hybrid ship hottest commodity asset right nowanalysis a t a time when commodity producers are...

1
18 Thursday, September 17 2015 BUSINESS REPORT Opinion & Analysis A T A TIME when commodity producers are writing down billions in asset values and cancelling projects around the world, one niche area of the gas market is booming. Hybrid ships, called Floating Storage and Regasification Units, or FSRUs, offer emerging nations from Egypt to Pakistan a cheaper, quicker way to attack power shortages by importing liquefied natural gas (LNG). They cost about $300 million (R3.9 billion) to build, or half as much as an on-shore import terminal, and are up and running as much as six times faster, sometimes within as little as a year, accord- ing to owners Hoegh LNG Holding and Excelerate Energy. As prices for the fuel slumped 64 per- cent from last year’s peak, the rout made importing the fuel more popular with new buyers seeking a quicker route to LNG amid soaring power demand. Built at ship- yards in South Korea, Hoegh sees as many as 55 such vessels in use within five years, from about 20 now and just the one a decade ago. “The main driver is speed,” Sveinung Stohle, Hoegh’s chief executive, said. “Demand for FSRUs follows a drastic reduction in the cost of LNG. We see that this has caused a very strong increase in requests.” Hoegh gained 44 percent this year in Oslo trading. By comparison, the 79-mem- ber Bloomberg world mining index fell 26 percent, led by Glencore’s 57 percent slump as raw materials from coal to copper plunged. Oil still dominates international energy trade because of the ease in pump- ing the fuel onto ships. Gas was historically sold just via pipelines, which imposed geographical limits on buying and selling. Now, mirror- ing oil with the added cost of new infra- structure, LNG will account for most of the 40 percent gain in inter-regional gas trade by 2020, the International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts. Fastest alternative FSRUs are emerging as the fastest alterna- tive for imports just as nations imposing limits on carbon dioxide emissions turn to gas, which is twice as clean as coal. With prices down, “environmentally beneficial natural gas delivered as LNG is becoming competitive with coal” in power generation, Graham Robjohns, the chief executive of Golar LNG Partners, said in an August 27 earnings call. Golar LNG has six operating FSRUs and two on order. Floating terminals account for 28 percent of the import capacity under construction, according to Bank of America.Competition to supply FSRUs had cut costs of leasing such vessels by 20 per- cent to about $120 000 per day from five years ago, said Keith Bainbridge, the managing director of industry consultant CS LNG in London. Once the 300-metre vessels are moored, fuel is transferred from arriving tankers through pipes. The LNG is then converted on-board into gas and typically used on-shore at a nearby power plant. The idea was copied from the oil markets, where floating production, storage and offloading vessels have been used since 1970s, according to the IEA. LNG would probably trade at $6 to $8 per million British thermal units through 2020 amid slowing demand in core markets such as Japan, South Korea and China, Citigroup said in July. That compares with $7.10 as of September 14, according to the World Gas Intelligence publication. Prices jumped 72 percent in 2011 as Japan shut its reactors after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. They peaked at $19.70 in February 2014. The average cost to build the floating terminals will probably more than double in 2017 from $96 per ton last year as buyers choose ever-larger vessels, according to the International Gas Union, a lobby group of energy companies in 91 countries. That compares with $212 a ton for a new on-shore LNG terminal last year, such as Poland’s. On-shore costs will probably peak at $350 a ton in 2016 amid demand for bigger tanks, according to the group. Global gas demand would rise 2 percent annually in the six years through 2020, the IEA said in June. Jordan received its first FSRU in May and Pakistan began imports in March. More FSRUs may be needed in Latin America,according to Stohle. Egypt was a gas exporter until last year. Now, the country is battling power short- ages and encouraging domestic gas explo- ration to meet demand in the future. Imports began in April through the Hoegh Gallant, moored in the Red Sea port of Ain Sokhna. The vessel imports enough gas to meet 10 percent of the nation’s annual demand. Egypt now receives four to five cargoes a month from companies including Vitol Group and Algeria’s Sonatrach. It will receive a second floating terminal by the end of September and plans to lease a third unit next year. – Bloomberg O VER the course of the past few months, Germany has been described, often by the same people, first as a villain (in the euro zone crisis) and now as an exemplar (in the refugee crisis). How to explain such a seemingly fun- damental contradiction? The answer is simple: History. Germany’s current top political leaders were largely born about ten years after the end of World War II. As such, their