horticultural crops - integrated pest management report/ar2013... · 2018-06-23 · ncipm ii annual...

ckxokuh Qlysa | Horticultural Crops

iokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

NCIPM

jk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcU/ku dsUnzyky cgknqj 'kkL=h Hkou] iwlk ifjlj

ubZ fnYyh 110 012] Hkkjr

National Centre for Integrated Pest Management

Lal Bahadur Shastri Building, Pusa Campus

New Delhi 110 012, India

okf"kZd izfrosnuokf"kZd izfrosnuokf"kZd izfrosnuokf"kZd izfrosnuokf"kZd izfrosnuAnnual Report

2013-14

NCIPM

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014ii

ladyu o lEiknu : ,p-vkj- ljnkuk H.R. Sardana

Compiled & Edited by eqds'k lgxy Mukesh Sehgal

vtark fcjkg Ajanta Birah

fodkl daoj Vikas Kanwar

ulhe vgen Nasim Ahmad

uhye esgrk Neelam Mehta

mYys[k : Okkf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14jk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izca/ku dsUnz] Ykkycgknqj 'kkL=h Hkou] iwlk ifjlj]ubZ fnYyh 110 012] HkkjrA i"B la[;k% 118

Citation : Annual Report 2013-14

National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, LBS Building, Pusa Campus,

New Delhi 110 012, India. 118p

izdk'kd : Mk- fpjaru pV~Vksik/;k;funs'kdjk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izca/ku dsUnz] Ykky cgknqj 'kkL=h Hkou] iwlk ifjlj]ubZ fnYyh 110 012] Hkkjr

Published by : Dr. C. Chattopadhyay

Director

National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, LBS Building, Pusa Campus,

New Delhi 110 012 India

nwjHkk"k@ Telephone No. : 91-11-25843935

QSDl@ Fax No. : 91-11-25841472

bZ&esy@ Email : [email protected], [email protected]

oSclkbZV@ Website : http://www.ncipm.org.in

:ijs[kk ,oa eqnz.k : eSllZ jkW;y vkWQlsV fizUVlZ] ,&89@1 ujk;.kk b.MfLVª;y ,fj;k] Qsl&1ubZ fnYyh 110 028

Design & Printed at : M/s Royal Offset Printers, A-89/1 Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I

New Delhi 110 028


iiiokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

izkDdFkuPreface

I take immense pleasure to present the AnnualReport of the National Centre for Integrated Pest

Management (NCIPM) for the year 2013-14, whichhighlights the significant achievements made by theScientists and staff of this Centre. NCIPM displays itsstrength to mitigate yield losses in Indian agriculturedue to pests through integration of knowledge base onpests, management practices, products, public andprivate personnel of the country. In addition tovalidation and popularization of IPM technologiesamong crops of rice, cotton, pulses, oilseeds, vegetablesand fruits at farmers' fields, the current highlight ofthe Centre has been the integrated surveillance-cum-awareness through national information networks forlarge scale real time pest monitoring and managementadvisory. Systematic surveys and surveillance supportedby information technology integrated with crop andpest management advisory, effective and extensiveimplementation of IPM practices among major cropspaid dividends in terms of improved yields and need -based use of pesticides.

This Centre made great strides in applied researchand transfer of improved IPM technologies during theperiod. Besides synthesis of new IPM technologies,extensive efforts have also been put for effectivedissemination of the same to farmers. Effectiveintegration of electronic networking throughdevelopment of customized software, supportinginfrastructure and human resource development hasmade pest management very effective at regional level.Such a web-interface has allowed faster flow of pestmanagement issues to planners, researchers andextension functionaries instantly and simultaneously.NCIPM envisages larger role in making IPM practicesmore effective across the country through higher levelsof integration of multidisciplinary technologies and ofstakeholders by means of improved research, education,training and extension for an enhanced crop and

iiiokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

>s jk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku dsUnz ¼jklukizds½ ds o"kZ 2013&14 dk okf"kZd izfrosnu izLrqr djus dk xkSjo

izkIr gksrk gSA bl izfrosnu esasa dsUnz ds oSKkfudksa rFkk deZpkfj;ksadh egRoiw.kZ miyfCèk;ksa ij izdk'k Mkyk x;k gSA eq>s bl ckrdh izlUurk gS fd jk-l-uk-iz-ds-ns'k esa uk'khthoksa ,oa izcaèkufofèk;ksa ls tqM+h lwpukvksa rFkk ns'k ds lkoZtfud ,oa futhdkfeZdksa ds Kku o vuqHko dk lesdu dj uk'khthoksa }kjk ns'kesa [ksrh dh mit esa gkfu;ksa dks de djus esa ,d vge HkwfedkfuHkk jgk gS rFkk viuh izfrc)rk dk iqjtksj fuokZg dj jgkgSA fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa pkoy] dikl] nygu] frygu] lfCt;karFkk Qyksa dh Qlyksa ij vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dk oSèkhdj.k ,oaizpkj&izlkj djus ds vykok] laLFkku dh orZeku miyfCèk;ksadk ,d izeq[k fcUnq gS fdlkuksa dks O;kid Lrj ij rRdkfyduk'khtho fuxjkuh vkSj izcaèku lykgdkj lsok nsus ds fy,jk"Vªh; lwpuk usVodks± ds ekè;e ls lesfdr fuxjkuh ,oatkx:drk dk;ZØe dk dk;kZUo;u djukA laLFkku }kjkle;≤ ij fd, x, losZ{k.kksa rFkk Qly vkSj uk'khtholykgdkj lsok ds lkFk lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh dk lesdu dsQyLo:i ns'k dh izeq[k Qlyksa esa vkbZih,e iz.kkyh ds izHkkoh,oa O;kid dk;kZUo;u ls bu Qlyksa esa vfèkd mit izkIrdjus rFkk dhVuk'kdksa dk iz;ksx de djus esa vikj lQyrkizkIr gqbZ gSA

bl vofèk ds nkSjku laLFkku us vuqiz;qDr vuqlaèkku djusesa rFkk fdlkuksa rd mUur lesfdr uk'khtho izca/ku izkS|ksfxfd;ksadks miyCèk djus esa ljkguh; dk;Z fd;k gSA vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds lesdu ds vykok laLFkku us fdlkuksa rd buizkS|ksfxfd;ksa dh mi;ksfxrk ds ckjs esa tkudkjh igqapkus dsfy, dkQh iz;kl fd, gSaA fof'k"V lkW¶Vos;jksa dks fodflrdjrs gq,] muds vuqdwy <kapk [kM+k dj rFkk ekuo lalkèkufodkl ds ekè;e ls bysDVªkWfud usVofd±x ds izHkkoh lesduls laLFkku us {ks=h; Lrj ij uk'khtho izcaèku dks dkQhizHkkodkjh cuk fn;k gSA bl izdkj ds osc&baVjQsl lkW¶Vos;jksadks miyCèk djkdj dsUnz us ;kstukdkjksa] vuqlaèkkudrkZvksa rFkkfoLrkj dkfeZdksa dks uk'khtho izcaèku lacaèkh leL;kvksa lsrRdkfyd :i ls fuiVus ds fy, O;kid lwpuk vkèkkj miyCèkfd;k gSA jklukizds us mi;ksxh 'kksèk] f'k{kk] izf'k{k.k rFkk

eq

NCIPM

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014iv

ecological health, sustainable agricultural growth.

The all round growth and development of theCentre has been possible with an active involvement,able guidance and constant encouragement receivedfrom Hon'ble Dr. S. Ayyappan, Secretary, DARE andDirector General, ICAR and Dr. Swapan Kumar Datta,Deputy Director General (Crop Science), ICAR, whichI acknowledge with great respect and gratitude. I amalso highly thankful to Dr. P. K. Chakrabarty and Dr.T. P. Rajendran Assistant Director General (PlantProtection & Biosafety), ICAR for their never endingscientific and administrative involvement, inspirationand guidance for overall growth of the Centre.

I would like to express my thanks to my Scientistsand all staff members of the institute, who really workedhard to meet the new challenges and for makingoutstanding contributions during the year. I am alsohighly thankful to the members of the publicationcommittee Drs. H. R. Sardana, Mukesh Sehgal, AjantaBirah, Vikas Kanwar, Nasim Ahmad and Ms. NeelamMehta for bringing out this report in time. Effortsmade by the annual report compilation and editing teamare highly appreciated. Help received from Mr. RakeshKumar and Mr. Hera Lal Yadav is also gratefullyacknowledged.

30 May, 2014 (C. Chattopadhyay)New Delhi Director

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014iv

laofèkZr Qly ,oa ikfjfLFkfrdh; LokLF;] LFkk;h Ñf"k fodklds fy, cgqvk;keh izkS|ksfxfd;ksa rFkk LVsdgksYMjksa ds mPpLrjh;lesdu ds ekè;e ls iwjs ns'k esa vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dks vkSjvf/kd izHkkodkjh cukus esa viuh cM+h Hkwfedk fuHkkus dhifjdYiuk dh gSA

dsUnz ds lexz fodkl esa ekuuh; MkW- ,l- v¸;iu] lfpo]Ms;j ,oa HkkÑvuqi ds egkfuns'kd rFkk MkW- LoIu dqekj nÙkk]egkfuns'kd ¼Qly foKku½] HkkÑvuqi dk lfØ; ;ksxnku]lrr ekxZn'kZu rFkk izksRlkgu vxz.kh; jgk gS] ftlds fy, eSaÑrKrk ds lkFk mudk vkHkkj O;Dr djrk gwaA MkW- ih- dspØorhZ ,oa MkW- Vh- ih- jktsUnzu] lgk;d egkfuns'kd ¼iknilaj{k.k ,oa tSo lqj{kk½] HkkÑvuqi }kjk oSKkfud vkSj iz'kklfud{ks= esa fn, x, ;ksxnku] izksRlkgu rFkk ekxn'kZu ds fy, eSamudk èkU;okn djrk gwaA

eSa dsUnz esa leLr oSKkkfudksa rFkk lHkh deZpkjhx.kksa dk HkhèkU;okn djrk gwa ftUgksaus ubZ pqukSfr;ksa ls fuiVus ds fy, dM+kifjJe djrs gq, o"kZ ds nkSjku laLFkku dh xfrfof/k;ksa esa viukmRÑ"V ;ksxnku fn;kA bl izfrosnu ds izdk'ku ds fy, eSaizdk'ku lfefr ds lnL;ksa] MkW- ,p- vkj- ljnkuk] MkW- eqds'klgxy] MkW- vtark fcjkg] Jh fodkl daoj] MkW- ulhe vgenrFkk Jherh uhye esgrk dk Hkh èkU;okn djrk gwaA eSa okf"kZdizfrosnu ladyu ,oa laiknu Vhe ds iz;klksa dh ljkguk djrkgwaA Jh jkds'k dqekj ,oa Jh ghjk yky ls izkIr lgk;rk ds fy,/kU;okn nsrk gw¡A

30 ebZ] 2014 ¼fpjaru pV~Vksikè;k;½ubZ fnYyh funs'kd


vokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

fof'k"V lkjka'kExecutive Summary

Synthesis, validation and dissemination of IPMtechnologies for major crops along with database

management, developing pest forecasting models andstrong linkages are the major mandates and activitiesof the National Centre for Integrated Pest Management(NCIPM). Recently, the Centre has also been activelyengaged in pest dynamics vis-a-vis climatic change,issuing pest advisory and human resource developmentincluding for the North Eastern Hill region.

Validation of integrated pest management (IPM)technology in rice crop cv. Pusa Basmati 1121 carriedout on 200 ha in farmers’ participatory mode atBambawad, Uttar Pradesh indicated the application ofonly one chemical pesticide spray of buprofezin by IPMpractitioner-farmers as against 2-4 chemical pesticidesprays in farmers’ practice (FP). Validation of IPMmodule led to significant reduction in brown planthopper (BPH) population (3.56 hoppers /hill) in IPMplots as against 5.21 hoppers /hill in FP. Bakanae diseasewas reduced to traces in IPM plots as against 17.7% inFP. Analysis of soil samples collected indicated higherlevel of organic carbon and zinc in IPM as comparedto FP. Application of IPM technology also resulted inhigher yield and benefit: cost (B:C) ratio as comparedto FP. Studies on estimation of contribution ofindividual components of IPM module at Rice ResearchStation (RRS), Chinsurah (Hooghly) during kharif(wet), 2013 and at RRLRRS (CRRI), Gerua, Assamduring Feb, 2014 in Boro rice revealed significantlyhigher yields with application of pretilachlor 750 mla.i./ha 5 days after sowing (DAT) and one applicationof rynaxypyr against no application of pesticide.

Impact of pesticides on various components ofenvironment like, soil health, water quality, crop healthand risk related health issues due to use of pesticides,using environmental impact quotient (EIQ) tool wasassessed under rice cropping system. The pre-crop soilanalysis revealed high consumption of pesticides, which

vokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku dsUnz ¼jklukizds½ dseq[; vfèkns'kksa ,oa fØ;kdykiksa esa izeq[k Qlyksa ds fy,

vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk la'ys"k.k] oSèkhdj.k rFkk izlkjdjus ds lkFk&lkFk MkVkcsl izcaèku djuk] uk'khthoksa dsiwokZuqeku ds fy, ekWMy fodflr djuk rFkk etcwr lg;ksxdks c<+kok nsuk gSA gky gh esa] dsUnz us uk'khtho xfrfØ;ksa dslkFk&lkFk tyok;q ifjorZu ds dkj.k Qlyksa ij iM+us okysizHkko dk vkdyu djus esas] uk'khtho lacaèkh lykgdkj&lsoktkjh djus esas] ekuo lalkèku fodkl ds {ks= esa viuh lfØ;rkc<+kbZ gS] ftles iwoksZÙkj ioZrh; {ks= Hkh 'kkfey gSaA

cEckoM xkao] mÙkj izns'k esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fresa 200 gs- {ks= esa iwlk cklerh pkoy fdLe 1121 ij lesfdruk'khtho izcaèku ¼vkbZih,e½ izkS|ksfxdh ds oS|hdj.k ls ;gtkudkjh izkIr gqbZ gS fd fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½ esa fdlkuksa}kjk 2&4 jklk;fud fNM+dko fd, tk jgs Fks] tcfd bldhrqyuk esa vkbZih,e dk;ZØe viukus okys fdlkuksa }kjk cqizksQsftudk dsoy ,d jklk;fud fNM+dko fd;k x;kA vkbZih,eekWM~;wy ds oSèkhdj.k ls fdlkuksa dh fofèk esa Hkwjk ikni ekgw¼chih,p½ dh lef"V ¼5-21 izfr Vhyk½ dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,eviukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa Hkwjk ikni ekgw dh lef"V¼3-56 ekgw izfr Vhyk½ esa Hkkjh deh ntZ dh xbZA fdlkuksa dhfofèk okys [ksrksa esa cdkus jksx 17-7% Fkk] tcfd vkbZih,e okys[ksrksa esa blesa tcnZLr deh ns[kh xbZ o bls NqV&iqV gh ns[kktk ldrk gSA enk ds laxzfgr izfrn'kks± ¼uewus½ ls bl ckr dhiqf"V gqbZ fd fdlkuksa dh fofèk okys [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,eviukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa dh enk esa tSfod dkcZu rFkkftad rRo vfèkd ek=k esa FksA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh viuk,tkus ls fdlkuksa dh fofèk dh rqyuk esa vfèkd ykHk%ykxrvuqikr izkIr fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e ekWM~;wy ds ,dy ?kVdksads ;ksxnku dk vkdyu djus ds fy, [kjhQ 2013 ¼ueh okysfnuksa esa½ esa pkoy vuqlaèkku dsUnz ¼vkjvkj,l½] fpulqjk ¼gqxyh½esa rFkk Qjojh 2014 esa vkjvkj,yvkjvkj,l ¼lhvkjvkjvkbZ½]xs#ok] vle esa cksjks pkoy ij ,d vè;;u fd;k x;k ftlesa;g ik;k x;k fd dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx ds ctk; izfrjksi.k ds5 fnuksa ds ckn iszfVykDyksj 750 fe-yh- izfr gs- rFkk jkbuSDlhijdk ,d fNM+dko djus ls vfèkd mit izkIr gks ldrh gSA

Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh ds rgr buokjesaVy bEiSDV dks'ksaV¼bZvkbZD;w½ Vwy dk iz;ksx djrs gq, i;kZoj.k ds vusd ?kVdksa]tSls enk LokLF;] ty xq.koÙkk] dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx ds

jk

NCIPM

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014vi

greatly affected microbial population in soil and waterquality. The post-crop samples showed enhanced levelsof micro and macro nutrients, organic carbon content;increase in natural enemy count resulting in reductionof pest population besides increase in yield and B:Cratio as compared to farmers’ practice.

A standalone window-based application (16MB)“Diagnosis & Sampling for Rice Pest Surveillance” hasbeen developed in Dot Net Framework 4.0 usingWindows 7 operating system.

To enable increase pulse productivity by reducingyield losses caused by pests, Accelerated PulseProduction Programme (A3P) was implemented acrosscrops of pigeon pea, chick pea, lentil, green gram andurd bean covering six major pulse growing states on16443.62 ha in farmers’ participatory mode. NuclearIPM villages (173) were developed to validate anddemonstrate working and effectiveness of different IPMstrategies. Reduction in pest incidence, lesser use ofchemical pesticides, less number of sprays and higheryields in A3P fields were observed as compared to non-A3P farmers. Based on the real-time population of thepest and their interpretation, advisories in locallanguages were sent to IPM farmers for takingappropriate measures.

Studies on the integrated management ofPhytophthora blight in pigeonpea at three locations(Jharkhand, Maharashtra and Karnataka) indicated thecombination of Trichoderma viride (soil and seedtreatment) and garlic bulb extract (seed treatment andfoliar spray) to be very effective and comparable withthe use of conventional chemical fungicides.

Crop Pest Surveillance and Advisory Project(CROPSAP) operated by the State Department ofAgriculture, Maharashtra across 33 districts, 348 talukasand 43000 villages of Maharashtra in 39.17, 38.68, 15.23,10.96 and 12.47 lakh ha in soybean, cotton, rice, pigeonpea and chickpea crops during 2013-14 was facilitatedwith ICT-based pest monitoring. Pest scenario onsoybean depicted Spodoptera litura, semilooper andgirdle beetle crossed ETL 40, 41 and 21 occasssions,respectively across Maharashtra during 2013. Oncotton, severity of pest infestation was of the order

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014vi

QyLo:i Qly LokLF; ,oa ekuoh; LokLF; ds fy,gkfudkjd fo"k;ksaa ij dhVuk'kdksa dk izHkko ewY;kadu fd;kx;kA Qly dh cqokbZ ls igys laxzfgr fd, x, enk izfrn'kks±ds fo'ys"k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd dhVuk'kdksa dk vfèkdmi;ksx fd, tkus ls enk esa thok.kqvksa dh lef"V rFkk ty dhxq.koÙkk dkQh T;knk izHkkfor gqb± gSA ysfdu] vkbZih,e dk;ZØeviuk, tkus okys Qly dh dVkbZ ds ckn tc enk izfrn'kZfy, x, rks muesa ekbØks ,oa eSØks iks"kd rRo] tSfod dkcZurRo vfèkd ik, x,( izkÑfrd 'k=qvksa dh lef"V esa of) gqbZftlds dkj.k uk'khtho dh lef"V esa dhVuk'kd dk fNM+dkofd, cxSj deh vkbZ rFkk ykHk%ykxr vuqikr esa Hkh of) ns[khxbZA

laLFkku }kjk foaMksa 7 vkWijsfVax flLVe dk iz;ksx djrs gq,,d lesfdr foaMks vkèkkfjr ,Iyhds'ku@lkW¶Vos;j ¼16 ,ech½Þpkoy uk'khthoksa dh fuxjkuh ds fy, Mk;Xuksfll ,oa izfrp;uÞfodflr fd;k x;k gSA

uk'khthoksa }kjk Qly dks igqapk, x, uqdlku dks dedjus rFkk nygu mRikndrk c<+kus gsrq fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrki)fr esa N% izeq[k nygu mRiknd jkT;ksa esa 16443-62 gss- {ks=esa vjgj] puk] elwj] ewax rFkk mM+n dh Qlyksa ij laofèkZrnygu mRiknu dk;ZØe ¼,3ih½ dk dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;kAvkbZih,e dh fofHkUu izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ,oa dk;Ziz.kkfy;ksa dhizHkkodkfjrk ij ijh{k.k djus vkSj mudk oSèkhdj.k djus dsfy, U;wfDy;j vkbZih,e xkao ¼173½ fodflr fd, x,A ,3ihdk;ZØe ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;ZØeviukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa uk'khtho ds izdksi esa rFkkjklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx esa deh vkbZ vkSj mit Hkhvfèkd izkIr dh xbZA uk'khthoksa dh rRdkfyd lef"V ¼fj;yVkbe ikWI;wys'ku½ rFkk mlds fo'ys"k.k ds vkèkkj ij vkbZih,eviukus okys fdlkuksa dks le; ij mfpr mik; djus gsrqLFkkuh; Hkk"kkvksa esa lykgdkj lsok,a nh xb±A

rhu LFkkuksa ¼>kj[kaM] egkjk"Vª rFkk dukZVd½ esa vjgj esaQkbVksIFkksjk vaxekjh ds lesfdr izcaèku ij fd, x, vè;;u esa;g tkudkjh izkIr gqbZ gS fd VªkbdksMekZ fojhMs ¼enk ,oa chtmipkj ds fy,½ rFkk yglwu xkaB dk vdZ ¼cht mipkj ,oaif.kZy fNM+dko ds fy,½ dkQh izHkkodkjh ik, x,] tks ikjEifjdjklk;fud QQwanuk'kdksa ds iz;ksxksa ls rqyuh; Hkh FksA

o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku jkT; Ñf"k foHkkx] egkjk"Vª }kjkjkT; ds varxZr 33 ftyksa] 348 rkyqdkvksa rFkk 43000 xkaoksa esalks;kchu] dikl] pkoy] vjgj rFkk pus dh Qlyksa esa Øe'k%39-17] 38-68] 15-23] 10-96 vkSj 12-47 yk[k gs- {ks= esa Qlyuk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykgdkj&lsok ifj;kstuk ¼ØkWilSi½pykbZ tk jgh Fkh ftlesaa laLFkku us vkbZlhVh vkèkkfjr uk'khthofuxjkuh ds :i esa viuh lsok,a miyCèk djkdj jkT; Ñf"kfoHkkx dh lgk;rk dhA o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku iwjs egkjk"Vª esa


viiokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

jassids> leaf reddening > whiteflies >thrips. Peststatus across the state on rice followed the order ofyellow stem borer>bacterial leaf blight>planthoppers> gall midge > leaf folder > blast. Amongthe five major pigeon pea growing regions ofMaharashtra, the pod damage was of the orderLatur>Nagpur> Amravati>Aurangabad>Nasikdivisions. Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea during rabiattained pest status from November till February.Dissemination of pest management advisories throughSMS based on ETL for different pests of soybean,cotton, rice, pigeonpea and chickpea were 15170, 24846,20959, 13364 and 10759, respectively.

In mustard, field survey conducted in differentvillages of Gurgaon, Mewat, Rewari and Mohindergarhdistricts of Haryana and Alwar, Jaipur, Dausa andBharatpur districts of Rajasthan revealed Sclerotiniasclerotiorum to be a serious threat to the its cultivation,and hot spots had disease incidence and severity up to80% and 4.0 grade, respectively. IPM validated inrapeseed-mustard across 40 ha in Mewat andMohindergarh districts of Haryana and Alwar districtof Rajasthan indicated lower mean disease incidence inIPM plots over farmers’ practices.

In cotton, e-pest surveillance and advisory activitieswere carried out in 1062 fields of 1372 farmers covering266 villages in eight states. Hoppers indicated highesthot spots i.e., 218 from 12 districts. Mirid bug wasfound to cross economic threshold level (ETL) on twoand five occasions at Akola and Perambalur,respectively. Among the diseases, the Alternaria leafblight recorded highest hot spots. Economic impactanalysis indicated significant reduction in the numberof chemical pesticide sprays to 4.27 in IPM plots from7.34 in FP. Survey studies indicated occurrence ofwhitefly at most of the places (5 to 20 nymphs/ adultsper leaf). Lepidopteran pests (Spodoptera litura, Eariasvittella and Pectinophora gossipiella) were recorded atfew locations in non-Bt cotton. Mealy bug and leafreddening was recorded at some locations. In southzone, mirid bugs and white fly were observed as majorpests. Analysis of the dynamics of sap feeders acrossseasons and locations of the North zone indicated thepeak population levels to be the determinant of the

viiokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

lks;kchu esa LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk uk'khtho ik;k x;kA ,l-fyVwjk] vèkZdq.Myd ¼lsehywij½ rFkk es[kyk Hkax ¼xzhMy chVy½us Øe'k% 40] 41 rFkk 21 ekSdksa ij bZVh,y dks ikj dj fy;kFkkA dikl esa uk'khtho laØe.k dh rhozrk vkjksgh Øe esa blizdkj Fkh % tSflM >iÙkh ykyiu >lQsn eD[kh > dk"BdhVAiwjs jkT; esa pkoy ij uk'khtho dh fLFkfr vkjksgh Øe esa blizdkj Fkh % ihyk ruk csèkd > thok.kqt iÙkh vaxekjh >

ikni ekgw > xky fet > iÙkh eksM+d > izLQqVuA egkjk"Vªesa vjgj dk mRiknu djus okys ikap izeq[k {ks=ksa esa Qyhuqdlku vkjksgh Øe esa bl izdkj Fkk % ykrqj > ukxiqj >vejkorh > vkSjkaxkckn > ukfld ds [kaMA pus esa jch dsnkSjku gSyhdksoikZ vkfeZtsjk uk'khtho ik;k x;k tkss uoEcj lsQjojh ekg rd ekStwn ik;k x;kA fofHkUu uk'khthoksa dsbZVh,y ds vkèkkj ij] lks;kchu] dikl] pkoy] vjgj rFkk pusdh Qlyksa ds laca/k esa ,l,e,l ds ekè;e ls fdlkuksa dksØe'k% 15170] 24846] 20959] 13364 rFkk 10759 uk'khthoizcaèku lacaèkh lykgdkj lsok,a Hksth xb±A

ljlksa ds lacaèk esa gfj;k.kk ds xqM+xkao] esokr] fjokM+h rFkkeksfgUnzx<+ ftyksa vkSj jktLFkku ds vyoj] t;iqj] nkSlk rFkkHkjriqj ftyksa ds fofHkUu xkaoksa esa vk;ksftr iz{ks= losZ{k.kksa ls;g tkudkjh izkIr gqbZ gS fd ljlksa dh [ksrh ds fy,LDysjksfVfu;k LDysjksfl;ksje ,d xaHkhj [krjk gS] tcfd gkWVLikWVdk izdksi ,oa rhozrk Øe'k% 80% rFkk 4-0 xzsM ikbZ xbZAgfj;k.kk ds esokr vkSj eksfgUnzx<+ ftyksa esa rFkk jktLFkku dsvyoj ftys esa 40 gss- {ks= esa ljlksa&rksfj;k esa vkbZih,e dsoSèkhdj.k esa ;g iqf"V gqbZ fd fdlkuksa dh fofèk ls dh tk jgh[ksrh dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e fofèk viukus okys fdlkuksa ds[ksrksa esa LDysjksfVfu;k LDysjksfV;ksje dk de jksx izdksi ik;kx;kA

dikl ds lacaèk esa vkB jkT;ksa ds varxZr 266 xkaoksa esa1372 fdlkuksa dks 'kkfey djrs gq, 1062 fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esabZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykgdkj&lsok lacaèkh dk;Z fd,x,A 12 ftyksa esa lokZfèkd ¼218½ laosnu'khy LFkkuksa ¼gkWVLikWV½ ij ekgw@gksij uk'khtho ik, x,A vdksyk rFkk isjecywjesa Øe'k% nks vkSj ikap ekSdksa ij fejhM cx dks bZVh,y ikj djrsik;k x;kA jksxksa esa] vYVjusfj;k iÙkh vaxekjh ds lacaèk esalokZfèkd laosnu'khy LFkku ntZ fd, x,A vkfFkZd izHkkofo'ys"k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd vkbZih,e viukus okys fdlkuksads [ksrksa esa jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoksa esa dkQh deh¼4-27 fNM+dko½ vkbZ gS] gkykafd fdlkuksa dh fofèk okys [ksrksaesa fNM+dko dkQh T;knk ¼7-34½ fd, tk jgs FksA

losZ{k.k ds vè;;uksa ls ;g irk pyk fd vfèkdrj LFkkuksaij lQsn eD[kh ¼5 ls 20 fuEQ@O;Ld izfr iÙkh½ dk vkxeuns[kk x;kA mÙkj {ks= esa xSj&chVh dikl esa dqN LFkkuksa ijysfiMksIVsju uk'khtho ¼LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk] bfj;sl foVsyk rFkk

NCIPM

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014viii

pest status of any given sap feeder.

Weather-based prediction rules for jassids (Amrascadevastans), thrips (Thrips tabaci) and mirids(Campylomma livida) in cotton were developed usinghistorical data sets (2001-2008), which were validatedwith independent data sets (2009 -2013) that yieldedmean prediction accuracy of 89, 97 and 93.2%,respectively, over five years. Weather-based predictionrules developed for Nagpur and tested across otherCentral zone locations indicated significantly greaterprediction accuracies at lower populations of bothjassids [r =-0.86** (P<0.01)] and thrips [r =-0.87**(P<0.01)] and vice versa indicating the need for fine-tuning of weather-based rules for individual locations.Jassids followed by white flies at Ludhiana, increasingthrips at Hisar, higher thrips and whiteflies atSriganganagar and importance of jassids as pest providedthe scenario of sap feeders in the Northern cottongrowing zone. The prediction periods in respect of A.devastans, T. tabaci and Bemisia tabaci were deducedas 25-30, 27-36 and 27-40 standard meteorological weeks(SMWs) for North zone cotton growing locations.

Twenty-five real time pest dynamics (RTPD)centers [Rice (7); Pigeonpea (7); Groundnut (5) &Tomato (7)] during kharif 2013 and 17 during rabicarried out the activities of pest and weather datacollection vis-á-vis entry and uploads to the databaseof NCIPM server that supported 24x7 web-enabledreporting system. Pheromone trap catch module forthe three crops viz., pigeonpea, groundnut and tomatoto capture week-wise data of Helicoverpa armigera andSpodoptera litura was incorporated into client softwarewith simultaneous updating of the web-enabledreporting system.

Severity of infestation of leaf folder on rice wasnoted throughout the season at Ludhiana (PB). Reducedincidence of Helicoverpa armigera on pigeonpea withincreased infestation of Maruca vitrata at Gulbarga(KA) and of Fusarium wilt at S.K. Nagar (GJ) was alsoobserved. Outbreak of red hairy caterpillar for thesecond successive kharif season was observed ongroundnut at Vridhachalam (TN). Early blight oftomato dominated at Moinabad (AP) and Bengaluru(KA), leaf curl virus at Rahuri (MH) and bacterial leaf

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014viii

isDVhuksQksjk xksflfi;syk½ fjdkWMZ fd, x,A dqN LFkkuksa ijfeyh cx rFkk iÙkh ykyiu Hkh ns[kk x;kA nf{k.k {ks= esa]fejhM cx rFkk lQsn eD[kh izeq[k uk'khtho ds :i esa ik,x,A mÙkj {ks= ds lHkh LFkkuksa esa rFkk iwjs ekSle ds nkSjku jlpwlus okys dhV dh lfØ;rkvksa o xfrfd;ksa ds fo'ys"k.k esa ;gmYys[k fd;k x;k gS fd fdlh Hkh jl pwlus okys dhV dhfLFkfr dks tkuus ds fy, mldh lokZfèkd lef"V Kkr gksukt:jh gS] rHkh mldh fLFkfr dk lgh vkdyu fd;k tk ldrkgSA vè;;u esa jl pwlus okys dhV dh lef"V lhfer ikbZ xbZA

dikl esa tSflM ¼vejkLdk fMoklVsal½] dk"BdhV ¼fFkzIlVscslkb½ rFkk fejhM cx ¼dSEihyksek fyfoMk½ ds fy, ekSlevkèkkfjr iwokZuqeku fu;e cukus ds fy, fgLVksfjdy MkVk lsV¼2001&08½ dk mi;ksx fd;k x;k] ftUgsa Lora= MkVk lsV¼2009&13½ ds lkFk oSèkhÑr fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj ftldh ikapo"kks± ds fy, mDr uk'khthoksa ds lacaèk esa vkSlr iwokZuqekulVhdrk Øe'k% 89] 97 vkSj 93-2% FkhA ukxiqj ds fy,fodflr fd, x, ekSle vkèkkfjr iwokZuqeku fu;eksa] ftudhvU; dsUnzh; {ks= LFkkuksa ij tkap dh xbZ ftlds vk/kkj ijtSflM [r =-0.86** (P<0.01)] rFkk dk"BdhV [r =-0.87**

(P<0.01)] nksuksa dh lef"V;ksa ij fd;k x;k iwokZuqeku dkQhlgh o LVhd ik;k x;k] ftlls ,dy LFkkuksa ds fy, ekSlevkèkkfjr fu;e cukus dh vko';drk dk ladsr feyrk gSAmÙkj Hkkjr ds dikl mRiknd {ks=ksa esa pwld dhVksa dk ifjn';vyx&vyx ik;k x;kA yqfèk;kuk esa tSflM rFkk mlds cknlQsn eD[kh dh lef"V vfèkd Fkh] fglkj esa dk"BdhVksa dhlef"V vfèkd ikbZ xbZA Jhxaxkuxj esa dk"BdhV ,oa lQsneD[kh dh lef"V vfèkd ikbZ xbZA mÙkj {ks= ds dikl mRiknuokys LFkkuksa ds fy, ,- fMoklVsal] Vh- Vscslkb rFkk csfefl;kVscslkb ds lacaèk esa iwokZuqeku vofèk;ka 25&30] 27&36 rFkk27&40 ekSle foKku ekud lIrkg ¼,l,eMCY;w½ ds :i esafuèkkZfjr dh xb±A

[kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku 25 fj;y Vkbe iSLV MkbukfeDl¼vkjVhihMh½ dsUnzksa [pkoy ¼7½( vjgj ¼7½( ewaxQyh ¼5½ rFkkVekVj ¼7½] ij rFkk jch ds nkSjku 17 dsUnzksa ij uk'khtho dhxfrfofèk;ksa ij rFkk ekSle lacaèkh MkVk ,d= fd;k x;k vkSjmls jklukizds ds loZj ds MkVkcsl esa viyksM fd;k x;k]ftlesa 24 × 7 osc&vkèkkfjr fjiksfV±x ds fy, lqfoèkk miyCèkgSaA gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtsjk ds lacaèk esa lkIrkfgd MkVk vfHkxzfgrdjus ds fy, rhu Qlyksa] vFkkZr vjgj] ewaxQyh rFkk VekVjds fy, Qsjkseksu VªSi dSp ekWM~;wy dks DykbaV lkW¶Vos;j lstksM+k x;k ftlesa osc&vkèkkfjr fjiksfV±x ds fy, lqfoèkkmiyCèk gSaA

yqqfèk;kuk ¼iatkc½ esa iwjs ekSle ds nkSjku pkoy ij iÙkheksM+d ds laØe.k dh rhozrk ikbZ xbZA xqycxkZ ¼dukZVd½ esavjgj ij gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtsjk dk izdksi de ns[kk x;ktcfd ek#dk foVjkVk dk laØe.k vfèkd ik;k x;kA ,l- ds-


ixokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

spot at Moinabad (AP) and Rahuri (MH) during kharif.Leaf miner was common on tomato across all locationsviz. Rahuri (MH)> Bengaluru (KA) >Moinabad (AP)during kharif as well as rabi seasons.

Decision tree based classification rules for yellowstem borer (YSB) vis-á-vis weather variables, heuristicweather-based rule for Spodoptera litura at Kadiri,ordinal logistic model predicting S. litura (nos./trap/week) during maximum severity period (34 SMW),empirical models for forewarning yellow stem borerbased on light trap moth catches for Aduthurai (TN),Chinsura (WB), Karjat (MH), Raipur (CG) and forMandya (KA) and of leaf folder at Aduthurai for kharifand rabi were developed and validated. Weather-basedmodels for prediction of four rice pests (yellow stemborer, gall midge, case worm and green leaf hopper),and S. litura on groundnut at weekly and fortnightlyintervals, empirical and artificial neural network modelspredicting maximum population of S. litura werevalidated.

Due to increased use of chemical pesticides resultingfrom continuous cultivation of different vegetables,IPM technology was validated, demonstrated anddisseminated in seven villages in Karnal and SonepatDistricts, Haryana in onion, tomato and bell peppercovering more than 72 ha. Validation of IPM technologyresulted in reduction in number of sprays, increase inyields, use of eco-safe pesticides and increase inpopulation of natural enemies apart from increase inawareness and knowledge about IPM and bio pesticidesamong the farmers.

Trials on IPM validation for greenhouse capsicum,cucumber and tomato conducted at Pusa campus, NewDelhi and KVK, Lohaghat, Champawat, Uttarakhandrevealed considerable reduction in sucking pests rangingfrom 17.8 to 3.5% of aphids and 63.3 to 26.2% ofpowdery mildew in capsicum as compared to non-IPM.Similar levels of management of aphids, powderymildew and mosaic virus complex was also achieved intomato and cucumber. Besides, there was increase inyield from 1.9 to 2.8 t/1000 sq.m in cucumber, 2.2 to3.1 t in capsicum and 12.2 to 15.0 t in tomato in IPM ascompared to non-IPM.

ixokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

uxj ¼xqtjkr½ esa ¶;qlsfj;e eqj>ku ikbZ xbZA o)kpye¼rfeyukMq½ esa yxkrkj nwljs [kjhQ ekSle esa yky ckyksa okysdSVjfiyj ¼bYyh½ dk izdksi ns[kk x;kA [kjhQ ds nkSjkueksbZukckn ¼vkaèkz izns'k½ rFkk csaxyq# ¼dukZVd½ esa VekVj ijvxsrh vaxekjh] jkgwjh ¼egkjk"Vª½ esa iÙkh daqpu laØe.k rFkkeksbZukckn vkSj jkgwjh esa thok.kqt iÙkh èkCck jksx ik;k x;kA[kjhQ rFkk jch] nksuksa ekSleksa esa lHkh LFkkuksa ij vFkkZr jkgwjh¼egkjk"Vª½ > csaxyq# ¼dukZVd½ > eksbZukckn ¼vkaèkz izns'k½ esaVekVj esa iÙkh eksM+d jksx lkekU; ik;k x;kA

[kjhQ rFkk jch ekSleksa ds nkSjku dkfnjh esa LiksMksIVsjkfyVwjk ds fy, ihyk ruk csèkd ¼okbZ,lch½ ds lkFk&lkFkekSle pjksa] g~;qfjfLVd ekSle vkèkkfjr fMlht+u Vªh csLMDyklhfQds'ku fu;e fodflr fd, x,A blh izdkj] ,l-fyVwjk ¼la[;k@ Qank@lIrkg½ ds iwokZuqeku ds fy, vfèkdrerhozrk vofèk ¼34 ,l,eMCY;w½ ds nkSjku vkWfMZuy ykWftfLVdekWMy( vnqFkqjbZ ¼rfeyukMq½] fpulqjk ¼if'pe caxky½] djtr¼egkjk"Vª½] jk;iqj ¼NÙkhlx<+½ rFkk ekaM;k ¼dukZVd½ esa ykbVVªSi eksFk idM+ ds vkèkkj ij ihyk ruk csèkd ds iwokZuqeku dsfy, vkuqHkfod ekWMy rFkk vnqFkqjbZ esa iÙkh eksM+d ds fy,fMlht+u Vªh csLM DyklhfQds'ku fu;e fodflr fd, x, vkSjmudk oSèkhdj.k fd;k x;kA pkoy ds pkj uk'khthoksa ¼ihykruk csèkd] xky fet] dsl okWeZ rFkk gjk iÙkk ekgq½ dsiwokZuqeku ds fy, ekSle vkèkkfjr ekWMy rFkk ewaxQyh esalkIrkfgd ,oa ikf{kd varjkyksa ij ,l- fyVwjk dh vfèkdrelef"V ds iwokZuqeku ds fy, vkuqHkfod ,oa Ñf=e U;qjyusVodZ ekWMyksa dk oSèkhdj.k fd;k x;kA

yxkrkj fofHkUu fdLeksa dh lfCt;ksa dh [ksrh djus rFkkjklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa dk vfèkd iz;ksx fd, tkus ds dkj.kgfj;k.kk ds djuky rFkk lksuhir ftyksa ds lkr xkaoksa esa 72gss- esa I;kt] VekVj rFkk f'keyk fepZ ij vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdhdk oSèkhdj.k] ijh{k.k rFkk izlkj fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdhds oSèkhdj.k esa dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoksa dh la[;k esa deh]mit esa of) dh iqf"V gqbZ vkSj i;kZoj.k vuqdwy dhVuk'kdksadk iz;ksx djus ls izkÑfrd 'k=qvksa dh lef"V esa Hkh of) ns[khxbZA blds ifj.kkeLo:i] fdlkuksa esa vkbZih,e rFkk tSfoddhVuk'kdksa ds ckjs esa tkx:drk Hkh dkQh c<+hA

iwlk ifjlj] ubZ fnYyh rFkk Ñf"k foKku dsUnz] yksgk?kkV]pEikor] mÙkjk[kaM esa gfjrxg f'keyk fepZ] [khjk rFkk VekVjij vkbZih,e ds oSèkhdj.k ds fy, ijh{k.k fd, x,A ijh{k.kds ifj.kkeksa esa f'keyk fepZ ds laca/k esa ;g ik;k x;k fdxSj&vkbZih,e dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa pwld uk'khthoksa]vFkkZr ekgw vkSj pwf.kZy QQwan esa Hkkjh fxjkoV ¼Øe'k% 17-8 ls3-5% vkSj 63-3 ls 26-2% dh jsat esa½ ns[kh xbZA VekVj vkSj[khjs ds fy, ekgw] pwf.kZy QQwan rFkk eksts+d ok;jl dkWEiysDlds izcaèku ds fy, leku fofèk viukbZ xbZ vkSj leku ifj.kke

NCIPM

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014x

Site-specific IPM module comprising applicationof bio-pesticides, mechanical methods, orchardsanitation, judicious and need-based application ofchemical pesticides with reduced risk was implementedon mango plantation in Southern Gujarat (8 ha) thathelped in reduction in cost of plant protection, lowerpest incidence that also resulted in higher economicreturns. Information technology based pest surveillancesystem was implemented in nine districts ofMaharashtra for mango, pomegranate and bananacovering 184643 ha. Based on the extent of damage dueto pests, advisories were issued through SMS for timelyaction on part of farmers.

The International Patent application for theinvention, “Light trap for managing insects” has beenfiled in three countries viz., Australia, Indonesia andVietnam. The newly invented insect light trap wasvalidated in cv. Pusa Basmati 1121 of paddy, tomato,cabbage crops in NCR Delhi during kharif season of2013 in farmers’ participatory mode. The technologyhas also been demonstrated on Chickpea (near Kanpur,U.P.) and Sugarcane (village Mundvar, Distt.Muzaffarnagar, U.P) crops.

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014x

izkIr fd, x,A blds vfrfjDr] xSj vkbZih,e dh rqyuk esavkbZih,e okys [ksrksa esa [khjs dh mit esa 1-9 ls 2-8 fDoa- izfr1000 oxZ eh- {ks=] f'keyk fepZ dh mit esa 2-2 ls 3-1 Vu rFkkVekVj dh mit esa 12-2 ls 15-0 Vu dh of) ns[kh xbZA

nf{k.kh xqtjkr esa vke ds jksi.k ¼8 gs-½ ds fy, tSfoddhVuk'kdksa] ;kaf=d fofèk;ksa] m|ku LoPNrk rFkk de tksf[keokys jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa dk foosdiw.kZ ,oa vko';drkuqlkjiz;ksx ds vkèkkj ij LFkku&fof'k"V vkbZih,e ekWM~;wy dkdk;kZUo;u fd;k x;k] ftlls ikni laj{k.k ykxr esa dehykus] uk'khtho izdksi dks de djus rFkk mPp vkfFkZd ykHkizkIr djus esa lgk;rk feyhA vke] vukj rFkk dsys ds fy,egkjk"Vª ds ukS ftyksa esa 184]643 gs- {ks= esa lwpuk izkS|ksfxdhvkèkkfjr uk'khtho fuxjkuh iz.kkyh dk dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;kAuk'khthoksa }kjk igaqpk, x, uqdlku ds Lrj ds vkèkkj ijfdlkuksa dks le; ij mfpr mik; djus ds fy, ,l,e,l dsekè;e ls lykgdkj&lsok,a nh xb±A

laLFkku us ÞykbV VªSi QkWj esusftax bUlSDV~lÞ izkS|ksfxdhdk vkfo"dkj fd;k gS vkSj blds varjjk"Vªh; isVsaV ds fy,laLFkku us rhu ns'kksa] vFkkZr vkLVªsfy;k] baMksusf'k;k vkSj fo;rukeesa vkosnu fd;k gSA laLFkku us [kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vªh;jktèkkuh {ks= fnYyh esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa iwlkcklerh 1121 fdLea] VekVj rFkk dan o xksHkh dh Qlyksa esami;qZDr u;s vkfo"dkfjr uk'khdhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dkoSèkhdj.k fd;k gSA puk ¼dkuiqj] mÙkj izns'k ds utnhd½ vkSjxUus ¼eqaMkoj] ftyk eqTtQjuxj] mÙkj izns'k½ dh Qlyksa ijbl izkS|ksfxdh dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;k gSA


xiokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14 xiokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

NCIPM

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014xii


xiiiokf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

fo"k;&lwphContentsizkDdFkuPreface iii

fof'k"V lkjka'kExecutive Summary v

1 ifjp;Introduction 1

2 laxBukRed xBuOrganogram 3

3 PkkoyRice 5

4 diklCotton 13

5 nyguPulses 19

6 fryguOilseeds 29

7 ckxokuh QlysaHorticultural Crops 34

8 tSfod fu;a=.kBiocontrol 48

9 lwpuk izks++|kSfxdh] uk'khtho iwokZuqeku ,oa fu.kZ; lgk;d iz.kkyhInformation Technology, Pest Forecasting and Decision Support System 54

10 lkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj izHkko fo'ys"k.kSocio-Economic Issues and Impact Analysis 72

11 vU; vuqlaèkkfud xfrfofèk;kaOther Research Activities 76

12 ekuo lalkèku fodkl ,oa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk gLrkukarj.kHuman Resource Development and Transfer of IPM Technologies 79

13 lqfoèkk,a vkSj ?kVukØeFacilities and Events 84

14 jktHkk"kkRajbhasha 90

15 vuqlaèkkfud ifj;kstuk,aResearch Projects 93

16 izdk'kuPublications 101

17 lsfeukj] laxks”Bh] izf'k{k.k ,oa iqjLdkjSeminars, Conferences, Trainings and Awards 108

18 dkfeZdPersonnel 111

19 ctVBudget 114

20 y?kq:iAbbreviations 115

NCIPM

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014xiv

1okf"kZd izfrosnu 2013&14

ifjp;Introduction

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a scientific

approach to harmonise economically and ecologically

viable strategies to reduce the pest population on crop

below economic threshold level (ETL). The main

motive of developing farmer-based knowledge-intensive

IPM strategies is to enhance the natural enemies of pests

with use of low-cost input technologies and reduce

dependence on chemical pesticide keeping the small/

marginal farmers in view. In the present era, there is

need to identify strategies and mechanism for

strengthening the actual transfer of IPM technologies.

The National Centre for Integrated Pest

Management (NCIPM) has been working as an interface

between ICAR institutes, AICRPs, State Agriculture

Universities and field functionaries of State Agricultural

and Horticultural Departments and is providing

directions to develop, validate and disseminate successful

harmonised IPM interventions for number of

agricultural and horticultural crops, which have been

targeted for improved competence and awareness

building in IPM at grassroots.

In basmati and non-basmati rice, development,

dissemination of location-specific IPM packages were

undertaken in different agro-climatic zones of India

covering varied cropping systems and states viz. Uttar

Pradesh, West Bengal, Assam, Odisha and Karnataka.

These packages were able to reduce the chemical

pesticide sprays from 12 to 3 in IPM plots compared

to farmers’ practices. IPM and National Information

System for Pest Management (NISPM) programmes

in cotton resulted in significant reduction in chemical

pesticide application and increase in the use of bio-

Qlyksa esa uk'khtho lef"V dks vkfFkZd gkfu Lrj ¼bZVh,y½ls de djus ds fy, viukbZ tkus okyh mi;qDr j.kuhfr;ksa esalesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku ¼vkbZih,e½ dk vge LFkku gS tks,d foKku vkèkkfjr fofèk gS vkSj vkfFkZd :i ls de [kphZyhgS rFkk i;kZoj.k ds vuqdwy Hkh gSA jklukizds dk fdlkuvkèkkfjr rFkk O;kid Kku vk/kkfjr vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dksfodflr djus dk izeq[k mís'; uk'khthoksa ds izkÑfrd 'k=qvksadh of) djuk rFkk mlds lkFk&lkFk NksVs ,oa lhekar fdlkuksadh vkfFkZd fLFkfr dks è;ku esa j[krs gq, de ykxr okys Ñf"kizkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds fodflr djuk gS rkfd jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksads iz;ksx dh fuHkZjrk dks de fd;k tk ldsA orZeku le; esa]vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dks fdlkuksa dks miyCèk djkus ds fy,mfpr dk;Zuhfr;ka ,oa dk;Zfofèk;ka cukus dh vR;Ur vko';drkgSA

jk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku dsUnz ¼jklukizds½ Hkkjrh;Ñf"k vuqlaèkku ifj"kn~ ds laLFkkuksa] vf[ky Hkkjrh; lefUorvuqlaèkku ifj;kstukvksa ¼,vkbZlhvkjih½] jkT; Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;ksarFkk jkT; Ñf"k ,oa ckxokuh foHkkxksa ds ijLij ,d vareqZ[k ds:i esa dk;Zjr gS vkSj ;g dsUnz vusd Ñf"k ,oa ckxokuh Qlyksads fy, mi;ksxh ,oa izHkkoh dk;Zuhfr;ka cukus] mudks ekU;rkfnyokus rFkk muds izpkj&izlkj ds fy, ekxZn'kZu nsus esa vgeHkwfedk fuHkk jgk gS] ftuesa lqèkkj ykus ds fy, rFkk tehuh Lrjij vkbZih,e dh nf"V ls tkx:drk ykus ds fy, fpfUgrfd;k x;k gSA

cklerh rFkk xSj&cklerh pkoy ds fy, ns'k ds fofHkUuÑf"k tyok;q {ks=ksa esa fofoèk Qlyhdj.k iz.kkfy;ksa vkSj fofHkUujkT;ksa] vFkkZr mÙkj izns'k] if'pe caxky] vle] vksfM'kk rFkkdukZVd ds fy, LFkku fof'k"V vkbZih,e iSdstksa dks fodflrfd;k x;k vkSj mudk izlkj fd;k x;kA bu iSdstksa dhlgk;rk ls fdlkuksa dh fofèk esa iz;ksx fd, tkus okys 12jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,eiSdsts viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [skrksa esa dsoy 3 jklk;fudfNM+dko fd, tkrs gSaA dikl esa vkbZih,e rFkk jk"Vªh;uk'khtho izcaèku lwpuk iz.kkyh ¼,uvkbZ,lih,e½ dk;ZØeksa ds

NCIPM

ANNUAL REPORT 2013–20142

control agents and botanicals. IPM practices also

showed good promise in pulse production apart from

being effective in reducing pest load on groundnut,

mustard, vegetables like tomato, brinjal, bell pepper,

chilli, onion, cauliflower, cabbage, and fruits

particularly mango, pomegranate and banana as also in

cucumber, tomato under protected cultivation. Timely

IPM interventions proved that farmers received higher

economic returns in comparison to their own practice.

To enable cater to need of constant refinement of

technologies, well directed research trials to prioritise

components in IPM packages has been initiated by the

Centre.

The present annual report is an amalgamation of

highlights of research activities carried out by the

NCIPM in collaboration with crop research institutes

of ICAR and the State Agricultural Universities,

AICRPs, KVKs and state agricultural and horticultural

departments. The efforts include facilitating the proper

identification, validation and promotion of low-cost

Integrated Crop Management (ICM) technologies for

doable IPM modules in important crops,

implementation of e-pest surveillance for an area-wide

coverage of IPM practices, analysis of pest scenario in

the changing climatic conditions, development of

forecast system for key pests, and impact analysis of

IPM technologies. The work plan of NCIPM would

continue to strengthen the research on Integrated Crop

Management through collaboration and coordination

with farmers’ participatory approach for better quality

of service to the Nation in eco-friendly crop protection

that ensures better livelihood security.

dk;kZUo;u ls jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx esa Hkkjh dehvkbZ gS vkSj nwljh vksj tSo dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx esa of) gqbZgSA nygu mRiknu esa Hkh vkbZih,e iz.kkyh ds dk;kZUo;u dscsgrj ifj.kke ns[ks x, gSaA blds vfrfjDr ewaxQyh] ljlksa]lfCt;ka] tSls VekVj] cSxu] f'keyk fepZ] fepZ] I;kt] QwyxksHkh] can xksHkh] [khjk rFkk Qy] fo'ks"k :i ls vke] vukj] vkSjdsyksa ,oa lajf{kr [ksrh ds vUrxZr mxk;s x;s [khjk rFkk VekVjdh Qlyksa ij uk'khtho ds izHkko dks de djus esa Hkh vkbZih,eiSdst dkQh izHkkoh ik, x, gSaA vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dklgh le; ij dk;kZUo;u o vuqdj.k fd, tkus ls fdlkuksa usLo;a dh Ñf"k fofèk dh rqyuk esa vfèkd vkfFkZd ykHk izkIrfd;k gSA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk vkSj izHkkodkjh cukus dsfy, laLFkku us vkbZih,e ds ?kVdksa ij xgu ,oa lqlaxrijh{k.k dh O;oLFkk dk izko/kku fd;k gSaA

jklukizds us orZeku okf"kZd izfronsu esa HkkÑvuqi dsQly vuqlaèkku laLFkkuksa] jkT; Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;ksa] vf[kyHkkjrh; lefUor vuqlaèkku ifj;kstukvksa] Ñf"k foKku dsUnzksarFkk jkT; Ñf"k ,oa ckxokuh foHkkxksa ds lg;ksx esa dh xbZvuqlaèkkfud xfrfofèk;ksa ds izeq[k fcanqvksa ij izdk'k Mkyk gSaAlaLFkku us vuqla/kku ds {ks= esa vusd dk;Z fd, gSa] tSlsvuqlaèkkfud ijh{k.kksa ds fy, egRoiw.kZ Qlyksa esa vkbZih,eekWM~;wyksa ds fy, de ykxr okys lesfdr Qly izcaèku¼vkbZlh,e½ izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dh igpku djuk] mudk oSèkhdj.kdjuk vFkok mUgsa ekU;rk fnyokuk vkSj mudk izksUu;u djuk(cnyrs tyok;q ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa uk'khthoksa ds ifjn'; dkfo'ys"k.k djuk( vkbZih,e iz.kkyh ds {ks=&okj dojst ds fy,bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh dk dk;kZUo;u djuk( izeq[k uk'khthoksads fy, iwokZuqeku iz.kkyh fodflr djuk rFkk vkbZih,e iSdstksadk izHkko fo'ys"k.k djukA ns'k esa i;kZoj.k ds vuqdwy Qlydk laj{k.k djus ds fy, csgrj lsok miyCèk djkus dh fn'kkesa jklukizds lg;ksx] leUo;u rFkk fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrki)fr ds ekè;e ls lesfdr Qly izcaèku ij vkSj vf/kdvuqla/kku djus ds fy, viuh orZeku dk;Z ;kstuk dks lrr:i ls tkjh j[ksxk rkfd fdlkuksa dh csgrj vkthfodk lqfuf'prdh tk ldsA

"Let New India arise--out of the peasants'

cottage, grasping the plough; out of the huts of

the fisherman...... Let her emerge from groves

and forests, from hills and mountains."

– Swami Vivekananda

NCIPM



pkoyRice

Synthesis and validation of location-specific IPMmodules in different rice agro-ecosystems

Bambawad (Uttar Pradesh)

A validation trial on IPM technology in rice wascarried out for the 4th consecutive year in 500 acreswith cv. Pusa Basmati 1121 at Bambawad (DistrictGautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) and adjoining villages infarmers’ participatory mode. Yellow stem borer (YSB),leaf folder, brown plant hopper (BPH), Bakanae andblast were the major pests. Major IPM interventionsincluded: green manuring with Sesbania (Dhaincha) orgreen gram, seed treatment with carbendazim (1 g a.i./kg), seedling root dipping in Pseudomonas fluorescens(3.0 X 1010 cfu; 5 ml/l of water, NCIPM strain), plantingof 2-3-seedlings/ hill, judicious application of fertilizer(60 N:50 P:40 K kg / ha) and ZnSO

4 @ 25 kg/ha,

installation of pheromone traps (5/ha) for YSBmonitoring, fixing of straw bundles (20/ha) foraugmentation and conservation of spiders, one releaseof Trichogramma japonicum @ 100,000/ha and need-based application of chemical pesticides (one spray ofbuprofezin in selected fields based on ETL-counts ofBPH).

The farmers’ practices (FP) involved no greenmanuring, no seed treatment, planting of 7-8 seedlings/hill, higher doses of fertilizer (220 N: 40 P: 0 K kg /ha), and 2-4 applications of chemical pesticides on theadvice of pesticide dealers. Non-IPM farmers had alsoapplied zinc sulphate but at lower dosages.

Observations on pest incidence were recorded from40 IPM fields and 20 FP fields by selecting 20 hills fromfive spots @ four hills/spot in each field. Soil analysiswas carried out for microbial and nutrients from IPM

fofHkUu pkoy Ñf"k ikfjra=kksa esa LFkku fof'k"VvkbZih,e ekWM~;wyksa dk la'ys"k.k ,oa oSèkhdj.k

cEckoM (mÙkj izns'k)cEckoM ¼ftyk xkSre cq) uxj½ rFkk mlds vkl&ikl ds

xkaoksa esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk izfØ;k esa 500 ,dM+ {ks= esaiwlk cklerh 1121 fdLe pkoy esa yxkrj pkSFks o"kZ vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxfd;ksa ij ,d oSèkhdj.k ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA pkoy dsijh{k.k esa izeq[k uk'khthoksa esa ihyk ruk csèkd ¼okbZ,lch½] iÙkheksM+d] Hkwjk ikni ekgw ¼chih,p½] cdkus rFkk izLQqVu 'kkfeyFksA vkbZih,e esa ijh{k.k djus ds fy, 'kkfey dh xbZ dk;Zuhfr;ksaesa <sapk ;k ewax dh gjh [kkn] dkcsZuMsfte 1 xzk- ,-vkbZ- izfrfdxzk- ds lkFk cht mipkj L;wMkseksukl ¶yksjkslsal ¼3-0 × 1010

lh,Q;w( 5 fe-yh- izfr yhVj ikuh] jklukizds fdLe½ esa ikS/kdh tM+ dks Mqcksdj j[kuk] 2&3 ikS/k izfr Vhyk dk jksi.k]moZjdksa ¼ukbZVªkstu 60 fdxzk-] QkLQksjl 50 fdxzk-] iksVk'k 40fdxzk- izfr gs-½ rFkk ftUd lYQsV 25 fdxzk- izfr gs- dh nj lsfoosdiw.kZ mi;ksx] okbZ,lch fuxjkuh ds fy, Qsjkseksu VªSi ¼5izfr gs-½ dk laLFkkiu] edM+h dh of) vkSj laj{k.k ds fy, Hkwlhds caMyksa dk yxkuk ¼20 izfr gs-½] ,d ckj 100]000 izfr gs-dh nj ls Vªkbdksxzkek tSiksfude dk NksM+uk rFkk jklk;fuddhVuk'kdksa dk ;Fkkvko';drk vuqlkj iz;ksx tSls dk;Z 'kkfeyFks ¼chih,p dh vkfFkZd gkfuLrj ds vkèkkj ij izHkkfor [ksrksaesa cqizksQhftu dk ,d fNM+dko½A

fdlkuksa dh Ñf"k fofèk;ksa ¼,Qih½ esa gjh [kkn rFkk chtmipkj 'kkfey ugha Fks] ijUrq mudh Ñf"k fofèk;ksa esa 7&8ikSèk@izfr Vhyksa dk jksi.k] moZjdksa ¼220 fd-xzk- ukbZVªkstu] 40fd-xzk- QkLQksjl] 0 fd-xzk- iksVk'k izfr gs-½ dk vfèkd iz;ksxrFkk dhVuk'kd Mhyjksa dh lykg ij jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksadk 2&4 ckj iz;ksx 'kkfey FksA vkbZih,e ugha viukus okysfdlkuksa us ftad lYQsV dk Hkh iz;ksx fd;k Fkk] ij mldhek=k de FkhA

NCIPM


and FP fields. Samples of grains at harvest were alsoanalyzed for estimating pesticide residues.

Pest incidence /Natural enemies

Lower incidence of yellow stem borer, leaf folderand brown plant hoper were observed in IPM comparedto and FP fields (Table 1). Spider population was foundto be higher in IPM (1.36/hill) as against FP (1.05/hill).Among diseases, ‘Bakanae’ remained the major one inFP fields with mean incidence of 17.7% while it wasnot observed in IPM fields.

40 vkbZih,e viukus okys rFkk 20 ,Qih viukus okys[ksrksa ls uk'khtho ds izdksi ij izs{k.k fd, x, ftlds fy,izR;sd [ksr esa 20 Vhyksa dks pkj Vhyk izfr LFkku ds fglkc ls ik¡pLFkkuks ls p;u fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e rFkk ,Qih [ksrksa ls izkIrenk esa thok.kqvksa ,oa iks"kd rRoksa ds fy, enk fo'ys"k.k fd,x,A dhVuk'kdksa ds vof'k"Vksa dk vkdyu djus ds fy, dVkbZds le; vuktksa ds izfrn'kksZa ¼uewuksa½ dk Hkh fo'ys"k.k fd;k x;kA

uk'khtho dk izdksi@izkÑfrd 'k=qkijh{k.k ds ifj.kkeksa esa ,Qih [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e

esa ruk Hksnd] iÙkh eksM+d rFkk Hkwjk ikni ekgw ¼czkmu IykaV gksij½dk izdksi de ik;k x;k ¼rkfydk 1½A edM+h dh la[;k ,Qih

rkfydk 1% cEckoM] mÙkj izns’k esa o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku vkbZih,e ,oa fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½ okys pkoy ds [ksrksaesa uk'khtho dk izdksi ,oa izkÑfrd 'k=qvksa dk ifjn`';A

Table 1: Scenario of pests and beneficials in IPM and FP fields of Basmati rice at Bambawad, UP during 2013

Ukk'khtho/Pest vkSlr@Mean

vkbZih,e@IPM ,Qih@FP

ihyk ruk csèkd ¼% xzflr ikS/ks½ @ Yellow stem borer (% infested tillers) 0.12 0.75

iRrh eksMd ¼% xzflr ikS/ks½ @ Leaf folder (% infested leaves) 0.09 0.26

Hkwjk ikni ekgw ¼l[;k@Vhyk½ @ BPH (Nos./hill) 3.56 5.21

edM+h ¼la[;k@Vhyk½ @ Spider (Nos./hill) 1.36 1.05

cdkus (% xzflr ikS/ks½ @ Bakanae (% incidence) 0 17.07

¼1-05 izfr Vhyk½ dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e ¼1-36 izfr Vhyk½ esavfèkd ikbZ xbZA jksxksa ds lacaèk esa] 17-7% ds vkSlr izdksi dslkFk fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa ^cdkus* izeq[k jksx ik;k x;k] tcfdvkbZih,e [ksrksa esa bls ugha ik;k x;kA

e`nk fo'ys"k.kiks"k.k lacaèkh fo'ys"k.k

izfrjksi.k ls igys ,d= fd, x, enk izfrn'kks± ¼uewuksa½ dsfo'ys"k.k ls ;g irk pyk fd fdlkuksa dh fofèk;ksa dh rqyuk esavkbZih,e esa tSfod dkcZu] miyCèk ukbVªkstu (N), QkLQksjl(P), iksVk'k (K) rFkk ftad (Zn) dh ek=k vfèkd FkhA QlyekSle ds eè; esa ¼flrEcj½ laxzfgr enk izfrn'kks± ds fo'ys"k.k esa;g ik;k x;k fd fdlkuksa dh fofèk;ksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esatSfod dkcZu rFkk ftad dh ek=k vfèkd FkhA rFkkfi] fdlkuksadh fofèk;ksa dh rqyuk esa] vkbZih,e esa ukbVªkstu] QklQksjl rFkkiksVkl dh ek=k de ikbZ xbZ D;ksafd fdlkuksa us viuh fofèk;ksaesa bu iks"kdksa dk vfèkd ek=k esa mi;ksx fd;k FkkA

thok.kqt lef"VizkjaHk esa fdlkuksa dh fofèk dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa

Soil analysis

Nutritional analysis

Analysis of soil samples collected beforetransplanting indicated higher level of organic carbon,available nitrogen, phosphorous, potash and zinc inIPM as compared to FP. Analysis of soil samplescollected during mid-crop season (September) indicatedhigher levels of organic carbon and zinc in IPM ascompared to FP. However, the level of N, P and Kwas lower in IPM as compared to FP as higher level ofthese nutrients was applied by the farmers in FP.

Microbial population

Count of P. fluorescens was initially higher in IPM

as compared to FP; however, during the mid-crop

season the trend was changed. Total bacteria, fungi,

and Trichoderma counts in September was higher in

IPM as against FP. No definite trend could be observed

in the population of microbials in IPM and FP fields.


Pesticide residue analysis

Seed treatment with carbendazim was an important

component in IPM. Analysis of rice grain samples at

harvest indicated carbendazim below detectable level

(<0.03 μg/kg). Out of five-grain samples collected,

buprofezin was detected in three IPM samples (0.03-

0.04 μg/kg). In case of FP, 24.6% farmers had applied

buprofezin whereas phorate and cartap hydrochloride

was applied by most of the farmers. In all the FP

samples, phorate was below detectable level (<0.02 μg/

kg), whereas buprofezin was detected in two samples

(0.051 and 0.064 μg/kg).

Socio-economic analysis

In IPM only one chemical pesticide spray of

buprofezin was given by 32.8% of farmers as BPH

crossed the ETL (8 adults or nymph/hill) in their plots

against 2-4 chemical pesticide sprays (Buprofezin, cartap

hydrochloride, malathion) in FP. IPM trial also

resulted in higher yield and beneft-cost (B:C) ratio

(Table 2) as compared to FP.

L;wMkseksukl Qyksjkslsal dh lef"V vfèkd Fkh( rFkkfi QlyekSle ds eè;karj ds nkSjku fLFkfr cny xbZA flrEcj ekg esa]fdlkuksa dh fofèk dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa dqy cSDVhfj;k]dod ¼QQwan½ rFkk VªkbdksMekZ vfèkd FksA vkbZih,e rFkkfdlkuksa dh fofèk okys [ksrksa esa thok.kqvksa dh lef"V esa dksbZfuf'pr izofÙk ugha ns[kh xbZA

dhVuk'kd vof'k"Vksa dk fo'ys"k.kvkbZih,e esa dkcZuMsfte ls cht mipkj ,d egRoiw.kZ

?kVd FkkA Qly dVkbZ ds le; pkoy ds izfrn'kks± ds fo'ys"k.kesa dkcsZuMsfte fMVsDVscy Lrj ¼0-03 fdxzk- izfr gs-½ ls deFkkA pkoy ds ikap laxzfgr izfrn'kks± esa ls vkbZih,e ds rhuizfrn'kks± ¼0-030&0-040 ekbØksxzke izfr fdxzk-½ esa cqizksQhft+uik;k x;kA fdlkuksa dh fofèk ds lacaèk esa] 24-6% fdlkuksa uscqizksQhftu dk mi;ksx fd;k Fkk] tcfd vfèkdrj fdlkuksa usQksjsV vkSj dkjVsi gkbMªksDyksjkbM dk mi;ksx fd;k FkkAfdlkuksa dh fofèk okys lHkh izfrn'kks± esa QksjsV fMVsDVscy Lrj¼0-02 fdxzk- izfr gs-½ ls de Fkk] tcfd nks izfrn'kks± ¼0-051vkSj 0-064 ekbØksxzke izfr fdxzk-½ esa cqizksQhftu ik;k x;kA

lkekftd&vkfFkZd fo'ys"k.kvkbZih,e esa 32-8% fdlkuksa us cqizksQhftu jklk;fud

dhVuk'kd dk dsoy ,d fNM+dko fd;k Fkk D;ksafd muds[ksrksa esa chih,p ¼izfr Vhyk 8 O;Ld vFkok uotkr Hkwjk ikniekgw½ vkfFkZd gkfu Lrj ls vfèkd gks x;k FkkA blds foijhr]fdlkuksa dh fofèk esa fdlkuksa us 2&4 jklk;fud dhVuk'kdfNM+dkoksa ¼cqizksQhftu] dkjVsi gkbMªksDyksjkbM] esykfFk;ksu½dk iz;ksx fd;k FkkA fdlkuksa dh fofèk dh rqyuk esa] vkbZih,eijh{k.k esa ykHk%ykxr ¼ch%lh½ vuqikr Hkh vfèkd Fkk ¼rkfydk 2½A

pkoy | Rice

rkfydk 2% cEckoM] mÙkj izns'k esa o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku vkbZih,e rFkk fdlkuksa dh fofèk;ksa okys pkoy ds [ksrksa esadhVuk'kdksa dk iz;ksx] mit rFkk vkfFkZd vkadM+ksa dk fo'ys"k.k

Table 2: Pesticide application, yield and economics in IPM and farmers’ practices (FP) in rice fields at Bambawad, UPduring 2013

pj vkbZih,e fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½

Variables IPM FP

dhVuk'kd fNM+dko@Pesticide sprays (range) 0-1 spray 2-4 sprays

dqy ykxr (`/gs-)@Total cost (`/ha.) 25480 28740

vkSlr mit ¼fDo-@izfr gs-½@Mean yield (q/ha) 34.63 27.69

dqy ykHk (`/gs-)@Total returns (`/ha.) 131594 105222

'kq) ykHk (`/gs-)@Net returns (`/ha.) 106114 76482

ykxr%ykHk vuqikr@Benefit:Cost ratio 5.16 3.66

pkoy dk ewY; `3800@& izfr fDoa- Rate of paddy ` 3800/- per q

For all the pests that out of earth arise the

earth itself the antidote supplies

– Lithica, c. 400 BC

NCIPM


Estimation of contribution of individual components

of IPM on pests, beneficial organisms and yield

in kharif rice.

