interplanar forces of black phosphorus caused by electron-lattice interaction
TRANSCRIPT
~ Solid State Communications, Vol.6],No.]0, pp.595-600, ]987. 0038-]098/87 $3.00 + .00 Printed in Great Britain. Pergamon Journals Ltd.
INT~RPLANAR FORCES OF BLACK PHOSPHORUS CAUSED BY ELECTRON-LATTICE INTERACTION
Naoshi SUZUKI and Masato AOKI
Department of Material Physics. Faculty of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka 560, Japan
(Received 7 November 1986 by J. Kanamori)
The generalized electronic susceptibility of a narrow gap semiconductor, black phosphorus, is calculated by using electron-lattice coupling con- statnts derived microscopically on the basis of tight-binding calcula- tions of the electronic band structure. Interplanar forces along the [I00] direction caused by the electron-lattice interaction are evaluated from the obtained generalized electronic susceptibility. Reflecting the narrow gap the interplanar forces take significant values even for far neighboring planes. Further, considerable decrease of the energy gap induced by pressure gives rise to a characteristic pressure depen- dences of the interplanar forces, which lead to qualitative explanation of the observed pressure dependences of the phonon dispersion curves.
Recent success in growing relatively large single crystals of black phosphorus (abbreviated BP hereafter) [I ,2] has stimulated many experi- mental and theoretical studies of its physical properties. BP is an interesting material from various points of view: (I) it is an elemental
semiconductor of narrow gap (Eg~0.3 eV) [3,4];
(2) it is a layered system consisting of pucker- ed layeres [5,6]; (3) as pressure is increased, it shows a successive phase transition such as semiconductor (orthorhombic)to semimetal (rhom- bohedral) and to metal (cubic) [6-8]; (4) in its cubic phase it becomes a superconductor with a fairly high transition temperature T =6m13 K[9].
BP is an intersting system also f~om the lat- tice dynamical point of view. According to in- elastic neutron scattering measurements[IO], for example, the whole of the longitudinal acoustic mode (LAx mode) along the [100] direction shows softening as pressure is increased, whereas the other phonon branches show hardening. This IAx mode corresponds to accordion motion of the puckered layer end affects strongly the bond angle of P atoms. Hence, this mode is expected to be strongly coupled with electrons. Thus, it is speculated that the softening of the LAx mode with increasing pressure is related with the electron-lattice interaction.
Thus far, lattice dynamical calculation at atmospheric pressure (hereafter denoted by 0 kbar) has been performed by Kaneta et al. [11 ] on the basis of the valence force model and by Kaneta and Morita [12] on the basis of the bond- charge model. The results obtained from the latter model can explain well the data obtained by inelastic neutron scattering [13], infrared absorption [14], Raman scattering [14,15] and specific heat measurements [16]. But there has been no attempt to explain the characteristic pressure dependneces of the phonon frequencies mentioned above. The aim of the present report
C " C V is to study micros opl all.~ the coupling between
the electrons and the lattice and to clarify the origin of the softening of the LAx mode caused by pressure. For this purpose we adopt the me- thod based on tight-binding calculation of elec- tronic structures. This method has been success- fully applied in explaining many aspects of st- ructural phase transitions and phonon anomalies in transition metals and transition-metal com- pounds [17].
After band calculation by Takao et al.[18] we adopt the extended Huckel approximation (EHA) [19] and use Slater-type wave functions with Cleminti exponents [20] for 3s and 3P orbitals of P atoms. In the EHA transfer integrals are assumed to be proportional to overlap integrals:
~ab(la + T)S £p'£'~ (£p~£,~) -b ab ~,£ '~ ab = (I)
la~ab (£~=£ '~)
(a,b = 3s,3P)
Here ~P'i'~) S ~p'£'~) ab and ab denote the transfer and
overlap integrals between the a orbital of £~ atom and the b orbital of £'v atom where £(£') and ~(~) specify the unit cell and the atom in a unit cell, respectively. The unit cell of BP contains four P atoms as depicted in Fig.1. In
eq. (I) I a denotes the ionization energy and Kab
represents a parameter chosen appropriately. In actual calculations the ionization energies are taken from the values calculated by Herman and Skillman [21 ] (I3s=-1.2588 Ryd., I3p=-0.6139
Ryd. ) and as to the values of K and K we use ss pp
the commonly chosen value 1.75. The remaining parameter K may be chosen so as to reproduce the band ga~Po.3 eV at 0 kbar [18].