hearts and mindsets were defined by the atrocities committed by their forefathers during the Third Re- ich. As an inevitable consequence, many of those post-World War II Germans suffered from serious identity crises. They were Germans by birth, but they most definitely were not proud of their roots. Looking at the past They sought refuge in a bigger and better world. It was hence only logical that they became the most outspoken co-creators of the European Dream. But how does this influence their be- haviour today, 70 years after the end of World War II? And how does it make them villains and paragons? Well, many of those who governed Germany, whether in the immediate post- war era or today, looked at the roots of fascism in Germany and concluded that economic instability was a pivotal factor in bringing Hitler to power. This is indeed partially correct. Many Germans, also in the population at large, identify economic instability with fiscal profligacy (incurring large public debts) and hyper-inflation. The images of 1923, when Germans pushed wheelbarrows loaded with cash to buy a loaf of bread, are still ingrained in their collective minds. What they don’t acknowledge – or don’t realise – is that it was not the fiscal pro- fligacy and hyper-inflation of the early 1920s, but fiscal austerity and the resulting depression of the late 1920s and early 1930s that facilitated Hitler’s rise. Evidently, the wheelbarrow is just too powerful an image. It was hence no surprise that Germans were such stern taskmasters throughout the euro zone crisis. The German govern- ment seemed unforgiving, heartless and uncompromising toward those who had committed the “sin” of fiscal imprudence. But in the minds of the German leader- ship and the German people, all they were doing was to save the European Dream. They never perceived themselves as potential “villains”, even when many within the euro zone unjustly did. But then something even more sur- prising happened. As the civil wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria intensified, hundreds of thousands of people fled their homelands and arrived at the shores of Italy and Greece and through neighbour- ing countries in Hungary. There was – and is – a lot of understand- able confusion in the EU. Not since the end of World War II has there been such a massive migration of people. The reaction of countries in the EU to this overwhelming challenge differed greatly. Hungary built a fence. Bulgaria, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Estonia and Cyprus stated that they prefer only Chris- tian refugees. Poland’s Deputy Prime Minister, Tomasz Siemoniak, said “Germans should not teach us about solidarity”, while ”generously” extending the country’s hand to a mind-boggling 2 200 refugees over the next two years. History Meanwhile, the UK has offered refuge to 25 000 asylum seekers – literally a drop in the bucket. And Germany’s reaction? The German government expects to take in 800 000 refugees in 2015 alone, almost 1 per- cent of the country’s present population. Why? Once again: History. The land of the Holocaust will do its utmost to right those past wrongs. And thus, the poem by Emma Lazarus, which is engraved in a plaque at the Statue of Liberty, might just as well also adorn the Brandenburg Gate now: “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” By and large, German reception of the tired, poor and huddled masses has set an example for humanity. And so it is that German history has made today’s Ger- many both villain and exemplar in the eyes of the world. All the while, Germans are trying to save their European Dream from turning into a European Nightmare. Uwe Bott is a financial risk consultant for large financial institutions, corporations and governments. Follow him @UweEconomist This article initially appeared on The Globalist. Follow The Globalist on Twitter: @Globalist W EDNESDAY last week, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) downgraded Brazil from BBB- to BB+ with a negative outlook, giving Brazil’s bonds the feared ‘junk status’. Why did this happen and what does it mean for South Africa? The three main rating agencies – S&P, Fitch and Moody’s – each have a scale by which it rates the risk of government and company bonds – that is, the ability of the bondholder to pay them back. Their scales are a combination of letters, symbols and numbers, but for simplicity’s sake note that A is better than B and more Bs are better than less, with a positive or negative sign marking the difference between each scale. In this way BBB- is better than BB+ but bond ratings are divided into two broad cat- egories: investment grade (BBB- and better) and junk grade (BB+ and worse). Many of the largest international in- vestors in bonds are funds looking for safe places to store their money including sov- ereign wealth, pension contributions and insurance installments. Their policies state they are not allowed to invest in junk grade bonds and when a rating agency downgrades a country’s bonds below this line, the demand for these bonds drops. Brazil entered into this situation due to weak economic growth, a growing fiscal deficit, high