Chinsurah, West Bengal

At Chinsurah (Hooghly, West Bengal) sheath

blight, sheath rot, bacterial leaf blight, yellow stem

borer, leaf folder and brown plant hopper are the

major pests in kharif rice whereas whorl maggot, green

leaf hopper, brown spot are the minor pests. An

experiment was conducted at the Rice Research Station

(RRS), Chinsurah (Hooghly) during kharif (wet), 2013

with cv. Swarna (MTU 7029) variety in split-split plot

design with three main plots, two sub plots and six seed

treatments as sub-sub plots to estimate the contribution

of individual components of IPM. All the treatments

were provided with fertilizer @ N : P2O

5 : K

2O ::

80:40:40 kg/ha (full P2O

5 + full K

2O + 1/2th N as

basal, 1/4th N as 1st top dressing and remaining 1/4th N

as 2nd top dressing). Status of N P K in the soil was

estimated before green manuring and transplan-

ting. Observations on insect pests and diseases were

recorded from 20 days after transplanting (DAT)

onwards at ten-day intervals. At sub-plot level, one

application of rynaxypyr 20 DAT provided

significantly lower infestation as compared to no such

application. In case of sheath blight, lowest incidence

was observed in green manuring by Sesbania followed

by pretilachlor application 5 DAT. Among the various

treatments, incidence of sheath blight remained

significantly lower in all the treatments having bio-

pesticide or carbendazim interventions as compared to

check.. Incidence remained lowest in seed treatment with

carbendazim @ 1g a.i./kg seed+soil application of

Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 20g/m2. Significantly higher

yield was observed in application of pretilachlor 750

ml a.i./ha 5 DAT as compared to green manuring.

Gerua, Assam

At RRLRRS (CRRI), Gerua, Assam, anexperimental trial was conducted with cv. Chandramaof rice in split-split plot design with four sub-sub plottreatments and four sub-plot treatments. Main plottreatments included spraying of rynaxypyr @ 50g a.i./

[kjhiQ pkoy esa uk'khthoksa] ykHkdkjh thok.kqvksarFkk mit ij vkbZih,e ds ,dy ?kVdksa ds ;ksxnkudk vkdyu

fpulqjk] if'pe caxkyfpulqjk ¼gqxyh] if'pe caxky½ esa [kjhQ pkoy esa vkPNn

vaxekjh] vkPNn lM+u] thok.kqt iÙkh vaxekjh] ihyk rukHksnd] iÙkh eksM+d rFkk Hkwjk ikni ekgw izeq[k uk'khthoksa ds :iesa ik, x,] tcfd OgksZy eSxkWV] gjh iÙkh ekgw ¼gksij½ rFkk HkwjkèkCck ekgw uk'khtho lkekU; :i esa ik, x,A vkbZih,e ds,dy ?kVdksa ds ;ksxnku dk vkdyu djus ds fy, [kjhQ2013 ¼vknzZrk ds fnuksa esa½ ds nkSjku pkoy vuqlaèkku dsUnz¼vkjvkj,l½] fpulqjk ¼gqxyh½ esa rhu eq[; IykVksa] nks miIykVksa rFkk mi&mi IykVksa ds :i esa N% cht mipkj IykVksa dslkFk fLIyV&fLIyV IykV fMtkbu esa Lo.kkZ fdLe ¼,eVh;w7029½ ij ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA lHkh mipkjksa esa moZjd@N: P

2O

5 : K

2O :: 80:40:40 ¼cSly ds :i esa iw.kZ :i esa

P2O

5+K

2O+1/2 N)] igyh VkWi MªSflax ds fy, 1/4 ukbVªkstu

rFkk nwljh VkWi MªSflax ds fy, 'ks"k (1/4) ukbVªkstu dk iz;ksxfd;k x;kA enk esa gjh [kkn feykus rFkk izfrjksi.k ls igysukbVªkstu] QkLQksjl rFkk iksVk'k dh fLFkfr dk vkdyufd;k x;kA izfrjksi.k ds 20 fnuksa ds i'pkr nl fnuksa dsvarjkyksa ij uk'khthoksa ,oa jksxksa ds MkVk ntZ fd, x,A miIykV Lrj ij izfrjksi.k ds 20 fnuksa ¼20 Mh,Vh½ ds cknjkbuSDlhfij dk ,d ckj iz;ksx fd, tkus ls uk'khtho laØe.kesa Hkkjh deh ns[kh xbZ] tcfd blls igys bl izdkj dk dksbZHkh vuqiz;ksx ugha fd;k tkrk FkkA vkPNn vaxekjh ds lacaèkesa] lslcsfu;k rFkk izfrjksi.k ds ikap fnuksa ds ckn ¼5 Mh,Vh½izsfVykDyksj ds iz;ksx ds dkj.k bl jksx dk U;wure izdksi ik;kx;kA fofHkUu mipkjksa esa] vkPNn vaxekjh dk izdksi de ik;kx;k D;ksafd mipkj esa daVªksy dh rqyuk esa tSo&dhVuk'kdvFkok dkcsZuMsfte dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k FkkA dkcZsuMsfte 1 xzk-izfr fdxzk- cht $ lwMkseksukl ¶yksjksalsal 20 xzk- izfr oxZ eh- {ks=ds enk vuqiz;ksx ls dkQh de izdksi ns[kk x;kA Qly dhdVkbZ ds le; mit lacaèkh vkadM+ksa ls ,slk ladsr feyrk gS fdizfrjksi.k ds ikap fnuksa ds ckn ¼5 Mh,Vh½ gjh [kkn ds LFkku ijizsfVykDyksj 750 fe-yh- izfr gss- {ks= ds iz;ksx ls dkQh vfèkdmit izkIr dh tk ldrh gSA

xs#vk] vlevkjvkj,yvkjvkj,l ¼lhvkjvkjvkbZ½] xs#ok] vle esa pkj

mi&mi IykVksa rFkk pkj mi&IykV mipkjksa ds lkFk fLIyV&fLIyVIykV fMtkbu dk iz;ksx djrs gq, pkoy dh pUnzek fdLe ij,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA eq[; IykV ds mipkj esa izfrjksi.k ds


ha at 35 DAT, 120 DAT, both at 35, 120 DAT andcontrol.

Cuttack, Odisha

IPM validation in rice was conducted at villageSinghamapur in 30 acres with cv. Pooja. In the rice-ricecropping system, rice variety Pooja was grown underirrigated conditions in 35 acres. The sowing dates fornurseries were 05 July and 12 July 2013 and dates oftransplanting were 03 Aug to 10 Aug 2013. The fertilizerapplication was N-80, P-40, K-40 in three splits. Acontrol plot of 5 acre was also maintained. Various IPMinterventions included one application of cartaphydrochloride (4G) at 30 DAT @ 1 kg a.i./ha, one sprayof carbendazim @ 1 g a.i./l at active tillering stage forblast and sheath blight affected plots and one spraybefore panicle initiation stage for false smut in all IPMplots and two sprays of plantomycin+ copperoxychloride in the bacterial blight affected plots at 8-day intervals.

YSB infestation was 1.2% in IPM as against 6.9%in FP. Leaf blast, sheath blight, BLB and false smutwere observed in traces in IPM as compared to 4.1 to10.9% in FP (Table 3).

ckn 35 ,oa 120 Mh,Vh rFkk daVªksy ij jkbuSDlhfij 50 xzk- izfrgs- dk fNM+dko fd;k x;kA

dVd] vksfM'kkfla?keiqj xkao esa 30 ,dM+ {ks= esa pkoy dh iwtk fdLe

esa vkbZih,e iz.kkyh dk oSèkhdj.k fd;k x;kA pkoy Qlyhdj.ki)fr esa flafpr fLFkfr;ksa ds varxZr 35 ,dM+ {ks= esa pkoy dhiwtk fdLe dh [ksrh dh xbZA ikS/k'kkykvksa ds fy, cqokbZ 05tqykbZ vkSj 12 tqykbZ 2013 dks dh xbZ vkSj 03 vxLr ls 10vxLr] 2013 rd izfrjksi.k fd;k x;kA moZjdksa dk iz;ksxukbVªkstu (N)-80, QkLQksjl (P)-40, iksVk'k (K) -40 rhu fLifyVek=kvksa esa fd;k x;kA ,d 5 ,dM+ dk daVªksy IykWV Hkhvuqjf{kr fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e dh fofHkUu dk;Zuhfr;ksa esajksikbZ ds ckn 30 fnuksa esa dkjVsi gkbMªksDyksjkbM ¼4th½ 1fdxzk- izfr gs- dk ,d fNM+dko( izLQqVu ds fy, lfØ; tqrkbZvoLFkk ij rFkk vkPNn vaxekjh ls izHkkfor IykVksa esa dkcsZuMsfte1 xzk- izfr yhVj dk ,d fNM+dko vkSj lHkh vkbZih,e IykVksaesa vkHkklh daM ¼QkYl LeV½ ds fy, èkku dh ckyh f[kyus lsigys ,d fNM+dko rFkk 8 fnuksa ds varjkyksa ij thok.kqtvaxekjh ls izHkkfor IykVksa esa IykaVksekblhu $ dkWijvkWDlhDyksjkbM ds nks fNM+dko 'kkfey FksA

fdlkuksa dh fofèk esa ihyk ruk Hksnd ¼okbZ,lch½ dklaØe.k 6-9% ik;k x;k] tks vkbZih,e esa 1-2% FkkA fdlkuksadh fofèk esa iÙkh izLQqVu] vkPNn vaxekjh] ch,ych rFkkvkHkklh daM ¼QkYl LeV½ 4-1 ls 10-9% tcfd vkbZih,e esu ds cjkcj ik;k x;k ¼rkfydk 3½A

pkoy | Rice

uk'khtho vkbZih,e fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½Pest IPM FP

ihyk ruk csèkd (%) / YSB (%) 1.2 6.9 (3-8 %)

iÙkh izLQqVu ¼iÙkh laØe.k½ (%) / Leaf blast (leaf infection) (%) Trace 4.1 (3-5 %)

vkPNn vaxekjh (%) / Sheath blight (%) Trace 5.8 (4- 10 %)

Hkwjk ikni ekgw (%) / BPH (%) Trace 8.9 (15-20 %)

QkYl LeV (%) / False smut (%) Trace 10.9 (15-20%)

rkfydk 3% o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku fla?keiqj] dVd ¼vksfM'kk½ esa vkbZih,e vkSj fdlkuksa dh fofèk okys pkoy ds [ksrksa esauk'khtho dk ifjn`';

Table 3: Pest scenario in IPM and FP rice fields at Singhampur, Cuttack (Odisha) during 2013

Lkkekftd&vkfFkZd fo'ys"k.k esa fdlkuksa dh fofèk dhrqyuk esa vkbZih,e viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa 16]196izfr gs- dk 'kq) ykHk izkIr fd;k x;kA vkbZih,e esa ykHk %ykxr vuqikr 3-1 Fkk] tcfd fdlkuksa dh fofèk dh rqyuk esa;g 2-63 Fkk ¼rkfydk 4½A

Socio-economic analysis indicated a net benefit of` 16, 196 /ha in the IPM fields over FP. B: C ratioremained 3.1 in IPM as against 2.63 in FP (Table 4).

NCIPM


lw=kÑfe ds fy, vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk oSèkhdj.k,oa izksUu;u

csaxyq#] dukZVdds- vkj- iSV] ekaM;k ftys esa 234 ,dM+ {ks= esa yxkrkj

pkSFks o"kZ Hkh lw=Ñfe ds lacaèk esa lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku dsoS|hdj.k ijh{k.k fd, x,A bl {ks= esa pkoy lw=Ñfe]eSyksMhxk;uh xzkfefudksyk] ruk csèkd] iÙkh eksM+d] iÙkh vaxekjhrFkk izLQqVu izeq[k uk'khtho ik, x,A ijh{k.k esa dkckZs¶;qjkWu0-3 xzke izfr oxZ eh- dk mipkj rFkk izfrjksi.k ds 40 fnuksa dsckn [ksr esa bldk iz;ksx 1-0 fdxzk- izfr gs-] ikS/k'kkyk esaL;wMkseksukl ¶yksjksalsal 20 xzk- izfr oxZ eh- ¼vkbZvkbZ,pvkjfdLe½ vFkok bfeMkDyksfizM 1 fe-yh- izfr 4 yhVj dk iz;ksxfd;k x;k ¼dkcksZ¶;qjkWu ds lkFk doduk'kd dk dksbZ iz;ksxugha fd;k x;k½A

ijh{k.kksa esa dh xbZ vU; xfrfofèk;ksa esa Qsjkseksu VªSiksa ds}kjk uk'khthoksa dh fujarj fuxjkuh] Vªkbdksxzsek tsiksfude dk[ksrks es NksM+uk rFkk vko';drkuqlkj ijthO;kHkksa dk vuqiz;ksx'kkfey FkkA

ftu ikS/k'kkykvksa esa doduk'kd ,oa dhVuk'kdksa ds vykokdkcksZ¶;qjkWu dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k Fkk] muesa L;wMkseksukl ¶yksjkslsalls mipkfjr vkSj daVªksy [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa de la[;k esa xkWy]izfr VªSi vfèkd la[;k esa ruk Hksnd O;Ld] de izLQqVu rhozrk]de 'kq"d ikni rFkk vfèkd mit ikbZ xbZA

Validation and promotion of IPM strategies for

nematode

Bengaluru, Karnataka

Trials for integrated pest management fornematode were carried out for the fourth successiveyear in 234 acres at K.R.Pet, Mandya district. Rice root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola, stem borer,leaf folder, blight and blast were the major pests.Treatments carbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m2 followed by itsfield application @ 1.0 kg a.i./ ha at 40 days aftertransplanting, application of Pseudomonas fluorescens@ 20 g/sq m (IIHR strain) in nursery or imidacloprid@ 1 ml/4 l were maintained. (No mention of fungicideuse with carbofuran)

Regular monitoring of pests through pheromonetraps, release of Trichogramma japonicum and need-based application of parasitoids were other activitiescarried out.

Nursery applied with carbofuran in addition tofungicide and insecticide recorded less number of galls,more number of adults per trap, less blast severity andless dried plants due to stem borer and with more yieldcompared to P. fluorescens treated and control fields.

pj vkbZih,e fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½Variables IPM FP

dqy ykxr / Total cost 20450 16550

mit ¼fDo- izfr gs-½ / Yield (q/ha) 49.8 34.1

dqy ykHk ¼` izfr gs-½ / Total return (`/ha) 63744 43648

'kq) ykHk ¼` izfr gs-½ / Net-return (`/ha) 43294 27098

ykHk @ykxr vuqikr / B:C Ratio 3.1 2.6

rkfydk 4% o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku fla?keiqj] dVd ¼vksfM'kk½ esa vkbZih,e vkSj fdlkuksa dh fofèk okys pkoy ds [ksrksa esamit o vkfFkZd vk¡dM+ksa dk fo'ys"k.k

Table 4: Yield and economics in IPM and farmers' practices (FP) rice fields at Singhamapur during 2013

mipkj ikS/k'kkyk esa ,Q,uih@200 lhlh xkWy@izfr 20 ikS/k izLQqVu izdksi (%)

Treatment FNP/200 cc in nursery Galls/20 Seedlings Blast incidence (%)

dkcksZ¶;qjkWu + 40 Mh,Vh/Carbofuran nursery + 40 DAT 224 21.55 2.6

ih- Qyksjkslsal & ikS/k'kkyk/P. fluorescens -nursery 285 34.35 2.5

vuqipkfjr daVªksy/Untreated control 418 78.35 2.8

rkfydk 5% o"kZ 2013&14 esa ikS/k'kkyk ds nkSjku tM+&xkaB] xzhok izLQqVu dh rhozrk vkSj uk'khthoksa }kjk fd;k x;k uqdlku

Table 5: Overall severity of root-knot, neck blast and insect damage during nursery 2013-14


L;wMkseksukl ¶yksjkslsal ls mipkfjr ikS/k'kkyk dh rqyukesa dkcksZ¶;qjkWu ls mipkfjr ikS/k'kkyk rFkk 40 Mh,Vh ij iqu%dkcksZ¶;qjkWu ds mipkj ls lw=Ñfe dh U;wure lef"V] U;wurexkWy la[;k rFkk izLQqVu izdksi de ntZ fd;k x;kA

f'keksxk] dukZVddukZVd ds nkokukfxjh ftys esa fpdkMkMkdkVs esa 32

,dM+ {ks= esa ijh{k.k fd, x,A ijh{k.k esa dkcksZ¶;qjkWu @0-3xzk- izfr oxZ eh- {ks= ds lkFk ikS/k'kkyk D;kjh mipkj rFkkizfrjksi.k ds 40 fnuksa ds ckn [ksr vuqiz;ksx( D;kfj;ksa esaL;wMkseksukl ¶yksjkslsal 20 xzk- izfr oxZ eh- {ks= dk vuqiz;ksx(VªkbdksMekZ fojhMs ¼vkbZvkbZ,pvkj fdLe½ 4 xzk- izfr fdxzk- dkcht mipkj vkSj vuqipkfjr daVªksy tSls mipkj 'kkfey FksA

ijh{k.k esa ;Fkkvko';drk dh xbZ vU; xfrfofèk;ksa esaQsjkseksu VªSiksa ds }kjk uk'khthoksa dh fu;fer fuxjkuh] Vh-tsiksfude ¼ihlhvkbZ fdLe½ dk foekspu rFkk doduk'kdksadk rRdkfyd ¼LikWV½ vuqiz;ksx 'kkfey FksA dkcksZ;wjkWu iz;ksxdh xbZ ulZjh esa esyksMksxk;uh xzkfefudksyk ds dkj.k izfr ikSèkU;wure xkWy ¼13½] L;wMkseksukl ¶yksjkslsal iz;ksx dh xbZ ulZjhesa 17 xky rFkk Vh- fojhMs iz;ksx dh xbZ ikS/k'kkyk esa izfr ikSèk22 xky ntZ fd, x,] tcfd vuqipkfjr daVªksy esa izfr ikSèk92 xky ntZ fd, x,A f'keksxk esa] tM+&xkaB lwpdkad 3-5&4-5 dh jsat esa Fkk( vkbZ,uih% 465@200 lhlh enkA

lkekU; :i ls] ulZjh rFkk jksikbZ ds 45 fnuksa ckndkckZs¶;qjkWu ds vuqiz;ksx] nksuksa esa lw=Ñfe dh U;wure lef"V]de la[;k esa xky rFkk de izLQqVu rhozrk ikbZ xbZ vkSj ih-¶yksjkslsal ls mipkfjr ,oa daVªksy QhYMksa dh rqyuk esa mitHkh vfèkd ikbZ xbZA

dY;k.kh] if'pe caxky24 ijxuk ¼mÙkj½] if'pe caxky ds ehuk vkSj gkcjk xkaoksa

esa lw=Ñfe ij dsfUnzr jgrs gq, pkoy esa lesfdr izcaèku dkoSèkhdj.k fd;k x;kA vuqipkfjr daVªksy esa izfrjksi.k ds 7fnuksa ds ckn ih- Qyksjkslsal 7-5 fdxzk- izfr gs- $ xkscj [kkn375 fdxzk- izfr gs- 7 lIrkg ckn dkcksZ¶;qjkWu 3 xzk- izfr fexzk-izfr gs- ds vuqiz;ksx dh rqyuk dh xbZA mipkj esa] vuqipkfjrdaVªksy dh rqyuk esa] enk esa tM+&xkaB lw=Ñfe lef"V ¼ts2½ esadkQh deh ns[kh xbZA vuqipkfjr daVªksy dh rqyuk esa mijksDrmipkj ls pkoy dh mit esa 31-3% dh of) gqbZA

Qly dVkbZ ds le;] ih- ¶yksjkslsal vkSj dkcksZ¶;qjkWuiz;ksx fd, x, [ksrksa esa] vuqipkfjr daVªksy dh rqyuk esa]xkfyax rFkk lw=Ñfe dh lef"V dkQh de ikbZ xbZ vkSj èkkudh mit esa dkQh of) ns[kh xbZA

Nursery application with carbofuran with anotherapplication at 40 DAT recorded least final nematodepopulation, least number of galls and less blast incidencecompared to nursery treated with P. fluorescens.

Shimoga, Karnataka

Trials were undertaken in 32 acres atChikadadakatte, Davanagere district of Karnataka. Thetreatments viz. nursery bed treatment with carbofuran@ 0.3g a.i/m2 followed by field application at 40 daysafter transplanting (DAT), application of Pseudomonasfluorescens @ 20 g/m2 of beds, seed treatment withTrichoderma viride (IIHR strain) @ 4 g/kg of seed anduntreated control were maintained at both the locations.

Regular monitoring of pests through pheromonetraps, release of T. japonicum (PCI strain) and spotapplication of fungicides were the other activities carriedout as and when needed. The lowest (13) galls/seedlingdue to Meloidogyne graminicola was recorded incarbofuran-applied nursery, 17 galls in P. fluorescens-applied nursery, 22 galls/seedling in T. viride-treatednursery compared to 92 galls/seedling in untreatedcontrol. In Shimoga, the root-knot index ranged 3.5 –4.5; INP: 465/200 cc soil.

In general, both nursery and 45 DAT applicationwith carbofuran recorded least nematode population,less number of galls, less blast severity, also recordedmore yield compared to P.fluorescens treated, andcontrol fields

Kalyani, West Bengal

Validation of integrated management focusing onnematode in rice was carried out in villages Mena andHabra, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal. Applicationof P. fluorescens @ 7.5 kg/ha + FYM @ 375 kg/ha at 7DAT followed by application of carbofuran 3 g @ 1kg a.i./ha at 4 weeks after transplanting (WAT) wascompared in untreated control. In treatment, root-knotnematode population (J

2) decreased significantly in soil

over untreated control. The treatment also increasedthe yield of rice by 31.3% over untreated control.

At harvest, galling as well as nematode populationin the P. fluorescens and carbofuran applied fields weresignificantly less in comparison to untreated controlwith substantial increase in the paddy yield.

pkoy | Rice

NCIPM


mipkj izHkkoh fVyjksa dh xky dh la[;k ,Q,uih@200 mit ¼fDoa@

Treatment la[;k izfr Vhyk izfr 10 Vhyk lhlh e`nk izfr gs-No. of effective Number of galls FNP/200 cc soil Yield (q/ha)

tillers/hill /10 hills

izfrjksi.k ds 7 fnuksa ds ckn ih- Qyksjkslsal@7-5 fdxzk- 18-22 38 57-174 59.2

izfr gs- $ xkscj [kkn@375 fdxzk- izfr gs- 7 lIrkg ckn

dkcksZ¶;qjkWu@3 xzk- izfr fdxzk- ldzh; rRo izfr gs- dk iz;ksx

Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 7.5 kg/ha + FYM@375 kg/ha at 7 days after transplanting followedby application of carbofuran 3G @ 1 kg a.i./ha at 4weeks after transplanting

vuqipkfjr daVªksy@Untreated control 11-15 198 196-300 45.1

rkfydk 6% izfrjksi.k ds i'pkr fVyj la[;k] :V xky vkSj mit dh fLFkfr

Table 6: Tiller number, root gall and yield after transplantation

"I really enjoy how rewarding it is to provide peace

of mind to people in a panic by solving their pest

problems."

– Jesse Huie, IPM Specialist


diklCotton

National Information System for Pest Managementin Bt cotton

The project, national information system for pestmanagement (NISPM) in Bt cotton under TMC MM-II was aimed at monitoring pest activities in Bt cottonin major cotton growing areas, sharing the pestinformation with State Agricultural Universities andState Agricultural Departments to issue the advisoriesand implement IPM technology in Bt cotton againstemerging pests. Under the project, there were thirteencooperating field centres and two specific centres.

e-pest surveillance and advisory system

Under the e-pest surveillance and advisory system,a total of 1062 fields were surveyed in 266 villagescovering 1372 farmers in eight states. Pest data collectedat weekly intervals from two fixed and two randomfields was uploaded at NCIPM Website by all Centresand on-line advisories were issued. Highest ETL wasreflected by leaf reddening; but as the leaf reddeningwas a common phenomenon only near crop maturity,therefore, the actual economic loss was not significant.Hoppers indicated highest hot spots i.e., 218 from 12districts. Mirid bug was found to cross ETL on 2occasions at Akola and 5 occasions at Perambalur.Among the diseases, the Alternaria leaf blight recordedhighest hot spots in two districts followed by parawilt(22 hot spots in five districts).

Extension activities

The capabilities of farmers on pest managementstrategies in Bt cotton were enhanced through villagelevel Farmers’ Group Meetings and Trainings at NISPMcentres. A total of 356 meetings and 72 farmers’ trainingwere organized, which were attended by 8796 and 2159

chVh dikl esa uk'khtho izcaèku ds fy, jk"Vªh;lwpuk iz.kkyh

Vh,elh ,e,e&II ds varxZr chVh dikl esa jk"Vªh;uk'khtho izcaèku lwpuk iz.kkyh ¼,uvkbZ,lih,e½ ifj;kstukdk mís'; izeq[k dikl mRiknd {ks=ksa esa chVh dikl esauk'khthoksa dh xfrfofèk;ksa dh fuxjkuh djuk] jkT; Ñf"kfo'ofo|ky;ksa ,oa jkT; Ñf"k foHkkxksa dks uk'khthoksa ds fo#)lykg tkjh djus rFkk chVh dikl esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dkdk;kZUo;u djus ds fy, uk'khthoksa ls lacafèkr lwpuk bdVBkdjuk FkkA ifj;kstuk ds varxZr 13 lg;ksxh iz{ks= dsUnz rFkknks fof'k"V dsUnz lfEefyr FksA

bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykg iz.kkyhbZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykg iz.kkyh ds varxZr vkB

jkT;ksa esa 1372 fdlkuksa dks lfEefyr djrs gq, 266 xkaoksa esadqy 1062 [ksrksa dk losZ{k.k fd;k x;kA lHkh dsUnzksa }kjk nksLFkk;h rFkk nks xSj fu/kkZfjr [ksrksa ls lkIrkfgd varjkyksa ijlaxzfgr uk'khtho lacaèkh vk¡dM+ksa dks jklukizds dh osclkbVij viyksM fd;k x;kA iÙkh ykyiu jksx ls vfèkdre bZVh,yns[kk x;k( ysfdu pwafd Qly dh ifjiDork ds vkl&ikl dhvofèk esa dsoy iÙkh ykyiu ,d vke ?kVukØe Fkk] blfy,okLrfod vkfFkZd gkfu T;knk ugha FkhA gksijksa esa mPpre gkWVLikWV ¼12 ftyksa ls 218½ ns[kk x;kA vdksyk esa nks voljksa ijrFkk isjecywj esa ikap ekSdksa ij fejhM cx dks bZVh,y ikj djrsik;k x;kA jksxksa esa] nks ftyksa esa nks gkWV LikWVksa esa lcls vfèkdvYVjusfj;k iÙkh vaxekjh rFkk mlds ckn iSjkfoYV ¼ikapftyksa esa 22 gkWV LikWV½ ntZ fd;k x;kA

foLrkj lacaèkh xfrfofèk;kachVh dikl esa uk'khtho izcaèku dk;Zuhfr;ksa ij fdlkuksa

dh {kerk,a c<+kbZ xb± ftlds fy, xkao Lrj ij fdlkuksa dhlewg cSaBdsa vk;ksftr dh xbZ rFkk ,uvkbZ,lih,e ds dsUnzksa

NCIPM


farmers, respectively for dissemination of IPM. Otherextension activities involved 127 newspaper publications,38 radio/TV talks and 4 field days. A total of 1,91,714SMSs were sent by 10 Centres to farmers representingdifferent communities (SC-28041, ST-12312 andWomen-296) to provide the pest information and IPMintervention.

Under the project, 6586 ha area was covered fordissemination of IPM by participation of 4250 farmers.A total of 6989 farmers were motivated through farmer-to-farmer interaction resulting an addition of 9163 haunder IPM activities.

Linkages for sharing of pest information

Strong linkages were developed with StateAgriculture Department, State Agriculture Universitiesand NGOs to create awareness among farmers aboutIPM. Based on the surveillance data, 88 pest reportswere compiled at fortnightly intervals for each districtand were submitted to respective State Department ofAgriculture.

Economic analysis

Economic impact analysis indicated significantreduction in the number of chemical sprays from 7.34in FP to 4.27 in IPM; quantity of chemical pesticides(a.i. kg/ha) was reduced from 5.2 kg/ha in FP to 2.8kg/ha in IPM. Application of bio-pesticides, includingbotanicals was more in IPM (23.6%) as compared tonon-IPM (6.8%). Benefit-cost ratio remained 2.70 inIPM as compared to 2.07 in FP (Table 1).

Weather parameters and pest correlation

Daily weather report for 15 reporting stations wasshared with all the project partners through e-mail. Theweather data along with pest data of respective centreswas used for developing association rules to apply inthe next season in agro-advisories. Pest incidence wasspatially depicted in GIS maps.

esa fdlkuksa dks izf'k{k.k Hkh fn;k x;kA dqy 356 cSBdksa rFkk72 fdlku izf'k{k.kksa dk vk;kstu fd;k x;k] ftuesa vkbZih,eds izlkj ds fy, Øe'k% 8796 vkSj 2159 fdlkuksa us Hkkxfy;kA vU; foLrkj xfrfofèk;ksa esa 127 lekpkj&i= izdk'ku]38 jsfM;ks@Vhoh okrkZ,a rFkk 4 iz{ks= fnol lfEefyr FksAuk'khtho lacaèkh lwpuk rFkk vkbZih,e dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa dksmiyCèk djkus gsrq fofHkUu leqnk;ksa ¼vuqlwfpr tkfr & 28041]vuqlwfpr tutkfr & 12312 rFkk efgyk fdlku & 296½ dkizfrfufèkRo djus okys fdlkuksa dks 10 dsUnzksa }kjk dqy 1]91]714,l,e,l Hksts x,A

ifj;kstuk ds rgr vkbZih,e ds izlkj ds fy, 6586 gs-{ks= dks lfEefyr fd;k x;k] ftlesa 4250 fdlkuksa us lgHkkfxrkdhA izR;sd fdlku ls ckrphr dj dqy 6989 fdlkuksa dksizksRlkfgr fd;k x;k] ftlds QyLo:i vkbZih,e dh xfrfofèk;ksads varxZr 9163 gs- vfrfjDr {ks= dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA

uk'khtho lacaèkh lwpuk lk>k djus gsrq lEidZvkbZih,e ds ckjs esa fdlkuksa esa tkx:drk ykus ds fy,

jkT; Ñf"k foHkkx] jkT; Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;ksa rFkk xSj&ljdkjhlaxBuksa ds lkFk lEidZ l'kDr fd, x,A fuxjkuh MkVk dsvkèkkj ij izR;sd ftys ds fy, ikf{kd varjky ij 88 uk'khtholacaèkh fjiksVks± dk ladyu fd;k x;k rFkk mUgsa lacafèkr jkT;Ñf"k foHkkx dks Hkstk x;kA

vkfFkZd fo'ys"k.kvkfFkZd izHkko fo'ys"k.k esa u dsoy fdlkuksa dh fofèk esa

7-3 jklk;fud fNM+dkoksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa jklk;fudfNM+dkoksa esa Hkkjh deh ¼4-3½ ykbZ xbZ cfYd fdlkuksa dh fofèkesa 5-2 fdxzk-@gs- jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ¼lØh; rRo fdxzk-@gs-½ dh ek=k dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksadh ek=k dks de dj 2-8 fdxzk-@gs- ds Lrj ij yk;k x;kAxSj&vkbZih,e ¼6-8%½ dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e ¼22-5%½ esaouLifr;ksa lfgr tSo&dhVuk'kdksa dk iz;ksx c<+k;k x;kAfdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½ esa 2-0 ykHk % ykxr vuqikr dhrqyuk esa vkbZih,e esa ykHk % ykxr vuqikr 2-7 FkkA ¼rkfydk&1½

ekSle lacaèkh izkpy vkSj uk'khtho ls mudk lglacaèkbZ&esy ds ekè;e ls lHkh ifj;kstuk lk>snkjksa ds lkFk 15

fjiksfV±x dsUnzksa dh nSfud ekSle fjiksVZ bdV~Bk dh xbZA la?k¼,lksfl,'ku½ ds fu;e cukus ds fy, lacafèkr dsUnzksa ds uk'khthoMkVk ds lkFk ekSle lacaèkh MkVk dk mi;ksx fd;k x;kA,lksfl,'ku }kjk rS;kj fd, x, fu;eksa dk Ñf"k lykg nsus dsfy, vxys ekSle esa vuqikyu fd;k tk,xkA uk'khtho ds izdksidks LFkkfud :i ls thvkbZ,l ekufp=ksa esa n'kkZ;k x;kA


dikl | Cotton

Synthesis and validation of IPM strategies foremerging pests of cotton

Surveys were conducted during 2013-14 indifferent location of north, central and south zones toassess the status of insect-pests, diseases and naturalenemies in Bt and non-Bt cotton.

North zone

Surveys were conducted in 10 villages of Fazilka,Muktsar, Bhatinda and Mansa districts of Punjab, 11villages of Fatehabad and Sirsa districts of Haryana andsix villages of Hanumangarh district of Rajasthanduring September 2013 for pests and natural enemiesin Bt and non-Bt cotton. Among sucking pests, whiteflywas present at most of the places (5 to 20 nymphs/

dikl ds mHkjus okys uk'khthoksa ds fy, vkbZih,edk;Zuhfr;ksa dk la'ys"k.k vkSj oS/hdj.k

chVh o xSj&chVh dikl esa uk'khdhVksa] jksxksa o fe= dhVksadh fLFkfr fu/kkZj.k gsrq o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku mÙkjh] e/; onf{k.kh {ks=ksa ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa esa losZ{k.k fd;k x;kA

mÙkjh {ks=kchVh ,oa xSj&chVh dikl esa uk'khthoksa rFkk izkÑfrd

'k=qvksa ds fy, flrEcj 2013 ds nkSjku iatkc esa QkftYdk]eqDlrj] HkafVMk rFkk eulk ftyksa esa 10 xkaoksa esa] gfj;k.kk dsQrsgkckn vkSj fljlk ftyksa ds 11 xkaoksa esa rFkk jktLFkku dsguqekux<+ ftys ds 6 xkaoksa esa losZ{k.k fd, x,A pwld uk'khthoksaesa] vfèkdrj LFkkuksa ij lQsn eD[kh ¼5 ls 20 fuEQ@O;Ldizfr iÙkh½ ikbZ xbZA dqN LFkyksa ij feyhcx dk izdksi Hkh ntZfd;k x;k] ftldk bZukfl;l cEckokysbZ }kjk Hk{k.k fd;k

rkfydk 1% dikl ds vkbZih,e ,oa fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½ okys [ksrksa esa dhVuk'kd dk iz;ksx] mit rFkk ykHk@ykxr vuqikr

Table 1: Pesticide application, yield and benefit/cost ratio in IPM and FP fields of cotton

dsUnz jklk;fud iz;ksx fd, x, tSo&dhVuk’kd cht dikl dh dikl mRiknu ykHk&ykxrCentre dhVuk’kd jklk;fud dk iz;ksx (%) mit ¼fDoa@gs-½ dh ykxr vuqikr

fNM+dko dh dhVuk’kd dh Application Seed cotton yield ¼`@gs-½ Benefit-Cost

la[;k ek=k ¼lØh; rRo of bio-pesticide (q/ha) Cost of cotton ratio

No. of chemical fdxzk-@izfr gs- (%) production

pesticide spray Quantity of (`/ha.)

chemical pesticide

applied (a.i. kg/ha)

vkbZih,e ,Qih vkbZih,e ,Qih vkbZih,e ,Qih vkbZih,e ,Qih vkbZih,e ,Qih vkbZih,e ,Qih

IPM FP IPM FP IPM FP IPM FP IPM FP IPM FP

QjhndksV/Faridkot 5.0 9.0 4.3 5.8 0 0.0 22.0 19.5 32250 34920 3.3 2.7

calokjk/Banswara 4.5 6.0 8.5 13.7 2.0 0.0 30.0 27.0 37750 43000 3.2 2.6

vkuan/Anand 6.2 8.6 2.9 4.1 18.0 9.1 22.5 20.4 52800 57300 2.2 1.8

jktdksV/Rajkot 5.0 11.0 3.7 16.0 64.2 13.0 26.9 25.0 48600 51400 3.2 2.8

[k.Mok/Khandwa 4.7 5.9 3.5 5.0 12.8 5.1 15.1 12.2 24254 27175 2.8 2.0

vdksyk/Akola 4.3 6.4 3.1 4.6 8.0 2.3 22.9 15.8 22450 21100 4.1 3.0

tkyuk/Jalna 4.0 7.0 3.7 5.2 1.5 0.6 27.5 18.7 63000 62750 2.0 1.4

vgenuxj/ 3.8 5.5 0.2 0.3 41.8 20.9 28.7 24.9 46750 44750 3.2 2.7Ahmednagar

djheuxj/ 5.0 9.0 0.7 1.0 2.0 0.0 13.5 12.3 37860 42370 1.5 1.2Karimnagar

xqaVwj/Guntur 4.0 12.0 0.5 2.5 55.0 5.0 26.0 24.0 49000 66000 2.1 1.4

csyxkao/Belgaum 2.7 3.5 1.7 3.3 36.6 11.2 13.0 10.8 34457 36725 2.1 1.6

eSlwj/Mysore 2.0 4.0 1.2 2.0 61.0 20.0 20.6 15.4 29350 33000 3.7 2.5

isjecywj/ 4.2 7.5 2.1 4.0 3.4 0.9 23.5 18.8 69666 76788 1.7 1.2Perambalur

dqy/Total 4.3 7.3 2.8 5.2 23.5 6.8 22.5 18.8 42168.2 45944.5 2.7 2.0

NCIPM


adults per leaf). Mealybug incidence was recorded atfew locations and it was parasitized by Aenasiusbambawalei. Moderate to high level of incidence ofCLCuD was also recorded. Lepidopteran pests(Spodoptera litura, Earias vittella and Pectinophoragossipiella) were recorded at few locations in non-Btcotton.

Central zone

During October 2013, surveys were conducted in23 villages of Wardha, Yavatmal, Amaravati andNagpur districts of Maharashtra and 20 villages ofSurendranagar, Bhavnagar, Kheda and Ahmedabaddistricts of Gujarat. Among sucking pests, whitefly(2-10 nymphs/ adults per leaf) was prevailing and otherpests viz. jassid, thrips, aphids, mealybug (traces), leafreddening and parawilt were also recorded. Among thediseases, 2-3% incidence of leaf curl virus was recordedat a few locations (Shaluka, Ghunti in Wardha andYavatmal districts, respectively).

South zone

Surveys were conducted in six villages of Salem andTrichy districts of Tamil Nadu during January 2014for insect pests, diseases and natural enemies in Bt andnon-Bt cotton. During this period, mirid bugs and whitefly were observed as major pests whereas other pestslike jassid, thrips and aphids were also present. Leafreddening was also observed at a few locations.

Development of models to predict infestation ofsap feeders based on AICCIP historical data (TMC1.5)

Collation of historical data on the target pests viz.Amrasca devastans, Bemisia tabaci Thrips tabaci andbollworms inclusive of Pectinophora gossypiella wasdone from secondary sources and data base withAICCIP for a total of 18 cotton growing locations incollaboration with CICR was carried out.

Analysis of sap feeder scenario in North Zone

Highest mean population of jassids, thrips, andwhiteflies at Faridkot was during 2011 and 2010 cottonseasons, respectively.

x;k FkkA dikl dk iŸkh dqapu jksx ¼lh,ylh;wMh½ dk izdksilkekU; ls vfèkd ntZ fd;k x;kA xSj&chVh dikl esa dqNLFkkuksa ij ysfiMksIVsju uk'khtho ¼LiksVksIVsjk fyVwjk] bZfj;klfoVsyk rFkk isDVhuksQksjk xkslhfi;syk½ ik, x,A

eè; {ks=kvDVwcj] 2013 ds nkSjku egkjk"Vª ds oèkkZ] ;or eky]

vejkorh rFkk ukxiqj ftyksa ds 23 xk¡oksa esa rFkk xqtjkr dslqjsUnz uxj] Hkkouxj] [ksM+k rFkk vgenkckn ftyksa ds 20 xk¡oksaesa losZ{k.k fd, x,A pwld uk'khthoksa esa lQsn eD[kh ¼2&10fuEQ@O;Ld izfr iÙkh½ dh lef"V vfèkd ikbZ xbZA tSflM]dk"BdhV] ekgw] feyhcx] iÙkh ykyiu rFkk iSjkfoYV ¼eqj>ku½tSls vU; uk'khtho Hkh ntZ fd, x,A jksxksa esa] dqN LFkkuksa ij¼oèkkZ esa 'kkyqdk] ?kqaVh rFkk ;korer ftys½ iÙkh dqapu fo"kk.kqdk 2&3% izdksi ntZ fd;k x;kA

nf{k.kh {ks=kchVh ,oa xSj&chVh dikl esa uk'khthoksa rFkk izkÑfrd

'k=qvksa ds fy, tuojh] 2014 ds nkSjku rfeyukMq ds lsyerFkk f=ph ftyksa ds 6 xkaoksa esa losZ{k.k fd, x,A bl vofèk dsnkSjku] izeq[k uk'khthoksa ds :i esa fejhM cx rFkk lQsn eD[khik, x,] tcfd tSflM] dk"BdhV vkSj ekgw tSls vU; uk'khthoHkh ekStwn ik, x,A dqN LFkkuksa ij iÙkh ykyiu Hkh ik;kx;kA

,vkbZlhlhvkbZih ds ,sfrgkfld MkVk (Vh,elh1-5) ds vkèkkj ij pwld dhVksa ds laØe.k dsiwokZuqeku ds fy, ekWMyksa dk fodkl

lhvkbZlhvkj ds lg;ksx esa dqy 18 dikl mRikndLFkkuksa ds fy, lgk;d lzksrksa rFkk ,vkbZlhlhvkbZih ds MkVkcsl ls yf{kr uk'khthoksa] vFkkZr vejkLdk fMokLkVsal] csfefl;kVscslkb] fFkzIl Vscslkb vkSj isDVhuksQksjk xkslhfi,Yyk ds lacaèkesa ,sfrgkfld MkVk ls feyku fd;k x;kA

mÙkjh {ks=k esa pwld dhVksa dk ifjn`'; fo'ys"k.ko"kZ 2011 vkSj 2010 dikl ekSleksa esa QjhndksV esa tSflM]

dk"BdhV ¼fFkzIl½ rFkk lQsn eD[kh dh lcls vfèkd lef"VikbZ xbZA yqfèk;kuk esa uk'khtho ds :i esa dk"BdhV ugha ik,tkrs FksA rFkkfi] fiNys o"kks± esa tSflM rFkk mlds ckn lQsneD[kh us uk'khthoksa dk :i èkkj.k dj fy;k gSA fglkj esatSflMksa dh ?kVrh rFkk dk"BdhVksa dh c<+rh izofÙk ikbZ xbZAJhuxj esa uk'khtho ds :i esa tSflM dksbZ [kkl egRo ugha


dikl | Cotton

pjedky ¼ihd ihfj;M½ rFkk mudh ekStwnxh ds LFkkuksa esalokZfèkd fHkUurk ikbZ xbZ ¼rkfydk&2½A tSflM ds fy,Jhxaxkuxj rFkk dk"BdhVksa ds fy, yqfèk;kuk dks NksM+dj]mÙkj {ks= ds lHkh LFkkuksa ij bZVh,y ls vfèkd FksA 37os ekSlefoKku ekud lIrkg ¼,l,eMCY;w½ ds lkFk Jhxaxkuxj esalQsn efD[k;ka lokZfèkd ¼56-3 la-@3 ifÙk;ka½ ikbZ xb±A

mÙkj {ks= ds LFkkuksa ds fy, tSflM] dk"BdhV rFkk lQsnefD[k;ksa ds lacaèk esa iwokZuqeku vofèk;ka 25&30] 27&36 rFkk27&40 ,l,eMCY;w vkadfyr dh xb±A

Analysis of the dynamics of sap feeders acrossseasons and locations of the North zone indicated thepeak population levels to be the determinant of thepest status of any given sap feeder (Fig. 1). Period ofpeaks varied among sap feeders and locations with thehighest peaks above ETL at all North zone locationsexcept at Sriganganagar for jassids, and Ludhiana forthrips (Table 2). Whiteflies were the highest (56.3/3leaves) at Sriganganagar coinciding with 37 SMW.

The prediction periods in respect of jassids, thripsand whiteflies were inferred as 25-30, 27-36 and 27-40SMWs for North zone locations.

fp= 1% dikl ds pwld dhVksa dk fofHkUu Hkkxksa esa ifjn`';

Fig. 1. Scenario of cotton sap feeders at different locations

j[krs Fks] gkykafd fiNys N% o"kks± esa dk"BdhV rFkk lQsnefD[k;ka dkQh T;knk egRoiw.kZ ekuk tkus yxk gSA

mÙkjh {ks= esa lHkh ekSleksa rFkk LFkkuksa esa pwld dhVksapwld dhV dh xfrfd;ksa ds fo'ys"k.k ls ,slk ladsr izkIr gqvkfd fdlh Hkh pqld dhVksa dh fLFkfr dks le>us ds fy, mldhlef"V ds Lrj eq[; fuèkkZjd gksrs gSa ¼fp=&1½A pwld dhVksa ds

Thrips were not pests at Ludhiana. However, jassidsfollowed by whiteflies gained pest status in recent years.Decreasing trend of jassids and increasing thrips werenoted at Hisar. Jassids were insignificant as pests atSriganganagar although thrips and whiteflies werehighly important over the last six years.

NCIPM


rkfydk 2% mÙkjh {ks= ds LFkkuksa esa pwld dhVksa ds fy, pjedky ¼ihd ihfj;M½

Table 2: Peak periods for sap feeders across North zone locations

LFkku pwld dhVksa dh lokZfèkd lef"V ¼la-@3 ifÙk;ka½Location ,oa vofèk;ksa ¼,l,eMCY;w½ dh jsat

Range of peak population (no./3 leaves) and periods (SMW) of sap feeders

tSflM dk"BdhV lQsn eD[khJassids Thrips Whitefly

QjhndksV / Faridkot 2.8 -20.2 (28-32) 5.3-31.3 (25-32) 3.1-17.1 (29-41)

fglkj / Hisar 2.4-8.8 (32-39) 12.0-35.4 (29-35) 1.9-27.2 (24-41)

yqfèk;kuk / Ludhiana 10.9-33.1 (24-31) 1.2-10.3 (23-30) 13.4-21.6 (24-36)

Jhxaxkuxj / Sriganganagar 2.5-5.5 (27-38) 21.4-49.6 (29-34) 18.0-56.3 (27-37)

{ks=h; / Zonal 3.2 -11.1 (25-30) 7.3-23.1 (27-36) 5.0-30.3 (27-40)


nyguPulses

vkbZih,e ds xgu vuqiz;ksx ls vjgj] puk] ewax]mM+n rFkk elwj dk c<+rk mRiknu

vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dks N% jkT;ksa esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k]ftlesa ,u,Q,l,e ds varxZr fpfUgr izeq[k nygu mRiknu{ks=ksa esa vjgj] puk] ewax] mM+n rFkk elwj ds yxHkx 16443-62gs- {ks= dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA fofHkUu vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksadh izHkkodkfjrk dk oSèkhdj.k rFkk izn'kZu&ijh{k.k djus gsrqU;wfDy;j vkbZih,e xkao fodflr fd, x,A vkbZih,e dk;ZØeds dk;kZUo;u ds QyLo:i dukZVd esa 9775-12 gs- esa] egkjk"Vªesa 2584-4 gs- esa] eè; izns'k esa 300 gs- esa]vkaèkz izns'k esa 800 gs- esa] mÙkj izns'k esa2571 gs- esa rFkk >kj[kaM esa 1000 gs- dksnygu Qlyksa ds varxZr yk;k x;kA bldk;ZØe ls vjgj] puk] ewax] mM+n rFkkelwj dh [ksrh djus okys 11098 fdlkuksadks ykHk feyk gSA

vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa esa LFkkuh; demit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks fo'ofo|ky;}kjk fodflr fdLeksa ls izfrLFkkfir fd;kx;kA fo'ofo|ky; }kjk fodflr fdLesau dsoy LFkkuh; uk'khthoksa ls izfrjksèkh gSa]cfYd muls mit Hkh vfèkd izkIr gksrh gSA LFkkuh; fdLeksa lsvfèkd ykHk dekus ds fy, fo'ofo|ky; esa fodflr tSomoZjd ¼jkbtksfc;e ,oe~ ih,lcha½ rFkk tSo dkjd ¼VªkbdksMekZiztkfr½ fdlkuksa dks miyCèk djk, x, vkSj muds iz;ksx dsfy, mUgsa izksRlkfgr Hkh fd;k x;kA fdlku ikB'kkyk ds nkSjkufdlkuksa dks izeq[k uk'khthoksa rFkk laca) ykHkksa] muds vkxeudk le;] cht mipkj rFkk fNM+dko ds p;u ,oa fNM+dkorS;kj djus ds ckjs esa crk;k x;kA bl nkSjku dqN xkaoksa dksfpfUgr fd;k x;k rFkk uk'khtho ds izdksi ,oa mit ijfoLrr lwpuk ,df=r dh xbZ vkSj xSj&vkbZih,e [ksrksa ds lkFkmldh rqyuk dh xbZA

Increasing pigeonpea, chickpea, mung, urd beanand lentil production through intensive applicationof IPM

The IPM programme was implemented in six statescovering 16443.62 ha under pigeonpea, chickpea,mung, urd and lentil in major pulse growing areasidentified under NFSM. Nuclear IPM villages (173)were developed to validate and demonstrateeffectiveness of different IPM strategies.Implementation of IPM has resulted in coverage of

9775.12 ha in Karnataka,2584.4 ha in Maharashtra,300 ha in Madhya Pradesh,800 ha in Andhra Pradesh,2571 ha in Uttar Pradeshand 1000 ha in Jharkhandbenefitting 11098 farmersgrowing pigeonpea,chickpea, mung, urd andlentil.

IPM strategies includedreplacement of localvarieties (low yielder) with

University-developed varieties having resistance againstlocal pest problems along with high yield. Farmers werealso provided and encouraged to use bio-fertilizers(Rhizobium and PSB) and bio-agents (Trichoderma spp.)developed at University to increase benefit due to localstrains. During the FFS, farmers were educated aboutkey insect pests and associated beneficials, their timingof occurrence, seed treatment, selection and decisionof making sprays. Few villages were earmarked anddetailed information on pest incidence and yield werecollected and compared with non-IPM fields.

NCIPM


Gulbarga and Bidar (Karnataka)

A3P programme was implemented in 3225.62 haunder pigeonpea and chickpea involving 2197 farmersin participatory mode. Using Farmers SMSs Portal of

GOI, timely advice wereprovided to farmersthrough SMSs in Kannadalanguage apart from regularfarmers meet (FFS) in theirvillages. Although, averageyield in comparison to stateand national average hadincreased by 43.05 and54.52%, the pest continuedto allude and warrants allout efforts in coming seasonespecially in view of changein rainfall pattern. Unlikeprevious years, theHelicoverpa podborer

infestation in non-A3P areas had crossed the ETL levelboth at 50% flowering (1.25 larvae/plant) as well aspodding stage (1.75 larvae/plant). Even in A3P areas,the Helicoverpa larvae crossed ETL at peak floweringstage. The spotted bollworm and podbug infestationwas on increase. The incidence level of spottedbollworm population was found directly related withthe rainfall pattern.

Similar programme has been implemented at KVK,Bidar benefiting 1499 farmers of 20 villages. Chickpeademos were successfully conducted in 3904 ha belongingto three blocks covering 12 villages involving 968farmers, who were convinced with the yield gained dueto adoption of various critical IPM inputs. Thereplacement of traditional seeds of Annigiri with JG-11 had resulted in better plant population due to itsresistant character. Farmers were also convinced of theresult of seed treatment with Trichoderma, andemammectin benzoate spray as green eco- friendlymolecule tried at their farms with their participation.Use of less pesticide had also encouraged conservationof beneficial insects especially the ladybird beetles andCampoletis. IPM technology in terms of yield, B:C ratioand reduction in number of pesticide sprays (Table 1).

xqycxkZ vkSj fcnj (dukZVd)fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk izfØ;k esa 2197 fdlkuksa dks lfEefyr

djrs gq, ,3ih dk;ZØe dks vjgj ,oa puk ds varxZr 3225-62gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;kA Hkkjr ljdkj ds fdlkuksa ls tqM+s,l,e,l iksVZy dk mi;ksxdjrs gq, vaxhÑr rFkk fiNyso"kks± esa dk;ZØe ls tqM+s fdlkuksadks u dsoy dUuM+ Hkk"kk esa,l,e,l ds ekè;e ls le;ij lykg nh xbZ] cfYdfdlkuksa dks muds xkaoksa esa Hkhfu;fer fdlku cSBdksa ¼fdlkuikB'kkyk½ ds ekè;e ls Hkhle; ij lykg nh xbZA;|fi jkT; vkSj jk"Vªh; vkSlrdh rqyuk esa vkSlr mit43-05 vkSj 54-52% c<+h]ysfdu o"kkZ dh izofÙk esa cnykods dkj.k fo'ks"k :i lsuk'khthoksa dh pqukSfr;ksa lsfuiVus ds fy, vkus okys ekSleds fy, leqps iz;kl fd, tkus dh vko';drk gSA fiNys o"kZ dsfoijhr] gsfydksoikZ Qyh Hksnd dk laØe.k xSj&,3ih {ks=ksa esa50% iq"iu ¼1-25 lwwaMh@ikni½ rFkk Qyh vkus ¼1-75 lwwaMh@ikni½nksuksa voLFkkvksa ij bZVh,y ls vfèkd FkkA ,3ih {ks=ksa ds lacaèkesa rks bZVh,y iq"iu dh pje voLFkk ¼1-50½ ds nkSjku gh ikj gksx;k FkkA fpfÙknkj lwwaMh vkSj ikWMcx dk laØe.k c<+rk tk jgkFkkA o"kkZ dh izofÙk fpÙkhnkj lwwaMh lef"V ds izdksi ds fy,izR;{k :i ls vuqdwy ikbZ xbZA

Ñf"k foKku dsUnz] fcnj esa Hkh blh izdkj ds dk;ZØe dkdk;kZUo;u fd;k x;k] ftlls 20 xkaoksa ds 1499 fdlkuksa dksykHk gqvkA pus ds lacaèk esa rhu Cykdksa ds varxZr 12 xkaoksa lslacafèkr 3904 gs- esa izn'kZu&ijh{k.k fd, x, ftlesa 968 ,slsfdlkuksa dks lfEefyr fd;k x;k tks vkbZih,e ds fofHkUuegRoiw.kZ fufof"V;ksa ¼buiqV½ ds vaxhdj.k ds dkj.k Qlymit esa of) ls larq"V FksA vféfxjh ds ikjEifjd chtksa dslkFk tsth&11 ds izfrLFkkiu ls rFkk mldh izfrjksèkh {kerk lscsgrj ikni lef"V izkIr gqbZA fdlku VªkbdksMekZ ls chtmipkj rFkk bekesfDVu csatks,V ds fNM+dko ds ifj.kke ls Hkhlarq"V Fks D;ksafd muds [ksrksa esa mudh lgHkkfxrk esa gh gfjri;kZoj.k eS=h ekWyhD;wy dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;k FkkA dhVuk'kdksads de iz;ksx ls Hkh ykHkdkjh dhVksa] fo'ks"k :i ls ysMhcMZ chVyrFkk dsEiksysfVl ds laj{k.k dks izksRlkgu feyk FkkA vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxdh dks mit] ykHk % ykxr vuqikr rFkk dhVuk'kdksa dsfNM+dko dh la[;k esa deh ds vkèkkj ij rkfydk 1 esa n'kkZ;kx;k gSA

Hkkjh cjlkr ds dkj.k esØksQksfeuk vaxekjh jksx dh pqukSrh

Unprecedented rain led to alarming situation ofMacrophomina blight disease


Anantapur (Andhra Pradesh)

IPM has been implemented at KVK, Anantapurinvolving 1749 farmers. A3P guidelines benefited themin terms of higher yields (8.95 q/ha). Farmers who hadgrown cv. BRG-1 and BRG-2 had escaped the powderymildew infestation. The spotted podborer infestationin A3P as well as non-A3P areas had crossed the ETLlevel at both 50% flowering (12.7 and 22.4 larvae/plant)as well as peak flowering stages (21.3 and 35.8 larvae/plant). Sudden increase could be attributed to excessrain (deviation of +99.1%) received during the monthof September 2013. The crop also suffered infestationof pod borer in A3P as well as non-A3P at 50%flowering (1.4 and 5.2 larvae/plant) as well as peakflowering stage (9.3 and 17.2 larvae/plant) and wilt,which, could be managed effectively with theTrichoderma applied as seed treatment.

vuariqj (vkUèkz izns'k)Ñf"k foKku dsUnz] vuariqj esa vkbZih,e dk fØ;kUo;u

fd;k x;k] ftlesa 1749 fdlkuksa dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA ,3ihdk;ZØe ds funsZ'kuksa ls fdlkuksa dks mPp mit ¼8-95 fDoa-@gs-½ izkIr gqbZA ftu fdlkuksa us chvkjth&1 vkSj chvkjth&2

pus esa jrqok@ Chickpea rust

Chickpea demos were implemented in 400 ha areabenefitting 336 farmers. The replacement of traditionalseeds of NbeG-3 with JG-11 resulted in better plantpopulation due to its resistant character. Except podborer infestation 1.2% in A3P as against 2.6% in non-A3P, there were not much insect-pest problems atvegetative stage (Table 1). Podborer was a great problemat podding stage (9.5% in non-A3P).

nygu | Pulses

fdLeksa dh [ksrh dh Fkh mUgsa pwf.kZy QQwan ds laØe.k ls dksbZuqdlku ugha gqvkA ,3ih rFkk xSj ,3ih {ks=ksa esa fpÙkhnkj Qyhcsèkd dk laØe.k 50% iq"iu ¼12-7 vkSj 22-4 lwaMh@ikni½voLFkk ij rFkk iq"iu ¼21-3 vkSj 35-8 lwaMh izfr ikni½ dhpje voLFkk ij bZVh,y ls vfèkd FkkA blesa vpkud of) dsihNs flrEcj] 2013 esa gqbZ vfèkd o"kkZ ¼$99-1% fopyu½ gksldrh gSA ,3ih ,oa xSj ,3ih esa 50% iq"iu ¼1-4 vkSj 5-2 lwaMhizfr ikni½ ij iq"iu ¼9-3 vkSj 17-2 lwaMh izfr ikni½ dh pjevoLFkk ij rFkk eqj>ku ij Qly dks Qyhcsèkd ds laØe.k dsdkj.k Hkh uqdlku gqvk] ftlls VªkbdksMekZ iz;ksx fd, chtmipkj ls izHkkoh :i ls fuiVk tk ldrk FkkA

pus ds lacaèk esa] 400 ,dM+ {ks= esa ijh{k.k fd, x,] ftlls336 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A ,uchbZth&3 ds ikjEifjd chtksadk tsth&11 ds lkFk izfrLFkkiu djus ls rFkk mldh izfrjksfèkrk{kerk ls csgrj ikni lef"V ikbZ xbZA xSj&,3ih esa 2-6%laØe.k dh rqyuk esa ,3ih esa QyhHksnd ds 1-2% laØe.k dksNksM+dj] okuLifrd Lrj ij uk'khtho lacaèkh dksbZ vkSj leL;kugha FkhA Qyh f[kyus ¼xSj&,3ih esa 9-5%½ dh voLFkk ijQyhHksnd ,d cM+h leL;k FkhA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ykHkksadks mit] ykHk % ykxr vuqikr rFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoesa de la[;k ds vkèkkj ij rkfydk 1 esa n'kkZ;k x;k gSA

pus esa pwf.kZy QQwan @Chickpea powdery mildew

NCIPM


rkfydk 1% p;fur LFkkuks ij izeq[k nygu Qlyksa esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds vkfFkZd igyq

Table 1: Economics of IPM technology in major pulse crops at selected locations

LFkku mit ¼fDoa- izfr gs-½ ykHk%ykxr vuqikr dhVuk'kd fNM+dkoksa dhVuk'kd fNM+dkoksaLocation Yield (q/ha) B:C ratio dh la[;k- dh la[;k- esa deh

No. of pesticide Reduction in no.

sprays of pesticide sprays

vkbZih,e xSj vkbZih,e vkbZih,e xSj vkbZih,e vkbZih,e xSj vkbZih,e

IPM Non IPM IPM Non IPM IPM Non IPM

Pigeonpea

vuariqj@Anantapur 7.07 6.4 2.0 1.7 2 2 0

xqycxZ@Gulbarga 10.6 9.1 3.4 2.7 2 4 2

fcnj@Bidar 13.7 8.2 4.0 2.1 3 5 2

tcyiqj@Jabalpur 13.1 7.5 0 0 2 3 1

cnukiqj@Badnapur 16.0 0 0 0 2 4 0

ijHk.kh@Parbhani 12.3 0 3.4 2.4 2 8 6

uSxkao@Naigoan 11.0 8.3 3.0 1.7 3 4 1

Qrsgiqj@Fatehpur 13.5 8.5 2.8 1.9 2 5 3

fetkZiqj@Mirzapur 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

yksgkjMkxk@Lohardaga 13.6 9.8 2.7 1.75 2 4 2

Chickpea

vuariqj@Anantapur 12.7 9.4 2.0 1.4 3 2 -1

xqycxZ@Gulbarga 11.7 9.7 2.6 2.0 3 4 1

fcnj@Bidar 13.5 10.5 2.4 1.7 2 3 1

tcyiqj@Jabalpur 0 0 0 0 2 3 1

cnukiqj@Badnapur 8.5 0 0 0 2 2 0

ijHk.kh@Parbhani 12.1 0 1.8 1.3 2 7 5

uSxkao@Naigoan 21.5 13.8 4.3 1.8 2 4 2

Qrsgiqj@Fatehpur 0 0 0 0 1 4 3

fetkZiqj@Mirzapur 0 0 0 0 2 2 0


Mung & Urdbean

cnukiqj@Badnapur 4.5 4.5 3.1 1 2 1

Lentil

tcyiqj@Jabalpur 13.5 10.0 0 0 0 0 0

fetkZiqj@Mirzapur 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1



Badnapur (Maharashtra)

IPM was implemented by ARS, Badnapur in 240ha benefiting 191 farmers of two villages. A3Pinterventions benefited them in terms of higher yields(8.95 q/ha). The replacement of traditional seeds(Khadkha and Majalgoan) with released varieties (BDN-711, BSMR-853 & BSMR-736) resulted in better plantpopulation due to its resistant character. A3P farmerscould achieve better yields (25 q/ha) in comparison toconventional farmers (7 q/ha) owing to the fact thatleaf roller, pod borer, plume moth, Maruca as well aspod bug infestation could be managed due to timelymonitoring and action. Among diseases, Phytophthorablight was of a major concern.

Chickpea IPM demonstration could beimplemented in 215 ha, benefiting 164 farmers of threevillages. Beneficiary farmers received higher yields (12.5q/ha) in comparison to conventional farmers (8.5 q/ha). The low productive varieties could be replacedwith cv. Vijay, Digvijay and BDN-9-3. The incidenceof collar rot was higher in non-A3P (7-20%). At 50%flowering stage, the incidence of podborer was also onhigher side (3.29 larvae/plant).

Mungbean IPM demos were also implemented in169 ha, benefiting 169 farmers of two villages. The lowproductive varieties could be replaced with BM-4 7 andBM. 2002-1. The incidence of thrips (12.66/plant),stemfly (0.69/plant) and Spodoptera (1.6/plant) wasmore in non-A3P farmers' fields. A3P farmers couldharvest 6 q/ha in comparison to 3q/ha by non-A3Pfarmers.

Parbhani (Maharashtra)

Pigeonpea A3P programme was implemented in

500 ha involving 450 farmers in participatory mode

covering four villages. Average A3P beneficiary farmers

could get higher yields (13.10 q/ha) in comparison

to conventional farmers (10.7 q/ha). The replacement

of traditional seeds (Yashoda, Khadkha and Majalgoan)

with released varieties (BDN-708, BSMR-853 & BSMR-

736) resulted in better crop growth. The pod borer

infestation level was well below the ETL, however the

crop suffered serious incidence of Cercospora leaf spot.

cnukiqj (egkjk"Vª),vkj,l] cnukiqj }kjk 240 gs- esa vkbZih,e dk dk;kZUo;u

fd;k x;k] ftlls 2 xkaoksa ds 191 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A ,3ihdh dk;Zuhfr;ksa ls fdlkuksa dks mPp mit ¼8-95 fDoa- izfr gs½izkIr gqbZA ikjEifjd chtksa ¼[kkn[kk vkSj ektyxkao½ dh foeksfprfdLeksa ¼chMh,u&711] ch,l,evkj&853 vkSj ch,l,evkj&736½ ds izfrLFkkiu ls rFkk mudh izfrjksèkh {kerk ls csgrjikni lef"V ikbZ xbZA iÙkh eksM+d] Qyh Hksnd] IY;we eksFk]fpfÙknkj lwaMh rFkk ikWM cx laØe.k dh le; ij fuxjkuhbR;kfn djus ds dkj.k ,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa dks] ikjEifjdfdlkuksa ¼7 fDoa- izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esa] csgrj mit ¼25 fDoa-izfr gs-½ izkIr gqbZA jksxksa esa] QkbVksIFkksjk jksx eq[; leL;k FkhA

pus ds lacaèk esa vkbZih,e dks 215 gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;kx;k] ftlls rhu xkaoksa ds 164 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A ykHkkaforfdlkuksa us ikjEifjd fdlkuksa ¼8-5 fDoa- izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esamPp mit ¼12-5 fDoa- izfr gs-½ izkIr dhA de mit nsus okyhfdLeksa dks fot;] fnfXot; vkSj chMh,u&9&3 fdLeksa lsizfrLFkkfir fd;k x;kA xSj&,3ih ¼7&20%½ okys fdlkuksa ds[ksrksa esa xzhok foxyu ¼dkWyj jkWV½ dk izdksi vfèkd FkkA 50%iq"iu voLFkk ij QyhHksnd dk izdksi ¼3-29 lwaMh izfr ikni½vfèkd FkkA

ewax ds lacaèk esa vkbZih,e dks 169 gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;kx;k] ftlls nks xkaoksa ds 169 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A de mitnsus okyh fdLeksa dks ch,e&4&7 vkSj ch,e 2002&1 ls izfrLFkkfirfd;k x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa dk"BdhV¼12-66 izfr ikni½] ruk eD[kh ¼0-69 izfr ikni½ rFkk LiksMksIVsjk¼1-6 lwaMh izfr ikni½ dk izdksi vfèkd FkkA ,3ih ugha viukusokys fdlkuksa ds 3 fDoa- izfr gs- mit dh rqyuk esa ,3ih viukusokys fdlkuksa dh mit 6 fDoa- izfr gs- FkhA

ijHk.kh (egkjk"Vª)vjgj lacaèkh ,3ih dk;ZØe dks 500 gs- esa fdlkuksa dh

lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k] ftlesa pkj xkaoksa ds450 fdlkuksa dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa¼10-7 fDoa- izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esa ,3ih viukus okys vkSlrykHkkFkhZ fdlkuksa dks mPp mit ¼13-10 fDoa- izfr gs-½ izkIrgqbZA ikjEifjd chtksa ¼;'kksnk] [kkndk rFkk ektyxkao½ dhfoeksfpr fdLeksa ¼chMh,u&708] ch,l,evkj&853 rFkkch,l,evkj& 736½ ds lkFk izfrLFkkiu djus ls Qly esaT;knk of) gqbZA ;|fi QyhHksnd dk laØe.k bfV,y Lrj lsde Fkk] rFkkfi Qly dks lsjdksLiksjk iÙkh èkCck izdksi lsdkQh uqdlku gqvkA

nygu | Pulses

NCIPM


For chickpea, the 317 farmers were adopted

covering 500 ha area. Farmers under A3P could harvest

(12.10 q/ha) in comparison to 10.6 q/ha by non-A3P

farmers. The main governing factors for higher yield

were use of Rhizobium and Trichoderma seed treatment.

