mekflud modul 2 & 5
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
1/27
Modul H-02 Hydrostatic Pressure
Determining a hydrostatic force magnitude on the vertical p Determining the correlation between water level and mass
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
2/27
Data ObservationFILLING TANK
DRAININ
Mass (m)
(gram)
Height of Water (y)
(mm)
Mass (m)
(gram)
50 45 50
70 56 70
90 68 90
110 69 110
130
76 130
150
82 150
170 87 170
190 93 190
210
98 210
230 103 230
250 109 250
270 114 270
290 118 290
310 122 310
330
127 330
350 133 350
370 137 370
a = 10 cm
b = 7.5 cm
d = 10 cm
L = 27.5 cm
m.g
b
yd
ar
r
L
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
3/27
Partially Submerged ExperimentFILLING TANK DRAINING TANK Average
y (x) m/y2(y) x2 y2 xyMass Height
of water
(cm)
Mass
(g)
Height
of water
(cm)
M H
(g)
50 4,6 50 4,6 50 4,6 4,6 2,36294896 21,16 5,583527789 10,86956522
70 5,6 70 5,6 70 5,6 5,6 2,232142857 31,36 4,982461735 12,5
90 6,3 90 6,3 90 6,3 6,3 2,267573696 39,69 5,141890467 14,28571429
110 6,9 110 6,8 110 6,85 6,85 2,344291118 46,9225 5,495700847 16,05839416
130 7,6 130 7,6 130 7,6 7,6 2,250692521 57,76 5,065616823 17,10526316
150 8,2 150 8,2 150 8,2 8,2 2,230814991 67,24 4,976535524 18,29268293
170
8,7 170 8,7 170 8,7 8,7 2,246003435 75,69 5,04453143 19,54022989
190 9,3 190 9,3 190 9,3 9,3 2,196785756 86,49 4,825867656 20,43010753
210 9,8 210 9,8 210 9,8 9,8 2,186588921 96,04 4,781171111 21,42857143
66,95 20,31784226 522,3525 45,89730338 150,5105286
Table 1. Regression Linear, relationship between /
=
=
=
=9 150,5105286
9 522,3525= 0.0259
=522,3525 20,31784226
9 522,3525= 2.450750717
y= -0.02597x + 2.450
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
4/27
. /
y = -0.026x + 2.4508
R = 0.5657
y = -0.045x + 2.727
R = 1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 5 10 15
m/y2(y)
Height of water (cm)
Graph of y and m/y2
Partially Submerged Experiment
m/y2
Theory
=
6 =
1
6
=
2=
= 2.727
Relative Mistake
=
= 10.13%
=
= 42,28 %
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
5/27
Calculating F-Hydrostatic
Mass Height of Water (m) F-Hydrostatic
50
0,046 1,037898
70
0,056 1,538208
90 0,063 1,9467945
110
0,0685 2,301548625
130 0,076 2,833128
150
0,082 3,298122
170
0,087 3,7125945
190 0,093 4,2423345
210
0,098 4,710762
F-Hydrostatic: 0,5gby2
0,510009,810,1y2
Table of Hydrostatic Pressure for partially submerged
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0 1 2 3
Heightofwater(m)
Hydrostatic Force (
Hydrostatic Force
Partially Submerged
Graph of Hydrostatic Force (Partially S
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
6/27
Fully Submerged ExperimentFILLING TANK DRAINING TANK Average
x2
y2
xy
Mass
Height
of water(cm)
Mass(g)
Height
of
water(cm) M (y) H (x)(g)
230 10,3 230 10,3 230 10,3 106,09 52900 2369
250 10,9 250 10,8 250 10,85 117,7225 62500 2712,5
270 11,4 270 11,3 270 11,35 128,8225 72900 3064,5
290 11,8 290 11,8 290 11,8 139,24 84100 3422
310 12,2 310 12,3 310 12,25 150,0625 96100 3797,5
330 12,7 330 12,8 330 12,75 162,5625 108900 4207,5
350 13,3 350 13,3 350 13,3 176,89 122500 4655
370 13,7 370 13,7 370 13,7 187,69 136900 5069
2400 96,3 1169,08 736800 29297
=
=
=
=8 29297 96,3 2
8 1169,08 927
=1169,08 2400
8 1169,08= 191.44
= .
Table 1. Regression Linear, relationship between
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
7/27
y = 40.655x - 189.38
R = 0.9994
y = 40.909x - 181.82
R = 1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 5 10 15 20
Mass(g)
Height of water (cm)
Graph of h and m
Fully Submerged Experiment
M (y)
Theory
.
