mrs submissions (volume 3 of 6) - part a

April 2016

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

Submissions 244 – 336

Volume 3 of 6

City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe,

Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove



Submissions 244 - 336

Volume 3 of 6

City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe,

Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove

April 2016

Disclaimer This document has been published by the Western Australian Planning Commission. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the government, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. © State of Western Australia Internet: www.wa.gov.au Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission, 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 2506 Perth WA 6001 MRS Amendment 1210/41 - Submissions 244 – 336 Volume 3 of 6 File 809-2-1-91 Pt 2 Published April 2016 Internet: www.planning.wa.gov.au Email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 655 19000 Fax: (08) 655 19001 National Relay Service: 13 36 77 Infoline: 1800 626 477 This document is available in alternative formats on application to Communications Services.

Introduction to Metropolitan Region Scheme major amendments The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for keeping the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) under review and initiating changes where they are seen as necessary. The MRS sets out the broad pattern of land use for the whole Perth metropolitan region. The MRS is constantly under review to best reflect regional planning and development needs. A proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the MRS is regulated by the Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for public submissions to be made on proposed amendments. For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section 41 of the Act), the WAPC considers all the submissions lodged, and publishes its recommendations in a report on submissions. This report is presented to the Minister for Planning and to the Governor for approval. Both Houses of Parliament must then scrutinise the amendment before it can take legal effect. In the process of making a substantial amendment to the MRS, information is published as a public record under the following titles: Amendment report This document is available from the start of the public advertising period of the proposed amendment. It sets out the purpose and scope of the proposal, explains why the amendment is considered necessary, and informs people how they can comment through the submission process. Environmental review report The Environmental Protection Authority must consider the environmental impact of an amendment to the MRS before it can be advertised. Should it require formal assessment, an environmental review is undertaken and made available for information and comment at the same time as the amendment report. Report on submissions The planning rationale, determination of submissions and the recommendations of the WAPC for final approval of the amendment, with or without modification, is documented in this report. Submissions This document contains a reproduction of all written submissions received by the WAPC on the proposed amendment. Transcript of hearings A person who has made a written submission may also choose to appear before a hearings committee to express their views. The hearings proceedings are recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts of all hearings are reproduced in this volume.

Alphabetical Listing of Submissions

MRS Amendment 1210/41


Submission Number

Submitter Name

48 Abzalov, Aygul 137 Albrecht, Marina 308 Aldrovandi, Jill 309 Aldrovandi, Riccardo 128 Allan, Ken & Dot 189 Allan, Sarah 447 Allerding and Associates (act on behalf of landowners Harman Nominees

Pty Ltd) 446 Allerding and Associates (act on behalf of landowners Two Twenty

Investments Pty Ltd & Dion Nominees Pty Ltd) 398 Anglican Church, Diocese of Perth 120 Annear O.A.M., Anne 355 Armstrong, Patrick H 337 Art Deco Society of WA (Vyonne Geneve) 44 Artelaris, Spiro & Penelope

138 Artelaris, Steve (Steve Artelaris Architects) 587 Ashford, Max 184 Asphar, Florence E 365 Asphar, Ian 145 Auer, John 433 Australian Urban Design Research Centre 175 Auto Management Pty Ltd 30 Backhouse, Lisa M

132 Bagshaw, Anthony & Ann 468 Bailey, Carolyn 119 Bailey, Mark 440 Balfe, Michael 441 Banfield, Tim & Gemma 17 Barker, David

228 Barron, Steve 419 Barrymore, Geoffrey 211 Bartel, Matt 385 Basson, E J & R M 32 Beamish, Marjorie (Flamenco Holdings Pty Ltd)

124 Bellson Pty Ltd ATF Brady Property Trust 47 Bennett, Pamela

576 Bennett, Pia 75 Bennett, Samuel 63 Bentley, Marjorie R 62 Berden, Matthew

165 Bishop, Luke 13 Blackburne Property Group (on behalf of The Owners of St Quentins

Apartments) 282 Blackwell & Associates Pty Ltd (Tony Blackwell)

470 Blackwell, Emmet 416 Blackwood, Beth (on hehalf of the Presbyterians Ladies' College) 459 Blair, Alison 294 Blanchard, Serverine (Co-Manager of Allegro Pizza) 114 Blight, Nicole 361 Blumann, Siobhan 92 Boehm, Peggy R

190 Bogue, Kevin & Marion 520 Bond, I L 50 Bowra & O'Dea - Funeral Directors

195 Boyd, A G 202 Boyd, L 384 Boyland, Father Peter (Parish Priest, Anglican Parish of Christ Church

Claremont) 68 Boyle, Peter & Celia

109 Boyle, Rafeena 484 Brake, Anne 59 Bremner, Mark

399 Brescacin, Danny (on behalf of his parents) 323 Brooker, Jacinta 201 Brooks, Y 327 Brown, Carolyn 31 Brown, Russell & Sally (Belregis Pty Ltd)

270 Brown, Sherri 322 Bruns, Maurits 580 Burns, William 329 Burrows, Amanda 91 Butcher, Luke

378 Butler, David & White, Justine 219 Calcutt, Julie 430 Cant, Ryan 49 Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd (on behalf of BP Australia Ltd)

390 Carles MLA, Adele (Member of Fremantle) 163 Carr, Emma 452 Carter, Jacqui 45 Carton, Romilly

522 Caslleden Family 262 Catelli, Anna & Maria 429 Challen, Michael B 523 Charlecraft, Henry 12 Charlesworth, Kate

153 Chartres, Margot (owner Violet Pilot) 155 Cheffers, Freya (owner Violet Pilot) 453 Cheffins, Jane & Pete 574 Cheffins, Peter 110 Cheung, Carol 310 Christy, Julie-Anne 223 Churack, Danielle 77 Churley, Julie

180 Clancy, Robyn L 103 Claremont Baptist Church (Ian Simms) 203 Claremont, Town of

95 Clark, Donald (on behalf of the Landowners of Seaview Lane Strata Lot 52/100 Stirling Hwy, North Fremantle)

579 Clune, Anna 212 Cmielewski, Cecelia 581 Cock, Daniel 369 Connor, Tony 100 Cook, Bruce 568 Cooper, Katey 284 Cooper, S P & G R 273 Cotton, Sandra J 577 Courtney, Liam 341 Cowell, Wendy 89 Craig, Daniel

391 Cranfield, Richard L J 332 Cromag Pty Ltd 498 Cropley, Cecily 491 Cropley, Peter 386 Croudace, Michael 387 Croudace, Susan 487 Crugnale, Gianpaolo (Gage Roads Construction) 415 Cullity, Dr Marguerite 93 Cunningham, Lesley

111 Cunningham, Tom & Bryant, Peri 115 Currie, Rachel 121 Curtis, Jackie 280 Dagg, Alan & Jennifer 72 D'Angelo, Marissa

388 D'arcy, John L 346 Date, Russel 141 Davidson, David K 232 Davidson, Ron & Dianne

6 Davies, Denise 3 Davies, Xian-Li

253 Davis, Christopher 382 Davis, Dr Neville J 252 Davis, Mary 373 Daw, Ian T 396 Daw, Trevor A (Chairman of the Forrest Grove Villas Body Corporate on

behalf of the Forrest Villa owners) 420 Day, Brenna 485 Day, Robert 191 D'Cress, Brian G 288 de Caux, Christian 104 Dean, Allan & William 28 Deejay Nominees Pty Ltd (Durack & Zilko Lawyers on behalf of)

272 Deighan, Dorothy H 566 Demissie, Bayoush 331 Department of Transport, Main Roads WA & Public Transport Authority 286 Desforges, Jonah & Danielle 519 D'Esterre Family 81 Dobra, Wendy & Max

277 Dodd, Marilyn 423 Donovan, Kim S & Payne, Carl D (Twine Court Pty Ltd)

55 Douglass, Tony (on behalf of Empire City Superannuation Fund) 237 Drayton, Roslyn 254 Dreyfus, Michele 313 D'Souza, Father James (Parish Priest Cottesloe/Mosman Park) 139 Dutry, Danicia 394 Dwyer, Bryan & Nyree 358 Eastwood, David 436 Eidsvold. Jaimie 502 Eldon, Lisa 255 Eldred, Sara 267 Elsey, Richard 23 Elton, Sophie

474 Evans, Glenn 207 Farnsworth, Kate 351 Faye, Bridget 178 Fearis, Neil 583 Ferguson-Thomas, Susan 210 Ferrari, Robert 431 Ferrell, Margaret 181 Ferrell, Walter J 596 Findlater, Kate & Brendon 489 Finn, Kirsty 243 Fiocco, Suzanne & John

4 Fire & Emergency Services Authority of WA 135 Flack, Ian 136 Flack, Jacqueline 345 Fleming, Hamish 404 Fletcher, Paul F 87 Flynn, Amber

257 Forarty, Cain 438 Ford, Patrick 244 Forma, Ann 98 Forrest, David & Nedela, Janis 19 Freind Investments Pty Ltd (Clayton Friend, Director on behalf of) 8 Fremantle Ports

84 Fremantle, City of 307 Galan-Dwyer, Bianca 242 Gamblin, Paul 336 Gardiner, Leigh 25 Gare, Robert C & Kathleen L

595 Gay, Marlene M 269 Gerard McCann Architect (on behalf of the owners Lot 51 Stirling Hwy,

North Fremantle) 206 Gilchrist, Sylvia 584 Glass, Stuart 401 Glassby, Cathie 353 Glegg, Trevor 479 Godden, Alison & Andrew 35 Godlonton, Heath Sanderson & Sasha

226 Goodlich, Mary-Ann 570 Goodridge, Phillipa 214 Goodwin, Clare 506 Grant, Barbara

505 Grant, Randall 260 Green, David 261 Green, Janet 558 Green, Russell 559 Green, Shirley 389 Greenway, Claire 427 Greg Rowe and Associates (act on behalf of owners Ortona P/L & Don

Russell Holdings) 445 Greg Rowe and Associates (act on behalf of owners Yat-Wing Liu &

Precious Holdings Pty Ltd) 458 Griffin, Scot & Clare 82 Groves, Norman John 67 Hall, John D & Penuel K 43 Hall, Lorraine & Geoff

409 Hamersley, Vicki & Simon (property held in the name of LF Rural Nominees Pty Ltd)

76 Hammond, L 9 Hams, Simon D D

362 Harper-Meredith, Karri 54 Harriott, John F

408 Harris, Daphne 134 Harvey, Clare 186 Hasluck, Sally A 162 Hatton, Damien 172 Hawkes, E 371 Hay, Cameron 71 Hayes, Bruce

333 Heagney, Karen 412 Health, Department of 301 Heard, Kent 421 Herbert, Serina 381 Hewitt, Maxwell E (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community

Association) 350 Hill, Richard & Schell, Fleur 147 Hills, Lisa J 340 Hills, Neville F 483 History Council of Western Australia (Dr Lise Summers, president) 572 Hopkins, Alexandra 74 Hopkins, Philip & Mary

511 Hos, Joanna 503 Hoskings, Janet 57 Hotchkin Hanly Lawyers (on behalf of Euro Form Constructions Pty Ltd)

276 House, Kate 357 Howe, Jim 10 Howe, Peter M

321 Howieson, Jill 379 Hume, B 196 Hunter, J M 197 Hunter, W 342 Hutchison, June 225 Hyndman, Trish 20 Imani, Dr Pedram 64 Independent Cinemas Pty Ltd

11 Indigenous Affairs, Department of 113 Ioppolo, Gary

1 Ioppolo, James 463 Jackson, Andrew (on behalf of all owners of Greenough Home Units) 131 Jeffree, Marjorie G V 377 Jelovsek, Francesco 39 Jeta Pty Ltd

241 Johnson, Jill 300 Johnson, Josephine 235 Johnstone, Graeme 231 Johnstone, Klara 424 Jones, Alex 289 Jones, Bryn 383 Jones, Peter F 518 Jordan, Ray 216 Joyce, Fletcher J 338 Kaesehagen, David 170 Kain, Anthony 393 Keely, Dr Nicholas 352 Keen, Michelle 108 Kelly, Simon 168 Kennedy, Dorothy 274 Kenny, Judith 204 Kent, Jack 205 Kent, Louis 125 Kidd, Paul 209 King, Natasha 158 Kleinig, Richard 221 Knutson, Barry 493 Kohan, Kimberley 591 Kotsoglo, Imogen 339 Kowald, Brian 588 Kruit, Michael 169 La Fontaine, Monique 348 Lane, Glendon 349 Lane, Jennifer 293 Lane, Richard 188 Langmead, Rex A (representing Langmead Investments P/L in trust for the

Langmead Familty Trust) 33 Leach, Jeffery & Helen

215 Leah, Ann 375 Leahy-Kane, Jane 14 Lee, Shirley C L

466 Leighton, Chris 271 Leondro Mika 83 Leslie, Benjamin & Oliver, Nicole 46 Lim, Tanya Fong

496 Line, Wendy 38 Ling, Kendrick

599 Litis, Desi 586 Llewellin, Michael 578 Loe, Louise 302 Lopresti, Frank (on behalf of the owners of 176 Stirling Hwy, Nedlands)

482 Lorenz, Anita 27 Lund, Wayne

562 Lushey, Robert A 126 Lyndon, Angie 367 Lyons, Christopher 557 Lyons, Emma 60 MacDougall, Sonya Lee

258 MacGill, Gerard (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association) 85 MacGowan, John & Charmaine

291 MacKay, Sharon 504 MacKie, Maggie 151 MacLeay, Shayne 112 MacLeay, Travis 299 MacNeill, Ron 359 Maher, Ingrid 356 Mair Property Securities Ltd (on behalf of all the owners of 525 Stirling Hwy,

Cottesloe) 585 Malacari, Luke S 217 Maley, Kirsten 573 Maloney, Bruce 246 Mannolini, Amanda; Gerrish, Laurence & Connolly, Anne-Maire 142 Mansell, Vanya 65 Martinick, Dirk

171 Martino, Bianca 368 Marwick, Susan 130 May, Sarah 249 McCormick, Jonathon R 179 McGechie, David & Ada 592 McGowan, Claire 571 McGown, Michael (on behalf of Kirsten Maley) 575 McKean, Andrew 594 McKenzie, Ian 473 McNab, Sandy C 461 Meehan, Pamela 230 Mellor, Edward 229 Mellor, Thomas 354 Meredith, David 56 Merks, Kristy

501 Metcalfe, Chris 517 Mian, C 192 Mignot, Belinda A 563 Miller, Todd 316 Milliner, Andrew 315 Milliner, Jessica 24 Mines and Petroleum, Department of

140 Monk, Anthony & Shirley 450 Monro, Caroline 360 Monro, Victoria 53 Morgan, Sue

303 Moriarty, Bruce 41 Morris, Dr Christina (Appollonia Nominees, Cottesloe Dental)

500 Morton, Keith 70 Mosman Park, Town of

582 Moulden, Deanne 457 Muir, Gregory 600 Mullen, Kate 476 Mulvena-Trinder, Brendan 495 Murray, David 413 Murray, John (Creation Landscape Supplies) 494 Murray, Lisa 101 Mussared, Helen A 372 Musto, Ken & Lyn 486 Nairn, Pam 26 Nardone, Rocco A (for Conpec Pty Ltd)

292 National Trust of Australia (WA) 29 Naughton, Paul

183 Nedlands Electors Association (Inc) 123 Nedlands, City of 462 Neil, Anne & Tepper, Steve 347 Newson, Alan & Barlow, Johanna 182 Nguyen, Thai Duy 434 Niblett, Dylan 222 Nichol, Colin 567 Nicholls, Scott 437 Nicholson, Charlie 52 Nikakhtar, Loghman

298 Nikolich, Amanda & Goran 236 Nixon, Bruce & Handcock, Karen 99 Nomet Pty Ltd

516 Nottage, J 314 O'Connor, David 187 O'Dea, John 256 Officer, Meg 296 O'Keefe, Joe 418 O'Loughlin, Edmond (on behalf of Geraldine O'Loughlin) 213 Orchard, Stuart 512 O'Reilly, Alexandra 513 Oria, Conrad 90 Orly, Tammy 34 Ou, Zhiliang

561 Owenell, Ben 560 Owenell, John 467 Owners of Brookwood, 396 Stirling Hwy (Andrew Bremner) 263 Owners of Terrara (Strata Plan 1275) 233 Palmer, Narayani 428 Palmer, Richard D 320 Paparone, Jack 319 Paparone, Romaine 278 Parmentier, Brice 247 Paterniti, Robert & Sue 295 Paterson, Alistair 564 Paterson, Eleanor 480 Paterson, Jennifer A 266 Paton, Mary-Anne 364 Pattison, Cate & Giles 156 Paulik-White, Dr Georgie

335 Pauling, Glenn 265 Paxton, James F 88 Pearce, Cameron

149 Pedro, Zamia 425 Peppermint Grove, Shire of 66 Petrides, Peter

218 Phillips, Dodie 118 Phillips, Jenny 51 Philpott, Martin & Mary

220 Pickles, Carol 410 Pieniazek, Jan & Cecilia 200 Pinkster, Lauren 597 Pinto, E 185 Pisano, Ngarie & Giglieto 465 Pittaway, Janine & Brown, Stewart 403 Planning Solutions (on behalf of Amana Living) 426 Poland, Greg 227 Pollard, Helena 166 Porter, Clare 287 Pratt, Brian & Gillian 590 Prindiville, T 208 Pritchard, Georgina 328 Ptolomey, Brendon (AAPI Certified Practising Valuer) 312 Pyvis, Sally 251 Quayle, Monica 106 Rae-Frae, Ama 78 Ramdas Tampi & Pamela Hendry

161 Ramsay, Rob 159 Randall, Brooke 370 Rattigan, Annabel 451 Rattigan, Graeme 569 Redgrave, Sian 167 Reed, Sandra 144 Rees, John (Mosman Park Veterinary Hospital) 297 Reeve, Thomas & Valerie 18 Reid, Sarah M 37 Remmerswaal, N

477 Revell, Kerry 58 Richardson, Gavin

598 Ridley, Ben & Dietrich, Jessica 593 Ridley, Cate 129 Rigg, Jeremy 157 Riley, Jim 454 Rippingale, Kelly 443 Rivalland, Virginia & Daniel 407 Roberts, Giles 193 Roberts, Lynn 411 Roberts, Peter; Strauss, Caroline; Wood, Anne & Lankester, Keith 435 Roberts, Tom 133 Robinson, John 514 Rogers, Joanna

5 Rogers, John 238 Rogers, Steve

515 Rogers, Steve 127 Rosenstein, Jennifer 173 Runco, Mario & Mary 160 Russell, Glenn 400 Ryan, Gary 326 Sambrailo, Christian 565 Savill, Julie 79 Savoy Management Pty Ltd

510 Scott, Elizabeth 40 Seng, James Cheah Kit (Duomark on behalf of the owners)

488 Shaw, Jeni 432 Shepherd, Melissa 290 Shepherd, Pip 380 Showell, John A 22 Simpson, John & Marie-Louise

275 Skipworth, Ric & Tish 490 Sluga, Lena 259 Smith, Deonne 250 Smith, Keith & Elizabeth 281 Smith, Roland 344 Smith, Sophie 343 Smith, Stewart 448 Socha, Pauline M 21 South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Council (SWALSC)

107 Spencer, David 234 Stansfield, Judith 69 State Heritage Office

414 Staude, Anita 442 Steffen, Thomas & Franscesca 248 Stirling, Kim 116 Stokes, Amy 366 Stone, Noel T 509 Stoner, B 80 Subiaco, City of

481 Sullivan, Andrew 279 Sullivan, Jane 224 Suttar, Craig 97 Swan River People Native Title Holders

330 Sweetman, Lorraine 456 Swift, Omega 499 Swiney, Tracey 469 Tambasco, Serena 15 Tan, John Tiang Tong

283 Tapp, Aimee 285 Taylor, Annie 240 Thayne, Nell 334 The Fremantle Society 94 The Landowners of Stirling Heights - SP5036

102 The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Perth 154 Thomas, Jacinta (Manager Violet Pilot) 521 Thompson, M O 148 Thompson, Stephen 174 Thorpe, John

122 Thorpe, Susan 444 TPG (on behalf of Rhys Edwards, owner Nedlands Post Office) 397 TPG (on behalf of the landowners Amhurst Enterprises Pty Ltd and John