government debt and rising borrowing costs. Government bonds are the government’s way of borrowing money from the public and the yield on the bond is the interest rate they have to pay the lender. The interest rates at the initial sale are therefore the cost of borrowing. These interest rates are set by demand and supply – the higher the demand for the bond, the lower the yield that needs to be offered to attract buyers, and vice versa. But due to low demand the yields on Brazil’s 10-year government bond have soared from 12.5 percent in July to over 15 percent in September. Any new bond issues will have to be offered at the higher rates making it more difficult for Brazil to pay its debts. The drop in demand due to the downgrade fur- ther increases Brazil’s borrowing costs – just after the S&P announcement, the yield on the 10-year government bond increased from 14.91 percent to 15.29 percent. The downgrade in Brazil has sparked speculation that other emerging markets may be downgraded to junk, especially Turkey, Malaysia and South Africa. In June this year, S&P maintained their rating of BBB- with a stable outlook for South Africa, saying that this was unlikely to change in the next two years. South Africa is facing many of the same risks that led Brazil to its junk status, but it is doing better. Brazil’s budget deficit in 2014 was only 0.6 percent of gross do- mestic product (GDP) to South Africa’s 3.8 percent. But where the Treasury has made solid commitments to decrease spending and slightly raise taxes, Brazil has been slack in coming up with a plan. Their deficit is expected to increase to 8 percent of GDP in 2015 and 2016. South Africa’s economy is growing slowly – forecast to be around 1.7 percent for 2015 – but Brazil is in a recession with annual GDP growth at negative 2.6 percent. South Africa’s government debt to GDP ratio of 39 percent is healthier than Brazil’s 59 percent, and while Brazilian 10-year bonds yields have exceeded 15 percent, South Africa’s are still around 8.5 percent. A downgrade for South Africa would not be welcome but as yet, we’re not follow- ing in Brazil’s footsteps. Pierre Heistein is the convener of UCT’s Applied Economics for Smart Decision Making course. Follow him on Twitter @PierreHeistein What Brazil’s junk status means for SA’s status ❚❚ DILBERT ❚❚ DIARY Hybrid ship hottest commodity asset right now The world sees Germany as both villain and exemplar Global gas demand would rise 2 percent annually in the six years through 2020, the International Energy Agency said in June. Germans were such stern taskmasters throughout the euro zone crisis… But in the minds of Germans, all they were doing was to save the European Dream. GAS MARKET “SEXBOTS” could seriously damage human relationships, a leading robot ethicist has warned. Experts hope to use artificial intelligence to create lifelike machines that can talk and have sex like a human. However, Kath- leen Richardson told the BBC the technology was “unnecessary and undesirable”. “Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics in- dustry and the models that they draw on – how they will look, what roles they would play – are very disturbing indeed,” she said. She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical. “We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women,” she said. Richardson, a robot ethicist at De Montfort University in Leices- ter, wants to raise awareness of the issue and persuade those developing sex robots to rethink how their technology is used. Pre- viously experts have warned that human relationships with robots were set to become commonplace. Sex between humans and machines may soon become the norm. As humans spend more time in virtual realities – includ- ing online gaming and social media – intimate relationships with androids might even improve people’s mental health, according to a sex psychologist. – Daily Mail Robots invasion of bedrooms has dangers, expert warns UNDERSTANDING RATINGS Pierre Heistein You can write, fax or e-mail a letter to: The Editor, Business Report, PO Box 1014, Johannesburg 2000 Fax: (011) 838-2693 e-mail: [email protected] Include daytime telephone numbers and full address. Pseudonyms are not acceptable. The editor reserves the right to edit or reject letters DIRECT ENQUIRES TO: JHB NEWSDESK 011 633 2484 You can send feedback, complaints or suggestions to: e-mail: [email protected] ❚❚ CONTACT Anna Shiryaevskaya ECONOMIC FEARS Uwe Bott ❚❚ QUOTE OF THE DAY The best inheritance a parent can give his children is a few minutes of his time each day. – Orlando Battista, Canadian-American chemist and author (1917 – 1995) A FSRU LNG vessel under construction in the dry dock at the Hyundai Heavy Industries shipyard in Ulsan, South Korea. Hybrid ships offer emerging nations from Egypt to Pakistan a cheaper, quicker way to attack power shortages. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG A street artist entertains, for free, migrants at the compound outside the Berlin Office of Health and Social Affairs as they wait for their registration in Berlin, Germany yesterday.The writer says Germany is driven to right its past wrongs. PHOTO: REUTERS

