item 8.2 – evanston gardens development plan … · attachment f – schedule 4b certificate ......

Item 8.2 – Evanston Gardens Development Plan Amendment (Privately Funded DPA) – Draft

ATTACHMENT 1 Summary of Consultation and Proposed Amendments Report

ATTACHMENT 2 Updated Traffic Assessment - SIDRA Analysis – WGA

ATTACHMENT 3 Traffic Interventions Plan

ATTACHMENT 4 Concept Plan Angle Vale Road Access

ATTACHMENT 5 Concept Plan Jack Cooper Drive/Hillier Road Access

ATTACHMENT 6 Evanston Gardens Development Plan Amendment

TOWN OF GAWLER COUNCIL MEETING 12 DECEMBER 2017

of 213ATTACHMENTS UNDER SEPARATE COVER

Town of Gawler

Evanston Gardens Development Plan Amendment

Summary of Consultation and Proposed Amendments (SCPA) Report

ATTACHMENT 1



Town of Gawler Evanston Gardens DPA

Table of Contents

iii

Table of Contents

Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 5

Consultation ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Consultation Process .................................................................................................................................... 5 Public Notification .......................................................................................................................................... 5

Public and Agency Submissions ........................................................................................................................ 6 Public Submissions ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Agency Submissions ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Review of Submissions and Public Meeting ................................................................................................. 6 Additional Matters and Investigations ........................................................................................................... 7

Timeframe Report ............................................................................................................................................... 7

CEO’s Certification ............................................................................................................................................. 7

Summary of Recommended Changes to the Amendment following Consultation ............................................ 8

Attachment A – Summary and Response to Public Submissions ............................................. 9

Attachment B – Summary and Response to Public Meeting Submissions ........................... 125

Attachment C – Summary and Response to Agency Submissions ....................................... 127

Attachment D – Timeframe Report ............................................................................................ 139

Attachment E – Schedule 4A Certificate ................................................................................... 140

Attachment F – Schedule 4B Certificate ................................................................................... 141

Attachment G – Additional Matters and Investigations ........................................................... 142




SCPA Report

5

Introduction

This report is provided in accordance with Section 25(13) of the Development Act 1993 to identify

matters raised during the consultation period and any recommended alterations to the amendment.

The report also provides details on the consultation process undertaken by Council.

The SCPA Report should be read in conjunction with the consultation version of the DPA. Where

relevant, any new matters arising from the consultation process are contained in this Report.

The Amendment reflects the recommendations of Council contained in this Report.

Consultation

Consultation Process

Statutory consultation with government agencies and the public was undertaken in accordance with

DPA process B2 (consultation approval not required) and in accordance with Section 25(6) of the

Development Act 1993; Regulations 10a, 11a and 12 of the Development Regulations 2008; and the

agreed Statement of Intent.

The following Local Member(s) of Parliament were consulted on the DPA:

(a) Member for Light – Tony Piccolo MP

(b) Member for Wakefield – Nick Champion

No comments were received.

The consultation period commenced on 10 August 2016, with a Public Meeting held on 27 October

2016 at the Gawler Sports and Community Centre.

Public Notification

A notice was published in the Government Gazette on 11 August 2016, ‘The Advertiser’ on 13 August

2016 and ‘The Bunyip’ on 10 August 2016.

The DPA documents were also on display in all Council offices and libraries and it was made available

on Council’s website. All residents/land owners in the area affected by the DPA and all relevant

government agencies were notified of the DPA by mail. A copy of the DPA was also forwarded to the

Department for Planning on 10 August 2016.




SCPA Report

6

Public and Agency Submissions

Public Submissions

322 public submissions were received. The key issues raised in these submissions are summarised

as follows:

(a) Expansion of the zoning to include other properties

(b) Stormwater implications and reuse

(c) Traffic implications

(d) Direct access to roads from residential development

(e) Height restrictions for residential development

(f) Vegetative screening

A report on these submissions (summary, comments and action taken in response) is included in

Attachment A.

Agency Submissions

All agencies listed in Section 4.2 Consultation of the SOI were consulted. Not all provided comments

on the DPA, with a total of five submissions being received from state and local government

agencies/authorities. The key issues raised in these submissions are summarised as follows:

(a) General comments regarding affordable housing, recycled water quality requirements, Crime

Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) and emergency vehicle access.

A report on each submission (summary, comments and action taken in response) is included in

Attachment C.

Review of Submissions and Public Meeting

Copies of all submissions were made available for the public to review from 10 August 2016 to 27

October 2016.

Four persons requested to be heard in response to their written representations, as a result a Public

Meeting was held at 7:00pm in the Town of Gawler Sports and Community Centre on Thursday 27

October 2016.

A summary of the verbal submissions made at the public meeting are included in Attachment B.




SCPA Report

7

Additional Matters and Investigations

The following additional matter was identified after the consultation process.

Council’s Commercial and Rural Areas DPA, which was on public consultation from 26 September to

21 November 2017, is seeking to rezone a small parcel of Council owned land (abutting the Area

Affected in the Evanston Gardens DPA) from Residential to Business Zone.

Council has identified that this site would be suitably located to accommodate a modern petrol filling

station with an associated small shop. This would provide access to petrol and convenience items to

otherwise relatively isolated residents.

However, Concept Plan Figure NCe(EG)/1 in the Neighbourhood Centre (Evanston Gardens) Zone

indicates a site for “Future Petrol Filling Station / Service Trade Premises” on adjacent land to the west

of the Council land, within the Area Affected by the Evanston Gardens DPA.

Council is endeavouring to avoid any potential uncertainty concerning this western land parcel in the

Concept Plan as it considers it should be used solely for residential purposes. To this end, Council is

proposing to amend the Concept Plan via the Evanston Gardens DPA to remove wording relating to

“Future Petrol Filling Station / Service Trade Premises” to better reflect the purpose of the Evanston

Gardens DPA.

A copy of the additional investigations is provided in Attachment F.

Timeframe Report

A summary of the timeframe of the DPA process relative to the agreed Statement of Intent timetable is

located at Attachment D.

Delay(s) occurred because:

(a) To ensure the required 8 week period was provided (allowing time in case of unforeseen

circumstances arising.)

(b) Investigations taking a longer period of time than originally expected.

(c) Preparing and negotiating the terms of an Infrastructure Agreement with the land owners.

CEO’s Certification

The consultation process has been conducted and the final amendment prepared in accordance with

the requirements of the Act and Regulations as confirmed by the CEO’s Certifications provided in

Attachment E (Schedule 4A Certificate) and Attachment F (Schedule 4B Certificate).




SCPA Report

8

Summary of Recommended Changes to the Amendment following

Consultation

The following is a summary of the changes recommended to the Amendment Instructions following

consultation and in response to public submissions and/or agency comments:

• Insertion of an amended Bushfire Protection Area Figure Ga(BPA)/3 to reflect the CFS

request to retain the Residential Park Zone within the General Bushfire Risk area (see DPA

Attachment A).

• Replacement of all policies under the heading “Interface Between Land Uses” with the latest

version (#6) from the SAPPL (see DPA Attachment D).

• Replacement of Neighbourhood Centre (Evanston Gardens) Zone Concept Plan Figure

NCe(EG)/1 - deleting reference to “Future Petrol Filling Station / Service Trade

Premises”(see DPA Attachment E).

• Amendments to DPA Attachment H (previously Attachment F) to also reference Hillier Road,

the opportunity for medium density development to occur in the south western corner of the

development area and the potential need for further site contamination investigations.

• Amendments to PDC 18(a) and (b) in DPA Attachment I (previously Attachment G) to also

reference Hillier Road.

• Amendment to PDC 18(c) in DPA Attachment I (previously Attachment G) to provide greater

clarity.

• Amendment to DPA Attachment J (previously Attachment H) to also reference the potential

need for further site contamination investigations.




Attachment A - Summary and Response to Public Submissions

9

Attachment A – Summary and Response to Public Submissions Report on each submission received (including summary, comments and action taken in response) Sub No.

Name Submission Summary Commentary Council Recommendation (re. DPA)

1. David Griffin 1.1. In full support of the DPA.

1.1. The author provides his full support for the DPA. As a result no action or further comment is proposed.

1.1. No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval.

2. Geoff Butler (Consultant) on behalf of Martin Banham

2.1 The most northern allotment (allotment 8) currently zoned ‘Rural’ which is proposed solely for open space and storm water purposes be reconsidered to allow development on the upper portion (section above the 1:100 ARI flood event). 2.2 Amend the structure plan to display allotment 8 as Residential Park instead of open space as the land owner has no intention to develop the site for open space purposes. The land owners have no issue with the lower portion of allotment 8 being designated for stormwater management purposes on the Structure Plan. 2.3 Amend the structure plan by removing the westernmost ‘Traffic Control’ symbol (suggesting a roundabout) from Hillier Road, due to concerns it will

2.1 DPTI have confirmed that the ‘Draft Update of the 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide’ does not change the status of this allotment and it remains outside of the ‘urban growth area’. In line with the original SOI which the Minister agreed to no change is suggested. 2.2 The response is noted – Refer to response 2.1 above 2.3 As a result of traffic discussions with DPTI and in relation to infrastructure requirements and funding, roundabouts are not now proposed at some locations. As the symbol

2.1 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 2.2 The reference to open space has been removed and replaced with a reference to stormwater management. The Structure Plan has been amended to reflect this land being utilised for stormwater detention purposes. 2.3 No changes suggested. The DPA is





10

have a negative effect upon the existing community who reside in the Hillier Park Residential Village.

on Structure Plan Map Ga/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement H is non-specific (it only indicates a “Traffic Control” device of some sort is envisaged), amendment of the Structure Plan is not considered necessary.

recommended for approval.

3. Marisa Pozenel 3.1 The author’s property was at one time considered Evanston Gardens (now titled Kudla) and believes that nearby residents should have been given the opportunity to include their land in this DPA. 3.2 The author is suggesting that by rezoning only the parcels identified Council will fall short in relation to targets set out by the 30 year plan in relation to rezoning land for urban development. 3.3 The author has requested that her property located at 85 Milne Road Kudla is included in this development plan amendment process.

3.1 The response is noted – The subject land in this DPA is located within the ‘Deferred Urban Zone’ and as a result is considered a logical and sequential extension to Gawler’s land supply for residential development. 3.2 The response is noted – However it is estimated that Council currently contains a land supply of in excess of 15 years for residential development within its existing Residential and Deferred Urban Zones. 3.3 The response is noted – Refer to response 3.1 above.

3.1 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 3.2 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 3.3 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval.

4. Graham Brookman

4.1 Concerns relating to stormwater potentially leading to unnatural flooding and wastage of potential aquifer recharge water. 4.2 Concerns with traffic configurations suggested in traffic engineering documents and mapping.

4.1 The response is noted – Council investigated this option to find it the volume of available water to make aquifer recharge unviable. 4.2 The response is noted – Since this time, Council has worked with the State Government and undertaken numerous traffic

4.1 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 4.2 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval.





11

investigations with W & G Engineering, finding the proposals to be sound.

5. Kelvin Goldstone

5.1 Wishes to see the proposed roundabout located at the entrance to Hillier Park also connecting the southern DPA site removed. 5.2 Does not wish to see any vehicular access/egress to the southern DPA site via Hillier Road. 5.3 Wishes to see a vegetative screening/buffer of the southern DPA site occur along the Hillier Road boundary.

5.1 The roundabout at the entrance to Hillier Park has been replaced by a seagull T-junction. 5.2 Council has negotiated with DPTI to provide for a second access to Angle Vale Road. It has been made clear that the Hillier Road access must remain. 5.3 It was always intended that development on the southern side of Hillier Road should be screened by a vegetative buffer. Rewording of the Desired Character statement in Attachment F will make this requirement more explicit.

5.1 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 5.2 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 5.3 It is recommended that the first paragraph in Attachment H be replaced with the following: “The north-western portion of the Policy Area is bounded by Hillier Road to the north, Jack Cooper Drive to the east, Angle Vale Road to the south and the Evanston Gardens Neighbourhood Centre Zone to the west. Housing fronting Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and the southern side of Hillier Road will be sited, designed and constructed to mitigate traffic noise and air quality impacts from these roads. In addition, housing adjacent Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and the southern side of Hillier Road will front these roads and be enhanced through street design and complementary road side planting providing a screening effect to development. Direct vehicular access to Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and Hillier Road will not be





12

5.4 Does not wish to see any dwellings face or have direct access via Hillier Road. 5.5 Wishes to see height limits enforced for dwellings located on the southern site closest to Hillier Road, directly adjacent to Hillier Park.

5.4 The first part of this suggestion is not supported. It is considered appropriate that dwellings along the southern side of Hillier Road face that road, rather than have back fences fronting onto it. This is a similar design requirement to that already proposed for Jack Cooper Drive and Angle Vale Road. The second part of this suggestion, to not enable direct access to Hillier Road, is supported, being in line with the position already taken for Jack Cooper Drive and Angle Vale Road. 5.5 Current policies applying to Residential Policy Area 4 indicate building heights will generally be low rise (1 to 3 storeys), with 4+ storeys located near the Tambelin Railway Station. These policies are also considered appropriate for new development south of Hillier Road. It is noted that new development on the southern side of Hillier Road will be separated from the Hillier Park Residential Village to the north by the width of Hillier Road and the requirement to provide a landscaped screen to development along the southern side of Hillier Road.

provided.” 5.4 It is recommended that PDC 18(a) in Attachment I be replaced with the following: (a) “Where directly adjacent Jack

Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and the southern side of Hillier Road, front these roads and be sited, designed and constructed to mitigate noise and air quality impacts from traffic.”

It is recommended that PDC 18(b) in Attachment I be replaced with the following: (b) “not have direct vehicular access to

Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and Hillier Road”.

5.5 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval.

6. Joan Easthope 6.1 As per Submission No. 5.

6.1 As per Submission No. 5.






13

6.2 As per Submission No. 5. 6.3 As per Submission No. 5. 6.4 As per Submission No. 5. 6.5 As per Submission No. 5.



7. Harolyn Mc Roberts

7.1 As per Submission No. 5. 7.2 As per Submission No. 5. 7.3 As per Submission No. 5. 7.4 As per Submission No. 5. 7.5 As per Submission No. 5.



8. Valmai Litster 8.1 As per Submission No. 5. 8.2 As per Submission No. 5. 8.3 As per Submission No. 5. 8.4 As per Submission No. 5. 8.5

8.1 As per Submission No. 5. 8.2 As per Submission No. 5. 8.3 As per Submission No. 5. 8.4 As per Submission No. 5. 8.5






14

As per Submission No. 5.



9. Edward Giles 9.1 As per Submission No. 5. 9.2 As per Submission No. 5. 9.3 As per Submission No. 5. 9.4 As per Submission No. 5. 9.5 As per Submission No. 5.



10. Kerry Datson 10.1 As per Submission No. 5. 10.2 As per Submission No. 5. 10.3 As per Submission No. 5. 10.4 As per Submission No. 5. 10.5 As per Submission No. 5.



11. M.K. Francis 11.1 As per Submission No. 5. 11.2 As per Submission No. 5. 11.3 As per Submission No. 5.

11.1 As per Submission No. 5. 11.2 As per Submission No. 5. 11.3 As per Submission No. 5.






15

11.4 As per Submission No. 5. 11.5 As per Submission No. 5.



12. Janet Francis 12.1 As per Submission No. 5. 12.2 As per Submission No. 5. 12.3 As per Submission No. 5. 12.4 As per Submission No. 5. 12.5 As per Submission No. 5.



13. Michael Kaminski




14. William Harvey 14.1 As per Submission No. 5.







16




15. Phil Litster 15.1 As per Submission No. 5. 15.2 As per Submission No. 5. 15.3 As per Submission No. 5. 15.4 As per Submission No. 5. 15.5 As per Submission No. 5.



16. Christopher Price








17




17. Sonya Nelson 17.1 As per Submission No. 5. 17.2 As per Submission No. 5. 17.3 As per Submission No. 5. 17.4 As per Submission No. 5. 17.5 As per Submission No. 5.



18. G Collins 18.1 As per Submission No. 5. 18.2 As per Submission No. 5. 18.3 As per Submission No. 5. 18.4 As per Submission No. 5. 18.5 As per Submission No. 5.



19. Yvonne Gill 19.1 As per Submission No. 5. 19.2 As per Submission No. 5. 19.3 As per Submission No. 5.







18




20. Colin Gill 20.1 As per Submission No. 5. 20.2 As per Submission No. 5. 20.3 As per Submission No. 5. 20.4 As per Submission No. 5. 20.5 As per Submission No. 5.



21. Graham Wilson 21.1 As per Submission No. 5. 21.2 As per Submission No. 5. 21.3 As per Submission No. 5. 21.4 As per Submission No. 5. 21.5 As per Submission No. 5.



22. M Leahy 22.1 As per Submission No. 5.







19




23. Viola Klingner 23.1 As per Submission No. 5. 23.2 As per Submission No. 5. 23.3 As per Submission No. 5. 23.4 As per Submission No. 5. 23.5 As per Submission No. 5.



24. Sylvia White 24.1 As per Submission No. 5. 24.2 As per Submission No. 5. 24.3 As per Submission No. 5. 24.4 As per Submission No. 5. 24.5 As per Submission No. 5.







20

25. Robert White 25.1 As per Submission No. 5. 25.2 As per Submission No. 5. 25.3 As per Submission No. 5. 25.4 As per Submission No. 5. 25.5 As per Submission No. 5.



26. Frederick Markham




27. June Markham 27.1 As per Submission No. 5. 27.2 As per Submission No. 5. 27.3 As per Submission No. 5. 27.4 As per Submission No. 5.







21




28. Maree Phelps 28.1 As per Submission No. 5. 28.2 As per Submission No. 5. 28.3 As per Submission No. 5. 28.4 As per Submission No. 5. 28.5 As per Submission No. 5.



29. Stephen Phelps 29.1 As per Submission No. 5. 29.2 As per Submission No. 5. 29.3 As per Submission No. 5. 29.4 As per Submission No. 5. 29.5 As per Submission No. 5.



30. A Spence 30.1 As per Submission No. 5. 30.2 As per Submission No. 5. 30.3 As per Submission No. 5. 30.4

30.1 As per Submission No. 5. 30.2 As per Submission No. 5. 30.3 As per Submission No. 5. 30.4






22

As per Submission No. 5. 30.5 As per Submission No. 5.



31. Dawn Radin 31.1 As per Submission No. 5. 31.2 As per Submission No. 5. 31.3 As per Submission No. 5. 31.4 As per Submission No. 5. 31.5 As per Submission No. 5.



32. Christopher Hook




33. Margarita Wintle 33.1 As per Submission No. 5. 33.2 As per Submission No. 5. 33.3 As per Submission No. 5.







23




34. Gary Luhmann 34.1 As per Submission No. 5. 34.2 As per Submission No. 5. 34.3 As per Submission No. 5. 34.4 As per Submission No. 5. 34.5 As per Submission No. 5.