The Trichoderma consortium provided by University

also served as PGPR aiding good plant health. Higher

number of predators (ladybird beetle), could bring

down the level of pod borer infestation. The infestation

level of pod borer was quite high in non-A3P (2.2/

plant) in comparison to A3P (0.9/plant) at podding

stage.

Naigaon (Maharashtra)

Demonstration of pigeonpea A3P programme was

implemented in 500.2 ha covering two villages involving

509 farmers. The replacement of traditional seeds

(Khadkha) with BSMR-736 resulted in better yield. The

infestation of pod borer was less, in general. However,

the incidence of podfly was low in A3P (1.37/25 pods)

as against high in non-A3P areas (2.93/25 pods). Disease

incidence was negligible and did not warrant any

protective measure. Average A3P beneficiary farmer

could get higher yields (10.99 q/ha) in comparison to

conventional farmer (8.29 q/ha).

Chickpea IPM demonstration was implemented in

500.2 ha, benefiting 624 farmers of two villages. The

low productive varieties could be replaced with Vijay.

The incidence of wilt was higher in non-A3P (1.18%).

At peak flowering stage, the incidence of pod borer

was also on higher side (0.57 larvae/plant) in non-A3P

farms. Beneficiary farmers received higher yield (21.48

q/ha) in comparison to conventional farmers (13.76 q/

ha), (Table 1). Low incidence of wilt could be attributed

to seed treatment with Trichoderma @ 10 g/kg seed,which also served as PGPR.

Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh)

IPM in pigeonpea has been implemented in 100 ha

benefiting 90 farmers of Shahapura block. The

infestation of pod borer was low in A3P (3.5 larvae/

plant) fields as against high in non-A3P fields (9.1 larvae/

plant). A3P guidelines benefited them in terms of

pus ds fy,] 500 gs- dks lfEefyr djrs gq, 317 fdlkuksadks vaxhÑr fd;k x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa dh 10-6 fDoa- izfr gs- mit dh rqyuk esa ,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa dks12-10 fDoa- izfr gs- mit izkIr gqbZA mPp mit ds fy, eq[;dkj.k jkbtksfc;e dk mi;ksx rFkk VªkbdksMekZ ls fd;k x;kcht mipkj FkkA fo'ofo|ky; }kjk miyCèk fd, x, VªkbdksMekZdUlksfVZ;e us ihthihvkj ds :i esa Hkh dk;Z fd;k] ftlls iknidk LokLF; vPNk cuk jgkA ijHkf{k;ksa dh vfèkd la[;k dsdkj.k QyhHksnd laØe.k de gks ik;kA iq"iu voLFkk ijQyhHksnd dk laØe.k ,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa ¼0-9 lwaMh izfrikni½ dh rqyuk esa ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ¼2-2 lwaMhizfr ikni½ ds [ksrksa esa dkQh T;knk FkkA

uSxkao (egkjk"Vª)vjgj lacaèkh ,3ih dk;ZØe dks 500-2 gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;k

x;k] ftlesa nks xkaoksa ds 509 fdlkuksa dks 'kkfey fd;k x;kAikjEifjd chtksa ¼[kkn[kk½ dk ch,l,evkj&736 ds lkFk izfrLFkkiudjus ls vfèkd mit izkIr dh xbZA lkekU; :i ls QyhHksnd dklaØe.k de FkkA rFkkfi] QyhHksnd dk izdksi ,3ih ¼1-37 lwaMhizfr 25 Qyh½ viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa de Fkk] tcfd,3ih dk;ZØe ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa QyhHksnd dkizdksi ¼2-93 lwaMh izfr 25 Qyh½ vfèkd FkkA jksx izdksi ux.; FkkvkSj blfy, dksbZ mipkjkRed o j{kksik;ksa dh vko';drk eglwlugha dh xbZA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa dh mit ¼8-29 fDoa- izfr gs-½ dhrqyuk esa ,3ih viukus okys vkSlr ykHkkFkhZ fdlkuksa dks mPp mit¼10-99 fDoa- izfr gs-½ izkIr gqbZA

pus ls lacafèkr vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dks 500-2 gs- esa dk;kZfUorfd;k x;k ftlls nks xkaoksa ds 624 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A demit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks fot; fdLe ls izfrLFkkfir fd;kx;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ¼1-18%½ ds [ksrksa esaseqj>ku dk izdksi vfèkd FkkA iq"iu dh pje voLFkk ij Hkh QyhHksnd dk izdksi ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esavfèkd Fkk ¼0-57 lwaMh izfr ikni½A ikjEifjd fdlkuksa ¼13-76fDoa- izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esa ykHkkFkhZ fdlkuksa dks mPp mit¼21-48 fDoa izfr gs-½ izkIr gqbZ ¼rkfydk 1½A eqj>ku dk de izdksigksus ds ihNs VªkbdksMekZ 10 xzke izfr fdxzk- cht ds lkFkmipkj Fkk] ftlus ihthihvkj ds :i esa Hkh dk;Z fd;kA

tcyiqj (eè; izns'k)vjgj ds lacaèk esa vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dks 'kkgiqjk CykWd esa

dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k] ftlls 90 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A ,3ihdk;ZØe ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ¼9-1 lwaMh izfr ikni½ esaQyhHksnd ds vfèkd laØe.k dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;ZØeviukus okys fdlkuksa ¼3-5 lwaMh izfr ikni½ ds [ksrksa esa laØe.k


de ik;k x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ¼7-51 fDoa-izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esa ,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa ¼13-12 fDoa-izfr gs-½ dks mPp mit izkIr gqbZA

pus ds lacaèk esa vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dks 100 gs- esa dk;kZfUorfd;k x;k] ftlesa 6 xkaoksa ds 100 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,A demit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks tsth&315 vkSj tsth&16 fdLeksa lsizfrLFkkfir fd;k x;kA iq"iu dh pje voLFkk ij ,3ih dk;ZØeviukus okys fdlkuksa ¼1-1 lwaMh izfr ikni½ ds [ksrksa esa QyhHkssnddk laØe.k de Fkk] tcfd ,3ih dk;ZØe ugha viukus okysfdlkuksa ¼5-6 lwaMh izfr ikni½ ds [ksrksa esa vfèkd FkkA

elwj ds lacaèk esa vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dks 100 gs- esa dk;kZfUorfd;k x;k] ftlls pkj xkaoksa ds 100 fdlku ykHkkafor gq,Ade mit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks ts,y&1] ts,y&2 rFkk uwjhfdLeksa ls izfrLFkkfir fd;k x;kA ,3ih dk;ZØe ugha viukusokys fdlkuksa ¼11-02 izfr ikni½ ds [ksrksa esa ,fQM ds mPplaØe.k dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;ZØe viukus okys fdlkuksa¼4-2 izfr ikni½ ds [ksrksa esa ekgq dk laØe.k de ik;k x;kAQ;qlsfj;e eqj>ku ds izdksi ds dkj.k ,3ih dk;ZØe viukusokys ¼3-4%½ ds rqyuk es ,3ih dk;ZØe ugha viukus okys¼9-6%½ fdlkuksa dh Qly dks T;knk uqdlku gqvkA ,3ih ughaviukus okys fdlkuksa dh mit ¼9 fDoa- izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esa,3ih viukus okys fdlkuksa dks vfèkd mit ¼13 izfr gs-½ izkIrgqbZA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ykHkksa dks mit] ykxr%ykHkvuqikr rFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko esa de la[;k ds vkèkkjij rkfydk1 esa n'kkZ;k x;k gSA

iQrsgkckn (mÙkj izns'k)vjgj ds lacaèk esa] vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dks 125-6 gs- esa

dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k] ftlls ikap xkaoksa ds 160 fdlkuykHkkafor gq,A lkekU; :i ls] QyhHksndksa dk laØe.k deik;k x;kA ,3ih dk;ZØe ¼0-17 lwaMh izfr ikni½ viukus okysfdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa QyhHkssnd uk'khtho dk laØe.k de Fkk]tcfd ,3ih dk;ZØe ¼0-23½ ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds[ksrksa esa ;g vfèkd FkkA lsjdksLiksjk iÙkh èkCck vkSj QkbVksIFkksjkvaxekjh ds fofoèkkRed izdksi ds dkj.k ,3ih dk;ZØe viukusokys ds rqyuk es ,3ih dk;ZØe ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa dhQly dks T;knk uqdlku gqvkA ,3ih dk;ZØe ugha viukusokys fdlkuksa ¼8-5 fDoa- izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;ZØeviukus okys fdlkuksa ¼13-50 fDoa- izfr gs-½ dks mPp mit izkIrgqbZA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ykHkksa dks mit] ykxr%ykHkvuqikr rFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko esa de la[;k rkfydk 1esa n'kkZ;k x;k gSA

yksgkjMkxk (>kj[kaM)vjgj ds lacaèk esa] ,3ih ds oSèkhdj.k dk;ZØe dks 500

gs- esa dk;kZfUor fd;k x;k] ftlesa 10 xkoksa ds 494 fdlkuksadks 'kkfey fd;k x;kA ikjEifjd chtksa ¼fprkyh½ dk ujsUnz

higher yields (13.12 q/ha) in comparison to non-A3P

(7.51 q/ha).

Chickpea IPM demonstration could be

implemented in 100 ha, benefiting 100 farmers of six

villages. The low productive varieties could be replaced

with JG-315 and JG-16. Infestation of pod borer was

low in A3P fields (1.1 larvae/plant) as against high in

non-A3P fields (5.6 larvae/plant) at peak flowering stage.

Lentil IPM demonstrations were also implemented

in 100 ha, benefiting 100 farmers of four villages. The

low productive varieties could be replaced with cvs.

JL-1, JL-2 and Noori. The incidence of aphids was low

in A3P (4.2/plant) as against high in non-A3P (11.02/

plant). The crop suffered from Fusarium wilt with

incidence of A3P (3.4%) and non-A3P (9.6%). A3P

farmers could harvest 13 q/ha in comparison to 9 q/ha

by non-A3P farmers (Table 1).

Fatehabad (Uttar Pradesh)

IPM in pigeonpea has been implemented in 125.6

ha benefiting 160 farmers of five villages. The infestation

of borers was low, in general. The infestation level of

key pest podborer was low in A3P (0.17 larvae/plant)

as against high in non-A3P fields (0.23 larvae/plant).

Crop of A3P as well as non-A3P suffered with varying

levels of incidence of Cercospora leaf spot and

Phytophthora blight (Table 1). A3P guidelines

benefited them in terms of higher yields (13.50 q/ha)

in comparison to non-A3P (8.5q/ha).

Lohardaga (Jharkhand)

Validation of pigeonpea A3P programme was done

in 500 ha covering 10 villages involving 494 farmers.

The replacement of traditional seeds (Chitali) with

Narender Arhar-1 resulted in better yield. Incidence

of sterility mosaic, Fusarium wilt and Cercospora leaf

spot was common in the A3P as well as non-A3P fields.

(Table 1) Average A3P beneficiary farmers could get

higher yields (13.6 q/ha) in comparison to conventional

farmers (9.85 q/ha).

nygu | Pulses

NCIPM


Chickpea IPM demonstration was implemented in

300 ha benefiting 32 farmers of 10 villages. The low

productive varieties could be replaced with Pusa-362.

The incidence of wilt was higher in non-A3P fields

(1.2%). Beneficiary farmers received higher yields (11.9

q/ha) in comparison to conventional farmers (8.7 q/

ha).

Capacity Building

State officials of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh,Karnataka and Assam were provided with updates onIPM and use of e-Pest Surveillance Software as real timedecision-making tool.

Salient achievements of A3P

Farmers got an opportunity to experience theimportance of micronutrients (Zn and Sulphur),bio-fertilizers (Rhizobium and PSB), bio-fungicides(Trichoderma) and synthetic fertilizers (Urea andDAP) in increasing the yield and quality of grain.

Use of improved varieties e.g., pigeonpea (TS-3R,BSMR-736, BSMR-853, NDA-1); chickpea (JG-11,Vijay, Digvijay, BDN -9 -3, Avrodhi); mungbean(BM-4, BM-2002-1 ) and lentil ( JL-1, JL-2, Noori,K-75, Mallika) with early maturing (escapemechanism) and built-in resistance mechanismhelped in reduction of pest infestation and diseaseincidence to the tune of 25-40%.

SMS advisories helped in timely and need-basedapplication of correct and quality pesticides. Thishelped them in restricting spread of pest incidence,thereby reducing the number of sprays and costof plant protection.

Farmers got confidence in use of alternativemethods of plant protection involving botanicalsand bio-agents like Neem oil, NSKE and HaNPV.

IPM strategies helped them in getting additionalyields with minimal toxic load to the environment.This had direct impact on increase in populationof predators and parasitoids in natural eco-system.

vjgj&1 ls izfrLFkkiu djus ls vfèkd mit izkIr gqbZA ,3ihdk;ZØe viukus okys rFkk ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksaesa ok¡> ekst+sd] jksx Q;qlsfj;e eqj>ku rFkk lsjdksLiksjk iÙkhèkCck dk izdksi ,d leku FkkA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa ¼9-85 fDoa-izfr ikni½ dh rqyuk esa ,3ih dk;ZØe viukus okys ykHkkFkhZfdlkuksa dks vfèkd mit ¼13-6 fDoa- izfr ikni½ izkIr gqbZAvkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ykHkksa dks mit] ykxr%ykHk vuqikrrFkk dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko esa de la[;k rkfydk 1 esan'kkZ;k x;k gSA

pus ds lacaèk esa] vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dks 300 gs- esa dk;kZfUorfd;k x;k] ftlls 10 xkaoksa ds 32 fdlku ykHkkfUor gq,A demit nsus okyh fdLeksa dks iwlk&362 fdLe ls izfrLFkkfirfd;k x;kA ,3ih ugha viukus okys [ksrksa ¼1-2%½ esa rqyukRed:i ls eqj>ku jksx dk izdksi vfèkd FkkA ikjEifjd fdlkuksa¼8-7 fDoa- izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esa ykHkkFkhZ fdlkuksa dks mPp mit¼11-9 fDoa- izfr ikni½ izkIr gqbZA

{kerk fuekZ.krRdkfyd fu.kZ; ysus ds fy, rfeyukMq] vkUèkz izns'k] dukZVd

rFkk vle ds jkT; inkfèkdkfj;ksa dks vkbZih,e dk;ZØe lacaèkhubZ lwpuk,a miyCèk djkbZ xb± rFkk ,d Vwy ds :i esa mUgsabZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh lkW¶Vos;j Hkh miyCèk djk;k x;kA

,3ih dk;ZØe dh miyfCèk;ka fdlkuksa dks vukt dh mit ,oa xq.koÙkk c<+kus ds fy,

lw{e iks"kdksa ¼ftad vkSj lYQj½] tSo moZjdksa ¼jkbtksfc;evkSj ih,lch½] tSo doduk'kdksa ¼VªkbdksMekZ ½ rFkk flaFksfVd¼Ñf=e½ moZjdksa ¼;wfj;k vkSj Mh,ih½ dh egÙkk tkuus dkvolj izkIr gqvkA

vxsrh ifjiDork ¼bLdsi eSdsfuTe½ rFkk jksx izfrjks/khmUur fdLeksa] tSls vjgj ¼Vh,l&3 vkj] ch,l,evkj&736]ch,l,evkj&853] ,uMh,&1½( puk ¼tsth&11] fot;]fnfXot;] chMh,u&9&3] vojksèkh½] ewax ¼ch,e&4]ch,e&2002&1½ rFkk elwj ¼ts,y&1] ts,y&2] uwjh] ds&75]efYydk½ ds mi;ksx ls uk'khtho ,oa jksx izdksi dks25&40% rd de djus esa lgk;rk feyhA

,l,e,l lykgdkj lsokvks a ls le; ij rFkkvko';drkuqlkj lgh ,oa xq.koÙkkiw.kZ dhVuk'kdksa dkiz;ksx djus esa lgk;rk feyhA blls fdlkuksa dks uk'khthoksads izdksi dks QSyus ls jksdus esa rFkk mlds QyLo:idhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dkoksa dks de djus vkSj ikni laj{k.kykxr dks de djus esa lgk;rk feyhA


fdlkuksa esa ouLifr;ksa vkSj uhe rsy] ,u,ldsbZ rFkk,p,,uihoh tSls tSodkjdksa lfgr ikni laj{k.k dsoSdfYid iz.kkfy;ksa ds mi;ksx ds fy, fo'okl tkxkA

vkbZih,e dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa ls fdlkuksa dks vfrfjDr mitizkIr djus esa lgk;rk feyh vkSj i;kZoj.k ij Hkh de lsde vlj iM+kA vkbZih,e dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa ls izkÑfrdikfjra= esa ijHkf{k;ksa vkSj ijthO;kHkksa ds lef"V dh o`f)esa Hkh izR;{k izHkko iM+kA

nygu | Pulses

iz{ks=k ,oa foLrkj xfrfofèk;kaField and Extension Activities

MkW- ts- ,l- laèkq] Ñf"k vk;qDr ¼Qly½ us fnukad 9&13 Qjojh] 2014 ds nkSjkulhvkbZlhvkj] ukxiqj esa vk;ksftr ÞÑf"k oalrÞ esays ds nkSjku ,u,Q,l,e dh,3ih ifj;kstuk ds varxZr foLrkj QksYMjksa dk foekspu fd;k

Dr. J. S. Sandhu, Agricultural Comissioner (Crops) released extensionfolders under the A3P project of NFSM, during “Krishi Vasant ” Melaheld at CICR, Nagpur during 9 – 13 Feb 2014

vuariqj esa iz{ks= fnol lekjksg dk vk;kstu

Field day celeberations at Anantapur

vjgj esa iQkbVksIFkksjk vaxekjh dk lesfdr izcaèkuvjgj esa QkbVksIFkksjk vaxekjh ds lesfdr izcaèku ij

fofHkUu LFkkuksa] vFkkZr yksgkjnxk ¼>kj[kaM½] xqycxkZ ¼dukZVd½rFkk cnukiqj ¼egkjk"Vª½ esa ijh{k.k fd, x,A

ijh{k.kksa ds nkSjku 10 x 5 oxZ eh- vkdkj ds IykVksa ijrhu iqujkofÙk;ksa ds lkFk fLifyV&IykV fMtkbu esa ,dy ,oala;ksftr rFkk ikfjra=&eS=h mipkj fd, x,A VªkbZdksMekZfojhMs ds Vh,p&thchvkj&13] Vh,p&,yMhth&2 rFkk Vh,p& chMhvkj&1 fo;qDrksa dks Øe'k% xqycxkZ] yksgkjnxk rFkkcnukiqj ijh{k.kksa esa iz;ksx fd;k x;kA yglqu dh xkaB¼2% tyh; MCY;w@oh½ rRo ds vdZ dks rktk&rktk rS;kjfd;k x;k rFkk mls cht mipkj vkSj if.kZy ¼Qksfy;j½ fNM+dkoesa mi;ksx fd;k x;kA cqokbZ ls 21 fnu igys enk dkVªkbdksMekZ iztkfr ls mipkj fd;k x;k rFkk cqokbZ ls igysHkh chtksa dk mipkj fd;k x;kA cqokbZ ds 30 fnu ds cknvFkkZr jksx&izdksi ns[krs gh vfr'kh?kz yglqu dh xkaB dk vdZvkSj VªkbdksMekZ fojhMs tSls tSfod dhVuk'kdksa rFkk jklk;fud

Integrated management of Phytophthora blight in

pigeonpea

The trial on integrated management of

Phytophthora blight in pigeonpea was conducted at

different locations viz. Lohardaga (Jharkhand),

Gulbarga (Karnataka) and Badnapur (Maharashtra).

Individual and combined eco-friendly treatments

were laid out in split-plot design with three replications

on 10 x 5 m2 size plots. The isolates Th-GBR-13, Th-

LDG-2 and Th-BDR-1 of T. viride were used in the

experiment at Gulbarga, Lohardaga and Badnapur,

fetkZiqj esa iz{ks= ijh{k.k

Field demonstration at Mirzapur

NCIPM


respectively. The extract of garlic bulb (2% aqueous

w/v) was freshly prepared and used in seed treatment

and foliar spray. The soil treatment with Trichoderma

spp. was done 21 days prior to sowing and seeds were

treated before sowing. The spray of biorationals i.e.

garlic bulb extract and T. viride and chemical fungicides

were done 30 DAS immediately after observation of

disease incidence. The crop was monitored after sowing

and observed for disease incidence at 30, 45 and 60 days

after sowing (DAS).

The results indicated that all treatments significantly

reduced the Phytophthora blight incidence as compared

to untreated control across three locations. But, the

lowest disease incidence (5.4% - Gulbarga, 5.8% -

Badnapur and 6.4% - Lohardaga) and highest yield (17.6

q/ha - Gulbarga, 19.8 q/ha - Badnapur and 16.4 q/ha -

Lohardaga) of pigeonpea was recorded with the

treatment (T6) at all locations, followed by T3 and T1,

which were statistically at par with T6. The result also

suggested that the bio-rational inputs, viz., garlic bulb

extract (GBE) and T. viride were comparable with the

conventional chemical fungicides in reducing the disease

incidence .

dhVuk'kdksa dk fNM+dko fd;k x;kA cqokbZ ds i'pkr Qlyij 30] 45 vkSj 60 fnuksa ds varjky ij jksx izdksi ds fy,fuxjkuh dh xbZA

ijh{k.k ds ifj.kkeksa esa ;g ik;k x;k fd rhuksa LFkkuksa ijvuqipkfjr fu;a=.k dh rqyuk esa leLr mipkjksa esa QkbVksIFkksjk

vaxekjh izdksi esa Hkkjh deh vkbZA rFkkfi] lHkh LFkkuksa esamipkj esa vjgj ds lacaèk esa U;wure jksx izdksi ¼xqycxkZ esa5-4%] cnukqij esa 6-4% vkSj yksgkjnxk esa 6-4%½ rFkk lokZfèkdmit ¼xqycxkZ esa 17-6 fDoa- izfr gs-] cnukqij esa 19-8 fDoa- izfrgs- vkSj yksgkjnxk esa 16-4 fDoa- izfr gs-½ ntZ dh xbZ] blds cknVh3 vkSj Vh1 dk LFkku Fkk] tks lkaf[;dh; :i ls Vh6 dslerqY; FksA ifj.kkeksa esa ;g Hkh irk pyk fd jksx izdksi dedjus esa tSfod dhVuk'kd] tSls yglqu dh xkaB dk vdZ¼thchbZ½ rFkk VªkbdksMekZ fojhMs ikjEifjd jklk;fuddhVuk'kdksa ls rqyuh; FksA

T1: Soil treatment with T.viride enriched FYM + Seed treatmentwith garlic bulb extract (2%) + Spray with garlic bulb extractVh 1% VªkbdksMekZ fofjMs ;qä xkscj [kkn }kjk enk mipkj + yglqu xkaB ds vdZ }kjk chtmipkj+yglqu xkaB ds vdZ dk fNM+dko

T3: Soil treatment with T.viride enriched FYM + Seed treatmentT.viride (10g) + Spray with garlic bulb extractVh 3% VªkbdksMekZ fofjMs ;qä xkscj [kkn }kjk enk mipkj + VªkbdksMekZ fofjMs ¼10 xzk-½ }kjkcht mipkj + yglqu xkaB ds vdZ dk fNM+dko

T6: Soil treatment with T.viride enriched FYM + Seed treatmentwith T. viride (10g) + Spray with RidomilVh 6% VªkbdksMekZ fofjMs ;qä xkscj [kkn }kjk enk mipkj + VªkbdksMekZ fofjMs ¼10 xzk-½ }kjkcht mipkj + fjMksfey dk fNM+dko

Life of farmers is solely dependent upon the

microbes present in the soil

- Parashar (Krishi Parashar, c400BC)


frygu | Oilseeds

fryguOilseeds

Validation of integrated pest management

technology for groundnut crop

Research project was initiated at Anantapur,Andhra Pradesh with a view to validate IPM technologyfor groundnut crop for different agro-eco-systems. Thesocio-economic baseline information was collected fromAnantapur, Andhra Pradesh on the various aspects ofplant protection measures.

KVK, ANGRAU, Andhra Pradesh

Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh comes underarid region besides being rain shadow district. Thepredominant cropping pattern is sole groundnut,

ewaxiQyh iQly ds fy, lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèkuizkS|ksfxdh dk oSèkhdj.k

fofHkUu Ñf"k ikfjra=ksa ds fy, ewaxQyh dh Qly dsfy, vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds oSèkhdj.k ds fy, vuUriqjftyk ¼vkU/kz izns'k½ esa vuqlaèkku ifj;kstuk 'kq: dh xbZAikni laj{k.k mik;ksa ds fofHkUu igyqvksa ij vuUriqj ftyk¼vkU/kz izns'k½ ls lkekftd&vkfFkZd vkèkkj lEcfU/kr tkudkjh,df=r dh xbZZA

Ñf"k foKku dsUnz] ,,uthvkj,;w] vkUèkz izns'klkekftd&vkfFkZd vk/kkj dh tkudkjh vuUriqj ftyk

¼vkU/kz izns'k½ ls ,df=r dh xbZ ftls uhps n'kkZ;k x;k gS%

ikni laj{k.k ds fy, flQkfj’ksa izkS|ksfxdh viukus okys fdlkuksa dk %Plant protection recommendations % farmers adopting / practicing

uhe ds fxjh dk vdZ@ Neem seed kernel extract 5

bfeMkDyksfizM ds lkFk cht mipkj@ Seed treatment with imidacloprid 60

VªkbdksMekZ ds lkFk cht mipkj@ Seed treatment with Trichoderma sp. 10

VªkbdksMekZ ds lkFk e`nk mipkj@ Soil treatment with Trichoderma sp. 5

varjQlyhdj.k@fefJr Qlyhdj.k@ Intercropping / mixed cropping 70

ykbV VªSiksa ¼izdk'keku Qanksa½ dk mi;ksx@ Use of light traps 5

Qsjkseksu VªSiksa ¼;kSu tky½ bR;kfn dk mi;ksx@ Use of pheromone traps, etc. 10

groundnut + pigeonpea intercropping under rainfedduring kharif and fallow during rabi. The predominantvariety of groundnut was K-6. In intercropping, theratio of groundnut and pigeon pea followed by farmerswas 15:1 and 21:1. Border cropping with bajra /sorghumwas followed to lesser extent (<5%) to minimizeincidence of peanut stem necrosis disease (PSND). Themajor biotic constraints in groundnut were leaf miner,thrips, collar rot, PSND and late leaf spot. Usually 2-3 sprays were taken up by using Taiwan power sprayerto control pests and diseases. Farmers generally used

vkU/kz izns'k dk vuariqj ftyk 'kq"d {ks= ds varxZrvkrk gS] blds vykok ;g of"V Nk;k ¼jsu 'ksMks½ okyk ftykgS] vFkkZr tgka ckfj'k de gksrh gSA bl {ks= esa [kjhQ dsnkSjku ckjkuh fLFkfr ds varxZr izeq[k Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh esadsoy ewaxQyh( ewaxQyh $ vjgj varjQlyhdj.k gS rFkkjch ds nkSjku mFkyh o ijrh ¼QsykS½ gSA ewaxQyh dh izeq[kfdLe ds&6 gSA varjQlyhdj.k esa] ewaxQyh vkSj vjgj dh[ksrh djus okys fdlkuksa dk vuqikr 15%1 vkSj 21%1 FkkAewaxQyh ruk Ård{k; jksx ¼ih,l,uMh½ ds izdksi dks dedjus ds fy, Tokj@cktjk ds lkFk dqN gn rd lhekorhZ

NCIPM


acephate as insecticide and mancozeb, carbendazim wereused as fungicides. As a whole, the farmer spent 5000/ha (25%) for plant protection.

During 2013-14 kharif season, groundnut andpigeonpea intercrop was sown with the receipt ofmonsoons during first fortnight of July 2013. Cropsuffered from biotic stress of leaf miner (16%), thrips(24%), and jassids (11%). Rain received at 50-65 DAS(pegging-pod initiation) stage, helped to reduce theincidence of above pests. The crop seemed recoveredfrom moisture stress. But later on, no rains were receivedand the crop was subjected to terminal moisture stress,which affected the turn out of the groundnut.

DGR, Junagadh (Gujarat)

Baseline information collected indicated that seedtreatment with fungicide mancozeb or carbendazim orthiram was given before sowing in groundnut crop.To keep the crop weed-free farmers sprayed pre-emergence weedicide pendimethaline and post-emergence weedicide Quizalofop-p- ethyl.

The main pests of groundnut were thrips and jassidsand farmers applied two sprays of eithermonocrotophos or imidacloprid or dimethoate orthiamethoxam for their management. Amongstdiseases, collar rot, stem rot and leaf spot (early andlate) were the main diseases of groundnut in this region.For the management of collar rot and stem rot, farmersapplied seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianumor T. viride or tebuconazole or carbendazim ormancozeb. For the foliar disease management, farmersapplied two to three sprays of fungicides viz.hexaconazole mancozeb + carbendazim ordifenoconazole.

Qlyhdj.k ¼5% ls de ½ fd;k tkrk gSA ewaxQyh esa izeq[ktho lacaèkh leL;k,a Fkha iÙkh eksM+d] dk"BdhV] xzhok foxyu]ih,l,uMh rFkk iNsrh iÙkh èkCckA fdlku lkekU; :i ls]uk'khthoksa ,oa jksxksa dks fu;af=r djus ds fy, rkbZoku ikojds 2&3 fNM+dko dj jgs FksA vkerkSj ij fdlku dhVuk'kdds :i esa ,flQsV rFkk doduk'kdksa ds :i esa esadkstsc vkSjdkcsZuMsfte dk iz;ksx fd,A ikni laj{k.k ds fy, fdlkuksa dhdqy ykxr ` 5000 izfr gs- ¼25%½ FkhA

[kjhQ 2013&14 ds nkSjku] tqykbZ 2013 esa igyh cjlkrgksus ij ewaxQyh vkSj vjgj dh varjQly ds :i esa cqokbZ dhxbZA Qly dks iÙkh eksM+d ¼16%½] dk"BdhV ¼24%½ rFkktSflM ¼11%½ tSls uk'khthoksa ds izdksi ls uqdlku igqapkAcqokbZ ds 50&65 fnuksa ds i'pkr~ o"kkZ gksus ls bu uk'khthoksa dsvkØe.k esa dqN ek=k esa deh vkbZ gSA ,slk izrhr gqvk fdQly ueh ncko ls mHkj jgh Fkh] ysfdu ckn esa ckfj'k u gksusds dkj.k Qly dks mÙkjksÙkj ueh ncko dk lkeuk djuk iM+k]ftlls ewaxQyh dh Qly izHkkfor gqbZA

Mhthvkj] tqukx<+ (xqtjkr),d= dh xbZ vkèkkj js[kk lwpuk ls ;g irk pyk fd

ewaxQyh dh Qly esa cqokbZ ls igys QQwanuk'kd esa esadkstscvFkok dkcsZuMsfte vFkok Fkkbje ds lkFk cht dk mipkjfd;k x;k FkkA Qly dks [kjirokj ls eqDr j[kus ds fy,fdlkuksa us uk'khthoksa ds vkxeu ls igys isaMhfeFkkyhu[kjirokjuk'kh rFkk dhVksa ds vkxeu ds ckn fDotykQksi&ihbZFkkby [kjirokjuk'kh dk fNM+dko fd;kA

ewaxQyh esa izeq[k uk'khtho dk"BdhV rFkk tSflM Fks vkSjfdlkuksa us mUgsa fu;af=r djus ds fy, eksuksØksVksQkWl vFkokbfeMkDyksfizM vFkok Mk;feFkks;sV vFkok feFkkfeFkksDte dsnks fNM+dko fd,A ewaxQyh esa jksxksa ds lacaèk esa] xzhok foxyu¼dkWyj jkWV½] ruk foxyu ¼LVse jkWV½ rFkk iÙkh èkCck ¼vxsrh ,oaiNsrh½ bl {ks= esa izeq[k jksx ik, x,A xzhok foxyu jksxksa dksfu;af=r djus ds fy, fdlkuksa us VªkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue ;kVªkbdksMekZ fojhMs ;k Vscwdksukstksy ;k dkcsZuMsfte ;k esadkstscls mipkj fd, x, cht dk iz;ksx fd;kA if.kZy jksx dksfu;af=r djus ds fy, fdlkuksa us gsDlkdksukstksy] esadkstsc $dkcZuMsfte ;k Mk;Qsuksdksukstksy QQ¡wn@doduk'kdksa ds nksls rhu fNM+dko fd,A

Peanut stem necrosis diseaseewaxQyh ruk Ård{k;


frygu | Oilseeds

Studies on management of Sclerotinia rot

(Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of rapeseed-mustard

Survey for incidence and severity of Sclerotinia

rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of Rapeseed-Mustard

Survey of 88 locations in eight districts viz.Gurgaon, Mewat, Rewari and Mohindergarh ofHaryana and Alwar, Jaipur, Dausa and Bharatpur inRajasthan was conducted for Sclerotinia rot ofmustard. In Haryana, incidence ranged 5-75% andseverity ranged 1.0 - 4.0 grades. In Rewari, highestincidence (30.0%) and severity (3.8) were observedfollowed by that in Mohindergarh [incidence 27.9%;severity 3.6 grades].

In Rajasthan, incidence and severity ranged 0–80% and1-4 grades, respectively. The incidence and severity ofSclerotinia rot ranged 10.1-27.0% and 2.3-3.6 grades,respectively. In Bharatpur, highest incidence (27.0%)and severity (3.6) were observed.

Validation of integrated disease managementpractices for Sclerotinia rot: Validation of integrateddisease management practices for Sclerotinia rot wereconducted in 40 hectares in Mewat and Mohindergarhdistricts of South-West zones of Haryana incollaboration with KVKs (CCS, HAU), Mewat andMohindergarh and Zone-III b (Alwar) of Rajasthanin collaboration with ARS (SKNAU) Navgaon(Alwar) in farmers’ participatory approach. Integrateddisease management package against Sclerotinia rot(Table 1) was found superior over FP in reducing thedisease incidence (from 40 to 20%) (Table-1).

An experiment in split plot design with three maintreatments of different levels of nitrogen and seven sub-treatments having different IPM interventions incollaboration with IARI, New Delhi and SKNAU,Durgapura, Rajasthan for post rainy rabi crop wascarried out. Different treatments were found superiorfrom untreated control in Sclerotinia rot incidence.Recommended dose of nitrogen was found better than50% of recommended and 150% recommended dosesin reducing the white rust on leaf and inflorescence.

An experiment with eight different treatments wascarried out at NCIPM Campus, Rajpur Khurd,Mehrauli, New Delhi. The integrated treatment, which

rksfj;k&ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu (LDysjksfVfu;kLDysjksfl;ksje) ds izcaèku ij vè;;u

rksfj;k&ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ¼LDysjksfVfu;kLDysjksfl;ksje½ ds izdksi rFkk izdksi dh rhozrk ds fy,losZ{k.k

ljlksa esa LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, gfj;k.kk ds xqM+xkao]esokr] fjokM+h vkSj eksfgUnzx<+ rFkk jktLFkku ds vyoj] t;iqj]nkSlk vkSj Hkjriqj esa] vFkkZr vkB ftyksa esa 88 LFkkuksa ij losZ{k.kfd, x,A gfj;k.kk esa] jksx izdksi 5&75% rFkk izdksi dhrhozrk 1-0&4-0 xzsM dh jsat esa FkhA fjokM+h esa rFkk mlds ckneksfgUnzx<+ esa Øe'k% lokZfèkd jksx izdksi ¼30-0% vkSj 27-9%½rFkk rhozrk ¼3-8 vkSj 3-6 xzsM½ ikbZ xbZA

jktLFkku esa] jksx izdksi rFkk mldh rhozrk Øe'k%0&80% vkSj 1&4 xzsM ds chp FkhA LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu dkjksx izdksi rFkk mldh rhozrk Øe'k% 10-1&27-0% vkSj2-3&3-6 xzsM ds chp FkhA Hkjriqj esa] vfèkdre jksx izdksi¼27-0%½ rFkk vfèkdre izdksi rhozrk ¼3-6½ ikbZ xbZA

LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, lesfdr jksx izcaèkudk oSèkhdj.k% gfj;k.kk ds dsohds ¼lhlh,l] ,p,;q½ esokr oegsUnzx<+ o ,vkj,l ¼,lds,u,;w½] uoxkao ¼vyoj½ ds lg;ksxesa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa gfj;k.kk ds nf{k.k&if'peh{ks=ksa ds esokr vkSj egsUnzx<+ ftyksa rFkk jktLFkku ds {ks=&III

[k ¼vyoj½ esa 40 gs- esa LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, lesfdruk'khtho izcaèku oSèkhdj.k dk;ZØe vk;ksftr fd, x,A jksxizdksi de djus esa ¼40 ls 20%½ LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu dsfo#) lesfdr jksx izcaèku dks] fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½ dhrqyuk esa csgrj ik;k x;kA ¼rkfydk&1½

jch ekSle ds ckn Qly ds fy, vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZfnYyh vkSj ,lds,u,;w] nqxkZiqjk] jktLFkku ds lg;ksx esaukbVªkstu ds fofHkUu Lrjksa dss rhu izeq[k mipkjksa rFkk fofHkUuvkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dks lfEefyr djrs gq, lkr mipkjksa dslkFk fLifyV IykV fMtkbu esa ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kALDysjksfVfu;k foxyu izdksi ij vuqipkfjr daVªksy esa fofHkUumipkj csgrj ik, x,A lQsn jrqok dk iÙkh o iq"ixqPNvoLFkk ij jksx de djus esa ukbZVªkstu dh flQkfj'k ek=kvPNh ikbZ xbZA

jk-l-uk-iz-ds- ifjlj] jktiqj [kqnZ] egjkSyh] ubZ fnYyh esavkB fHkUu mipkjksa ds lkFk ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA lesfdrmipkj dks] ftlesa cqokbZ ds 60 fnuksa ij esVkySfDly 4 MCY;w

NCIPM


includes foliar spray of metalaxyl 4 WP + mancozeb64 WP at 60 days after sowing (DAS) was foundeffective in reducing the white rust on leaf andinflorescence and increasing yield followed by freshaqueous garlic bulb ( 2% w/v) extract (Fig. 1).

Genetic enhancement of rapeseed-mustard fordevelopment of varieties and hybrids: Geneticsenhancement of new sources of resistance for white rust,Alternaria blight and Sclerotinia rot was carried out.Screened six Brassicas coordinated trials viz. AVT-I &II timely sown irrigated, AVT-I & II quality, IVTtimely sown and IHT timely sown, Brassicas AVT-Iand AVT-II strains (Plant Pathology) against different

rkfydk 1 % rksfj;k&ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, lesfdr izcaèku ¼vkbZ,e½ ,oa fdlkuksa dh fofèk;ksa ¼,Qih½ds vuqlkj viukbZ tkus okyh dk;Zuhfr;ka

Table 1: Integrated management (IM) and farmers' practices (FP) interventions for Sclerotinia rot of rapeseed-mustard

ih $ esadkstSc 64 MCY;wih dk fNM+dko ;k rktk cus yglqudk vdZ ¼2%½ 'kkfey Fkk] ftls Qwy vkus dh voLFkk esa lQsnjrqok dks de djus esa izHkkoh ik;k x;k ¼fp=&1½A

fdLeksa ,oa gkbfczMksa dks fodflr djus ds fy,rksfj;k&ljlksa dk vkuqoaf'kd laoèkZu % lQsn jrqok] vYVjsfu;kvaxekjh rFkk LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ds fy, u;s lzksrksa dkvkuqoaf'kd laoèkZu fd;k x;kA ljlksa&rksfj;k ds izeq[k jksxksa dsfo#) N% czkfldk lefUor ijh{k.kksa dh laoh{kk dh xbZ] vFkkZr,ohVh&I vkSj II dh le; ij cqokbZ ,oa flapkbZ ds fy, laoh{kk],ohVh&I ,oa ,ohVh&II dh xq.koÙkk ds fy, laoh{kk] le; ijvkbZohVh ,oa vkbZ,pVh dh cqokbZ ds fy, laoh{kk] fofHkUu jksxksa,oa leku ¼;wfuQkseZ½ jksx okyh ikS/k'kkyk ¼ikni jksx foKku½

ekWM~;wy cqokbZ ls igys cqokbZ ds le; ikSèk ,oa okuLifrd iq"i ,oa QyhModule Pre – sowing At sowing voLFkk ij Lrj ij

At seedling & At floweringvegetative stage & pod stage

vkbZMh,eIDM

Hkh"k.k xehZ esa xgjh tqrkbZ djukAikuh dh csgrj fudklh ds fy, [ksrksadks rS;kj djukADeep summer ploughing. Preparationof well-drained field.

eDdk] pkoy bR;kfn tSls ukWu&gkWLVQly viukukACrop rotation with non-host likemaize, rice, etc.

moZjdksa ¼N:60, P:40, K:40, S:40 fdyks@izfr gs-½ dk larqfyr mi;ksxdjukABalanced application of fertilizer

(N:60, P:40, K:40, S:40 kg/ha)

vDVwcj esa fnukad 16&31 dsnkSjku cqokbZ djukASowing during 16–31 October.

LoPN ,oa izekf.kd cht dkmi;ksx djukAUse of clean and certified seed

Vh- gftZ,ue@10 xzk- izfr fdxzk-ds lkFk cht mipkj djukASeed treatment withT. harzianum) @ 10 g/kg.

50 fdxzk- ,QokbZ,e esa iwoZ&m"ekf;r Vh- gftZ,ue@2-5 fdxzk-izfr gs- dk e`nk iz;ksx djukSoil application of T. harzianum

@ 2.5 kg/ha pre-incubated in 50kg of FYM.

vfèkdre iknilef"V;ksa dk vuqj{k.kdjukAMaintenance ofoptimum plantpopulation

foosdiw.kZ flapkbZdjukJudicious irrigation

lØfer ikniksadks gVkukRogueingof infectedplants

Hkh"k.k xehZ esa xgjh tqrkbZ ughadjukANo summer ploughing

vlarqfyr moZjd dk mi;ksxUnbalanced fertilizer application

,QihFP

vDVwcj esa fnukad 16&31 dsnkSjku cqokbZ u djukANo sowing during 16–31 October

cht vkSj e`nk dk mipkj ughadjukANo seed and soil treatment

vf/kd flapkbZ djukAHigh irrigation andpopulation

lØfer ikniksadks ugha gVkukNo rouging ofinfected plants


frygu | Oilseeds

ds fo#) xq.koÙkk ds fy, czkfldk ,ohVh&I ,oa ,ohVh&II

¼ikni jksx foKku½ fdLeksa dh laoh{kkA ijh{k.kksa esa 138 oa'kkofy;ka¼,aVªht½ 'kkfey dh xb±A czkfldk tuunzO; ¼,ohVh&I vkSj,ohVh&II½ dh laoh{kk dh xbZ vkSj pkj oa'kkofy;ksa] vFkkZr,lchth&13&14] ,lchth&13&23] ,lchth&13&24],lchth&13&25 dks ifÙk;ksa ij lQsn jrqos ls eqDr ik;kx;kA bUgsa rksfj;k&ljlksa dh fdLeksa ,oa gkbfczMksa dks fodflrdjus ds fy, mi;ksx fd;k tk ldrk gSA

diseases and Uniform disease nursery (Plant Pathology)against major diseases of rapeseed-mustard comprising138 entries was conducted. Screening of Brassicagermplasm (AVT-I and AVT-II), four entries viz. SBG-13-14, SBG-13-23, SBG-13-24, SBG-13-25 were foundfree from white rust incidence on leaves and could beutilized in development of varieties and hybrids inrapeseed-mustard.

fp= 1- vkbZih,e~ ?kVdksa dk ljlksa dh chekfj;ksa ,oa cht iSnkokj ij çHkko

Fig. 1. Effect of IPM component treatments on diseases and seed yield in Indian mustard

….the cup of joy is full only when the findings find

practical applications

– Louis Pasteur

NCIPM


ckxokuh iQlysaHorticultural Crops

lCth iQlysaI;kt

djuky ¼gfj;k.kk½ ftys ds fla?kksbZ] fla?kksok rFkk jkaHkkxkaoksa esa 4 gs- {ks= esa vaxhdj.kh; vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dkoSèkhdj.k fd;k x;k] ftlesa 10 mUur'khy [ksfrgj fdlkuksa dks'kkfey fd;k x;kA

vkèkkj js[kk lwpukmiq;ZDr xkaoksa ds ckjs esa vkèkkj lwpuk ,d= dh xbZA

fdlkuksa dh lkekftd&vkfFkZd fLFkfr ls ;g irk pyk fdmijksDr xzkeh.kksa dk eq[; dk;Z [ksrh] Ms;jh rFkk deh'ku ijQlyks a dh Vª sfMax djuk gSA gkykafd fdlku tSofu;a=.k@vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds ckjs esa tkudkjh j[krs Fks]ysfdu os uk'khthoksa dks fu;a=.k djus ds fy, iw.kZ :i lsjklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ij gh fuHkZj jgrs FksA ,d Qly ekSleesa vkSlru izR;sd fdlku 7&8 jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa dk fNM+dkodjrk gS ¼ftldh dher ` 6250&7500@ekSle@gs- gS½A bujklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa esa lkekU;r% Mk;feFkks;sV] fFk;kesFkksDte]izksikbusc] bfeMkDyksfizM] lkbijesfFku] esadkstsc rFkk ,sflQsV gSavkSj dhVuk'kdksa dks fefJr :i ls mi;ksx fd;k tkrk gSA

ikS/k'kkyk rFkk eq[; Qly esa I;kt ds ftu fofHkUuuk'khthoksa ds fy, vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk oSèkhdj.k fd;kx;k muesa mHkjh D;kjh ¼jsTM cSM½] VªkbdksMekZ ;qDr xkscj [kkndks ikS/k'kkyk dh enk ds lkFk feykuk] L;wMkseksukl Qyksjkslsalds lkFk ikSèk dh tM+ dks Mqcksuk] uhys jax ds VªSi ¼Qans½ LFkkfirdjuk rFkk uhe] fLiukslsM] esadkstSc vkSj ,sflQsV dhVuk'kdksadk vko';drkuqlkj fNM+dko djuk 'kkfey FkkA

vkbZih,e dk;ZØe ds dk;kZUo;u ls uk'khtho dhfLFkfr rFkk vkfFkZd igyq

vkbZih,e dk;ZØe ds dk;kZUo;u ls izeq[k uk'khtho]

Vegetable crops

Onion

Validation of adaptable IPM technology in 4 ha

area covering 10 progressive farming families was carried

out in Singohi, Singoha and Rambha villages, District

Karnal (Haryana).

Base line information

Base line information was collected about the above

mentioned villages and socio-economic status of farmers

revealed farming, dairying and commissioning for crop

produce as the predominant profession of villagers.

Farmers of the hamlet were though aware about the

biocontrol / IPM technologies but were wholly

dependent on chemical pesticides for pest control. On

an average, every farmer applied 7-8 sprays (worth

` 6250-7500/ season/ ha) of chemical pesticides in a

season. The commonly used pesticides were dimethoate,

thiamethoxam, propineb, imidacloprid, cypermethrin,

mancozeb and acephate and use of mixtures of pesticides

was quite prevalent.

The IPM interventions for various pests of onion

validated in nursery as well as main crop included raised

bed, mixing nursery soil with farm yard manure

enriched with Trichoderma, seedling root dip treatment

with Pseudomonas fluorescens, erection of blue coloured

traps, need- based sprays of neem, spinosad, mancozeb

and acephate pesticides.

Pest status and economics of IPM implementation

The mean incidence of key insect pest viz. thrips



vFkkZr dk"BdhV dk izdksi vkbZih,e viukus okys fdlkuksa ds[ksrksa esa de ¼5-1 izfr ikni½ ik;k x;k] tcfd fdlkuksa dhfofèk ¼,Qih½ okys [ksrksa esa ;g dkQh T;knk ¼9-2 izfr ikni½FkkA LVseQk;fy;e vaxekjh izdksi fdlkuksa dh fofèk;ksa okys[ksrksa esa dkQh T;knk] vFkkZr 5-5 ¼0&9 jsfVax½ izfr ikni ik;kx;k] tcfd vkbZih,e okys [ksrksa esa ;g vis{kkÑr de ¼2-1½FkkA vkbZih,e dk;ZØe ugha viukus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa¼1-2½ dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e dk;ZØe okys fdlkuksa ds [kskrsa esaI;kt ihyk ckSuk izdksi ekewyh :i ls de 10-4%½ Fkk ¼rkfydk1½A bl ckr ij xkSj fd;k x;k fd tuojh&Qjojh ekg esacs&ekSle cjlkr gksus ds dkj.k ^,y&28^ I;kt fdLe dkjksi.k nsjh ls fd;k x;k] ftlesa dkj.k LVseQk;fy;e vaxekjhdk izdksi dkQh T;knk ik;k x;k vkSj de mit izkIr gqbZAblds QyLo:i] cktkj esa I;kt dh vkiwfrZ Hkh de gqbZA

was found to be lower i.e. 5.1 per plant in IPM fieldsas against higher incidence of 9.2 per plant in farmers'practice (FP) fields. Among the diseases, Stemphyliumblight incidence was very high i.e. 5.5 (0-9 rating) perplant in farmers' practices fields (FP) where as it wasrelatively low (2.1) in IPM fields. Onion yellow dwarfincidence was marginally low (0.4%) in IPM fields ascompared to non-IPM fields (1.2) (Table 1). It was alsoobserved that due to occurrence of unusual rains duringJanuary-February months, planting of cultivar L-28'was delayed resulting in higher incidence ofStemphylium blight and consequently leading to lowmarketable yields.

Higher natural enemy population especially ofspiders was recorded in IPM fields of onion comparedto that in FP.

The implementation of IPM technology by oniongrowers had significant impact on quantity of chemicalsprays and yield. Less number of sprays (5.3) in IPMand higher (8.7) in non-IPM fields and at the same timean increased yield of 181.3 q/ ha in IPM and 165.8 q/ha in farmers' practices (FP) fields was obtainedresulting in the higher BCR of 2.24:1 and 2.04:1 inIPM and non-IPM fields, respectively (Table 2).

fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½ okys I;kt ds [ksrksa dh rqyukesa vkbZih,e okys [ksrksa esa izkÑfrd 'k=q] fo'ks"k :i ls edfM+;ksadh lef"V vfèkd ntZ dh xbZA

ftu I;kt mRikndksa us vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh viukbZmuds jklk;fud fNM+dkoksa rFkk mit ij dkQh izHkko iM+kAvkbZih,e okys [skrksa esa de fNM+dkoksa ¼5-3½ rFkk vfèkd mit¼181-3 fDoa-@gs-½ ds dkj.k vkbZ ih,e viukus okys fdlkuksadks mPp ykHk % ykxr vuqikr ¼2-24%1½ izkIr gqvk] tcfdnwljh vksj fdlkuksa dh fofèk okys [ksrksa esa vfèkd fNM+dkoksa¼8-7½ rFkk de mit ¼165-8 fDoa- izfr gs-½ ds dkj.k bufdlkuksa dks de ykHk % ykxr vuqikr ¼2-04%1½ izkIr gqvk¼rkfydk 2½A

rkfydk 1% djuky ¼gfj;k.kk½ ftys ds fla?kksok] fla?kksgh rFkk jkaHkk xkaoksa esa I;kt ds vkbZih,e ,oa ,Qih [ksrksa esauk'khtho dh fLFkfr rFkk izkÑfrd 'k=q dk ifjn`';

Table 1: Pest status and natural enemy scenario in IPM and FP fields of onion in Singoha, Singohi and Rambhavillages, district Karnal (Haryana)

uk'khtho vkbZih,e ,QihPest IPM FP

dk"BdhV@ikni Thrips/plant 5.1 9.2

LVseQk;fy;e vaxekjh (0-9) / Stemphylium blight (0-9) 2.1 5.5

I;kt ihyk ckSuk (%) / Onion yellow dwarf (%) 0.4 1.2

NCIPM


Bell Pepper

More than 60 ha of bell pepper area was taken upin Uncha Samana, Daha-Bajindan, Madanpur and Sirsivillages, a hamlet in Karnal District of Haryana forIPM validation, demonstration, promotion anddissemination of trials and for wider adaptation byfarmers. All recommended IPM interventions werecarried out and demonstrated to bell pepper growers.Farmers' field schools were organized and trainingswere imparted to farmers on soil solarisation, raisedseed bed, mixing of Trichoderma, monitoring ofemergence of adult moths through pheromone traps,using drip irrigation to minimise Fusarium wilt damage,timing the spray of green labeled pesticides and properselection of eco-safe pesticides, use of specific

f'keyk fepZvkbZih,e ds oSèkhdj.k] ijh{k.k] izksUu;u rFkk fdlkuksa

}kjk cM+s iSekus ij vkbZih,e viuk, tkus ds fy, ijh{k.kksa dsizlkj gsrq gfj;k.kk ds djuky ftys ds varxZr Åapk lekuk]nkgk ckthanu] enukiqj rFkk fljlh xkaoksa ¼,d dLck½ esaf'keyk fepZ ij 60 gs- esa ijh{k.k vk;ksftr fd;k x;kA f'keykfepZ mRikndksa dks vkbZih,e dh leLr laLrqr dk;Zuhfr;ksa oeè;LFkkvksa dk izn'kZu fn[kk;k x;kA blds vykok] fdlkuksa dsfy, iz{ks= Ldwy vk;ksftr fd, x, rFkk mUgsa e`nklkSjhdj.k]mHkjh cht D;kjh] VªkbdksMekZ dk lfEeJ.k] QsjkseksuVªSiksa ds ekè;e ls O;Ld eksFk ¼iraxk½ ds vkxeu ij fuxjkuh]¶;wlsfj;e eqj>ku gkfu dks de djus ds fy, fMªi ¼Vidk½flapkbZ dk mi;ksx] gjs yscy okys dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko dhle;kofèk vkSj i;kZoj.k eS=h dhVuk'kdksa ds fNM+dko dhle;kofèk rFkk i;kZoj.k eS=h dhVuk'kdksa dk lgt p;u],p,,uihoh] fLiuklsM] uhe vkèkkfjr mRiknksa] tSls fof'k"VtSo dhVuk'kdksa dk mi;ksx rFkk izkÑfrd 'k=qvksa dh igpkudjus esa izf'k{k.k Hkh fn;k x;kA dk;ZØe dk mís'; yksgs dsNYyksa ¼fjax½ okys ikWyhFkhu 'khVksa ls doj fd, x, jsTM+ cSMksa¼mHkjh D;kfj;ksa½ dk iz;ksx djrs gq, LoLFk ikS/k'kkyk fodflrdjuk Fkk] D;ksafd budh vofèk yach gksrh gSA vkbZih,e okys[ksrksa esa uhe vkèkkfjr vkSj mfpr ek=k rFkk le; ij p;furdhVuk'kd ds iz;ksx ls jklk;fud iz;ksxksa esa deh vkbZA bldsQyLo:i] vkbZih,e viukus okys [ksrksa esa] fdlkuksa dh fofèkokys [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa] mPp mit rFkk mPp ykHk % ykxrvuqikr ns[kk x;kA

rkfydk 2% djuky ¼gfj;k.kk½ ftys ds fla?kksok] fla?kksgh rFkk jkaHkk xkaoksa esa I;kt dh Qly esa vkbZih,e ds vkfFkZd igyq

Table 2: Economics of IPM in onion crop in Singoha, Singohi and Rambha villages, district Karnal (Haryana)

uk'khtho vkbZih,e ,QihPest IPM FP

jklk;fud fNM+dkoksa dh la[;k @Number of chemical sprays 5.3 8.7

ikni laj{k.k@fNM+dko dh ykxr (`/gs-) @Cost of plant protection/sprays (`/ha) 7687.5 6625.0

ikni laj{k.k lfgr [ksrh dh ykxr (`/gs-) @Cost of cultivation including plant protection (`/ha) 80575 80762.7

vkSlr mit ¼fDoa-@gs-½ @Mean yield (q/ha) 181.3 165.8

dqy ykHk (`/gs-)@Gross return (`/ha) 180525.0 165091.3

'kq) ykHk (`/gs-)@Net returns (`/ha) 99950.0 84328.8

ykHk % Ykxr vuqikr@B:C ratio 2.2:1 2.0:1

fdlkuksa ds fy;s ikB'kkyk ds ekè;e ls vkbZih,e viukus okysfdlkuksa ds lkFk ckrphr

Interaction with IPM farmers through Farmers' Field School



biopesticides like HaNPV, spinosad, neem-basedproducts and identification of natural enemies.Emphasis was on raising of healthy nursery using raisedbeds covered with polythene sheets supported by ironrings because of its longer duration. IPM fields hadreduced chemical pesticide applications due to the need-based and selective pesticide use in proper doses atproper time. Higher yields and in turn higher BCRwere observed in IPM fields as against FP fields.

Tomato

Ten hactare of tomato was undertaken fordemonstration, promotion and dissemination of IPMtechnology in Palari village in Sonepat District ofHaryana. Farmers were given demonstration andtraining for soil solarisation, Trichoderma mixing,covering nursery beds with nylon nets and marigoldplanting as trap crop, pheromone-based adult mothsmonitoring and spray of specific biopesticide likeHaNPV with jaggery in evening, use of eco-safe andreduced risk pesticides and identification of pest damageand natural enemies etc. Farmers' Field School and KisanGhosthi on IPM in tomato were also conducted, whichwas attended by more than 60 farmers. Leaf curl andfruit borer were observed as major pests and weremanaged successfully using IPM technology and theirincidence was marginally lower than FP.

Promotional activities were carried out byregularly visiting the adopted fields, interacting withfarmers, organizing the Farmer' Field Schools (FFS's),

VekVjVekVj esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds ijh{k.k] izksUu;u rFkk

izlkj ds fy, gfj;k.kk ds lksuhir ftys ds iyjh xkao esa10 gs-+ esa ijh{k.k vk;ksftr fd;k x;kA fdlkuksa dks enklkSjhdj.k] VªkbdksMekZ lfEeJ.k cukus] uk;ykWu ds tkyksa lsikS/k'kkyk D;kfj;ksa dks doj djus vkSj Qk¡n ¼VªSi½ Qly ds :iesa xasns dk jksi.k djus] Qsjkseksu vkèkkfjr O;Ld eksFk ¼iraxk½ dhfuxjkuh djus] lk;adky esa tSxjh ds lkFk eS=h ,oa detksf[ke okys dhVuk'kdksa dk mi;ksx djus rFkk izkÑfrd'k=qvksa dh igpku djus bR;kfn ds ijh{k.k fn[kk, x, vkSjmUgsa izf'k{k.k Hkh fn;k x;kA blds vykok] fdlkuksa ds fy,VekVj iz{ks= Ldwy rFkk fdlku xks"Bh Hkh vk;ksftr dh xbZ]ftlesa 60 ls Hkh vfèkd fdlkuksa us Hkkx fy;kA bl xkao esa ik,x, izeq[k uk'khtho iÙkh eksM+d rFkk Qy csèkd Fks] ftUgsavkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk mi;ksx dj lQyrkiwoZd fu;af=rfd;k x;kA blds QyLo:i] bu uk'khthoksa dk izdksi fdlkuksadh fofèk dh rqyuk esa ekewyh de ik;k x;kA

vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds izksUu;u ds fy, vusd dk;ZØepyk, x,] tSls vaxhÑr [ksrksa dk fu;fer nkSjk djuk] fdlkuksals ckr djuk] fdlkuksa ds fy, fdlku xks"Bh] fdlku ikB'kkyk

uhy xk; ls laj{k.k / Protection from rose (Neel Gai)

ikniksa dh LVSfdax

Staking of plants

Qsjkseksu ;kSutky ¼VªSi½ ,oa xsank

Pheromone traps and marigold

NCIPM


Kisan Ghosthi, display of visual-aids and publicitythrough print and electronic media.

Bitter Gourd

A preliminary trial on validation of IPMtechnology was initiated in bitter gourd in villagePadhana, Karnal District of Haryana. Base lineinformation was collected about the village and socio-economic status of farmers indicated bitter gourd as amajor crop grown in village apart from tomato andrice. Crop information revealed pumpkin beetle, fruitfly, Alternaria cucumarina and Pythium fruit rot asthe major pests and total unawreness about IPM/biocontrol practices among the farmers. Interacationwith the farmers revealed that on an average a bittergourd grower spent about ` 45000 - 50000 per ha onchemical pesticides in a season.

Chilli

An IPM trial was undertaken for chilli crop in theUpper Krishna Project area at Sunkeshwarhal, inDeodurga district of Raichur during July, 2013 toFebruary, 2014.

Pest scenario

In Byadagi, peak activity of thrips was noticedduring August with a mean peak population of 1.71thrips per leaf in IPM plot while non-IPM plotsrecorded a peak of 2.52 thrips per leaf. Highest mitepopulation i.e. 1.0 per leaf was noticed in IPM-plotduring September while in non-IPM plot, it was 1.33mites per leaf. There was negligible population of bothaphids and white fly throughout the season. The activityof fruit borer, H. armigera was noticed during Octoberwith 0.82 and 1.68 larvae per plant in IPM and nonIPM plots, respectively. In both IPM and non IPMplots, damage due to defoliators was negligible. On theother hand, predatory population viz. coccinellids andChrysoperla was higher in IPM plots compared to non-IPM. In general, leaf spot (Alternaria/Cercospora)severity was slightly higher in non-IPM plotsthroughout the season. Powdery mildew appeared inthe third week of October with incidence reaching upto36% and 37.4% in IPM and non-IPM plots, respectively.Anthracnose incidence began during second week of

vk;ksftr djuk] foToy ¼n';½ izpkj rFkk bySDVªkWfud ehfM;kds ekè;e ls izpkj djukA

djsykdjsys ds lacaèk esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds oSèkhdj.k ds

fy, gfj;k.kk ds djuky ftys esa ikèkuk xkao esa ,d izkjafHkdijh{k.k vk;ksftr fd;k x;kA bl xkao ds ckjs esa vkèkkj js[kklwpuk ,d= dh xbZ ftlls fdlkuksa dh lkekftd&vkfFkZdfLFkfr dk irk pyk fd xkao esa VekVj vkSj pkoy ds vykokizeq[k :i ls djsys dh [ksrh dh tkrh gSA Qly lacaèkh lwpukls ;g irk pyk fd xkao dh Qlyksa esa lhrkQy eax] QyeD[kh] vYVjusfj;k dqdqesfjuk rFkk fifFk;e izeq[k uk'khthoik, tkrs gSaA fdlkuksa dks vkbZih,e@tSfod fu;a=.k fofèk;ksads ckjs esa dqN Hkh tkudkjh ugha FkhA fdlkuksa ls ckrphr dsnkSjku ;g Kkr gqvk fd fdlku djsys esa jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksadk fNM+dko djrs gSa vkSj ,d ekSle esa fdlku vkSlru` 45]000&50]000 izfr gs- ds ewY; ij djsyk csprs gSaA

fepZfepZ dh Qly ds fy, tqykbZ 2013 ls Qjojh 2014 ds

nkSjku jk;pwj ds nsonqxkZ ftys esa lqads'kokjgy ds Åijh Ñ".kkifj;kstuk bykds esa vkbZih,e ij ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA

uk'khtho ifjn';c;knkxh esa vkbZih,e viukus oyks [ksrksa esa vxLr ekg ds

nkSjku dk"BdhV dh vfèkdre xfrfofèk ikbZ xbZ] ftldhvkSlr lef"V izfr iÙkh 1-71 dk"BdhV Fkh] tcfd vkbZih,eugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa dk"BdhV dh lef"V 2-52 izfr iÙkhikbZ xbZA flrEcj ekg ds nkSjku vkbZih,e viukus okys [ksrksaesa c#Fkh dh lokZfèkd lef"V izfriÙkh 1-0 ikbZ xbZ] tcfdvkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa c#Fkh dh lef"V 1-33 izfriÙkh FkhA iwjs ekSle ds nkSjku ekgw rFkk lQsn eD[kh dh lef"Vfcydqy ugh ds cjkcj FkhA vDVwcj ekg ds nkSjku vkbZih,eviukus okys rFkk vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa QyHksnd] ,p- vkfeZtsjk dh lef"V Øe'k% 0-82 vkSj 1-68 lwaMhizfr ikni ikbZ xbZA vkbZih,e rFkk xSj&vkbZih,e nksuksa [ksrksaesa fu"i=d ¼fMQksfy;sVj½ ds dkj.k uqdlku ux.; FkkA nwljhvksj] vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,eviukus okys [ksrksa esa ijHk{kh] vFkkZr dksfDlusfyM ,oa ØkblksiykZdh lef"V vfèkd ikbZ xbZA lkekU; :i esa] vkbZih,e okys[ksrksa esa iwjs ekSle ds nkSjku iÙkh èkCck ¼vYVjusfj;k@ldksZLiksjk ½dh rhozrk vfèkd ikbZ xbZA vDVwcj ds rhljs lIrkg esa pwf.kZyQQwan ikbZ xbZ tks vkbZih,e ,oa xSj&vkbZih,e [ksrksa esa Øe'k%



October and reached its peak in last week of December.Incidence of Fusarium wilt was low (upto 18.3%).

Yield and Economics

Numbers of interventions were 13 in IPM plots asagainst 19 in non-IPM plots of cv. Byadagi while incv. US 341, it was 14 and 18, respectively in IPM andnon IPM plots. IPM plots of cv. Byadagi recorded anaverage yield of 27.50q/ha with a net profit of` 1,51,415/- as against ` 1,25,100/- in non-IPM plotswith 24.25 q/ha of dry chilli and net gain of 26,315/-in IPM plot. Almost similar trend was recorded withUS 341.

Pointed gourd

Haringhata, West Bengal

IPM validation was carried out in village UttarRajapur, Haringhata, district Nadia, West Bengal inplots of 14 farmers.

Treatments included Trichoderma virideapplication @ 7.5 kg/ha + FYM @ 375 kg/ha atplanting and at three weeks after emergence of plantfollowed by application of carbofuran 3G @ 0.3 g a.i./plant at 6 weeks after emergence.

It was observed that treated plots had lower (2.9)root-knot index (RKI) and root-knot nematode (119.3)population (J2) in soil over untreated control (4.9; 529.6per 200 cc soil). The treated plots had higher fruit yieldof pointed gourd by 53% over untreated control. Thefinal nematode population was also lower to the extentof 77.5% over control. Thus, the treated plots hadhigher yield of 53% compared to untreated ones.