Since the overlap integral is calculated analytically for any pair of P stems, the energy
595
596
b12 - C
INTERPLANAR FORCES OF BLACK PHOSPHORUS
[Ryd] 0.£'
Vol. 61 , No. I 0
I z
-0..~ x
L U Z
-I .{
Fig.1. A portion of the crystal structure of BP.
band structure can be calculated if we give lat- tice constants a, b and c and structure cons- rants u and v. Using values of these crystal structure parmeters determined by Cartz et al. [22] we have calculated first the energy bands of BP at 0 kbar. In actual calculations the overlap integrals are taken into consideration up to tenth neighboring atom pairs. The value
of K has been determined to be 1.379, which is sp
slightly different from that determined by Takao et al. [18] who used the crystal structure para- meteres different from ours. The energy disper- sion curves along the U-line (Z-L) in the first B.Z. are shown by solid curves in Fig. 2. The dispersion curves of the highest valence bands and the lowest conduction band as well as the overall features of the density of states (not shown here) are quite similar to those obtained by Asahina et al. [23] on the basis of the self- consistent pseudopotential method, which explain well many experimental results related to the electronic structure of BP [2£-27]. We have calculated also the energy bands at 15 kbar by using the crystal strucutre parameters at 15kbar [22J and the same value of Ksp. The dispersion
Fig.2. The energy band structure of BP along the U-line (Z-L). The minimum gap is located at the Z-point.
curves at 15 kbar are shown by dotted curves in Fig.2. As seen clearly, the gap between the highest valence band and the lowest conduction band decreases remarkably with increasing pres- sure. The minimum gap at the Z-point decreases from 0.3 eV to 0.174 eV.
In the tight-binding based method the elect- ron-lattice interaction is expressed in terms of derivatives of overlap and transfer integrals with respect to the atomic displacements. Adi- abatic harmonic potential for the atomic motion is obtained by calculating the electronic free energy in terms of the atomic displacements up to the second order[17]. The result is expressed as folows :
AF =~ ~ ~ ~ (;v,q) _ (2) quv
where u (a=x,y,z) denotes the Fourier~trans- form of~he lattice ~ displacement and X (~v,q) is defined by
f(Enk) - f(En,k_ q) x ~(uv,q) =2Z I
nn'k Enk - En'k-q
x gu~ (nk,n,k_q)g~ (nk,n'k-q)* (3)
Here ~a(nk ,n 'k -q) denotes the e l ec t ron - l a t t i ce coupling which represents the strength of coupl- ing between the two electronic states nk and n'k-q caused bY displacements of M-type atoms in the ~-direction. This coupling coefficients are expressed in terms of derivatives of overlap and
Vol. 6], No. lO
transfer integrals with respect to the atomic displacement. In the present calculation based on the extended ~dckel approximation the deriva- tives of transfer integrals as well as of over- lap integrals are calculated analytically. ~The generalized electronic susceptibility
X a~ (Uv ,~ contributes directly to the dynamical matrix D ~ (~ ,q) :
D °d3 (Uv ,q) = X a6 (~v ,q) + R ~'lB (#v ,q) (A)
where K ~6 (l.tV ,q) is usually called the short- range repulsive part which includes all contri-
butions other than X ~ ~v ,q). Phonon frequen-
cies are obtained by diagonalizing ~ ~v ,q). The summation over k in eq.(3) has been car-
ried out by dividing the I/8 zone of the first B.Z. into 234 meshes. The numerical calculation
of X a6 ~ ,q) at T=O K has been performed for
seven wave vectors along the A-line (£-X), q = (m/6,0,0) (m=0-6), and eigenvalues and eigenvec-
tots of X a6 ~v ,q) have been determined for each
q. All of the obtained eigenvalues are uegative, which means that electron-lattice interaction has a role of lowering phonon frequencies. In Fig.3 we show for each q three eigenvalues of
X a~ (]JV ,q) which correspond to three acoustic
modes, LAx, TAy and TAz. The symmetries of LAx,
TAy and TAz are AI, AA, and A2, respectively.
The eigenvectors of the LAx mode consists mainly of a linear combination of x1+ x 4 and x2+ x3,
hut components of z 1- z& and z 2- z 3 are also
included a little. In Fig.3 the closed circles denote the results at 0 kbar and the open cir- cles those at 15 kbar. As seen from the figure the magnitude of the eigenvalues become larger
as pressure is increased. Hence, X a6 (~v,q)
plays a role of softening the phonon frequencies with increasing pressure. The increase of the magnitude of the eigenvalue is largest for the LAX mode among three acoustic modes. This fact strongly implies a possibility that only the LAx mode shows softening as pressure is applied.
