innovation in health care delivery: bundled payments for high-value care … · 2019. 12. 17. ·...
TRANSCRIPT
InnovationinHealthCareDelivery:BundledPaymentsforHigh-ValueCare
RobinWangDr.AmolNavathe
Agenda
• Background• Significance• StudyAims• MyContributions/Results• FinalThoughts
USHealthCareSpending
CMSprojectsnationalhealthspendinggrowthrateof5.6%for2016–2025,outpacingGDPby1.2%Healthshareeconomyriseto19.9%by2025from17.8%in(2015)
(US:$9,990)
USHealthCareQuality
FeeForService
• Traditionally,privateinsurersandMedicare/Medicaidhavepaidprovidersusingfee-for-service(FFS)reimbursement
• Providerspaidforeachoftheindividualservicestheysupply• FFSrewardsforquantity,notqualityofcare.• Incentivetoprovidemorecostlycareasopposedtohigh-valuecare,leadstoinefficientspending
• Fragmentedcare,littleincentivetocoordinatecare
BundledPayment• AlternativetoFFS,behavioraleconomicsprincipleshaveinspiredbundledpayment
• Insteadofpayingforeachserviceseparately,bundledpaymentprovidesasingle,pre-determinedpaymentacrossanepisodeofcare
• Totalfeescomparedagainsttargetprice,providersassumelossforover-targetspendingorrewardedthroughsharedsavings
• Introducesfinancialrisk-sharingamongproviders• Mayincentivizecost-consciousandhigh-qualitycarebypromotinggreatercarecoordinationandcareredesigntocutdownonunnecessaryspending(PACutilization,readmissions)
Agenda
• Background• Significance• StudyAims• MyContributions/Results• FinalThoughts
CMS(andPrivateInsurers)areRapidlyExpandingBundledPayment
Medicaregoaltolink50%ofpaymentstoalternativepaymentmodelsby2018
• 2013:BundledPaymentforCareImprovement(BPCI)• Voluntary,~1400participants
• 2016:ComprehensiveCareforJointReplacement(CJR)• Mandatory,~800hospitalsautomaticallyenrolledacross67MSAs• Lowerextremityjointreplacement(MS-DRG469,470),90-Dayepisode
• 2018:BundledPaymentsforAMI,CABG,andhip/femurfactures• Mandatory,across98MSAs
• Limitedevidenceontheeffectsofpoliciesonvalueofcare
Agenda
• Background• Significance• StudyAims• MyContributions/Results• FinalThoughts
• Describe any differences in baseline spending and quality between BPCI and CJR hospitals
• Later as data becomes available, evaluate the effects of these policies and compare spending, mortality, and readmissions
• Part of a larger portfolio of questions:
Descriptive Policy Impact
Extending Policy Analysis
Provider Responses
Prospective Design
BPCI vs. CJR
BPCI volume response & selection
BPCI commercial spillovers
LDI-AHA National Survey on Bundled Payment
HMSA cardiac, ortho, oncology
BPCI vs. EPM
BPCI impact by condition types
BPCI within hospital spillovers
Premier Cigna ACO / bundle coordination
BPCI top 10 conditions
BPCI disparities
BPCI vs. ACO mechanisms
OrthoCarolina
Anthem
Bundles vs. ACOs
CJR Private Payers
StudyAims
HeatMapsforBPCIandCJRParticipantHospitals
Agenda
• Background• Significance• StudyAims• MyContributions/Results• FinalThoughts
MedicareCost-Standardization
-WecannotsimplycomparerawMedicarepaymentstoprovidersbecausepaymentsaresubjecttomultipleadjustmentsthatdonotreflecttheactualvolumeofservicesprovided.
The image part with relationship ID rId3 was not found in the file.
The image part with relationship ID rId3 was not found in the file.
MedicareCost-StandardizationMedicarePaymentAdjustments
MedicareCost-Standardization
- TomeaningfullyandaccuratelydescribetheeffectofMedicare’sbundledpaymentpolicies,needtodevelopanapples-to-applescomparison- Acrossallcomponentsofcare:
- Inpatientpayments- Readmissionpayments- HealthCareProviderpayments- Outpatientpayments- Post-AcuteCarepayments
- SkilledNursingFacilities- HomeHealthAgencies- InpatientRehabilitationFacilities
Results- ApplyingCostStandardizationMethodologytoData
ChallengesFacingBundledPayment• Administrativecomplicationsindefiningbundle,howgains/lossesdistributed
• Compensatoryvolumeresponseandshifttowardshealthierpatients
• CallsforbetterintegrationwithACOs,extendingdurationofbundle,patient-levelriskadjustment
Agenda
• Background• Significance• StudyAims• MyContributions/Results• FinalThoughts
ThankYou!
Questions?