laser driven accelerators for a new frontier in ultrafast physics...laser driven accelerators for a...

30
[email protected] Laser driven accelerators for a new frontier in ultrafast physics Brendan Dromey Studying nascent proton driven radiation chemistry in H 2 O in real time SPIE Prague, 2 nd April 2019

Upload: others

Post on 10-Feb-2021

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • [email protected]

    Laser driven accelerators for a new frontier

    in ultrafast physics

    Brendan Dromey

    Studying nascent proton driven radiation

    chemistry in H2O in real timeSPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Acknowledgments

    • Mark Coughlan • Balder Villa-Gomez• Mark Yeung• Hannah Donnelly• Nicole Breslin• Christine Arthur• G. Nersisyan

    • M. Zepf

    • Rong Yang• Martin Speicher• Jorg Schreiber

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Overview

    •Ultrafast sources of laser driven radiation

    •Optical streaking technique

    •Pulsed radiolysis in SiO2: The role of dimensionality

    •Pulsed radiolysis in H2O: Solvated electron dynamics on ultrafast timescales

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Laser driven ion accelerators – a novel source for ultrafast physics

    H. Schwoerer, “Laser-plasma acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic protons from microstructuredtargets”, Nature, 439, 445-448, 2006

    Traget Normal Sheath Acceleration, TNSA

    PIC simulation: Broadband energy spectrum

    1

    10-2

    10-4

    10Energy (MeV)

    Sharp high energy cut off

    By slowing and stopping lower energy components of the ion energy spectrum the ultrafast pulse duration can be recovered to

    permit ultrafast pulsed radiolysis

    Velocity dispersion

    E

    Time (ps)

    1 ps

    Phase space rotation

    ~ 100 ps

    Critically, ultrafast pulse duration is

    preserved in narrow energy bandwidths of

    the TNSA spectrum

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Transparent Dielectrics (or aqueous solutions)

    Standard pump probe approach…….

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Observing ultrafast proton interactions in a single shot

    Schematic(not to scale)

    Probe ion induced a) opacity (free electrons in conduction)b) Photabsoption bandsc) Polaristation effects

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

    ………400 fs to 1.4 ns

  • [email protected]

    ………Ultrafast optical streaking for proton matter interactions

    Sample can be Trasparent Dielectric

    H2O

    Excitation/ionisation to allow free-free absorption of probe photons

    Chirped pulse optical streakingExample of normalised transient

    opacity data (SiO2)

    Dromey et al. “Picosecond metrology of laser-driven proton bursts”, Nat. Comms, 7, 10642 (2016)

    Target:H2O, biological samples

    Collimating slit

    Chirped probe

    Ion

    pu

    lse

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    0.45

    0.5

    0.55

    0.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    0 100 200

    Time from To (ps)

    De

    pth

    into

    a-S

    iO2

    (mm

    )

    Raw

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0 200

    Y

    Z

    X

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    0.45

    0.5

    0.55

    0.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    0 100 200

    9 MeV

    8 MeV

    7 MeV

    10MeV

    Time from To (ps)

    9 MeV

    8 MeV

    7 MeV

    10MeV

    Calculated 1

    0.8

    Transm

    ission

    Dromey et al. “Picosecond metrology of laser-driven proton bursts”, Nat. Comms, 2016

    Results: Optical streak of opacity in SiO2

    TNSA spectrum1

    10-2

    10-4

    10Energy (MeV)

    Sharp high energy cut off

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Revealing ultrafast dynamics

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    0.45

    0.5

    0.55

    0.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    0 100 200

    Time from To (ps)

    De

    pth

    into

    a-S

    iO2

    (mm

    )

    Raw

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0 200

    Y

    Z

    X

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    0.45

    0.5

    0.55

    0.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    0 100 200

    9 MeV

    8 MeV

    7 MeV

    10MeV

    Time from To (ps)

    9 MeV

    8 MeV

    7 MeV

    10MeV

    Calculated 1

    0.8

    Transm

    ission

    Dromey et al. “Picosecond metrology of laser-driven proton bursts”, Nat. Comms, 7, 10642 (2016)

