mrs submissions (volume 2 of 6) - part a

206
April 2016 Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation Submissions 101 – 243 Volume 2 of 6 City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe, Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove

Upload: vudien

Post on 31-Jan-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

April 2016

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

Submissions 101 – 243

Volume 2 of 6

City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe,

Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

Submissions 101 - 243

Volume 2 of 6

City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe,

Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove

April 2016

Disclaimer This document has been published by the Western Australian Planning Commission. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the government, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. © State of Western Australia Internet: www.wa.gov.au Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission, 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 2506 Perth WA 6001 MRS Amendment 1210/41 - Submissions 101 – 243 Volume 2 of 6 File 809-2-1-91 Pt 2 Published April 2016 Internet: www.planning.wa.gov.au Email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 655 19000 Fax: (08) 655 19001 National Relay Service: 13 36 77 Infoline: 1800 626 477 This document is available in alternative formats on application to Communications Services.

Introduction to Metropolitan Region Scheme major amendments The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for keeping the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) under review and initiating changes where they are seen as necessary. The MRS sets out the broad pattern of land use for the whole Perth metropolitan region. The MRS is constantly under review to best reflect regional planning and development needs. A proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the MRS is regulated by the Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for public submissions to be made on proposed amendments. For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section 41 of the Act), the WAPC considers all the submissions lodged, and publishes its recommendations in a report on submissions. This report is presented to the Minister for Planning and to the Governor for approval. Both Houses of Parliament must then scrutinise the amendment before it can take legal effect. In the process of making a substantial amendment to the MRS, information is published as a public record under the following titles: Amendment report This document is available from the start of the public advertising period of the proposed amendment. It sets out the purpose and scope of the proposal, explains why the amendment is considered necessary, and informs people how they can comment through the submission process. Environmental review report The Environmental Protection Authority must consider the environmental impact of an amendment to the MRS before it can be advertised. Should it require formal assessment, an environmental review is undertaken and made available for information and comment at the same time as the amendment report. Report on submissions The planning rationale, determination of submissions and the recommendations of the WAPC for final approval of the amendment, with or without modification, is documented in this report. Submissions This document contains a reproduction of all written submissions received by the WAPC on the proposed amendment. Transcript of hearings A person who has made a written submission may also choose to appear before a hearings committee to express their views. The hearings proceedings are recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts of all hearings are reproduced in this volume.

Alphabetical Listing of Submissions

MRS Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

Submission Number

Submitter Name

48 Abzalov, Aygul 137 Albrecht, Marina 308 Aldrovandi, Jill 309 Aldrovandi, Riccardo 128 Allan, Ken & Dot 189 Allan, Sarah 447 Allerding and Associates (act on behalf of landowners Harman Nominees

Pty Ltd) 446 Allerding and Associates (act on behalf of landowners Two Twenty

Investments Pty Ltd & Dion Nominees Pty Ltd) 398 Anglican Church, Diocese of Perth 120 Annear O.A.M., Anne 355 Armstrong, Patrick H 337 Art Deco Society of WA (Vyonne Geneve) 44 Artelaris, Spiro & Penelope

138 Artelaris, Steve (Steve Artelaris Architects) 587 Ashford, Max 184 Asphar, Florence E 365 Asphar, Ian 145 Auer, John 433 Australian Urban Design Research Centre 175 Auto Management Pty Ltd 30 Backhouse, Lisa M

132 Bagshaw, Anthony & Ann 468 Bailey, Carolyn 119 Bailey, Mark 440 Balfe, Michael 441 Banfield, Tim & Gemma 17 Barker, David

228 Barron, Steve 419 Barrymore, Geoffrey 211 Bartel, Matt 385 Basson, E J & R M 32 Beamish, Marjorie (Flamenco Holdings Pty Ltd)

124 Bellson Pty Ltd ATF Brady Property Trust 47 Bennett, Pamela

576 Bennett, Pia 75 Bennett, Samuel 63 Bentley, Marjorie R 62 Berden, Matthew

165 Bishop, Luke 13 Blackburne Property Group (on behalf of The Owners of St Quentins

Apartments) 282 Blackwell & Associates Pty Ltd (Tony Blackwell)

470 Blackwell, Emmet 416 Blackwood, Beth (on hehalf of the Presbyterians Ladies' College) 459 Blair, Alison 294 Blanchard, Serverine (Co-Manager of Allegro Pizza) 114 Blight, Nicole 361 Blumann, Siobhan 92 Boehm, Peggy R

190 Bogue, Kevin & Marion 520 Bond, I L 50 Bowra & O'Dea - Funeral Directors

195 Boyd, A G 202 Boyd, L 384 Boyland, Father Peter (Parish Priest, Anglican Parish of Christ Church

Claremont) 68 Boyle, Peter & Celia

109 Boyle, Rafeena 484 Brake, Anne 59 Bremner, Mark

399 Brescacin, Danny (on behalf of his parents) 323 Brooker, Jacinta 201 Brooks, Y 327 Brown, Carolyn 31 Brown, Russell & Sally (Belregis Pty Ltd)

270 Brown, Sherri 322 Bruns, Maurits 580 Burns, William 329 Burrows, Amanda 91 Butcher, Luke

378 Butler, David & White, Justine 219 Calcutt, Julie 430 Cant, Ryan 49 Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd (on behalf of BP Australia Ltd)

390 Carles MLA, Adele (Member of Fremantle) 163 Carr, Emma 452 Carter, Jacqui 45 Carton, Romilly

522 Caslleden Family 262 Catelli, Anna & Maria 429 Challen, Michael B 523 Charlecraft, Henry 12 Charlesworth, Kate

153 Chartres, Margot (owner Violet Pilot) 155 Cheffers, Freya (owner Violet Pilot) 453 Cheffins, Jane & Pete 574 Cheffins, Peter 110 Cheung, Carol 310 Christy, Julie-Anne 223 Churack, Danielle 77 Churley, Julie

180 Clancy, Robyn L 103 Claremont Baptist Church (Ian Simms) 203 Claremont, Town of

95 Clark, Donald (on behalf of the Landowners of Seaview Lane Strata Lot 52/100 Stirling Hwy, North Fremantle)

579 Clune, Anna 212 Cmielewski, Cecelia 581 Cock, Daniel 369 Connor, Tony 100 Cook, Bruce 568 Cooper, Katey 284 Cooper, S P & G R 273 Cotton, Sandra J 577 Courtney, Liam 341 Cowell, Wendy 89 Craig, Daniel

391 Cranfield, Richard L J 332 Cromag Pty Ltd 498 Cropley, Cecily 491 Cropley, Peter 386 Croudace, Michael 387 Croudace, Susan 487 Crugnale, Gianpaolo (Gage Roads Construction) 415 Cullity, Dr Marguerite 93 Cunningham, Lesley

111 Cunningham, Tom & Bryant, Peri 115 Currie, Rachel 121 Curtis, Jackie 280 Dagg, Alan & Jennifer 72 D'Angelo, Marissa

388 D'arcy, John L 346 Date, Russel 141 Davidson, David K 232 Davidson, Ron & Dianne

6 Davies, Denise 3 Davies, Xian-Li

253 Davis, Christopher 382 Davis, Dr Neville J 252 Davis, Mary 373 Daw, Ian T 396 Daw, Trevor A (Chairman of the Forrest Grove Villas Body Corporate on

behalf of the Forrest Villa owners) 420 Day, Brenna 485 Day, Robert 191 D'Cress, Brian G 288 de Caux, Christian 104 Dean, Allan & William 28 Deejay Nominees Pty Ltd (Durack & Zilko Lawyers on behalf of)

272 Deighan, Dorothy H 566 Demissie, Bayoush 331 Department of Transport, Main Roads WA & Public Transport Authority 286 Desforges, Jonah & Danielle 519 D'Esterre Family 81 Dobra, Wendy & Max

277 Dodd, Marilyn 423 Donovan, Kim S & Payne, Carl D (Twine Court Pty Ltd)

55 Douglass, Tony (on behalf of Empire City Superannuation Fund) 237 Drayton, Roslyn 254 Dreyfus, Michele 313 D'Souza, Father James (Parish Priest Cottesloe/Mosman Park) 139 Dutry, Danicia 394 Dwyer, Bryan & Nyree 358 Eastwood, David 436 Eidsvold. Jaimie 502 Eldon, Lisa 255 Eldred, Sara 267 Elsey, Richard 23 Elton, Sophie

474 Evans, Glenn 207 Farnsworth, Kate 351 Faye, Bridget 178 Fearis, Neil 583 Ferguson-Thomas, Susan 210 Ferrari, Robert 431 Ferrell, Margaret 181 Ferrell, Walter J 596 Findlater, Kate & Brendon 489 Finn, Kirsty 243 Fiocco, Suzanne & John

4 Fire & Emergency Services Authority of WA 135 Flack, Ian 136 Flack, Jacqueline 345 Fleming, Hamish 404 Fletcher, Paul F 87 Flynn, Amber

257 Forarty, Cain 438 Ford, Patrick 244 Forma, Ann 98 Forrest, David & Nedela, Janis 19 Freind Investments Pty Ltd (Clayton Friend, Director on behalf of) 8 Fremantle Ports

84 Fremantle, City of 307 Galan-Dwyer, Bianca 242 Gamblin, Paul 336 Gardiner, Leigh 25 Gare, Robert C & Kathleen L

595 Gay, Marlene M 269 Gerard McCann Architect (on behalf of the owners Lot 51 Stirling Hwy,

North Fremantle) 206 Gilchrist, Sylvia 584 Glass, Stuart 401 Glassby, Cathie 353 Glegg, Trevor 479 Godden, Alison & Andrew 35 Godlonton, Heath Sanderson & Sasha

226 Goodlich, Mary-Ann 570 Goodridge, Phillipa 214 Goodwin, Clare 506 Grant, Barbara

505 Grant, Randall 260 Green, David 261 Green, Janet 558 Green, Russell 559 Green, Shirley 389 Greenway, Claire 427 Greg Rowe and Associates (act on behalf of owners Ortona P/L & Don

Russell Holdings) 445 Greg Rowe and Associates (act on behalf of owners Yat-Wing Liu &

Precious Holdings Pty Ltd) 458 Griffin, Scot & Clare 82 Groves, Norman John 67 Hall, John D & Penuel K 43 Hall, Lorraine & Geoff

409 Hamersley, Vicki & Simon (property held in the name of LF Rural Nominees Pty Ltd)

76 Hammond, L 9 Hams, Simon D D

362 Harper-Meredith, Karri 54 Harriott, John F

408 Harris, Daphne 134 Harvey, Clare 186 Hasluck, Sally A 162 Hatton, Damien 172 Hawkes, E 371 Hay, Cameron 71 Hayes, Bruce

333 Heagney, Karen 412 Health, Department of 301 Heard, Kent 421 Herbert, Serina 381 Hewitt, Maxwell E (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community

Association) 350 Hill, Richard & Schell, Fleur 147 Hills, Lisa J 340 Hills, Neville F 483 History Council of Western Australia (Dr Lise Summers, president) 572 Hopkins, Alexandra 74 Hopkins, Philip & Mary

511 Hos, Joanna 503 Hoskings, Janet 57 Hotchkin Hanly Lawyers (on behalf of Euro Form Constructions Pty Ltd)

276 House, Kate 357 Howe, Jim 10 Howe, Peter M

321 Howieson, Jill 379 Hume, B 196 Hunter, J M 197 Hunter, W 342 Hutchison, June 225 Hyndman, Trish 20 Imani, Dr Pedram 64 Independent Cinemas Pty Ltd

11 Indigenous Affairs, Department of 113 Ioppolo, Gary

1 Ioppolo, James 463 Jackson, Andrew (on behalf of all owners of Greenough Home Units) 131 Jeffree, Marjorie G V 377 Jelovsek, Francesco 39 Jeta Pty Ltd

241 Johnson, Jill 300 Johnson, Josephine 235 Johnstone, Graeme 231 Johnstone, Klara 424 Jones, Alex 289 Jones, Bryn 383 Jones, Peter F 518 Jordan, Ray 216 Joyce, Fletcher J 338 Kaesehagen, David 170 Kain, Anthony 393 Keely, Dr Nicholas 352 Keen, Michelle 108 Kelly, Simon 168 Kennedy, Dorothy 274 Kenny, Judith 204 Kent, Jack 205 Kent, Louis 125 Kidd, Paul 209 King, Natasha 158 Kleinig, Richard 221 Knutson, Barry 493 Kohan, Kimberley 591 Kotsoglo, Imogen 339 Kowald, Brian 588 Kruit, Michael 169 La Fontaine, Monique 348 Lane, Glendon 349 Lane, Jennifer 293 Lane, Richard 188 Langmead, Rex A (representing Langmead Investments P/L in trust for the

Langmead Familty Trust) 33 Leach, Jeffery & Helen

215 Leah, Ann 375 Leahy-Kane, Jane 14 Lee, Shirley C L

466 Leighton, Chris 271 Leondro Mika 83 Leslie, Benjamin & Oliver, Nicole 46 Lim, Tanya Fong

496 Line, Wendy 38 Ling, Kendrick

599 Litis, Desi 586 Llewellin, Michael 578 Loe, Louise 302 Lopresti, Frank (on behalf of the owners of 176 Stirling Hwy, Nedlands)

482 Lorenz, Anita 27 Lund, Wayne

562 Lushey, Robert A 126 Lyndon, Angie 367 Lyons, Christopher 557 Lyons, Emma 60 MacDougall, Sonya Lee

258 MacGill, Gerard (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association) 85 MacGowan, John & Charmaine

291 MacKay, Sharon 504 MacKie, Maggie 151 MacLeay, Shayne 112 MacLeay, Travis 299 MacNeill, Ron 359 Maher, Ingrid 356 Mair Property Securities Ltd (on behalf of all the owners of 525 Stirling Hwy,

Cottesloe) 585 Malacari, Luke S 217 Maley, Kirsten 573 Maloney, Bruce 246 Mannolini, Amanda; Gerrish, Laurence & Connolly, Anne-Maire 142 Mansell, Vanya 65 Martinick, Dirk

171 Martino, Bianca 368 Marwick, Susan 130 May, Sarah 249 McCormick, Jonathon R 179 McGechie, David & Ada 592 McGowan, Claire 571 McGown, Michael (on behalf of Kirsten Maley) 575 McKean, Andrew 594 McKenzie, Ian 473 McNab, Sandy C 461 Meehan, Pamela 230 Mellor, Edward 229 Mellor, Thomas 354 Meredith, David 56 Merks, Kristy

501 Metcalfe, Chris 517 Mian, C 192 Mignot, Belinda A 563 Miller, Todd 316 Milliner, Andrew 315 Milliner, Jessica 24 Mines and Petroleum, Department of

140 Monk, Anthony & Shirley 450 Monro, Caroline 360 Monro, Victoria 53 Morgan, Sue

303 Moriarty, Bruce 41 Morris, Dr Christina (Appollonia Nominees, Cottesloe Dental)

500 Morton, Keith 70 Mosman Park, Town of

582 Moulden, Deanne 457 Muir, Gregory 600 Mullen, Kate 476 Mulvena-Trinder, Brendan 495 Murray, David 413 Murray, John (Creation Landscape Supplies) 494 Murray, Lisa 101 Mussared, Helen A 372 Musto, Ken & Lyn 486 Nairn, Pam 26 Nardone, Rocco A (for Conpec Pty Ltd)

292 National Trust of Australia (WA) 29 Naughton, Paul

183 Nedlands Electors Association (Inc) 123 Nedlands, City of 462 Neil, Anne & Tepper, Steve 347 Newson, Alan & Barlow, Johanna 182 Nguyen, Thai Duy 434 Niblett, Dylan 222 Nichol, Colin 567 Nicholls, Scott 437 Nicholson, Charlie 52 Nikakhtar, Loghman

298 Nikolich, Amanda & Goran 236 Nixon, Bruce & Handcock, Karen 99 Nomet Pty Ltd

516 Nottage, J 314 O'Connor, David 187 O'Dea, John 256 Officer, Meg 296 O'Keefe, Joe 418 O'Loughlin, Edmond (on behalf of Geraldine O'Loughlin) 213 Orchard, Stuart 512 O'Reilly, Alexandra 513 Oria, Conrad 90 Orly, Tammy 34 Ou, Zhiliang

561 Owenell, Ben 560 Owenell, John 467 Owners of Brookwood, 396 Stirling Hwy (Andrew Bremner) 263 Owners of Terrara (Strata Plan 1275) 233 Palmer, Narayani 428 Palmer, Richard D 320 Paparone, Jack 319 Paparone, Romaine 278 Parmentier, Brice 247 Paterniti, Robert & Sue 295 Paterson, Alistair 564 Paterson, Eleanor 480 Paterson, Jennifer A 266 Paton, Mary-Anne 364 Pattison, Cate & Giles 156 Paulik-White, Dr Georgie

335 Pauling, Glenn 265 Paxton, James F 88 Pearce, Cameron

149 Pedro, Zamia 425 Peppermint Grove, Shire of 66 Petrides, Peter

218 Phillips, Dodie 118 Phillips, Jenny 51 Philpott, Martin & Mary

220 Pickles, Carol 410 Pieniazek, Jan & Cecilia 200 Pinkster, Lauren 597 Pinto, E 185 Pisano, Ngarie & Giglieto 465 Pittaway, Janine & Brown, Stewart 403 Planning Solutions (on behalf of Amana Living) 426 Poland, Greg 227 Pollard, Helena 166 Porter, Clare 287 Pratt, Brian & Gillian 590 Prindiville, T 208 Pritchard, Georgina 328 Ptolomey, Brendon (AAPI Certified Practising Valuer) 312 Pyvis, Sally 251 Quayle, Monica 106 Rae-Frae, Ama 78 Ramdas Tampi & Pamela Hendry

161 Ramsay, Rob 159 Randall, Brooke 370 Rattigan, Annabel 451 Rattigan, Graeme 569 Redgrave, Sian 167 Reed, Sandra 144 Rees, John (Mosman Park Veterinary Hospital) 297 Reeve, Thomas & Valerie 18 Reid, Sarah M 37 Remmerswaal, N

477 Revell, Kerry 58 Richardson, Gavin

598 Ridley, Ben & Dietrich, Jessica 593 Ridley, Cate 129 Rigg, Jeremy 157 Riley, Jim 454 Rippingale, Kelly 443 Rivalland, Virginia & Daniel 407 Roberts, Giles 193 Roberts, Lynn 411 Roberts, Peter; Strauss, Caroline; Wood, Anne & Lankester, Keith 435 Roberts, Tom 133 Robinson, John 514 Rogers, Joanna

5 Rogers, John 238 Rogers, Steve

515 Rogers, Steve 127 Rosenstein, Jennifer 173 Runco, Mario & Mary 160 Russell, Glenn 400 Ryan, Gary 326 Sambrailo, Christian 565 Savill, Julie 79 Savoy Management Pty Ltd

510 Scott, Elizabeth 40 Seng, James Cheah Kit (Duomark on behalf of the owners)

488 Shaw, Jeni 432 Shepherd, Melissa 290 Shepherd, Pip 380 Showell, John A 22 Simpson, John & Marie-Louise

275 Skipworth, Ric & Tish 490 Sluga, Lena 259 Smith, Deonne 250 Smith, Keith & Elizabeth 281 Smith, Roland 344 Smith, Sophie 343 Smith, Stewart 448 Socha, Pauline M 21 South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Council (SWALSC)

107 Spencer, David 234 Stansfield, Judith 69 State Heritage Office

414 Staude, Anita 442 Steffen, Thomas & Franscesca 248 Stirling, Kim 116 Stokes, Amy 366 Stone, Noel T 509 Stoner, B 80 Subiaco, City of

