may 9, 2002 triumf canada1 a new e experiment at psi for the muegamma collaboration stefan ritt...
TRANSCRIPT
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 1
A new e experiment at PSI
For the MUEGAMMA collaborationStefan Ritt
(Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland)
•Motivation
•Experimental Technique
•New Electronics
•Current status
•Motivation
•Experimental Technique
•New Electronics
•Current status
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 2
Physics Motivation
• Minimal SM: Conservation of Baryons (proton decay) and Lepton Flavour (+ e+
• Super Symmetry (SUSY) theories generically predict LFV
• Processes like + e+ are not “contaminated” by SM processes and therefore very clean
• Discovered oscillations are expected to enhance LFV rate
• The search for + e+ is therefore a promising field to find physics beyond the SM
• Minimal SM: Conservation of Baryons (proton decay) and Lepton Flavour (+ e+
• Super Symmetry (SUSY) theories generically predict LFV
• Processes like + e+ are not “contaminated” by SM processes and therefore very clean
• Discovered oscillations are expected to enhance LFV rate
• The search for + e+ is therefore a promising field to find physics beyond the SM
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 3
Prediction from SUSY SU(5)
This experiment 2)
1)
1) J. Hisano et al., hep-ph/97113482) MEGA collaboration, hep-ex/9905013
• Based on observation of atmospheric neutrino anomaly
• BR(+ e+ ) 10-14
• BR(± ± ) 10-9
• Conversion( e) 10-16
• Based on observation of atmospheric neutrino anomaly
• BR(+ e+ ) 10-14
• BR(± ± ) 10-9
• Conversion( e) 10-16
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 4
10
J ust so
(GeV)M R2
141312101010
bound
Experimental
-1-2-3 11010
MSW small angle
MSW large anglesmall mass
J ust so
MSW large angle
sin 22
m
2(e
V )2
e
)
Br(
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10
10
-11
10
10
10
10
10
10
-10
-11
-12
-13
-14
-15
MSW
larg
e an
gle
MSW
small a
ngle
~ larg
e an
gle sm
all m
ass
Connection with oscillations1)
J. Hisano and D. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 116005
This experiment
favored!
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 5
Previous + e+ Experiments
Place YearUpper limit
Author
SIN (PSI), Switzerland
1977 < 1.0 10-9 A. Van der Schaaf et al.
TRIUMF, Canada
1977 < 3.6 10-9 P. Depommier et al.
LANL, USA 1979< 1.7 10-
10 W.W. Kinnison et al.
LANL, USA 1986< 4.9 10-
11 R.D. Bolton et al.
LANL, USA 1999< 1.2 10-
11
MEGA Collab., M.L. Brooks et al.
PSI~2005
~ 10-14 This Experiment
Search for Lepton-Flavour
Violation:
Search for Lepton-Flavour
Violation:
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 6
MEG Collaboration
Institute Country Main Resp. Head Scientists Students
ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo Japan LXe Calorimeter T. Mori 12 2
Waseda University Japan Cryogenics T. Doke 5 2
INFN, Pisa Italye+ counter, trigger, M.C.
C. Bemporad 4 3
IPNS, KEK, Tsukuba JapanSupercoducting Solenoid
A. Maki 5 -
PSI SwitzerlandDrift Chamber, Beamline, DAQ
S. Ritt 4 -
BINP, Novosibirsk RussiaLXe Tests and Purification
B. Khazin 4 -
Nagoya University Japan Cryogenics K. Masuda 1 -
35 7
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 7
Time Table
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Planning R & D Assembly Data Taking
now
“large prototype”
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 8
Experimental MethodExperimental Method
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 9
Detector Overview
1m
e+
Liq. Xe Scintilla tionDetector
Drift Chamber
Liq. Xe Scintilla tionDetector
e+
Tim ing Counter
Stopping TargetThin S uperconducting Coil
M uon Beam
Drift Chamber
• Stopped beam of 108 s-1, 100% duty factor
• Liquid Xe calorimeter for detection
• Solenoidal magnetic spectrometer with gradient field
• Radial drift chambers for e+
momentum determination
• Timing counter for e+
• Stopped beam of 108 s-1, 100% duty factor
• Liquid Xe calorimeter for detection
• Solenoidal magnetic spectrometer with gradient field
• Radial drift chambers for e+
momentum determination
• Timing counter for e+
Ee = 52.8 MeV
Kinematics e= 180°
Eg = 52.8 MeV
e
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 10
Signal and Background• + e+ signal very clear
– E = Ee+ = 52.8 MeV
– e+ = 180°
– e+ and in time
• Background– Radiative + decays– Accidental overlap
• Detector Requirements– Excellent energy resolution– Excellent timing resolution– Good angular resolution
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 11
e Signature
eEe,E = 52.8MeV
eEe,E < 52.8MeV
0.9
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
1
1.02
0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02X
Y
10 14 Decays in Acceptance
X = Ee/52.8MeV
Y =
E/
52.8
MeV
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 12
Sensitivity and Background RateN 1108
T 2.2 107 s (~50 weeks)
/4 0.09
e 0.95
0.7
sel 0.8
FWHM
Ee 0.7%
E 1.4%
e 12 mrad
te 150 ps
BR(e) = (N • T • /4 • e • • sel )-1 = 0.94 10-14
Prompt Background Bpr 10-17
Accidental Background Bacc Ee • te • (E)2 • (e)2 5 10-15
Aimed resolutions:
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 13
Comparison with previous experiments
Exp./Lab
Ee/Ee %FWHM
E/E %FWHM
te (ns)
e (mrad)
Inst. Stop rate (s-1)
Duty cycle (%)
SIN (PSI) 8.7 9.3 1.4 - (4..6) x 105 100
TRIUMF 10 8.7 6.7 - 2 x 105 100
LANL 8.8 8 1.9 37 2.4 x 105 6.4
Crystal Box
8 8 1.3 87 4 x 105 (6..9)
MEGA 1.2 4.5 1.6 17 2.5 x 108 (6..7)
PSI 0.7 1.4 0.15 12 108 100
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 14
Paul Scherrer Institute
ExperimentalHall
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 15
Experimental Hall
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 16
E5 Beam Line
e
U-versionE52
Z-versionE51
AST
First Degrader
Beam transport
ASC
Detector
solenoid
• 108 /s on 55 mm2
• Neutron background measured in 1998• Two Beam tests in 2002
• 108 /s on 55 mm2
• Neutron background measured in 1998• Two Beam tests in 2002
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 17
Detector
1m
e+
Liq. Xe Scin tilla tionDetector
Drift Cham ber
Liq. Xe Scin tilla tionDetector
e+
Tim ing Counter
Stopping TargetThin S uperconducting Coil
M uon Beam
Drift Cham ber
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 18
LXe Calorimeter
• ~800l liquid Xe (3t)
• ~800 PMTs immersed in LXe
• Only scintillation light detected
• Fast response (45 ns decay time)
• High light output (70% of NaI(Tl))1)
• High uniformity compared with segmented calorimeters
• High channel occupancy will be accommodated by special trigger scheme
• ~800l liquid Xe (3t)
• ~800 PMTs immersed in LXe
• Only scintillation light detected
• Fast response (45 ns decay time)
• High light output (70% of NaI(Tl))1)
• High uniformity compared with segmented calorimeters
• High channel occupancy will be accommodated by special trigger scheme
Liq. Xe
H.V.
Vacuum
for thermal insulation
Al Honeycombwindow
PMT
Refrigerator
Cooling pipe
Signals
fillerPlastic
1.5m
1) T. Doke and K. Masuda, NIM A 420 (1999) 62
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 19
Response
3 cm
Liq. Xe
Liq. Xe
14 cm
(a)
(b)
05 10 15
2025
3035
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
05
1015 20 25
3035
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
52.8 MeV
52.8 MeV
• Signal is distributed over many PMTs in most cases
• Weighted mean of PMTs on the front face x ~ 4mm FWHM
• Broadness of distribution z ~ 16mm FWHM
• Timing resolution t ~ 100ps FWHM
• Energy resolution ~ 1.4% FWHMdepends on light attenuation in LXe
• Signal is distributed over many PMTs in most cases
• Weighted mean of PMTs on the front face x ~ 4mm FWHM
• Broadness of distribution z ~ 16mm FWHM
• Timing resolution t ~ 100ps FWHM
• Energy resolution ~ 1.4% FWHMdepends on light attenuation in LXe
x
z
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 20
Calorimeter Prototypes
• 32 PMTs, 2.3 l LXe• Tested with radioactive sources
51Cr, 137Cs, 54Mn, 88Y• Extrapolated resolutions at 52.8 MeV
in agreement with quoted numbers
“Small” “Large”
Measure resolutions with 40 MeV photon
beam at ETL, Tsukuba, Japan
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 21
Large Prototype• Currently largest
LXe detector in the world (224 PMTs, 150l),
• Contains all critical parts of final detector
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 22
Status of Large Prototype
• Two beam tests, many -source and cosmic runs in Tsukuba, Japan
• Light attenuation much too high (~10x)• Cause: ~3ppm of Water in Lxe • Cleaning with “hot” Xe-gas before filling
currently under investigation• Preliminary results in June ‘02
• Two beam tests, many -source and cosmic runs in Tsukuba, Japan
• Light attenuation much too high (~10x)• Cause: ~3ppm of Water in Lxe • Cleaning with “hot” Xe-gas before filling
currently under investigation• Preliminary results in June ‘02
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 23
Positron SpectrometerHomogeneous Field
e+ from +e+e+ from +e+
Gradient Field(COnstant-Bending-RAdius)
Ultra-Thin (~3g/cm2)superconducting solenoidwith 1.2 T field
Ultra-Thin (~3g/cm2)superconducting solenoidwith 1.2 T field
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 24
Drift Chamber
• 16 radial chambers with 20 wires each• Staggered cells measure both position and time• He – C2H6 gas to reduce multiple scattering• Vernier pattern to determine z coordinate
• 16 radial chambers with 20 wires each• Staggered cells measure both position and time• He – C2H6 gas to reduce multiple scattering• Vernier pattern to determine z coordinate
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 25
Prototype Test at PSI
• 0, 0.6, 0.8, 1T field
• 3 tilting angles
• Chamber ok, electronics needs improvement
• 0, 0.6, 0.8, 1T field
• 3 tilting angles
• Chamber ok, electronics needs improvement
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 26
Positron timing counter
z
(t )z L
(t )R
L(t )
Rz(t )
e+
e+
e+
Impact Point
1m
• Aimed resolution ~100ps FWHM
• Tests with cosmic confirmed 100ps FWHM
• Aimed resolution ~100ps FWHM
• Tests with cosmic confirmed 100ps FWHM
e+
Timing Counter
Stopping TargetThin Superconducting Coil
Muon Beam
Drift Chamber
http://meg.psi.ch/ subprojects/tcount/
http://meg.psi.ch/ subprojects/tcount/
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 27
Trigger ElectronicsTrigger Electronics
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 28
Trigger Requirements
Beam rate 108 s-1
Fast LXe energy sum > 45MeV2103 s-1
interaction point e+ hit point in timing counter time correlation – e+ 200 s-
1
angular corrlation – e+ 20 s-1
Beam rate 108 s-1
Fast LXe energy sum > 45MeV2103 s-1
interaction point e+ hit point in timing counter time correlation – e+ 200 s-
1
angular corrlation – e+ 20 s-1
Ee = 52.8 MeV
Kinematics e= 180°
Eg = 52.8 MeV
e
M.C.
• Total ~800 PMTs
• Common noise contributes significantly to analog sum
• AC coupling Baseline drift
• How to evaluate of shower center?
• Total ~800 PMTs
• Common noise contributes significantly to analog sum
• AC coupling Baseline drift
• How to evaluate of shower center?
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 29
Digital TriggerType1
8 channels8 channels
clck, clear
VMEInterface(Cypress)
3.3V 2.5VFADC
LVDS
FPGA
SRAM
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
LVDS
FPGA
FPGA
FPGA
SRAM
LVDS
48 bits output
100MHz 10bit
VMEInterface(Cypress)
3.3V 2.5VFADC
LVDS
FPGA
SRAM
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
LVDS
FPGA
FPGA
FPGA
SRAM
LVDS
48 bits output
100MHz 10bit
VMEInterface(Cypress)
3.3V 2.5VFADC
LVDS
FPGA
SRAM
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
LVDS
FPGA
FPGA
FPGA
SRAM
LVDS
48 bits output
100MHz 10bit
VMEInterface(Cypress)
3.3V 2.5VFADC
LVDS
FPGA
SRAM
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
FADC
LVDS
FPGA
FPGA
FPGA
SRAM
LVDS
48 bits output
100MHz 10bit
• All PMTs in trigger• Board hierarchy with LVDS interconnect• Use FPGA with double capacity
• All PMTs in trigger• Board hierarchy with LVDS interconnect• Use FPGA with double capacity
VMEInterface(Cypress)
3.3V 2.5V
LVDS
FPGA
SRAM
LVDS
LVDS
LVDS
FPGA
FPGA
FPGA
SRAM
LVDS
LVDS
LVDS
LVDS
LVDS
LVDS
LVDS
LVDS
Type2
LVDS
LVDS
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 30
Baseline Subtraction
Lat
ch
Lat
ch
Lat
ch
Lat
ch
Lat
ch
BaselineSubtractionL
atch
10 bit
100 MHz Clock
-+
<thr
+
-
BaselineRegister
Uses ~120 out of 5000 logic cells
8 channels/FPGA use 20% of chip
Uses ~120 out of 5000 logic cells
8 channels/FPGA use 20% of chip
Baselinesubtracted
signal LUT10x10
Calibrated and
linearized signal
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 31
QT Algorithmoriginal
waveform
smoothed anddifferentiated (Difference Of
Samples)Threshold in DOS
Region for pedestal
evaluation
integration area
t
• Inspired by H1 Fast Track Trigger (A. Schöning)
• Hit region defined when Difference of Samples is above threshold
• Integration of original signal in hit region
• Pedestal evaluated in region before hit
• Time interpolated using maximum value and two neighbor values in LUT 1ns resolution for 10ns sampling time
• Inspired by H1 Fast Track Trigger (A. Schöning)
• Hit region defined when Difference of Samples is above threshold
• Integration of original signal in hit region
• Pedestal evaluated in region before hit
• Time interpolated using maximum value and two neighbor values in LUT 1ns resolution for 10ns sampling time
10ns
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 32
Trigger latency
BS
BS
BS
BS
Max
Max
Max
.
.
.
T[ns] 0 50 100 110 120..200 220 230
>45MeV
e+
AND
10 stages = 1024 chn
. . .
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
.
.
.
Inter-board communication: 120nsTotal: 350ns (simulated)
~600 chn. / 10 bitAt 100 MHz
75 GB/sprocessing powerIn 2 VME crates
~600 chn. / 10 bitAt 100 MHz
75 GB/sprocessing powerIn 2 VME crates
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 33
Prototype board
ADCSignal-
Generator DACFPGA
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 34
DAQ ElectronicsDAQ Electronics
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 35
DAQ Requirementsn
E[MeV]50 51 52
e
t
PMTsum
e
e
e
51.5 MeV
0.511 MeV
• ’s hitting different parts of LXe can be separated if > 2 PMTs apart (15 cm)
• Timely separated ’s need waveform digitizing > 300 MHz
• If waveform digitizing gives timing <100ps, no TDCs are needed
• ’s hitting different parts of LXe can be separated if > 2 PMTs apart (15 cm)
• Timely separated ’s need waveform digitizing > 300 MHz
• If waveform digitizing gives timing <100ps, no TDCs are needed
~100ns
e
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 36
Domino Sampling Chip
C. Brönnimann et al., NIM A420 (1999) 264
Existing:• 0.5 – 1.2 GHz sampling
speed• 128 sampling cells• Readout at 5 MHz, 12 bit• ~ 60 $/channel
Needed:• 2.5 GHz sampling speed• Circular domino wave• 1024 sampling cells• 40 MHz readout• < 100ps accuracy
Existing:• 0.5 – 1.2 GHz sampling
speed• 128 sampling cells• Readout at 5 MHz, 12 bit• ~ 60 $/channel
Needed:• 2.5 GHz sampling speed• Circular domino wave• 1024 sampling cells• 40 MHz readout• < 100ps accuracy
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 37
Domino Ring Sampler (DRS)
input
• Free running domino wave, stopped with trigger
• Sampling speed 2 GHz (500ps/bin), trigger gate sampling gives 50ps timing resolution
• 1024 bins 150ns waveform + 350ns delay
• Free running domino wave, stopped with trigger
• Sampling speed 2 GHz (500ps/bin), trigger gate sampling gives 50ps timing resolution
• 1024 bins 150ns waveform + 350ns delay
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 38
DRS Prototype4mm
1mm
.
.
.
.
.
•0.25m Process (“CERN is using”)
•768 cells•Wafer back
July ‘02
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 39
Domino Simulation “Analog Extracted”
• 16 cells
• All paracitics included
• Domino speed: 1.5-2.2 GHz
• 16 cells
• All paracitics included
• Domino speed: 1.5-2.2 GHz
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 40
DAQ Board• 9 channels 1024 bins / 40 MHz = 230 s acceptable dead
time• Zero suppression in FPGA• QT Algorithm in FPGA (store waveform if multi-hit)• Costs per channel: ~25$ (board) + 6$ (chip)
• 9 channels 1024 bins / 40 MHz = 230 s acceptable dead time
• Zero suppression in FPGA• QT Algorithm in FPGA (store waveform if multi-hit)• Costs per channel: ~25$ (board) + 6$ (chip)
VMEInterface(Cypress)
3.3V 2.5V8 channel
DRS
TriggerInput
Board inter-connect
FPGA
FPGA
SRAM
SRAM
SRAM
SRAM
FADC
8 channelDRS
8 channelDRS
FADC
8 channelDRS
Trigger BUS(2nd level tr.)
8 in
puts
triggergate
FADC
3 state switches
FPGA
SRAMshift register
40 MHz 12 bit
domino wave
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 41
DAQ Topology
PMT
FADCFPGA
triggergate
2GHz
40MHz
DC TriggerBoard
triggergate
100MHz
DSC
TriggerBoard
CPU
CPU
•LXe•e+ counter
•wires•strips
Waveformor QT readout
DAQ board
Waveformor QT readout
2nd level trigger
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 42
“Redefinition” of DAQ
Conventional New
AC coupling Baseline subtraction
Const. Fract. Discriminator
DOS – Zero crossing
ADC Numerical Integration
TDCBin interpolation (LUT)
Waveform Fitting
Scaler (250 MHz) Scaler (50 MHz)
Oscilloscope Waveform sampling
400 US$ / channel 50 US$ / channel
TDCDisc.
ADC
Scaler
Scope
FADC
FPGA
SRAM
DRS ~GHz
100 MHz
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 43
Cryogenics Design
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 44
Slow ControlHV
PC
RS
232
12345
Temperature, pressure, …
GP
IB
Valves
??? 15° C
heater
PLC
12:30 12.3
12:45 17.2
13:20 15.2
14:10 17.3
15:20 16.2
18:30 21.3
19:20 18.2
19:45 19.2
MIDASDAQ
Eth
ern
et
Terminal Server
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 45
Slow Control BusHV
Temperature, pressure, … Valves
heater
MIDASDAQ
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 46
Field Bus Solutions• CAN, Profibus, LON
available• Node with ADC >100$• Interoperatibility not
guaranteed• Protocol overhead• Local CPU? User
programmable?• How to integrate in HV?
(CAEN use CAENET)
• CAN, Profibus, LON available
• Node with ADC >100$• Interoperatibility not
guaranteed• Protocol overhead• Local CPU? User
programmable?• How to integrate in HV?
(CAEN use CAENET)
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 47
Generic node
• ADuC812 / C8051Fxxx Micro controllers with 8x12 bit ADC, 2x12 bit DAC, digital IO
• RS485 bus over flat ribbon cable
• Powered through bus• Costs ~30$• Piggy back board
• ADuC812 / C8051Fxxx Micro controllers with 8x12 bit ADC, 2x12 bit DAC, digital IO
• RS485 bus over flat ribbon cable
• Powered through bus• Costs ~30$• Piggy back board
B
RxD
9
INT
A
7
54
21
9
1
8
1 5
TC
KT
DI
TM
ST
DO
2
+3
V
4
A5 A4
1 1
P0.
2
TxD
1
P0.
4
B
+ 3V
-12V
+ 3V
6
0
3
2 2
1 6 2
1
+3
V
DG
ND
+1
2V
8
P 0
11.0
59 M
Hz
AG
ND
+3V
I/O _2
1 0
I/O _1
D E
A
RES
5V
in in
g nd g nd
/RS TP3 .4
+5VD G N D
J1
7
4
1
J1
+ 3V
J3
LED
+ 5V
0 6
+3
V
+3
V
2 2
SCS 200
A7 A6
J2
9
A2 A1
2J4
P0.
3
D I
R OR E
g nd
V c c
MAX1483
RE
SE
T
+ 5V
C 4 2 ,2uF
n c
in in
g nd
g ndn c
1 o ut
n c
8in
g nd
78L03
+ 12V
C 7 2 ,2uF
P 1
+5V
D G N D
56
23
0
P 2
4K
7R
2
1
AG
ND
-12
V
AV
+ AG
ND
1 2 .10 .2001
S C S 200
R .S CH M ID T
A0
1 o ut 8n c
C 6 2 ,2uF
RE
SE
T
C1
22
,2u
F
C9
27p
F
C 10 2 ,2uF
79L12V R 3
78L12
V R 1
J2
A3
C 3 2 ,2uF
V R 2C 2 2 ,2uF
C 1 2 ,2uF
+ 15V
-15v
4K 7R 1
Pau l-Scherrer-InstitutCH-5432 Villigen / PSI
C 112 ,2uF
C8
27p
F
C 5 2 ,2uF
17
AV
+
20
/RS
T6
2V
DD
23
P3
.35
9P
1.7
26
P3
.05
6P
0.7
29
TD
O5
3P
2.3
32
P1
.55
0P
0.5
1 6AV +
1 3A IN 6
1 0A IN 3
7A IN 0
4C P 0 +
1C P 1 -
3 3 P 2 .0
3 6 P 1 .2
3 9 P 0 .0
4 2 P 0 .1
4 5 P 3 .7
4 8 P 0 .3
19
XTA
L2
18
XTA
L1
1 5A G N D
1 2A IN 5
9A IN 2
6V R E F R
5A G N D
8A IN 1
11A IN 4
1 4A IN 7
63
DA
C1
64
DA
C0
3C P 0 -
2C P 1 +
22
TC
K
25
P3
.1
28
TD
I
31
VD
D
24
P3
.2
27
P2
.1
30
DG
ND
60
P1
.6
57
P3
.5
54
P2
.2
51
P2
.5
55
P0
.6
58
P3
.4
52
P2
.4
3 4 P 1 .4
3 7 P 1 .1
4 0 V D D
4 3 P 2 .7
3 5 P 1 .3
3 8 P 1 .0
4 1 D G N D
4 6 P 3 .6
4 7 P 0 .2
4 4 P 2 .6
21
TM
S6
1D
GN
D
49
P0
.4
6051F000
U 1
www.cygnal.comwww.cygnal.com
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 48
2 Versions
• Generic node with signal conditioning• Sub-master with power supply and PC
connection (Parallel Port, USB planned)• Integration on sensors, in crates• RS232 node with protocol translator
BUS OrientedBUS Oriented
Crate OrientedCrate Oriented
• 19” crate with custom backplane• Generic node as piggy-back• Cards for analog IO / digital IO / °C / 220V• crate connects to parallel port (USB)
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 49
Midas Slow Control Bus
• 256 nodes, 65536 nodes with one level of repeaters• Bus length ~500m opto-isolated• Boards for voltage, current, thermo couples, TTL IO, 220V
output• Readout speed: 0.3s for 1000 channels• C library, command-line utility, Midas driver, LabView driver• Nodes are “self-documenting”• Configuration parameters in EEPROM on node• Node CPU can operate autonomously for interlock and
regulation (PID) tasks (C programmable)• Nodes can be reprogrammed over network
http://midas.psi.ch/mscb
• 256 nodes, 65536 nodes with one level of repeaters• Bus length ~500m opto-isolated• Boards for voltage, current, thermo couples, TTL IO, 220V
output• Readout speed: 0.3s for 1000 channels• C library, command-line utility, Midas driver, LabView driver• Nodes are “self-documenting”• Configuration parameters in EEPROM on node• Node CPU can operate autonomously for interlock and
regulation (PID) tasks (C programmable)• Nodes can be reprogrammed over network
http://midas.psi.ch/mscb
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 50
Vin
Vout
• • • 12 times • • •
DAC
2400V
0-2400V
ADC
• Cheap and stable (<0.3V) HV system
• Regulate global external voltage
• Use series of opto-couplers
• Compensate non-linearities of opto-couplers by regulation loop
• ADC and DAC from slow control node
• Cheap and stable (<0.3V) HV system
• Regulate global external voltage
• Use series of opto-couplers
• Compensate non-linearities of opto-couplers by regulation loop
• ADC and DAC from slow control node
HV System Design
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 51
High Voltage System
C node
Op
to-c
ou
ple
rs
External HV
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 52
HV performance
• Regulates common HV source• 0-2400V, ~1mA• DAC 16bit, ADC 14bit• Current trip ~10s • Self-calibration with two high
accuracy reference voltages• Accuracy <0.3V absolute• Boards with 12 channels, crates with
192 channels• 30$/channel (+ext. HV)
• Regulates common HV source• 0-2400V, ~1mA• DAC 16bit, ADC 14bit• Current trip ~10s • Self-calibration with two high
accuracy reference voltages• Accuracy <0.3V absolute• Boards with 12 channels, crates with
192 channels• 30$/channel (+ext. HV)
Prototype
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada 53
Conclusions
• Decision about feasibility of LXe calorimeter soon• Innovative electronics useful for other experiments
– FPGA-based trigger with 100MHz FADC– 2 GHz cheap waveform sampling– New slow control system MSCB
• Physics runs expected in 2005
• Decision about feasibility of LXe calorimeter soon• Innovative electronics useful for other experiments
– FPGA-based trigger with 100MHz FADC– 2 GHz cheap waveform sampling– New slow control system MSCB
• Physics runs expected in 2005
http://meg.psi.chhttp://meg.psi.ch