joint ats-wasc accreditation reviews please join the audio portion of this training: 1-866-854-6779...
TRANSCRIPT
Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews
Please join the audio portion of this training:
1-866-854-6779 Access code *1912504*
2
Announcements
This presentation and the accompanying materials are available for download from: http://www.wascsenior.org/ats2009
For assistance with Voice and Web connections please contact:
Genesys Help Desk, 1-866-436-3797 (press option 2)
Please mute your microphone if you are not speaking
3
Value of ATS-WASC Reviews
• Enriches the experience for the institution
• Brings more points of view to the evaluation of the institution
• Reduces duplicative work of preparing reports for and conducting two reviews
4
General Responsibilities
• Sharing information, reports, and actions on institutions
• Providing orientation to participating institutions and teams
• Coordinating actions• Staffing teams collaboratively• Planning visits collaboratively• Conducting visits and preparing reports together
Protocol for the Conductof Joint VisitsWASC & ATS
* ATS Protocol
6
General Principles of the Joint Protocol
• To facilitate the process of accreditation for the member institutions
• To guide the process of joint visits involving both accrediting agencies
7
Responsibilities of the WASC and ATS Staff
• Orientation of ATS/WASC Chairs• Coordination of team recommendations and
respective Commission actions• Staffing of visits [two visits: Capacity and
Preparatory Review (CPR) and Educational Effectiveness Review (EER)]– Normally most CPR members also serve, if possible,
on EER team
8
Responsibilities of the WASC and ATS Staff
• Sharing of Documents: No restrictions on sharing of accreditation-related information
• Logistics of Visit Planning: WASC/ATS staffs consult on team composition 12 months
prior to visits WASC/ATS staffs consult 20-24 weeks prior to coordinate WASC staff consult with school on dates and
coordinate with ATS staff Materials for visits sent to each agency and to team members 12
weeks prior
9
Responsibilities ofTeam Members
• Team Co-Chairs (one from each agency)
• Role of ATS Co-Chair: The usual ATS chair duties AND preparation of the ATS supplemental report
• Role of WASC Co-Chair: Responsible for oversight of visit, drafting WASC team report with WASC Assistant Chair, making team recommendation to Commission
10
Development and Constructionof the Team Report
• General Report Coverage: Address standards/criteria of both agencies
• Report Format: Preference for joint reports with ATS supplement that addresses ATS standards that might not be covered in joint report
• Team Recommendations: Consensus desired with respect to recommendations and
monitoring actions Alignment desired as much as possible, but differences may
emerge Note difference about team recommendation to commissions
* CPR Report Template* EER Report Template
11
Development and Constructionof the Team Report
• Finalizing Team Report Commission staffs, team chairs/assistant chairs confer as soon as
possible Drafts to be available ordinarily within two weeks of visit
• Exit Meeting and Confidentiality of Team Recommendations Each agency has different practices and will report findings
appropriately at the exit interview ATS and WASC teams are not required to make the same
recommendation The Commissions of each agency make the final recommendations that
may or may not follow the recommendation of the visiting team
12
More on the WASC Three-Stage Review Process
1. Proposal: Identifies priorities, areas of emphasis, and outcomes. Aligns work with institutional plans and needs.
2. Capacity/Preparatory Review: Focuses on capacity and readiness for educational effectiveness.
3. Educational Effectiveness: Focuses on results of assessment of student learning/quality improvement.
* 3 Stage Process
13
More on the Scope of the Two Reviews
Capacity and Preparatory
• Preparatory as: readiness for the Educational Effectiveness Review
• Capacity as: purposes, integrity, stability, resources, structures, policies, processes
Educational Effectiveness
• Demonstrating student learning• Demonstrating institutional
learning• Demonstrating evidence-based
decision-making
* Expectations for 2 Reviews
14
WASC Expectations about Assessment of Student Learning
CPR• Student learning outcomes
set at program and course level
• SLOs are in syllabi• Faculty has developed
assessment plans• Faculty has set
expectations for student achievement
• Faculty has tools to measure learning (direct and indirect; multiple)
EER• Results of assessment
show extent to which graduates are meeting expected levels of achievement
• Results used to improve student learning
• Results used to improve assessment strategies
* Closing the Loop
15
More on the Team Pre-Visit Preparation and Coordination
• Materials review• Call with the CEO and chairs• Pre-visit conference call
– To meet team members– To identify issues and strategy– To agree on team assignments– To refine visit schedule– To identify needed documents– To plan visit logistics and report
* Pre-Visit Conference Call Worksheet- CPR and EER
16
WASC Standards and CFRs
• Core Commitments: Capacity and EE• Standards: Broad, holistic, encompassing• Criteria for Review: Provide specificity and
meaning• Guidelines: Ways to demonstrate compliance
with CFRs
* Alignment of ATS and WASC Standards
17
Team Use of the Standards and CFRs
• Team judgments must be linked to specific Standards and CFRs
• CFRs must be cited in reports • Standards and CFRs form the basis for
Commission decisions• Standards and CFRs provide a context for
continuous quality improvement
WASC Standards at a Glance
* Standards at a Glance* WASC Standards
STANDARD 1:Defining Institutional Purposes and Ensuring Educational Objectives
Institutional PurposesIntegrity
STANDARD 2:Achieving Educational Objectives
Through Core Functions
Teaching and LearningScholarship and Creativity
Support for Student Learning
STANDARD 3: Developing and Applying Resources and
Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability
Faculty and StaffFiscal, Physical, and Information Resources
Organizational Structures and Decision-Making Processes
STANDARD 4: Creating an Organization Committed
to Learning and Improvement
Strategic Thinking and Planning Commitment to Learning and
Improvement
What’s New on WASC Visits in 2009-10
24
New on WASC Visits, 2009-10• Systematic review and reporting of off-campus sites
and distance education programs• Team rating of institution on Framework for Evaluating
Educational Effectiveness (pilot) • Compliance audits for new and sanctioned institutions• Revisions to CFRs adopted in 2008 • Coverage of student success on both reviews• Coverage of program review at EER stage
25
WASC Tools for Teams: Rubrics for
Assessment of Student Learning • Academic Program Learning Outcomes• Use of Portfolios in Assessing Program
Outcomes• Use of Capstones in Assessing Program
Outcomes• Integration of Student Learning Assessment
into Program Review
* Rubrics: Capstone, PLO, Program Review, Portfolio
26
Expected Examples of Evidence of Assessment
• Retention and graduation data/disaggregated and analyzed
• Standardized test results/licensing exams• Faculty assessments
– Grades– Portfolios, capstones and work samples
• Surveys and standardized interviews
27
Using the WASC EE Framework
• Identify where the institution fits on the framework for each line
• Use results to determine where the institution is in its evolution toward being a highly developed learning organization
• Use language of the framework in the report to guide the Commission and the institution
* Educational Effectiveness Framework
28
Using Evidence in Team Reports
• Use qualitative and quantitative evidence • Select evidence carefully and purposefully• Connect evidence to an assertion or question • Analyze information; do not just put forth data• Let evidence suggest improvements• Use evidence that speaks to the institution’s themes and
the team's questions• Address results/findings of assessment, not just process
29
Thank You!
This presentation and the accompanying materials are available for download from:
http://www.wascsenior.org/ats2009