481 Sullivan, Andrew 279 Sullivan, Jane 224 Suttar, Craig 97 Swan River People Native Title Holders

330 Sweetman, Lorraine 456 Swift, Omega 499 Swiney, Tracey 469 Tambasco, Serena 15 Tan, John Tiang Tong

283 Tapp, Aimee 285 Taylor, Annie 240 Thayne, Nell 334 The Fremantle Society 94 The Landowners of Stirling Heights - SP5036

102 The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Perth 154 Thomas, Jacinta (Manager Violet Pilot) 521 Thompson, M O 148 Thompson, Stephen 174 Thorpe, John

122 Thorpe, Susan 444 TPG (on behalf of Rhys Edwards, owner Nedlands Post Office) 397 TPG (on behalf of the landowners Amhurst Enterprises Pty Ltd and John

Fountain as trusteee for the John Fountain Family Trust) 439 TPG (on behalf of the owners CITI Fiedlity Nominee Co Pty Ltd) 497 Tregonning, Anne 492 Trishs' Place (Antiques) 245 Truscott, Kate 449 Tucak, Layla 478 Tucak, Michael 146 Tulloch, Alastair (Councillor) 376 Turner, Stacey 96 University of Western Australia (Professor Paul Johnson)

471 Unknown 524 Unknown 525 Unknown 526 Unknown 527 Unknown 528 Unknown 529 Unknown 530 Unknown 531 Unknown 532 Unknown 533 Unknown 534 Unknown 535 Unknown 536 Unknown 537 Unknown 538 Unknown 539 Unknown 540 Unknown 541 Unknown 542 Unknown 543 Unknown 544 Unknown 545 Unknown 546 Unknown 547 Unknown 548 Unknown 549 Unknown 550 Unknown 551 Unknown 552 Unknown 553 Unknown 554 Unknown 555 Unknown 556 Unknown 601 Unknown 602 Unknown 61 Vasudavan, Dr Sivabalan (Sole Director of Lola Management Pty Ltd) 16 Victoria Creek Pty Ltd

198 Vidulich, K M 199 Vidulich, M

86 Vigano, Anthony J 152 Vujic, Tara 164 Vujic, Tijana 507 Wall, Jon 472 Wallbridge, Philip 239 Walsh, Aiden 143 Walsh, Brett 317 Walsh, Jane 318 Walsh, John 402 Walter, Peta (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association) 422 Walton, Haylee 306 Warrall, Ian

2 Water (Swan Avon Region), Department of 363 Water Corporation 177 Watson, Nevin J 264 Weber, David 460 West, Carly 455 West, Michael 105 Wheeldon, Chris 176 Whelans WA Pty Ltd (on behalf of owners Gull Properties) 268 Whelans WA Pty Ltd (on behalf of owners WA Flour Mills Pty Ltd) 508 White, Rolf 374 Whitley, John 417 Wickenden, Kyele J 589 Wilkinson, Kate 395 Williams, Simon & Jill 325 Willis, Jane 475 Willson, Hayley E 73 Wilson, Kerri

117 Wilson, Stacey 150 Wilson, Tracey 464 Woods, Trent 405 Woollett, Sara 305 Worrall, Charlotte 304 Worrall, Karen 36 Yau, Bonnie

311 Yeaton, Jeff 392 Yeo, Veronica J 406 Yu, Lawrence 42 Yuen, Julie (for Weng Hoong Nominees Pty Ltd) 7 YWB Pty Ltd

194 Zevis, M A & A C 324 Zuvela, Peter

Late

Submissions Name

623 Adams, Pete 612 Bekkevold, Sacha 620 Bell, James 622 Berrovic, L 608 Caddy, Stephen M 626 Cottesloe, Town of

627 Crandell, J D 606 Evans, George M 624 Evans, Susan 625 Gow, Peter 621 Graeme Robertson Group 610 Hood, Libby 614 Lane, Gary 613 MacRae, Jenna 611 Merride, Christopher 609 Nolan, Clint 607 O'Driscoll, Nanette 618 Owenell, Helen; Willing, Suzanne & Bennett, Christine (Busatti) 604 Page, Jane & Gilmore, Mike, Jane, Tom & Elea 615 Rowe, Jacqui 628 Shell Company of Australia, The 603 Silove, Dr Kym 605 State Development, Department of 616 Unknown 617 Unknown 619 Wright, Timothy (Wrightfeldhusen Architects)

Submissions

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

DEP RTMENT of planning

1 G JUL 2012

FILE LS)c>o2

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 101

i i

Name rs elen nn MUSSARED(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .....Bo.x. .CUN.DE.RDIN Postcode ...,64?7

Contact phone numb 8. 9.63.51.177. Email address

Tips for completing a submission:Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuesInclude property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

This submission is being made as owner/occupier of Unit 4'"Tehf afa"' 224' Stifling High ay'Claremont'.

Be. .the. .proposed. resumption. se.t. .out. in. .Metro olitan. .Region. Scheme Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservationmen ment ¦ Re or -dated- -2012 If ¦ this- -scheme • is- -adopte • it- -wiil • severely

impact on our Unit (4). The value of our property will be decreased and"Har "to sell'.

.We. .will. lose. .our. .parking. .ba . along. with. .two. .visitor. .car. .pa ks. and. .t e complex will lose the driveway which makes getting on and off Stirling-Hi h ay ¦ feasible- -and- -safe-;

The letter boxes will have to be removed elsewhere, plus the gardenand reticulation will have to be re-organized.The. reserve. on. -our. side .of. Stirling. .Highwa . ill. .be. 1Q...2. .metres. and

yet directly opposite on the other side of the Highway only 2.1 metres -this- does- appear- -to-1 he- tot lly- unf ir.

Enclosed is a paper cutting from the "POST" with a totally differentconcept which is very feasible.

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Morgan sbold roadrevolutionBy BRET CHRISTIAN

A highway alon the Perth-Fremantle railway line wouldbe better th n idenin St lingHighway and resumin 25ha ofhouses, local mayors were toldlast week.

All six western suburbs may¬ors decided to take the ideaback, to their councils with aview to jointly funding a feasibilitystudy.

The idea, put forward b Cottesloe ayor Kevin Morganat a Western Suburbs Re ionalOrganisation Councils (WES-ROC) meeting last week, wouldsee a highway atop a sunkenrailway with a cycleway, high-den¬sity housing built on spare land,a d green space.

Stirling Highway widening, atleast 20 years away, may then nothave to happen. It would ac¬commodate local traffic only.

The Perth-Fremantle rail re¬serve has 680,000sq.m of availableland, according to a local engi¬neer.

Surplus land could be devel¬oped with high-density housing.as an alternative to demohshingestablished uburbs under the gov¬ernment transport-oriented de¬velopment plan, Mr Morgan said.

The east-west road would prob-ably have to terminate atAberdare Road because the SubiCentro development had alreadyremoved the option of going tothe city.

But it would serve the univer¬sity and the QEII medical centre,relieving the pressure on StirlingHighway. !

There as sortie urgency be¬cause the north-east Claremont

• Please turn to pag

• From page 1

precinct would have to be altered for thecorridor to work.

Mr Morgan said that even if the railwaywas sunk, no building should be permit¬ted on top to leave future transport optionsopen.

Mr Morgan said urgent action was alsoneeded to address the school traffic prob¬lem in Claremont.

Dedicated bus services with secure busand train stops to keep students separatefrom the non-student population was oneoption to be discussed by local mayors,

The government advertised the plan towiden Stirling Highway this week.

It would mean resuming and buying pri¬vate l nd but keepin the highway atfour lanes, with fewer obstructions.

A'median strip, right-turn lanes, busjump lanes, cycle lanes and a better pedes¬

trian environment were part of the plan.Planning Minister John Day said there

was no funding for the long-term plan, whichwas 20 years away.

It would mean removing the road reservefrom a number of private properties at theCottesloe end of the highway and createcertainty for those owners.

The reserve line goes through the mid¬dle of Premier Colin Barnett s house.

Buildin heights alon the reser e wouldbe graded so that the highest buildings wouldbe at the centre and the outer edgeswould match the heights of adjoiningbuildings. _ _

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Submission

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

1 G JUL 2012

file L <0

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 102

t i

Name . ... 'XH .. £cman. .csrM.QUc.. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address . .. v.mq a. . Postcode ..600.Q

Contact phone number, . MrZJ.O SZ. ... Email address

Tips for com leting a submission:Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuesInclude property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

6. .. T C .

//

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

0 Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Signature Date ITH€ fZOMAr i i TH UC jbtCtf&iSMOP Of

Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

Due to the intrusive nature of the proposed road widening of the Stirling Highway and Alfred Road(north east corner), and the detrimental effect it will have upon the St Anne s parish community. TheRoman Catholic Archbishop of Perth has the following concerns:

1. Traffic noise, which is already a concern due to the last widening of this road, will increasesignificantly, thereby impacting upon the celebration of the mass for both parishioners and

the priest.2. Increased traffic noise will impinge upon the residence priest s right to quiet enjoyment

within his own home.3. Access to the church and community centre may be compromised.4. The subject area currently provides a playground for children and safety may be affected by

this amendment.5. The subject area is sometimes used for additional parking space when required, a reduction

to this area will create parking problems for people attending mass services.6. The proposed road widening will result in the reserve being within 1 meter of the existing

church buildings (see attached plan). This may result in extra stresses being placed upon thefabric of the building structure due to the volume of traffic movement/vibration being so

close to the building.7. Due to the close proximity of proposed works, the building structure may be damaged

during construction of the road widening.8. The existing masonry boundary fence will be lost (will need to be reinstated).

The church has concerns that the proposed works will not only significantly reduce its land holding,thus reducing the amenities it is currently able to offer, but will also create a financial burden for theparish community due to ongoing expense for the future maintenance and running of the parish ie.the need to install costly noise reduction measures (double glazing, acoustic insulation to the church

buildings).

If the above ite s can be addressed effectively and appropriately, The Roman Catholic Archbishopof Perth would accept the amendment as proposed.

<3 UNDEFINEDTL MANHOLE

BLOCK KERB

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

1 7 JUL 2012

FILE

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

OFFICE USE ONLY¦ I

Submission 103

i - i

Name ... Jan Simms, on behalf of Claremont Baptist Church(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .... 324a.Stirling Highway,. Claremont Postcode ?9.J.Q

Contact phone number ....9.3.9.38.5 2607 Emai| address [email protected]

Tips for completing a submission:Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuesInclude property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages if you require more s ace to complete your submission

Submission

Please refer to attached 3-page document

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

D Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORd] Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

Signature Date 16 July.2Q12

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Submission: Re Lots 7, 8 and 9 (no.324a) Stirling Highway, Claremont

Claremont Baptist Church has been actively ministering to the Claremont community for over a

century and has been situated at our current site for more than 110 years. The central location of

our property and the purpose-built nature of our buildings allow us to provide ministry to the

community.

While we accept the reduction in the road reserve size (which was placed on our property after we

had developed the property), the broad proposal to redevelop Stirling Highway will have major

ramifications to us as a church serving the community in the following areas:

I. Functional Impacts:

The final widening of Stirling Highway, and during construction, is likely to have adverse impacts on

us functioning as a church.

1) Short term impacts during road construction - alternate accommodation could be required

i. The extent of the construction is unclear from the proposal and therefore also the

duration of the roadwork. The construction will have direct impact on the main access

into the church building from Stirling Highway. The church sanctuary and the main

meeting room are located at street level. Whilst access via the rear laneway may be

possible, the rear laneway is only a one-lane thoroughfare, and wheelchair access may

also be limited only to the lower floor of the church. Depending on the extent of the

construction (see also structural integrity comments below), it may be necessary for the

church to look for alternative accommodation during the road-widening construction, as

the building may be considered no longer functional or fit for purpose due to the many

factors stemming from the road-widening work.

ii. The noise during construction, as well as the much reduced parking, will also impact on

our regular meetings held during the week, though we understand these inconveniences

may be unavoidable for any construction work. However, if special consideration and

dispensation can be given to us, it will assist in mitigating the inconvenience.

iii. It will be difficult and costly for us to look for suitable premises as temporary

accommodation. We ll need assistance from the government in this regard.

2) Long term impacts - Relocation or modifications to existing building required

i. We understand the widening proposal will mean that the road / pavement will come

very close to our existing building line. This may result in the church needing to re¬

orientate our building usage, which will have significant impact on our functioning as a

church. For example, we may need to relocate our sanctuary during and after the road-

widening so that we can function effectively and efficiently. There will also be flow-on

impacts on the use of other parts of the building.

ii. During the road-widening construction, as well as the resulting reduction in the reserve

land, it is likely that parking and/or stopping at the entrance of the church will berestricted, if not impossible. This will directly impact on how our church is able to serve

the community in conducting weddings, memorial services and funerals. The possibility

of having a drop-off point for the elderly and disabled at the front of the church is also

questionable after the road widening.

iii. If the resulting impacts from the road-widening are such that we can no longer function

effectively as a church, it may be necessary for us to relocate to another site zoned for

this purpose. We are not at this stage able to assess this possibility. However, we

envisage it will not only be difficult, it will also be costly to find a suitable site in the

expensive Claremont district.

II. Structural Integrity:

It is unclear to us from the information provided whether the resultant changes to the Stirling

Highway will impact directly on our buildings (necessitating alterations to the buildings), or whether

the buildings will remain unaffected. This is a crucial issue to us in determining long-term impact on

our church after the Stirling Highway work is completed.

We need to understand the structural design of the road to be able fully to assess how it may affect

the structural integrity of our existing building; but we have a number of concerns if the road works

were to impact the buildings. We register the following concerns:

1) Significant financial impost if building structure is affected

The nature of the building design with a support wall at the front of the building and a significant

drop-off in land gradient from Stirling Highway indicates to us that any encroachment upon our

building (even if only minor in distance) will likely have a disproportionate impact on the overall

structural integrity of the building and its internal configuration for our purposes, and the

amount of subsequent modifications that are required to be made to the building.

i. Depending on the structural design of the road, and the extent of the road-widening into our

properties, additional retaining wall structures may be necessary for part or all of the land,

and this could encroach further onto our property than the average 7.5 metre designated

reserve;

ii. The road widening and its construction may affect the foundation and the structural design

of our existing building which is more than 100 years old;

iii. If any alteration to the building is necessary as a result of the road widening, there will be

significant structural engineering work required given the age of the building and the

contour of the land;

iv. Any alteration to the building also means disturbing its asbestos roof which will require

major work and significant costs to replace and / or restore;

v. Any alteration and modification to the existing building (see also point ii above) will need to

satisfy current building code and will require significant capital outlays.

In conclusion:

We foresee the road-widening proposal will have significant impacts on our functioning as a church,

both during the construction phase and in the long term. We therefore request the Planning

Commission gives regard to:

1) The structural design of the road-widening to minimise the impacts it may have to our 3

properties;

2) Make available to us the structural engineering report for the road design and the extent of

modifications so we can make an assessment of its impacts on our properties;

3) The assistance, both practical and financial, that we need when we look for temporary

accommodation during the construction of the road widening work;

4) The financial impost placed on us if we need to make modifications to our properties due to the

impacts of the road-widening on the structural integrity of the building and the e fective

functioning of our activities, and

5) The assistance, both practical and financial, if we need to relocate permanently to another site,

due to the difficulties and significant costs involved in finding a suitable alternate site in the

Claremont area.

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Submission

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

7 JUL 2012

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 104

i i

Man D, w//. / l\ m. ..M .i . ...!)<I , (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) ,

.. /..0..... S. .r. l. . .1. i fi\... .Hyl/i ... H jh.. I t .o ftrt.U.i...

p one number .ij:.(A..If-.. . Email address .d nJ AjXC,n.Ii?.ony a) jy o |pU(/ /. cot

Name ../J. J.lH t .Ll

Address

Contact

.a.i

Postcode

Tips for completing a submission:• Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues• Include property addresses and specific location descri tions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

1:1 submit that White St in North Fremantle should remain closed permanently as:i) The truncation needed to open White St to Stirling Hwy will result in direct physicaldamage/demolition the property (house).

ii) If White St remains closed (as is currently is) the potential damage to the house will bereduced/negated.

iii) Keeping White St closed would allow traffic flow on Stirling Hwy to flow unimpeded ratherthan being disrupted by entering traffic.

iv) White St is a very quiet and narrow residential street, property owners need to park theirvehicles on the street as houses do not have carports or garages.

2: I request that the size of the proposed 5.1 m verge be significantly reduced and bikelane removed from plans as:i) I have already seen the property effected with loss of some land for widening of Stirling Hwy in1974 (Title adjusted in 2000). Loss of more land will see me hit twice.

ii) The house is already in close proximity to Stirling Hwy, noise, disturbance and vibrationsadversely affect living conditions and this will only increase.

iii) 66 Stirling Hwy is on the register of The Heritage Council of W.A. If the proposed 5.1m vergeneeds to be reduced here I propose it is similarly reduced between 66-70 Stirling Hwy.

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

a No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go ernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Signature Date 2. .12u

Note: Submissions MUST be received b the a vertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://w w.planning.wa.go .au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

1 7 JUL 2012

FILE

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 105

Name r T.S t g. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) " ' j

Address .. .... . rrr.. .( >.6. .7... 3 Q l Postcode

Contact phone number Email address

Tips for com leting a submission:Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues

• Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages if you require more space to co plete your submission

Submission

o.

.(.... . k V

57 0 V -v v t<V7.S P.y

.7

77.S ....

.kk.i?i

. Vj.v. r> . t-

. .... Pr7.V A. P. At- fcL N r. C S.'r ~

Aa . k. ... .77 a, FA.kviv SYT. sS .. .\V 5c <p&~~

. . Dva Cy.t - ,

.. 7 >.<¥7 rlTr? SA s sV. sps c. .Cr sES X. ,

.U.bV7Prl

1... A. ... Pt . A Ar , k.p .17 <A .q ./A7i rv&t ~

• feA C .CAC.T .c j. .7.cl Ak . kkkA.... .. .AA .

.c? It. C .cAvs ti c Q lAkp 7-7 , ct1

.C. O YN. AC PrV.V r). A ].

PO C cX, ;

A 7 . .<7 [cLckr.... WAT... .k . .7.k... A. .TtCA

... A 9p s-p[o. r .... k.... .kkks. t kk .

.. 77t.... Is k \o s... . . dd

....ckkk . 77k j .ks r. k...'bCl QykV -P#-V . 1 il _ r I It' cL. .C. .'k: .r.A)..-.

turn over to complete your submission

r' ff ied k fC? w/\ iW tA A- 42»V OL.

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recom endation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

JZf No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties. •

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Signature

To be signed by person(s) makin the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Submission 106

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built herita e of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a buspriority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the doublestorey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed inthe amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to singleeach way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of busbays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements shouldnow be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions.

Signed

Name

Submission 107

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

1 7 JUL 2012

RLE

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a buspriority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the doublestorey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed inthe amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to singleeach way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of busbays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements shouldnow be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions.

Name -c aj\Q'K U /

S bmissio 108

17 JUL 2012

FILE i jOol

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation(WAPC): Increasing the e isting Primary Regional Roads reservation in NorthFremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to iden the road and to demolishbuildin s 261 to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which canachieve a significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built herita e of NorthFremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to thewest, making use of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the Cityrequests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway furtherwest in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongsidethe rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in thevicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoiningsuburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary RegionalRoads (PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with StirlingHighway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal wouldresult in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roadswould hand to Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them toundertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen Victoria Street betweenTydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local Centre’ under Council’s LocalPlanning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a ‘mainstreet’, with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant andentertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of trafficlanes to single each way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use theroute and the present lack of bus bays contribute to this calming. It is thus highlyanomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

Simon Kelly

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Submission

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

1 7 JUL 2012

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 109

i i

., Rafeena BoyleName

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .230Oar,in9tOnS,reet:.HlltOn: Postcode .P.6.3

0405480193 [email protected] phone number Email address

Tips for completing a submission:• Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues• Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant

Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submissionSubmission

To whom it may concern,

while I do support efforts by Planning WA to incorporate and improvesustainable transportation options. I do not support the currentproposals to widen Queen Victoria Street in North Fremantle.