The large softening of the LAx mode with
Al-Symmetry is related with the electronic band
strucutre near the Fermi level. Because of the energy difference in the denominator of eq. (3) a main contribution to X arises from coupling between the highest valence band and the lowest conduction band near the Z-point. If we consi- der the wave vector q on the A-line and choose as the i%k state the bottom of the conduction
band at the Z-point, z4, then a large contribu-
tion arises if n'k-q state lies in the highest valence band with U2-symmetry along the U-line. In this case, there is a selection rule by group theoretical consideartion, and only the A l-mode
can connect these two electronic states, z[ and
U 2. As seen from Fig.2 the energy difference
E(z~)-E(U2) decreases considerably with increas-
ing pressure. This is the main reason why the
INTERPLANAR FORCES OF BLACK PHOSPHORUS
( c m 1 )
0
597
-I O 0
- 2 0 0
F
• % . . I
"~" 1 "
e Okb "~'~"~"
___..._._ 1 5 k b
A X
decrease of the eigenvalue of the LAx mode (A 1- -symmtry) under~ressure is the largest.
In general X ~ ~ ,q) can be expressed as the Fourier transform of interatomic forces [28] and their knowledge can bring us new insight into the nature of interatomic interaction and crys- tal bonding. In case we focus our attention on phonon dispersions along a particular direction in the q-space as in the present case, it is convenient to introduce interplanar forces [29]. It is noted that the lattice dynamics for wave vectors along a particular direction can be completely determined by giving forces between planes perpendicular to that direction because all of the same kind of atoms on one of such planes vibrate in the same phase. In terms of interplanar forces the generalized electronic
~ k Fig.3. Three eigenvalues of X~(~v,q) corres- ponding to three acoustic modes along the [100] direction (A-line). In this figure we have plotted -~(-eigenvalue)/M where M denotes the mass of P atoms. Note that the eigenvalues are negative. The numbers, I, 2 and 4, denote the symmetry of the accoustic modes: I; A I (LAx), 2;
A 2 (TAy), 4; A 4 (TAz). The open and closed
circles are obtained by diagonalizing X SB (~,q) calculated from eq.(3) whereas the solid and
dotted curves are obtained by using Xa6(~,q)
calculated from eq. (5).
598 INTERPLANAR FORCES OF BLACK PHOSPHORUS Vol. 61, No. |0
susceptibility XaB(Wv ,q) can be expressed as
follows:
X~B(wv'q) :[p ~xB(P~'P'v)exp(ilqiRp~,p'v)" (5)
where K ~ (p~ ,p'v ) represents an effective force X
constant between the p-th plane of ~ atoms and
the p'-th plane of v atoms, and Rpu,p,v denotes
the distance between the two planes. If we con- fine ourselves to the [100] direction, each ato- mic plane contains only one kind of P atom, 1,2, 3, or 4. Instead of performing inverse Fourier transform of eq.(5) we have determined the in- terplanar forces by a least-squares fitting pro-
cedure so as to reproduce ×aB(~v,q) for q = F,
(I/2)FX, and X. The form of interplanar forces is determined by the crystal symmetry and it takes the following form in the present case:
a, O, d
K~ (p~ ,p'v) = 0, b, 0 (6)
d' O, c
Off diagonal xy,yx,yz, and zy components vanish exactly. For both pressures, O and 15 kbar,
XaB(~v,q) have been reproduced almost completely
by taking account of interplanar forces up to the ninth neiboring planes. The full and dotted curves in Fig.3 represent the results of diago-
nalization of XaS(~v,q) obtained from eq.(5)
using such determined effective force constants. xx 0 In Fig.4 we show -K X (p,) which represents
the force acting on the plane p along the x-di- rection when the plane O is displaced by a unit length along the x-direction. Here the suffix ~, V for atoms are omitted for simplicity. A plane of atom I has been chosen as the plane O. The plane I is a plane of atom 2, the plane 2 is a plane of atom 3, the planes 3A and 3B are planes of atom 4, and so on. The eigenvalue of
the LAx mode is determined mainly by K.~XX(p,0). A
The nearest neighboring and the next nearest neighboring force constants take naturally large values, but it should be noted that the fourth neighboring interplanar force is also fairly large. Thus, the interatomic forces due to elec- tron-lattice interaciton can be never described by near neighboring forces only. This long- range nature of the effective forces is ascribed to the small gap of BP. Other components of the force constants show distance-dependence similar
to those of KwXX(p,O). In Fig.A we show also the
difference between the force constants at O kbar
and at 15 kbar, AK..XX(p,O) ~ Kx(P,O)[O kbar] - A
K xx, 0 ~ ~X ~p' }[15 kbar]. As seen from the figure XX
the magnitude of K X (p,O) increases with
increasing pressure. In particlar, the fourth
interplanar force C(4,0) shows the neighboring
largest relative increase of the magnitude.