35. Nola Luhmann 35.1 As per Submission No. 5. 35.2 As per Submission No. 5. 35.3 As per Submission No. 5. 35.4 As per Submission No. 5. 35.5 As per Submission No. 5.



36. G Elvidge 36.1 As per Submission No. 5. 36.2 As per Submission No. 5.







24




37. Yvonne Sewell 37.1 As per Submission No. 5. 37.2 As per Submission No. 5. 37.3 As per Submission No. 5. 37.4 As per Submission No. 5. 37.5 As per Submission No. 5.



38. John Bird 38.1 As per Submission No. 5. 38.2 As per Submission No. 5. 38.3 As per Submission No. 5. 38.4 As per Submission No. 5. 38.5 As per Submission No. 5.



39. Doreen Leadbeater

39.1 As per Submission No. 5. 39.2







25

As per Submission No. 5. 39.3 As per Submission No. 5. 39.4 As per Submission No. 5. 39.5 As per Submission No. 5.



40. William Leadbeater




41. Auchey Bateman




42. K.R. Piggott 42.1 As per Submission No. 5.







26




43. Patrick O'Leary 43.1 As per Submission No. 5. 43.2 As per Submission No. 5. 43.3 As per Submission No. 5. 43.4 As per Submission No. 5. 43.5 As per Submission No. 5.



44. Valerie Stafford 44.1 As per Submission No. 5. 44.2 As per Submission No. 5. 44.3 As per Submission No. 5. 44.4 As per Submission No. 5. 44.5 As per Submission No. 5.







27

45. Jan Sawley 45.1 As per Submission No. 5. 45.2 As per Submission No. 5. 45.3 As per Submission No. 5. 45.4 As per Submission No. 5. 45.5 As per Submission No. 5.



46. Maureen Little 46.1 As per Submission No. 5. 46.2 As per Submission No. 5. 46.3 As per Submission No. 5. 46.4 As per Submission No. 5. 46.5 As per Submission No. 5.



47. Fred Piggott 47.1 As per Submission No. 5. 47.2 As per Submission No. 5. 47.3 As per Submission No. 5. 47.4 As per Submission No. 5.







28




48. Robert Coult 48.1 As per Submission No. 5. 48.2 As per Submission No. 5. 48.3 As per Submission No. 5. 48.4 As per Submission No. 5. 48.5 As per Submission No. 5.



49. Leslie & Brenda Cowling




50. Joan Ellanrener 50.1 As per Submission No. 5. 50.2 As per Submission No. 5. 50.3 As per Submission No. 5. 50.4







29




51. Joan Purser 51.1 As per Submission No. 5. 51.2 As per Submission No. 5. 51.3 As per Submission No. 5. 51.4 As per Submission No. 5. 51.5 As per Submission No. 5.



52. Ronald Purser 52.1 As per Submission No. 5. 52.2 As per Submission No. 5. 52.3 As per Submission No. 5. 52.4 As per Submission No. 5. 52.5 As per Submission No. 5.



53. John Ludbrook 53.1 As per Submission No. 5. 53.2 As per Submission No. 5. 53.3 As per Submission No. 5.







30




54. Gladyn Ludbrook




55. Lorraine Dawe 55.1 As per Submission No. 5. 55.2 As per Submission No. 5. 55.3 As per Submission No. 5. 55.4 As per Submission No. 5. 55.5 As per Submission No. 5.



56. Geoff Dawe 56.1 As per Submission No. 5. 56.2 As per Submission No. 5.







31




57. Robert Luke 57.1 As per Submission No. 5. 57.2 As per Submission No. 5. 57.3 As per Submission No. 5. 57.4 As per Submission No. 5. 57.5 As per Submission No. 5.



58. Mary Luke 58.1 As per Submission No. 5. 58.2 As per Submission No. 5. 58.3 As per Submission No. 5. 58.4 As per Submission No. 5. 58.5 As per Submission No. 5.



59. Julie Eldridge 59.1 As per Submission No. 5. 59.2







32




60. John Gillen 60.1 As per Submission No. 5. 60.2 As per Submission No. 5. 60.3 As per Submission No. 5. 60.4 As per Submission No. 5. 60.5 As per Submission No. 5.



61. Wendy Prior 61.1 As per Submission No. 5. 61.2 As per Submission No. 5. 61.3 As per Submission No. 5. 61.4 As per Submission No. 5. 61.5 As per Submission No. 5.



62. Margaret Lindsay








33




63. Colin Lindsay 63.1 As per Submission No. 5. 63.2 As per Submission No. 5. 63.3 As per Submission No. 5. 63.4 As per Submission No. 5. 63.5 As per Submission No. 5.



64. Reg Loveley 64.1 As per Submission No. 5. 64.2 As per Submission No. 5. 64.3 As per Submission No. 5. 64.4 As per Submission No. 5. 64.5 As per Submission No. 5.







34

65. Joan Retallack 65.1 As per Submission No. 5. 65.2 As per Submission No. 5. 65.3 As per Submission No. 5. 65.4 As per Submission No. 5. 65.5 As per Submission No. 5.



66. Carol Boothey 66.1 As per Submission No. 5. 66.2 As per Submission No. 5. 66.3 As per Submission No. 5. 66.4 As per Submission No. 5. 66.5 As per Submission No. 5.



67. Eunice Gillen 67.1 As per Submission No. 5. 67.2 As per Submission No. 5. 67.3 As per Submission No. 5. 67.4 As per Submission No. 5.







35




68. Ted Hzath 68.1 As per Submission No. 5. 68.2 As per Submission No. 5. 68.3 As per Submission No. 5. 68.4 As per Submission No. 5. 68.5 As per Submission No. 5.



69. Lronie Hzath 69.1 As per Submission No. 5. 69.2 As per Submission No. 5. 69.3 As per Submission No. 5. 69.4 As per Submission No. 5. 69.5 As per Submission No. 5.



70. Rosalyn Abraham








36




71. Robert Abraham 71.1 As per Submission No. 5. 71.2 As per Submission No. 5. 71.3 As per Submission No. 5. 71.4 As per Submission No. 5. 71.5 As per Submission No. 5.



72. Sheila Anzil 72.1 As per Submission No. 5. 72.2 As per Submission No. 5. 72.3 As per Submission No. 5. 72.4 As per Submission No. 5. 72.5 As per Submission No. 5.



73. Christine Green 73.1 As per Submission No. 5. 73.2 As per Submission No. 5. 73.3 As per Submission No. 5.







37




74. Geoffery Green 74.1 As per Submission No. 5. 74.2 As per Submission No. 5. 74.3 As per Submission No. 5. 74.4 As per Submission No. 5. 74.5 As per Submission No. 5.



75. Norman Stafford 75.1 As per Submission No. 5. 75.2 As per Submission No. 5. 75.3 As per Submission No. 5. 75.4 As per Submission No. 5. 75.5 As per Submission No. 5.



76. Brian John 76.1 As per Submission No. 5. 76.2 As per Submission No. 5.







38




77. George Francis Westell




78. June Westell 78.1 As per Submission No. 5. 78.2 As per Submission No. 5. 78.3 As per Submission No. 5. 78.4 As per Submission No. 5. 78.5 As per Submission No. 5.



79. Warwick Johnson








39




80. Jeff Walker 80.1 As per Submission No. 5. 80.2 As per Submission No. 5. 80.3 As per Submission No. 5. 80.4 As per Submission No. 5. 80.5 As per Submission No. 5.



81. Earnest Clifton 81.1 As per Submission No. 5. 81.2 As per Submission No. 5. 81.3 As per Submission No. 5. 81.4 As per Submission No. 5. 81.5 As per Submission No. 5.



82. Betty Coombs 82.1 As per Submission No. 5.







40




83. Dennis Bolland 83.1 As per Submission No. 5. 83.2 As per Submission No. 5. 83.3 As per Submission No. 5. 83.4 As per Submission No. 5. 83.5 As per Submission No. 5.



84. Gerrad Jacob 84.1 As per Submission No. 5. 84.2 As per Submission No. 5. 84.3 As per Submission No. 5. 84.4 As per Submission No. 5. 84.5 As per Submission No. 5.







41

85. Ellen Walker 85.1 As per Submission No. 5. 85.2 As per Submission No. 5. 85.3 As per Submission No. 5. 85.4 As per Submission No. 5. 85.5 As per Submission No. 5.



86. E Kerrison 86.1 As per Submission No. 5. 86.2 As per Submission No. 5. 86.3 As per Submission No. 5. 86.4 As per Submission No. 5. 86.5 As per Submission No. 5.



87. Beryl Elizabeth 87.1 As per Submission No. 5. 87.2 As per Submission No. 5. 87.3 As per Submission No. 5. 87.4 As per Submission No. 5.







42




88. J Monterooy 88.1 As per Submission No. 5. 88.2 As per Submission No. 5. 88.3 As per Submission No. 5. 88.4 As per Submission No. 5. 88.5 As per Submission No. 5.



89. Barbara Clifton 89.1 As per Submission No. 5. 89.2 As per Submission No. 5. 89.3 As per Submission No. 5. 89.4 As per Submission No. 5. 89.5 As per Submission No. 5.



90. Carol Smith 90.1 As per Submission No. 5. 90.2 As per Submission No. 5. 90.3 As per Submission No. 5. 90.4







43




91. Geoff Smith 91.1 As per Submission No. 5. 91.2 As per Submission No. 5. 91.3 As per Submission No. 5. 91.4 As per Submission No. 5. 91.5 As per Submission No. 5.



92. Neil Scales 92.1 As per Submission No. 5. 92.2 As per Submission No. 5. 92.3 As per Submission No. 5. 92.4 As per Submission No. 5. 92.5 As per Submission No. 5.



93. Margaret Scales 93.1 As per Submission No. 5. 93.2 As per Submission No. 5. 93.3 As per Submission No. 5.







44




94. J.M. Everett 94.1 As per Submission No. 5. 94.2 As per Submission No. 5. 94.3 As per Submission No. 5. 94.4 As per Submission No. 5. 94.5 As per Submission No. 5.



95. D.J. Everett 95.1 As per Submission No. 5. 95.2 As per Submission No. 5. 95.3 As per Submission No. 5. 95.4 As per Submission No. 5. 95.5 As per Submission No. 5.



96. M Rowe 96.1 As per Submission No. 5. 96.2 As per Submission No. 5.







45




97. Brian Ferrari 97.1 As per Submission No. 5. 97.2 As per Submission No. 5. 97.3 As per Submission No. 5. 97.4 As per Submission No. 5. 97.5 As per Submission No. 5.



98. Denzil & Naise Smtih




99. David Raynor 99.1 As per Submission No. 5. 99.2







46




100. Jacqueline Raynor




101. Brenda Davies 101.1 As per Submission No. 5. 101.2 As per Submission No. 5. 101.3 As per Submission No. 5. 101.4 As per Submission No. 5. 101.5 As per Submission No. 5.







47

102. Graham Howard 102.1 As per Submission No. 5. 102.2 As per Submission No. 5. 102.3 As per Submission No. 5. 102.4 As per Submission No. 5. 102.5 As per Submission No. 5.



103. H Elvidge 103.1 As per Submission No. 5. 103.2 As per Submission No. 5. 103.3 As per Submission No. 5. 103.4 As per Submission No. 5. 103.5 As per Submission No. 5.



104. A.C. Kerrison 104.1 As per Submission No. 5. 104.2 As per Submission No. 5. 104.3 As per Submission No. 5. 104.4







48




105. Roger Ogdor 105.1 As per Submission No. 5. 105.2 As per Submission No. 5. 105.3 As per Submission No. 5. 105.4 As per Submission No. 5. 105.5 As per Submission No. 5.



106. Priscilla Brazil 106.1 As per Submission No. 5. 106.2 As per Submission No. 5. 106.3 As per Submission No. 5. 106.4 As per Submission No. 5. 106.5 As per Submission No. 5.



107. Jim Taylor 107.1 As per Submission No. 5. 107.2 As per Submission No. 5. 107.3 As per Submission No. 5.







49




108. Janet Dawn 108.1 As per Submission No. 5. 108.2 As per Submission No. 5. 108.3 As per Submission No. 5. 108.4 As per Submission No. 5. 108.5 As per Submission No. 5.



109. Elaine Greaves 109.1 As per Submission No. 5. 109.2 As per Submission No. 5. 109.3 As per Submission No. 5. 109.4 As per Submission No. 5. 109.5 As per Submission No. 5.



110. Dennis Greaves 110.1 As per Submission No. 5. 110.2 As per Submission No. 5.







50




111. Eileen Sawley 111.1 As per Submission No. 5. 111.2 As per Submission No. 5. 111.3 As per Submission No. 5. 111.4 As per Submission No. 5. 111.5 As per Submission No. 5.



112. E Patterson 112.1 As per Submission No. 5. 112.2 As per Submission No. 5. 112.3 As per Submission No. 5. 112.4 As per Submission No. 5. 112.5 As per Submission No. 5.



113. Margaret Poole 113.1 As per Submission No. 5. 113.2







51




114. June Jones 114.1 As per Submission No. 5. 114.2 As per Submission No. 5. 114.3 As per Submission No. 5. 114.4 As per Submission No. 5. 114.5 As per Submission No. 5.



115. John Poole 115.1 As per Submission No. 5. 115.2 As per Submission No. 5. 115.3 As per Submission No. 5. 115.4 As per Submission No. 5. 115.5 As per Submission No. 5.



116. Judith Marks 116.1 As per Submission No. 5.







52




117. Garry Illington 117.1 As per Submission No. 5. 117.2 As per Submission No. 5. 117.3 As per Submission No. 5. 117.4 As per Submission No. 5. 117.5 As per Submission No. 5.



118. Beverley Horner 118.1 As per Submission No. 5. 118.2 As per Submission No. 5. 118.3 As per Submission No. 5. 118.4 As per Submission No. 5. 118.5 As per Submission No. 5.







53

119. Jan Watson 119.1 As per Submission No. 5. 119.2 As per Submission No. 5. 119.3 As per Submission No. 5. 119.4 As per Submission No. 5. 119.5 As per Submission No. 5.



120. Coral Phillips 120.1 As per Submission No. 5. 120.2 As per Submission No. 5. 120.3 As per Submission No. 5. 120.4 As per Submission No. 5. 120.5 As per Submission No. 5.



121. William Warner 121.1 As per Submission No. 5. 121.2 As per Submission No. 5. 121.3 As per Submission No. 5. 121.4 As per Submission No. 5.







54




122. Marjorie Warner 122.1 As per Submission No. 5. 122.2 As per Submission No. 5. 122.3 As per Submission No. 5. 122.4 As per Submission No. 5. 122.5 As per Submission No. 5.



123. G Bottger 123.1 As per Submission No. 5. 123.2 As per Submission No. 5. 123.3 As per Submission No. 5. 123.4 As per Submission No. 5. 123.5 As per Submission No. 5.



124. Marion McKay 124.1 As per Submission No. 5. 124.2 As per Submission No. 5. 124.3 As per Submission No. 5. 124.4







55




125. Susan Van Someren




126. Tony Van Someren




127. Jerry Westlake 127.1 As per Submission No. 5. 127.2 As per Submission No. 5. 127.3 As per Submission No. 5.







56




128. Barry Harvey 128.1 As per Submission No. 5. 128.2 As per Submission No. 5. 128.3 As per Submission No. 5. 128.4 As per Submission No. 5. 128.5 As per Submission No. 5.



129. Marie Harvey 129.1 As per Submission No. 5. 129.2 As per Submission No. 5. 129.3 As per Submission No. 5. 129.4 As per Submission No. 5. 129.5 As per Submission No. 5.



130. Doreen Skipper 130.1 As per Submission No. 5. 130.2 As per Submission No. 5.




of 213 ATTACHMENTS UNDER SEPARATE COVER



57




131. Terence Reilly 131.1 As per Submission No. 5. 131.2 As per Submission No. 5. 131.3 As per Submission No. 5. 131.4 As per Submission No. 5. 131.5 As per Submission No. 5.



132. V.G. McLeod 132.1 As per Submission No. 5. 132.2 As per Submission No. 5. 132.3 As per Submission No. 5. 132.4 As per Submission No. 5. 132.5 As per Submission No. 5.



133. K.J. Trenck 133.1 As per Submission No. 5. 133.2







58




134. Margaret Muir 134.1 As per Submission No. 5. 134.2 As per Submission No. 5. 134.3 As per Submission No. 5. 134.4 As per Submission No. 5. 134.5 As per Submission No. 5.



135. Natalie Pearce 135.1 As per Submission No. 5. 135.2 As per Submission No. 5. 135.3 As per Submission No. 5. 135.4 As per Submission No. 5. 135.5 As per Submission No. 5.



136. Baden Pearce 136.1 As per Submission No. 5.







59




137. T Eairlie 137.1 As per Submission No. 5. 137.2 As per Submission No. 5. 137.3 As per Submission No. 5. 137.4 As per Submission No. 5. 137.5 As per Submission No. 5.



138. M.J. McVeity 138.1 As per Submission No. 5. 138.2 As per Submission No. 5. 138.3 As per Submission No. 5. 138.4 As per Submission No. 5. 138.5 As per Submission No. 5.







60

139. James Skipper 139.1 As per Submission No. 5. 139.2 As per Submission No. 5. 139.3 As per Submission No. 5. 139.4 As per Submission No. 5. 139.5 As per Submission No. 5.



140. Fred Schode 140.1 As per Submission No. 5. 140.2 As per Submission No. 5. 140.3 As per Submission No. 5. 140.4 As per Submission No. 5. 140.5 As per Submission No. 5.



141. Y.P. Court 141.1 As per Submission No. 5. 141.2 As per Submission No. 5. 141.3 As per Submission No. 5. 141.4 As per Submission No. 5.







61




142. J Edmonds 142.1 As per Submission No. 5. 142.2 As per Submission No. 5. 142.3 As per Submission No. 5. 142.4 As per Submission No. 5. 142.5 As per Submission No. 5.



143. Eric & Elsie Clarke




144. Kenneth Ruge 144.1 As per Submission No. 5. 144.2 As per Submission No. 5. 144.3 As per Submission No. 5. 144.4







62




145. Rudi Wallstab 145.1 As per Submission No. 5. 145.2 As per Submission No. 5. 145.3 As per Submission No. 5. 145.4 As per Submission No. 5. 145.5 As per Submission No. 5.



146. Terry Brand 146.1 As per Submission No. 5. 146.2 As per Submission No. 5. 146.3 As per Submission No. 5. 146.4 As per Submission No. 5. 146.5 As per Submission No. 5.