Fountain as trusteee for the John Fountain Family Trust) 439 TPG (on behalf of the owners CITI Fiedlity Nominee Co Pty Ltd) 497 Tregonning, Anne 492 Trishs' Place (Antiques) 245 Truscott, Kate 449 Tucak, Layla 478 Tucak, Michael 146 Tulloch, Alastair (Councillor) 376 Turner, Stacey 96 University of Western Australia (Professor Paul Johnson)

471 Unknown 524 Unknown 525 Unknown 526 Unknown 527 Unknown 528 Unknown 529 Unknown 530 Unknown 531 Unknown 532 Unknown 533 Unknown 534 Unknown 535 Unknown 536 Unknown 537 Unknown 538 Unknown 539 Unknown 540 Unknown 541 Unknown 542 Unknown 543 Unknown 544 Unknown 545 Unknown 546 Unknown 547 Unknown 548 Unknown 549 Unknown 550 Unknown 551 Unknown 552 Unknown 553 Unknown 554 Unknown 555 Unknown 556 Unknown 601 Unknown 602 Unknown 61 Vasudavan, Dr Sivabalan (Sole Director of Lola Management Pty Ltd) 16 Victoria Creek Pty Ltd

198 Vidulich, K M 199 Vidulich, M

86 Vigano, Anthony J 152 Vujic, Tara 164 Vujic, Tijana 507 Wall, Jon 472 Wallbridge, Philip 239 Walsh, Aiden 143 Walsh, Brett 317 Walsh, Jane 318 Walsh, John 402 Walter, Peta (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association) 422 Walton, Haylee 306 Warrall, Ian

2 Water (Swan Avon Region), Department of 363 Water Corporation 177 Watson, Nevin J 264 Weber, David 460 West, Carly 455 West, Michael 105 Wheeldon, Chris 176 Whelans WA Pty Ltd (on behalf of owners Gull Properties) 268 Whelans WA Pty Ltd (on behalf of owners WA Flour Mills Pty Ltd) 508 White, Rolf 374 Whitley, John 417 Wickenden, Kyele J 589 Wilkinson, Kate 395 Williams, Simon & Jill 325 Willis, Jane 475 Willson, Hayley E 73 Wilson, Kerri

117 Wilson, Stacey 150 Wilson, Tracey 464 Woods, Trent 405 Woollett, Sara 305 Worrall, Charlotte 304 Worrall, Karen 36 Yau, Bonnie

311 Yeaton, Jeff 392 Yeo, Veronica J 406 Yu, Lawrence 42 Yuen, Julie (for Weng Hoong Nominees Pty Ltd) 7 YWB Pty Ltd

194 Zevis, M A & A C 324 Zuvela, Peter

Late

Submissions Name

623 Adams, Pete 612 Bekkevold, Sacha 620 Bell, James 622 Berrovic, L 608 Caddy, Stephen M 626 Cottesloe, Town of

627 Crandell, J D 606 Evans, George M 624 Evans, Susan 625 Gow, Peter 621 Graeme Robertson Group 610 Hood, Libby 614 Lane, Gary 613 MacRae, Jenna 611 Merride, Christopher 609 Nolan, Clint 607 O'Driscoll, Nanette 618 Owenell, Helen; Willing, Suzanne & Bennett, Christine (Busatti) 604 Page, Jane & Gilmore, Mike, Jane, Tom & Elea 615 Rowe, Jacqui 628 Shell Company of Australia, The 603 Silove, Dr Kym 605 State Development, Department of 616 Unknown 617 Unknown 619 Wright, Timothy (Wrightfeldhusen Architects)

Submissions

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41


DEPARTMENT OF PLANNI f

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission) 24

Name ... f. 4/ N.. i (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

5.0 l Rv(G;Sr . Postcode... .(5 .Address . T . ! .Y. V/VV.V1.... .tVVTTV .(Vl'T.Y1.t.T.T.V(T.f. .l/?..:. V.... Postcode

Contact phone number . .'.T..9.V... Email address T! :?.,..1.Y.1.4': 0.t .T l''e

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues• Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to co plete your sub ission

Submission

lA. * Tr l ' ,-. ."i •,'j r ct ,4 .

/ y " Y T .

, c Ctc

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of su missions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

El . Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

, I will be represented by:

[vf Myself-My telephone number (business hours): .. .9.....

3 1 -' S'I I A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREl Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

Signature . AV. /rT .. .Yr. Date AY./7./AT

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, beingdose ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.go .au


SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41R tion lisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

I am a resident of North F emantle since 1971, with a deep inte est in the welfare of thesuburb. In 1991 as a community epresentative I took part in consultation on the StirlingHighway Policy. In 2000 I attended workshops on the Fremantle to Cottesloe Transport Plan.In 1990 the community assessed the Port Options Study.

In' 1992-3 I coordinated, and wrote the report for the North Fremantle Community MapCultural Heritage Project that (guided by historian Michael Bosworth) tapped the physical(natural and built environment) and social values of importance to past and present residentsof the suburb through interactive workshops. A Community Map is vailable illustrating thesevalues.

As a Fremantle City Councillor from 1992 to 19981 took part in writing a new PolicyStatement for the North Fremantle Town Centre (1993) designed to guide good urban design,revitalise businesses and strengthen the historic fabric of the old Town Centre. As acommunity representative in 2003 I took part in the Queen Victoria Street Local CentreProject that led to the traffic calming and urban design improvements to the Town Centrenow fuelling its evolving renaissance as a vibrant centre.

GENERALIt is disappointing that in successive Stirling Highway Policy proposals, North Fremantle isregarded as a suburb with less need for special consideration for its exceptional herit gevalues than e.g. Claremont. Even after the huge effort we have made to put our Town Centreback together after the destruction of 1966 -71 it is still regarded as somewhere it isjustifiable to destroy to make minor improvements and put fast roads through, rather than animportant destination and historic heart of a suburb in itself.

Past road works have had no highway landscaping effort, few East West connections acrosshighways for residents, no consideration to give back left over land resumed for roads tosupport the revival of what was left of the Town Centre for parking etc, in fact noencouragement for the Town Cent e to survive at all. How ironic that despite all this thestrength and authenticity of the place has recently shown in new generation businessesopening and flourishing, just in time to be dealt a new knockout blow in this latest StirlingHighway widening proposal.

What will result from the widening for a cycle lane and a few bus stops? The desecration ofscores of heritage buildings, loss of historic elements - curtilege, walls, steps, destruction ofsuccessful businesses, valued homes. What will happen to these sites with the front shaved off- certain blight for many years to come, ugliness, used car yards, but most tragic the loss ofthe soul of a suburb of immense historical importance and authentic charm that is absent innew development.

Why are all our young Weste n Australians leaving for Melbourne? Because Melbourne hasrecognised the gold in locations like North Fremantle, that are a boon to local residents butincreasingly a drawcard to tourists and others who want to spend time in interesting oldsuburban shopping strips where businesses with flair are set in historic buildings of humanscale - and where walking and lingering leads to fascinating discoveries of unexpected placesso lacking in the boredom and alienation of new development.

1

North Fremantle Town CentreDefinitionWhat is the North Fremantle Town centre? The core of the Town Centre is defined in theanalysis drawn by Craig Burton on Page 16 of the Co munity Mapping Report.

Attachment 1 (Pages 15, 16, 22 Community Mapping Report)The graphic clearly identifies the extent and links to and from the rest of the suburb into theNorth Fremantle Town Centre. At the top right hand corner we see a Section drawing of theTown Hall and the shops opposite. It is these shops that would be demolished for a bus stopunder this Stirling Highway proposal. This must not happen.

The Council s Town Centre Policy preserves these shops on the local Heritage list. Thisproposal gives dangerous support to any property owners looking to disregard maintenanceand seek demolition of local heritage.

In the bottom Right Hand corner we see the Town Centre defined in plan view by the graphicwith a dotted line around what must be considered the untouchable heart of the suburb. -Burns St, Queen Victoria Street, Jewell Parade (an interesting back lane environment soprized in Melbourne) Pearse and Jackson Streets.

It is not acceptable to say the State Heritage listed To n Hall building is not affected. Itwould become a lone building without context at the North end of the centre, missing theshops that have always been opposite and are part of the social history of the Town Hall.Constant nibbling at the context and curtilege of Heritage buildings kills them as surely asdemolition.

Reinforcing the Corners is what we need in the Town Centre, not continuing the destructionby nibbling at them. This leads to why it is so i portant that the corner of Jackson Street andQueen Victoria Street should be left alone and not be truncated.This corner is the entrance and curtilege of the historic St Mary s Church and Hall that lostits congregation in 1971 due to the demolition of 300 houses to the West for port and roadexpansion. It is also the northern extremity of the Town Centre and needs to keep the historicroad pattern.

The Town Centre has all the elements of a historic self contained Town of its era. Churches,Town Hall and Literary Institute, War Memorial, Police Station and shops

The Elephant in the roomWhile not part of this amendment (and it should have been because it is so interactive)the road shown joining to Stirling Highway just north of the Town Centre is another thr eat tothe Town Centre environment and its connectivity to the rest of the suburb.

Bicycle Lanes (See Attachment 2)Yes we would all like to give bicyclists a safe passage but Stirling Highway is not the place todo it. Creating bicycle lanes leads to unacceptable impacts on many heritage buildings on theState and Local Heritage register, wipes out businesses and erodes the social fabric andcharacter of the suburb. I attach a newspaper clipping from Post newspapers from May 2012about the funding of the Perth- Fremantle cycleway along the railway as far as the MontessoriSchool. Why isn’t it funded into Fremantle? Why is there no coordination between thisproject and the requirement for bicycle lanes on Stirling Highway?

2

Old North Fremantle Pri ary and Infants school(George Temple Poole buildings- State Heritage list)The road design in this vicinity must be changed to give back the curtilege of the School andInfant School

Railway Station, Alfred Road shops and Catholic church, corner of Alfred oad andStirling HighwayThe road design seriously affects the parking for North Fremantle Railway Station, the localshops at Alfred Road and appears to put the Catholic church in danger.

Matilda Bay Brewery, old Ford FactoryIt is detrimental to this important building to reduce its setback to the highway.

The entire context of the suburbHouses, shops and commercial buildings all alon Stirling HighwayThe gains suggested as a result of the Stirling Highway amendment are far outweighed by theunnecessary demolition of so many historic structures that contribute enormously to thesocial, cultural and historic fabric of North Fremantle.It is irresponsible planning to create so much havoc for so little gain. This must not besupported.I call on the Government to sell government owned properties acquired for road building andend the blight of North Fremantle.

Ann Forma 23/7/12

3

3.1.12 General qualities valued in thebuilt environment

Village feeling

The soci l aspects of old development pattern.Need this in new development.

The streets are meeting places.

Age mix, social mix

Activity that industry brings to the suburb

Interesting contrast of naturalness with industry

Topography, limestone, hilliness

Stone buildings

Low scale, low key development

Diversity in scale, both residential and industrial

Mixture of architectural styles.

3.1.13 Dislikes in the built environment

Selling old Town Hall. Want it in public use.

The divisive nature of Stirling Highway

Stirling highway alignment

Lac of meeting places due to highway killingshopping centre. Bring back the village.

Having a building in front of St. Mary s Church,memory of the building as a church.

Places where foreshore access is limited.

Pier 21 gates to jetties locke when it waspromised they wouldn t be.

W ter Police Headquarters, loss of amenityHarvest Rd, beach

City Beach type development’

3.1.14 Assessment Built environmentoutcomes

Value of places in earlier generations seemed lessconsciously attached to aesthetics of buildings orappreciation of the natural environment thanpresent residents. The natur l environment wasperhaps taken for granted in times when thesuburb abounded in open spaces. Bushland wasthen more to be tamed or exploited rather than scarce resource to be nurtured, and access to theriver was unhindered by development.

People’s value of buildings related most to use,and social experiences. People valued places theyhad attended over many years, such as thekinderg rtens, schools, churches. Town Hall, PostOffice, shops and places they were bom (manyparticipants were born at Hillcrest)

The significance of particular places washighlighted by:the number of people and groups who touched onthem during discussion,

the numbers of stories which emerged aboutplaces

their importance as a focus of activity in thesuburb, e.g.social, recreational, employment,retail.

the places associated with peo le who werecaring about the community as a whole and

therefore respected by it.

the use during unusual times e.g. artime

Domestic Architecture

The individual homes people identified weremostly the large grander landmark homes builtby important people about the town. Ho ever thestreets people valued are full of homes of an Iopposite nature. Staples St and Passmore Avenuein particular are intimate streets of small scalewith modest cottages. The general qualitiespeople valued like, low scale, low keydevelopment’ and the ‘social aspects of the olddevelopment pattern’ relate to the more modestdomestic architecture of the suburb.

Conserving the residential character of NorthFremantle s a town of predominantly small,modest cottages on small blocks is a complextask. Protecting the scale and integrity of thestreets and houses is an important issue now thatthere is pressure to enlarge many homes. Forexample, the existing cottages in PassmoreAvenue are of a much smaller scale, than the newhomes at the entrance to Passmore AvenueKeeping the character of streets and housesdesigned in pre-motor car days is part of thechallenge. Many homes have no off-streetparking. The social aspect of developmentreferred to is partly the feeling that people notcars dominate. New development must create thesocial quality of existin homes or the characterof the suburb ill be eroded.

General qualities people appreciate in thebuilding stock of the suburb need carefulconsideration so that everyday planning controlsreflect and protect these qualities. The modestcottage or building remnant, such as the manyold limestone walls are part of the fabric of thesuburb. Ways to protect them need discussionTheir value should not be reduced byconcentrating on particular grand buildings to theexclusion of the surrounding context. In manyways the entire suburb is of Heritage value. Mostof the older buildings were constructed between1890 and 1920.

Town Centre Precinct

This area emerged s a major focus of value inthe suburb. There were anecdotes and memoriesfrom all groups. A map of buildings in thisprecinct has been shaded in three coloursshowing pre-1897-98 buildings, pre WI andpost W I buildings.

The town centre bounded by Stirling Highway,Tydeman Rd. and the railway line, or includingDe Lisle St to complete the original subdivisioncould be treated as a historic precinct..Bums St.and Pears'e St are reasonably intact residentialstreets. If the subdivision map is compared withthe topographical map it can be seen that theroads followed the natural depressions in thelandscape.See also Appendix 8.2.

Until 1971 when the road works for the StirlingBridge cut this area off from the rest of thesuburb, it was the heart and focus of NorthFremantle. The vibrant shops attracted peoplefrom other suburbs and the gracious publicbuildings, the Town Hall and Post Office (PoliceStation) were still in public use. The majorshopping axes were Queen Victoria Street fromJackson Street to the traffic bridge, and John Stfrom the railway (original alignment) to Bruce St(Stirling Highway).

The memory of this place, the employment, thepeople, the ceremonies, the social experiences islike a living hologram in the minds of manypeople. Workshop participants could name everyshop in order bn Queen Victoria Street. Fornewer residents, the aspirati ns for its revival andthe imagination of what it could be like is strong.Every Anzac Day there was ceremony at theSoldier Memorial. Part of the original Municipal

gardens is now divided off from the rest by a low !limestone wall and is in private ownershipattached to the Town Hall. The remainder withthe War memorial belongs to Fremantle Council. |

Pictures in the Town Flail began in the Silentmovie era. Next door as the Literary Institutewith a well stocked library. St Mary s churchwas a focal point for an active p rish. Mr Doepel |the chemist. Dr Hallion, Mr Dedman, thebutcher, Miss Molloy from the haberdashery andothers were exceptional in their care for thecommunity.

People would like to see the old shopping centrerestored to eneral use bringing back a villagefeeling and meeting place. They did not like thedivisive nature of Stirling Highway.

Away from Queen Victoria Street the church andold bakery in Pearse Street deserve specialresearch. Several homes in Jewell Parade are ofinterest like the duplex and garden 13 JewellParade and number 23 which is said to be an oldstables.

Industry

j Industrial buildings were valued as places ofj interesting activity, employment, sometimes! aesthetic appeal and even for their smell as in thej case of the now defunct Weeties factory. The size! of the larger industrial buildings, provides the

contrast in scale which people find interestingand part of the character of the area. The ‘Dingo’painted on the flour mill is a symbol of NorthFremantle.

E isting industrial buildin s notable to manyworkshop participants:

Old Burford’s soap factory, (now residentialunits) Weeties factory (non industrial use), Fordfactory (Matilda Bay Brewery), ‘Din o ‘FlourMill, Boatsheds Point Brown to Point Directionnotably A.E. Brown and WW II boatsheds Southof Harvest Rd. Two grandsons of A.E. Brownwere present at the workshop.

The industrial history of North Fremantle is veryrich and i portant. Today certain older industrialbuildin s are important aesthetically asrepresentative of certain eras e.g. Ford factory ;(Matilda Bay Brewery.) \

The history of the workers and the industri l useof buildings existing and gone needsdocumenting and commemorating.

Two important industries now gone, the St teEngineering Works, and Mt Lyell fertiliser worksare commented on below.

Old riverside industrial sites, StateEngineerin Works and C.S.B.P.

These sites are now a vacant landscape but theremnants of the human activity which cre tedthem is evident in the landscape.

Many early industries were established by theriver in North Fremantle as it was a convenientplace to dispose of effluent and in earlier timeswas an e tremely important tran port route.

The State Engineering Works site will become aresidential subdivision in the near future and thearea needs suitable commemoration of thatindustry and the previous quarrying.

Although the C.S.B.P. site is in Mosman Parkoutside the study area it is part of the Rocky Baylandscape.Many people at the workshop workedor had relatives who worked at the Mt LyellFertiliser works. The remnant of railway cuttingon that site relates to the history of the quarry atRocky Bay. The railway was built from the NorthMole to bring stone from the Rocky B y quarryand ended up servicing industry as far as theColonial Sugar Refinery on Point Roe. Savingand interpreting this remnant is important to theinterpretation of the history of North Fremantle.The history of the dry stone walling lower down

St Mary’s Cricket Club Premiers 1939-40. •

Those who helped this church team included Glen Doepel, Gordon Dedman and the Rev.J.W. Budge. Church, Sunday School, and sport were strong features of community life.

Pae e 15

NORTH FREMANTLE HE

Key to illustrations

Some of the drawings from N.F.P.S. students year6/7Centre: War memorial Q.Vic. St. by ConnorBeaver

Clockwise from top left comer:

12 John St, Gingerbread house or CorkhillHouse by John Charles Twight

Church, Pearse St. by Genna Ritchie

Duplex 13 Jewell Par de by Chantal Masitto

Harvest Rd. beach looking down from CypressHill by Nari McSkimmingHeritage Trail Path by Tosca Dilkes-Hall

Boat on foreshore between Harvest R . nd JohnSt. by Zoe O Hara.

Harvest Rd. Jetty and Water Police H.Q. byElyssa Obee

Weeties Factory by Daryl Crow

Detail of steps 13 Jewell Pde. by NeomieDickerson

Detail of archway 20 John St. old Gresha Hotelby Tosca Dilkes-Hall

Pa o . 1 n

means most today to people for its recreationalvalue. But in the past, although swimming andboating were enjoye by many, the river hadmore serious meaning in the lives of NorthFrem ntle inhabitants. Not only was it importantin indu tries and factories where many localswere employed, the river also supplied fish andcrabs for family tables. Old ti ers in the area areparticularly emphatic that the quality andqu ntity of river fish was much greater when theywere young than it is today. Effluent fromvarious factories might have been stre ming intothe river, but in their memories, the river wasalive with fish. Sadly, this is not the ca e today.

The river was one very distinctive gift to thoselucky enough to live in North Frem ntle. Theother as limestone. As a buildin materi llimestone is variable in quality, but it was presentalong the co stal strip in great quantity and wasextensively quarried on both side of the Swanriver. Again, it was the expertise brought to thecolony by the masters of the ConvictEst blishment which allowed the buildingpotential of limestone to be explored. Bychoosing limestone as the cheapest option withwhich to build the convict prison, ComptrollerGeneral Edmund Henderson began a processwhich trained hundreds of convicted men inquarrying and building techniques. NorthFremantle is littered with quarry sites - somelarge enough to be recalled on map of theperiod, some so small that their locations remaina secret except to the owners of particular back¬yards. Limestone was the m teri l used toconstruct the harbour moles, and in the 1890s ar ilway track was laid from the harbour-side toRocky Bay in order to transport it. Once theharbour works were complete, the site of theRocky Bay quarry as levelled to become usefulland. On it was built a chemic l works, the StateImplement and Engineering works and, later, asuperphosph te factory.

