lecture # 17 monopoly: applications lecturer: martin paredes

61
Lecture # 17 Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes Lecturer: Martin Paredes

Upload: marilynn-kelley

Post on 25-Dec-2015

227 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

Lecture # 17Lecture # 17

Monopoly: ApplicationsMonopoly: Applications

Lecturer: Martin ParedesLecturer: Martin Paredes

Page 2: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

2

1. Natural Monopoly2. Multi-plant Monopoly3. Cartels4. Price Discrimination

Page 3: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

3

Definition: A market is a natural monopoly if, over the relevant range of production, the total cost of production incurred by a single firm is lower than the combined total cost of two or more firms, producing the same output level.

In other words, it is a market in which production is cheaper when there is only one firm.

Page 4: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

4

Suppose an industry with a decreasing average cost at all points.

If AC is always decreasing, then AC > MC.

Therefore, setting P = MC will not be profitable.

Page 5: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

5Quantity

Demand

Example: Natural Monopoly

Page 6: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

6Quantity

Demand

AC

Example: Natural Monopoly

Page 7: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

7Quantity

Demand

AC

Example: Natural Monopoly

8000

2.50

Page 8: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

8Quantity

Demand

AC

Example: Natural Monopoly

4000

8000

2.50

4.80

Page 9: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

9

In a natural monopoly, the appropriate benchmark to calculate deadweight loss cannot be P=MC, because the firm will incur losses.

For a natural monopoly, the appropriate benchmark is P=AC.

Page 10: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

10

Note: The definition of whether an industry is a

natural monopoly depends on the size of the market.

See the following example where AC first falls and then raises.

Page 11: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

11

Example: Natural Monopoly with Rising Average Cost

Quantity

Price

AC

Page 12: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

12

Example: Natural Monopoly with Rising Average Cost

Quantity

Price

D1

AC

If demand is given by D1, then the industry is a natural monopoly.

Page 13: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

13

Example: Natural Monopoly with Rising Average Cost

Quantity

Price

D1

AC

If demand is given by D2, the industry is no longer a natural monopoly.

D2

Page 14: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

14

Suppose a monopolist has two plants, but each plant has different marginal costs:

Plant 1: MC1(Q)

Plant 2: MC2(Q)

How should the monopolist allocate production across the two plants?

Page 15: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

15

When the marginal costs of the two plants are not equal, the firm can increase profits by reallocating production…

Away from the plant with higher marginal cost.

Towards the plant with lower marginal cost.

Page 16: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

16

Example: Suppose: MC1 = 4Q

MC2 = 2Q Suppose the monopolist produces 100 units. Will it choose to split the production equally

between both plants? MC1 = 4*50 = 200

MC2 = 2*50 = 100 Reducing production in plant 1 units and

increasing it in plant 2 raises profits Produce more than 50 units in plant 2.

Page 17: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

17Quantity

MC1 MC2

50

100

200

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist

Page 18: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

18

Definition: The Multi-Plant Marginal Cost Curve traces out the set of points generated when the marginal cost curves of the individual plants are horizontally summed.

In other words, it shows the total output that can be produced at every level of marginal cost.

The monopolist’s production decision will be based on its multi-plant Marginal Cost

Page 19: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

19

Back to example: Given: MC1 = 4Q

MC2 = 2Q For a marginal cost of €200:

Plant 1 can produce 50 units Plant 2 can produce 100 units.

So the total production for a cost of €200 is 150 units

In fact: MCT = 4 Q 3

Page 20: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

20Quantity

MC1 MC2

50

•200

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist

Page 21: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

21Quantity

MC1 MC2

50 100

•200

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist

Page 22: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

22Quantity

MC1 MC2

50 100 150

•200

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist

• •

Page 23: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

23Quantity

MC1 MC2

50 100 150

•200

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist

• •

MCT

Page 24: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

24

The profit maximization condition that determines optimal total output is now:

MR = MCT

The marginal cost of a change in output for the monopolist is the change after all optimal adjustment has occurred in the distribution of production across plants.

Page 25: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

25

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist Maximization

Quantity

MCT

MC1 MC2

Price

Page 26: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

26

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist Maximization

Quantity

Price

MCT

Demand

MC1 MC2

Page 27: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

27

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist Maximization

Quantity

Price

MCT

Demand

MR

MC1 MC2

Page 28: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

28

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist Maximization

Quantity

Price

MCT

Demand

MR Q*T

P*

MC1 MC2

Page 29: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

29

Example: Multi-Plant Monopolist Maximization

Quantity

Price

MCT

Demand

MRQ*1 Q*2 Q*T

P*

MC1 MC2

•••

Page 30: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

30

Definition: A cartel is a group of firms that collusively determine the price and output in a market. In other words, a cartel acts as a single monopoly firm that maximizes total industry profit.

Page 31: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

31

The problem of the optimal allocation of output across cartel members is identical to the monopolist's problem of allocating output across individual plants.

If all firms have the same marginal cost curve, production will be equally divided.

If not, firms will higher marginal cost will produce less.

Page 32: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

32

Definitions: A monopolist charges a uniform price if

it sets the same price for every unit of output sold.