147. Lorraine Brand 147.1 As per Submission No. 5. 147.2 As per Submission No. 5. 147.3 As per Submission No. 5.







63




148. Marina Chenoweth




149. Mary Wilson 149.1 As per Submission No. 5. 149.2 As per Submission No. 5. 149.3 As per Submission No. 5. 149.4 As per Submission No. 5. 149.5 As per Submission No. 5.



150. Robert & Gail Young








64




151. Pam May 151.1 As per Submission No. 5. 151.2 As per Submission No. 5. 151.3 As per Submission No. 5. 151.4 As per Submission No. 5. 151.5 As per Submission No. 5.



152. Bob May 152.1 As per Submission No. 5. 152.2 As per Submission No. 5. 152.3 As per Submission No. 5. 152.4 As per Submission No. 5. 152.5 As per Submission No. 5.



153. David Bowd 153.1 As per Submission No. 5. 153.2







65




154. Charles Singer 154.1 As per Submission No. 5. 154.2 As per Submission No. 5. 154.3 As per Submission No. 5. 154.4 As per Submission No. 5. 154.5 As per Submission No. 5.



155. Susan Singer 155.1 As per Submission No. 5. 155.2 As per Submission No. 5. 155.3 As per Submission No. 5. 155.4 As per Submission No. 5. 155.5 As per Submission No. 5.



156. Bruce Lavis 156.1 As per Submission No. 5.







66




157. Beveryley Ann Conner




158. Sue Lavis 158.1 As per Submission No. 5. 158.2 As per Submission No. 5. 158.3 As per Submission No. 5. 158.4 As per Submission No. 5. 158.5 As per Submission No. 5.







67

159. Robert Kerr 159.1 As per Submission No. 5. 159.2 As per Submission No. 5. 159.3 As per Submission No. 5. 159.4 As per Submission No. 5. 159.5 As per Submission No. 5.



160. Alison White 160.1 As per Submission No. 5. 160.2 As per Submission No. 5. 160.3 As per Submission No. 5. 160.4 As per Submission No. 5. 160.5 As per Submission No. 5.



161. James Pendry 161.1 As per Submission No. 5. 161.2 As per Submission No. 5. 161.3 As per Submission No. 5. 161.4 As per Submission No. 5.







68




162. Gillian Green 162.1 As per Submission No. 5. 162.2 As per Submission No. 5. 162.3 As per Submission No. 5. 162.4 As per Submission No. 5. 162.5 As per Submission No. 5.



163. Danvite Carter 163.1 As per Submission No. 5. 163.2 As per Submission No. 5. 163.3 As per Submission No. 5. 163.4 As per Submission No. 5. 163.5 As per Submission No. 5.



164. Ken Connor 164.1 As per Submission No. 5. 164.2 As per Submission No. 5. 164.3 As per Submission No. 5. 164.4







69




165. Fielden 165.1 As per Submission No. 5. 165.2 As per Submission No. 5. 165.3 As per Submission No. 5. 165.4 As per Submission No. 5. 165.5 As per Submission No. 5.



166. John Newshant 166.1 As per Submission No. 5. 166.2 As per Submission No. 5. 166.3 As per Submission No. 5. 166.4 As per Submission No. 5. 166.5 As per Submission No. 5.



167. Lynn Bartley 167.1 As per Submission No. 5. 167.2 As per Submission No. 5. 167.3 As per Submission No. 5.







70




168. Marie Oates 168.1 As per Submission No. 5. 168.2 As per Submission No. 5. 168.3 As per Submission No. 5. 168.4 As per Submission No. 5. 168.5 As per Submission No. 5.



169. Roy Oates 169.1 As per Submission No. 5. 169.2 As per Submission No. 5. 169.3 As per Submission No. 5. 169.4 As per Submission No. 5. 169.5 As per Submission No. 5.



170. Barry Pope 170.1 As per Submission No. 5. 170.2 As per Submission No. 5.







71




171. Jennifer Pope 171.1 As per Submission No. 5. 171.2 As per Submission No. 5. 171.3 As per Submission No. 5. 171.4 As per Submission No. 5. 171.5 As per Submission No. 5.



172. G Hood 172.1 As per Submission No. 5. 172.2 As per Submission No. 5. 172.3 As per Submission No. 5. 172.4 As per Submission No. 5. 172.5 As per Submission No. 5.



173. Audrey Bateman








72




174. Raymond Bartlett




175. Doreen Lamb 175.1 As per Submission No. 5. 175.2 As per Submission No. 5. 175.3 As per Submission No. 5. 175.4 As per Submission No. 5. 175.5 As per Submission No. 5.



176. Susan Marshall 176.1 As per Submission No. 5.







73




177. Gordon Marshall 177.1 As per Submission No. 5. 177.2 As per Submission No. 5. 177.3 As per Submission No. 5. 177.4 As per Submission No. 5. 177.5 As per Submission No. 5.



178. Mary Gregory 178.1 As per Submission No. 5. 178.2 As per Submission No. 5. 178.3 As per Submission No. 5. 178.4 As per Submission No. 5. 178.5 As per Submission No. 5.







74

179. Peter Olsen 179.1 As per Submission No. 5. 179.2 As per Submission No. 5. 179.3 As per Submission No. 5. 179.4 As per Submission No. 5. 179.5 As per Submission No. 5.



180. Jennifer Olsen 180.1 As per Submission No. 5. 180.2 As per Submission No. 5. 180.3 As per Submission No. 5. 180.4 As per Submission No. 5. 180.5 As per Submission No. 5.



181. Peter Lloyd 181.1 As per Submission No. 5. 181.2 As per Submission No. 5. 181.3 As per Submission No. 5. 181.4 As per Submission No. 5.







75




182. Keith Fitzgerald 182.1 As per Submission No. 5. 182.2 As per Submission No. 5. 182.3 As per Submission No. 5. 182.4 As per Submission No. 5. 182.5 As per Submission No. 5.



183. T&V Haycock 183.1 As per Submission No. 5. 183.2 As per Submission No. 5. 183.3 As per Submission No. 5. 183.4 As per Submission No. 5. 183.5 As per Submission No. 5.



184. Norma Docherty 184.1 As per Submission No. 5. 184.2 As per Submission No. 5. 184.3 As per Submission No. 5. 184.4







76




185. Rosalina Sims 185.1 As per Submission No. 5. 185.2 As per Submission No. 5. 185.3 As per Submission No. 5. 185.4 As per Submission No. 5. 185.5 As per Submission No. 5.



186. J.E. Laws 186.1 As per Submission No. 5. 186.2 As per Submission No. 5. 186.3 As per Submission No. 5. 186.4 As per Submission No. 5. 186.5 As per Submission No. 5.



187. Paul Cockshell 187.1 As per Submission No. 5. 187.2 As per Submission No. 5. 187.3 As per Submission No. 5.







77




188. Ben Rolton 188.1 As per Submission No. 5. 188.2 As per Submission No. 5. 188.3 As per Submission No. 5. 188.4 As per Submission No. 5. 188.5 As per Submission No. 5.



189. Joan Dunning 189.1 As per Submission No. 5. 189.2 As per Submission No. 5. 189.3 As per Submission No. 5. 189.4 As per Submission No. 5. 189.5 As per Submission No. 5.



190. George Crocs 190.1 As per Submission No. 5. 190.2 As per Submission No. 5.







78




191. WIlliam Parrin 191.1 As per Submission No. 5. 191.2 As per Submission No. 5. 191.3 As per Submission No. 5. 191.4 As per Submission No. 5. 191.5 As per Submission No. 5.



192. Jocelyn Walker 192.1 As per Submission No. 5. 192.2 As per Submission No. 5. 192.3 As per Submission No. 5. 192.4 As per Submission No. 5. 192.5 As per Submission No. 5.



193. Sandra Shaw 193.1 As per Submission No. 5. 193.2







79




194. Mariska Nicholls 194.1 As per Submission No. 5. 194.2 As per Submission No. 5. 194.3 As per Submission No. 5. 194.4 As per Submission No. 5. 194.5 As per Submission No. 5.



195. Jean Newsham 195.1 As per Submission No. 5. 195.2 As per Submission No. 5. 195.3 As per Submission No. 5. 195.4 As per Submission No. 5. 195.5 As per Submission No. 5.



196. George & Eileen Cross








80




197. Mary Ridings 197.1 As per Submission No. 5. 197.2 As per Submission No. 5. 197.3 As per Submission No. 5. 197.4 As per Submission No. 5. 197.5 As per Submission No. 5.



198. Carol Parkin 198.1 As per Submission No. 5. 198.2 As per Submission No. 5. 198.3 As per Submission No. 5. 198.4 As per Submission No. 5. 198.5 As per Submission No. 5.







81

199. Beryl Songer 199.1 As per Submission No. 5. 199.2 As per Submission No. 5. 199.3 As per Submission No. 5. 199.4 As per Submission No. 5. 199.5 As per Submission No. 5.



200. Susan Alexander




201. F Kennedy 201.1 As per Submission No. 5. 201.2 As per Submission No. 5. 201.3 As per Submission No. 5. 201.4 As per Submission No. 5.







82




202. Geoffery Elsworth




203. Freda Webb 203.1 As per Submission No. 5. 203.2 As per Submission No. 5. 203.3 As per Submission No. 5. 203.4 As per Submission No. 5. 203.5 As per Submission No. 5.



204. WIlliam Webb 204.1 As per Submission No. 5. 204.2 As per Submission No. 5. 204.3 As per Submission No. 5. 204.4







83




205. Pamela Atkins 205.1 As per Submission No. 5. 205.2 As per Submission No. 5. 205.3 As per Submission No. 5. 205.4 As per Submission No. 5. 205.5 As per Submission No. 5.



206. Glenda Gorton 206.1 As per Submission No. 5. 206.2 As per Submission No. 5. 206.3 As per Submission No. 5. 206.4 As per Submission No. 5. 206.5 As per Submission No. 5.



207. Merel Turner 207.1 As per Submission No. 5. 207.2 As per Submission No. 5. 207.3 As per Submission No. 5.







84




208. John Campey 208.1 As per Submission No. 5. 208.2 As per Submission No. 5. 208.3 As per Submission No. 5. 208.4 As per Submission No. 5. 208.5 As per Submission No. 5.



209. G.B. Ayres 209.1 As per Submission No. 5. 209.2 As per Submission No. 5. 209.3 As per Submission No. 5. 209.4 As per Submission No. 5. 209.5 As per Submission No. 5.



210. Willie Hoad 210.1 As per Submission No. 5. 210.2 As per Submission No. 5.







85




211. Colin Phillips 211.1 As per Submission No. 5. 211.2 As per Submission No. 5. 211.3 As per Submission No. 5. 211.4 As per Submission No. 5. 211.5 As per Submission No. 5.



212. C Coleton 212.1 As per Submission No. 5. 212.2 As per Submission No. 5. 212.3 As per Submission No. 5. 212.4 As per Submission No. 5. 212.5 As per Submission No. 5.



213. Phyllis Atkins 213.1 As per Submission No. 5. 213.2







86




214. William Atkins 214.1 As per Submission No. 5. 214.2 As per Submission No. 5. 214.3 As per Submission No. 5. 214.4 As per Submission No. 5. 214.5 As per Submission No. 5.



215. Jennifer Drummond




216. Len Jones 216.1 As per Submission No. 5.







87




217. Peraval Drummond




218. Wick Edward 218.1 As per Submission No. 5. 218.2 As per Submission No. 5. 218.3 As per Submission No. 5. 218.4 As per Submission No. 5. 218.5 As per Submission No. 5.







88

219. Barbara Anderson




220. Judith Fenton 220.1 As per Submission No. 5. 220.2 As per Submission No. 5. 220.3 As per Submission No. 5. 220.4 As per Submission No. 5. 220.5 As per Submission No. 5.



221. David Washington








89




222. Margaret Bell 222.1 As per Submission No. 5. 222.2 As per Submission No. 5. 222.3 As per Submission No. 5. 222.4 As per Submission No. 5. 222.5 As per Submission No. 5.



223. Leigh Wilson 223.1 As per Submission No. 5. 223.2 As per Submission No. 5. 223.3 As per Submission No. 5. 223.4 As per Submission No. 5. 223.5 As per Submission No. 5.



224. Inez Healy 224.1 As per Submission No. 5. 224.2 As per Submission No. 5. 224.3 As per Submission No. 5. 224.4







90




225. Vin Healy 225.1 As per Submission No. 5. 225.2 As per Submission No. 5. 225.3 As per Submission No. 5. 225.4 As per Submission No. 5. 225.5 As per Submission No. 5.



226. Marion Roberts 226.1 As per Submission No. 5. 226.2 As per Submission No. 5. 226.3 As per Submission No. 5. 226.4 As per Submission No. 5. 226.5 As per Submission No. 5.



227. Debra Spencer 227.1 As per Submission No. 5. 227.2 As per Submission No. 5. 227.3 As per Submission No. 5.







91




228. Sandra Cockshell




229. Joseph Perkins 229.1 As per Submission No. 5. 229.2 As per Submission No. 5. 229.3 As per Submission No. 5. 229.4 As per Submission No. 5. 229.5 As per Submission No. 5.



230. Christeen Spehr 230.1 As per Submission No. 5. 230.2 As per Submission No. 5.







92




231. Rudi Spehr 231.1 As per Submission No. 5. 231.2 As per Submission No. 5. 230.3 As per Submission No. 5. 231.4 As per Submission No. 5. 231.5 As per Submission No. 5.



232. Paul Stevens 232.1 As per Submission No. 5. 232.2 As per Submission No. 5. 232.3 As per Submission No. 5. 232.4 As per Submission No. 5. 232.5 As per Submission No. 5.



233. Margaret Kerr 233.1 As per Submission No. 5. 233.2







93




234. Audrey Body 234.1 As per Submission No. 5. 234.2 As per Submission No. 5. 234.3 As per Submission No. 5. 234.4 As per Submission No. 5. 234.5 As per Submission No. 5.



235. Lionel Reynolds 235.1 As per Submission No. 5. 235.2 As per Submission No. 5. 235.3 As per Submission No. 5. 235.4 As per Submission No. 5. 235.5 As per Submission No. 5.



236. Delphine Reynolds








94




237. Jennifer Bongelhardt




238. Lindsay Salter 238.1 As per Submission No. 5. 238.2 As per Submission No. 5. 238.3 As per Submission No. 5. 238.4 As per Submission No. 5. 238.5 As per Submission No. 5.







95

239. Margaret Salter 239.1 As per Submission No. 5. 239.2 As per Submission No. 5. 239.3 As per Submission No. 5. 239.4 As per Submission No. 5. 239.5 As per Submission No. 5.



240. Jean Elsworth 240.1 As per Submission No. 5. 240.2 As per Submission No. 5. 240.3 As per Submission No. 5. 240.4 As per Submission No. 5. 240.5 As per Submission No. 5.



241. Joan Reilly 241.1 As per Submission No. 5. 241.2 As per Submission No. 5. 241.3 As per Submission No. 5. 241.4 As per Submission No. 5.







96




242. Marion Smith 242.1 As per Submission No. 5. 242.2 As per Submission No. 5. 242.3 As per Submission No. 5. 242.4 As per Submission No. 5. 242.5 As per Submission No. 5.



243. Peter Smith 243.1 As per Submission No. 5. 243.2 As per Submission No. 5. 243.3 As per Submission No. 5. 243.4 As per Submission No. 5. 243.5 As per Submission No. 5.



244. R Oldale 244.1 As per Submission No. 5. 244.2 As per Submission No. 5. 244.3 As per Submission No. 5. 244.4







97




245. Margaret Oldale 245.1 As per Submission No. 5. 245.2 As per Submission No. 5. 245.3 As per Submission No. 5. 245.4 As per Submission No. 5. 245.5 As per Submission No. 5.



246. Max Allford 246.1 As per Submission No. 5. 246.2 As per Submission No. 5. 246.3 As per Submission No. 5. 246.4 As per Submission No. 5. 246.5 As per Submission No. 5.



247. Dimne Allford 247.1 As per Submission No. 5. 247.2 As per Submission No. 5. 247.3 As per Submission No. 5.







98




248. W.J. Balliga 248.1 As per Submission No. 5. 248.2 As per Submission No. 5. 248.3 As per Submission No. 5. 248.4 As per Submission No. 5. 248.5 As per Submission No. 5.



249. Janice Esselbach




250. Les Hosllins 250.1 As per Submission No. 5. 250.2 As per Submission No. 5.







99




251. Kersti Hosllins 251.1 As per Submission No. 5. 251.2 As per Submission No. 5. 251.3 As per Submission No. 5. 251.4 As per Submission No. 5. 251.5 As per Submission No. 5.



252. Tonrin 252.1 As per Submission No. 5. 252.2 As per Submission No. 5. 252.3 As per Submission No. 5. 252.4 As per Submission No. 5. 252.5 As per Submission No. 5.



253. Alan Frith 253.1 As per Submission No. 5. 253.2







100




254. B Johnson 254.1 As per Submission No. 5. 254.2 As per Submission No. 5. 254.3 As per Submission No. 5. 254.4 As per Submission No. 5. 254.5 As per Submission No. 5.



255. Audrey Stone 255.1 As per Submission No. 5. 255.2 As per Submission No. 5. 255.3 As per Submission No. 5. 255.4 As per Submission No. 5. 255.5 As per Submission No. 5.



256. Diane Sandland 256.1 As per Submission No. 5.







101




257. Kenneth Newby 257.1 As per Submission No. 5. 257.2 As per Submission No. 5. 257.3 As per Submission No. 5. 257.4 As per Submission No. 5. 257.5 As per Submission No. 5.



258. Garry Esselbach 258.1 As per Submission No. 5. 258.2 As per Submission No. 5. 258.3 As per Submission No. 5. 258.4 As per Submission No. 5. 258.5 As per Submission No. 5.







102

259. Robert Main 259.1 As per Submission No. 5. 259.2 As per Submission No. 5. 259.3 As per Submission No. 5. 259.4 As per Submission No. 5. 259.5 As per Submission No. 5.



260. John & Jean Fahey




261. Lyn Oliver 261.1 As per Submission No. 5. 261.2 As per Submission No. 5. 261.3 As per Submission No. 5. 261.4 As per Submission No. 5.







103




262. Nick Oliver 262.1 As per Submission No. 5. 262.2 As per Submission No. 5. 262.3 As per Submission No. 5. 262.4 As per Submission No. 5. 262.5 As per Submission No. 5.



263. Jane Walker 263.1 As per Submission No. 5. 263.2 As per Submission No. 5. 263.3 As per Submission No. 5. 263.4 As per Submission No. 5. 263.5 As per Submission No. 5.



264. David Brigden 264.1 As per Submission No. 5. 264.2 As per Submission No. 5. 264.3 As per Submission No. 5. 264.4







104




265. Lyn Sincock 265.1 As per Submission No. 5. 265.2 As per Submission No. 5. 265.3 As per Submission No. 5. 265.4 As per Submission No. 5. 265.5 As per Submission No. 5.