North Fremantle did not live up to its promise ofbeing a desirable residential address until veryrecently. The cataclysmic events of two worldwars, but particularly the first, brought toWestern Australia, amongst other things, anervousness bout its place in the world.Fremantle was changing into a major tradingport. Oil companies fro round the English-speaking worl began to utilise the spaceavailable for stor ge tanks on the north side ofthe Swan. The Western Australian governmenthad long had its largest stores building there, theCommonwealth government had defence forcesestablished in Fort Forrest, the biggest Fort in theState, and the major exports of wool and wheatleft the west from Fremantle Harbour. During theSecond World War when Frem ntle became asubmarine port, American and British sailors

were billeted in North Fremantle. Much use ofthe port on the north side is related to the state’sdevelopment and defence. By tracing thechronology of the buildings, when they first

ppeared, when and how they changed ordis ppeared, the histori n can also trace thesignificance of particular dominant ideologies inthe history of Western Australia. Trade, importsand exports, defence, xenophobia, are all relatedthemes which can be partly revealed by anexa ination of this site.

In a more general ay, North Fremantle’sindustries determined the ocial character of thesuburb. Before technological changes adopted inthe l st few decades many industries representedin North Frem ntle were l bour intensive. Workdone by lumpers, wheat h ndlers, flour millers,and iron workers, needed many men. Before the

ide availability of motor transport, mostworkers elected to live near their workplace, sothe demographic growth spurt that can bedetected in North Frem ntle in the first t odec des of the twentieth century can be explainedin part by the growth in industry and employmentopportunities. The fact that many houses remainfrom this period also indicates that the area wasnot widely inhabited by the well-to-do, for thehouses have not been extended, demolished(except by the port authority), or otherwisechanged until recently. Preserved by acomparative poverty of resources, NorthFremantle exhibits in its domestic buildingsrelics of an earlier population which was largelyemployed locally. The spread of housing can beseen on the Water, Sewerage and Drainage mapscited in the biblio raphy. They make it clear thatit was not until after the tu of the century thatpermanent houses outnumbered empty blocks ofland. T5

The social centre of the suburb was found aroundthe shops along Queen Victoria Street, theStirling Highway and John St. Here were thepublic buildings - the town hall, the policestation, and the post office. Butchers, bakers, apharmacy, grocery, haberdashery and barbershops are recalled by locals, as are pubs and winebars. A memory of n ‘Indian’ shop, which mayor may not h ve been owned by Indians who mayor may not have been ‘Afghans’ - the researchhas not been done to e tablish the truth of theseassertions - indicates that the suburb was not asAnglo-centric in population as it now appears tobe. Chinese market gardeners supplied localswith vegetables and fruit, and appeared fromtime to time, especially in tire 1920s, to attractthe xenophobic attention of the Council. Othercontemporary reports from local newspapers alsosu gest that the past wa not as idyllic as

emory might suggest. The roads were dusty insummer, the dunny pans leaked and the disposal

of night-soil was another source of riverpollutants. The lower part of the suburb regularlyflooded during the winter months. In 1926 floodwaters swept away p rt of the railway bridge,causing massive disruption to rail traffic andmajor discomfort to all who lived on low lyingland by the river.

Perhaps another indication that all was not wellin the streets of North Fremantle was the earlypresence there of the Salvation Army. The Ar yc me to the west in 1891, and set up a corps inNorth Fremantle in 1898. In May 1903 theSalvationists opened maternity home in SwanSt which was staffed by five officers a d couldcare for up to twenty women. In 1910, HopetonMaternity home opened in Harvest Rd replacingthe establishment in Swan St. Such was therespectability of the Salvation Army at that timeth t both homes were opened by the governor’swife. By 1919 Hopeton could accommod teforty-eight wo en, but two years later HillcrestHospital as opened and Hopeton as then useds a home for young children. Later it sheltered

old women. Cle rly there was need for servicesthe Ar y could provide, and apart from suchworthy enterprises, these included the pleasuresof a weekly band concert, usually held outsideone of the major pubs in the town but lookedforward to and enjoyed by many local people.

Hillcrest Salv tion Army Home is on the WAHerita e Council data base as are eight othersites. None has yet been nominated for inclusionon the state’s Register of Herit ge places,presumably because each waits a full heritagereport. Only the War Memori l in StirlingHighway has achieved interim registration.Perhaps, reflecting the uncomfortable fact thatNorth Fremantle has lost more than itspopulation, which has dwindled from a height of4,250 in 1916 to fewer than 1,500 today, there isa feeling that North Fre antle is now merely acommuter suburb. Who now sits in a rose gardenbeside the memorial? The garden is long one.The site, in common with many others on thedat base is on a major road and the suburb itselfis now physically split by a road system which

I divides people from each other.

Identifica ion, inter retation an suggestions

For the purposes of a heritage study one of themain problems f ced by the histori n is that ofidentif ing the significant sites in any particul rarea. As the preceding section showed. NorthFremantle does hold a certain significance in theindustrial history of the state. Therefore, lmostcertainly, the lives of so e of its population willreve l themes of industrial relations, socialjustice nd works practices which may be of

particular interest. The built environment longthe river, between the rail bridge and the sea, canbe compared to industrial sites at Australian portsof equivalent size, e.g. Port Adelaide, or evenPort Fine, which had a similar concentration ofworic place . Such work, which has been st rtedby some labour historians in this state, should bedone before any st tement of significance ismade about any part of it.

The other place of importance to NorthFrem ntle is undoubtedly the river. Much workhas already been completed on identifyin changes that have taken place there, and aHeritage walk around the cliffs to Roc y Bay isin place. What remains is to retain and maint inthe walk, and possibly to insert some interpretivesigns along the way. The tunnel hich allegedlycame from the Burford Soap Factory wouldrepay further investigation by both a historianand an industrial archaeologist, and sites whichcan be definitely identified as quarries should benamed. Perhaps, more contentiously, river vistasfrom various places in the suburb and are s as yetundeveloped beside or above the river, likeCypress Hill, need attention. Especial vigilanceon the part of the community may be necessary ifit is desired to preserve them. North FremantleOval, which is enjoyed by many people who donot live in the area, is an example of the benefitsof such a preservation policy.

Many people and buildings have disappearedfrom the North Fremantle landscape, but wherethey have left significant traces of themselvesthey can be ac nowledged. The boriginal peopledo not appear to have left much evidence of theiruse of the area, but it is likely that consultationwith aboriginal elders who are still associatedwith the site would identify tracks nd placeswhere the river was crossed. The Chinese m rketgardeners may also have left marks on the land.In other places, not bly Beaufort St, Perth, theirwells were shown on Water Board maps to be tenfeet square, although they were not very deep. Itis not known if such wells were constructed fortheir rdens in North Fremantle, but as marketgardening depends on a good watering system itis li ely that a system of wells or water ch nnelswas built. Finding and identifying traces of suchsmall engineering feats would give texture to thesuburb’s history.

Convicts and Pensioner Guards have been almostcompletely obliterated from popular memory,although there are many fa ily historiansendeavouring to retrieve the . North Fremantlewas an important place in their lives and siteslike the Depot and the main quarries, should beidentified and incorporated into any historicalmaterial later produced by the museum atFremantle Prison. The original pl ns of the

-tl hr- -t. Iconvict built North Fremantle bridge (or copiesof them) would ma e a pleasing display for any exhibition planned to show the wide variety ofinfluences upon the built environment of NorthFremantle.

The public buildings, most of them alre dyidentified for further study by the National Trust,need proper investigation. It is not really enou hto state that a building was designed by Geor eTemple Poole to claim significance. Knowingmore about when and how it was built, and whatother buildin s are similar in style help est blishsignificance more firmly. The list so far co piledignores many structure which could be called‘public’ - there are other halls, pubs and churchesin the suburb which would repay historicalinvesti ation. This research would be useful inestablishing a fuller picture of North Fremantle’ssocial history, thus enlarging the alleged‘heritage’ beyond a architectural listing.

Yet the most interesting, and most difficult, taskof identification remains to be done. It is clearthat the stoc of domestic housing remaining inNorth Fremantle is quite mi ed. There are somelarge modem structures on the heightsoverloo ing the river, there are some sm ll, old,shacks elsewhere. Between these t o extremesare a number of houses remaining from thebeginning of this century. Some treets have somany that they could be claimed as a precinct, ifthis was the will of the residents. Other streetshave clusters of houses representin particularstyles, and probably particular incomes andoccupations, of the owners at the time they werebuilt Certain architects who came to WesternAustralia during the ‘golden years’ have workrepresented in North Fremantle hich should beidentified. The Parish Map project gives residentsthe chance to be involved in this work. It is hopedthat the following bibliography will help thecommunity recognise sources which willdocument any further research.

8.4 Research on convict depot

The North Fremantle Convict Dep>mo eable feast. Michal Boswort

The convict presence is not the first thing whichcomes to mind about North Fremantle.Industrialisation, gentrification, soaring houseprices, a beautiful but busy location caughtbetween the river and the sea are all more usu lways of perceiving North Fremantle. Yet thedevelopment of this narrow pit of land o es agood deal to convict labour. One of the manyitems on a wish li t prepared by colonists andgovernor in the 1850s was a road bet een Perthand Fremantle, another was a bridge to span theSwan river near its mouth. Convicts l boured on

ADDITTION TOSUBMISSION 244

5 5l rc

/P P .

A /2- a,

k c - J

A. .

The Cyclists Action Grouphas commended the State gov¬ernment for uttin millionsinto bicycle transport.

Gi'oup president BruceRobinson said the money wouldhel the Pe th-Fremantle cy¬cleway.

This week Trans ort Ministe Troy Buswell and Tx-easurerChristian Porter said $20 mil¬lion would be spent over twoyears to improve and increasebicycle netwo ks

This funding boost will en¬able relatively lai ge sectionsof p incipal-shared paths to

be consti-ucted, whe eas thishas previously been done on akilometre by kilomet e basis, the ministers said.

The Fre antle i-ail pathfi'om Shenton Park station toLoch Street station, and fromGrant Sti-eet station to MarinePai'ade, will et some of themoney.

Mr Robinson said: Less thanhalf the 19km of the eyclepathalong the railway line lias beencompleted so fax-, and the budg¬et provides for completion asfar as the Beehive MontessoriSchool, but not the remaining20% into Fremantle.

The Perth-Fre antle cycle¬way is important as thex-e are11 secondai y schools alon ox-close to the railway line.

The school-time con estionon Sti ling Highway couldbe significantly x-educed ifmore students were able toride safely and convenientlyto school, rather than bein taken by car.

Mr Robinson said tx-ying tocure tx-afflc congestion by wid¬ening highways was ruinouslyexpensive and self-defeating,as wide roads just enex-atedmox-e car trips.

SUBMISSION 244 & 435TABLED AT THE HEARINGS 29/10/13

A case for rejection of the amendmentThe reservation lifted in 1996 is the correct way to proceed for Nort Fremantle. It allowsNorth Fremantle s culture and highly important heritage to remain intact. This amendmentapplies a simplistic blanket approach to road design, uninformed by any of the criticalbackground issues of Curtin Avenue extension, Port Options Study, Perth to FremantleCycleway, new bridges and significant Heritage issues such as the North Fremantle TownCentre

Lack of integration of this Amend ent with critical planning and transport issues1. Curtin Avenue extensionThe Fremantle Regional Strategy 1994 proposed a road west of the rail line in NorthFremantle referred to as the Curtin Avenue extension.

The local community accepted the Curtin Avenue extension as a two lane road and onlybecause of the logic that it was a way of saving the built fabric along Stirling Highway fromthe damage of a Stirling Highway expansion to 6 lanes.It is a betrayal of community trust to now plan a four lane Curtin Avenue extension as well aspropose this Amendment which results in so much damage to buildings along StirlingHighway and in the Town Centre of North Fremantle, thereby destroying its character.The lack of integration of this proposal with the Curtin Avenue proposal, which together feeda total of 8 lanes into North Fremantle at the northern end of the Town Centre isunacceptable. This Town centre is one of the most important Heritage Precincts in WesternAustralia.

There has been no consultation with local community to provide information for a planningcontext to this Amendment.

2. Port Options StudySuccessive governments have ignored the major Port Options Study completed in 1990. Thefigures in this report showed a new container Port would be needed by 2015 to 2020 -whenFremantle would be at capacity.Most other historic ports in the world have made provision to elocate container operations toa new port with excellent road and rail links to save the historic fabric of the old port andstreamline movement of containers. We witness daily the results of this inaction, with overuse of the Stirling Bridge by container trucks, and the tortuous path of container trainsthrough the historic west end of Fremantle.3. Perth to Fremantle Cyclewa Surprisingly there is no mention of this cycleway in the Amendment. It is currentlywill beconst ucted to Mosman Park. Why is the planning not in place for the extension to Fremantle,via No th Fremantle? Bicycle paths should not be on Stirling Highway, but alongside the railand continue into Fremantle with a dedicated lane over the rail bridge. Access from thesuburb could be at Alfred Rd or further north.4. BridgesA new traffic bridge into Fremantle is planned. There may be a need for a new rail bridge.Planning is required to plan for cycle access preferably via the rail bridge into Fremantle.5. Heritage issues and Town CentreThere is a continued attitude that North Fremantle and the historic Town Centre does notexist and can continue to be arbitrarily blighted and demolished despite the great importanceof this historic gem and it’s recent revival as a destination for music, food, shops andservices.

Recently a new building on the south end has put back the corner . This is the thrust of allPolicy, to maintain the integrity of the centre by preserving it’s edges. Demolishing a group

of shops for a bus stop and cutting a sweeping corner off the North end at the church is notacceptable.

Important documents: Refer to:

Community Map and graphic by Craig Burton in Mapping ReportFremantle City Council Town Centre PolicyNorth Fremantle Town Centre Traffic Study by Voran consultants 1999for Main Roads. Thisled to the Traffic Calming of the North Fremantle Town Centre.All along the highway this widening affects scores of properties by just slicing the front offthem. The building fabric of North Fremantle is rendered worthless by all the historiccottages losing their front fa5ade. Not to mention walls and other elements, some of themvery old and possibly convict built.The comment in the report that the land required is a small amount disguises the fact that theimpact of this small amount is huge. Removing the front of the building is as damaging asdemolishing the whole building. Is this a ploy to devalue all these properties to the extent theowners are willing to sell to those wishing to amalgamate lots and build high rise.As well as buildings on the Council s heritage list, the curtilage of State listed Heritagebuildings is also severely affected.If Main Roads owned properties on Stirling Highway were sold there would be a rapidrenaissance and redevelopment could happen. This money could go into much needed publictransport options like buying back the rail line from Kenwick to South Fremantle.Traffic flowsStirling Highway is adequate. Two things should be done, before destruction of property andheritage:Firstly, synchronise the traffic lights all the way from McCabe St to the T-junction at High StFremantle and from North Fremantle to Perth.Secondly introduce split grades for 2 lanes at critical major intersections.These solutions are widely used in European cities, and are far cheaper than the expense ofacquiring more land for ever wider roads.

PedestriansThe plan claims to improves pedestrian safety with median islands. The most dangerous placefor pedestrians is at Harvest Rd and Stirling Highway, where a massive median exists. It failsto protect pedestrians from the 1960’s wide open road design that allows 2 lanes of speedingtraffic to descend on pedestrians around a blind corner. A fatality there a couple of monthsago shows that road designs that slow traffic rather than facilitate it are safer for pedestrians.


Form 41

Subm ssiontVletropolitan egion Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reserv tion

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 245

Name .... . !. . C. & ..« / (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .7. . 0... . Q[ . . r Postcode

Contact phone number /(p... . . .... Email address .

T/ps for completing a submission:<> Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant

Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submissionSubmission

../... k ... .<?. k.J. 9r.Q :. 7 f& . rf . l.<

.fP tf. .. h. j... ffr?. .. . <$. S. .( br.. f. vytt.

/.... hrPft X .}. !.h. .\.. ?...

C.p. m< ./ k<r /. .. A s d c 1 CsA?. &y /h&t /.... y s> AAsA.....

Bk. Ci a. .. ... B. . Y yc Al

. fi.Y . .. I p.&Bts. ...h>... h .sfyp. osle . ...eAc. &. V). c.t .A.t .. .S.hs.A &.t C Loc k.. vJi ASt..

.(MO). cB.Ar.. .

.../. t *0IA.(c>{... $.Q l.llA... A?., .p. S).!> . ..Q.bA...!fSnA.. .(hA.b ..

.OAi.S YYYp.hS....:S. s. YrAS:.hi... / . ( yv U. .SSr.Y.1.

. Q . £>. qm a ... fii... ..B .. A GAM . .. A.c.

.. £ bsi.BL.. QY ... S.h . lABAApyp ...Bs.... cyjA.

. . p&BhYyQ.... .. A J .. HYSj

.. lpy<py. y... p y. b.y h. ly. ...Ve . /j... .0 Id... crrcL.. L CSY-.nl). b. dA.S.... Ah. ...

dt S.... Vi .Q r s ... AM rJ Ay.. .< . ,... dKv.. £y . .. Scfr. YXY.rddr: At hAO i4l.

Vi II 'iPAA tu n over to complete your submission c

/-/ Gff S frey- V eS) -ftp >j (Loof CA, b yCLK~ljioC poY fo* fw-Ahe.

o s gyS.

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.



Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

0 Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

0"I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours): Q. r.<Q.ilk.[90.Sor

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours):Postal address:



ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



0 The WAPC is sub\ec o\he Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) makin the submission

Signature .. Date 2 S A! 2_

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

SUBMISSION 245TABLED AT THE HEARINGS 6/11/13

WAPC HEARING NOTES

SUBJECT: RATIONALISATION OF STI LING HIGHWAY RESERVATIONDATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2013

Good morning, my name is K te Truscott. I lived in North Fremande from birth until thege of 25 years. For the l st three years I have owned my own home in North Freman e. I

am an active participant in community matters and am here as a representati e of the NorthFremande community.

I am also an en ironmental speci list, ith over 13 years of professional ex erience,including h ving previously orked for state Government agencies the former Departmentof En ironment and the Heritage Council. I currendy ork for Hatch, Canadianconsulting engineering nd project im lementation company. I worked for Hatch for 4.5years in Vancouver, British Columbia.

I consulted for the BC Ministry of Transportation as their En ironmental M nager andOwners Representative on the Pitt River Bridge and Mary Hill Interchange Project, and theEnvironment l Quality Manager on the Port Ma n Highway O e Project. Both Projectsinvolved considerable highway idening and l ne additions. During die delivery of theseprojects I orked on social and environmental impact ssessment, high ay design review,consultation and propert acquisitions. So I h ve some professional experience in suchmatters.

I am very concerned about the Rationalis tion of Stirling Highway design in its current form.I am very concerned bout the process that ppears to have been utilized to come u withthe preliminary design, which only considers State Heritage listed properties. There does notap e r to h ve been any addition l im act assessment, including impacts to LocalGovernment heritage listed properties, businesses, residences, etc.

I have re iewed the design from McCabe Street to Queen Victoria Street, against thesubmission made by the City of Fremande, which was an agenda item for the PlanningServices Committee Meeting of 20 June 2012.1 wish to have noted my greement with theirassessment and recommendations, in particular to object to the amendment in its currentform, and request modification of the proposed amendment, to ddress concerns regardingimpacts in North Fremande.

Planning and Development Act 2005

Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme mendment 1210/41

Ra ionalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

1 5 JUL 2012

I.F. / O'

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: Secretary D Western Australian Planning Commission Submission 2 6Locked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001 a

Name ..A (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .LA i..A.1!...Postcode .

Contact phone number .0 . Email address

T/ps for completing a submission: O'*o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant® Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

. CO\A ,

... 9mtA:r.... AnA HCI)..

tu n o er to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not com ulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Please choose one of t e following:

El No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson




OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

e In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.


