatives thathave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.

I believe the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considere for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.



Submission 51®

The SecretaryWestern AustraliLocked Bag 2501PERTH WA 600 ,

department OF pl nning I

2 5 JUL 2012

file u

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - ationalisation of Stirling Highway Reseiwation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)


North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small specialty shops, cafes, galle ies, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.






Submission 520

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNI G

2 4 JUL 2012

FILEi


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

oLST ToI strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 I sKS?Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.


The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity or the area, arall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.

In addition, it is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiatives thathave alre dy been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.




Date 9 l / 9- •

Submission 521


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reser ation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)








Signed

Date

Submission 522

DEP RTMENT OF PLANNING

2 7 JUL 2012


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in WorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at SL IQueen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.


The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atail times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Signed

Date 1

Submissio 523

DEPARTMENT OF PLA NI G

2 5 JUL 2012


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation(WAPG): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in HorfhF emantle)




In addition, it is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiati es thathave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.




Signed

Date

Submission 524


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE ns)o The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(W PC): Increasing the existing Primary egional Roads rese vation in NorthF emantle)



The cur ent WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Signed

Date

Su missio 525


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPG): increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reser ation in No thFremantle)








Signed

Submission 526

departme t of pl nning

2 6 JUL 2012


Re: Amendment 1210 41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reser ation(W PC)2 Increasing the existing Priniary RegLon J„Roads ese_rvatiQn in Worth _ Fremantle)


North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andente tainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate incre sed access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.





Signed.

527


11, JUL 2012

|FIIF Ujoi i The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001


I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at l toSS Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.







Submissio 528


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE lo


Re: mendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAFC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)





I believe the orth Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.



Signed

Date

S bmissio


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway eservation (WA C): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

3 SIS te 3 b II strongly object to the repugnant proposal to emolish buildings ite5K3?7 alon Queen Victoria Street.

North Fremantle in particular Queen Victoria Street is activel develo ing into a vibrant 'local centre with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertainme t.

The propo al fails to consider the impact on the diversity of businesses and the social activation of the area both day and night. The destruction of theheritage-listed buildings, simply to create better access for vehicles to and from Fremantle would be highly anomalous . Especially as the street has beenpurposely calmed to romote this growth.

Fre antle- City Council reco mends that the highway reservation be oved to the est, making use of railway- eserved land. Among other' comments, theCity requests tire APC to explore the op ortunit to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking thehighway alongsi e the rail line. This would open up opportunities to evel p urban-zoned lan in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians an cyclists bet een adjoining suburbs and the beach.

Further roposals, not currently out for comment, concents two options for taking Curtin Avenue southwards: directly to Tydeman Road, or alternativelyfollowing a curve through North Fremantle to join Stirling Highway near its intersection with Queen Victoria St.

Also a lane expansion on the East side of Stirling Bridge ould better accommo ate the continuousl increasing (heav ) truck movements to Leach High ayfrom Fremantle Port. t the same time this woul offer a lane dedicated to those turning left onto Canning Highwa . The intersection could also offer vehiclesthe o tion to turn right on Canning Highway into Fremantle.

I believe that the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft and the above-mentioned options are the only consideration for theStirling Highway redevelopment.

It is abhorrent that heritage-listed b ildings be so easily disregar e to facilitate the needs of rivate vehicles. Focus should be on infrastructure thateventual light rail.


2 7 JUL 2012

i

S bmi io 530


Re: Amendmen 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highwa Reser ation(W PC): Increasing the existing Prima y Regional Roads reserv tion in No thFremantle)


North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victo ia Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small special y shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the iewsof local people, both customers and business owners.

in addition, it is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiatives thathave already been Installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.

I believe the Nort Fremantle proposal should be remo ed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.

it is unt inkable that heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded tofacili ate the needs of moto vehicles, when other viable options exist.

The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings play a vita! role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features aiong wit practicai transport infrastructure.

Submissio SSI

d partment of plan ing

2 5 JUL 2012

The Secretary LtlS-Tn. T --Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese ation(WAPC): Incr asing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, North F emantle.

North Fremantle, in particular t is section of Queen Victoria Street, is a ibrant localcentre with small specialty s ops, cafes, galleries, small bars, estaurants andentertainment.


In addition, it is also completely cont adictory to the traffic calming initiatives thathave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.



The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia, and our heritagebuildings play a vital role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport infrastructure.

Submissio 532


2 5 JUL 2012

|c„cThe SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in Ho thFremantle)

i strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.


The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes toraffic flow on the di ersity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, at

all times of the day and night. The destruction of eritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.


I believe the orth Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.



Submission S33


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE


Re: Amendme t 1210/41 - Ration lisation of Stirling Highwa Rese vation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Pri ary Regional Roads reservation in WorthFremantle)

! strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.

North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vib ant localcent e with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of t ese businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of eritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sig ted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.

In addition, it is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiatives thatha e already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.

i believe the North Fremantle proposai should be remo ed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.

it is unthinkable that heritage-listed buildings couid be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of motor vehicies, when other viable options exist.

The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings play a vital role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport, infrastructure.

Date Z ) | ' | rZ -

Submission 534

D PARTMENT OF PLAN ING

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE t .


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): increasing the existing Primar Region l Roads reservation in MorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, Morth Fremantle.

North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Vic oria Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small specialt shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes toraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activit of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of he itage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both custome s and business owners.

in addition, it is also completely cont adictory to the raffic calming initiatives hathave al eady been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.

I believe the North Fremantle proposal s ould be remo ed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.

It is unthinkable tha heritage-listed buildings couid be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of moto vehicles, when other viable options exist.

The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our he itagebuildings pla a vital role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport infrastructure.

Signed.

Submissio S35



2 5 JUL 2012

Re; Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highwa Reservation(W PC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads eservation in MorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, North Fre antle.

North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small special y shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to conside the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.


i believe the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.


The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings play a vi al role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport infrastructure.

Submi sion 13.6



2 5 JUL 2012

FILE V2- L S 1 fl

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - ationalisation of Stirling Highway Reser ation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads eservation in NorthFremantle)


North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victo ia Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small specialt shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes toraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, at

aii times of the day and night. The destruc ion of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.


I belie e the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.

It is unthinkable that heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of motor ehicles, when other viable options exist.


Signed \ >

Date - I V 2-V V

Submissio 537

DEPARTMENT OF PLAN I G

2 5 JUL 2012

The Secretary 1Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Hig way Reser ation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Pri ary Region l Roads reser ation in WorthPremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider t e impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activ ty of the area, atail times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both custome s and business owners.



It is unthinkable hat heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of motor vehicles, when other viable options exist.

The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings piay a vital role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport infrastructure.

Submissio 538


I he Secretary FILEWestern Australian Planning Commission Locked Bag 2506PERTH W 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)



The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the di ersity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.

in addition, it is also completely con radictory to the traffic calmin initiatives thatave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of this

shopping precinct.

i believe the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway edeveiopment.

It is unthinkable that heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of motor vehicles, w en other viable options exist.

The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings play a vital role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus s ould be onmaintaining our herita e features along with practical transport infrastructure.


2 5 UL 2012


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in Nort Premantle)








Date C- l 7.. t

Submission 540



2 4 JUL 2012


sr teT T b I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 1 to* 7Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.







Submissio 541


2 4 JUL 2012

FILE


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPG): Increasing the existing Prima Regional Roads reservation in WorthF emantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at Si, Id IQueen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.


The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local eople, both customers and business owners.

in addition, it is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiatives thathave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.




Submissio 542


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

ass fo ZhlI strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at SK toQueen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.



In addition, it is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiati es thathave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.




Submissiom) 543

DEPARTMENT Of PLANNI G

2 JUL 2012

FILE _


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling ighway Rese ation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Prima y Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at ! 5I 4© 23TFQueen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.







Su mission 544


2 JUL 2012

FILE 1The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stil ling Highway Reservation( APG): Increasing the existing Prima Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 JS sS Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.







o?55 /-&

Sic

Submission 545

department of plan ing

2 4 JUl 2012

FILE S I O l t <5*


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAFG): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads eservation in Wo thFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at #1 to 2#TQueen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.







aSb 3l(o\

Date

Submission S46


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reser ation in NorthFremantle)

3A-ST

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 2£S! -teQueen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.







Signed

Date - i -Ol/ - 2 0 V

Submission 547


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Inc easing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthF emantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 35 Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.


The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atail times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the iewsof local people, both customers and business owners.



It is unthinkable that heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of motor vehicles, when other iable options exist.

The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings play a vita! role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport infrastructure.

Submission 548The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existin Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

ass 'to b II st ongly object to the repugnant proposal to demolish buildings 2 tto==67 alon Queen Victoria Street.

North Fremantle in particular Queen Victoria Street is actively developing into a vibrant 'local centre ith small specialty sho s, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertainment.

The proposal fails to consider the impact on die diversity of businesses and the social activation of the area both day and night. The de truction of theheritage-listed buil ings, simply to create better access for vehicles to and from Fremantle would be highly ano alous . Es ecially as the street ha beenpurposely 'calmed' to promote this growth.

Fremantle City Council recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railway-reserved land. Among other comments, theCity requests the APC to explore the op ortunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking thehighway alon side the rail line. This would o en up op ortunities to develop urban-zone lan in the vicinit , and to imp ove connectivity for pe estrians andcyclists bet een adjoining suburbs and the beach.

Further proposals, "not currentl out for com ent, concerns two o tions for takin Curtin Avenue southwards: directly to Tydenian R , or alternativelyfollowing a curve through Nort Fremantle to join Stirling Highway near its intersection with Queen Victoria St.”

Also a lane expa sion on the East side of Stirling Brid e would better accommodate the continuousl increasing (heavy) truck move ents to Leach High ayfrom Fremantle Port. At the same time t is wo ld offer a lane edicated to those turnin left onto Canning Hi hway. The intersection coul also offer vehiclesthe option to turn rig t on Canning Hi way into Fremantle.

I believe that the North Fremantle ro osal should be re oved from he WAPC draft and the above-mentioned o tions are the only consideration for theStirling Highwa redevelopment.

1

Submission S49T e SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WA C): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roa s reservation in NorthFremantle)

1 strongly object to the repugnant proposal to emoli h buildings 261 to 2 7 alon Queen Victoria Street.

No th Fremantle, in particular Queen Victoria Street is actively develo ing into a vibrant 'local centre with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bar's,restaurants and entertainment.

The proposal fails to c nsi er the i pact on the diversity of businesses and the social activation of the a ea both a an night. The destruction of theheritage-listed buildings, sim ly to create better access for vehicles to and from Fremantle would he highly anomalous' . Especially as the t eet has beenpur osely calmed to promote this gro th.

Fremantle City Council reco mends that (he high ay reservation be oved to the west, making use of railway-reserved land. Among other' comments, theCit requests the W PC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highwa further est in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking tirehighway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban-zoned land in the vicinit , and to imp ove connectivit fo pe est ians andc clists between a joining suburbs an the beach.

Fur ther proposals, not cur rentl out for com ent, concer s two o tions for taking Curtin Avenue southwards: directly to Tydeman Ro d, or alternativel following a curve through North Fremantle to join Stirling Highwa near' its intersection with Queen Victoria St."

Also a lane expansion on tire East side of Stirl ng Bridge would better accommodate the continuously increasing (heavy) truck movements to Leach Highwa from Frem ntle Port. At the same time this wo ld offer a lane dedicated to those turning left onto Canning High ay. The intersection coul also offer vehiclesthe option to turn right n Canning Hi hway into Fremantle.

I believe that tire North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC raft and the above-mentioned options are the only consideration for the

Submission 550The SecretaryWestern Australian Pla ning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highwa Reservation (WA C): Increasing the existin Primary Regional Roads reservation in Nort Premantle)

.ass f-c t-Cs(

1 strongly object to the repugnant proposal to e olish buildings.2fefa 3ff? al ng Queen Victoria Street.

North Fremantle, in partic lar Q een Victoria Street is actively develo ing into a vibrant local centre with small specialty s ops, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertainment.

The proposal fail to consider the impact on the iversity of b sinesses and the social activation of the area both day nd night. The destruction of theheritage-liste buildings, simply to create better access for vehicles to and f om Fremantle would be highly ano alous . Es ecially as the street has beenputposely calmed to romote this growth.

Fremantle. City Council recommends that the high ay reservation be move to the west, making use of railway-reser ed lan . mong other comments, theCity re uests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, hiking thehighway alon si e the rail line. This would open u op ortunities to develop u ban-zoned lan in the vicinit , an to imp ove connectivity for pe est ians an c clists between adjoini g subu bs and the beach.

Further proposals, not currently out for comment, concerns t o options for taking Curtin Avenue southwar s: directly to Tydeman Road, or alternativelyfollowing a cu ve tiuough North Fremantle to join Stirling Highway near its intersection with Queen Victoria St.”

Also a lane expa sion on the Ea t si e of Stirling Bri ge ould better accommodate the continuously incteasing (hea y) truck movements to Leach Highwayfrom Fremantle Port. At the same time this ould offer a lane dedicated to those tu ing left onto Canning High . The intersection coul also offer vehiclesthe o tion to turn ri ht on Canning Highway into Fremantle.