266. Ruth Tonkin 266.1 As per Submission No. 5. 266.2 As per Submission No. 5. 266.3 As per Submission No. 5. 266.4 As per Submission No. 5. 266.5 As per Submission No. 5.



267. Jeffery Brown 267.1 As per Submission No. 5. 267.2 As per Submission No. 5. 267.3 As per Submission No. 5.







105




268. T Ryan 268.1 As per Submission No. 5. 268.2 As per Submission No. 5. 268.3 As per Submission No. 5. 268.4 As per Submission No. 5. 268.5 As per Submission No. 5.



269. Jennifer Main 269.1 As per Submission No. 5. 269.2 As per Submission No. 5. 269.3 As per Submission No. 5. 269.4 As per Submission No. 5. 269.5 As per Submission No. 5.



270. Patricia Goult 270.1 As per Submission No. 5. 270.2 As per Submission No. 5.







106




271. Kathleen Mcphee




272. Bill Walter 272.1 As per Submission No. 5. 272.2 As per Submission No. 5. 272.3 As per Submission No. 5. 272.4 As per Submission No. 5. 272.5 As per Submission No. 5.



273. David Daw 273.1 As per Submission No. 5. 273.2







107




274. Christine Jones 274.1 As per Submission No. 5. 274.2 As per Submission No. 5. 274.3 As per Submission No. 5. 274.4 As per Submission No. 5. 274.5 As per Submission No. 5.



275. Anthony Goult 275.1 As per Submission No. 5. 275.2 As per Submission No. 5. 275.3 As per Submission No. 5. 275.4 As per Submission No. 5. 275.5 As per Submission No. 5.



276. S.G. Sherratt 276.1 As per Submission No. 5.







108




277. L Boothey 277.1 As per Submission No. 5. 277.2 As per Submission No. 5. 277.3 As per Submission No. 5. 277.4 As per Submission No. 5. 277.5 As per Submission No. 5.



278. Tony Chipping 278.1 As per Submission No. 5. 278.2 As per Submission No. 5. 278.3 As per Submission No. 5. 278.4 As per Submission No. 5. 278.5 As per Submission No. 5.







109

279. Gillian Chipping 279.1 As per Submission No. 5. 279.2 As per Submission No. 5. 279.3 As per Submission No. 5. 279.4 As per Submission No. 5. 279.5 As per Submission No. 5.



280. Pamela Frith 280.1 As per Submission No. 5. 280.2 As per Submission No. 5. 280.3 As per Submission No. 5. 280.4 As per Submission No. 5. 280.5 As per Submission No. 5.



281. Annita Gibbons 281.1 As per Submission No. 5. 281.2 As per Submission No. 5. 281.3 As per Submission No. 5. 281.4 As per Submission No. 5.







110




282. Pauline Barns 282.1 As per Submission No. 5. 282.2 As per Submission No. 5. 282.3 As per Submission No. 5. 282.4 As per Submission No. 5. 282.5 As per Submission No. 5.



283. Mary Thom 283.1 As per Submission No. 5. 283.2 As per Submission No. 5. 283.3 As per Submission No. 5. 283.4 As per Submission No. 5. 283.5 As per Submission No. 5.



284. S.D. Sherratt 284.1 As per Submission No. 5. 284.2 As per Submission No. 5. 284.3 As per Submission No. 5. 284.4







111




285. Robert Spruce 285.1 As per Submission No. 5. 285.2 As per Submission No. 5. 285.3 As per Submission No. 5. 285.4 As per Submission No. 5. 285.5 As per Submission No. 5.



286. Jean Matchett 286.1 As per Submission No. 5. 286.2 As per Submission No. 5. 286.3 As per Submission No. 5. 286.4 As per Submission No. 5. 286.5 As per Submission No. 5.



287. Lois Atyeo 287.1 As per Submission No. 5. 287.2 As per Submission No. 5. 287.3 As per Submission No. 5.







112




288. Bryce Atyeo 288.1 As per Submission No. 5. 288.2 As per Submission No. 5. 288.3 As per Submission No. 5. 288.4 As per Submission No. 5. 288.5 As per Submission No. 5.



289. Martin Smtih 289.1 As per Submission No. 5. 289.2 As per Submission No. 5. 289.3 As per Submission No. 5. 289.4 As per Submission No. 5. 289.5 As per Submission No. 5.



290. Jinda Kofalvi 290.1 As per Submission No. 5. 290.2 As per Submission No. 5.







113




291. R Drummond 291.1 As per Submission No. 5. 291.2 As per Submission No. 5. 291.3 As per Submission No. 5. 291.4 As per Submission No. 5. 291.5 As per Submission No. 5.



292. Phillip Day 292.1 As per Submission No. 5. 292.2 As per Submission No. 5. 292.3 As per Submission No. 5. 292.4 As per Submission No. 5. 292.5 As per Submission No. 5.



293. Ingrid Cutes 293.1 As per Submission No. 5. 293.2







114




294. Colin Spink 294.1 As per Submission No. 5. 294.2 As per Submission No. 5. 294.3 As per Submission No. 5. 294.4 As per Submission No. 5. 294.5 As per Submission No. 5.



295. Jannice Schutz 295.1 As per Submission No. 5. 295.2 As per Submission No. 5. 295.3 As per Submission No. 5. 295.4 As per Submission No. 5. 295.5 As per Submission No. 5.



296. Glenys Millington








115




297. Doris Lowing 297.1 As per Submission No. 5. 297.2 As per Submission No. 5. 297.3 As per Submission No. 5. 297.4 As per Submission No. 5. 297.5 As per Submission No. 5.



298. M.A. Nitschke 298.1 As per Submission No. 5. 298.2 As per Submission No. 5. 298.3 As per Submission No. 5. 298.4 As per Submission No. 5. 298.5 As per Submission No. 5.







116

299. Dorothy Jakeman




300. Robert Bothe 300.1 As per Submission No. 5. 300.2 As per Submission No. 5. 300.3 As per Submission No. 5. 300.4 As per Submission No. 5. 300.5 As per Submission No. 5.



301. K.J. Bothe 301.1 As per Submission No. 5. 301.2 As per Submission No. 5. 301.3 As per Submission No. 5. 301.4 As per Submission No. 5.







117




302. Phyllis Davies 302.1 As per Submission No. 5. 302.2 As per Submission No. 5. 302.3 As per Submission No. 5. 302.4 As per Submission No. 5. 302.5 As per Submission No. 5.



303. Colin Spink 303.1 As per Submission No. 5. 303.2 As per Submission No. 5. 303.3 As per Submission No. 5. 303.4 As per Submission No. 5. 303.5 As per Submission No. 5.



304. Alan Gill 304.1 As per Submission No. 5. 304.2 As per Submission No. 5. 304.3 As per Submission No. 5. 304.4







118




305. Donna Wilcox 305.1 As per Submission No. 5. 305.2 As per Submission No. 5. 305.3 As per Submission No. 5. 305.4 As per Submission No. 5. 305.5 As per Submission No. 5.



306. Ken Wilcox 306.1 As per Submission No. 5. 306.2 As per Submission No. 5. 306.3 As per Submission No. 5. 306.4 As per Submission No. 5. 306.5 As per Submission No. 5.



307. Bailey Sylvih 307.1 As per Submission No. 5. 307.2 As per Submission No. 5. 307.3 As per Submission No. 5.







119




308. Joy Cameron 308.1 As per Submission No. 5. 308.2 As per Submission No. 5. 308.3 As per Submission No. 5. 308.4 As per Submission No. 5. 308.5 As per Submission No. 5.



309. June Ogden 309.1 As per Submission No. 5. 309.2 As per Submission No. 5. 309.3 As per Submission No. 5. 309.4 As per Submission No. 5. 309.5 As per Submission No. 5.



310. Ray Moldon 310.1 As per Submission No. 5. 310.2 As per Submission No. 5.







120




311. Brian Pipe 311.1 As per Submission No. 5. 311.2 As per Submission No. 5. 311.3 As per Submission No. 5. 311.4 As per Submission No. 5. 311.5 As per Submission No. 5.



312. Jean Pipe 312.1 As per Submission No. 5. 312.2 As per Submission No. 5. 312.3 As per Submission No. 5. 312.4 As per Submission No. 5. 312.5 As per Submission No. 5.



313. Sylvia Belchambers








121




314. Frank Belchambers




315. Phillip Buxton 315.1 As per Submission No. 5. 315.2 As per Submission No. 5. 315.3 As per Submission No. 5. 315.4 As per Submission No. 5. 315.5 As per Submission No. 5.



316. Sylvia Buxton 316.1 As per Submission No. 5.







122




317. James Yates 317.1 As per Submission No. 5. 317.2 As per Submission No. 5. 317.3 As per Submission No. 5. 317.4 As per Submission No. 5. 317.5 As per Submission No. 5.



318. Sue Yates 318.1 As per Submission No. 5. 318.2 As per Submission No. 5. 318.3 As per Submission No. 5. 318.4 As per Submission No. 5. 318.5 As per Submission No. 5.







123

319. Christine Spencer




320. Rosemary Upton




321. Ruth French 321.1 As per Submission No. 5. 321.2 As per Submission No. 5. 321.3 As per Submission No. 5. 321.4 As per Submission No. 5.







124




322. Lucy & James Banham & Arnold







Attachment B - Summary and Response to Public Meeting Submissions

125

Attachment B – Summary and Response to Public Meeting Submissions

Report on each submission received (including summary, comments and action taken in response) Sub No.

Name Submission Summary Commentary Council Recommendation (re. DPA)

1. Kelvin Goldstone

1.1. Concerns with the traffic infrastructure suggested by the W&G report, in particular the location of the proposed roundabout which was anticipated at the time to be directly in front of the Hillier Residential Park entrance.

1.1. As a result of traffic discussions with DPTI and in relation to infrastructure requirements and funding, roundabouts are not now proposed at some locations. As the symbol on Structure Plan Map Ga/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement H is non-specific (it only indicates a “Traffic Control” device of some sort is envisaged), amendment of the Structure Plan is not considered necessary.


2. URPS/Banhams

2.1 Concern with most northern allotment being solely used for stormwater, rather than in combination with residential village use. 2.2 Amendment of structure plan to show the most northern allotment not being developed as passive open space. 2.3 Amendment to structure plan by removing the western most ‘Traffic Control’ symbol.

2.1 DPTI has confirmed that The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide – 2017 Update’ does not change the status of this allotment and it remains outside of the ‘urban growth area’. In line with the original SOI which the Minister agreed to no change is suggested. 2.2 It is suggested the structure plan be amended to show this allotment as primarily being used for stormwater detention purposes with screening landscaping. It is not required as public open space. 2.3 As a result of traffic discussions with DPTI and in relation to infrastructure requirements and funding, roundabouts are not now proposed at some locations. As the symbol on Structure Plan Map Ga/1 (Overlay 1)

2.1 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 2.2 Amend the structure plan as suggested to show this allotments primarily being used for stormwater detention purposes with screening landscaping. 2.3 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval.




Attachment B - Summary and Response to Public Meeting Submissions

126

Enlargement H is non-specific (it only indicates a “Traffic Control” device of some sort is envisaged), amendment of the Structure Plan is not considered necessary.

3. Marisa Pozenel 3.1 Wished to see her land included in the DPA.

3.1 The subject land in this DPA is located within the ‘Deferred Urban Zone’ and as a result is considered a logical and sequential extension to Gawler’s land supply for residential development. Ms Pozenel’s land is not located within the Deferred Urban Zone.


4. Graham Brookman

4.1 Concerns relating to stormwater potentially leading to unnatural flooding and wastage of potential aquifer recharge water. 4.2 Concerns with traffic configurations suggested in traffic engineering documents and mapping.

4.1 Council investigated this option to find the volume of available water would make aquifer recharge unviable. 4.2 Since this time, Council has worked with the State Government and undertaken further traffic investigations with W & G Engineering. A number of the initial traffic measures suggested for Infrastructure Agreement discussions are now not being pursued. As the symbols on Structure Plan Map Ga/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement H are non-specific (only indicating a “Traffic Control” device of some sort is envisaged), amendment of the Structure Plan is not considered necessary.





Attachment C - Summary and Response to Agency Submissions

127

Attachment C – Summary and Response to Agency Submissions

Report on each submission received (including summary, comments and action taken in response) Sub No.

Name Submission Summary Planning Department Comment IES Recommendation to Council

1. SA Health 1.1 That Council be mindful of recycled water quality requirements for the proposed wetland and recycled water reuse component as per the Australian Guidelines 23 for Water Recycling: Managing Health and Environmental Risks (Phase 2) -Stormwater Harvesting and Reuse.

1.1. The response has been noted, further action will occur at development stages.


2. South Australian Metropolitan Fire Services

2.1. It is expected that buildings will comply with the Building Code of Australia, SA Water will supply street mains with the normal fire plug access and that the Department of Road Transport will maintain adequate roadways for emergency vehicle access.

2.1. No action is proposed. It is a legislative requirement that buildings are assessed and constructed in accordance with the Building Code of Australia. In relation to issues associated with water supply and access there are sufficient provisions within the Development Plan to ensure that any future development has appropriate water supply and access.


3. Light Regional Council

3.1 The Light Regional Council has no comment to make in regard to this DPA.

3.1 No action is proposed.






128

4. Renewal SA 4.1 Notes that Council may wish to include the SA Planning Library’s affordable housing incentive/concessions. 4.2 Notes that the ‘Affordable Housing Overlay’ is encouraged for all areas being rezoned for residential purposes.

4.1 Evanston Gardens/Evanston South/Hillier Residential Policy Area 4 provisions already include reference to affordable housing in Objective 1 and PDCs 24 and 25. Residential Park Zone provisions also contain references to affordable housing in Objective 1 and the Desired Character statement. 4.2 While similar policies also apply in the Residential (Gawler East) Zone, no associated ‘Affordable Housing Overlay’ maps are currently provided in Council’s Development Plan. Given the limited nature of this DPA and the need to provide a consistent approach to this issue across the Council area, it is suggested this matter be considered further by Council in any future residential review.


5. South Australian Police (SAPOL)

5.1 SAPOL does not have any comment at this time.

5.1 Although SAPOL have no specific comments to make, they have offered the assistance of a representative to provide Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) guidance in later stages.


6. SA Water

6.1 SA Water highlights the DPA makes adequate reference to the provision of water, water infrastructure and the possibility of an augmentation charge.

6.1 The response has been noted and no action is proposed.






129

7. Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure Transport Services Division

7.1 The trip generation rates utilised in the assessments undertaken are too low. 7.2

7.1 Following the closure of the public consultation period on 14 October 2017, Council met with DPTI senior officers on 8 February 2017 regarding Transport Services Division concerns, the main one being that traffic flows would be impeded by the installation of roundabouts and the Department would not support them. Also, no access would be allowed onto Angle Vale Road and access should be provided only to Hillier Road. At a meeting on 1 June 2017, Council requested consideration of the access onto Angle Vale Road due to the roundabout solution being unacceptable and SIDRA analysis was then requested by the Department. Further detailed analysis was undertaken by Council’s consultant engineers Wallbridge Gilbert Aztec, resulting in the Department’s acceptance on 29 September 2017 of an access onto Angle Vale Road and the proposed design incorporating seagull T-junctions for Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and Hillier Road. Changes to Coventry Road and roundabouts are long term traffic interventions and are not required to facilitate traffic movements associated with future developments enabled by this DPA.

7.1 None of the traffic interventions have resulted in amendments being required to the DPA. No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 7.2





130

Traffic modelling is required to be undertaken utilising applicable traffic projections. 7.3 The requirement for roundabouts has not been adequately demonstrated. Insufficient traffic modelling has been undertaken. DPTI’s recommendation is to carry out traffic modelling on the arterial road network for the current DPTI planning horizon (2036). 7.4 The department has questioned the necessity of a number of additional traffic interventions suggested in the W&G report including: a roundabout at the Jack Cooper Drive and Angle Vale Road junction; and the realignment of Coventry Road and conversion of T-intersection into a roundabout. 7.5 DPTI states that the anticipated costs in the report for recommended traffic interventions and upgrades is too low and that a mechanism be put in place to allow for the equitable contribution from all parties (including the subject DPA sites) to fund these upgrades. 7.6

7.2 Please see Item 7.1 above. 7.3 Please see Item 7.1 above. 7.4 Please see Item 7.1 above. 7.5 Costs are indicative only. DPTI has indicated the future developers will be required to enter into a Deed of Agreement regarding works relating to the roads under their care and control (Jack Cooper Drive and Angle Vale Road). No action from the proponents is required in conjunction with the DPA. Council will negotiate with the proponents regarding Hillier Road.

Please see Item 7.1 above. 7.3 Please see Item 7.1 above. 7.4 Please see Item 7.1 above. 7.5 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 7.6





131

DPTI state there are currently no funding plans in place to provide additional bus services as suggested in the structure plan 7.7 Note was made that the report shows the relocation of bus stop 169. DPTI have stated if required this will be at the cost of the developer. 7.8 DPTI suggest that Council liaise with the Department regarding the upgrades, suggestions and an updated traffic analysis.

7.6 Comment noted – Council staff consider an additional bus service in the area to be a desirable outcome and will continue to lobby for additional public transport services. 7.7 Comment noted. 7.8 Please see Item 7.1 above.

No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 7.7 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 7.8 Please see Item 7.1 above.

8. Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure Strategic and Development Planning Section

8.1 Removal of areas from the ‘General Bushfire Risk’ classification in Bushfire Protection Area Figure Ga(BPA)/3. The figure excludes a number of relevant parcels which the Department wish to see the CFS is support of. 8.2 The Structure Plan MAP Ga/1 indicates medium density living to occur in the south western corner of the ‘Living’ area (new Residential Zone adjacent Angle Vale Rd). This is not made reference to sufficiently in the Desired Character Statement.

8.1 Comment regarding the removal of the classification from the CFS has now been received. The CFS have showed support to exclude the site south of Hillier Road from the Bushfire Protection Area, however does not support the exclusions of the sites north of Hillier Road. 8.2 Comment noted.

8.1 Amend the Bushfire Protection Area Map (Figure Ga(BPA)/3) to maintain the sites north of Hillier Road within the Bushfire Protection Area. 8.2 It is recommended that the following wording be added at the end of the Desired Character statements contained in Attachments H: ‘Medium density development is envisioned to occur in the south western corner of the ‘Living’ area (Residential Zone adjacent Angle Vale Rd), these developments will have direct access to quality open space as well as education and





132

8.3 The DPA is proposing to include several areas to the Residential Code maps. Finalised maps are required post consultation for approval and a separate gazette notice will be required, in the instance the DPA is approved. 8.4 If any agency requires maps to be amended, adobe illustrator versions of the maps will need to be provided to the Department prior to approval.

