mobile devices

43
MOBILE DEVICES Amir & Anne

Upload: arwen

Post on 25-Feb-2016

148 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

MOBILE DEVICES. Amir & Anne. Definition of Mobile Device. Handheld device, handheld computer or simply handheld Small, hand-held computing device Has a display screen with touch input and/or a miniature keyboard Weighting less than 2 pounds For example: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MOBILE DEVICES

MOBILE DEVICESAmir & Anne

Page 2: MOBILE DEVICES

Definition of Mobile Device

• Handheld device, handheld computer or simply handheld

• Small, hand-held computing device

• Has a display screen with touch input and/or a miniature keyboard

• Weighting less than 2 pounds

• For example:• personal digital assistant (PDA)• Smart phones; iPhone, iPad,

Page 3: MOBILE DEVICES

Display Size

3” x 4” 4” to 6” x 6” to 8” 6” to 13” x 10” to 14”

Page 4: MOBILE DEVICES

SmartPhone Penetration2009 VS 2011

Page 5: MOBILE DEVICES

Latest Update - February, 2012

Mobile devices shipments 2011: Nokia remains number one.

Smartphone shipments: Samsung is top dog.

Smartphone operating systems Android is nearly half smartphones shipped.

Top mobile Web countries: South Korea and Japan lead in mobile broadband penetration.

Page 6: MOBILE DEVICES

Mobile User Demographic

Page 7: MOBILE DEVICES

SmartPhone Adoption by Race & Ethnicity

Page 8: MOBILE DEVICES

SmartPhone Platforms

Apple's iOS (iPhone, iPod Touch, and iPad)

Google's Android OS

Blackberry's RIM Operating System

Nokia and Sonny Ericson’s Symbian platform

HP's webOS (successor of Palm OS after Palm’s acquisition by HP)

Windows® Phone 7 mobile operating system

Page 9: MOBILE DEVICES

SmartPhone Platform Trend in U.S. 2010

Page 10: MOBILE DEVICES

SmartPhone Market Share 2010

Page 11: MOBILE DEVICES

SmartPhone Market Share in 2010

Page 12: MOBILE DEVICES

Mobile User Activity

Page 13: MOBILE DEVICES

SmartPhone Users are Social Network Drivers

Page 14: MOBILE DEVICES

MOBILE DESKTOP

Brief focused interactions. Respond to a tweet or SMS message.

Continuous interaction on a single task. Compose a memo.

More intrusive interruptions on device. Receive call while reviewing mail on smartphone.

Less intrusive interruptions. Receive call on phone while reviewing mail on laptop.

Frequently changing environmental context. Use phone during air travel (upon landing, walking to gate, and so on).

Infrequently changing context. Using a spreadsheet application at desk.

Tendency toward transactional interactions. Checking weather forecast.

Supports non-transactional interactions. Composing a report.

Mobile and Desktop Experience Differences

Page 15: MOBILE DEVICES

MOBILE DESKTOP

Viewing dominates interacting. Flipping through photos.

Balanced viewing and interacting. Editing vacation photo albums.

Page loads are more disruptive. Mobile web browsing experience.

Page loads are less disruptive. Desktop web browsing experience.

Simplicity of experience. Reading an e-book.

More tolerant of complexity. Using a word processing application.

More social. Relative importance of phone, texting, geo-social, sharing applications.

Less social Relative importance of office productivity applications.

Mobile and Desktop Experience Differences

Page 16: MOBILE DEVICES

Top Considerations for SmartPhone Purchasers

Page 17: MOBILE DEVICES

Mobile Design Heuristics

Jakob Nielsen's Heuristics 1994Nokia Developer Heuristic EvaluationNick Watt & Christine Velen’s What makes a great mobile appSavio & Braiterman’s Design Sketch: The Context of Mobile Interaction

Page 18: MOBILE DEVICES

1: Visibility of application status

The status message and information regarding the application should be displayed to the user.

Look at the possible ways to improve the notification mechanism from usability perceptive.

Example: Shazam provides Feedback as it analyzes audio

Page 19: MOBILE DEVICES

2: Match between application & the real world

The app should sense the user’s environment and speak the user's language, with words, phrases and concepts familiar to the user.

Example: Google map’s geo sensitive results.

