lte good ref

Upload: chee-leong

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    1/36

    Interference Management for LTE HeterogeneousNetworks

    ,

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    2/36

    Outline

    LTE Air Interface Overview

    Heterogeneous Networks

    Interference Management

    Adaptive Resource Partitioning Advanced Receivers

    System Simulation Results

    2QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    3/36

    Air Interface Overview

    3QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    4/36

    LTE Air Interface Overview

    LTE

    4G cellular technology standardized by 3GPP

    Release 8 specifications

    The E-UTRAN consists of eNBs, interconnected with each other by means of X2 interface.

    eNBs are also connected b means of S1 interface to EPC Evolved Packet Core

    LTE network architecture

    4QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    5/36

    LTE Air Interface Overview

    Physical layer

    Downlink and uplink transmissions are organized into radio frames with 10

    ms duration

    Each 10 ms radio frame is divided into ten equally sized sub-frames. Each sub-frame consists of two equally sized slots

    ,

    subframes are available for uplink transmissions in each 10 ms interval.

    Uplink and downlink transmissions are separated in the frequency domain.

    5QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    6/36

    LTE Air Interface Overview - downlink

    Waveform

    Based on conventional OFDM using a cyclic prefix

    OFDM sub-carrier s acin is f= 15 kHz

    12 consecutive sub-carriers during one slot correspond to one resource block Number of resource blocks, NRB, in a system can range from NRB-min = 6 to NRB-max

    = 110

    Signals

    Synchronization signals r mary an secon ary, use or ce e ec on ransm e n rs an s x

    subframe of each frame

    Reference symbol

    se or ra o resource managemen , c anne ee ac an emo u a on For 2 Tx eNBs, transmitted in first and fifth OFDM symbol of each slot

    When present, it is transmitted in every sixth sub-carrier per Tx antenna

    6QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    7/36

    LTE Air Interface Overview - downlink

    Channels*

    Physical broadcast channel (PBCH)

    Ma ed to subframe 0 and re eated ever 40 ms

    Contains information necessary for cell acquisition Physical downlink control channel (PDCCH)

    TDM multiplexed with the DL data channel

    Physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) DL data channel

    7QUALCOMM Proprietary

    *not an exhaustive list

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    8/36

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    9/36

    LTE Air Interface Overview - downlink

    9QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    10/36

    LTE Air Interface Overview - uplink

    Waveform

    Based on single-carrier FDMA, more specifically DFTS-OFDM

    Uplink sub-carrier spacing is

    f= 15 kHz -

    Number of resource blocks, NRB, in a system can range from NRB-min = 6 to NRB-max= 110

    10QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    11/36

    LTE Air Interface Overview - uplink

    Channels

    Physical uplink control channel (PUCCH)

    Carries H brid ARQ ACK/NAKs in res onse to downlink data transmission

    In addition, carries scheduling requests and downlink channel feedback Physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH)

    Physical random access channel (PRACH)

    Carries the random access preamble

    Utilized by UE to access the system

    11QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    12/36

    Accessing and maintaining a connection

    UE requirements for access

    Detect synchronization signals

    Content referred to as Master Information Block (MIB)

    Decode system information broadcast (SIB) messages

    ransm e on

    Access the system on PRACH

    UE requirements for maintaining the connection

    In addition to access requirements, estimated control channel reliability must

    remain about certain threshold

    12QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    13/36

    Heterogeneous Networks

    13QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    14/36

    Heterogeneous Networks

    Compared to the performance of3G networks, LTE Rel 8 does not

    offer anything substantially unique to significantly improve spectral

    efficiency, i.e. bps/Hz

    LTE improves system performance by using wider bandwidths if spectrum is

    available

    For Rel 10, 3GPP has been workin on various as ects to im rove

    LTE performance in the framework also referred to as LTE

    Advanced

    strategy using heterogeneous networks

    Deployment of low power nodes in macro network, such as relays, picos and femtos

    14QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    15/36

    Heterogeneous Networks

    Traditional network deployments

    Homogeneous networks are using macro-centric planned process

    All base-stations have similar transmit ower levels antenna atterns receiver

    noise floors, and similar backhaul connectivity to the (packet) data network

    As traffic demand grows, network relies on cell splitting or additional carriers to

    overcome capacity and link budget limitations and maintain uniform user

    Process is complex and iterative

    Moreover, site acquisition for macro base-stations with towers becomes more difficult in

    dense urban areas

    More flexible deployment model is needed for operators to improve

    broadband user experience in ubiquitous and cost effective way

    15QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    16/36

    Heterogeneous Networks

    Traditional macro networks provide foundation for wide area

    coverage

    16QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    17/36

    Heterogeneous Networks

    Alternative network deployments

    Heterogeneous network using a diverse set of base stations

    Brin network closer to mobile users

    Improve spectral efficiency per unit area Macro base-stations typically transmit at high power level (~5W - 40 W)

    - - -, ,

    substantially lower power levels (~100 mW 2 W) and are typically deployed in

    relatively unplanned manner.