Brinjal and tomato

Jorhat, Assam

Integrated management module was demonstratedin plots infested with plant parasitic nematodes(Meloidogyne incognita) in Danichapori, Golaghatdistrict, Alengmora and Boloma Moran Gaon, Teok,in Jorhat district of Assam in farmers' participatorymode in 1 ha in brinjal and tomato crops. Nursery bedtreatment with carbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m2 + root diptreatment with carbosulfan @ 500 ppm for 1 hr,

36% vkSj 37-4% FkhA vDVwcj ds nwljs lIrkg ds nkSjku,aFkzsDukst ds izdksi dk izkjaHk gqvk vkSj fnlEcj ds vafrelIrkg esa ;g vius pje ij igq¡p pqdk FkkA ¶;qlsfj;e eqj>kudk izdksi de ¼18-3%½ ik;k x;k A

mit ,oa vkfFkZd igyqc;knkxh fdLe ds xSj&vkbZih,e [ksrksa esa 19 dh rqyuk esa

vkbZih,e okys [ksrksa esa 13 gLr{ksi gq,] tcfd ;w,l 341 fdLeesa vkbZih,e rFkk xSj vkbZih,e ij Øe'k% 14 vkSj 18 ijh{k.k fd,x,A c;knkxh esa vkbZih,e viukus okys [ksrksa esa vkSlr mit27-50 fDoa- izfr gs- Fkh vkSj 'kq) ykHk ` 1]51]415@& Fkk] tcfdvkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa lw[kh fepZ dh mit24-25 fDoa- izfr gs- Fkh vkSj 'kq) ykHk 26]315@& FkkA ;w,l 341esa Hkh blh izdkj dh fLFkfr ntZ dh xbZA

ijoy

gfj.k?kkVk] if'pe caxkyif'pe caxky ds ufn;k ftys esa gfju?kkVk ds varxZr

mÙkj jktkiqj xkao esa 14 fdlkuksa ds IykVksa esa vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxdh dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA

jksi.k rFkk ikni vadqj.k ds nkSjku rFkk 3 lIrkgksa ds cknVªkbdksMekZ fofjMs 7-5 fdxzk- izfr gs- $ xkscj [kkn 375 fdxzk-izfr gs- dk vuqiz;ksx rFkk ikni vadqj.k ds 6 lIrkgksa ds ckndkcksZQqjku 3 th 0-3 xzk- izfr ikni dk vuqiz;ksx tSls dk;Zfd, x,A

ijh{k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd vuqipkfjr daVªksy ¼4-9 xk¡Blwpdkad 529-6 izfr 200 lhlh enk½ dh rqyuk esa enk dsmipkj fd, x, IykVksa esa tM+&xk¡B lwpdkad ¼vkjdsvkbZ½ rFkktM+&xk¡B lw=Ñfe lef"V ¼ts2½ de Fkh] vFkkZr Øe'k% 2-9 vkSj119-3 daVªksy dh rqyuk esa vafre ¼Qkbuy½ lw=Ñfe lef"V Hkhde ¼77-5%½ FkhA vr% vuqipkfjr IykVksa dh rqyuk esa mipkjfd, x, IykVksa esa 53% mit vfèkd izkIr dh xbZA

cSaxu vkSj VekVj

tksjgkV] vlecSaxu vkSj VekVj dh Qlyksa ds lacaèk esa vle ds tksjgkV

ftys esa nkfupkiqjh] xksyk?kkV] vysaxeksjk rFkk cksyksek eksjkuxkao] fV;ksd esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa 1 gs- esa ikniijkthoh lw=Ñfe ¼esykMksxk;uh budkWxfuVk ½ ls xzflr IykVksaesa lesfdr izcaèku ekWM~;wy dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA ijh{k.k esadkcksZ¶;wjku 0-3 xzk- lØh; rRo izfr oxZ eh- esa ikS/k'kkyk cSMmipkj $ 1 ?kaVs rd dkcksZlYQku 500 ihih,e ds lkFk tM+Mqck;s j[kuk] izfrjksi.k ls igys [ksr esa dkcksZ¶;wjku@ 0-3 xzk-

NCIPM


seedling raised in solarised nursery beds treated withcarbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m2 + neem cake @ 500 kg/haon the field before transplanting and untreated controlwere maintained. It was observed that application ofcarbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i. /m2 + neem cake @ 500 kg/hain the field before transplanting brinjal seedlings waseffective in reducing nematode population. Tomatoseedlings raised in solarised nursery bed treated withcarbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m2 + neem cake @ 500 kg/hain the field before transplanting had less infestation ofnematode.

IPM in protected cultivation

Trials on IPM modules for greenhouse capsicum,cucumber and tomato were conducted at ResearchStation and KVK, Lohaghat, Champawat, Uttarakhandduring April to December, 2013 with a view to developIPM technology for these crops grown under protectedcultivation.

Capsicum

IPM interventions on greenhouse cucumbercomprised of raising healthy nursery by applying seedtreatment with carbendazim @ 1 g a.i./kg at time ofsowing. Soil solarization and fumigation of polyhousebed with formalin (@ 5 l/m2) drenching and usingfortified FYM (mix bioagents such as Trichodermaharzianum culture (2 x 109 cfu/g) @ 1 kg/500 kg ofFYM and/or P. fluorescens (2 x 1012 cfu/ml) 1 l/500 kgFYM. Application of carbofuran 3G @ 6 g/sq m andcopper oxychloride @ 1g/l just after transplanting forpreventing root-knot nematode, cut worms and soilborne diseases. One or two sprays of horticultural oilwere included for controlling sucking pests (aphids/whiteflies), which were regularly monitored throughyellow sticky traps.

Need-based application of imidacloprid 17.8 SL @0.01% was done at 15-day intervals just 30 days aftertransplanting. The adoption of IPM module resultedin reducing the number of chemical sprays to 4-5 from10-12 in non-IPM plots. IPM module reduced theincidence of pests resulting in higher capsicum fruityield (31 q/1000 sq m) as compared to non-IPMpractices (22.3 q/1000 sq m) (Table 3).

lØh; rRo izfr oxZ eh- ds lkFk mipkfjr ikS/k'kkyk D;kfj;ksaesa ikSèk yxkuk $ uhe [kyh 500 fdxzk- izfr gs- dk iz;ksx ikS/k izfrjksi.k ls igys fd, x, rFkk vuqipkfjr daVªksy Hkh j[kkx;kA ijh{k.k ds ifj.kkeksa esa ;g ik;k x;k fd lw=Ñfe lef"Vdks de djus esa cSaxu ds ikSèkksa ds izfrjksi.k ls igys [ksr esadkcksZ¶;wjku 0-3 xzk- izfr oxZ eh- $ uhe dsd 500 fdxzk- izfrgs- dk vuqiz;ksx dkQh izHkkodkjh ik;k x;kA [ksr esa izfrjksi.kls igys dkcksZ¶;wjku 0-3 xzk- izfr oxZ eh- $ uhe dsd 500fdxzk- izfr gs- ds lkFk mipkj fd, x, lkSjhÑr ikS/k'kkyk esaVekVj ds ikSèks mxkus ls lw=Ñfe dk laØe.k de ik;k x;kA

lajf{kr Ñf"k esa vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyvizSy ls fnlEcj] 2013 ds nkSjku mÙkjk[kaM ds vuqlaèkku

dsUnz rFkk yksgk?kkV vkSj pEikor Ñf"k foKku dsUnzksa esa f'keykfepZ] [khjk vkSj VekVj dh Qlyksa ds fy, gfjrxg ¼xzhu gkml½fLFkfr;ksa ds varxZr vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh fodflr djus dsmís'; ls fofHkUu ekWM~;wyksa ij ijh{k.k vk;ksftr fd, x,A

f'keyk fepZf'keyk fepZ ij ijh{k.k ds fy, vkbZih,e }kjk viukbZ

xbZ dk;Zuhfr;ksa esa cqokbZ ds le; dkcsZuMsfte 1 xzke izfrfdxzk- ls cht mipkj dj LoLFk ikS/k'kkyk rS;kj djuk]QkesZfyu@5 yh izfr oxZ eh- MªSfpax ds lkFk ikWyhgkml dk?kweu ¼¶;wehxs'ku½ vkSj enk lkS;Zdj.k rFkk xkscj [kkn@1fdxzk- ds lkFk VªkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue laoèkZ (2 x 109cfu/g) tSlstSodkjdksa ds izcyhÑr xkscj [kkn vFkok ih- Qyksjkslsal (2

x 1012cfu/ml)@1 ,e,y izfr 500 fdxzk- xkscj [kkn feJ.kdk iz;ksx tSls dk;Z fd, x,A tM+&foxyu lw=Ñfe@dVokeZrFkk enk tfur jksxksa dks jksdus ds fy, izfrjksi.k ds ckn 'kh?kzdkcksZ¶;wjku 3th 6 xzk- izfr oxZ eh- vkSj dkWij vkWDlhDyksjkbM1 xzk- izfr yh- ds lkFk D;kjh esa iz;ksx fd;k x;kA pwlduk'khthoksa ¼ekgw@lQsn efD[k;ksa½ dks fu;af=r djus ds fy,ckxokuh rsy ds ,d ;k nks fNM+dko fd, x,] ftudh ihysfpifpisa Qkanks ¼VªSiksa½ ls fu;fer :i ls fuxjkuh dh xbZA

izfrjksi.k ds 30 fnuksa ds ckn 15 fnuksa ds varjkyksa ijbfeMkDyksfizM 17-8 ,l,y 0.01% dk ;Fkk vko';drk iz;ksxfd;k x;kA vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa esa vkbZih,eekWM~;wy ds vaxhdj.k ls jklk;fud dhVuk'kdksa ds 10&12fNM+dkoksa ds eqdkcys 4&5 fNM+dko rd deh ykbZ xbZAvkbZih,e ekWM~;wy ls uk'khtho ds izdksi esa Hkh deh vkbZftlds QyLo:i vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys [ksrksa ¼22-3 fDoa-izfr 1000 oxZ eh-½ dh rqyuk esa mPp f'keyk fepZ mit ¼31fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh-½ izkIr dh xbZ ¼rkfydk 3½A



Cucumber

The IPM interventions for cucumber crop ingreenhouse cultivation was same as for capsicum. IPMmodule reduced the incidence of pests, which resultedinto higher cucumber fruit yield (27.6 q/1000 sq m) ascompared to non-IPM practices (19.0 q/1000 sq m)(Table 4).

rkfydk 4% gfjrx`g esa vkbZih,e rFkk xSj vkbZih,e IykVksa esa uk’khtho dh fLFkfr vkSj mit

Table 4: Pest status and fruit yield in IPM and non-IPM plots of cucumber in greenhouse

Rkfydk 3% gfjrx`g f'keyk fepZ ds vkbZih,e rFkk xSj&vkbZih,e IykVksa esa uk'khtho dh fLFkfr ,oa mit

Table 3: Pest status and fruit yield in IPM and non-IPM plots of capsicum in greenhouse

pj vkbZih,e xSj&vkbZih,eVariable IPM Non-IPM

ekgq ¼la- izfr ikni½ / Aphids (no./plant) 3.5 17.26

lQsn eD[kh ¼la- izfr ikni½ / Whiteflies (no./plant) 3.1 13.86

pwf.kZy QQwan (%) / Powdery mildew (%) 26.2 63.3

Ekkst+sd ok;jl dkEIysDl (%) / Mosaic virus complex (%) 13.5 34.5

mit ¼fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh-½ / Yield (q/1000 sq m) 31 22.3

[khjk[khjs dh Qly ds fy, viukbZ xbZ vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ka

mlh izdkj Fkha tSls f'keyk fepZ esa viukbZ xbZ FkhaA [khjk esavkbZih,e ekWM~;wy viuk, tkus ls uk'khthoksa ds izdksi esa dehvkbZ] ftlds dkj.k xSj vkbZih,e fofèk;ksa ¼19-0 fDoa- izfr1000 oxZ eh-½ dh rqyuk esa mPp [khjk mit ¼27-6 fDoa- izfr1000 oxZ eh-½ izkIr dh xbZ ¼rkfydk 4½A

VekVjVekVj [khjs dh Qly ds

fy, viukbZ xbZ vkbZih,edk;Zuhfr;ka mlh izdkj Fkha tSlsf'keyk fepZ esa viukbZ xbZ FkhaAVekVj esa vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyviuk, tkus ls uk'khthoksa dsizdksi esa deh vkbZ] ftldsdkj.k xSj vkbZih,e fofèk;ksa¼122-3 fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh½dh rqyuk esa mPp VekVj mit¼150 fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh-½izkIr dh xbZ ¼rkfydk 5½A

Tomato

The IPM module fortomato crop ingreenhouse cultivationwas same as for capsicum.IPM module reduced theincidence of pests, whichresulted into higher tomatofruit yield (150 q/1000 sqm) as compared to non-IPM practices (122.3 q/1000 sq m) (Table 5).


ekgw ¼la- izfr ikni½ Aphids (no./plant) 3.8 10.4

pwf.kZy QQwan (% O;kidrk) / Powdery mildew (% incidence) 24.2 54.7

Ekkst+sd ok;jl dkEIysDl (% O;kidrk) / Mosaic virus complex (% incidence) 10.7 24.8

mit ¼fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh-½ / Yield (q/1000 sq m) 27.6 19.0

yksgk?kkV esa gfjr x`g VekVj esa vkbZih,e

IPM in Greenhouse tomato in Lohaghat

NCIPM


Effect of bio-agents on the penetration of roots byroot-knot nematodes

An experiment involving fungal and bacterialbioagents, Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonasfluorescens, was conducted in a greenhouse at IARI,

New Delhi during the training of CVRaman Fellow to investigate the potentialof Trichoderma harzianum andPseudomonas fluorescens to prevent rootpenetration by root-knot nematodejuveniles in the nursery. Plastic tray cellswere filled with media comprisingcocopeat, vermiculite and perlite in theratio of 3:1:1. Each completely filled cellwas sown with one tomato seed (cv.Rohini) and judiciously watered.

The thrice replicated treatments in theexperiment were Trichoderma harzianum,Pseudomonas fluorescens and a control. Fiveweeks later, the bio-agent treated seedlingswere inoculated with five freshly hatchedroot-knot nematode juveniles each.Nutrient application in the form of NPK19:19:19 (procured from NationalChemical Fertilizer Ltd, India) was donein solution form @ 25 ml/l water to

treatments twice

Tomato plants treated with Trichodermaharzianum performed better in terms of height, weight,dryweight and suppression of root-knot nematodepenetration.

rkfydk 5% gfjrx`g VekVj ds vkbZih,e rFkk xSj vkbZih,e IykVksa esa uk'khtho dh fLFkfr vkSj mit

Table 5: Pest status and fruit yield in IPM and non-IPM plots of tomato in greenhouse

tM+&xk¡B lw=kÑfe uk'khtho iQly dh tM+ksa esaizdksi ij tSodkjdksa dk izHkko

ulZjh esa tM+&foxyu fd'kksj lw=Ñfe;ksa ds Qly dhtM+ksa esa izdksi dks jksdus ds fy, VªkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue vkSjL;wMkseksul Qyksjkslsal dh laHkkoukdh [kkst djus gsrq lhoh jeu QSyksi z f'k{k.k dk; ZØe ds nk SjkuvkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh ds ,dgfjr xg esa ,d ijh{k.k fd;k x;kAIykfLVd VªS ds izdks"Bksa dks dksdksihV]oehZD;wykbV rFkk ijykbZV ehfM;kds lkFk 3%1%1 ds vuqikr esa Hkjkx;kA Hkjs gq, izR;sd izdks"B esa VekVj¼jksg.kh fdLe½ dk ,d&,d nkukcks;k x;k ftlesa mfpr ek=k lsflapk x;kA

ijh{k.k esa fd, x, mipkjksa esaVªkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue] L;wMkseksulQyksjkslsal rFkk ,d daUVªksy 'kkfeyFkkA ikap g¶rkas ds ckn tSodkjdksals mipkfjr ikSèkksa dks ikap izR;sduotkr tM+&xk¡B lw=Ñfe;ksa ds lkFklajksfir fd;k x;kA 25 yh- ikuh esaukbVªkstu] QkLQksjl rFkk iksVk'k moZjd 19%19%19 ¼jk"Vªh;jklk;fud moZjd fy-] Hkkjr ls [kjhns x,½ ds vuqikr esa ,d?kksy rS;kj fd;k x;k] ftldk nks ckj iz;ksx fd;k x;kA

VªkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue ls mipkfjr VekVj ds ikS/ks of)]Hkkj] 'kq"dHkkj ds fglkc ls vPNs ik;s x;s ,oa muesa tM+&xkaBlw=dfe dk izdksi Hkh de ik;k x;kA

lhoh jeu QSyks] MkW- fdaXtys vkslh ijh{k.k dsfy, VekVj cht ds mipkj gsrq IykfLVd VªS ds

izdks"Bksa dks Hkjrs gq,

CV Raman Fellow Dr Kingsley Osei fillingcells of plastic tray to nurse tomato for

the experiment


lQsn eD[kh ¼la- izfr ikni½ @Whiteflies (no./plant) 3.8 14.4

pwf.kZy QQwan (% O;kidrk) @Powdery mildew (% incidence) 14.2 33.4

iNsrh vaxekjh (% O;kidrk) @Late blight (% incidence) 5.3 16.3

mit ¼fDoa- izfr 1000 oxZ eh-½ @Yield (q/1000 sq m) 150 122.3



Fruit Crops

Mango

Validation of mango IPM technology was carriedout in two locations viz. Valsad and Navgaon districtsof Gujarat.

Management of major pests of mango

IPM interventions comprising cultural practices,mechanical methods, application of microbial and ETL-based application of safer pesticides were validated onKesar and Alphonso varieties of mango at farmers'orchards.

Seasonal abundance of pests

Population of hopper fluctuated throughout theyear wherein highest population (29.7 hoppers/panicle)was observed from 8th to 9th standard meteorologicalweeks. Hopper population had significant positivecorrelation with maximum temperature (‘r’=0.4), sunshine hours (‘r’=0.4364) and significant negativerelationship with minimum temperature (‘r’=-0.3964),average relative humidity (r=-0.5). Thrips populationhad significant positive correlation with maximumtemperature (‘r’=0.5) and sun shine (‘r’ =0.5) andsignificant negative correlation with average relativehumidity (r=-0.5) and rainfall (‘r’=-0.3). Fruit flydamage to the mango crop is observed mainly duringMay - July, more predominant in late maturing varietiescoinciding with early rains or high humidity. Leaf gallmidge (Protocontarinia matteiana) was recordedthroughout the year. Blossom midges, Erosomiya indicawas observed from November to May. Spiders,coccinellids and green lace wing bug (Chrysoperla sp.)were recorded predating upon mango hopper.

Amongst the major diseases, incidence of powderymildew was observed during January-March.Anthracnose development on leaves and inflorescencerachis and fruits was observed during Jan- April.Highest occurrence of powdery mildew (19% on flowerpanicles) was observed in 8th standard week, anthracnosepeaked (29%) on flower panicles during 12th standardweek while, it was 36.5% on stone sized fruits during14th standard week.

iQy okyh iQlysa

vkevke esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk ijh{k.k xqtjkr ds nks

LFkkuksa] vFkkZr oylkM vkSj uoxkao esa fd;k x;kA

vke ds izeq[k uk'khthoksa dk izcaèkufdlkuksa ds vke ds cxhpksa esa vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk

dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;k] tgk¡ dslj ,oa vYQkalksa vke fdLeksaij ikjaifjd fofèk;ka] ;kaf=d@e'khuh fofèk;ka] thok.kqt ,oalqjf{kr dhVuk'kdksa dk bZVh,y vkèkkfjr vuqiz;ksx dk oSèkhdj.kfd;k x;kA

uk'khthoksa dh ekSle vkèkkfjr O;kidrkiwjs o"kZ ds nkSjku vHkZd ¼gksij½ dh lef"V esa mrkj&p<+ko

ns[kk x;k vkSj 8 ls 9 ekSle foKku ekud lIrkgksa ds nkSjkuvHkZdksa dh vfèkdre lef"V ¼29-7 vHkZd izfr vke&xqPN½ ikbZxbZA vHkZd dh lef"V dk vfèkdre rkieku ('r' = 0.4) rFkkèkwi ('r' = 0.4364) ds lkFk ldkjkRed vkSj U;wure rkieku ('r'= - 0-3964) ,oa vkSlr vkisf{kr vknzZrk (r = - 0 .5) ds lkFkudkjkRed lglacaèk ns[kk x;kA dk"BdhV dh lef"V dkvfèkdre rkieku ('r' = 0.5) rFkk èkwi ('r' = - 0.5) ,oa o"kkZ ('r'= - 0.3) ds lkFk udkjkRed lg&lacaèk ns[kk x;kA ebZ lstqykbZ ds eghuksa ds nkSjku vke dh Qly ij Qy eD[kh dhgkfu ns[kh xbZA ;g ,d la;ksx gh gks ldrk gS fd le; lsigys ckfj'k ;k mPp vknzZrk ds dkj.k iNsrh ifjiDou okyhfdLeksa esa Qy eD[kh dk izdksi vius pje ij gksrk gSA iwjs o"kZiÙkh xky fet ¼izksVksdkWuVsfjfu;k eSfV;kuk½ dk jksx ntZ fd;kx;kA uoEcj ls ebZ ekg rd CykWlkWe fet] bjkslksfe;k bafMdkdh ekStwnxh ns[kh xbZA ijHkf{k;ksa esa] edM+h] dkWfDlusfyM] xzhuysl foax cx ¼ØkblksiykZ iztkfr½ ik, x, tks vke vHkZdksa dkHk{k.k djrs FksA

izeq[k jksxksa esa] tuojh ekg ds nkSjku pwf.kZy QQwan ikbZ xbZtks ekpZ ekg rd tkjh jghA tuojh&vizSy ekg ds nkSjkuifÙk;ksa ,oa buQyksjkslsal jSfpl rFkk Qyksa ij ,saFkzsdukst+ dkteko ik;k x;kA vkBosa ekud lIrkg esa pwf.kZy QQwan ¼19%

iq"i xqPNksa ij½ dk mPpre izdksi ik;k x;k] 12osa ekudlIrkg esa iq"i xqPNksa ij ,saFkzsDukst+ viuh ijkdk"B ¼29%½ ijFkk] tcfd NksVs Qyksa ¼LVksu lkbt½ ij ,saFkzsDukst+ dk izHkko14osa ekud lIrkg esa viuh vafre ifjdk"Bk ¼36-5%½ ijFkkA

NCIPM


Pest scenario and economics of IPM

Number of hoppers, thrips and intensity ofpowdery mildew, anthracnose was low in IPMorchards as compared to the non-IPM orchards in boththe varieties. Adoption of IPM module also resulted inless number of applications of pesticides i.e. six each inKesar and Alphonso varieties as compared to farmers’practice of 11-12 sprays of highly toxic pesticides, thusreducing the cost of plant protection and bettermanagement of the pests. Mango fruit yield in Kesarand Alphonso cultivars was higher in IPM orchards (9200and 13680 kg/ha) than farmers' practices (6641 and 8610kg/ha), respectively (Table 6).

uk'khtho ifjn`'; rFkk vkbZih,e dk vkfFkZdfo'ys"k.k

vkbZih,e ugha viukus okys cxhpksa dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,eviukus okys cxhpksa esa] nksuksa fdLeksa vFkkZr dslj ,oa vYQkalksaesa vHkZdksa ¼gksij½ dh la[;k] pwf.kZy QQwan rFkk ,saFkzsDukst+ dhrhozrk de ikbZ xbZA vkbZih,e ekWM~;wy ds dk;kZUo;u ls dsljvkSj vYQkalksa vke Qyksa esa fdlkuksa dh fofèk ds 11&12 mPpfo"kkDr dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e okyscxhpksa esa dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx ¼6 ckj½ esa deh ns[kh xbZAblds ifj.kkeLo:i ikni laj{k.k dh ykxr esa deh vkbZ rFkkuk'khthoksa dk izcaèku Hkh csgrj <ax ls gks ik;kA dslj vkSjvYQkalks fdLeksa esa vke dh mit] fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼Øe'k%6641 vkSj 8610 fdxzk- izfr gs-½ dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e viukusokys cxhpksa esa ¼Øe'k% 9200 vkSj 13680 fdxzk- izfr gs-½ vfèkdikbZ xbZ ¼rkfydk 6½A

fo'ys"k.k esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudyk fd fdlkuksa dh fofèk dsvuqlkj dslj fdLe ¼6-5%1½ dh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfrviuk, tkus esa vYQkalks fdLe ¼11-3%1½ vkfFkZd :i ls T;knkykHkdkjh gSA vke dk mRiknu djus okys fdlkuksa dh vkbZih,eds ?kVdksa ds ckjs esa tkx:drk ,oa tkudkjh c<+kbZ xbZA

It was concluded that adoption of IPMinterventions in Alphonso cultivar were moreeconomical (11.3:1) as compared to that of Kesar cutivar(6.5:1). The awareness and knowledge towardsIPM components had been enhanced among mangogrowers.

rkfydk 6% o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku dslj vkSj vYQkalks vke fdLeksa esa uk'khtho ifjn`'; rFkk vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dkvkfFkZd fo'ys"k.k

Table 6: Pest scenario and economics of IPM in Kesar and Alphonso varieties of mango during 2013-14

izkpy dslj* vYQkalks**Parameter vkbZih,e ,Qih vkbZih,e ,Qih

IPM FP IPM FP

gksij izfr Vguh ;k iq"ixqPN@Hoppers/twig or panicle 3.37 6.85 3.35 6.82

dk"BdhV izfr Vguh ;k iq"ixqPN@Thrips/twig or panicle 5.87 11.02 3.20 6.15

Qy eD[kh ¼% Qy gkfu½@Fruit Fly (% fruit damage) 3.80 8.62 4.00 6.80

pwf.kZy QQwan ¼% gkfu rhozrk½@Powdery mildew (% disease intensity) 4.40 7.85 4.60 6.70

,saFkzsDukst+ ¼% gkfu rhozrk½@Anthracnose (% disease intensity) 8.27 14.32 6.57 12.30

[ksrh dh dqy ykxr ` izfr gs- ¼leLr buiqV½@No. of sprays of pesticide 6 11 6 12

dqy vk; ¼` izfr gsDVs½*@Total cost of cultivation /ha (all inputs) 25004 36108 33404 48068

vkSlr mit ¼fdxzk- izfr gs-½@Gross Income (`/ha)* 1,61,630 1,16,217 3,76,200 2,36,775

Qy mit ¼Qy la[;k izfr isM+½@Mean Yield (kg/ ha) 9236 6641 13680 8610

dhVuk'kd fNM+dko dh la[;k@Fruit bearing (No. of fruits/ tree) 370.25 265.65 547.20 344.40

ykHk % ykxr vuqikr@Benefit Cost ratio 6.5 3.2 11.3 4.9

cktkj ewY;% dslj% ` 350@20 fdxzk( vYQkalks% ` 550 izfr 20 fdxzk-Market price: Kesar: ` 350/20 kg; Alphonso: 550/20 kg



Mandarin orchards

A network project for integrated management ofpests of mandarin in three different agro-climaticregions of India is being implemented in collaborationwith PAU, Ludhiana; SKRAU, Bikaner; AssamAgricultural University, Assam; NRC Citrus, Nagpurand NCAP, New Delhi.

PAU, Ludhiana (Punjab)

Panjkosi village in Abohar (Punjab) was adoptedfor the purpose. Major pests identified werePhytophthora and sucking pests affecting the kinnowtrees.

Five farmers were adopted with 0.4 ha each in thisvillage, where IPM components are being validated.Major components of IPM technology for Phytophthorawas popularizing basin method of irrigation andapplication of Trichoderma harzianum followed bylinseed oil on affected twigs, soil drenching and foliarapplication of safer bio-pesticides/fungicides. Formanagement of citrus psyilla, need-based applicationof microbial and reduced risk pesticides and theirapplication on community basis were promoted.

Panjkosi village has 5500 population and amongthem, 150 farmers' families are mainly engaged inkinnow cultivation. Other crops in the area are cottonin summer and kharif seasons and wheat in the rabiseason; hence, there was intensive cropping. They hadno knowledge about the role of pollinators inenhancing crop productivity. On an average, farmerswere spending 43000-45000/ha on kinnow cultivation.Number of applications of pesticides were 15-20 fromFebruary to December. The farmers pasted the trunkwith blue copper and lime in the month of February.The technical knowhow of the farmers aboutpreparation of bordeaux mixture and its applicationwas very poor and using wrong proportions. Most ofthe pesticides as told by farmers werelambdacyhalothrin, cypermethrin, fenvalerate,triazophos, thiomethaxom, imidacloprid, (confidor),fosetyl AL 80 WP (Aliette), ergon kresoxim methyl443. Power operated and tractor driven spray machinewas used in application of pesticides. Spray tank wasnot provided with any type of agitator and hence

esuMfju (larjk oxhZ;) iQyih,;w] yqfèk;kuk( ,ldsvkj,;w] chdkusj( vle Ñf"k

fo'ofo|ky;] vle( ,uvkjlh flVªl] ukxiqj rFkk ,udSi]ubZ fnYyh ds lg;ksx esa Hkkjr ds rhu fHkUu Ñf"k tyok;q {ks=ksaesa larjk oxhZ; Qy ¼esuMfju½ uk'khthoksa ds lesfdr izcaèku dsfy, ,d usVodZ ifj;kstuk dk dk;kZUo;u fd;k tk jgk gSA

ih,;w] yqfèk;kuk (iatkc)ifj;kstuk ds lacaèk esa vcksgj ¼iatkc½ ds iatdks'kh xkao dks

vaxhÑr fd;k x;kA fdUuw ds isM+ksa dks uqdlku igqapkus okysfpfUgr izeq[k uk'khthoksa esa QkbVksIFkksjk rFkk pwld uk'khtho FksA

izR;sd xkao esa 0-4 gs- esa ikap fdlkuksa dks vaxhÑr fd;kx;k] tgka vkbZih,e ?kVdksa dk oSèkhdj.k fd;k tk jgk FkkAQkbVksIFkksjk dks fu;af=r djus ds fy, vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dsizeq[k ?kVdksa esa csflu flapkbZ ¼nzks.kh&flapkbZ½ fofèk dk izlkjrFkk VªkbdksMekZ gftZ,ue dk iz;ksx djuk vkSj mlds cknizHkkfor Vgfu;ksa ij vylh ds rsy dk fNM+dko djuk] enkdh iyokj ¼Mªsafpax½ cukuk rFkk lqjf{kr tSo&dhVuk'kdksa@QQwanuk'kdksa dk if.kZy iz;ksx djuk 'kkfey FkkA flVªl flykds izcaèku ds fy, vko';drkuqlkj thok.kqt vuqiz;ksx rFkkde tksf[ke okys dhVuk'kdksa dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k vkSjleqnk; vkèkkj ij muds mi;ksx dks c<+kok fn;k x;kA

vcksgj ¼iatkc½ ds iatdks'kh xkao dh tula[;k 5500 gS]ftlesa ls 150 fdlku ifjokj fdUuw dh [ksrh djrs gSaA bl {ks=esa [kjhQ esa dikl rFkk jch ekSle esa xsgwa dh [ksrh dh tkrhgSA vr% bl {ks= esa fujarj [ksrh dk;Z pyrk jgrk gSA fdlkuksadks Qly mRikndrk c<+kus esa ikWyhusVjksa dh Hkwfedk ds ckjs esaHkh dksbZ tkudkjh ugha FkhA vkSlru :i ls fdlku ` 43]000& 45]000 izfr gs- fdUuw dh [ksrh ij [kpZ dj jgs FksA fdlkuQjojh ls fnlEcj rd 15&20 dhVuk'kd fNM+dko djrs FksAfdlku Qjojh ekg esa isM+ ds èkM+ ¼Vªad½ ij uhys dkWij ,oa pwus¼ykbe½ dk ysi yxkrs FksA fdlkuksa dks cksMkZ feJ.k rS;kj djusesa rduhdh tkudkjh dkQh de Fkh vkSj os bldk mi;ksx Hkhlgh <ax ls ugha djrs FksA fdlkuksa }kjk crk, x, vfèkdrjdhVuk'kdksa esa ysEcMklk;gsyksfFkzu] lk;ijesfFkzu] QsuosyjsV]Vªk;ktksQkWl] fFk;ksfeFkksDt+e] bfeMkDyksfizM ¼dUQkbMj½]QksjVkby ,,y 80 MCY;wih ¼,yhVs½] vxksZu fØlksfdt+e feFkk;y443 'kkfey FksA dhVuk'kdksa dk vuqiz;ksx djus ds fy,fdlkukas }kjk ikoj vkèkkfjr rFkk VªSDVj pkfyr Lizs e'khuksa dkmi;ksx fd;k tkrk FkkA Lizs Vsad esa dksbZ iz{kksHkd ¼,ftVsVj½]vFkkZr VSad ds Hkhrj dhVuk'kd fgykus&<qykus okyk ;a= o

NCIPM


pesticides settled down and uniform application ofpesticides could not be made. Such type of sprayingcould be phytotoxic to plants.

AAU, Assam

Greening disease transmitted by citrus psyilla andother sucking insect and trunk borer were a major threatto khasi mandarin in Tinsukia region of Assam.

Crop pest surveillance and advisory forhorticultural crops (banana, pomegranate andmango)

Monitoring of pests of banana, pomegranate andmango in nine districts of state of Maharashtra wascarried out through field scouting and digitization ofpest damage on centralized server at NCIPM. Basedon the extent of damage and action threshold, short-term advisories were issued to targeted farmers throughSMS on mobile phones (Table 7). Major pests monitoredwere sigatoka and thrips in banana; bacterial leaf spot,wilt and thrips in pomegranate; hoppers, thrips,powdery mildew and anthracnose in mango.

O;oLFkk ugha Fkh ftlds dkj.k dhVuk'kd VSad ds Hkhrj uhpste tkrk Fkk ;k fLFkj jgrk Fkk vkSj blfy, dhVuk'kdksa dk,d tSlk vuqiz;ksx ugha fd;k tkrk FkkA bl izdkj dsfNM+dko ikniksa ds fy, fo"kSys gks ldrs gSaA

,,;w] vleflVªl flyk rFkk vU; pwld dhVksa ,oa ruk Hksndksa }kjk

mRiUu gfjr jksx ¼xzhfuax fMft+t+½ vle ds frulqfd;k {ks= esa[kklh esuMfju ds fy, izeq[k pqukSrh FkhA

ckxokuh iQlyksa (dsyk] vukj vkSj vke) dsfy, iQly uk'khtho fuxjkuh ,oa lykgdkjlsok,a

egkjk"Vª ds ukS ftyksa esa iz{ks= esa rSukr dfeZ;ksa }kjk dsyk]vukj rFkk vke dh fuxjkuh dh xbZ rFkk jklukizds esa dsUnzh;ÑrloZj ij uk'khtho gkfu dks vadksa esa n'kkZ;k x;k FkkA Qyksa dhgkfu jksdus rFkk mipkjkRed mik;ksa ds fy, yf{kr fdlkuksadks eksckby Qksu ij ,l,e,l ds ekè;e ls vRikofèk lykgdkjlsok,a nh tkrh Fkh ¼rkfydk 7½A bl {ks= esa dsys esa ik, tkusokys eq[; uk'khthoksa esa flxkVksdk ,oa dk"BdhV] vukj esathok.kqt iÙkh èkCck] eqj>ku rFkk dk"BdhV] vke esa vHkZd¼gksij½ dk"BdhB] pwf.kZy&QQwan vkSj ,saFkzsDukst+ FksA

rkfydk 7 % dsyk] vke vkSj vukj ds fy, vk¡dM+ksa dk izos'k ¼MkVk ,aVªh½ rFkk uk'khtho izcaèku ¼2013&14½

Table 7: Data entries and pest management advisories for banana, mango and pomegranate (2013-14)

Qly ftyk MkVk ,aVªh ¼la[;k½ ,l,;w }kjk uk'khtho lacaèkhCrop District Data entries (nos) tkjh dh xbZ lykgdkj

lsok,a ¼la[;k½

uk'khtho LdkmV uk'khtho eWkuhVlZ Pest Management advisories

Pest scout Pest monitor issued by SAUs (nos)

dsyk@Banana Jalgaon 518 64 452

vke@Mango Thane 619 608 4

Raigad 1390 267 25

Ratnagiri 6343 487 106

Sindhudurga 874 207 21

vukj@Pomegranate Nashik 2239 453 561

Ahmednagar 380 160 80

Solapur 966 145 401

Sangli 324 135 445

Total 13653 2526 2095



jk"Vªh; Ñf"k tyok;q izfrLdanh igy 'kfDr(,uvkbZlhvkj,) ds vèkhu tyok;q ifjorZu ls vkeuk'khthoksa dh lfØ;rkvksa ds fy, j.kuhfrd 'kksèk

o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku ns'k ds N% Ñf"k tyok;q {ks=ksa ds fy,vke uk'khthoksa ds izdksi rFkk vtSfod dkjdksa ij MkVk dksfMftVkbt dj fuxjkuh dh xbZA ns'k ds lHkh Ñf"k tyok;q{ks=ksa esa vke vHkZd dh lef"V rFkk dhVksa esa Qy eD[kh vkSjpwf.kZy QQwan ,oa ,saFkzsDukst+ dk izdksi ns[kk x;kA o"kZ 2013 dsMkVk ds vè;;u ls ;g irk pyk fd vkbZlh,vkj vkjlhbZvkjjkaph ¼80-75 izfr xqPN½ esa 16osa ,l,eMCY;w ¼ekSle foKkuekud lIrkg½ esa ¼bfM;ksLdksIl Dyk;fifyl] bZ- ukbfo;ksLisjllrFkk vefjVksMl vVfdulksuh ½ rFkk mlds ckn lhvkbZ,l,py[kuÅ ¼16-85 izfr xqPN½ esa 19osa ,l,eMCY;w esa] ,vkj,lisfj;k ¼9-55 izfr xqPN½ esa 46osa ,l,eMCY;w esa vHkZdksa dhlokZfèkd lef"V lokZf/kd ikbZ xbZ vkSj vU; rhu LFkkuksa esa 2-5 ,l,eMCY;w esa lcls de ¼1-69 & 1-95 izfr xqPN½ lef"VikbZ xbZA ,vkj,l isfj;k ¼30-3 izfr xqPN izfr VªSi½ esa dk"BdhVksa¼fLØVksfFkzIl MkslsZfyl vkSj ,l- esXuhQsjsbZ ,oa fjfQQksjksfFkzIlØw,uVªsVl½ dh lef"V lokZfèk Fkh vkSj rFkk vkbZlh,vkj]vkjlhbZvkj jkaph ¼33-25 izfr xqPN izfr Qkan½ vkSj vU; LFkkuksaij 1&10 ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku budh lcls de ¼1-30 & 10-3½ izfr xqPN lef"V ns[kh xbZA lhvkbZ,l,p] y[kuÅ esa yhQoscj ¼vksFkkZxk ,Dlfousfl;k ½ ds dkj.k 36osa ,l,eMCY;w esaizfr ikni tkyksa dh la[;k lokZfèkd ¼37-8½ Fkh] mlds cknvkbZlh,vkj] vkjlhbZvkj jkaph ¼30-4½ esa nwljs ,l,eMCY;w esarFkk ,vkj,l- isfj;k ¼13-6 izfr xqPN½ dk LFkku FkkAlhvkbZ,l,p] y[kuÅ vkSj vkjlhbZvkj jkaph esa fet¼izksdksuVsfjfu;k esVfj;suk½ dh gkfu ntZ dh xbZ gkykafd vU;LFkkuksa ij bldh gkfu de ntZ dh xbZA vkjlhbZvkj jkaph],vkj,l rFkk isfj;k esa dsoy ,saFkzsDukst+ vkSj pwf.kZy QQwan ghntZ fd, x,A

Strategic research for pest dynamics on mango inrelation to climate change under National Initiativeon Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)

Digitization of data on the incidence of pests ofmango and abiotic factors were monitored for six agro-climatic regions of India during 2013. Population ofmango hopper, fruit fly among insects and incidenceof powdery mildew, anthracnose were observedubiquitously in all the six agro-climatic regions of India.A perusal of the data during year 2013 revealed thathighest population of the hoppers (Idioscopus clypealis,I. niveosparsus and Amritodus atkinsoni) was recordedat ICAR RCER Ranchi (80.75/ panicle) in 16th SMWfollowed by CISH Lucknow, (16.85/panicle) in 19th

SMW, ARS Paria (9.55/panicle) in 46th SMW and verylow (1.69 -1.95 per panicle) at other three locationsoccurring in 2-5th SMWs. Population of thrips(Scirtothrips dorsalis and S. mangiferae andRhiphiphorothrips cruentatus) was very high at ARSParia (30.3/panicle/trap) and at ICAR, RCER Ranchi(33.25/ panicle/trap) and at other locations it remainedlow 1.30-10.3/panicle during 1-10 SMWs. At CISH,Lucknow, number of webs/tree due to leaf webber(Orthaga exvinacea) were maximum (37.8 ) during 36th

SMW followed by that in ICAR RCER Ranchi (30.4)during 2nd SMW and ARS Paria (13.6/panicle). Midge(Procontarinia matteriana) damage was recorded atCISH Lucknow and RCER Ranchi, whereas at otherlocation damage was very low. Anthracnose andpowdery mildew were recorded at RCER Ranchi,ARS, Paria only.

To those who are hungry, God is bread

– Mahatma Gandhi, 1946

NCIPM


tSo fu;a=k.kBiocontrol

Exploration of native Trichoderma spp. for the

management of soil borne diseases in North East

Region

Plant growth promotion and reduction in disease

incidence by Trichoderma spp.

The promising isolates of Trichoderma spp. werecharacterized for biopriming, plant growth promotingcharacteristics, reduction of disease incidence andcorresponding yield increase in cabbage, cauliflower,mustard and field pea. The seeds of cabbage,cauliflower, mustard and field pea were bioprimed withfreshly prepared biocontrol (Trichoderma) in the formof slurry @ 5-10 g/kg seed. Another important methodof delivery of Trichoderma is soil application/soiltreatment. The potential Trichoderma spp. (1 kg) wereinoculated in well-rotten FYM (100 kg) 21 days inadvance, allowed to grow, multiply in it and was applied(5 kg/m2, wet weight basis) in the field at the time ofsowing of cabbage, cauliflower, mustard and field pea.

The field emergence of four crops was recorded at30 days after sowing (DAS) and seedling vigour of allcrops was calculated (Fig. 1). The disease incidence(Rhizoctonia solani) induced collar rot in cabbage andcauliflower, Fusarium oxysporum f sp. pisi in pea andSclerotinia sclerotiorum stem rot in mustard) wasrecorded at 30, 45 and 60 DAS and final yield wasrecorded after harvest of each crop.

All isolates of Trichoderma significantly improvedthe field emergence and seedling vigour (Fig 1), reducedthe collar rot incidence and increased yield (Fig. 2) ofcabbage. However, highest seedling vigour (1848.9) andyield (25.8 q/ha), lowest collar rot incidence (3.2%) wasrecorded with isolate Th-22b. This isolate was followed

iwoksZÙkj {ks=k esa e`nk tfur jksxksa ds izcaèku ds fy,?kjsyw VªkbdksMekZ iztkfr dh [kkst

VªkbdksMekZ ds vuqiz;ksx ls ikni dh of¼ esa izksUu;urFkk jksx izdksi esa deh ykuk

ikni dh of) c<+kus esa lgk;rk nsus okys y{k.kksa] jksxizdksi esa deh ykus rFkk rnkuqlkj mit c<+kus ds fy;s can¼iÙkk½ xksHkh] Qwy xksHkh] ljlksa vkSj gjh eVj esa VªkbdksMekZdk ck;ksfizfeax y{k.ko.kZu fd;k x;kA can xksHkh] Qwy xksHkh]ljlksa rFkk gjh eVj ds chtksa dh rktk rS;kj fd, x, tSofu;a=.k ¼VªkbdksMekZ½ ds lkFk 5&10 xzke izfr fdxzk- dh njls cht Lyjh ds :i esa ck;ksfizfeax dh xbZA VªkbdksMekZvkiwfrZ dh vU; fofèk gS enk esa mldk iz;ksx djukA le)VªkbdksMekZ iztkfr ¼1 fdxzk-½ dks 21 fnu ,Mokal esa iw.kZ :ils lM+h ,QokbZ,e ¼xkscj [kkn½@100 fdxzk- ds lkFk lajksfirfd;k x;k vkSj mls c<+us rFkk cgqxq.ku ds fy, NksM+ fn;kx;k rFkk can xksHkh] Qwy xksHkh] ljlksa rFkk gjh eVj dhcqokbZ ds le; 5 fdxzk-@oxZ eh dh nj ls bldk iz;ksx fd;kx;kA

cqokbZ ds 30 fnuksa ¼Mh,,l½ ds ckn pkjksa Qlyksa ds [ksrksadh fLFkfr fjdkWMZ dh xbZ rFkk lHkh Qlyksa ds ikSèksa dh of)dk fo'ys"k.k fd;k x;k ¼fp= 1½A cqokbZ ds 30] 45 ;k 60fnuksa ds ckn can xksHkh rFkk Qwy xksHkh esa xzhok foxyu jksxizdksi ¼jk;tksDVksfu;k lksykuh½] eVj esa ¶;wlsfj;e vkWDlhiksje,Q- iztkfr ikblh rFkk ljlksa esa LDysjksfVfu;k LDysVksfl;ksjeruk foxyu jksx izdksi ntZ fd;k x;k vkSj izR;sd Qlydh dVkbZ ds i'pkr vafre mit Hkh ntZ dh xbZ¼fp= 2&3½ ftlls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd VªkbdksMekZ ds lHkhfo;qDrksa ls [ksrksa ds mitkÅiu rFkk ikSèkksa ds of) o fodklesa u dsoy dkQh lqèkkj gqvk cfYd can xksHkh ds xzhokfoxyu izdksi esa deh vkbZ rFkk mit esa of) Hkh gqbZArFkkfi] Vh,p&22ch fo;qDr esa mPp ikSèk o`f) ¼1848-9½]U;wure xzhok foxyu izdksi ¼3-2%½ rFkk csgrj mit


tSo fu;a=.k | Biocontrol

by Th-4, Th-25a, Th-17, Th-27, Th-10, Th-12b, Th-19c, Th-2, Th-16c, Th-7, Th-11, Th-9b and least effectiveisolate was Th-8b.

¼25-8 fDoa- izfr gs-½ ntZ dh xbZA bl fo;qDr ds ckn Vh,p&4]Vh,p&25,] Vh,p&17] Vh,p&27] Vh,p&10] Vh,p&12 ch]Vh,p&19 lh] Vh,p&2] Vh,p&16 lh] Vh,p&7] Vh,p&11rFkk Vh,p&9 ch dk LFkku FkkA Vh,p&8 ch lcls de izHkkohfo;qDr ik;k x;kA

Similar trend was also recorded with cauliflower,where all isolates of Trichoderma were foundsignificantly effective in improving seedling vigour,minimizing collar rot (R. solani) incidence and yield.But, the isolate Th-22b was found most effective inimproving seedling vigour index (1630.5) and yield(23.8q/ha) (Fig.1), reducing collar rot incidence (4.6%)of cauliflower (Fig.2). The other promising isolates ofTrichoderma in their descending order of chronologywere- Th-4, Th-17, Th-25a, Th-9b, Th-8b, Th-12b,Th-7, Th-2 and least effective isolate was Th-11.

The efficacy of Trichoderma isolates with theirinherent properties of plant growth promotion(seedling vigour), minimizing wilt (Fusariumoxysporum f. sp. pisi) incidence and improving yieldof dry field pea seed was also found encouraging.However, the isolate Th-9b was most effective inimproving plant vigour index (1630.5), yield (12.5q/ha) and reducing wilt (4.6%) incidence of dry field peaseeds (Fig. 1, 2). The isolate Th-9b was closely followed

Qwy xksHkh ds lacaèk esa Hkh mDr izdkj ds ifj.kke ntZ fd,x,] ftlesa VªkbdksMekZ ds lHkh fo;qDr ikSèk dh of) c<+kus]xzhok foxyu izdksi ¼vkj- lksykuh½ de djus rFkk Qwy xksHkhdh mit esa leuq:i of) djus esa dkQh izHkkodkjh ik, x,ArFkkfi] xksHkh ds ikSèk dh of) c<+kus lacaèkh lwpdkad ¼1630-5½¼fp= 3½] xzhok foxyu vkiru ¼4-6%½ de djus rFkk lokZfèkdmit ¼23-8 fDoa- izfr gs-½ ¼fp= 4½ ds fy, Vh,p&22 chfo;qDr dks rFkk mlds ckn Vh,p&4] Vh,p&17] Vh,p& 25 ,]Vh,p&9 ch] Vh,p&8ch] Vh,p&7 rFkk Vh,p&2 fo;qDrksa dksvfrizHkkoh ik;k x;k vkSj Vh,p&11 ¼fp= 3&4½ fo;qDr dkslcls de izHkkoh ik;k x;kA

VªkbdksMekZ fo;qDrksa dks ikSèk dh of) c<+kus dh {kerk]eqj>ku ¼¶;qlsfj;e vkWDlhLiksje ,Q- iztkfr ikblh ½ dedjus rFkk lw[kh eVj ds cht dh mit c<+kus okys y{k.kksads vkèkkj ij Hkh izHkkodkjh ik;k x;kA rFkkfi] lw[kh eVjds chtksa ds ikni fodkl lwpdkad ¼1630-5½ dks c<+kus] U;wureeqj>ku ¼4-6%½ izdksi rFkk mit ¼12-5 fDoa- izfr gs-½ esalokZfèkd of) djus esa Vh,p&9 ch fo;qDr dks lcls vfèkddkjxj ik;k x;k ¼fp= 2½A blds ckn Vh,p&22 ch] Vh,p&12

fp=- 1- can xksHkh] xksHkh ,oa eVj ds ikSèkksa esa csgrj o`f) djus esa VªkbdksMekZ fo;qDrksa dk izHkko

Fig. 1. Effect of Trichoderma isolates in improving seedling vigour of cabbage, cauliflower and pea

NCIPM


fp=- 2- xksHkh] Qwy xksHkh esa xzhok foxyu izdksi ¼vkj- lksykuh½] eVj esa eqj>ku izdksi ¼¶;qlsfj;e vkWDlhLiksje½ ,oa mit ij VªkbdksMekZ fo;qDrksa dk izHkko

Fig. 2. Effect of Trichoderma isolates on incidence collar rot (Rhizoctonia solani) and yield of cabbage, cauliflower and incidence ofwilt (Fusarium oxysporum) and yield of pea

ch] Vh,p&2] Vh,p&8 ch] Vh,p&7 rFkk Vh,p&11 fo;qDrksadks leku y{k.kksa ds fy, de dkjxj ik;k x;kA

VªkbdksMekZ ds vk'kktud fo;qDrksa dks ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;kfoxyu dks de djus rFkk nwljhvksj mit esa leuq:i of) djuses a Hkh izHkkoh ik;k x;kAVh,p&22 ch ¼fp= 3½ fo;qDrdks rFkk mlds ckn Vh,p&9ch] Vh,p&10] Vh,p&16 lh]Vh,p&12 ch] Vh,p&17]Vh,p&2] Vh,p&8 ch ]Vh,p&19 lh] Vh,p&25 ,]Vh,p&27 vkSj Vh,p&7 fo;qDrksad k s ljlk s a e s a U; wureLDysjksfVfu;k foxyu ¼1-1%½izdksi rFkk lokZfèkd mit ¼11-9 fDoa- izfr gs-½ ds fy, izHkkohik;k x;k] tcfd Vh,p&11fo;qDr dks leku y{k.kksa ds fy,lcls de izHkkoh ik;k x;kA

by Th-22b, Th-12b, Th-2, Th-8b, Th-7 and Th-11 wasleast effective for the same properties.

The promising isolates of Trichoderma were alsofound effective inreducing Sclerotiniarot of mustard andincreasing yield. LowestSclerotinia rot (1.1%)incidence and highestyield (11.9 q/ha) ofmustard was observedwith the isolate Th-22b(Fig.3), followed by Th-9b, Th-10, Th-16c, Th-12b, Th-17, Th-2, Th-8b, Th-19c, Th-25a, Th-27, Th-7, and the isolateTh-11 was least effectivefor the same properties.

fp=- 3- VªkbdksMekZ fo;qDrksa dk LDysjksfVfu;k ruk foxyuij rFkk ljlksa dh mit ij izHkko

Fig. 3 Effect of Trichoderma isolates on Sclerotinia rotand yield of Indian mustard



uk'khtho izcaèku ds fy, vko';d ;kaf=kd midj.kksadk fodkl

fofHkUu iQlyksa esa uoksUes"kh dhV jks'kuh vkdZZ"k.kiQank dk ifj"dj.k] oSèkhdj.k vkSj izlkj

dhV jks'kuh vkdZZ"k.k Qanks ds fy, fofHkUu ekWMyksa ijfopkj fd;k x;kA varr% ,d ,slsdhV ykbV VªSi dh vfHkdYiuk¼fMtkbu½ vkSj va'kkdu fd;k x;ktks mUur 'kadq ¼dksu½ vkdkj ekWMydh rjg Fkk rFkk mlesa fQYVj pSEcjHkh yxk gqvk FkkA m|e@fofuekZrkls 'kaDokdkj ¼dksu tSlk vkdkj½ekWMy dh MkbZ dk Hkh va'kkdu¼QSczhds'ku½ djok;k x;kA vU;ykHkksa ds vykok bl u;s vfHkdfYirekWMy esa dhVksa dks idM+us@,d=djus rFkk muds ifjogu esa lgtrkfeyrh gSA

pkoy

[kjhQ ekSle 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vªh; jktèkkuh {ks=

¼,uhlhvkj½ esa fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk esa] èkku dh Qly ds

lacaèk esa fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa esa iwlk&cklerh 1121 fdLe ij

mijksDr dhV ykbV VªSiksa dk oSèkhdj.k fd;k x;kA dhV ykbV

VªSi esa idM+s x, dhVksa] fQYVj pSEcj esa idM+s x, dhVksa esa ls

Hkkx fudyus okys dhVksa dh la[;k] Qly ij uk'khdhVksa dh

lef"V ds izdksi dk vè;;u fd;k x;k rFkk VªSi ds fcuk

daVªksy ds lkFk rqyuk dh xbZA dhV ykbV VªSiksa ij] uk'khtho

fuxjkuh Vwy ds :i esa] vè;;u fd;k x;kA dhV ykbV VªSiksa

esa idM+s x, dhV vfèkdrj gsfeIVsjk] dksfy;ksIVsjk rFkk ysfiMksIVsjk

oa'kØeksa ls lacafèkr FksA dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks ls dkQh

la[;k esa dhV ¼ftudk 'kjhj vkdkj NksVk ;k½ Hkkxus esa lQy

ik, x,A uk'khtho fuxjkuh Vwy ds :i esa jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k

Qank ls èkku dh Qly ij ruk Hksnd rFkk Hkwjk ikni ekgw

¼czkmu IykaV gksij½ ds vkØe.k ds le; dk irk pykA

fdlkuksa dks ykbV VªSi izkS|ksfxdh bR;kfn ds rduhdh Kku]

fofunsZ'ku] mi;ksx djus dh fofèk] j{kksik; rFkk ykHkksa ds ckjs

esa tkudkjh nh xbZA

Qly ekSle ds nkSjku Hkwjk ikni ekgw] uhykioZrk Y;wxsuldh lef"V vfèkd ikbZ xbZA ykbV VªSai dk uk'kdhVksa dh lef"V

Development of mechanical devices needed for pest

management

Refinement, validation and popularization of

innovative insect light traps in different crops

The different models of the insect light trap wereconceptualized. Theimproved cone shapedmodel of insectcollecting filterchamber was designedand fabricated. Thedye of the cone shapedmodel had also beengot fabricated by theentrepreneur. Thenewly designedsystem has ease inassemblage andtransportation of thegadget besides otherbenefits.

Rice

The above insect light traps had been validated inPusa-Basmati 1121 on the farmers' fields in paddy cropin NCR Delhi during kharif season 2013 in a farmers'participatory mode. The insects trapped in the insectlight trap, the total number of insects escaped aftertrapping in the filter chamber, the attack of insect pests'population on the crop was studied and compared withcontrol without trap. The light traps had also beenstudied as pest monitoring tool. In the insect light trap,insects mostly belonging to insect orders: Hemiptera,Coleoptera, Lepidoptera were found trapped. A largenumber of insects (having smaller body size) had beenfound escaped/filtered out from the insect light trapThe light trap as pest monitoring tool indicated thetime of attack of stem borer and brown plant hopperon the paddy crop. The farmers were educated aboutthe technical knowhow, specifications, mode ofoperation, safety precautions and benefits of the lighttrap technology, etc.

During the crop season, the population of brownplant hopper Nilaparvata lugens was observed to behigh. The light trap could also be used for monitoring

mUur dksu vkdkj okys fQYVj pSEcj ds lkFk ykHkdkjh dhVksads fy, lajf{kr ykbV VªSi

Light trap safer to beneficial insects with the improvedcone shaped filter chamber

NCIPM


the population of insect pests as it was trapping boththe sexes. Higher yield, B:C ratio was obtained in fieldswhere light trap was installed in comparison to non-light trap plots (Table 1, 2, 3).

dh fuxjkuh djus ds fy, Hkh mi;ksx fd;k x;k D;ksafd blesanksuksa gh fyaxksa ds uk'kdhVksa dks idM+k tkrk FkkA ftu IykVksaesa ykbV VªSi LFkkfir fd, x, Fks ogka ykbV VªSi ugha yxk,x, [ksrksa dh rqyuk esa mPp mit vkSj ykHk%ykxr vuqikr izkIrfd;k x;k ¼rkfydk 1] 2] 3½A

rkfydk 2% [kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vªh; jktèkkuh {ks=]ubZ fnYyh esa iwlk&1121 pkoy mRiknu dh mit ,oavkfFkZd fo'ys"k.k

Table 2: Yield and economics of Pusa - 1121 rice productionduring kharif season 2013 in NCR, New Delhi

pj vkbZih,e xSj ,QihVariable IPM Non-IPM

dqy ykxr ¼` izfr gs-½/Total cost (`/ha) 30654 39176

vkSlr mit ¼fDoa-@gs-½/Mean yield (q/ha) 42.50 33.50

dqy ykHk ¼` izfr gs-½/Total return (`/ha) 1,72,125 1,35,675

'kq) ykHk ¼` izfr gs-½/Net return (`/ha) 1,41,471 96,499

ykxr%ykHk vuqikr / B :C ratio 5.62:1 3.46:1

èkku dk ewY; @ ` 4050@& izfr fDoa-Rate of paddy @ ` 4050/- per q

rkfydk 1% [kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vªh; jktèkkuh {ks=]ubZ fnYyh esa vkbZih,e viukus okys rFkk fdlkuksa dhfofèk;ksa ¼,Qih½ okys [ksrksa esa uk'khtho dk izdksi

Table 1: Pest incidence in IPM and farmers' practices (FP)paddy fields at NCR, Delhi during kharif 2013

uk'khtho@ykHkdkjh vkbZih,e ,QihPest/Beneficial IPM FP

ruk Hksnd (%) / Stem borer (%) 2.7 6.0

iÙkh eksM+d (%) / Leaf folder (%) 5.8 9.2

Hkwjk iÙkh ekgw izfr Vhyk / BPH/hill 6.7 9.2

edM+h izfr Vhyk / Spiders/hill 1.4 0.8

rkfydk 3% o"kZ 2013 ds [kjhQ ekSle ds nkSjku èkku ¼iwlk cklerh 1121½ ds [ksrksa esa LFkkfir jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank¼fofHkUu vkdkj ds½ ds fNnzksa ls Hkkx x, dhVksa dk izfr'kr

Table 3: Percentage escape of insects from light trap pores of (different sizes) installed in paddy (Pusa Basmati 1121)fields during kharif season 2013.

vofèk jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks ds fNnzksa ls Hkkx jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks ds fNnzksa ls Hkkx

Period x, dhVksa@izfr jkf= dk izfr'kr x, dhVksa@izfr jkf= dk izfr'kr

¼fNnzksa dk vkdkj 5 fe- eh-½ ¼fNnzksa dk vkdkj 3 fe- eh-½% insects escaped/night from % insects escaped/night from

the pores (pore size 5mm) the pores (pore size 3mm)

38 ,l,eMCY;w /38th SMW 52.4 52.1

39 ,l,eMCY;w @39th SMW 72.0 39.7

VekVjo"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vªh; jktèkkuh {ks= fnYyh esa VekVj

dh Qly ij fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa u, fodflrdhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dks oSèkhdj.k ds fy, LFkkfir fd;kx;kA fdlkuksa dks dhV ykbV VªSi izkS|ksfxdh bR;kfn dkrduhdh Kku] fofunsZ'ku] mi;ksx djus dh fofèk] j{kksik; rFkkykHkksa ls voxr djk;k x;kA jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks esa idM+s x,rFkk muesa ls Hkkx x, uk'khdhVksa dk vkdyu fd;k x;kAVekVj dh Qly ds fy, LFkkfir jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qankssa dkQly rFkk blds fofHkUu ?kVdksa bR;kfn ij uk'khdhVksa dsvkØe.k ds vkèkkj ij izHkko vè;;u fd;k x;k ¼rkfydk&4½A

Tomato

In a farmers' participatory mode, the newlyinvented insect light traps were installed for validationin tomato crop on the farmers' fields in NCR Delhiduring 2013. The farmers were educated about thetechnical knowhow, specifications, mode of operation,safety precautions and benefits of the light traptechnology, etc. The insects trapped and filtered outhad been observed. Impact of insect light trap installedin the tomato crop had also been observed in terms ofattack of insect pests on the crop and its differentattributes, etc. (Table-4).



rkfydk 5% o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku VekVj ds [ksrksa esa LFkkfir jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks esa idM+s x, rFkk VªSi ds fNnzksa lsHkkx x, dhV

Table 5: Insects trapped and filtered out from insect light trap in tomato crop fields during 2013 season in NCR-Delhi

jklukizds ¼HkkÑvuqi½] ubZ fnYyh esa vkfo"dkj fd, x, rFkk jklukizds }kjkisVsaV djk, x, dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dk VªsMekdZ

Trademark of insect light trap as invented and patentedat NCIPM (ICAR), New Delhi

rkfydk 4 %o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku jk"Vªh; jktèkkuh {ks= fnYyh esa VekVj ds fofHkUu izkpyksa ij fofHkUu mipkjksa dk izHkko

Table 4: Impact of different treatments on different parameters on tomato crop during 2013 season in NCR-Delhi

pj jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank LFkkfir fd, x, [ksr daVªksyVariable Fields where light traps installed Control

Ukk'kdhVksa }kjk Qyksa dks igqapkbZ xbZ gkfu dk % / % fruit damaged by insects 0.4 1.2

vkSlr Qy la[;k izfr ikni @Average number of fruits/plant 58.8 53.5

,l,eMCY;w dqy idM+s x, dqy Hkkx x, dhV lkèkkj.k jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank esa cpk, x, dhVksa dk %

SMW dhV Total insects escaped ekj fn, tkus okys dhVksa dh la- % insects savedTotal insects To be killed in ordinary

trapped insect light trap

14 376 1254 1630 76.9

15 377 18227 18604 98.0

16 7359 2933 10292 28.5

17 557 5013 5570 90.0

18 1428 7319 8747 83.7

19 1970 2463 4433 55.6

20 772 2281 3053 74.7

21 460 2653 3113 85.2

22 21 2197 2218 99.0

vkSlr /Average 1480 4926.7 6406.7 76.9

lkSj@cSVjh ÅtkZ ls pkfyr dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qanks dsu, fMtkbuksa ij Hkh fopkj fd;k x;kA uoksUes"kh fodflrdhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank ds ckSf)d laink vfèkdkjksa ¼vkbZihvkjjkbV½ dks lajf{kr djus ds fy, dhV jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dsVªsMekdZ dks Hkh fMtkbu fd;k x;k vkSj mls ÞisVsaV vkfQlÞubZ fnYyh esa tek fd;k x;kA bls ÞVsjkÞ uke fn;k x;k gS vkSjyksxks ij vafdr fd;k x;k gSA

The new design of solar/battery operated insectlight traps had also been conceptualized and studied.To protect IPR rights of innovative insect light trapinvented, the trademark of insect light had also beendesigned and filed in "Patent office", New Delhi, whichhas been named as "Tera" with logo.

NCIPM


lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh] uk'khtho iwokZuqeku,oa fu.kZ; lgk;rk iz.kkyhInformation Technology, Pest Forecastingand Decision Support System

Crop pest surveillance and advisory project(CROPSAP) in Maharashtra

CROPSAP was operated across 33 districts, 348talukas and 43000 villages of Maharashtra in an area of39.17, 38.68,15.23, 10.96 and 12.47 lakh hectares inrespect of soybean, cotton, rice, pigeonpea and chickpeacrops, respectively during 2013-14. Implemented by theState Department of Agriculture, Maharashtra,NCIPM facilitated the ICT-based pest monitoring forthe fifth successive year.

Considering the onset of monsoon (normal ordelayed), planting of crop (before June end or not),rainfall of > 60 mm, <50 mm and 10 mm in respectof 29 SMW (16-22 July), 30 SMW (23-29 July) and 31SMW (30 July - 5 Aug) or not, severity predictionswere evolved and incorporated into CROPSAPsoftware using Dot Net Framework 4.0 technology.While delayed onset of monsoon and delayed plantingwith rainfall >60 mm , <50 mm and <10 mm inrespect of 29, 30 and 31 SMWs predicted the outbreak,normal monsoon with normal planting dates withrainfall events not meeting the conditions of outbreakpredicted low to moderate severity or no outbreaksituation.

egkjk"Vª esa iQly esa uk'khtho dh fuxjkuh rFkklykgdkj lsok ifj;kstuk (ØkWilSi)

o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku] egkjk"Vª esa lks;kchu] dikl]èkku] vjgj rFkk pus dh Qlyksa esa Øe'k% 39-17] 38-68] 15-23] 10-96 vkSj 12-47 yk[k gs- {ks= esa 33 ftyksa] 348 rkywdkvksarFkk 43]000 xkaoksa esa ØkWilSi ifj;kstuk dk dk;kZUo;u fd;kx;kA jkT; Ñf"k foHkkx] egkjk"Vª }kjk bl ifj;kstuk dkdk;kZUo;u fd;k rFkk jklukizds us mUgsa vkbZlhVh&vkèkkfjruk'khtho fuxjkuh djus ds fy, yxkrkj ikaposa o"kZ esa Hkhlgk;rk nhA

ekWulwu ds 'kq: gksus ¼lkekU; ;k foyafcr½] Qly dkjksi.k ¼twu ekg ds var esa vFkok ugha½] 29 ekud ekSle lIrkg¼,l,eMCY;w½ ¼16&22 tqykbZ½] 30 ,l,eMCY;w ¼23&29 tqykbZ½rFkk 31 ,l,eMCY;w ¼30 tqykbZ & 5 vxLr½ ds nkSjku Øe'k%60 fe-eh- ls vf/kd] 50 fe-eh- rFkk 10 fe-eh- ls de o"kkZ gksusvFkok ugha gksus tSls fcUnqvksa ij fopkj djrs gq, lks;kchu ijLiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk dh rhozrk ds iwokZuqekuksa dk vkdyu fd;kx;k rFkk MkWV usV ÝseodZ 4-0 izkS|ksfxdh dk iz;ksx djrs gq,vkdyuksa dks ØkWilSi esa lekfo"V fd;k x;kA nsjh ls ekWulwu'kq: gksus vkSj 29] 30 ,oa 31 ,l,eMCY;w ds lacaèk esa Øe'k%60 fe-eh- ls vf/kd rFkk 50 fe- eh- vkSj 10 fe-eh- ls de o"kkZgksus ds lkFk nsjh ls jksi.k ds dkj.k uk'khtho ds izdksi QSyusdk iwokZuqeku fd;k x;kA lkekU; ekWulwu ds lkFk lkekU;frfFk;ksa esa jksi.k rFkk lkekU; o"kkZ ds vkèkkj ij ;g iwokZuqekuyxk;k x;k fd lks;kchu ij uk'khtho dh ekewyh rhozrk gksxh;k izdksi fcydqy Hkh ugha gksxkA


lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh] uk'khtho iwokZuqeku ,oa fu.kZ; lgk;rk iz.kkyh | Information Technology, Pest Forecasting and Decision Support System

lks;kchulkaxyh ftys ds lHkh rglhyksa esa ,l- fyVwjk ds ,dy

ykokZ dh lef"V vfèkd ikbZ xbZ] gkykafd vU; ftyksa dhrglhyksa esa blesa fHkUurk FkhAegkjk"Vª ds vU; LFkkuksa dhrqyuk esa iq.ks ftys ds gosyhrglhy esa 0-72@eh- iafDr dsekSle vkSlr ds lkFk ,l- fyVwjkdh lokZfèkd vkSlr lef"V ikbZxbZA o"kZ 2013 ekSle ds nkSjkugsfydksoikZ vkfeZtsjk ykokZ dhlef"V dkQh de ikbZ xbZA

eSlksLdsy ds vkèkkj ij lHkhfu"i=dksa ¼,l- fyVwjk] ,p-vkjfetsjk vkSj lh- ,D;wVk½ dsfy, ftyk s a dh vLFkk;hxfrfd;ksa ls ;g irk pyk fd Qly ekSle ds nkSjku dksbZ Hkhgkfudkjd uk'khdhVksa dh lef"V ugha ikbZ xbZ] gkykafd 27osa,oa 39osa ekSle foKku ekud lIrkgksa ¼,l,eMCY;w½ ds nkSjkuuk'khdhVksa dk vkxeu ns[kk x;k FkkA fiNys ikap _rqvksa¼2009&13½ ds nkSjku ,l- fyVwjk vkSj lh- ,D;wVk ds rqyukRedifjn'; ls ;g fu"d"kZ fudyk fd o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku lks;kchuij uk'khthoksa dh lef"V lcls de ikbZ xbZ ¼fp= 1½A

diklfofHkUu ftyksa esa vusd ekSdksa ij tSflM ¼,ejkLdk

fMokLVsUl½ dk vkxeu ,oa rhozrk ns[kh xbZA egkjk"Vª dsleLr LFkkuksa esa dikl ij dk"BdhV ¼fFkzIl Vckdh ½ rFkklQsn eD[kh ¼csfefl;k Vckdh ½dk izdksi lkekU; ik;k x;kAtqykbZ ekg ls dk"BdhVksa rFkklQsn efD[k;ksa dh lef"V ns[khxbZ ftlesa vxLr ekg ds eè; lsof) gksus yxh ¼fp= 2½A

egkjk"Vª esa ,d ;k vU; LFkkuksaij feyh cx] fQukdksDdllksysuksfIll dk vkxeu ns[kk x;k]ij mldh lef"V dkQh de FkhAuanqjcj] ;korey rFkk oèkkZ ftyksaesa feyhcx dk vkxeu fujarj ns[kkx;kA

Soybean

Solitary larva of S. litura were relatively higheracross teshils of Sangli while it was variable among

teshils of all otherdistricts. Haweli teshil ofPune had the highestmean population ofsolitary S. litura with aseasonal mean of 0.72/mrow over other locationsof Maharashtra. Larvalnumbers of Helicoverpaarmigera were too lowduring the 2013 season.