I believe that the North Fremantle ro osal should be removed from the WAPC raft and the above- entioned options are the only consideration for theStirlin Hi h ay redevelopment.

It is abhorrenlAhat/reritage-Iisted buildings be so easily disregar e to facilitate the needs of rivate vehicles. Focus should be on infrastructure thataccommodates existing publjc transport and eventual light rail.

Signed


2 4 JUL 2012

FILE V Zh'

1

Submission 551The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Ba 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WA C): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in Nort Fremantle)

I strongly object to the repugnant proposal to demolis buildings 261 to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

North F emantle, in pa ticular Queen Victoria Street is ctively developin into a vibrant 'local centre with small specialt shops, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertain ent.

The proposal f ils to consider the imp ct on the iversity ofbusinesses and the social activation of the area both ay and night. The estruction oftheheritage-listed buildings, simply to create better access for vehicles to and from Fremantle would be highly ano alous' . Especially as the street has beenpurposely 'calmed’ to pro ote this growth.

Fremantle City Council recommends that the highway reservation be oved to the west, making use of railway-reserved land. Among other comments, theCity equests the WAPC to explore the op ortunit to elocate Stirlin Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking thehighway alongside the rail line. This ould open up op ortunities to develo urban-zoned land in the vicinit , and to improve connectivity for pedestrians andc clists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

Further proposals, ''not cu ently out for comment, concerns two o tions for taking Curtin Avenue southwards: di ectly to Tydeman oad, or alternativelyfollo ing a curve through North Fremantle to join Stirling Highway near its intersection ith Queen Victoria St.

Also a lane expansion on the East side of Sti ling Bridge ould better accommodate the continuousl increasing (heav ) truck movements to Leach High ayfrom Frem ntle Port. At the same lime this would offe a lane de ic te to those turning left onto Canning Highw y. The intersection could lso offer ehiclesthe option t turn l ight on Canning Highway into Fremantle.

1 believe that the No th Fremantle pro os l should he re o ed from the WAPC draft ari the above-mentione options are the onl consideration for theStirling Highway redevelopment.

It is abhonent that heritage-listed buildings e so easily disregarded to facilitate the nee s of rivate veliicles. Focus should be on infrastructure that

1


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Hi hway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

as-sr ho ib/I strongl object to the repugnant proposal to de olish buildings along Queen Victoria Street.

North Fremantle, in particular Q een Victoria Street is actively developing into a vibr nt 'loc l centre with small specialt shops, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertainment.

The proposal fail to consider the impact on the diversity of b sinesses an the social activation of the area both y and ni ht. The destruction of theheritage-listed buildings, i ly to create better access for vehicles to and from Fremantle would be highly ano alous'’. Especially as t e street has beenpur osely 'calmed’ to promote this growth.

Fremantle City Council reco mends that the highway reservatio be oved to the west, making use of railway-reserved land. Among other1 comments, theCity requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersectiorr, takin thehighway alongside the rail line. This would pen u o ortunities to develop urban-zoned lan in the vicinit , and to mprove c nnectivity for pe est ians andcyclists bet een adjoining subur bs and the beach.

Further roposals, not currently out for comme t, concerns two o tions or t king Curtin Avenue south ards: irectly to T deman oad, or alternatively

follo ing a cur ve through North Fremantle to join Stirling Highway near' its inter section ith Queen Victor ia St.”

Also a lane expansion on the East side of Stirl ing Bridge would better accommodate tire contin o sly increasing (heavy) truck movements to Leach High ayfront Fremantle Port. At the same time this ould of er a lane de icated to those turning left onto Cannin Highwa . The intersection could also offer vehiclesthe o tion to turn ight on Canning Highway into Fremantle.

I believe that the North Fremantle ro osal should be remove from the WAPC raft and the above-mentioned options are the only consideration for theStirling Highway redevelopment.

It is abhorrent that heritage-lisled buildings be so easily disregarded to facilitate the needs of private vehicles. Focus should be on inf astructure that

1

Submissio 553The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amend ent 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highwa Reservation (WAPC): increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the repugnant proposal to emolish buildings 261 to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

North Fremantle, in particular Queen Victoria Street is actively developing into a vibrant 'local centre with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertainment.

The proposal fails to consi er the impact on the iversity of businesses and the social activation of the area both ay and night. The destruction of theheritage-listed buildings, sim ly to create better access for vehicles to and from Fremantle would be highly anomalous'’. Especially as the street has beenpuiposely calmed’ to promote this growth.

Fremantle City Council reco mends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, akin use of railway-reserved lan . Among other comments, theCity requests the WAPC to explore the op ortunit to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking thehigh ay alon side the rail line. This would open u opportunitie to develo urban-zoned land in the vicinit , and to improve connectivity for pedestrians an cyclists bet een adjoining suburbs and the beach.

Further proposals, not cur ently out for co ment, concerns two options for taking Curtin Avenue southwards: directly to Tydeman Road, or alternativelyfollo ing a curve through North Fremantle to join Stirling Highwa near its intersection ith Queen Victoria St.

Also a lane expansion on the East side of Stirling Bridge oul better accommo ate the continuously increasing (heavy) truck movements to Leach High ayfrom Fremantle Port. At the same time this would offer a lane de icated to Ihose turning left onto Canning High ay. The intersection coul also offer vehiclesthe option to turn right on Canning High a into Fremantle.

I believe that the North Fremantle ro osal should be remove from the WAPC draft and tire above-mentioned o tions are the only consideration for theStirling Highway redevelopment.

It is abhorrent that heritage-listed buildings be so easily isregarded to facilitate the needs of private vehicles. Focus should be on infrastructure that


14 JUL 2012

i

Submissio iS4The SecretaryWestern Australian Pla ning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WA C): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the repugnant proposal to dem lish buildings 261 to 2 7 along Qu en Victoria Street.

No th Fremantle, in particular Queen Victo ia Street is actively develo ing into a vibrant 'local centre with small special shops, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertainment.

The proposal fails to consider the impact on the diversity of businesses and the social activation of the area both day and ni ht. he destruction of theheritage-listed buildings, sim ly to create better access for vehicles to an f om Fremantle would be highly ano alous'’. Especially as the street has beenpui osely calmed’ to promote this gro th.

Fremantle City Council recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, akin use of railway-reserved land. Among other comments, theCity requests the W PC lo explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking thehighway alongside the rail line. This would open up op ortunities to develop urban-zoned l nd in the vicinity, an to improve connectivity for pedestrians andc clists bet een adjoining subu bs and the beac .

Further roposals, “not currently out for co ment, conce ns two o tions for taking Cu tin Avenue southwards: di ectly to T deman Road, or alternativelyfollowing a curve throu North Fremantle to join Sti ling Highway near its inte section ith Queen Victor ia St.

Also a lane expansion on the East side of Stirling Bri ge would better accommodate the continuously increasing (heav ) t uck movements to Leach Hi hwayfrom Frem ntle Fo t. At the same time this would offer a lane de icated to those turning left onto Canning Highway. The intersection could also offer ve iclest e o tion to turn right on Canning Highway info Fremantle.

1 believe tirat the No th Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC raft and the above-mentione options are the only consideration for tireStirling Highway redevelopment.

1


Re: Amend ent 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increa ing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the repugnant proposal to demolish buil ings 261 to 2 7 along Queen Victoria Street.

North Fremantle in partic lar Q een Victoria Street is actively developing into a vibrant 'local centre with small specialt shops, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertainment.

The proposal fails to consider the imp ct n the diversity of b sinesses nd the social activation of ie area both ay and night. T e destruction of theheritage-li ted buildings, simply to create better access for vehicles to and from Fre antle would be highly anomalous . Es ecially as the street has beenpurposely calme to promote tills growth.

Fremantle City Council reco mends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railway- eser ed land. Among other comments, theCity requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity (o relocate Stirling Highway further est in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersectio , taking thehigh ay alongside the rail line. This would o en up op ortunities to develo urban-zoned l nd in the vicinit , and to im rove connectivit for pedestrians andcyclists betwee adjoining suburbs a d the beach.

Further ropo als, not cur e tly out for comment, conce ns two o tions tor takin Curti Avenue southwards: di ectly to T dem n Road, or alternativel follo ing a curve through North Fremantle to join Sti ling Highway near its inte section with Queen Victoria St.”

Also a lane expansion on the East side of Stirling Bri ge would better accommodate the continuously increasing (heavy) truck movements to Leach High a from Fremantle Port. At the same lime this ould offer a lane de icate to those t rning left onto Canni g High a . The intersection could also offer vehiclesthe o tion to turn right on Canning Highway into Fremantle.

1 believe that the North Fremantle ro osal should be removed from the APC draft and the above-mentioned options are the onl consideration for theStirling Highway redevelopment.

1

Submission 556The SecretaryWestern Australia Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the repugnant proposal to demolish buildings along Queen Victoria Street.

North F emantle, in particular Queen Victoria Street is actively developin into a vibrant 'local centre with small speci lt shops, cafes, galleries, small bars,restaurants and entertain ent.

The proposal fails to consi er the impact on the iversity of businesses and the social activation of the a ea both a and night. The de truction of theheritage-listed buildings, sim ly to create better access for vehicles to and from Fre antle woul be highly ano alous . Es ecially as the street has beenpur osely calmed’ to promote tills growth.

Fremantle City Council recommends that the high ay reservation be moved to the west, aking use of railway-reser ed land. Among other comments, theCity requests the WAPC to explore the op ortunity to relocate Stirling Highway further we t in the vicinit of the McCabe Street inter ection, taking thehighway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban-zoned lan in the vicinit , and to im rove connectivit for pedestrians an cyclists between adjoining subu bs and the beach.

Further proposals, not cu rentl out f com ent, c nce ns two options for taking Cu tin Avenue south ards: di ectly to Tydeman Ro d, or alternativelyfollowing a cu ve through North Fremantle to join Stirling Highway near its intersection with Queen Victoria St.

Also a lane expansion on the East side of Stirling Bridge w uld better accommo ate the continuousl increasing (heavy) truck movements to Leach High a from Fremantle Port. At the same time th s would offer lane e icated to those tu ing left onto Canning High ay. The intersection could also offer vehiclesthe o tion to turn right on Canning Highway into Fremantle.

I believe that the North Fremantle proposal should be remo e from the WAPC raft and the above-mentioned options are the onl consideration fo theStirling Highway redevelopment.

It is abhorrent that heritage-listed buildings be so easily disrega ded to facilitate the needs of rivate vehicles. Focus sho l be on infrastructu e thataccommodates existing public transport an eventual light rail.

Signed


2 6 JUL 2012

FILE I I

i

Submission 557Bubanic, Manja

From: mrsSubject: FW: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway

Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roadsreservation in North Fremantle)

From: Emma Lyons rmailto:emmalvons92(aiqmail.comlSent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 9:07 PMTo: corporateSubject: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existingPrimary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

The Secretary Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PE TH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existingPrimary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261 to 267along Queen Victoria Street.


Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use ofrailway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity torelocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highwayalongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and toimprove connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservationin Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. Ifimplemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shopsfrom 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roadsthe responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. QueenVictoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's LocalPlanning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scaleshops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each wayand increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute tothis calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered apriority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buiiHinn and their local functions.

Emma Lyons

24/07/12114 Selby RoadWest BridgfordNottinghamNg2 7baUK07792518365

l

Planning and Development Act 200oSection 41 Amendment (Substan al)

Form 41

SubmissionMet opolitan Region Scheme Amen ment 1210/41

DEPARTME T OP .A MTE

2 7 JUL 2012

FILE ( j Od L] (tlRationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation


OFFICE USE ONLY

Submissio 5S8

Name7


Address f.4 . . Postcode

Contact phone number Email address T TT; .

Tips for completing a submission:° Use headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issues° Include pro erty addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

Pk04 ,. M..

turn ove to complete your submission

Hearing of s bmissions




I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR



I I Myself - y telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson


would refer m hea ing to be conducted i :

I I Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORI I Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be





® All hearings are recorded and transcribed, The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. The

Note: Submissions IVIUSI be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Hi hway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of orth Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, ma ing use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive roposal is that for the widenin of the Primary Re ional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezonin of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to Undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growin

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increase parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now


Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme men ment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stilling Highway Reservation

[departmeht of planning

2 7 JUL 2012


Name .. SOI.'¦.•- •.a \ t j (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address

i U LCMOC r II I ULC KL

,lO fe. y \\\ I \ ,yv\ C5

OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 55®

Postcode M.Contact phone number T.4f..S3Sc'i Email address

Tips for completing a submission:9 Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descri tions where relevant® Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

.. 4 t.


The Secretary


Loc ed Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the





significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use


opportunity to relocate Stirlin Hi hway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street




A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Re ional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Hi hway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the doubl storey,




the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Hi hway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing


entertainment.


way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays


be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This s ot compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions an hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.



