management of selective iugr in monochorionic...

19
Eduard Gratacos www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/ MANAGEMENT OF SELECTIVE IUGR IN MONOCHORIONIC TWINS BCNatal – Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine Hospital Clinic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Eduard Gratacos

    www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    MANAGEMENT OF SELECTIVE IUGR IN MONOCHORIONIC TWINS

    BCNatal – Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine!Hospital Clinic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona!

    www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    1. Diagnosis and types!!2. Expectant vs active management!

    3. Technical aspects!

    4. Conclusions

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    1. Diagnosis and types!!2. Expectant vs active management!

    3. Technical aspects!

    4. Conclusions

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • Chronic unbalanced transfusion !• Twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS)• Twin anemia polycytemia syndrome (TAPS)

    COMPLICATIONS OF MONOCHORIONIC PREGNANCY

    Discordant placental territories!• selective IUGR

    Unidirectional acute transfusion!• Single fetal demise• Sustained bradichardia in one fetus

    High!risk

    High risk

    Discordant Malformation

  • selective IUGR (sIUGR) • EFW < P10 in one fetus • ≈10 % of MC

    Unequal placental sharing+ placental anastomoses

    (=INTERFERENCE IN NATURAL HISTORY)

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    MC twins: apparent discrepancy in AF and/or fetal size

    Algorithm for differential diagnosis

    AF: > 8 cm (> 10 cm) / < 2cm!Clearly discordant bladders

    EFW 1.5 /

  • Latency

    Survival IUGR

    Hemodynamic accidents

    GA@delivery

    www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    Very long Short Very long!but unstable

    OR AND AND

    Very high Low High

    Very low Very low!Only if IUFD High

    High (>34) Low (34)

    Unequal placental sharing+ placental anastomoses

    (=INTERFERENCE IN NATURAL HISTORY)

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    MC + sIUGR (EFW

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    MC + sIUGR (EFW

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    1. Diagnosis and types!!2. Expectant vs active management!

    3. Technical aspects!

    4. Conclusions

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    Expectant!(n=138)

    Laser!(n=50)

    Cord Occlusion!(n=98)

    GA@delivery 29-32 32-35 33-37

    Survival! ! AGA! ! IUGR

    !70-85 %!40-85 %

    !70-90 %!30-40 %

    !>90 %!

    0 %

    Sequelae (*) !! AGA! ! IUGR

    !15-35%!25-50%

    !

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    Severity !Cord Occlusion!

    Laser!Expectant!

    Severe early discordance!Pronounced REDF

    Moderate discordance!Telediastolic AEDF

    Parents’ wishes

    Technical aspects

    sIUGR is not a unique disease as TTTS!FACTORS INFLUENCING MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    Feasible 90%!More difficult than TTTS!• NO polihydramnios (amnioinfusion/

    drainage required)!• equator often in smaller sac!• type and size of anastomoses

    LASER THERAPY IN sIUGR

    Quintero, Gratacos, Chaloui

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • Fetal Diagn Ther 2014www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    Type I!UA N

    II!AREDV

    III!iAREDV

    Subtype a!DV N

    b!DV pat

    a!AEDV

    b!AREDV, Disc>30%,

    DVpatol

    Follow up 2w 1w 1w 1w 1w

    Attitude Expectant Discuss expectantDiscuss therapy

    Discuss expectant

    Discuss therapy

    Consider delivery !

    (if not treated)34-35w 32w

    30w DV>95!>26w if DV atrial flow neg

    33-34w30w DV>95!>26w if DV atrial flow neg

    sIUGR in MC pregnancy Tentative management scheme

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    Poor prognosis: high risk of IUFD and neurological damage for both twins

    Normally good prognosis

    TYPE II TYPE IIITYPE I

    EXPECTANT CORD OCCLUSION LASER

    MODULATORS!• Severity!• Parents’ wishes!• Technical aspects

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    1. Clinical forms!!2. Expectant vs active management!

    3. Technical aspects!

    4. Conclusions

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    III: iAREDF

    II: AREDF 1. Adequate diagnosis.!

    2. UA Doppler.!

    3. Abnormal Doppler has poor prognosis.!

    4. Active management protects normal fetus but worsens that of IUGR.!

    5. Final decision: balance between severity + parents’ wishes (+ rarely technical issues).!

    6. A randomized trial in homogeneous groups is difficult due to clinical variability.

    Conclusions!Management of sIUGR in MC twins

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org

  • www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org/

    http://www.fetalmedicinebarcelona.org