=
2
=
1
= 40.909
= 3
6
= 1 7.5 1
= 181.8181
Relative Mistake
=
= 5,293%
=
= 0,81227%
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
8/27
Calculating F-HydrostaticF-Hydrostatic:
1000 9,81 0,1 0,1 ( ,
)
Mass Height of Water (m) F. Hydrostatic
230
0,1035,1993
250
0,10855,73885
270 0,1135 6,22935
290
0,1186,6708
310
0,12257,11225
330
0,12757,60275
350
0,1338,1423
370 0,1378,5347
Table of Hydrostatic Pressure for fully submerged
0
0.020.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
4 5 6 7
Heightofwater(m)
Hydrostatic Force
Hydrostatic Force
Fully Submerged
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
9/27
Analysis Partially submerged is measured at the water level below 100 mm and lo
starting from 50 grams to 210 grams. For fully submerged it is measured
mm and loadings starting from 210 grams all the way to 370 grams. The vand b are determined for both sections and then compared to the theorTo find a and b, we used least square
For partially submerged experiment, ( = 0.025973326 and = 2.45We then used the equations =
and =
+
to f
theoretical values.
Relative mistake for a = 42.28% and b = 10.13%. The coefficient of correlobtained is R2= 0.565, which means that the x and y are not closel
For fully submerged experiment, ( = 41.24129196 and = 191.44Relative mistake for a = 5.29% and b = 8.12%. The coefficient of correlatiois R2= 0.999, which means that the x and y are very closely related.
We also obtain the value of hydrostatic force at each of the water level bformula = 0,5 for partially submerged and = for fully submerged.
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
10/27
Conclusion
The magnitude of hydrostatic force is perpendicular to the surface of tapparatus. As more volume of the object is submerged, the more hydforce will act on it.
As the weight of the load increases, the height of the water also increbecause more water is needed to balance the scales arm.
The values of a and b obtained from experiment and theory show a linrelationship between the relationship of mass and water level.
The weights that are added to the apparatus are able to be balanced water to the tank because there is hydrostatic force acting on the vertof the apparatus.
The sum of moments and hydrostatic force acting on the surfaces thatvertical is zero because the directions point straight to the hinge. The because it is not perpendicular
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
11/27
Modul H-05 Flow Rate Measuremen
Demonstrating various type of basic flow rate measurementprinciples
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
12/27
Data ObservationNo Manometer Reading (cm) Volume
(mL)
Time
(s)
Orifice Pipe Venturimeter Pitot Pipe
3 4 5 6 7 8
5 19,7 19,4 19,4 18,8 18 18,5 215 3,05
7,5 13,2 12,3 12 10,8 9,5 10,5 350 3,30
10 12,5 10,5 9,8 7,7 4,5 6,3 430 3,00
12,5 16,7 13,5 13,8 9,5 6 8,9 570 3,28
15
19,3 14,7 15,2 8,7 4 8,5 750 3,08
17,5 22,3 15,9 16,2 7,5 2,5 8,5 800 3,00
20 26,8 18,5 19,5 8 2 9,8 940 3,12
22,5
34,5 24 26 11,5 4 14 1050 3,03
d1 d2 A1
(m) (m) (m2)
Orifice
Pipe
0,029 0,02 0,00066
Venturi
meter
0,029 0,017 0,00066
Pitot - 0,019 -
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
13/27
Determining Flow Rate Coefficien(Cd)
Orifice Pipe = .
h3
h4
|h3-
h4|
Qorifice(X) Volum
e
Time
(m)
(m) (m3/s) (m3) (s)
0,197
0,194 0,003 0,000076179
8
0,0002
2
3,05 0
0,132 0,123 0,009 0,000131947 0,0003
5
3,3 0
0,125 0,105 0,02 0,000196695 0,0004
3
3 0
0,167
0,135 0,032 0,000248802 0,0005
7
3,28 0
0,193
0,147 0,046 0,000298303 0,0007
5
3,08 0
0,223 0,159 0,064 0,000351859 0,0008 3 0
0,268 0,185 0,083 0,000400699 0,0009
4
3,12 0
0,345 0,24 0,105 0,000450685 0,0010
5
3,03 0
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
14/27
y = 0.8664x
0
0.00005
0.0001
0.00015
0.0002
0.00025
0.0003
0.00035
0.0004
0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004 0.0005
Qreal(m3/s)
QOrifice (m3/s)
Graph of QOrifice and Qreal
Graph of Linear Regression of Or
y = m . x Qreal= Cd . QORegression line obtained, y = 0,86
Value of Flow rate coefficient (Cd
Manual method
=
b = Cd = 0,8466784960
So, value of Cdorifice= 0
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
15/27
Venturi meter = .
