home - emodnet medsea checkpoint - …...emodnet sea-basin checkpoint project mare/2012/11 oil leak...
TRANSCRIPT
EMODnet Sea-basin Checkpoints Tender no MARE/2012/11
EMODNETOilPlatformLeakBulletin
Date:13/05/2016
TheEuropeanMarineObservationandDataNetwork(EMODnet)isfinancedbytheEuropeanUnionunderRegulation(EU)No.1255/2011oftheEuropeanParliamentandoftheCouncilof30November2011establishingaProgrammetosupportthefurtherdevelopmentofanIntegratedMaritimePolicy.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
2
Executive Summary InAugust2013anincidentoccurredduringatankerloadingoperationatabuoyoffthecoastoftheSidiKerirterminaloftheSumedpipeline(LAT:31,130824N;LON:29,75227E)withanestimatedrateof5000m3 Brent crude oil spilled during a period of 24 hours starting 8:15 CET on 13/08/2013. Theaccidentwentlargelyunattendedintheaftermathofthe2013EgyptianCoupd’étatduringaperiodofunrestandinstability.TheEMODnetOilPlatformLeak (OPL)Bulletinhasbeenproducedafter24hours fromtheDGMARErequestreportingthesimulationofthetransportandtransformationof theoil inthedaysfollowingtheincidentandthelikelihoodofimpactsontheenvironment,consideringtheavailableforcingdatasetsforwindandcurrentfieldstorunaMEDSLIK-IIsimulation.Theshortdailysummaries (eachmorningbefore11:00CET)with few illustrationsof theresultsareprovidedforinforminginterestedstakeholders.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
3
Preface
OnMaythe10th2016at11.23DGMAREalertedaboutthefollowingsituation(Fig.1):
"InAugust2013anincidentoccurredduringatankerloadingoperationatabuoyoffthecoastoftheSidiKerirterminaloftheSumedpipeline(LAT:31,130824;LON:29,75227)withanestimatedrateof5000m3 Brent crude oil spilled during a period of 24 hours starting 8:15 CET on 13/08/2013. Theaccidentwentlargelyunattendedintheaftermathofthe2013EgyptianCoupd’étatduringaperiodofunrestandinstability."
Figure1:Releasepointoftheoilspill(LAT:31,130824;LON:29,75227).
Bulletin Content
• Hindcastofcurrentsandwind• Fate,transportanddispersionoftheoilatthesurfaceandoncoastsduringthefirst72hours
fromthetimeoftheincident
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
4
• PotentialImpactonenvironmentalandhumanactivities Data and Method
Tab.1summarizestheinputdatausedtoruntheoilspillmodels.
INITIALASSUMPTIONS
OILTYPE Brentcrudeoil(API=38)
LEAKPOSITION LAT:31,130824LON:29,75227
TIMEOFTHELEAK 8:15CETon13/08/2013
DURATIONOFSPILLAGE 24hours
RATEOFSPILLAGE 177Ton/hr
TOTALAMOUTOFOILSPILLED 5000m3
Tab1:oilspillmodelsetupparameters
TheproductionoftheOPL-Bulletinreliesontheavailabilityofmeteo-oceanographicanalysesfortheMediterranean Sea provided through CMEMS (CopernicusMarine EnvironmentMonitoring Service)portalandothernationalforecastingsystems.Thenecessaryinputcharacteristicsare:
• Horizontalvelocityofthewatercolumn(currents)• Temperatureofthewatercolumn• Windvelocitycomponents• Wavedirection(notcompulsory)
Two SCENARIOS have been simulated one at INGV and one at OC-UCY and Tab.2 summarizes theforcingdatasetsusedfortheOPLBulletininthetwosystems.Oceancurrentsand temperaturehavebeendownloaded from theavailableCMEMSMED-MFCdataarchivecontainingdailyaveragesofmodelanalyses.Hourlydataarenotavailable forthepastyearssince CMEMSmaintains only a 30 days rolling archive for hourly data. Atmospheric analyses fromECMWF(SCENARIO1)areavailableforthetestperiod.SCENARIO2considered1-hourlySKIRONwindfieldsandCYCOFOS3hourlywavesimulations.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
5
SCENARIO 1 2
ProductionCentre INGV OC-UCY
Oilspillmodel MEDSLIKII MEDSLIK
WIND ECMWF SKIRON
temporalresolution 6hours 1hour
spatialresolution 25km 5km
updatefrequency daily saily
CURRENTSandSST CMEMS CMEMS
temporalresolution dailymeans dailymeans
spatialresolution 6.5km 6.5km
updatefrequency daily daily
WAVES - CYCOFOS
temporalresolution - 3hours
spatialresolution - 10km
updatefrequency - daily
Tab.1PredictionsystemsimplementedtoproducetheOPL-Bulletinresults.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
6
Description of the results
Oil spill after 2 hours13/08/201310:15CET
SCENARIO1
Sea surface currents areestward (Figure 2) andturn slightly southapproachingthecoastline.Wind is north-westerlyand reaches a velocity ofabout6m/s.