Temporal dynamicsat a mesoscale of districtfor all defoliators

(S. litura, H. armigera and C. acuta) indicated non-damaging population during the crop season althoughoccurrence was observed between 27 and 39 standardmeteorological weeks (SMWs). Semilooper wasrelatively higher at Dhule between 31 and 34 SMW.Comparative scenario for S. litura and C. acuta overfive seasons (2009-13) indicated lowest population levelson soybean during 2013 (fig. 1).

Cotton

Occurrence and severity of jassid (Amrascadevastans) was noted on many occasions across severaldistricts. Thrips (Thrips tabaci) and whitefly (Bemisiatabaci) incidence on cotton was common across all

locations of Maharashtra.Thrips and whiteflies wereseen from July onwards withtheir increase from mid-August (fig. 3)

Mealy bug Phenacoccussolenopsis occurred at one orother locations ofMaharashtra at very low levelswith its continuousoccurrence at Nandurbar,Yeotmal and Wardha districts(fig. 4).

fp= 1- egkjk"Vª esa lks;kchu dhVksa dh fLFkfr ¼2013½

Fig. 1. Status of soybean pests across Maharashtra (2013)

fp= 2- egkjk"Vª esa dikl ds ekSle esa pwld dhVksa ,oa iÙkh ykyiudh fLFkfr

Fig. 2. Status of sap feeders and leaf reddening during cottongrowing season in Maharashtra

NCIPM


Incidence of leaf reddening was high at Nanded>Wardha> Parbhani> Hingoli> Nagpur districts.However, Jalgaon, Parbhani, Beed, Nanded,Ahmednagar and Jalna had <10% incidence of redleaves from 2nd week of October till harvest.

Rice

Yellow stem borer (YSB) damage was significantonly at Gadchiroli with maximum of 38% during 3rd

SMW. Highest infestation of3% of gall midge was notedduring 31 st SMW atGadchiroli. Leaf folder damagewas highest at Nandurbardistrict (12%) during mid-season. Bacterial leaf blight(BLB) was above ETL on 32occasions during September.Increasing blast incidence atDhule and Nagpur wasnotable. Nagpur >Dhule>Bhandara had relatively

higher blast disease over other locations. Pest statusacross Maharashtra on rice followed YSB>BLB> planthoppers> gall midge > leaf folder > blast (Fig. 3).

Pigeonpea

Damage to pigeonpea pods due to pod borercomplex measured as per cent pod damage was highestduring November and December.

Chickpea

The dynamics of trend of H. armigera and itsmagnitude varied between locations with peaks eitherduring December or January. Wilt incidence variedwith division, being the highest for Amravati followedby Latur, Pune and Aurangabad. Highest wilt incidencewas found during December.

Dissemination of pest management advisories

Dissemination of pest management advisoriesthrough short mail services (SMS) across the crops-basedon ETL scenario of different pests in soybean, cotton,rice, pigeonpea and chickpea were 15170, 24846, 20959,13364 and 10759 during 2013-14. Their distributionacross divisions and crops is given below (Fig 4).

ukaMsM+] oèkkZ] ijHk.kh] fgaxksyh rFkk ukxiqj ftyksa esa ¼vkjksghØe esa½ iÙkh ykyiu dk izdksi lokZfèkd FkkA rFkkfi] tyxkao]ijHk.kh] chM] ukaMsM] vgenuxj rFkk tkyuk esa vDVwcj ekgds nwljs lIrkg ls Qly dh dVkbZ rd 10% ls de iÙkhykyiu jksx ik;k x;kA

pkoyrhljs ekSle foKku ekud lIrkg ds nkSjku dsoy x<+fpjkSyh

esa ihyk ruk Hksnd ¼okbZ,lch½ dh gkfu dkQh ¼38%½ ikbZ xbZAblh LFkku ij 31oss ekud lIrkgds nkSjku xky fet dk lokZfèkd¼3%½ laØe.k ik;k x;kA ekSle dseè;e esa uanqjcj ftys esa iÙkh eksM+dgkfu lokZfèkd ¼12%½ ikbZ xbZAflrEcj ekg ds nkSjku 32 ekSdksa ijthok.kqt iÙkh vaxekjh ¼ch,ych½jksx bZVh,y ls Åij ik;k x;kAèkwys rFkk ukxiqj esa izLQqVu izdksic<+rk gqvk ik;k x;kA mPp LFkkuksadh rqyuk esa ukxiqj] èkwys rFkk Hkkanzkesa ¼vkjksgh Øe esa½ mPp izLQqVujksx ik;k x;kA iwjs egkjk"Vª esa uk'khthoksa dh fLFkfr vkjksghØe esa bl izdkj Fkh% okbZ,loh >ch,ych> ikni ekgw>xkyfet>iÙkh eksM+d>izLQqVu ¼fp= 3½A

vjgjuoEcj vkSj fnlEcj ds nkSjku Qyh Hksnd }kjk vjgj dh

Qly dks igqapk, x, uqdlku dk izfr'kr lokZfèkd FkkA

puk,p- vkfeZtsjk ds izofÙk dh xfrfØ;ksa rFkk blds ifjek.k

esa LFkku&nj LFkku fHkUurk ikbZ xbZ] tks fnlEcj ;k tuojh esaviuh ijkdk"Bk ij FksA vejkorh rFkk mlds ckn ykrwj] iq.ksvkSj vkSjaxkckn esa eqj>ku izdksi lcls vfèkd ik;k x;k]gkykafd bu LFkkuksa esa eqj>ku izdksi esa fHkUurk FkhA fnlEcjekg ds nkSjku lcls vfèkd eqj>ku izdksi ik;k x;kA

uk'khtho izcaèku lacaèkh lykgdkj lsokvksa dk izlkjo"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku lks;kchu] dikl] èkku] vjgj

rFkk pus ds fy, fofHkUu uk'khthoksa ds bZVh,y ifjn'; ijfdlkuksa dks Qly ds vkèkkj ij ,l,e,l ds ekè;e ls Øe'k%15170] 24846] 20959] 13364 rFkk 10759 lykgdkj loks,atkjh dh xbZ ¼fp= 4½A

fp= 3- egkjk"Vª esa pkoy ds dhVksa dh fLFkfr

Fig. 3. Status of rice pests across Maharashtra (2013)



tyok;q ifjorZu ds lacaèk esa uk'khthoksa dhxfrfØ;karRdkfyd uk'khtho xfrdh fuxjkuh flLVe dkdk;kZUo;u (vkjVhihMh)

o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku pkj Qlyksa] vFkkZr pkoy] vjgj]ewaxQyh rFkk VekVj esa yxkrkj rhljs o"kZ uk'khtho dhfuxjkuh rFkk ekSle ds iwokZuqeku ds fy, 10 Ñf"k ikfjra=ksa dsvarxZr 10 jkT;ksa ds 10 Ñf"k tyok;q {ks=ksa esa 26 dsUnzkas ijvkjVhihMh dk vè;;u gsrq dk;kZUo;u fd;k x;kA [kjhQ2013 ds nkSjku pkoy ¼7½( vjgj ¼7½( ewaxQyh ¼5½ rFkk VekVj¼7½ dks feykdj iPphl ¼25½ vkjVhihMh dsUnzksa us rFkk jch2013 ds nkSjku 17 dsUnzksa us vkjVhihMh dk dk;kZUo;u fd;kAbu dsUnzksa us uk'khthoksa dh xfrfØ;ksa rFkk ekSle ds lacaèk esavkadM+s ,d= fd, rFkk mUgsa jklukizds ds loZj esa viyksMfd;k] ftlesa 24 x 7 osc vkèkkfjr fjiksfV±x dh lqfoèkk miyCèkdh xbZ FkhA

,uvkbZlhvkj, (fuØk) xzkgd lkWÝVos;j dk v|rurFkk osc&vkèkkfjr fjiksfV±x

vjgj] ewaxQyh rFkk VekVj rhu Qlyksa ds fy, fodflrQsjkseksu VªSai dSp ekWM~;wy dks gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtsjk ,oa LiksMksIVsjkfyV;qjk ds lacaèk esa lkIrkfgd vkèkkj ij MkVk vfHkxzfgr djusgsrq xzkgd lkW¶Vos;j esa lekfo"V fd;k x;k] ftlesa lkIrkfgd]ekfld rFkk okf"kZd vkèkkj ij eksFk ¼iraxk½ idM+ lwpukviyksM+ djus ds fy, osc vkèkkfjr fjiksfV±x lqfoèkk miyCèk dhxbZ gSA

pkoy uk'khthoksa ds Mk;Xuksfll ,oa fuxjkuhizfrp;u ds fy, fof'k"V lkWÝVos;j

foaMksa 7 vkWijsfVax flLVe dk iz;ksx djrs gq, MkWV usVÝseodZ 4-0 esa ,d lesfdr foaMks vkèkkfjr izksxzke ¼16 ,ech½

Pest dynamics in relation to climate change

Implementation of real time pest dynamics (RTPD)

Recording of weather data as part of RTPD wasdone at 10 agro-climatic zones of 10 states spread across12 agro ecological regions were implemented with pestand weather monitoring during 2013-14 for the thirdyear in four crops viz. rice, pigeonpea, groundnut andtomato. Twenty five RTPD centers [rice (7); pigeonpea(7); groundnut (5) & tomato (7)] during kharif 2013,and 17 during rabi recorded the pest dynamics andweather data vis-a-vis entry and uploads to the databaseof NCIPM server that supported 24X7 web-enabledreporting system.

Up gradation of NICRA client software and web-

enabled reporting

Pheromone trap catch module for the three cropsviz. pigeonpea, groundnut and tomato to capture weekwise data of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera liturawas incorporated in the client software withsimultaneous updating of the web-enabled reportingsystem for retrieval of moth catch scenario on weekly,monthly and yearly basis.

Customised software for diagnosis & sampling for

rice pest surveillance

A standalone window-based application (16MB)"Diagnosis & Sampling for Rice Pest Surveillance" hasbeen developed in Dot Net Framework 4.0 usingWindows 7 operating system. Diagnosis and samplingof variables viz. plants (4), insects (23), diseases (8),

fp= 4- egkjk"Vª esa 2013 ds nkSjku uk'khtho çca/ku ij tkjh dh xbZa lykg

Fig. 4. Pest management advisories issued at Maharashtra during 2013

NCIPM


beneficials (6) and light trap catches (16) wereincorporated with their description, images andprocedure of observations.

Changing pest status vis-a-vis weather scenario

Rice

Leaf folder was observed with incidence rangingfrom 15 to 70% at Ludhiana (Pb). Severity of leaf folderwas also reflected in light trap catches. Comparison of

Þpkoy uk'khtho fuxjkuh ds fy, Mk;Xuksfll rFkk izfrp;uÞfodflr fd;k x;k gSA ikniksa ¼4½] dhVksa ¼23½] jksxksa ¼8½] ykHkdkjh¼6½ rFkk ykbV VªSi idM+ ¼16½ tSls pjksa ds Mk;Xuksfll rFkkizfrp;u ¼lSaifyax½ ds fy, muds y{k.k] fp=ksa ¼besft+t+½ rFkk izs{k.kdh izfØ;k ds vkèkkj ij xzkgd lkW¶Vos;j esa lekfo"V fd;k x;kA

ekSle ifjn'; ds lkFk&lkFk uk'khtho dh cnyrhfLFkfr

pkoy

yqfèk;kuk ¼iatkc½ esa 15 ls 70% dh jsat esa iÙkh eksM+dizdksi ik;k x;kA ykbV VªSi idM+ esa Hkh iÙkh eksM+d uk'khthodh rhozrk ns[kh xbZA pkoy ds ysfiMksIVsjl uk'khthoksa dh eksFk¼iraxk½ idM+ ds rqyukRed v/;;u esa iÙkh eksM+d ds vykoklQsn rFkk xqykch ruk Hksnd uk'khthoksa dh c<+rh izofÙk ns[khxbZA U;wure rkieku ds fopyu ds fo'ys"k.k esa ;g ik;k x;kfd izR;sd o"kZ twu vkSj vDVwcj ekg ds nkSjku U;wure rkiekuesa dkQh of) ¼0-3 & 40 ls-½ gqbZA dqN xkaoksa esa Hkwjk ikni ekgw¼chih,p½] uhykioZr Y;qxsal ds dkj.k gksij cuZ ik;k x;kA

[kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku vnqFkqjkbZ ¼rfeyukMq½ esa OgksyZeSxkWV ik;k x;k] ftlus Qly dks cgqr de uqdlku igqpk;kFkkA jch 2013 ds nkSjku vnqFkqjkbZ esa izfrjksi.k ds 30 fnuksa¼Mh,Vh½ ds ckn ihyk ruk Hksnd ¼okbZ,lch½] fLØiksQkxkbuljV~vYl ¼81-2%½] dkys f'kjk okyk Hksnd ¼Mh,pch½] dkbyksikyhØkbll ¼12-5%½] xqykch ruk Hksnd ¼ih,lch½] fllsfe;kbuQjsal ¼6-2%½ uk'khtho ik, x,A vDVwcj 2013 ds nkSjkuukxkifVue ¼rfeyukMq½ ds fdyosyqj CykWd esa 2&3 lIrkgksa ds'kq"d fnuksa ds ckn cjlkr ds dkj.k ,dy :i esa cqokbZ fd,x, pkoy ¼lhvkj 1009 ,oa chihVh 5204 fdLesa½ esa pkoyfeyhcx] czsfofu;k jsgh dk izdksi ik;k x;kA

[kjhQ ekSle ds nkSjku djtr ¼egkjk"Vª½ esa vfèkd ckfj'kds dkj.k ikS/k'kkykvksa rFkk izfrjksfir pkoy Qly izHkkforgqbZ] ftlds dkj.k pkoy dk iqu% jksi.k fd;k x;kA bl izdkjdh fLFkfr dslokWeZ ds vkxeu ds fy, vuqdwy FkhA vDVwcj2013 esa ckny;qDr ekSle rFkk fNViqV ckfj'k ls pkoy dhvxsrh fdLeksa dh Qly ij ifjiDou dh voLFkk ij pkoyvkehZokWeZ dk dkQh T;knk izdksi ik;k x;kA thok.kqt iÙkhvaxekjh rFkk izLQqVu rhozrk de FkhA

;|fi ekaM;k ¼dukZVd½ esa [kjhQ 2013 ds nkSjku izeq[kuk'khthoksa dk izdksi bZVh,y ls de Fkk] ysfdu eSlwj] mÙkj

moth catches of lepidopterous pests of rice showedincreasing trends of white and pink stem borers besidesleaf folder. Analysis of deviation of minimum temperaturefrom its indicated significant increase of minimumtemperature by 0.3 - 40C between June and October ofeach year. Hopper burn due to brown plant hopper(BPH), Nilaparvata lugens was observed in some villages.

Damage due to whorl maggot was in traces duringkharif 2013 at Aduthurai (TN). Stem borer complex atAduthurai (TN) in rabi yellow stem borer (YSB)Scirpophaga incertulas (81.2%) >dark headed borer(DHB), Chilo polychrysus (12.5%) >pink stem borer(PSB), Sesamia inferens (6.2%) at 30 DAT. Ricemealybug, Brevenia rehi outbreak in direct- seeded rice(cvs. CR1009 and BPT5204) in Kilvelur block ofNagapattinam district (TN) during October 2013 wasnoticed following prolonged dry spell of 2 - 3 weeksfollowed by rains.

At Karjat (MH) during kharif season, excess rainfallhad affected nurseries as well as transplanted rice leadingto replanting. This situation was favourable forcaseworm occurrence. Cloudy weather and intermittentrains in the month of October 2013 caused heavy

fp= 5- yqf/k;kuk esa jks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qans es idM+s x, pkoy dsysfiMksIVsju uk'khtho

Fig. 5. Light trap catches of rice lepidopteran pests at Ludhiana



dUuM+ rFkk dksiky ftyksa esa chih,p ¼Hkwjk ikni ekgw½ dkizdksi ekewyh FkkA flrEcj 2013 ds nkSjku dkosjh ls lVsyxHkx 1200 gs- esa nsjh ls jksi.k fd, tkus rFkk vfèkd cjlkrds dkj.k dslokWeZ dk izdksi dkQh QSy x;k FkkA ikbyhupØokr ds dkj.k vfèkd o"kkZ gksus rFkk jkf= esa de rkiekuds dkj.k dslhihvkbZ ds 400 gs- ls Hkh vfèkd {ks= esa xzhokizLQqVu ¼uSd CykLV½ dh rhozrk ikbZ xbZA

jk;iqj ¼NÙhlx<+½ esa ruk Hksnd rFkk Hkwjk ikni ekgw¼chih,p½ uk'khtho ik, x,] ftuds }kjk Qly dks uqdlkuigqapk, tkus ds dkj.k de mit izkIr gqbZA MSM gkVlZ ds :iesa ruk Hksnd laØe.k dh rhozrk 6-5 vkSj 36-2% ds chp Fkh]tcfd lQsn d.kZ dh rhozrk 23-7% FkhA bl {ks= esa Hkwjk ikniekgw us dkQh T;knk uqdlku fd;k Fkk] ftldh lef"V dh jsat23&77 O;Ld lef"V izfr 20 Vhyk FkhA dbZ LFkkuksa ij gksijcuZ ds y{k.k ik, x, rFkk o"kkZ( cknyksa okyk ekSle bldhrhozrk ds fy, vuqdwy ik;k x;kA o"kZ 2007 vkSj 2008 dsekSleksa dh rqyuk esa ?kVrs rkieku rFkk c<+rh o"kkZ ds dkj.keq[; :i ls cksjks ekSle ds nkSjku fpulqjk ¼if'pe caxky½ esao"kZ 2011 ls yxkrkj ihyk ruk Hksnd ¼okbZ,lch½ dk mPpizdksi ns[kk tk jgk gS ¼fp= 6½A

incidence of rice armyworm at the maturity stage ofearly varieties of rice crop. Bacterial leaf blight and blastseverity was low.

Although at Mandya (KA) the incidence of majorpests was below ETL in 2013 kharif, moderate incidenceof BPH was observed in parts of Mysore, Uttarkannadaand Koppal districts. Late planting combined withexcess rainfall during September resulted in outbreakof case worm in about 1200 ha of cauvery command.More than 400 ha of KCPI had severity of neck blastcaused by excess rainfall brought about by Phailincyclone vis-a-vis lower night temperatures.

At Raipur (CG), stem borer and BPH were thepests limiting grain yield. While the intensities of stemborer infestation observed as dead hearts rangedbetween 6.5 and 36.2%, white head was up to 23.7%.BPH had caused significant losses with populationrange of 23-777 adult counts per 20 hills. The symptomof hopper burn was observed at several places and therains, cloudy weather favoured the severity. Chinsurah(WB) continued to have higher incidence of YSB from2011 during Boro season mainly due to the decreasingtemperature regimes and increased rainfall over 2007and 2008 seasons (Fig 6).

lHkh LFkkuksa dh rqyuk esa ls yqfèk;kuk ¼iatkc½ rFkk eaM;k¼dukZVd½ esa iÙkh eksM+d ds dkj.k Qly dks dkQh uqdlku gqvkgS] tcfd [kjhQ ds fiNys rhu ekSleksa ls fpulqjk ¼if'pecaxky½ vkSj djtr ¼egkjk"Vª½ esa fNV&iqV izdksi ns[kk x;kA ,dekSle ls nwljs ekSle ds chp fo"kerkvkssa ds dkj.k lHkh LFkkuksa ijjks'kuh vkd"kZ.k Qank dh okf"kZd idM+ ls [kjhQ dh okLrfodo lgh izofÙk dk vanktk ugha yxk;k tk ldkA

Among all the locations, Ludhiana (PB) andMandya (KA) had considerable damage due to leaffolder, and Chinsurah (WB) and Karjat (MH) had strayincidence over the past three seasons of kharif. Theyearly light trap catches did not reflect the exact trendat all locations possibly due to the variations betweenseasons in a given location.

fp= 6- fiNys o"kksaZ es rkieku o o"kkZ vk/kkfjr vkd"kZ.k Qans es idM+s x, ihyk ruk Hksnd ds o;Ld

Fig. 6. Trap catches of yellow stem borer moth over years compared to temperature and rainfall

NCIPM


Pigeonpea

Spotted pod borer (Maruca) and pod fly(Melanagromyza) damage were dominant betweenNovember and December months. At Warangal (AP)insect pest load was low in general and for Helicoverpaarmigera and Maruca vitrata in particular. Sporadicincidence of mealybugs and severe wilt incidence atcertain locations was due to excess moisture (235.2 mmof rainfall) during October. Pudukottai (TN) hadhighest Maruca webs on flowers (22/plant) followedby plume moth (18 larvae/plant), blue butterfly (12.5larvae/plant), and H.armigera larvae (11/plant). Amongthe pod bugs, Clavigralla gibbosa was dominant(maximum: 25/plant) followed by Riptortus pedestris(3/plant) and Nezara viridula (2.5/plant). Among podborers, podfly (Melanagromyza obtusa) and H. armigeradamage to pods was 40 and 8%, respectively.

Gulbarga (KA) had decreasing incidence of H.armigera and almost all diseases (Alternaria, Fusariumand sterility mosaic disease SMD) during 2013 overprevious two seasons. Blue butterfly and spotted podborer incidence was twice higher over previous years.

The level of damage of M. vitrata between 40 and44 SMWs, and 47 and 52 SMWs were higher in the2011 season, the early higher damage between 38 and40 SMWs followed by continued higher damagebetween 45 and 46 SMWs during 2013 resulted inhigher seasonal damage. The higher rainfall years (655and 640 mm in 2011 and 2013, respectively) had higherM. vitrata damage over low rainfall year (466 mmduring 2012). More than the direct effect of rainfall, itis the influence of rainfall on crop phenology in turn

affecting the damage due to M. vitrata.

Perusal of status of H. armigera and M. vitrataacross locations indicated declining trend of the formerat all pigeonpea study locations over years with overalloccurrence of both the pests being higher at S.K. Nagar(GJ) >Rahuri (MH) and Gulbarga (KA). Fusariumwilt at S.K. Nagar (GJ) was higher during 2013 (rainfall:1032 mm; rainy days: 40) during 2013 over 2011 (950mm in 34 rainydays) and 2012 (630 mm in 22 rainydays). Rahuri (MH) had less severity of diseases overS.K. Nagar (GJ) and Gulbarga (KA).

vjgjuoEcj vkSj fnlEcj ekg ds chp fpÙkhnkj Qyh Hksnd

¼ek#dk½ rFkk Qyh eD[kh ¼esykuksvkxzksekbt+k ½ }kjk Qly dksdkQh uqdlku igqapk;k x;kA okjaxy ¼vkUèkz izns'k½ esa lkekU;:i ls uk'khtho] fo'ks"k :i ls gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtsjk rFkkek#dk foVjkVk dh ekStwnxh de FkhA vDVwcj 2013 ds nkSjku235-2 fe-eh- o"kkZ gksus ds QyLo:i vfèkd ueh ds dkj.k dqNLFkkuksa ij feyhcx dk NqV&iqV izdksi ns[kk x;k] ysfdu eqj>kuizdksi dkQh T;knk FkkA iqMqdksVkbZ ¼rfeyukMq½ esa iq"iksa esa dkQhT;knk ek#dk ds tky ¼22 izfr ikni½ ik, x,] mlds cknIY;we eksFk ¼18 lwaMh izfr ikni½] uhyh cVjykbZ ¼12-5 lwaMh izfrikni½ rFkk ,p- vkfeZtsjk ¼11 lwaMh izfr ikni½ ik, x,A QyhvHkZdksa ¼ikWM cx½ esa Dysfoxjsyk fxCckslk ¼25 izfr ikni½ rFkkmlds ckn fjiVkWjVl isM~lfVªl ¼3 izfr ikni½ vkSj ust+kjkfofjMqyk ¼2-5 izfr ikni½ dh ekStwnxh dkQh T;knk ikbZ xbZAQyh csèkdksa esa] Qyh eD[kh ¼esykuksvkxzksekbt+k vkWCV~;qlk ½ vkSj,p- vkfeZtsjk dk uqdlku Øe'k% 40% vkSj 8% FkkA

xqycxkZ ¼dukZVd½ esa fiNys nks ekSleksa dh rqyuk esa o"kZ2013 ds nkSjku ,p- vkfeZtsjk rFkk yxHkx lHkh jksxksa¼vYVjusfj;k] ¶;qlsfj;e rFkk ujcaè;rk ekst+sd jksx ,l,eMh½dk izdksi de ns[kk x;kA uhyh cVjykbZ rFkk fpÙkhnkj QyhHksnd dk izdksi fiNys o"kks± dh rqyuk esa nqxquk FkkA

o"kZ 2011 ds ekSle esa 40 vkSj 44 ekud lIrkg ¼,e,eMCY;w½rFkk 46 vkSj 52 ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku ,e- foVjkVk }kjkQly dks igqapk;k x;k uqdlku vfèkd FkkA o"kZ 2013 dsnkSjku 38 vkSj 40 ,l,eMCY;w ds chp vfèkd uqdlku dsdkj.k rFkk mlds ckn 45 vkSj 46osa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjkuyxkrkj mPp uqdlku ls ekSle ds dkj.k dqy feykdj T;knkuqdlku ns[kk x;kA de o"kkZ okys o"kks± ¼o"kZ 2012 ds nkSjku466 fe-eh-½ dh rqyuk esa vfèkd o"kkZ okys o"kks± ¼2011 vkSj2013 esa Øe'k 655 vkSj 640 fe-eh½ esa ,e- foVjkVk ds dkj.kvfèkd uqdlku gqvkA Qly dks uqdlku igqapkus esa o"kkZ dsizR;{k izHkko ds ctk; o"kkZ dk Qly ?kVukØe&foKku ijiM+us okys izHkko dh T;knk Hkwfedk gSA ftlds QyLo:i ,e-foVjkVk Qly dks T;knk uqdlku igqapkrk gSA

lHkh LFkkuksa ij ,p- vkfeZtsjk rFkk ,e- foVjkVk ds fLFkfrdh leh{kk djrs gq, ;g ik;k x;k fd xr o"kks± dh rqyuk esavjgj ds lHkh vè;;uxr LFkkuksa ij ,p- vkfeZtsjk dh izofÙkde gksrh tk jgh FkhA xqycxkZ ¼dukZVd½ esa rFkk mlds cknjkgqjh ¼egkjk"Vª½ vkSj ,l- ds- uxj ¼xqtjkr½ esa nksuksa uk'khthoksadk vkxeu vfèkd FkkA o"kZ 2011 ¼34 o"kkZ fnolksa esa 950 fe-eh- o"kkZ½ vkSj 2012 ¼22 o"kkZ fnolksa esa 630 fe-eh- o"kkZ½ dhrqyuk esa o"kZ 2013 ¼40 o"kkZ fnolksa esa 1032 fe-eh-½ esa vfèkd



In view of the seasonal means of insect pests anddiseases represented largely by the peak populationsand severity, respectively a preliminary attempt toseggregate the effect of dynamics of pests dependenton crop phenology was made through comparison ofcrop age coinciding with highest population or severityover years for a particular location, and over locationsin respect of a particular year/season. In either of thecases both population/severity of pests as well as cropage were different implying the dominant role ofecological interactive forces (biotic and abiotic)determining the population dynamics, althoughglimpses of effect of weather extremities at a givenspace and time could be inferred relatively easily.

Groundnut

Outbreak of red hairy caterpillar, Amsacta spp, for thesecond successive season (2012 & 2013) of kharif atChinnavadavadi village of Vridhachalam (TN)wasnoticed from 35 SMW mainly attributable to the receiptof continuous rains during all weeks of August and firstfortnight of September (esp. 35 & 36 SMW). The non-outbreak season of 2011 and before did not have rainsduring 35 and 36 SMWs. Late leaf spot (up to severityof 8 grade) and dry root rot (5-10%) incidence wasobserved during crop maturity phase.

Junagadh (GJ) had lower insect pests (aphids, jassids,thrips, leaf miner) and highest severity of foliar dieasesduring 2011 kharif mainly due to narrow differencesbetween maximum and minimum temperature regimesin addition to higher rainfall (> 800 mm) and thereverse trend at Kadiri (AP) and Dharwad (KA). Leafminer infestation was higher during kharif over rabi,in general. Jalgaon (MH) had the highest thripsinfestation during 2012 (>70%) and 2013 (>90%) ofkharif, and 2012 of rabi (>80%).

Tomato

In Rajendranagar (AP) and Bengaluru (KA)incidence of big bud phytoplasma was confirmedduring rabi that had caused elongated calyx uniting toform green bud like sterile structure.

Continuous rainfall during kharif 2013-14 atMoinabad (AP) led to low levels of aphids and whiteflies

o"kkZ ds dkj.k ,l- ds- uxj ¼xqtjkr½ esa ¶;qlsfj;e eqj>kuvfèkd ik;k x;kA ,l- ds- uxj rFkk xqycxkZ ¼dukZVd½ dhrqyuk esa jkgqjh ¼egkjk"Vª½ esa jksxksa dh rhozrk de FkhA

ekSle ds nkSjku uk'khtho ds vkxeu ds fy, vuqdwyuh;lkèkuksa rFkk uk'khthoksa dh lokZfèkd lef"V vkSj rhozrk dsdkj.k mRiUu jksxksa dks è;ku esa j[krs gq, Qly ?kVukØefoKku ij uk'khthoksa ds xfrfØ;ksa ds izHkko dks vyx djus dk,d izkjafHkd iz;kl fd;k x;kA blds fy, Qly dh voLFkk]fdlh Hkh fof'k"V LFkku rFkk fdlh Hkh ekSle@o"kZ ds nkSjkulHkh LFkkuksa ds foxr o"kks± ds Qly ij uk'khthoksa dh lokZfèkdlef"V dh ekStqnxh vFkok rhozrk dh rqyuk dh xbZA nksuksa ghfLFkfr;ksa esa] uk'khthoksa dh lef"V@rhozrk rFkk Qly dhvoLFkk esa fHkUurk,a ikbZ xb± ftlls ;g vuqeku yxk;k tkldrk gS fd uk'khthoksa dh xfrfØ;vksa o lfØ;rkvksa esaikfjfLFkfrdh; var%fØ;k'khy ?kVdksa ¼tSo ,oa vtSo½ dh izeq[kHkwfedk gksrh gS] rFkk ekSle esa vlkekU; mrkj&p<+ko ds izHkkodks vklkuh ls ekik tk ldrk gSA

ewaxiQyho)kpye ¼rfeyukMq½ esa [kjhQ ds yxkrkj nwljs o"kZ

¼2012 ,oa 2013½ esa 34 ,l,eMCY;w ls yky ckyksa okysdSVjfiyj] ,elsDrk iztkfr;ksa dk izdksi QSy x;k Fkk] tksvxLr ds lHkh lIrkgksa rFkk flrEcj dk igyk i[kokM+k¼fo'ks"k :i ls 35osa o 36osa ,l,eMCY;w esa½ ds nkSjku yxkrkjckfj'k ds dkj.k QSykA o"kZ 2011 rFkk mlls igys ftu o"kks±esa 35osa rFkk 36osa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku ckfj'k ugha gqbZ Fkh rcdSVjfiyj dk izdksi Hkh ugha QSyk FkkA Qly ds ifjiDouvoLFkk ds nkSjku iNsrh iÙkk èkCck ¼8 xzsM dh rhozrk rd½ rFkk'kq"d tM+ foxyu ¼5&10%½ dk izdksi ns[kk x;kA

twukx<+ ¼xqtjkr½ esa [kjhQ 2011 ds nkSjku vfèkd o"kkZ¼800 fe-eh- ls vfèkd½ ds vykok eq[; :i ls vfèkdre ,oaU;wure rkieku esa ekewyh varj ds dkj.k uk'khthoksa ¼ekgw]tSflM] dk"BdhV rFkk iÙkh laqjxd½ dh lef"V de ikbZ xbZtcfd if.kZy jksxksa dh rhozrk vfèkdre ikbZ xbZA dkfnjh¼vkUèkz izns'k½ rFkk èkkjokM+ ¼dukZVd½ esa fLFkfr foijhr FkhAlkekU; :i ls] jch dh rqyuk esa [kjhQ ds nkSjku iÙkh lqjaxd¼yhQ ekbuj½ dk laØe.k vfèkd FkkA tyxkao esa 2012 ¼70%

ls vfèkd½ rFkk 2013 ¼90% ls vfèkd½ ds nkSjku lokZfèkddk"BdhV laØe.k ik;k x;k] tcfd jch 2012 ds nkSjkulaØe.k 80% ls vfèkd ik;k x;kA

VekVjjktsUnz uxj ¼vkUèkz izns'k½ rFkk csaxyq# ¼dukZVd½ esa jch ds

nkSjku fcx cM+ QkbVksIykTek ds izdksi dh iqf"V dh xbZ]

NCIPM


ftlls dSysDl cM+k gks x;k ,oa vkil esa feydj gjs dyh dhrjg lajpuk cu xbZ tks fd ok¡K FkhA

[kjhQ 2013&14 ds nkSjku eksbukckn ¼vkUèkz izns'k½ esaQly fodkl dh iw.kZ vofèk ds nkSjku ekgw vkSj lQsn efD[k;ksadh de lef"V ikbZ xbZA iq"iu rFkk Qy yxus dh voLFkk dsnkSjku ,p- vfeZtsjk rFkk Qly fodkl ds igys dqN lIrkgksads nkSjku iÙkh lqajxd izdksi ns[kk x;kA blds foijhr] 29osa,oa 44osa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku yxkrkj o"kkZ gksus ds dkj.k34&77 ,l,eMCY;w ds chp thok.kqt èkCck izdksi c<+rk tkjgk Fkk] tks Qly ifjiDou dh voLFkk rd 60&85% rdigqap x;k FkkA jch VekVj ij ekpZ vkSj vizSy ekg esa thok.kqtvaxekjh dk Hkh izdksi vfèkd ¼80% rd½ FkkA

csaxyq# ¼dukZVd½ esa [kjhQ dh rqyuk esa xzh"e esa jl pwlusokys dhVksa] lSi QhMjksa vFkkZr VSVªkuk;dl ;wjVkbdh vkSjcsfefl;k Vscslkbdh lef"V dkQh vfèkd ikbZ xbZ rFkk xzh"edh rqyuk esa [kjhQ esa gsfydksoikZ vkfeZtsjk dk izdksi ¼ih =

0-05*½ vfèkd ik;k x;kA o"kZ 2012 ds nkSjku xzh"e esa igyhcjlkr gksus rFkk mlds ckn ,p- vkfeZtsjk vkSj ,l- fyVwjk dsfy, 17osa ,l,eMCY;w ¼20 fe-eh- o"kkZ½ esa vkSj o"kZ 2013 esa ,l-fyVwjk ds fy, 11osa ,l,eMCY;w ¼5 fd-eh- o"kkZ½ rFkk ,p-vkfeZtsjk ds fy, 15osa ,l,eMCY;w ¼33-2 fe-eh- o"kkZ½ esaQsjkseksu Qk¡n ¼VªSi½ idM+ esa ;g ik;k x;k fd ,l- fyVwjk dhrqyuk esa ,p- vkfeZtsjk ds vkxeu o izdVu ds fy, vfèkdueh dh vko';drk gksrh gSA o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku csaxyq#esa VekVj iÙkh dqapu csaxyq# laØe.k] dqdqeks ekst+sd laØe.k¼ekst+sd ,oa ifÙk;ksa esa eqM+u½ rFkk ewaxQyh cM uSØksfll laØe.kdh iqf"V gqbZA csaxyq# ¼dukZVd½ ds dqN LFkkuksa esa iNsrhvaxekjh dh vf/kd O;kiDrk ;gka rd dh 100% Hkh ns[kh xbZAVekVj esa ch- Vscslkb dh lef"V }kjk mRiUu iÙkh dqapu izdksiik;k x;k] tks [kjhQ dh rqyuk esa xzh"e dky esa vfèkd FkkA

dY;k.kh ¼if'pe caxky½ esa o"kZ2011 esa jch ds nkSjku dksjkbuhLiksjkdk izdksi ik;k x;k] gkykafd 44osavkSj 50osa ,l,eMCY;w ds nkSjku bldsvkxeu esa fHkUurk,a ns[kh xb±A o"kZ2011&12 dh rqyuk esa fiNys nksekSleksa ¼2012&13 vkSj 2013&14½esa jch ekSle ds nkSjku iÙkh dqapuizdksi rFkk vxsrh vaxekjh jksx deik;k x;kA leLr uk'khthoksa esa] jksxksads izdV gksus rFkk jksxksa ds viuh

throughout the crop growth period, H. armigerabetween flowering and fruiting stage and leaf minerincidence during first few weeks of crop growth. Onthe contrary continuous rainfall between 29 and 44SMWs resulted in increasing bacterial spot incidencefrom 34 - 47 SMW reaching 60- 85% at crop maturity.Bacterial blight also had high incidence (up to 80%)during March and April on the rabi tomato.

At Bengaluru (KA), sap feeders viz.Tetranychusurticae and Bemisia tabaci were significantly higher insummer compared to kharif, and the incidence ofHelicoverpa armigera was (p=0.05*) greater in kharifcompared to summer. The first summer showers andsubsequent pheromone trap catches observed in SMW17 (20 mm rainfall) for H. armigera and S. litura during2012 and after SMW 11 (5 mm rainfall) for S. lituraand after SMW 15 (33.2 mm rainfall) for H. armigeraduring 2013 indicated existence of higher thresholdmoisture required for H. armigera over S. litura foremergence. Virus diseases viz. tomato leaf curlBengaluru virus, cucumo mosaic virus (mosaic and leafdistortion), and groundnut bud necrosis virus (necrosisring spots similar to topso virus) were confirmed atBengaluru during 2013-14. Heavy incidence even up to100% of late blight was observed at some places inBengaluru (Karnataka). Incidence of tomato leaf curlvirus was B. tabaci population dependent and higherduring summer over kharif.

Kalyani (WB) had the incidence of target spotCorynespora during rabi since 2011 with differences inits onset between 44 and 50 SMWs. Leaf curl incidenceand early blight during rabi season of the previous two

years (2012-13and 2013-14)were lower ascompared to2011-12. Evenwith all theinsect pests, theinitiation andthe peak periodfollowed similarpattern (Table 1)associated with

fp= 7- dY;k.kh ¼if'pe caxky½ es o"kkZ cnyko vk/kkfjr forj.k

Fig. 7. Changing rainfall distribution at Kalyani (West Bengal)



the shift in planting dates from kharif to rabi (Octoberplanting in main fields) due to heavy rainfall duringAugust.

Aphids and whiteflies were low at Ludhiana (PB)

during Kharif with the leaf miner population increasing

from 2nd week of November to mid-December with

peak in December.

Leaf miner population declined to traces with

lowering of temperature and frost from December last

week (frost days: 25-30th December 2013, 4-7th January

2014). H. armigera damage to fruits was at peak of 15%

between 2nd fortnights of February and March 2014.

Damping off incidence was high in August (12.5 - 60%)

due to heavy rains and high temperature necessitating

gap filling in main fields during 1st week of September

for the kharif tomato. 70-80% damping off occurred

in nursery sown during mid-October leading to

resowing of nursery for the rabi crop. Tomato leaf

curl virus incidence was 8% at the end of August and

increased to 22 and 44% during early September to

November end, respectively.

Rahuri (MH) had higher leaf miner and whiteflies

during kharif of 2013-14, Moinabad (AP) and Bengaluru

(KA) had low populations over seasons and years.

Increased leaf miner and whiteflies from 2012 to 2013

in kharif and their decrease from 2012 to 2013 rabi was

noted at Rahuri (MH). Early blight was recorded from

all climatic zones irrespective of seasons and years. Early

blight severity highest maximum (> 50%) at Bengaluru

ifjdk"Bk ij igqapus dh izÑfr Bhd oSlh gh Fkh tSlh vxLrekg esa Hkkjh cjlkr ds dkj.k [kjhQ ls jch esa jksi.k dh frfFk;ksa¼eq[; [ksrksa esa vDVwcj esa jksi.k½ esa cnyko gksus ij FkhA

yqfèk;kuk ¼iatkc½ esa [kjhQ ds nkSjku ,fQM ¼psaik½ rFkklQsn efD[k;ksa dh lef"V de ikbZ xbZA iÙkh lqjaxd uk'khthodh lef"V esa uoEcj ls fnlEcj ekg ds nwljs lIrkg ls of)ns[kh xbZ] tks fnlEcj ekg esa viuh ijkdk"Bk ij igqap xbZ FkhA

fnlEcj 2013 ds vkf[kjh lIrkg ls rkieku rFkk ikykiM+us esa deh vkus ¼25&30 fnlEcj] 2013 rFkk 4&7 tuojh]2014 dh vofèk esa ikyk iM+us okys fnu½ ls iÙkh lqjaxd lef"Vesa deh ns[kh xbZA Qjojh ds nwljs i{k vkSj ekpZ 2014 ds chp,p- vkfeZtsjk }kjk Qyksa dks vfèkdre ¼15-1%½ uqdlku igqapk;kx;kA vxLr esa vfèkd o"kkZ vkSj mPp rkieku ds dkj.k vknzZiru jksx T;knk ¼12-5 & 60%½ Fkk] ftlds dkj.k [kjhQVekVj ds fy, flrEcj ds igys lIrkg ds nkSjku eq[; [ksrksaesa varjky Hkjus dh t:jr eglwl gqbZA vDVwcj ds eè; esacks;h x;h ikS/k'kkyk esa 70&80% vknzZ iru jksx gqvk] ftldsdkj.k jch Qly ds fy, ikS/k'kkyk dh cqokbZ iqu% djuh iM+hAvxLr ekg ds var rd VekVj iÙkh dqapu laØe.k jksx 8% Fkk]tks flrEcj ds 'kq#vkrh fnuksa ls uoEcj ds var ds chp dhle;kofèk esa c<+dj Øe'k% 22 vkSj 44% gks x;k FkkA

[kjhQ 2013&14 ds nkSjku jkgwjh ¼egkjk"Vª½ esa iÙkh lqjaxdvkSj lQsn efD[k;ksa dh lef"V vfèkd ikbZ xbZ] tcfd eksbZukckn¼vkUèkz izns'k½ rFkk csaxyq# esa fiNys ekSleksa ,oa o"kks± dh rqyukesa de lef"V ikbZ xbZA jkgwjh esa 2012 ls [kjhQ 2013 rdiÙkh lqjaxd rFkk lQsn efD[k;ksa dh lef"V vfèkd Fkh vkSj2012 ls 2013 jch rd mudh lef"V;ksa esa deh dks ntZ dhxbZA o"kZ 2012&13 ds [kjhQ rFkk jch nksuksa ekSleksa ds nkSjku

rkfydk 1 % jch VekVj esa uk'khthoksa dk vkxeu rFkk mudh ekStwnxh dk pje dky

Table 1: Initiation and peak periods of insect pests in rabi tomato

uk'khtho 2011&12 2012&13 2013&14

Insect pests vkxeu pje dky vkxeu pje dky vkxeu pje dky

Initiation Peak Initiation Peak Initiation Peak

,fQM ¼psaik½@Aphids 40 46 42-43 50 47-48 50

lQsn eD[kh@Whiteflies 37 46 40-41 45 45-46 47

c#Fkh@Mites 40 44 43-44 49 47-48 51

dk"BdhV@Thrips 37-38 46 43-44 50 47-48 49

iÙkh lqajxd@Leaf miner 40-41 46 47-48 5 51-52 8

,l- fyVwjk@S. litura 38-39 46 41-42 47 46-47 47

,p- vkfeZtsjk@H. armigera 42-43 48 49-50 3 2 5

rkfydk esa fn, x, eku ekSle foKku ekud lIrkg ¼,l,eMCY;w½ ds leuq:i gSaAValues in the table correspond to the Standard Meteorological weeks (SMW)

NCIPM


csaxyq# ¼dukZVd½ esa vxsrh vaxekjh rhozrk vfèkdre ¼50% lsvfèkd½ FkhA o"kZ 2012&13 ds nkSjku csaxyq#] jk;iqj ¼NÙkhlx<+½rFkk jkgqjh esa pwf.kZy QQwan ikbZ xbZ vkSj csxyq# esa bldh rhozrklokZfèkd ¼20%½ FkhA 2013&14 esa jch dh rqyuk esa [kjhQ ekSleesa pwf.kZy QQwan dh rhozrk vfèkd FkhA iÙkh dqapu jksx iwjs ns'kesa ik;k x;k vkSj vfèkdrj LFkkuksa ij [kjhQ dh rqyuk esa jchekSle esa ;g vfèkd ik;k x;kA dyh vaxekjh ¼cM CykbV½jktsUnz uxj ¼vkaèkz izns'k½] jkgwjh ¼egkjk"Vª½ vkSj jk;iqj ¼NÙkhlx<+½rd gh lhfer Fkk] gkykafd csaxyq# ¼dukZVd½ rFkk okjk.klh¼mÙkj izns'k½ esa Hkh bls NqV&iqV :i esa ik;k x;kA vè;;u fd,x, LFkkuksa dks NksM+dj jch dh rqyuk esa [kjhQ ekSle ds nkSjkuthok.kqt èkCck jksx rhoz Fkk] tcfd yqfèk;kuk ¼iatkc½ vkSjdY;k.kh ¼if'pe caxky½ esa ;g fcydqy Hkh ugha ik;k x;kA

iwokZuqeku djus ds fy, ekWMyksa dk fodklo"kZ 2006&07 ds MkVk lsV dk mi;ksx djrs gq, vnqFkqjbZ

¼rfeyukMq½] djtr ¼egkjk"Vª½] jk;iqj ¼NÙkhlx<+½ rFkk fpulqjk¼if'pe caxky½ ds LFkkuksa ds fy, rhu ls ikap i'p lIrkgksa¼ySx ohd½ ls ekSle dkjdksa] tSls vfèkdre rkieku] U;wurerkieku] izkr%dkyhu ,oa lk;adkyhu vkisf{kd vknzZrk rFkko"kkZ ij vk/kkfjr ihyk ruk Hksnd ¼okbZ,lch½ ds fy, lh4-5 ,YxksfjFe ¼dyu&fofèk½ dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fu;e vkèkkfjr¼fMlht+u Vªh csLM½ oxhZdj.k fd;k x;kA ;fn rhljs lIrkg esaokbZ,lch dh i'p lef"V] ikapos i'p lIrkg esa vkisf{kdvknzZrk rFkk rhljs i'p lIrkg ds fy, o"kkZ Øe'k% >4-6@VªSi@lIrkg] ≤ 54.4% rFkk ≤ 66.6 fe-eh- gSa rks ;g vuqekuyxk;k tkrk gS fd uk'khtho dh rhozrk vfèkd gksxhA fpulqjk¼if'pe caxky½ esa vuqLrjrk 83-5% ikbZ xbZA

LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk ds fy, LokuqHkkfod ¼g~;qfjfLVd½ ekSlevk/kkfjr fu;e cuk, x, ftlesa ekSle laca/kh ekunaMksa] tSlsvfèkdre rkieku 28&340 ls-] U;wure rkieku 18&220 ls-]vkisf{kd vknzZrk ¼izkr%dkyhu½ 55&65%] vkisf{kd vknzZrk¼lk;adkyhu½ 40&50% rFkk 20 fe-eh- ls vf/kd o"kkZ rFkkdkfnjh ¼vkaèkz izns'k½ ds ,l- fyVwjk ds vkB o"kks± ¼2006&13½ dsnkSjku Qsjkseksu VªSi idM+ laca/kh MkVk dks 'kkfey fd;k x;k Fkkftuds vkèkkj ij mPp rhozrk ¼400 ls vfèkd½] lkekU; rhozrk¼200&400½ vkSj U;wure rhozrk ¼200 ls de½ dk iwokZuqekufd;k x;kA ikap ekSle vkèkkfjr ekunaMksa esa ls ;k rks lHkhekunaMksa us ;k pkj us ;k rhu us ;k blls de ekunaMksa us Øe'k%mPp] lkekU; rFkk de rhozrk dk iwokZuqeku fd;kA fiNys rhuekSleksa dh rqyuk esa iwokZuqeku dh vkSlr lVhdrk 97% FkhA

èkkjokM+ ¼dukZVd½ ds ewaxQyh Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh ds

(KA) during both kharif and rabi seasons of 2012-13.

Powdery mildew was prevalent at Bengaluru (KA),

Raipur (CG) and Rahuri (MH) with Bengaluru

recording higher severity (upto 20%) during 2012-13

and 2013-14, severity being higher during kharif than

rabi. Leaf curl was also recorded across the country,

being higher in rabi over kharif in majority of the

locations. Bud blight was restricted to Rajendranagar

(AP), Rahuri (MH), and Raipur (CG) with traces at

Bengaluru (KA) and Varanasi (UP). Bacterial spot was

severe during kharif compared to rabi irrespective of

the study locations and absent at Ludhiana (PB) and

Kalyani (WB).

Development of models for forecasting

Decision tree-based classification using C4.5

algorithm enabled frame decision rules for yellow stem

borer (YSB) vis-a-vis weather variables viz. maximum

temperature, minimum temperature, morning, evening

relative humidity and rainfall from three to five lag

weeks for the locations of Aduthurai (TN), Karjat

(MH), Raipur (CG) and Chinsura (WB) using data sets

of 2000-2007. If lag population of YSB during the third

week, relative humidity in the fifth lag and rainfall for

the third lag week are >4.6/trap/week, ≤ 54.4% and

≤ 66.6mm, respectively the severity of pest attack would

be higher; 83.5% concordance was found for Chinsura

(WB).

Heuristic weather-based rule for Spodoptera

litura viz., maximum temperature 28-340C, minimum

temperature 18-22 0C, relative humidity (morning) 55-

65 %, relative humidity (evening) 40-50% and rainfall

> 20 mm predicting the severity viz., high (> 400),

moderate (200 - 400) and low (< 200) based on

pheromone catches of S. litura of Kadiri (AP) over

eight years (2006-2013) was developed. Satisfying all the

five, four and three or less, out of five weather-based

criteria predicted high, moderate and low severity,

respectively. Mean accuracy of prediction over the last

three seasons was 97%.

Ordinal logistic model predicting the weekly

male moth of S. litura (nos./trap/week) during higher

population period (34 SMW) was developed for the



fy, [kjhQ ekSle ¼26 ls 44 ,l,eMCY;w½ ds 22 o"kks± ¼1990&2011½ds uk'khtho ,oa tyok;q lacaèkh MkVk dk mi;ksx djrs gq,vkWfMZuy ykWftfLVd ekWMy fodflr fd;k x;k] ftlls ujeksFk] ,l- fyVwjk ¼la[;k izfr VªSi izfr ikni½ dh vfèkd lef"V¼34 ,l,eMCY;w½ ds nkSjku mldh lkIrkfgd lef"V dkiwokZuqeku fd;k tkrk gSA vkuqikfrd vkWM~ ekWMy dks G Lrjksa(g= 0, 1, 2), Y vkmVde vkSj nks fizfMDVj (× 1 ,oa × 2) dslkFk fuEu :i ls n'kkZ;k x;k gS %

groundnut cropping system of Dharwad (KA) using

pest and weather data of twenty two years (1990-2011)

for kharif season (26 to 44 SMW).The proportional odds

model with an outcome (Y) with G levels (g=0, 1, 2)

and two predictor (X1 and X2) is defined by

iwokZuqekuh; Js.kh ¼0] 1] 2½ ¼rkfydk 2½ bl izdkj gS =32osa ,l,eMCY;w dk vfèkdre rkieku vkSj = 32osa ,l,eMCY;wdh vkisf{kr vknzZrkA vkWM~l ¼fo"kerk½ dks bl izdkj n'kkZ;kx;k gS %

gkykafd ekWMy dh lkFkZdrk dk ,dk;ds lwpuk ekunaM¼,vkbZlh½ rFkk Ldkokt+Z ekunaM ¼,llh½ dk iz;ksx djrs gq,ewY;kadu fd;k x;k] ij fo'ys"k.k esa ,l- fyVwjk ij nks iwoZlIrkgksa ¼32osa ,l,eMCY;w ds½ esa vfèkdre rkieku rFkkizkr%dkyhu vkisf{kd vknzZrk dk dkQh izHkko ns[kk x;kA 32osa,l,eMCY;w ds vfèkdre rkieku ij izR;sd fMxzh of) dsfy, mPp ;k lkekU; vkWM~l dh rqyuk esa mPp uk'khthovkØe.k lacaèkh vkWM~l 8-6 ds xq.kkad esa of) gqbZ] tcfdizkr%dkyhu vkisf{kd vknzZrk ds fy, vkWM~l vuqikr 6-4 dkxq.kkad FkkA o"kZ 2012 vkSj 2013 ds fy, iwokZuqekfur izkf;drkvksarFkk izsf{kr izfrfØ;kvksa ds la;kstu ds chp izfr'kr dkWudkWMs±lvkSj fMldkWudkWMs±l ds vkèkkj ij ekWMy dk oSèkhdj.k fd;kx;k ftlesa dkWudkWMs±l ds fy, lekurk rFkk fMldkWudkWMs±lds fy, vlekurk ikbZ xbZA

vnFkqjbZ ¼rfeyukMq½] fpulqjk ¼if'pe caxky½] djtV¼egkjk"Vª½] jk;iqj ¼NÙkhlx<+½ ds fy, o"kZ 2000 ls 2010 rdds rFkk ekaM;k ¼dukZVd½ ds fy, 1995 ls 2010 rd ykbV VªSi

Here is the predictive category (0, 1, 2) (Table 2 ).= maximum temperature of 32nd SMW and =relative humidity morning of 32nd SMW, and oddsare defined as

While the adequacy of the model was assessed usingAkaike information criterion (AIC) and Schwarzcriterion (SC), the analysis revealed the significantinfluence of maximum temperature and morningrelative humidity prior to two weeks (of 32 SMW) onS. litura. For each degree increase in maximumtemperature of 32 SMW, the odds of being high pestattack (as opposed to lower or medium) increased by amultiple of 8.6 as compared to the odds of being highor medium (as opposed to low), while the odds ratiofor morning relative humidity was a multiple of 6.4.The validation of the model done in terms of percentconcordance and discordance between association ofpredicted probabilities and observed responses for 2012and 2013 showed match and non-match, respectively.

Empirical models for forewarning yellow stemborer at different centers based on light trap mothcatches (data sets of 2000 to 2010) for Aduthurai (TN),

rkfydk 2% /kkjokM+ esa ewaxQyh ij LiksMksIVsjk fyVwjk dk izlkj

Table 2: Distribution of Spodoptera litura in groundnut at Dharwad

uk'khtho mxzrk Js.kh vuqØfer oxhZdj.k (g) MkVk dk oxhZdj.k ¼lHkh dk %½Pest severity category Ordered classification (g) Distribution of data (% of total)

U;wu (<200) / Low (<200) Y=2 27.27

lkekU; (200-400) / Medium (200-400) Y=1 31.82

mPp (>400) / High(>400) Y=0 40.91

NCIPM


ls idM+s x, eksFk ds vkadM+ksa ¼MkVk lsV½ vkSj fofHkUu ,l,eMCY;wds lacaèk esa vfèkdre rkieku] U;wure rkieku] izkr%dkyhuvkisf{kd vknzZrk] lka;dkyhu vkisf{kd vknzZrk rFkk o"kkZ tSlsekSle dkjdksa ds vkèkkj ij fofHkUu dsUnzksa ij ihyk ruk csèkddh iwoZ psrkouh nsus ds fy, vkuqHkkfod ekWMy fodflr fd,x,] ftuesa ekSle ds iwokZuqeku ds lIrkg ls N% i'p lIrkgksard ds ekSle fufof"V;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;k] ftlls fofHkUulIrkgksa ds fy, iwokZuqeku ekWMyksa dks ik;k x;k ¼rkfydk 3½A

;|fi vnqFkqjbZ ¼rfeyukMq½] djtV ¼egkjk"Vª½] rFkk jk;iqj¼NÙkhlx<+½ LFkkuksa ds fy, [kjhQ ds nkSjku oSèkhdj.k vuqekfur

Chinsura (WB), Karjat (MH), Raipur (CG) and of 1995to 2010 for Mandya (KA) and weather variables viz.,maximum temperature, minimum temperature,morning relative humidity, evening relative humidityand rainfall were obtained for different SMWs.Weather inputs up to six lag weeks from week offorecast were considered to device forecast models fordifferent weeks (Table 3).

While validations were approximate for Aduthurai(TN), Karjat (MH) and Raipur (CG) locations during

Fks] fpulqjk ¼if'pe caxky½ vkSj ekaM;k ¼dukZVd½ ds fy, jchds nkSjku iwokZuqeku Øe'k% ;k rks de Fks ;k T;knk FksA

yqfèk;kuk ¼iatkc½ rFkk vnqFkqjbZ ¼rfeyukMq½ esa [kjhQ dsnkSjku vkSj fpulqjk ¼if'pe caxky½ ,ao ekaM;k ¼dukZVd½ esaiÙkh eksM+d ds iwokZuqeku ds fy, leku i)fr viukbZ xbZ¼rkfydk 4&5½A

kharif, the rabi predictions for Chinsurah (WB) and Mandya(KA) were under and over predictions, respectively.

Similar approach for leaf folder prediction duringkharif at Ludhiana (PB) and Aduthurai (TN), and rabifor the later location yielded models (Table 4 -5).

rkfydk 3% pkoy ihyk ruk csèkd ¼okbZ,lch½ dh iwoZ psrkouh ds fy, ekWMy

Table 3: Models for forewarning of rice yellow stem borer (YSB)

LFkku iwokZuqeku ekud lIrkg ekWMy R2

Location Standard meteorological Modelweek of forecast

vnFkqjbZ^ / Aduthurai^ 49 Y= 992.480 + 498.581 Z31

-1943.671 Z21

0.92

djtV^ / Karjat^ 37 Y= 1158.505+ 162.787 Z21

- 0.910 Z121

+ 0.290 Z141

0.94

jk;iqj^ / Raipur ^ 35 Y= 54931 + 1039.533 Z21

+ 3.270 Z131

- 111.218 Z20

0.93

fpulqjk/ Chinsura& 16 Y= -37.12967 + 1.483 Z351

+ 0.225 Z341

+ 0.376 Z450

0.92

ekaM;k/ Mandya& 17 Y= -5952.100 + 11.936 Z31

- 683.513 Z20

+ 1099.650 Z21

0.86

^: [kjhQ &: jch ekSle^: kharif season &: rabi season

rkfydk 4% [kjhQ èkku ds nkSjku iÙkh eksM+d dh iwoZ psrkouh ds fy, ekWMy

Table 4: Models for forewarning of leaf folder during kharif paddy

LFkku ekud lIrkg ij iwokZuqeku ekWMy R2

Location Standard meteorological week of forecast Model

yqfèk;kuk ¼iatkc½/ Ludhiana (PB) 32 Y= -14104.0 + 283.61Z21

0.58

33 Y= 10266.0 + 1.30 Z131

0.61

34 Y= 407.73 + 1.53 Z131

+ 550.99 Z21

- 4.78Z121

0.67

35 Y= 339.8 + 1.229 Z131

+ 383.158 Z21

0.67

36 Y= 1298.87 + 1.812Z131

+ 452.31Z21

0.68

vnqFkqjbZ ¼rfeyukMq½/ Aduthurai (TN) 32 Y= 235.288 + 5.174 Z11

+ 0.001Z151

0.64

33 Y= 316.145 + 5.140 Z11

- 0.0009Z151

0.63

34 Y= 330.305 + 5.100 Z11

- 0.0008Z151

0.64

35 Y= 210.979 + 4.182 Z11

+ 0.003Z151

0.67

Subscript digits indicate weighted and unweighted coefficients of max. temp. (1), min. temp. (2), morning relative humidity (3) and bright sunshine hours (5)



lkekU;r%] uk'khthoksa ¼ihyk ruk Hksnd vkSj iÙkh eksM+d½dh iwokZuqeku dh xbZ vkSj izsf{kr lef"V folaxfr;ka ikbZ xbZa]tks ekSle esa fofo/krk rFkk ekWMy fodflr djus esa mi;ksxfd, x, foxr o"kks± ¼fgLVksfjdy MkVk½ ds MkVk dh rqyuk esagkfy;k o"kks± ls laca) ekSle ?kVukØe ds dkj.k gks ldrs gSaAblds vykok] vU; Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh rFkk ikfjra= dsvar%fØ;k'khy ?kVdksa dh Hkh mijksDr folaxfr;ksa esa Hkwfedk gksldrh gSA

VekVj esa if.kZy jksxksa ds fy, vkuqHkfod ekWMydY;k.kh ¼i-ca-½ ls o"kZ 2011&12 vkSj 2012&13 nks ekSleksa

ds nkSjku VekVj ds ekSle dkjdksa rFkk if.kZy jksxksa ¼VkjxsVLikWV] iÙkh daqpu vkSj vxsrh vaxekjh½ ds izkjafHkd lglaca/k esalHkh ekSle pjksa] /kwi ds ?kaVksa dks NksM+dj] 0-01 izfr'kr ijudkjkRed ik, x,A

rFkkfi] ekSle pjksa ds lekos'ku ls fd, x, LVsi MkmulekJ;.k fo'ys"k.k esa vfèkdre rkieku ¼Vh eSDl-½] pedrhèkwi ds ?kaVs ¼,l,l½ rFkk vkSlr ok"i ncko ¼,eohih½ vkSjyf{kr LikWV ds fy, vafre izkXoDrk] iÙkh dqapu ds fy,pedrh èkwi ds ?kaVs ¼,l,l½ vkSj vkSlr ok"i ncko ¼,eohih½rFkk vxsrh vaxekjh jksx ds fy, vfèkdre rkieku ¼Vh eSDl-½,oa vkSlr ok"i ncko esa lehdj.k cuk;s x;s ¼rkfydk 6½A

In general, there are discrepancies in the predictedand observed population of insects (YSB and leaffolder), possibly arisen due to the weather variabilityand extreme events of weather associated with the recent

years (as evidenced through the pest scenario analysis)

over those used in the model development (historical

data sets) not to rule out other cropping system and

ecosystem interactive forces playing a major role.

Empirical models for foliar diseases of tomato

Preliminary correlation of weather variables and

foliage diseases (target spot, leaf curl and early blight)

of tomato of two seasons viz. 2011-12 and 2012-13 of

Kalyani (WB) revealed that all weather variables are

negatively correlated at 0.01% but for sun shine hours.

However, step down regression analysis made

through inclusion of weather variables yielded

equations with maximum temperature (T max.),

sunshine hours (ss) and mean vapour pressure (mvp) as

ultimate predictors of target spot, ss and mvp for leafcurl and Tmax. and mvp for early blight disease(Table 6).

rkfydk 6% dY;k.kh esa VekVj ds jksxksa dk vkuqHkfod iqokZuqeku ekWMy

Table 6: Empirical models to forecast diseases of tomato at Kalyani (WB)

jksx ekWMy lek;ksftr R2

Disease Model Adjusted R2

yf{kr LikWV Ý= 113.532-1.432(VheSDl)*-1.107(ss)-17.647(,eohih)**Target spot Ý= 113.532-1.432(Tmax.)*-1.107(ss)-17.647(mvp)** 0.91

VekVj iÙkh dqapu Ý = 124.814-2.595(,l,l)-31.824(,eohih)*Tomato leaf curl Ý = 124.814-2.595(ss)-31.824(mvp)* 0.91

vxsrh vaxekjh Ý = 43.668-2.595(VheSDl)*-5.180(,eohih)**Early blight Ý = 43.668-2.595(Tmax)*-5.180(mvp)** 0.79

iwokZuqeku ekWMyksa dk oSèkhdj.kLokuqHkfod iwokZuqeku fu;e % vnqFkqjbZ ¼rfeyukMq½ ,oa

jk;iqj ¼NÙkhlx<+½ rFkk èkkjokM+ ¼dukZVd½ ,oa dkfnjh ¼vkaèkzizns'k½ LFkkuksa ds lacaèk esa Øe'k pkoy vkSj ewaxQyh ds fy,fodflr fd, x, fu;e vkèkkfjr ekWMyksa ds iwokZuqeku dhlVhdrkvksa dks ek=kRed vkuqHkfod ekWMyksa dh rqyuk esaiwokZuqeku ds fy, fo'oluh; ,oa mi;ksxh ik;k x;k¼rkfydk 7½A

Validation of prediction models

Heuristic prediction rules: Prediction accuracies ofthe rule-based models developed for rice and groundnutpests for Aduthurai (TN) and Raipur (CG), andDharwad (KA) and Kadiri (AP) locations, respectivelyindicate their reliable utility in forewarning over thequantitaive empirical models (Table 7).

NCIPM


pkoy vkSj dikl vkèkkfjr iQlyhdj.k iz.kkfy;ksads izeq[k uk'khthoksa ds fy, fu.kZ; lgk;rkiz.kkfy;ksa dk fodkl (,u,vkbZih)

dikl lSi iQhMjksa (jl pwlus okys dhV) ds fy,ekSle vkèkkfjr iwokZuqeku dh tkap

o"kZ 2001&08 dh le;kofèk ds ,sfrgkfld MkVk lsV dkmi;ksx djrs gq, dikl lSi QhMjksa] vFkkZr tSflM ¼vejkLdkfMokLVsal ½] dk"BdhV ¼fFkzIl Vckdh ½ vkSj fefjMh ¼dSEihyksekfyohMk ½ ds fy, ekSle vkèkkfjr iwokZuqeku fu;e cuk, x,AekSle vkèkkfjr fu;eksa dks Lora= tkap MkVk lsV ¼2009&13½ds lkFk oSèkhÑr fd;k x;k] ftUgsa ekWMy fodflr djrs gq,mi;ksx ugha fd;k x;k FkkA tSflM] dk"BdhV rFkk fefjM dslacaèk esa vkSlr iwokZuqeku lVhdrk Øe'k% 89] 97 vkSj 93-2%

FkhA bu ekSle vkèkkfjr fu;eksa dks lkIrkfgd vkèkkj ijuk'khtho dh rhozrk ¼vkfFkZd FkzslgksYM Lrj ds vkèkkj ij de]lkekU; rFkk mPp rhozrk½ dk vkdyu djus gsrq mi;qDrizcaèku dk;Zuhfr;ka cukus ds fy, mi;ksx fd;k tk ldrk gSA

Development of decision support systems for majorinsect pests of rice and cotton-based croppingsystems (NAIP)

Testing of weather-based prediction for cotton sap

feeders

Weather-based prediction rules for cotton sapfeeders' viz. jassids (Amrasca devastans), thrips (Thripstabaci) and mirids (Campylomma livida) weredeveloped using historical data sets for the period 2001-2008. The weather-based rules were validated withindependent testing data sets (2009 -2013) not used inmodel building. The mean prediction accuracy overfive years in respect of jassids, thrips and mirids was89, 97 and 93.2%, respectively. These weather-basedrules can be used to estimate weekly pest severity(low, medium and high based on economic thresholdlevel) for taking up appropriate managementinterventions.