Upload: lamtuong

Post on 28-May-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

18 Thursday, September 17 2015 BUSINESS REPORT

Opinion&Analysis

AT A TIME when commodityproducers are writing downbillions in asset values andcancelling projects around theworld, one niche area of the

gas market is booming.Hybrid ships, called Floating Storage

and Regasification Units, or FSRUs, offeremerging nations from Egypt to Pakistana cheaper, quicker way to attack powershortages by importing liquefied naturalgas (LNG). They cost about $300 million(R3.9 billion) to build, or half as much asan on-shore import terminal, and are upand running as much as six times faster,sometimes within as little as a year, accord-ing to owners Hoegh LNG Holding andExcelerate Energy.

As prices for the fuel slumped 64 per-cent from last year’s peak, the rout madeimporting the fuel more popular with newbuyers seeking a quicker route to LNGamid soaring power demand. Built at ship-yards in South Korea, Hoegh sees as manyas 55 such vessels in use within five years,from about 20 now and just the one adecade ago.

“The main driver is speed,” SveinungStohle, Hoegh’s chief executive, said.

“Demand for FSRUs follows a drastic

reduction in the cost of LNG. We see thatthis has caused a very strong increase inrequests.”

Hoegh gained 44 percent this year inOslo trading. By comparison, the 79-mem-ber Bloomberg world mining index fell26 percent, led by Glencore’s 57 percentslump as raw materials from coal to copperplunged. Oil still dominates internationalenergy trade because of the ease in pump-ing the fuel onto ships.

Gas was historically sold just viapipelines, which imposed geographicallimits on buying and selling. Now, mirror-ing oil with the added cost of new infra-structure, LNG will account for most of the40 percent gain in inter-regional gas tradeby 2020, the International Energy Agency(IEA) forecasts.

Fastest alternativeFSRUs are emerging as the fastest alterna-tive for imports just as nations imposinglimits on carbon dioxide emissions turn togas, which is twice as clean as coal.

With prices down, “environmentallybeneficial natural gas delivered as LNG isbecoming competitive with coal” in powergeneration, Graham Robjohns, the chiefexecutive of Golar LNG Partners, said inan August 27 earnings call.

Golar LNG has six operating FSRUs andtwo on order. Floating terminals accountfor 28 percent of the import capacity underconstruction, according to Bank ofAmerica.Competition to supply FSRUs hadcut costs of leasing such vessels by 20 per-cent to about $120 000 per day from fiveyears ago, said Keith Bainbridge, themanaging director of industry consultantCS LNG in London. Once the 300-metre

vessels are moored, fuel is transferredfrom arriving tankers through pipes. TheLNG is then converted on-board into gasand typically used on-shore at a nearbypower plant. The idea was copied from theoil markets, where floating production,storage and offloading vessels have beenused since 1970s, according to the IEA.