OR

Y@s, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will foe re resente by:


or

[ I A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hou s): Postal address:


Li Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)






» ll hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To e signed by person(s) ma incj fthe submissio

Signature Date

u rNote: S bmissions MUST be recei ed by the advertised closing ate, being close of

business (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions wil! NOT be consi ered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://wwvv.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Subst ntial)

Form 41

S bmissioniUIetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vation


2 7 JUL 2012

FILE


OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission g6©

L

Name (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Postcode


Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descri tions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Sub ission

tu n ove to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not com ulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Please choose on of the following:



I will be re resented b :


o

d] A spokesperson


I would prefe m hea ing to b® conducted in:

CU Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORI I Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be






Note: Submissions IVIUST be received by the advertised closing d GbeiAg close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be c nsidered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http;//www.planning.wa.gov.au

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway eservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reser ation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, stron ly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 2&L 5" ~ ltO 3!&71 alon Queen Victoria Street.





opportunity to relocate Stirlin Hi hway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street





Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stifling Highway to accommodate a bus


heritage listed shops from : . / Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in


Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflectin its function and growing

development as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.



contribute to this calming. It is thus hi hly anomalous that facilitatin bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildin s and their local

functions.

Name

\JSigned

Planning and Development Act 2005Sect on 41 Amendment (Subst ntial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetro olitan Region Schema Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation


2 7 JUL 2012


OFFICE USE ONLY

Submissio 561

i i

Name (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Postcode


Tips for com leting a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Sub ission

,. m,,

tu n ove to complete your submission





P Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

LI Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Ple se complete the following details)


tZl Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson


I woul p efe m hearing to be conducted in:


ORH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its eport on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be.disclosed to third parties.


Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed by the advertise closing date, bei g close ofusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late su missions will NOT e con idered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; kmail - [email protected]; Website - http.Y/www.planning.wa.gov.au

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/ 1 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the


I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings -2©T c -S -ST 6(


I belie e WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity an built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the hi hway reservation be moved to the west, making use


opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further est in the icinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, takin the highway alon side the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop



A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widenin of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)



heritage listed shops from i ! Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would han to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to u dertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling High ay is zoned Local



entertainment.


way and increased parkin . The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays


be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of herita e buildings and their local

)UbmissloEi

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH VA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/dl - Rationalisa ion of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existing P imaryRegionat Roads reservation in Nort Fremantle)

I he un ersigned, strongly objec to the proposal o widen the oa and to demolish buildings 261 o 267 along QueenVictoria S reet, ¦.

I believe WAPC should adopt t e Fremantle City Council s amend ent which can achieve a signif cantly re uced cost tothe amenity and built heritage of North F eman le.

Impor antly, the Ci y recommends that t e highway reservation be moved o the west, making use of railway reservedland. Among other commen s, t e City equests he WAPC to e plore the opportunity to reloca e Stirling Highwayfu ther >. zest in the vicinit of the McCabe Street in ersection, ta ing the high ay alongside the rail line, This wouldopen up oppor unities o develop urban zoned land in the'vicinity, and to impro e connectivity for pedestrians andc clists bet een adjoi ing su urbs and the beach.

A particularl des uctive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation in QueenVictoria S ree a its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If imple ented, thisproposal ould result in t e total demolition of the double storey, heritage liste shops from 261 to 267 Queen VictoriaStreet.

ezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand o Main Roads theresponsibility fo this portion, enabling them to undertake t e or s proposed in the amendmen . Queen ic oria Streetbet een Tydeman Road and S irling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No. ,reflec ing its function an growing developmen as a 'main street , wi h small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar,restaurant and entertainment.

I DEPARTM NT OF P NNING

2 6 JUL 2012

HIF

Tiie st ee has in effect been raffic calmed in recent times by reductio of t affic lanes to single each ay andincreased parking. The fe bus routes chat use the route and t e present lack, of bus ays contribute to this calming. Itis thus highly anomalous hat facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority, particularly at theenormous cost of heritage buil ings and their local functions.

Name... Robert Allan LusheyDate... 25/7/2012Address... 2/9 Swan Street orth Freman leCon act Number... 04081 0679

Submission 563

The Secretary









importantly, the City recommends that the high ay reservation be moved to the west, making use






A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reser ation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus


heritage l sted shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of ueen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to



Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a ' ain street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.





functions.

Todd Miller6/3 Pamment StreetNorth Fremantle(08) 9284 220320th July 2012

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001


2 6 JUL 2012

FILE

Re: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the


I the undersi ned, stron ly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261










A particularly destructive proposal is that for the wi ening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)







Centre under Council's Local Plannin Scheme No.4, eflectin its function and growin

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, estaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in ffec been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each




functions.

37 Howard streetFremantleWA 6160

23 July 2012


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirli g Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the exi tingPrimary Regional Roads eservation in Nort Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly objec to he proposal to widen he road and to demolish buildings 261 to 267 along QueenVictoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment hich can achieve a significantly reduced cost to theamenity and built heritage of North F emantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railway reserved lan .Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west inthe vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunitiesto develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to i prove connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoiningsuburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PR ) Reservation in QueenVictoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposalwould result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed sho s from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen Victoria Streetbetween Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflectingits function and growing development as a 'main street', ith small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant andentertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic cal ed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way and increasedparking. The few bus routes that use the route.and the present lack of bus bays contribute to this calming. It is thus highlyanomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost ofheritage buildings and their local functions.

This area is an important community hum for the wider Fremantle & North Fremantle areas.

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNI GThe Secretary


Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001 FILE

2 5 JUL 2012



to 267 alon Queen Victoria Street.














Main Roads the responsibility forthis portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local


evelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.





functions.

ame / Address / Contact hone number / Date / Sign


14IV, $L/ (pOQO

2o 2012

i /-v

Submissio 567


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisat on of Stirling Highway Reservation(W PC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)







The Fremantle area is a unique loc tion in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings play a vital role in creating the ambience of the City. Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport infrastructure.

Signed

Date

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506 FILE

2 5 JUL 21)12

04/11?PERTH WA 6001 ~r











urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to im rove connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between


A particularly destructive proposal is that forthe widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)









entertainment.





functions.

Name / Address/ Contact phone number / Date /Sign

Submis io S§§NG

The Secretary



2 5 JUL 2012

FILE tS






si nificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of orth Fremantle.














Centre under Council s Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing


entertainment.





functions.

Name / Address / Contact phone number / Date / Sign

Submission 57®

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001


existin Primary Regional Roa s reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersi ned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261



significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built herita e of North Fremantle.




intersection, taking the highway alon side the rail line. This would open up opportunities to evelop










Centre' under Council's Local Plannin Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing


entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to sin le each


contribute to this calmin . It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now


functions.

ame / Address / Contact phone number / Date / Sign

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE

Aj C -C

Submission 571Kirsten Maley15 Herbert StreetNorth F emantle WA 61590424 244 211

26 July 2012


Dear Sir/Madam

RE: AME DME T 1210/41 ATIO ALISATION OF STIRLING HIGHWAY RESERVATIO (WAPCl:I CRE SING THE EXISTING PRIMARY REGIONAL RO DS RESERVATION IN NO TH FREM NTLE1

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council's amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a buspriority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in theamendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant andentertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to singleeach way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of busbays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements shouldnow be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions.

(ON BEHALF OF I STEN AAALEY1

Submissio 5 2

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

2 7 JUL 2012

• ) ?PERTH WA 6001 "

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC):Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolishbuildings 261 to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west,

making use of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC

to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of theMcCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open upopportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads(PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway toaccommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total

demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads wouldhand to Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the worksproposed in the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and StirlingHighway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its

function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes,

showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes tosingle each way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the

present lack of bus bays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous thatfacilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous

cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

Submission S?3Bruce SVIaloney

PO Box 1408, West Perth WA 6872Phone: 0418 949 208

Email: [email protected]

26 July 2012


2 7 JUL 2012The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reserv tion (WAPC): Inc easingthe existing Primary Region l Roads reservation in North Fremantle

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261 to267 along Queen Victoria Street.


Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use ofrailway reserved land. Among other com ents, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunityto relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking thehighway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in thevicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and thebeach.


Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ainRoads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in theamendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'LocalCentre under Council’s Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing developmentas a 'main street’, with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single eachway and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bayscontribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now beconsidered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

Yours sincerely

BRUCE M LONEY

Peter Cheffins

Submission 574

PO Box 1408, West Perth WA 6872Phone: 0419 901 106

Email: peter.c [email protected]

26 July 2012



2 7 JUL 2012

mFILE

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (W PC): Increasingthe existi g Primary Region l Roads reservation in North Fremantle

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261 to267 along Queen Victoria Street.


Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use ofrailway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunityto relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking thehighway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in thevicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and thebeach.


Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to MainRoads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in theamendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned LocalCentre under Council’s Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing developmentas a 'main street , with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single eachway and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bayscontribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now beconsidered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

Yours sincerely

PETER CHEFFI S

Su mission 575

UhPAHI MtNI US LAIMNIImG

The Secretat Western Australian Planning Commission


2 7 JUL 2012

FILE

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC):Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolishbuildings 261 to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.


Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west,making use of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC

to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of theMcCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open upopportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for

pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads(PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway toaccommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the totaldemolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads wouldhand to Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the worksproposed in the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and StirlingHighway is zoned local Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its

function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes,

showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes tosingle each way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and thepresent lack of bus bays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous thatfacilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous

cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

Submission 576


2 7 JUL 2012

FILE


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reser ation(WAPG): Increasing the existing Prima Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated atQueen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.

North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vibrant localcentre, with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment. .






oignea_ ji/t & M lC'h

Date fg Hik


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Hi hway Reservation (WAPC): Increasin the

existin Primary Re ional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I t e undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261


I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achie e a





intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop












entertainment.





functions. „

Yours incemly,

Lian Courtney

Submissio 578JING

17 July 2012Dear Sir

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): IncreasingPri ary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the roa and to demolish buildings 261 to 267 alongQueen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a significantly reducedcost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate StirlingHighway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line.This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented,this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions..

Name

2 7 JUL 2012


FILE s . I o

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reser ation (WAPC): Increasing the existingPrimary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)


I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achie e a significantly reducedcost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.



Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ain Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zone 'Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street , with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lac of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions..

Name: // W/? Cuu'J

Signature:.

Submissio i§©


2 7 JUL 2012

file '€ L j -2 b3

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - ationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existingPrimary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to iden the road and to demolish buildings 261 to 267 alongQueen Victoria Street.




Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.


Name:.

Signature:

Submi sio 581


2 7 JUL 2012

FILE jti ( )




Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate StirlingHighway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line.This would open up opportunities to develo urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.


Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ain Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.


Submission 582

2 7 JUL 2012




I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council's amendment which can achieve a significantly reducedcost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the est, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate StirlingHighway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line.This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, an to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.


Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ain Roads theresponsibility for this ortion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enor ous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions..

Name:_ ,.6\rv Mc;tbtc \

14 Bunda PIWaikiki 6169

2 7 JUL 2012

FILE. j S (16 July 2012

Dear Sir




Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate StirlingHighway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line.This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity fo pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.


Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ain Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, sho room,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.


Yours sincerely

Deanne Moulden

Su missio 583

2 7 JUL 2012

FILE; |



I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a significantly reducedcost to the amenity and built heritage of orth Fremantle.



Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works pro osed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme

o.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.



Submission 58


2 7 JUL 2012

FILE O

e: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existingPrimary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)




A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reser ation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented,this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ain Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lac of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions..

Name: ' A rZ i < tA

Signature:.

2 7 JUL 2012


FILE L -S | O l

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Inc easing the existingPrimary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)



Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, aking use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the op ortunity to relocate StirlingHighway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line.This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.


Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ain Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroo ,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way an increased arking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a riority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions..

Name:.

Signature:

S bmission S8§UtPAHIMUVi l ;; LANNING


2 7 JUL 2012

FILE IS I 0 1




Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other co ments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate StirlingHighway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line.This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and tire beach.


Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to ain Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo. , reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic cal ed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions..

Name:.

Si nature: /

Submission S8


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirlin Hi hway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existin Primar Re ional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)





Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, ma ing use



intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop







ezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to



Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme o.4, reflecting its function and growing


entertainment.





functions.

Yours Sincerely,

Max Ashford

Submissio 588

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNINGThe Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001 FILE

2 5 JUL 2012










intersection, taking the hi hway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop







Rezoning of this ortion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to





entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to sin le each




functions.

Name / Address / Contact nhone number / Date / Sien

Submissio 1§9



I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to de olish buildings 261 to 267 alongQueen Victoria Street.

1 believe WAPC should adopt the Fre antle City Council s amendment which can achieve a significantlyreduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be oved to the est, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocateStirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside herail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improveconnectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Rese vation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. Ifi plemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roadsthe responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. QueenVictoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local Centre’ under Council’s LocalPlanning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a main street’, with small scaleshops, cafes, showroom, s all bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

FILi

2 5 JUL 2012

Submission 591

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

2 5 JUL 2 12

file H

PERTH WA 6001



I the undersigned strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261



















entertainment.





functions.

Submission 592

The Secretary



2 5 JUL 2012
















heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 ueen Victoria Street.






entertainment.





functions.

Submission 593

nF.PARTMF.NT OF PLANNINGThe Secretary



2 5 JUL 2012

FILE jo AgRe: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the













Reservation in Queen ictoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.






entertainment.





functions.

6

Submissio 594PLANNING


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

2 5 JUL 201

FILE



I the undersigned strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261







intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up o portunities to develop











entertainment.





functions.