8.3 DPTI has confirmed this matter does now not need to be addressed in this DPA. DPTI will consider this matter as part of a future, wider review across a number of Council areas. 8.4 Comment noted.

community facilities’. 8.3 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 8.4 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval.

9. Natural Resources Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges

9.1 Notes that the DPA has made appropriate deliberations in regard to water quality improvements and water reuse through proposed utilisation of numerous provisions. 9.2 Suggestion was made for Council to amend their water quality targets to align them with State Government’s guidelines for water sensitive urban design, and, if appropriate, incorporate them into Council’s Development Plan. 9.3 Council should investigate if drainage off the northern allotment through non-structural solutions is

9.1 Comment noted. 9.2 DPTI has advised that WSUD water quality targets are a broad issue that should be applied Council wide and not included as part of this smaller DPA. The integration of these targets into land use policy will be addressed by DPTI at a later date. Council can, however, adopt the latest targets irrespective of whether they are listed in the Development Plan or not. 9.3 Stormwater management advice received from Australian Water Environments (AWE) indicates that a

9.1 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 9.2 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 9.3 No change is required to the stormwater management policies (as proposed by AWE) and exhibited in the consultation version of the DPA.





133

possible without effecting the private property located just north of the subject land.

suitably sized infiltration basin, located on the lower portion of the northern allotment adjacent to Clifford Road, can be designed to cater for a 1:100 storm event. In effect, such a basin would act as a detention basin with the outlet through infiltration, rather than an overflow outlet. This effectively meets Council’s guideline from its Standards and Requirements for Land Development/Land Division (2011) document, which requires ‘Storms up to and including a 1:100 year event must be contained within the site without causing inundation of the dwelling and surrounding properties until such time as the floodwaters can subside.’ In those rare extreme events of a greater than a 1:100 ARI event, overtopping of the basin would result in pooling on the land adjacent to the north in the low lying area in front of the private residence. It is understood this house has been constructed on a raised pad some 1200mm above the natural ground level and has a finished floor level a further 600mm above the pad height, giving a total level of some 1800mm above the “natural surrounding ground level.” It is expected this low lying land would be awash with water prior to any overflow occurring from the basin. AWE has indicated a number of advantages in using an infiltration basin as compared to a detention basin with a





134

9.4 The subject parcels are not near lands managed by DEWNR and as a result are not of concern from a DEWNR fire management perspective, however Council should carefully consider the judgement to exclude the areas from the General Bushfire Risk Category. 9.5 Recommendation made that water sensitive urban design, green infrastructure objectives and community open spaces are encouraged through every aspect of the development.

more traditional channelized overflow path. Given the AWE advice that the currently proposed stormwater management measures will meet the required 1:100 year standard, and that there are advantages in using an infiltration basin over a detention basin and more traditional channelized overflow path, it is recommended that no changes be made to the current policies in the DPA. This issue will be further discussed during infrastructure negotiations. 9.4 Refer to point 8.1 9.5 Council’s Development Plan already contains a number of policies requiring consideration of these matters (i.e. Council wide PDC 48, Objectives 1 and 4 and discussion in the Desired Character statement for the Evanston Gardens/Evanston South/Hillier Residential Policy Area 4). Additional support is provided in policies proposed in this DPA.

9.4 Refer to point 8.1 9.5 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval.





135

9.6 The DPA takes into consideration the sub region’s key priorities, of particular relevance to this DPA being: - Support land use planning to

minimise the impact of current and future urban growth to the natural environment; and

- Protect and restore the Light and Gawler rivers’ riparian zones for improved biodiversity and water quality outcomes.

9.7 Mention was made that the northern allotment located within the rural zone falls outside of the ‘planned urban lands to 2038’ identified by the 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide and that it is recommended the DPA remains consistent with the plan.

No further action is considered necessary in this DPA. 9.6 Comment noted – The Gawler Development Plan contains sufficient provisions for dealing with matters relating to natural resource management. 9.7 DPTI have confirmed that the ‘Draft Update of the 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide’ does not change the status of this allotment and remains outside of the ‘urban growth area’. In line with the original SOI which the Minister agreed to no change is suggested.


10.

Environment Protection Authority

10.1 The proposed policy changes in the DPA relating to attachments F, H and I are all supported by the EPA. 10.2 An overflow path be constructed for the retention basin proposed in the northern allotments. This overflow path should be designed to direct floodwater away from nearby properties.

10.1 Comment noted. No action is proposed. 10.2 See earlier discussion on this issue under 9.3.






136

10.3 Stormwater re-use for watering of parks or council owned landscaped areas should be considered. 10.4 Consideration be given to who will be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of any WSUD elements proposed to ensure optimum performance of the stormwater management system. 10.5 MUSIC modelling be conducted on the final proposed stormwater management systems for both the northern and southern allotments to ensure EPA water quality objectives will be met. 10.6 A construction environmental management plan be developed for the sites to outline methods proposed for managing stormwater flow during the construction phase of the development. 10.7 The EPA support plans to introduce policies from the SAPPL concerning site contamination. 10.8 Recommendation to alter the Desired Character Statements be amended to identify the potential for site contamination and the need for further investigations prior to

10.3 Comment noted. 10.4 Water sensitive urban design principles are addressed in the current Development Plan. These will be incorporated into the assessment of future development applications. 10.5 This will occur at the development assessment stage. 10.6 Comment noted. Such plans will be requested during the development assessment phase. 10.7 Comment noted. No action is proposed. 10.8 The DPA introduces the latest version of site contamination policies from the SAPPL. In addition, preliminary investigations indicate the potential for site contamination is considered to be

10.3 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 10.4 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 10.5 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 10.6 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 10.7 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 10.8 It is recommended that the following wording be added at the end of the Desired Character statements contained in Attachments F and H: ‘Preliminary investigations indicate that the





137

residential development occurring. 10.9 The EPA supports proposed amendments to combat noise and air emissions. 10.10 The EPA recommend that the Interface between Land Uses Module from the SAPPL be incorporated into the DPA as it contains further air and noise policies.

low. Notwithstanding this, additional wording can be provided in the Desired Character statements (for both land parcels) to require further consideration of this matter prior to residential development occurring. 10.9 Comment noted. No action is proposed. 10.10 Comment noted.

potential for site contamination is low. However, further investigations may be required prior to residential development occurring to confirm this.’ 10.9 No changes suggested. The DPA is recommended for approval. 10.10 Incorporate the Interface between Land Uses Module from the SAPPL into Council’s Development Plan.




Attachment D – Timeframe Report

139

Attachment D – Timeframe Report

SCPA Timeframe Report: Process B – with consultation approval

The SOI was agreed by the Minister and Council on 21 April 2015

Key steps Period agreed to in SOI Actual time taken Reason for difference (if applicable)

Investigations conducted and DPA prepared

20 weeks 81 weeks Delay caused by investigations taking a longer period of time than originally expected. Preparing and negotiating the terms of an Infrastructure Agreement

Agency and public consultation period (report on any delays incurred by agencies

8 Weeks 9 Weeks To ensure the required 8 week period was provided (allowing time in case of unforeseen circumstances arising).

Public Hearing held, submissions summarised and DPA amended in accordance with Council’s assessment of submissions. Summary of Consultations and Proposed Amendments submitted to Minister for approval.

12 Weeks 61 weeks Extended negotiations with the DPTI – Transport Division regarding traffic implications and additional engineering analysis being ultimately required to a level deemed satisfactory and justified. Preparing and negotiating Infrastructure Agreements with the proponents.




Attachment E – Schedule 4A Certificate

140

Attachment E – Schedule 4A Certificate

CERTIFICATION BY COUNCIL’S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2008

SCHEDULE 4A

Development Act 1993 – Section 25 (10) – Certificate - Public Consultation

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER THAT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (DPA) IS SUITABLE FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC

CONSULTATION I, Henry Inat, as Chief Executive Officer of the Town of Gawler, certify that the Statement of Investigations, accompanying this DPA, sets out the extent to which the proposed amendment or amendments-

(a) accord with the Statement of Intent (as agreed between the Town of Gawler and the Minister under section 25(1) of the Act) and, in particular, all of the items set out in Regulation 9 of the Development Regulations 2008; and

(b) accord with the Planning Strategy, on the basis that each relevant provision of the Planning Strategy that related to the amendment or amendment has been specifically identified and addressed, including by an assessment of the impacts of each policy reflected in the amendment or amendments against the Planning Strategy, and on the basis that any policy which does not fully or in part accord with the Planning Strategy has been specifically identified and an explanation setting out the reason or reasons for the departure from the Planning Strategy has been included in the Statement of Investigation; and

(c) accord with the other parts of the Development Plan (being those parts not affected by the amendment or amendments); and

(d) complement the policies in the Development Plans for adjoining areas; and

(e) satisfy the other matters (if any) prescribed under section 25(10)(e) of the Development Act 1993.

The following person or persons have provided advice to the council for the purposes of section 25(4) of the Act:

• Geoff Butler, RPIA – Senior Associate at URPS • Grazio Maiorano, RPIA (Fellow) – Director at URPS

DATED this "Insert Date" day of "Insert Month" 2017 ………………………………………… Henry Inat Chief Executive Officer




Attachment F – Schedule 4B Certificate

141

Attachment F – Schedule 4B Certificate

Schedule 4B—Certificate—section 25(14)(b) Certificate of chief executive officer that an amendment to a Development Plan is suitable for approval

I, Henry Inat, as Chief Executive Officer of the Town of Gawler, certify, in relation to the proposed amendment or amendments to Town of Gawler Development Plan, as last consolidated on 28 April 2016, referred to in the report accompanying this certificate—

(a) that the council has complied with the requirements of section 25 of the Development Act 1993 and that the amendment or amendments are in a correct and appropriate form; and

(b) in relation to any alteration to the amendment or amendments recommended by the council in its report under section 25(13)(a) of the Act, that the amendment or amendments (as altered)—

(i) accord with the Planning Strategy, on the basis that each relevant provision of the Planning Strategy that relates to the amendment or amendments has been specifically identified and addressed, including by an assessment of the impacts of each policy reflected in the amendment or amendments against the Planning Strategy, and on the basis that any policy which does not fully or in part accord with the Planning Strategy has been specifically identified and an explanation setting out the reason or reasons for the departure from the Planning Strategy has been included in the report of the council; and

(ii) accord with the other parts of the Development Plan (being those parts not affected by the amendment or amendments); and

(iii) complement the policies in the Development Plans for adjoining areas; and

(iv) satisfy the other matters (if any) prescribed under section 25(14)(b)(ii) of the Development Act 1993; and

(c) that the report by the council sets out a comprehensive statement of the reasons for any failure to complying with any time set for any relevant step under section 25 of the Act; and

(d) that the following person or persons have provided professional advice to the council for the purposes of section 25(13)(a) of the Act:

• Henry Inat, FPIA

DATED this "Insert Date" day of "Insert Month" 2017

....................................................................................

Chief Executive Officer



http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/index.aspx?action=legref&type=act&legtitle=Development%20Act%201993




Attachment G – Additional Matters and Investigations

142


As discussed earlier in this Report, an additional matter was identified by Council after the consultation

process on the Evanston Gardens DPA.

Council’s Commercial and Rural Areas DPA, which was on public consultation from 26 September to 21

November 2017, is seeking to rezone a small parcel of Council owned land (abutting the Area Affected in the

Evanston Gardens DPA) from Residential to Business Zone.

Council has identified that this site would be suitably located to accommodate a modern petrol filling station

with an associated small shop. This would provide access to petrol and convenience items to otherwise

relatively isolated residents.

However, Concept Plan Figure NCe(EG)/1 in the Neighbourhood Centre (Evanston Gardens) Zone indicates

a site for “Future Petrol Filling Station / Service Trade Premises” on adjacent land to the west of the Council

land, within the Area Affected by the Evanston Gardens DPA.

Council is endeavouring to avoid any potential uncertainty concerning this western land parcel in the

Concept Plan as it considers it should be used solely for residential purposes. To this end, Council is

proposing to amend the Concept Plan via the Evanston Gardens DPA to remove wording relating to “Future

Petrol Filling Station / Service Trade Premises” to better reflect the objectives of this DPA.

Under the “Need for the amendment” section in the draft Commercial and Rural Areas DPA, the following

discussion was provided in support of Council’s proposal to rezone its land at Evanston Gardens:

The Evanston Gardens site is currently within the Residential Zone and particularly Policy Area 4 – Evanston

Gardens/Evanston South Residential and is located on the corner of Jack Cooper Drive and Angle Vale

Road. It has previously been used by both the Country Fire Services and Council as a depot.

This parcel of land would be difficult to develop for residential land uses due to its size and location, being

triangular in shape with extensive frontages along both Angle Vale Road and Jack Cooper Drive, which are

arterial roads under the care and control of DPTI.

The draft Evanston Gardens DPA notes that this site is likely to be impacted by traffic noise. Given its

elongated road frontage and narrow depth, as a standalone parcel this may well result in the proposed

development turning its back on these roads thus providing a street frontage of solid fencing.

It is also possible that this site, even if amalgamated with adjoining land currently zoned deferred urban, will

be required for noise attenuation measures for a residential land use. Conversely, the site’s exposure, road





143

frontages and location are all positive attributes for the use of the site as a commercial site which will buffer

the residential land behind from noise.

In particular, the site is in close proximity to developing residential areas not well serviced with commercial

facilities. In order to access such facilities, residents must cross the by-pass, which forms both a physical

and psychological barrier.

Council has identified that this site would be suitably located to accommodate a modern petrol filling station

with an associated small shop. This would provide access to petrol and convenience items to these

otherwise relatively isolated residents.

To this end, the site could be excised from the Residential zone and changed to a zone that enables a use of

the site that supports the neighbourhood and takes advantages of aspects of the site and its locality that

would otherwise not be possible.



Town of Gawler

Evanston

Gardens DPA

Review

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT

Job No. WAD151176 / Rev A 15 September 2017

ATTACHMENT 2



i WGA Evanston Gardens DPA Review Job No. WAD151176 / Rev A

Revision History

Rev Date Issue Originator Checker Approver

A 15/09/17 For Information MOF HB HB



ii WGA Evanston Gardens DPA Review Job No. WAD151176 / Rev A

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 SUMMARY OF EVENTS .............................................................................................................. 2

2 SUBDIVISION ACCESS ...................................................................................................................... 3

3 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ......................................................................................................... 4 3.1 JACK COOPER DRIVE ................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 ANGLE VALE ROAD .................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 HILLER ROAD / JACK COOPER DRIVE JUNCTION .................................................................. 5

4 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES .................................................................................................... 6 4.1 SCENARIO 1: SINGLE ACCESS ................................................................................................. 7 4.2 SCENARIO 2: DUAL ACCESS ..................................................................................................... 8

5 TURN WARRANTS FOR ANGLE VALE ROAD JUNCTION ........................................................... 10

6 SIDRA ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................. 12 6.1 SCENARIO 1: SINGLE ACCESS ............................................................................................... 12 6.2 SCENARIO 2: DUAL ACCESS ................................................................................................... 14

7 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................. 16

8 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 18 8.1 HILLIER ROAD / JACK COOPER DRIVE .................................................................................. 18 8.2 NEW SOUTHERN ACCESS (ANGLE VALE ROAD) ................................................................. 18

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A SHORT TERM AND LONG TERM INTERVENTION PLANS

APPENDIX B TRAFFIC COUNTS

APPENDIX C DPTI MEETING MINUTES / NOTES 08/02/2017



1 WGA Evanston Gardens DPA Review Job No. WAD151176 / Rev A

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

The following report summarises the additional modelling undertaken by WGA following the meeting with the Town of Gawler (Council) on the 29/8/2017 and consolidates the analysis and findings from the previous two working papers.

As part of this analysis, Council has requested that the total number of allotments used for the traffic generation from Hillier Park residential village (shown as Area 9 in Figure 1) be reduced from 150 to 70 dwellings.

Figure 1: Locality Plan

DPTI noted that the land at the corner of Angle Vale Road identified in the Commericial and Rural areas DOI (southeast corner of Area 8) is likely to be more appropriately rezoned as residential. Council advices that this is irrelevant for this DPA and a separate DPA will be issued for this land.




1.2 SUMMARY OF EVENTS

The Evanston DPA review process has been ongoing since late 2015 where Council engaged WGA to review the traffic and stormwater infrastructure for a larger area encapsulating a proposed Development Plan Amendment presented to Council. The following is a summary of events:

• March 2016 the following reports were issued to Council

– 151176rp001 – Traffic Assessment Report

• Reviewing the traffic infrastructure for the wide development area.

– 151176rp002 – Stormwater Assessment Report

• Reviewing the stormwater infrastructure for the wide development area.

– 151176rp003 – DPA Assessment Report.

• Reviewing the DPA submission in context with the wider infrastructure planning outlined in report 001 and 002.

• February 2017 Developer and Authority responses received.

– URPS – Developer Planner responses

– DPTI

– EPA

• February 2017 DPTI/ WGA/ Council meeting held to discuss the DPTI responses. Refer copy of the minutes enclosed.

– DPTI confirmed new development traffic to be directed out onto Hiller road only.

– Requested additional modelling be completed to demonstrate the need for the proposed interventions.

– DPTI to provide 2036 Traffic Data for use.

• March 2017 WGA Responses provided, inclusive of the SIDRA modelling justifying the need of the roundabout interventions. WGA completed the SIDRA modelling based upon a sensitivity analysis projecting the available traffic data.

• April/ May 2017 DPTI advise the 2036 data not available, the Council need to undertake traffic counts in order for DPTI to develop the data.

• June 2017 Council requested a meeting DPTI elevating to their key Development Assessment personnel. Meeting held on the 1/6/2017 to discuss, actions as follows:

– WGA to review the SIDRA modelling based upon utilising two access points to the proposed DPA land, 1) via Hiller road, 2) via Angle Vale Road.

– Modelling to be based upon a sensitivity analysis in projecting the current data available.

– A short term and long-term plan to be reviewed, noting the initial DPA may not trigger the full scope of works on day one.

• August 2017 Following advice received from DPTI, Council met with WGA to resolve the following matters, actions as follows:

– WGA to expand SIDRA modelling to include analysis of proposed new intersection with Angle Vale Road, both short-term and long-term.

– SIDRA analysis to be expanded to include both AM and PM peak periods of a typical business day, with two scenarios tested, one being for all development traffic being accommodated (i.e. no access to Angle Vale Road) and the other based on the additional direct access to Angle Vale Road.

– WGA to provide assurance on the basis of SIDRA analysis that the resulting level of service is acceptable.

– WGA to prepare concept plans indicating likely intersection and lane geometry required to accommodate proposed intersection layouts and how existing network constraints can be appropriately accommodated and/or modified.