Qly LFkku uk'khtho iwokZuqeku lVhdrk* (%)Crop Location Insect pest Prediction accuracy* (%)

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

pkoy vnqFkqjbZ ¼rfeyukMq½ ihyk ruk csèkd 96.2 86.5 85.5

Rice Aduthurai (TN) Yellow stem borer 96.0 (98.1) 96.0 (100) 85.5 (100)

jk;iqj ¼NÙkhlx<+½ xky fet 100 (100) 100 (100) -Raipur (CG) Gall midge

dsl okWeZ (100) (100) (100)Case worm

gjh iÙkh ekgw (100) (98.7) (86.5)Green leaf hopper

ewaxQyh èkkjokM+ ¼dukZVd½ ,l- fyVwjk ¼lkIrkfgd½ 77.7 84.2 100Groundnut Dharwad (KA) S. litura (weekly)

,l- fyVwjk ¼ikf{kd½ 84.2 100 100S. litura (fortnightly)

dkfnjh ¼vkaèkz izns'k½ ,l- fyVwjk ¼lkIrkfgd½ 100 90.5 100Kadiri (AP) S. litura (weekly)

*: dks"Bdksa esa fn, x, vkadM+s iwokZuqeku lVhdrk,a gSa] tks lesfdr uk'khthoksa ds fy, ekWMy( ekSle vkèkkfjr ekunaM vkSj uk'khthoksa dh rhozrk ij vkèkkfjr gSa]fu;e http://ncipm.org.in/nicra ij miyCèk fd, x, gSaA

*: Figures in parentheses are prediction accuracies based on model for combined pests; Weather-based criteria and pest severity and rulesare available at http://ncipm.org.in/nicra

rkfydk 7% pkoy ,oa ewaxQyh ds uk'khthoksa ij LFkku ,oa o"kZ vk/kkfjr iwokZuqeku ekWMyksa dk oS/khdj.k

Table 7: Validation of forecasts of rice and groundnut pests over locations and years



eè; {ks=k ds dikl mRiknd LFkkuksa ds fy, ekSlevkèkkfjr iwokZuqekuksa dh tkap

,- fMokLVsal rFkk Vh- Vscslkb ds fy, lHkh LFkkuksa ijekSleksa ds nkSjku Øe'k% c<+rh rFkk ?kVrh izofÙk;ka uksV dhxb±A ukxiqj ds fy, fodflr fd, x, ekSle vkèkkfjr iwokZuqekufu;eksa] ftudh eè; {ks= ds LFkkuksa ds fy, tkap dh xbZAtSflM rFkk dk"BdhV nksuksa ds lacaèk esa iwokZuqeku lVhdrkvksaesa dkQh varj ik;k x;kA

p;fur lCth iQlyksa (cSaxu vkSj VekVj) esauk'khtho izcaèku ds fy, fo'ks"kK ra=k dk fodkl

o"kZ ds nkSjku fdLeksa ds p;u] Qly dVkbZ rFkk HkaMkj.kekWM~;wyksa ds fy, izksxzkfeax iwjh dh xbZA fdLe ds fy,] p;uiz;ksDrk ¼;wt+j½ dks Qly rFkk Qly cks;s tkus okys LFkku dksp;u djuk gksxkA iz;ksDrk p;u ds ckn ra=@flLVe mufdLeksa dh lwph iznf'kZr djrk gS] ftUgsa mDr LFkku ds fy,laLrqr fd;k x;k gSA blds vfrfjDr] vfèklwfpr fdLeksa ijfDyd djrs gq, iz;ksDrk Qlyksa ds ckjs esa leLr lwpuk,a] tSlsQlyksa dk fooj.k] foekspu ¼fjyhftax½ djus okyh ,tsalh]Qly ls lacafèkr uk'khtho fujksèkh mik;] bR;kfn ns[k ldrkgSA fo"k;ijd fo'ks"kKksa ds lq>koksa ij uk'khtho igpku ekWM~;wydk iqu% fMtkbu cuk;k x;kA uk'khtho dh igpku ds fy,iz;ksDrk dks pkj ckrksa dk p;u djuk gksxk] vFkkZr Qly dhvoLFkk] Qly ds izHkkfor Hkkx] uk'khtho }kjk igqpkbZ xbZvkjafHkd gkfu ds y{k.k rFkk vafre gkfu;ksa ds y{k.kksaA iz;ksDrkds p;u ¼lysD'ku½ ds vkèkkj ij bUQjsal batu flLVe esamiyC/k izklafxd ukWyst&csl ¼Kkukèkj½ dh [kkst djrk gS vkSj;FkkFkZ ;k laHkkfod uk'khthoksa dh igpku djrk gSA flLVe esa]uk'khtho dh igpku djus ds fy, uk'khtho }kjk Qly dksigqapk, x, uqdlku dh rLohj iznf'kZr djus dk Hkh fodYifn;k x;k gSA vfHkKkr uk'khtho ij fDyd djus ij flLVeokafNr uk'khtho ds ckjs esa lqlaxr lwpuk iznf'kZr djrk gSAbl laca/k esa] fo"k;ijd fo'ks"kKksa us Hkh dqN lq>ko fn, Fks]ftUgsa flLVe esa 'kkfey dj fy;k x;k gS rkfd bls vfèkdlwpukizn ,oa iz;ksDrk ds iz;ksx ds fy, lgt cuk;k tk ldsAvHkh rd flLVe ds lHkh ekWMyksa ds fy, izksxzkfeax iwjh dj yhxbZ gS vkSj flLVe dks fMcfxax ¼nks"k gVkus ds fy, fujh{k.k½ds vèkhu j[kk x;k gS] tks vHkh Hkh tkjh gSA fMcfxax rFkk tkapiwjs gksus ds ckn bls iz;ksDrkvksa ds fy, jklukizds dh osclkbVij miyCèk djk;k tk,xkA

Testing of weather-based predictions for cotton grow-

ing locations of Central zone

Increasing and decreasing trends of populationlevels for A. devastans and T. tabaci, respectively werenoted over seasons across all locations. The weather-based prediction rules developed for Nagpur locationwas tested for different locations of Central zone thatindicated varying degree of accuracies for both jassidsand thrips.

Development of expert system for pestmanagement in selected vegetable crops (Brinjaland tomato)

During the year, programming for selection ofvarieties, harvest and storage modules was completed.For variety, selection user has to select crop andlocation. Thereafter, system lists the varietiesrecommended for that location. Further clicking onlisted varieties, user can see all the information aboutthem such as description, releasing agency, its pestresistance, etc. Pest identification module too wasredesigned based on domain expert's suggestions. Forpest identification, user has to make four selections i.e.crop stage, parts affected, initial and final pest damagesymptoms. On the basis of user selection, the inferenceengine searches the knowledge base and identifies theexact pest or probable pests. In the system, option todisplay pest damage picture too has been added tofacilitate pest identification. On clicking the identifiedpest, system displays the relevant information aboutthat pest. The domain experts also suggested somechanges, which were incorporated into the system tomake it more informative and user-friendly. As of now,programming for all the modules of the system hasbeen completed and system has been put underdebugging which is continuing. Once debugging andtesting is over, this would be hosted on centre's website.

On completion, the outcome of the project in theform of expert system would cater to the needs of KVKpersonnel, extension workers and progressive farmers.

NCIPM


Technical assistance programme for cotton inMalawi (Africa): Implementation of ICT-basedpest surveillance in Malawi (Africa)

The project is aimed to develop and implement anICT-based e-pest surveillance system in cotton inMalawi (Africa) on feasible pilot scale. A team ofNCIPM scientists visited Malawi during 27 Nov to4 Dec 2013 to collect the baseline information aboutthe pest scenario, surveillance system and ICTinfrastructure available in Malawi for implementationof e-pest surveillance system.

Baseline information

The country has been divided into eight AgricultureDevelopment Divisions (ADD) covering 28 districts.Each district is having one District AgriculturalDevelopment Office (DADO) and in total 190Extension Planning Areas (EPAs). Various practiceswere promoted at national levels by ADDs throughDADO by organizing field days at the village and EPAlevel.

Baseline information was collected in Balaka andMachinga districts at district level from respectiveDADOs.

DADO, Balaka: Interaction with Incharge,DADO and officers of EPAs indicated that most ofthe area under cotton (95%) was rainfed and only 5%area was irrigated. Prevailing cropping system involvedcotton followed by cotton maize (intercropped withpigeon pea) or sorghum was planted in irrigated area

cropping systemthat comprisedof maize aftermaize or cottonfollowed byvegetables (incertain areas).Literacy rate ishigh (90%) bothamong malesand females. Lifeexpectancy waslow (45 formales; 43 for

mijksDr izfØ;k lEiUu gksus ij ifj;kstuk ifj.kke rgr]fo'ks"kK ra=@flLVe ds :i esa] Ñf"k foKku dsUnzksa ds dkfeZdksa]foLrkj dk;ZdrkZvksa rFkk mUur'khy fdlkuksa dh vko';drkvksadh iwfrZ djsxkA

eykoh (vizQhdk) esa dikl ds fy, rduhdhlgk;rk dk;ZØe% eykoh (vizQhdk) esa vkbZlhVhvkèkkfjr uk'khtho fuxjkuh dk dk;kZUo;u

bl ifj;kstuk dk mís'; eykoh ¼vÝhdk½ esa O;ogk;Zizk;ksfxd vkèkkj ij dikl esa vkbZlhVh vkèkkfjr uk'khthofuxjkuh iz.kkyh fodflr djuk rFkk mldk dk;kZUo;u djukgSA eykoh esa bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh iz.kkyh ds dk;kZUo;u dsfy, jklukizds ds oSKkfudksa dh ,d Vhe us eykoh esa uk'khthoifjn';] fuxjkuh iz.kkyh rFkk miyCèk vkbZlhVh volajpuk dsckjs esa vkèkkj js[kk lwpuk laxzfgr djus ds fy, fnukad 27uoEcj ls 4 uoEcj] 2013 ds nkSjku eykoh ¼vÝhdk½ dk nkSjkfd;kA

vkèkkj js[kk lwpukeykoh ns'k dks vkB Ñf"k fodkl izHkkxksa ¼,MhMh½ esa ckaVk

x;k gS] ftuesa 28 ftys gSaA izR;sd ftys esa ,d ftyk Ñf"kfodkl dk;kZy; ¼Mh,Mhvks½ rFkk dqy 190 foLrkj ;kstuk {ks=¼bZih,½ gSaA Ñf"k fodkl izHkkxksa us ftyk Ñf"k fodkl dk;kZy;ds ekè;e ls xkao vkSj foLrkj ;kstuk {ks=ksa ¼bZih,½ ds Lrjksa ijiz{ks= ¼QhYM½ fnol vk;ksftr dj jk"Vªh; Lrjksa ij fofHkUuÑf"k fØ;kvksa o fofèk;ksa dk izksUu;u fd;k gSA

ftyk Ñf"k fodkl dk;kZy; ¼Mh,Mhvks½ }kjk ftyk Lrjij cykdk rFkk efpaxk ftyksa esa vkèkkj js[kk ,d= dh xbZA

Mh,Mhvks] cykdk % izHkkjh Mh,Mhvksds lkFk rFkk bZih, ds vfèkdkfj;ksa dslkFk ckrphr djus ds nkSjku ;g Kkrgqvk fd dikl ds varxZr vfèkdrj {ks=¼95%½ flafpr FkkA {ks= esa dikl rFkkmlds ckn dikl] eDdk ¼vjgj ds lkFkvarjQlyhdj.k½ iz.kkyh viukbZ tkrh gSvkSj Tokj dk Hkh jksi.k fd;k tkrk gS]tcfd flapkbZ okys {ks= esa eDdk ds ckneDdk ;k dikl rFkk mlds ckn lfCt;ksa¼dqN {ks=ksa esa½ dh Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyhviukbZ tkrh gSA iq#"kksa rFkk efgykvksanksuksa esa mPp f'k{kk nj ¼90%½ gSA vusd

ftyk Ñf"k fodkl dk;kZy;] cykdk esa mifuns'kd ds lkFk,ulhvkbZih,e dh Vhe

NCIPM team with Deputy Director and officers at DistrictAgricultural Development Office, Balaka (Malawi)



females) due to variousreasons. For pestmanagement, in general,the farmers carried outtwo sprays for suckingpests and four to sixsprays for bollworms.Though N: P: Krecommendation is 90:0: 20-30 kg/ha but nofertilizer was applied incotton by the farmers.Average seed cottonyield is 800 kg/ha.

Villages: Interaction was undertaken with farmersfrom two cotton growing villages representing EPA,Bazale and EPA, Ulongwe. There were 271 villagesunder EPA, Bazale and 190 villages under EPA,Ulongwe. There were 700 households and each familyhaving 6-10 persons. Common varieties grown by thefarmers included SZ 9314 and QM301. Both the villageswere mainly rainfed.

Meeting at Ministry of Agriculture & Food Security

Two separate meetings were held at Ministry ofAgriculture and Food Security (MOAFS), one withMs. Christine C. Miambo, Deputy Director (Fieldcrops) and the second with Mr. F.M. Biggi Sajiwa,Comptroller, Department of Information andTechnology Management Services. One server isavailable at MOAFS for agriculture ICT infrastructuresfor implementation of project activities. All theAgriculture Development Divisions and DistrictAgriculture Development Offices are equipped withthe computers, internet connectivity and mobilefacilities. Mobile telephony is prevalent in the villagesthrough various cellular service providers.

dkj.kksa ds pyrs ekuoh; thouvof/k de gS ¼iq#"kksa ds fy, 45(efgykvksa ds fy, 43½A lkekU;:i ls] uk'khtho izcaèku ds fy,fdlku pwld uk'khthoksa ds fy,nks fNM+dko rFkk ckWyokeZ ¼xksy'kyHk½ ds fy, pkj ls N% fNM+dkodjrs gSasA ;|fi ukbVªkstu (N)]QkLQksjl (P) rFkk iksVk'k (K)

dks 90%0%20&30 fdxzk- izfr gs- dsvuqikr esa iz;ksx djus dh laLrqfrdh xbZ gS] ij fdlkuksa }kjk diklesa fdlh Hkh moZjd dk iz;ksx ughafd;k tkrk gSA dikl dh vkSlrmit 800 fdxzk- izfr gs- gSA

xkao % jklukizds dh Vhe us bZih,] cktkys rFkk bZih,]myksuXoh dk izfrfufèkRo djus okys nks xkaoksa ds fdlkuksa dslkFk ckr dhA bZih,e cktkys ds varxZr 271 xkao rFkk bZih,]myksuXoh ds varxZr 190 xkao gSasA xkaoksa esa 700 ifjokj jgrs gSasvkSj izR;sd ifjokj esa 6&10 yksx gksrs gSaA fdlku lkekU;fdLeksa dh [ksrh djrs gSa ftlesa ,ltsM 9314 vkSj D;w,e 301'kkfey gSaA ewyr% nksuksa xkao o"kkZfJr gSaA

Ñf"k ,oa [kk| lqj{kk ea=kky; esa cSBdÑf"k ,oa [kk| lqj{kk ea=ky; ¼,evks,,Q,l½ esa nks

vyx&vyx cSBdsa vk;ksftr dh xbZa] ,d lqJh fØlVkbu lh-fe;kEcks] mi funs'kd ¼iz{ks= Qly½ rFkk nwljh Jh ,Q- ,e-fcxh lkftok] fu;a=d] lwpuk ,oa izkS|ksfxdh izcaèku lsok dslkFkA ifj;kstuk ds fØ;kdykiksa ds dk;kZUo;u gsrq Ñf"klacaèkh vkbZlhVh volajpukvksa ds fy, Ñf"k ,oa [kk| lqj{kkea=ky; ¼,evks,,Q,l½ esa ,d loZj miyCèk gSA leLr Ñf"kfoHkkx izHkkxksa rFkk ftyk Ñf"k fodkl dk;kZy;ksa esa daI;wVj]baVjusV dusfDVfoVh rFkk eksckby lqfoèkk,a miyCèk gSaA xkao esafofHkUu lsY;wyj lsok iznkrkvksa ds ekè;e ls eksckby VsyhQksuhlsok miyCèk dh xbZ gSA

fdlkuksa ds lkFk ukudqack xkao ¼eykoh] vÝhdk½ ds,ulhvkbZih,e Vhe dh ckrphr

Interaction of team NCIPM with farmers ofNankumba village (Malawi, Africa)

NCIPM


Lkkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSjizHkko fo'ys"k.kSocio-Economic Issues and ImpactAnalysis of IPM

Impact assessment of IPM technology in rice atregional level in Haryana

Impact assessment of IPM technology wasconducted at regional level in Haryana in Basmati

rice as it was validated in Chajjpur village in DistrictPanipat during 2013-14. Total area under Basmati ricein Haryana was 6.22 lakh ha and the productivitywas 25.87 q/ha. Validation of IPM technology inChajjpur village during 2002-2005 indicated that netprofit of IPM technology over farmers' practice was` 17,500/ha If the IPM technology was adopted inBasmati growing area in whole of Haryana, the netbenefit of ` 10.88 billion would accrue to farmersand the savings in chemical pesticides would be of1430 tonnes. Sustainability of IPM technology showsthat IPM technology was still being adopted byfarmers after ten years of withdrawal from villageChajjpur as indicated in Table 1 below.

gfj;k.kk esa {ks=kh; Lrj ij pkoy esa vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxdh ds izHkko dk ewY;kadu

gfj;k.kk esa {ks=h; Lrj ij cklerh pkoy esa vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxdh ds izHkko dk ewY;kadu fd;k x;k ftls o"kZ 2013&14ds nkSjku ikuhir ftys ds Nktiqj xkao esa bls oSèkhÑr fd;kx;k FkkA gfj;k.kk esa cklerh pkoy ds varxZr dqy {ks= 6-22 yk[k gss- Fkk vkSj mRikndrk 25-87 fDo-a@gss- FkhA o"kZ2002&2005 ds nkSjku Nktiqj xkao esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdhds oSèkhdj.k ls ;g irk pyk fd fdlkuksa dh Ñf"k fofèk;ksadh rqyuk esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ls izkIr 'kq) ykHk` 17]500@& izfr gss- FkkA ;fn gfj;k.kk jkT; ds lexzcklerh pkoy dh [ksrh esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh viukbZ xbZgksrh rks fdlkuksa dks u dsoy ` 10-88 fcfy;u dk ykHkgksrk] cfYd 1430 Vu jklk;fud uk'khthouk'kd dh Hkhcpr gksrhA vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh v{kq..krk dk ,slk izHkko gSfd Nktiqj xkao esa 10 o"kks± ls vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh uviuk, tkus ds ckotwn vkt Hkh fdlkuksa }kjk vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxdh viukbZ tk jgh gS] tSlk fuEu rkfydk esa n'kkZ;kx;k gS %

rkfydk 1% o"kZ 2013 ds nkSjku Nktiqj] gfj;k.kk esa pkoy esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh vaxhdj.k lwpdkad ¼%½

Table 1: IPM technology adoption index (%) in rice during 2013 in Chajjpur, Haryana

izkS|kfxdh vaxhdj.k lwpdkad ¼%½Technology Adoption Index (%)

nks ikS/k izfr Vhyk @ Two seedlings per hill 79

moZjd dk foosdiw.kZ iz;ksx @ Judicious fertilizer application 90

ikuh dk foosdiw.kZ iz;ksx @ Judicious use of water 88

<sapk dk jksi.k @ Dhaincha plantation 90

tSo dkjdksa dk iz;ksx @ Use of bio-agents 95

jlk;fud uk'khthouk'kdksa dk iz;ksx ¼rRdkfyd vuqiz;ksx½ 7Use of chemical pesticide (spot application)


Lkkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj izHkko fo'ys"k.k | Socio Economic Issues and Impact Analysis of IPM

p;fur lCth iQlyksa esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksads viukus lEca/h ck/kvksa dk vè;;u

o"kZ 2013&14 ds nkSjku vè;;u djus ds fy, gfj;k.kk dslksuhir ftys esa jk; CykWd ds varxZr ikYnh xkao dk p;umn~ns'; gsrq fd;k x;kA bl xkao esa jklukizds lCth dhvkbZih,e Vhe }kjk fdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr esa LFkkufof'k"V xksHkh vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ka fodflr dh xbZ gSa vkSjbls c<+kok Hkh fn;k x;k gSA bl xkao esa vè;;u djus dkmís'; vkbZih,e izf'kf{kr xksHkh mRikndksa }kjk vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds vaxhdj.k esa vkus okyh leL;kvksa o dfBukbZ;ksadk irk yxkuk FkkA vfu;fer :i ls pqus x;s 68 fdlkuksa dslosZ{k.k }kjk eq[; ck/kkvksa dh igpku dks rkfydk&2 esa n'kkZ;kx;k gSA

Study on the constraints in adoption of IPMtechnologies in selected vegetable crops

The village Paldi, Block Rai, District Sonepat ofthe state Haryana was purposely selected to conductthe study during year 2013-14. The location specificcauliflower IPM technologies have been developed andpromoted in the village Paldi, Sonepat, Haryana bythe vegetable IPM team of NCIPM in farmers'participatory mode. This study was conducted withthe objective to identify the constraints in the adoptionof IPM technologies as perceived by the IPM trainedcauliflower growers. The main constraints identifiedby surveying the sixty eight randomly selected farmersare presented in Table-2.

rkfydk 2% xksHkh dh [ksrh djus okys fdlkuksa }kjk vkbZih,e dk;ZØe vaxhdj.k esa eglwl dh tkus okyh leL;k,a

Table 2: Constraints perceived by the farmers in adoption of IPM in cauliflower

leL;k,a % tokc nsus okys fdlkuConstraint % respondents

Lkekftd&vkfFkZd] ifjfLFkfrdkjd] volajpukRed rFkk uhfrxr leL;k,a

Socio-economic, situational, infrastructural and policy constraints

NksVh Hkwfetksr vkdkj / Small size of land holding 51.47

foÙkh; lalkèkuksa dk vHkko / Lack of financial resources 66.17

tSo uk'khthouk'kdksa ds vkiwfrZ dk vHkko\ vkbZih,e ?kVdLack of supply of bio-pesticides? IPM components 95.58

fdlkuksa esa vkilh lg;ksx esa deh / Poor cooperation among farmers 73.53

detksj ,o vizHkkoh jkT;&foLrkj leFkZu iz.kkyh / Weak and inefficient state extension support system 98.52

jkT; foLrkj ,tsafl;ksa }kjk vkbZih,e ij izf'k{k.k nsus ds fy, rFkk fdlkuksa ds fy, ,Dlikstj¼vuqHko izkIr djus gsrq½ nkSjksa dh vi;kZIr O;oLFkkLack of provision for IPM training and exposure visit by state extension agency 91.11

dhVuk'kd daifu;ksa }kjk dhVuk'kdksa ds vfèkd iz;ksx ds fy, tcnZLr izpkj&izlkj rFkk vukpkjAggressive propaganda and malpractices by the pesticide companies 97.05

le; ij xq.koÙkkiw.kZ vkbZih,e ?kVdksa o lkefxz;ksa dks miyCèk u djkus esa laLFkkxr leFkZu esa dehLack of institutional support of timely and quality IPM components 94.11

vkbZih,e dh fofèk ls mRikfnr mit ij izhfe;e ewY; dh dksbZ O;oLFkk dk u gksukNo provision for premium price for IPM produce 86.76

tkudkjh ,oa lwpuk lacaèkh leL;k,a / Knowledge and information constraints

fdlkuksa rd izekf.kr vkbZih,e lwpuk igqapkus dh foQyrkAbsence of authentic IPM information delivery at door step 98.52

jkT; foLrkj ,tsafl;ksa }kjk vkbZih,e ds laca/k esa mi;ksxh foLrkj lkfgR; miyCèk u djk ikukPoor availability of quality extension literature on IPM by state extension agency 85.29

izkS|ksfxdh; lacaèkh leL;k,a / Technological Constraint

vkbZih,e esa T;knk esgur rFkk T;knk etnwjksa dh vko';drk / More time and labour consuming 61.17

NCIPM


The study concluded that the amelioration of theseconstraints for the promotion of cauliflower IPM inlarger area is needed on priority. The constraints maybe overcome with the active involvement of variousstakeholders of IPM at one platform. The pro-activerole of state extension agencies in information deliveryand input supply certainly will motivate the farmersfor adoption of IPM. SHGs could also play vital rolein providing pest advisory services by facilitating IPMand extension services to farmers in collaboration withresearch and extension institutions.

Impact assessment of pesticides on environmentusing EIQ tool under rice cropping system

Impact of pesticides on environment was assessed usingEIQ tool under rice cropping system, at Sitapur district,Uttar Pradesh in collaboration with KVK-II, Katia, Sitapur,CSSRI, RRS and CISH, Lucknow. Base line informationof farmers from 14 different villages was collected andanalyzed. Majority of farmers living in these villages havingsmall land holdings. In farmers' participatory mode, thevalidation of IPM program was carried out by adopting31 farmers under IPM and equal number using farmers'practice, covering 62 acres area. In addition to this, fiveacre land was selected as control, where no interventionswere made.

The samples of soil and water were analyzed forpesticide residues, at different crop stages (pre-transplantation, mid and post crop season). Soil healthcards were developed for each adopted farmer.

Based on the information collected on pestscenario, availability of critical inputs, practice of usingcalendar-based and hazardous pesticides without labelclaims, six IPM modules were synthesized, each withfive replicates, and observations were made in thesemodules as well as in KVK farm and untreated control.

Major pest problems observed were leaf folder, stemborer, plant hoppers, hispa, gundhi bug, bacterial blightand blast. In a few fields, heavy infestation of white tipand root-knot nematode was recorded.

The pest and natural enemy count was observed inIPM, farmers' practice (FP) and untreated control, atdifferent intervals.The yield data revealed no significantdifferences among modules, but methods (IPM and

bl vè;;u ds fu"d"kZ esa ;g mYys[k fd;k x;k Fkk fdcM+s {ks= esa xksHkh vkbZih,e ds izksUu;u ds fy, mDr leL;kvksadk lekèkku djuk csgn t:jh gSA blds fy, vkbZih,e dsLVsdgksYMjksa ¼i.kZèkkjdksa½ dks ,d IysVQkeZ ij ,d lkFkyk;k tkuk pkfg, rFkk mudh lØh; Hkkxhnkjh ls leL;kvksadk gy <wa<+k tkuk pkfg,A ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd lwpuk ,oafufof"V ¼buiqV½ miyCèk djkus esa jkT; foLrkj ,tsafl;ksadh lfØ; Hkwfedk fuf'pr :i ls fdlkuksa dks vkbZih,e dsvaxhdj.k ds fy, izksRlkfgr djsxhA blds fy, fdlkuksa dhlgHkkfxrk i)fr ds ekè;e ls fdlkuksa dks mi;ksxh ,oaizekf.kd xksHkh vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds gLrkarj.k ,oaizlkj ds fy, jkT; foLrkj ,tsafl;ksa dh Hkwfedk dks l'Drfd;k tkuk vko';d gSA fdlkuksa ds la?k ¼,lksfl,'ku½rFkk Lo;a lgk;rk lewg Hkh vuqlaèkku ,oa foLrkj laLFkkvksads lg;ksx esa vkbZih,e vkSj foLrkj lsokvksa esa lgk;rknsdj uk'khtho lacaèkh lykgdkj lsok,a nsus esa vge HkwfedkfuHkk ldrs gSaA

pkoy iQlyhdj.k iz.kkyh ds varxZr bZvkbZD;wdk iz;ksx djrs gq, i;kZoj.k ij uk'khthouk'kdksads izHkko dk ewY;kadu

mÙkj izns'k ds lhrkiqj ftys esa pkoy Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyhds varxZr bZvkbZD;w dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Ñf"k foKku dsanz&II]dfr;k] lhrkiqj] lh,l,lvkjvkbZ] vkjvkj,l rFkklhvkbZ,l,p] y[kuÅ ds lg;ksx es a i;kZoj.k ijuk'khthouk'kdksa ds izHkko dk ewY;kadu fd;k x;kA 14 fofHkUuxkaoksa ds fdlkuksa ls vkèkkj&js[kk lwpuk ,d= dh xbZ vkSjmldk fo'ys"k.k fd;k x;kA bu xkaoksa esa jgus okys vfèkdrjfdlkuksa ds ikl tksrus ;ksX; Hkweh dkQh de gSA fdlkuksa dhlgHkkfxrk i)fr esa] vkbZih,e dk;ZØe ds varxZr 31 fdlkuksadks vaxhÑr djrs gq, rFkk bruh gh la[;k esa ,Qih fdlkuksadks lfEefyr djrs gq, vkbZih,e dk;ZØe dk oSèkhdj.k 62,dM+ {ks= ij fd;k x;k FkkA blds vfrfjDr] daVªksy ds :iesa ikap ,dM+ Hkwfe dk p;u fd;k x;k] tgka fdlh izdkjdksbZ izfØ;k ugha dh xbZA

Qly dh fofHkUu voLFkkvksa ¼izfrjksi.k ls igys] e/;Qly ekSle ds le; esa rFkk Qly ekSle mijkUr½ ij tyesa fo|eku jlk;fud vo'ks"kksa ds uewuksa dk fo'ys"k.k fd;kx;kA izR;sd vaxhÑr fdlku ds fy, enk LokLF; dkMZfodflr fd, x,A

uk'khtho ds ifjn'; ij ,d= dh xbZ lwpuk] vko';dfufof"V;ks ¼buiqV½ dh miyCèkrk rFkk dSysUMj vkèkkfjr ,oayscy nkoksa ds cxSj [krjukd dhVuk'kdksa ds iz;ksx dh


Lkkekftd&vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj izHkko fo'ys"k.k | Socio Economic Issues and Impact Analysis of IPM

fofèk ds vkèkkj ij 6 vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyksa dks la'ysf"kr fd;kx;k ¼izR;sd ekWM~;wy esa ikap iqujkoÙk Fks½ rFkk Ñf"k foKkudsanz }kjk bu ekM~;wyksa o daVªksy dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

izeq[k uk'khthoksa }kjk mRiUu leL;kvksa esa iÙkh eksM+d]ruk csèkd] ikni vHkZd ¼IykaV gksij½] fgLik] xaèkh cx] thok.kqtvaxekjh rFkk izLQqVu FksA dqN [ksrksa esa 'osrkxz jksx ¼OgkbVfVi½ vkSj tM+ foxyu lw=Ñfe Hkh fjdkWMZ fd, x,A

fofHkUu eè;karjksa ij vkbZih,e] fdlkuksa dh fofèk ¼,Qih½rFkk daVªksy esa uk'khtho ,oa izkÑfrd 'k=q dh lef"V ikbZ xbZAekWM~;wyksa esa mit ,oa vkadM+ksa dh nf"V ls dksbZ [kkl varj ughaFkk] ij vkbZih,e vkSj fdlkuksa dh Ñf"k fofèk;ksa o iz.kkfy;ksaesa dkQh varj 5% egÙkk dk vk/kkj ij ik;k x;kA

fofHkUu vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyksa ds ykHk % ykxr vuqikryxHkx ,d tSls FksA xSj&vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyksa ds lacaèk esaekewyh varj ik;k x;kA rFkkfi] ekWM~;wy 7 ¼,e 7½ 'ks"k ekWM~;wyksals fcydqy vyx FkkA fdlkuksa }kjk vius Lrj ij fofHkUu Ñf"kfØ;kvksa@fofèk;ksa dks viuk, tkus ds dkj.k ,slk varj ns[kktk ldrk gSA rFkkfi] lqO;ofLFkr izfØ;k rFkk lqizokgh Ñf"kfØ;kvksa ls vkbZih,e ekWM~;wy viukus okys fdlkuksa dks dkQhT;knk vkfFkZd ykHk izkIr gqvkA

farmers' practice) and weeds wounts were significantlydifferent (P<0.05).

The benefit:cost ratios of different IPM moduleswere almost at par. However, the module 7 (M7) wasquite different from rest of the modules. The differencemight have arisen because of different agriculturalpractices followed by the farmers at their end.However, the systematic approach and streamlinedagricultural practices created significant economicalreturn in IPM modules.

One is constantly reminded of the infinite lavishness and fertility of Nature

– inexhaustible abundance amid what seems enormous waste. And yet when

we look into any of Her operations..... we learn that no particle of Her

material is wasted or worn out. It is eternally flowing from use to use,

beauty to yet higher beauty.

John Muir, 1889

NCIPM


Wheat yellow rust incidence in north-western plainand northern hill zone (Haryana, Punjab andHimachal Pradesh)

In view of conducting pilot study on epidemiologyand forecasting of yellow rust of wheat in northernIndia, survey was conducted jointly by team of scientistsfrom Indian Agricultural Research Institute andNational Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Pusa,New Delhi, during January - March, 2014. The teamsurveyed wheat cropped areas for yellow rust innorthern plain and hill zones of Haryana, Punjab andHimachal Pradesh. The dominant varieties sown in theseareas were WH 711, HD 2967, PBW 550, PBW 551,PBW 621, HD 2932, PBW 750, HD 2894 and HD2851, PBW 343, and Barbat (local variety).

During the first survey (8-9 Jan 2014), survey teamvisited different wheat growing farmers’ fields invillages namely Badedi, Badonda, Shantadi under IndriBlock and villages such as Kheri Davdalan, Sura,Badsami, Ban of Ladwa Block (Karnal) and villages likeNandpura, Damla, Daurag, Kunjal, Ratangarh inYamuna Nagar district of Haryana. Afterward, surveyteam visited different wheat growing fields in villagesnamely Bhavakpur, Janetpur (Ambala, Haryana) andvillages Jangpura, Jalalpur, Jahanjeir (Mohali,Chandigarh), Sangowal, Rajgarh, Rara Sahib, Doraha,Machhiwada (Ludhiana, Punjab); Malikpur, ChandpurJakhera, Majara, Chandesar, Gangowal, UpperSurewal, Dher, Anandpur Sahib, Kalsera, Nangal(Ropar, Punjab). Overall the crop was in a goodcondition and was free from yellow rust and brownrust at all the places except in one village Ratangarh

mÙkj&if'peh eSnkuh {ks=kksa rFkk mÙkj ioZrh; {ks=kksa(gfj;k.kk] iatkc vkSj fgekpy izns'k) esa xsgwa esaihys jrqos dk izdksi

mÙkj Hkkjr esa xsgwa ij ihyk jrqok egkekjh ds izdksi ,oaiwokZuqeku dk izk;ksfxd vè;;u djus ds fy, Hkkjrh; Ñf"kvuqlaèkku laLFkku ¼vkbZ,vkjvkbZ½ rFkk jk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khthoizcaèku dsUnz] iwlk] ubZ fnYyh ds oSKkfudksa dh ,d Vhe ustuojh&ekpZ] 2014 ds nkSjku ,d la;qDr losZ{k.k fd;kA blVhe us ihyk jrqok ds izdksi dk vkdyu djus ds fy, mÙkjHkkjr ds eSnkuh {ks=ksa rFkk gfj;k.kk] iatkc vkSj fgekpy izns'kds igkM+h {ks=ksa esa xsgwa dh Qly okys {ks=ksa dk nkSjk fd;kA bu{ks=ksa esa cqokbZ dh xbZ xsgwa dh izeq[k fdLeksa esa MCY;w,p 711],pMh 2967] ihchMCY;w 550] ihchMCY;w 551] ihchMCY;w 621],pMh 2932] ihchMCY;w 750] ,pMh 2894 ,oa ,pMh 2851]ihchMCY;w 343 rFkk ckcZr ¼LFkkuh; fdLe½ fdLesa 'kkfey FkhaA

igys losZ{k.k ¼fnukad 8&9 tuojh] 2014½ ds nkSjkulosZ{k.k Vhe us gfj;k.kk ds ;equkuxj ftys esa banzh CykWd dsvarxZr xsgwa dh [ksrh djus okys fofHkUu fdlkuksa ds xkaoksa]vFkkZr cMsMh] cMksUMk] 'kkarMh( ykMok CykWd ¼djuky½ dsvarxZr [ksM+h nsonkyu] lqjk] cnleh] cSu rFkk gfj;k.kk ds gh;equkuxj ds uaniqjk] nkeyk] nkSjkx] dqaty] jRux<+ xkoksa dknkSjk fd;kA rRi'pkr] losZ{k.k Vhe us Hkkodiqj] tusriqj ¼vEckyk]gfj;k.kk½ vkSj taxiqjk] tykyiqj] tgkathj ¼eksgkyh] paMhx<+½]laxksoky] jktx<+] jkjk lkfgc] nksjkgk] ePNhokM+k ¼yqfèk;kuk]iatkc½ rFkk efydiqj] panuiqj t[ksM+k] ektjk] panslj] xaxksokyÅijh lqjsoky] èksj] vkuaniqj lkfgc] dysljk] ukaxy ¼jkisM+]iatkc½ xkaoksa esa xsgwa dh [ksrh djus okys fdlkuksa ds [ksrksa dkfujh{k.k fd;kA losZ{k.k esa ;g ik;k x;k fd dqy feykdj xsgwadh Qly dh fLFkfr vPNh Fkh vkSj dsoy jRux<+ xkao ¼nkeyk];equkuxj½ dks NksM+dj tgka MCY;w,p 711 xsgwa fdLe ij 3 oxZ

vU; vuqlaèkkfud xfrfofèk;kaOther Research Activities


vU; vuqlaèkkfud xfrfofèk;k | Other Research Activities

(near Damla, Yamuna Nagar), where yellow rust wasobserved up to 60S within 3 m2 radius (30004’18’’N,77011’26.2’’E, 220.51 m MSL) on var. WH 711. Overallcrop was in a good condition at all the places and noyellow rust incidence was recorded from any other placevisited by the survey team.

During the second survey (27 Jan 2014), visitedseveral wheat fields of Bayana, Randoli, Badedi, Ladwa(Karnal district), Radaur, Ratangarh and adjoiningvillages of Yamunanagar District (Haryana). Theobjective of this survey was to observe the spread ofyellow rust in adjoining fields from the infection focus,observed on 08 Jan 2014. There was no spread of yellowrust of wheat in Ratangarh village (Yamunanagar),where it was noticed on 08 Jan 2014. But spot incidenceof yellow rust was observed in Bayana village (IndriBlock, Karnal) to an extent of 40-50S (29°42’44.2’’N,76°59’53.1’’E). The infection was observed in a spot ofapprox 20 m2 area. The crop was at maximum tilleringto booting to early heading stage. The overall conditionof crop was good and healthy with hardly any diseaseincidence seen in the area surveyed.

During the third survey (2-4 Feb 2014), same routewas followed (Indri, Ladwa of Karnal; Radaur,Bilaspur, Sidhaura of Yamunanagar; Majara of Ambala;Machiwada of Ludhiana; Shahadpur, Mulana, ChamkarShahib, Rashidpur, Phool de Khurd, Balachaur ofRopar; Langranga, Nawashahar, Gari Ajeet Singhvillages of Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar district, Punjab).The dominant varieties were HD2967, HD 2329,HD2851, PBW 621 and PBW343. The overall healthof the crop was good with exception of generalyellowing in some isolated spots (not yellow rust) andisolated patches of yellow rust infection focus atShahadpur (20-40S, 76° 21' 43.6"’N, 30° 57' 41"E) andRashidpur (10-20S, 76° 23' 40"N, 30° 56' 9"E), Ropardistrict to the extent of 10-40 S (5 m2 area). There wasno spread of disease near the infection focal point,which was earlier detected.

During the fourth survey (6-7 Mar 2014), visitedseveral villages of Karnal, Ambala & Yamunanagar(Haryana) and Kartarpur, Ludhiana, Jalandhar,Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur and Shaheed Bhagat SinghNagar districts of Punjab. The objective of this survey

eh- jsfM;l {ks= dh nwjh ¼300 04'18'' N, 770 11'26-2'' E,220-51

eh- ,e,l,y½ ds Hkhrj 60,l rd ihyk jrqok ik;k x;k] lHkhLFkkuksa ij xsgwa dh Qly ihyk jrqok rFkk Hkwjk jrqok ds jksx ,oaizdksi ls eqDr ikbZ xbZA

nwljs losZ{k.k ¼27 tuojh] 2014½ ds nkSjku Vhe us ;equkuxj¼gfj;k.kk½ ds ck;kuk] jaMksyh] cMsMh] ykMok ¼djuky ftyk½]jknkSj] jRux<+ rFkk ;equkuxj ftys ds vkl&ikl ds xkaoksa esaxsgwa ds [ksrksa dk losZ{k.k fd;kA bl losZ{k.k dk mís'; fnukad08 tuojh] 2014 dks izsf{kr ihyk jrqok jksx ds laØe.k dkutnhdh [ksrksa esa QSyus dk vkdyu djuk FkkA jRux<+ xkao¼;equkuxj½ esa] tgka fnukad 08 tuojh 2014 dks bl jksx dksns[kk x;k] xsgwa dh Qly esa ihyk jrqok dk jksx ugha QSyk Fkk]ysfdu ck;kuk xkao ¼banzh CykWd] djuky½ esa ihyk jrqok dkizdksi 40&50 ,l ¼290 42'44-2'' N, 760 59'53-1'' E½ rd ns[kkx;kA laØfer {ks= yxHkx 20 oxZ eh- FkkA Qly iw.kZ:i lsrS;kj Fkh vkSj dVkbZ ds dxkj ij FkhA dqy feykdj] Qly dhfLFkfr dkQh vPNh Fkh rFkk losZ{k.k fd, x, {ks=ksa esa ihykjrqos dk dksbZ izdksi ugha ik;k x;kA

rhljs losZ{k.k ¼2&4 Qjojh] 2014½ ds nkSjku Hkh losZ{k.kds fy, mUgha ekxks± ¼banzh] ykMok] djuky( jknkSj] fcykliqj]flèkksM+k( ;equkuxj( ektjk] vEckyk] ePNhokM+k] yqfèk;kuk]'kkgniqj] ekSykuk] pedj lkfgc] j'khniqj] Qwy Ms [kqnZ] ckykpkSM+]jksiM+( yaxjaxk] uoklkgj] xjh vthr flag] 'kghn Hkxr flaguxj ftyk] iatkc½ dk vuqdj.k fd;k tSls fiNys losZ{k.k dsnkSjku viuk, x, FksA bu {ks=ksa esa izeq[k :i ls xsgwa dh ,pMh2967] ,pMh 2339] ,pMh 2851] ihchMCY;w 621 rFkk ihchMCY;w343 fdLeksa dh [skrh dh tkrh gSA jksiM+ ds 'kkgniqj ¼20–40S,

760 21'43–6'' N, 300 57'41'' E½ rFkk j'khniqj ¼10–20S, 760 23'40''

N, 300 56'9'' E½ esa xsgwa dh Qly lkekU; :i ls ihyh ikbZ xbZ¼vFkkZr ;g ihyk jrqok ds dkj.k ugha Fkk½] ijUrq NqV&iqV [ksrksaesa 10&40 ,l ¼5 oxZ eh- nwjh rd½ ihyk jrqok ds y{k.k fn[kkbZfn,A

pkSFks losZ{k.k ¼fnukad 6&7 ekpZ] 2014½ ds nkSjku gfj;k.kkds djuky] vEckyk rFkk ;equkuxj vkSj iatkc ds djrkjiqj]yqfèk;kuk] tyaèkj] xqjnkliqj] gksf'k;kjiqj rFkk 'kghn Hkxrflag uxj ftyksa dk losZ{k.k fd;k x;kA bl losZ{k.k dk mís';iwoZ esa ik, x, ihyk jrqok laØe.k dk utnhdh [ksrksa esa QSykodk vkdyu djuk FkkA losZ{k.k Vhe us ;g ik;k fd fdlkuksa}kjk izksfidksuktksy dk fNM+dko fd, tkus ls ihyk jrqok jksxfu;af=r fLFkfr esa Fkk rFkk laØe.k dsUnz ls utnhdh [ksrksa esaQSyko ugha gqvkA ysfdu laØe.k dsUnz ¼ftls iwoZ esa fjiksVZ

NCIPM


was to observe the spread of yellow rust in adjoiningfields from the Yellow Rust infection focus, noticedearlier. The survey team observed that the disease wascontrolled (which was reported earlier) by spraying ofPropiconazole and there was no spread in the adjoiningfield from infection focus. But some new wheat fieldslocated far from the infection focus (earlier reported)have been observed, viz. Nanhera (10S, 29°52’26.5’’N,77°05’29.8’’E) in Haryana and Gurdaspur ResearchFarm (10-80S, 32°03’04.8’’N, 75°25’1.2’’E), Hoshiarpur(20-30S, 31°27’03’’N, 75°39’01’’E), Dasuya (10-20S,31°48’05.7’’N, 75°39’6.9’’E), Kartarpur (10S,31°28’06.9’’N, 75°22’05.1’’E) of Punjab.

During the fifth survey (05 Mar 2014), visitedseveral fields of wheat growing areas of Rajasthan. Thecrop health was good and free from any rust infectionexcept RARI, Durgapura (26°53’07’’N, 75°48’03’’E),Jaipur and Bhaupura (27°25’07’’N, 77°08’06’’E),Bharatpur district, where 10-20S yellow rust of wheatwas recorded.

During the sixth survey (21-22 Mar 2014), severalwheat growing areas of Haryana indicated that mostof the wheat fields were free from yellow rust of wheatexcept Dingerheri (28°16’44.1’’N, 76°57’10’’E) (Mewatdist.), Nasibpur (28°06’26.5’’N, 76°08’12.1’’E),Dhanonda (28°21’82’’N,76°14’31.9’’E), Kakarala(28°17’78.6’’N, 76°19’16.0’’E) of Mahendergarhdistrict, Haryana, with only traces of yellow rust inwheat were observed in the variety PBW-343.

The survey team is in strong belief that systematicand detailed study of incidence and spread pattern ofyellow rust of wheat is needed because the appearanceof disease over a period of time has no specific pattern.The varietal pattern and geographical locations of wheathas also not reflected uniform pattern of yellow rustincidence during the survey period.

fd;k x;k Fkk½ ls fLFkr nwj&njkt bykdksa esa] vFkkZr gfj;k.kkesa uugsjk ¼10S, 290 52'26-5'' N, 770 05'29-8'' E½ rFkk iatkc esaxqjnkliqj vuqlaèkku dsUnz ¼10–80S, 320 03'04-8'' N, 750 25'1-2''

E½] gksf'k;kjiqj ¼20–30S, 310 27'03'' N, 750 39'01'' E½] nklq;k¼10–20S, 310 48'05-7'' N, 750 39'6-9'' E½ rFkk djrkjiqj ¼10S, 310

28'06-9'' N, 750 22'05-1'' E½ esa xsgwa ds dqN [ksrksa esa ihyk jrqosds y{k.k ik, x,A

ikaposa losZ{k.k ¼fnukad 05 ekpZ] 2014½ esa losZ{k.k Vhe usjktLFkku ds fofHkUu xsgwa ds [skrksa dk losZ{k.k fd;kAvkj,vkjvkbZ] nqxkZiqjk ¼260 53'07'' N, 750 48'03'' E½] t;iqj ,oaHkkSiqjk Hkjriqj ftyk ¼270 25'07'' N, 770 08'06'' E½ tgka xsgwa esa10&20 ,l rd ihyk jrqok ik;k x;k] dks NksM+dj Qly dhfLFkfr vPNh Fkh vkSj mlesa jrqos dk dksbZ laØe.k ugha ik;kx;kA

NBs losZ{k.k ¼fnukad 21&22 ekpZ] 2014½ ds nkSjku Vhe usgfj;k.kk esas xsgwa ds vusd [ksrksa dk losZ{k.k fd;k vkSj ;g ik;kfd esokr ftys ds varxZr fMaxjgsjh ¼280 16'44-1'' N, 760 57'10''

E½ rFkk egsUnzx<+ ftys ds varxZr ulhciqj ¼280 06'26-5'' N, 760

08'12-1'' E½] èkukSuank ¼280 21'82'' N, 760 14'31-9'' E½ vkSj ddjkyk¼280 17'78-6'' N, 760 19'16-0'' E½ xkaoksa dks NksM+dj xsgwa dsvfèkdrj [ksr ihyk jrqos ls eqDr ik, x, vkSj dsoyihchMCY;w&343 xsgwa fdLe esa ihyk jrqok ds NqV&iqV y{k.kik, x,A

ihyk jrqos ls xzflr [ksrksa esafdlkuksa ls ckrphr

Interaction with Farmers ininfected (YR) field

losZ{k.k Vhe dh vke jk; gS fd xsgwa esa ihyk jrqok jksx ,oaizdksi rFkk mlds QSyus dh izofÙk ij lrr :i ls foLrrvè;;u fd, tkus dh vko';drk gS D;ksafd yacs le; rdjksx tkjh jgus ls muds foLrkj esa fof'k"V izofÙk;ka ugha ns[khtk ldrh gSaA xsgwa dh fofoèkkRed izofÙk rFkk xsgwa ds fHkUuHkkSxksfyd LFkkuksa ds dkj.k losZ{k.k dh vofèk ds nkSjku lHkhLFkkuksa ij ihyk jrqok izdksi dh leku izofÙk ugha ns[kh xbZA

ihyk jrqok ¼60,l½

Yellow rust (60S)


ekuo lalkèku fodkl ,oa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk gLrkukarj.k | Human Resource Development and Transfer of IPM Technologies

ekuo lalkèku fodkl ,oa vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk gLrkukarj.k

Human Resource Development andTransfer of IPM Technologies

IPM exhibition

Krishi Vasant Mela

NCIPM participated in Krishi Vasant Mela atNagpur during 8-13 Feb 2014 for dissemination of IPMtechniques. A large number of farmers, researchers,extension functionaries, planners and students fromdifferent parts of the country visited the IPM stall andshowed keen interest in the validated IPM technologies.

vkbZih,e izn'kZuhÑf"k olar esyk

jklukizds us vkbZih,e rduhdksa dk izlkj djus ds fy,ukxiqj esa fnukad 8&13 Qjojh 2014 ds nkSjku Ñf"k olar esysesa lgHkkfxrk dhA ns'k ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa ds fdlkuksa] vuqlaèkkudrkZvksa]foLrkj inkfèkdkfj;ksa] ;kstukdkjksa rFkk fo|kfFkZ;ksa us vkbZih,eLVky dk nkSjk fd;k vkSj oS|hÑr vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa esadkQh #fp fn[kkbZA

HkkÑvuqla] ubZ fnYyh esa iwlk Ñf"k foKku esys esavkbZih,e dh izn'kZuh

jklukizds us Hkkjrh; Ñf"k vuqlaèkku laLFkku] ubZ fnYyh}kjk vius ifjlj esa Þv{kq..k Ñf"k ds fy, tyok;q izfrLdanhizkS|ksfxfd;kaß 'kh"kZd ij fnukad 26&28 Qjojh] 2014 ds

IPM Exhibition at Pusa Krishi Vigyan Mela, IARI,

New Delhi

The NCIPM also participated in Pusa Krishi VigyanMela organized by IARI during 26-28 Feb 2014 throughinstallation of an IPM stall and distribution of relevant

jklukizds ds LVky ij Hkkjrh; Ñf"k vuqlaèkku ifj"kn~ ds ekuuh; egkfuns'kd rFkk lgk;d egkfuns'kd ¼ikni laj{k.k o tholqj{kk½

Hon'ble DG and ADG (PP and Biosafety), ICAR at NCIPM stall

NCIPM


literature in the ICAR pavilion at IARI, New Delhiwith the theme "Climate Resilient Technologies forSustainable Agriculture". This exhibition is used as avehicle for dissemination of technologies by the IARIevery year as a long tradition and has been very popularamong the farmers, researchers, extension functionaries,planners and students throughout the country

Visitors to NCIPM

A number of students, farmers, extensionfunctionaries, researchers, planners, journalists andentrepreneurs from different parts of the country visitedNCIPM. They were apprised about the NCIPMactivities using various teaching aids, demonstrated theIPM technologies like bio-control agents at the Bio-agents Lab. Visitors were also made aware of the IPMconcept, philosophy and importance through lectures,and were shown documentary films on IPM.

The farmers and extension workers from severalstates viz. Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, MadhyaPradesh, Haryana and Rajasthan along with theextension functionaries visited NCIPM. Farmers-scientists interaction sessions were organized for sharingthe experiences mutually in pest management. Farmersnarrated their pest problems and pest managementpractices adopted, while scientists apprised aboutsuitable IPM solutions. The lectures on IPM conceptand its components were also organized, the visits tobio-control lab was arranged and extension literatureon IPM was given to them. Pest problems, pestmanagement practices and constraints in pestmanagement were documented through questionnairefor extension studies.

Students from across the country also visitedNCIPM. They were introduced to NCIPM activitiesand its role in promotion of IPM using various teachingaids. bio-control lab and AKMU cell were visited bythese students and extension literatures on IPM werealso provided to them.

nkSjku vk;ksftr iwlk Ñf"k foKku esys esa Hkh lgHkkfxrk dh]tgka jklukizds us HkkÑvuqi ds isosfy;u esa vkbZih,e ij ,dLVky LFkkfir fd;k rFkk vkbZih,e lacaèkh i=&if=dk,a ¼lkfgR;½Hkh forfjr dhA Hkkjrh; Ñf"k vuqlaèkku laLFkku] ubZ fnYyh]}kjk bl izn'kZuh dk vk;kstu izR;sd o"kZ izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dkizlkj djus ds fy, fd;k tkrk gS] tks mldh dkQh iqjkuhijEijk gS vkSj fdlkuksa] vuqlaèkkudrkZvksa] foLrkj inkfèkdkfj;ksa]m|fe;ksa] ;kstukvksa rFkk ns'k ds fo|kfFkZ;ksa esa ;g izn'kZuhdkQh yksdfiz; gSA

jklukizds esa vkxarqdksa dk nkSjkns'k ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa ds fdlkuksa] vuqlaèkkudrkZvksa] foLrkj

inkfèkdkfj;ksa] ;kstukdkjksa m|fe;ksa] i=dkjksa rFkk fo|kfFkZ;ksaus vkbZih,e dk nkSjk fd;kA jklukizds ds fØ;kdykiksa ds ckjsesa vkxarqdksa dks voxr djk;k x;k] ftlds fy, fofHkUuf'k{k.k lgk;rkvksa dk bLrseky fd;k x;k vkSj tSo&dkjdiz;ksx'kkyk ij tSo&fu;a=.k dkjdksa tSlh izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dkizn'kZu fn[kk;k x;kA vkxarqdksa dks vkbZih,e ds fl)kar]Kku&rRoksa vkSj egÙkk dh tkudkjh nsus ds fy, O;k[;ku fn,x, vkSj vkbZih,e ij or&fp= Hkh fn[kk;k x;kA

ns'k ds vusd jkT;ksa] tSls mÙkj izns'k] fcgkj] >kj[kaM] eè;izns'k] gfj;k.kk vkSj jktLFkku ds fdlkuksa vkSj foLrkj dkexkjksads lkFk foLrkj inkfèkdkfj;ksa us jklukizds dk nkSjk fd;kAuk'khtho izcaèku esa ,d nwljs ds vuqHkoksa dk vknku&iznkudjus ds fy, Ñ"kd&oSKkfud ijLij ckrphr lacaèkh l=ksa dkvk;kstu fd;k x;kA fdlkuksa us uk'khtho izcaèku esa viuhleL;kvksa rFkk rRlacaèk esa muds }kjk viukbZ tk jgh Ñf"kfofèk;ksa ds ckjs esa foLrr :i ls vius fopkj O;Dr fd,] tcfdoSKkfudksa us vkbZih,e dh mfpr dk;Zuhfr;ksa ls mUgsa voxrdjk;kA vkbZih,e esa fl)karksa rFkk mlds ?kVdksa ij O;k[;kuHkh fn, x,A tSo&fu;a=.k iz;ksx'kkyk ds nkSjs dk izcaèk fd;kx;k vkSj mUgsa vkbZih,e lacaèkh foLrkj lkfgR; miyCèk djk;kx;kA foLrkj vè;;uksa ds fy, uk'khtho rFkk uk'khtho izcaèkulacaèkh fofèk;ksa ,oa leL;kvksa dk iz'ukofy;ksa ds ekè;e lsizys[khdj.k fd;k x;kA

ns'k ds vusd Hkkxksa dss Nk=ksa us Hkh jklukizds dk nkSjkfd;kA fofHkUu f'k{k.k lkexzh dk mi;ksx djrs gq, bu Nk=ksa dksjklukizds ds fØ;kdykiksa o xfrfofèk;ksa rFkk vkbZih,e dsizksUu;u esa mldh Hkwfedk ls voxr djk;k x;kA bu Nk=ksa ustSodkjd iz;ksx'kkyk rFkk ,ds,e;w izdks"B dk Hkh nkSjk fd;kvkSj mUgsa vkbZih,e lacaèkh i= if=dk,a ¼lkfgR;½ Hkh nh xbZaA



MkW- v#.k ds- èkj ¼eSjhySaM] ;w,l,½

Dr. Arun Dhar, (Maryland, USA)

02 tqykbZ 2013

02 July 2013

Þty Ñf"k esa Vhdksa ,oa jksxksipkjksadk fodkl% ikni foKku dhizklafxdrkÞ ij lsfeukj nsus gsrqTo deliver a seminar on"Developing vaccines andtherapies in aquaculture:Relevance to Plant Science"

MkW- dUgS;k pkSèkjh] mi lfpo ¼f'k{kk½] HkkÑvuqi

Sh. Kanhaiya Chaudhary, Deputy Secretary (ICAR)

12&17 vxLr 2013

12-17 Aug 2013

ÞlkoZtfud izki.kÞ ij O;k[;kunsus gsrqTo delivere lectures on"Public Procurement"

MkW- fiVj dsueksj] mi funs'kd] ikni laj{k.k ,oa ikni izHkkx] Hkkjr esa,Q,vks izfrfufèk]

Dr. Peter Kenmore, Deputy Director, Plant Production andProtection Division, FAO

19 flrEcj 2013

19 Sep 2013

vkbZih,e ij ,d lsfeukj nsusgsrq

To delivere a seminar onIPM

vkxUrqd frfFk mns';Visitors Date Purpose

Distinguised Visitors

fof'k"V vkxUrqd

lh,chvkbZ ¼dSch½ VheMkW- myfjp dqgyeku ¼vkjMh lh,chvkbZ fLoVtjySaM vkSj izksxzke dk;Zikyd]ikni&vuqlkj½] MkW 'kku gkWCl ¼oSf'od funs'kd] ukWyst cSad½] MkW jfo [ksrjiky ¼daVªhfuns'kd] bafM;k ,oa lkbal funs'kd] ,f'k;k] lh,chvkbZ½ rFkk MkW- dkO;k nlgksjk

¼ofj"B oSKkfud] lh,chvkbZ½CABI teamDr. Ulrich Kuhlmann (RD CABI Switzerland and ProgrammeExecutive, Plant-wise), Dr. Shaun Hobbs (Global Director, KnowledgeBank), Dr. Ravi Khetarpal (Country Director, India, and ScienceDirector, Asia, CABI) and Dr. Kavya Dashora (Sr. Scientist, CABI)

16 ebZ 2013

16 May 2013

jklukizds ds lkFk lg;ksx dslaHkkfod {ks=ksa ij ppkZ djus gsrq

Possible areas of collaborationwith NCIPM.

MkW- Loiu dqekj nÙkk] mi egkfuns'kd ¼Qly foKku½ vkSj MkW- ih- ds-pdorhZ] lgk- egkfuns'kd ¼ikni laj{k.k½] HkkÑvuqi

Dr. Swapan Kumar Datta, Deputy Director General (CropScience) and Dr. P. K. Chakrabarty, Assistant Director General(PP), ICAR

22 vDVwcj 2013

22 Oct 2013

cEckoM ¼ftyk xkSre cq) uxj]mÙkj izns'k½ esa cklerh pkoy esavkbZih,e oSèkhdj.k ,oa izlkjdk;ZØe ds nkSjs gsrq

IPM validation anddissemination programmein Basmati rice beingconducted by NCIPM atBambawad (DistrictGautam Budh Nagar, UP)

Jh MkWuokgh byk fxusV] mik/;{k] pktZ bZ Msl fjys'kUl] pSEcj Ms dkelZ ,oabaMLVªh] vkbojh dksLV rFkk dSe#u ls ekyksax lkfgc ,oa MkW- ds oh izHkq¼la;qDr funs'kd] vuqlaèkku] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ½Donwahi Illa Ginette, Vice President, Charge e des Relationsfrom Chamber de commerce at Industries de Coted'Ivoire fromIvory Coast, Marewe Malong Sahib from Cameroon andDr K V Prabhu (Joint Director - Research, IARI)

06 uoEcj 2013

06 Nov 2013

jklukizds ds lkFk Hkkoh lg;ksxij ppkZ djus gsrq

To discuss futurecollaboration with NCIPM

NCIPM


Ø-la- fo"k; fnukad izfrHkkfx;ksa LFkkudh la[;k Venue

S. No. Topic Date No. ofparticipants

1- pkoy dh Qly esa vkbZih,e dh Hkwfedk 31 ebZ 2013 46 Ñf"k foKku dsUnz&II] dfr;k] lhrkiqj]Role of IPM in rice crop 31 May 2013 mÙkj izns'k

Krishi Vigyan Kendra-II,

Katia, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh

2- lw=Ñfe lacaèkh leL;k,a rFkk mudk izcaèku 13 twu 2013 87 'kdqukgyh] lksjkck rkyqdk] ftyk Nematode problems and their management 13 June 2013 f'keksxk] dukZVd

Shakunahalli (Soraba tq,

Shimoga Dist), Karnataka

3- ulZjh iwoZ dk;Z'kkyk ¼dhVuk'kdksa dk foosdiw.kZ iz;ksx½ 03 tqykbZ 2013 38 vksjhiqj xkao] xkSjhxat] mÙkj izns'kPre-nursery workshop (Judicious use of pesticides) 03 July 2013 Village Oripur, Gaurigunj,

Uttar Pradesh

4- izfrjksi.k ¼tSo&dkjdksa dk iz;ksx½ 16 vxLr 2013 54 c[kkfj;k] if'peh pEikju] fcgkjTransplanting (Use of bio-agents) 16 Aug 2013 Bakharia, West Champaran,

Bihar

5- Hkkjr ds iwoksZÙkj ioZrh; {ks= dh egRoiw.kZ 9&11 flrEcj 2013 49 HkkÑvuqi] ukxkySaM dsUnz] >jukikuhQlyksa esa vkbZih,e 9 -11 Sep 2013 ICAR, Nagaland Centre,

IPM in Important Crops of NEH Region of India Jharnapani

6- iwoksZÙkj ioZrh; {ks= dh izeq[k Qlyksa ij lesfdr 13&15 flrEcj 2013 37 iwoksZÙkj ioZrh; {ks= ifjlj] mes;euk'khtho izcaèku 13-15 Sep 2013 ICAR Research Complex

Integrated Pest Management on Major Crops for NEH Region, Umiam

of NEH Region

7- dYys QwVus dh voLFkk ¼uk'khtho ,oa izkÑfrd 'k=q dh igpku½ 01 vDVwcj 2013 22 Lons'k xkao] ef.kiqjTillering stage (Identification of pest and 01 Oct 2013 Swadesh village Manipur

natural enemy)

8- dhVuk'kd ds iz;ksx o vuqiz;ksx esa tkudkjh lk>k djuk 28 vDVwcj 2013 48 Ñf"k foKku dsUnz&II] dfr;k] lhrkiqj]Knowledge sharing in Pesticide use and 28 Oct 2013 mÙkj izns'kapplication Krishi Vigyan Kendra-II,

Katia, Sitapur, UP

9- f=iqjk ds iz{ks= inkfèkdkfj;ksa ds fy, lesfdr 20&22 uoEcj 2013 75 izKku Hkou] vxjrykuk'khtho izcaèku 20-22 Nov 2013 Pragyan Bhawan, Agartala

Integrated Pest Management for Field

Functionaries of Tripura

10- f=iqjk ds mUur'khy fdlkuksa ds fy, lesfdr 19&22 uoEcj 2013 56 iwoksZÙkj {ks= HkkÑvuqi vuqlaèkkuuk'khtho izcaèku ifjlj] f=iqjk dsUnz] ysEcqpsjkIntegrated Pest Management for Progressive 19-22 Nov 2013 ICAR Research Complex forFarmers of Tripura NEH Region, Tripura Centre

at Lembucherra

11- vxys Qlyhdj.k vuqØe.k ij vkbZih,e dk izHkko 29 tuojh 2014 24 vkSjhiqj xkao] xkSjhxat] mÙkj izns'kImpact of IPM on next cropping sequence 29 Jan 2014 Village Oripur. Gaurigunj,

Uttar Pradesh

12- fdlkuksa ds vuqHko rFkk iz{ks= nkSjk 21 Qjojh 2014 36 lhvkbZ,l,p] lh,l,lvkjvkbZ]Farmers experiences and field visit 21 Feb 2014 y[kuÅ] mÙkj izns'k

CISH, CSSRI, Lucknow,

Uttar Pradesh

ekuo lalk/u fodkl (,pvkjMh)@ Human Resource Development (HRD)

fdlkuksa ds fy, izf'k{k.k rFkk iz{ks=k fnolksa dk vk;kstuTrainings / Farmers' field / day



Ø-la- fo"k; fnukad izfrHkkfx;ksa LFkkudh la[;k Venue

S. No. Topic Date No. ofparticipants

13- gfj;k.kk ,oa jktLFkku esa ljlksa&rksfj;k ds LDysjksfVfu;k 05 ekpZ 2014 250 ,lds,u,;w] dsohds] uoxkao] vyojfoxyu ds izcaèku ij ljlksa] iz{ks= fnol 05 Mar 2014 ¼jktLFkku½Mustard Field Day on management of SKNAU, KVK, Navgaon,

Sclerotinia rot of rapeseed-mustard in Alwar (Rajasthan)

Haryana and Rajasthan

14- lw=Ñfe izcaèku ds fy, lw=Ñfe dh igpku djus 14 ekpZ 2014 152 ;w,p,,l] f'keksxkgsrq tkx:drk fnol 14 Mar 2014 UHAS, Shimoga

Nematode Awareness Day Identification

of Nematode Management

15- pkoy esa tM+ foxyu ds fy, lw=Ñfe dk izcaèku 15 ekpZ 2014 182 fcMkjs xkao] f'keksxk] dukZVdRice Root-Knot Nematode Management 15 Mar 2013 Bidare Village, Shimoga,

Karnataka

NCIPM


lqfo/k,a vkSj ?kVukØeFacilities and Events

Library

The Library of the Centre now has more than 2446books, encyclopedia and manuals, covering variousaspects of agriculture including integrated pestmanagement, computer applications, economic,statistics and chemistry. NCIPM regularly subscribesseveral journals on plant protection, annual reviews andabstracts, thus enriching the literature facility regularly.

Agriculture Knowledge Management Unit (AKMU)

Institute is actively engaged in development of web-based databases and information systems on differentaspects of IPM using latest ICT tools. In the last 3-4years, the Centre has ventured into e-pest surveillancein important crops of the country. For successfulimplementation of the IT-based programmes, Centrehas established its own server facility consisting of fourservers for crop database and e-mail. Centre's websiteand all the web applications are successfully runningon these servers. Information on NCIPM web site isupdated regularly. 50 mailboxes of institute staff aremaintained with 24 mbps line internet connectivity.AKMU Cell is also engaged in developing user-friendlyexpert systems, PMIS and other softwares useful fordecision making on IPM popularisation.

Diagnostic laboratory

NCIPM has a diagnostic and microbial laboratoryand has a repository of important insect pathogensand fungal antagonists, and the nucleus cultures ofbioagents are supplied for field testing purposes acrossthe Nation. Trainings on mass production technologyof bioagents and quality control of biopesticides toprospective entrepreneurs are taken up from time totime.

iqLrdky;dsUnz dh iqLrdky; esa 2446 ls vfèkd iqLrdsa] fo'odks"k

vkSj fu;ekofy;ka miyCèk gSa] tks uk'khtho izcaèku] dEI;wVjvuqiz;ksxksa] vkfFkZd ,oa lkaf[;dh rFkk jlk;u foKku lfgrÑf"k ds vusd vk;keksa dks lfEefyr djrs gSaA ;g dsUnzvkbZih,e vkSj ikni laj{k.k] okf"kZd iqujh{k.kksa rFkk lkj&laxzgksads lacaèk esa fu;fer :i ls vusd varjkZ"Vªh; ,oa jk"Vªh; tuZyksadk vfHknku djrk gS] ftlds dkj.k dsUnz dk iqLrdky;lkfgR; dh nf"V ls lEiUu gSA iqLrdky; esa ikni laj{k.k ds{ks= esa uohure izdk'ku fo|eku gSaA

Ñf"k Kku izcaèku bdkbZ (,ds,e;w)vkèkqfud vkbZlhVh midj.kksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, laLFkku

vkbZih,e ds fofHkUu vk;keksa ij osc vkèkkfjr MkVkcslksa vkSjlwpuk ra=ksa ds fodkl esa lfØ; :i ls iz;kljr gSA foxr3&4 o"kks± esa dsUnz us ns'k dh egRoiw.kZ Qlyksa ds lacaèk esabZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh esa nLrd nh gSA vkbZVh vkèkkfjr dk;ZØeksads lQy dk;kZUo;u ds fy, dsUnz us Lo;a dh loZj lqfoèkkLFkkfir dh gS] ftlesa nks MSy loZj & ,,l ihbZ 2900lfEefyr gSa tks Qly MkVkcsl vkSj esy ds fy, osc ds :iesa lsok iznku djrs gSaA bu loZjksa esa dsUnz dh osclkbV rFkk oscds lHkh vuqiz;ksx lQyrkiwoZd lapkfyr gks jgs gSaA blosclkbV esa lwpukvksa dks fu;fer :i ls lkekf;d fd;k tkrkgSA laLFkku ds 50 esy ckWDl 24 ,echih,l ykbu baVjusVlEidZ ls vuqjf{kr fd, tkrs gSaA ,ds,e;w izdks"B iz;ksDrkfgrS"kh fo'ks"kK ra=ksa dks fodflr djus esa Hkh laca) gSA vkbZih,edh yksdfiz;rk ds ihNs ih,evkbZ,l rFkk vU; lkWVos;jfu.kZ; fuekZ.k gsrq dkQh mi;ksxh gSaA

uSnkfud (MkbXuksfLVd) iz;ksx'kkykdsUnz ds ikl ,d laxzg gS] ftlesa egRoiw.kZ dhV jksxk.kq

vkSj QQwan izfrjksèkh laxzfgr gSa( vkSj tSodkjdksa ds ukfHkdlaoèkZuksa dh iwjs ns'k esa QhYM ijh{k.k ds fy, vkiwfrZ dh tkrhgSA le;≤ ij tSodkjdksa dh O;kid mRiknu izkS|ksfxdhrFkk laHkkfod m|fe;ksa dks tSo dhVuk'kdksa dh xq.koÙkk dsfu;a=.k ij izf'k{k.k fn;k tkrk gSA


lqfo/kk,a vkSj ?kVukØe | Facilities and Events

Prioritisation, Monitoring and Evaluation Cell (PMEcell)

Prioritisation, Monitoring and Evaluation (PME)cell maintains records of all the research projects andprogrammes of the Centre. Parliamentary records havebeen maintained in the form of question and answerfile. Submission of monthly cabinet, quarterly and halfyearly progress reports, provision of material forDARE report of the scientists to the Council andprocessing proposal for training/ seminar/symposia/conference are carried out through PME Cell. Sendingmonthly cabinet report to the council, processing andsending proposals, etc. of all the officials of the Centre,sending 'Quarterly Progress Report' to the Council,annual report material to Council for DARE report,six-monthly targets and achievements of the scientists(HYPM) of the Centre to the Council are the otheractivities of the PME cell.