A monopolist price discriminates if it charges more than one price for its output

Page 33: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

33

Motivation: When the monopolist charges a uniform

price, it maximises profits, but does not receive the consumer surplus or dead-weight loss associated with this policy.

The monopolist can overcome this by charging more than one price for its product.

Page 34: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

34

Requirements: Ability to sort/identify consumers No possibility of resale or arbitrage. Need market power.

Page 35: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

35

Example: Prices for UA Flight 815

Ticket Price Number of Passengers

Average Advance Purchase

$2000 18 12 days

$1000-$1999 15 14 days

$800-$999 23 32 days

$600-$799 49 46 days

$400-$599 23 65 days

$200-$399 23 35 days

$1-$199 34 26 days

$0 19 -

Page 36: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

36

Based on the classification by A.C. Pigou: First degree price discrimination

Also called “personalized pricing”. Second degree price discrimination

Also called “menu pricing”. Third degree price discrimination

Also call “group pricing”.

Page 37: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

37

Definition: A policy of first degree (or perfect) price discrimination attempts to price each unit sold at the consumer's maximum willingness to pay.

The consumer's maximum willingness to pay is also called the consumer's reservation price.

Page 38: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

38

Recall that the demand curve can be interpreted as the consumers’ willingness to pay for one unit of the good.

In other words, the demand curve represents the reservation prices of every consumer in the market.

Page 39: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

39

If the monopolist can observe the reservation price of every consumer, then the monopolist can observe demand perfectly and can "perfectly" price discriminate.

The monopolist will continue selling units until the reservation price exactly equals marginal cost.

Page 40: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

40

Example: Monopoly

D

Quantity

Price

MC

Page 41: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

41

Example: Uniform Pricing

D

MC

Quantity

Price

MRQm

Pm : Consumer Surplus

: Producer Surplus

: Deadweight Loss

Page 42: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

42

Example: First Degree Price Discrimination

D

Quantity

Price

MC

Page 43: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

43

Example: First Degree Price Discrimination

D

Quantity

Price

MC

Page 44: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

44

Example: First Degree Price Discrimination

D

Quantity

Price

MC

Page 45: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

45

Example: First Degree Price Discrimination

D

Quantity

Price

MC

: Producer Surplus

Q*

Page 46: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

46

Notes: A perfectly price discriminating

monopolist will produce and sell the efficient quantity of output.

When the monopolist sells an additional unit, it does not have to reduce the price on the other units it is selling.

Therefore, MR = P. (i.e., the marginal revenue curve equals the demand curve.)

Page 47: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

47

Definition: A policy of second degree price discrimination allows the monopolist to charge a different price to different consumers, even though the reservation price of any one consumer cannot be directly observed.

The monopolist usually design a menu of options and let the consumer select its preferred package

It involves quantity discounting.

Page 48: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

48

Examples of second degree price discrimination include:

Two-part tariff Block pricing

Page 49: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

49

Definition: A monopolist charges a two part tariff if it charges:

A per unit fee, r, plus A lump sum fee F.

The lump-sum fee is paid whether or not a positive number of units is consumed.

Page 50: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

50

With two-part tariffs, consumers that demand a high quantity are charge a smaller price per unit than consumers that demand a low quantity.

Examples include Telephone landlines Club membership

Page 51: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

51

Definition: A monopolist charges a block tariff if the consumer pays one price for one block of output and another price for second block of output

Page 52: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

52

Definition: A policy of third degree price discrimination offers a different price to each consumer group (or segment of the market) when membership to a group can be observed.

Examples include movie ticket sales to older people or students at a discount.

Page 53: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

53

Suppose: A monopolist faces two markets, each

with a different demand curve Marginal cost for the two markets is the

same.

How does a monopolist maximize profit with this type of price discrimination?

Page 54: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

54

The monopolist will set the marginal revenue in each market equal to marginal cost.

In other words, the monopolist maximizes total profits by maximizing profits from each group individually.

At the optimum: MR1 = MC = MR2

If not, the monopolist could raise revenues by switching sales from the low MR group to the high MR group.

Page 55: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

55

Example: Third Degree Price Discrimination

QQ

P PMarket 1 Market 2

D1D2

Page 56: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

56

Example: Third Degree Price Discrimination

QQ

P PMarket 1 Market 2

D1D2

MR1 MR2

Page 57: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

57

Example: Third Degree Price Discrimination

QQ

P PMarket 1 Market 2

D1D2

MR1 MR2

MC MC

Page 58: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

58

Example: Third Degree Price Discrimination

QQ

P PMarket 1 Market 2

D1D2

MR1 MR2

P1

P2

Q1 Q2

Page 59: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

59

1. Price discrimination generally allows a monopolist (or any firm with market power) to capture more surplus than a uniform pricing policy.

2. First degree (or perfect) price discrimination allows the monopoly to produce efficiently and capture all the resulting surplus.

Page 60: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

60

3. Second degree price discrimination may or may not allow as much surplus to be created and captured as perfect price discrimination, depending on the precise form of the discrimination.

4. Third degree price discrimination generally does not create or allow as much capture of surplus.

Page 61: Lecture # 17 Monopoly: Applications Lecturer: Martin Paredes

61

5. In order to capture surplus from any form of price discrimination, a firm must have some market power, have some information on the differential willingness to pay of customers and must be able to prevent resale (arbitrage) among customers.