2 SUBDIVISION ACCESS

Two accesses to the residential subdivision have been considered. The approximate locations of the junctions are shown in Figure 2. The modelling has been undertaken for two scenarios:

• Scenario 1: Single access to subdivision on Hillier Road only.

• Scenario 2: Dual access to subdivision on Hillier Road and Angle Vale Road.

Figure 2: Location of Proposed T-Junctions




3 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Traffic volumes have been assessed based on existing DPTI counts for Jack Cooper Drive and Angle Vale Road. The existing counts have been included as Appendix B.

3.1 JACK COOPER DRIVE

Existing volumes on Jack Cooper Drive are as follows:

• 5400 AADT on Jack Cooper Drive

AM Peak (8:30am – 9:30am)

• 190 vehicles/hour – Southbound

• 220 vehicles/hour – Northbound

PM Peak (4:30pm – 5:30pm)

• 230 vehicles/hour – Southbound

• 265 vehicles/hour – Northbound

3.2 ANGLE VALE ROAD

Existing volumes on Angle Vale Road are as follows:

• 3100 AADT on Angle Vale Road

AM Peak (8:30am – 9:30am)

• 150* vehicles/hour – Westbound

• 130 vehicles/hour – Eastbound

*It is noted that the westbound peak volume occurs earlier than the overall peak at approximately 7:30am.

PM Peak (5:30pm – 6:30pm)

• 220 vehicles/hour – Westbound

• 100 vehicles/hour – Eastbound




3.3 HILLER ROAD / JACK COOPER DRIVE JUNCTION

No DPTI traffic counts were available for the intersection of Hillier Road and Jack Cooper Drive. Therefore, WGA has undertaken manual traffic counts at the intersection on Tuesday 27th June 2017 at 4pm-5pm during the weekday peak afternoon period and on Thursday 7th September 2017 between 8:30am and 9:30am. The observed traffic volumes are as follows:

AM Peak:

• 42 vehicles/hour – Right In

• 8 vehicles/hour – Right Out

• 16 vehicles/hour – Left In

• 74 vehicles/hour – Left Out

PM Peak:

• 12 vehicles/hour – Right In

• 19 vehicles/hour – Right Out

• 10 vehicles/hour – Left In

• 58 vehicles/hour – Left Out

The site visit also revealed a maximum wait time of approximately 8 seconds for the right turn out of Hillier Road.




4 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES

The projected traffic generation of the development has been based on rates from the Draft Gawler Transport and Traffic Management Plan, DPTI Trip Generation Rates for Assessment of Development Proposals (2014), ITE guidelines and RTA guidelines. The following areas will contribute to the performance of the two accesses to the development, as shown in Figure 3:

• Area 1 – Residential

• Area 2 – Recreational

• Area 3 – Recreational


• Area 6- Educational


• Area 9 - Retirement

Figure 3: Contributing Catchments

The generated traffic volumes for each development area are summarised in Table 1: Proposed Development Area Peak Hour Traffic Generation

Table 1: Proposed Development Area Peak Hour Traffic Generation




Development Area

Units Trip Rate Incoming Trips

Outgoing Trips

Total Trips

Area 1 156 Allotments 0.65 per unit 65 35 100

Area 2 9.8 Hectares 0.02 per hectare

0 0 0

Area 3 7.9 Hectares 0.02 per hectare

0 0 0


Area 6 120 Students 0.28 per student

23 12 35


Area 9 70^ Allotments 0.2 per unit 9 5 14

Total New Trips (Peak Hour) 242 127 369

^reduced from 150 as requested by Gawler Council

The projected traffic generation of the development is the following for the afternoon peak hour (critical) period:

• 250 vehicles/hour – into the development

• 130 vehicles/hour – out of the development

Jack Cooper Drive represents approximately 64% of the combined AADT. Therefore, it has been assumed that two-thirds of the traffic accessing the development will be travelling to/from the north via Jack Cooper Drive and one-third of the traffic will be travelling to/from the west via Angle Vale Road.

4.1 SCENARIO 1: SINGLE ACCESS

Analysis has also been undertaken assuming a single access only on Hillier Road.

The projected volumes are summarised in Figure 4.




Figure 4: Projected Traffic Volumes from Development (Single Access)

4.2 SCENARIO 2: DUAL ACCESS

In order to generate the split between the two entrances, the following assumptions have been made:

• 80% of out northbound traffic use the left turn at Hillier, 20% use the left turn at southern access.

• 80% of out westbound traffic use the right turn at southern access, 20% use the right turn at Hillier.

• 80% of the inbound traffic from the north use the right turn at Hillier, 20% use the right turn at the southern access.

• 80% of the inbound traffic from the west use the left turn at the southern access, 20% use the left turn at Hillier.

The projected volumes are summarised in Figure 5.

Left In: 80

Left Out: 85

Right In: 162

Right Out: 42




Figure 5: Projected Traffic Volumes from Development (Dual Accesses)

Left In: 16

Left Out: 68

Right In: 130

Right Out: 8

Left In: 64

Left Out: 17

Right In: 32

Right Out: 34




5 TURN WARRANTS FOR ANGLE

VALE ROAD JUNCTION

In order to determine the most appropriate arrangement for the proposed junction on Angle Vale Road, the existing traffic volumes have been analysed in accordance with Figure 4.9 from Austroads Part 4A, as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Turn Warrants for Angle Vale Road Junction

It can be seen from Figure 6 that the junction on Angle Vale meets the Austroads warrant for a basic left turn

(BAL) treatment and an a channelised right turn (CHR) treatment. Examples of each are shown in Figure 7 and

Figure 8.

QL = 65 veh/h,

QM = 100 (existing) + 80 (dev)

= 180 veh/h

QR = 32 veh/h,

QM = 220 + 100 (existing) + 80 +

32 (dev)

= 432 veh/h




Figure 7: Typical BAL Arrangement

Figure 8: Typical CHR Arrangement




6 SIDRA ANALYSIS

6.1 SCENARIO 1: SINGLE ACCESS

Analysis has been undertaken using the software package, SIDRA 7.0, to assess the performance of the intersection. The existing arrangement has been modelled using the existing traffic volumes in addition to the projected development volumes assuming single access only, as discussed in Section 4.

Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the results of the modelling, which indicate satisfactory performance with all movements reaching Level of Service (LOS) greater than C at the Hillier Rd / Jack Cooper Drive intersection.

Figure 9: SIDRA Analysis showing LOS for existing + development traffic for Hillier Rd / Jack Cooper Drive (AM)

LOS Indicator




Figure 10: SIDRA Analysis showing LOS for existing + development traffic for Hillier Rd / Jack Cooper Drive (PM)

The SIDRA guidelines (Table 11.2 and Table 5.14.5) are shown above, which relate delay and degree of saturation to a given Level of Service depending on the intersection type.




6.2 SCENARIO 2: DUAL ACCESS

Analysis has been undertaken using the software package, SIDRA 7.0, to assess the performance of the intersection. The existing arrangement has been modelled using the existing traffic volumes in addition to the projected development volumes assuming dual accesses, as discussed in Section 4.

Figures Figure 11 to Figure 14 show the results of the modelling, which indicate satisfactory performance with all movements reaching Level of Service (LOS) A or B, at both accesses.

Figure 11: SIDRA Analysis showing LOS for existing + development traffic for Hillier Rd / Jack Cooper Drive (AM)

Figure 12: SIDRA Analysis showing LOS for existing + development traffic for Hillier Rd / Jack Cooper Drive (PM)




Figure 13: SIDRA Analysis showing LOS for existing + development traffic for Angle Vale Rd Access (AM)

Figure 14: SIDRA Analysis showing LOS for existing + development traffic for Angle Vale Rd Access (PM)




7 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

2036 traffic demand projections have not been made available to WGA. Therefore, a manual sensitivity analysis has been undertaken to assess the performance of the junction under a range of growth scenarios.

Figure 15 shows the performance of the intersection in terms of delay and degree of saturation as the existing traffic is increased from the current volumes. It can be seen that the delay on the right turn from Hillier (worst movement) increases above 35 seconds (LOS E) after an approximate 30% increase on existing traffic volumes if dual access are provided. If a single access only is provided, the delay increases to LOS E after an approximate 10% increase in existing traffic volumes (Figure 16).

Figure 15: Sensitivity Analysis on Volumes at Existing Intersection with Dual Accesses

LOS C/D

LOS E

% Increase on Existing Traffic Volumes




Figure 16: Sensitivity Analysis on Volumes at Existing Intersection with Single Access

% Increase on Existing Traffic Volumes

LOS C/D

LOS E




8 CONCLUSIONS

8.1 HILLIER ROAD / JACK COOPER DRIVE

Given the introduction of a second access point to the subdivision on Angle Vale Road, SIDRA analysis has revealed that, in the short term, the existing arrangement at the junction of Jack Cooper Drive and Hillier Road has sufficient capacity to cater for the increased traffic demand from the development.

A sensitivity analysis has revealed that when existing traffic volumes increase by approximately 30%, the right turn out of Hillier Drive reaches LOS E. At this stage, or should projected data become available from DPTI, a seagull arrangement may be adopted to improve the LOS on the right turn from Hillier Road, as this would allow for a two-staged right turn. Concept plans for this junction have been included as Appendix A.

If traffic volumes increase further, or faster than expected, a roundabout option may be considered for the T-junction.

Roundabouts are generally considered to have a number of safety benefits over a priority controlled T-junction due to:

• Reduction in traffic speed passing through the intersection from all legs.

• Elimination of high angles of conflict ensuring low relative speeds between conflicting vehicles.

• Reduction in the number of conflict points

• Relative simplicity of decision making at the point of entry

Additionally, studies have shown that the installation of roundabouts results in crash reductions of up to 75% in overall crashes and injury crashes.

8.2 NEW SOUTHERN ACCESS (ANGLE VALE ROAD)

Based on expected traffic volumes and the Austroads turn warrants, it is recommended that the new T-junction on Angle Vale Road consist of the following in the short term:

• Basic Left Turn (BAL) Treatment

• Channelised Right Turn (CHR) Treatment

The longer term option for this junction will be to realign nearby Coventry Road to a 4-way signalised intersection. Concepts for these two options have been included as Appendix A.




APPENDIX A

SHORT TERM AND

LONG TERM

INTERVENTION PLANS




APPENDIX B

TRAFFIC COUNTS



Classification Summary Report TG882651_201203 site no 6271.xlsm

Location Details Meter Type MetroCount

Road No. 5000 Road Name ANGLE VALE ROAD Site 6271

Location 1km NE Dalkeith Rd. View Location in Google Maps AMG TG882651

Imagery may not be current

RRD 14.05 Locality

INSERT MAP HERE

Count Period : Thursday 15/03/2012 to Wednesday 21/03/2012 inclusive

Count Summary

5 Day Average Daily Traffic (two way) 3205 Heavy Vehicles (two way) 5 day average 255

7 Day Average Daily Traffic (two way) 2997 Heavy Vehicles (two way) 7 day average 215

Est AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic)* 3,000 7 Day Average Heavy Vehicle content 7%

COMMENTS: *Seasonal Factor applied: 1.00

Totals by AUSTROADS Vehicle Classification (Dominant vehicles shown in diagram above)

Two Way Traffic NB. Bin 13 contains unclassifiable vehicles

Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total

15/03/2012 Thu 3003 48 190 18 3 6 5 3 18 3 0 0 0 329716/03/2012 Fri 3073 73 197 16 5 9 5 5 4 1 0 0 2 339017/03/2012 Sat 2416 101 99 7 0 6 9 6 9 1 0 0 1 265518/03/2012 Sun 2149 64 73 1 1 5 1 3 5 0 0 0 1 230319/03/2012 Mon 2657 57 192 13 0 2 8 8 21 1 0 0 0 295920/03/2012 Tue 2758 68 186 28 3 6 9 6 21 0 1 0 0 308621/03/2012 Wed 2944 63 210 25 8 4 10 2 19 4 1 1 1 32925 day Ave 2887 62 195 20 4 5 7 5 17 2 0 0 1 3205

7 day Ave 2714 68 164 15 3 5 7 5 14 1 0 0 1 2997

East Bound

Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total


7 day Ave 1337 33 72 7 1 3 3 2 6 1 0 0 1 1467

West Bound

Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total


7 day Ave 1378 35 92 8 2 3 3 3 7 0 0 0 0 1531

HILLIER

The information has been collected for internal use by DPTI, and is provided herein as an information resource only. It is not a substitute for

independent professional advice and users should exercise their own skill, care and judgment with respect to the use of this material.

Whilst all reasonable care has been taken in its preparation, the State of South Australia does not guarantee, and accepts no legal liability

arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency, suitability or completeness of the material.

Contact ph (08) 8343 2810Traffic Information Unit 1 of 9

Spatial Intelligence and Road Assets SectionDepartment of Planning, Transport and InfrastructureTOWN OF GAWLER

COUNCIL MEETING 12 DECEMBER 2017 of 213

ATTACHMENTS UNDER SEPARATE COVER

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=-34.63250,138.69080&ll=-34.63250,138.69080&ie=UTF8&z=12&om=1


Location Details

Road No. 5000 Road Name ANGLE VALE ROAD Site 6271

Location 1km NE Dalkeith Rd. AMG TG882651

RRD 14.05

Daily Traffic Volumes and Heavy Vehicle %

Breakdown of classifications by broad groupings

Cars and Cars Towing - 1&2 , Rigid HVs - 3,4 & 5, Articulated HVs - 6,7,8 & 9, B-Doubles - 10 , Double Road Trains or MAD 25m Combination Vehicles - 11.

NB. Bin 13 contains unclassifiable vehicles

Temporal Distribution For Average Weekday and Average Weekend Traffic

Note: Please see page 1 for disclaimer.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Thur

sday

Frid

ay

Sat

urda

y

Sun

day

Mon

day

Tues

day

Wed

nesd

ay

To

tal N

um

be

r o

f V

eh

icle

s

Daily Traffic Volumes

TWT East Bound West Bound

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday

No

. o

f C

ars

an

d C

ars

To

win

g p

er

da

y

No

. o

f H

Vs

pe

r d

ay

3,4 & 5 6,7,8 & 9 10 11 1 & 2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Vo

lum

e o

f C

ars

an

d H

Vs

pe

r h

ou

r

Time of Day (Hour Ending)

Ave weekend Cars Ave weekend HVs Ave weekday Cars Ave weekday HVs

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

Thur

sday

Frid

ay

Sat

urda

y

Sun

day

Mon

day

Tues

day

Wed

nesd

ay

He

av

y V

eh

icle

%

Daily Heavy Vehicle %

Total HV% East Bound West Bound






Daily Temporal Distributions Site 6271

ANGLE VALE ROAD AMG TG882651

1km NE Dalkeith Rd.

Thursday 15/03/2012 Friday 16/03/2012

Saturday 17/03/2012 Sunday 18/03/2012

Monday 19/03/2012 Tuesday 20/03/2012

Wednesday 21/03/2012

Count Summary

7 Day Average Daily Traffic (two way) 29975 Day Average Daily Traffic (two way) 3205Est AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic)* 3,000

LegendTotal TrafficEast BoundWest Bound


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Traf

fic V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Traf

fic V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Traf

fic V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Traf

fic V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Traf

fic V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Traf

fic V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Traf

fic V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)






Directional Daily Temporal Distributions of Vehicle Classification Groups Site 6271

ANGLE VALE ROAD East Bound AMG TG882651

1km NE Dalkeith Rd.

Thursday 15/03/2012 Friday 16/03/2012

Saturday 17/03/2012 Sunday 18/03/2012

Monday 19/03/2012 Tuesday 20/03/2012



LegendCars and Cars TowingRigid HV'sArticulated B - DoublesRoad Train or MADs

Note: Triple Road Trains are not plottedNote: Please see page 1 for disclaimer.

Count Summary

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

V's

per

hou

r

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

V's

per

hou

r

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No

of H

V's

per

hou

r

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)






Directional Daily Temporal Distributions of Vehicle Classification Groups Site 6271

ANGLE VALE ROAD West Bound AMG TG882651

1km NE Dalkeith Rd.

Thursday 15/03/2012 Friday 16/03/2012

Saturday 17/03/2012 Sunday 18/03/2012

Monday 19/03/2012 Tuesday 20/03/2012



LegendCars and Cars TowingRigid HV'sArticulated B - DoublesRoad Train or MADs

Note: Triple Road Trains are not plottedNote: Please see page 1 for disclaimer.

Count Summary

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

per h

our

No.

of H

Vs

per h

our

Hour (ending)






Daily Temporal Distributions Site 6271


1km NE Dalkeith Rd.

