morphology of psoas minor and psoas accessorius
TRANSCRIPT
MORPHOLOGY OF PSOAS MINOR AND PSOAS ACCESSORIUS S D Joshi, S S Joshi, U K Dandekar, S R Daini Deptt. of Anatomy, Rural Medical College, P.I.M.S. Loni Distt. Ahmednagar, Maharashtra
ABSTRACT
Psoas minor muscle is considered to be a vestigial muscle like palmaris longus and plantaris. It lies
anterior to the psoas major muscle. It has a small fleshy belly and a long flat tendon. This small muscle is the
representative in man of a relatively large muscle which in most mammals plays an important part of flexing the
lumbar part of vertebral column. In some lower mammals it is larger than psoas major and acts as a flexor of
pelvis; this being utilized in running by the rabbit and the apes in brachiating. It begins to disappear in those
primates which assume the erect posture. The presence of this muscle varies from person to person and on the
two sides. It is present in about 40 to 60 % of the population. In the majority it is inserted on the iliopubic
eminence but may also be attached to the arcuate line of ilium and the iliac fascia. While going through the
literature we did not come across any detailed study of the muscle in the population of this region. Hence, we
have conducted a detailed study of psoas minor muscle in 30 cadavers bilaterally. In the present series this
muscle was absent in 70%. Average length of fleshy belly was 8.23 em and that of the tendon 15.48 em. In some
cases an unusual interesting feature observed was the origin of some fibers of psoas major from the deep surface
of flattened tendon of psoas minor muscle, which we have named as Psoas accessorius.
Key Words-Morphology, Psoas minor, Psoas major, psoas accessorius.
INTRODUCTION
The Psoas Minor is also known as 'Psoas
parvous' (Bryce, 1923'; Keith, 1948l "Psoas" is a
Greekwordforthe loins -the muscle of the lower back
(Webster's comprehensive dictionary, 19863). This
muscle although well developed and constant in most
lower animals, sometimes exceeding the psoas major
in size, is not constant in man' and is considered by
many as a vestigial muscle. It begins to disappear in
those primates who assume the erect posture2.This
muscle lies anterior to psoas major (Hollinshead,
19854; Moore, 19855
; McMinn, 19906; Williams, 19957
;
Snell, 20088) but Wood Jones (1953)9 stated that it lies
anteromedial to the psoas major except at the pelvic
brim, where its expanded tendon turns to the medial
side of that muscle. Kendall (1993) 10 stated that it is
relatively unimportant and is only present in about
40% of the population; while Wood Jones (1953)9 has
described it to be present, on one or both sides, in
about 45% of the population. In a study of racial
discrepancies, psoas minor has been reported to be
absent in 50% in Orientals; 57% in whites and 67% in Correspondence Dr. S. D. Joshi Pro( & Head, Dept. of Anatomv Rural Medical College, PIMS, Loni, Dis//. Ahmednagar. Maharastra Ph . . 02422 • 272067 Email: sdjoshi _ [email protected]
J. Anat. Soc. India 59(1) 31-34 (2010) 31
blacks (Hanson P et al, 1999 "). The short fleshy belly
soon gives way to a long, flat tendon which may be
attached to the pecten pubis, iliopectineal eminence
and/ or iliac fascia 1'7
'9
'12
'13
''4
· • Looking at the differences
regarding its presence, laterality, size and variability
of insertion and its evolutionary significance it was
decided to undertake a detailed study of this muscle;
although small and vestigial but not insignificant.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study was carried out on 30 embalmed
cadavers (males-24, females-6) available in this
department, over a period of two years. Clearance of
institutional ethical committee was obtained before
starting the work. These were the cadavers which
were utilized by medical students for routine
dissection. When all organs were removed from the
abdominal cavity then the dissection of posterior
abdominal wall was undertaken.· On the anterior
surface of Psoas major muscle, when present, Psoas
minor muscle was cleaned right from its origin (above
the medial arcuate ligament) up to its insertion. Any
variations of this muscle at its attachment (both at the
origin as well as insertion) or along its whole length
were recorded and, whenever deemed necessary,
photographs were taken. The length and width of
Morphology of Psoas ....... .. .. .. ... ... ........ .. . SD Joshi, S S Joshi, U K Dandekar, S R Daini
fleshy belly as well as long tendon were measured
with the help of divider, thread, scale and digital
vernier caliper. Careful dissection of distal attachment
was done to verify the insertion of tendon to the
neighbouring fascia and the bone.
