mic stove final presentation
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
1/24
JIANG Sicong (21048741) Christopher Obi (20050928) LI Dezheng (21045675) Wilkey Michael (20052070)
SHI Lei (19047718)
MIC-StoveTime to cook.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
2/24
Introduction
PDS
Design and working principle
Materials Selection
Manufacture
Business Plan & Costing
Business objective
Competition
Price and costing Financial Projections
Prototype
Conclusion
References
MIC-StoveTime to cook.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
3/24
Introduction Half the World Still Uses Solid Fuels for Home Cooking and Heating
Indoor smoke from cook stoves leads to 1.5 million premature deathseach year.
Continued demand by governments and non-governmentalorganization for efficient cook stove design and distribution.
Available improved stoves are too expensive for rural dwellers indeveloping countries.
Reference:
Jacob Moss (2007) Senate Briefing on Cookstoves and Black Carbon
http://cleancookstoves.org/resources/publications-and-reports/
MIC-StoveTime to cook.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
4/24
Product Design Specification (PDS)Specification.
Made out of recycle able material.
List price should be less than20
Easy to assemble.
Eco- friendly.
Fuelled by chopped wood
Performance and Dimension:
Should be efficient.
Weigh less than 2 kg
MIC-StoveTime to cook.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
5/24
PDS (continued)Sustainability:
Utilise one material for all component parts.
Ash gauze should be easily replaceable within minutes.100% of raw materials used should be sourced from
manufacturing location.
98% of material re-cycled.
MIC-StoveTime to cook.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
6/24
PDS (continued)MIC-Stove technical design specification
Author: Group C
Date: 21/3/12
No. D/W Design requirement Implications and comments
1
D
W
Function
Cook food
heat space
2
W
D
Performance and dimensions
Efficiency60 %
Mass2 kg
ease of deployment
3
D
D
W
D
W
Operation
can be operated by one person
Maintenance interval remove ash after usage
Increased interval for ash removal
Fuelchopped wood
Increase type of bio-fuels used
easy to operate
ability to empty ash without cleaning stove
most user dont always clean stove after use
4
D
D
D
D
Manufacturing
Quantity to be made 1 (one)
Targeted manufacturing costless than 20
Testing to test efficiency and emission
Packagingvery easy to assembly
enable design evaluation
assemble at point of use
5
D
Environment
Emissionsefficient combustion
6
D
D
D
D
D
Sustainability
Materials - one material for all parts
MaintenanceAsh gauze easily replaceable within
minutes
Distribution100% of part materials sourced and
fabricated within Sheffield.
Disposal95% of material re-cycled
ease of recycling
part that might likely damage
The technical specification looksat both the products technicalrequirement and its sustainabilityrequirement and it considers both
Wished (W) and Demanded (D)requirements.
Demanded (D)To efficiently cook food.
Wished (W)To heat up space during coolweather.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
7/24
Design Intent;
to efficiently convert energy stored in wood to heat energy
minimise emission of CO and many combustible Hydrocarbons
Working principle;
21 MJ/kg 0.65(21) MJ/kg
convert
organic gases
primary air
secondary air
Main air inlet
Design and working principle
MIC-StoveTime to cook.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
8/24
Design calculations
Assumptions Calculations
Required air supply for efficientcombustion. Jet penetration for airflow
Actual Air/ Fuel ratio = 5.44 kg/ kg of air [1]
Equivalence ratio in combustion chamber () = 2
Wood mass loss rate per unit area (m")= 9.8 gm-2s-1 [2]
Wood Burning Area (Aw) = 14 x chamber area
Reference:
[1] CURKEET, Rick (2011). Wood Combustion Basics. [online]. Last accessed 22 April 2012 at: http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/workshop2011/WoodCombustion-Curkeet.pdf[2] TRAN, Hao C. and WHITE, Robert H. (1992). Burning Rate of Solid Wood Measured in a Heat release rate calorimeter. [online]. Fire and Materials, 16, 197-206. last accessed 22
April 2012 at: http://128.104.77.228/documnts/pdf1992/tran92b.pdf[3] Chris Morleys Gaseq Chemical Equilibrium program
Design and working principle (continued)
MIC-StoveTime to cook.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
9/24
Calculations Wood burning rate (m) = Awx m
= 4.53x10-3 kgs-1
Required air supply rate = m x A/F ratio= 0.025 kgs-1 of air
Volumetric air supply rate = m/ air= 0.02 m3s-1
Air inlet area (Aair)Vair= 23.6 Aair
Aair
= 0.006 m2
.
Aair
Fig 1: Area of main air Inlet
since equivalence ratio () = 2
Aair primary + Aair secondary= 0.5 Aair
Fig 2: Area of main air Inlet
Design and working principle (continued)
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
10/24
Material selection
Granta CES software was used to select an optimalmaterial for the MIC-Stove.
Selection criteria: low carbon footprint Cheap Easy to machine
Mild steel was selected for the stove designMild steel is a carbon steel typically with a maximum of 0.25%
Carbon and 0.4%-0.7% manganese, 0.1%-0.5% Silicon andsome + traces of other elements such as phosphorous, it mayalso contain lead (free cutting mild steel) or sculpture (againfree cutting steel called re-sulphurised mild steel)
MIC-StoveTime to cook.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
11/24
Manufacture
Machine selection criteria The cutting area of the machine should be large enough to cut stove parts.
The cutting speed should be high enough to meet the expected production rate per day.
Should cut evenly and cut narrow gaps with low distortion and very little deformation.
YM-1212 multifunction digital laser cutting machine was selected, and would
be used in the fabrication of the MIC-Stove . It is a computer numerical control (CNC) machine that emits a high powered laser beam
to cut metal.