Submission 595 lFPLANN1NG

The Secretary


Loc ed Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE I | OoL

Re: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Hig way Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the





















entertainment.





functions.

Submission 596•I MIN 6

The Secretary



FILE

2 5 JUL 2012

Re: Amen ment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regio al Roads reservation in North Fremantle)



I believe WAPC should ado t the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a





intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up o portunities to develop












entertainment.





functions.

Su mission S97

The Secretary



1 5 UL 2012

FILE I 0









opportunity to relocate Stirling Highwayfurtherwestinthe vicinity of the McCabe Street













entertainment.





functions.

Nam e & kQ

Submission 598



Re: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Hig way Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the




I believe WAPC should ado t the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a


Importantly, the City recommends that the highway eservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to ex lore the





A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PR )








d velopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restau ant and

entertainment.





functions.

S bmission 599

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasin the





significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built herita e of North Fremantle.



opportunity to relocate Stirlin Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, takin the hi hway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop












entertainment.


way and increased parkin . The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays



functions.


0 /7)321 0

Submission 600

DEPARTMENT of planningThe Secretary



2 5 JUL 2012

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirlin Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existin Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the oad and to demolish buildings 261



significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built herita e of orth Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, makin use


opportunity to relocate Stirling Hi hway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street



adjoinin suburbs and the beach.


Reservation in ueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus


herita e listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Re ional Roads would hand to

ain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in


Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme o.4, reflecting its function and g owing


entertainment.



contribute to this calmin . It is thus hi hly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now


functions.


\A] r » . (&OU O B8 0 .

Submission 601

17 July 2012

2 7 JUL 2012

FILE L Dear Sir




Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, ma ing use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate StirlingHigh ay further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line.This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructi e proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented,this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amend ent. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning SchemeNo.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street1, with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant an entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priorit ,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions..

Name:_

Signature,.

Su mission 602

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506 FILE )g.l jo2 PERTH WA 6001 1

Re: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Hi way Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the


I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

















entertainment.





functions.

La e Sufjmissto§03

From:Sent:To:Subject: STIRLING HIGHWAY

kym silove <[email protected]>Friday, 27 July 2012 7:47 PMmrs

Dear Sir/Madame

I am very strongly opposed to the proposed plan to widen Stirling Highway especiall in The NorthFremantle vicinity.It would destroy the lovely community that has developed there.

Yours FaithfullyDr Kym SiloveNorth Fremantle resident

i

Bubanic, Marija

Late Submission604


Jane Page & Mike Gilmore <[email protected]>

Friday, 27 July 2012 11:06 PMmrs

Stirling Hwy widening North Fremantle

Dear Si /Madam,

I am submitting this to object to the proposed widening of Queen Victoria St in NorthFremantle, where my family and I live.

I don't agree that widening the road along Queen Victoria St will ease the congestion at thisbottleneck. That part of the highway is never particularly congested, as it ca ies littletraffic. The real problem is the Stirling Bridge, and only at certain times of the day. If thatbridge was widened and the road leading up to it was widened (and there would be no housesor heritage buildings to be demolished), the traffic would flow much better. If more traffic ispushed onto Queen Victoria St the Old Fremantle Bridge will need to be repaired or replaced(as it does even now without the extra traffic). So even without the issue of the destruction ofthe North Fremantle entertainment and shopping precinct and the associated heritagebuildings (which is a big enough issue in itself), the widening of that road makes no sensewhatsoever. It makes much more sense to widen the Stirling bridge and the road leading upto it, which would cause very minimal damage.

Please log my objection to this proposal.

Yours sincerely,

Jane Page21 Rule StNorth Fremantle

Mike, Jane, Tom and Elea GilmorePerthWestern Australia

i

Late Submissio 60S

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of State Development

Your ref: 809-2-1-91 Pt2 (RLS/0248)

Our ref: S0089/200904

Enquiries: Jamie Brady - Ph 08 92220517

PERTH WA 6001

Attention: John O Hurley

Dear Mr I homson

METROPOLIT N REGION SCHEME PROPOSED AMEND ENT 1210/41RATIO ALISATION OF STIRLI G HIGHWAY RESERVATION

Thank you for your letter dated 20 March 2012 which invites comment from theDepartment of State Development regarding the Metropolitan Region SchemeProposed Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation.

The Department has reviewed the paper and wish to advise that we have nocomment to make regarding this amendment.

Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate tocontact Mr Jamie Brady on 9222 0517.

Yours Sincerely

Mr Neil ThomsonSecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506

Email: [email protected]

cDirectorSTRATEGIC INDUSTRIAL LANDS

24 July 2012

Level 6, 1 Adelaide Terrace, East Perth, Western Australia 6004Telephone +61 8 9222 0555 Facsimile +61 8 9222 0505

www.dsd.wa.gov.au

wa.gov.au

ABN 90 199 516 864


Form 41

Submission

department OF PLANNING

3 1 JUL 2012

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 pile

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway ese vation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Late Submission606

Name.

/ ) ( EASE PRIN LEARm .. . ... Address Postcode

Contact phone number... cy. J. >. ¦ Email address

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

Cl).

.7.. <7.£?... F?7P.. ;TTT. kiC ih: Irr rh ..

... ' i.r... . . . rrr. 'r. . . .. .vr/r n-'. . .ji . /..

... t .. . C .CLL-:... .... :'r. ? /. .?

.... .V i. . tMNt-CT . .. .. .' v r r ' .jfonc cydr& .UC__

J/J

• • . . Yrr . .fe.. 9- Li.TfA-r A.N

3) . 0. :.t .... 1

.( 9. / h fx.. Mo... .... ... 4 r L. .. . T

.c WTtp. frM M . rfe .y hfL r. C fX,. -. y.9. 333 ._ _ / _ . . -. - ./ rAr/.

c iJr Oy-< : • „ "Is ciCJ- ; r :••"• •

.. .Y-rF r Tp.. CM bTy. 'c ry lh-Q.. rNTAArNTLyt .dQ.. .. / -u y

"s'yysy/ VI

tu n over to complete you submission

( ) l}£? ypy-/ f cp* fp X gpv cU,


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally p esent the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the ecommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


PSease choose one of the following:

Q Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Q Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be re esente b :

d] Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

dl A spokesperson


I would prefe m hearing to be conducted in:

C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORH Private (only the peo le nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its re ort on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the p oposed amendment. TheWAPC ecommendations are similarly published in a report on sub issions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ne Say personfs) making tb© su mission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the a vertise closing date, being close ofbusiness (5 m) on 27 JULY ?,012. Late submissions will NOT be considere .

Contacts: Telep one - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Websile - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

t

thewestNEWS @ ® c <5 st 3instralianMonday, July 23,2012

School's back and s®are bigger traffic snarls

SEATING RO D BLOCKS

a Kent Acott

Thousands of extra ve icles will re¬join Perth s road network this weekwhen the July sc ool holidays end.

Information from Main Roa sWA s ows traffic volumes acrossthe city generally decline in schoolholidays.

Thoug the difference is not asmarked as in some cities i t e east,it represents t ousands of extracars every day.

For example, in July last yearthere was a 3.6 per cent fall in theaverage number of cars travellin east on Graham Farmer Free ay

PUTASTOPTO RED SPOTSmcst , tfk

ustralian _

www.redspotswa.com.au

in the school holidays from50,132 to 48,342.

And on the Mitchell Freewaysout of Ocean Reef Road, t erewas a 1.6 per cent decli e from85,659 to 84,284 vehicles.

Fewer vehicles on congestedroads generally leads to better flow¬ing traffic, with the general, rule

being that a 5 per cent increase canmean up to a 50 per cent decrease i a era e s eeds.

The West Australian has joine the AC a d Channel 7 in the big¬gest ever survey of traffic conges¬tion in WA.

The Red Spots survey allowsmotorists to no inate the city sworst congestion points.

After six eeks, the results willbe collated an t e worst redspots identified. An inde endentroads expert will assess them to de¬termine how to relieve con estion.

In some cases, it mi ht be as si ¬ple as a minor road realig ment,

modified traffic signals or dedicat¬e turning lane.

You can no i ate your conges¬tion re spot by oing towww.redspotswa.com.au

The school holidays also ha e abi impact on public trans ortpatrona e.

The number of commuters onPerth’s buses and trains will growbetween 21 and 2 er cent thisweek, based on atrona e fi uresfrom pre ious years.

he bi est change in publictrans ort is usually i su erwhen parents and university stu¬dents also have holi ays.

Violence atho se party

Gabrielis Knowles

Three people were injured by bro¬ken glass after bottles were thrownat an out-of-control party in Ballaj-ura on S turday night.

iot police were called to a Hum¬mingbird G rdens home about11.15p after reports of about 100people outside the home fightin an smashing glass.

Three people were treated for i¬nor injuries. No one as arrested.

Police were also forced to moveon about 100 people who attended abeach party in Port Kennedy onFriday night.

One an was arrested for disor¬derly conduct.

a EDiTOFT ¦ PI6

D sabled onthe agenda

Canberra

The nuts and bolts of the NationalDisability Insurance Scheme willbe at the top of the agenda henFederal and State leaders meet thisweek for the Council of AustralianGovernments meeting.

Pre iers and chief ministers.o rro on Canberra for the

Battlers--

P¦FT

To:

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 4'i Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Submissionll/ietiopolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41


department of planning!

3 JUL 2012

FILE i - Q 2 (

SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

DEPARTMENT Of PLANNING

3 1 JUL 2012

FILE _

OFFICE USE ONLY[P Tl

Late SubmissionSOT

II ,

. /Vft i l.a+ ... O' .Name, . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Postcode .6. f.

_ ntact phone number Email address . i rt&t

T/ s for completing a submission:o /se headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to com lete your submission

Submission

pi-me,. a;.. jWhM

turn ove to complete your sub ission

Hearing of su missions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amend ent may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


PSease choose one of the ollowing:

/ Wo, i do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I will e represented by:


or

A spokesperson


S oul e e m hearing to be con ucted in:






° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be.disclosed to third parties.


Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be consi ered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au

The Secretary

Western Aust alian Planning Commission



existing Primary Re ional Roads reser ation in North Fremantle)






of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to e plore the

o portunity to relocate Stirlin Hi hway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street




A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widenin of the Primary Re ional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirlin Hi hway to accommodate a bus



Rezoning of this ortion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to



Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflectin its function and growing


entertainment.


way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lac of bus bays


be conside ed a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of herita e buildin s and their local

functions.

Name / /tT r'! c-<r Cv ,

Si ned


Form 41



3 1 JUL 2012

ig i j o ii 2Rationalisation of Stirli g Highway Reservation

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth A 6001

OFFICE USE ONLY

Late Su missio §08

.. J

Q D{:( (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) . f

Address . .L ). i .J. i t. . H.... Postcode . .\ . . 1.

jntact phone number Email addressJ CI /iQ j l »D ()

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include roperty addresses and s ecific location descri tions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more s ace to complete your submission

Submission

jP/ 4 4<l., fbM&hM. il&r .:



Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may persohally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed ahnendlinentwhether you nominate to spea at the hearings or not.


Please choose o e of the following:


OR


I ill be epresented by:

C Myself ~ My telephone number (business hours):

or

m A spokesperson


I woul p efer my hea ing to be conducted in:

[ Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORm Private (only the people nominate by you or the hearings committee will be




° In the cou se of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with ail written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and publishe as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Pa liament.

Note: S missions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late sub issions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax •• (08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]/a.gov.au; Website - http://www.planning. a.go .au

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Gommission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001


existing Primary Regional oads reservation in North Fremantle)





Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, makin use






A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widenin of the Primary Re ional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen ictoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Hi hway to accommodate a bus




ain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to Undertake the works proposed in




entertainment.





functions.

Stephen Mark Caddy

Name

Signed' 11 mIcI i/z

T e SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Late Submission609

- 1 AUG 2012




Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocateStirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, talcing the highway alongside herail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improveconnectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. Ifimplemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

RezOning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roadsthe responsibility for this portion, enabling the to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. QueenVictoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local Centre under Council’s LocalPlanning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a main street’, with small scaleshops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

Late Submission 6 id : PLANNING





Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocateStirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, talcing the highway alongside herail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improveconnectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Flighway to accommodate a bus priority lane. Ifimplemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roadsthe responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. QueenVictoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local Centre under Council’s LocalPlanning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a ‘main street’, ith small scaleshops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at th enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

Name:

Signed:

vV wt 8v LbJUyJdAlt Lo*-4

Late Submission611 NG


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existingPri ary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)



Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocateStirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, talcing the highway alongside herail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to i proveconnectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection ith Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. Ifimplemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roadsthe responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. QueenVictoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local Centre’ under Council’s LocalPlanning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and gro ing development as a ‘main street’, ith small scaleshops, cafes, sho room, small bar, restau ant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,

L£. (

( QlA

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Late Submission612


- 2 U 2012

/file







Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reser ation be moved to the west, making use















entertainment.





functions.

Name_ Q qcVvi Spkispv 01 d

Signed_

The Secretary



Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Ra ionalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the








opportunity to relocate Stirling High ay further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street













entertainment.





functions.