I would like to let it be known that the absence of any analysis of thesocial impact of the amendment, with particular reference to theimpact on the old town centre is inappropriate.

As a frequent visitor of this area I feel that the current proposals willhave a adverse impact on the cultural centre of North Freo and wouldlike PlanningWAto consider the suggestions made by Fremantlecouncil on this issue and consider other alternatives that will have lessof a negative impact.

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

a No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

1 will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

1 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is sub ectto the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties. •

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Signature

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

„a.o. J : .:? oi

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling High ay Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001 .

Submission 110

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)Name..... (ml. SI

Address . Postcode .

Contact phone number . .7 ~1. Q.Email address . .CfiO?.I.

r-- « « ..»w V« *.

*> Use headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issuesinclude pro erty address s and specific location descriptions where relevant

s Attach additional numbered pages if you requi e more space to complete your submission

.. J. .d ft re&r.. . .l&c l... Ihj$! (le s. M.. (T w tb

.. (.ft:.- [zlo/ I ). . Here ,,. er de... [(b . .-ftps*

... I l.. r/p.. .t j.e0\.. ... jh k fe- .. qoi.. A.

...•feri

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is include in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of t e following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

O Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

a All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parlia ent and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Signature

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions ill OT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

From:Sent:To:Subject:Attachments:

Carol Cheung <[email protected]>Wednesday, 18 July 2012 12:58 AMmrs

Amendment 1210/41 Submission formmojos Stirling highway widening l.jpg; mojos Stirling highway widening 2.jpg

Please find attached my form opposing option 2.

Tha k you,Carol

Carol Cheung(587) 708 - [email protected]

http://caroledmonton.wordpress.com

1

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme A endment 1210/41

ationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 111i 1

,/b . Name ....(M t.... / . (PLEASE PRINT CLEA LY) </

Address .... . Postcode ...bJ.T..

Contact phone number . .P T.. Ml.... Email address . Af/We .

T/ps for completing a submission:• L/se headings or nu bers to separate different topics and issues

Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

jv. x.c . .... /fyktfJ'., .. 7 . /.

/. f 2 ./.

i rt<sJ M./sAY./(hyy....f/fflfxk .&rff. i ttG &A.?.. n• .°./t ?>6 ..A. #.?<&/: *

J.&Afc /.(/$. 4?/ ?. . aav4 7 41 fi ,. A ....

( /c/Pi &A- yk ?. .fr tA&. s..

j D'ir M< S / &t A. (AAi-. r . iAA

Sy m//;m7 (A.... . .vk& : Ayr.iA.. Ay.q l/i A A/./Ay*A /k fc . ..s. ArM /y i. <?/ : A. A..!

AJ i A .AA .. ' //// iM A..... J'.A/?. A.k.€. :4$:rr..... AA.Ak A.9. \ mA. Al. : Ayj...

hlkvy. c, 4.4.... ... AA.. /r A.. • 4 4j

A Ah4/ck-..../AAy... 'A..J.o/kA...../kift ....../Air.... ....kAyA./....AfkkAf....

turn over to complete your submission

S i'lT /f

s/ >

// J\/Asy6 (Py y 6iJ t/o/f ] /- Pyp

c_ yyx /0.70J

/ ./

Alfise (C ( A> Qouzey t/ c A tyJe yly Aud6 S( PC>y 6 / A z iyyP

<y( P . f. cyAz y\S' y

c Aayyy 'y Ay y \ A PApi yp PfAWA'A AAx c'j P ApysyAy A y?! Xe* P'A (?

A-& /cO (

6- .

A?JP- / x&

0.) <x s ooffp' /

AAy (Ppyi py .J'? Py Ay. Xt c z - & -C A oP /P\ x f-.

y/y t x / /yy><i .c /ypP (P>- ca- c

) : fA/Ao yAy/ A-e.. pAy: p/ X As A Ay A'A /4iyP

S .o tf ' 00 Ayy yy S-

CXL SS A CJ / A ( AA ~y Ja yyk Af palA A ty/c y -P A o

gy yC py J' A o A

$"A%Ly ( A -O ALAf CP yi fi y yfyz~K.fA- <y{A

i/rcAtyt* SS

) f TA AAA Aya c/ s /? Aa /b - AA /S /Pa (y\ P oAo rS &J O- Acy>.e. St

xA So A JCyy y As A / 7AtJ zjypp PxJo A<Afp ou A o op~<=> A"A o . /p ppy pryyP Ay/ A j

Sty A /Pylsi/'O A (SyaOy yiy\y\ p A €<€> C>A

(Aoe&y cA/O/o y St. Ae A py>A yypoyAA'-c. AyiA~(ytyp A pjA t- Ay >~ AliPt

f/ Vi / /yj 0< ~ - o S'

/ Gl -' c. - C/s * < , < £ ' J C-' .P . (S/ r~c> /r / oy / /7<p ;; ~- /

-. .) . s CS Sr/ e u sty

/L ?0 v i ¦'// - 2- (~~j

Of- fl/c> f - / y ?. / cSisi /fe- <ySt i - /i <?L7j'-o

-v .

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

L Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

H Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OR

EH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

e All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the ad ertised closing date, being close ofbusinessT5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

To be signe ) by person(s) making the submission

DateSignature

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900: Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:// ww.planning.wa.go .au

H-

From:Sent:To:Cc:Subject:Attachments:

Tom Cunningham <[email protected]>Wednesday, 18 July 2012 9:36 AMmrs

Peri Cunningham ([email protected])Form 41 SubmissionSCAN002674.pdf

Categories: Red Category

Hello,

Please find attached our submission.

Regards,

Tom CunninghamCivil EngineerP (08) 9381 8111 | F (08) 9382 2407 | M 0419 909 661 E [email protected] Wwww.advanteerinq.com.au

Disclaimer:The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the recipient to whom it isaddressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not theintended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosureis strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please advise us by return email anddelete the email document without making a copy.

i

Submission 112

Travis Macleay

DEPARTMENT OF PLANN1MS

Unit 7/3-5 Harvest RoadNorth Fremantle, WA 6159

Phone: +61407 082 861Email: travismacleav(5)gmail.com

1 9 jUL 2012Skype: travismacleay

16 July 2012

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

e: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Hig way Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary RegionalRoads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261 to 267 along Queen VictoriaStreet.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council's amendment which can achieve a significantly reduced cost to the amenityand built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railway reserved land. Amongother comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirlin Highway further west in the vicinity ofthe McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop urban zonedland in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists bet een adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Re ional Roads (PRR) Reservation in ueen ictoria Streetat its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the totaldemolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads the responsibility forthis portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road andStirling Highway is zoned Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way and increased parkin .The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous thatfacilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and theirlocal functions.

Sincerely,

/Travis MacleayResidentUnit 7/3-5 Harvest RoadNorth Fremantle, WA 6159

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Submission 113

8 JUL 2012

leC s I

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads reser ation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a buspriority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the doublestorey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to singleeach way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of busbays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements shouldnow be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions.

Name

Signed

m U

Submission 114

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

1 g jiJL 2012

13th July 2012

Re: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads re...servation in North Fremantle)

Dear Secretary

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a buspriority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed inthe amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant andentertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single eachway and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bayscontribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should nowbe considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions.

Kind regards

/D >

Nicole Blight+61 400 052 [email protected]

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

13th July 2012

Submission 115

lO LzDiZ |

LStfcgh J

Re: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads re...servation in North Fremantle)

Dear Secretary

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the oad and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed inthe amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant andentertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single eachway and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bayscontribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should nowbe considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions.

[email protected]

Submission 116

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

1 g JUL 2012

FiLi tUsloZlig

To whom it may concern,

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I, the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261 to 267 alongQueen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment, which can achieve a significantlyreduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate StirlingHighway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line.This would open up opportunities to develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining sub rbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation inQueen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented,this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads theresponsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre under Council’s Local PlanningScheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a 'main street’, with small scale shops, cafes,showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way andincreased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to thiscalming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority,particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

This strip of shops is an important community hub in the Fremantle area, serving to connect both localcommunities and drawing visitors from the outer Fremantle area. The Fremantle and wider Perthcommunity will not stand for the West Australian Planning Commission treating people, and ourcommunity as expendable.

This area is a vital creative and communit hub, which we will not allow to be decimated but a myopicmissive from the planning commission.

Signed,

Amy Stokes

22 Myrtle StPerth WA 6000Mb: 0438 705 980

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Submissio 117

1 o jUL 2012

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a buspriority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the doublestorey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed inthe amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to singleeach way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of busbays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements shouldnow be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions.

.+-1 am v+-

Submission 118

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

1 9 JUL 2012

;-ilE

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a buspriority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the doublestorey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed inthe amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to singleeach way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of busbays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements shouldnow be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Name

Signed i /1um k-4- 4-i a .

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

r; .7 OF PLANNING

1 9 JUL 2012

Fi LE \_Q Lk L

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001 * •

Submission 119¦ i

Name (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address / /.!. Postcode

Contact p one number.! Email address .

Tips for completing a submission: < c L • se headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues

Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act f 992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by personfs) making the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the ad ertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

HERITAGE AND URBAN ENVIRONMENTThe Amendment report refers to the negligible impact on State Registered buildings butignores those listed in the local Municipal Inventory and State Heritage Database. The latterinclude about 40 buildings which would be affected in some way, with as many as 18 beingdemolished. As well as the effect on heritage values, the loss of these buildings woulddiminish the character and identity of North Fremantle. Buildings not demolished would inthe main have their amenity seriously affected by closeness to the highway. The frontages ofthe two former primary schools, for example, and of St Anne s church would be reduced toalmost zero.

AMENITYA particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads(PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway toaccommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the totaldemolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would handto Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the worksproposed in the amendment.

Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'Local Centre'under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing developmentas a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant andentertainment. The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction oftraffic lanes to single each way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the routeand the present lack of bus bays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous thatfacilitating bus movements should now be considered a priority, particularly at the enormouscost of heritage buildings and their local functions.

Widening of the highway in the vicinity of Alfred Road and truncating the intersection wouldsignificantly reduce the parking at the shops there, perhaps fatally affecting their viability.These shops contribute importantly to the quality of life in North Fremantle. Parking at thestation, already inadequate, would also be significantly affected. A consequence of this couldbe the spill over of station parking into neighbouring streets, or simply more cars on thehighway.

Planners make much of the importance of 'liveable communities with transport and otherfacilities within walking distance. North Fremantle was once the quintessential liveablecommunity but like many others lost this quality with loss of its population and the migrationof shops and services to larger centres. In recent years there has been a populationresurgence and a gradual revival of the old town centre, which is continuing. A roadwidening reservation over a portion of Queen Victoria Street would halt this revival by placinga 'planning blight' over the reserved land which would discourage improvements elsewhereand leading to further dilapidation of this amazing location.

The North Fremantle Town Centre has in fact become a destination and should not beregarded as a place where passing through it more efficiently becomes the primary objective.

The amenity north of Alfred Road to Mosman Park has been significantly affected by the sameblight and what should, with careful and sensitive planning be a jewel in the crown in the linkbetween Perth Fremantle remains a desolate unfriendly wasteland.

ALTERNATIVESAlternatives to the present proposals have been well articulated in some detail by the City ofFremantle in its response to the Amendment and I support that response.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west,making use of railway reserved land. I believe that it is critical that the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the region between Victoria Streetand Alfred Road to take the highway alongside the rail line and also integrate it with theLeighton Redevelopment Master Plan to bring Curtin Ave east on the other side of the rail lineand turn Port Beach Rd into a local beach access road. This would open up opportunities to

develop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians andcyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

CONCLUSIONI cannot support the proposal in their present form because of its significant deleteriousimpacts on the urban environment, heritage values and amenity of North Fremantle.

I also do not believe that WAPC has acted in concerted effort with Transperth and Main Roadsto ensure that the plan makes maximum use of the existing road and rail corridors. Theplanning seems to be a very 'old school single-dimensional, unimaginative approach to anproblem that requires a great deal more intelligence and creativity, with the goal to improveamenity not reduce it. Wider roads simply mean more cars: they do not solve the problems.

I support the alternative proposals put forward by the City of Fremantle and the NorthFremantle Community Association and urge the Commission to reconsider the Amendment inthe light of them.

/

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

1 0 JUl 2012

FILE

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 120

Name.. ft i f (£.. .... <£ . WL (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address ..... Postcode ..i.1.

Contact phone number. . Email address

Tips for completing a submission:• Use headings or numbers to se arate diff rent topics and issues

Include pro rty addresses and specific location d scri tions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages If yo require more space to com lete your submission

Submission

. ,. .i/j( b ... .j? .. .. CP. nti?.. , k .c/1.. 12... . j

kLw iA . ..fSi ci .. .tft <3 Li/.A .... .. . ? .. Xkl. .1 ))

h ... I .. . k. . .l'V. r.'Tk* -

1. . . / , .. . o. <fi(Ur$... At

.. . 7.. ... .. .. £ £.)£ A ...

,...\ku... d u .yA.O... ..6 Usi... V..A kXC ..LAA %

Ul c./.L. . t.. .. (k k.U.. :)c\c, * .a..Alxcr...t| .0.L. ...\. s. o...

•S y . .. o..ft.. c.tX...xP4l.o?J7..pXAA ,Vv. xuk ..'

u .o... . r.Xkx.CXua A....\.A ...u .C.L.l..r L Jl...<to k\.chi blffiL |

W g d ?. ... . ... .}..&k p x A v. . r. ... . g > k.

. rt . i .. :Ha L. . .. ./.. lUrtAXxZ aa.

u • ¦ xdYXk-. . Xx>.. .CtAf XA . ,ev. .. J

\ ftxx.. fek ..<X r.4 S...feckkk.L t.... .. .CtAlY A r-.....Xlui ...6 .Q\r.4 ... A . ,

.. RAA .WL . . AX,. .<iWu ( ... L. .U\k .. S .Q. idA .Wo . x ,d iVul

XXA lAuZ t\X -A &... ,42/iX. .A k-.. IdZ O r-...! f... X. .!\<x( .A I XL-

C < .( . ft ,'o.. .. 4 i<4. r >.\. !. .¦£? ./ ( . k cA.. .X-r. .(Xrl DcAr A.. IX. .42t |

turn over to complete your submission

\ Q\j2\(Ls Q

Y\u, ii rt iu/ i / r u' \ ' p i _ u

( il f Cu H £ \I I > . •• "Pyl 'O) Vt - l l J' v 2 /l

~D . j - loVtu ll . " f _ pr l As Jl = l

J W L , a trU | iu L(_s L Oi v v u i u u7t J i icb2_ hpsi

i V au . i Ia lv loi - r < «

/ Up i / j 7r | 11

*> M iT i n Vo l /Ic t i .\ U bl S v S,

t ( A Ai " Yli/ ICI Y C 6 i - c l v,

U ( \ l 7)T i X ly\MLJt& )n tSW

& CKTOi\V lf Uj\b ( UH i L > & U U D\f' _A)f(> id M- lVa 1\ (. li~ s c

A v w Jd < - c i u \ rL c

Airiic-al -dVu ih u u p>uzssi Ui

'dLx \ b rt?uj Y - r c

\ 2- W' - Ma l ( aDwi v l [d x 0 ,. . \ r n /l . * ( \ . a

P »4 (A La I J z> UU : ( 0 . t <6 IV ( - U lu J til C lwc- -

44 ~4 l 1/ v r pl l OlcJ b X V ' 4A f

¦ 65x iD A 4 \/ < - 6 L/'d b £b i/ i • ' - \

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

s No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to spea at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours):Postal address:

I would prefer my hea ing to be conducted in:

E Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

« All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all ritten submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go ernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) makin the submission

Signature . Date 1.. .....

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertise closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions ill NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 121i ¦

Name U ckl (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) _

Address 1 Postcode ...9.J....

Contact phone number Email address Ljt o'/-

Tips for completing a submission:m Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues» Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant

Attach additional numbered pages if you require more s ace to complete your submission

Submission

jl !(. (?K .

) NTPC_3. Tl°r .. .. .7.7 J. .l! ! f)... .7. . .9 7. .ji ..W! .

S b. .l .9:9/..:

• •<r J.'s/ •. "

\aj. of (. 9... . . i bY .... 9. !?'... .Yhf.

fef .9;. ( 4 t ® 7lu o -cl sb . .7 .... .-b /.' .b...b .7.7 .. . L9\..

> ..7bf2...,bfA.(b.9.

b...,f\pu

turn over to com lete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission ill be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I ill be represented by:

d Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

E Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORE Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, ay be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) makin the submission

Signature K.. .... 3h.. . Date ...ECL V .. ? :

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amen ment (Substantial)

Form 41

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

1 9 JUL 2012

FILE b

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: Secretary .Western Australian Planning Com issionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 122

Na e Susan Thorpe (PLEASE FR NT CLEARLY)

Address Vlila 6' 128 Forrest St, Peppermint Grove, WA Postcode 8011

Contact phone number 88 8888 88?.1 Email address .su.sa.na* *90.rPe@.'in.61 .n® .au.

Tips for completing a submission:Use headings or numbers to se arate ifferent to ics and issuesInclu e ro erty a dresses and sp cific location descriptions where relevantAttach a ditional nu bered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

Re: the proposed rationalisation of the Stirling Highway Reservation.

Special Reference to:

Forrest Grove Estate of 23 mainly owner occupied villas at 128 Forrest Street,Peppermint Grove, 6011. (Lot No. 38)

In particular: Villa 6.

This individual submission supports and is complimentary to the group submissionpresented by Mr. Trevor Daw, the chairman of the Forrest Grove Villa ManagementCommittee on behalf of all owners.

1.1 The Stirling Highway needs to be considered as a local road in a long standing hi hdensity area with a varied demographic. As it is it serves its purpose well especially intandem with Curtin Avenue and the railway line land. All that is required is a thoughtfulreorganisation of how the space is used:

1.2 Some suggestions for consideration.

i. The area around the highway at its confluence with Leake Street, Napoleon Street andJarrad Street needs to connect rather than disrupt the local communit . The highway needsto be placed underground here to integrate the local community by allowing for easy andsafe pedestrian access to the commercial and social centres. The integrit of The GroveLibrary and Community Centre, a National landmark in forward looking social andenvironmental thinking must be protected. It is beautiful, useful and appreciated. Do noharm!

ii. The median strip needs to be better defined not enlarged.

1

iii. Bicycle lanes are unnecessary. The secondary roads adjacent to the highway are verypleasant and safe for cyclists.

iv. Bus stops and bays need to be relocated on land that is at present underused such as onthe eastern corner of Me Neill Street and the highway. For e ample, the proposedredevelopment of the Forrest Street intersection will result in us loosin two large beautifuland gracious Lemon Eucalypts, a block of flats, several houses and parts of the developmentknown as Forrest Grove Villas.

v. Crossing places need to be well defined by beacons that warn the traffic that extra care isneeded. They need to be located with reference to bus stops and road junctions.

vi. The footpaths are wide enough and need only barriers, such as hedges or pickets in morevulnerable places.

vii. The existing gardens need a long term coherent plan for planting and maintenance.These are an important part of our community and provide some fresh air and beauty to the

hi hway space.

viii. The schools need to be engaged in a rationalisation of their own processes, so thatchildren are not so overloaded and overcommitted that they need parents to drive them toschool.

ix. School buses could collect students from bus bays and railway car paries.