h5
h6
|h5-h6|
Qventuri(X) Volume Time Qreal (Y)
(m) (m) (m3/s) (m3) (s) (V/t)
(m3/s)
0,194 0,188 0,006 0,0000778379 0,000215 3,05 0,0000704
0,12
0,108 0,012 0,00011008 0,00035 3,3 0,0001060
0,098 0,077 0,021 0,00014562 0,00043 3 0,0001433
0,138 0,095 0,043 0,00020838 0,00057 3,28 0,000173
0,152
0,087 0,065 0,0002562 0,00075 3,08 0,0002435
0,162 0,075 0,087 0,0002964 0,0008 3 0,0002666
0,195 0,08 0,115 0,00034077 0,00094 3,12 0,0003012
0,26 0,115 0,145 0,00038265 0,00105 3,03 0,0003465
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
16/27
y = 0.9617x
0
0.00005
0.0001
0.00015
0.0002
0.00025
0.0003
0.00035
0.0004
0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004
Qreal(m3/s)
QVenturi (m3/s)
Graph of QVenturi and Qreal
Graph of Linear Regression o
y = m . x Qreal= Cd
Regression line obtained, y =
Value of Flow rate coefficient
Manual method
=
b = Cd = 0.9383930
So, value of Cdventur
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
17/27
Pitot Pipe
= .
h7 h8 |h7-h8| Qpitot(X) Volume Time Qreal (
(m) (m) (m3/s) (m3) (s) (V/t
(m3/
0,18 0,185 0,005 0,0000887589 0,000215 3,05 0,000070
0,095
0,105
0,01
0,00012552
0,00035
3,3
0,00010
0,045 0,063 0,018 0,00016841 0,00043 3 0,00014
0,06 0,089 0,029 0,00021376 0,00057 3,28 0,00017
0,04 0,085 0,045 0,00026628 0,00075 3,08 0,00024
0,025 0,085 0,06 0,00030747 0,0008 3 0,00026
0,02 0,098 0,078 0,00035057 0,00094 3,12 0,00030
0,04 0,14 0,1 0,00039694 0,00105 3,03 0,00034
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
18/27
y = 0.8654x
0
0.000050.0001
0.00015
0.0002
0.00025
0.0003
0.00035
0.0004
0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004 0.0005
Qreal(m3/s)
QPitot (m3/s)
Graph of QPitot and Qreal Graph of Linear Regression of Pity = m . x Qreal= Cd . QORegression line obtained, y = 0.86
Value of Flow rate coefficient (Cd
Manual method
=
b= Cd = 0.89246526639
So, value of Cdpitot= 0.8
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
19/27
Determining Head Loss Coefficie
Orifice Pipe =
, =
2
=
2
Variable Area
h3
h4
h=|h3-h4|
Qorifice (Y) V (Q/A2) (m/s) h =V2/2g
(m) (m) (Y) (X)
(m3/s)
5 0,197 0,194 0,003
0.00006707242
0,2243818
0.002321
7,5
0,132 0,123 0,009
0.00011617283
0,3376019
0.006964
10 0,125 0,105 0,02
0.00017318024
0,4562420
0.015476
12,5 0,167 0,135 0,032
0.00021905760
0,5531576
0.024761
15 0,193 0,147 0,046
0.00026264083
0,7751019
0.035594
17,5
0,223 0,159 0,064
0.00030979423
0,8488254
0.049522
20 0,268 0,185 0,083
0.00035279496
0,9590081
0.064224
22,5 0,345 0,24 0,105
0.00039680577
1,1030526
0.081247
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
20/27
y = 1.2924x
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.060
0.080
0.100
0.120
0.00000 0.02000 0.04000 0.06000 0.08000 0.10000
hprkatikum(
m)
h' theory (m)
Graph of h' and h (Orifice)
Graph of head loss coefficient
y = m . x h = k.h |Regression line obtainedy = 1,
Value of head loss coefficient
Manual method
=
m = k = 1.2
So, value o
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
21/27
Venturi meter =
, =
2=
2
Variable Area
h5
h6
h=|h5-h6|
Qventuri (Y) V (Q/A2) (m/s) h =V2/2g
(m) (m) (Y) (X)
(m3/s)
5 0,194 0,188 0,006
0.000073164500,310563926
0.00529
7,5 0,12 0,108 0,012
0.000103470220,467270244
0.0105810
0,098 0,077 0,0210.00013687824
0,6314785440.01852
12,5
0,138 0,095 0,0430.00019586597
0,7656181160.03792
15 0,152 0,087 0,0650.00024081384
1,0728081770.05732
17,5 0,162 0,075 0,087
0.000278602101,174848004
0.07672
20 0,195 0,08 0,1150.00032031235
1,3273504270.10141
22,5 0,26 0,115 0,145
0.00035967376