Late Submissio 613

DEPARTMENT OF P NNING

- 2 AUG 2012

FILE ttlT jo 2/U

Late Syismissioo614

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

DEPARTMENT Of PLANNING

FILE

- 2 AUG 2012









opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further est in the vicinity of the McCabe Street




particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)









entertainment.





functions.

Late Submission615

The Secretary


Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001 FILE

- 2 AUG 2012

5j0 A(f






















entertainment.





functions.

Name

Late Submission616

DEPARTMENTC NNING

3 1 JUL 2012

¦ ?. 8FILE

The Secretai Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)






It is unthinkable that heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of motor vehicles, when other iable options exist.


Signed

Date 0'7 - $0/

Late Submission617

DEPARTMEN OF PLANNING

- 1 AUG 2012

FILE


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the existing Primar Regional Roads reservation in MorthFremantle)








Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Su stantial) DEPARTME T OP PLANNING

l-orm 41

Submission 3 AUG 2012

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41file

ationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation/

OFFICE USE ONLY


=3

Late SubmissioBi618

Name

A 1 dress


Postcode


Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues° Incl de property addresses and specific location descri tions where relevant• Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submiss on

4€t .



Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsu mission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' ox is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhet er you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions an hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.


Mo, I do not wish to speak at the earings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

O

Yes, I wish to speak at t e hearings. (Please complete the following details)

v

o

A spokesperson

number (business hours):?-j /£ i\( Q U rY A A, A,

AT / a/ /A i-J i I L > aYS

I A' AY f£ IS i Ji r , Tl~

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal a dress:



O Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be.disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public ecords should the Governor approve the pro osed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To b§ signed b aersonfs) ma ing he submission

Signature

Note: Submissions MUST be receivecffoy the ad ertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 -JULY 012. Late submissio s will NOT e considere .

Contacts: telephone-(08) 6551 800; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]/a.gov.au; Website - http://wwv/.planning.wa.gov.au

The Secretary

W stern Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001



I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildin s

to SS along Queen Victoria Street. COS S 03.1 |


significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built he ita e of North Fremantle.










herita e listed shops from'2r&t o-3'&?-Queen Victoria Street.=1? SS 3- )

Rezonin of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Re ional Roads would hand to



Centre' under Council's Local Plannin Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing


entertainment.




be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of herita e buildings and their local

functions.

Name £ j £77*

Signed_


For 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Ame dment 1210/41


OFFICE USE O LY


Late Su iiDiss osii619

i 1

Name .T i &l . A-... (PLEASE PRI T CLEARLY)

Ad ress S -S... Xt«r: JuM ].

Contact phone 5T . . >D. II. Email addiess

Postcode 6.011

LTTLcJ-C+J UTips (or completing a submission: . , •

• Use headings or numb rs to separate different to ics and issues« Include ro erty addre ses and specific location descriptions where lelevant. Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

tur over to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not com ulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearing or not.




OR

¥ Yes, I ish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


Myself-My telephone number (business hours): 1.!

o

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours):Postal address:

I would refe my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general pu lic may attend your presentation)


permitte to attend) * •

You should be a are that:

The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

in t e course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

« All earings are reco ed and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and publi hed as public recor s should the Governor approve the proposed a endment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) makin the sub ission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.

Contacts: Telephons - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

wrightfeldhusen

v.rifjlitloldnusun ajchitecls535 siirllng hv.ypto o* 616 cotteslo 691western au:? ra!iat 538 6611e tlrn .ri bKclcJhusen.comw wv.w.wfighWeld usen.com


Submission ttachment

I own 585 Stirling Highway Cottesloe. It is currently used as my otfice for my Architectural Practice.

T e building is an old shop of around 120 years old. The verandah covers the current footpath andthe front wall is on the boundary. The building is on the Cottesloe municipal inventory for a heritagebuilding.

The proposed idening to Stirling Highway will require demolition of around 3 meters of the frontportion of my property. This will render the building useless.

This proposal for Stirling Highway is absolutely absurd, and draws on out- ate highway planning andprincipals, that have no regard for property so ereignty. A far better solution would be to u grade therail service and to utilise the land of the rail ay reserve. This would have minor effect on property.

Notwithstan ing w ether the construction work actually oes proceed, propert will be incumbent iththis reser ation, affecting t e property values and ultimately urban blight. Property maintenance anddevelopment will be stifled if this ri iculous proposal is up eld.

I strongly reject all aspects of this oorly planned an ill-concei ed proposal.

ngrt!.- chiiect Iks m n -47 o/7 asiwfcng iii . ilghtf- Tf s

585 Stirling Hwy 6011 i +61 (8) 9384 6611PO Box 616Cottesloe 6911 e [email protected] Australia w www.wriahtfeldhusen.com

2

SUBMISSION §19TABLED T THE HEARINGS 29/10/13

STIRLING HIGHWAY RESERVATION

585 Stirling Highway

Historic restored shop

Opposite Irvine Street, Historic John Coppins building

Have owned and occupied for nearly 2 years

Operate my Architect Practice from the premises.

The Highway reserve is absolutely ridiculous

My property in particular is built to the boundary. Around 4 metres will be demolished andrender the property completely useless.

The compensation cost that must be provide will be prohibitive if this situation is played out tothe vast majority of properties that are affected in this way.

Stirling Highway in Cottesloe by and large is not congested.

It flows freely all day I have witnessed this every day for the last two years.

The main congestion occurs in Claremont around the 7:30 to 9:00 at the school drop off.There is no congestion during school holidays.

The entire problem is with the schools/shopping precinct of Claremont. This is where all theplanning and construction resources should be focused.

Indeed infrastructure in the Claremont/Swanbourne/Cottesloe area is absolutely appallinggiven the relative wealth of the area.

Two major congestion areas are the Swanbourne railway traffic bridge and the Eric StreetBridge

Both bridges are hopelessly out dated single lane timber structures constructed in anotherera. Why can t these be rebuilt this will alleviate congestion.

The real elephant in the room is the chronically under-utilized railway corridor land. Anyperceived future traffic pressure on Stirling highway could easily be alleviated by a road andinfrastructure along this. Perhaps the railway could be more of an inner urban tram line thatshares car traffic and even cycle ways. The remaining land can be sold for medium to highdensity development to part fund this.

Frankly this sort of lateral thinking is far more relevant than the out dated just knockeverything down and make a wide highway' policy.

Finally the most dramatic result of this reservation issue is that property titles will beencumbered with this widening thereby reducing the value of land and the possibledevelopment potential and also the will of owners to maintain their properties.

Its ridiculous to have a widening reservation, with the reality that it will never happen.

Just take this reservation away and do not add to it or increase it. It is wrong.

Timothy Wright 585 Stirling Highway Cottesloe

Late Submission620

DEPARTiV!0v < C;! PLANNING

8 AUG 2012

Lsf o . h $FILE _

The SecretaiyWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(W PC): Increasing the existing P ima y Regional Roads reservatio in NorthFremantle)


North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants and

entertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heriiage-lisied buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business o ners.


[ believe the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.



Sinned -ZEliy-JC

tx> fir JL 7 336- 5 q

D ate y W/ y / •? o

( 6A .

iq, -v deote. j ,

t d:

Bubanic, IMarija

Late Submission§21

Subject: FW: 262 (Lot 202) Stirling Highway ClaremontAttachments: WAPC 262 Stirling Hwy.pdf

From; Graeme rmailto:[email protected]: Thursday, 9 August 2012 3:04 PMTo:SHAGSSubject: 262 (Lot 202) Stirling Highway Claremont

To whom it may concern

With regard to the above attachment.

We are concerned that Lot 202 Stirling Highway is the site of the oldest building in Claremont, previouslythe Congregational Church built of rubble limestone and is Heritage Listed.

The heavy traffic on Stirling Highway has required us to reinforce the building with steel rods and structuralsteel beams to prevent the bell tower from collapsing onto the road.

The buildings on the opposite site of the road have no Heritage value and we believe it is essential for anyroad widening to occur on the northern side of the highway.

Yours sincerely

GRAEME ROBERTSON

Graeme Robertson Grou

262 Stirling HighwayP O Box 140CLAREMONT WA 6910

Tel: 9385 3511Fax: 9385 3486Mobile: 0429 919 998

1

Proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Amendmen

Mo.262 (Loi 201 Highway, ClaremontProposed a ea required 38 m 2

subject to su vey

Extr ct of ro osed changes: plan number 1.7146 ('190-b)

WesternAustralian

"i Planning- Commission

cl'js153ji2rti Aug 2011Pro jct i byMzF' g G oS J*ID- a Erov i, Qi -rtn nlc Plsnn'o?, P mV/.1.Cnb .'.lfct'tii Y/. itun J tr " iFI:nir Ct nip sr en.B j; Mo nsSsn :irpp! < d by W: :xrn iiili l i Lull Inte ion .'/. onty U /sa-EC Jf-l

Bilsling reserve boundary

Proposed reserve boundary

Property boundary

CllJA Propose area require

Scale 1:400

0 8

metres

tote: All dimensions re in rr r c -.

La e Submission622


Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): increasing the existing P imar Regional Roads reservation in NorthPremantle)








jiJEPARTMF' l OF PMM j

? 7 AUG 2012

[file /Tus o ZT-g

Signed C

Date


Form 41




Name ..

Address .

Ij 2 AUG 2012


-i

OFFICE USE ONLY

Late Sufemissiorii623

p

Postcodeis*2)-

Contact phone number.. ?. . .4. Email address @.e.£ .0. . . tr.,.'JPT, C-O ¦

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

.. . 7». . ?9 <?: ¦ 9.f~->T 'F- .

TW O E ' fs X . Wf; Wv - Ne C 'v g .

"p* \ O f or *3 L po| ''a A g5L-<A io-*-3* ¦=, ca iaj X if J ' VZ o/ Vx

VCiwotZ tx. .s 5 <~<S-

\ > \*t5, ©v* » > (2-V.OH.T . V c- to€- e> C E»>-»T -€.

<?u © c s g -va3!'

jo>C_ p&.C rv © -'==> V o c ocs ® - o Ar i V 1- O l

og-TH. ¦VgeJr- <._'E ©C-Ct

d'CjSJE- g-COK -'S- Pr ' V?>(2 0\5T

y' f- es. ' 6 * \oov l o>- j£i

Ar > o r . rl v v .

C- V -VCs CyPi

r £ w c r i€ to *

( O fj 1 C X /><<_- oC- V \Si -5? VE Vv'c-C C-g O AA A A sC , teerrr t.

V s i_0: toe .»A T 'c V C- ' •> j \' j 'M&C A V-\S-


f T •¦-.1 $ ,\,[r:\ri >' * f v• V l-i '-0(i-C5 ¦ ¦ TVV5V ©

l •• , * v»' v O - ;-. . 5 T ,W V VTA & P C -/ 5- -' ¦ Tv . ,

' p ¦?¦.1 -r j «* '7.fi. f--,;7 r

-s-a L oP V'. <WX ' l,-'-.• > < ¦\V_ ';-- ¦«:

p rr -¦ \ 6 Ps5?s. «

IjJ l.-i u C/ - Pi'i??' «.p ;;. '¦' '',-A iv*~-v; \ . *

O. -V© j;. m. i ;J'S )

V h.j co-srr -t vi- VL

?e( T ( tSsV-S. i' IJ !>J t-W •iH-P-fS TS S' ?c OtC t/ PrL fv v,'?' P 3 £5V"

- i \ I*2 ' vruvv vev S tP g.' S'? 'P cr'|4; C- VV-rV f. -1 •i

& & H X 'b - ISO Sio

a2 i rt- eb.cm 1''4 '• /

?a fi:A-S

j; Jv wcr" )'i | M

3-,.-,- - - \.C-S» fis fA a-5 . t . v ¦po n,. '

.fr C % -i

/!>'c ©' S'° fig H > tf a

, , .,S- (g; [ -






OR



C Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson


1 would pr f r my hearing to be conducted in:





* The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheW PC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Signature

lined by person(s) making the su mission

Note: Submissions iViUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning. a.gov.au

Late Submission624

26 June 2012

Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC)C/ SecretaryLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 60001 FILE L- I oq4-&

2 8 AUG 2012

Dear Sir Madam

RE: ATIONALISATION OF STIRLI G HIGHWAY RESE VATION - METRO EGIO SCHEMEA ENDMENT 1210/41 - LOT 70 (392) STIRLING HWY, CLAREMONT

Further to correspondence of 20 March 2012, in relation to the above mentioned, we would

li e to put forward a submission to the WAPC on behalf of Unit 16 at 392 Stirling Hwy,Claremont.

It is our understanding from the information provided that WAPC is making an amendment tothe original reservation put in place in 1963 which will significantly reduce the originalboundary of this reservation and introduce a new boundary.

Whilst it is appreciated that the boundary has been reduced, it appears that the proposedboundary overlaps part of the rear of the existing building and therefore will impact on thedevelopment as a whole.

In correspondence provided by the Stirling Highway Project Team, it is suggested that thegeneral presumption is that in the event that a building or portion of a building is affected bya reservation, the entire development will eventually be purchased by the State Governmentand or demolished.

A number of Owners have purchased a property within this development as an investment

or as a place of residence and this would financial and physically impact on every Owner.

