measurements of bc/ec and the contribution of wood burning ... · bc vs ec (07/02/2010 until...

27
Measurements of BC/EC and the contribution of wood burning to PM 10 in Flanders December 2nd, 2013 Christine Matheeussen

Upload: others

Post on 18-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Measurements of BC/EC and

    the contribution of wood burning

    to PM10 in Flanders

    December 2nd, 2013

    Christine Matheeussen

  • 2 2

    Number Pollutant

    31 PM10

    10 PM2,5 European Directive

    2008/50/EG 38 NO/NO2

    20 O3

    24 SO2

    4 CO

    8 VOC (e.g. benzeen)

    16 Heavy metals in PM10 (e.g. Pb, As, Cd, Ni) European Directive

    2004/107/EG 5 PAH in PM (e.g. benzo(a)pyreen)

    11 Heavy metals in deposition (e.g. Pb, Cd) VLAREM II

    3 PAH in deposition

    3 Hg

    0 Black smoke

    14 Black carbon

    24 Dioxines en PCB’s

    9 Acidification

    6 Meteorological parameters

    Pollutants measured by VMM - 2013

  • 3 3

    Measurements of BC/EC and the

    contribution of wood burning to

    PM in Flanders

    • BC / EC measurements

    • Routine BC measurements

    • BC measurements near E40 highway

    • Local contribution of EC to PM10 in street

    canyons and near access roads in cities

    • Contribution of woodburning to PM10

    • Conclusions

  • Routine BC measurements in Flanders - 2013

    Multi Angle Absorption Photometer (MAAP 5012)

  • Routine BC measurements in Flanders - 2012

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    Ze

    lza

    te

    Ro

    ese

    lare

    Zw

    ijndre

    cht

    Lu

    ch

    tba

    l

    Gent

    Bo

    rge

    rho

    ut

    Bo

    rge

    rho

    ut tra

    ffic

    Ha

    sse

    lt

    Ho

    ute

    m

    De

    sse

    l

    industrial urban suburban rural

    µg

    /m3

  • Routine BC measurements in Flanders

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    bla

    ck

    ca

    rbo

    n (

    µg

    /m³)

    industrial urban suburban rural

  • 6 m

    17 m

    55 m

    96 m

    BC measurements near E40 highway in

    Affligem with mobile units – April 2012 to Feb

    2013

  • 0.0

    100.0

    200.0

    300.0

    400.0

    500.0

    600.0

    700.0

    0.0

    2.0

    4.0

    6.0

    8.0

    10.0

    12.0

    14.0

    16.0

    -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    %

    µg

    /m3

    Distance from highway (m)

    PM2.5 (µg/m3) BC (µg/m3) PM2.5 (%) BC (%)

    L800 MW04MW03MW02

    = 5,6 µg/m3

    = 3,9 µg/m3

    BC and PM2.5 measurements near E40

    highway with mobile units – SW wind

    PM2.5 (µg/m3)

    BC (µg/m3)

  • 0.0

    100.0

    200.0

    300.0

    400.0

    500.0

    600.0

    700.0

    0.0

    2.0

    4.0

    6.0

    8.0

    10.0

    12.0

    14.0

    16.0

    -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    %

    µg

    /m3

    Distance from highway (m)

    PM2.5 (µg/m3) BC (µg/m3) PM2.5 (%) BC (%)

    L800 MW04MW03MW02

    BC and PM2.5 measurements near E40

    highway with mobile units – SW wind

    PM2.5 (%)

    BC (%)

  • • PM10

    • EC/OC TOT (NIOSH) OC x 1,4 = OM

    • levoglucosan >> GC/MS (trimethylsilylation)

    OM (wood) = 9,1 Levoglucosan

    PM (wood) = 10,7 Levoglucosan

    >> Schmidl et al., Atm. Env. (2008)

    Project based measurement of EC and

    contribution of woodburning to PM10

  • 11

    Comparison BC (MAAP 5012) vs EC (TOT-NIOSH) at

    Borgerhout (urban background (traffic))

    R2 BC/EC

    2007 BC = 1.45*EC + 0.66 0.91 1.82

    2008-2009 BC = 1.18*EC + 0.92 0.64 1.68

    2010-2011 BC = 1.65*EC + 0.35 0.78 1.89

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

    BC

    g/m

    3)

    EC (µg/m3)

    BC vs EC ( 09/03/2007 until 11/07/2007)