1,526720416
0.12787
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
22/27
y = 1.1339x
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.00000 0.05000 0.10000 0.15000
hprkatikum(
m)
h' theory (m)
Graph of h' and h (Venturi meter)Graph of head loss coefficient of Ve
y = m . x h = k.h |h4-h3
Regression line obtained y = 1,13398
Value of head loss coefficient (kventu
Manual method
=
m = k = 1.133899256
So, value of kventuri= 1.133
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
23/27
Pitot Pipe =
, =
2=
2
Variable Area h7 h8 h=|h7-h8| Qpitot (Y) V (Q/A2) (m/s) h =V2/2g
(m) (m) (Y) (X)
(m3/s)
5 0,18 0,185 0,005
0.00008883955
0,248622015
0.005000
7,5 0,095 0,105 0,01
0.00012563810
0,37407329
0.010000
10 0,045 0,063 0,018
0.00016856120
0,505530279
0.018000
12,5 0,06 0,089 0,029
0.00021395397
0,612915741
0.029000
15 0,04 0,085 0,045
0.00026651865
0,858836807
0.045000
17,5 0,025 0,085 0,06
0.00030774923
0,940524812
0.060000
20
0,02 0,098 0,078
0.00035088811
1,062610658
0.078000
22,5
0,04 0,14 0,1
0.00039730255
1,222216344
0.100000
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
24/27
y = x
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.060
0.080
0.100
0.120
0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120
hpraktikum(
m)
h'theory (m)
Graph of h' and h (Pitot Pipe)
Graph of head loss coeffi
y = m . x h = k.h
= m
Regression line obtained
Value of head loss coeffic
Manual method
=
m = k = 1
So, value of kpit
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
25/27
Table Results
Flow Rate Coefficient
Graph Method Manual Method
Orifice pipe 0,8664 0.846678496044
Venturimeter
0,9617 0.938393092725
Pitot pipe
0,8654 0.892465266392
Head Loss Coeff
Graph Method
Orifice pipe 1,2924
Venturimeter 1,1339
Pitot pipe 1
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
26/27
Analysis flow rate coefficient formula for orifice pipe and venturimeter :
= . 2 1 2
1
determine the regression line (y = mx + a). Q is the value of y,
2 1 2
1
is the value of x, the flow rate coefficient (Cdvalue of m.
for the pitot pipe, the equation is: = . 2 1 2
because the diopening and end of pitot pipe is the same, so there is no difference in the areof x is 2 1 2
, the y is obtained from the values of Q. The manua
determined by using least square To determine the head loss coefficient (k), =
=
and h = k.h =
V which is the volume of the outflow that is measured for 3 seconds. The valuobtained by Q/A. The gravitational acceleration is 9,8 m/s2. The graphical metto find the linear regression (y = mx +a). The value of the x is h, the value of and the value of m is k. For the manual method, the value of k is determined bleast square
-
8/10/2019 Mekflud Modul 2 & 5
27/27
Conslusion
The value of flow rate coefficient (Cd) and head loss coefficient (k) can be de
experimentally and calculated by using the graphical and manual method. From Bernoullis equation, one can obtained the formulas to find the value o
coefficient: = . 2 1 2
1
for orifice and ventu
= . 2 1 2
for pitot pipe.
Flow rate can be determined by using the formula: Q =V (mL)
t (s)
The coefficient of head loss for orifice pipe is 1,2924. For venturimeter the v1,1339. And the value for pitot pipe is 1, all according to the graphs
The coefficient of flow rate for orifice pipe is 0,8664. For venturimeter the va0,9617. And the value for pitot pipe is 0,8654.
Orifice pipe has the least value flow rate coefficient than venturimeter and palso has the largest value of head lost compared to venturimeter and pitot p