The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Property Lot 51 (No 91) Stirling Hig way, Nedlands - Amendment 1210/41 -Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC):

While w understand the amendment proposes to reduce the regional reservationover our property (above), we the undersigned, strongly object to the proposalsshown in the Concept Design Reports and Plans which have been used to supportthe Stirling Highway MRS Amendment 1210/41. Our submission below is based onour collective local knowledge and experience having lived on Stirling Highway,Nedlands, for over 10 years and refers to the Concept Design for the area StirlingHighway: Loch Street to Hampden Road, Nedlands:

The proposed design (Stirling Highway: Loch Street to Hampden Road, Nedlands)severely impacts on the set back of our apartment building to the highway. See

below:

BCRONIA AVtNUL

The cross-section proposed for the south side of the highway directly opposite ourapartments consists of 4 traffic lanes, while the north side consists of 2 traffic lanesand a merging bus priority lane. This amounts to 6 and half lanes of traffic proposedfor the highway directly outside our apartments! I

Sustainability - if the State is committed to public transport we should not bewidening our highway to add traffic lanes but using the existing width to force amodal shift from private cars. It is presumed that the success of the proposed buslanes lies in the need for them to continue through to the City of Perth. In Crawley,from the University of Western Australia to the Point Lewis roundabout. Mounts BayRoad is physically constrained by the Kings Park escarpment and the river whichwould ma e it difficult to provide bus priority in this section without removing trafficlanes. We fail to understand the logic of providing dedicated bus lanes if they are notcontinued from the start to the end of the route.

On what basis was the decision to include bike lanes on Stirling Highway given thevolume of traffic, location adjacent to the proposed bus lane, the number ofcrossovers and intersections, the traffic speed and the generally poor environment(which will be made worse by increasing the road width)? How will the proposedbike lanes either side of the highway connect to the existing PSP along the southernside Mounts Bay Road?

Similar bike lanes can be found throughout the Metropolitan area and are generallyonly frequented by very experienced (predominantly male) bike riders. These typesof facilities fail to encourage less experienced people (in particular women andchildren) to use bicycles as their main mode of transport.

It Would seem a far better option to reduce traffic speeds and upgrade currentfacilities on quieter, more human scaled streets adjacent to Stirling Highway toencourage less experienced bike riders.

Livability and amenity - living adjacent to a highway currently carrying more than30,000+ vehicles a day has challenges that need to be experienced to appreciate.

Gehl Architects have produced a table Flow Versus Quality (Christchurch PublicSpaces Public Life Study 2009 - see attached) which clearly illustrates how trafficvolumes affect public life. Gehl states a rule of thumb: the more traffic, the lowerthe quality of the environment for pedestrians and cyclists. According to Gehl,Stirling Highway would be considered an "Unpleasant Street" where noise andpollution problems are significant and cycling conditions are very low. Furthermore,Gehl states that cycling should only be considered on roads with 25,000+ vehicles aday where a raised, fully separated track can be provided. On road bike lanes(demarcated by painted lines) do not provide adequate protected adjacent to highvolumes of traffic at high speed (60km/hr).

In terms of residential amenity (based on our own experience) the traffic noiserenders outdoor areas fronting Stirling Highway almost unusable. The only respite

THE CITYget ing to and from the city centre

FLOW VERSUS QUALITY

HOW DO VEHICULAR TR FFIC VOLUMESAFFECT THE QUALITY OF THEPEDESTRI N EN IRONMENT?

THIS TABLE CO ERS A ' LASSIC'STREET SECTION WITH 2-4 LANES FORVEHICULAR T AFFIC ND A WIDTH OF10-30 METERS.

FLOW VERSUS QUALITYA rule of thumb: the more traffic, the lower the qualityof the environment for pedestrians and cyclists. Quality in the table on the next page has to do with multiplefactors: safety, comfort and the possibility for public lifeto take place.

AVERAGE DAILY TOTAL PEDESTRIAN EN I ONMENT ENVIRO ME TAL F CTORS- NOISE & POLUTION

BICYCLE SAFETY & E JOYME T

VERY PLEASANT STREET 1000 CARS Pedestrians nd cyclists are able to share theroad with cars and c oss safely at any time.Recreational life (e.g. outdoor cafes) has goodo portunities. It is likely there will be a lot ofopen and activo facades at ground floor level.

o noise problems.Pollution is at an acceptable le el to breatheand see. Buildings can have w ndo s opento the street.Street trees and greenery ha e goodoppportunities if the right conditions areavailable.

Cyclists are able to ride safely in the trafficflow ith cars.It is pleasant.

PLEASA T ST EET 5,000 CARS More separation between cars, pedestriansand cyclists is necessary. A edicate zonefor pedest ians is necessary along facades,that can be used when needed. It is possibleto cross midblock. Recreational life still hasgood op ortunities. It is likel there are stillcafes and active faca es at ground level.

Only mino noise proble s.Pollution is at an acceptable le el.Street trees and greenery have goodoppportunities if the right conditions areavailable.

Cyclists are ble to ride safely in the trafficflow with cars.It is a good experience.

OKAY STREET 10 000 „„

AH

People are able to cross at intersections andcarefully at mid-block.It is still possi le to sit at a bench nd havean o ay time, but you ill choose to besome here lse with lo /er traffic impact ifyou ha e the option.

There will be noise and pollution issues,especially at pea hours.People are able to talk, but need to standclose.Buildings are not able to ha e window s opento the street, because of noise and pollution.

Cycle lanes are necessary and cycls trac readvised. It is an o ay street to cycle along.

UNPLE SANT STREET 25,000 CA S Crossing at intersections only. It is anunpleasant experience to alk along thestreet and there is no recreational life onfootpaths.

Noise and pollution proble s are significant.People are unable to hol a con ersation.

Cycle trac s (raised, separate spac forbicycles) are necessary.The quality of cycling is very low.

VERY U PLEASA T STREET 50.000 CARS

. JOT FIT rOR PEDEST IANS!

Crossing at intersections only and waitingtimes are in reased significantly.Guard rails, barriers and similar interventionsare often introduced in order to preventpe estrians wal ing into car lanes.No pedestrian quality.

Se ere noise and pollution problems. Inollution ter , it is a street orth avoiding if

one ants to stay healthy.Only some of the more tolerant species oftrees are able to sur ive.

Cycle tracks (raised, separated space forbicycles) are definitely necessary.Cycling is an unpleasant e perien e, and isnot recommende .

CHRISTCHURCH PUBLIC S ACE PUBLIC LIFE • GEHL ARCHITECTS 33

for residents living in our apartment building is the current generous set back to thehighway. This setback is far more important for liveability than having a widemedian in the middle of the highway (as proposed in the concept designs).

The high volumes of vehicles currently using the highway make for a very poorenvironment for walking and cycling. Holding a conversation while walking along thehighway is almost impossible! Widening the road to accommodate more vehiclesand removing the current setbacks will further degrade the amenity and furtherdisconnect the north and south sides of the highway.

Heritage - the design will have a negative and devastating effect on heritagebuildings along the full length of Stirling Highway. The buildings of concern in ourlocal centre are the Captain Stirling Hotel and the Windsor Cinema.

Heritage buildings do not just speak of our past, they also add to the diversity ofbuilding stock in our city as well as offering affordable residential and commercial inareas (such as Nedlands, Claremont and Cottesloe) which are currently unaffordableto most people. For example, the block of Art Deco apartments on the corner ofStirling Highway and Dalkeith Road, Lot 306, (valued approximately $350,000 each atthe time of demolition) were recently replaced with new dwellings selling from$800,000+. Another new development on Stirling Highway on the opposite side ofthe Captain Stirling Hotel also failed to provide anything equivalent (to the existingHeritage) in terms of affordability.

Limited diversity in housing stock also leads to homogenous and boring suburbs!

Conclusion:

The preparation of the Concept Plans appears to have been completed with a lack ofconsultation with local residents and businesses or detail analysis of the existingconditions. Residents in our apartment block at 89-91 Stirling Highway, forexample, have not been consulted on how we use the space, our local centre or our

day to day needs. Residents living along the highway have special needs which haveclearly not been considered in the development of the concept designs.

There are also many inconsistencies with the proposed Concept Plans. For example,

buildings of local heritage listing or significant character (such as the WindsorCinema and adjacent buildings and the Captain Stirling Hotel) would need to bedemolished in order to install the proposed bus priority lane and reinstate thefootpaths. See below:

The commercial/residential building on Lot 306 (95 Stirling Highway) was recentlybuilt (2009) without an adequate set back to allow for the proposed cross-section.This building would also need to be demolished in order to achieve the required roadwidth.

The existing bottlenec at each end of the proposed MRS Amendment (trafficbridges at the Fremantle terminus and Mounts Bay Road at UWA) will continue toexist and will in fact get worse as the population increases and more people take totheir cars. These areas are physically constrained and any upgrades would come at ahuge expense. The proposal also does not address the congestion currentlyexperienced in Claremont.

If the State is committed to increasing the residential density along Stirling Highway,serious thought needs to be given to the amenity of the space and adjacent localcentres. It is imperative that that highway be made as attractive as possible toencourage people to live, play, study and work in the area. Future infrastructureupgrades should include the installation of trams (not buses) and the reduction oftraffic lanes. Safe bike facilities should be installed in quieter, low speed streetsadjacent to the highway to encourage a broad section of the community to use bikesas their principle means of transport.

The concept designs have failed to address basic human needs and have beendesigned for traffic not people; we do not believe that a functional design for StirlingHighway has been achieved. On this basis we do not support the Stirling HighwayMRS Amendment 1210/41.

Yours sincerely,

Amanda Mannolini3/89 Stirling HighwayI edlands WA 6009

Laurence Gerrish

3/89 Stirling HighwayNedlands WA 6009

Anne-Maire Connolly

5/89 Stirling HighwayNedlands WA 6009


Form 41

SubmissionMetro olitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirl ng Highway Reservation

| DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE S j ( 1 €

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth A 6001

OFFICE USE ONLYb

Submission 247i_ i

Name Robert and Sue Paterniti(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Buvel°t Place, Woodvale

Contact phone number ?.53. 07. Email address

.... Postcode

[email protected]

6026

Tips for completing a submission:Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues

« Include property addresses and s ecific location descri tions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to com lete your submission

SubmissionWe submit an objection to the proposed amendment to increase the road reservation on the property at Lot 203,204, 205,

and 206 (No. 63) Stirling Highway, North Fremantle on the following grounds:1. In over 25 years of our involvement with the property there has been no increase in either pedestrian or cycle

traffic either in front of our property on Stirling Highway or in Jackson Street. The provision of specialised additional cycle

and pedestrian paths is not justified and will waste valuable taxpayer funds on poorly utilised assets. There is no evidence

of need to justify the extension to the road reserve.

2. There is no sustainable argument to support the realisation of the suggested benefits. The proposal contains

some inferences that some benefits may result, however the evidence is not contained in the proposal.

3. The referenced study (para 6 Page 2) concluded that traffic volumes on Stirling Highway were only likely to

increase marginally over future decades. There is no evidence of need for an extended reservation over our property.

4. Para 6 page 4 states that this plan is a guide, not a definitive plan’. Our property will be impacted severely based

on a series of assumptions and the production of a guide’. This proposal will place a considerable amount of uncertainty

over the future of our property.

5. The imposition of the reservation without any firm commitment on t e delivery of the proposed works will prevent

owners from adding improvements to impacted properties.

6. Jackson Street is a small residential street with very little traffic. The number of residents in the area is limited and

the historical nature of t e housing prevents any high density development. There is no need for any allowance of

increased bus services or specialised bus lanes to service the area.

7. The proposed reservation will cause an immediate loss of value to our property. The value will be reduced to

reflect the uncertainty imposed by this proposal. Future development potential will be extinguished along with the ability to

maximise any returns from the property.8. The uncertainty that this proposal will impose on the property will negatively impact the leasing opportunities for

the property.9. This proposal is a virtual acquisition of our property an Just Terms’ compensation s ould immedi tely commence

should t e Co mission ignore our srgwmpntsrogstfling the nep fprthe sd reservation.





m No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR




or

C] A spokesperson







0 The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.


a All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Signature





Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amen ment 1210/4

Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation

I 5 Jlil 20B

Si


OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 248¦ S

NamejtYAA -

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

. ./ »tcode

Contact phone number .r?.... Email address

Address

Tips for com leting a submission:s Use headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issues* Include property addresses and s ecific location descn tions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to com lete your submission

Submission

/ r sm .

turn ove to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further info mation on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.


0"' Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I will be rep esented by:


o

E A spokesperson


I would p efer my hea ing to be conducted in:

E Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)






a All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the pro osed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Signature


SUBMISSION


North Frema tle Town Ce tre

Traffic engineers have to acceptthat in any evolving urban centre, stress points and bottlenecks

develop. It is not possible to eliminate all of these. It is in fact undesirable to do so. One only has to

look as the spatial qualities of viable, attractive urban nodes or centres in cities any here in the

world to understand some of the qualities that make them appealing. None of these spaces include

freeways or road widths such as those of Joondalup (Go save us). The proposal is reminiscent of

tactics used in the Vietnam War where it was deemed necessary to destroy the village in order to

save it . Except North Fremantle does not need any more saving .

North Fremantle town centre is only just returning to some sense of presence and viability, and

exhibiting a rare vibrancy found in few other places in Perth. Removal of a Primary edge to this

centre will utterly destroy the ambience and appeal of this location. And it should be realised that

any buildings replacing those demolished will never have the appeal of those lost. Look at what is

happening at the corner of Tydeman and Queen Elizabeth for an idea of what can be expected when

developers move into Greenfield sites! The Town Centre should be protected not destroyed - and

the roposal is utterly destructi e.

Jackson St Wo ks

I am advised the proposed destruction of the entry to Jackson St is to provide fora cul de sac turning

circle and closure of access/ egress at this point. Given the restricted number of residences served

and the exit condition at Tydeman Rd this cannot be a practical solution. Even if it was, a small

turning space (even if a 3 point turn was necessary) is preferable that would not require resumption

and destruction of so much property. The slight inconvenience caused to those vehicles accidentally

caught is a small price to pay. But once again, there is little reason to do anything in this location.

With slowed traffic the intersection works quite adequately.

There is no evidence of traffic problems or accidents at this intersection and no reason to interfere

with the existing road systems in orth Fremantle.

Kim Stirlin

Stirling Architects

10 Jackson St North Fremantle

24/07/12

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 mendment (Substantial)

Form 41


department of planni g

2 5 JUL 2012

)u2(si<?FILE

Rationalisation of Stirling High ay Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 249

s »

Name - (l iM


Address .... /F . f . Tj CAFF.°. '.L.. Postco e ... A c .!».

Contact phone number c!?. Email address . TTTT.

T/ps for completing a submission:a L/se headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

7a Qt'iC 0 f J,9 , (T

turn o er to co plete your sub ission

Hea ing of submissions



Please choose one of t e following:

Wo, i do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


l will be represented by: -

Myself - My telephone number (business hours): ...*

or

A spokesperson


/ 1 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:





e The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


e All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Signature x Date

Note: S bmissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.


These submissions are made by Jonathan McCormick as owner of Unit 2 in the stratacomplex known as Terrara 224 Stirling Highway, Claremont ( Terrara stratacomplex ) regarding the proposed resumption set out in Metropolitan Region SchemeAmendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation AmendmentReport dated March 2012 ( Report”).

The Terrara strata complex comprises 11 units and my unit is the unit on the north(using the parlance of the report) closes to the Highway and includes a large garagewhich is 8 metres from the current boundary from the Highway.

If Stirling Highway is widened as proposed in the Report my garage will bedemolished and the footpath will adjoin my courtyard. The courtyard is very smallapproximately 3 metres in width. If a set back is required of 4.1 metres then my unitwill need to be demolished.

Widening Stirling Highway has a significant impact on me in particular because ofthe location of my unit.

I am a single man living on a limited income and have lived in the unit for 14 years.Currently I enjoy a set back of 14 metres. I do not want to relocate.

This submission is in four parts I submit:

1. that widening Stirling Highway as set out in the MRSA should not occur; and

2. it is unfair that the resumptions on the other side of the Highway is only 2.7metres whereas the resumption proposed on our side of the Highway is 10.2metres;

3. imposing a set back of a minimum of 4.1 metres is unworkable;

4. if the widening of Stirling Highway is to proceed I make the followingsuggestions on how this can be done to reduce the impact on the me.

First Submission - No widening of Stirling HighwayI submit that Stirling Highway should remain as it is without any widening andcongestion dealt with by putting traffic:

1. along Curtin Avenue;2. along the railway reserve; or3. sinking the railway line and putting roads above it.

Second SubmissionThe fact that 2.7 metres is being taken from the other side compared with 10.2 metresfrom this side is manifestly unfair. It would seem the other side gets an economicadvantage which we will not.

Third Submission

Imposing 4.1 metres is unworkable. This means my unit and the complex will need tobe demolished.

Fourth Submission -Stirling Highway is m de wider

This submission is only put forward as an alte ative to the first submission but I donot want Stirling Highway made wider.

If the proposed resumption set out in Report proceeds it will severely impact on me asfollows:

1. I lose the use of my garage;

2. If my unit is demolished I lose my residence of 14 years;

3. If the unit is not demolished the amenity of my unit will be severely degradedbecause of:

a. additional noise;b. additional pollution;c. danger in crossing the road;d. closeness of pedestrianse. loss of privacy;f. loss of set back;

4. the reticulation and garden which is currently in place will disappear;

5. the garage which is part of Unit 2 will need to be demolished;

6. the Terrara strata complex will lose the use of 3 car parks, currently set asidefor the use of Units 3, 4 and 6;

7. the Terrara strata complex will lose the use of two visitor car parks;

8. the Terrara strata complex will lose the driveway which makes getting on andoff Stirling Highway feasible and safe;

9. the Terrara strata complex will lose their letter boxes;

10. access to and from Stirling Highway and access to the Units will bedramatically reduced and tu ing off and onto Stirling Highway will be atraffic hazard and dangerous not only to the commuters on the Highway butalso to those trying ingress and egress from the Terrara strata complex.

In order to minimise the impact on me:

1. There should be no right hand tu into Walter Road. By doing this much lessland needs to be resumed.

L

4

2. The bus stop currently earmarked to be constructed right outside ou Terrarastrata complex be moved further down the oad towards Claremont TownCentre (near lot 11 which has a much greater set back than our comple ) orsouth in the terminology of the Report.

•3. It is unfair that the reserve di ectly on the other side of Stirling Highway willbe limited to 2.7 metres whereas the reserve on our side of Stirling Highwaywill be 10.2 metres.

4. If the property alongside Terrara strata complex (that is Lot 2 to the North) isresumed (and this seems likely as the reserve actually goes th ough the currentbuilding) we request that part of the land be provided to the Te rara stratacomplex to enable additional car pa king facilities to be p ovided to thoseowners who no longer have car parking bays and safe access on and offStirling Highway at no cost to Terrara strata complex.

Signed by Jonathan McConnick

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Su s antial)

Form 41


DEPARTMENT OF PL NNING

2 5 JUL mi

FILE LiiS

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWeste Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Su mission 250

I I

Name .' !(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address . Postcode

Contact phone number Email address .

T/ps for completing a submission:® Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

. / .' ... .

( t y-i . u- fcr tfyA ""V ; : 7/ 7/

771A(jfl) && & y>-u -i Aci 6- o i CAjd

(AA . >'ca /WAtjlfct

faLfi -ut 1 '* /y& Aiy 7 vK£L -' 66- .

- ui

r ... ... r .. (iPAA rA. Afy. 77; .

V-. .AA. . '([/&.. .7P... PPA&aC. PAPA&P A. ..

yii'L

(o) t iA c p . 7 77. y £ 7 / p u 'stfcjt ' l H

fA fA.Y A?. APa A:.



Anyone who as made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticke . This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to spea at the hearings or not.


Please ctioose one of the following:

o, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

0 Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the follo ing details)

0I will be epresented by:


or

A spokesperson


izlI would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:






® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties. •

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.



Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website-http://www.planning.wa.gov.au


Form 41DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

Submission ' ;J 7|||/

[Wletropolitan Region Scheme Ame dirient 1210/4 F|[ £ jo Z


OFFICE USE ONLY


Su missio 251

Name(o MoN\c/f\ GhAv g .


t $>i f PostcodeAddress

Contact phone number. f. . J. fl. Email address . .O oni Ati(- a xQ. hkypoj ,/ c

Tips for completing a submission:a Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues» Include property addresses and specific location descri tions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

A.. .. eto... .. . vjkctrxxzt... • ¦

fdyp di e?/7.??. c :i.... ug..... mi...m....Acgg.....

31 ...M: « .... . . toy terf?.- M(. .. d SAo.

P.Ac?d'. ?!.... .A ... ... /tX- Am.

a .fioz. A_ _ -A c... .A.....A?.... AAtb.. .ao A.. ... dAfd.. .m.x €!c??c?. ,.si... . A... Mi- .y AtwA.