Research Advisory Committee (RAC) meeting

Meeting of the RAC was held during 29-30 Apr2013 at NCIPM under the Chairmanship of Dr SSChahal, Ex Vice- Chancellor, MPUAT, Udaipur asChairman along with Dr RJ Rabindra, Dr P Reddy,Dr MK Naik, Dr AR Sharma, Dr PS Birthal, Dr TPRajendran ADG (PP) and Director, NCIPM asmembers. The committee also approved the actiontaken report on recommendations of last RAC. Theresearch programmes of the institute were presentedand evaluated; recommendations were made regardingfurther improvement of programmes of NCIPM. TheCouncil has subsequently approved the proceedings ofthe meeting.

Institute Research Committee (IRC) meeting

The meeting of the IRC was held on 13, 14 and 22May 2013 under the Chairmanship of Dr. C.Chattopadhyay, Director, NCIPM. The ongoingresearch programmes of the Centre were reviewed andevaluated along with Action Taken Report of last IRCmeeting along with necessary suggestions. Technicalprogramme for 2013-14 was finalized thereafter. TheDirector complimented the scientists for achievementsof the Centre, specifically the success achieved insurveillance programme in Maharashtra and initiationof ICT-based project in Malawi. Various projects,

izkFkehdhdj.k] fuxjkuh vkSj ewY;kadu izdks"B(ih,ebZ izdks"B)

izkFkehdhdj.k] fuxjkuh vkSj ewY;kadu izdks"B ¼ih,ebZizdks"B½ dsUnz ds lHkh vuqlaèkku ifj;kstukvksa vkSj dk;ZØeksa dsvfHkys[kksa dks vuqjf{kr djrk gSA lalnh; vfHkys[kksa dks iz'u,oa mÙkj Qkby ds :i esa vuqjf{kr fd;k x;k gSA ih,ebZizdks"B }kjk ekfld dSfcusV] =Sekfld rFkk v)Z&okf"kZd izxfrizfronsu] oSKkfudksa ds Ms;j izfrosnuksa dks ifj"kn dks izLrqrdjus ds fy, izkoèkku vkSj izf'k{k.k@lsfeukj@laxks"Bh@lEesyuds fy, izLrkoksa dks izkslsl fd;k x;k gSA ih,ebZ izdks"B dhvU; xfrfofèk;ksa esa ifj"kn dks ekfld dSfcusV izfrosnu Hkstuk]dsUnz ds lHkh inkfèkdkfj;ksa ds izLrkoksa dks izkslsl dj vkxsHkstuk] ifj"kn dks =Sekfld izxfr izfrosnu Hkstuk] Ms;j izfrosnuds fy, ifj"kn dks okf"kZd izfrosnu lkexzh] v)Z&okf"kZd y{;vkSj ifj"kn dks oSKkfudksa ds v)Z&okf"kZd ¼,pokbZih,e½miyfCèk;ksa dks Hkstuk 'kkfey gSA

vuqlaèkku lykgdkj lfefr (vkj,lh) dh cSBdvkj,lh dh cSBd MkW- ,l- ,l- pgy] mi&dqyifr

¼lsokfuoRRk½ ,eih;w,Vh] mn;iqj dh vè;{krk esa jklukizds esa29&30 ekpZ] 2013 dks gqbZ MkW- vkj- ts- jfoUnzk] MkW- ih- jsM~Mh]MkW- ,e- ds uk;d] MkW- ,- vkj- 'kekZ] MkW- ih- ,l- fojFky] MkW-Vh- ih- jktsUnzu] lgk- egkfuns'kd ¼ikni laj{k.k½] HkkÑvuqirFkk jklukizds ds funs'kd MkW- lh- pV~Vksikè;k; us cSBd esaHkkx fy;kA lfefr us fiNyh vkj,lh dh ,Vhvkj fjiksVZ dkvuqeksnu fd;kA cSBd esa jklukizds ds vuqlaèkkfud dk;ZØeksa

dk izLrqrhdj.k fd;k x;k vkSj mudh leh{kk dh xbZ( dsUnz dsdk;ZØeksa esa vkSj vfèkd lqèkkj ykus ds fy, flQkfj'ksa dh xb±ArRi'pkr ifj"kn }kjk cSBd dh dk;Zokfg;ksa dk vuqeksnufd;k x;kA

laLFkku vuqlaèkku lfefr (vkbZvkjlh)MkW- lh- pV~Vksikè;k;] funs'kd] jk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho

izcaèku dsUnz dh vè;{krk esa laLFkku vuqlaèkku lfefr dh cSBd13&14 ,oa 22 ebZ] 2013 ds nkSjku gqbZA dsUnz ds izxfr'khyvuqlaèkku dk;ZØeksa ds lkFk&lkFk vkbZvkjlh dh fiNyh ,Vhvkj

NCIPM


including the externally-funded ones and major activitiesof the Centre were deliberated in the meeting underfive programmes. Mid-term IRC was held during 25-26 Oct 2013 to review the research programmes goingon in the Centre.

Quinquennial Review Team (QRT): 2008-14

On 23 April 2013 the QRT (Prof. Anupam Varma,Prof. A.N. Mukhopadhyay, Prof. B.V. Patil, Prof. D.J.Patel & Prof. V. Kumar) visited field trials on pestdynamics being carried out under NICRA programmein Boro rice in collaboration with Rice ResearchStation, Chinsurah (W. Bengal) and root-knot nematodemanagement trial conducted in pointed gourd (Parwal)and brinjal crops in collaboration with BCKV, Kalyani(W. Bengal). Dr. S.K. Roy, Dr. S. Chatterjee and

fjiksVZ dk vko';d lq>koksa ds lkFk iqujh{k.k ,oa ewY;kadufd;k x;k rFkk o"kZ 2013&14 ds fy, rduhdh dk;ZØeksa dksvafre :i fn;k x;kA funs'kd us dsUnz dh miyfCèk;ksa ds fy,]fo'ks"k :i ls egkjk"Vª esa fuxjkuh dk;ZØe rFkk eykoh esavkbZlhVh vkèkkfjr ifj;kstuk 'kq: djus ds fy, oSKkfudksa dkscèkkbZ nhA cSBd esa dsUnz dh cká ifj;kstukvksa vkSj vU; izeq[kdk;ZdrkZvksa dks feykdj ikap dk;ZØeksa ds vèkhu fopkj&foe'kZfd;k x;kA jklukizds esa izxfr'khy vuqlaèkku dk;ZØeksa dhleh{kk djus ds fy, fnukad 25&26 vDVwcj] 2013 ds nkSjkueè;kofèk vkbZvkjlh dh cSBd dk vk;kstu fd;k x;kA

iapo"khZ; leh{kk Vhe (D;wvkjVh) 2008&14fnukad 23 vizSy 2013 dks D;wvkjVh us ¼izks- vuqie oekZ]

izks- ,-,u- eq[kksik/;k;] izks- ch-oh- ikfVy] izks- Mh-ts- iVsy ,oaizks- oh- dqekj½ pkoy vuqlaèkku dsUnz] fpulqjk] if'pe caxky dslg;ksx esa cksjks pkoy esa ,uvkbZlhvkj, ¼fuØk½ dk;ZØe dsvarxZr uk'khtho dh xfrfof/k;ksa ij pyk, tk jgs iz{ks=ijh{k.kksa rFkk chlhdsoh dY;k.kh ¼if'pe caxky½ ds lg;ksx esaijoy ,oa cSaxu dh Qlyksa ij vk;ksftr tM+ xkaB lw=Ñfeizcaèku ijh{k.k dk nkSjk fd;kA vkjvkj,l ls MkW- ,l- ds- jkW;]MkW- ,l- pVthZ rFkk MkW- fpjkJh xkaxqyh] oSKkfud us Vhe dhvxqokbZ dh vkSj cksjks pkoy esa nks LFkkuksa ij ijh{k.k fn[kk,AvkbZih,e dh dk;Zuhfr;ksa ds vuqlkj cSaxu esa tM+&foxyujksx dks de djus esa ulZjh esa VªkbdksMekZ fofjMh 7-5 fdxzk-izfr gs- dh nj ls+ ,QokbZ,e 375 fdxzk- izfr gss- dk iz;ksx rFkkjksi.k ds 21 fnuksa ds ckn dkcksZQqjku 0-3 xzk- izfr ikni dkiz;ksx izHkkodkjh ik;k x;kA blh izdkj ls ijoy ds lacaèk esaHkh Vh- fofjMh ds leku izHkko ns[ks x,A D;wvkjVh Vhe uscsgrj ifj.kkeksa ds fy, ijoy esa Vh- fofjMh ds nwljh ckjiz;ksx fd, tkus dh lykg nhA if'pr caxky ds 24 ijxuk¼mÙkj½ ds jkepUnziqje esa D;wvkjVh Vhe us cksjks pkoy esalw=Ñfe ds ckjs esa tkx:drk rFkk izcaèku fofèk;ksa dkstkuus&le>us ds fy, vk, yxHkx 50 fdlkuksa dks lacksfèkrfd;kA Vhe us ;g Hkh lq>ko fn;k fd lw=Ñfe ds izcaèku dsfy, ulZjh vkSj eq[; [ksr esa dkcksZQqjku vkSj L;wMkseksulQyksjslsal ds lkFk&lkFk isflyksekblsl fyykflul Hkh iz;ksxfd;k tk ldrk gSA

fnukad 07 vxLr] 2013 dks D;wvkjVh Vhe us xqtjkr dsoMksnjk ftys esa èkkor xkao dk nkSjk fd;k] tgka vkuan Ñf"kfo'ofo|ky;] vkuan ds lg;ksx esa ,uvkbZ,lih,e ¼chVhdikl½ ifj;kstuk py jgh gSA jklukizds ls MkW- lh- pV~Vksikè;k;]MkW- vkj- ds- raoj rFkk ,,;w vkuan ls MkW- cksjkM] MkW- HkkjiksM+krFkk MkW- rwewy Hkh D;wvkjVh Vhe ds lkFk xkao ds nkSjs esa 'kkfeyFksA

D;wvkjVh Vhe us fnukad 23 flrEcj] 2013 dks dukZVdds fcnj ftys esa gqeukckn CykWd ds varxZr exny xkao dk Hkh

Dr. Chirasree Ganguly, Scientists from RRS led theteam and showed the trials at two locations in Bororice. IPM interventions in brinjal crop involving theapplication of Trichoderma viride @ 7.5 kg/ ha + FYM@ 375 kg/ha in nursery followed by application ofcarbofuran @ 0.3 g a. i./plant at 21 days after plantingwas found effective in reducing root-knot nematodesin brinjal. Similar effect of T. viride was also observedin pointed gourd. Second application of T. viride inpointed gourd was suggested by QRT for better results.At Ramchandrapur in 24 Parganas (N), the teamaddressed about 50 farmers gathered for nematodeawareness and management practices in Boro rice. Itwas also suggested that along with carbofuran andPseudomonas fluorescens, Paecilomyces lilacinus may alsobe tried for nematode management in nursery and mainfield.

On 7 Aug 2013, the QRT visited Dhawat villagelocated in Vadodara district of Gujarat, where NISPM



(Bt cotton) project activities are being carried out incollaboration with Anand Agricultural University,Anand. Dr. C. Chattopadhyay, Dr. R.K. Tanwar andMr. S.P. Singh from NCIPM and Dr. Borad, Dr.Bharpoda and Dr. Tumool from AAU, Anand alsojoined the team during their visit to the village.

The QRT also visited Magadal village ofHumnabad block in Bidar district of Karnataka on 23Sep 2013, where IPM trial is being carried out in pigeonpea. The team visited pigeon pea field of Sh. BasavarajGadi (1.2 ha) and interacted with 50 farmers. Oneprogressive farmer informed that as a result ofadoption of IPM technology he could get higher yieldsthan non-IPM farmers. The team also visited pulseprogramme (2008-11) carried out at Afzalpur village inGulbarga on 24 Sep 2013, interacted with KVK staffand progressive farmers, where the team learnt aboutthe impact of IPM technology. The team also visitedUAS, Raichur where chilli IPM programme was goingon and IPM technology sustainability was admired bythe QRT.

On 27 Sep 2013, QRT visited large-scale validationtrial in Basmati rice being carried out in Bambawadvillage (Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar, UP). Dr. VirenderKumar, Member QRT suggested that all the farmersshould maintain records for calculating the expenditureincurred on purchasing different items and net gain atthe end of crop season. The farmers were further advisedto include the labour cost of family members whilecalculating the benefit /cost ratio as most of the farmersdo not include their own efforts as cost in wages.

NICRA group meetings

Crop-wise group meetings of the 'Pest Dynamicsin relation to Climate Change [Target Crops: Rice,Pigeonpea, Groundnut & Tomato]' under NationalInitiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)2013-14 were held on various dates with theparticipation of associates from Centers of Real TimePest Dynamics (RTPD) across the country at NCIPM,New Delhi.

Dr. C. Chattopadhyay, Director (NCIPM)chaired the inaugural sessions, and scientists fromCentral Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture(CRIDA), Hyderabad Drs YG Prasad (RTPD-Rice),

nkSjk fd;k] tgka vjgj ij vkbZih,e ijh{k.k fd;k tk jgk gSAD;wvkjVh Vhe us Hkh cklokjkt xknh ¼1-2 gs- Hkwfe½ ds vjgjds [ksr dk nkSjk fd;k vkSj 50 fdlkuksa ls ckr dhA ,dmUur'khy fdlku us crk;k fd vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds vaxhdj.kds ifj.kkeLo:i mls xSj&vkbZih,e fdlkuksa dh rqyuk esavfèkd ykHk izkIr gqvkA fnukad 24 flrEcj] 2013 dks Vhe usxqycxkZ esa vQty xkao esa vk;ksftr IYl dk;ZØe ¼2008&11½dk Hkh nkSjk fd;k vkSj mUur'khy fdlkuksa rFkk Ñf"k foKkudsUnzksa ds deZpkfj;ksa ds lkFk ckr dh vkSj vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdhds izHkko ds ckjs esa tkudkjh yhA D;wvkjVh Vhe us ;w,,l]jk;pwj dk Hkh nkSjk fd;k tgka vkbZih,e dk;ZØe pyk;k tkjgk FkkA Vhe us vkbZih,e ds izkS|ksfxdh ds v{kq..krk dhiz'kalk dhA

fnukad 27 flrEcj] 2013 dks D;wvkjVh Vhe us cEckoMxkao ¼ftyk xkSre cq) uxj] mÙkj izns'k½ esa cklerh pkoy esacM+s iSekus ij pyk, tk jgs oSèkhdj.k ijh{k.k dk nkSjk fd;kAD;wvkjVh Vhe ds lnL; MkW- ohjsUnz dqekj us lq>ko fn;k fdlHkh fdlkuksa dks fofHkUu enksa ds Ø; ds fy, [kpZ fd, x,O;; rFkk Qly ekSle ds var esa 'kq) ykHk ds ifjdyu ds fy,fjdkMZ vuqjf{kr djus pkfg,A mUgksaus fdlkuksa dks ykxr ykHkvuqikr dk ifjdyu djrs gq, mlesa ifjokj }kjk fd, x, Jeykxr dks Hkh tksM+us dk lq>ko fn;k x;k D;ksafd vfèkdrjfdlku ,slk ugha djrs gSa vkSj etnwjh ykxr esa vius Je dks'kkfey ugha djrs gSaA

jk"Vªh; df"k tyok;q izfrLdanh igy 'kfDr (fuØk)cSBdsa

jk"Vªh; Ñf"k tyok;q izfrLdanh igy'kfDr ¼fuØk½ dsvarxZr tyok;q ifjorZu ds lacaèk esa uk'khthoksa dh lfØ;rkij vk;ksftr lewg cSBdsa ¼2013&14½ %jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh esafuØk ds varxZr fofHkUu rkjh[kksa ds nkSjku tyok;q ifjorZu dslacaèk esa uk'khtho lfØ;rk* Qly% pkoy] vjgj] ewaxQyhvkSj VekVj ij Qly ds vuqlkj lewg cSBdsa vk;ksftr dh xb±ftuesa ns'k ds leLr Hkkxksa ls fj;y Vkbe MkbukfeDl dsUnzksa¼vkjVhihMh½ ds lg;ksfx;ksa us lgHkkfxrk dhA

MkW- lh- pV~Vksikè;k;] funs'kd ¼jklukizds½ us mn~?kkVh;l=ksa dh vè;{krk dh vkSj dsUnzh; 'kq"d {ks= Ñf"k vuqlaèkkulaLFkku] gSnjkckn ds oSKkfudksa] vFkkZr MkW- okbZth izlkn¼vkjVhihMh & pkoy½] MkW- ,e,l jko ¼vkjVhihMh% vjgj½ vkSj,l nslkbZ ¼vkjVhihMh% ewaxQyh vkSj VekVj½ us bu cSBdksa esaleh{kk lnL;ksa ds :i esa lgHkkfxrk dh rFkk lekiu l=ksa dhvè;{krk Hkh dhA ;|fi lacafèkr vkjVhihMh dsUnz ds vuqlaèkkudrkZvksa }kjk dk;Z dh izxfr dk fooj.k izLrqr fd;k x;k]jklukizds esa ihvkbZ ¼fuØk½ }kjk ^vkjVhihMh dh fLFkfr rFkk2012&13 ds fy, MkVkcsl* gsrq ekaaxksa dk izLrqrhdj.k fd;k

NCIPM


MS Rao (RTPD: Pigeonpea) and S Desai (RTPD:Groundnut & Tomato) participated as review

members, and chaired the concluding sessions. While

summary of work progress was presented by the

researcher of the respective RTPD center, the 'status

of RTPD and requirements for data base for 2012-13'

was put forth by PI (NICRA) at NCIPM. Discussion

and finalization of work plan for 2013-14, and

demonstration of installation of NICRA (RTPD) client

software, and of web-enabled features of reporting

system were held. Approved proceedings with general

and specific recommendations in respect of target crops

have been communicated to all the RTPD centres and

NCIPM team members for implementation.

Institute Management Committee (IMC) meeting

Centre held its twelfth and thirteenth IMC

meetings under the chairmanship of Director, NCIPM

on 24 Oct 2013 and 24 Feb 2014, respectively wherein

all the members were present in addition to the

administrative and scientific staff of NCIPM. Important

proposals on the list of equipment for procurement

and civil works to be undertaken at Rajpur Khurd,

Mehrauli during 2013-14 were discussed. Additionally,

the status of budget utilization and re-allocation of funds

within the same sub-head under Plan budget of 2013-

14 was reviewed. The proceedings of IMC have been

put up for further approval by the Council.

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

NCIPM signed MoU with CRRI, Cuttack for

inter-institutional work on 20 June 2013.

NCIPM signed MoU with IL & FS Clusters Ltd.,

for project "Technical Assistance Programme for

Cotton in Africa" Implementation of ICT based Pest

Surveillance in Malawi (Africa) on 18 Sep 2013.

x;kA o"kZ 2013&14 ds fy, dk;Z ;kstuk] fuØk ¼vkjVhihMh½xzkgd lkW¶Vos;j dh laLFkkiuk dk izn'kZu rFkk fjiksfV±x flLVsedh osc vkèkkfjr fof'k"Vrkvksa dks vafre :i nsus ds fy, ppkZdh xbZA cSBdksa dh vuqeksfnr dk;Zokfg;ksa ds lkekU; :i lsrFkk yf{kr Qlyksa ds lacaèk esa fof'k"V flQkfj'kksa ds dk;kZUo;uds fy, vuqeksfnr dk;Zokfg;ksa dks leLr vkjVhihMh dsUnzksarFkk jklukizds ds Vhe ds lnL;ksa dks laizsf"kr fd;k x;k gSA

laLFkku izcaèku lfefr (vkbZ,elh) dh cSBddsUnz us viuh vkbZ,elh dh cSBd jklukizds ds funs'kd

dh vè;{krk esa 24 vDVwcj 2013 ,oa 24 Qjojh] 2014 dksvk;ksftr dh ftlesa bl dsUnz ds iz'kklfud o oSKkfuddeZpkfj;ksa ds vykok bl lfefr ds vU; lnL; ekStwn FksA

dk;ZØe fnukad lgHkkfx;ksa dh la[;kProgramme Dates No. of participants

pkoy@Rice 26 Jul 2013 20

vjgj@Pigeonpea 30 Jul 2013 23

ewaxQyh@Groundnut 2 Aug 2013 20

VekVj@Tomato 6 Aug 2013 19

bl cSBd ds midj.kksa dh lwph dh [kjhn o 2013&2014 dsnkSjku jktiqj [kqnZ] egjkSyh esa fd;s tkus okys fuekZ.k dk;ks± dsizLrkoksa ij ppkZ dhA blds vykok 2013&14 ds Iyku ctVds rgr ,d mi'kk[kk ds Hkhrj ctV ds mi;ksx vkSj èku dkiqu% vkoaVu dh fLFkfr dh leh{kk dh xbZA vkbZ,elh dhdk;Zokgh ifj"kn }kjk vkxs vuqeksnu ds fy, izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

lgefr Kkiujklukizds us 20 twu 2013 dks lhvkjvkjvkbZ] dVd ds

lkFk varj&laLFkku dk;ksZ ds fy, lgefr Kkiu ij gLrk{kjfd;kA

jklukizds us 18 flrEcj 2013 dks vkbZ,y ,.M ,Q,ldyLVlZ fy- ds lkFk **vQzhdk esa dikl ij rduhdh lgk;rkdk;ZØe** ifj;kstuk ds vaarxZr eykoh ¼vQzhdk½ esa vkbZlhVhvk/kkfjr uk'khtho fuxjkuh ij lgefr Kkiu ij gLrk{kj fd;kA



jklukizds dks 18 ekpZ] 2014 dks vkbZ,lvks 9001%2008 laLFkku izek.ki= iznku fd;k x;kNCIPM has been certified ISO 9001: 2008 Institute on 18 March 2014

jklukizds us 23 fnlEcj 2013 dks vkbZthdsoh] jk;iqjds lkFk lg;ksxh vuqla/kku ,oa ys[k dk;Z ds fy, lgefrKkiu ij gLrk{kj fd;kA

varjjk"Vªh; efgyk fnoljk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku dsUnz] ubZ fnYyh ds

efgyk izdks"B us vius dsUnz ds ifjlj esa 7 ekpZ] 2014 dksÞvarjjk"Vªh; efgyk fnolÞ euk;kA dsUnz ds lHkh efgyk LVkQus ,dtqV gksdj bl volj dks 'kkunkj <ax ls euk;kA

NCIPM signed MoU with IGKV, Raipur on 23

Dec. 2013 for collaborative research and thesis work.

International Women's Day

Women's Cell of the National Centre for

Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi celebrated

International Women's Day on 7 Mar 2014 with the

spirit of get together of all the women staff ofNCIPM.

NCIPM


jktHkk"kkRajbhasha

jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u dk;Zbl dsUnz esa jktHkk"kk laca/kh laoS/kkfud izko/kkuksa dk

vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus rFkk foHkkxh; dk;ksZa esa jktHkk"kkdk;kZUo;u ds izlkj gsrq fganh izdks"B }kjk Hkjiwj iz;kl fd;ktk jgk gSA dsUnz }kjk uxj jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dhlnL;rk Hkh xzg.k dh xbZ gSA

dsUnz esa jktHkk"kk vf/kfu;e 1963] jktHkk"kk fu;e 1976ds fofHkUu izko/kkuksa ds vuqikyu ij fo'ks"k /;ku fn;k tk jgkgSA jktHkk"kk vf/kfu;e 1963 dh /kkjk 3 (3) dk vuqikyulqfuf'pr djus] fganh esa izoh.krk izkIr vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk fganhesa dk;kZy; dk;Z djus] jktHkk"kk foHkkx }kjk 2013&14 dsfy, fu/kkZfjr y{;ksa dh izkfIr djus] feflyksa ij fganh esavf/kd ls vf/kd fVIif.k;ka fy[kus] vaxzsth esa izkIr Ik=ksa ds

mRrj fganh esa nsus ,oa vU; tkap fcanqvksa ds vuqikyu ,oaekuuh; jktHkk"kk lalnh; lfefr dh nwljh milfefr dks fn,x, vk'okluksa ij dk;Zokgh djus gsrq le; ij vko';dfunsZ'k tkjh fd, x, gSa ,oa jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh=Sekfld cSBdksa esa Hkh bl ij ppkZ dh tkrh gSA

fgUnh psruk lIrkg 2013 dk vk;kstujk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcU/ku dsUnz] iwlk ubZ fnYyh

esa fgUnh psruk lIrkg] 2013 dk vk;kstu funs'kd ¼jktHkk"kk½]Hkkdvuqi ds funsZ'kkuqlkj fnuk¡d 30 flrEcj] 2013 ls 06vDVwcj] 2013 rd euk;k x;kA fnuk¡d 30 flrEcj] 2013 dkslekjksg dk mn?kkVu MkW- fpjaru pÍksik/;k;] funs'kd dhv/;{krk esa fd;k x;kA lekjksg esa eq[; vfrfFk ds :Ik esaJh lqftr dqekj fe=k] funs'kd ¼Qly foKku½ HkkdvuqIk]

Ø-la- Ikzfr;ksfxrk iqjLdkj fotsrkvksa ds Ukke ,oa Ikn

1 Jqfrys[k ¼dq'ky lgk;h deZpkfj;ksa ds fy,½ izFke Jh jktsUnz dqekj 'kkg] dq'ky Lkgk;h deZpkjh

f}rh; Jh jktdqekj] dq'ky Lkgk;h deZpkjh

Rk`rh; Jh egs'k dqekj] dq'ky Lkgk;h deZpkjh

2 Okkn&fookn izFke MkW- eqds'k lgxy] iz/kku oSKkfud

fo"k; % Þljdkjh deZpkfj;ksa dh lsokfuo`fÙk vk;q f}rh; Jh lrh'k ckcw

c<+kusa ds izHkkoÞ Rk`rh;&1 MkW- ,e-,l-;kno] Ikz/kku oSKkfud

Rk`rh;&2 Jh egs'k dqekj] dq'ky Lkgk;h deZpkjh

lkaRouk MkW- ,e-,u- HkV~V] Ikz/kku oSKkfud

3 jktHkk"kk uhfr ,oa lkekU; Kku IkzFke Jh ,l-ih-flag] lgk;d eq[; Rkduhdh vf/kdkjh

f}rh; Jh jkds'k dqekj] oSKkfud

Rk`rh; MkW- vkj-oh-flag] Okfj"B oSKkfud

lkaRouk Jh ,- ds- vxzoky] Ikz'kklfud vf/kdkjh

4 fuca/k IkzFke MkW- uosn lkfcj] Ikz/kku oSKkfud

fo"k; % ÞHkkjr esa lkEiznkf;d lnHkkouk cuk, f}rh; MkW- ulhe vgen] lgk;d eq[; Rkduhdh vf/kdkjh

j[kus ds mik;Þ Rk`rh; Jh egs'k dqekj] dq'ky Lkgk;h deZpkjh

5 dkO; ikB IkzFke Jh ,l-ih- flag] lgk;d eq[; Rkduhdh vf/kdkjh

f}rh; MkW- uosn lkfcj] Ikz/kku oSKkfud

Rk`rh; dq- fgeka'kh iaokj] ,l-vkj-,Q-


jktHkk"kk | Rajbhasha

ubZ fnYyh mifLFkr gq,A fgUnh vuqHkkx ds izHkkjh] Jh ,e- ds-eqykuhs }kjk fgUnh psruk lIrkg ds fo"k; esa izdk'k Mkyrs gq,dk;ZØe dk lapkyu fd;k x;kA fgUnh psruk lIrkg dsvUrxZr fofHkUu izfr;ksfxrkvksa dk vk;kstu fd;k x;k ftlesadsUnz ds lHkh Lrj ds oSKkfudksa vf/kdkfj;ksa] ,oa deZpkfj;ksa usHkkx fy;kA fnukad 05 vDVwcj] 2013 dks fganh psruk lIrkgdk lekiu lekjksg vk;ksftr fd;k x;kA ftlesa MkW- vks- ih-;kno] funs'kd] eDdk vuqla/kku funs'kky;] iwlk] ubZ fnYyheq[; vfrfFk ds :Ik esa lknj vkeaf=r fd, x, FksA lekiulekjksg esa fganh psruk lIrkg ds nkSjku vk;ksftr izfr;ksfxrkvksads fotsrkvksa dks iqjLdkj Hkh forfjr fd, x,A

jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh cSBdsadsUnz dh jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dk iquxZBu Hkkjr

ljdkj] xg ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx }kjk tkjh dk;kZy;Kkiu la[;k 12024@2@92&jk-Hkk-¼[k&2@3½ fnukad21@7@1992 }kjk tkjh fn'kk funsZ'kksa ds vuqlkj fuEu izdkjfd;k x;k %&

1- MkW- fpjaru pÍksik/;k;] funs'kd & v/;{k]2- leLr bdkbZ;ksa@vuqHkkxksa ds & lnL;x.k

izHkkjh@Vhe yhMj3- Jherh lhek pksiM+k] mifuns'kd] & ljdkjh izfrfuf/k

jktHkk"kk] Hkk-d-v-la-] ubZ fnYyh4- Jh ,e- ds- eqykuh] & lnL; lfpo

izHkkjh fgUnh izdks"B

funs'kd@v/;{k jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh v/;{krkesa jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u lfefr dh o"kZ 2013 esa fuEu cSBdsafnukad 26@4@2013] 30@9@2013] 28@12@2013 ,oa22@3@2013 dks vk;ksftr dh xbZaA bu lHkh cSBdksa dsdk;ZoRr Hkh Ikfjpkfyr dj fn, x, ,oa fofHkUu eqíksa ij dhxbZ dkjZokbZ ,oa izxfr ls le;≤ ij funs'kd ¼jktHkk"kk½]HkkdvuqIk] ubZ fnYyh dks Hkh voxr djk;k tkrk jgk gSA

fgUnh dk;Z'kkykjktHkk"kk ds izfr deZpkfj;ksa ,oa vf/kdkfj;ksa esa :fp iSnk

djus ,oa dk;kZy; dk;Z fganh esa djus esa f>>d nwj djus gsrqizR;sd frekgh esa fofHkUu fo"k;ksa ij dk;Z'kkykvksa dk vk;kstufd;k x;kA dk;Z'kkykvksa dk vk;kstu djus ds fy, fgUnh dsizfrf"Br fo}kuksa dks vkeaf=r fd;k x;kA dk;Z'kkykvksa esa dsUnzds vf/kdkfj;ksa ,oa deZpkfj;ksa dh lgHkkfxrk c<+&p<+ djjghA o"kZ 2013&14 esa fuEu fganh dk;Z'kkyk,a vk;ksftr djkbZxbZA

fgUnh ds iz;ksx ls lEcfU/r izxfr fjiksVZjktHkk"kk vf/kfu;e] jktHkk"kk fu;eksa rFkk jktHkk"kk

lEcU/kh vkns'kksa ds vuqikyu ,oa jktHkk"kk dk;kZUo;u dhizxfr ls lEcfU/kr frekgh fjiksVZ fu;fer :Ik ls funs'kd]¼jktHkk"kk½] Hkkjrh; df"k vuqla/kku Ikfj"kn] df"k Hkou] ubZfnYyh dks izsf"kr dh xbZA jktHkk"kk ¼funs'kd½] }kjk bu fjiksVksZadh leh{kk esa fn, x, lq>koksa ,oa funsZ'kksa ds vuqikyu gsrqmfpr iz;kl fd, x, gSaA

Laklnh; jktHkk"kk lfefr dh nwljh milfefr}kjk dsUnz ds fujh{k.k

Laklnh; jktHkk"kk lfefr dh nwljh milafefr }kjk fnukad17 vizSy] 2013 dks jk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcU/ku dsUnz dkjktHkk"kk laca/kh fujh{k.k fd;k x;kA bl lfefr dh v/;{krkekuuh; Jh lR;ozr prqosZnh th us dhA blds lnL; Jh jes'kcSl] Jh j?kquanu 'kekZ rFkk MkW- ¼Jherh½ cksPpk >kalh y{eh FksA

fujh{k.k ds nkSjku bl lfefr us dsUnz dks uxj jktHkk"kkdk;kZUo;u lfefr dk lnL; cuus dk lq>ko fn;k rFkk

fnukad dk;Z'kkyk dk fo"k; vkeaf=r vuqns'kd

23@05@2013 ,e ,l vkWfQl bfUMd VwYl Jherh uhye esgrk] rduhdh vf/kdkjh] jklukizds] iwlk] ubZ fnYyh

30@09@2013 orZuh dk ekudhdj.k Jherh lhek pksiM+k] mi funs'kd] ¼jktHkk"kk½] Hkkd`vuqla]iwlk] ubZ fnYyh

20@12@2013 Lkjdkjh dke&dkt fgUnh esa djus ds fy, vfHkizsj.kk MkW- izse flag] lsok fuo`Rr la;qDr funs'kd] foKku ,oa izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx]izkS|ksfxdh Hkou] ubZ fnYyh

22@02@2014 fVIi.k ,oa vkys[ku MkW- izse flag] lsok fuo`Rr la;qDr funs'kd] foKku ,oa izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx]izkS|ksfxdh Hkou] ubZ fnYyh

NCIPM


dEI;wVj ij fgUnh esa dke djus ds fy, izsfjr fd;k olHkh izdk'ku f}Hkk"kh :Ik esa izdkf'kr djus ds fy, dgkALaklnh; jktHkk"kk lfefr us jklukizds ds funs'kd] MkW- fpjaru

pÍksik/;k; dks jktHkk"kk laca/kh dk;ksZa esa vkSj vf/kd lQyrkizkIr djus ds fy, dqN ekxZn'kZu Hkh fn,A

fut Hkk"kk mUufr vgS] lc mUufr dks ewy

fcu fut Hkk"kk Kku ds] feVr uk fg; ds 'kwyA

& Hkkjrsanq gfj'paæ


vuqlaèkkfud ifj;kstuk,a | Research Project

vuqlaèkkfud ifj;kstuk,aResearch Project

ifj;kstuk dk uke ifj;kstuk yhMj@lg;ksxh lgHkkxh ¼dksyScksjsVj½Name of the project Project leader and associates Collaborators

dk;ZØe I % fofHkUu Ñf"k&ikfjra= {ks=ksa ds izeq[k mRiknu iz.kkfy;ksa ds fy, {ks= fof’k"V vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyksa ,oa izkS|ksfxfd;ksa ds fodkl dsfy, ,d jk"Vªh; usVodZ dh LFkkiuk

Programme I: Establishment of a national network for development of area-specific IPM modules & technologies for themajor production systems of different agro-ecological zones

fofHkUu pkoy Ñf”k&ifjra=ksa esa {ks= fof’k”V vkbZih,edk;Zuhfr;ksa dk fodkl] izlkj vkSj lkoZtfudhdj.kDevelopment, dissemination andpopularization of location-specific IPMstrategies in different rice agro-ecosystems

dikl esa mHkjus okys uk'khthoksa ds fy, vkbZih,edk;Zuhfr;ksa dk la'ys"k.k ,oa oSèkhdj.kSynthesis and validation of IPM strategies ofemerging pests of cotton

chVh dikl esa uk’khtho izcaèku ¼,uvkbZ,lih,e½ dsfy, jk”Vªh; lwpuk ra= % {ks= fof’k”V vkbZih,e ekWM~;wyvkSj tkx:drk vfHk;ku ¼MhvkslhMh½National Information System for PestManagement (NISPM) in Bt Cotton: locationspecific IPM module and awareness campaigns(DOCD)

vkj- ds- raoj] ihvkbZ

vks- ih- 'kekZvtark fcjkg,l- HkxrLkh- pV~Vksikè;k;R. K. Tanwar PIO. P. SharmaAjanta BirahS. BhagatC. Chattopadhyay

vtUrk fcjkg] ihvkbZ

vkj- ds- raojvks- ih- 'kekZ,l- ih- flagAjanta Birah PIR. K. TanwarO. P. SharmaS.P. Singh

vkj-ds- raoj] ihvkbZ

,l- osfuykfodkl daojvtark fcjkgfujatu flag,l- ih- flagR. K. Tanwar PIS. VennilaVikas KanwarAjanta BirahNiranjan SinghS. P. Singh

,l- ds- jkW;] vkjvkj,l] fpulqjk] if'pe caxkyS.K. Roy, RRS, Chinsura, West Bengal

ih- osadVs'ku] ,l- fnO;k] Ñf"k foKku dsUnz] isjecywj] rfeyukMqP. Venkatesan, S. Divya, KVK, Perambalur, TamilNadu

ts- ,l- cjkj] lruke flag] ih,;w] {ks=h; dsUnz] QjhndksV] iatkcds- ds- nfg;k] vkj- ds- lSuh] MhvksbZ] lhlh,l,p,;w]] fglkj] gfj;k.kkiz'kkar tkewydj] ,l- jes'k ckcw ,oa vkj- ds- dY;k.k] vkj,;w]culokM+k] vkj,l] jktLFkkuvkj- lh- >kyk] Vh-,e- HkkjiksMk] ,e- th- iVsy] ,,;w] vkuan] xqtjkrch- ch- dikfj;k] ,e- ch-] fojkfn;k] dsohds] eSu Mh,Qvkj,l]ts,;w rj[kkfM;k] jktdksV] xqtjkrih- ih- 'kkL=h] ,l- ds- ikjlsbZ] lhvkj,l] vkjoh,ldsohoh] [kk.Mok]eè; izns'koh- lksuydj] ch- vkj- ikfVy] dikl vuqHkkx] MkW- ihMhdsoh] Ñf"kuxj] vdksyk] egkjk"Vª,-s th- ferdkjh] ,l- oh- lksuwus] dsohds] [kkjiqMh] tkyuk] egkjk"Vª,u-oh-oh-,l- nqxkZ izlkn] th-,e-oh- izlkn jko] vkj,vkj,l,,uthvkj,;w] xqUVwj] vkaèkz izns'kMh- lh- pkSÅxkyk] ,l- 'k'kh dqekj] dsohds] VqdkjkRrh ry] xksdd]csyxe] dukZVdokbZ- osudkUuk] osadVs'oj jko] dsohds] tkeqfudqaVk] djheuxj] vkaèkz izns'koh- osadVs'ku] ,l- fnO;k] dsohds] okyhdkunkiqje] isjecywj rfeyukMq

NCIPM



J. S. Brar, Satnam Singh, PAU, Regional Station,Faridkot, PunjabK.K. Dahiya, R.K. Saini, DOE, CCSHAU, Hisar,HaryanaPrashant Jamulkar, S. Ramesh Babu and R.K. Kalyan,RAU, Banswara, RS, RajasthanR.C. Jhala, T. M. Bharpoda, M.G. Patel, AAU, Anand,GujaratB.B. Kaparia , M.B. Viradiya, KVK, Main DFRS, JAUTarkhadia, Rajkot, GujaratP.P. Shastry, S.K. Parsai, CRS, RVSKVV, Khandwa,Madhya PradeshV. Sonalkar, B.R. Patil, Cotton Section, Dr. PDKV, KrishiNagar, Akola, MaharashtraA.G. Mitkari, S.V. Sonune, KVK, Kharpudi, Jalna,MaharashtraN.V.V.S. Durga Prasad, G.M.V. Prasad Rao, RARSANGRAU, Guntur, Andhra PradeshD.C.Chougala , S. Shashi Kumar, KVK, Tukaratti Tal,Gokak, Belgaum, KarnatakaY.Venkanna, Venkateshwara Rao, KVK, Jamnikunta,Karimnagar, Andhra PradeshP. Venkatesan, S. Divya, KVK, Valikandapuram,Perambalur Tamil Nadu

cYc ¼I;kt½ lCth Qlyksa ds fy, vaxhdj.kh; vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk la#i.k] oSèkhdj.k ,oa izksUu;uFormulation, validation and promotion ofadaptable IPM technology for bulb (onion)

vegetable crops

VekVj vkSj f’keyk fepZ esa vuqdwyuh; vkbZih,eizkS|ksfxdh dk izn’kZu@fu:i.k@izfriknu vkSj izksUu;u¼,u,pch½Demonstration and promotion of adaptable IPMtechnology in tomato and bell pepper (NHB)

fepZ dh eqj>ku jksx dk izcaèkuManagement of chilli wilt

cjlkrh ekSle dh xksHkh ds oS|hÑr vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdhdk izksUu;u] lkoZtfudhdj.k] izlkj vkSj dk;kZUo;uPromotion, popularization, dissemination &implementation of validated IPM technologyof rainy season cauliflower

,p- vkj- ljnkuk ihvkbZ,e- ,u- HkV~VH. R. Sardana, PIM. N. Bhat

,p- vkj ljnkuk ihvkbZ

,e- ,u HkVeqds'k lgxyvkj- oh- flagH. R. Sardana PIM.N. BhatMukesh SehgalRV Singh

,e- ,u- HkV~V ihvkbZ,p- vkj- ljnkukM.N. Bhat PIH.R. Sardana

Mh- ch- vkgwtk ihvkbZ,u- lkfcjD.B. Ahuja PIN. Sabir

lqjs'k xkoaMs] Mhvksthvkj] iq.ks] egkjk"VªSuresh Gawande, DOGR, Pune, Maharashtra

,e- ds- uk;d] ;w,,l] jk;pwj] dukZVdk

M.K. Naik, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka

iq#"kksÙke dqekj vjksM+k] Ñ".k dqekj vkjvkj,l] vcksgj] iatkcMkW- ,l- ds- csjok] lgk- izksQs- ¼ikni laj{k.k½ ,vkj,l]Jhxaxkuxj] ,ldsvkj,;w] chdkusj] jktLFkku,- ds- nkl] ,uvkjlh flVªl] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vªf'k[kk Msdk] lhvkj,l] frulqfd;k] ,,;w] vleÅ"kk jkuh] vgwtk] ,ulh,ih] ubZ fnYyhParshotam Kumar Arora, Krishan Kumar RRS, Abohar,PunjabS.K. Bairwa , Asstt Professor (PP) ARS, Sriganganagar,SKRAU, Bikaner, RajasthanA.K. Das, NRC Citrus, Nagpur, MaharashtraSikha Deka, CRS, Tinsukia, AAU, AssamUsha Rani Ahuja, NCAP, New Delhi



,l- ds- lDlsuk] th-ch- dkykfj;k] ,p- ‘kekZ] ,u,;w] uolkjh]xqtjkrS.K. Saxena, G.B. Kalaria, H. Sharma, NAU, Navsari,Gujarat

eqds’k [kqYyj] Ñf”k ea=ky;] Mh,lh] ubZ fnYyh,- uhjtk] Mh,lh] ubZ fnYyh,- ds- HkkSfed] dsohoh] vèkkjry] tcyiqj] eè; izns’kvkj- lh- ykosdj] Ñf”k dkWyst] uSxkao] ukaMsM] egkjk”Vªds- vkj- dkeys] ,l-Mh- nakrsokM] ,vkj,l cnukiqj] egkjk”Vªch- oh- HksMs] ,e,;w] ijHk.kh] egkjk”Vª,u- vkj- iraxs] lhvks,] vkslekukckn] egkjk”Vªlqgkl ;sy’ksV~Vh] ,vkj,l xqycxkZ] dukZVd,l-ds- flag] vkbZvkbZihvkj] dkuiqj] mÙkj izns’kih- y{eh jsM~Mh] dsohds] ,ih,;w] jsM~MhiYyh] vuariqj] vkaèkz izns’k

Mukesh Khuller, Ministry of Agriculture, DAC, N. DelhiA. Neerja, DAC, N. DelhiA.K. Bhowmick, JNKVV, Adhartal, Jabalpur, MadhyaPradeshR.C. Lavekar, Agriculture College, Naigaon, Nanded,MaharashtraK.R. Kamle, S.D. Dantewad, ARS Badnapur,MaharashtraB.V. Bhede, MAU, Parbhani, MaharashtraN.R. Patange, COA, Osmanabad MaharashtraSuhas Yelshetty, ARS Gulbarga, KarnatakaS.K. Singh, IIPR, Kanpur, Uttar PradeshP. Laxmi Reddy, KVK, APAU, Reddipalli, Anantapur,Andhra Pradesh

fcjs'oj flUgk] lh,;w] bEQky] ef.kiqjBireshwar Sinha, CAU, Imphal, Manipur

fofHkUu tyok;qd ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vke ds fy, LFkkufof’k”V vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa dk fodkl vkSj oS|hdj.kDevelopment and validation of site specific IPMtechnologies for mango in different climaticconditions

jk”Vªh; [kk| lqj{kk fe’ku ¼,u,Q,l,e&,3ih½ ds varxZrlesfdr uk’khtho izcaèku ds xgu vuqiz;ksx ds ekè;els puk vkSj vjgj ds mRiknu dks c<+kukIncreasing production of chickpea and pigeonpeathrough intensive application of integrated pestmanagement (NFSM-A3P)

vjgj esa QkbVksIFkksjk vaxekjh dk lesfdr izcaèkuIntegrated management of Phytophthora blightin pigeonpea

mÙkj&iwohZ {ks= esa e`nk tfur izeq[k jksxksa ds izcaèku dsfy, ns’kt VªkbdksMekZ iztkfr;ksa dh [kkstExploration of native Trichoderma sp. for themanagement of key soil borne diseases (Fieldpea and cole crops) in north east region

Mh- ch- vkgwtk ihvkbZvkj- oh- flagD. B. Ahuja PIR.V. Singh

vks- ih- ‘kekZ ihvkbZ,l- osf..kyk,l- Hkxrfujatu flag,l- ih- flaguhye esgrkO.P. Sharma PIS. VennilaS. BhagatNiranjan SinghS. P. SinghNeelam Mehta

,l- Hkxr ihvkbZvks- ih- ‘kekZ,l- osf..kykulhe vgen,l- ih- flagS. Bhagat PIO. P. SharmaS. VennilaNasim AhmadS. P. Singh

,l- Hkxr ihvkbZvks- ih- ‘kekZS. Bhagat PIO. P. Sharma


NCIPM


Dqynhi flag tkMksu] iwue tljksfV;k ew¡xQyh vuqlaèkku funs'kky;]twukx<+] xqtjkr,u- lh- osadVs'ojyw] ds- osekuk] Ñf"k vuqlaèkku dsUnz] dkfnjh]vkpk;Z ,u- th- jaxk Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;] jktsUnz uxj] gSnjkckn]vkaèkz izns'kih- y{eh jsM~Mh vkSj ,e- ds- T;ksLFkkuk] Ñf"k foKku dsUnz] jsM~Mhikyh]vuariqj] vkpk;Z ,u- th- jaxk Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky; jktsUnz uxj]gSnjkckn] vkaèkz izns'kKuldeep Singh Jadon, Poonam Jasrotia Directorate ofGroundnut Research, Junagadh, GujaratN.C. Venkateswarlu, K. Vemana, Agricultural ResearchCentre, Kadiri, Acharya N.G. Ranga AgriculturalUniversity Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra PradeshP.Lakshmi Reddy and M. K. Jyosthna, Krishi VigyanKendra, Reddipalli, Anantapur, Acharya N.G. RangaAgricultural University Rajendranagar, Hyderabad,Andhra Pradesh.

uohu flag] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyhts- ,y- ;kno] dsohds] eksfgUnjx<+] ,p,;w] fglkj] gfj;k.kk,- ds- ikBd] ,vkj,l] uoxk¡o] ,lds,u,;w] tkscusj] jktLFkkuNaveen Singh, IARI, New DelhiJ. L. Yadav, KVK, Mohindergarh, HAU, Hisar, HaryanaA.K Pathak, ARS, Navgaon, SKNAU, Jobner, Rajasthan

;w,,l] caxykSj] dukZVdvle Ñf”k fo’ofo|ky;] tksjgV] vlechlhdsoh] dY;k.kh] if’pe caxky]UAS, Bangalore, KarantakaAssam Agricultural University, Jorhat, AssamBCKV, Kalyani, West Bengal

HkkÑvuql] ubZ fnYyhIARI, New Delhi

ew¡xQyh dh Qly ds fy, lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku dkla'ys"k.k] oSèkhdj.k rFkk izlkj&izlkjSynthesis, validation and popularization ofintegrated pest management technology forgroundnut crop

gfj;k.kk vkSj jktLFkku esa cM+s {ks= esa ljlksa dsLDysjksfVfu;k ruk foxyu ds izcaèku ij vè;;uStudies on management of Sclerotinia stem rotof mustard on large area of Haryana andRajasthan

uk'khtho izcaèku ds fy, vko';d midj.kksa dk fodklDevelopment of mechanical devices needed forpest management

ckxokuh Qlyksa & ¼,vkbZlhvkjih½ esa lw=Ñfe gkWVLikWVds fy, vkbZih,e dk;Zuhfr;ksa dk oS|hdj.k vkSj izksUu;uValidation and promotion of IPM strategies fornematode hotspots in horticultural crops –(AICRP)

mPp ewY;ksa okys lfCt;ksa vkSj dV ¶ykojksa dh lajf{kr[ksrh% ,d ewY; Ük‘a[kyk fl)kar ¼,u,vkbZih½Protected cultivation of high value vegetablesand cut flowers: A value chain approach (NAIP)

,l- ds- flag ihvkbZ,e- ,l- ;knojkds'k dqekjih- oh- oekZulhe vgenSK Singh PIM.S. YadavRakesh KumarP. V. VermaNasim Ahmad

,e- ,l- ;kno ihvkbZljkst flagulhe vgenM.S. Yadav PISaroj SinghNasim Ahmad

lqjsUnz dqekj flag ihvkbZSurender Kumar Singh PI

eqds’k lgxy ihvkbZuosn lkfcj,p- vkj- ljnkukMukesh Sehgal PINaved SabirH.R. Sardana

uosn lkfcj lhlhihvkbZvkj- ds- raojNaved Sabir CCPIR.K. Tanwar




dk;ZØe II % izeq[k uk’khthoksa ij MkVkcslksa dk fodkl vkSj bySDVªkWfud usVofd±xProgramme II: Development of databases on major pests and electronic networking

Qly uk’khtho fuxjkuh vkSj lykgdkjh ifj;kstuk¼lhvkjvksih,l,ih½ & egkjk”VªCrop Pest Surveillance and Advisory Project(CROPSAP)-Maharashtra

Ckkxokuh Qlyksa & vukj] vke vkSj dsys ds fy, QlylEca/kh uk’khtho fuxjkuh vkSj lykgdkjh ifj;kstukCrop pest surveillance and advisory project forhorticultural crops-pomegranate, mango andbanana

p;fur lCth dh Qlyksa ¼cSxau vkSj VekVj½ esa uk’khthoizcaèku ds fy, fo’ks”kK ra= dk fodklDevelopment of Expert System for pestmanagement in selected vegetable crops (Brinjaland tomato)

,l- osf..kyk ihvkbZfujatu flagS. Vennila PINiranjan Singh

Mh-ch- vkgwtk ihvkbZ

fujatu flag,- ds- duksft;kD.B. Ahuja PINiranjan SinghA. K. Kanojia

fujatu flag ihvkbZ,p- vkj- ljnkukukosn lfcj,e- ,u- HkVNiranjan Singh PIH.R. SardanaNaved SabirM.N. Bhat

Ñf”k foHkkx] egkjk”Vª ljdkj] egkjk”VªlhvkjvkbZMh,] gSnjkckn] vkaèkz izns’k,l-th- cksjdj] ds- ,l- j?kqoa’kh] ,l- vkj- dqyd.khZ] chih-ØqUnzdj] ,u- ch- ‘ks[k] ,l] ijns’kh] ,u- ,e- ikfVy] ,eihdsoh]jkgwjh] egkjk”Vª,l- ds- xksMls] ,e-ch- nkyoh] MkW- ch,ldsdsoh] niksyh] egkjk”Vªvkj- Fkaxkosyw] ,uvkjlh cukuk] fVªph] rfeyukMqT;ksRluk ‘kekZ] ,uvkjlh iksejxzsusV] lksykiqj] egkjk”VªDepartment of Agriculture, Government of Maharashtra,MaharashtraCRIDA, Hyderabad, Andhra PradeshS.G. Borkar, K.S. Raghuvanshi, S.R. Kulkarni, B.P.Krundakar, N.B. Shaikh, S. Pradeshi, N.M. Patil, MPKV,Rahuri, MaharashtraS.K. Godse, M.B. Dalvi, Dr. BSKKV, Dapoli,MaharashtraR. Thangavelu, NRC Banana, Trichi, Tamil NaduJyotsana Sharma, NRC Pomegranate, Solapur,Maharashtra

dk;ZØe III% jk"Vªh; egÙkk ds uk’khthoksa ds iwokZuqeku ds fy, ekWMyksa dk fodklProgramme III: Development of models for forecasting of pests of national importance

tyok;q ifjorZu ds lacaèk esa uk’khthoksa dh xfrfd;ka &jk”Vªh; Ñf”k tyok;q izfrLdanh igy’kfDr ¼fuØk½

,l- osf..kyk ihvkbZvkj- ds- raojvks- ih- ‘kekZ,p- vkj- ljnkuk,e- ,u- HkV~V,e- ,l- ;kno,l- Hkxrfujatu flagih- oh- oekZ,l- ih- flaguhye esgrk

lg;ksfxd laLFkkuMh- ds- nkl] fxjh’k dqekj >k] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyhvejsUnz dqekj >k] vkbZ,,lvkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyh

lg;ksxh dsUnzpkoy,e- Jhfuokl izlkn] oh- >kalh y{eh] ,e- laiFk dqekj] Mhvkjvkj]gSnjkckn] vkaèkz izns’kVh- t;jkt] ,l- ekSgEen tykywíhu] ,- dkfrZds;u] VhvkjvkjvkbZ]vnqFkwjkbZ rfeyukMqMh- ds- flM~Ms xksoMk] ,e- ds- izlUuk dqekj] vkjvkj,l] eun;k] dukZVdlat; ‘kekZ] vkbZthdsohoh] jk;iqj] NÙkhlx<+izhrsUnz flag ljko] ih- ,l- ‘ksjk] ts- ,l- yksj] ih,;w] yqfèk;kuk] iatkc,l-ds- jkW;] flrs’k pVthZ] fouk;d tyxkodj] vkjvkj,l] fpulqjk]if’pe caxky,l-ds- eagnys] oS’kkyh lkoar] MkW- ch,ldsdsoh] niksyh] jk;x<+] egkjk”Vª


NCIPM


vjgjlqgkl ;sy'ksV~Vh] jpIik] oh- gosjh] ,vkj,l] xqycxZ] dukZVdMh- ch- iVsy] okbZ] jfoUnz ckcw] ,lMh,;w] ,lds ukxj] xqtjkr,l- ekyrh] ,uthvkj,;w] okjaxy] vkaèkz izns'kx.ks'k ihns'keq[k] ih-,u- gkjsj] v'kksd ih- pkou],eihdsoh] jkgwjh]egkjk"Vªts dfork ijkuhèkju] ,- dkfrZfd;su] Vh,u,;w] ckoau] rfeyukMq,l- ch- nkl] ts,udsohoh] tcyiqj] eè; izns'ky{eh ih- jsM~Mh] T;ksRluk] dsohds] vuariqj] vkaèkz izns'k

ew¡xQyhih- ih- Fkh:eykbZlkeh] Mhthvkj] twukx<+] xqtjkr,e- fljds] ,eihdsoh] tyxkao] egkjk"Vªoh- jfopUnzu] ih- bfUnjk xkaèkh] Vh,u,;w] o`èkkpye] rfeyukMqds- oseuk] ,u- lh- osadVs'ojyw] ,vkj,l] vuariqj] vkaèkz izns'kegkcys'oj gsxMs] ;w,,l] èkkjokM+] dukZVd

VekVj,e- ,p- dksnunkje] ,- ch- jk;] lqtkW; lkgk] vkbZvkbZohvkj]okjk.klh] mÙkj izns'k,l- ,l- xksly] lanhi dkSj] fouhr dqekj] vfHk'ks[k 'kekZ] 'kkdh;Qly ij ,vkbZlhvkjih] yqfèk;kuk] iatkclh- ch- cpdkj] ,eihdsoh] jkgwjh] egkjk"Vªds- fljh'kk] ts fnyhi ckcw] ,e- fot;] vkj- oh-,l- ds- jsM~Mh],vkj,l] ,ih,p;w] gSnjkckn] vkaèkz izns'klqczrk nÙkk] chlhdsoh] dY;k.kh] if'pe caxkylhih [kjs] ,l- ds- ikfVy] vkbZthdsohoh] jk;iqj] NÙkhlx<+oh- Jhèkj] ,- ds- lDlsuk] vkbZvkbZ,pvkj] cSxyw#] dukZVd

Collaborative InstitutionsD.K. Das, Girish Kumar Jha, IARI, New DelhiAmrender Kumar, IASRI, New Delhi

Cooperating Centres

RiceM. Srinivas Prasad, V Jhanshi Laxmi, M Sampath Kumar,DRR, Hyderabad, Andhra PradeshT. Jayaraj, S. Mohamed Jalaludin, A. Karthikeyan, TRRI,Aduthurai, Tamil NaduD. K. Sidde Gowda, M. K. Prasanna Kumar, RRS,Mandya, KarnatakaSanjay Sharma, IGKVV, Raipur, ChhattisgarhPreetinder S. Sarao, P.S. Shera, J.S. Lore, PAU, Ludhiana,PunjabS. K. Roy, Sitesh Chatterjee, Vinayak Jalgavkar, RRS,Chinsura, West BengalS.K. Mahendale, Vaishali Sawant, Dr. BSKKV, Dapoli,Raigarh, Maharashtra

Pest dynamics in relation to climate change-National Initiative on Climate Resilient

Agriculture (NICRA)

S. Vennila PIR.K. TanwarO.P. SharmaH.R. SardanaM.N. BhatM.S. YadavS. BhagatNiranjan SinghP.V. VermaS.P. SinghNeelam Mehta




PigeonpeaSuhas Yelshetty, Rachappa V. Haveri, ARS, Gulbarga,KarnatakaD. B. Patel, Y. Ravindrababu, SDAU, SK Nagar, GujaratS. Malathi, ANGRAU, Warangal, Andhra PradeshGanesh P. Deshmukh, P. N. Harer, Ashok P. Chavan,MPKV, Rahuri, MaharashtraZ. Kavitha, Paranidharan, A. Karthikeyan, TNAU,Vamban, Tamil NaduS. B. Das, JNKV, Jabalpur, Madhya PradeshLaxmi P. Reddy, Jyotsna, KVK, Anantapur, AndhraPradesh

GroundnutP.P. Thirumalaisamy, DGR, Junagarh, GujaratM. S. Shirke, MPKV, Jalgaon, MaharashtraV. Ravichandran, P. Indira Gandhi, TNAU,Vridhachalam, Tamil NaduK. Vemana, N. C. Venkateswarlu, ARS, Anantapur,Andhra PradeshMahabaleshwar Hegde, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka

TomatoM. H. Kodandaram, A.B. Rai, Sujoy Saha, IIVR,Varanasi,Uttar PradeshS. S. Gosal, Sandeep Kaur, Vineet Kumar, AbhishekSharma, AICRP on Vegetable Crops, Ludhiana, PunjabC. B. Bachkar, MPKV, Rahuri, MaharashtraK. Sireesha, J. Dilip babu, M. Vijaya, R.V.S.K. Reddy,ARS , APHU, Hyderabad, Andhra PradeshSubrata Dutta, BCKV, Kalyani, West BengalC. P. Khare, S. K. Patil, IGKV, Raipur, ChhattishgarhV. Sridhar, A. K. Saxena, IIHR, Bengaluru, Karnataka

izeq[k pkoy vkSj dikl vkèkkfjr Qlyhdj.k iz.kkfy;ksads uk’khtho izcaèku ds fy, fu.kkZ;d lgk;rk iz.kkfy;kasij ‘kks/kDecision support systems for the managementof insect pests of major rice and cotton-basedcropping systems (NAIP)

Development of models to predict infestationof sap feeders-based on AICCIP historical data(TMC 1.5)

,l- osf..kyk ihvkbZS. Vennila CC PI

,l- osf..kyk ihvkbZS. Vennila CC PI


NCIPM


dk;ZØe IV% lkekftd ,oa vkfFkZd fo"k; vkSj vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk izHkko fo’ys"k.kProgramme IV: Socio-economic issues and impact analysis of IPM technology

pkoy esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxfd;ksa esa lkekftd ,oa vkfFkZdfo’ys”k.kSocio-economic analysis in IPM technologies inrice

pkoy Qlyhdj.k iz.kkyh ds varxZr bZvkbZD;w Vwy dkiz;ksx djrs gq, i;kZoj.k ij dhVuk'kdksa dk izHkkoewY;kaduImpact assessment of pesticides on environmentusing EIQ tool under rice cropping system

‘kkdh; Qlyksa ds fy, uk’khtho izcaèku lwpuk lqiqnZxhiz.kkyh ij vè;;uStudies on pest management informationdelivery system for vegetable crops

fodkl daoj ihvkbZvkj- ds- raojVikas Kanwar PIR. K. Tanwar

lqfe=k vjksM+k ihvkbZSumitra Arora PIMukesh Sehgal

vkj-oh- flag ihvkbZ,p- vkj- ljnkuk,e- ,u- HkV~VMh- ch- vkgwtkR.V. Singh PIH. R. SardanaM. N. BhatD. B. Ahuja

vkuan flag] vejh'k flag ;kno] n;k 'kadj JhokLro] lkSjHk] euh"k]dqekj fclsu] 'kSysUnz dqekj flag dsohds] lhrkiqjlat; vjksM+k] vkjvkj,l] lh,l,lvkjvkbZ] y[kuÅvuqi HkV~Vkpk;Zth] lhvkbZ,l,p] y[kuÅAnand Singh, Ambreesh Singh Yadav, Daya ShankarSrivastava, Saurabh, Manish Kumar Bisen, ShailendraKumar Singh, KVK, SitapurSanjay Arora, RRS, CSSRI, LucknowAnup Bhattacharjee, CISH, Lucknow

vkj- ds- ;kno] dsohds mtokvjfoan dqekj] dsohds f’kdksgiqj] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyhR.K. Yadav, KVK UjwaArvind Kumar, KVK Shikohpur, IARI, New Delhi

dk;ZØe V% vkbZih,e esa ekuo lalkèku dk fodklProgramme V: Human resource development in IPM

ekuo lalkèku fodklHuman resource development

eqds’k lgxyMukesh Sehgal



izdk'ku | Publications

izdk'kuPublications

Research papers

Ahmad, I. and Bhagat, S. (2013).DNA fingerprintingof bio-control isolates of Trichoderma spp. isolatedfrom different crop rhizospheres of Andaman Islands.Vegetos-An Internat. J. Plant Res., 26: 460-466.

Ahuja, D. B., Singh, S., Sharma, Pratibha, Malik, M.,Singh, R. V., and Kalra, B. (2013). Development andon - farm validation of location specific IPM technologyfor rainy season cauliflower. Indian J. Agric. Sci.,83: 78-82.

Arora, Sumitra, Mukherji, Irani, Kumar, Aman andGarg, D. K. (2014). Comparative estimation of pesticideresidues in grain, soil and water from IPM andnon-IPM trials of Basmati rice. Environ. Monitor.Assessm., 186: 361-366.

Bhagat, S., Bambawale, O. M., Tripathi, A. K., Ahmad,I., Srivastava, R. C. (2013). Biological management offusarial wilt of tomato by Trichoderma spp. inAndamans. Indian J. Horticulture, 70: 397-403.

Bhattacharya, B.K. and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013). Amultistage tracking for mustard rot disease combiningsurface meteorologyand satellite remote sensing.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 90: 35-44

Birah, A., Bhagat, S., Tanwar, R. K. andChattopadhyay, C. (2014). Seed treatment in crop healthmanagement. SATSA Mukhapatra Annual TechnicalIssue, 18: 15-26.

Birah, A., Simhachalam, P., Ganeshan, S., Ahmad, Israrand Gautam R. K. (2014). Molecular genetic structureof fruit fly (Bactrocera sp) population of SouthAndaman revealed through RAPD-PCR analysis,Indian J. Agric. Sci., 84: 73-6.

Birah, A., Zamir Ahmad, S. K., Anandhraj, A.,Tripathi, R. S. and Dam Roy, S. (2014). Occurrence ofBandicoot rat, Bandicota bengalensis in paddy fields ofBay Islands, India, Annals Pl. Prot. Sci., 22: 213-14.

'kksèk i=kvgen] vkbZ ,oa Hkxr ,l- ¼2013½A vaMeku }hi lewg dsfofHkUu Qly ewy ifjos'kksa ls fo;ksftr VªkbdksMekZ iztkfr dstSo dkjd fo;qDrksa dh Mh,u, fQaxj fizafVxA osftVksl & ,ubaVjus'kuy ts- IykaV- jsl-] 26% 460&466-

vgwtk] Mh- ch-] flag] ,l-] 'kekZ] izfrHkk] efyd] ,e-] flag] vkj-oh-] ,oa dkyjk] ch- ¼2013½A o"kkZ _rq dh xksHkh ds fy, LFkkufof'k"V vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh dk fodkl rFkk QkeZ ij oSèkhdj.kbafM;u ts- ,fxzd] lkbal] 83% 78&82-

vjksM+k] lqfe=k] eq[kthZ] bjkuh] dqekj] veu ,oa xxZ ¼2014½Acklerh pkoy ds vkbZih,e rFkk xSj&vkbZih,e ijh{k.kksa lsvukt] enk vkSj ty esa dhVuk'kd vof'k"Vksa dk rqyukRedvè;;uA buok;j- ekWfuVj] vLle]- 186% 361&366-

Hkxr] ,l-] cEckokys] vks- ,e-] f=ikBh] ,- ds-] vgen] vkbZ-JhokLro] vkjlh- ¼2013½A vaMeku esa VªkbdksMekZ iztkfr ds¶;wlsfj;e eqj>ku dk tSfod izcaèkuA bafM;u ts- gksfVZdYpj]70% 397&403-

HkV~Vkpk;Z] ch- ds- ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2013½A ljlksa esalM+u jksx ds fy, iFoh vkèkkfjr ekSle foKku ,oa mixzgvkèkkfjr lqnwj laosnu ds la;kstu esa ,d cgqeq[kh [kkstAdaI;wVlZ ,aM bysDVªkWfuDl bu ,xzhdYpj 90% 35&44

fcjkg] ,-] Hkxr] ,l-] raoj] vkj- ds ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh-¼2014½A Qly LokLF; izcaèku esa cht mipkjA lrlk eq[ki=kokf"kZd rduhdh vad] 18% 15&26-

fcjkg] ,-] lhegkpkye] ih-] x.ks'ku] ,l-] vgen] b'jkj ,oaxkSre vkj- ds- ¼2014½A vkj,ihMh&ihlhvkj fo'ys"k.kksa dsekè;e ls bafxr nf{k.kh vaMeku dh Qy eD[kh ¼csDVªkslsjkiztkfr½ dh lef"V dh vkf.od vkuqoaf'kd lajpuk] bf.M;uts- ,fxzd lkbal 84% 73&6-

fcjkg] ,-] tehj] ,l- ds-] vuaèkjkt] ,-] f=ikBh] vkj- ,l- ,oanke jkW;] ,l- ¼2014½A Hkkjr ds }hi lewgksa esa èkku ds [ksrksa dscanhdwV pwgksa] canhdksVk csaxysfll dk izdVu] ,uYl IykaVizksVs- lkbal] 22% 213&214-

NCIPM


Fondevilla, S., Chattopadhyay, C., Khare, N. andRubiales, D. (2013). Erysiphe is able to overcomw er1and er3, but not er2, resistance genes in pea. EuropeanJ. of Plant Pathology, 135: 557-563

Goyal, P., Chattopadhyay, C., Mathur, A. P., Kumar,A., Meena, P. D., Datta, S. and Iquebal, M. A. (2013).Pathogenic and molecular variability among differentoilseed Brassica isolates of Alternaria brassicae from India.Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 21: 349-359.