LNG would probably trade at $6 to $8per million British thermal units through2020 amid slowing demand in core markets

such as Japan, South Korea and China,Citigroup said in July. That compares with$7.10 as of September 14, according to theWorld Gas Intelligence publication.

Prices jumped 72 percent in 2011 asJapan shut its reactors after theFukushima nuclear disaster. They peakedat $19.70 in February 2014.

The average cost to build the floatingterminals will probably more than doublein 2017 from $96 per ton last year as buyers

choose ever-larger vessels, according to theInternational Gas Union, a lobby group ofenergy companies in 91 countries. Thatcompares with $212 a ton for a new on-shore LNG terminal last year, such asPoland’s. On-shore costs will probably peakat $350 a ton in 2016 amid demand forbigger tanks, according to the group.

Global gas demand would rise 2 percentannually in the six years through 2020, theIEA said in June. Jordan received its firstFSRU in May and Pakistan began importsin March. More FSRUs may be needed inLatin America,according to Stohle.

Egypt was a gas exporter until last year.Now, the country is battling power short-ages and encouraging domestic gas explo-ration to meet demand in the future.Imports began in April through the HoeghGallant, moored in the Red Sea port of AinSokhna. The vessel imports enough gas tomeet 10 percent of the nation’s annualdemand. Egypt now receives four to fivecargoes a month from companies includingVitol Group and Algeria’s Sonatrach. Itwill receive a second floating terminal bythe end of September and plans to lease athird unit next year. – Bloomberg

OVER the course of the past fewmonths, Germany has beendescribed, often by the samepeople, first as a villain (in theeuro zone crisis) and now as

an exemplar (in the refugee crisis). How to explain such a seemingly fun-

damental contradiction? The answer issimple: History. Germany’s current toppolitical leaders were largely born aboutten years after the end of World War II.

As such, their hearts and mindsetswere defined by the atrocities committedby their forefathers during the Third Re-ich. As an inevitable consequence, many ofthose post-World War II Germans sufferedfrom serious identity crises. They wereGermans by birth, but they most definitelywere not proud of their roots.

Looking at the past They sought refuge in a bigger and betterworld. It was hence only logical that theybecame the most outspoken co-creators ofthe European Dream.

But how does this influence their be-haviour today, 70 years after the end ofWorld War II? And how does it make themvillains and paragons?

Well, many of those who governedGermany, whether in the immediate post-war era or today, looked at the roots offascism in Germany and concluded thateconomic instability was a pivotal factor inbringing Hitler to power. This is indeedpartially correct.

Many Germans, also in the populationat large, identify economic instability with

fiscal profligacy (incurring large publicdebts) and hyper-inflation.

The images of 1923, when Germanspushed wheelbarrows loaded with cash tobuy a loaf of bread, are still ingrained intheir collective minds.

What they don’t acknowledge – or don’trealise – is that it was not the fiscal pro-fligacy and hyper-inflation of the early1920s, but fiscal austerity and the resultingdepression of the late 1920s and early 1930sthat facilitated Hitler’s rise.

Evidently, the wheelbarrow is just toopowerful an image.

It was hence no surprise that Germanswere such stern taskmasters throughoutthe euro zone crisis. The German govern-ment seemed unforgiving, heartless anduncompromising toward those who hadcommitted the “sin” of fiscal imprudence.

But in the minds of the German leader-ship and the German people, all they weredoing was to save the European Dream.They never perceived themselves aspotential “villains”, even when manywithin the euro zone unjustly did.

But then something even more sur-prising happened. As the civil wars inAfghanistan, Iraq and Syria intensified,hundreds of thousands of people fled theirhomelands and arrived at the shores ofItaly and Greece and through neighbour-ing countries in Hungary.

