mechanistic empirical pavement design guide

44
MEPDG : Where are We Now? Louisiana Transportation Engineering Conference Baton Rouge, LA February 12, 2007 Chris Wagner, P.E. FHWA – Resource Center

Upload: roberto-zepeda

Post on 25-Nov-2015

77 views

Category:

Documents


14 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • MEPDG : Where are We Now?

    Louisiana Transportation Engineering Conference

    Baton Rouge, LAFebruary 12, 2007

    Chris Wagner, P.E.FHWA Resource Center

  • [email protected]

    Auburn and LSU Common Denominator

    BEATBAMA

    !!!!!

  • [email protected]

    Objectives

    State Implementation Activities Status of MEPDG

    Current State of the Practice

    General Overview of ME DesignBenefits and Issues of Implementation

  • [email protected]

    What else happened in 1958 ?

    Construction finished on the AASHO Road Test

  • [email protected]

    Whats Being Used (2003 survey)

    Design Procedures DOTs1972 AASHTO Guide 3

    1986 AASHTO Guide 2

    1993 AASHTO Guide 26

    Agencys own pavement design guide or combination of AASHTO/Agency design procedures

    17

  • [email protected]

    1950s 1950s

    ConstructionConstructionMethods...Methods...

    (AASHO, 1961)

  • [email protected]

    Question ?z Why was the original AASHO Road Test conducted ?

    How much did it cost ?

  • [email protected]

    Objectives

  • [email protected]

    The Big Picture

    Climate Inputs

    EICM

    Material Properties

    Transfer Functions

    Predicted Performance Mechanistic Analysis

    Traffic

  • Loads and Layer Stiffness

    Mechanistic AnalysisLayered Elastic Analysis

    E*

    Mr

    Mr

    Strain Calculations at Critical Locations

    E = /

  • [email protected]

    Empirical Portion of MEPDGP

    r

    e

    d

    i

    c

    t

    e

    d

    P

    e

    r

    f

    o

    r

    m

    a

    n

    c

    e

    Observed Performance

    Line of

    Equality

    = Empirical Shift Factor

  • [email protected]

    Test Section Performance

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

    Log Damage (%)

    A

    l

    l

    i

    g

    a

    t

    o

    r

    C

    r

    a

    c

    k

    i

    n

    g

    (

    %

    o

    f

    T

    o

    t

    a

    l

    L

    a

    n

    e

    A

    r

    e

    a

    ) Local Performance Data

  • [email protected]

    Local Calibration Benefits

    Test Section Observations

    National Data Set

    Local Data Set

  • [email protected]

    Traffic

    z Improved traffic characterizationz Ability to deal with changing load types

    ESAL18k Load Spectra

  • [email protected]

    1950s Vehicle Loads...1950s Vehicle Loads...

    Who drove these trucks ?

    Extrapolati

    ons beyond

    these

    total load a

    pplications

    should be u

    sed with ca

    ution.

    Pg 7: AASHTO 72

  • [email protected]

    Materialsz Enhanced definition of material propertiesz Relate material properties to performancez Material Aging

    LayerCoefficient Modulus

  • [email protected]

    0

    500,000

    1,000,000

    1,500,000

    2,000,000

    2,500,000

    3,000,000

    0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60

    Pavement Age (month)

    M

    o

    d

    u

    l

    u

    s

    (

    p

    s

    i

    )

  • [email protected]

    Aging

    0

    200,000

    400,000

    600,000

    800,000

    1,000,000

    1,200,000

    1,400,000

    0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120

    Pavement Age (month)

    AC at 1/2" DepthAC at 5" DepthAC at 10" depth

    D

    y

    n

    a

    m

    i

    c

    M

    o

    d

    u

    l

    u

    s

    (

    p

    s

    i

    )

  • [email protected]

    0

    100,000

    200,000

    300,000

    400,000

    500,000

    600,000

    700,000

    800,000

    900,000

    1,000,000

    0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60

    Pavement Age (month)

    M

    o

    d

    u

    l

    u

    s

    (

    p

    s

    i

    )

    What happened here ??

    Granular Base

  • [email protected]

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    70,000

    80,000

    90,000

    100,000

    0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60

    Pavement Age (month)

    M

    o

    d

    u

    l

    u

    s

    (

    p

    s

    i

    )

    Granular Base

    Soil

    Input Value

  • [email protected]

    AASHTO Materials Characterization

    z How do you Characterize your materials ??z SMAz Superpave HMAz Hveem HMAz Polymer Modifiedz Warm Mix Asphaltz RAP

    Are they all ai = 0.44 ?

  • [email protected]

    Climatez Site specific climate considerationsz Material properties effected by climatez PCC Joint openings, Curl / Warping

    Extrapolated fromOttawa, IL 800 Weather Sites

  • [email protected]

    Major Advantages

    z Modular system that allows for incremental enhancement

    z Produces a more reliable designz No longer dependent on the extrapolation of

    empirical relationshipsz Excellent for forensic analysisz Answers What if. questions

    z Calibrate to Local Materials, Traffic, Climate.