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

    BC

    g/m

    3)

    EC (µg/m3)

    BC vs EC (25/10/2008 until 31/12/2009)

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

    BC

    g/m

    3)

    EC (µg/m3)

    BC vs EC (07/02/2010 until 06/02/2011)

  • • PM10 chemical characterisation projects

    • routine EC measurements in PM2,5 at the rural

    background station in Retie

    Project based measurements of EC and

    contribution of woodburning to PM

    1st 2006-2007 Mix of rural, urban, suburban, industrial sites

    2nd 2008-2009 Hot spots

    3th 2010-2011 Wood burning

    4th 2011-2012

    -4 cities

    Urban background, street canyon, major road

    -Wood burning at urban background stations

    5th 2013 -5 cities

    -Urban background, street canyon

  • Concentration and composition of PM10 within cities (Chemkar IV)

    • 4 cities

    • Urban background

    • Access road

    • Street canyon

    • Every 4th day (= 92d x 6)

    • From June 2011 to July 2012

    • PM10

    • Ions

    • Levoglucosan at urban background

    Brugge : urban background access road street canyon

    • EC/OC

    • Elements

  • Concentration and composition of PM10 within cities (Chemkar IV)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    access r

    oad

    backgro

    und

    canyon

    access r

    oad

    backgro

    und

    canyon

    access r

    oad

    backgro

    und

    canyon

    access r

    oad

    backgro

    und

    canyon

    Antwerpen Brugge Gent Oostende

    EC OM seasalt NO3 NH4 nssSO4 mineral dust other

  • 15

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14a

    cce

    ss r

    oa

    d

    str

    ee

    tca

    nyo

    n

    acce

    ss r

    oa

    d

    str

    ee

    tca

    nyo

    n

    acce

    ss r

    oa

    d

    str

    ee

    tca

    nyo

    n

    acce

    ss r

    oa

    d

    str

    ee

    tca

    nyo

    n

    Antwerpen Brugge Gent Oostende

    µg/m

    3

    EC OM seasalt NO3 NH4 nssSO4 mineral dust

    Local contribution to PM10 within cities (Chemkar IV)

  • • 7 sites

    • Every 4th day (= 92d x 6)

    • From Feb 2010 to Feb 2011

    • PM10

    • EC/OC

    • Levoglucosan

    Rural Urban Rural (sources) Urban Suburban Rural (sources ?) Rural

    Houtem Gent Hamme Borgerhout Mechelen Lier Retie

    Contribution of wood burning to PM10 (Chemkar III)

  • • 4 urban background sites

    • Every 4th day (= 92d x 6)

    • From June 2011 to July 2012

    • PM10

    • EC/OC

    • Levoglucosan

    • Ions

    • Elements

    Contribution of wood burning to PM10 (Chemkar IV)

    Oostende Brugge Gent Antwerpen

  • PM10 concentrations (Chemkar III)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    01 feb

    10

    01 mrt

    10

    01 apr

    10

    01 mei

    10

    01 jun

    10

    01 jul

    10

    01 aug

    10

    01 sep

    10

    01 okt

    10

    01 nov

    10

    01 dec

    10

    01 jan

    11

    01 feb

    11

    µg

    /m3

    HAM GEN HOU MEC LIE BOR RET(H)

  • Levoglucosan concentrations (Chemkar III)

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    01 feb

    10

    01 mrt

    10

    01 apr

    10

    01 mei

    10

    01 jun

    10

    01 jul

    10

    01 aug

    10

    01 sep

    10

    01 okt

    10

    01 nov

    10

    01 dec

    10

    01 jan

    11

    01 feb

    11

    µg

    /m3

    HAM GEN HOU MEC LIE BOR RET(H)

  • EC concentrations (Chemkar III)

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    01 feb

    10

    01 mrt

    10

    01 apr

    10

    01 mei

    10

    01 jun

    10

    01 jul

    10

    01 aug

    10

    01 sep

    10

    01 okt

    10

    01 nov

    10

    01 dec

    10

    01 jan

    11

    01 feb

    11

    µg

    /m3

    HAM GEN HOU MEC LIE BOR RET(H)

  • OC concentrations (Chemkar III)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    01 feb

    10

    01 mrt

    10

    01 apr

    10

    01 mei

    10

    01 jun

    10

    01 jul

    10

    01 aug

    10

    01 sep

    10

    01 okt

    10

    01 nov

    10

    01 dec

    10

    01 jan

    11

    01 feb

    11

    µg

    /m3

    HAM GEN HOU MEC LIE BOR RET(H)