2.1 The present proposal suggests that the road works project could be imminent but nodate for the beginning of the work has been given. The owners of the Forrest Grove Villasneed an end to uncertainty.

2.2 The owners of Forrest Grove villas need an assurance of proper compensation for thoseindividual owners whose homes are rendered unsaleable, are damaged or becomeuninhabitable. These are villas 1-6, 22 and 23. Villa 23 is marked for demolition, but villa 6would be so affected as to be uninhabitable.

2.3 The Owners of Forrest Grove Villas would need to be compensated for loss of land heldin common.

3.1 The local and wider WA community needs to treasure such a unique historical, socialand architecturally interesting estate that provides a fine blueprint for humane high densityliving.

3.2 The integrity and security of the estate depends especially on the residential road andthe garages, both of which would be directly affected by the proposed changes.

3.3 There would be loss of structural integrity, loss of the present tranquil and friendlyambience with unbearable noise, chemical, particle and vibration pollution.

3.4 Even as it is, in recent years the owners have found it more difficult to counter theincreased noise and dirt from the highway. For a start, to double-glaze the windows on eachhouse would costa minimum of $40,000.

3.5 The remainder of the villas would be indirectly affected.

2

4.1 The present threatened disruption to our lives has caused stress related illnesses, griefand confusion, My personal health difficulties with cardiovascular illness have increasedwith this crisis.

4.2 Much of the distress is caused by lack of certainty about the future. Most people are ableto accept the inevitable, however reluctantly, if they are clear about and compensated for itsconsequences.

4.3 The owners need to know that their houses will be assessed fairly, based on the valuethey would have in the market if the present indecisions about the reservation had notalready devalued them.

4.4 At present, with the road works project suddenly possibly imminent, they are unsaleableand devalued in the future. So, unless there is fair compensation taking into account humansuffering, the people affected lenow that they will not be able to buy into a comparable housenor into their home suburb.

4.5 Chronic rief such as this, affecting both individuals and the associated wider communityis a very real issue and will have economic, welfare and political consequences.

5. Conclusion.

5.1 The boundary of the reservation needs to be moved to the existing edge of thehighway and its existing footpath.

5.2 People need to know if their homes are safe and habitable for the definable future.If they are not:

i. when they will required to leave their homes and

ii. that fair compensation will be paid either now or at that time.

iii. that assistance will be given to help with removal and local rehousing of the samequality.

Susan Thorpe. Joint Owner Villa 6 Forrest Grove.

3

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

CJl Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be a are that:

• The APC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) makin the submission

Signature Date . J?.:.. •

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions ill NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:// ww.planning.wa. ov.au

Submission 123

Enquiries: Christie Downie 9273 3500Our Reference: TPN/067-04 M12/16193

17 July 2012

Western Australian Planning Commission140 William StreetPERTH WA 6000

City of Nedlands

ABN 92 6I4 728 2I4

Dear Sir / Madam,

Metropolitan Region Scheme Proposed Amendment 1210/41Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

The above matter was considered at the Council Meeting of the 26 June2012 and Council adopted the following resolution:

Council:

1. supports the proposed Metropolitan Region SchemeAmendment, Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation;

2. requests the Western Australian Planning Commission(WAPC) in accordance with Section 126 of the Planning andDevelopment Act 2005 to concurrently with this amendmentprocess rezone the affected land to a zoning under the City ofNedlands To n Planning Scheme No. 2 (TPS2) that is the sameas the land within the same lot; and

3. requests the Western Australian Planning Commission(WAPC) to reconsider the reservation on 26, 35, 80, 100, 102and 134 Stirling Highway due to the presence of buildings withheritage value.

Should you have any queries regarding the above, you can contact me [email protected] or on 9273 3500.

71 Stirling Highway Nedlands WA 6009 • PO Bo 9 Nedlands WA 6909T 08 9273 3500 F 08 9273 3670 E [email protected] Printed on 100 per cent recycled pa er. nedlands.wa.gov.au

10. Jul. 2012 13:16 A Jo. 0344 P. 1

/ oo

Plan ing and Development Act 2006Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmisstonMetropolitan Region Scheme Amandmont 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

DEPARTMI fl LANNINGS

1 1 JUL 2012

FILE

OfFlCS UBS ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Ferttl WA 6001

Submission 124

Contact phone numberEmail address

Tips for completing a submission:« Use headings or n mbers lo separate different topics and Issues

Include pro erty addresses and specific locatio descriptions where elevant• Attach a dilfonal numbered ages If you r quire mom space to com lete your submission

Submission

4

The MRS amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling High ay Reservation has beenreview d by myself and the following issues have been identifie to reject the proposed increasei reservation area,;

1. The increased reservation boundar (re ) ould require St Quentins Apartments to bedemolished;The St Quentins building was onl recently built and met all local planning authorityrequirements, including ensity an appearance; andThe concept of establis ing an extra lane on ShVIing R ill ot alleviate trafficcongestion on Stirling H y.Jij

agree ith the proposal to increase the flo of traffic alongStirling H but c ntests meStirling Road.

2.

3.

i,.&proposal to increase the reservation boun ary (red) along

1U. Jul. ' u 1 :16 No. 0344 . 2

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amen ment may personally resent the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-com ittee oftheWAPC if the below'Yes' box Is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourw itten submission will be consi ered in etermining the recom endation for the propose amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further Information on sub issions and heari gs is Included in Appendix E of t e amendment report.

Pleasa choosa one of the following:

OR

Q YOS, I wish to speak al the hearings, (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:Q Myself-M telephone nu ber (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokes erson: > Co tact telephone nu ber (business hours): Postal ad ress:

I would prefer my hea ing to be conducted in:ublic (members fro the general publ ic ay attend your presen ation)

ORD Private (onl the people nominated by you or the hearings com ittee will be

ermitted to at end)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC Is subject to the Fmedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under Ihe act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or aking Its report on these submissions, copies of oursubmission or the s bstance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties,

• ll hearings are recorded and transcribe . The transcrlpls of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled In Parliament and u lishe as p blic recor s should the Go ernor approve the pro ose amend ent. TheWAPC recommendations are si ilarly publishe In a report on submissions an table In Parliament

To be signed by personfsl mak ng the submissio

Sfgnalure Data

Note: Submissions MidsT received by the adver ised closing date, ying close ofbu iness (5pm) oK 7 l)LY 2012. Late submissions will NOT bs considbred.

ConladK Telephone - (OB) 0551 900: Fax-(Dfi) 65&1 goal, Email-m 6@plannlngmgo .eui Websiifl-hnpVAwAv.piBrvnlng. a.0ov,

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 125

NameI a

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) . /

AMress

Contactjlhone mlrehA4S£ S 2.?-ATn-Bftail-a®ra|S .. L l. .fel d d.fcfbi o im J Cter Ji .

Tips for ompleting a su mission: c. U C a AJ . 2 f\ J-tjselieadinge-omumbers-Lo-separaleAtfferenI topics and issues

. Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

( '

Crlf . ,ApTl. f . . . f D. rr ... ••(. .' ?. il._.'i'if..

frA . / c s j. (rk .

Pb Ai. Pi. A AX?..... i.JJ.. fy . .f

c c V~: .. PPX.'A?.

7 C. w?. .S ./ ..... .. . fi , ?Vc 2 :4 .!?... T7.

..;.. .3 , ! .P.fi& Xi A r... .< 7... ... Pf . Q J

jfe o.u/ f.&QdX. . ... . s> d?. . Ac.C.c J.C..

(2l (

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

U No, I do not wish to spea at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by: 5?-

Myself- My telephone number (business hours): 7 ) ...-r..... tJRor

dl A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours):Postal address:

1 7I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

Signature

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

THE SOLUTION - SPLIT LOCAL AND THROUGH TRAFFIC

Stirling Highway carries a mixture of local traffic andthrough traffic between Perth and Fremantle. There areretail businesses along much of its length, many schools, andhouses and apartments.

Instead of widening Stirling Highway provide a newhighway for through traffic along the railway reservationand Aberdare road; commencing at Tydman Street in NorthFremantle and terminating at the WilberforceAvenue/Thomas Street/Aberdare Road intersection inSubiaco; with one interchange only at the West CoastHighway/Curtin Avenue intersection with a connectionacross the rail line to Railway Street.

A sketch of the proposed route is attached.

THE ADVANTAGES OF NOT WIDENING STIRLING HIGHWAYBY PROVIDING A NEW ROUTE FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC

• Traffic density will be less• No mixing of slow stop/start local traffic and faster

through traffic• Much safer for school children and old people to cross

the highway• Less traffic noise and pollution• No expensive acquisition of properties• Remaining properties will appreciate in value rather

than lose value• Existing businesses will not lose their present car park

spaces, where adjacent to the highway, which maymake their businesses not viable and may contravenelocal authority rules on car park space requirements

ADVANTAGES OR A DEDICATED ROUTE FOR THROUGHTRAFFIC

® Faster and safer journey times between Perth andFremantle

0 Much of the proposed route is on unused railwayreserve land

• No demolition of existing residences if a tunnel isconstructed under Aberdare Road

° Minimal impact on residences because there are fewresidences close to the railway reservation

° Reduce traffic density on most existing roads andespecially in the Claremont area

Induslnall

FREMANTLE

l r,i,I /n lnur/ ,' SMlfar irt /3r Terminal ;&/

ArthurHead

Navigation.Eoacoo South

PointMarquis

tttltlh f VFRE

ttfM vfr,f

\\ iUtf imiir

tin y**arbdkr

. * OAR PARK. COLLEGE •Jfc COLLEGE ¦. ) CYCLEW -, A DISTANCE. I emerge :

AMBULANCE STATION .vBARBECUE BOAT RAMP ... BOWLING CLUB/GREENCAM ING AREA CARAVA PARK

FOR MORE DETAILSEE M P 573

CONCISE MOTORING

ATLAS OF AUSTRALIA

F 380E G H J K •8,, L M NJOINS MAP 345 !

PARK, RESERVE. OVAL [

SCHOOL, HOSPITAl ,... [

iSCELLAMEOUS AREA .. [Vl_ =_A2 .

5A

E F o. G

V-Phone TollFree 1800 021 987

INDIAN

dtSoDDARDREAL ESTATE

• RESIDENTIAL • STRATA

COMMERCIAL

• PROPERTY SALES & ANAGEMENT i

11 Hislop Rd, Attadale

Tel: (08) 9317 1707Fax: (08 9317 1607

Email: yodre gi rel net au

OCE YN

»5JTiWi3tE PERT ittfi- *

rR== AY- DSED = ==WAY _HiV Y sr A'\ nO' TE

al ernate oute .... . ApcICA3L6 OAD

=ROPOSE =O D

pap< SERVE OVAL .

SC-CCu -OSPiTAL

.SCEL ANEOUS AREA..,

MA . P ZA

SW MP

AMBULANCE STATION ....... + CAR PARKBARBECUE A COLLEGE -BOAT RAMP & COLLEGE--BOW ING CLUB GREEN & CYC EWAVCAMPING AREA .A DISTANCE ==CARAVAN PARK JB E ERGENC

IV

DALKEITH \ 6009;

Ro)-»l Fi hivaiei Baycfy.. Y MCbb

tKbiir ." . Keanes PIPIPPER MJRT_

'GROVE! n.

SjHiWaiAn) Gifil Mostnan Bay

Park PI Resolutionwmtas /S

t&SRK i-y-ji Park.

RIVER

SMOSMANPI Waller 1'

JPARK toV WaterCooml>r\Pea \ l

:=• F DkVlCK. 5T

P l WaiterRc<natonm

Mi ¦Confere ce

Cnu ConteQ * Cfut KKJSO

BEAQL*

Walter'TomSkaie Peno pA /

Pesemt/S rfeS.. fr' SL

CW.'STCf.Goll Course

Minim oi'S' [ray]-''. PM ~~i

COLDWB S

fie TONPEI BROXE

ST V BECHW

iHwaiKWMBIA ST

306JOINS MAP 286

G lM. H J K

8 H J-JJOINS AP 326

K L ,c M N

4 CJ9D SOUAJIES MEASURE 1km

; RESIDENTIAL - COMMERCIAL - STRATA - SALES & MANAGEMENTDARD aie ph: (°8) 9317 no?- -z - aoale www.reiwa.net\goddard• Email: godre@ net.net.au Map ref: 307. F15

.••I 7Ri==ICROUTE. - ROUNDABOUT ,.o SWIMMING POOL . .* SCHOOL - PRIVATE TELEPHO E tr

:.-:= :-/.o=SrP i

ffi:=: *

acs :¦= :i s

RCHOOI - PUBLIC a TOILETS i«sem ITS . TRAFFIC LIGHT SERVICE STATION SHOPPING CENTRE ¦ !

WEIGHBRIDGE WINERIES

8

i Ped Upaii

HIU5IES = =. 5! _ -J?r\ ¦ -mr-,. I

.. OSBORNEw/ ® Is"/ /AJ/STEY ST

i oif u 1R IE ST c5

Pit Vi 1zCD

utlb

PEPPER INT McrOc _

ai /. i ' ¦ II / Co**s°Gr\4 -il J 11/ Boalthed bOl 1

5 WARATAH

fJZZ

fe |: r-zl: sr.n v

•S4 =S ;*-.= Vi'/ AFFIC ROUTE .* ROUNDABOUT . SWIMMING POOL,,.3 - :¦. : ;=1SA ,.tt SCHOO -PRIVATE ...„.. r telephone

Si < <= -.ilEO1 WORSHIP „,..£ SCHOOL - PUBLIC t3 TOILETS -as 4 » v3s;. ; / SCOUTS r„ n K.-jr- TR FFIC LIGHT.......- .,0..- « j-i- -*• SERVICE STATION <S WEIGHBRIDGE

2 SHOPPING CENTRE ,-...Ts WINERIES.™

, PUfiUSHEBS P flTD KMT

PerthLOCALITYDIAGR M

Key Map Coverage

Rosatalr Pr rf

|E L L r

CiTOSEfiT 9

'rrc -t.'. j •

MemorialFimr

Karrakstti

karrakatta

CAfiWWQfgap* -w

P&Y\ o.- . 5J 63ian<} ,Ccmpuoll

JA-na .P. il

_MYERS ST

.c awley)

O CA Q3I ST

Xss+'.iDaninsBoat La d ng

MELV1STA" H Abrah msR $/ ;

HOTCHIfinii?(sfiGOLDSMITH RD

G LLOP

PHI IP

Pi iJuA',

j-fir.u#'

WARAT H

¦fe[¦SC OO HEVaiE Pj \ . -v_ inL/C i

COPYftjHT ©UNlVEA£-*i S

for more det ilSEE MAP 577

aim•J ORID SQUARES ME SURE Ikm ATLASOF USTRALI

- G6 A B*

31

Bubanic, Marija

From:Sent:To:Cc:Subject:

Paul Kidd <[email protected]>Monday, 23 July 2012 11:25 AM

Attachments:

mrs

[email protected] on Rationalisation or Stirling Highway affecting in particularour property Katsui Studio, 343 Stirling Highway, Claremont.3032_001.pdf

Follow Up Flag:Flag Status:

Follow upFlagged

To whom it may concern

Revised submission with address of our property and removal of carparking spaces highlighted.

If replying by email please reply to paul.kidd(5)iinet.net.au

Regards

Paul Kidd

From: Ausenco Perth rmailto:[email protected]: Monday, 23 July 2012 11:26 AMTo: Paul KiddSubject: Attached Image

i

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisa ion of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 126

NameL l <hv

to I A.Postcode.

a ress

y oo -co

Address

Contact phone number

Tips for com leting a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

l t ps ir v iL .C ..p.. . , ?.5 Q.fs I \& j cJ

. C \AA,Wf K p v\ rr[ . . 70...

I fVT r. ?.T: !fY... yyrsi A . , \ W

, I J. I. .irTTT.l h> t v l

V IqT* i -TO-- - yCA. vt>.l?T SrrlTg j ..JA Fr.,.. .i/ ! ki...cvro

...I cec.rd ....... tp.r>5{a ,re .r.r.

p. Ti. Le .i: ..F

f{2 Ti rncA p le

qT c-O yv vV La ! .s | kvt.v..(l....'S..«£Z-. ; S_ i< ¦

V T .. .

tu n over to complete ou submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submissidn on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

e Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

l will be epresented by:

C Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

C] Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORC Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5 m) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website-http:// iW.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 127

Name .2 . .'. ...2. . . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) <

.2). . f TD Postcode ..2. .19..Address

Contactphon*.number Email addressH 0 , L tit 3d) CL | C r .1 ,rips for completing a submission: 1 /tips for completing

a Use headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issuesa Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant« Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

7r.. . br.... ... JAyy k. .9)92... f .. h . y9r.....

...9)....9 .. . ... .22 -.. ..Q ?y.\-i%kq>... .CVf ...

Qf\ i R O H- t ? fW j .f V3 ;....

U .... .<?... r&S.dlf k:. ..p.<?r ..X ).. jUkrkk.. k kklkk.

. . t rr . .

S. d-Vn.lpj-.. :... .. OP ALA,. .j. tvv?. . r. .Crk $... kkk Jrd

... .C. ( Ll.' dj?... .L sxh.d... Mm . !j9 C f j... O. . .<*. f rk A . .Ak/J? J

S-. d. . C.l t .. 2 ..M.. (AkAj2 a\ .h Cys S .TT. |q .rr rdv7'.0 T V>' ft . -..'. * . .fet. .am. . .. ?. A r... .Ja .. .pta.Mftk

{.a . Akrk.'C Mf s... PYvJd... .' i /?Yrk.. 9f..

d.

49 .. .U ... - .... .2) . Sjkkv/L.. - i

(q.*... kCr' riftCrYX .$ .. .4.... p ...kx' C 2.. kA).s.. f. AArk:. .

.. p fh&?. ..9... f PAk .... Ck fa. .dX

1.9.. .. . • . .fa vJC..

<i.v...A).t .(A Af.VkY9...9J....!(){M ....(pX k

turn over to co plete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours): .Qf g..9. o£?.Yor

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours):Postal address:

I would refer my hearing to be conducted in:

C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

j

)

You should be aware that:

° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

3 All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the su mission

Signature CH

Note: Submissions MUST be received y the advertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: l elephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Submission

Op AR ; ! dF PLANNING

2 0 NOV 2012

FILE

Wiet politan Region Scheme mendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

SUBMISSION NUMBER

128

Name Ken & Dot Allan

Address ostcode

(PLEASE PRI T CLEARLY)

Contact phone number Email address

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

H No, 1 do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

1 will be ep esented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

1 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of t e WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s making ths s bmission

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 900 ; [email protected]; Website - http:// ww.planning.wa.gov.au

Submission 128

From: Ken & Dot Allan <[email protected]>Subject: queen victoria street North Fremantle proposal

Date: 19 July 2012 4:20:59 PM

My Name is Dorothy Allan of Apt18/1 Corkhill street orth Fremantle I am absolutely appalled anyone in their right mind couldpossibly consider this proposal. This is the old village of North Fremantle it would be sacrilegious to harm this sacred area in anyway. I certainly hope sense prevails. YOurs sincere Dorothy Allan

DEP RTMENT OF PLANNING I

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE 1 2 ,8

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

department' of planning

2 3 JUL 2012

file

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 129i i

Name

Address T 3 . S~r , EA T r, .,£)H4 5de QSlt...