The oil spill 2 hours afterthe reported incident didnot impact the coastalzone.
SCENARIO2
In the Sidi Kerir terminalthe sea surface currentsare North-East, while thewind is North-West withlowintensityaslowas3.1m/s.
The oil spill 2 hours afterthe reported incidentwasat sea surface 82.9%withoutany impactat thecoastalzone.
Figure 2: SCENARIO 1 - Position of the oil slick at 10:15 of 13/08/2013 (oil
concentration is given in units of ton/km2) and the corresponding daily surfacecurrents(blackarrows)andwind(greenarrow)producedbyINGV.
Figure 3: SCENARIO 2 - Position of the oil slick at 10:15 of 13/08/2013 (oil
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
7
concentration is given in units of cu.m) and the corresponding daily surface
currents(blackarrows)andwind(whitearrow)producedbyOC-UCY.
Oil spill after 24 hours14/08/201308:15CET
SCENARIO1
Sea surface currents are south-estward (Figure 3) and turn
south approaching thecoastline.Windisnorthwesterly
andreachesavelocityofabout6m/s.
The oil spill impacted thecoastal zone after 6 hours of
simulation (15:15 CET) andthere is a progressingbeaching
oftheoil.
SCENARIO2
Theoilstartedtobebeachedatthe coastal zone of Sidi Kerir
terminal 3 hours after thereported time of the incident.
After 24 hours of the oil spillincident, the oil on the coast(permanent and potential
releasable) constitutes the43.68% of the total released
amount, while 39.20% wasevaporated(Figures4-5)
Figure3:SCENARIO1 - Positionof theoil slick at surfaceandon the coasts at 08:15of14/08/2013 (oil concentration is given in units of ton/km2) and the corresponding dailysurfacecurrents(blackarrows)andwind(greenarrow)producedbyINGV.
Figure4:SCENARIO2-Positionoftheoilslickat08:15of14/08/2013(oilconcentrationis
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
8
given in units of cu.m) and the corresponding daily surface currents (black arrows) andwind(whitearrow)producedbyOC-UCY.
Figure5:SCENARIO2-oilonthecoastsafter24hoursincu.m.
Oil spill after 48 hours15/08/201308:15CET
SCENARIO1
Surface currents are eastward,turningsouth-eastwardandthe
wind isnorth-westerlyatabout6 m/s. The oil stacks at the
coastalzone.
SCENARIO2
IntheSidiKerirterminaltheseasurfacecurrentscontinuetobe
North-East, while the wind isWest with low intensity 2.7
m/s. The oil stacks at thecoastal zone (permanent and
potential releasable constitutesthe42.64%ofthetotalamount,
while 57.33% was evaporated,during the 48 hours of the
simulation.
Figure4:SCENARIO1 -oilat thesurfaceandonthecoasts in tons/kmafter48hours.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
9
Figure5:SCENARIO2-Positionoftheoilslickat08:15of15/08/2013,oilconcentrationisgiveninunitsofcu.m.
Figure6:SCENARIO2-oilonthecoastafter48hoursincu.m
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
10
Oil spill after 72 hours16/08/201308:15CET
SCENARIO1
Surface currents are eastward,
turningsouth-eastwardandthewind isnorth-westerlyatabout
6 m/s. The oil stacks at thecoastalzone.
SCENARIO2
IntheSidiKerirterminalthesea
surfacecurrentsarecontinuetobe North-East. The wind is
North-West with low intensityaslowas3.2m/s.
The oil stacks at the coastal
zone (permanent and potentialreleasable) constitutes the
36.14% of the total amount,while 63.86% was evaporated,
during the 72 hours of thesimulation.