Has a power rating of 1000 - 4000 W
The size of its cutting area is 2440 x 1220mm.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
12/24
Manufacturing process
The manufacturing process of the MIC-Stove is simplified into four steps:
First step: preliminary cutting Second step: detail drilling
Last step: polish and assemblingThird step: Cutting
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
13/24
Marketing Primary market
Government procurement
Aid organizations
Secondary market
Backcountry travelers Rural dwellers
4 P of marketing: Price, Product, Place and Promotion
our product is relatively cheap and unique
Three directions of focus, cost and differentiation
Designed after a detailed questionnaire survey and marketing research.
A kind of wood fuel stove, but different to existing products, it must be more metcustomer requirements.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
14/24
Business plan and costing
Business Objective:
Short Term Objectives: To introduce Product in summer 2012 and find established
business partners.
Medium Term Objectives: To start up business and break-even within two years
Long Term Objectives: To control 30% of cooking stoves market within 2 years of
introduction
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
15/24
Business plan and costing(continued)
Emberlit twig burning campstove
Price : 22.4
Strength:Small and Portable
Easy to collect the fuel (can use twigsor debris laying around).Weakness:
Not eco-friendlyNot innovative,Too expensive for rural dwellers
BioLite StovePrice: 67Strength:
CleanSafeEfficientGenerating electricity to chare phones
Weakness:Expensive
MSR WhisperliteInternationale MultiFuelStovePrice:
47.49 for the burner11.49 for one 0.5 Litre fuel bottle
Strength:
More effective than wood fuel.cleanWell-known brandHas brand loyalty
Weakness:ExpensiveAdditional in buying fuel bottle
Competition
Emberlit stoveBioLite Stove
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
16/24
Business plan and costing(continued)
Cost of mild steel per ton is estimated at $743.43 (460.33) as of 14th April 2012
460.33/1000 = 0.46033 Pound/kg
0.46033 * 31.40 = 14.45 Pound/ m2
One MIC-Stove needs 0.5 m2 of mild steel material:
materials cost for a stove = 8.00
Material cost:
Pricing and Costing
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
17/24
Business plan and costing(continued)
Labour Cost: average hourly earnings in China : 3.50
Number of Staff: 3 persons
Number of stoves produced per hour = 4
labour cost per stove = 2.625
Overhead = 25% of labour costs
Labour & Overhead costs = 3.30
Total manufacturing cost = 11.30
To make a 50% profit Margin
List Price = 16.95
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
18/24
Financial projection
Total Investment = 80,000
Machines purchase cost: Guillotine = 8,000 CNC YM-1212 Multifunction digital laser cutting machine = 45,300
313 working days in one year, and each day for 8 hours. Each hour there are 4 stoves be produced.
Projected sales = 169,771 (10,016 Stoves) per year
Labour & overhead cost 32,865( 3 employee working for 313 working days per year, and 8 hours per day)
Materials 80,128
Total manufacturing cost : 113,185
Gross Profit = 56,586
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
19/24
Financial analysis Both labour and materials are expected to rise by 3% per year for the foreseeable future.
No ongoing costs are incurred other then direct costs.
Market predicted increase per year: 4.7%
Assume: discount factor is 5%
If the initial investment is 80,000
year Number of
stoves sold
Labour
cost/unit,
Overhead
cost/unit,
Materials
cost /unit,
Labour cost,
Materials
cost,
Overhead
cost,
Total
production
cost,
2012 10,016 2.625 0.675 8 26,292 80,128 6761 113,185
2013 10,487 2.7 0.695 8.24 28,315 86,412.9 7288.5 122,016.4
50% year Number ofunits sold
Totalproduction
cost,
ROI profit, Each unitprice,
Total
revenue, Discountfactor, 5%
Profit present
value, Discounted
cash flow,
0 80,000 1.000 80,000
2012 10,016 113,185 20% 56,586 16.95 169,771 0.952 53,869.8 26,130.2
2013 28269 122,016.4 20% 61,008.2 17.45 183,024.6 0.907 55,334,4 -29,204.2
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
20/24
Prototype
Front ViewRear View
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
21/24
Conclusion
The MIC-Stove is designed to be cheap, easy to use,portable, and eco-friendly.
Use of Mild steel and selection of China as manufacturing
location enabled its price (16.95)to be about three timescheaper than major competitors.
Based on projected financial analysis, the payback periodfor the MIC Stove business will be 2 years.
Future designs of MIC-Stove will incorporate thermal electricity converter.
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
22/24
-
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
23/24
Reference: ASHPITE, Sue, NEWTON, David and DULKEN , Stephen Van (2002). Introduction to patentsinformation. London, British Library.
BHADESHIA, H.K.D.H. (2006). Steels: microstructure and properties. 3rd ed., Amsterdam,Butterworth-Heinemann.
CIAMBRONE, David F. (1997). Environmental life cycle analysis. Boca Raton, Lewis Publishers.
CRAWFORD, C. Merle (2003).New products management. Boston; London, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
[online]. Last accessed 02 May 2012 at: HYPERLINK "www.ymlaser.com" www.ymlaser.com
KELMAN, Ilan (2011). Disaster Diplomarcy: How Disasters Affect Peace and Conflict. Taylor&Francis.
MURTHY, D. N. P. (2008). Prodcut reliability: specification and performance. London, Springer.
SMITH, G T. (1993). CNC machining technology. Springer-Verlag.
http://www.ymlaser.com/http://www.ymlaser.com/ -
7/31/2019 MIC Stove Final Presentation
24/24
THANKS FOR LISTENING
MIC-StoveTi t k