[nterpl anar Forces ~oooso [dyn/c.~
-K~ ~ ~p.o~ I
............ .,"::":-...>;."/.::..:. ..... :-.:..>.,5.:.>i.."::::,::::: ..... -AK X {p,O;'",.. '""2:2"'. ...... .. "'"";.')'... "'"'1:22"-.. '"":."
i ii !1 i! ii ii
Fig.g. Effective interplanar force constants
KXX(p,O) and short-range interplanar force ×
constants Ky(p,O) at 0 kbar. AK~.XX(p,O) A
represents the difference between the effective force constants at 0 kbar and at 15 kbar.
To see whether only the LAx mode can actually show softening as pressure is applied we have calculated the phonon dispersions along the [100] direction by taking account of short-range
repulsive part R~(wv,q). We have expressed
R~S(wv,q) in terms of short-range interplanar
~S(p~,p'v ) up to the third forces neighboring
planes. As mentioned before, phonon frequencies are determined by diagonalizing the total dyna-
mical matrix X ~B ~ ,q) + ~ (~ ,q). The short-
range interplanar force constants at O kbar have been determined by a procedure of least-squares fit so as to reproduce 13 phonon frequencies ( 8 at F, 2 at X and 3 at (I/2)FX) observed by Raman scattering [14], by infrared reflection [14] and by inelastic neutron scatte$ing [10]. The determined short-range forces K~(p,O) are illustrated in Fig.4 and the phonon-dispersion curves of the LAx and TAz modes at O kbar are shown by full curves in Fig.5. Since we have no way to evaluate the pressure dependence of the short-range force, we have assumed simply that
of K~RS(P,O) increase at the same rate all as
pressure is applied. The dotted curves in Fig.5 show phonon dispersion curves obtained by using
K~(p,O) at 15 kbar and short-range forces x larger by 5% than those at 0 kbar. As seen from the figure the LAx mode does show softening whereas the TAz mode shows hardening. Thus, ex- perimental results by Yamada et al.[10] are qua- litatively explained, though there is some ambi- guity in short-range force constants. Other pho- non modes not shown in Fig.5 show hardening ex- cept the TAy mode whose frequency is almost un- changed. Experimentally there is no observation about the pressure dependence of the TAy mode.
It shoud be emphasized that far-neighboring
Vol. 6l, No. I0
--1 ( o m ) Phonon
1 0 0 r-
INTERPLANAR FORCES OF BLACK PHOSPHORUS
5 0
O it/
I
o Exp. (OKb)
• Exp.(15Kb)
L A x ( A 1 )
o
Energy
e
T A z ( A 2 )
o
A X
Fig.5. Phonon dispersion curves of the LAx and TAz modes. Solid curves -- at 0 kbar- dotted curves -- at 15 kbar. Experimental data are taken from ref.10.
599
the force constant model which takes account of interplanar forces only up to the third neigh- boring planes, but our trial was unsuccessful. In this connection it is noted that the valence force model used by Kaneta et al.[11] cannot explain either the pressure effect because their model takes into account interplanar forces essentially up to the third neighboring planes with respect to the [100] direction.
In summary: (I) Effective interplanar forces caused by elec-
tron-lattice interaction is fairly long- ranged in black phosphorus because of its small energy gap.
(2) These effective interplanar forces play a role of softening phonon frequencies as pressure is applied.
(3) The softening is the largest for the LAx
(At-symmetry) mode. This consequence comes
from: (i) the energy gap decreases consi-
derably by pressure and (ii) only the A 1-
phonon mode can couple the conduction band bottom (Z Z) with the highest valence band
states (U2-symmetry) near the Z point.
(4) These effective interplanar forces combined with short-range repulsive forces appropri- ately chosen can explain qualitatively the characteristic pressure dependences of phonon frequencies, i.e. only the LAx mode shows softening as pressure is applied whereas other modes show hardening.