Page 20: MOBILE DEVICES

3: User control and freedom

Allow users to stay in control by being able to leave an unwanted state (Emergency exit)

Provide users the option to undo an redo

Page 21: MOBILE DEVICES

4: Error prevention

Eliminate error-prone conditions as much as possible

Check for errors and present users with a confirmation option before they commit to the action.

Page 22: MOBILE DEVICES

5: Consistency & convention

The system has to comply with the conventions like style guide, etc and has to be consistent

Users should not have to wonder whether different words, situations, or actions mean the same thing.

Example: iOS Human Interface Guidelines

Page 23: MOBILE DEVICES

6: Recognition rather than recall

The user should not have to remember information from one part of the dialogue to another.

Minimize the user's memory load by making objects, actions, and options visible.

Page 24: MOBILE DEVICES

7: Flexibility & efficiency

Allow users to tailor frequent actions.

Anticipate user needs.

Example: Maps app anticipates users will need to define travelling by foot, car or train and displays options on map screen instantly

Page 25: MOBILE DEVICES

8: Aesthetic & minimalist design

The interface should be minimal and not verbose

Screens should not contain information which is irrelevant or rarely needed

Example: Instagram filters are hidden when not in use

Page 26: MOBILE DEVICES

9: Help users recognize & recover from errors

Error messages should be expressed in plain language to help users understand the problem

Constructively suggest users with a solution to solve the errors on their own or by taking the help of the documentation provided with the software.

Page 27: MOBILE DEVICES

10: Help & documentation

Help should be focused on the user’s task, list concrete steps to be carried out, and not be too long.

Use images and animations to facilitate learning

Snapseed help overlays are always accessible from a question mark icon.

Page 28: MOBILE DEVICES

Mobile Devices Strengths

Touch interfaces

Acceleration sensing

Orientation awareness

Simulations of physical behavior

Short periods of use

Focused activity

Spontaneous

Page 29: MOBILE DEVICES

To Create Applications, Development Teams Need:

Skills in diverse development technologies

Knowledge of capabilities of a vast, continually changing array of devices

Knowledge of differing UI style conventions and standards

Multiple programming and cross porting efforts

Expensive multidevice and multiplatform test efforts

Page 30: MOBILE DEVICES

Responsive layouts

Automatically adjusts the layout to fit the size and orientation of the device

Reformat multicolumn layouts to a single column layout when the device screen size and resolution become too small to support multiple columns

Page 31: MOBILE DEVICES

Two-Panel Selector

Page 32: MOBILE DEVICES

One-Window Drilldown

Page 33: MOBILE DEVICES

Redundancy of Controls

Redundant software buttons should be hidden when a web application is viewed on Android and Blackberry devices with physical buttons

Page 34: MOBILE DEVICES

Touch sensitive control size

Minimum recommendations for touch target size vary between 7 mm and 10 mm square 36 – 52 pixels square for the iPad 2 90 – 128 pixels square for the iPhone Retina

display The minimum space between targets

should be around 1-2 mm.

Page 35: MOBILE DEVICES

Navigation elements

Navigation should be kept to two or three levels.

When navigation exceeds two levels, make sure there's a convenient way to return to "Home”

On iOS devices, use virtual home and back buttons

On Android devices, physical back and home buttons are provided so avoid these soft keys

Page 36: MOBILE DEVICES

Gestural interaction to address size

Support smaller screens : Swipe with a finer instead of dragging a scroll bar control

Multiple gestures can be available in the same view, for different operations, without any visible control features occupying space

Example: pinch open/close for zooming, swipe right/left for panning, swipe up/down for scrolling, and tap to close.

Page 37: MOBILE DEVICES

Gestural interactions cost

Users need to know what actions are available Use affordances and metaphors that suggest

how to interact

Visual affordances consume some real estate, but much less than controls that serve as touch targets

Page 38: MOBILE DEVICES

Mobile Accessibility

Vision

Hearing

Physical & Motor Skills

Page 39: MOBILE DEVICES

Users with Visual impairment

VoiceOver The rotor Siri White on Black Speak Selection Audible, Visible, and Vibrating Alerts

Page 40: MOBILE DEVICES

Users with Hearing Disabilities

FaceTime: Use sign language and lip reading

Mono Audio: Hear both channels in each one ear.