    Low-power base-stations can be deployed to eliminate coverage holes andimprove capacity

    Due to their lower transmit power and smaller physical size, pico/femto/relay

    base-stations can offer flexible site acquisitions

    Relay base-stations offers additional flexibility in backhaul where wireline backhaulis unavailable or not economical

    17QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    18/36

    Heterogeneous Networks

    Bring Network Closer to User for Uniform User Experience and

    Increased Capacity

    OperatorDeployed Relays

    Remote

    Radio heads User Deployed

    Repeaters

    User Deployed

    Closed or Open

    Femtocells

    Operator Deployed

    Pico cells

    18QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    19/36

    Heterogeneous Networks

    LTE Advanced realizes full benefits

    Intelligent Node

    Association

    Adaptive Resource

    Allocation

    Advanced UE

    receivers

    19QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    20/36

    Interference Management

    20QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    21/36

    Interference Management

    Challenges for co-channel HetNet deployment in Rel 8/9

    Co-channel Rel 8 deployments have limited inter cell interference

    coordination (ICIC) and load balancing capability

    Rel 8 mechanism does not provide mechanisms for DL control channel ICIC

    Cell association generally based on best DL cell or limited bias negotiated over X2

    Limited number of UEs can be associated with low power eNBs, which limits

    potential for load balancing and increase in network throughput

    System throughput gain can be very limited

    DL control channel outage is observed when closed HeNBs are deployed in co-

    Pico eNBClosed HeNB

    Macro eNB

    Coverage hole for macro UEs

    21QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    22/36

    Interference Management

    HetNet Solution: Range expansion and enhanced inter cell

    interference coordination

    Range expansion (RE)

    Refers to UE ability to connect and stay connected to a cell with low SINR

    Achieved with advanced UE receivers - DL interference cancellation (IC)

    Effectively extends ICIC to DL control - time domain

    Requires synchronization at least between macro eNB and low power eNBs in itsfoot rint

    No negative impact on legacy Rel 8 UEs

    Range

    Expansion

    Pico eNBClosed HeNB

    Macro eNB

    22QUALCOMM Proprietary

    Coverage hole for macro UEs is eliminated -

    coordinated use of resources between macro

    network and closed HeNBs

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    23/36

    Interference Management

    RE + eICIC

    Eliminates coverage holes created by closed HeNBs

    and leads to significant network throughput increase

    Enables more UEs can be served by low power eNBs, which can lead to

    substantiall hi her network throu h ut

    23QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    24/36

    Interference Management

    eICIC

    Backhaul based eICIC for DL control and data channel interference mitigation

    leads to creation of almost blank subframes

    Unicast DL data traffic is not scheduled in almost blank subframes

    Only legacy broadcast signals and channels are transmitted to support legacy Rel

    8 UEs

    PSS/SSS/PBCH and CRS

    Example: Semi-static: 50% to Macro and

    100% to Picos

    24QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    25/36

    Interference Management

    Advanced receivers

    Mitigate interference from broadcast signals and channels transmitted to

    support legacy UEs

    Exploit successive interference cancellation principle

    Detect, decode and cancel strong interferer

    Fully feasible for signals and channels that are broadcasted at full power

    If it cannot be decoded, interference is weak and can be ignored o a ways eas e or un cas a a c anne s

    Modulation and coding is selected targeting desired user

    25QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    26/36

    Interference Management

    Advanced receivers

    Rel 10 UEs employing advanced receivers enjoy full potential benefits of

    range expansion

    Synchronization signals (PSS/SSS) interference cancellation

    Essential for cell acquisition known signal broadcast at full power

    Need to estimate the channel before cancellation is performed

    Primary broadcast channel (PBCH) interference cancellation

    Essential for cell acquisition broadcast at full power

    Use decode an cancel principle

    Need to estimate the channel before cancellation is performed

    Common reference signal (CRS) interference cancellation

    Known signal broadcast at full power

    trong nter erence remove

    Essential for decoding of DL control and data channels (PDCCH/PDSCH) and accurate

    RRM measurements and channel feedback for range expansion UEs

    Need to estimate the channel before cancellation is performed

    26QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    27/36

    Interference Management

    Synchronization signals (PSS/SSS) interference cancellation

    PSS/SSS (cell ID) detection probability for a system with a serving cell

    C/N=0dB in the presence of an interferer at I/N=20dB with full collision of

    PSS/SSS.

    The results are for TU30 and assuming 0Hz frequency offset

    TU30, Serving cell geometry= 0dB, interference geometry = 20dB

    0.95

    1

    bility

    0.8

    0.85

    .

    etectionProb

    0.7

    0.75

    CellID

    D

    27QUALCOMM Proprietary

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80.65

    Number of combinings for PSS/SSS burst

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    28/36

    Interference Management

    Primary broadcast channel (PBCH) interference cancellation

    PBCH decoding probability for a SFBC (2x2) system in the presence of an

    interferer at I/N=16dB with full collision of PBCH.

