interdisciplinary writing unit: expository

33
Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository Shantelle Roberson READ 7140 OWA Summer 2008

Upload: wanda

Post on 25-Feb-2016

61 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository. Shantelle Roberson READ 7140 OWA Summer 2008. 5 th Grade Level Expository Writing: Bio-Poem Social Studies: Immigration. Georgia 5 th Grade Writing Assessment. Description Evaluation of student response Assigned a topic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Interdisciplinary Writing Unit:

Expository

Shantelle RobersonREAD 7140 OWA

Summer 2008

Page 2: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

5th Grade LevelExpository Writing:

Bio-PoemSocial Studies:Immigration

Page 3: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Georgia 5th Grade Writing Assessment

DescriptionEvaluation of student responseAssigned a topicAllowed ~120 minutes to write essayAdministered in one dayMake-up given the following day

Type of Writing:

Narrative

Informational

Persuasive

Page 4: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Teacher’s Instructional Grouping

• Whole Group– Saves time; promotes active learning– Modeling

• Individual– Monitor students’ progress– Assessment

• Small Groups/Partners– Enhances social interactions– Scaffolding

Page 5: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Grouping: Students’ Needs

• Developmental– Students function independently at their

Zone of Proximal development• Cultural

– Students instructed with visual aids and modeling

• Linguistic– Students instructed at their language

demand

Page 6: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Accommodations/Modifications

Developmental Needs:

Heterogeneous Grouping

Preferential seating

Peer tutor

Assistive Technology

Modified Assignments

Short Breaks

Cultural/Linguistic Needs:

Visual Aids

Modeling

Peer Tutor

Repeated Instruction

Word Walls/Banks

Scaffolding

Page 7: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

The Writing Process

Page 8: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

5 Stages of Writing(1) Pre-Writing

(2) Drafting

(3) Revising(4) Editing

(5) Publishing

Page 9: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Prewriting•Getting-ready-to-write stage

•Generate and organize ideas

•Decide what direction to take

•Most neglected stage in the writing

process

•At least 70% of writing time

Determine~

Topic: Immigrant Group (Jewish)

Form: Bio-Poem

Audience: Teacher, Classmates

Purpose: To Inform

Page 10: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Instructional ProceduresPrewriting

• Modeling– No sentence structure

• Sentences, spelling, punctuation, etc.– Video Demos

• Hints about Print• Fact Fragment Frenzy

• Practice– Complete bio-organizer together– Reference materials, including internet

Page 11: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Assessment

• Bio-Poem Organizer (Individual)

• Reference materials, including internet

• Bio-poem Prewriting Scoring Rubric

Page 12: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Bio-Poem Organizer

Name ______________________________ Date __________________ Topic ______________________________ Audience ______________________ Form ______________________________ Purpose ________________________ Immigrant Group

Traits (adjectives) that describe the group

Immigrants of….

Motivated by… (why they left, why they chose America)

Hardships endured… (voyage, arrival, life in America)

Prejudices faced… (why, how, and from whom)

Impacted on… (how America benefited)

Other Factual Items… (Things they saw or did, clothes they wore, food they ate, length of stay at Ellis Island, etc.)

Who settled… (a brief description of specific place where immigrants settled after Ellis Island)

Synonymous descriptor

Citation for resources

Modified by Roberson, S. (2008). Bio-poem organizer. Bio-poem format: Retrieved May 16, 2008 from Heritage Preservation web site: http://www.heritagepreservation.org/Programs/Sos/4KIDS/4kids2000/bio.html

Page 13: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Bio-Poem Prewriting Scoring Guide

Name __________________________________ Date _________________________

Meets

(3 pts.) Partially met

(1 pt.) Did not meet

(No pts.) Points

Traits 6 adjectives to describe the group

4-5 adjectives to describe the group

No adjectives to describe the group

Motivation 5 items listed about immigrant

group

3 or less items listed about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Hardships 5 items listed about immigrant

group

3 or less items listed about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Prejudices 5 items listed about immigrant

group

3 or less items listed about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Impact 5 items listed about immigrant

group

3 or less items listed about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Factual Information

5 items listed about immigrant

group

3 or less items listed about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Format Follows poem format

Partially follows form format

Does not follow poem format

References At least 2 resources listed (print or online)

At least 1 resource listed

(print or online)

No resources listed (print or online)

Total Points

Comments: Roberson, S. (2008). Bio-poem prewriting scoring rubric. Valdosta State University: Georgia. READ 7140

Page 14: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Drafting •Focus on getting ideas on paper

•Little concern about mechanical aspects of writing

•Changes may be made in the topic, purpose, or even audience 

•Label paper “Rough Draft”

•Skip Lines

•WRITE! WRITE! WRITE!