Figure7:SCENARIO1-oilatthesurfaceandonthecoastintons/kmafter72hours.
Figure8:SCENARIO2-Positionoftheoilslickat08:15of16/08/2013,oilconcentrationisgiveninunitsofcu.m.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
11
Figure9:SCENARIO2-oilonthecoastincu.mafter72hours.
Final discussion
Figure 10 illustrates the area average percentage of oil in four categories, evaporated, at the seasurface,dispersedinthewatercolumnandatthecoastsforSCENARIO1and2.
TheresultsofbothSCENARIOSshowedthatafter30-40hoursalmostallthereleased,non-evaporatedoil(Figure10redline)arrivedoncoast,mainlyduetothepersistentnorthwesterlywindsandcurrents.Thehighpercentageofthefreeoiloncoast(potentiallycapabletoreturnbacktothesea)shownbybothSCENARIOSisanindicationofpossibleprolongedandextendedcoastalimpactsupto72hours.
InSCENARIO1about30%oftheoilevaporatedinthefirst8hoursandafter30hoursmorethan50%oftheoilevaporated.InSCENARIO2theevaporatedoilreaches40%inthefirst8hoursofsimulationandprogressivelyincreasesupto60%after72hours.
Furthermore Figure 11 presents the estimate of the oil impact on coast from SCENARIO 2. Theestimatedcoastalstripimpactedbytheoilleakis3.55kmlongafter40hours.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
12
Figure10:Percentageoftheoilonfourcompartments:atthesurface,dispersedinthewatercolumn,evaporatedandat
thecoastsasafunctionofsimulationtime:(left)SCENARIO1;(right)SCENARIO2.
Figure11-SCENARIO2estimatesoftheoilimpactoncoast
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
13
Potential Impact on environmental and human activities
Theassessmentofpotentialimpactsonthecoastalenvironmentandhumanactivitiesneedsadditionaldatasetsaboutkeycharacteristics:
• BathymetryandElevation• Coastalgeomorphology• Seabedsubstrate• Marineandcoastalinfrastructures• Mariculture• MPAs• Transportroutes• Useofcoastalareas
TheavailabilityofthisinformationhasbeenfirstanalyzedontheEMODNETtematicportals.Bathymetry/elevationandcoastalgeomorphologyInformation has been retrieved from the EMODnet Bathymetry web portal http://portal.emodnet-bathymetry.eu/,selectingtheincidentareaandtheinterestinglayers.TheresultisshowninFigure12.Theinitialoilleakhappenedonthecontinentalshelf,veryclosetothecoastlargelyinfluencedbytheNileriverdelta.Thebathymetryoftheincidentareaisshallowerthan50meters.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
14
Figure 12 -Map of the Incident area containing layer information on: bathymetry, coastline depthcontours,landgeographyandtopography,coastalareaswithhigh-resolutionbathymetry,meandepthfullcoverage.SeaBedHabitatsInformation has been retrieved from EMODnet SeabedHabitat regardingmodeledmaps of specifichabitatsfromMEDISEHEUProject:
• Figure13showsaverylowprobability(<10%)ofhavingcoralligenoushabitatintheimpactedarea,beingariverinfluencedarea.
• Figure14showshightoveryhigh(50-90%)probabilitiestofindmaerlhabitatintheimpactedarea,beingariver-influencedarea.
• Figure15showshightoveryhigh(>50%)probabilitiesoffindingPosidoniaOceanicanearshorearea,withtheexceptionoftheAlexandriaharbor.
Dueto thehighprobabilityofhavingPosidoniaOceanicaonthenearshorearea impactedby theoilleak,theeffectsontheSeabedhabitatandtheecosystemmightbedisastrous.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
15
Figure13ModeledmapofprobabilityofCoralligenoushabitat (fromMEDISEHProject) retrievedbyEMODnetSeabedHabitatwebportal:http://www.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/default.aspx?page=1974
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
16
Figure 14 - Modeled map of probability of maerl habitat (from MEDISEH Project) retrieved byEMODnetSeabedHabitatwebportal:http://www.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/default.aspx?page=1974
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
17
Figure15 -Modeledmapof probability of PosidoniaOceanica (fromMEDISEHProject) retrievedbyEMODnetSeabedHabitatwebportal:http://www.emodnet-seabedhabitats.eu/default.aspx?page=1974MarineProtectedAreasandBiologicalzonesInformation about Med conservation areas and biological zones has been retrieved by MedSeaCheckpointChallenge2targetedproduct(MEDSEA_CH2_Product_2).TheproducedshapefilecontainslayerswiththeMedprotectioninitiatives(managementandconservationareas),MPAextensionareasand different protection levels for each of them together with biological depth zones.http://www.emodnet-mediterranean.eu/medsea-challenge-2-product-1/CircalittoralandInfralittoralbiologicalzoneswouldbehighlydamagedasshowninFigure16.