  • Contribution of wood burning to organic

    matter in PM10 (Chemkar III)

    2.06

    3.85

    3.273.51 3.54

    2.99 2.95

    0.78

    1.35

    3.20

    1.261.50

    1.411.20

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    HOU GEN HAM BOR MEC LIE RET(H)

    µg

    /m3

    OM(andere) OM(hout)

    OM (non wood burning) OM (wood burning)

  • Average contribution of wood burning to PM10 in

    summer and winter (Chemkar III)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    HOU GEN HAM BOR MEC LIE RET(H) average

    µg

    /m3

    Apr-Sep Oct-Mar

    All year Summer Winter Winter/

    Summer

    All stations 1,8 µg/m3 6,9 % 0,5 µg/m3 2.3 % 3,0 µg/m3 10.6% 5,9

  • Average contribution of wood burning to

    PM10 in summer and winter (Chemkar IV)

    0.420.370.30 0.22

    2.92 2.88

    1.92

    2.55

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    Antwerpen Brugge Gent Oostende

    PM

    g/m

    3)

    SUM WIN

    All year Summer(Apr-Sep) Winter (Oct-March) Winter/

    Summer

    All stations 1.4 µg/m3 5.4 % 0.3 µg/m3 1.5 % 2.6 µg/m3 8.4 % 7.8

  • Contribution of wood burning to PM10 on

    exceedance days (Chemkar III)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    07-0

    2-1

    0

    24-0

    4-1

    0

    28-0

    4-1

    0

    20-1

    2-1

    0

    07-0

    2-1

    0

    15-0

    2-1

    0

    24-0

    4-1

    0

    21-0

    7-1

    0

    25-0

    7-1

    0

    08-1

    2-1

    0

    20-1

    2-1

    0

    01-0

    1-1

    1

    29-0

    1-1

    1

    02-0

    2-1

    1

    07-0

    2-1

    0

    15-0

    2-1

    0

    08-1

    2-1

    0

    20-1

    2-1

    0

    01-0

    1-1

    1

    29-0

    1-1

    1

    02-0

    2-1

    1

    07-0

    2-1

    0

    15-0

    2-1

    0

    08-1

    2-1

    0

    20-1

    2-1

    0

    01-0

    1-1

    1

    29-0

    1-1

    1

    02-0

    2-1

    1

    07-0

    2-1

    0

    15-0

    2-1

    0

    08-1

    2-1

    0

    29-0

    1-1

    1

    02-0

    2-1

    1

    07-0

    2-1

    0

    15-0

    2-1

    0

    09-0

    7-1

    0

    08-1

    2-1

    0

    20-1

    2-1

    0

    01-0

    1-1

    1

    29-0

    1-1

    1

    07-0

    2-1

    0

    15-0

    2-1

    0

    29-0

    1-1

    1

    Houtem Gent Hamme Borgerhout Mechelen Lier Retie

    µg/m

    3

    PM-PMwood PMwood 50 µg/m3

  • Contribution of wood burning to PM10 on

    exceedance days (Chemkar IV)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    21/1

    1/2

    01

    1

    05/0

    2/2

    01

    2

    16/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    28/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    23/0

    5/2

    01

    2

    16/0

    1/2

    01

    2

    16/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    24/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    28/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    23/0

    5/2

    01

    2

    21/1

    1/2

    01

    1

    16/0

    1/2

    01

    2

    16/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    24/0

    3/2

    012

    28/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    23/0

    5/2

    01

    2

    16/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    24/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    28/0

    3/2

    01

    2

    23/0

    5/2

    01

    2

    Antwerpen Brugge Gent Oostende

    µg/m

    3

    PM-PMwood PMwood 50 µg/m3

  • 27

    Conclusions

    • Concentrations of EC and BC are highly influenced by traffic

    • Average contribution of wood burning to PM10 • 2010-2011 : 1.8 µg/m3

    • 2011-2012 : 1.4 µg/m3

    • Average contribution of wood burning to PM10 in winter 6 to 8 times higher than in summer • Winter 2010-2011 : 3.0 µg/m3

    • Winter 2011-2012 : 2.6 µg/m3

    • During exceedance days the contribution can even be more important • 2010-2011 : average contribution of 6 µg/m3

    • 2011-2012 : average contribution of 3 µg/m3