Temporal Distribution for Average Weekday and Average Weekend Volumes of Heavy Vehicles

Temporal Distribution for Average Weekday Volumes of Rigid Heavy Vehicles

Temporal Distribution for Average Weekday Volumes of Articulated Heavy Vehicles


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Vo

lum

e o

f R

igid

HV

s p

er

ho

ur

Time of Day (hour ending)

Four Axle Rigid Truck Three Axle Rigid Truck Two Axle Rigid Truck

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Vo

lum

e o

f A

rtic

ula

ted

He

av

y V

eh

icle

s p

er

ho

ur


Road Trains

B - Doubles

Six Axle Articulated Vehicles

Five Axle Articulated Vehicles

Four Axle Articulated Vehicles

Three Axle Articulated Vehicles

0

5

10

15

20

25 1:

00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Vol

ume

of H

eavy

Veh

icle

s pe

r hou

r


HVs (Weekday Ave)

HVs (Weekend Ave)






Daily Temporal Distributions for Speeding Vehicles Site 6271


1km NE Dalkeith Rd. East Bound Traffic

Thursday 15/03/2012 Friday 16/03/2012

Saturday 17/03/2012 Sunday 18/03/2012

Monday 19/03/2012 Tuesday 20/03/2012


Legend

>= the PSL>= 5 km/h over the PSL>= 10 km/h over the PSL>= 15 km/h over the PSL

Posted Speed Limit (PSL) 90 km/h

East Bound

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)






Daily Temporal Distributions for Speeding Vehicles Site 6271


1km NE Dalkeith Rd. West Bound Traffic

Thursday 15/03/2012 Friday 16/03/2012

Saturday 17/03/2012 Sunday 18/03/2012

Monday 19/03/2012 Tuesday 20/03/2012


Legend

>= the PSL>= 5 km/h over the PSL>= 10 km/h over the PSL>= 15 km/h over the PSL


West Bound

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Spe

edin

g V

olum

e P

er H

our

Hour (ending)






Class Speed Matrix 6271

ANGLE VALE ROAD TG882651

1km NE Dalkeith Rd.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

10 - 19.9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20 - 29.9 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

30 - 39.9 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

40 - 49.9 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

50 - 59.9 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

60 - 69.9 97 5 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

70 - 79.9 1059 49 85 12 0 2 7 4 7 0 1 0 0

80 - 89.9 4619 126 241 20 3 12 10 4 27 3 0 0 2

90 - 99.9 3129 46 146 13 5 5 7 6 11 4 1 0 2

100 - 109.9 332 3 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

110 - 119.9 61 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

120 - 129.9 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

130 - 139.9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

140 - 149.9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

150 - 159.9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

160 - 169.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

170 - 179.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

180 - 189.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

190 - 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9357 231 505 49 9 19 24 14 45 8 2 0 5

91.1% 2.2% 4.9% 0.5% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

10 - 19.9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20 - 29.9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

30 - 39.9 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

40 - 49.9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

50 - 59.9 20 2 6 2 2 0 1 5 16 0 0 0 0

60 - 69.9 157 18 27 3 1 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0

70 - 79.9 900 45 81 9 0 4 5 3 7 0 0 0 0

80 - 89.9 4222 119 265 20 2 9 12 3 12 1 0 0 0

90 - 99.9 3782 54 226 19 6 5 5 4 11 1 0 1 0

100 - 109.9 438 3 31 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

110 - 119.9 84 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

120 - 129.9 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

130 - 139.9 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

140 - 149.9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

150 - 159.9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

160 - 169.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

170 - 179.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

180 - 189.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

190 - 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9642 243 642 59 11 19 23 19 52 2 0 1 0

90.0% 2.3% 6.0% 0.6% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Mean Speed (km/h)

85th Percentile (km/h)


>= 5 km/h over the PSL


>= 15 km/h over the PSL>= 30 km/h over the PSL

6

5

0.0%

6

1

10713

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

10268

Site

AMG

Class Totals

km/h

km/h

1

12

7

3

16

3

3

54

120

1226

5067

East Bound Traffic

9.8%

212

1054

3375

352

62

15

AUSTROADS CLASS

AUSTROADS CLASS

Class Totals

West Bound Traffic

Speed Bins

Speed Bins

0.1%

11.9%

49.3%

32.9%

3.4%

0.1%

0.0%

0.2%

1.2%

0.0%

4.5%

0.8%

0.2%

0.1%

0.1%

Speed Bin Totals

0.3%

1047 Vehicles449 Vehicles

65 Vehicles

5.0%2.1%1.8%

0.0%

5.7%2.4%0.0%


27 Vehicles


38 Vehicles

4.3%14.5%12.6%

100.03033 Vehicles

99.3 100.71743 Vehicles 16.3%1290 Vehicles

94.288.695.3

88.194.8

87.7

0.0%

0.6%

0.1%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Speed Bin Totals

0.0%2

1

0.0%

0.0%

0.5%

2.0%

East Bound West Bound

SPEED STATISTICS

Two Way

4665

4114

480

88

23

7

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

43.5%

38.4%





Classification Summary Report TG912664_201506 site 6707 EVANSTON for TVS starting 25-06-2015 .xlsm

Road Name JACK COOPER DRIVE

Road No. 5000 RRD 17.64

Locality EVANSTON

Location 700m south of RN 4413 (Evanston Interchange Off Ramp) Latitude, Longitude -34.620373,138.723157

INSERT MAP HERE

Count Summary (Two Way) Count Period : Thursday inclusive

5 Day Average Daily Traffic 4952 5 Day Average Heavy Vehicles 239

7 Day Average Daily Traffic 4649 7 Day Average Heavy Vehicles 189

Est AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic)* 4,600 7 Day Average Heavy Vehicle Content 4%

Totals by AUSTROADS Vehicle Classification (Dominant vehicles shown in diagram above) See Back Page for detailed description

Two Way Traffic NB. Bin 13 contains unclassifiable vehicles

Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total

25/06/2015 Thursday 4721 104 185 21 3 5 7 2 11 0 0 0 0 505926/06/2015 Friday 4882 111 178 20 4 4 12 4 6 4 0 0 1 522627/06/2015 Saturday 4144 124 60 4 1 2 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 434028/06/2015 Sunday 3272 115 53 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 344529/06/2015 Monday 4197 103 179 11 3 11 7 2 7 1 0 0 1 452230/06/2015 Tuesday 4567 108 166 55 8 7 12 5 28 1 0 0 0 49571/07/2015 Wednesday 4659 109 175 18 0 3 8 5 10 4 1 0 2 49945 Day Ave 4605 107 177 25 4 6 9 4 12 2 0 0 1 4952

7 Day Ave 4349 111 142 18 3 5 7 3 9 1 0 0 1 4649

North Bound

Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total


7 Day Ave 2196 56 56 8 1 2 3 1 7 1 0 0 0 2333

South Bound

Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total


7 Day Ave 2152 55 86 10 2 3 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 2316

Contact Phone 8343 2810 Traffic Information Unit Road and Marine Assets Section

6707Site No.

TG912664AMG

Meter Type Metrocount

The information has been collected for internal use by DPTI, and is provided herein as an information resource only. It is not a substitute for independent professional advice and users should

exercise their own skill, care and judgment with respect to the use of this material. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken in its preparation, the State of South Australia does not guarantee, and

accepts no legal liability arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency, suitability or completeness of the material.

COMMENTS:

25/06/2015 1/07/2015to Wednesday

*No seasonal factor applied

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=-34.620373,138.723157Click to view the location in Google Maps (imagery may not be current)

1 of 9TOWN OF GAWLER COUNCIL MEETING 12 DECEMBER 2017



Road Name JACK COOPER DRIVE Site 6707

Road No. 5000 RRD AMG TG912664

Locality EVANSTON

Location 700m south of RN 4413 (Evanston Interchange Off Ramp)

NB. Bin 13 contains unclassifiable vehicles

17.64

Daily Traffic Volumes

Average Weekday and Weekend Temporal Distributions (see page 5 for broad groupings)

Cars and Cars Towing - 1&2 , Rigid HVs - 3,4 & 5, Articulated HVs - 6,7,8 & 9, B-Doubles - 10 , Road Trains or MAD 25m Combination Vehicles - 11, 12

Heavy Vehicle Percentage

Breakdown of Classifications by Broad Groupings

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s

North Bound South Bound Two Way

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%


Hea

vy V

ehic

le %

North Bound South Bound Two Way

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0

50

100

150

200

250


Num

ber o

f Car

s an

d C

ars

Tow

ing

Per D

ay

Num

ber o

f HVs

Per

Day

Classes 3 to 5 Classes 6 to 9 Class 10 Classes 11&12 Classes 1&2

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Num

ber o

f HVs

Per

Hou

r

Hour (Ending)

Ave Weekday HVs Ave Weekend HVs





Road No. 5000 RRD 17.64 AMG TG912664

Locality EVANSTON


Thursday 25/06/2015 Friday

Saturday 27/06/2015 Sunday

Monday 29/06/2015 Tuesday

Wednesday 1/07/2015

Thursday 518 16:00 299 16:00 219 16:00Friday 500 18:00 265 16:00 252 18:00Saturday 443 12:00 226 12:00 217 12:00Sunday 342 13:00 168 13:00 174 13:00Monday 457 16:00 235 16:00 222 16:00Tuesday 454 9:00 249 18:00 223 9:00Wednesday 518 18:00 278 18:00 240 18:00

Total Vehicles 5 Day Average Daily Traffic 4952North Bound 7 Day Average Daily Traffic 4649South Bound Est AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic) 4,600

Temporal Distributions of All Vehicles

26/06/2015

28/06/2015

30/06/2015

Legend Count Summary (Two Way)

PEAK HOUR BY DAY

Two Way

Volume

Hour

(Ending)

Hour

(Ending)

North Bound South Bound

Volume

Hour

(Ending) Volume

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (ending)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s P

er H

our

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (ending)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (ending)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1:00

3:00

5:00

7:00

9:00

11:0

0

13:0

0

15:0

0

17:0

0

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:0

0

Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (ending)





Road No. 5000 RRD 17.64 AMG TG912664

Locality EVANSTON


5 Day Average Daily Traffic 2486 5 Day Average Daily Traffic 24667 Day Average Daily Traffic 2333 7 Day Average Daily Traffic 23165 Day Percentage of HVs 4.1% 5 Day Percentage of HVs 5.5%7 Day Percentage of HVs 3.4% 7 Day Percentage of HVs 4.7%

Temporal Distribution of Vehicle Classification Groups

LegendNorth BoundSouth Bound

North Bound Traffic - Count Summary South Bound Traffic - Count Summary

0

50

100

150

200

250

300


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Cars and Cars Towing - Classes 1 & 2

0

5

10

15

20

25


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Rigid HVs - Classes 3 - 5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Articulated HVs - Classes 6 - 9

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

B Doubles - Class 10

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Road Trains & MADS (Medium Articulated Vehicle with a Dog Trailer) - Classes 11 & 12





Road No. 5000 RRD 17.64 AMG TG912664

Locality EVANSTON


0/01/1900

Cars and Cars Towing - (Classes 1 & 2)

Rigid HVs - (Classes 3 - 5)

Average Weekday and Weekend Temporal Distributions

Articulated HVs - (Classes 6 - 9)

Road Trains & MADS (Medium Articulated Vehicle with a Dog Trailer) - (Classes 11 & 12)

B Doubles - (Class 10)

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

400.00

450.00

500.00 1:

00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Num

ber o

f veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (Ending)

Ave Weekday Cars Ave Weekend Cars

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Num

ber o

f veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (Ending)

Ave Weekday Rigids Ave Weekend Rigids

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Num

ber o

f veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (Ending)

Ave Weekday Articulated Ave Weekend Articulated

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Num

ber o

f veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (Ending)

Ave Weekday B Doubles Ave Weekend B Doubles

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

0:00

Num

ber o

f veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Hour (Ending)

Ave Weekday Roadtrains Ave Weekend Road Trains





Road No. 5000 RRD 17.64 AMG TG912664

Locality EVANSTON


North BoundSouth Bound

North Bound South Bound North Bound South Bound North Bound South Bound

Thursday 19 12 10 5 2 1Friday 13 17 5 6 1 3

Saturday 20 9 7 4 1 2Sunday 13 11 5 5 2 1Monday 11 11 3 4 1 2Tuesday 7 9 2 5 0 1

Wednesday 19 11 7 8 0 2

Legend

Temporal Distributions for Vehicles Exceeding Posted Speed limit by Greater 5 km/h

>5 km/h >10 km/h >20 km/h

DAILY VOLUMES OF VEHICLES EXCEEDING THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT

Posted Speed Limit - 80 km/h

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Vehicles Travelling Greater than 5 km/h over the Posted Speed Limit

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r


0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

5 15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

105

115

125

135

145

Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s

Speed (km/h)

Speed Frequency Histogram - All Vehicles





Road No. 5000 RRD AMG TG912664

Locality EVANSTON


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

5.0 - 19.9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120.0 - 29.9 6 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 030.0 - 39.9 16 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 040.0 - 49.9 207 20 40 5 0 1 0 3 6 2 0 0 050.0 - 59.9 3639 162 180 41 7 9 9 5 35 5 1 0 060.0 - 69.9 8532 175 148 10 3 4 9 2 6 2 0 0 070.0 - 79.9 2711 27 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 080.0 - 89.9 225 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 090.0 - 99.9 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0100.0 - 109.9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0110.0 - 119.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0120.0 - 129.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0130.0 - 139.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

140.0 - 149.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0150.0 - 159.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0160.0 - 169.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0170.0 - 179.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0180.0 - 189.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0190.0 - 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

15375 392 395 59 10 14 18 10 47 9 1 0 1

94.1% 2.4% 2.4% 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

5.0 - 19.9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 020.0 - 29.9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 030.0 - 39.9 14 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 040.0 - 49.9 372 22 34 11 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 050.0 - 59.9 6072 154 300 21 5 6 14 4 8 0 0 0 260.0 - 69.9 6467 165 205 31 5 10 15 3 7 0 0 0 170.0 - 79.9 1925 37 52 5 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 080.0 - 89.9 171 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 090.0 - 99.9 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0100.0 - 109.9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0110.0 - 119.9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0120.0 - 129.9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0130.0 - 139.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0140.0 - 149.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0150.0 - 159.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0160.0 - 169.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0170.0 - 179.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0180.0 - 189.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0190.0 - 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

15067 382 601 70 11 18 32 8 19 1 0 0 3

92.9% 2.4% 3.7% 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Mean Speed (km/h)





>= 30 km/h over the PSL>= 45 km/h over the PSL

22

69.6

South Bound

64.1

4

Posted Speed Limit - 80 km/h

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

2.7%

40.6%

North Bound Traffic - CLASS SPEED MATRIX (7 Day Totals)

AUSTROADS CLASS

0

0.2%

1.7%

25.1%

0

0

0 0.0%

0.0%

16.9%

0.0%

Speed Bin Totals

5

9

28

0

0.2%

0.0%

54.4%

228

29

284

4093

2757

8891

0.1%

1.4%

7

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

179

23

1

South Bound Traffic - CLASS SPEED MATRIX (7 Day Totals)

1.1%

12.5%

km/h

Class Totals

0

9

3

0.0%

0.0% 0 Vehicles0.0%0.0% 0 Vehicles

0.0%0.0%

39 Vehicles 0.2% 0.2%

0 Vehicles


7 Vehicles0 Vehicles 0.0%

0.2%

5 Vehicles0.1%

76 Vehicles37 Vehicles0.1%

0.0%

19 Vehicles

75.8

0

7

2026

6909

0

6586

0

0

16331

74.970.475.4

62.0

7 DAY SPEED STATISTICS

Two Way

0

0

0.0%

16212

0.0%

North Bound

63.071.0

Class Totals

Speed Bins

0

0

17.64

Speed Bin Totals

0.1%

42.6%

0.1%

0.0%

AUSTROADS CLASS

0

443

km/h

Speed Bins

0 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%




Road Name JACK COOPER DRIVE Site

Road No. RRD AMG TG912664

Locality EVANSTON


5.0 - 19.9 0 3 3 020.0 - 29.9 0 6 6 330.0 - 39.9 0 16 2 1240.0 - 49.9 6 201 7 36550.0 - 59.9 33 3606 72 600060.0 - 69.9 94 8438 86 638170.0 - 79.9 30 2681 19 190680.0 - 89.9 7 218 4 167

90.0 - 99.9 2 27 0 22100.0 - 109.9 4 3 1 6110.0 - 119.9 0 0 1 3120.0 - 129.9 0 0 0 1130.0 - 139.9 0 0 0 0140.0 - 149.9 0 0 0 0150.0 - 159.9 0 0 0 0160.0 - 169.9 0 0 0 0170.0 - 179.9 0 0 0 0180.0 - 189.9 0 0 0 0190.0 - 200 0 0 0 0

2249 3013

7 Day Ave 29 2124 2152

Tuesday 23 2243 2266

1/07/2015 Wednesday 27 2282 2309

5 Day Ave 29

34

30/06/2015

Mo

torc

yc

les

/

Bic

yc

les

Mo

torc

yc

les

/

Bic

yc

les

Oth

er

Cla

ss

1 V

eh

icle

s

1/07/2015 Wednesday

25/06/2015

28/06/2015

26/06/2015

Speed Bins km/h

Date

5 Day Ave

26/06/2015 Friday

30/06/2015 Tuesday

Thursday

25/06/2015 Thursday

7 Day Ave

Date

27/06/2015 Saturday

28/06/2015 Sunday

Sunday

29/06/2015 Monday

29/06/2015 Monday

1998

2350

2312 2343

2171 2196

2324 2350

2094 2118

1601 1619

2414 2448

6707

2282

2301

2301

3075

Other Class 1

Vehicles

Total

16231994

Total

2026

1653

2022

DAILY TOTALS - South Bound

1926

28

31

25

Motorcycles /

Bicycles

2418

3028

2827/06/2015 Saturday

27

26

5000 17.64

2149 2175

DAILY TOTALS - North Bound

Oth

er

Cla

ss

1 V

eh

icle

s

SPEED MATRIX (7 Day Totals)

South BoundNorth Bound

2378

Friday 35 2399 2434

BREAKDOWN OF CLASS 1 VEHICLES

Motorcycles /

Bicycles

Other Class 1

Vehicles

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Motorcycle Volumes


0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Motorcycles Travelling Greater than 5 km/h over the Posted Speed Limit


0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50


Num

ber o

f Veh

icle

s Pe

r Hou

r

Motorcycles Travelling Greater than 20 km/h over the Posted Speed Limit




Level 1 Level 3

Length Vehicle Type

(indicative)Type Axles Groups Typical Description Class Parameters Typical Configuration

Short Short

up to 5.5m 1 or 2 Sedan, Wagon, 4WD, Utility, 1 d(1) 3.2m and axles = 2Light Van, Bicycle, Motorcycle, etc

Short - Towing groups = 33, 4 or 5 3 Trailer, Caravan, Boat, etc 2 d(1) 2.1m, d(1) 3.2m,

d(2) 2.1m and axles = 3, 4 or 5

Medium

2 2 Two Axle Truck or Bus 3 d(1) > 3.2m and axles = 2

5.5m to 14.5m3 2 Three Axle Truck or Bus 4 axles = 3 and groups = 2

> 3 2 Four Axle Truck 5 axles > 3 and groups = 2

3 3Three Axle Articulated

Three axle articulated vehicle, or Rigid vehicle and trailer

6d(1) > 3.2m, axles = 3

and groups = 3

Long

4 > 2Four Axle Articulated

Four axle articulated vehicle, or Rigid vehicle and trailer

7d(2) < 2.1m or d(1) < 2.1m or d(1) > 3.2m

axles = 4 and groups > 2

11.5m to 19.0m5 > 2

Five Axle Articulated

Five axle articulated vehicle, or Rigid vehicle and trailer

8d(2) < 2.1m or d(1) < 2.1m or d(1) > 3.2m

axles = 5 and groups > 2

6 > 2Six Axle Articulated

Six axle articulated vehicle, or Rigid vehicle and trailer

9axles = 6 and groups > 2 or

axles > 6 and groups = 3

Medium

Combination

> 6 4B Double

B Double, or Heavy truck and trailer

10 groups = 4 and axles > 6

17.5m to 36.5m> 6 5 or 6

Double Road Train

Double road train, or Medium articulated vehicle and one dog trailer (M.A.D.)

11groups = 5 or 6 and axles > 6

Large

Combination

Over 33.0m> 6 > 6

Triple Road Train

Triple road train, or Heavy truck and three trailers

12groups > 6

and axles > 6

Definitions: Group: d(1): Distance between first and second axleGroups: d(2): Distance between second and third axleAxles:

Axle group, where adjacent axles are less than 2.1m apartNumber of axle groupsNumber of axles (maximum axle spacing of 10.0m)

HEAVY VEHICLES

AUSTROADS Vehicle Classification System

Level 2

Axles and AUSTROADS Classification

LIGHT VEHICLES

Axle Groups

Page 9 of 9TOWN OF GAWLER COUNCIL MEETING 12 DECEMBER 2017



APPENDIX C

DPTI MEETING

MINUTES / NOTES

08/02/2017




Attendees

• Ryan Byrne & Hugh Gallagher – W&G

• Scott Reid, Ben DeGilio, David Petuzzella – Council

• Marc Hryciuk – DPTI

Notes

• Meeting held with DPTI to discuss their responses on the Evanston DPA documentation reviews, primary focus was a couple key areas only:

• Recommendation to introduce roundabouts on the arterial road without modelling justification.