Contact phone number Email address ..J.' .T tti ti Li

Tips for com leting a submission:Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issuesInclude roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant

• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submissionSubmission

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

Ef No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amend ent. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv person(s) makin the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

I write to express strong objections to the proposals relating to the Queen Victoria Street precinct.

I am currently a resident of East Fremantle, and having lived in the area for the majority of the

period from 1995 to the present day, I have seen significant community renewal of the precinct that

I believe is under considerable threat from this proposal.

As I understand it, included in the current plans is a proposal for the widening of the Primary

Regional Roads (PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to

accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition

of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is currently zoned Local Centre

under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing development as a

'main street', with a number of small retail shops, cafes, a small wine bar and entertainment venues.

For the proposed works to be undertaken by Main Roads WA, I understand this portion of Queen

Victoria St would be rezoned from Urban to Other Regional Roads.

The demolition of heritage buildings and rezoning of the land would completely undermine the

amenity and community feel that has evolved in recent years.

In addition, the street has been traffic calmed in recent times both by reduction of traffic lanes to

sin le each way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack

of bus bays contribute to this calming. In this context, it seems perverse that facilitating bus

movements should now be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage

buildings and their value both to the local community and visitors to the precinct.

I believe WAPC should give thorough consideration to the amendment put forward by Fremantle

City Council in an effort to achieve a significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of

North Fremantle.

Jeremy Rigg

33 Walter St

East Fremantle, WA 6158

Ph 0416 215 481

Planning and De elopment Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

FILE

O PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012o2 S

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Com issionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 130

Name ,$Mi' (rite . y (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address . .5! J. . .hteiM. .. ..( .d/ . . 'foew UL.. Postcodf

Contact phone number Email address UrG .QQ ..Co , 4 .

Tips for com leting a submission:• Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues• Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant

Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submissionSubmission

Wd).....t) ...Quilnv...

.fc... .. , (i .. ivu .. .. . .. .r. .t ... /L ....

. .. .Wuk.......C .. .Cto.... tj 0.... (ldm< .Cfririt /U . tf.uJ.U

j;t (/) iMpo bu to..jct p - l . ...Sh . yjOfc j . Sl cfc l! K iA/t i ( £Ut Iw ....

.. ljMui.. ...J H.. .li.. ico... . i ..io rl cL*/.. .:jv>/

. .C .... CU kI. ... .. .Cl... j . ....-tor.. ...... .dd.. .< 3... ./ ... cl .

W t l . i M (tt.... .Cld l p. .W-£.brl...

. .IklL. l. Cftr$.. l... ,IM>1 Icim.. . f.. .tv .d... ...

. ... n. . . i .. .d.. m ckd -k>.. . .he.... Jfrms &ft.

... .Qi{n .. Sk C =... ti t.... .Ct fc yM , fek .1

.. M R... C .I. ylJMv.. d! .. .fee..Cftt .. <@.. .St Vrt;.... .. .ftfecut..

x i _x_ i : : *. i. (a ia a /) ; A .turn over to complete our submission Uj u'

eoL /C.,(« e. f-

toe («<M w Sto/ r« in0 16 to OlVic, J as -

uybthv

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the for and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details) |

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go ernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; Website - http://www.pianning.wa.gov.au

INTRODUCTION

Examining the MetropolitanRegion Scheme is anopportunity to discussplanning policies.

For example, car free citieswill probably become the norm.

How do we future proof andbuild a sustainable urbanWA and not loose our currentlifestyle amenity?

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

SUBMISSION 130Tabled at the Hearings 29/10/13

In 2007, the Bureau of Transport andRegional Economics estimated thatcongestionis costing Australia almost$10 billion a year.

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

It was hailed as a solution to some ofMelbourne s worst traffic roblems.Now four years after it opened, TheCitylink tollway is the focus of a newtraffic nighmare - worsening peak-hour congestion on the roads that feedinto it.

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

If road users were c arged for thecost of travel choices, peak urban usewould decline and so would congestionlevels. The cost could decrease offpeak times and rural roads.> Use GPS technology

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

PERTH CONTEXTIn June 2010, the populationof Perth was 1.696 million

ABS projections of populationindicate that Perth willcontinue to be one of thefastest growing capital citiesin Australia into the future,having an annual growth ratebetween 1.6 and 2.5 per centover the next decade.

ABS publishes projectionsup until 2051 and predictsPerth s population to bebetween 2.7 and 3.8 million.

CONTEXTRationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reser e

ST IRLING H WY

Stir ling Hwy co n nectsthe Western S ub urbs wiFremantle and Pe rth.° It is bot a cj i strict an

loc;al road» 27 mins (at 9.5I3pm)° Re a k hour... 40 ins

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

CONTEXT

STIRLING HWY LANDUSE

schoolsu wa

CONTEXTRationalisation of Stirling Hwy Re erve

STIRLING HWY LANOUSE

health clinics + hospitals retail

CONTEXTRationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

MRS Amendment 1210/41

j

Road Reserve

Cross Section C - (29.5m Pedestrian ro ing) us p iority lane Intersection for a m in T Juctlo intersection

The rationalisation of the Stirling Highway reservation toimprove pedestrian, cycling and public transport = goo thing!The proposed ultimate Stirling Highway road design ismade up of the following features:

• two lanes of through traffic in each direction (similar to the existing situation);» widening verges to 5.1 metres (on each side) for improved pedestrian safety;• introducing solid central medians 2 metres to 5.5 metres wide to prevent uncontrolled right hand» turns and act as pedestrian refuges for informal pedestrian crossings° introducing 1.5 metre wide on-road cycle lanes (on each side) for safer cyclist movements (future best practice may warrant

redesign of proposed cyclist lanes utilising the allocated 3 metres);• introducing bus queue jump lanes at existing and proposed traffic light controlled intersections for-priority movement of

Transperth buses.

TYPICAL SECTIONRationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

MRS Amendment 1210/41LEGEND

PROPOSED KERB LINEDESIGN LI E MARKINGDESIGN CYCLE LA EPROPOSED BUS PRIORITY LANEP OPOSED PRIMARY REGIONALROADS BOUNDARYEXISTING CADASTRAL BOUNDARYSTATE HERITAGE LISTED PROPERTY

OCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY

NORTH FREORationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

MRS Amend men! 1210/41LEGEND

PROPOSED KERB LINEDESIGN LINE MARKINGDESIGN CYCLE LANEP OPOSED BUS PRIORITY LANEPROPOSED PRIMARY REGIONALROADS BOU DARYEXISTI G CADASTRAL BOUNDARYSTATE HERIT GE LISTED PROPERTYLOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY

NORTH FREORationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

COMPLETE STREETSA Complete Street is onethat is designed for people,not just cars.

Complete Streets focuses onstreets as a lace to go andspend time, not just a wayfor cars to pass through.

Complete Street considerst e street as a social spacefirstly, and aims to re uceprivate motor vehicle trips.City of Moonee Valley, Victoria

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

CONTEXT

OLUC

\ (Xo

o><DW

QC

\ ov'a

CONTEXTSingle lanes and onstreet parking slowsthe traffic

Lack of bus baysalso assists with thecalming of traffic

NORTH FREORationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

CONTEXT

These residential properties wouldbe demolished

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

NORTH FREO

'--

CONTEXT

Limestonewalldemolished

Retail propertieswould bedemolished

NORTH FREORationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

CONTEXT

Rationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

CONTEXT

NORTH FREORationalisation of Stirling Hwy Reserve

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

For 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 131

Name M &VAct.#A> jA&........(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address . /I. .'1.. L/Az &itfttA p. flC... fitUA /XU/f .. (z&a

Contact phone number Email address

Postcode

Tips for completing a submission:• Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues• Include property addr sses and specific location descriptions where relevant

Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to com lete your submissionSubmission

? ;f/. .... Sfca ' xG.. . .0lP/ £S/)Xl/. ... . /k>.

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the botto of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

CD Myself- My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

CD Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORC Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personfs) making the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the ad ertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://ww .planning.wa.gov.au

Hearing of su missions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the a endment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be ep esented by:

E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

o

EH A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: ... t: .Ei' .kT..... .0. ....... .......

Contact telephone number (business hours): :.|. . . Vr.\... (E. .'3. . .. .

Postal address: Y ' l-(Y -¦ • foY

I would p efer my hea ing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amend ent. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

i o be signed by personfs) makin the submission

Note: Form IVIUST be received by close of business (5pm) on 1 OCTOBER 2012.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Mrs. M.G.V. Jeffree

11A Crossland Court,Peppermint Grove l/V 4 6011

Ph:93844892

Saturday, 21 July 2012

Secretary,Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 3 JUL 20)2

nLE £i£.\0 h£Dear Sir/Madam,

Re: Rationalisation of Stirlin Highway Reservation

I have perused the draft information regarding this matter as sent to me for the impact it will haveon my property at 512 Stirling Highway, Peppermint Grove (Lot 401, plan number 1.7148 [399-e]). Itis proposed to take 9.5 metres on the north side directly across the property (after an existingallowance of 0.7 metres) to 9.1 meters at the south side totalling 222m2 in area. This will have asevere impact on me in several ways, some of which are listed below:

• This property is rented to a secure tenant and reducing both the rentable area of thepremises and the useable area of the car park is going to reduce the rental value.

• The tenant is concerned at the effect the changes will have on access to the propertyo in the short term while such works are carried outo and in the longer term with the changes to the traffic flow

• The building is quite old and I have been discussing renovations/changes to the highway endof the showroom including possibly demolishing/replacing the awning and the displaywindows. Now there is uncertainty as to whether such changes can be done at all orwhether they will be done and then immediately removed when the property is truncated.

• The car park requires changes to the drainage and resurfacing that have also been underconsideration but again this could be wasted when the property is truncated.

I have serious personal reservations as to the wisdom of all these changes in that all they will do isallow more traffic on Stirling Highway with no apparent improvement to the movement ormanagement of traffic that has exited the highway or is trying to enter the highway and in particular,traffic trying to cross the highway that will face an even longer wait at even more traffic lights andthe added frustration of no increase in the number of crossings over the railway.

Most important of all is that I am now 88 years old and need an expedited decision on theseproposed changes so I can finalise my plans for the changes to my building as it is obviously looking

run down and cannot be allowed to stay this way.

Yours fa'tHfiillv

Marjorie Jeffree

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Submission

DEPARTMtNf OF PLANNING1

2 3 JUL 2012

gllc iLsIo

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 132

Name ...FAW -i Kk ' (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Postcode . 5®

Contact phone number Email address ! /.t l . l l ( /vi r< i

Tips for completing a submission: C> ~ Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuesInclude property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant

• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to com lete your submissionSubmission

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself-My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

» All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

SUBMISSION

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirlin Highway Reservation

Submitted by A & A Bagshaw

1. We declare a direct interest in the matter in that we o n a unit (4/1A Osborne Parade,

Claremont 6010: facing Stirling Highway across from Eric Street) which would bedirectly affected if the Amendment is approved.

2. We recognise that Stirling Highway is an important road between Perth and Fremantle

which also services many homes and businesses in the suburbs along its route.

3. We also recognise that the population of the Perth metropolitan region is increasing,

bringing with it many more vehicles travelling on our roads. This suggests to us that

public transport should assume a role of greater importance in the movement of

people in the future. Stronger measures should be taken to encourage people to use

public transport; otherwise we face potential traffic jams in the busiest areas of the

greater Perth region, including vehicles travelling along Stirling Highway.

4. We have particular concerns with the proposed Amendment in the specific section

which includes the Claremont central district. If in fact the Highway cannot be

sufficiently widened between Leura Avenue and Stirling Road in Claremont, and a

proposed 50kph speed limit applied, it seems self evident that a bottleneck will existwith vehicles travelling in both directions. This seems an ideal recipe for traffic jams,

especially at peak times.

5. We propose two suggestions for consideration:

(a) That Stirling Highway be a preferred route for public transport (buses) butrestricted to private vehicles (only travelling within the local suburbs) and

commercial vehicles servicing businesses within those local suburbs. The

present two lanes could remain, with the inner lane being a bus only lane

from North Fremantle to Crawley. And the outer lane could have a 50kph

(or even 40kph) limit on it.

Page 1 of 2

(b) That a major transport route be constructed along the Fremantle/Perth train

line between North Fremantle and Subiaco. The railway line would be

sunk, with a 4-lane road constructed above it with minimum traffic lights

to ensure a free flow of vehicles. This road would be designed for through

traffic travelling between the Fremantle region and Perth/Northern

Suburbs. It would start at North Fremantle (off Stirling Highway); therewould be a few key junctions (such as Marine Parade and West Coast

Highway, Cottesloe; Aberdare or Nicholson Roads, Shenton Park and

finishing at Bagot Road, Subiaco) for vehicles to enter/exit.

Dr ANBAGSHAW Mrs A C BAGSHAW

20 July 2012.

Page 2 of 2

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Submission

department of planning

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWeste Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 133i i

Name John Robinson (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address ... 1.4/26 Broome Street, Nedjands Postcode .

Contact phone number. .(9.P)P.PP?.1P?.P Email address . J. [email protected]!D? ij.• 99m.

Tips for completing a submission:Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuesInclude property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

I fully support the proposed MRSA 1210/41 which entirely deletes the Primary Regional

Roads reservation from lot.500 (No.. 26) Broome St, edlands.

I am the owner of unit 14 at lot 500. My townhouse is directly adjacent to Stirling Highway.

The amended boundary.wiljensure.that my courtyard will .remain .intact a.s an. integraj .part,

of the property that I own.

.Quality.of Life ;

This amendment will maintain the necessar living space required for me and my famil to

continue to enjo a reasonable quality of life.

.P pert . Value

Ensuring that my land remains as is will im rove the resale value of the pro erty.

.Ayojdance.gf Legal. Complications...

. The courtyard .is common property .fpr.th.e.c.qm .le.x.o.f. 20. units located.at lot 500 . althou h

specified as or exclusive use by unit 14'. The amendrnent will remove the otential

, complications of reaching, agreement vy.ith .20 common.property oyyners oyer the.size and..

equitable.distribution, of com ensation.for reclaimed land.

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

SI No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv person(s) making the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website-http:// ww.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 134i. .. i

Name .. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Postcode

Contact phone number.. .... Email address . i Y.' .' .yT U-C

Tips for completing a submission:Use headings or numbers to se arate d fferent topics and issuesInclude property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevantAttach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

(Tyy\ vc.-r>V\y o o \ajL.....dA-.wV9.V ...tPu- y . <a

.. fy i Vp.cocLti'Lv v S

. y .cL .,.ViP.'TrVVy. . ,V>. . .\ .... . VV . V\. ,V\ /1

l/Xo T U. ,i cy .t IuOfA VyVvA fC cy ) Vyi vyWt Uyl ksbb Vta . . , Y.<?vcr. rVoTV , t yy .Aby. y?v o.V .( vr brrt

VlvcA. p \ ov .SVVTrT: .(1 i .b kp/yc Tro /a C A V

fj /..... ip Cj V Vl icly . yiVu.yj.., (A/x ... .ivi i. iy > 1Vs 4-..... /A (x ...

I® rv/J o y p V> bL opAibvVA A. \V tyc

1... Aij.v X.... w. . V.... a U tl.L . ... 0 v.w.rj ly T .V..... W ,... j. a aa .

. P.W>.Wldvu rt RsyoLavl Vj vva H a. . VsAroo tyv-fA Vi . . A. y .y'y. VVW . A

yes .<?o v\ i cv . oTx V y).... VWx yx vVb I V .... (co otV v Vb

IWe ;/ \vv yuVvAi . T+¦ A

..(.... yVcyv .L .. (J f i.... .fkx Cftw y \ > Vp.... .YC Vi )?..... f\WTrCiA

\y\ y jy.Q r y / 3 - jL v A . ty , VVyb.VV ...,k9. VaatA V\?.\aJ. ... tv .

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

M No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subjectto the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by personfst makin the submission

Signature . Date . AY

Note: Submissions MUST be received b the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness 15pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:// ww.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantiaf)

Form A1\

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

13 JUL 2012

FILE

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLYI

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning OommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 135

Name .,. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address . . f .. oo fi J.. ( Rj Postcode ... ? J.

Contact p one number Email address ..til&.WQll

Tips for completing a submission:• Use headings or numbers to se arate differeni'topics and iss es• Include property addresses and specific location (descriptions where relevant

Attach additional numbered pages if you require moi space to compl te your submissionSubmission

.... 5r. .'W l'fiH .7.P. ,? 6;7 fc£CT!'..TT ..fiA.OtPpS,&p.. 7T.Q ~H ,P.!hftefiZ& T.IPrx!...

... .Cj?t .. Sfr.i& . ?r. H iCr yp. R7. tk .Q . e&r ?. LXr . . TTffe. PH a PPP . ./m . fr..

Vn W/ Gh A fe scr? T MMs Lfc SOF W IT O CS&; C- 2.I ST C H fiCH

OHdflc ., 11 h ljl, A, RTt. . rH& fe.

.PA'Ap Ter r-g> r &, y. Sy. .ir/.fi CHi&c?]i/.<Ztlf .$j?;i.&riytd,ir.t.

j oy. . .rr.. .oif .w: . H.i/.rpc+i

,» feu.rr1.>f7.FfTIp4.,.O.FrC ;C- /fJ P c t O.fW H . CHDP-C,y,

.OHC&PM. tf.QLL,rh-. ftE r &y.

. . )r'.&..t1SOc(C6dg>. Gs WEETi / CyvtULjS -AH jC+tYyfV'-/ ft OBN/R rAT C*'l"'i| ( Poul h lO /)

... ... 9At . nTT T .Sy.tW. .YV.TP . H-. .. 7

e.. .FTV.(WHl?G .fteCW.ce.. . .©MtS?'.. .C.-S&. .Qt TTrtf?. M.W MPRqflL,.6.

. OOP< =Q. .8 FLAfnmi Gt.C (Y'.f i . iW.fl QdfttJ. .Fflfi .a ift.U.o/.Cr.ti.t.OW 7

j.B., 25 ;/y, i h a-t/ojV , cyr .TpM £7. . S , P TH... . f ffQV.Cif?.

3ofy) ssr © .'TlAi rS; .Qo yc&itd 5 .

turn overto complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

OZl Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

S Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

H Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

ermitted to attend)

You should be a are that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

•- In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your-submission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings atong ith all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and publishe as public records should the Governor approve thejcroposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in.a report on submissions and tabte Jn. Parliament.

TpjJjgsigned by person(s) making the submission

k . cy iSignature VfPFFY.. .Q.7r y dc Date 14- '0L7 Qp I 2

Note: Submissions MUST be received b the advertised closjitgdate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissionswvill NfbT-be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - httpVAvww.planning.wa.go .au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 mendment (Substa tial)

Form 41

Submission)Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway eservation

[department of pl nning

13 JUL 2012

file

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Sytoissto 136t I

Name i t S... 1. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .I .77, ! -r. ....i lyl'rrr Postcode ...

Contact phone number Email address . ] in pi<9pi )

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and sp cific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

Tt.,. . t 1.3 h. it?. . &a &rr. . PHfw. Fyss q.