    Experimental Data Modelling

    Reveals ultrafast lifetime of electrons in the conduction band < 0.5 ps

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    1020 cm-3

    Transition from free electron gas to electron hole plasma

    Exciton (correlated electron hole pair)

    formation provides a rapid decay channel

    electron is no longer ‘free’

    Slow decay

    Rapid decay

    D. Grojo “Time-Evolution of Carriers after MultiphotonIonization of Bulk Dielectrics” ” IThI3, 2009 OSA/CLEO/IQEC 2009

    >1020 cm-3

    100 ps

    Audebert et al., Space-Time Observation of an Electron Gas in SiO2, PRL 73, 1990 (1994)

    “Two speed decay”

    (i)

    (ii)(iii)

    (ii)

    (iii)

    EElectronHole

    Proton

    Exciton

    Time (fs)

    N(e

    )

    (i)

    t ~ 150 fs

    Temporal response of SiO2 to ionisation – Exciton formation

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Y (

    m

    )

    1

    0

    X (m)

    0

    0

    1

    1

    Z (m)

    Direction ofpropagation

    Y (

    m

    )

    1

    00 Z (m)

    1

    Nanoscale tracks of ion damage from a combination of TRIM calculations (trajectories) and FLUKA simulations (track size) for protons in SiO2

    Results suggests near solid density ionisation along each track >1021 cm-3

    Electron – Hole plasma conditions not suitable for exciton formation

    Why are we seeing an ultrafast response in experiments?

    Flux: 50-100 µm-2 – same as the experimental conditions

    Nanostructured dose distribution of protons in SiO2

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Y (

    m

    )1

    0

    X (m)

    0

    0

    1

    1

    Z (m)

    Direction ofpropagation

    Y (

    m)

    1

    0 10

    X (m)

    Such evolution would be consistent with predictions from Monte Carlo simulations for electron diffusivity

    Osmani et al. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotech. Vol. 8 (2010) 278-282

    >1022 cm-3~1018 cm-3

    This only the instantaneous picture….. Nanometre scale energy density gradients

    3-D

    2-D transverse cross section

    Hypothesis – rapid evolution of localised free density

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • log

    10

    (ne )

    [email protected]

    log

    10

    (ne )

    After approx. 200 fs near uniform conditions with

    ~1019 cm-3

    Diffusivity – 10 -100 cm2/s

    log

    10

    (ne )

    How can we study this quantitatively?

    Implied rapid evolution of density (simplified)

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Tortuous nanostructured matrix of SiO22-4 nm structures

    20 - 30 nm voids

    2-4 nm particles of SiO2

    SiO2 Aerogel – reduced dimensionality

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    3D Approx. 1D

    2.6 gcm-3 .26 gcm-3 0.8 gcm-3

    (schematic, for illustrative purposes only)

    SiO2 Aerogel – reducing dimensionality

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Results: Optical streak of opacity in ~ 0.26 gcm-3 Aerogel

    TNSA ion pulse

    Yields direct information about the absolute arrival time of various species

    Prompt X-rays/Fast electron pulse – gives very accurate to

    0.9

    0.92

    0.94

    0.96

    0.98

    1

    1.02

    1.04

    1.06

    -300 -100 100 300 500 700 900

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

    No

    rmal

    ise

    d T

    ran

    smis

    sio

    n

    Time from To (ps)

  • [email protected]

    Time from To (ps)

    No

    rmal

    ise

    d T

    ran

    smis

    sio

    n0.9

    0.92

    0.94

    0.96

    0.98

    1

    1.02

    1.04

    50 250 450 650 850 1050

    Z @ 550 m

    Average ‘Z’

    Calculated

    0.9

    0.92

    0.94

    0.96

    0.98

    1

    1.02

    1.04

    200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    No

    rmal

    ise

    d T

    ran

    smis

    sio

    n

    3.5 ps FWHM< 0.5 ps decay time constant

    Nearly 200 ps decay constant

    Clear effect of nanostructure

    Direct comparison with solid density SiO2

    Streaks on the same timescales

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Scaling with average density/dimensionalityN

    orm

    alis

    ed

    Sig

    nal

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    500

    0.01 0.1 1 10

    (Density)-1.1±0.3

    Density (g/cm-3)