At. .-/X ....

.... &t72&.... -dA.... &&& .<&&* $.... (AA.rCfX.. .<M (AAj... AvtATv

M: M .A/m.y . f... M... xcA.... i/A A. ..O?... -AtAA.. ..A... . A frA..

. .. Ax.ZCA. ...77.

AAxp.x.<'.&.- -?L.r:AM. /.(:T>xc?.

..<rj....mc.o/u/Cui-mS.... <A&....McAmuX.. AfMm..AA -x&r...cAcdi...QAq.....

A gsi&te i. . T-TtHc . .x xt . .. (At? t.AtAxt. fy<4?... x?xzcA. xmAAmd.. .M& . ./ f&cc

.. AC O. A? . .. (Adm. A '... AAA?0. Afc. ..Ai ... rAAfy? ...

turn o er to complete your submission

Hear ing of submissions




Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


D will be represented by:

E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson




O Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



s The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.



To be the submission

Signature


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

udU XZ- r o; C YK} c0J J -'- szscl - .

- t o z /.

s2 >o QA&- s~& ; <- y

jl&c- / // t y i il. f l / 7/jl. 'C/tzt c $JdJ 7

,/ &L b gs /zz!.£ - > '

~/ a f-*0 <fc> J t -i- // z zz

jiy g tgc/z / fl xeto z/i co /z

/2yy zi y yt/ M /

// « ua pp y«

a -

y?cxz

'feoe- y&z* z ts&d /ddd d y -cpo «A t./y /2e/ 71 )

z& /yz- yp y /&<z. & yy pyc iy yio D izf yy -

_PyO ? - d- I -y -- l y yt/ /y -/? d'~ /2 zryy /Z.d- -XO <-

/2fi <g>-nJ j <y / -oj* csyop yy yg ay/yL yyy o

iffri yy iyy

ci- .-7A-0 <(UY i/Cd c' \J A JV / /tf/SS/tm. 7 C/ y/ d

d- ? trt1 (Ai c/ , 0 a/

CUO&O cy />l /( Ci - /d ic r C

yy <Oa/ ///{J/)

/ tey/ . v yy


Form 41

Submission


1 h JUL 2012

FILE ) Oc ) *



OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 252

Mary DavisName

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)3 Hayes Tce.Mosman Park

Address

Contact phone number Email address

Postcode

[email protected]

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues9 Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant® Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

I am appalled and distressed about the plans to widen Stirling Highway south of Jarrad Street

Cottesloe to the end of Queen Victoria Street in North Fremantle. Along this route are a number of

heritage buildings as well as a popular retail, dining and entertainment strip in North Fremantle which

adds character to the area and is valuable to retaining a communit so important for holistic health.

St Anne s Church in North Fremantle has a very vibrant community. Peo le from North Fremantle,

Mosman Park, Cottesloe and Pe permint Grove attend this Church as well as a huge.number of

. Croatian s from all. oyer Perth The Church.itself was. b.u.ilt by. Irish workers H ing, in. the. surrounding

.workers .co.t.t.ag .and .1. a.m.y.ery prou .o . this heritage an . woul not .like, to .see. it .interfer , ith.

. I .urge .you. to .consider.other, alternati es



Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


PIsas© choose one of the following:

m Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I will be ep esented y:


or

E A spokesperson


I oul prefer my hearing to be conducted in:





o The WAPC is subjectto the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.



To be si ned b person(s) makin the submission

Signature Date ....2 ... 1.0 1

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the ad ertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au


Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan R gion Scheme Amendment 1210/41


OFFICE USE ONLY


Name Christopher Davis(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Postco e „ 6012

Contact phone number.. ®3.83.1.?7.6 Email address .ch.ris.a.ncl.nna.rVd,[email protected]:n.e!. au

Tips for completing a submission:« Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

SubmissionI wish to express my very strong objection to the proposed amendment to the Stirling Highway road

reserve south of Jarrad Street, Cottesloe. The eastern side of this section of the highway, along with

the whole of Queen Victoria Street in North Fremantle, features a number of fine heritage buildings.

The widening of the road reserve in these areas will encroach on these buildings or threaten them

with demolition. Perth already has too few buildings of this class to provide a sense of history and

connection with the past. They are part of the special character of Fremantle and its approaches. If

lost, they are irreplaceable and Perth will continue its drift towards a mediocre, generic, modern city

that could be anywhere in the world.

I am particularly concerned about the impact on Saint Anne s church, at the corner of Alfred Street,

and the yyhole of Queen Victoria Street.

There are alternatives which would provide for the soughPafter traffic imprgyements withput

. threatening.these, historical areas, such.as.making, better.use of the .railway, reserve.. I. strongly urge

. the. Planning Com mission .to. reconsider, such, options.

Submission 253i - i

DEPARTMENI OF PLANNING

2 5 JUL

FILE T-C j G '-1 I7



Anyone who as made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.




OR




or

E A spokesperson



I I Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)







To be si ned by psrson(s) making the submission

Signature


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - tt ://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Su misslosii 254

PO Box 314NORTH FREMANTLE WA 6159

08 9336 [email protected]


Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Submission



SecretaryWA Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Dear Sir or Madam

In my submission regarding the Amendment I wish you to note that whereas I agreewith is broad intent, I cannot accept it in its present orm because of the significantdeleterious impacts it will have on the urban environment, heritage values andamenity of North Fremantle.

I am particularly concerned about the proposed widening of Queen Victoria St in theNorth Fremantle old town centre. This would not only destroy valued heritagebuildings but would reverse recent moves to traffic calm the street, which haveencouraged the development of the street as an attractive restaurant, entertainment

and specialty shops precinct.

I do not wish to attend or to be represented at the hearings.

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substant al)

Form 41



DEPARTMENT OF PLAN I G

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submissio 255

Name .. S. . S. . Rtfcl.(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address.8My.HQN..-sr. NOKW...FKBM M.l £ p„s,Code....b S .

Contact phone number .0.L03 ATQ..L.T L... Email ad ress ..'53. rtl.?. Pll . CO*

Tips for completing a submission:9 Use headings or numbers to s parate different topics and issuesb Include prop rty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

..I... i t k .te., rtj'Tl.. .to. .ttve.. BrrmdMTrt... tsqmbim. ttu.. y.iXJdOv O hOJmri... .fp. .3Tt! ina. .: 6.tA«.W. .• J. . .live.. AmSMkm yt... ryipcrf .faCk.. .. jjx, b. .ct.c.cc. .ui..... tie c. ffeU.... i .... worts... wouid. .Lwve..,(M.

fon,. CMA/adlf.. .(Xwd.. .rSPCldf. .. /T.IC./u'i.U.. c/. 1:1 i Lv is-sirtcu.vii ... Lug ...s.t... d<LLU v./..\.. v. cit..un.. :. Tlvv...

pteposa L... far.. Tu ... ae .. q£ .. .tie... Primaru.. mqmvU. KCflds... .I st fliM A.. n.. . U . .V UMi. .:. ca. .id: iFto/rSe iot . .wl±ki. Sti i Q.iEigkiA/gy... to... .accimoctai a.. bus. i.a.!.\c... i&. .t2p.e> ta.iiv;. odcx/mi dfl... tot.. . iv .....to.. . a... ah a totoA.. pflapa al.. .vvo. i:. . v towL... ato U-i .. of. .dcub .. .ztor .,.. h,artoa e.. .jMfk.ed.dtot os. ..cvv... Q sm.. bL tra. St..

.Ot i.. .Md -. . past.. fe. .ueais.. .di t... d.. hav.c... heM ied.. ..titrtadtou . Lstko,..!. h l<u.sl iL!. .® c . Vi.ctmc'-St)...diAs (fcvetoitea...vCiit ....a...TkiwtLvg..( bs,.. mi .co muitodij.,. a Pep.caf'toi.tatoiq.VLettaF .ac.ul


Qj \±cj'fcca,/\iTifci/ /t ac ltKw nao r aiv Qiam/ Vich na. 8t to c rui laCfi- visc/tiwJ X bte ( /rx Mto to o to axxto to rmtoj locaJ b tyu oUwfs xWio ncc ruA -tto a vod o Shxi ,

, ccv ma ltu u VD d itotato

I f I Dposcx cjo (xhjiGkd. <£ht r fwyiQX\X

fortw JzIasu cKa a&lX ato tovt f nc> l S X\CUXbbi fcOVVW CC t C ( ( Ui2.5.K ict USX wcuAd ix ev oc btxj dx trutoc l beUcA/ ,ju ufanl ®toctoaltffvx ww wre to so aJ -u fCi ts of -to p poto xtoe mwnUy to e to X wtoi lten toto [wpoea-(fr oc rd b j -to CxJ/ of- tortoto Q

itoftf r to to k te e cto ametoy ObnJovWv fxejtoieutol to


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amen ment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.



E Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I will be represente by:

C Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

[ A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone nu ber (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefe my hearing to be conducted in:

I I Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)




a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv person(s) making the submission

Signature a . Date


Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning.and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41


[department of pl nning

2 5 JUL 2012

tU-S olUS1FILE

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reserv tion

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 256

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)Name . .

(PL ...

Address 1: ... P . ... ...( .fe. 7 stcode ..Ql59.

Contact phone numberf Ort .LQ .. .7Qo.... Email address

Tips for completing a submission:® Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues» Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

i.. .. (sfej. &k. x>.. .&W..

X. .f XvH Srt .:.. L vtQ

.. A Qrt ,.. AAXq. .... . fe.

I rvyr .... .h€ kQ sJ. 2

G i Cl ... .. . t :.. l.Q.CAJ .. C r ..

. < r c /? c .. ( A Xiy f . , C{-.

. A jA -i. . CVyX ..

Ys rf.. U QJH£A. o. . j2 . .

.. AJx7s/r A -rfJJ. .. £ & j?s/ sSxO XjjL L dYY 'J/

. Jo.. .&&/... i aMt .

... frUhi .... br Y O. 'YrXJOr.. .4...

&J ju.

... . L-n-rs./ .GOJO& S. .. PfO?Y>Xbf.

. ?! S>... VY\ st. PrO.

..CS'... ,J9... C OCS'.

.. Or-O... .40>Oh./\J: >l .. , l&s. .... Y ?... .J=h-f>.AYi G

( ) .blovf ry... . . ... .. .oi.OOYO ... .av .-Jyo.Q:

h - j Ji . turn over to complete your submission . s / / i/\o\ i! ) (~J2 \A Q

cdC)7

i JU h (YT-r Ojz f Q47 7c/ ' PUSAX&f -Z / jQ u O C-kV'-0£ sSPC Q-

\s JI/ A J£3l j .

I


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. Ti is is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in ppendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose o e of the following:

M®, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


.1 will be represented by:

dl Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson


1 would prefer my hearing to b© conducted in:

EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)



You should be aware that


° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are recorded an transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signe by ersenfs making tfne submissaoBi

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised osing date, being ose ofusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be consi ered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://wv w.planning.wa.gov.au


Form 41

Submission[ etropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

DEPARTMENT OF PLAN ING

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE I | G 'Z


OFFICE USE ONLY


Sufemissioii 25?a

Name C&Lr . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address b.7J. 1 . . 77 ) .Uf?.. ... Postcode .... Afi .o.Z.

Contact phone number. .QY. 7?.V( Email address

Tips for com leting a submission:° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descnptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

/X yy\fU dir iA :. /V<y-

rty

. fhr.p.pr& .y. F/.y..... .ic. / .yj..... f li . .

.. /.. . Fr. jz F.T'. '<y .... C .j. .-.

./ .. u. j. /....FlF tf .'.yQ. .FY}F /.(F .Fc Ff. CrSp y-'/.

. 4... .p c F .. f/ igs / t o.(4f(.. 7 7

. .idc&fcrj. frFM.FfJ. .jy yF ... -.

/. ( (Fkf Fr. FFX.i vy.FJ.. .yP.f.XXXP

/ M 4/9 U'(.//S.. f//. (44. /'.f.. .MF.

.. j W k/9-.f. Coa J. //t u f/j. x/tdry/Hcrf. CO//. ikhk1/. <3/fyy(\ X. p.... ... / iyf./. fM.M do,

....cx/d o kd.... . .t'(jh/.u/./.y h p./Mi ...,-rr. id. d...y/xx/. 0,J

-i

/./.....dsy..dydu/o F idyd/f . -f. -.Q. k.uy/dy/yj. , \Jr Fk

l ./Of .. rix. ky..,.. ./ €/)/FVx . .?

Ikdxk. /d/.xt.....dyvJAfd/. dyy/X d.. .fxy/x/d/d.,l/M. Ck/F/K /xdd..../td.diflfj. .o .d.. d/i/yri f///, //fX/. 9t& dt oddMJ..pt 's s{</h..-.

2< .. s/.°0. fA.pyp dd... .dx.xyi .Cx... . y/d...&ff.. dd. /.ld/..&d.. /de

. fXA d ./Aitzy... r -. J. iP./M d., d/pMc ck(P/ j' X.... .(mm . . M>

turn over to complete you submission

f , ' v g* >v -

S //, mr j f

rr hr/ TT T'V 7 f r

y VP Jf l j y pyniyj , 1

p/y - / JP w/ L SV f y -yif& JitMm itfu sdoyfi i r- f 7 bv rP

Q j /y y/yyS jv umj ij- jh f° bT ? y ?

1 m ? jyiij y /ck S 7 )a/v





Q No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

O Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)



or

E A spokesperson




OR

EH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)


a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.


To be signed by persontst ma ing the submission

Signature D:,:, ...ijhh


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au


Form 41

Submission[ etropolitan Region Scheme Amend nt 1210/41


OFFICE USE ONLY

1


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE


Submission 258i

Name .TAPLAt). AF, .A!LL (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address W.r. Postcode

Q. c. l - <C\Contact phone number.. k .) Email address

T/ps for completing a submission:o L/se headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanta Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

SubmissionXtJM T VAS... .S.«.. TV:lbo r ).

turn o er to complete ou submission






OR



Myself - My telephone number (business hours)

or

A spokesperson


sfI would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:









Signatur .,.

. O Xi \T. ix Od, O- TVs 'T .

'- -'-vv /'- J ; r .V- c =-1 >

Date 16 ,.- O


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au


Section 41 Amendment (S bstantial)

Submission



This submission is made on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association.The Association notes that whereas there would be eneral agreement thatrationalisation of the Stirling Highway reservation to improve the viability ofautomobile, pedestrian, cycling and public transport use, the Amendment paysinsufficient attention to its impacts on the urban environment, heritage values, andamenity. The Association cannot therefore support the Amendment in its presentform.

HERITAGE AND URBAN ENVIRONMENTThe Amendment report refers to the negligible impact on State Registered buildingsbut ignores those listed in the local Municipal Inventory and State Heritage Database.The latter include about 40 buildings which would be affected in some way, with asmany as 18 being demolished. As well as the effect on heritage values, the loss ofthese buildings would diminish the character and identity of North Fremantle.Buildings not demolished would in the main have their amenity seriously affected bycloseness to the highway. The frontages of the two former primary schools, forexample, and of St Anne s church would be reduced to almost zero. The demolitionof heritage listed shops in Queen Victoria Street is dealt with below.

AMENITYA particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary RegionalRoads (PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with StirlingHighway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal wouldresult in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to267 Queen Victoria Street. Rezoning of this portior of Queen Victoria St from Urbanto Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads the responsibility for this portion,enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment.

Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function andgrowing development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom,small bar, restaurant and entertainment. The street has in effect been traffic calmed inrecent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way and increasedparking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bayscontribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating busmovements should now be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost ofheritage buildings and their local functions.

Widening of the highway in the vicinity of Alfred Road and truncating theintersection would significantly reduce the parking at the shops there, perhaps fatallyaffecting their viability. These shops contribute importantly to the quality of life inNorth Fremantle. Parking at the station, already inadequate, would also besignificantly affected. A consequence of this could be the spill over of station parkinginto neighbouring streets, or simply more cars on the highway.

Planners make much of the importance of liveable communities with transport andother facilities within walking distance. North Fremantle was once the quintessentialliveable community but like many others lost this quality with loss of its populationand the migration of shops and se vices to larger centres. In recent years there hasbeen a population resurgence and a gradual revival of the old town centre, which iscontinuing. A road widening reservation over a portion of Queen Victoria Streetwould halt this revival by placing a ‘planning blight’ over the reserved land anddiscouraging improvements elsewhere.

The North Fremantle Town Centre has in fact become a destination and should not beregarded as a place where passing through it more efficiently becomes the primaryobjective.

ALTERNATIVESAlternatives to the present proposals have been well articulated in some detail by theCity of Fremantle in its response to the Amendment

The broad thrust of the Council's response is that the aims of the Amendment can beachieved at significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of NorthFremantle. Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be movedto the west, making use of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the Cityrequests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway furtherwest in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongsidehe rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in thevicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrian and cyclists between adjoiningsuburbs and the beach.

CONCLUSIONIn conclusion the Association supports the intent of the Amendment but cannotsupport the proposals in their present form because of their significant deleteriousimpacts on the urban environment, heritage values and amenity of North Fremantle.The Association supports the alternative proposals put forward by the City ofFremantle and urges the Commission to reconsider the Amendment in the light ofthem.

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantia!)

Form 41

Su missionMetro olitan Region Scheme Amend ent 1210/41


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE / 0.

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 2S§¦ -i i- -V f--- ¦ - J

Namefa t H;


.SO r-l rS

\i i Mi'll m i i j .

Address L .... .?!' (.. .3 1. .34../ Postcode ...h ..[. j.

Contact phone number... PP.P...'.42 .. .14f?:.1... Email address .

Tips for completing a sub ission:o Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevante Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

(Vs 0 of: .°. ...riWvj \ <5 ft taAW

'oi. j pJ .iP j..hovfe(ef. jf <5)2 li \\ a J. .

Q ''- r iLiSf Oa Tij \ Ka OvxI e cftcfo TKic ca 6st\0A 2i tr|

Kwu CC{fe2 £" 100% SGI400I’ a/Ai be. (vvfcUY\ - 0 ¦ 3 .s ' '5f>-- - 3 S ,

2k (T i 4 Wa i fecA T cI r;lul \ ; Sc/WtxQ | Ko 11 dc

F > o kv((4c:, u TrTi l-A S l

, \D, J iS .

('Z~) i 1 c -AlA£ o4 \ 4(1(2 I Qt y tkv .vt -yfe kof]¦v c > t>

2\ \ 4 Vv(F\2 cdJj &X d d VWt S Lb ' I;;L 2% - A

(v i vv OttoT )i l0 <A (Oi <Fv (PTdIo v , 4 - 2 Aiok \ vj pstL )

3..j lj\ c W&S dji &\ i i wHj24yy spdHr y KycK y . . i. y. € . ; (

.4..1... t

vJ...fe...f! !p . . . .2(222(4 1 !L '..tur over to complete your submission

v 0\ ty (1 (]x

jywifV o n pQtl 9d0f (¦

m f5 «) + f jiq dOfi) rs ] Qi9

-fo)i Qi/(t _j \i offjV1 Lif Jj» QiWjnj tp)

> i i _ | ? «) g /yg \r

'u| P ayjJh® pe /ewfl wvJ ll

|<w s> '>p ri $ ifl> \A to

' ) 9_p p .

nl sQ g, Cp l / p (-15 J3' WJ

q bS? _p J iAi / lajS? - n vvrjqd )

o]\J }| ' ) 'jjqs _ja? ii jpi j? _ < |o-ra}05

nU f Y> 3pLnO / jcvz0 P aiS' -w jv

Qgl D v j ty-Jn J ysf s: !w o s.)


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to s eak at the hearings or not.



M No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR




or

E A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone numb r (business hours): Postal address:







a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

0 All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be: the submission

Signature




Form 41

Submission[ etropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41


2 5 JUL 2012

fill iLL _l

ationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 260

Name DAVLh ROTYl (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .V. .lr . ! . Postcode ..

Contact phone number.... Email address

Tips for completing a submission:° Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues

Include pro rty addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more s ace to complete your submission

Submission

J- ....V\ £>r?)C...IcP. ..j ,..sU- p....

y Pr i-... ... I ?.. iC. k O ) .. . .CAg £Aa %&hJC. ...

.. i tAACArd.. , |... . .o gy,. .u, . c/\... .ftv?.

i. r . .e v;®4r>... < rCedf r... .. ff([..

. OdMd-.. .r u ek-.

.2., . .fa.. . .fmo*... .cJ-.erm .