    The results are for ETU30 and assuming 0Hz frequency offset.

    28QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    29/36

    Interference Management

    PDCCH reliability

    PDCCH performance (2x2). Black: No interferer. Blue: I/N=16dB w/o interf

    suppression. Red: I/N=16dB w/ interf suppression. Green: I/N=16dB w/ RE

    nulling. Diamonds: 1 OFDM symbol, Squares: 3 OFDM symbols for control

    100

    PDCCH 1A 4CCE (SFBC, non-colliding RS)

    CellID0-2TX-PCFICH1

    CellID0-2TX-PCFICH1-CellID121-2TX-PCFICH1-16dB

    - - - - - - -

    10-1

    CellID0-2TX-PCFICH3

    CellID0-2TX-PCFICH3-CellID121-2TX-PCFICH3-16dB

    CellID0-2TX-PCFICH3-CellID121-2TX-PCFICH3-IC-16dB

    CellID0-2TX-PCFICH3-NullSym0-CellID121-2TX-PCFICH3-NullSym0-16dB

    BLER

    10-

    29QUALCOMM Proprietary

    -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 410

    -3

    Serving cell C/I (dB)

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    30/36

    Interference Management

    PDSCH reliability

    PDSCH performance (2x2). Black: No interferer. Dark Green: I/N=16dB w/o

    interf suppression. Light Green: I/N=16dB w/ interf suppression.

    5500

    6000NoncollidingRS-TxMode3

    CellID0-TxMode3

    CellID0-TxMode3-CellID121-TxMode3-16dB

    CellID0-TxMode3-CellID121-TxMode3-IC-16dB

    4000

    4500

    )

    2500

    3000

    Throughput(Kbps

    500

    1000

    1500

    30QUALCOMM Proprietary

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 320

    Serving cell C/I (dB)

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    31/36

    Interference Management

    System simulation assumptions

    10 MHz FDD spectrum and 2x2 MIMO

    - - ,

    site distance and 4 picos per macro cell

    Uniform layout: UEs and Picos randomly

    dro ed within macro cell

    MacroeNB

    PicoeNB

    UE

    Pathloss model (NLOS)

    Macro to UE (dB): 128.1 + 37.6*logD

    *

    Maximum

    PA Power

    (dBm)

    46 30 23

    . .

    Building penetration loss 20 dB

    Log-normal shadowing and TU model of

    Antenna

    Gain (dB)

    16 5 -1

    as a ng

    Noise figure at UE: 10 dB

    Noise figure at eNB: 5 dB

    Loss (dB)

    31QUALCOMM Proprietary

    FTP Traffic Model with PF scheduler

    Macro antenna downtilt: 10 degrees

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    32/36

    Interference Management

    Per cell traffic model

    Poisson arrivals with rate for user data

    Per cell trafficuser1 user2 user3 user4

    Time

    Parameter Statistical Characterization

    File size, S 2 Mbytes (one user downloads a single file)

    User arrival rate Poisson distributed with arrival rate

    32QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    33/36

    Interference Management

    Resource partition algorithm

    Local partitioning algorithm based on average number of served UEs over an

    averaging period

    Macro eNB controls partitioning of resources between itself and pico eNBs under

    its footprint

    Pico eNB coordinate resource partitioning only with a single macro eNB

    Maximum number of users in pico range expansion area is compared to number of

    users in macro coverage and resources are proportionally split

    Semi-static genie aided partitioning with CRS IC Local partitioning scheme as described above based on long term statistics of user

    density assuming full buffer traffic

    33QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    34/36

    Interference Management

    System simulation results

    Capacitygains

    Throughput[Mbps] (gain vs. noRP)

    Macroonly

    4 picos,no RP

    4 picos, RE,genie semi-stat ic RP

    4 picos,RE,

    adaptiveRP, 50 ms

    4 picos, RE,adaptive RP,1000ms

    Max. stable

    served cellthroughput

    20.4 (0.88x) 23.2(1x) 32.4(1.4x) 31.8(1.37x) 34.4(1.48x)

    5% UE

    throughput (at

    stability point for

    1.3 (1.3x) 1 (1x) 2.5(2.5x) 3.3(3.3x) 2.9(2.9x)

    no

    Median UE

    throughput (at

    stability point forno RP)

    4.6(1x) 10.4(2.3x) 13.2(2.9x) 11.1(2.41x)

    Served 21.5(1x) 32.4(1.5x) 30.4(1.41x) 32.8(1.52x)

    1.2Mbps 5%user throughput)

    34QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    35/36

    Interference Management

    System simulation results

    35QUALCOMM Proprietary

  • 8/10/2019 lte good ref

    36/36

    36QUALCOMM Proprietary