RESULTS
In the present study psoas minor was found
to be present in 9 cases (30%). It was present
bilaterally in 23.3% and unilaterally only on the left
side in 6.6%. In all the cases the psoas minor was
present onthe anterior surface of psoas major and
tended to lie medial to the psoas major towards its
insertion (Fig. 1 A). The origin of psoas minor was from
the sides of 12'h thoracic and 1" lumbar vertebrae and
the intervening disc between them, except in two
cases, where the origin was from a lower level i.e.
from sides of 3'd and 4'h lumbar vertebrae (Fig. 3A) and
the intervening intervertebral disc bilaterally. In these
two. cases the muscle was quite bulky. In almost all
cases the tendon, when traced inferiorly, flattened out
and blended with the iliopsoas fascia (Fig. 1 8). Some
aponeurotic fibres were inserted on the iliopubic
eminence and the arcuate line. The average length of
fleshy belly was 8.23 em (Rt-7.71cm, Lt-8.75 em) and
that of the tendon was 15.52 em long (Rt-15.8 em, Lt-
15.24 em). The average maximum width of the fleshy
part of muscle was 1.31 em (Rt-1.45cm, Lt-1.18 em)
and that of the tendon was 0. 7cm (Rt-0.67 em, Lt-0. 73
em). In few specimens the fleshy fibres of the muscle
extended further lower down on the deep surface of
the tendon. In 4 cases (25 %) it was found that some
fibres of psoas major were arising from the deep
surface of the flattened tendon of psoas minor (
Fig.2A,28 & Fig.3A,38) and in this position these fibres
continued on the superficial surface of the muscle
right up to its insertion. In 7 cases (43.75%) there was
a zone of overlapping between fleshy belly and
tendon (Fig.2A).
Fig.1A: Showing Right Psoas minor muscle -'A' lying
superficial to Psoas major muscle- '8'.
Fig.1B: Showing left Psoas major (B) and Psoas minor (A).
When traced inferiorly tendon of Psoas minor merges with
the dence iliopsoas fascia (indicated by black dots). Also
seen is the genitofemoral nerve (black arrow).
Table 1: showing the Length and Width of Fleshy belly and the Tendon of Psoas minor muscle (In em):
FLESHY BELLY TENDON TOTAL LENGTH
Right Range Average Range Average Range Average
Length 3.10.5 7.71 " 14-18.5 15.8 18-29 23.51
Width 0 .8-2 1.45 0 .5-1 0.67
Left
Length 5-11 8.75 12.5-20 15.24 20-30 24
Width 0.5-2 1.18 0 .21.5 0.73
J. Anat. Soc. India 59(1) 31-34 (2010) 32
Morphology of Psoas ........... ... ... .... ......... SO Joshi, S S Joshi, U K Dandekar, S R Daini
Fig.2A: Showing left Psoas major (8), tendon of Psoas minor (A), the fleshy fibers of a muscle 'C' (Psoas accessorius) seen arising from the deep surface of Psoas minor and descending superficial to Psoas major. The tendon of Psoas minor has been turned to show the origin of this muscle from the deep surface of the tendon. Edge of Psoas minor has been indicated by red arrow.
Fig.28: Showing left Psoas major (B). The tendon of Psoas 'minor has been turned to expose its posterior surface wherein, the fleshy fibres of Psoas minor (A) are seen to join the tendon (red arrow). Belowthatthe origin of fleshy fibres of Psoas accessorius are seen-'C' as shown in fig.2A
DISCUSSION
The presence of Psoas minor muscle varies
from person to person and on the two sides. Many
workers have stated that it is present in about 60% of
the population5• s.
7' s. 12
' 13
' 15
• In the present study it was
present in 30% cases.
J. Anat. Soc. India 59(1) 31-34 (2010) 33
Fig.3A: Showing left Psoas major (B) and lying superficial
to it is seen a well developed Psoas minor. muscle (A)
vertebrae. A well defined tendon is present along the lateral
edge of this muscle. Also seen are the fibres of Psoas
accessorius (C) arising from the deep surface of Psoas
minor.
Fig.3B: Showing Left Psoas major (B), tendo~:~ of Psoas minor
(A) and the sheet of Psoas accessorius (C) arising from the
deep surface of Psoas minor tendon and spreading anterior
to Psoas major.
The study of racial differences described by Saib ( 1934) has been referred to by Hanson P et al ( 1999) 11
wherein it was reported that the psoas minor was absent in 50% in Orientals; 57% in whites and 67% in blacks. Hanson Petal (1999) 11 studied psoas minor in young blacks (21 cases) and white men (23 cases) during routine autopsies. They observed that the psoas minor was present in 2 subjects (9%) in blacks. In the whites, the psoas minor was present on both sides (87%). Further, on visual inspection the psoas minor in black subjects appeared as a slight thickening of the fascia surrounding the psoas major, rather than actual muscle. In contrast, in the white group the psoas minor was a well defined muscle positioned anterior to and separate from the psoas
Morphology of Psoas .............................. SD Joshi, S S Joshi, U K Dandekar, S R Daini
major fascia.