. /akvAfiASe,.. > kY?*tfcy>:

L fir... ...... kVS.c k AG h...

.. fs .. gX4r&* j.. wL. . .t/ M&i ..( [..feg

c k h ..... N 9.... .. fif¥..

i f siffar.. .6 . .77. . .. ,l ?kww-.<r&-..

D? ...\y 3 fet .. h &<2fS.

turn ove to complete our submission

Hea ing of subm ssions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC ifthe below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulso y. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.



m Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR




o

D A spokesperson


I would prefe my hearing to be conducted in:

CD Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORCD Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be


You should.be aware that:

° The WAPC is subject to ihe Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC ma besubject to applications for access under the act.


° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Gove nor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a eport on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) makin the submission

r>c -iA C_ . Signature . Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the a vertise closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp:/Avww. fanning,wa.gov.au


Form 41


DEPARTMENT OF PL N I G

2 5 JUL 2012

file


OFFICE USE ONLY


Name (PLEASE P INT CLEARLY)

Address . .. L. ..

Contact p one number.. .. . . .lhzmail address

Submissio 261

Postcode ;

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues« Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant» Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

; f r.Q . Dr?

rf Lrt .ITT.. . r.C. .... i.C t\f*S c I C i Ct f<Lc L C>Ai T

2 t.... (H Od ;. C& . D. s(

r... /6 :XT) O./ c ro _ t s, .!9.

99.... OtXr Co CL.-i. C Co lb T C AtlCC. fri:

., 1.S ,_ f l Si,T >>< ( T*, . .Vr7. C.CAf CTT

..C).r...1?dr. 1 7 tX ;(r rC/ D 7. ?.?/7XC. . H p CA / 1

. ,l . ... .I c 1 .. .l aa.l t a. . C . .C?!,c.

<7,C;«h C. ..-AXTL.tA.... kC .CX lXX . :.r? TX . Cr.A

.C/rl7rTr. r. C /fbC. T, . X..X.) .FrC ;S e.C/-j AE XX .T rr)T

9 rv/CCAoX ,

AD 7C 7. t $ A .

tu n over to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee ofthe WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulso y. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Please choose one ofthe following:

A/

Wo, I do not wish to spea at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to spea at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be epresented b :


or

A spokesperson


1 would p efe my hearing to be conducted in:






o In the course ofthe WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.



Signature Date n>

Note: Submissions MUST be received b the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected],gov.au; Website - htlp.,//w\vw.planning,wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantia!)

Form 41


OFFICE USE ONLY


Submissio 262

i I

Name 1 .T . .C& V v C ..) PT, .Cfr>'l .fr.(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) ,

Address Irii.l .. Postcode

Contact phone number. .H.Q.. .. 2 ..Email address

7/ps for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuese Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant® Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission







OR



d] Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E] A spokesperson




ORLI] Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



9 The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

0 In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.




These submissions are made by Anna Catelli and Maria Catelli as joint owners ofUnit 7 in the strata complex known as Ter ara 224 Stirling Highway, Claremont( Terrara strata complex ) regarding the proposed resumption set out in MetropolitanRegion Scheme Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling HighwayReservation Amendment Repoxt dated March 2012 ( Report”).

The Terrara strata comple comprises 11 units and our unit is the unit at the back.

We are making a separate submission because this affects our unit. The unit is aninvestment property which we lease and which will become our source of income inour retirement. We do not want to lose it or for it to be unlettable as a result of thewidening of Stirling Highway proposed in the Report.

This submission is in four parts we submit:

1. that widening Stirling Highway as set out in the MRSA should not occur; and

2. it is unf ir that the resumptions on the other side of the Highway is only 2.7metres whereas the resumption proposed on our side of the Highway is 10.2metres;

3. imposing a set back of a minimum of 4.1 metres is unworkable;

4. if the widening of Stirling Highway is to proceed we make the followingsuggestions on how this can be done to reduce the impact on the me.

First Submission - No widening of Stirling HighwayWe submit that Stirling Highway should remain as it is without any widening andcongestion dealt with by putting traffic:


Second SubmissionThe fact that 2.7 metres is being taken from the other side compared with 10.2 metresfrom this side is manifestly unfair. It would seem the other side gets an economicadvantage which we will not.

Third Submission

Imposing 4.1 metres is unworkable. This means the entire complex will need to bedemolished because all the units are interconnected either by connecting walls orsharing rooves and ceilings where there are units above.

Fourth Submission -Stirlin Highway is made wide

This submission is only put forward as an alte ative to the first submission but we donot want Stirling Highway made wider.

If the proposed resumption set out in Report proceeds it will severely impact on us asfollows:

1. If our unit is demolished we will lose our income;

2. If the unit is not demolished the amenity of our unit will be severely degradedbecause of:

a. additional noise;b. additional pollution;c. danger in crossing the road;d. closeness of pedestrianse. loss of privacy;f. loss of set back;

3. the reticulation and garden which is currently in place will disappear;

4. the garage which is part of Unit 2 will need to be demolished;

5. the Terrara strata complex will lose the use of 3 car parks, currently set asidefor the use of Units 3, 4 and 6;

6. the Terrara strata complex will lose the use of two visitor car parks;

7. the Ten'ara.strata complex will lose the driveway which makes getting on andoff Stirling Highway feasible and safe;

8. the Te 'ara strata complex will lose their letter boxes;

9. access to and from Stirling Highway and access to the Units will bedramatically reduced and turning off and onto Stirling Highway will be atraffic hazard and dangerous not only to the commuters on the Highway butalso to those trying ingress and egress from the Terrara strata complex.

In order to minimise the impact on us:

1. There should be no right hand tu into Walter Road. By doing this much lessland needs to be resumed.

2. The bus stop cu rently earmarked to be constructed right outside our Terrarastrata complex be moved further down the road towards Claremont TownCentre (near lot 11 which has a much greater set back than our complex) orsouth in the terminology of the Report.

3. It is unfair that the reserve directly on the other side of Stirling Highway willbe limited to 2.7 metres whereas the reserve on our side of Stirling Highwaywill be 10.2 metres.

4. If the property alongside Ten'ara strata complex (that is Lot 2 to the North) isresumed (and this seems likely as the reserve actually goes through the current

building) we request that part of the land be provided to the Terrara stratacomplex to enable additional car parking facilities to be provided to thoseowners who no longer have car parking bays and safe access on and offStirling Highway at no cost to Terrara strata complex.

Signed by Anna Catelli and Maria Catelli


Form 41




OFFICE USE ONLY

ll - - - - ' . 4. - =a

Submissio 263i i

Name

Add ess

O OT\ex 0( l <£.c r <r r c\ S P(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

j ( .). . s... P-fI )4.t.!.V.P. .

I a is

... Postcode .3

Contact phone number.Q. .P. X.Q. ... ... Email address . f.i AT.h tr\ .l. P. t

V\o V cv \ - y\TT/ps for completing a submission:

® Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

C

turn ove to co plete you submission


Anyone who has made a written sub ission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.




OR


1 will be represented by:


or

A spokesperson


I would p efe my hearing to be conducted in:

n Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)




• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

q In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personfs) making the submission

CM1ASignature : j! ..... .Y. :./F. Date

,2 /7/42

Tfote: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.


These submissions are made by the Owners of Terrara Strata Plan 1275 ( Owners ofTerrara ) regarding the proposed resumption set out in Metropolitan Region SchemeAmendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation AmendmentReport dated March 2012 ( Report ) with respect to the strata complex known as 224Stirling Highway, Claremont (“Terrara strata complex”).

The Terrara strata complex comprises 11 units which houses approximately 17persons. Of the 11 units 4 are owner occupiers. 3 of the units are on the first floorwhereas the balance of the units are on the ground floor. All the units are connectedand share either dividing walls or ceilings/floors or both. The units do not lendthemselves to being subdivided. If one unit were to be resumed then all units must beresumed. Widening Stirling Highway has a significant impact on all unit owners forthis reason.

This submission is in two parts:

1. the primary submission is that the Owners of Terrara submit that wideningStirling Highway as set out in the MRSA should not occur; and

2. the secondary submission is that if the widening of Stirling Highway is toproceed the Owners of Terrara make suggestions on how this can be done toreduce the impact on the Terrara strata complex.

Primary Submission - No widenin of Stirling HighwayThe Owners of Terrara submit that Stirling Highway should remain as it is withoutany widening and congestion dealt with by putting traffic:


Secondary Submission -Stirling Highway is m de wider

This submission is only put forward as an alternative to the first submission but theOwners do not want Stirling Highway made wider.

If the proposed resumption set out in Report proceeds it will severely impact on theTerrara strata complex as follows:

1. The amenity of the entire Terrara strata complex will be degraded because of:

a. Additional noise;b. Additional pollution;c. Danger in crossing the road;d. Closeness of pedestrian;e. Loss of privacy;

2. As mentioned previously, it seems that the entire block will need to bedemolished as none of the units are free standing.

3. The reticulation and garden which is currently in place will disappear;

4. The garage which is part of Unit 2 will need to be demolished;

5. The Terrara strata complex will lose the use of 3 car parks, currently set asidefor the use of Units 3, 4 and 6;

6. The Terrara strata complex will lose the use of two visitor car parks;

7. The Terrara strata complex will lose the driveway which makes getting on andoff Stirling Highway feasible and safe;

8. The Terrara strata complex will lose their letter boxes;

9. The garage which is part of Unit 1 will be almost impossible to access fromStirling Highway or from any where else;

10. Access to and from Stirling Highway and access to the Units will bedramatically reduced and turning off and onto Stirling Highway will be atraffic hazard and dangerous not only to the commuters on the Highway butalso to those trying ingress and egress from the Terrara strata complex.

In order to minimise the impact on Terrara strata complex we request the followingchanges to the proposal:

1. There should be no right hand turn into Walter Road. By doing this much lessland needs to be resumed.

2. The bus stop currently earmarked to be constructed right outside our Terrarastrata complex be moved further down the road towards Claremont TownCentre (near lot 11 which has a much greater set back than our complex) orsouth in the terminology of the Report.

3. It is unfair that the reserve directly on the other side of Stirling Highway willbe limited to 2.7 metres whereas the reserve on our side of Stirling Highwaywill be 10.2 metres.

4. If the property alongside Terrara strata complex (that is Lot 2 to the North) isresumed (and this seems likely as the reserve actually goes through the currentbuilding) we request that part of the land be provided to the Terra a stratacomplex to enable additional car parking facilities to be provided to thoseowners who no longer have car parking bays and safe access on and offStirling Highway at no cost to Terrara strata complex.

The common seal of the Owners of TerraraStrata Plan 1275 is hereunto affixed by authorityof the Council and in the presence of:

.... IXp. if j . Lt.i.. . /Council Membe Council Member Terrara"

©teria Plan1275

COMMON SFAl


Form 41



2 5 JUL 2012


OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 264

Name Mi.. l\l ; X (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) J

Address !~3 .P6.03t . .... . 3 „. Postcode .. . . (Sf f.

Contact phone number. Email address .

Tips for completing a submission:Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues

• Include property addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

. 1....i l f _ i _ - fs.;..dc jC x toK .'d ... 1 (bbIi . . .b.p

.... r. i/\.<U £X$). ju... 4p 2.- B. . PP.l /

CP Q .. P.)pl. o' .

- .' '. B... ..

.3 Y .trv .

.. .r > P.d/..... .. .XjtfLQ:

- - - - M.. .B BP.c Y 1

r?t T .j Y-

. l ...X... ~. .IP A jl Xl. ... .

13... 3i4.... lexs ... .... ml. .. ... .r o,. s.......' A 1

pi4P ....n ...

. .'. ili. T;. rOx-ijA x

..xiuexxx

/imI...

B£

. U

X

.P .-P/X...... pr.c!P. lx.... /}. bIC c '

Pd .of . pj, J b. cA.$gJ.... .'flpl.Tf X.PBpBi

.C/QPrtP.C

hJxsdi.... XsPV y1... j l / .C/l.... y l ... . o. i C l

lex. . .>... pt .... p:.... .cpxX .. :3srfY.l: .

Iq P. . .. i ! .... > ¦ ¦ ¦

. .... . e.4:- ¦ Y.. if CcXlfe... JXisuiX ¦

.... d slrr. b>. dtY Xx ... ... aAx<u. /\ pb- ¦ • ?

.f A ftlx... S tA bfi .... .b xfo/ 2 .. .Ull

. [C>....

P.PerA/p

Itdxdturn over to complete your submission

1

C- P l'n Mor li w, ImzA Soey w -j

sof t 'C- rbctd f I esKS k/

d l ( r 'S firt / c U r li Jct

Nty lop IajQoi$<Z i UXj e - Cct«i AJ'vS

sll no e/(J

fj££$> 1 ItLO j

J/ f f r j - c / l/l

( l! ( / o se ii

X of n i H

, •/vlor-fv\ l/So

(XV 2 ople- Ac AiJ <5.,>'Y.i i 'X C ' x.

Pp ple ( (DAA//;(p A .1 Ml

y , ,.„ } Ae Jrt Stv . r c<J) \A J\ V p •' ••• - •-• •

' 7

, \ pMa o /

9l u r -M eeM.. At

/

Y aU~3 iXckirk Y ,

>>9 )U

X.:C< M - po t

uw &re \





Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


, I will be represented b : .

E3 Myself - My telephone number (business hours): ....J. z. r...7 ....!..

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): .• Postal address:


0 Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORE Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be


iz


° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act f 992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

9 In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To person(s) making the submission

Signature Date




Form 41




2 5 JUL 2012

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 265

Name ; fp iVc-0> "~P*Pv ' | O , \ Vr C $ c 1 >-


Av/ CC \ oAddress TV, I f .... Sr: Tfr TT ?T7?rr ~Postcode

Contact phone number. T.Tf .!. T! Email address .(T?. ( '.TT .'r . ~

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuese Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

[ j i 2 Si. h 'r f i'

"("' I •O- i ( T

, ! 1Trrjr.,? T: r.T , f 'T>~ pt-L C "*1 "i U . i. C A

( ' L.,*. J '.vt (l-' .J~r 'i A - v

c I Ci/ 'T ? i






[y Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I will be rep esented by:


or

E A spokesperson







° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of/n/bmaf/onAcf 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

q In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and publfehed as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

pef bv person(s) makin the submission

Signature Date

Note: Subnffssions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.


Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (S bstantial)

Form 41



OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 266

Name ...i (PLEASE PI- . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) ,

Address .. . / '.. pos[co6e O O

Contact phone number Email address ..[

Tips for completing a submission:¦= Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues< Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant9 Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission u7

h....e rCi.. gL&i ai/xci qJ jaj U l:xl T m

ZZZA...rk k .... hr L i.. .Qr r ofs

. w.... yy f y..piSpy)...Ir o. ..h .'ddo.

yy d py. CQy rd:C /3> r i/U fy dyy k AsC&d At) Pycypp pt

p . pyypf. rdddyy. td. . . Ia& (yy yp.f jA pdA /L 3 dj piotAl lAjd)

X dod dcdAxjl z i/1 ML j2A\ Jp. edc -djp - d- A p pt a JpJ cu pi/\ yu .

.).. f dyfh . .fAicprPPX ./ (j (o op jpi/

oca

5~:.fddf yylry]- •. •. d pAd6.. , .- , d a iS '(qJ- ' a ' ydfP>'tAiA "cy w", l C J Ar u A/y turn over to completeWour submission , < i

' Iqj?OAJ [A Jld OAJj 4 O(A fjr id -CAAst CA rcX/ J.


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally presen the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.



OR


S will e represented b :


o

A spokesperson


1 would p efe m hea ing to be conducted in:

CD Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings co mittee will be



s The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursu mission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hea ings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public eco ds should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

io be maki g the subm ssion

dM a cSignatu e .YY .. I .. A Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received b the advertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late su missions will NOT be consi ere .

Contacts: Felephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected] ; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au.


Form 41

Submission


2 S JUL 2012

FILE i j O IJa

Metropolitan Region Schem Amendment 1210/41


OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 267» . i i

Name..Rich.a.rd.El.se.y(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Salustri Place North Fremantle

Contact phone number 0.40.2 2.6 3.4 Email address

_ t „ 6159. Postcode

[email protected]

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues

Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant« Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

Queen Victoria St (QVS) is unique.for the residents of North Fremantle

1 Commercial devebpment has not kept pace with residential demand, therefore we need QVS

2 QVS is underdeveloped offering huge potential. Interference with road configuration would inhibit'evelbpmeht

3 QVS has a -cosy feeling enhanced- by- the- ag -and -a chiteeture- of -the -buildings.- -The- "minor" road

nature of .QVS js .part of.this atmosphere.

It would seem that a little imagination would allow modification to the PRRB where it extends intothe' horthem' en of QVS Stirling Bridge traffic -will -diminish- ov r ti as FPA-and-the-James Feint- Cockbnr-n-Sou d portso en in the future. The Government failed to build the Fremantle bypass off Stirling Bri ge, anadmission that traffic is not a significant factor.

I appeal to the planners that QVS be left alone






El Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR




or

E A spokesperson


I would pref r my hearing to be conducted in:





° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.



Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed by the ad ertise closing date, being close ofusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au


Form 41

Submission[Vletropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling ighway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submissio MU

Name fvj 044 f \ \-. y

... \?<0 -box- • - rt- . . l.p GE l.Address . , v /A.... Postcode ... ?..! .4.

;, , ,. • . | r-i • LwP l )Contact phone number , Email address ?.hAi/.t.1:1. .-..Ct WI. . ..

T/ s for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issueso Include property addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

... p . ,v/y.

turn ove to complete your submission






OR


I will be re resented by:


or

E A spokesperson


I ould prefer my hea ing to be conducted in:






• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.



Signature >P/ .



07478 - submission.doc

24 July 2012 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

2 5 JUL 2012

Submission, Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41Ratio alisation of Stirling Highw y ReservationLot 200 (154) Stirling Hi hway Nedland - Objection - ANNEXU E 6A

We are town planners for the owner of lot 200 on the corner of Stirling Highway andTaylor Road Nedlands. On behalf of the owner, WA Flour Mills Pty Ltd we formallyobject to the proposal to widen Stirling Highway reservation resulting in an excisionof a portion of lot 200 with substantial affect to the commercial building on the land.

Proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Amendment

The land is presently affected by the existing MRS reservation at 43 metres wide onthe southern side of Stirling Highway. The proposed amendment is to reduce this to8.7 metres together with an 8.48 metres truncation at the intersection with TaylorRoad. Please refer to the attached plan number 1.7145 (101-b). The proposedamendment will reduce the area of reservation from 2064 square metres to 426 squaremetres.

Additionally, the physical operation of Stirling Highway for vehicle movement willchange due to the introduction of a new median strip. Presently, patrons can turnfrom Stirling Highway when travelling east into Taylor Road, The proposed medianstrip change will prevent this. The result will be serious implications for vehicularaccess and will reduce the volume of shoppers to the commerci l operations.

Subject Land and Improvements

The lot 200 is in two sections (separated by Taylor Road) and comprises 4458 squaremetres. The weste section fronting Stirling Highway has a land area of 3535 squaremetres. The eastern section fronting Taylor Road has a land area of 923 squaremetres. The site it currently occupied by a multi-level commercial buildingcomprising a supermarket, speciality shops and car parking. The frontage of thestores and access is from Taylor Road.

The proposed amendment will excise 426 square metres of land on the frontage toStirling Highway, including the truncation at Taylor Road. Please refer to theattached Figure 1.

HEAD OFFICE:133 Scarborough Beach Road, Mount Hawthorn WA 6016

PO Box 99, MOUNT HAWTHORN WA 6915T: 08 9443 1511 F: 08 9444 3901

E: v/[email protected] W: wv/.whelans.com.au

PERTH | KALGOORLIE | KARRATHA | BROOME | KUNUNURRAWHELANS (WA) PTY LTD ACN 074 363 741

ASSOCIATED OFFICES: ADELAIDE | MELBOURNE | SYDNEY | BRISBANE

1

whelans

The land for reservation contains several improvements associated with thecommercial building and operations on the site.

City of Nedlands Tow Plannin Scheme No 2

Under the City of Nedlands town planning scheme the land has two land-useclassifications of Retail Shopping for the western section (frontage to StirlingHighway) and ‘Office/Showroom for the easte section (frontage to Taylor Road).The setback on Stirling Highway is nil and therefore no affect on this setback.However, the development rights rely upon a maximum plot ratio of 0.75. The loss ofland area will mean a reduction in plot ratio area from 3344 square metres to 3024square metres.