• DPTI looking to preserve traffic flows on the arterial route, initial concern raised with the number of roundabouts proposed.

• Logic of each was discussed, noting the ‘Recommendation 5’ (Jack Cooper/ Angle Vale Rd) roundabout probably could be more of a re-configured priority arrangement. WGA highlighted the roundabout recommendation was not only for the traffic volumes but from a safety point of view.

• DPTI asked Council/ WGA to demonstrate the need for the roundabouts through some high level SIDRA intersection modelling. Modelling should use the latest DPTI 2036 projected traffic volumes, DPTI to provide. (Note – WGA has completed with exercise, refer draft memo attached. No traffic volumes provided to date, hence a sensitivity analysis competed with up to a 30% increase on the existing volumes).

• DPTI want to minimise the access point onto Angle Vale/ Jack Cooper Drive. This can be accommodated, new DPA land to be directed out via Hiller Road only.

• DPTI have a push to keep the speed at 80km/hr, however as discussed in future this is not practical given the long term use with a neighbourhood centre and the existing school.

• DPTI would be keen to see plans on the proposed neighbourhood centre when available. Council/ WGA noted it is a bit early at this stage, planning in detail on this area has not commenced.

• DPTI advise a school drop off arrangement should be considered in the planning (KISS drop off or similar). WGA view this as the next level of planning, comment can be made at this point in time, however this detail to be considered in future. DPTI noted previous negotiation with the school in attempting to encourage them to access pick/ drop offs via Hiller Rd have not been met positively, preference to use Angle Vale Road. It is however noted formalisation of Hiller Road and a Hiller/ Jack Cooper roundabout may encourage this alternative route, providing for a prefer pick up location off the busy Angle Vale Road.



Michael O’Flaherty TRAFFIC ENGINEER

Telephone: 08 8223 7433

Email: [email protected]

ADELAIDE 60 Wyatt St Adelaide SA 5000 Telephone: 08 8223 7433 Facsimile: 08 8232 0967

MELBOURNE Level 2, 31 Market St South Melbourne VIC 3205 Telephone: 03 9696 9522

PERTH 634 Murray St West Perth WA 6005 Telephone: 08 9336 6528

DARWIN Suite 7/9 Keith Ln Fannie Bay NT 0820 Telephone: 08 8941 1678 Facsimile: 08 8941 5060

WHYALLA 1/15 Darling Tce Whyalla SA 5600 Phone: 08 8644 0432

WALLBRIDGE GILBERT AZTEC www.wga.com.au [email protected]



mailto:[email protected]

http://www.wga.com.au/

PREL

IMINA

RY IS

SUE

NOT

FOR

CONS

TRUC

TION

I:\20

15\1

5110

1 - 1

5120

0\15

1176

- E

vans

ton

Gar

dens

DP

A R

evie

w G

awle

r Cou

ncil\

WA

D15

1176

-SK

07.d

wg,

D, 1

7/11

/201

7 4:

14 P

M, t

bette

ridge

When sheet printed full size, the scale bar is 100mm.0 50 100mm

C

A0 DRAWING NUMBERSheet No.Job Number Rev.

Design Drawn

60 Wyatt Street, AdelaideSouth Australia 5000

Telephone 08 8223 7433Email [email protected]

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION DRAFT CHKDENG.

SK07151176DSK RFF

TRAFFIC INFRASTRUCTURESHORT TERM

DPA STRUCTURE PLAN

EVANSTON GARDENS

ATTACHMENT 3



ATTACHMENT 4



CONCEPT ONLY

I:\20

15\1

5110

1 - 1

5120

0\15

1176

- E

vans

ton

Gar

dens

DP

A R

evie

w G

awle

r Cou

ncil\

WA

D15

1176

-C03

.dw

g, A

, 19/

9/20

17 2

:09

PM

, bha

rris

When sheet printed full size, the scale bar is 100mm.0 50 100mm

C

A0 DRAWING NUMBERSheet No.Job Number Rev.

Design Drawn

60 Wyatt Street, AdelaideSouth Australia 5000

Telephone 08 8223 7433Email [email protected]

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION DRAFT CHKDENG.

NOT

FOR

CONS

TRUC

TION

C03WAD151176

SHORT TERM OPTION

HILLER RD / JACK COOPER DRIVE

ATTACHMENT 5



Evanston Gardens DPA

The Amendment

Town of Gawler

For Approval

Approved by the Minister responsible for the administration of the Development

Act 1993 pursuant to Section 25 (18), of the Development Act 1993.

……………………………….. Minister’s Signature

Date………………………………..

ATTACHMENT 6



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Amendment Instructions Table

1

Amendment Instructions Table

Name of Local Government Area: Town of Gawler

Name of Development Plan: Gawler (CT)

Name of DPA: Evanston Gardens

The following amendment instructions (at the time of drafting) relate to the Council Development Plan consolidated on 28 April 2016. Where amendments to this Development Plan have been authorised after the aforementioned consolidation date, consequential changes to the following amendment instructions will be made as necessary to give effect to this amendment.

Am

end

men

t In

stru

ctio

n N

um

ber

Method of Change Replace Delete Insert

Detail what is to be replaced or deleted or detail where new policy is to be inserted. Objective (Obj) Principle of Development

Control (PDC) Desired Character

Statement (DCS) Map/Table No. Other (Specify)

Detail what material is to be inserted (if applicable, i.e., use for Insert or Replace methods of change only).

Is R

enu

mb

erin

g r

equ

ired

(Y

/N) Subsequent

Policy cross-references requiring update (Y/N) if yes please specify.

COUNCIL WIDE / GENERAL SECTION PROVISIONS (including figures and illustrations contained in the text)

Amendments required (Yes/No): Yes

Bushfire Protection

1. Replace Bushfire Protection Area Figure Ga(BPA)/3

With new map in Attachment A

N N

Contaminated Land 2. Replace PDC 41 With new policies in

Attachment B Y N

3. Insert Immediately after current Contaminated Land PDC 41

New policies in Attachment C Y N

Form of Development 4. Insert After reference to

“Enlargement F” in current Objective 20

“, G, H” N N

Interface Between Land Uses 5. Replace All policies under the

heading “Interface Between Land Uses”

With new policies in Attachment D

Y N

ZONE AND/OR POLICY AREA AND/OR PRECINCT PROVISIONS (including figures and illustrations contained in the text)


Neighbourhood Centre (Evanston Gardens) Zone

6. Replace Gawler (CT) Neighbourhood Centre (Evanston Gardens) Zone Concept Plan Figure NCe(EG)/1

With new map in Attachment E

N N

Residential Zone

7. Replace Index To Residential Policy Areas Figure Res/1

With new map in Attachment F

N N



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Amendment Instructions Table

2

Evanston Gardens/Evanston South/Hillier Residential Policy Area 4 8. Replace Evanston

Gardens/Evanston South/Hillier Residential Policy Area 4 Figure Res/2

With new map in Attachment G

N N

9. Replace The words “The northern portion” in the first sentence of the 17th paragraph of the Desired Character statement

With the words “The north-eastern portion”

N N

10. Replace The words “this area” in the first sentence of the 18th paragraph of the Desired Character statement

With the words “the north-eastern portion of the Policy Area”

N N

11. Insert As a new paragraph following paragraph 20 of the Desired Character statement

The contents of Attachment H N N

12. Insert Immediately after PDC 17 The contents of Attachment I Y N

Residential Park Zone

13. Insert After the last paragraph under ‘Desired Character’

The contents of Attachment J N N

14. Insert Immediately after PDC 16 The contents of Attachment K Y N

TABLES

Amendments required (Yes/No): No

Table

MAPPING (Structure Plans, Overlays, Enlargements, Zone Maps, Policy Area & Precinct Maps)


Map Reference Table: No

Map(s)

15. Replace Structure Plan Maps Ga/1 (Overlay 1) Part A and Part B

With corresponding maps in Attachment L

N N

16. Replace Evanston Gardens/Evanston South/Hillier Structure Plan Map Ga/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement H

With corresponding map in Attachment M

N N

17. Replace Noise and Air Emissions Map Ga/1 (Overlay 3)

With corresponding map in Attachment N

N N

18. Replace Zones Map Ga/4 and Ga/8 With corresponding maps in Attachment O

N N

19. Replace Policy Areas Map Ga/16 and 22

With corresponding maps in Attachment P

N N



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment A

3

Attachment A



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment B

4

Attachment B Objective 18: Protection of human health and the environment wherever site contamination has been

identified or is suspected to have occurred.

Objective 19: Appropriate assessment and remediation of site contamination to ensure land is suitable for the proposed use and provides a safe and healthy living and working environment.

PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL

41 Development, including land division, should not occur where site contamination has occurred unless the site has been assessed and remediated as necessary to ensure that it is suitable and safe for the proposed use.



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler

Attachment C

5

Attachment C

Crime Prevention

OBJECTIVES

Objective 20: A safe, secure, crime resistant environment where land uses are integrated and designed to facilitate community surveillance.


42 Development should be designed to maximise surveillance of public spaces through the incorporation of clear lines of sight, appropriate lighting and the use of visible permeable barriers wherever practicable.

43 Buildings should be designed to overlook public and communal streets and public open space to allow casual surveillance.

44 Development should provide a robust environment that is resistant to vandalism and graffiti.

45 Development should provide lighting in frequently used public spaces including those:

(a) along dedicated cyclist and pedestrian pathways, laneways and access routes

(b) around public facilities such as toilets, telephones, bus stops, seating, litter bins, automatic teller machines, taxi ranks and car parks.

46 Development, including car park facilities should incorporate signage and lighting that indicate the entrances and pathways to, from and within sites.

47 Landscaping should be used to assist in discouraging crime by:

(a) screen planting areas susceptible to vandalism

(b) planting trees or ground covers, rather than shrubs, alongside footpaths

(c) planting vegetation other than ground covers a minimum distance of 2 metres from footpaths to reduce concealment opportunities.

48 Site planning, buildings, fences, landscaping and other features should clearly differentiate public, communal and private areas.

49 Buildings should be designed to minimise and discourage access between roofs, balconies and windows of adjoining dwellings.

50 Public toilets should be located, sited and designed:

(a) to promote the visibility of people entering and exiting the facility (eg by avoiding recessed entrances and dense shrubbery that obstructs passive surveillance)

(b) near public and community transport links and pedestrian and cyclist networks to maximise visibility.

51 Development should avoid pedestrian entrapment spots and movement predictors (eg routes or paths that are predictable or unchangeable and offer no choice to pedestrians).



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment D

6

Attachment D

OBJECTIVES

Objective 42: Development located and designed to minimise adverse impact and conflict between land uses.

Objective 43: Protect community health and amenity from adverse impacts of development.

Objective 44: Protect desired land uses from the encroachment of incompatible development.


107 Development should not detrimentally affect the amenity of the locality or cause unreasonable interference through any of the following:

(a) the emission of effluent, odour, smoke, fumes, dust or other airborne pollutants (b) noise (c) vibration (d) electrical interference (e) light spill (f) glare (g) hours of operation (h) traffic impacts.

108 Development should be sited and designed to minimise negative impacts on existing and potential future land uses desired in the locality.

109 Development adjacent to a Residential Zone or residential area within a Township Zone should be designed to minimise overlooking and overshadowing of adjacent dwellings and private open space.

110 Residential development adjacent to non-residential zones and land uses should be located, designed and/or sited to protect residents from potential adverse impacts from non-residential activities.

111 Sensitive uses likely to conflict with the continuation of lawfully existing developments and land uses desired for the zone should be designed to minimise negative impacts.

112 Non-residential development on land abutting a residential zone should be designed to minimise noise impacts to achieve adequate levels of compatibility between existing and proposed uses.

Noise Generating Activities

113 Development that emits noise (other than music noise) should include noise attenuation measures that achieve the relevant Environment Protection (Noise) Policy criteria when assessed at the nearest existing noise sensitive premises.

114 Development with the potential to emit significant noise (e.g. industry) should incorporate noise attenuation measures that prevent noise from causing unreasonable interference with the amenity of noise sensitive premises.

115 Outdoor areas (such as beer gardens or dining areas) associated with licensed premises should be designed or sited to minimise adverse noise impacts on adjacent existing or future noise sensitive development.

116 Development proposing music should include noise attenuation measures that achieve the following desired noise levels:



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment D

7

Noise level assessment location Desired noise level

Adjacent existing noise sensitive development property boundary

Less than 8 dB above the level of background noise (L90,15min) in any octave band of the sound spectrum and Less than 5 dB(A) above the level of background noise (LA90,15min) for the overall (sum of all octave bands) A-weighted level

Adjacent land property boundary Less than 65dB(Lin) at 63Hz and 70dB(Lin) in all other octave bands of the sound spectrum or Less than 8 dB above the level of background noise (L90,15min) in any octave band of the sound spectrum and 5 dB(A) overall (sum of all octave bands) A-weighted level

Air Quality

117 Development with the potential to emit harmful or nuisance-generating air pollution should incorporate air pollution control measures to prevent harm to human health or unreasonable interference with the amenity of sensitive uses within the locality.

118 Chimneys or exhaust flues associated with commercial development (including cafes, restaurants and fast food outlets) should be designed to ensure they do not cause a nuisance or health concerns to nearby sensitive receivers by:

(a) incorporating appropriate treatment technology before exhaust emissions are released to the atmosphere

(b) ensuring that the location and design of chimneys or exhaust flues maximises dispersion and takes into account the location of nearby sensitive uses.

Rural Interface

119 The potential for adverse impacts resulting from rural development should be minimised by:

(a) not locating horticulture or intensive animal keeping on land adjacent to townships (b) maintaining an adequate separation between horticulture or intensive animal keeping and

townships, other sensitive uses and, where desirable, other forms of primary production.

120 Traffic movement, spray drift, dust, noise, odour and the use of frost fans and gas guns associated with primary production should not lead to unreasonable impact on adjacent land uses.

121 Existing primary production and mineral extraction should not be prejudiced by the inappropriate encroachment of sensitive uses such as urban development.

122 Development that is adjacent to land used for primary production (within either the zone or adjacent zones) should include appropriate setbacks and vegetative plantings designed to minimise the potential impacts of chemical spray drift and other impacts associated with primary production.

123 New urban development should provide a buffer of at least 40 metres wide (inclusive of any fuel break, emergency vehicle access or road) separating urban and rural activities.

124 Development located within 300 metres of facilities for the handling, transportation and storage of bulk commodities should:

(a) not prejudice the continued operation of those facilities (b) be located, designed and developed having regard to the potential environmental impact arising

from the operation of such facilities and the potential extended hours of operation.



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment E

8

Attachment E




Attachment F

9

Attachment F



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment G

10

Attachment G




Attachment H

11

Attachment H The north-western portion of the Policy Area is bounded by Hillier Road to the north, Jack Cooper Drive to the east, Angle Vale Road to the south and the Evanston Gardens Neighbourhood Centre Zone to the west. Housing fronting Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and the southern side of Hillier Road will be sited, designed and constructed to mitigate traffic noise and air quality impacts from these roads. In addition, housing adjacent Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and the southern side of Hillier Road will front these roads and be enhanced through street design and complementary road side planting. Direct vehicular access to Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and Hillier Road will not be provided. Residential development adjacent to the Neighbourhood Centre Zone will be sited, designed and constructed to minimise potential adverse impacts from that Zone. Given the fall of the land from the north-east near the Hillier Road/Jack Cooper Drive intersection to the south-west corner adjacent the Neighbourhood Centre Zone on Angle Vale Road, the option exists to locate wetlands/stormwater detention basins in this south-western portion in conjunction with an open space area. Medium density development is envisioned to occur in the south western corner of the ‘Living’ area (Residential Zone adjacent Angle Vale Rd), these developments will have direct access to quality open space as well as education and community facilities. Preliminary investigations indicate that the potential for site contamination is low. However, further investigations may be required prior to residential development occurring to confirm this.



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment I

12

Attachment I 18 Residential development in that part of the Policy Area north of Angle Vale Road and west of

Jack Cooper Drive should:

(a) where directly adjacent Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and the southern side of Hillier Road, front these roads and be sited, designed and constructed to mitigate noise and air quality impacts from traffic

(b) not have direct vehicular access to Jack Cooper Drive, Angle Vale Road and Hillier Road (c) where adjacent to the Neighbourhood Centre (Evanston Gardens) Zone, be sited, designed

and constructed to minimise potential adverse impacts from that Zone.




Attachment J

13

Attachment J The portion of the Zone located at Hillier will develop in accordance with the Evanston Gardens/Evanston South/Hillier Structure Plan Map Ga/1 (Overlay 1) Enlargement H and be undertaken in an orderly manner that achieves the most efficient use of the land. Development will recognise that the lower areas of land fronting Clifford Road are subject to flood risk hazard. Housing and other accommodation forms will not be located within this area, including all land contained within Certificate of Title 5111/77, with development primarily limited to stormwater management. Housing and other accommodation forms may be located on the upper areas of the land, forming a logical extension to the Hillier Residential Village. Direct vehicle access to Clifford Road will not be provided. Development which is on land subject to inundation in a 1 in 100 year average return interval flood event will not result in the loss of floodplain storage. This can be achieved by incorporating measures to increase floodplain capacity in the locality through the use of reserves, roadways and swales for temporary flood storage, with works designed and certified by a suitably qualified engineer. Acoustic measures will be provided along the Clifford Road boundary to minimise noise and air quality impacts from traffic on Jack Cooper Drive. These measures will comprise a continuation of the existing earth mounding, landscaping and setbacks for dwellings already provided along the southern portion of Clifford Road. This mounding and associated landscaping will also provide a significant visual screening effect to the residential village when viewed from Jack Cooper Drive and Clifford Road. Preliminary investigations indicate that the potential for site contamination is low. However, further investigations may be required prior to residential development occurring to confirm this.



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment K

14

Attachment K 17 Development in that part of the Zone north of Hillier Road at Hillier, which is on land subject to

inundation in a 1 in 100 year average return interval flood event or within Certificate of Title 5111/77, should be limited to stormwater management.




Attachment L

15

Attachment L



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment L

16




Attachment M

17

Attachment M



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment N

18

Attachment N




Attachment O

19

Attachment O



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment O

20




Attachment P

21

Attachment P



Evanston Gardens DPA Town of Gawler Attachment P

22



item 8.2 – evanston gardens development plan … · attachment f – schedule 4b certificate ......

Documents