We therefore request that the WAPC consider our position and look at re-engineering theroad design to avoid any need to purchase or demolish the existing development at 392Stirling Hwy, Claremont. The need to demolish or purchase this site will not only affect my unitbut will also affect the remaining 20 dwellings within this development.

Should you have any queries or concerns with my submission, please do not hesitate to

contact me directly on the below contact details.

Your faithfully

Ms Susan Evans

36 Saddington CrescentMosman Park WA 6012

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial) DEPAR™r' 1 r - N,'ll| |6

Form 412 7 AUG 2012

Submission[ etropolitan Region Scheme Amendment /Q2-


OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001 ( 7 fj b S ! !6LU£ f uj \J

Late Submissio 625

j

Name 3(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

. LC?.. l >o S7 £> c> jn/ c. v .o t aAddress I .Q. .!>? ... . JA Postcode ?rr.

G ..tact phone number.. . .T1. Email address f.e r.C.r . .5?

L (A PoocJ c'jrTips for completing a submission:° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and iss es° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

/ f re $ss

. r ... . rfr. A. .P..

I W/. c . rn

... 2 ,... _j>

.Jk-. f f > K * / p '4 i y* _c p. r . .jX fk .'Trl. ty krf?. A/

¦ 77 ) - • ' ';y'~

. / < l/tt 7 , ., 799. . .C-. .0 S... ./P .akJ&i. .A . j . 9 fft...

. <4 44 .'k/y 'JrdJZf ..... . rf: 7? 9(97 '

. ktdk . 4 2 Crf.S drtC. 1/

(A92 i kk.. y njZ ,

2

A G. V.Ct r T r .' . P?f 7fi :kr'j

turn over to comple e you submission





i N©, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Y©S, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)



or

A spokesperson



EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)




° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maysubject to applications for access under the act.

© In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submiss on, may be disclosed to third parties.

© All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning. a.gov.au


Form 41

Submission][ etropolitan Region Scheme mendment 1210/41

atio alisation of Sti li g Highway Reser ation

OFFICE USE ONLYb. ¦_ _ _ .

To: Secretary Late SubmissionWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506 0 26Perth WA 6001 . ,

Name .. ..(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .r.. Postcode

Contact phone number Email address ..£\.'

T/ps for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional nu bered pages if you require more pace to complete your submission

Submission

-(J--rrc { - ((_ t-f- (L 0"f~ 2 !> 2~o / d ,

turn o er to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee ofthe WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsor . Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Please choose one o the following:

S o, l do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom ofthe form and sign)

OR


1 ill be epresented by:


or

A spokesperson


S would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:





o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.


° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

the submission

Signature cTTY/... Dater r Y-

Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed by the ad ertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be consi ered.

Co tacts: Telephone-(03) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - t1p://vw/w.planning.wa.gov.au

EXTRACT OF TOWN OF COTTESLOE MINUTES OF ORDI ARY COU CILMEETI G ON 25 JUNE 2012

11.1.1 ETROPOLITA REGIO SCHE E ( RS) E DMENTRATIO LIS TIO OF STIRLING HIGHW Y ESERV TION - FURTHERREPORT

File o:ttachments:

Responsible Offices :

Author:

SUB/1058Stirling Hwy Lot 58 to McNeil Street.pdfCa l skewChief Executive Offices’Ed DrewettSenio Planning Office

P oposed eeti g Date: 18 June 2012

uthor Disclosure of I te est: il

SU ARY

This report provides additional information to assist Council in formulating a submissionto the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) with respect to the proposedMRS Amendment to rationalise the Stirling Highway Reservation.

A preliminary report regarding this proposal was considered by Council on 23 April 2012and is included in this report for reference. The comment period for submissions closeson 27 July 2012.

BACKGROU DOn 23 April 2012 Council resolved to:

1. Note the preliminary report regarding the MRS Amendment for the rationalisationof the Stirling Highway reservation.

2. Request that the Department of Planning give a briefing to Councillors on theproposed MRS Amendment to further explain the full implications to the Town ofthe proposed changes to the road reservation prior to a formal submission beingmade by Council.

On 5 June 2012 elected members and staff were briefed by Mr John O Hurley from theDepartment of Planning (DoP) and Mr Mike Sjepcevich from the Department ofTransport (DoT).

EXTRACT OF COUNCIL MINUTES - 23 PRIL 2012

By way of background an extract from the minutes of the Council meeting held on 23April 2012 is reproduced in italics as follows:

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of a proposed MRSAmendment to rationalise the Stirling Highway Reservation that has been prepared bythe Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) and released for publicconsultation. The comment period closes on 21 July 2012.

BACKGROUND

Media Statement

A media statement on the MRS Amendment was released by the Planning Minster, theHon. John Day, on 21 March 2012 and advised:

The State Government has released for public comment an amendment to theMetropolitan Region Scheme to facilitate the improvement of Stirling Highway overthe next 20 years.

While Stirling Highway s configuration would remain two lanes each way, theamendment proposed some adjustment to the current road reservation which wouldhelp better meet local traffic needs and cater for users of the road into the future.

Stirling Highway is an integral part of Perth s road network for local residents and thethousands of motorists, pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users that travel alongit each day.

This amendment is an opportunity for the public to consider and comment on transportplanning and the long term design of Stirling Highway, the historical linkbetween Perth and Fremantle.

It will allow for improved road safety focusing on pedestrian, cyclist and public transportamenity and provide consistent planning guidance across seven local councils for thenext two decades.

This process would help to provide clarity and certainty for landowners along thehighway, many of whom have been significantly affected by the reser ation since1963.

Proper planning for improvements along Stirling Highway has long been needed and itis crucial that the State Government provides this certainty as Perth grows.

Put simply, we have arrived at a situation in which the reserve as currently applied is toowide in some locations while not wide enough in others.

The amendment identifies more than 25 hectares of private land that is surplus tohighway requirements, which is currently included in the road reservation, and theamendment proposes to rezone the land to remove restrictions on future development.

There are, however, certain areas where increases or minor variations to the currentreserve are proposed - affected landowners will be contacted individually and theseadjustments will be subject to extensive public consultation.

Without agreement on a future plan for Stirling Highway, it will not be possible tocoordinate improvements that are vital to its continued safe use as Perth grows duringthe next 20 years.

Amendment Report

The MRS Amendment report details the background to the proposed changes.

The main points are summarised as follows:

° Stirling Highway has been reserved in the MRS since 1963. Under the currentMRS it has the status of a Primary Regional Roads reservation. The originallygazetted regional road reservation was approximately 80 metres wide, more thantwice the width necessary for such a regional road;

o Amending the reservation over Stirling Highway will provide clarity and certaintyfor future road planning and orderly land use planning along the urban corridor;

o Stirling Highway traverses seven Local Government Areas (LGAs) and requiresconsistent regional road planning and design guidance across municipalboundaries for long term safety and amenity of road users;

o From the mid 1990s until recently the WAPC supported the practice of imposinga 5 metre interim setback from Stirling Highway for any proposed development orsubdivision north of Jarrad Street in Cottesloe, thus permitting developmentwithin the remaining MRS reserve. In 2009 this interim setback reservation wasextended to North Fremantle for consistency but was based on little practicalroad design consideration. Interim setbacks are no longer used for assessment,with subdivision and development proposals presently assessed against theproposed MRS Amendment, given its advanced detail;

o In 1999, the Stirling Highway Reservation Planning Review (SHRPR) proposed adecrease of the Stirling Highway reservation between Jarrad Street, Cottesloeand Winthrop Avenue, Subiaco. This study was completed by Main Roads A in2002 and concluded that future traffic volumes on Stirling Highway were likely to

increase marginally over future decades depending on development densitiesand the move towards more sustainable transport. Four lanes (two each way), acentral median, intersection improvements, improved pedestrian/cyclist facilitiesand public transport priority measures were identified as necessary for ultimateroad design;

o In 2006 the Infrastructure Coordinating Committee (of the WAPC) required thatany review of MRS road reservations in inner urban areas include planning for5.1 metre verges to accommodate better pedestrian amenity and adequate off¬road space for the provision of underground services and landscaping;

o The proposed MRS Amendment and accompanying Concept Design Plans seekto modify the existing reservation to match the road design that has beendeveloped during the past decade; and

o In 2006, the WAPC initiated the Stirling Highway Activity Corridor Study (SHACS)which is a project wor ing group that has no formal status but has provided aforum for regional and local government specialist stakeholders to share issuesand understand competing interests in terms of the highway s function. The MRSAmendment is part of SHACS Phase 1 focussing on regional transport;

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES

As described in the report, the MRS Amendment and supporting Concept DesignPlans attempt to satisfy the following criteria (subject to existing development andconstraints):

o Verges of 5.1m width on both sides of Stirling Highway, reduced to 4.5m inconstrained areas and to an absolute minimum of 4.1m in severely constrainedisolated locations;

o 1.5m on road cycle lane in each direction;

o Bus priority treatment at traffic-signalised intersections, generally an additionallane (designated bus lane) serving as a left turn pocket, and prioritised controlsto favour Transperth buses;

° 3.5m wide traffic lanes (two lanes in each direction);

° 2m to 5.5m width central median (to cater for central street trees, right turn lanepockets and pedestrian refuges);

o Consolidated right turn lanes to reduce the potential for traffic conflict alongStirling Highway (informed by relevant LGA and Main Road officers); and

o Adaptive design to minimise impacts on State Heritage property.

The proposed road carriageway plans are a guide, not a definitive plan, and futureroad planning by the relevant State authority may vary the present design based onbest practice (subject to further consultation).

RELATIONSHIP TO WAPC STRATEGIES 8, POLICIES

In preparation of this MRS Amendment the following WAPC strategies and policieshave been taken into consideration:

o Directions 2031 and Beyond;o Draft Central Metropolitan Perth Sub-Regional Strategy;o State Planning Policy 4.2 Activity Centres for Perth and Peel;o Development Control Policy 1.6 Planning to Support Transit Use and Transit

Orientated Development (DC 1.6); ando Development Control Policy 1.7 General Road Planning (DC 1.7).

These are all relevant strategy and policy considerations providing guidance onaccommodating Perth s future growth.

STAFF COMMENT

Overall initiative

The proposed MRS Amendment to rationalise the Stirling Highway Reservation hassignificant implications for many residential and commercial properties located along thehighway in Cottesloe and in the neighbouring LG As. However, as in most localities theaffected properties are partially or wholly situated within the existing MRS roadreservation, the proposed overall reduction should generally be less of a hindrance toproperty owners wishing to possibly subdivide or develop their properties in the future.

Properties owned by o vested in the Town

The following lots are owned by the Town and are affected by the MRS Amendment.However, due to the proposed rationalisation of the road reserve these lots would nolonger be affected by the reserve and would be zoned Urban under the MRS. Thisshould be an advantage to the Town when considering future development proposalson the land.

Lot 2 24 Station Street - sump siteLot 3 22 Station Street - sump site

Invitation from the Department of Planni g (DQP) to add ess Council

The DOR has offered to go through the MRS Amendment with Council to assist in

the understanding of the amendment documents. This is considered to be worthwhileand should be arranged as soon as possible to ensure that Council is fully briefed priorto making a formal submission on the MRS Amendment.

Conclusion

The proposed rationalisation of the Stirling Highway road reservation has merit butalso has potential far-reaching implications on individual properties within the Town sboundary and beyond. The impacts on heritage-listed buildings will also need carefulconsideration by Council and the WAPC as various heritage properties have little or nosetback to Stirling Highway and may be affected by the MRS Amendment proposal (eg:Albion Hotel).

The information provided in the MRS Amendment and accompanying ConceptDesign Plans only focus on regional transport initiatives. It is in the next stage that it isintended to focus on land use and urban design opportunities for Stirling Highway andSHACS will continue to have an important role in providing a forum to ensure continuedrepresentation by the Town.

Following a briefing of Council from the Department of Planning it is recommendedthat this matter be referred back to Council for further consideration and a formalsubmission being made to the WAPC on the proposed MRS Amendment.

ADDSTIONAL COMMENTS FOLLOWING BRIEFING

Further to the briefing on 5 June 2012 the following comments are made:

Is a broader approach needed to transport planning around Stirlin Hi hway?

The DoP advised that the proposed MRS Amendment only affects Stirling Highway andcomments should therefore be made in respect to the proposed rationalisation of thecurrent road reservation. However, broader suggestions regarding road transportplanning in the locality can still be made and will be reported to the WAPC forconsideration.

How was the proposed reserve for Stirling Highway worked out?

The proposed rationalisation of the road reservation is based on detailed ConceptDesign Plans. These provide more certainty to landowners as to how each individualproperty may be affected in the future and are based on actual engineering designproposals.

Does the proposed rationlisation of the reserve allow sufficient area for future increasedpublic and private transport demand alon Stirling Highway?

The western suburbs are well served by public transport and there is no foreseeabledemand for future light rail along Stirling Highway, especially as the existing nearby

heavy rail system is under-utilised. Priority bus lanes, wider verges, cycle lanes andturning pockets will all be incorporated within the proposed reserve.

State Road Design Requirements for Stirling Highway

Cross Section D • (29.5m Pedestrian Cro sing) •Wellington St eet

Will c clists be iven safer facilities alon Stirling Highway?