Land Area (sqm) Permitted Plot Ratio Plot Ratio (sqm)Current 4458 0.75 3344Proposed 4032 0.75 3024

The other town planning element to be considered is if the allowable plot ratio isincreased in the future town planning scheme at a future date the net gain for WAFlour Mills will be less than can be expected under the present land area.

The Implicatio s of the Proposed Amendment

Based upon the foregoing the effect of the reservation will be substantial on thecommercial property. That is:

o The building faqade and signage,o Refrigeration plant, cool rooms,o Closure of the right hand turn for vehicles travelling east on Stirling Highway,® Pedestrian access from Stirling Highway, ando Development potential is decreased by 9%.

Loss of Amenity and Value

Whilst the amendment is a reduction in the previous width of the reservation for thewidening of Stirling Highway the affect on the property is still substantial.

The property has two levels of commercial operations. The ground floor tenancycomprises an IGA supermarket of 1,401 square metres. The main entrance to the storeis accessed from Taylor Road which runs of Stirling Highway. The store includes aliquor outlet trading as ‘The Wine Box’.

The first floor premises comprise an upper level retail outlet of approximately 515square metres. It has similar construction as the ground floor with masonry walls andperimeter columns. Access to the premises is via stairs off Stirling Highway footpath,stairs off Taylor Road or via a panelled lift off Taylor Road.

2

The Gross Lettable Area is app oximately 1,916 square metres:

AccommodationUpper retail outletGround floor supe market

Buildi g Area (sqm)

Total GLA

5151.401.51.916.5

Based upon the proposed oad widening it is estimated that the floor space for thesupermarket and upper level showroom will be reduced by 120 squa e metres and 100square metres, respectively (areas are approximate only).

The major impact on the property arising out of the proposed road widening ofStirling Highway will be the excision and demolition of approximately three met esfrom the front of the existing premises. This will require partial demolition,reinstatement of the faqade, relocation of existing refrigeration plant and cool rooms.

The subject property occupies a prominent place in one of Perth s premier soughtafter, high value subu bs. The p operty is readily accessible and in close pro imity toresidential, education, shopping, medical, transport and community facilities and iskeenly sought after by prospective purchasers.

Therefo e the diminution in value (loss of amenity, limited development options,future development constraints etc) is significant due to a reduction in the highest andbest use potential of the property resulting from the area for the reservation.

These factors will lead to a claim for compensation if the amendment is gazetted.

Conclusion

The rationalisation to reduce the width of the reservation from 43 met es to 8.7 metresis welcomed but the net affect is still substantial for the property and therefore thisobjection to any reservation for resumption.

This property is enhanced by the current physical circumstances in that:there are no vacancies in commercial operations,

the property is in a strong socio-economic community,- it is a good quality development anchored by a quality tenant,- there is ample bitumen car parking,- the history is a strong trading performance,- the property is on a corner location, and- the long-term commercial prospects are very good.

3

In summary we object to the MRS Amendment on the following basis:

® The substantial negative impact of future development potential and restrictionof options,

° A significant reduction in vehicular access from Stirling Highway,o Loss of amenity for enjoyment of the subject land, and® Loss of financial value by a reduction of highest and best use.

Please contact the undersigned for information on 9443 1511.

Yours faithfully ?

VetTo n riamicr

Whelans Town Planning

Attachments

4

Proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Amendment

Reduction in land requiredfor road purposes

No.154 (Lot 200) Stirling Highway, NedlandsProposed area required 426 m2

subject to survey

Extract of proposed changes: plan number 1.7145 (101-b )

« )¥» "-'V*vrofv !ST» -4 A- -r»i .«

WesternAustralianPlanningCommission

Existing r serve boundary

Proposed reserve boundary

Property boundary11 Auj £011

. > j Uj< ;'( (| K Crn :¦ ii.ti o11 £ ; • •• •!rua =«>.i I l l4 V'f»> wml • > r-- rii.rrirv. r -rrr -- / -

¦n.: . , 1 • T t* • • Tk -JCiT •-•-It •••: i I t-.r-l ¦ •. I- ¦ .Atr urKy 1,1 i3A-3<Ki9-t GOA Proposed area required

Scale 1:600

R Zi

0 12

I ime I res

Notu: All dimtinsjons iiift in atins.

TOWN PLANNING


Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)Form 41



OFFICE USE ONLYL I ¦ i-. j


Submissio 269

Name ....6. /Z fc ... (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .. S . . ? /... . . ? . . . Al ... Postcode ... £3 ;

Contact phone number St ... &. ?.{?. Email address . ti. . £f.*. Q&. ??.<&/

T/ps for completing a submission:® Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevants Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission





/ Please choose one of the following:


OR


I will be re resented by:


or

A spokesperson


I would prefer my hea ing to be conducted in:








jerson(s) making the submission

Signature Date...5Y|..7./rA

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertise closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.


ERARD McCANN ARCHITFCT30 HAMILTON STREET EAST FREMANTLE V/A 6159 PH:9336 2856 E: [email protected]

24 July 2012

Your ref: 809-2-1-91 Pt 2 (RLS/0248)

SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE lii

Dear Sis or Madam:

Re: Metropolitan Region Scheme Proposed Am n ment 1210/41Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reserv tion

I am writing on behalf of the owners of Lot 51, Strata Plan No 14798, 106 Stirling Highway,North Fremantle in response to your letter of 20 March 2012.

In principle, we have no objection to the proposed annexation / increase in the regionalreservation as illustrated in the supplied diagram, subject to the following:

1 Under the Fremantle Council TPS 4, the land, zoned mixed use, has the developmentpotential illustrated in the attached analysis. The reduction in the develop ent potential ofthe land as a result of resumption / reservation of the subject land would reduce the amountof floor area that coul be generated on the site which would downgrade its value. Thiswould obviously affect the value of any development. The land is mostly vacant, withbuildings nearing the end of their economic life, and with no heritage value, is ready forredevelopment.

2 In agreeing to any increase in the regional reservation, we, the owners, wish to retainour right to compensation for any loss of value as a result of this increase.

3 The overhead high tension and local power lines are on kerbside poles, located in anarrow strip between he path and the road. In front of 106, 107 108 and 109, these polesare a traffic hazard, and several incidents of trucks colliding with these poles have occurred,particularly truck and trailer combinations exiting the Dingo Flour Mill, cnr Leslie Street. In

orst incident, po er to our Lot as lost for over half a day. Any road reserve re¬assessment should consider this issue, and plan for underground power to be integrated intothe scheme.

I would be happy to answer any enquiries you have regarding this letter. I can be contactedon mobile 0419 947 890.

Yours sincerely

From:Sent:To:

Subject:Attachments:

Gerard McCann <[email protected]>Wednesday, 6 March 2013 5:47 PMmrsReference: Lot 51, 106 Stirling Highway North Fremantle106 Stirling Hway Development 11211.doc

Hi Maria

The Site Analysis referred to is attached. I am happy to field any questions or discuss any aspect should you wish.

Regards

Gerard McCann

PS (Note new address for correspondence with me)

GERARD McCANN ARCHITECT

30 Hamilton St East Fremantle WA 6158

Mobile : 0419947890 Office : 0427716927 Email: [email protected]

V

1

Addition to Submission

GERARD McCANN2/107 STIRLING HIGH AY NORTH FREMANTLE WA 6159 PH:9336

2856 FX:9430 4837 E:qmccannSiinet.net.au

106 Stirling HwayNorth Fremantle

Re-Development Potential of Lot 51 as per attached survey sheet.This analysis ignores the potential or synergy of developing withLot 50 (Greg Muir) - a synergy that would allow 1 extraresidential unit.

Lot 51 Area: 1539m2

Zoning: Mixed Use - Clause 5.2.5 of TPS4 of FremantleCouncil allows for residential develop ent up to R60(subject to Council being satisfied that the development is notdetrimental to the amenity of the area. I have had along meeting with the senior planner and this site, subject

to normal R-Code provisions relative to neighbouringresidential areas, would not be seen to bedetrimental to the amenity of the area.)

Minimum Open Space: 45%, which is 693m2.

Site Coverage: 55%, which is 846m2.

Maximum height: 2 storeys and 7.5 metre walls. No roofheight specified, so with pitched roof can have loft

accommodation in residential units.

Street setback: 5 metres until September 2012, (MRDprovision) and then 4.0 metres.

Usage: Mixed commercial and residential, with maximum75% residential, 25% commercial to satisfyClause 5.2.5. Mix can be 50/50 or other amounts, but residentialmaximum is 75%.

R60 zoning: R60 zoning is an average residential lot areaof 166.6m2, therefore 1539m2 di ided by 166.66 m2equals 9.23 residential units, ie, 9 units. Units have to beinterleaved and touch the commercial section insome form.

Potential: 55% site co erage of 846m2 and 2 storeymaxi um means a build floor area of l,692m2. Carparking would mostly be underground and below natural groundlevel so therefore does not enter the equation. Onthe 75:25 split residential and commercial, residential

would have 1269m2 for 9 units (average 141m2 each) andco mercial 423m2 for say 8 units (average 53m2 eachunit) . If a residential unit size of 110m2 was selected (allowing

that parking is separate) for the 9 units, thiswould result in 990m2 for residential and 702m2

Addition to Submission

for commercial, (a split of 58%:42%) which would be 8 commercialunits at 88m2 each, an area of 11m x 8m, or 17m x 5mgross. One could have 12 commercial offices say, at58m2 each, an area of 11.5m x 5 m. lso possible to ha e 1bedroom units for all or some of the residential,in which case units are maximum 60m2 each, and would yield,

subject to Council approval, 16 units.

Permitted uses: Medical centre, health consulting rooms,offices, vet rooms, bank.

Possible uses: (Subject to Council approval) mongst otherpossible uses - Shop, child care, showrooms,

convenience store, liquor store, short stay dwelling, smallbar, restaurant, B & B, health studio.Parking: Underground parking would cater for allcommercial staff and private residential. A centre

courtyard would provide short term parking for customers orpatients as the case may be, with overflow into theunderground parking. 2 per residential unit unless 1 bed unitsused, in which case 1 bay per unit. Officesgenerally require 1 bay per 30m2, which would be 3

per office unit on average (24 bays for 8 units) unlessmedical suites used, in which case the requirementis 5 bays per consulting room or practitioner. If medical suiteswere chosen, of 702m2 a ailable, this wouldresult in possibly 8 practitioners, ie 40 bays

required. A central courtyard would yield 12 bays, resultingin 28 underground. Underground parking would thusbe 28 plus 18 residential, equaling 46 bays. At 2.6

metres width per bay, and 5.5 length, with 6.0 metrecorridors, results in an area of around 1200m2required for entry, exit and aisles etc, with stairs up tooffices and residential units.

Bicycle racks: 4 required.


Form 41



OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Commission Submission 27©Locked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001 .

Name .S (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) , ,

Address .. Z Bt merji... £i . a . t Pgym e. Postcode . .

Contact phone number 's sn . Email address ...££LC .h<{f.. ( P..U.}.VpL '

Tips for completing a submission:° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant® Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

,QV\ .y. .. r?

n..... i . .. B-.W.& .... rfi .. oM mJL.. .Am ... mA .. tiZb .

(iJMU., ... CtUikWSh.. ( v l y .. ..i/:IA>.\p ..k...

.... :.. 4a . . MAsM '.. teli .. m.. <zU .

.... r/ />Y.

.. .ft ... . .fe. y. .huA.>. .) £&...

. . L.. iz h'i/e.. :m&1 m iA/. ji... . .h L.. izd&i/c..

6 U: ....p ?£)/ ssWj/Llw.t (ly k ...m... m l. ..

P wd iA j... CIp . fct M xd ...C A lr\jL ..:tcYj&.. . /v zl... uA . ,

turn over to co plete your submission




Please choose one of the following:/

Si Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign) I

OR


1 will be ep esented by:


o

A spokesperson


I would prefe m hea ing to be conducted in:

d Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORd Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be






To be si ned bv person(s) making the submission

Signature Date 2I-7. M,

Note: Submissions iVIUST be recei ed y the adve tised closing date, being close ofusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considere .

Contacts: Telep one - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://ww .planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 4il Amen ment (Subst n ial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropoli an Region Scheme A endment 1210/ 1


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway eservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submissio 271

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)Name

Address .. i. O.. 15k Postcode . £

Contact phone number Ok .0. S. . .1. .0 Email address,Av>Alk .

Tips for completing a submission: v o [/YY\ c JJ > Co 9 Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

.. .(On ... [co .... ... ... -kkvo .od. i\).Qkhuy.\. Jk koAl

. . L/. rOl.. ... . .. Jl.... tnp.L-.. .. .. &

. St l.... iK}/dcf& .... Fn jryx .i.4. LLsk u. hekt.... <kku cJ A...

. '.m . iO Qjq j. /i. j. Qfyn. jA Thd. .0.. .

La ..O l. ... .Qj/L OD / v suaJp. .... la Jov. e-j .... . . O .

. ... A jb d. .u Q ,

A.ii Oi... A... J. i . C&zJl ....St . *>.. .Xk . .

.. O.... I . t.... .y] c2\ .'O.a l

»

oSas . .. U .1. .(Oa . s . .. .2\.. VaoJi.... h x r .... c ).. . klf J yXy.c\

S ..... AI.... .. . O l..,...O (<Li S .i i.... .wBjqA. . .

. S .... .... ,(jj_ x'O.. .< .

. . O .aai. .. .tO. ... Out / v. . .... .. .L L/ cL.... IqO a?x... <~AhSl..

. (l: k $h 4... AajL. .....,1 ... .O OA..,G?r r b .. (4 ....ZprUZl ...t( r0 tLG. .Cr A...C

o xfkL.... O a. ...0.... .... o. Uh. cOL... ... O tO. .... 2 (j. 2/.... lL

X 9. id. .l.eo....vS Ov 7>.. . O...- s... ...6 ? .

. 5... .0. ¦ • • On lyO... tsk .... .VP1.1. •. . .Ob.. .tO .. .fe . . 'v (Vc

Hea ing of s bmissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPG if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. Ibis is not compuisory. Yourwritten submission will be consi ered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appen ix E of the amen ment report.

Please choose os e of the following:


OR

m Yds, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

.8 will be represented by:

d] Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number ( usiness hours): Postal address: ,

'S ould prefe my hearing to be condueted in:


ORPri ate (only the people nomina ed by you or the hearings committee will be




o in the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or mak ng its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

0 All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all earings, along wit all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go ernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly publis ed in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To ba sicffleri y laersoimf ]) mak Tiei the submSssion

Mote: Su miss on MUST e received toy ti e a erti ed efasirjg ate, eing close ofbusiness (Spm) on 27 JULY 2012. lat® submissions will NOT be considere .

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://wv V.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning.and Development Act 2005Secfson 41 Amen ment (Su stan ial)

Form 41

Su missionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

R tionalisation of Stirling Highway eserva ion


OFFICE USE ONLY

SUBMISSIO NUMBER

2.7 \

(PLEASE PRI T CLEARLY)Name.. fLlltr L {jl kd C .

A (ri_i_i-v.

Address .. IQ.. .. S . Postcode . .<

Contact phone number. 77Q. 770. i , Email address . . ?$? < X .

Tips for completing a submission: .

° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions wher r levant

Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submissionSubmission

. .< ?... .lOc/. .. UI.I jLO i j?:C. rr. ?... .

.. Li, drL\ :&:t.. . .- . . 2- I . A JU, K

- Lr J .c,,.

r hi. C A* I I I -

.U. ... .i .. .7.0 7 r\... Kb. ki rrr.. . r.. ,i7. .. .7

.0 .. cl.... .. tit.* ... -•

.. A.q v /t.. . . T... . . .,

.. ... .A . .77 e rx......A*...47. .

cwst o.. ... W. kfi vs-QJok ..A. At/ p...A:fe ..oi\


Hearing of submiss ons

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This i not compulsory. Yourwritten su mission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Please choose ooie ©f the foSBowiing:

do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

O

I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

J will be represamfedl by:


OF

A spokesperson


I ould prefer my hearing t© be conducted in:


OHPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besu ject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or mak ng its re ort on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWA C recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

T© be s gned to¥ persorafeD rnakjng the submission

W©te: Su miss o s MUS i be rec ived by the advertised closing ate, eing close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late subm ssions will MOT e considered.


Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amen ment (Substantial)

Form 41



2 5 JUL 2012

FILE I



OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 272

Name ivf.,;?.'/ 1\i., t fuL . J T) c \ :

Contact phone number. . [+7. : Email address . j . rT.' Q. . ..jpD.Ac(

Tips for completing a submission: v GiC -• Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more pace to complete your submission

Submission

e - ' e SiL r'J tt foie¦ /

Am•**S i .Ls u ) O UL. < <3n,k e.

.. .Oa .. fe.. ...oJ. .'fcjL

. J. .. : 42 ... . -tSS tz:. 1. .. . Jl ...

.. r . .... fej ... t . Jb. .On

¦ o • ¦ • u cj xu cd:--: br ' jftxMS-' ccJJL: •

- c - <ob 3J dl - ii_ miiLLtTJkL V

©iv O /fQ _

(q _ »-- x COi> jrv J t\jj

. lJ -£ Q_A -cJ y

C= 7

.. .'Tl te- .. < .. t/ foi C' ... .tTsA SoA.ViUyv .. .Xb r :o >\j L.1 , (\lLt

.&do.

.vTLi

b-fbl .. o sSL 4vr tsj y .... .or s/i.. . . s o

! . S .. fc3 s.. r. r i .Qj . f rsIS . &r< . .(2s. cb' <€lr>2Sl .1

v

qSX ¦ A "' '' ' oSx Al O-t 'bit'

( cp 5 r t iA ' st c ' b

-C_ .§L. ._?' icpT-rr- O J\l JnJL. b- L X i bj

Q s V 0,.\Tc vr k_

ov

Q So te v- vQ.te _ __

vh < , ct o ch hrr!t'2l .,


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally p esent the bssis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not com lsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


You should be aware that'




To be signed bv personfsli ma n the su m ssion

Note: Submissions SViUS 1 be received by the vertised ctosimig date, being close ofbusiness (Spm) on 27 JULY 2012. Lat© submissions will NOT be considered.



Form 41

Su missionM tropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41


OFFICE USE ONLY


Name.. DI CACC DDIMT m CADI V\(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .i CJK>.t vt .V r.Y .... .Postcode .

Contact phone number..Q. a ... Email address )?.,r

Tips for completing a submission: 'r fi _® Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issue » Include properly addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant* Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

js .. . f .. . 2$ ... *?*d....

.. V Or JljT A/ . V - .V ..

4 .. .S rrNiL - i SsJ j nJ

L_,'t N | J L<lJC- /t L

r.flWCl .E. 5....S3l .- fV : %4. S.Y..:£ k ±..fe. .

£ :. r; ' o l&u... .*§0 l f\c C .v ¦ (.sC j-J . . CT.VYv.'rj ..

o kj si J ... . .a .Ysa si . . .S

& .f i.v r t. . c . C Ia.-S f

o <t:o. . . < s4jcjX Q -... i. . A. . i l .Q iS'.lCtt .

. P... ... cp.Wr. .rrs-. ... pJpptY . PpY..

cAfe sfe •••• -SoA ••

. V ©r , . ' j ... .v/v o .... Sp. .'... rr A -... r. .Yl iL

• • • ' 5A:i- trsio>'< : ¦ • • <:3 ' £Al

¦ .. .. ¦ • - c ¦ ¦ (4>

{turn oveTto complete your submission

VS- •AY V H, . r w .14cr usj A |\i <S\

. t JSi , t -Ml- $

Hea ing of su missions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not eompiusory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Pleas© choose one of the following:


OR


J will be represented by:

D Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson


8 ould prefer m hea ing to be conducted in:

Public (members fro the general public may attend your presentation)

ORE Pri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, ma be disclosed to third parties.


To be si ned bv person(s making the submission

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www. lanning.wa.go .au

Planning.and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substanti l)

Form 41

DEPARTMENT OF PLA NI G

2 5 JUL 2012Submission

etropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 p = j LS

Rationalisation of Stirli g Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submissio 273

Name

Address I.(....6

Contact phone number....!

'/T-TA/n CO l tJ. PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) f

Postcode . 7. . t .

Email address M. ojtvpr?.