  • [email protected]

    Reasons for Changez Reduce Over-and-Under Design Costs z Legislative Mandatez Consider Alternative Designs/Unique Conditionsz Rational Basis for Warranties, LCCA, PRS,

    QA/QC, Pay Factorsz Forensic Investigationsz Impact of Management Decisions on

    Pavement Systemz Tie Design to Construction

  • [email protected]

    LCCA

    Time

    P

    a

    v

    e

    m

    e

    n

    t

    P

    e

    r

    f

    o

    r

    m

    a

    n

    c

    e

    Initial Construction

    First Rehab

  • [email protected]

    PRS Example

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    4 8 12

    Air Voids (%)

    B

    o

    t

    t

    o

    m

    U

    p

    C

    r

    a

    c

    k

    i

    n

    g

    (

    %

    )

    8% Air Void Spec Limit

    Contractor Builds 12% Va

    $$$

  • Pavement Design

    Pavement Management Construction

    Materials Selection

    Communication

    Integration

  • [email protected]

    Objectives

  • [email protected]

    Implementation Team

    z Include In-House Experts; Pavements Materials and Traffic, PMS

    z Consider Regional or Multi-State Effort; PFSz Contract with Consultant or Universityz Include Upper management Personnel

    Develop a Team and Plan

  • [email protected]

    Data Collection - Traffic

    z Most States Have Inadequate Dataz Some are Planning Regional Weight Data by

    Roadway Classification (TRB Session 283)z Share Collection and Storage Efforts with

    Other Offices Using Traffic Dataz Enhance WIM Quality and Magnitudez Integrate with PMS

  • [email protected]

    Data Collection - Materials

    z Most States Need Additional Equipmentz Several are Determining Mr, FWD, DCP and

    CBR Relationships for Catalogz Testing Equipment for CTE and E*z Predictive Equations for E*

  • [email protected]

    Practical Considerations

    z You have to design before you buildz MEPDG is used for Design and Forensic

    Evaluationz Dont need to use all distress predictions for

    designz Do not need Level 1 for all Inputsz Do not throw out past experience

  • [email protected]

    Using MEPDG for Design

    State specific guidance is necessaryz Pavement Design Manual z Distress criteria and limitsz Design parameters to change

  • [email protected]

    Implementation Timeframe

    z Some DOTs Already Underwayz Others are Awaiting Other Efforts:z NCHRP Projectsz FHWA Research Projectsz Copy Other State Approachesz AASHTO Adoptionz Windfall from Gas Tax Revenuesz Hell Frozen

  • [email protected]

    Who will use the MEPDG?

    z State DOTs Main Userz Pavement Designersz Upper Managementz Remaining Service Life, What if questions

    z Academiaz Industryz Consultant Designersz Warranty, Design Build, PRS, PWL etc..

  • [email protected]

    Other WorkLead StateImplementation PlanBothUnknown

  • [email protected]

    Things to remember

    z All pavement design systems need:z Quality Materials Characterizationz Quality Traffic Dataz Calibrated to local conditions

    z The MEPDG is one tool for a designerz Focused on the structural design aspectsz Has limitations

  • [email protected]

    Version 1.0 Changes

    z State DOTs will receive 2 copies soonz Batch Modez Model Recalibrationz Use of Volumetrics in rutting modelz Computer Program Stabilityz Perpetual Pavement Concept z Calculation of ESALs

    NCHRP Draft Research Results Digest

  • [email protected]

    More Informationz www.trb.org/mepdg z www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/dgitz Webcast Workshopsz Traffic, Climate, Materials, Introduction

    z ARA bugtracker website

    z Local Calibration Guide and Users Manualz NHI Course: Hands on Application of MEPDG

    zRead the book !!!

  • [email protected]

    Help Wanted

    z Contact the DGITz Research Proposal Reviewz Training z Technical Assistance

  • [email protected]

    AASHTO ImplementationJoint Technical Committee on Pavements

    Subcommittee of Design &

    Materials

    Full AASHTO Balloting

    Interim Guide Spring 2008 ?

    April 10-11, 2007MEPDG Roll Out Workshop

    Irvine, CA

  • [email protected]

    Perspective1960 Completion of Road Test Experiment

    1961-62 AASHO Interim Guide for the Design of Rigid and Flexible Pavements

    1972 AASHTO Interim Guide for the Design of Pavements

    1981 Revised Chapter III on Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Design

    1986 Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures

    1993 Revised Overlay Design Procedures

    1998 Supplement to Concrete Design Procedures

  • [email protected]

    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."

    PerspectivePerspective

  • [email protected]

    Questions ??

    www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/dgit/

    www.trb.org/mepdg

    BEATBAMA !!!

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False

    /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure true /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles true /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /NA /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /LeaveUntagged /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice