May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ashley Folse4735 Sepulveda Blvd Apt 447Sherman Oaks, CA 91403-5426

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Paul Sauser917 S Bundy DrLos Angeles, CA 90049-5828

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Stephen Bradshaw342 E Mayfair AveOrange, CA 92867-6724

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Valerie Delahaye131 S Wilton P1Los Angeles, CA 90004-4909

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Martha Jean Ottina3900 Woodcliff RdSherman Oaks, CA 91403-5054

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Kirk Attebury1911 17th St Apt 3Santa Monica, CA 90404-4725

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.WHY WOULD YOU EVEN TAKE A RISK????????

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive ..... and it must be COMPREHENSIVE... and OPEN reviewprocess.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Betty Murphy35 Linden Ave Apt 310Long Beach, CA 90802-5059

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Rolf Mauermann3231 Brookhill StLa Crescenta, CA 91214-1202

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Elias R Torres618. 1/2 N Garfield AveMontebello, CA 90640-1639

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Timothy Root

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

I studied nuclear power plants in detail for years, and starting theplant without a severe overhaul would be dangerous - you would beputting people's lives in your hands. Simply starting the reactor upafter such a long period of inactivity would be very dangerous due tothe xenon that builds up in the core.

The issue in chernobyl that created the explosion was started simply byhuman oversight and a lack of understanding - I am aware that we arenot Russia and we have better oversight than them, but this seems likea ploy to save some money at the expense of our citizens.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Michelle Varner5311 Reese RdTorrance, CA 90505-3238

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ida Hurt5 Kent WayNorthridge, CA 91324-3609

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Blythe Wheaton2888 Bernard CtLaguna Beach, CA 92651-2076

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

They have been saying for years that plant is safe that turned out tobe untrue they have an agenda... done open it early please..Given thetroubled history and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRCof conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of eitherfailed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Rachel Matteson4246 Rutgers AveLong Beach, CA 90808-1628

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ute Watson2322 Calle AdrianaSan Dimas, CA 91773-3982

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Wesley Keebler15442 La Maida StSherman Oaks, CA 91403-1043

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashingtoni DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Michael Wagner845 W Colorado BlvdMonrovia, CA 91016-2517

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

John GeistPO Box 1599Hawaiian Gardens, CA 90716-0599

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Shawn Johnson407 W Avenida De Los Lobos MarinosSan Clemente, CA 92672-4325

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Peggy O'Connell133 Mauna Loa DrMonrovia, CA 91016-2017

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a !'preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Scott Milton331 S Archer StAnaheim, CA 92804-2417

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jason Hashimoto4058 Michael AveLos Angeles, CA 90066-5116

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Bruce Cowan232 Robinhood PlCosta Mesa, CA 92627-2133

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shor.tcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ann Chickey5520 W 190th StTorrance, CA 90503-1012

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Susan Ray7906 Santa Monica BlvdWest Hollywood, CA 90046-5169

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's-request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Carolina Shores2001 Gates StLos Angeles, CA 90031-3107

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Pierre Grimes947 Capital StCosta Mesa, CA 92627-3309

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jeni Blumenthal511 N Bonhill RdLos Angeles, CA 90049-2325

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Lisa Ferguson383 W 9th StSan Pedro, CA 90731-3713

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.Nuclear waste is destroying our EARTH. Stop aiding in thisdestruction...

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Loulou S1659 Appian WaySanta Monica, CA 90401

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Chris Gerolmo12311 Rochedale Ln # CaLos Angeles, CA 90049-1936

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Claudine Armand4057 Rosabell StLos Angeles, CA 90066-5739

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ron Cast122 La PlacentiaSan Clemente, CA 92672-3818

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Renee Coleman25042 Vermont DrNewhall, CA 91321-3420

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Maryjaye Simms8430 Fenwick StSunland, CA 91040-2824

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Loren Johnson17281 La Mesa LnHuntington Beach, CA 92647-6107

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Marta Collier6008 Ventura Canyon AveVan Nuys, CA 91401-3028

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Frank Ortiz5365 Carolina P1Los Angeles, CA 90022-4018

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Daniel Romero3350 Griffith Park BlvdLos Angeles, CA 90027-2227

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jamie Perlman28 Fairway PtNewport Coast, CA 92657-1722

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Craig Watson1707 Port Ashley P1Newport Beach, CA 92660-5335

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Nadine Cano13821 Valerio StVan Nuys, CA 91405-2605

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Dan Ecklandt900 W Sierra Madre AveAzusa, CA 91702-1872

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Allan Prival2921 10th StSanta Monica, CA 90405-5749

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

STUART HASSEL1146 Montecito DrLos Angeles, CA 90031-1637

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Rachel Myers1461 S Canfield Ave Apt 4Los Angeles, CA 90035-3232

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Kim Genelle Bledsoe3017 llth AveLos Angeles, CA 90018-3334

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

David Palmer1671 Pegasus StNewport Beach, CA 92660-1347

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Marta Collier6008 Ventura Canyon AveVan Nuys, CA 91401-3028

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Joe Rivera658 W Hammel StMonterey Park, CA 91754-6909

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Thomas Rounds825 Wilshire Blvd # 109Santa Monica, CA 90401-1809

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Where is the logic is opening our coastline to uncontrolled disaster?

If this plant is reopened, the tragedy that follows will not qualify asan accident.

Given all we know about nuclear spills, the propensity for"accidents" and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRCof conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of eitherfailed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

La Vergne RosowPO Box 85Huntington Beach, CA 92648-0085

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Many people including babies and young children will be in danger ifsomething goes wrong. No one can guarantee the safety of thisstart-up. Along with the age of the reactor and the fact thatearthquakes are a fact of life in California this plant should remainclosed.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Peggie Kirkpatrickl5260 Via GeraldinaYorba Linda, CA 92886-4529

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Michael McMahan4892 Maui CirHuntington Beach, CA 92649-2363

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Victoria Hatfield5242 Stanford AveGarden Grove, CA 92845-2348

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Lilia Aguirre14861 Mulberry Dr Unit 1309Whittier, CA 90604-1562

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Cruz Gomez1477 Belgreen DrWhittier, CA 90601-1043

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

I am understandably quite concerned.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Michelle Turner5543 S Verdun AveLos Angeles, CA 90043-1523

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Harvey Liss12 BirdsongIrvine, CA 92604-4500

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Benjamin Dean101 N Victory Blvd# 199Burbank, CA 91502-1847

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Renee Coleman25042 Vermont DrNewhall, CA 91321-3420

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from'theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Brian Russell1419 N Fairfax Ave Apt 1West Hollywood, CA 90046-3941

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Sally Holloway35302 Vista De TodoCapistrano Beach, CA 92624-1849

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Robert Thornhill5850 Benner St Apt 306Los Angeles, CA 90042-4730

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Janice Vieth21333 E Venton StCovina, CA 91724-1937

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Sarah Alvarez3414 Cricklewood StTorrance, CA 90505-6623

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current conditiop of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Patt Healy403 San Vicente BlvdSanta Monica, CA 90402-1742

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Evan Rivera

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of publ'c concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Mr. Steve Tapia112 Harvard Ave # 79Claremont, CA 91711-4716

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Moe Stavnezer9112c E Fairview AveSan Gabriel, CA 91775-1308

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Suzanne Ray11242 Belcher StNorwalk, CA 90650-2708

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Katherine Hatfield5372 Santa Rita AveGarden Grove, CA 92845-1040

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Joan Siegel2022 Topanga Skyline DrTopanga, CA 90290-4042

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Lauren Kelley1656 E Villa St.CA 91106

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator..

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jim Mey__26700 Oak AveCanyon Country, CA 91351-2409

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Yvonne Fast

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Alegria Maron5055 Buffalo AveSherman Oaks, CA 91423-1432

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Angelique Curran1 Saint MaximeLaguna Niguel, CA 92677-5403

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Michael Hedgecock15432 Jackson St Apt 210Midway City, CA 92655-1505

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NAC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Andrew Frey85 N Holliston Ave Apt 12Pasadena, CA 91106-1929

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Ryan Davis250 N First St Unit 425Burbank, CA 91502-1873

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Sandi Miller1346 E Chestnut AveOrange, CA 92867-3837

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Michael Parsons21421 Plane Tree Ln Unit 201Newhall, CA 91321-4259

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Giventhe recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

paul hollombe

CA

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Patty Gray6012 Sierra Siena RdIrvine, CA 92603-3912

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

David Leitch2554 Lincoln BlvdVenice, CA 90291-5082

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Kate Fields11160 Huston StNorth Hollywood, CA 91601-4450

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

LESLIE Jean KOCH

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jerold GorskiPO Box 60740Irvine, CA 92602-6024

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Lindsey Newman16574 Hemlock CirFountain Valley, CA 92708-2317

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

San Onofre is broken. Why start it before it is fixed? Given thetroubled history and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRCof conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of eitherfailed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Edward Mainland

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Rob Gallinger5053 Montezuma StLos Angeles, CA 90042-3228

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Dorrit Ragosine3855 Fredonia DrLos Angeles, CA 90068-1211

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Iva Morehead620 N 6th StBurbank, CA 91501-3231

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Jesus Jornacion3460 S Centinela Ave Apt 407Los Angeles, CA 90066-1800

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Sara Snyder8048 Willis AvePanorama City, CA 91402-5806

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Joe Demma

CA 92544

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Halimah Allah2271 Lake Ave # 6301Altadena, CA 91001-2414

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Josh Peterson7526 Simpson AveNorth Hollywood, CA 91605-3259

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Carol Rigrod5301 Balboa BlvdEncino, CA 91316-2702

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Lydia Price8644 S 86th AveJustice, IL 60458-2111

May 3, 2013

Ms Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thatcould lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforethe Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesfull opportunity for public participation and independent experttestimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restartdecision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not tofollow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregardednumerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminaryfinding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed nosignificant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials inbelieving that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restartat either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public WorksCommittee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal,which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant before the investigations of the crippled plant arecompleted, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Restarting San Onofre is an EXTREMELY DANGEROUS proposal. Given thetroubled history and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRCof conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of eitherfailed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Diane Hennessy111 Avenida Buena VenturaSan Clemente, CA 92672-3402