There was – and is – a lot of understand-able confusion in the EU. Not since the endof World War II has there been such amassive migration of people.

The reaction of countries in the EU tothis overwhelming challenge differedgreatly. Hungary built a fence. Bulgaria,Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Estonia andCyprus stated that they prefer only Chris-tian refugees.

Poland’s Deputy Prime Minister,Tomasz Siemoniak, said “Germans should

not teach us about solidarity”, while”generously” extending the country’s handto a mind-boggling 2 200 refugees over thenext two years.

History Meanwhile, the UK has offered refuge to25 000 asylum seekers – literally a drop inthe bucket. And Germany’s reaction? TheGerman government expects to take in800 000 refugees in 2015 alone, almost 1 per-cent of the country’s present population.

Why? Once again: History. The land ofthe Holocaust will do its utmost to rightthose past wrongs. And thus, the poem byEmma Lazarus, which is engraved in aplaque at the Statue of Liberty, might justas well also adorn the Brandenburg Gate

now: “Give me your tired, your poor, yourhuddled masses yearning to breathe free,the wretched refuse of your teeming shore.Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost tome, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

By and large, German reception of thetired, poor and huddled masses has set anexample for humanity. And so it is thatGerman history has made today’s Ger-many both villain and exemplar in the eyesof the world. All the while, Germans aretrying to save their European Dream fromturning into a European Nightmare.

Uwe Bott is a financial risk consultant for largefinancial institutions, corporations andgovernments. Follow him @UweEconomist Thisarticle initially appeared on The Globalist. FollowThe Globalist on Twitter: @Globalist

WEDNESDAY last week,Standard & Poor’s (S&P)downgraded Brazil fromBBB- to BB+ with anegative outlook, giving

Brazil’s bonds the feared ‘junk status’. Whydid this happen and what does it mean forSouth Africa?

The three main rating agencies – S&P,Fitch and Moody’s – each have a scale bywhich it rates the risk of government andcompany bonds – that is, the ability of thebondholder to pay them back. Their scalesare a combination of letters, symbols andnumbers, but for simplicity’s sake note thatA is better than B and more Bs are betterthan less, with a positive or negative signmarking the difference between each scale.In this way BBB- is better than BB+ butbond ratings are divided into two broad cat-egories: investment grade (BBB- and better)and junk grade (BB+ and worse).

Many of the largest international in-vestors in bonds are funds looking for safeplaces to store their money including sov-ereign wealth, pension contributions andinsurance installments. Their policiesstate they are not allowed to invest in junkgrade bonds and when a rating agencydowngrades a country’s bonds below thisline, the demand for these bonds drops.

Brazil entered into this situation due toweak economic growth, a growing fiscaldeficit, high government debt and risingborrowing costs. Government bonds arethe government’s way of borrowingmoney from the public and the yield on thebond is the interest rate they have to paythe lender. The interest rates at the initialsale are therefore the cost of borrowing.

These interest rates are set by demandand supply – the higher the demand for thebond, the lower the yield that needs to beoffered to attract buyers, and vice versa.But due to low demand the yields onBrazil’s 10-year government bond havesoared from 12.5 percent in July to over15 percent in September.

Any new bond issues will have to beoffered at the higher rates making it moredifficult for Brazil to pay its debts. Thedrop in demand due to the downgrade fur-ther increases Brazil’s borrowing costs –just after the S&P announcement, the yieldon the 10-year government bond increasedfrom 14.91 percent to 15.29 percent.

The downgrade in Brazil has sparkedspeculation that other emerging marketsmay be downgraded to junk, especiallyTurkey, Malaysia and South Africa. InJune this year, S&P maintained theirrating of BBB- with a stable outlook forSouth Africa, saying that this was unlikelyto change in the next two years.

