hotdog warms significantly faster than forced-air

2
MORE EFFECTIVE HOTDOG PATIENT WARMING Two HotDog warming blankets and a maress can be powered by one controller for difficult-to-warm cases. 1.0 - 0.2 0.2 0.6 0 0.4 0.8 0 120 105 90 75 60 45 30 15 Time (min) Conductive Fabric Warming Forced-air Warming Statistically Significant CLINICAL VALUE: THE NEXT WAVE IN PATIENT WARMING FORCED-AIR LEAVES PATIENTS COLD Evaluang core temperatures in 58,814 adults having surgery lasng >60 min, Cleveland Clinic research reveals that forced-air warming systems frequently fail to prevent hypothermia: The incidence of hypothermia 2 hrs aſter inducon was nearly 50%. “Intraoperave hypothermia was common, and oſten prolonged” The Cleveland Clinic research confirms research published in 2014 in the Journal of Arthroplasty, revealing that a “disturbingly high” 26.9% of paents undergoing total hip or knee replacement remained hypothermic at the con- clusion of surgery despite being warmed with Bair Hugger.* 3.7x more peri- prosthec infecons occurred in the cases where Bair Hugger failed. Clinical Warming Effectiveness of Conductive Fabric Warming vs Forced-air Warming Hypothermia with Forced-air Warming Conducve fabric warming (HotDog) showed significantly high- er warming rates than forced-air warming (FAW) (0.35˚C/hr vs 0.02˚C/hr), when all other relevant variables were held constant in a prospecve, randomized controlled trial. The temperature difference between the two groups was stascally significant at each data point aſter 30 minutes. The authors’ conclusion: “We conclude from these data that the clinical heat transfer effecveness of [HotDog warming] is signifi- cantly greater than FAW convecon. This is due to the combina- on of conducve heat transfer and the larger surface area of simultaneously heang from above and below the paent.” Hayashi, H; Koizumi, T; Sumita, S.; Yamakage, M. Relave clinical heat transfer effecveness: Forced-air warming vs. Conducve fabric electric warming. ASA abstract 2015. Submied for publicaon. HOTDOG WARMS SIGNIFICANTLY FASTER THAN FORCED-AIR “[T]he perioperave use of Bair Hugger alone is not sufficient to prevent hypothermia in every orthopedic paent.” 20% 30% 50% 1 6 5 4 3 2 Time After Induction (hr) 63% 24% 38% 1. Sessler, D. et al. Intraoperave Core Temperature Paerns, Transfusion Requirement, and Hos- pital Duraon in Paents Warmed with Forced Air. Anesthesiology. 2015; 122:276-285. 2. Leijtens, Borg; et al. High Incidence of Postoperave Hypothermia in Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(6): 895-898. * Bair Hugger is a registered trademark of 3M Derived from data in Sessler, Anesthesiology (2015)

Upload: others

Post on 11-May-2022

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HOTDOG WARMS SIGNIFICANTLY FASTER THAN FORCED-AIR

MORE EFFECTIVE

HOTDOG PATIENT WARMING

Two HotDog warming blankets and a mattress can be powered by one controller for difficult-to-warm cases.

1.0

- 0.2

0.2

0.6

0

0.4

0.8

0 120105907560453015

Time (min)

Conductive Fabric Warming

Forced-air Warming

Statistically Signi�cant

CLINICAL VALUE:THE NEXT WAVEIN PATIENT WARMING

FORCED-AIR LEAVES PATIENTS COLDEvaluating core temperatures in 58,814 adults having surgery lasting >60 min, Cleveland Clinic research reveals that forced-air warming systems frequently fail to prevent hypothermia:

• The incidence of hypothermia 2 hrs after induction was nearly 50%.• “Intraoperative hypothermia was common, and often prolonged”

The Cleveland Clinic research confirms research published in 2014 in the Journal of Arthroplasty, revealing that a “disturbingly high” 26.9% of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement remained hypothermic at the con-clusion of surgery despite being warmed with Bair Hugger.* 3.7x more peri-prosthetic infections occurred in the cases where Bair Hugger failed.