TwoMarineProtectedAreasarelocatednearbytheaccidentzone:
1. InternationalMPAclosetoEl-Alamain,south-westtheimpactedarea;2. NationalMPAenclosingawetlandareaclosetoBaltim,northeasttheimpactedarea.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
18
Considering the seasonal prevailing circulation in the impacted coastal area the secondMPA couldpotentiallybeaffectedbythecoastalecosystemdamages.
Figure 16 - MEDSEA_CH2_Product_2 developed by MedSea Checkpoint Challenge 2: Medconservationareasandbiologicalzones.ShapefilewiththelayerscontainingtheMedprotectioninitiatives (management and conservation areas),MPA extension areas and different protectionlevels for each of them and depth zones. http://www.emodnet-mediterranean.eu/medsea-challenge-2-product-1/
Transportrouteanduseofcoastalareas
Human Activities web portal (http://www.emodnet-humanactivities.eu/view-data.php) has beenconsidered to retrieve information,butwenotedgapsof informationalong theAfricancoast.NoneMPAorharboraredisplayedonthegraphicinterface.TheinitialleakareaisclosetotheentranceoftheAlexandriaHarbor,whichisthemainportinEgypt.Alexandria isalsoconsideredthesecondmost importantcity inEgyptand itscoastalstrip isdenselypopulated.Theeconomicalimpactoftheincidentontouristicandmaritimetransportactivitieshastobeestimated.
EMODnetSea-BasinCheckpointProjectMARE/2012/11OilLeakBulletin
19
The main factors which have strong influence on the outcomes of the fate and expected impact
The production of the OPL-Bulletin relies on the availability of meteo-oceanographic forecasts andanalyses for the Mediterranean Sea. In this specific case, it is particularly important to note thatCMEMS (Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service) is the only service that provideshistorical current products to produce the simulations. However time resolution is daily instead ofhourlyandthishasanimpactontheoilspilltransport,asshownintheliterature.ThustheEMODnetOPLhasadegradedqualityduetothelackoftimeresolutionintheCMEMShistorical.
IntheparticularcaseexaminedhereandhavingonlyCMEMSlowresolutionproducts,theaccuracyoftheforecastwillbestronglyaffectedbysmalldisplacementsofthesourcepointbecausecurrentswillbestrongerfaroffshoreandthedisplacedsourcecouldintercepttheboundarycurrentrunningmainlyattheshelfbreak.ThisadditionalSCENARIOmightpresentawiderimpactonthecoastalareaallowingtheadvectionoftheoilfurtheralongthecoastline.
Weaknesses of the assessment methodology
Theweaknessestobepointedoutare:
1. the assessment of the coastal impact: this is dependent on the specific transformation andbeaching processes included in the oil spill model that is normally the weakest part of themodelitself.
2. theassessmentoftheenvironmental impact fromEMODnetHumanActivitiesGIS layers: thisinformationisabsentfortheAfricancoastsandthetestarea.
3. theprioritytobegivenintheassessment:thisshouldbedoneinclosecollaborationwiththeinterestedstakeholdersinordertopresentacustomizedreportonthepossibleimpacts.
Recommendations
FirstrecommendationistoincludeallMedSeaprotectedareasinthehumanactivityportal,sincethecompletedatasetidavailablefromtheMedSeaCheckpoint(challenge2targetedproduct):MEDSEA_CH2_Product_1:Medprotection initiatives,managementandconservationareas,excel filecontaininginformationonMPAextensionareasanddifferentprotectionlevelsforeachofthem.Another recommendation, helpful from a user perspective, is to have the possibility to insert onEMODnet thematic portals GIS maps a pointer or a polygon to highlight the interested area, oreventually,toquerytheavailableinformationaroundaselectedpoint.