Goyal, P., Kumar, A., Chahar, M., Iquebal, M. A.,Datta, S. and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013). Pathogenicand genetic variability among different oilseed Brassicaisolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum from India and UK.Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 21: 377-386.

Goyal, P., Mathur, A.P., and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013).Histopathology in Brassica juncea - Alternaria brassicaeinteraction and localization of histochemicals inAlternaria blight-infected B. juncea leaves. Annals of PlantProtection Sciences 21: 322-328.

Kumar, A., Agrawal, R. and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013)Weather-based forecast model for diseases in mustardcrop. Mausam. 64: 663-670.

Kumar, Amit, Arora, Sumitra, Mogha, Navin, Salem,S., Al-Deyab, Z., Ansari, A. and Ansari, S. G. (2013).Glutathione coated zinc oxide nanoparticles: apromising material for pesticide detection. EnergyEnviron. Focus, 2: 101-107.

Kumar, K., Bhagat, S., Madhuri, K., Birah, A. andSrivastava, R. C. (2013).Occurrence of unreported fruitrot caused by Fusarium chlamydosporum on Capsicumannum in Bay Island, India. Veg. Sci., 39: 195-197.

Meena, P. D., Gour, R. B., Gupta, J. C., Singh,H. K., Awasthi, R.P., Netam, R. S., Godika, S., Sandhu,P. S., Prasad, R., Rathi, A. S., Rai, D., Thomas, L.,Patel, G. A., Chattopadhyay, C. (2013). Non-chemicalagents provide tenable, eco-friendly alternatives forthemanagement of the major diseases devastating Indianmustard (Brassica juncea) in India. Crop Protection53: 169-174.

Nagamani, P., Viswanath, K., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat,S. and Reddy, P. L. (2013). Demonstration of IPMmodule for management of Helicoverpa armigera atvillage level. Annals Pl. Prot. Sci., 21: 432-434.

QksuMsfoyk] ,l-] pV~Vksikè;k;] lh-] [kjs] ,u- ,oa :fc;kysl]Mh- ¼2013½A eVj esa ,sjhflQ s bZvkj 1 rFkk bZvkj 3 thu dkizfrjksèk djus esa l{ke gS ijUrq bZvkj 2 esa l{ke ugha gSA;wjksfi;u ts- vkWQ IykaV iSFkksykWth 135% 557&563-

xks;y] ih-] pV~Vksikè;k;] lh-] ekFkqj] ,- ih-] dqekj] ,-]ehuk] ih- Mh-] nÙkk] ,l- ,oa bdcky] ,e- ,- ¼2013½A Hkkjresa vYVjusfj;k czkfldk ds fofHkUu frygu czkfldk fo;qDrksaesa jksxk.kqtud ,oa vkuqoaf'kd fofoèkrkA ,uYl vkWQ IykaVizksVsD'ku lkbafll 21% 349&359-

xks;y] ih-] dqekj] ,-] pkgj] ,e-] bdcky] ,e- ,-] nÙkk],l- ,oa pV~Vksikè;k; lh- ¼2013½A Hkkjr ,oa ;w-ds- dsLDysjksfVfu;k LDysjksf'k;ksje ds fofHkUu frygu czkfldkfo;qDrksa esa jksxk.kqtud ,oa vkuqoaf'kd fofoèkrkA ,uYlvkWQ IykaV izksVsD'ku lkbafll 21% 377&386-

xks;y] ih] ekFkqj] ,l- ih-] ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2013½Aczkfldk tqufl;k esa fgLVksiSFkksykWth & vYVjusfj;k czkfldkdh var%fØ;k rFkk vYVjusfj;k vaxekjh xzflr ch- tqufl;kifÙk;ksa esa fgLVksdsfedy dk LFkkuh;dj.kA ,uYl vkWQIykaV izksVsD'ku lkbafll 21% 322&328-

dqekj] ,-] vxzoky] vkj- ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2013½Aljlksa dh Qly esa jksxksa ds fy, ekSle vkèkkfjr iwokZuqekuekWMyA ekSle- 64% 663&670-

dqekj] vfer] vjksM+k] lqfe=k] eks?kk] uohu] lyhe] ,l-],y&ns;kc] tsM-] valkjh] ,- ,oa valkjh] ,l- th- ¼2013½AXywFkkfFk;kWu ysfir ftad vkWDlkbM usuksikfVZdYl% dhVuk'kddh [kkst ds fy, ,d vk'kktud lkexzhA ,uthZ buok;j]Qksdl] 2% 101&107-

dqekj] ds-] Hkxr] ,l-] ekèkqjh] ds-] fcjkg] ,- ,oa JhokLro]vkjlh- ¼2013½A Hkkjr ds }hi lewgksa eas f'keyk fepZ ,U;weij ¶;wlsfj;e DykekbMksLiksje }kjk mRiUu ,oa fjiksVZ ughafd, x, Qy lM+u jksx dk izdVu] ost- lkba-] 39% 195&197-

ehuk] ih- Mh-] xkSj] vkj- ch-] xqIrk] tslh-] flag] ,p- ds-]voLFkh] vkj- ih-] usre] vkj- ,l-] xksfndk] ,l-] laèkq] ih-,l] izlkn] vkj-] jkBh] ,- ,l-] jk;] Mh-] FkkWel] ,y-] iVsy]th- ,-] ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2013½A Hkkjr esa ljlksa dhQly dks cckZn djus okys izeq[k jksxksa ¼czkfldk tqufl;k½ds izcaèku ds fy, xSj&jklk;fud ,tsaV mfpr ,oai;kZoj.k vuqdwy fodYi miyCèk djkrs gSaA ØkIl izksVsD'ku53% 169&174-

ukxef.k] ih- fo'oukFk] ds-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l- ,oajsM~Mh] ih- ,y- ¼2013½A xkao Lrj ij gsfydksoikZ vkfet+sjkds izcaèku ds fy, vkbZih,e ekWM~;wy dk ijh{k.kA ,uYlIykaV izksVs- lkbal] 21% 432&434-



Pan, S., Mukherji, R. and Bhagat, S. (2013). Evaluationof Trichoderma spp. against soil borne plant pathogens.Annals Pl. Prot. Sci., 21: 197-198.

Ravindra, H., Kenchangowda, P. V., Sehgal, M. andShivanna, S. (2013). Evaluation of groundnutgermplasm for resistance against root-knot nematodes.Pakistan J. Nematol., 31: 179-181.

Ravindra, H., Sehgal, Mukesh, Manu, T. G., Murali,R. and Narasimhamurthy, H. B.(2013). First Incidenceof root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on onionin Karnataka. Indian J. Nematol., 43: 233-234.

Sardana, H. R., Bhat, M. N. and Sehgal, M. (2013).Evaluation and validation of non-chemical IPM andINM technology for bell pepper (Capsicum annum varfrutescens L). through farmers' participatory apporach.Indian J. Ent., 75: 127-131.

Sardana, H. R., Kanwar, Vikas, Bhat, M. N. and Singh,R. V. (2013). Farmers' driven approach for fieldimplementation and economic analysis of IPMtechnology in tomato. Indian J. Ent., 75: 185-188.

Singh, M., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S. and Pandey, N.(2013).Effect of systemic fungicides, culture media,temperature and pH on growth of Sclerotiniasclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary causing white mold ofchickpea. Annal. Pl. Prot. Sci., 21: 136-139.

Srivastava, D. S., Sehgal, Mukesh, Dweivedi, B. K. andSingh. S. P. (2013). Identification of safer chemical forthe management of root knot nematode. Pestic. Res. J.,32: 105-108.

Vennila, S. and Agarwal, Meenu (2013). Fruit crops asalternate hosts of cotton mealybug. Annal. Pl. Prot. Sci.,21: 434-436.

Vennila, S. and Agarwal, Meenu (2013). Seasonalityand severity of cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsisTinsley on vegetable crops. Annal. Pl. Prot. Sci., 21:

265-269.

Vennila, S. and Agarwal, Meenu (2014). Ornamentalhosts of cotton mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis). IndianJ. Agric. Sci., 84: 161-163.

Vennila, S. and Agarwal, Meenu (2014). Spices as hostcrops of cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis. Annal.Pl. Prot. Sci., 22: 191-192.

Yadav, M. S., Singh, N., Singh, S., Ahmad, N. andGodika, S. (2013). Assessment of prevalence and severityof Sclerotinia rot of Indian mustard in Rajasthan andHaryana. Indian J. Pl. Prot., 41: 243-252.

iku] ,l-] eq[kthZ] vkj- ,oa Hkxr] ,l- ¼2013½A enk tfurikni jksxk.kqvksa ds fo#) VªkbdksMekZ iztkfr dk ewY;kaduA,uYl IykaV izksVs- lkbal] 21% 197&198-

jfoUnz] ,p] dsupuxksoMk] ih- oh-] lgxy] ,e- ,oa 'khokuk],l- ¼2013½A tM+&foxyu lw=Ñfe;ksa ds fo#) izfrjksèk dsfy, ewaxQyh tuunzO; dk ewY;kaduA ikfdLrku ts- usekVksy]31% 179&181-

jfoUnz] ,p-] lgxy eqds'k ekuw] Vh- th-] eqjyh] vkj- ,oaujflEgkewfrZ] ,p- ch- ¼2013½A dukZVd esa I;kt ij tM+foyxu lw=Ñfe esykMksxk;uh budkWxfuVk dk igyk izdksiAbf.M;u ts- usekVksy-] 43% 233&234-

ljnkuk] ,p- vkj-] HkV] ,e- ,u- vkSj lgxy] ,e- ¼2013½Afdlkuksa dh lgHkkfxrk i)fr ds ekè;e ls f'keyk fepZ¼dsiflde ,ue osjk- ÝwfVlsal ,y½ ds fy, xSj jklk;fudvkbZih,e ,oa vkbZ,u,e izkS|ksfxdh dk ewY;kadu rFkkoSèkhdj.kA bf.M;u ts- baV-] 75% 127&131-

ljnkuk] ,p- vkj-] daoj] fodkl] HkV~V] ,e- ,u- ,oa flag]vkj- oh- ¼2013½A VekVj esa vkbZih,e izkS|ksfxdh ds iz{ks=dk;kZUo;u ds fy, fdlkuksa }kjk visf{kr i)fr rFkk vkfFkZdfo'ys"k.kA bf.M;u ts- baV-] 75% 185&188-

flag] ,e-] 'kekZ] vks- ih- Hkxr] ,l- ,oa ik.Ms] ,u- ¼2013½ALDysjksfVfu;k LDysjksf'k;ksje ¼fyc-½ Mh csjh ds fodkl ijQaQwnuk'kdksa] dYpj ehfM;k] rkieku rFkk ih,p ds izHkko lspus esa lQsn èkCcsA ,uYl IykaV izksVs- lkbal] 21% 136&139-

JhokLro] Mh- ,l-] lgxy] eqds'k] f}osnh] ch- ds- ,oa flag],l- ih- ¼2013½A tM+ foxyu lw=Ñfe ds izcaèku ds fy,lqjf{kr jlk;u dh igpkuA isfLVd fjl- ts-] 32% 105&108-

osfuyk] ,l- ,oa vxzoky] ehuw ¼2013½A dikl feyhcx dsoSdfYid ijiksf"k;ksa ds :i esa Qy QlysaA ,uYl IykaV izksVs-lkbal] 21% 434&436-

osfuyk] ,l-] ,oa vxzoky ehuw ¼2013½A lCth dh Qlyksa ijdikl feyhcx] fQusdksdl lksysuksfIll fVUlys dk vkxeu,oa izdksi dh rhozrkA ,uYl IykaV izksVs- lkbal] 21% 265&269-

osfuyk] ,l-] ,oa vxzoky ehuw ¼2014½A dikl feyhcx¼fQusdksdl lksysuksfIll½ ds vkHkq"k.kh; ifjiks"khA bf.M;uts- ,fxzd] lkbal-] 84% 161&163-

osfuyk] ,l- ,oa vxzoky] ehuw ¼2014½A dikl feyhcx]¼fQusdksdl lksysuksfIll½ dh ifjiks"kh Qlyksa ds :i esaiztkfr;kaA ,uYl IykaV izksVs- lkbal] 22% 191&192-

;kno] ,e- ,l-] flag] ,u-] flag ,l-] vgen] ,u- ,oaxksfndk] ,l- ¼2013½A jktLFkku vkSj gfj;k.kk esa Hkkjrh;ljlksa ds LDysjksfVfu;k foxyu dh O;kidrk ,oa rhozrkAbf.M;u ts- IykaV izksVs-] 41% 243&252-

NCIPM


Book

Sehgal, Mukesh and Chattopadhyay, C. (2013). IPMon important field and horticultural crops of NEHregion in India, NCIPM, New Delhi. pp 134.

Technical bulletins/Folders/Popular articles

Ahuja, D. B., Bhat, M. N. and Singh, R.V. (2014). Agetiphool gobhi avam bandhgobhi men samiket nashijivprabhadan. Extension folder No. 27, (Hindi), NCIPM,New Delhi.

Ahuja, D. B., Singh, R. V., Saxena, S. P., Sharma,Hemant, Kalria, G. B., Pawar, Satish and Patel, N.,(2014). Alphanso avm Kesar aam ki prajatiyon mey tikaunashijeev prabandhan. Extension folder No.28, (Hindi),NCIPM, New Delhi.

Ahuja, D. B., Singh, R. V., Saxena, S. P., Sharma,Hemant, Kalria, G. B., Pawar, Satish and Patel, Nilesh,(2014). Sustainable pest management in mango orchardsfor southern Gujarat, Extension folder No.13,NCIPM, New Delhi.

Bhagat, S., Sharma, O. P., Kumar, Sunil, Saini, ManishRanjan, and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Chane meinlagne vale nasheejeevon ki sachitr pustika. Extensionfolder 22 (Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.

Birah, Ajanta, Ahamd, Jamir and Tripathi, R.S. (2013).Dhan ki fasal mein chuha niyantran (in hindi), Kheti,September, pp 32.

Chandrashekar, K., Gupta, O., Yelshetty, S., Sharma,O. P., Bhagat, S., Chattopadhyay, C., Sehgal, M.,Kumari, A., Amaresan, N., Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K.,Asre, R., Kapoor, K.S., Satyagopal, K. and Jeyakumar,P. (2014). Integrated pest management package forchickpea. Published by NCIPM, New Delhi,DPPQ&S, Faridabad and NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 43

CROPSAP (Horticulture) Team of E pest surveillance(2013) Pests of Fruits (Banana, Mango andPomegranate)-E-Pest Surveillance and Pest Advisory:CROPSAP (Horticulture) (ed. D.B. Ahuja) Jointlypublished by National Centre for Integrated PestManagement, New Delhi and State Department ofHorticulture, Commissionerate of Agriculture, Pune,M. S. pp 67.

Gade, R. M., Tanwar, R. K., Jeyakumar, P., Kanwar,V., Birah, Ajanta, Singh, S. P. and Singh, Amar (2014).Kapas Mein Patti Lalpan Evam Uska Prabandhan,Technical Bulletin 33, NCIPM, New Delhi, pp 16.

iqLrdlgxy] eqds'k ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2013½A egRoiw.kZ iz{ks=esa vkbZih,e rFkk Hkkjr esa iwoksZÙkj ioZrh; {ks= dh ckxokuhQlysa] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh] 134 ihih-

rduhdh lekpkj&i=k@iQksYMj@yksdfiz; ys[kvgwtk] Mh] ch-] HkV] ,e- ,u- ,oa flag] vkj- oh- ¼2014½Avxsrh Qwy xksHkh ,oa canxksHkh es lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèkuAizlkj i=d laa- 27] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA

vgwtk] Mh- ch-] flag] vkj- oh-] lDlsuk] ,l- ih- 'kekZ] gsear]dkyfj;k] th- ch-] iokj] lrh'k ,oa iVsy] ,u-] ¼2014½AvYQklks ,oa dslj vke dh iztkfr;ksa esa fVdkÅ uk'khthoizcaèkuA izlkj i=d laa- 28] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA

vgwtk] Mh- ch-] flag] vkj- oh-] lDlsuk] ,l- ih] 'kekZ] gsear]dkyfj;k] th- ch-] iokj] lrh'k ,oa iVsy] ,u-] ¼2014½Anf{k.kh xqtjkr ds fy, vke ds ckxksa esa v{kq..k uk'khthoizcaèku] izlkj i=d laa- 13] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA

Hkxr] ,l-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] dqekj] lquhy] lSuh] euh"k jatu],oa pV~Vksikè;k; lh- ¼2014½A pus es yxus okys uk'khthoksadh lfp= iqLrdA izlkj i=d laa- 22] jklukizds] ubZfnYyhA

fcjkg] vtark] vgen] tehj ,oa f=ikBh] vkj- ,l- ¼2013½Aèkku dh Qly esa pwgk fu;a=.k] [ksrh] flrEcj] ihih 32-

pUnz'ks[kj] ds-] xqIrk] vks-] ;sys'ksV~Vh ,l-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr],l-] pV~Vksikè;k;] lh-] lgxy] ,e-] dqekjh] ,-] vejlsu] ,u-lq'khy] ,l- ,u-] flUgk] ,- ds-] vkljs] vkj-] diwj] ds- ,l-]lR;xksiky] ds- ,oa t;kdqekj] ih- ¼2014½A pus ds fy,lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku iSdst] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh }kjkizdkf'kr] MhihihD;w ,aM ,l] Qjhnkckn rFkk ,uvkbZih,p,e]gSnjkckn] ihih 43-

bZ&uk'khtho fuxjkuh ¼2013½ dk Øki lSi ¼ckxokuh½AQyksa ¼dsyk] vke vkSj vukj½ ds uk'khthoA bZ&uk'khthofuxjkuh ,oa uk'khtho laca/kh lykg% Øki lSi ¼Mh- ch-vgwtk }kjk laikfnr½] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh vkSj jkT; ckxokuhfoHkkx] Ñf"k vk;qDr] iq.ks] ,e- ,l- ihih 67-

xMs] vkj- ,e-] raoj] vkj- ds-] t;dqekj] ih-] daoj] oh-] fcjkg]vtark] flag] ,l- ih- ,oa flag] vej ¼2014½A dikl esa iÙkhykyiu ,oa mldk izca/ku] rduhdh cqysfVu 33] jklukizds]ubZ fnYyh] ihih 16-



Kumar, Sangit, Kumar, Pradyumn, Bana, Jugal Kishor,Shekhar, M., Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K., Asre Ram,Kapoor, K. S., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Sehgal, M.,Boopathi, T., Amaresan, N., Chattopadhyay, C.,Satyagopal, K. and Jeyakumar, P. (2014). Integratedpest management package for maize. Published byNCIPM, New Delhi, DPPQ&S, Faridabad andNIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 44.

Mohan, S., Monga, D., Kumar, Rishi, Nagrare, V.,Gokte, Nandini, Vennila, S., Tanwar, R. K., Sharma,O. P., Bhagat, Someshwar, Agarwal, Meenu,Chattopadhyay, C., Kumar, Rakesh, Birah Ajanta,Amaresan N., Singh Amar, Sushil S. N., Asre Ram,Kapoor K. S., Jeyakumar, P. and Satyagopal, K. (2014).Integrated pest management package for cotton.Published by NCIPM, New Delhi, DPPQ&S,Faridabad and NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 84.

Prakash, Anand, Bentur, J. S., Srinivas, Prasad, M.,Tanwar, R. K., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, Someshwar,Sehgal, Mukesh, Singh, S. P., Singh, Monika,Chattopadhyay, C., Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K., Asre,Ram, Kapoor, K. S., Satyagopal, K. and Jeyakumar,P. (2014). Integrated pest management package for rice.Published by NCIPM, New Delhi, DPPQ&S,Faridabad and NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 43.

Ravindra, H., Mukesh, Sehgal, Manu, T. G., Murali,R., Narsimhamurthy H. B., Latha M. and Jain, R. K.(2014). Success story of rice roo- knot nematodeMeloidogyne graminicola in Shimoga (Karnataka).Extension folder (In Kannad). Zonal Agricultural andHorticultural Research Station, University ofAgricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shimoga -577225 (Karnataka).

Sabir, Naved, Singh, B., Sumitha, R., Hasan, M.,Tanwar, R.K., Ahuja, D.B. and Bambawale, O.M.(Eds). E-Bulletin on Greenhouse Pests in India: BaselineReflect Serious Buildups 2012 publ. 2014 published byNational Centre for Integrated Pest Management, NewDelhi - 110012

Sabir, Naved, Singh, A.K. and Hasan, M., (2014)Greenhouse Kheere mein Nashijeev PrabandhanTakneeki Patrika, NCIPM, New Delhi, pp 8.

Sardana, H. R., Bhat, M. Narayana and Sabir, N. (2014).Tamatar ki fasal mein samekit nashijeev prabandhan.Extension folder No. (Hindi), NCIPM, New Delhi

Sehgal Mukesh, Chattopadhyay, C., Nagchan, S. V.and Dutta, M. N.(2013). Pest Guide. NCIPM, NewDelhi, pp 16.

dqekj] laxhr] dqekj] izn~;qeu] csuk] tqxy fd'kksj] 'ks[kj] ,e]lq'khy] ,l- ,u-] flUgk] ,- ds-] vkljs jke] diwj] ds- ,l] 'kekZ]vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l-] lgxy] ,e-] Hkwifr] Vh-] vejlsu] ,u-]pV~Vk sikè;k;] lh-] lR;xk siky] ds- ,oa t;dqekj]ih- ¼2014½A eDdk ds fy, lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku iSdstAjklukizds] ubZ fnYyh] MhihihD;w ,aM ,l] Qjhnkckn rFkk,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn }kjk izdkf'kr] ihih 44-

eksgu] ,l-] eksaxk] Mh-] dqekj] fj"kh] ukxzkjs] oh-] xksDVs] uafnuh]osfuyk] ,l-] raoj] vkj- ds-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] lkses'oj]vxzoky] ehuw] pV~Vksikè;k;] lh-] dqekj] jkds'k] fcjkg vtarkvejlsu ,u-] flag vej] lq'khy] ,l- ,u-] vkljs jke] diwj] ds-,l-] t;kdqekj] ih- ,oa lR;xksiky] ds- ¼2014½ dikl ds fy,lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku iSdstA jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh] MhihihD;w,aM ,l] Qjhnkckn rFkk ,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn }kjk izdkf'kr]ihih 84-

izdk'k] vkuan] csarwj] ts- ,l-] Jhfuokl] izlkn] ,e-] raoj] vkj-ds-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] lkses'oj] lgxy] eqds'k] flag] ,l- ih-]flag] eksfudk] pV~Vksikè;k;] lh-] lq'khy] ,l- ,u] flUgk] ,-ds- vkljs ,e- ,oa tSu] vkj- ds- ¼2014½A f'keksxk ¼dukZVd½ esapkoy tM+ foxyu lw=Ñfe] esykMksxk;uh xzkfefudksyk dhlQyrk xkFkkA izlkj i=d ¼dUuM+ Hkk"kk esa½A {ks=h; Ñf"k ,oackxokuh vuqlaèkku dsUnz] Ñf"k ,oa ckxokuh foKku fo'ofo|ky;]f'keksxk & 577225 ¼dukZVd½A

jfoUnz] ,p-] lgxy] eqds'k] euq] Vh- th-] eqjyh] vkj-] ujflagkeqjFkh,p- ch-] ysBk ,e- ,oa tSu] vkj- ds- ¼2014½A f'keksxk ¼dukZVd½esa pkoy tM+ foxyu lw=Ñfe] esykMksxk;uh xzkfefudksyk dhlQyrk xkFkkA izlkj i=d ¼dUuM+ ,oa vaxszth Hkk"kk esa½A{ks=h; Ñf"k ,oa ckxokuh vuqlaèkku dsUnz] Ñf"k ,oa ckxokuhfoKku fo'ofo|ky;] f'keksxk & 577225 ¼dukZVd½A

lkfcj] uosn] flag] ch-] lqfeFkk] vkj-] glu] ,e-] raoj] vkj-ds-] vkgqtk] Mh-ch- ,oa cEckokys] vks-,e- ¼2014½A Hkkjr esa xzhugkmluk'khthoksa ij bZ&cqysfVu% vk/kkjHkwr xEHkhjrk] rduhdh if=dk]jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA

lkfcj] uosn] flag] ,-ds-] ,oa glu] ,e-] ¼2014½A xzhugkml[khjs esa lesfdr uk'khtho izc/kau] rduhdh if=dk izdk'kujklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA ihih 8

ljnkuk] ,p- vkj-] HkV~V] ,e- ukjk;.ku ,oa lkfcj] ,u-¼2014½A VekVj dh Qly esa lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèkuA izlkji=d la- 30A jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh 110012-

lgxy] eqds'k] pV~Vksikè;k;] lh-] ukxpu] ,l- oh- ,oa nÙkk],e- ,u- ¼2013½A uk'khtho ekxZnf'kZdkA jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh16 ihih-

NCIPM


Sehgal, Mukesh, Arora , Sumitra, Srivastav, D. S.,Yadav, Ambrish Singh, Sourabh, Manish KumarBishen, Singh, Shailender Kumar, Arora, Sanjay andBhattacharya, Anoop. (2013). Dhan mein sutrkrimiprabandhan, (Hindi), KVK-II, Sitapur, Katia, pp 8.

Sehgal, Mukesh, Arora, Sumitra, Srivastav, D. S., Yadav,Ambrish Singh, Sourabh, Manish Kumar Bishen, Singh,Shailender Kumar, Arora, Sanjay and Bhattacharya,Anoop (2013). Dhan peedikon ke prakartik shatru,(Hindi), KVK-II, Sitapur, Katia, pp 8

Sehgal, Mukesh, Chattopadhyay, C., Bora, B. C.,Choudhay, B. N., Bhagwati, B and Jain, R. K. (2014).Success story of root-knot nematode Meloidogynegraminicola in Assam. Extension folder No.31.NCIPM, New Delhi, pp 6.

Sharma, A. N., Gupta, G. K., Verma, R. K., Sharma,O. P., Bhagat, S., Amaresan, N., Saini, M. R.,Chattopadhyay, C., Sushil, S. N., Asre, R., Kapoor,K. S., Satyagopal, K. and Jeyakumar, P. (2014).Integrated pest management package for soybean.Published by NCIPM, New Delhi, DPPQ&S,Faridabad and NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 41.

Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Singh, Monika, Kumar, Sunil,Vennila, S. and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Moong evamurad mein lagne vale nasheejeevon ki sachitr patrika.Extension folder 17 (Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.

Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Singh, Monika, Vennila, S.and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Chane mein sclerotiniarog evam uska prabandhan. Extension folder 16 (Hindi).NCIPM, New Delhi.

Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Vennila, Kumar, Sunil andChattopadhyay, C. (2014). Arhar mein baanjhpanmasaic rog evm iska prabandhan. Extension folder 19(Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.

Sharma, O. P., Vennila, S., Bhagat, S., Kumari, Arpanaand Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Phali bedhak keet evamiska prabandhan. Extension folder 18 (Hindi). NCIPM,New Delhi.

Sharma, O. P., Vennila, S., Bhagat, S., Kumari, Arpana,Kumar, Sunil and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Arharmein lagne vale nasheejeevon ki sachitr patrika.Extension folder 15 (Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.

Sharma, O. P., Vennila, S., Bhagat, S., Kumari, Arpana,Kumar, Sunil and Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Arhar kichittidar patti chedak ka prabandhan. Extension folder14 (Hindi). NCIPM, New Delhi.

lgxy] eqds'k] vjksM+k] lqfe=k] JhokLro] Mh- ,l- ;kno]vejh'k flag] lkSjHk] euh"k dqekj fc'ku] flag] 'kSysUnz dqekj]vjksM+k] lat; ,oa HkV~Vkpk;Z] vuwi ¼2013½A èkku ihM+dksa dsizkÑfrd 'k=q] dsohds&II] lhrkiqj] dfV;k] ihih 8A

lgxy] eqds'k] vjksM+k] lqfe=k] JhokLro] Mh- ,l-] ;kno]vejh'k flag] lkSjHk] euh"k dqekj fc'ku] flag 'kSysUnz dqekj]vjksM+k latho ,oa HkV~Vkpk;Z] vuwiA ¼2013½A èkku es lw=Ñfeizcaèku] dsohds&II] lhrkiqj] dfV;k] ihih 8A

lgxy] eqds'k] pV~Vksikè;k;] lh-] cksjk] chlh-] pV~Vksikè;k;]ch- ,u- Hkxorh] ch ,oa tSu] vkj- ds- ¼2014½A vle esa tM+foxyu lw=Ñfe] esykMksxk;uh xzkfefudksyk dh lQyrk xkFkkAizlkj i=d ua- 31] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA 6 ihih-

'kekZ] ,- ,u-] xqIrk] th- ds-] oekZ] vkj- ds-] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr],l-] vejlsu] ,u-] lSuh] ,e- vkj- pV~Vksikè;k;] lh] lq'khy],l- ,u] vkljs] vkj-] diwj] ds- ,l-] lR;xksiky] ds- ,oat;kdqekj] ih- ¼2014½A lks;kchu ds fy, lesfdr uk'khthoizcaèkuA jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh] MhihihD;w ,aM ,l] QjhnkcknrFkk ,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn }kjk izdkf'kr] ihih 41-

'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l-] flag] eksfudk] dqekj] lquhy]oSf..kyk] ,l- ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2014½A ewax ,oa mM+nesa yxus okys uk'khthoksa dh lfp= iqfLrdkA izlkj i=d17 ¼fgUnh½] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA

'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l-] flag] eksfudk] oSf..kyk] ,l- ,oapV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2014½A pus esa LdysjksfVfu;k jksx ,oamldk izca/kuA izlkj i=d 16 ¼fgUnh½] jklukizds-] ubZfnYyhA

'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr] ,l-] oSf..kyk] ,l-] dqekj] lquhy] ,oapV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2014½A vjgj esa cka>iu jksx ,oa bldkizca/kuA izlkj i=d 19 ¼fgUnh½] jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA

'kekZ] vks- ih-] oSf..kyk] ,l-] Hkxr] ,l-] dqekjh] viZ.kk ,oapV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2014½A Qyh cs/kd dhV ,oa bldkizca/ku izlkj i=d 18 ¼fgUnh½] jklukizds-] ubZ fnYyhA

'kekZ] vks- ih-] oSf..kyk] ,l-] Hkxr] ,l-] dqekjh] viZ.kk]dqekj] lquhy ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2014½A vjgj esa yxusokys uk'khthoksa dh lfp= if=dkA izlkj i=d 15 ¼fgUnh½]jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhA

'kekZ] vks- ih-] oSf..kyk] ,l-] Hkxr] ,l-] dqekjh] viZ.kk] dqekj]lquhy ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2014½A vjgj dh fpŸkhnkjiŸkh Nsnd dk izca/kuA izlkj i=d 14 ¼fgUnh½] jklukizds] ubZfnYyhA



Singh, Saroj, Thirumalaisamy, P. P., Harish, G., Datta,Ram, Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K., Asre, Ram, Kapoor,K. S., Satyagopal, K., Jeyakumar, P., Birah, Ajanta,Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, Someshwar, Verma, P. V.,Kumar, Sunil, Chattopadhyay, C. and Yadav, M. S.(2014). Integrated pest management package forgroundnut. Published by NCIPM, New Delhi,DPPQ&S, Faridabad and NIPHM, Hyderabad, pp 49.

Singh, S. K., Verma, P. V., Kumar, R., Yadav, M. S.,Ahmad, N., Reddy, L., Venketshwalru, C., Vemanna,K., Jyotarana, N. K., Jadho, K. S. and Jasrotiya, P.(2014). Mungphalee mein samekeet nasheejeevprabandhan, Extension folder No.23, (Hindi), NCIPM,New Delhi.

Yadav, M. S., Ahmad, N., Yadav, D. K., Singh, S. K.,Yadav, J. L., Verma, P. V., Mehta, N. andChattopadhyay, C. (2014). Sarson mein samekeetnasheejeev prabandhan, Extension folder No.25(Hindi), NCIPM, New Delhi.

Patents filed

Sharma, Satyawati, Naik, Satyanarayan, Mittal, Aditya,Sabir, Naved, Sharma, Abhishek (2014). A Compositionfor Enhancement of Pathogenicity of Paecilomyceslilacinus and uses thereof. Indian Institute Technology,Delhi-110016 India. Application No. 3590/Del/2013.

Singh, Surender Kumar and Bambawale, O.M. (2012)"Light trap for managing insects" International Bureauof the World Intellectual Property Organization,Application No.:PCT/IB2012/050168, which was filedon 13 Jan 2012 for PCT, the same had qualified at theInternational level during the current year.

Singh, Surender Kumar and Bambawale, O.M. (2012).The "FER" was replied for the already patentedinvention "Field kit for the multiplication of insectlarval parasitoid" Indian Patent Application number170/Del/2007 dated 29 March, 2012, this was submittedto the Patent office, New Delhi in March, 2013.

Radio talk

Sardana, H. R. (2014). Delivered a radio talk on topicentitled `Sabjion ki faslon mein samekit NashijivPrabandhan' on 24 Mar 2014 on All India Radio,Akashvani, Rohtak, Haryana.

flag] ljkst] fr:eyk;klSeh] ihih-] gjh'k] th-] nÙkk] jke]lq'khy] ,l- ,u-] flUgk] ,- ds-] vkljs jke] diwj] ds- ,l-]lR;xksiky] ds- t;dqekj] ih- fcjkg] vtark] 'kekZ] vks- ih-] Hkxr]lkses'oj] oekZ] ih- oh-] dqekj] lq'khy] pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ,oa;kno] ,e- ,l- ¼2014½A ewaxQyh ds fy, lesfdr uk'khthoizcaèkuA jklukizds] ubZ fnYyh] MhihihD;w ,aM ,l] QjhnkcknrFkk ,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkckn }kjk izdkf'kr] ihih 49-

flag] ,l- ds-] oekZ] ih- oh-] dqekj] vkj-] ;kno] ,e- ,l-]vgen] ,u-] jsM~Mh] ,y-] osadVs'ojyw] lh-] oseUuk] ds-] T;ksrluk],u- ds-] tkèkks] ds- ,l- ,oa tljks] ih- ¼2014½A ewaxQyh eslesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku] izlkj i=d laa- 23] jklukizds] ubZfnYyhA

;kno] ,e- ,l- vgen] ,u-] ;kno] Mh- ds-] flag] ts- ,y] oekZ]ih- oh-] esFkk] ,u- ,oa pV~Vksikè;k;] lh- ¼2014½A ljlksa esalesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku] izlkj i=d laa- 25] jklukizds] ubZfnYyhA

izLrqr isVsaV'kekZ] lR;orh] uk;d] lR;ukjk;.k] feRry] vkfnR;] lkfcj]uosn] 'kekZ] vfHk"ksd ¼2014½ iflyksekblht fyyksflul dsjksxmRiUu esa cVksRrjh ds fy;s cuk;s x;s ,oa mlds ok;iz;ksxA Hkkjrh; rduhdh laLFkku] fnYyh 110016 Hkkjr- vkosnula[;k 3590@Mhb,y@2013-

flag] lqjsUnz dqekj vkSj cEckoys] dk;kZy; Kkiu ¼2012½AÞdhVksa ds izcaèku ds fy, ykbV VªSiÞ varjjk"Vªh; fo'ockSf)d&laink laxBu C;wjks] vkosnu la[;k ihlhVhA@vkbZch2012@050168] ftls fnukad 13 tuojh] 2012 dks ihlhVh dsfy, tek fd;k x;k Fkk] ftls orZeku o"kZ ds nkSjku varjjk"Vªh;Lrj ij Lohdkj dj fy;k x;kA

flag] lqjsUnz dqekj vkSj cEckokys] vks- ,e-] dk;kZy; Kkiu¼2012½A isVsaV ds fy, igys ls vkosnu fd, x, vkfo"dkjÞijthO;kHk ykokZ dhV ds iztuu ds fy, QhYM fdVÞ ds fy,Þ,QbZvkjÞ dk mÙkj izkIr gks x;k gS] Hkkjrh; isVsaV vkosnufnukad 29 ekpZ 2012 la- 170@MhbZ,y@2007] bls isVsaVdk;kZy;] ubZ fnYyh esa ekpZ] 2013 esa tek fd;k x;k FkkA

jsfM;ks okrkZljnkuk] ,p- vkj- ¼2014½ fnukad 24 ekpZ] 2014 dks vkWybafM;k jsfM;ks] vkdk'kok.kh] jksgrd] gfj;k.kk ij ^lfCt;ksadh Qlyksa esa lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku* 'kh"kZd ij ,djsfM;ks okrkZ izLrqr dhA

NCIPM


lsfeukj] laxks"Bh] izf'k{k.k,oa iqjLdkjSeminars, Conferences, Trainingsand Awards

?kVukØe dk uke vofèk LFkku izfrHkkxh

Name of the event Duration Venue Participants

lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku ij ,e,,l,p,oh }kjk izk;ksftr varjjk"Vªh;vkj ,aM Mh ikB~;ØeMASHAV Sponsored International R& D Course on IntegratedPest Management

^Qly vkèkkfjr uk'khthoksa ,oa [kjirokjksa ds tSfod fu;a=.k ijvf[ky Hkkjrh; lefUor vuqlaèkku ifj;kstuk* dh okf"kZd lewg cSBdAnnual Group Meeting of ‘All India Co-ordinated ResearchProject on Biological Control of Crop Pests and Weeds’

Ckhloha vf[ky Hkkjrh; ljlksa vuqla/kku dkexkj lewg cSBd20th All India Group meeting on Rapeseed Musted Research

Ñf"k vuqlaèkku izcaèku ij iqu'p;kZ ikB~;ØeRefresher Course on Agricultural Research Management

lewg cSBd ¼fj;y Vkbe uk'khtho xfrfd;ka & pkoy½Group Meeting (Real Time Pest Dynamics-Rice)

Qy eD[kh ij izfrHkk mUu;u dk;ZØe ,oa dk;Z'kkykFruit Fly Brainstorming and Workshop

izkS|ksfxdh dk okf.kT;hdj.k vkSj uoizorZu izcaèkuTechnology Commercialization and Innovation Management

lewg cSBd ¼fj;y Vkbe uk'khtho xfrfd;ka & vjgj½Group Meeting (Real Time Pest Dynamics – Pigeonpea)

21 vizSy & 14 ebZ] 201321 Apr -14 May 2013

24&25 ebZ] 201324-25 May 2013

5&7 tqykbZ] 20135-7 July 2013

15&27 tqykbZ] 201315-27 Jul 2013

26 tqykbZ] 201326 Jul 2013

27 tqykbZ] 201327 Jul 2013

29 tqykbZ&1 vxLr] 201329 Jul-1 Aug 2013

30 tqykbZ] 201330 Jul 2013

flukMdks ¼vkbZ,u,u,Mhlhvks½izf'k{k.k dsUnz] oksYdkuh] csV Mkxu]rsy voho] bt+jkbZyCINNADCO's TrainingCentre Volcani, Bet Dagan,

Tel Aviv, Israel.

,uch,vkbZvkbZ] cSaxyq#NBAII, Bangaluru

ljnkj dq'khuxj nkarhokMkd`f"k fo'ofo|ky;] ,l-ds-uxjnkarhokMkSardarkrushinagar DantiwadaAgricultural University, S.K.

Nagar, Dantiwada

ukeZ] gSnjkcknNAARM, Hyderabad

jklukizds] ubZ fnYyhNCIPM, New Delhi

,uch,vkbZvkbZ] cSaxyq#NBAII, Bengaluru

vkbZ,lch] gSnjkcknISB, Hyderabad


,e- ,l- ;knoeqds'k lgxyM.S. YadavMukesh Sehgal

vtark fcjkgAjanta Birah

ulhe vgenNasim Ahmad

vtark fcjkgAjanta Birah

,l- osfuykvkj- ds- raoj,l- ih- flagfujatu flagS. VennilaR.K. TanwarS.P. Singh

Niranjan Singh

Mh- ch- vgwtkD.B. Ahuja

,l- ds- flagS.K. Singh

,l- osfuykvks- ih- ‘kekZ,l- Hkxr


lsfeukj] laxks"Bh] izf'k{k.k ,oa iqjLdkj | Seminars, Conferences, Trainings and Awards



uk'khtho ds [krjksa ds fo'ys"k.k ij varjjk"Vªh; izf'k{k.kInternational Training on Pest Risk Analysis

oSf'od xSi ekud ij cMs+ iSekus ij O;olk; ds fy, bZ&yfuZxdkslZe-Learning Course on GLOBAL GAP standard for great

marketing Access

eDdk gkbfczM ij jk"Vªh; ijh{k.k dk;ZØeProgramme on National Demonstration on Maize Hybrids

Qly ds [krjukd jksxksa ds fy, gkWaLV&iSFkkstu ck;ks,tsaV baVjsD'kudh fØ;kfofèk dks le>us ds fy, lh,,QVh ¼dkÝV½ izf'k{k.kCAFT Training on Understanding of Mechanism of Host-Pathogen-Bio-agent Interaction and Sustainable ManagementStrategy for Threatening Crop Diseases

lewg cSBd ¼fj;y Vkbe uk'khtho xfrfd;ka & ewaxQyh½Group Meeting (Real Time Pest Dynamics – Groundnut)

lewg cSBd ¼fj;y Vkbe uk'khtho xfrfd;ka & VekVj½Group Meeting (Real Time Pest Dynamics – Tomato)

,lth,l Vsªfuax ds }kjk [kk| lqj{kk ij vxz.kh vkfMVj dh ;ksX;rkizkIr dhQualified as Lead Auditor through SGS Training - Lead Auditorfor Food Safety Management System ISO22000

ih,evkbZ,l ij izf'k{k.k dk;ZØeTraining Programme on PMIS

Þeq[; Qlyksa esa mHkjrs jksxksa dh igpku djus ds fy, QyukReddk;Zuhfr;ksaÞ ij jk"Vªh; laxks"BhNational Symposium “Functional Strategies for Tracking

Emerging Diseases of Majors Crops”

,l,,l dk iz;ksx djrs gq, MkVk fo'ys"k.kData Analysis Using SAS

2&6 flrEcj] 20132-6 Sep 2013

10&12 flrEcj] 201310-12 Sep 2013

21 flrEcj] 201321 Sep 2013

24 flrEcj &14 vDVwcj] 201324 Sep -14 Oct 2013

2 vxLr] 20132 Aug 2013

6 vxLr] 20136 Aug 2013

21&25 vDrwcj21-25 Oct

15&30 fnlEcj] 201315-30 Dec 2013

13 fnlEcj] 201313 Dec 2013

29 tuojh &05 Qjojh] 201429 Jan-05 Feb 2014

,uvkbZih,p,e] gSnjkcknNIPHM, Hyderabad

jk"Vªh; mRikndrk ifj"kn]ubZ fnYyhNational Productivity Council,

New Delhi

eDdk vuqlaèkku funs'kky;]ubZ fnYyhDirectorate of Maize Research,

New Delhi

Hkk-d`-vuq-la-] ubZ fnYyhIARI, New Delhi



,lth,l Hkkjr izk- fy-xqM+xkaoSGS India Pvt Ltd,Gurgaon

vkbZ,,lvkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyhIASRI, New Delhi

Hkk-d`-vuq-la-] ubZ fnYyhIARI, New Delhi

vkbZ,,lvkjvkbZ] ubZ fnYyhIASRI, New Delhi

fujatu flagS.VennilaO.P. SharmaS. Bhagat

Niranjan Singh

vtark fcjkg,l- HkxrAjanta Birah

S. Bhagat

uosn lkfcjNaved Sabir

vatrk fcjkgAjanta Birah

,l- HkxrS. Bhagat

fuØk ewaxQyh Vhe dslHkh ,lksfl;sVAll associates ofNICRA Groundnut

team

fuØk VekVj Vhe dslHkh ,lksfl;sVAll associates ofNICRA Tomato

team

uosn lkfcjNaved Sabir

lHkh oSKkfud ,oaiz’kklfud deZpkjhAll scientific andadministrative staff

,e- ,l- ;knoulhe vgenM.S. Yadav

Nasim Ahmad

,l- osfuykS. Vennila

NCIPM




21 oha lnh ds fy, usr`Ro % vjktdrk] la?k"kZ vkSj lkgl ijvarjkZ"Vªh; çf'k{k.kInternational Training on 'Leadership for the 21st Century:Chaos, Conflict and Courage'

Ñf"k olar esykKrishi Vasant Mela

varjkZ"Vªh; lks;kchu vuqlaèkku lEesyu ¼lks;dkWu & 2014½International Soybean Research Conference (SOYCON 2014)

^baVjusV izksVksdkWy ot+Zu 6 ¼vkbZihoh 6½ ij lqxzkghdj.k dk;Z'kkykSensitization Workshop on ‘Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPV6)’

02&07 Qjojh] 201402-07 Feb 2014

9&13 Qjojh] 20149 - 13 Feb 2014

22&24 Qjojh] 201422-24 Feb 2014

27 Qjojh] 201427 Feb 2014

gkoZMZ dsusMh Ldwy] dSfEczt] la;qäjkT; vejhdkHarvard Kennedy School,

Cambridge, USA

dsUnzh; laLFkku dikl vuqlaèkku]ukxiqjCentral Institute of Cotton

Research, Nagpur

lks;kchu vuqlaèkku funs'kky;]bUnkSjDirectorate of Soybean

Research, Indore

vkbZ,,lvkjvkbZ] ,u,,llhdkEIysDl] ubZ fnYyhIASRI, NASC Complex,

New Delhi

lh- pV~Vksikè;k;C. Chattopadhyay

Mh- ch- vgwtkvks- ih- ‘kekZvkj- ds- raojuosn lkfcj,e- ,l- ;kno,l- Hkxr,l- ih- flagD.B. AhujaO.P. SharmaR. K. TanwarNaved SabirM.S. YadavS. Bhagat

S.P. Singh

fujatu flagNiranjan Singh

fujatu flagNiranjan Singh

iqjLdkj ,oa lEekuvgwtk] Mh- ch- ¼2014½- dhV&foKku vuqlaèkku la?k vkjlh,]mn;iqj rFkk MkW- vkj- ih- JhokLro Lefr QkmUMs'ku] mn;iqj]jktLFkku }kjk fnukad 07 tuojh] 2014 dks o"kZ 2013 ds fy,MkW- vkj- ih- JhokLro Lefr jk"Vªh; iqjLdkj iznku fd;k x;kA

Hkxr] lkses'oj ¼2013½- Hkkjrh; ikni jksx foKku laLFkk] iknijksx foKku izHkkx] vkbZ,vkjvkbZ] iwlk] ubZ fnYyh }kjk ,e- ds-iVsy ;qok oSKkfud iqjLdkj 2013 iznku fd;k x;kA

MkW- lh- pV~Vksikè;k; ¼2014½- dksydrk esa fnukad 21 Qjojh]2014 dks varjjk"Vªh; laxks"Bh esa ^fdlkuksa ds vkthfodk dhlqj{kk ds fy, Qly LokLF; izcaèku% Hkkjr esa orZeku fLFkfrrFkk laHkkouk,a* ij Hkkjrh; ekbdksykWthdy lkslkbVh dsizksQslj ,l- ch- pV~Vksikè;k; Lefr O;k[;ku izLrqrhdj.kfd;k x;kA

MkW- lh- pV~Vksikè;k; ¼2014½- iatkc Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;] yqfèk;kukesa vk;ksftr jk"Vªh; czkfldk lEesyu ds nkSjku fnukad 15&16Qjojh] 2014 dks rksfj;k&ljlks a vuqlaèkku lkslkbVh¼,Q,lvkj,evkj½ dh QSyksf'ki iznku dh xbZA

Awards/Recognition

Ahuja, D. B. (2014). Dr. R.P. Srivastava MemorialNational Award conferred by Entomological ResearchAssociation RCA , Udaipur, and Dr. R.P.SrivastavaMemorial Foundation Udaipur Rajasthan, for the year2013, 7 Jan 2014.

Bhagat, Someshwar. (2013). Awarded M. K. PatelYoung Scientist Award 2013 by IndianPhytopathological Society, Division of PlantPathology, IARI, Pusa, New Delhi.

Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Delivered the Prof. S.B.Chattopadhyay Memorial Lecture 2014 of the IndianMycological Society on 'Crop Health Management forLivelihood Security of Farmers: Current Status andProspects in India', at the International Symposium2014 on 21 Feb 2014 at Kolkata.

Chattopadhyay, C. (2014). Fellowship of the Societyof Rapeseed-Mustard Research (FSRMR) at theNational Brassica Conference during 15-16 Feb 2014at PAU Ludhiana.


dkfeZd | Personnel

dkfeZdPersonnel

MkW- lh- pV~Vksikè;k; funs'kdDr. C. Chattopadhyay Director

oSKkfud deZpkjh@SCIENTIFIC STAFF

MkW- Mh- ch- vgwtk izèkku oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV foKku½Dr. D. B. Ahuja Principal Scientist (Agril. Entomology)

MkW- vks- ih- 'kekZ izèkku oSKkfud ¼ikni jksx foKku½Dr. O. P. Sharma Principal Scientist (Plant Pathology)

MkW- ,p- vkj- ljnkuk izèkku oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV foKku½Dr. H. R. Sardana Principal Scientist (Agril. Entomology)

MkW- vkj- ds- raoj izèkku oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV foKku½Dr. R. K. Tanwar Principal Scientist (Agril. Entomology)

MkW- eqds'k lgxy izèkku oSKkfud ¼lw=Ñfe foKku½Dr. Mukesh Sehgal Principal Scientist (Nematology)

MkW- ¼Jherh½ ,l- osfuyk izèkku oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV foKku½Dr. (Mrs) S. Vennila Principal Scientist (Agril. Entomology)

MkW- ,e- ukjk;.k HkV~V izèkku oSKkfud ¼ikni jksx foKku½Dr. M. Narayana Bhat Principal Scientist (Plant Pathology)

MkW- uosn lkfcj izèkku oSKkfud ¼lw=Ñfe foKku½Dr. Naved Sabir Principal Scientist (Nematology)

MkW- lqjsUnz dqekj flag izèkku oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV foKku½Dr. Surender Kumar Singh Principal Scientist (Agril. Entomology)

MkW- ¼Jherh½ lqfe=k vjksM+k izèkku oSKkfud ¼tSo jlk;u½Dr. (Mrs) Sumitra Arora Principal Scientist (Organic Chemistry)

MkW- egsUnz flag ;kno izèkku oSKkfud ¼ikni jksx foKku½Dr. Mahender Singh Yadav Principal Scientist (Plant Pathology)

MkW- vkj- oh flag ofj"B oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k foLrkj½Dr. R. V. Singh Senior Scientist (Agril. Extension)

MkW- ih- t; dqekj ofj"B oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV foKku½ 27 twu] 2012 lsizfrfu;qfDr ij

Dr. P. Jeyakumar Senior Scientist (Agril. Entomology) on deputation since

27 June 2012

MkW- vatrk fcjkg ofj"B oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV foKku½Dr. Ajanta Birah Senior Scientist (Agril. Entomology)

MkW- lkses'oj Hkxr ofj"B oSKkfud ¼ikni jksx foKku½Dr. Someshwar Bhagat Senior Scientist (Plant Pathology)

NCIPM


Jh fodkl daoj oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k vkfFkZdh½Shri Vikas Kanwar Scientist (Agril. Economics)

Jh fujatu flag oSKkfud ¼lax.kd vuqiz;ksx½Shri Niranjan Singh Scientist (Computer Application)

Jh ,- ds- duksft;k oSKkfud ¼Hkwxksy½ vè;;u gsrq NqV~Vh ij 07 tuojh 2013Shri A. K. Kanojia Scientist (Geography) on study leave w.e.f 07 Jan 2013

Jherh ehuk{kh efyd oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k lkaf[;dh½ vè;;u gsrq NqV~Vh ij 18vDVwcj 2013

Mrs Meenakshi Malik Scientist (Agril. Statistics) on study leave w.e.f 18 Oct 2013

Jh jkds'k dqekj oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV foKku½Shri Rakesh Kumar Scientist (Agril. Entomology)

rduhdh deZpkjh@TECHNICAL STAFF

Jh ih- oh- oekZ lgk;d eq[; rduhdh vf/kdkjhShri P. V. Verma Asstt. Chief Technical Officer

Jh ,l- ih- flag lgk;d eq[; rduhdh vf/kdkjhShri S. P. Singh Asstt. Chief Technical Officer

MkW- ulhe vgen lgk;d eq[; rduhdh vf/kdkjhDr. Nasim Ahmad Asstt. Chief Technical Officer

Jherh uhye esgrk rduhdh vfèkdkjhMrs Neelam Mehta Technical Officer

Jh lRksUnz rduhdh lgk;dShri Satender Technical Assistant

Jh fueZy dqekj rduhdh lgk;dShri Nirmal Kumar Technical Assistant

Jh v'kksd dqekj rduhdh lgk;dShri Ashok Kumar Technical Assistant

Jh lrh'k ckcw rduhdh lgk;dShri Satish Babu Technical Assistant

Jh ghjk yky ;kno rduhdh lgk;dShri Hera Lal Yadav Technical Assistant

Jh lqjs'k iky Okfj"B rduhf'k;uShri Suresh Pal Sr. Technician

iz'kklfud deZpkjh@ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF

Jh Ñ".k dqekj ofj"B foÙk ,oa ys[kk vfèkdkjhShri Krishan Kumar Sr. Finance & Account Officer

Jh ,- ds- vxzoky iz'kklfud vfèkdkjhShri A. K. Agarwal Administrative Officer

Jh ,e- vkj- 'kekZ lgk;d iz'kklfud vfèkdkjhShri M. R. Sharma Asstt. Administrative Officer

Jh ,e- ds- eqykuh lgk;d foÙk ,oa ys[kk vfèkdkjh ¼24 vxLr 2013 ls½Shri M. K. Mulani Asstt. Finance & Account Officer (w.e.f 24 Aug 2013)

Jh ch ckYehfd lgk;dShri B. Balmiki Assistant


dkfeZd | Personnel

Jh uonhi nÙkk lgk;dShri Navdeep Datta Assistant

Jh ch- ,l- rsofr;k oS;fDrd lfpoShri B. S. Tewatia Private Secretary

Jherh laxhrk eYgks=k oS;fDrd lgk;dMrs Sangeeta Malhotra Personal Assistant

Jherh vfuek yxqu vk'kqfyfid xzsM&IIIMrs Anima Lugun Stenographer Grade III

Jh Hkwis'k pkSèkjh vij Js.kh fyfidShri Bhupesh Chaudhary Upper Division Clerk

Jh iznhi dekj vij Js.kh fyfidShri Pradeep Kumar Upper Division Clerk

Jh lqjs'k ;kno vij Js.kh fyfidShri Suresh Yadav Lower Division Clerk

dq'ky lgk;d deZpkjh@SKILLED SUPPORTING STAFF

Jherh f'kaxkjh nsoh Mrs Shingari Devi

Jh jkt dqekj Shri Raj Kumar

Jh jktsUnz dqekj 'kkg Shri Rajendra Kumar Shah

Jh mek 'kadj feJk Shri Uma Shankar Mishra

Jh lquhy dqekj Shri Sunil Kumar

Jherh deyk Mrs Kamla

Jh egs'k dqekj Shri. Mahesh Kumar

Jh n;ky pUn Shri Dayal Chand

Jherh lfjrk dqekjh Mrs Sarita Kumari

inksUufr] fu;qfDr ,oa ifjorZuinksUufr MkW- ,e- ,l- ;kno] ofj"B oSKkfud ¼ikni jksx foKku½ fnukad 01

tuojh] 2012 ls izèkku oSKkfud ds in ij inksUur Jh fujatu flag] oSKkfud ¼lax.kd vuqiz;ksx½ fnukad 31 vxLr]

2012 ls vkjthih ` 9000@& esa inksUur Jh v'kksd dqekj] Vh&2 fnukad 17 tuojh] 2011 ls Vh&3 ds in

ij inksUur Jh lrh'k ckcw] Vh&2 fnukad 30 tuojh] 2011 ls Vh&3 ds in ij

inksUur Lo- Jh lat; pksiM+k] Vh&3 fnukad 05 Qjojh] 2011 ls Vh&4 ds

in ij inksUur

fu;qfDr Jh jkds'k dqekj fnukad 11 vizSy] 2013 dks oSKkfud ¼Ñf"k dhV

foKku½ ds in ij fu;qDr fd, x,

Jh ghjk yky ;kno fnukad 13 twu] 2013 dks rduhdh lgk;d¼Vh&3½ ds in ij fu;qDr fd, x,

ifjorZu MkW- ¼Jherh½ ljkst flag] izèkku oSKkfud ¼ikni jksxfoKku½ fnukad

30 flrEcj] 2013 dks lsokfuoÙk gqb±A

Promotions, Recruitment and Fluxes

Promotions

Dr. M. S. Yadav, Sr. Scientist (Plant Pathology)promoted to Principal Scientist w.e.f. 01 Jan 2012

Sh. Niranjan Singh, Scientist (Computer Application)promoted RGP ` 9000/- w.e.f 31 Aug 2012

Sh. Ashok Kumar, T-2 promoted to T-3 w.e.f 17 Jan 2011 Sh. Satish Babu, T-2 promoted to T3 w.e.f 30 Jan 2011 Lt. Sanjay Chopra, T-3 promoted to T-4 w.e.f 05 Feb

2011

Joining

Sh. Rakesh Kumar joined as Scientist (Agril.

Entomology) on 11 Apr 2013 Shri Hera Lal Yadav joined as Technical Assistant

(T-3) on 13 June 2013.

Fluxes

Dr. (Mrs) Saroj Singh, Pr. Scientist (Plant Pathology)

superannuated on 30 Sep 2013

NCIPM


ctVBudget

ctV 2013-14

Budget 2013-14

'kh"kZ LohÑr ctV okLrfod O;;Head Sanctioned budget Actual expenditure

xSj&;kstuk@Non-plan 548.00 526.00

;kstuk / Plan 131.50 131.26

dqy / Total 679.50 657.26

¼#- yk[k esa½ @ (` in lacs)

lalk/u l`tuResource generation

izkS|ksfxdh dh ykbZlsaflaxLicensing of technology : ` 49.18

jktLo izkfIr;k¡Revenue receipts : ` 12.32

dqyTotal : ` 61.50


y?kq:i | Abbreviations

y?kq:iAbbreviations

,ulhvkbZih,e % jk"Vªh; lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku dsUnz

vkbZih,e % lesfdr uk'khtho izcaèku

,Qih % fdlku fof/k

,vkbZlhvkjih % vf[ky Hkkjrh; lefUor vuqlaèkku ifj;kstuk

HkkÑvuqi % Hkkjrh; Ñf"k vuqlaèkku ifj"kn

,l,;w % jkT; Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;

chlh % ykHk&ykxr

lhvkjvkjvkb % dsanzh; pkoy vuqla/kku laLFkku

,vkj,l % Ñf"k vuqla/kku LVs'ku

dsohds % Ñf"k foKku dsUnz

bZVh,y % vkfFkZd gkfu lhek&js[kk Lrj

ohihds,,l % foosdkuan ioZrh; Ñf"k vuqlaèkku laLFkku

ih,;w % iatkc Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;

,3ih % laofèkZr nygu mRiknu dk;ZØe

,l,eMCY;w % ekud ekSle foKku lIrkg

,,u,u % Ñf=e U;wjy usVodZ

,QokbZ,e % xkscj dh [kkn

okbZ,lch % ihyk ruk csèkd

;w,,l % Ñf"k foKku fo'ofo|ky;

Mh,Vh % jksikbZ ds ckn fnu

,,;w % vle Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;

,uvkbZ,lih,e % jk"Vªh; lwpuk iz.kkyh ds rgr bZ&uk'khthofuxjkuh

Mh,,l % cqokbZ ds ckn fnu

,u,Q,l,e % jk"Vªh; [kk| lqj{kk fe'ku

vkbZvkbZihvkj % Hkkjrh; nygu vuqlaèkku laLFkku

ts,udsoh % tokgjyky usg: Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;

,e,;w % ejkBokMk Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;

,l,e,l % y?kq lans'k lsok

,l,eMh % LVfjfyVh ekstsd jksx

,p,,uihoh % gsyhdksoikZ vkfeZtsjk U;wfDy;j iksyh gsMjksfllfo"kk.kq

vkbZVh,l % baVjuy VªkalØkbcM Lislj

,uthvks % xSj ljdkjh laxBu

chih,p % Hkqjk Qqndk

,ulhvkj % jkt/kkuh ds ikl ds {ks=

MCy;qVhvks % fo'o O;kikj laxBu

,u,vkj,l % jk"Vªh; d`f"k vuqla/kku iz.kkyh

chlhdsoh % fc/kku pUnz Ñf"k fo'ofo|ky;

vkbZlhVh % lwpuk ,oa lapkj midj.k

,eih;w,Vh % Ekgkjk.kk izrki d`f"k ,oa izkS|ksfxdh fo'ofo|ky;

vkbZVh,l % vkarfjd VªkaLØkbcM Lislj

,ulhchvkbZ % jk"Vªh; tSo izkS|ksfxdh dsUnz

vkbZ,vkjvkbZ % Hkkjrh; d`f"k vuqla/kku laLFkku

lhlh,l,p,;w % pkS/kjh pj.k flag gfj;k.kk d`f"k fo'ofo|ky;

,ldsvkj,;w % Lokeh ds'kokuan jktLFkku d`f"k fo'ofo|ky;

vkbZMh,e % ,dhd`r jksx izca/ku

,Q,Q,l % fdlku ikB'kkyk

lhihlhVh % lajf{kr [ksrh izkS|ksfxdh dsUnz

ØksilSi % Qly dhV fuxjkuh ,oa lykgdkj ifj;kstuk

th,eMh,p % MkVk gSaMfyax lewg fof/k

MhMCy;qvkj % xsgwa vuqla/kku funs'kky;

bljks % Hkkjrh; varfj{k vuqla/kku laxBu

Mhvks, % d`f"k foHkkx

Mhth % egk funs'kd

,ds,e;w % Ñf"k Kku izcaèku bdkbZ

vks;w,Vh % vksfM'kk d`f"k ,oa izkS|ksfxdh fo'ofo|ky;

,pokbZih,e % v)Z&okf"kZd ifj;kstuk fuxjkuh

lh,l,;w,Vh % panz 'ks[kj vktkn d`f"k ,oa izkS|ksfxdhfo'ofo|ky;

NCIPM


,uch,vkbvkb % jk"Vªh; d`f"k egRoiw.kZ dhV C;wjks

Ms;j % d`f"k vuqla/kku ,oa f'k{kk foHkkx

,,uthvkj,;w % vkpk;Z ,u-th- jaxk —f"k fo'ofo|ky;

,ih,p;w % vka/kz çns'k ckxokuh fo'ofo|ky;

,lvkjch % —f"k oSKkfud p;u cksMZ

ch,ldsohoh % ckck lkgsc lkoar dksad.k —f"k fo|kihB

lhvks, % —f"k d‚yst

lhvkjvkbZMh, % 'kq"dHkwfe —f"k ds fy, dsaæh; vuqla/kku laLFkku

lhvkj;wvkjvkj,l % dsUæh; o"kkaZ vkSj la;a= jkbl fjlpZ LVs'ku

Mh,lh % —f"k vkSj lgdkfjrk foHkkx

Mhvksihch ,aMth % IykaV czhfMax vkSj tsusfVDl foHkkx

Mhvkjvkj % pkoy vuqla/kku funs'kky;

thdsohds % xka/kh —f"k foKku dsUæ

vkbZ,,lvkjvkb % Hkkjrh; —f"k lkaf[;dh vuqla/kku laLFkku

vkbZthdsohoh % bafnjk xka/kh —f"k fo'ofo|ky;


y?kq:i | Abbreviations

A3P : Accelerated Pulse Production Programme

AAU : Assam Agricultural University

AICRP : All India Coordinated Research Project

AKMU : Agriculture Knowledge Management Unit

ANGRAU : Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University

ANN : Artificial Neural Network

APHU : Andhra Pradesh Horticultural University

AP : Andhra Pradesh

ARS : Agricultural Research Station

ASRB : Agriculture Scientists Recruitment Board

BCR : Benefit Cost Ratio

BCKV : Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya

BPH : Brown Plant Hopper

BSKVV : Baba Saheb Sawant Konkan KrishiVidyapeeth

CABI : Centre for Agricultural BiosciencesInternational

CCPI : Co-operating Centre Principal Investigator

CCS HAU : Chaudhary Charan Singh Hisar AgriculturalUniversity

CG : Chhattisgarh

COA : College of Agriculture

CPCT : Centre of Protected Cultivation Technology

CRIDA : Central Research Institute for DrylandAgriculture

CROPSAP : Crop Pest Surveillance and Advisory Project

CRRI : Centre for Rice Research Institute

CRURRS : Central Rainfed and Upland Rice ResearchStation

CSAUA&T : Chandra Shekhar Azad University ofAgriculture and Technology

CYMMIT : International Maize and Wheat ImprovementCentre

DAC : Department of Agriculture and Cooperation

DAP : Days After Planting

DARE : Department of Agricultural Research andEducation

DAT : Days After Transplanting

DG : Director General

DOA : Department of Agriculture

DOPB&G : Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics

DRR : Directorate of Rice Research

DWR : Directorate of Wheat Research

ETL : Economic Threshold Level

FFS : Farmer’ Field Schools

FP : Farmers’ practices

FYM : Farm Yard manure

GJ : Gujarat

GKVK : Gandhi Krishi Vigyan Kendra

GMDH : Group Method of Data Handling

HaNPV : Helicoverpa armigera Nuclear Poly hedrosisVirus

HYPM : Half Yearly Progress Monitoring

IARI : Indian Agriculture Research Institute

IASRI : Indian Agricultural Statistics ResearchInstitute

ICAR : Indian Council of Agricultural Research

ICT Information and communication tools

IDM : Integrated Disease Management

IGKVV : Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya

IIHR : Indian Institute of Horticulture Research

IIPR : Indian Institute of Pulse Research

IIVR : Indian Institute of Vegetable Research

IPM : Integrated Pest Management

IRC : Institute Research Committee

ISRO : Indian Space Research Organization

ITS : Internal Transcribed Spacer

JNKVV : Jawaharlal Nehru KrishiVishwaVidyalaya

KA : Karnataka

KVK : Krishi Vigyan Kendra

MAU : Marathwada Agricultural University

MLP : Multi-Layer Perceptron

MLR : Multiple Linear Regression

MoA : Ministry of Agruculture

MPKV : Mahatama Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth

MPUAT : Maharana Pratap University of Agricultureand Technology

MS : Maharashtra

NAARM : National Academy of Agricultural ResearchManagement

NARS : National Agricultural Research System

NASC : National Agricultural Science Centre

NBAII : National Bureau of Agriculturally ImportantInsects

NCBI : National Centre for Biotechnology

NCIPM : National Centre for Integrated PestManagement

NCR : Near Capital Region

NFSM : National Food Security Mission

NGO : Non-governmental Organization

NICRA : National Initiative on Climate ResilientAgriculture

NIPHM : National Institute of Plant HealthManagement

NISPM : National Information System for PestManagement

NCIPM


NPRC : National Pulse Research Centre

OUAT : Odisha University of Agricultural andTechnology

PAU : Punjab Agricultural University

PB : Phytophthora Blight

PB : Punjab

PBND : Peanut Bud Necrosis Disease

PCI : Pest Control (India)

PDKV : Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth

PI : Principal Investigator

PME : Priority Setting, Monitoring, and Evaluation

PNN : Polynomial Neural Networks

PRA : Participatory Rural Appraisal

QRT : Quinquennial Review Team

RAC : Research Advisory Committee

RARS : Regional Agriculture Research Station

RBF : Radial Basis Function

RCER : Regional Centre for Eastern Region

RRS : Regional Research Station

SAD : State Agriculture Department

SAU : State Agricultural University

SKRAU : Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan AgriculturalUniversity

SMD : Sterility Mosaic Disease

SMS : Short Message Service

SMW : Standard Meteorological Week

TN : Tamil Nadu

TNAU : Tamil Nadu Agricultural University

TRRI : Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute

UAS : University of Agricultural Sciences

UP : Uttar Pradesh

VPKAS : Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi AnusandhanSansthan

WB : West Bengal

WBPH : White Backed Plant Hopper

WTO : World Trade Organization

YSB : Yellow Stem Borer

ZARS : Zonal Agricultural Research Station

horticultural crops - integrated pest management report/ar2013... · 2018-06-23 · ncipm ii annual...

Documents