South Africa is facing many of thesame risks that led Brazil to its junk status,but it is doing better. Brazil’s budget deficitin 2014 was only 0.6 percent of gross do-mestic product (GDP) to South Africa’s3.8 percent. But where the Treasury hasmade solid commitments to decreasespending and slightly raise taxes, Brazilhas been slack in coming up with a plan.Their deficit is expected to increase to8 percent of GDP in 2015 and 2016.

South Africa’s economy is growingslowly – forecast to be around 1.7 percent for2015 – but Brazil is in a recession withannual GDP growth at negative 2.6 percent.South Africa’s government debt to GDPratio of 39 percent is healthier than Brazil’s59 percent, and while Brazilian 10-yearbonds yields have exceeded 15 percent,South Africa’s are still around 8.5 percent.

A downgrade for South Africa wouldnot be welcome but as yet, we’re not follow-ing in Brazil’s footsteps.

Pierre Heistein is the convener of UCT’s AppliedEconomics for Smart Decision Making course.Follow him on Twitter @PierreHeistein

What Brazil’sjunk statusmeans forSA’s status

❚❚ DILBERT ❚❚ DIARY

Hybrid ship hottest commodity asset right now

The world seesGermany as bothvillain and exemplar

Global gas demand wouldrise 2 percent annually inthe six years through 2020,the International EnergyAgency said in June.

Germans were such sterntaskmasters throughout theeuro zone crisis… But inthe minds of Germans,allthey were doing was tosave the European Dream.

GASMARKET

“SEXBOTS” could seriouslydamage human relationships, aleading robot ethicist has warned.

Experts hope to use artificialintelligence to create lifelikemachines that can talk and havesex like a human. However, Kath-leen Richardson told the BBC thetechnology was “unnecessary andundesirable”.

“Sex robots seem to be agrowing focus in the robotics in-dustry and the models that theydraw on – how they will look, whatroles they would play – are very

disturbing indeed,” she said.She believes that they reinforce

traditional stereotypes of womenand the view that a relationshipneed be nothing more thanphysical.

“We think that the creation ofsuch robots will contribute todetrimental relationshipsbetween men and women, adultsand children, men and men andwomen and women,” she said.

Richardson, a robot ethicist atDe Montfort University in Leices-ter, wants to raise awareness of

the issue and persuade thosedeveloping sex robots to rethinkhow their technology is used. Pre-viously experts have warned thathuman relationships with robotswere set to become commonplace.

Sex between humans andmachines may soon become thenorm. As humans spend moretime in virtual realities – includ-ing online gaming and socialmedia – intimate relationshipswith androids might even improvepeople’s mental health, accordingto a sex psychologist. – Daily Mail

Robots invasion of bedrooms has dangers, expert warns

UNDERSTANDINGRATINGS

Pierre Heistein

You can write, fax or e-mail a letter to:The Editor, Business Report, PO Box1014, Johannesburg 2000Fax: (011) 838-2693e-mail: [email protected] daytime telephone numbers and full address.Pseudonyms are not acceptable.The editor reserves the right to edit or reject lettersDIRECT ENQUIRES TO:JHB NEWSDESK 011 633 2484You can send feedback, complaints orsuggestions to:e-mail: [email protected]

❚❚ CONTACT

Anna Shiryaevskaya

ECONOMIC FEARS

Uwe Bott

❚❚QUOTE OF THE DAYThe best inheritance a parent can give his children is a few minutes ofhis time each day. – Orlando Battista, Canadian-American chemist and author (1917 – 1995)

A FSRU LNG vessel under construction in the dry dock at the Hyundai Heavy Industriesshipyard in Ulsan, South Korea. Hybrid ships offer emerging nations from Egypt toPakistan a cheaper, quicker way to attack power shortages. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG

A street artist entertains, for free, migrants at the compound outside the Berlin Office of Health and Social Affairs as they wait for theirregistration in Berlin, Germany yesterday. The writer says Germany is driven to right its past wrongs. PHOTO: REUTERS