mosley 9e ppt_ch04
TRANSCRIPT
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
CHAPTER 4
FUNDAMENTALS OF ORGANIZING
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Identify the advantages and disadvantages of the functional, product, and matrix departmentalization approaches
• Explain the principles of unity of command and span of control
• Describe the difference between line and staff• Understand how to avoid excessive conflict
between line and staff• Explain the three types of authority found in
organizations
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
2
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Understand the stages of organization growth• Distinguish between centralization and
decentralization• Discuss the benefits and costs of downsizing• Explain the four types of contemporary
organizational approaches• Understand the relationship between
management philosophy, strategy, and newer forms of organization
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
3
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• One-person organization• Organization with assistants added• Line organization: Concerned with the primary
functions of the firm• Production, sales, and office administration/
finance• Line-and-staff organization: Staff positions are
added to serve the basic line departments • Helps accomplish the organization objectives
more effectively
STAGES IN GROWTH OF AN ORGANIZATION
4
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Quick, decisive action on problems is possible because authority is centralized
• Lines of responsibility and authority are clearly defined• Evasion of responsibility is minimized and
accountability is maximized
ADVANTAGES OF LINE ORGANIZATION
5
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Determining how activities are to be grouped• Types
• Service• Process• Territory• Customer• Functional• Product• Matrix
DEPARTMENTALIZATION
6
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.7 - FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENTALIZATION AT THE TOP MANAGEMENT LEVEL
7
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Maintains the power and prestige of the major functions
• Creates efficiency through the principles of specialization
• Centralizes the organization’s expertise• Permits tighter top-management control of the
functions• Minimizes costly duplications of personnel and
equipment
ADVANTAGES OF FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENTALIZATION
8
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Responsibility for total performance rests at the top
• Narrow functional focus limits the training of managers to take over the top position
• Coordination between and among functions becomes complex and more difficult as the organization grows in size and scope
• Functional responsibilities are identified by causing subgroup loyalties, identification, and tunnel vision
DISADVANTAGES OF FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENTALIZATION
9
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.8 - EXAMPLE OF PRODUCT DEPARTMENTALIZATION
10
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Attention can be directed toward specific product lines or services
• Coordination of functions at the product division level is improved
• Profit responsibility can be better placed• Easier for the organization to obtain or develop
executives who have managerial experience in running a total entity
ADVANTAGES OF PRODUCT DEPARTMENTALIZATION
11
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• More personnel and material resources are required
• Unnecessary duplication of resources and equipment maybe caused
• Greater burden for top management to establish effective coordination and control
DISADVANTAGES OF PRODUCT DEPARTMENTALIZATION
12
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.9 - EXAMPLE OF MATRIX DEPARTMENTALIZATION
13
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
DISADVANTAGES OF MATRIX DEPARTMENTALIZATION
• Permits open communication and coordination of activities among the relevant functional specialists
• Its flexibility enables the organization to respond rapidly to change
Advantages
• Lack of clarity and coordination in assigned roles• Conflict occur when:
• Requirements result in decisions contrary to the philosophy and viewpoint of the home office
• Team members are assigned to more than one project• Lack of roots for employees due to the temporary nature
of assignments
Disadvantages
14
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Everyone should report to and be accountable to only one boss
• Reasons for its importance• Prevents duplication and conflict when orders
and instructions are passed down• Decreases confusion and blame games
UNITY OF COMMAND PRINCIPLE
15
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Provides an opportunity for a supervisor and the employees to:
• Learn about each other’s strengths and weaknesses• Develop supportive relationships • Realize their individual and group potential in
achieving organizational objectives
• Promotes higher morale
UNITY OF COMMAND PRINCIPLE
16
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• There is a limit to the number of people a person can supervise effectively
• Narrower span of control at the top• Top-level managers - Solve a variety of different,
nonrecurring problems• Middle managers - Develop long-range plans,
work with outside interest groups, and coordinate the activities of the organization
• First-level managers - Are concerned with clearly defined areas of operation
SPAN OF CONTROL PRINCIPLE
17
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.11 - NARROW, WIDE, AND VERY WIDE SPANS OF CONTROL
18
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.12 - FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO A NARROW OR WIDE SPAN OF CONTROL
19
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• The greater the supervisor’s capacity, the more people he or she can supervise
• General supervision is more effective than close supervision
• New developments in management• Wider spans of control save the company
money
REASONS FOR THE TENDENCY TOWARD WIDER SPANS OF CONTROL
20
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.13 - FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO A NARROW OR WIDE SPAN OF CONTROL
21
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Line personnel: Carry out the primary activities of a business