“ROUGH DRAFT”

Skip lines

Rough DraftX

X

X

X

X

Page 15: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Instructional ProceduresDrafting

• Modeling– Information pulled from organizer– Follow poem format/template

• Practice– Complete template together– Shared pen technique

Page 16: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Assessment• Bio-poem template (Individual)

• Factual Information

• Bio-poem Draft Scoring Rubric

Page 17: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Bio-Poem Template _________________________________

(Title of Poem)

_________________________________ (Author's Name)

___________________________

(Immigrant group)

______________, ______________, _______________, ______________

Immigrant of ______________________

Motivated by ____________, ____________ and ____________

Hardships endured ____________, ____________ and ____________

Prejudices faced____________, ____________ and ____________

Impacted on ____________, _____________, and _____________

___________________, _________________, and __________________

Who settled ________________________________________

_______________________________. (Synonymous descriptor)

Modified by Roberson, S. (2008). Bio-poem template from: Opp-Beckman, L. (2003). Pizazz…Persona-Poems. Retrieved May 19, 2008 from University of Oregon web site: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~leslieob/bio-poem.html

Page 18: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Bio-poem Drafting Scoring Rubric

Name __________________________________ Date _________________________

Meets (3 pts.)

Partially meets (1 pt.)

Did not meet (No pts.)

Points

Traits 4 adjectives to describe the

group

2-3 adjectives to describe the

group

No adjectives to describe the group

Motivation Selected 3 items about immigrant

group

Selected 2-3 items about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Hardships Selected 3 items about immigrant

group

Selected 2-3 items about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Prejudices Selected 3 items about immigrant

group

Selected 2-3 items about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Impact Selected 3 items about immigrant

group

Selected 2-3 items about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Factual Information

Selected 3 items about immigrant

group

Selected 2-3 items about

immigrant group

No items listed about immigrant

group

Format Follows poem format

Partially follows form format

Did not follow poem format

Total Points

Comments:

Roberson, S. (2008). Bio-poem drafting scoring rubric. Valdosta State University: Georgia. READ 7140

Page 19: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Revising

•Clarify/refine your ideas

•Revising types:

~add

~delete

~rearrange

~substitute

•Continual process

Reread rough draftWriting GroupMake revisions w/ different color ink

Page 20: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Instructional ProceduresRevising

• Modeling– Point out revisions

• Practice– Students paired into writing groups

• Students share their writing with peers• Peers offer comments, suggestions, and ideas• Students revise on the basis of the feedback receive

from the writing group.– Revise class’ completed rough draft

Page 21: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Assessment•Different color revision marks

•Proofreaders’ marks

•Bio-poem Revising Scoring Rubric

Page 22: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Bio-poem Revising Scoring Rubric

Name _________________________________

Exceeds Standard

3

Meets Standard

2

Partially Meets

Standard 1

Does not Meet Standard

0

Self Score

Teacher Score

Adding *6 or more additions were

made *Additions

varied (words, sentences,

phrases, etc.)

5 additions were made

3-4 additions were made

2 or less additions were

made

Deleting All unnecessary information or

words were deleted

Most unnecessary

information or words were

deleted

Some unnecessary

information or words were

deleted

There is information (or

words) that needs to be

deleted, yet no deletions were

made

Rearranging All rearrangements were made as

necessary

Most rearrangements made to clarif y

writing

Some rearrangements were made to clarify writing

There were no rearrangements

that were needed were

not made

Color of revision marks

All revisions are made using

a diff erent colored pen

Most revisions are made using

a diff erent colored pen

Revisions are made with same color pen/ pencil in which draf t was written

Proof reading

Marks

All proof reading

marks are used correctly

Most proof reading

marks are used correctly

Some proof reading

marks are used correctly

No proof reading marks have been used or all have been used incorrectly

Total Score: Modified by Roberson, S. (2008). from: Kidd, L. (2007). Bio-poem revising scoring guide. Unpublished rubric, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA.

Page 23: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Editing•Put piece into final form•Focus on Mechanics ~ Spelling ~ Punctuation ~ Sentence structure ~ Capitalization (Proper Nouns)•Use Proofreaders’ marks

Page 24: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Instructional ProceduresEditing

• Modeling– Point out mechanics

• Practice– Students partner with peer editor

• Locate mechanical errors• Edit on basis of feedback from peer

– Edit class’ revised draft• Shared pen technique

– Use dictionary, thesaurus, other references

Page 25: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Assessment• Mechanics

• Proofreaders’ Marks

• Editor’s Checklist

• Bio-poem Editing Scoring Rubric

Page 26: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Proofreaders’ Marks

Tompkins, G. E. (2008). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Page 27: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Editor’s Checklist

Author Peer

Editor Category

I have circled and corrected the words that might be misspelled, using a dictionary or asking someone if necessary.