HT fi?..+ fs? u.ift' Sw.E r ). fM " T Aorv. . i) n.O. rf.«7?. c?. . RQV? '

ViH ?clm /AQAt iTk-'/. 7.H CiSfe .PAlFSc A, W HQ RQ&r. .CTi.W H.Qi/U. A&y iO\ .j.7WE

Md E. r. AS T .... SCV T? S 07 . ?F,

o Py/V.Lu FLt-r 7 ,fte.5P. c: . tHCT.'.77TTvvfiAi- .$PtTr?.<//)C-. HHQ.-.SCTWAP-. :) y.77 TV.. l d$J CHUfiC-fl

PV.QV. R4T S 7 ' . H. t . FTf? JTVXWCV: 7.. G5:A., W.fl

a,. &ljpy) .i fcri o ..qlv. .CV.R'Tt A?..£7, e,ni7dif i?.d7 l R. M..f.R.C OP.h'?i7. TfUftC CH CH -(P T .

f P. .Re<7r.P.F T

«.7. . SQVCED. .(rimff.. RfeLMSfL'T . . fW.Q.Vj&r. Fn JM ( /noi& , 'Vietimicirv )

.7 7277,07. T .Orr.feft S-. . r. s L.7Tf. . T .7+) . . +}fe. .1. .TrfeV-.V T.t ry /.

.®.P)T=f?....WSfe...Qfrr.?7.£f;.! .A.T)S. HcfcTAp.'y 8&gr .fe .V.RGP.. H>

PuR.yt i Gl&r . .COWXT/. 5S(. gr is.. BP foi H.t7.. 7P.G.. , 2-S. .S !.'.'GU.a .G. .. fy.W M

SO Tu.Q>n ..PRo .QGAX. .-...'rr..MMYSG -..fef TCT!

.GrT.. .77' 7. SMft/TXP. . .S70G&.

turn over to coinpiete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

M No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

1 would p efer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

° The WAPC \s s bieciioihe Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissionsmadetothe WAPCmay besubject to applications for access under the act.

» In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

a All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written sub issions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Qovernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Date

Note: Submissions MUST be eceived by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness t5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - htip://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme mend ent 1210/41

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE PlSlo ktf

Rationalisation of Stirling Highwa Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 137

Name Marina Albrecht(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

18A Herbert Street, North Fremantle , , 6159

„ , , , . 93362539 [email protected] phone number Email address

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant® Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

The district centre at North Fremantle has for many years suffered from neglect and lack of investment.

However, the past five years has seen early signs of an economic renaissance. This has seen the

establishment of a range of new businesses, improvements in amenity associated with the traffic calming of

Queen Victoria Street, and the increased activity and vibrancy these changes have brought to the centre.

The Stirling Highway Activity Corridor Concept Design Report (Rev 1) prepared by Sinclair Knight Merz in

March 2009 recommended the provision of Priority Bus Bypass Lanes at major intersections on Stirling

Highway. Each of these cases sought to address delays to buses at peak periods at intersections on a

road carrying approximately 34,000 vpd.

Queen Victoria Street in North Fremantle currently carries approximately 13,000 vpd. In this context, and

given its role as a feeder road into Stirling Highway, it has little in common with the intersections noted above.

The current proposal to demolish important elements of significant local heritage, potentially threatening

existing businesses and the associated adverse impacts on local amenity, could undermine the recent

economic revitalization of the area.

Page 1 of 3

PTO

turn over to complete your submission

Page 2

Should conjesiion build up on Queen Victoria Street, in the short term this could be

addressed by altering the signalization of the lights at the intersection with Stirling Highway

during peak hours.

In the longer term, if a bypass lane was required it could be accommodated by utilizing the

current parking on the western side of Queen Victoria Street to provide an additional peak

hour bus lane and minor change to the intersection treatment at Jackson Street without a

need to widen the current road reservation.

The establishment of the proposed reserve, particularly in the circumstances of no short to

medium term commitment to implementation, has already brought, and will continue to bring,

considerable uncertainty to affected businesses that have made an important contribution

to revitalising the town centre.

Hearing of submissions Page 3

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

E3 Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

o

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hea ing to be conducted in:

EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

q The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

a All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received b the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late su missions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://vww.planning.wa.gov.au

I

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amen ment (Substan ial)

Form 41

Su missionIVieti opolitan egion Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Name ... .S SL (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .. \6q .. <_ 1 4,0 Sfy l iFJ P (aJ ,

Contact phone number.. .OtH.S. . .S JQj.0 fr: Email address ..pQrJ .V\c L. O-M

Postcode ... .£?Q \.

Tips for com leting a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

a).. i : (2,. .(s.p.J).. . .t uy. . Qf .tPe „

.2=

4

.. pte -:.... . .Cptppsu :gs .

. £0 ApCP.. ; So .r 2. . ). .... p :2 S/q!.73) ..

s. ... .p. P|Prr. ... QpfP. ....

- P. . S... .p.AQpppp ' ¦ P .....

.... A . y... VIS.CL A. ... ¦. cb. AC . A? r. .1

... .-rjrO. ... ..x.. W.Q.IAU ... PXrP . . p T rVi.S...

AiiZr&M rlu.. ... pe . P. . .5

tu n over to co plete you s bmission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in A pendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

iFOR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours): . .. > :Z\0 .}0 r

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would p efe my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)E3

You should be aware that:

° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed y person(s) making the submission

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au

A R T E L A R S ARCHITECTS

WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLA NI G COMMISSIONLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6000

Dear Mr O Hurley,

RE: PROPERTY: LOT 12 (561) STIRLI G HIGH AY COTTESLOEProperty Ref: 356B, Cottesloe

APG ref: 809-2-1=91 Pt (RLS/Q173)

Thanks for the your letter of 13 April 2012, related to the RS Proposed Amendment 1210/41,Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation and I appreciate the time and effort you ha emade to contact me personally. I am sorry for the delay to my own response/submission but Ihave been away for good eriod of the last 2 months.

I do understand what the WAPC is attempting to undertake with this rationalisation of StirlingHighway Reservation and in general I believe the highway needs a long-term plan and targetsset to complete the upgrade work to bring this important arterial road into the 21st century assoon as possible. The intended reduction of the road reserve affecting my property howeverdoes still have huge ramifications on its future viability. Whether you take 2 metres or 20metres for the road reserve, with the heritage fagade being built right on the Stirling Highway(see photo enclosed) any such work would not only destroy the visual integrity of this building,it would also destroy the structural integrity. The building is over hundred years old and theessence of this building is in the road-front fagade.

I understand that quite a number of properties will claim this similar heritage defence and it willbe quite a task for your department to discern the merits of one from the other. For example -if the Albion Hotel with similar characteristics of heritage, no front setback and located on thesame west side, is being preserved every effort should be made to preserve my building in itsentirety. An additional 2 metres surely could be taken from the east side of Stirling Hwy - theCottesloe Central Shopping Centre & Grove Library side where setbacks have been considerwithin these newer building designs.

I therefore would like to register my objection to any future road reserve affecting my propertyat Lot 12 (561) Stirling Highway Cottesloe.

Yours faithfully,

Steglen Pty Ltd

160 WELLINGTON STREET, MOSMAN PARK, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6012STEGLEN PTY LTD T/F THE ARTELARIS TRUST T/A STEVE ARTELARIS ARCHITECTS ABN 16 699 120 561

From:Sent:To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Artelaris <[email protected]>Monday, 1 October 2012 4:05 PMmrs

Rationalisation of the Stirling Hwy Reservation - Specifically Lot 12 561Stirling Hwy CottesloeWAPC Form 41 Submission - Lot 12 (561) Stirling Hwy Cottesloe..pdf

Dear Mr Neil Thomson

I attach my submission to address any hearing that may take place in relation to the proposed Stirlin Hwy

Realignment through the Cottesloe precinct - specifically in front of my property at 561 Stirling Hwy. I willalso send it by hard copy

Regards

St@ve Artel ris I Principal PRAIA

STEVE ARTELARIS ARCHITECTS | 160 WELLINGTON STREET MOSMAN PARK WA 6012

Ph: (08)9284 2977 | Fax: (08) 9383 3381 | Mob: 0418 210 104 I email: [email protected]

1

A R T E L A R I S ARCHITECTS

Submission 138

22 July 2012

Mr John O HurleyWESTERN AUSTRALIA PLANNING COMMISSIO Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6000

Dear Mr O Hurley ,

depaTtmTnt of planning

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE -ei..sJo--2

RE: PROPERTY: LOT 12 (561) STIRLING HIGHWAY COTTESLOEProperty Ref: 356B, CottesloeW PC ref: 809-2-1=91 Pt 2 (RLS/0173)

Thanks for the your letter of 13 April 2012, related to the MRS Proposed Amendment 1210/41,Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation and I appreciate the time and effort you havemade to contact me personally. I am sorry for the delay to my own response/submission but Ihave been away for good period of the last 2 months.

I do understand what the WAPC is attempting to undertake with this rationalisation of StirlingHighway Reservation and in general I believe the highway needs a long-term plan and targetsset to complete the upgrade work to bring this important arterial road into the 21st century assoon as possible. The intended reduction of the road reserve affecting my property howeverdoes still have huge ramifications on its future viability. Whether you take 2 metres or 20metres for the road reserve, with the heritage fagade being built right on the Stirling Highway(see photo enclosed) any such work would not only destroy the visual integrity of this building,it would also destroy the structural integrity. The building is over hundred years old and theessence of this building is in the road-front fagade.

I understand that quite a number of properties will claim this similar heritage defence and it willbe quite a task for your department to discern the merits of one from the other. For example -if the Albion Hotel with similar characteristics of heritage, no front setback and located on thesame west side, is being preserved every effort should be made to preserve my building in itsentirety. An additional 2 metres surely could be taken from the east side of Stirling Hwy - theCottesloe Central Shopping Centre & Grove Library side where setbacks have been considerwithin these newer building designs.

I therefore would like to register my objection to any future road reserve affecting my propertyat Lot 12 (561) Stirling Highway Cottesloe.

Yours faithfully,

STEVE ARTELARISPrincipal / DirectorSteglen Pty Ltd

160 WELLINGTON STREET, MOSMAN PA K, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6012STEGLEN PTY LTD T/F THE ARTELARIS TRUST T/A STEVE ARTELARIS ARCHITECTS ABN 16 599 120 561

TELEPHONE (08) 9284 2977 FACSIMILE (08) 383 3381OBILE 0 18 210 10

SUBMISSION 138TABLED AT THE HEARINGS 16/10/13

f3n

52 i2 2926

1¦»

27I8j

A GnoN

U/ 5.9

LEAN

22 2\

a,820I 19

\JM.2

(0,6

•?.2

2 12.0 3?500 r6.4

6.4

STREET6.4 90

19.

i cr

/Q 2506.3

/ g 91f f>7\

1 %

Gvy 3 353 / h-tyM H Vl tf >/V/7 /.5 J- 3

a <tUN r 2? 3YW (P S m n un™loNY) M HI 3( 3n <j) AphJ 0(1 tt/W nj A//

swoji 337/ j-f (7A*J- ( i vo om S 3 003 (r miiM vti

33.$(7. 3.7fV N .r. . .LNa in/vo 3 Hi iui j 3133303 '-33 wYi 'fi V 3ft Vh £

: lV(? '¦ '{ ¦' '/ ' '' '¦ 33'nQ""j5(/31 ll l'' 5iHl''"IN33 W 'l/' "

03V 'iii V'Q' 'xj '"31 '"hiwn ' W ' 'v'" '"

l iVt o' ' aai ' ''' aaw" a/vj '; 5 a ' (£p' 9 35''' x '' c

ViVoXid''"m3 X '&"" ""dVoV''" .X30 vVyi Xfi 13 j" nlkf'i'iy'aXj "VXV'eW'' "h 30X103 "s ail'd a H a Hi'' ' i''' VaiVlWi'

3Q X 0' "I lH d'lW "V l " 1W '(oVVm ""n Ijjw id V""'" " i iVwVila''"jWi il fii/j"'nm''' ii3"' " disW x " z''

•" ali '' "VnV h i'l '(/'ill ' O h o 'y) 3ill''ll'"f\ [13H t " ' i'1 'i'S''' 3o''(IqIld'3si3 i}"' "3" ''"i

i'll" 'l7' "i'l 'lAjil '' s'' "v i io""(i'3'iiril "3(?"'ViW''' 'Ml ""o'!

liiol" ' oi 'li/' v'' mh s if' 'ill'll "V" sii''' Mow Mi

lo'/sh WMs'''m do'' li "1 "ill! "'ll" iaiw'' 5 in MX o)'''' 3 HZ' vi""

'[i/Q i a 'mi m m '' 3 i/ nfisW'' '113 H o IH VH'i l' i lo 'dills' Vi 0) d " "Ml

m mm? 'io'ioji ' iii voi o i a oi iniii Irlaill' Mid u lolri" W "

uojssjiuqnguoissiiuqns jnoA efe/duioo o) ooeds sjoiu ajmbsj noA fi seded pejequinu leuoifjppe qoe)] / »

fUBAe/ej ejeqm suoqduose uo/;eoo/ oyioeds pue sessejppe A adojd epn/oui <»senssi pue soldo) )uejejjip 9)ejedss o; sjeqiunu jo sBui eeq es o

luojssjiuqns e Buifeiduioo o} sd)±

YW ' UOO l ' Szi' ( j I i?" SS3JPPB IIBLU3 yi'Sbl'oboO'o"" 8U0Lld bjuoqYj/9 U±VON 3hZ *M 01 ll l

g 7? 0pools d VM " "Ij'iM(Vi'lJ ' M 3 MiWV YZ SS9jppv(AiavaiOlNIMd 3SV31d)

'llinl'"Vy) lVQ 9LUEN

g£ yoissimqns

11

A1N0 3Sfl SOIddO

1 009 VM L|)JSd9092 Beg ps> o-|

uoissi iujoo Bujuusid UE!|Bj)snv uj0)S0/v\Ajei0jo0s :oi

uoqEAjesey Abm Bih Bujijqg |o uoqesjiEuoqe

l i 31U

miinr

9NINNV1d JO lN3 1dVd3q

I IOIZV iuei puaiu suiaijog uoiBay UE iodoj ai j

uoissiiuqns

yi lujoj

(iBjjuejsqng) jueuipueiuv V uopoag3002 V lU9Lodo|0A0a pue BuiuuBid

4. ConcernsThe resumption of Queen Victoria St (from the intersection lights at StirlingHighway to Tyderman Road lights) into the Stirling Highway Reserve and part ofthe Main Roads plan into the future is both short-sighted and incrediblydetrimental to the local community for a number of reasons.

1) Effect on Sense of Place and CommunityAs a past community engagement and development specialist workingdirectly with many local shires, the East Perth Redevelopment Authority(now MRA) and Midland Redevelopment Authority, I know howchallenging creating and maintaining a sense of place and positivecommunity wellbeing can be.Great places don t happen quickly - the best ones develop over manyyears and they become a fundamental yet intangible part of a communitythat flourishes and functions.Queen Victoria Street and the heart of North Fremantle is one of thoseamazingly special places. It has grown and evolved to become a very smallcorner of the world that delights both locals and visitors with its eclectic

sense of place, gathering and spirit.It is a place where you can stop, breathe, catch up on the local news andinteract with like-minded people in spaces that are warm, friendly andmost of all places that are rich in heritage and history.There is no suburban shopping mall, no artificially created landscapedplaces or sad looking skate park. It is rather a place, that due to theforesight of local business leaders like Murray Gill (original founder ofHarvest), Gerry (original owner of Old Bridge Cellars - one of Perth s laststanding independent bottle shops), Clint Nolan (current owner ofHarvest), Hamish Fleming and Siobhan Blumann (owners of Flipside andMrs Brown#) and Paul Bower (Matilda's antiques) and all the other localbusinesses that straddle Queen Victoria, that today brings people togetherdaily to celebrate the wonderful things in life - old bits of history, greatwine, good food and good company. It is a place where at any givenmoment and any time of day you can see people standing on the curbchatting to their neighbours and getting to know those in theircommunity. This is an attribute that is rare and often lamented as beingcompletely lacking in Perth, or our modern way of life.As a case in point, when Gerry, the past owner of Old Bridge Cellars onQueen Victoria St, retired after many years of service to the NorthFremantle community, around 300 local residents came down to say theirfarewells and wish him the best at a unique event at the North FremantleBowling Club. One resident said so accurately said in their speech on thisday that it is a special type of community that gathers to support a localbusiness owner, with numbers such as these only seen in days of old at aChurch on Sunday. To draw a line through the heart of this communityand take that spirit away is absolutely ludicrous.As a family, we recently commissioned a pre Christmas 2011 familyportrait session in this very spot as it represents to us - history,community, family and the place that we come together. This is another

Danicia DutryPO Box 292North Fremantle WA 6159

tele hone08 9319 9075mobile

email

qa@hig way I .com.au

0 09089532

small example that gives a sense of the joy that we find in a place quiteunlike anywhere else in Perth.

2). Queen Victoria St is NOT Stirling Highway.There is no need to resume or rezone Queen Victoria as part of theStirling Highway reservation. As we are all aware, Stirling Highway runsto the other side of Queen Victoria across into the new bridge and spaceexits on either side of this artery to make any additional lanes or safetychanges effectively without impacting on this area.In addition, Curtin Avenue/Port Beach Road to the ocean and railway sideprovides another major route to the old bride via Tyderman Road. Againthere is plenty of space on either side of Curtin Avenue/Port Beach Roadto add whatever lanes maybe required into the future. There is no logicalreason to add Queen Victoria third route into the equation. See mapattached as Appendix 1.

5. Additional Considerations.

1) Could the use of Stirling Highway on the new bridge andTyderman Road/Curtin Avenue be further utilised as the accessroutes into and out of Fremantle and leave the heart of NorthFremantle well alone into the future? This could mean adding aPedestrian bridge over Curtin Avenue at the Beehive Montessori andNorth Fremantle train station intersections to improve traffic flowdown Curtin Avenue and encourage more traffic down this route,particularly in the morning peak hour.

2) Could we not use this as an opportunity to encourage the heart ofNorth Fremantle town centre even more by zoning it for localbusiness, residential, civic and cultural uses?

3) Could we include in the future lans, the option to pave the areaof Queen Victoria between the lights at Stirling Highway andTyderman Road, along Harvest Road in front of HarvestRestaurant and down Burns St for local traffic, cyclists andpedestrians only? This would avoid congestion altogether and forcetraffic back down the major arteries, as per point 5.1. As theredevelopment of Matilda s Antiques takes effect this would add suchan asset to an already thriving local area.

I thank you again for the opportunity to provide this submission and trust thatthis together with the consistent points already articulated by local businessesand residents of North Fremantle that we can protect its heart into the future.

PAGES

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticke . This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

El Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)IF £ / MFY) f\PP/loPn< TB

I will be rep esented by:

[3 Myself - My telephone number (business hours): .Q .Q J. . .Y. i

or

[3 A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORE Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the APC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

Signature .. Date .. . . U.. '.LJ.

/ _______ - __Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed b the ad ertised closing date, being close of

business (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telep one - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

ueen victoria st north fremantle - Google Maps18/07/12 10:38 PM

Go gk Address Queen Victoria StNorth Fremantle WA 6159

Gilbert i-raserReserve

A

Pi*r 2I1 Apartment

Tne Fher

Sorretl Par v? Tne Left Ban1n Cafe Re\

<2-

Cann'trtS

©2gi2 Google - Map data ©2012 Google, Wherei R), SensStPty Ltd -

f°cm iftn &£j)Oi / obo - ry oewi o /Is ccess r

to siverd f>£t>£STn FfiJ HU - g/LiDC{ES TD imP/lo E FLOW POiT

rio St ticrv 9 ofxi rz soax: t Pe.fin Hou p r

6(IX>F&~ TO / /Cft.eASe i\ PeOL OF THI SloUT£ oUFfL6UA<? k/ \J \CTbfL f .

ftoftCT H£A*T OFW««W ite t Art tC + t.Cfi C duT

' Opptndiy. 1:

http://maps.google.com.au/maps?hl=en&q=queen+victoria+st+no...6159&gl=au&t-h&z-16&vpsrc-0&ei-U8oGUP3mOcnSmAWQ3uiSCQ&pw 2 Page 1 of 1

6F S7lr4tiw

Add if io f©

Submission i3§

From: mrsSubject: FW: Stirling Highway Amendment 1210/41Attachments: Stirling Highway Ammendment Submission.pdf

From: Danicia Dutr rmailto:[email protected] : Tuesday, 2 July 2012 11:28 AMTo: corporate; curtinavenuetaimanunsell.comCc: [email protected]: [email protected]

Subject: Stirling Highway Amendment 1210/41

Dear Premier, Minister Day and planners,

Please find attached an electronic copy of a submission for the Stirling Highway Reservation Proposal(specifically in relation to Queen Victoria St North Fremantle). This follows a hard copy of the samesubmission mailed to the WA Planning Commission Secretary last weekend.