Tips for com leting a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pag s if you require more space to complete your sub ission

Afd /KSubmission ) c- y /o /~T _

1

y.-.y- *.

¥o yhJ v t .. ..&ryhi rrr.... ¦

G q rV.. .. .c rd..

.... o

dfflfLr.. ¦ .yA r ffsL .

. : .. D ... cyy.

/ y J

j.

d My kdr.. ... dd&J- -

hk j ? e i>

. Wyy ... dt..

turn ove o complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the p oposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Please choose ©Bie of the following:

Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign) I

OR




o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or mak ng its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.


To be signed Co persomifs makSncji the sufamSssaon

Mote: Submissions MUST be received by the advertise closing d te, being ciose ofbu iness (§pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will MOT be considere .

J will foe represented by:


or

A spokesperson


I would prefer my hearing to e conducte in:


ORPri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




For 41



OFFICE USE ONLY


Name(PLEASE PRINT CLE RLY

.6J .Address • •; Postcode

Contact phone number...d. . Email address .

Tips for completing a submission: . ( /s Use headings or numbers to se arate different to ics and issuese Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more s ace to compl te your submission

Sub ission

//uo / A xdx ... ( Axrxd.. ycidP-

do. xd.. dt rn/i .. liifJO... AcAW..XXl/j AJ...Q uuxAi - yv 1 ...Q A .....i&. Cxx? 2Xx.Xl/.l lAf. x

ipxwAiAxix ):

iXio' . -. oLcm) .. ruff- - qcAmw:... . Affxt..~/ aIm ' aS opQAt ...

\f (y A/n KmA S iVU

/ dC'3.U t xf XX:. IxAprr. .fiPfAx,

i

.m.

nllrXA

uq I aJImlC)

..ify ....

Axx>_... / /iV) "/ l"

( i/kxxA.. ....Ax:...dLxr A :.d/y A,

turn over terco plete your submission

Heariinig of submiss ons


Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Ap endix E of the amendment report.

Fle s© choose one of the following:

m M©, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


S will be represente y:


or

A spokesperson


1 wo ld prefer m Siearirag to be conducted in:


ORPri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




9 In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or mak ng its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.


To be signed hv personifsT roakSimq the suhmSssaoni

b siness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2912. Late submiss ons will WOT be consi ered.


Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substan ial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetro olitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41


OFFICE USE ONLY


2 5 JUL 2012

FILE S j 0 2


Sy mission 274

Name i r\ u(PfcEASI!E PRINT CLEARLY)

Address C .Postcode 6 6 2.

Contact phone number.. .<£ . (-. ?>. 7... Email address .. tO/TH.

et n . M.- X.3 3Tips for completing a submission:

Submission

Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuesInclude property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

... .€ e-nHr. , e>... .p .. 9 5. ..p.h? p>Dse< >(.

. ryy. m.Qck yy?&!o.~h... ...b. e.c o.m j. . .. .<2t... r.€

. K-.i.c... Clr.Ga... erf... X p r.Xv. ..Ere .22. E/. . a., .o. yyd. .cXo. /.. /-e

.(S .E..all....fe>.P....TT L. FP...IcP.DO. .U.n.i.X ... h. . E.s./f .f?E... . .lm kft'.1 ;V.X.. X.'C. C.ft.ft! ... .ft.. ;tE r .1. U).n j... . jQ ft. XO. Q ... .ftJ col .€>. K . ty). &. C.! ft .

ftyTCft..j.. ... b .... EcEE... .l cr tis*.. ,< ?o. H... .<$».>.7 p.es, E -/. H

1.5>..:.. .V.A .<pu. !... .(.n b , P.1*0 r .. .ft u. m. b. P e... .C?X.... .t r .I. -.

b.C..E.w>.». W( .1...V ft.oX., X....u .bvpE... kccu P bee

.U).t l .•e. ft \. ?s. ep... .K-. . E(.s> p. ... . .efl f.e. 5>... . a.o r.e.. .' rftE-fj.ft...... ./.X

Xc?es.. v.p'fb.i ffte .... X??... .k .ft e . .T .e .rr. .. m.p.re... .eXLeft-.w. .1. • .n . /.

.TVT C ift o.rTf S Ji X.o.n ........ ." .DgLpPj.. .&.£>. ..) .« ... ,P .r:9.E...i. ... 4\e. .L*ft4j.

. . 1 .. .u Ttv.. .Xrci-Eft c. . ... ft Jo. .1. i.ftl.i.ft j... X.LPj.ftj.e/c: . .LP.ift .'e-. r.

. fc-.fp. ... .a yv<?A.. rVv.ft>n &.1 s.... ftb? .es.kx.. X.. X .c.i i.i;Xt .e. ...X.i cl.. He r.w.¦ CL.

.Sft?J. tXi.eftv .... .... . .,ftf!eX....cfH £.r.... .pEt.r H-.S....rr....-b .ffe./T.. ft.i.( ..fpEE

...r.A .v !. ...V \ .r. ... b. L e.s. ... .it .i9.cp. .. i.J... Xr. e 1 EX.

k.v.i».. pcft|?.os.ft. j Lftt .1.1 .e.o.X. .tIXt. . .E<?.w.ft.. ,< . .nEc. .. .\ys. .~E . >.

.7L.v>rE... .rc.peEr... .p-e.pi. sEc./.ftcS.. X Sp y. r -p r .. "tko.. .ctc g®,..»

P. I'C ft.5.6.... E >.*>. \ S'/reir.. .ftcc-.X... .Cr v.t.e rr.... .co s tc rc r... tI E'P. . .el'g e

turn over to complete your submission -EXeeXs o>l\ U)in<2j

EXs X IvA f? e _ Lfttf)

•&P-

s fe? I QLjDp uniW<x,ve & v\ '-l k4> E uEor' P .

-P- S>kr?ftJ Di tor

'¦I X et[4e r>\X-iLhSS i?.ce


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is no compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.



W@, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


1 will foe represented by:


or

d A spokesperson


I would prefer my hea ing to foe conducted in:

C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORE Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 an as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or ma ng its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, ma be disclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go ernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed fo person(s) makin the submission

Signature Date ...a?. f.J. . J.J. rr-..

Note: Sufomissions MUST foe recei ed t the ad ertised cliosing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be consi e ed.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au


Form 41i




2 5 JUL 2012

FILE loik g

r

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 275

i i

Name . t .. fa!.F1?fr/. /r iC7.7 . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address k. v?.i-T... ..Postcode .

Contact phone nu ber .0/F:.OP. Y7?. .*?. . P. .1 Email ad ress C.iF .O.bJ.((FF .Y-.f Y. P. f/YF?/./ co j

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuesa Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submi sion

j /Ypp.. PPPPPY.. .P... . PXfPFYPP...PP.P... .FFYY....S.f .

5 .ST/XPf. PPPP XYfP....P. P.Y?ZZ?.... A;.../P.f./y .. JP'...PPY P .

TP. PPyP.PP.PTPF... PT.... .. 771 PP.. PPPs:PX7<t.rgc. -/97V.P... Y7/PPP?7S:Z?Y$JO.

..hl.fe... ,i PPP7 /7P.T pp.. PPPffPXP r. 6//7rP... /Pp.77.. P /.l-rT.. /Fb/P/ f. 77.. . lf...

rppT ./ &rPTfpplTP.. .P.P77. 7PP/~... ... popr? ..... d -

J7//&1 P77P.P7 fP.P. PPPY/PY. P, t /fp.... ./ F/ -.i/P .... (P.PYZY.P... X

.jC?f : PYZP.. P PP/.Tf YPPr..//XJ P c.fP. PPT.XXlP ......PPPPP..

&17M S TZ> / bU;7 Ipppppp P... p T.. Z PPTPFFP . .. A < r/P... . .PPrPsr... P.fP.

0/TM-.... I.YPPYYPPi.... ... TP... X YP.. .. T7TP... PP FfP Cfr+ f

pFrtP. PrPFPl...TP... .77.F~....ZySP/T. P..TF. .&p. ...P .T ~£ v .../.T. .PJt~.....

. .0.T...PPPFY7.T.T.. T?.Y P.... .. /}/&.<SF7.<.&7?7?Pg.... F. P.T TP T.

p/p Op/ /Z _P7TPFF?77PPT. fp.4T...Fb FTr.T...T?.T...Trp rr

.PTPS. TfTFT.....P PpFFSJ. r/.F ,...TP.... Tf...../?....€,Z7g S.C7ZS./&. .

T FpL/pT/,.. 70 T cO .bST?..s:....P.<2ZMOi/.<T/:T:A ,.... /.FTYTYTCTF.

pp TPTTP)... (TT.. .PTPrT.... TT.. T:. .TPX.P. .T ... .TPT.T. 7T.s:77- J.c>.

.hpTp.y....TP.T. S.7T?m...& .C,.£TfTSY 77 7.7::..F.PPTT.....T eF-../.T TTVr.....

TO. T .TP y k. /ToPlo . ... 7JTP7 ..

. ~ TTP.. PT . TTY. Ta . )yN.../).. 7J/.V.T.. T / tP. . AT.S. ... PPPP fssPoS &A//'


A '

PTT Pc>/o7 'C &~(T&/Z'-/7~ 7/y>s c. //7 77-/£ /7~ otP/s /s. Tc> 7i7cJ£>rzj?-i£S i -

c j77Z i/vj 5> Ta/ r .


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of thei submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes box is ticked. This is not compuisory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Fleas® ctoose one of the follo ing:


QFt


I will be eprese ted by:


or

A spo esperson


I would prefer m bearing to be conducted in:






o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or mak ng its report on these submissions, copies of yoursu mission or the substance of that submission, ma be isclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are simila ly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To e signed bv persoim(sl) maEdimgi tbs gu mB snora

Signature Date . .$:/.;.. 7. ' / 9

Note: Su mis ions MUST b© received by the advertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (ipm) on 27 JULY 2612. Late ubmissions will MOT be consi ered.

Contacis: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 655 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://wvw.plannin .wa. ov.au

Planning, and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amen ment 1210/41


2 5 JUL 2012


OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 276

Name . fefe.

Address . IQ...

ijz) KcLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

cl. postcode .1. Q-..

Contact phone number . Email address (/L.

lips for completing a submission:» Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

.dU \jpQ. tiA .. . a .... tf fc&iJxidrUS..../. d.... S.fi. .l.

rt. .... d U. sl vuJl .

d • -• • :: ...:.:A.7 .. Azr t.....i. .Q.

.f /.pyfi. . 4 Be . ( sJjL .fi.. U... 8:

.. Ail <3..Q.. .pycl '.

.Q .QLv. fae fr A. .y.....'t :......4.. j r .

Kq a. 4 J

• pc ct LC-.

.T]. y5.... .. N S f .VA ; y ! Tf?rVfT; \.. .] ... . O.Ctg .... 6;.T S Tf?rVfT; V. \.. .atStT. ..L S... n .Ctg A

.AVyA f >A.W.l2v A .. . A eTA CAl . aV !

[yQ. i r A X r:e,-.d.. .• T a, jAATAv? : f>-r:fA.y-r 'A'AC'C cA . V v vAC.

.. T .2 'y i k ...VAA %A .

.. .(V ?. r. r....... S\ Hj . r... .Oycic

.. ,V =r . , :\ C).

..ft .t. . .*k.. ) Ys.cl A. lL l...

. v&i& r ?. -Q . jpSyp A A\ ....)... ....

... .Ick . (Tckv . . .(:.3tA p > >.

. I Ativ. \ VjaA jI- ..... k

i j turn over to co plete your submission Oi t A 'V-L .

earing of submissions



Pleas® choose one of the following:

W®, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

O

O Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

' will be represent©©] by:

e Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson


1 would prefer my hea ing to be conducted in:


ORCZ1 Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be





o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be s qoed bv nersonfs) maE sicji the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST S3© rece ved by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (Spm) on 27 JULY 2012. Lat© submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au


For 41


| department of planni g I

2 5 UL 2012

FILE fti S

R tionalisation of Stirling Highw y Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 277

Name..

Address

Contact phone number j Email address Mu em -

Tips for completing a submission:® Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuese Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant

Attach additional numbered pages it you require more space to complete your submissionSubmission

..Ct/i cl.. Umia....p Aop&9. A.. amM..

AlAl/Mj.. rJadJjj.-... (jAm. .pA £J/yicJ.. .. uuMk- ..jrO&& n£-. ...Kr. AMJ Wr i.... ./QJj&cjL .

..nao...h/b AlffM...Aftir .... 't& b).... { .cyAkrt..Iav OAI APA.....

. fht£... j A u.cM'.

.s0.a jM.t... .J. u i.-.. .f&ukld-.. . (A. .Jy ;..(A?r.d. I p.. . 9.

dJ..-JJ l..Jd.....mPyLp?0,... rKPjy)AAXjAJP)py.. ''.hu .ddpki ,...d...

cPfMi . .PdJtdd.. Jf ttlt.. /dJjArlld.Gf... }jpyy.ip J:ouj... CMiJjp . .<Ai.. Jdt /...AP( .. dM.. ! d..A .y (P pct fAtsd-o

o. ¦ AlU/hL. ..vdjML... D rri... Caw PAA . ..ppbitiL. .A.. P?. &/dd.i ir.p.... 4o..ddtZ

./QJ, h .cd . A. P d fo&uAr.. .M yiAP.C d o)... (9?p.. OAhpy .u dlOr* ¦ 0900 ' * " * * •••••k. ...... .. j... ; .<i \ .. .£?. i.. .... yA . .

. o. . (j.. ...cl., .docoicddcf.. h d.. ocAh..

..)lo..TiOA ...(HMO.. J/K.pJ.t9rUA. Xi 'kd ...h t... -ddw.t.Apu.MM,.dp..

( Obiud. kQh. .id E m:.. dhionJ '&uA eoaJL.. lum ..... $?>oLi tur over to complete your submission • ,

f dlLcf Jh Ao0 /s

/


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Please choose ora© o f @ following:


OR

Y<§§, 1 wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

J will ha re resente ! b :


or

A spokesperson


1 would prefer m hearing to be conduc ed in:


OR

Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will beper itted to attend)


° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions ma e to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, ma be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go ernor a prove the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be receive by he a vertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (Spm) on 27 JULY 2012. L te submissions will NOT be considered.


Planning.and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amen ment (Su stantial)

Form 41



DEPARTMENT OF PLAN I G

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE 0 L

OFFICE USE ONLY


Su mission 278

Name .O.G2-,..

Address ..

Contact


Postcode Usct

phone number Email address _

Tips for com leting a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

. .. . r s... . t ... .oh J fcaF rTX..... O u ... .. .oyixx<

.. .CLA... <2 o.t. =?L Q Am (

.. p l r..... jX 2 Aj .i fL / p. ..

. . sSi yCs ca .pi . ....(jl.

pi 1 /TLArl (7/]A/ > i vArC. c 7 A, ¦IT ! '

L?....X%.q J d . o J. .6

. ... . e : f/.hz>... ,{ £.A... g&Lr . /< „„ L /)/] i /)< X Ji) .

/li (. /xa.5. to

q}.... . .... l<12 .. . ..... .. .riljdljfO.

.( .... . m>.... b t.... ijL x . X...

'.X ......•g&c.X-r rf.. o....'(r& air....... so...

.. .t o. .yj. . X. . X..-r( to... .pXto.. ... . .. .< b r.....

..... cJb\ .. b>.

(jdj ... .cla i : / >4... .6Xl.

X ?to' o er to co plete you submission

. 7A. :c /, crA . r

/l t t qIl tf&jcA.. ... JJl h. i C . ...fe ijQh.... .M+ Q..Xtor A C?VI ).A t. U /h.

?r rT/X Q.. ...t fe 7

.. .. fc | .\<to


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. Tl s is not com ulsor . Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.


Please eSioese one of the ollowing:

I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OK


1 will be represented by:

C Myself-- IVIy telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: .. r . .i. . TTf. . .9r( . ?...............

Contact telephone number (business hours): .O.. Q..(.Postal address: .. .O. . ... )U £>

1 would prefer m hea ing to be conducte in:


OR[ Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be





o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly ublished in a report on submissions and tabled in arliament.

To be si ned by person(s) roal roj the subm ssaon

Signature

Note: Submis ions MUST be received b he advertised osing date, being close ofbusiness (Spin) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT e consi ered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au


Form 41

Su missionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

DEP RTIVIENT OF PLANNING

2 5 JUL 2012

Rationalisa ion of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Sy missS@ 279

Namer„_ , , (PLEASE PRINT CLEAHLY) , /

A dress Postcode . /Sf....

Contact phone number Email addresp . /ne.Sg e.Qp ll&S-..?.(!?>

Tips for completing a submission:® Use headings or numbers to separate diff rent topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° ttach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complet your submission

Submission • '

. /y.ip.k*:..,?r . i ih A AJ0/t7? / ...CM.n .... 7.. e/?h/ .hrR.

Ci.... . y)... y./p.f-rr y yy/f.y.h y / /ote. /a.4 l

'Qh.. 'hohU),...h h.tyy.yffy.. h& /ch

iX.y. / ..y..y {?Xr. .s/

.... cxiOy.ij. x>. ay...... .. hi..... c?fx...... y ix .y. ?..

(3y. Vhfi :... ...p.y.Qy. .'c

. .T y.... fi

. .. (yn OAU

cy y/ f yiAy/ihzZ.

" y

. 1.

.1... .s ./y.jy. o.y. h h.hO.yy coy/.y?. c.t l.c. ) //


Healing of subm ssions


Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendi E of the amendment report.

Please ebeose one off ffli® following:

If Gto.i do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


.8 will e re resente by:


o

A spokesperson

Name of spokes erson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

8 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:


O Pri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




° In the course of the W PC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.


To be signed] b ersonfsl waiklriicii tlhe s b Sssloiiii

Wot®: Submissloras MUST be received by the advertise closing date, eing close ofbusiness (Sprr?) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will WOT be considere .

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.plannin .wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amen ment (Su stanti l)

Form 41


DEPARTMENT OF PLA I G

2 5 JUL 2012

FILE

Ratio alisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 280

Name l' L A (PLEASE PRI T CLEARLY)

Address .r1....( P.L Tf. Postcode

Contact phone number... .3 . Email address .. . .1 .

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant® Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

f Z a- j) i quwijuqL l ot c f s L S / owv

A C t <(X v\ju .

nZLT

AJQ.\). £ir. i. d ? <! \ el V 'r. y>.. ?r! .

fijz . \ c (a glamzL A'Ou m £CLl ...$?* fiQ '&l.* Ce S ul lA/ .

3 ) (x i\ ... . A . fA~.

( o'(y\AG M Z U fc i, \ A .....4 . ..

04{ LC_ _ . ... AZr .. A.1. . / . i.. .

Ij- . C t Af AAA . . j. .3. r /.

ff. - (L\_C J Jb A ljL Q ' uJ-vCly Q lCX-A' L y- . . Ire- - i JC 2i

©11



Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. TSiis is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Ap endix E of the amendment report.


a M®, do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

O




OF

A spokesperson


1 would prefer m hearing to be conducted in:





° T e WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the propose amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by persenfs) making the submission

Signature Date . j/.' r:.

Wot©: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing te, being oiose ofbusiness (Spm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:/Avww.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Sec ion 1 Amen ment (Su stantial)

Form 41

Su missionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/ 1


2 5 JUL 2012

FILEK. 2 S Ool (

Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLoc ed Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 211!

I AName p. (jhf. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

ddress postoode

Contact phone number . .'TT O 7 Email address r / tfl) G/Vr; /

.g./. .

Tips for completing a submission:e Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

/A/S . . . .. C O <2m/ r

..u>.. M. L. /.... .o 4?. ... .; Q.

f.Jl.d u

o t .... / i

.

. .k .J/t. j .dk.

... A2 Zd ft qZft oi OL.. (hi.....ZZjjft- ~ : A)...Ad ¦ ¦ • ZZ.. .. .

/. ZZ( ZZiftZZZftlZ ZZZZftl'..


Healing of submissions


Further information on submissions and he rings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Piease choose ©s e of the following:


OR

Ye , I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represente by: » ,

Myself- My telephone number (business hours):

o

E A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telepho e number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer m hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)OR

Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)

You should be aware that'


8 ,n the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or ma ing its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv oersoufsi makina tfa© submi sion

Note: Submissions MUST be received by ti e advertise closing d te, eing close ofbusiness (5pm) o 27 JULY 2012. P.ate su missions will OT be considere .


mrs submissions (volume 3 of 6) - part a

Documents