I have checked that all proper nouns begin with capital letters.

I have checked for grammar mistakes, including subject-verb agreement.

I have used a different color pen than the one I used during revising and drafting.

I have used proofreaders’ marks to identify and make corrections (author only).

Comments:

Author: ____________________ Editor: ______________________

Modified by Roberson, S. from: Tatum, S. (2008). Editing checklist for author and editor. Unpublished manuscript. Waycross, GA. Valdosta State University.

Page 28: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Bio-poem Editing Scoring Rubric

Meets 3 pts.

Partially meets 2 pt.

Does not meet No pts.

Points

Grammar; Subject/Verb Agreement

Most grammar is correct; correct

subject/verb agreement

Some grammar is correct; some

correct subject/verb agreement

Very little or no grammar is correct;

subject/verb agreement

Spelling Most spelling is correct

Some spelling is correct

Very little or no spelling is correct

Capitalization (Proper Nouns)

Most capitalization is correct

Some capitalization is correct

Very little or no capitalization is

correct

Proofreaders’ Mark

Most proofreading marks are used

correctly

Some proofreading marks are used

correctly

No proofreading marks have been

used or all have been used incorrectly

Color of editing marks

All revisions are made using a

different colored pen

Most revisions are made using a

different colored pen

Revisions are made with same color

pen/pencil in which draft was written

Total points

Comments:

Roberson, S (2008). Bio-poem editing scoring rubric. Unpublished manuscript. Valdosta State University, G.A.: READ 7140.

Page 29: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

•Recopy writing ~ Neatness

•Final Form: ~ Making books

~ Poetry Tree

~ Author’s Chair

Publishing

Page 30: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Instructional ProcedurePublishing

• Practice– Recopy class’ edited draft

– Best Handwriting

– Display poem on Poetry Tree

Page 31: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

•Readable

•Content

•Illustration

•Bio-poem Publish Rubric

Assessment

Page 32: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Bio-poem Publish Scoring Rubric

Criteria Exceeds 4 pts.

Meets 3 pts.

Partially Meets 2 pts.

Does not meet No pts.

Points

Ideas (Lines)

All ideas are factual and relevant to requested information

Most ideas are factual and relevant to requested information

Some ideas are factual and relevant to requested information

No ideas are factual and relevant to requested information

Word Choice Precise, original, fresh words Creates vivid images

Uses most descriptive words to create image Experiments with new and different word with success

Attempts to use descriptive words to create images Experiments with new and different words with some success

General or ordinary words Attempts new words with limited success may include inappropriate words or limited use of vocabulary

Language Conventions (spelling, grammar, punctuation)

Has grade-level Appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation; contains few, if any, errors that do not interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Has mainly grade level Appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation; contains some errors that do not interfere with the reader’s understanding.

May contain many errors in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation that may interfere with the reader’s understanding.

May contain frequent and numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation that interferes with the reader’s understanding.

Content (Poem)

The content of this poem is clearly related to the topic.

The content of this poem relates to the topic well.

The content of this poem relates to the topic only minimally.

The content of this poem does not relate to the topic.

Format Follows poem format

Partially follows form

format

Did not follow poem format

Illustration/ Picture

Effective and creative use of an illustration or picture enhances the poem’s meaning.

Uses an illustration or picture to enhance the poem’s meaning.

Uses an Illustration or picture that may add to the poem’s meaning.

Lacks an illustration or picture.

Page 33: Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Expository

Effort Student’s work

demonstrates a complete understanding of the assignment and goes beyond the requirements.

Student’s work demonstrates an understanding of the assignment.

Student’s work Demonstrates some understanding of the assignment.

Student’s work Lacks understanding of the assignment.

Neatness (“Readable”)

Handwriting is legible or poem is typed

Handwriting is legible or poem is typed

Handwriting is legible or poem is typed

Handwriting needs improvement; poem needs to be typed

References Print/On-line

3+ resources listed

2 resources listed

1 resource listed

No resources listed

Total Points

Comments:

Roberson, S. (2008). Bio-poem publishing scoring rubric. Unpublished transcript. Valdosta State University, G.A.: READ 7140