Thank for the opportunity to make comment on the proposal. I cannot express enough how crucial it is thatwe protect and encourage the sense of place that has been achieved in North Fremantle and as such do notproceed with the proposed changes to the reserve in this section.

Queen Victoria St (like the nearby George St in East Fremantle) are absolute assets to this city - from acultural, community and lifestyle perspective. They are the essence of the definition of great places and whatour community needs. It is this intangible sense of place that is present in applauded and liveable cities likeMelbourne and other overseas capitals and is so often absent in our own city. It is only going to get betterwith the current proposals for new developments in Matilda s Antiques and the continued growth of otherlocal businesses in the area.

I trust and so sincerely hope that in this early stage of planning we can make the most of the opportunity torecognise and protect this rather than destroy it. Especially when so many other options for traffic exist withinmetres of Queen Victoria St.

Thanks you again for the opportunity.

Yours sincerely,

Danicia Dutry

r

DANICIA DUTRYCeremonies

Authorised Civil Marriage CelebrantPO Box 292North Fremantle WA 6159

Mob:0409089532

Email: [email protected]: http://www.daniciadutrvceremonies.com

Looking for personal ceremony ideas, check out my recent articles published on Ms Polka Dot..http://www.polkadotbride.com/2012/05/tips-for-outdoor-weddinq-ceremonies/http://ww .polkadotbride.com/2011/06/tellinq-vour-storv/http://www.polkadotbride.eom/2011/12/takinq-that-once-in-a-lifetime-walk/http:// ww.polkadotbride.co /2012/02/surprise-here-comes-tl)e-bride/

1

Plannin nd Development Act 200SSection 41 Amendment (Substanti l)

Form 41Submission

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41Rationalisation of Stirlin Highw y Reservation

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Name. Danicia DutryAddress23 Duke St East Fremantle WA 6158PO BOX 292 North Fremantle WA 6159Contact phone number : 0409089532.Email: address [email protected]

To Whom It May Concern,

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Rationalisation ofStirling Highway Reservation Scheme Ammendment 1210/41.

1. My comments are made as a local resident and relate solely to thearea of Queen Victoria St from the lights at the intersection of StirlingHighway to the Lights at Tydeman Rd.

2. I reside with my family in East Fremantle (Plympton Ward) but spent 7years as an owner of an apartment in the Weeties Factory, NorthFremantle. I also have a post office box at North Fremantle Post OfficeBox which I use for my business and personal use. We frequent thearea at least daily, and on many occasions multiple times per day.

3. I have a number of concerns with the current amendment proposal inrelation to this area and these are listed over for your reference andconsideration.

Danieia DutryPO Box 292North Fremantle WA 6159

telephone08 9319 9075mobile

emailqa@highway I .com.au

0409089532

4. ConcernsThe resumption of Queen Victoria St (from the intersection lights at StirlingHighway to Tydeman Road lights) into the Stirling Highway Reserve and part ofthe Main Roads plan into the future is both short-sighted and incrediblydetrimental to the local community for a number of reasons.

1) Effect on Sense of Place and CommunityAs a past community engagement and development specialist workingdirectly with many local shires, the East Perth Redevelopment Authority(now MRA) and Midland Redevelopment Authority, I know howchallenging creating and maintaining sense of place and positivecommunity wellbeing can be.Great places don t happen quickly - the best ones develop over manyyears and they become a fundamental yet intangible part of a communitythat flourishes and functions.Queen Victoria Street and the heart of North Fremantle is one of thoseamazingly special places. It has grown and evolved to become a very smallcorner of the world that delights both locals and visitors with its eclecticsense of place, gathering and spirit.It is a place where you can stop, breathe, catch up on the local news andinteract with like-minded people in spaces that are warm, friendly andmost of all places that are rich in heritage and history.There is no suburban shopping mall, no artificially created landscapedplaces or sad looking skate park. It is rather a place, that due to theforesight of local business leaders like Murray Gill (original founder ofHarvest), Gerry (original owner of Old Bridge Cellars - one of Perth s laststanding independent bottle shops), Clint Nolan (current owner ofHarvest), Hamish Fleming and Siobhan Blumann (owners of Flipside andMrs Browns) and Paul Bower (Matilda s antiques) and all the other localbusinesses that straddle Queen Victoria, that today brings people togetherdaily to celebrate the wonderful things in life - old bits of history, greatwine, good food, good music and good company.It is a place where at any given moment and any time of day you can seepeople standing on the curb chatting to their neighbours and getting toknow those in their community. This is an attribute that is rare and oftenlamented as being completely lacking in Perth, or our modern way of life.As a case in point, when Gerry, the past owner of Old Bridge Cellars onQueen Victoria St, retired after many years of service to the NorthFremantle community, around 300 local residents came down to say theirfarewells and wish him the best at a unique event at the North FremantleBowling Club. One resident said so accurately said in their speech on thisday that it is a special type of community that gathers to support a localbusiness owner, with numbers such as these only seen in days of old at a

Church on Sunday.

PAGES

Danicia DufcryPO Box 292North Fremantle WA 6159

telephone08 9319 9075mobile

0409089532

emailqa@hig way I .com.au

To draw a line through the heart of this community and take that spiritaway is absolutely ludicrous.As a family, we recently commissioned a pre Christmas 2011 familyportrait session in this very spot as it represents to us - history,community, family and the place that we come together. This is anothersmall example that gives a sense of the joy that we find in a place q iteunlike anywhere else in Perth.

2). Queen Victoria St is NOT Stirling Highway.There is no need to resume or rezone Queen Victoria as part of the

Stirling Highway reservation. As we are all aware, Stirling Highway runsto the other side of Queen Victoria across into the new bridge and spaceexits on either side of this artery to make any additional lanes or safetychanges effectively without impacting on this area.

In addition, Curtin Avenue/Port Beach Road to the ocean and railway sideprovides another major route to the old bride via Tyderman Road. Againthere is plenty of space on either side of Curtin Avenue/Port Beach Roadto add whatever lanes maybe required into the future. There is no logicalreason to add Queen Victoria a third route into the equation. See mapattached as Appendix 1.

5. Additional Considerations.

1] Could the use of Stirling Highway on the new bridge andTyderman Road/Curtin Avenue be further utilised as the accessroutes into and out of Fremantle and leave the heart of NorthFremantle well alone into the future? This could mean adding aPedestrian bridge over Curtin Avenue at the Beehive Montessori andNorth Fremantle train station intersections to improve traffic flowdown Curtin Avenue and encourage more traffic down this route,

particularly in the morning peak hour.

2] Could we not use this as an opportunity to encourage the heart ofNorth Fremantle town centre even more by maintaining its zoningas a local community centre - leaving it for local business, residential,

civic and cultural uses?

3] Could we include in the future plans, the option to pave the areaof Queen Victoria between the lights at Stirling Highway ndTyderman Road, along Har est Road in front of Harvest

estaurant and down Burns St for local traffic, cyclists andpedestrians onl ? This would avoid congestion altogether and forcetraffic back down the major arteries, as per point 5.1. As theredevelopment of Matilda s Antiques takes effect this would add suchan asset to an already thriving local area.

PAGES

Danicia DutryPO Box 292North Fremantle WA 6159

emailqa@highway I om.au

telephone08 9319 9075mobile0 09089532

I thank you again for the opportunity to provide this submission and trust thatthis together with the consistent points already articulated by local businessesand residents of North Fremantle that we can protect its heart into the future.

Yours sincerely

liu V1 Lid'-

Danicia Dutry (B.Com]

PAGES

It takes a place to create a community and a community tocreate a place!

SUBMISSION 139Tabled at the Hearings 29/10/13

From the edgy urban enclave of Shoreditch in London to the revitalization of Brooklyn in New York, there is global recognition that texture, style, a diversity of population, an identifiable sense of community and urban living are not onlyattracting significant investment but also serving their role in tourism and

CDC0

05

Co05cC/)0

~G

Q.3

>> O= s_ s_05 05;o 0±=0

0 3R > OO S >>

0 ¦-

5 S'

05C CD 0 ° t-; JZ"U 05 •+-

1 00'

0 > 5C

¦ 0 co 050

0 05Q.

05 Cc iz "D

0o

0 5 05= o

C/j

05 3 o"o. ~ 2

03 o0 _o W

0 a) g<u £ 03> 05 S-0 I

0 Q-0 4-i- oo

Triangulation is the process by which some externalstimulus provides a linkage between people and

prompts strangers to talk to each other as if they kneweach other Holly Whyte

The Government of Western Australia s Traffic WebsiteThe Bigger Picture states the following values:Transforming. Reshaping. Reconnected.Creating a More VIBRANT and Connected Perth.

Queen Victoria St is the heart of the North FremantleCommunity. It IS a Connected, Vibrant and Transformedpart of our City.

The resumption of Queen Victoria St (from theintersection lights at Stirling Highway to Tydeman Roadlights) is both short-sighted and incredibly detrimental tonot only our local community but to our City of thefuture.

Planning and D velopment Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Su missionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

department OF PLA ING

2 3 JU1 Z012

FILE 5

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Su mission 140fc . - I

Name ... AMT tP Y...dWt.

Address..

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

$ 7 £ £ 7_ Pn tondp Ca&SO

; Contact phone number ( < .0.. 3 Email address ... eAA.APA Ak lm),

Tips for completing a submission:a Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issueso Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

II

turn over to complete you submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be epresented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would efe my hearing to be conducted in:

E Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OR[ Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or ma ing its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personfs) making the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST e receive b the advertise closing date, being close ofusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Name Anthony Monk and Shirley Monk

Address 26 Walpole Street, SWANBOURNE Postcode 6010

Contact hone numbe (08) 93844421 E ail address samonk(a)bigpond.com

Tips for completing a submission:

Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues

Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant

• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submissionSub ission

We submit that the proposed rationalisation of the existing Stirling Highway Regional RoadsReservation will have a devastating effect on the amenity and use of heritage-listed ChristChurch, Claremont built in 1893. We refer to proposed changes impacting on Lot 5 CnrQueenslea Drive and Stirling Hwy (Christ Church, Hall and Rectory, Claremont).

1. The proposed 1.5m on-road cycle lane and the bus priority queue jump lane at thetraffic lights allowing a left turn ocket for other traffic will bring traffic closer to thechurch and cause damage to the fabric of an historic building and the higher volumeof traffic will increase noise pollution. One of the stated aims for rationalisation is topropose adaptive design to minimise impacts on State Heritage property. Theproposed scheme totally negates this intention.

2. The left turn pocket will remove parking space in front of the church used byparishioners and the wider community for worship, weddings and funerals. The lossof parking space will have consequences for people who use the Parish Hall. TheParish Hall is a community resource used by a variety of groups throughout theweek. The loss of parking space will also have serious consequences for anincreasing number of elderly parishioners who require easy access to the Church.

3. It seems undemocratic to allow other traffic (i.e. school traffic) roughly forty weeksper year of school days to bring about such a major change. Meeting the needs ofIndependent School parents should not take precedence over the needs of peopleusing Christ Church s buildings. During our son s attendance at CCGS we avoidedentering Queenslea Drive except for after-school activities or late sports days “pick¬ups . While our experience as parents may not apply to other parents, surely it isCCGS and MLCs’ responsibility to assist in reducing the traffic congestion.

4. We question whether it is feasible for Stirling Highway to accommodate a cycle lane.There is a well-used cycle lane running parallel to the railway line and two on eitherside of Princess Rd. It seems an unrealistic and unsafe provision to include a cyclelane in the proposed scheme. While the intention may be to enhance social benefitsand healthy lifestyle etc. for the community at large, the proposed inclusion of a cyclelane in this constricted location seems misguided.

5. In a more general sense we question whether the proposed rationalisation of theexisting Stirling Highway Regional Roads Reservation is appropriate at this time withso many changes occurring in the Perth CBD and other inner city suburbs. Thisnineteenth century road has challenged planners for many years and alternativesolutions have been made. Perhaps in the twenty first century it is time for an evenmore radical solution to meet future traffic needs. Apart from our particular concern

1 | P a g e

(outlined above) it would be a very sad day if the historic parts of North Fremantle,Cottesloe and Nedlands were to be demolished and the heart torn out of theseprecincts.

6. Christ Church, Claremont has served people of the local and the wider community for109 years and the building has been maintained with great care, thought andexpense by the people of Claremont. The proposed scheme will have a seriousimpact on the Church, Hall and Rectory and their extensive use as communityresources. We are dismayed by, and strongly oppose the proposal as set out inL1430-2009-2.

2 | age

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

- f o pLANNINGl

13 )UL 2012

FILE lA o2

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: Secretary . .Western Australian Planning Commission Submission ! iLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001 , ,

Name....

Address .. .V. ' rT

Contact phone number . T.

Vr (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

.. Postcode . fr?. .

Email address... Av rc1f

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separat different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant* Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

... . . =?? A. >rr?lS? . .

. . i. /As;- . ?7vA, f

T2.:rr

.V.. fiT 1. \ .. S . .S.

A r- .

c pr A .A &

D \- r A.. "A. . ,<A>y J .V ,W« ... ,c=?. A

A. cp:ry£... v.T. \ .Ws .. A:.... .T rx .'7 :.

.

,'T rA... S .\~C L...(.<¦_..;J22.dSAxs -acz.

(A. LS'.VrA .L A t. . .Ay .X . . . .- . . rt f A .. . .C . .

turn over to complete your submission

I ) \

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has mae a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sjb-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submisnon will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether yoj nominate to spea at the hearings or not.

bffther information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

S Jo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

/ °R

Ef Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represente by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

1 woul prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

B Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

s The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go ernor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by persontst makin the submission

Signature Date•

Mote: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

SyfemossflOBD M2

EPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE g-l I

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: mendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vation(W PC) Increasing the existing Prima Regional Roads eservation i Wo thPremantle)

I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish buildings situated at 261 to 267Queen Victoria Street, North Fremantle.

North Fremantle, in particular this section of Queen Victoria Street, is a vibrant localcentre with small specialty shops, cafes, galleries, small bars, restaurants andentertainment.

The current WAPC proposal fails to consider the impact of the proposed changes totraffic flow on the diversity of these businesses and the social activity of the area, atall times of the day and night. The destruction of heritage-listed buildings, simply tocreate increased access for vehicles is short-sighted and fails to address the viewsof local people, both customers and business owners.

In addition, it is also completely contradictory to the traffic calming initiatives thathave already been installed to support and promote the social amenities of thisshopping precinct.

I believe the North Fremantle proposal should be removed from the WAPC draft andother options considered for the Stirling Highway redevelopment.

It is unthinkable that heritage-listed buildings could be so easily disregarded tofacilitate the needs of motor vehicles, when other viable options exist.

The Fremantle area is a unique location in Western Australia and our heritagebuildings play a vital role in creating the ambience of the Cit . Focus should be onmaintaining our heritage features along with practical transport infrastructure.

Signed

(I

Date

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 mendment (Substantial)

Form 41

Submission

DEPARTMENT OF PL NNING I

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE US Ooll/) ?

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 143

Name. i (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address ...y c/. ?, 7 . [ Postcode rFfP. ..

Contact phone number. Q. / . . Y... Y7.Y... Email address ..

Tips for completing a submission:° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issueso Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanta Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

v ........ ,....

" 2).... f-! f?Y .

. IqQ . .. T rr...

. O Ujj l. ( thYrT.....

i - . T.YyA. kf.!. t Y: fr7 )77.' Y.. . . . p. f .i . r'Y. r .

. /f\. th' r .KTTfr f . rCV. Y.trt . t rv. TTTT T

rrlYr frfi (Yffr k r:....... h. (Yr f frr..... CfcYT terrfrr n

.. l .Cr. / r. r/t. A rvA : ..... fc T .-...

r . n' Tr r. l ff>.>?. rT7 ? t7T\A -< rr - -y.f7 i -.

V . ?tt dh Sf. f2 r $./f?77r>r&-TV? <

trd.Y/ Y . ry r-.... .

s Pr <rr. L (r.f:. Y l. 77: Yin

rfri'.fr rTf. <brn .... CY7.

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amen ment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

M wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

i will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORE Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties. •

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be makin the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telep one - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://ww .planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendr|nent (Substantia!)

department of planning

2 3 JUL 2012Form 41

ft.

SufomiFILE

ssionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506' Penh WA 6001

OFFICE USE ONLY

Submiss on 144

Name

Address

(PLEASE PRINT CLE

Contact phone number

osicode ...!

b : c>'' o=mail address .

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to se arate different to ics and issues

Include pro erty addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevant¦» Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

V

I

turn over to complete your submission

Hearing of st bmissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the belcwritten submission will be considered in determiningwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not

Further information on submissions and hearings is in¦ j

Please choose one

w 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourthe recommendation for the proposed amendment

luded in Appendix E of the amendment report.

of the following:

ha No, 1 do not wish to speak at then ;

hearings. Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

1 OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the followi g details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson :

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (businesPostal address:

s hours):

I would prefer my hearing to be c nducted in:

L Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORd! Private (only the people nominated

permitted to attend)sy you or the hearings committee will be

You should be aware that:

° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1 92 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, orsubmission or the substance of that submis jcjrj, may be

iiAll hearings are recorded and transcribed,tabled in Parliament and published as public reWAPC recommendations are similarly publish

besfaned by person(s)

inaking its report on these submissions, copies of yourdisclosed to third parties.

aonji shot tsd inia rep >i

liapscrip s of all hearings, along with aii written submissions, are1 'd the Governor approve the proposed amendment. The

rt on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

making the submission

ignature .... ...]././///./.// Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received b the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness jmpm) on 27 JULY 2012. Latei submissions ill NOT be considered.! I _Ji_L !

¦Contacts: I elephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; Email - mr @planning.wa.gov.au; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

John ReesMosman Park Veterinary Hospital588 Stirling HighwayMosman Park WA 6012

Mosman ParkVeterinary

ospital

Telephone: 08 9383 2285Facsimile: 08 9383 4107

588 Stirling HighwayMosman Park WA 6012

[email protected] V.mosmansparkvet.com.au

17 July 2012

To Whom It May Concern

RE Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41. Rationalisation of StirlingHighway Reservation

I am a me ber of a property syndicate that owns the property at 588 Stirling HighwayMosman Park. I am also the managing partner of the Mosman Park Veterinary Hospital atthe address and sublet the property to Physiotherapy Solutions and Posh Dogs PetGrooming. The scheme s new boundary includes all the business car park and part of theexisting building.

Economic ImpactThe businesses at this one property employ approximately 30 people. Multiplied along thestrip of commercial premises between our premises and Glyde Street this would have asignificant economic impact on the local area. The compensation for land acquired would notcover the costs of business interruption, lost revenue and decreased good will if thosebusinesses were forced to relocate and or redevelop the property.

Traffic ImpactThese businesses all provide services to principally local people, placing little additionalburden on the arterial road system in the area as they are. Animal owners particularly preferto access local pet related services.