• Staff personnel: Have the expertise to assist line people and aid top management
• Reasons for the conflicts between line and staff• Staff personnel give direct orders to line
personnel• Lack of good human relations practices• Confusions due to the overlapping of authority
and responsibility
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LINE AND STAFF
22
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Belief that staff people are not knowledgeable about the conditions at the operating level
• Attempt of the staff people to influence line decisions against line managers’ wishes
• Misuse of staff personnel by the top management
• Narrow viewpoint of the organization by the departments
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LINE AND STAFF
23
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Delineating authority • Types of authority
• Advisory authority: Authority of staff departments to serve and advise line departments
• Line authority: Power to directly command or exact performance from others
• Functional authority: Staff person’s limited line authority over a given function
• Having effective communication between people and between departments
AVOIDING EXCESSIVE LINE-STAFF CONFLICT
24
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Decentralization: Extent to which authority is delegated from one unit of the organization to another
• Decentralized organization• Important decisions related to their units are
made by the middle and lower levels of management
• Centralized organization• Important decisions that concerns all the units
or levels are made by the top management
DECENTRALIZATION VERSUS CENTRALIZATION
25
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
FACTORS AFFECTING DECENTRALIZATION
Top-management philosophy
History of the organization’s
growth
Geographic location(s)
Quality of managers Availability of controls Economy
Mergers, acquisitions, and
joint ventures
External business environment
26
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Eliminating unnecessary levels of management • To become leaner and more efficient
• Benefits• Immediate cost reductions• Speedier decision making• Communication improves in all directions• Increased responsiveness to customers • Faster product delivery• Tendency for each level to justify its existence is
removed
DOWNSIZING
27
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Costs• Loss of control• Loss of loyal, effective managers when done in
an insensitive manner• Morale problems and threatened job security
for remaining employees • Increased workloads• Diminished chances of promotion• Social costs for the dismissed employees
• Remaining managers must adapt to vague lines of authority and develop team building skills
DOWNSIZING
28
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Focusing on the remaining employees by developing strategy of support
• Developing strategic plans for growth and development for the organization
• Developing effective work teams• Reengineering: Rethinking and redesigning
processes to improve the cost, quality, service, and speed• Can be very expensive
WAYS TO GET BEYOND DOWNSIZING
29
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Work units - Functional to process teams• Jobs - Simple tasks to multidimensional work• Roles - Controlled to empowered• Job preparation - Preparation to education• Focus of compensation - Activity to results
TYPES OF CHANGES OCCURRING AFTER REENGINEERING
30
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Advancement criteria - Performance to ability• Values - Protective to productive• Managers - Supervisors to coaches• Organizational structure - Hierarchical to flat• Executives - Scorekeepers to leaders
TYPES OF CHANGES OCCURRING AFTER REENGINEERING
31
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.14 - NORDSTORM’S INVERTED PYRAMID
Source: Based on description found in Robert Spector and Patrick D. McCarthy, The Nordstrom Way: The Inside Story of America’s #1 Customer Service Company (New York: Wiley, 1996).
32
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Wagon wheel: Organization form with:• Hub of the wheel - Customers• Series of spokes - Business functions or teams• Outer rim - Chief executive and the board
THE WAGON WHEEL AND TEAM STRUCTURES
33
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Team structure: Utilizes permanent and temporary cross-functional teams to improve horizontal coordination and cooperation• Provide speed and flexibility to meet the
challenges associated with the dynamic business environments
• Provide the opportunity to use the diverse talents to achieve effective outcomes
THE WAGON WHEEL AND TEAM STRUCTURES
34
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.16 - EXAMPLE OF A VIRTUAL NETWORK
35
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Firms are shifting to increased decentralization, team development, and empowerment due to global competition
• Strategies identified by Michael Porter• Cost leadership strategy: Attempts to lower
costs below competitors by focusing on creating efficiencies within organizational systems
• Differentiation strategy: Gaining a competitive advantage through goods and/or services that are unique or different from the competition
MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY, STRATEGY, AND ORGANIZATION
36
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
TYPES OF VARIABLES
• Determine the course of developments and the results achieved by the organization
• Include independent variables that can be altered or changed by the organization and its management
Causal variables
• Reflect the internal state and health of the organization
Intervening variables
• Dependent variables that reflect the achievements of the organization
End-result variables
37
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
EXHIBIT 4.18 - ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY AND STRUCTURE: A FIT PERSPECTIVE
38
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Advisory authority• Cost leadership strategy• Decentralization• Departmentalization• Differentiation strategy• Downsizing• Functional authority• Functional
departmentalization• Inverted pyramid• Line-and-staff organization• Line authority
• Line organization• Line personnel• Matrix departmentalization• Network structure• Product departmentalization• Reengineering• Span of control principle• Staff personnel• Team structure• Unity of command principle• Wagon wheel
IMPORTANT TERMS
39