(5) It is the effective force v~x(4,0) (fourth
neighboring interplanar force) that plays a most crucial role in pressure-induced softening of the LAx mode.
interplanar forces caused by electron-lattice interaction is indispensable to explaining the observed pressure-dependence of phonon frequen- cies. In particular, large increase of the mag-
nitude of KXX(4,0) caused by pressure has played ×
a vital role in pressure-induced softening of the LAx mode. In fact, we have tried to explain the observed pressure effects on the basis of
Acknowledgements We are grateful to Prof. K. Motizuki of Osaka
University for useful and fruitful discussion and for critical reading of the manuscript. This work is partly supported by the Kurata Foundation. The numerical calculations were performed with use of ACOS 1000 system at the computer center of Osaka University.
REFERENCES
I. l. Shirotani, R.Maniwa, H. Sato, A.Fukizawa, N.Sato, Y.Maruyama, T.Kajiwara, H.Inokuchi and S.Akimoto, Nippon Kagaku Kaishi (1981) No.t0, 1604 [in Japanese].
2. S.Endo, Y.Akahama, S.Terada and S.Narita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21, LA82 (1982).
3. R.W.Keyes: Phys. Rev. 92, 580 (1953). 4. D.Warschauer, J.Appl. Phys. 34, 1853 (1963). 5. J. Donohue, The Structure of the Elements,
(Wil~y, New York, 1974). 6. A.Brown and S.Rundqvist, Acta Cryst. 19, 684
(1965). 7. J.C.Jamieson, Science 139, 1291 (1963). 8. T.Kikegawa and H. Iwasaki, Acta Cryst. B39,
158 (1983).
9. H. Kawamura, I. Shorotani and K. Tachikawa, Solid State Commun. 49, 879 (1984).
10. Y.Yamada, Y.Fujii, Y.Akahama, S.Endo, S.Narita, J.D.Axe and D.B.McWhan, Phys. Rev. B30, 2410 (1984).
11. C.Kaneta, H. Katayama-Yoshida and A.Morita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55, 1213 (1986).
12. C.Kaneta and A.Morita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55, 1224 (1986).
13. Y.Fujii, Y.Akahama, S.Endo, S.Narita and Y. Yamada, Solid State Commun. 44, 579 (1982).
14. S.Sugal and I.Shirotani, Solid State Commun. 53, 753 (1985).
15. S.Sugai, T.Ueda and K.Murase, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 50~ 3356 (1981).
600 INTERPLANAR FORCES OF BLACK PHOSPHORUS
16. K. Paukov, Zh. Fiz. Khim. 43, 1385 (1969). 17. K.Motizuki and N.Suzuki, Structural Phase
Transiiton of Layered Transition-Metal Compounds9 ed. K.Motizuki (D. Reidel Pub- lishing Co.) pp.I-134 (in press).
18. Y.Takao, H.Asahina and A.Morita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 50, 3362 (1981).
19. R.Hoffman, J. Chem Phys. 39, 1397 (1963). 20. E.Clementi and D.L.Raimondi, J. Chem. Phys.
38. 2686 (1963). 21. F.Herman and S.Skillman, Atomic Structure
Calculations (Prentice-Hall, N.J. 1963). 22. L.Cartz, S.R.Srinivasa, R.J.Riedner, J.D.
Jorgensen and T.G. Worlton, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 1718 (1979).
23. H.Asahina, K. Shindo and A.Morita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 1192 (1982).
Vol. 61, No. l0
24. Y.Akahama, S.Endo and S.Narita, J.Phys. Soc. Jpn. 52, 2148 (1983).
25. Y.Harada, K.Murao, l.Shirotani, T.Takahashi and Y.Maruyama, Solid State Commun. 2~. 877 (1982).
26. Y.Hayashi, T.Takahashi, H. Asahina, T.Sagawa, A.Morita and I.Shirotani, Phys. Rev. B30, 1891 (1984).
27. T.Takahashi, H. Tokailin, S.Suzuki. T.Sagawa and I.Shirotani, Phys. Rev. B29, 1105(1984)~ J. Phys. C 18, 825 (1985).
28. K.Motizuki, N.Suzuki, Y.Yoshida and Takaoka, Solid State Commun. 40, 357 (1981).
29. K.Kunc and P.G.Dacosta, Phys. Rev. B32, 2010 (1985).