If these businesses were forced to reiocate, local people seeking these ser ices would beforced to travel further afield to access these services, further increasing traffic on StirlingHighway.

Scheme FeaturesOn road cycle lanesAs a daily bicycle commuter, the only reason I sometimes use Stirling Highway to ride on isthe dangerous nature of the cycle paths as they travel through North Fremantle. Moneycould be far more efficiently used to put efficient and safe cycle paths on the eastern orwestern side of the railway reserve. It is often forgotten that cyclists, as well as drivers, liketo get places in a timely manner. The circuitous cycle path through North Fremantle means itis often quicker to travel on Stirling Highway.

Off road cycle paths are a far safer alternative than on road cycle paths.

Dr John Rees BSc BVMS MSc Dr Sophie McPherson BSc BVMS Dr Ashleigh Arbufhnof BSc BVMS & Associates. Veterinary Surgeons

Mon - Fri: 7.00am - 7.00pm Sat: 8.00am - 3.00pm Sun: 9.00am - 1 1.00am Consultations by Appointment

The small numbers of cyclists that travel on Stirling Highway could be encouraged onto thewestern side of the railway reserve, with efficient off road cycle paths with more connectionsto the eastern side of the railway line and a more direct path through North Fremantle to thetraffic bridges and thei cycle paths.

Bus queue jump lanesThe low numbers of buses that travel along Stirling Highway, approximately 6 per hourduring business hours are often replicating train services. A more efficient way is to feed busservices from railway services.

Alternative measuresApropriating more of the railway reserve.A significant railway reserve runs from the pedestrian overpass at Cottesioe primary schoolthrough to North Fremantle train station. In that distance there are approximately 4businesses that would be affected by compulsory acquisition on that side, businesses thathave developed in a low input way because they assumed that compulsory acquisition waslikely.

From Willis St to Clyde Street alone there will be approximately 30 businesses directlyaffected or affected indirectly by necessary redevelopment of buildings on the eastern sideof Stirling Hwy. In that distance, on the western side of the highway, there is one business,Muzz Buzz, a take away coffee chain, based in a demountable or donger. It would makesignificantly more sense to push the redevelopment as far into the railway reserve aspossible.

The car park for the Mosman Park train station could be removed or relocated to the westernside of the railway line. This would further ease congestion at the Clyde St intersection withStirling Hwy.

Off Road Cycle Paths.When there is no alternative on road cycle paths are preferable to no cycle path forimproving safety of cyclists. However with a large uninterrupted railway reserve running fromSwanbourne to North Fremantle an offroad cycle path would be significantly cheaper thanall the forced acquisition of prime commercial premises along the highway.

With the closure of a number of the road crossings over the railway it will become cheaper,faster, and more convenient to install a safe off road cycle path, thereby encouraging morecyclists than an on road cycle path. It is known that on road cycle paths are an impedimentto many people cycling due to safety concerns.

If you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact me on 0417 931 714.

Submission i4S

5 Turton StreetNorth Fremantle 6159

T e SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth 6001Western Australia

19 July 2012

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012

FILEi

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC):Increasing the existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle

Dear sir/madam

I am writing on behalf of my wife and myself to express our objection in the strongestpossible terms to the proposal to widen the road and demolish buildings 261 to 267along Queen Victoria Street in North Fremantle.

I am a graduate civil engineer with degrees in Engineering from the University ofMelbourne and Stanford University. One of the primary responsibilities of ourprofession as I understand it is to support local communities and give a measuredpriority to maintaining heritage streets and their buildings. We are not about drivingroads through sensitive areas regard ess of the consequences.

There are alternatives to this proposal. The city of Fremantle Council for example hasproposed that the highway reser ation be moved to the west, making use of railwayreserved land. This would provide op ortunities to develop urban zoned land in thevicinity, and encourage pedestrians and cyclists to walk and cycle between theirsuburbs and the adjoining beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the P imary RegionalRoads (P ) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with StirlingHighway, in order to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposalwould result in the total demolition of the double story, heritage listed shops andaccom odation from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Page 1 of2

In the six years we have lived in North Fremantle we have seen this Queen VictoriaStreet precinct between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway come alive as the focalpoint and public heart of North Fremantle, with the establishment of rest urants,cafes, an intimate (human scale) bar, an excellent wine vendor, art gallery, smallmusic entertainment venue, antique sellers as well as a number of clothing and fabric-related shops. There is no other area of North Fremantle to where this can be relocatedor duplicated. Surely a high priority must be given in the planning process tomaintaining the integrity of this precinct.

This transformation has taken place with the enthusiastic support of our local counciland councillors, under the Council s Local Planning Scheme No. 4. The street hasbeen traffic calmed in the past few years by reduction of traffic lanes and increasedparking, giving priority to cyclists, pedestrians and local users. The few bus routesthat use this road and the present lack of bus lanes contribute to this effect. Putting ina bus lane and encouraging more vehicular traffic along this street now seems to be aprimary priority of this plan. We strongly object to it. Please go back to the drawingboard’ and develop alternatives which acknowledge and respect the work that hasbeen done to give North Fremantle a community heart.

Yours sincerely

/John Auer

page 2 of 2

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 men ment (Substa tial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

department of planning

23JUL2012

FILE I

Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation

OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Co missionLocked Bag 2506Perth A 6001

Submissio 14§

Name ..

Address

Contact phone number

~ A 4 5 TA / I L c. H.

/"V vr / (PLEASE PRI T CLEARtY) /

2. |'/ 2- Cl n ..

C¥Z U/ Email address . .AT. ?.kb. &.d.

Postcodeb Ol

C-o i/Vx.

Tips for completing a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues0 include property addresses and specific location descriptions wher relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours):Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) makin the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the a vertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

We the undersigned all being electors of the Town of Claremont do respectfully request that the Council:-

The names and addresses of your petitioners are as follows:-

Date Name Address Signature

il j 1! j IQ J an/ie L o I /i i i 2 !/vi j/I a y> t zj'C Q L- ;

jLZ-~l{-i Dtwic! Cc! v ' '.' i a {/ A / y L- i * lA i / iJd V / 7/

„x:;. / ¦ io / ; J ./-f V - O ' \ /v O i > h nJJi/i ¦ •, 7. ';

. n JJ W/:/ .< :) y C •> ./ / t- /;'/-.. /*••> Cl ¦ .-; . l . * /. ?.*' i T-1 '*» Ko r C? 'i'T.'Ci-¦7;'r/ i ,¦ J. /•ivTt vr . O.rv.'.J....

/ ¦ T ' _

/V l { Ti, ( l-v • _.

1%<II. . 0 JL-' 15 J i -i . 'l Vt \j l i C-(i_ f t- /-V WA H- f Wtil Tt T'-i'J?' r IJ 4- t • 1 ' i(- iO J/KjJ / /J7i/- U 6 ;.' Jier ! (WYtkA22. H ,10 c\ u Je.v' -V (y cdywcyrl*

7 • ! 1 • / r. t f C 7 :)f , , J ! ' 6 J V ti' *S j7. C /cirY.3,. ~rM4Uw -o SWi lea l Vi W v- Ci Cvte.w-. lAjfc

2 ..li -i u'N i i.Jl 2 U S» my to O feiohi/T / A/1 O 1 C\ fy a '/J

5.2•l0'/e, - J f [¦ /L-L. . 44m lTit S T . .07-/7 • /c ,712 ti \j j / 5 7l T7T7 > . C' 'VfoJW/W

\/ , [/\L. O /3 /' T T / J TJ T C 'VMJteo - -f fJ J. y&S T. - /U/TTA it £/!3 ~< t £>.- f

-J O It ft f~ <Xs T . // Sm/fh S : ySd fi3f!i!{o :-A JJvn fOf A ll 'orm h oA y(\ r\'r{/J' & 'JiQ u iQ \4 {$y / . t > \ j i i c { yyi / r y N i.y iy

0£' •2 / S/ v cT o JT -

,t i/ 2.J1 sY ry -<yi /yym jm

J jl! i t ) kl ifl Th r nu ( /ky-St, dytmy y y/ d i Lui 0,i )*(/y<i- 1 . 7J y, C 1 ll Si f M /

( .M M Mj o i S iii' i ul-Jr• / / j

We the undersigned a!! being electors of the Town of Claremont do respectfully request that the Council:-

The names and addresses of your petitioners are as follows:-

Date Name Address Signature

ig-ib n? 4i{2 lUt L. o cH 2- |/i/ / h» - X i A j AAzA I iM Ma R- WAR fT71% 10-iO L 1bl /BAX/Obt 3a Walt . St'RchAjII* gAZJC K.

3A <s 3/ g /oio (Jv 6.4rikEK 3/?: <St. S-if/ h« 3 -S & AAr 1% iu/in O iDS l IS /Acm ST rtV ,/ / ? / r/ Tc5 ff A Ah-U'/hAA ZyHhiL 4 B Ma S n ,jsvr£,P- -yrkir W/Wo Ich/V ZA WAUlt/Z At

. f •

ib// ///O- i iLL-iAh i Loater 1 Na it&z rteT i) i k= r.-t; ~

fifthli to [A.(( /i' 3 i2 T

idj fiO rj . nV Mi C lt rxO v X jCI (/Jt &tQk T Cfa-Y &n & t 3 - j .

t9o(}/1/ [ Q A i l/fAr& ' A _ ( A e '/y f - Aa n 'Yr~7)

< ( (([(<=> Cfff ir5y/y LoiA ' Na l feAs T

WfWA -A, a.i i pM T1 VTi 1 a. Ti.i O < i| Oc f-LotX- 33 tAo UTTr CJk -R

5/// // J L/, (%!! o 2 h a dl. cU -/s r/ / A

Submission M?

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

2 3 JUt 2012

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads reser ation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the est, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersectlornA/ith 5tTrling Highway t accommo ate bus-priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the doublestorey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed inthe amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'LocalCentre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant andentertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to singleeach way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of busbays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements shouldnow be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions. 1

ame ¦iscv cw.> Mills

Signed

a r'

Planning and Development Act 2005 DEPARTME T OF PLANNINGSection 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41 1 9 SEP 2012

Su m ssion F!LE ll lolhgMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41

Rationalisa ion of Stirling Highway Rese vation

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

OFFICE USE ONLY

SUBMISSION NUMBER

148

Name .| (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

ddress .. .I.f5 lr5.cr. !/rf. Postcode .!. ?

Contact phone number. .. PP. .r. P: .[CP... Email address ..J ! .cr i'E 0.: C- A

Tips for com leting a submission:o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issuese Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevanto Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission

Submission

...I l £•srP.. .f:.Vr? f!9.f!?i5 T.' 4 J- j;l

.. . . ?. .7... v , V _/o (/ v c ~ r-\ ljv-j 1 Q (- (jr#-

.f y li . .i.STvT'.t. P.f: t> IjL, fiX/npAjp

. . P .'fT?. .E rv .. . . .' 7... :)Pr .lryr?P.. .. . ...Q.P... .PP1. r .

. "X...t.. :-t f+. .h... .i.X.... /. ... .51 s Ic . &<2<o f rpix!

C o A C l ( 5 <2 y ' '-£ V v rA -, 1' Vr lW r?. .A. i P *1 t < c (

. .. Vs . ..... Ar TcV.... irZ?. .,7. /X. tH. ."Pp. .f.?? VaT 0- *0 fa-i <ri

.'vrp. .Wj. '.v.£....£>.P....tK ....' v. ...y.'p. . C- . pv e .t C

turn over to co plete your submission

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of theirsubmission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Yourwritten submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendmentwhether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.

t-urther information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.

Please choose one of the following:

Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented y:

E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

1 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)

You should be aware that:

° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed y personfs) ma i g the su mission

SignatureQrvvf SJ? Date

Note: Form MUST be received by close of business (5pm) on 1 OCTOBER 2012.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Submission 148DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

506/6 Belvoir StSurry Hills 201002 9217 01466

2 3 UL 2012

FILE ¦ v LSj Q<5

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling HighwayReservation (WAPC): Increasing the xisting Primary Regional Roadsreservation in Worth Fremantle)

I am writing to strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and todemolish buildings 261 to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment whichcan achieve a significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage ofNorth Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved tothe west, making use of railway reserved land. Among other comments, theCity requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate StirlingHighway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street intersection, takingthe highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities todevelop urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity forpedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the PrimaryRegional Roads (PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersectionwith Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, thisproposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey, heritagelisted shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other RegionalRoads would hand to Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enablingthem to undertake the works proposed in the amendment. Queen VictoriaStreet between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local Centre under Council’s Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function andgrowing development as a main street’, with small scale shops, cafes,showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction oftraffic lanes to single each way and increased parking. The few bus routesthat use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to this calming.It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now beconsidered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildingsand their local functions.

Regards

Stephen Thompson

DEPAm Submission 1 9

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

2 3 JUL 2012

(file

Re: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, ta ing the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus hi hly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Zamia Pedro / 9 Simper Crescent White Gum Valley / 0412484727 / 20/07/2012

Submission 15©

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

OIPARTIVl NT OF PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE ftj-S j cj / }&>

Re: Amendment 1210/41- Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing theexisting Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street. p

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve asignificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making useof railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore theopportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Streetintersection, taking the highway alongside he rail line. This would open up opportunities to developurban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists betweenadjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the doublestorey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand toMain Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed inthe amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned 'LocalCentre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to singleeach way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of busbays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements shouldnow be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their localfunctions.

Submission 151

16 July 2012

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE ¦ LLS Qcl )

Shayne MacleayUnit 7/3-5 Harvest RoadNorth Fremantle, WA 6159

Phone: +61417 937 130Email: shavne(5>cerdan.com.au

The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the existing Primary Re ionalRoads reser ation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261 to 267 along Queen VictoriaStreet.

I bel eve WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a significantly reduced cost to the amenityand built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reser ation be moved to the west, makin use of railway reserved land. Amongother comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity ofthe McCabe Street intersection, taking the high ay alongside the rail line. This would open up o portunities to develop urban zonedland in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Re ional Roads (PRR) Reservation in Queen Victoria Streetat its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result n the totaldemolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to Main Roads the responsibility forthis portion, enabling them to undertake the wor s pro osed in the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road andStirling Highway is zoned Local Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growingdevelopment as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each way and increased parking.The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous thatfac litating bus movements should now be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and theirlocal functions.

Shayne MacleayOwnerUnit 7/3-5 Harvest Road

North Fremantle, WA 6159

Submission 152

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

departm nt of planning

13 JUL 2012

FILE'

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildin s 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reser ation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Name / Address / Contact phone number / Date / Sign

\ o. c-

2- '•A- T,Vr .«Jr_ laJ 6

Oi Uc\ -\

2_ \ - o 7- - -7 o ri-

Submissio 153Page | 1

19/01120121$

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012

FILf

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

si nificantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale sho s, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

Page | 2

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Name

Owner:

tadd; PtCet261 Queen Victoria261 Queen Victoria StreetNorth Fremantle 6159 WATel: 61 8 9336 2 86Email: violetpilot.shopS'gmail.comwww. iolotpilot.com.au

Signed

Submission 154Page | 1

19/07/20123

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

DIP ARTMSNT OF PLANNING

2 3 UL 2012

file OQ_

e: Amendment 1210/41-Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up op ortunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme o.4, reflecting its function an growing

development as a main street', with small scale sho s, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

Page | 2

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Name

Manager:

261 Queen Victoria Si261 Queen Victoria StreetNorth Fremantle 6159 VVATel: 61 8 9336 2486Email: vio!etpilot.shop 'gmail.com

vAV.violetpilot.com.au

Signed

Submission 15SPage | 1

19/07/20123

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

department of pla ning

2 3 JUL 2012

Re: Amendment 1210/41-Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the wo ks proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function an rowing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

Page | 2

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasin the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 alon Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widenin of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildin s and their local

functions.

Dr Geor ie Paulik-White

Clinical Psychologist

80 Forrest Street, Fremantle, WA 6160

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Submission 1 7I DEP RTMENT of PLANNING

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE J o l-nf

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Hi hway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, takin the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

•N-a-m-e-AA dressV-C -iTt-a&t-phQne number / Date ./.Wigrr- ~

il c/ <, c SctA

DEPAi

The Secretary

Submission 1582 3 JUL 2012

FILE

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional oads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, ma ing use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a main street , with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Richard Kleinig, 1/545 William St Mt Lawley WA 6050 19/07/2012

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

DEp, Submissio

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

26 Jackson Circuit MADELEY WA 6065

0408 349 51920 July 2012

Submission I§©DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

2 3 JUL 2012

lets) o.2PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

1 the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus hi hly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Name / Address / Contact phone number/ Date / Sign

jLt'MAj , >oA I z- pL-i- LUC . -n FeT t I

;'- ' I i / 2-0 . 7, < o| -2_

Submission 161

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNINGThe Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

2 3 JUL 2012

RLE -ft-lslcu 2|(C

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reser ation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoinin suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Name / Address / Contact phone number / Date / Sign

33o n

Submission 162

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

DEPARTMENT OF PLA NING

2 3 JUL 2012

file C lolhl?

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be mo ed to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Name / Address / Contact phone number / Date / Sign

p \M I £ l- ro A7

2o /f Z.

Submissio 163

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

department of pla ning

2 3 JUL 2012

p,ip i , |o

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Emma Carr

37B Tareena St, Nedlands, WA 6009. Ph: 0430 106 530

19-07-2012

Submission 164DEPART mu.,* i ur rL h/i iNU

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alon side the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE

Tijana Vujic, 81a Oakover street, East Fremantle, 0402 454 202 19/07/2012

Submission) 165

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

2 3 JUL 2012

FILE 'Id'S

PERTH WA 6001

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that for the widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a 'main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of heritage buildings and their local

functions.

Luke, Bisho , 1/28 Park Street Como 6152, 0403 757 703 19/07/2012

Submission iii

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

The Secretary

Western Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

2 3 JUL 2012

FILEPERTH WA 6001 •

Re: Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation (WAPC): Increasing the

existing Primary Regional Roads reservation in North Fremantle)

I the undersigned, strongly object to the proposal to widen the road and to demolish buildings 261

to 267 along Queen Victoria Street.

I believe WAPC should adopt the Fremantle City Council s amendment which can achieve a

significantly reduced cost to the amenity and built heritage of North Fremantle.

Importantly, the City recommends that the highway reservation be moved to the west, making use

of railway reserved land. Among other comments, the City requests the WAPC to explore the

opportunity to relocate Stirling Highway further west in the vicinity of the McCabe Street

intersection, taking the highway alongside the rail line. This would open up opportunities to develop

urban zoned land in the vicinity, and to improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists between

adjoining suburbs and the beach.

A particularly destructive proposal is that forthe widening of the Primary Regional Roads (PRR)

Reservation in Queen Victoria Street at its intersection with Stirling Highway to accommodate a bus

priority lane. If implemented, this proposal would result in the total demolition of the double storey,

heritage listed shops from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street.

Rezoning of this portion of Queen Victoria St from Urban to Other Regional Roads would hand to

Main Roads the responsibility for this portion, enabling them to undertake the works proposed in

the amendment. Queen Victoria Street between Tydeman Road and Stirling Highway is zoned Local

Centre' under Council's Local Planning Scheme No.4, reflecting its function and growing

development as a main street', with small scale shops, cafes, showroom, small bar, restaurant and

entertainment.

The street has in effect been traffic calmed in recent times by reduction of traffic lanes to single each

way and increased parking. The few bus routes that use the route and the present lack of bus bays

contribute to this calming. It is thus highly anomalous that facilitating bus movements should now

be considered a priority, particularly at the enormous cost of h ritage buildings and their local

functions.

Name / Address / Contact phone number / Date / Sign

->7 •