The Concept Design Plans propose 1.5m wide bike lanes on both sides of the highwaywhich will improve cyclist safety. An independent, detached cycle lane is not feasible asthere are too many road intersections to make it workable.

Why is a solid median needed along Stirlin Highway?

A solid central median is proposed along Stirling Highway with left and right turningpockets. The median will provide a pedestrian refuge for people attempting to cross thehighway safely. The length of the turning pockets could possibly be made longer toavoid the possibility of cars queuing on the highway and this could be included in thesubmission from Council.

Will landowners be compensated for the loss of land included in the proposed reserve?

If a landowner seeks to redevelop or subdivide their land, new development is generallynot allowed on the reserved portion of the site. However, in most cases this will besignificantly less than that previously required under the 5m interim road widening

requirement. Landowners may seek compensation from the WAPC if they are affectedby the proposed road widening reservation although this is likely to be based on existingland value rather than any loss of development potential;

The WAPC advises:

There are several options available to the owners of reserved land.

(i) Retain ownership of your property and continue quiet enjoyment of the propertyuntil the government needs it for the public purpose. You may complete anydevelopment or subdivision of the property approved before the reservationcame into effect. Under non-conforming use rights, you may continue to use theproperty for the purpose for which it was legally being used immediately beforethe reservation came into effect.

(ii) Sell the property on the open market to another person(s). The WAPCrecognises that due to the reser ation this may be difficult. Subject to acquisitionpriorities and the availability of funds, the WAPC would be willing to considerpurchasing a reserved property if an owner is unable to achieve a private sale onthe open market.

( i) Offer the property for sale to the WAPC. Subject to acquisition priorities and theavailability of funds, the WAPC would be willing to consider purchasing areserved property. The WAPC purchases a property at its current market valueignoring the effect of the reservation. The WAPC obtains two independentvaluations to provide it with advice on the value of the property.

(iv) If the WAPC refuses a development application on reser ed land, or approves adevelopment application subject to conditions that are unacceptable to theapplicant, the applicant can make a claim for compensation for injuriousaffection. However, you must be the owner of the property when it was firstreser ed to be eligible to make a claim. In such cases, the WAPC may elect topurchase the property instead of paying compensation. The purchase price canbe determined by negotiation, by reference to the State Administrative Tribunalor by arbitration.

Could Council consider rezoning lots that are most affected by the proposed roadreservation?

The lots between Eric Street and Napier Street appear most affected by the proposedroad reservation as the land requirement ranges from approximately 10.5m to13.4mdeep in this locality. Although these lots are currently reserved under the MRS forPrimary Regional Road (PRR), the adjacent zoning and density coding in current TPS2 and proposed LPS 3 includes mainly Residential R20 and pockets of ResidentialR30/R60.

Council could consider rezoning these lots to the higher densities of say ResidentialR60 once the existing road reservation has been rationalised and removing theassociated Scheme requirement for such medium density development to be a

comprehensive redevelopment of more than one lot. However, this may put furtherpressure on the use of the existing rights-of-ways at the rear of the properties, maynecessitate the rights-of-ways to be widened to 6m to accommodate two-way traffic,and it could result in local amenity issues and generate additional traffic on existingroads. Also as the landowners may be compensated by the WARC for any loss of landin the proposed road reservation it may not be necessary for the Town to makeconcessions in this area.

Similarly, for all other areas along the highway where the PRR reservation is definedand reduced, the statutory requirement will be for the Town to amend its Scheme tocreate appropriate zones and density codes to enable local land use and developmentcontrol. South of Vera Street, for example, this would entail the Residential/Office andTown Centre zones with medium to high density codes (ie R100 as exists for the TownCentre). Practically, a single Scheme amendment will probably be initiated, which ishow best to zone, density-code and otherwise plan for the various parcels of de-reserved land.

Will heritage buildings be protected for the proposed road reservation?

In the overall Amendment there are 14 State Heritage Listed properties that could beaffected by the proposed road reservation and these have all been identified by the DoPand highlighted on the Concept Design Plans. Of these 14 buildings only the oldClaremont Fire Station at 441 Stirling Highway is abutting Stirling Highway and locatedwithin the Town s boundary. At present it is almost entirely located within the existingroad reservation but this will be significantly reduced to between 1.4m - 1.7m under theproposed reservation and the building will not be affected by the proposed ConceptDesign Plans.

Above: Concept Design Plan showing the Old Claremont Fire Station

There are 5 other properties that are on the Town s Municipal Heritage Inventoryabutting Stirling Highway and within the Town s boundary, including the old ClaremontPolice Station that is also included under Schedule 1 of TPS 2. Although theseproperties ha e not been highlighted on the Concept Design Plans they will all be lessaffected by the proposed road reservation than that which currently exists and the Townwill have an opportunity to comment on individual properties as they would only beaffected if there was a development or subdivision proposal submitted by thelandowners.

fr«"' -lr«-ir t

Above: Concept Design Plans showing buildings (highlighted in blue) that areincluded on the Tow s Municipal In entory - (refer attachment)

What happens if the proposed MRS Amendment is not approved?

The existing 80m road reservation will remain into the future. However, withoutagreement on the long-term function and design of Stirling Highway, no budget orpriority is likely for improvements.

CONCLUSIONThe excessively-wide MRS reservation for Stirling Highway has existed for almost 50years and despite previous examination has not until now been proposed forcomprehensive rationalisation. Without an amendment the current unsatisfactorysituation would continue. Although the overall transport system may be debated and theultimate concept design for the highway could be modified, it is considered timely and

beneficial fo define and clarify the intended land requirements for the future roadwayenvisaged.

The briefing by the DoP and DoT provided an opportunity for elected members and staffto receive a more detailed background to the proposed MRS Amendment and to askquestions regarding local and regional transport concerns affecting the WesternSuburbs and Cottesloe.

The DoP advised that it had been approached by many affected landowners,particularly seeking clarification about the current and proposed status of theirlandholdings and whether compensation would be paid in the event that land wasresumed.

Whilst this proposed MRS Amendment does affect a considerable number of properties,the majority of the existing road reservation will be considerably reduced north of JarradStreet and it will give landowners and developers clarity and certainty to make decisionsin advance of any roadworks proposed in the long term (20 years plus).

Council could resolve to seek a submission from WESROC but it is unlikely that this willoccur prior to the closing date for submissions. It is therefore recommended that Councilconditionally supports the proposed MRS Amendment, as it represents a logicaladvancement on the current 80m road widening reservation and there will be furtheropportunity to comment on specific land use and urban design aspects during the nextplanning stage to be initiated by the WARC.

OTING

Simple Majority

COMMITTEE CO ME T

Committee discussed various aspects associated with the proposal as were highlightedin the recent briefing session on the matter. It was agreed that the recommendationwould benefit by being expanded to comment more widely in relation to transportplanning, the highway engineering, and land requirements including the impacts andcompensation process.

OFFICER RECOMME DATIONMoved Cr Strzina, seconded Cr Boland

THAT Council:

1. Request staff to complete the WAPC s submission form to advise that the Townsupports the proposed MRS Amendment for the rationalisation of the StirlingHighway Primary Regional Road Reservation, subject to:

a) the WAPC also giving due consideration to future public and private transportdemands along other regional roads in the western suburbs, especiallyaround the existing bottleneck in Claremont and along Curtin Avenue; and

b) that the WAPC further reviews the Concept Design Plans to determinewhether the length of the proposed turning pockets are adequate to ensurethat vehicles, including buses, will not conflict with the continuous traffic flowalong Stirling Highway and that there are adequate access points availablefor turning vehicles following the creation of the solid central median; and

2. Request staff to:

a) monitor progress of the proposed MRS Amendment for further reporting toCouncil regarding the submissions and outcome as relevant; and

b) give preliminary consideration to the future necessary local planning schemeamendment(s) to create zones, residential density codes, land use ordevelopment requirements and any special planning controls orredevelopment incentives for all of the land to be removed from the MRSPRR Reservation, including heritage properties, for further reporting in duecourse.

AMENDMENTMoved Cr Jeanes, seconded Cr Downes

The recommendation is amended as follows:

1. Request staff to complete the WAPC s submission form in respect to theproposed MRS Amendment for the rationalisation of the Stirling Highway PrimaryRegional Road Reservation advising that further consideration should be given tothe following:

a) future public and private transport demands along other regional roads inthe western suburbs, especially around the existing bottleneck inClaremont and along Curtin Avenue;

b) alternatives to Stirling Highway, in particular along the railway reserve thatruns parallel to the highway for a considerable distance, as this wouldreduce the impact on landowners abutting Stirling Highway;

c) development of a system that gives greater certainty to landownersabutting Stirling Highway including a simple and transparentcompensation mechanism; and

d) review of the proposed Concept Design Plans to determine whether thelength of the proposed turning pockets are adequate to ensure thatvehicles, including buses, will not conflict with the continuous traffic flowalong Stirling Highway and that there are adequate access pointsavailable for turning vehicles following the creation of the solid centralmedian; and

2. Request staff to:

a) monitor progress of the proposed MRS Amendment for further reporting toCouncil regarding the submissions and outcome as relevant; and

b) give preliminary consideration to the future necessary local planningscheme amendment(s) to create zones, residential density codes, landuse or development requirements and any special planning controls orredevelopment incentives for all of the land to be removed from the MRSPRR Reservation, including heritage properties, for further reporting in duecourse.

Carried 5/1

COMMITTEE RECO ENDATION & COUNCIL RESOLUTIO oved Cr Walsh, seconded Gr Strzina

THAT Council:

1. Request staff to complete the APC s submission form in respect to theoposed MRS mendment fo the rationalisation of the Sti ling Highw y

Prima y Regional Roa Rese ation advising that fu ther conside ationshould be given to the following:

a) future public and private trans o t demands along other egionaloads i the weste subu bs, especially a oun the e isting

bottleneck in Claremont and along Curtin venue;

b) alternatives to Stirling Highway, in particular along the railwayreserve that runs arallel to the highway fo a conside able distance,as this woul reduce the i pact on la downe s abutting StirlingHighway;

c) development of a syste that gives g eate cer ainty to landownersabutting Sti li g Highway including si ple and t ans a entcompensation echanis ; nd

d) eview of the ro osed Concept Design Pl ns to deter i e whet ert e lengt of the proposed tu ning ockets a e adequate to ensuret a vehicles, including b ses, will not conflict with t e continuoustraffic flow along Sti ling Hig way and t at the e are adequa eaccess oints available fo turning vehicles following t e c eation ofthe solid cent al edian; an

2. Request s aff to:

a) monitor rogress of the pro osed MRS endment for furtherepo ting to Council egarding the sub issions and outco e asele ant; a

b) give eliminary conside ation to the futu e necess r local plan ingscheme amen ent(s) to create zones, esiden ial densit codes,land use or develo ent requi ements a any special planningcont ols o edevelo men incentives for all of t e land to beremove f o the MRS PRR Reservation, including he itageproperties, for further re orting i due course.

THE MENDED SUBSTANTIVE MOTIO WAS PUTCar ied 9/0

Late Submission

627

1 Septembe 2012

From: J D Crandell9 Peel StreetJOLIMONTWA6014

To: The SecretaryWeste Australian Plan ing Commission •140 William StreetPERTHWA 6000

Dear Sir

I a deeply conce ed about the impacts of the above plan on A t Deco heritage places aswell as the gene a char cter and amenity of the areas affected by this scheme.

I think it ould be very worthwhile to consider an alternative. Something to consider ratherthan widen the highway is to build n underground system belo the existing roadway forbuses or light ail vehicles o both. Too, with the prospect of buses in futu e being hybrids orrunning on hydrogen and e hausting only H2O, then pollution of die air below ground ill beless nd less of an issue to deal ith s time goes on.

Having these ehicles below the surface would also benefit the amenity of the high ay,ma ing businesses and living along the highway more attractive.

Given that the underground system in London and the sub ay system in New Yor havebeen in operation for over a hundred years, the long-term benefit of doing such veryob iously presents itself. Doing so would save not only tire existing streetsca es, but wouldnot bring bout the hardships that would be caused to businesses and private parties in theareas affected. Such an underground system ould very much be roviding a long-termsolution. Otherwise, such road idening might need to take place again and again over timeas the popul tion exp nds, further causing disru tion, with the cost of again reclai ing land;

I would be grateful to have a res onse to the above.

Yours since ely

Metropolitan Region Scheme Major Amendment 1210/41 -Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

JD Cra dell

1

Late Syb issto62 §

Subject: FW: MRS Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway reservation - SHELL

From: Fiona.Murrav(g)shell.com rmailto:[email protected]: Friday, 17 May 2013 3:10 PMTo: Bubanic, MarijaCc: O'Hurley, JohnSubject: RE: MRS Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway reservation - SHELL

Hi Maria,

Thanks for your email.

Please treat my letter as a late submission from Shell.

Shell will provide a further information in relation to the Claremont Property and Mosman Park Property by 14 June

2013.

Thanks in advance for your help; any queries, please don't hesitate to call Ph: 0428 33 44 30.