Clinical Warming Effectiveness of Conductive Fabric Warming vs Forced-air Warming

Hypothermia with Forced-air Warming

Conductive fabric warming (HotDog) showed significantly high-er warming rates than forced-air warming (FAW) (0.35˚C/hr vs 0.02˚C/hr), when all other relevant variables were held constant in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. The temperature difference between the two groups was statistically significant at each data point after 30 minutes.

The authors’ conclusion: “We conclude from these data that the clinical heat transfer effectiveness of [HotDog warming] is signifi-cantly greater than FAW convection. This is due to the combina-tion of conductive heat transfer and the larger surface area of simultaneously heating from above and below the patient.”

Hayashi, H; Koizumi, T; Sumita, S.; Yamakage, M. Relative clinical heat transfer effectiveness: Forced-air warming vs. Conductive fabric electric warming. ASA abstract 2015. Submitted for publication.

HOTDOG WARMS SIGNIFICANTLY FASTER THAN FORCED-AIR

“[T]he perioperative use of Bair Hugger alone is not sufficient to prevent hypothermia in every orthopedic patient.” 20%

30%

50%

1 65432Time After Induction (hr)

63%

24%

38%

1. Sessler, D. et al. Intraoperative Core Temperature Patterns, Transfusion Requirement, and Hos-pital Duration in Patients Warmed with Forced Air. Anesthesiology. 2015; 122:276-285.

2. Leijtens, Borg; et al. High Incidence of Postoperative Hypothermia in Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(6): 895-898.

* Bair Hugger is a registered trademark of 3M

Derived from data in Sessler, Anesthesiology (2015)

Page 2: HOTDOG WARMS SIGNIFICANTLY FASTER THAN FORCED-AIR

SURFACE AREA & WARMING EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON:

HotDog vs. Forced-air vs. Underbody Only

Forced-air warming:

Inefficient blankets

SAVES LIVESHypothermia causes many complications:

• Increased wound infections1

• Increased blood loss2

• Increased ICU times and hospital stays1

• Higher mortality rates3

• Increased transfusion requirements4

“Even mildly hypothermic patients could suffer an increase in adverse outcomes that can add costs of as much as $2,500-$7,000 per patient.”5

MORE EFFECTIVE

HOTDOG PATIENT WARMING

CLINICAL VALUE:

©2015 Augustine Temperature Management, LLC. HotDog is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

PN M122B 07-2015

6581 City West ParkwayEden Prairie, MN 55344phone: +1 952-746-1720toll free: 1-888-439-2767email: [email protected]

www.hotdog-usa.com

THE NEXT WAVEIN PATIENT WARMING

HOTDOG MEETS THE CHALLENGEThe HotDog system is versatile and adaptable, able to meet all of your patient warming needs. Consider using HotDog for these challenging cases to really experience the difference:

• Large Heat-Loss Abdominal Cases• Full Frontal Prep (i.e. Cardiac)• Wet Cases (i.e. Plastics)

• Steep Trendelenburg Positioning• Avoiding Implant Infections

> >HotDog

patient warming:Efficient heat transfer

Maximum surface area

UnderbodyOnly:

Insufficient heat transfer

REDISTRIBUTIONAnesthesia causes vasodila-tion and a free-flow of core blood to the peripheral com-partments. The patient’s overall temperature drops 1.6˚C in the first 30 min fol-lowing induction.

POIKILOTHERMICUnder anesthesia, the patient be-comes poikilothermic (tempera-ture varies with environment). Rate of re-warming depends on the delta between active warming and heat loss from conduction, convec-tion, radiation, and evaporation.

PRE-WARMINGThe only way to re-duce redistribution hypothermia is by pre-warming, spe-cifically pre-warm-ing the legs. Hot-Dog can effectively pre-warm patients to reduce hypother-mia.

WHY WARM?TYPICAL PATTERN OF HYPOTHERMIA

WARMING

37˚C 35.3˚C

31-35˚C 33-35˚CReference citations available at

www.hotdog-usa.com