    Re

    cove

    ry/D

    ecay

    Tim

    e c

    on

    stan

    t (p

    s)

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    283 383 483 583 683 783

    2.66 g/cm3

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    283 383 483 583 683 783

    0.26 g/cm3

    2.66 g/cm3

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    283 383 483 583 683 783

    0.26 g/cm3 0.09 g/cm3

    2.66 g/cm3

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    283 383 483 583 683 783

    0.26 g/cm3 0.09 g/cm3

    0.04 g/cm3

    2.66 g/cm3

    Time from peak ion induced opacityo (ps)

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    1/e recovery constant

    Full transmission

  • [email protected]

    • Possible to directly measure proton damage in materials (here transparent dielectrics) on ultrafast timescales

    • In bulk SiO2 this allows direct measurement of the proton pulse duration.

    • Nonlinear variation in recovery times for changing the dimensionality of the interaction for nanostructured SiO2

    • Clear conclusion: Reduced dimensionality inhibits the exciton pathway

    • Next step: Absolutely verify scaling with average density/dimensionality and underlying physics

    Summary SiO2

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Addressing the rising incidence of cancer

    ULTIMATE GOAL - Improve long term prospects for young patients by reducing damage near the tumor site

    Increasing cancer rates, in particular amongst young people (33% since 1993)

    http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/

    1) Dose escalation and/or

    2) Highly targeted dose for radiosensitive treatment sites

    Ions -Characteristic

    Bragg peak

    Dose vs Depth curves

    Electrons

    X-rays

    Protons

    Rivista trimestrale dell’Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nuclearehttp://www.roma1.infn.it/rog/astone/didattica/asimmetrie6.pdf

    This is driving major facility development and proliferation

    https://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Ultrafast ion interactions in H2O – nascent chemistry

    This timeframe has been inaccessible to experimental observation to date

    seeds

    This prevents the benchmarking of ab initio, or “bottom up”, numerical models

    Baldacchino, G., ”Pulse radiolysis in water with heavy-ion beams. A short review” Radiat. Phys. Chem. 77, 1218– 1223 (2008)

    This in turn prevents unlocking the predictive power of these models

    e-aq is a powerful reducing agent for the cytotoxic HO·

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Solvated Electron

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Studying the solvation process using ions

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Observing ultrafast proton interactions in a single shot

    Schematic(not to scale)

    Probe ion induced a) opacity (free electrons in conduction)b) Photabsoption bandsc) Polaristation effects

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Full modelling of interaction – Geant 4

    d2(T)dt2

    d(T)dt

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Experimental results optical streak of solvated electron dynamics

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    -500 -300 -100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

    ProtonsFast electrons and prompt X-raysD

    ep

    th (

    mm

    )

    Time from T0=0 (ps)

    No

    rmalise

    d Tran

    smissio

    n (T)

    0

    1

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Experimental results optical streak of solvated electron dynamics

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    -500 -300 -100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

    ProtonsOnset Fast electrons and prompt X-rays

    De

    pth

    (m

    m)

    Time from T0=0 (ps)SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

    d(T)dt

  • [email protected]

    Mismatch between experiment and theory

    Time from T0=0 (ps)

    d2(T)dt2

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    200 300 400 500 600

    De

    pth

    (m

    m)

    d(T)dt

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    70 170 270 370 470

    Leading edge of opacity

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Proton induced dynamics in water – nanocavitation?

    Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations indicate a marked difference in H2O response for increasing linear energy transfer (LET)

    Simulation input by P. deVera and F. Currell, Univ. of Manchester

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019

  • [email protected]

    Ultrafast implications for nascent water chemistry?

    This timeframe has been inaccessible to experimental observation to date

    seeds

    e-aq is a powerful reducing agent for the cytotoxic HO·

    SPIE Prague, 2nd April 2019