Kind Regards,

Fiona Murray | Property Management Co-ordinator - SA & WA

The Shell Company of Australia Ltd (ABN 46 004 610 459)GPO Box 872K | Melbourne VIC 3001 | AustraliaMob:+ 61 428 33 44 30Ph: +61 03 8823 4618Email: Fiona.Murray(S)shelLcotn

1

Mr. John O Hurley

Principal Planning Officer

Strategic Planning Implement tion

Department of Planning

Level 5, Gordon Stephenson House

140 William StreetPERTH WA 6000

The Shell Company of Australia LimitedRetail

GPO Box 872KMelbourne VIC 3001

AustraliaTel 0428 33 44 30

Email [email protected]

Internet http;//vvww.shell.co .au

Attention: Mr. John O Hurley By Email

16 May, 2013

Dear Sir,

Re: Mosman Park & Claremont Resumptions- MRS Amendment 1210/41Rationalisation of Stirling Highway reservation (Amendment)Shell Service Station, 269 Stirling Highway, Claremont (Claremont Property)

Th nk you for our email of 14 M y 2013 regarding the above A endment.

As discussed with ou, I have recently commenced employ ent ith Shell and am seeking confirmation that the

Depa tment has received a submission f om Shell regarding the Amendment.

H ving eviewed die lans for the Amendment provided by you, I am ver conce ned tiiat the impact to the

Claremont Pro e ty (in p rticular) will be signific nt and th t the cost burden to government to compensate Shell

should tire Amendment proceed as is will be extr ordin rily high and excessive.

In this regard, I understand that the impacts to the Claremont Propert are likely to include: -

1. Relocation of major infrastructure incurring substantial capital costs due to: -

® 4 of the 5 fuel tanks being located within 3m from die Claremont Property bound ry and therefore requiringrelocation.

® Fill boxes and fuel dispensers will need to be relocated to ensure a set back of 5m from the Cl remontProperty boundary. The existing building will lso re uire set back to ccommodate the forecourtconfigur tion. This will require total demolition and rebuild of e isting built structures.

ABN 46 004 610 459

2. Loss attributable to disturbance and disruption to business predicted to be extremely high

The Amendment indicates that 380sqm of the Claremont Property is to be resumed. If this proceeds as perthe Amendment, significant losses will be incurred by Shell in the reconfiguration of the remaining l nd. Thisis likely to result in significant financial loss to Shell from reductions in ret il volume, merchant ser ice fees,and refinery margin and rent l income paid to Shell. Odrer loss is likely to arise due to parking and s acerequirements of the Kmart workshop.

I underst nd that oral hearings will commence shordy reg rding the Amendment.

I would be a reciative if ou could confirm if the submission has received by Shell so that Shell can prep re for tiiese

hearings. In the event tiiat the submission c nnot be located, Shell would like to meet witii the Department to discuss

its concerns with the intended urpose to reduce the burden of compensation costs to government.

In tins regard, I ill be travelling to Perdi at from 3-5 June 2013 and would welcome the opportunity to meet witir

yourself and the Department.

Thanks in adv nce for your assist nce; if you have any queries, lease don t hesitate to contact me Ph: 0428 33 44 30.

Yours faithfully

Fiona Mutray

Ptoperty Management Coordin tor (SA & A)

Ph: 0428 334 430

2

Addi ion t®Su mission 628

Attachments:

Subject: FW: Shell Submission - MRS Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling HighwayReservationDepartment of Planning - Shell Submission -14 6 13 FINAL.pdf; Lt - Department ofPlanning -15 5 13.pdf; Shell Claremont.pdf; Shell Mosman Park.pdf

Importance: High

From: Matthew.HankinOshe .com rmailto:[email protected]: Friday, 14 June 2013 11:16 AMTo: O'Hurley, JohnSubject: Shell Submission - MRS Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway ReservationImportance: High

Good Morning John

Please find attached Shell s updated submission regarding MRS Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of StirlingHighway reservation, and implications for Shell sites at Claremont and Mosman Park.

We look forward to hearing from you soon and would welcome any opportunity to discuss this with the Department.

Kind Regards

MattHankin | Property Management Coordinator-WA/SA

The Shell Company of Australia Ltd (ABN 46 004 610 459)22 Bracks St, North Fremantle, WA, 6159Mob: + 61 439 998 339Ph: +61 08 9432 1272Email: [email protected]

1

The Shell Company of Australia LimitedMr. John O Hurley

Principal Pl nning Officer-

Strategic Planning Implement tion

Department of Pl nning

Level 5, Gordon Ste henson House Email [email protected] http://www.shell.com.au

22 Bracks StNorth Fremantle WA 6159

AustraliaTel 0439 998 339


Attention: Mr. John O Hurley By Email

14 June, 2013

Dear John,

Re: Mosman P rk & Claremont Resumptions- MRS Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway reservation (Amendment)

Shell Service Station, 269 Stirling Highway, Claremont (Claremont Property).

We efer to the bove matter and to our previous correspondence.

As per our em il exchange of 17 May 2013, we confirm th t it h s been agreed th t our letter of 16 May 2013 (a co yof hich is ttached) ill be considered as a late submission to the Amendment nd th t Shell may make additionalsubmissions by 14June 2013.

In light of the above, e no m ke the follo ing additional submissions reg rding the Claremont site (of hich webelieve the resum tion will have the greatest impact). Mosman P rk costs re still to be determined (subject to

ailability of more d anced plans).

1. Shell s consultants h ve dvised that the Amendment will require total site reconfigur tion. This willinclude elocation and repl cement of major infrastructure (as described in our letter of 16 May 2013) as wellas associated fuel infrastructure including venting, services and signage.

2. Shell’s consultants estimate th t infr structure and reconfiguration costs ill be appro imately $3.5M on best case scena io basis’ for the Claremont location.

3. Shell’s consultants ha e advised that the forecourt layout ill be reduced. The forecourt is the trading re for fuel sales. hen reduced, Shell believes that this may neg tively im act on car park stacking, congestionand accessibilit . Shell believes that this will result in decline in trading performance and will require new

ABN 46 004 610 45

site safety and traffic management plans to support continuing business oper tions. The resulting financialcosts and losses incurred cannot be quantified at this time.

4. Shell also expects to incu loss attributable to disturbance and disruption. This loss is lso not ascertainable ina monetary amount t this time.

5. Shell's Alliance partner (the Coles Express and Km rt Tyre & Auto businesses) will lso be impacted by theresumption/ orks. This will be subject to separate cl im submitted by their owners (Coles Group) hich isnot ascertainable in a monetary mount at this time.

6. To minimise the predicted financi l imp ct and avoid furt er financial loss from being incurred. Shell needsconfi mation that existing ing ess and egress to tire site (including any cross over access) will be retained.Shell views the support from both State and Loc l government departments in this reg rd as critical.

At this time, Shell h s considered a number of scen rios to chieve site reconfiguration based on the land to beresumed ( s shown in the attached plans) which Shell understands from the Dep rtment captures the proposedA endment.

However, s more advanced plans re not available at this time, Shell is unable to progress these scen rios further to

assess the full impact on its business operations including, for example, car p rking, supply logistics/fuel tanker-

deli eries and services.

Shell is com itted to orking with the Department and other government bodies to re ch a practical solution th t

will enable the Amendment to proceed while minimising the cost burden of compensation to government by reaching

practical compromises that accommodate Shell s business requi ements.

In this regard, we would welcome the opportunity to discuss this matter further so that planning can progress.

Th nk you for your assist nce in this matter.

If you h e any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me b email or at the mobile number belo .

Yours f ithfully

Matt Hankin

Property Management Coordinator (WA/SA)Ph: 0439 998 339

2

Mr. John O Hurley

Princi al Planning Officer

Strategic Pl nning Implementation

Department of Pl nning

Level 5, Gordon Stephenson House


The Shell Company of Australia LimitedRetail

GPO Box 872KMelbourne VIC 3001

Australia

Tel 0428 33 44 30Email [email protected]

Internet http://w w.shell.co .au

Attention: Mr. John O Hutley By Email

16 May, 2013

Dear Sir,

Re: Mosman Park & Claremont Resumptions- MRS Amendment 1210/41Rationalisation of Stirling Highw y reservation (Amendment)Shell Service Station, 269 Stirling Highway, Claremont (Claremont Property)

Th nk you for your em il of 14 Ma 2013 reg rding the above Amendment.

As discussed with ou, I have recendy commenced employment idi Shell and am seeking confirm tion th t the

Department has received a submission from Shell regarding the Amendment.

Having reviewed the pl ns for tire Amendment provided by you, I m very concerned that tire impact to tire

Claremont Prope ty (in particular) will be significant and that the cost bu den to government to compensate Shell

should tire Amendment proceed as is ill be extraordinarily high nd excessive.

In this regard, I understand that the impacts to the Claremont Propert are likely to include: -

1. Relocation of m jor infrastructure incurring substantial capital costs due to: -

® 4 of tire 5 fuel tanks being loc ted within 3m from tire Claremont Property boundary and therefore requiringreloc tion.

® Fill boxes and fuel dispensers will need to be relocated to ensure set back of 5m from the Cl remontProperty bound ry. The existing building will also require set b ck to accom odate the forecourtconfiguration. This will require total demolition and rebuild of existing built structures.

ABN 46 004 610 59

2. Loss ttributable to distutbance and disruption to business predicted to be extremely high

The Amendment indic tes that 380sqm of the Claremont Pro erty is to be resumed. If this proceeds as erthe Amendment, significant losses will be incurred b Shell in the reconfigur tion of the rem ining land. Thisis likely to result in signific nt financial loss to Shell from reductions in retail volume, merchant service fees,and refiner margin and rental income aid to Shell. Other loss is likely to arise due to parking and s ace

requirements of the Kmart workshop.

I understand that oral hearings will commence shordy regarding die Amendment.

I ould be appreciative if you could confirm if the submission has received by Shell so di t Shell can repare fo these

hearings. In the event that the submission cannot be located, Shell would like to meet with die Department to discuss

its concerns witii the intended urpose to reduce the burden of compensation costs to go ernment.

In tifis regard, I ill be travelling to Perth at from 3-5 June 2013 nd would welcome die opportunity to meet with

yourself and the Department.

Th nks in advance for your ssistance; if you have any que ies, please don t hesit te to contact me Ph: 0428 33 44 30.

Yours faithfully

Fiona Murray

Property Management Coordinator (SA & WA)

Ph: 0428 334 430

2

Proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Amendment

Reduction in land requiredfor road purposes

No.271 (Lot 7) & No.269 (Lot 8)Stirling Highway, Claremont

Proposed area required 223 nf

subject to survey

Extract of proposed changes: plan number 1.7146 (146-b

CQVERUMEMTOFWESTERN AUSTRALIA

WesternAustralianPlanningCommission

Existing reserve boundary


Property boundarydare 145. d i31 Aug 2011Produced by (Japping &. GeoSpallal Dala Brandi, Department of naming, Perth WAOn behalf of the Weste ustralfan Plann ng Commission.Bass Kormadon sup lied by Weste Australian Lan information Authorit U 430-2009-4 PM Proposed area required

)

metres

Note: All dimensions are In metres.


Increase in land require for road purposes

No.582 (Lot 1) Stirling Highway, Mosman ParkProposed area required 51 m2

subject to survey

(

Extract of proposed changes: plan number 1.7148 (382-e )

i WesternAuJli . n; Australian

«j gyL AyW : PlanningCommission



¦

Wos382.tJgn XGDA

Produced by Mapping & GeoSpaUal Dala Brariti. Dapartmenl of Rar ng, Penh WAOn bshall of tfia V/eststn Australian Plarrang Commissicn. Proposed area required / Base Harmaiion suppGad by Western Australian Land Info mation Authorit U 430-2009-4

Scale 1:400

0 8

metres

Note: All dimensions are In metres.


Increase in land requiredfor road purposes

No.582 (Lot 2) Stirling Highway, Mosrnan ParkProposed area required 46 m2

subject to survey

14

Extract of proposed changes: plan number 1.7148 ( 383-e)

WesternAustralianPlanningCommission

Mos383.dgn2G Oct 2011Produce by Mapp ng & GeoSpallal Data Branch, Department ct Pla ing, Perth V/AOn behalf ol the Western Australian Planning Commissicn. fin ABase Info mation suppEad by Western Aust alian Land Irformalion Authority U 430-2009-4 ll.zz. l


Proposed reserve boun ary

Property boundary

Proposed area required

Scale 1:400

0 8

I Imetres

Note: All dimensions are in metres.


Increase in land requ redfor road pu poses

No.582 (Lot 3) Stirling Highway, Mosman ParkProposed area required 40 m2

subject to survey

Extract of proposed changes: plan number 1.7148 ( 384-e )

WesternfllT i 'L, Australian

JLsSOIL AfcsPlannlnacovehnuehtof Oommlssion

WESTERN USTRALIA

f.tos354.dgn - 26 Od 2011 ><Produced b Mapping & GeoSpai/al Data Brandi, Department ol Planning, Perth V/A / \On behalf of the Western Auslraflan Planning Com ission. Q HABase WormalJon supplied by Western Aust al an Lan Informailon uthority U 420-2003-4 zz.d

E isting reserve boundary = =

Proposed reserve boundary > > ™ , ,

Property boundary

Scale 1:400

0 8

I IProposed area required \/ / /\ metres

Note: All dimensions are in metres.

mrs submissions (volume 6 of 6)

Documents