Anatomical texts have described the origin of psoas minor from the bodies of 12"' thoracic and 1 .. lumbar vertebrae and the disc between them'·5
•6
•7·'
0·'2.'6
In the present study the origin of the muscle was found to be similar except in 2 cases where psoas minor was arising from sides of L3 and L4 vertebrae. The short fleshy belly soon gives way to a long flat tendon, which is attached to the pecten pubis, iliopectineal eminence and iliac fascia'·9
·'2
•13
·'•· The psoas minor is a weak flexor of the lumbar spine. The muscle also flexes the pelvis on the trunk5·'3. As a flexor of the pelvis on the spine its value to the rabbit when running and to the apes while brachiating is quite apparent17
·
It has also been described that the tendon of psoas minor may be mistaken for the genitofemoral nerve 17
• It is active in cats when they arch their backs •s. It is also proposed that psoas minor could support the lumbar trunk during stance. While reviewing the literature it is observed that except for the incidence of presence or absence of the muscle no other morphological features have been described and as such the findings of the present work cannot be compared with that of any other workers.
CONCLUSION
This study has been conducted on 30 cadavers bilaterally. In the present series Psoas minor was found to be present in 30% cases. The absence of the muscle described in the literature ranges from 50-90%; also racial differences have been reported. During evolution and with the assumption of bipedal gait, the function and hence the incidence and size of psoas minor has been reduced. But, at times the muscle may be large. We have found a hitherto undescribed muscle mass in the literature which arises from deep surface of the tendon of psoas minor and spreads out as a substantial fleshy mass on the anterior surface of psoas major and continues in the same position till its insertion and have named it as -Psoas Accessorius.
REFERENCES
1. Bryce T H; Quain's elements of Anatomy, 11"' Edn. Vo1.4, part 2, mycology, Longmans, Green and co. London 1923, pp 224.
2. Keith A; Human embryology and morphology, 6"' Edn. Edward Arnold and co. London 1948, pp 629.
J. Anat. Soc. India 59(1) 31-34 (2010) 34
3. Webster's comprehensive Dictionary, Encyclopedic edition, vol. 2, J.G.Ferguson Publishing Company Chicago 1986, pp 1018.
4. Hollinshead WH; Textbook of Anatomy, 4"' Edn. Harper and Row publishers, Philadelphia, London 1985, pp 679-681.
5. Moore KL; Clinically oriented anatomy, 2"d Edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, London 1985, pp 275.
6.McMinn RMH; Last's anatomy regional and applied, 8"' Edn. English Language Book Society I Churchill Livingstone, Edinburg, London 1990, pp 357.
7.Williams PL; Gray's Anatomy, 38"' Edn. Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh, London, Philadelphia 1995, pp870.
8. Snell RS; Clinical Anatomy by Regions, 8'h Edn. Wolters Kluwer I Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, New York 2008, pp 174,175,580.
9. Wood Jones F; Buchanan's Manual of Anatomy in The Abdomen, 8"' Edn. Bailliere, Tindall and Cox 7 and 8 Henrietta ST, W.C. London 1953, pp 841-842.
10. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG; Muscles testing And function, 4"' Edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, New York, London1993, pp 214.
11. Hanson P, Magnusson SP, Sorensen H and Simonsen EB; Anatomical differences in the psoas muscles in young black and white men. J. Anat 1999,194 (2) pp 303-307.
12. Romanes G.J; Cunningham's Textbook of Anatomy, 12"' Edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, Toronto 1981, pp 363.
13. Woodburne RT; Essentials of Human Anatomy, 7'h Edn. Oxford University Press, New York 1983, pp 465.
14. Palastanga N, Field D, Soames R; Anatomy and human movements-structure and function, 4'h Edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, Johannesburg 2002, pp469.
15. Hamilton WJ; Textbook of human Anatomy, 2"d Edn. English language book society and Macmillan press Ltd. London and Basingstoke 1978,149.
16. Sahana SN; Human Anatomy {Descriptive and Applied}, 3rd Edn. Vol.1, Amitabha Sen for central educational enterprises, New central book agency Calcutta 1977, pp 701.
17. Basmajian JV, Slonecker CE; Grant's method of anatomy -A clinical problem- solving approach, 11"' Edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, London 1986, pp 197.