Visual Voicemail TTY Support

Page 41: MOBILE DEVICES

Physical & Motor Skills

AssistiveTouch: Enter Multi-Touch gestures

Intelligent Keyboard with Predictive Text Entry

Siri

Page 42: MOBILE DEVICES

ReferencesBarkhuus, L. & Polichar, E. V. (2011). Empowerment through seamfulness: smart phones in everyday life ,Pers Ubiquit Comput, 15, 629-

639.Butler, B. (2010). The Strategies for Multiband, Multimode Mobile Devices. Evaluation Engineering, 20-23.Choney, S. 72 Percent of Adults are Text-Messaging Now, Study Says. Technolog on MSNBC.com. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from

http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/09/01/5023529-72-percent-of-adults-are-text-messaging-now-study-saysDawson, A. Designing for Different Age Groups. Six Revisions. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from

http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/designing-for-different-age-groups/Faiola, A. & Matei, A. S. (2010). Enhancing Human–Computer Interaction Design Education: Teaching Affordance Design for Emerging

Mobile Devices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 29–254.Franko, I. O. (2011). Smartphone Apps for Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1-7.Gahran, Amy. Hispanics lead U.S. embrace of mobile technology. CNN. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from

http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/05/20/hispan ic.mobile.engagement.gahran/index.htmlGahran, Amy. How Americans Really Use Cell Phones. CNN. Retrieved February 15, 2012 from

http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/08/16/pew.cell.phone.report.gahran/index.htmlGong, J. & Tarasewich, P. (2004). Guidelines for handheld mobile device interface design. Proceedings of DSI 2004 Annual Meeting, 3751-

3756.Haefele, C. (2011). One Block at a Time: Building a Mobile Site Step by Step. The Reference Librarian, 52, 117-127.Hanson, C.W. (2011). Why Worry about Mobile?. Library Technology Reports, 47(2), 5-10.Kane, K. S., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, O. J. & Ladner, E. R. (2009). Freedom to Roam: A Study of Mobile Device Adoption and Accessibility for

People with Visual and Motor Disabilities. Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, 115-122. 

Lentz, J.(2011). User Interface Design for the Mobile Web. IBM. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-interface/

Mobile Most Read. Smart Phone Users are Social Network Drivers. Online Marketing Trends. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from http://www.onlinemarketing-trends.com/2011/03/smartphone-users-are-social-network.html 

Mobile Most Read. US Smartphone Adoption by Race and Ethnicity. Online Marketing Trends. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from http://www.onlinemarketing-trends.com/2011/03/us-smartphone-adoption-by-race-and.html 

Page 43: MOBILE DEVICES

ReferencesMobile Most Read. US Smartphone Users Prefer Android to Apple OS. Online Marketing Trends. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from http

://www.onlinemarketing-trends.com/2011/01/us-smartphone-users-prefer-android-to.html Nielsen, Jakob (1994). Usability Engineering. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 115–148. ISBN 0-12-518406-9.Nokia. (2009). Heuristic evaluation Retrieved Feb 20, 2012, from http://www.developer.nokia.com/Community/Wiki/Heuristic_evaluationOulasvirta A., Wahlstrom, M. & Ericsson, A. K. (2011). What does it mean to be good at using a mobile device? An investigation of three

levels of experience and skill. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 69(3),155-169.Sanchez, A. C. & Branaghan, J. R. (2011). Turning to Learn: Screen Orientation and Reasoning with Small Devices. Computer in Human

Behavior, 27, 793-797.Sarker, S. & Wells, J.D. (2003). Understanding Mobile Handheld Device Use and Adoption. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 35-40.Savio, N., & Braiterman, J. (2007). Design Sketch: The Context of Mobile Interaction. Mobile HCI 2007.

Smith, A. Smartphone Adoption and Usage. Pew Internet. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Smartphones/Summary.aspx

Soep, E. (2011). Youth Media Goes Mobile. National Civic Review, 100(3), 8-11.Tarasewich, P. (2003). Wireless devices for mobile commerce: user interface design and usability. Mobile commerce: technology, theory,

and applications, 26-50. Watt, N., & Velen, C. (2010). What Makes A Great Mobile App Retrieved Feb 20, 2012, from

http://www.slideshare.net/nick_watt/what-makes-a-great-mobile-app