holocene climate variability on the centennial and
TRANSCRIPT
335Copyright © The Korean Space Science Society http://janss.kr plSSN: 2093-5587 elSSN: 2093-1409
Received Oct 30, 2014 Revised Dec 9, 2014 Accepted Dec 9, 2014†Corresponding Author
E-mail: [email protected], ORCID: 0000-0003-3090-0977Tel: +82-2-2123-3439, Fax: +82-2-2123-8675
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Research PaperJ. Astron. Space Sci. 31(4), 335-340 (2014)http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.4.335
Holocene Climate Variability on the Centennial and Millennial Time Scale
Eun Hee Lee1†, Dae-Young Lee2, Mi-Young Park2, Sungeun Kim3, Su Jin Park3
1Yonsei University Observatory, Seoul, 120-749 Korea2Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 361-763 Korea3Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Sejong University, Seoul, 143-747 Korea
There have been many suggestions and much debate about climate variability during the Holocene. However, their complex forcing factors and mechanisms have not yet been clearly identified. In this paper, we have examined the Holocene climate cycles and features based on the wavelet analyses of 14C, 10Be, and 18O records. The wavelet results of the 14C and 10Be data show that the cycles of ~2180-2310, ~970, ~500-520, ~350-360, and ~210-220 years are dominant, and the ~1720 and ~1500 year cycles are relatively weak and subdominant. In particular, the ~2180-2310 year periodicity corresponding to the Hallstatt cycle is constantly significant throughout the Holocene, while the ~970 year cycle corresponding to the Eddy cycle is mainly prominent in the early half of the Holocene. In addition, distinctive signals of the ~210-220 year period corresponding to the de Vries cycle appear recurrently in the wavelet distribution of 14C and 10Be, which coincide with the grand solar minima periods. These de Vries cycle events occurred every ~2270 years on average, implying a connection with the Hallstatt cycle. In contrast, the wavelet results of 18O data show that the cycles of ~1900-2000, ~900-1000, and ~550-560 years are dominant, while the ~2750 and ~2500 year cycles are subdominant. The periods of ~2750, ~2500, and ~1900 years being derived from the 18O records of NGRIP, GRIP and GISP2 ice cores, respectively, are rather longer or shorter than the Hallstatt cycle derived from the 14C and 10Be records. The records of these three sites all show the ~900-1000 year periodicity corresponding to the Eddy cycle in the early half of the Holocene.
Keywords: climate variability, Holocene, forcing factors, Hallstatt cycle, Eddy cycle, de Vries cycle, grand solar minima
1. INTRODUCTION
The current geological epoch, the Holocene started about
11,500 years ago when the glaciers began to retreat. The
concentration of 10Be in ice halved abruptly at that time,
because the annual precipitation of snow increased by a
factor of about two (Beer et al. 2012). This warm climate
epoch is commonly considered as an interglacial, and it was
once thought to have been climatically stable (Dansgaard et.
al. 1993). This conventional view was primarily supported by
the relative isotope temperature stability on the Greenland
summit, which appears to be fairly invariable on centennial
and longer time scales during the Holocene (Bütikofer
2007). However, well-dated paleo-climatic proxies such
as ice cores, tree-rings and sediment records show that
significant climate variations also occurred during most of
the Holocene, although with basically weaker amplitudes
than during glacial times (Sarnthein et al. 2003, Bütikofer
2007).
Over the past several decades, many extensive paleo-
climate studies have testified to the considerable climate
fluctuations in the Holocene (Mayewski et al. 2004, Dergachev et
al. 2007). Subsequently, Holocene climate variability on the
centennial-millennial time scale has been demonstrated
by many authors. The debate about Holocene climate
cycles on the millennial-scale was primarily initiated by
the investigations of Bond & Lotti (1997). Since then, many
studies have uncovered evidence of repeated climate
336http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.4.335
J. Astron. Space Sci. 31(4), 335-340 (2014)
oscillations of ~2500, ~1500, and ~1000 years (Debret et
al. 2007). As well, climate cycles of the centennial-scale
which have periods of ~520, ~350, and ~210 years have
been discussed in a number of studies. Nevertheless, there
is surprisingly little systematic knowledge about climate
variability during this period (Mayewski et al. 2004). The
debate on their forcing cause and factors related with the
climate cycles is still ongoing.
To seek a more comprehensive demonstration, therefore,
we have studied the Holocene climate cycles and features
using the wavelet analysis of climate proxies of 14C, 10Be, and 18O, and compared these with the results of different studies.
2. DATA AND METHOD
In this work, we carried out the wavelet analysis using
the high-resolution records of 14C, 10Be, and 18O, which have
been already released in the literature and the World Data
Center for Paleo-climatology. Specifically, we obtained the 14C records from INTCAL09 (Reimer et al. 2009), total solar
irradiance reconstruction data of 10Be from GRIP ice core
(Steinhilber et al. 2009), and 18O records from GRIP & NGRIP
(Vinther et al. 2006) and GISP2 (Stuiver et al. 1995) ice cores.
These records used in this work are listed in Table 1.
Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) analysis provides
a time evolution of the spectral features of the fluctuations.
The CWT of a discrete time sequence xn is defined as the
convolution of xn with a scaled and translated version of
wavelet function as below.
1
0'
*' ])'([)(
N
nnn s
tnnxsW
2/4/10
20)( eei
(1)
where ψ is the wavelet function, (*) indicates the complex
conjugate, s is the scale factor, and N is the number of data
points (Torrence & Compo 1998). By varying the wavelet
scale s and translating along the localized time index n, one
can construct a “scalogram” showing how wave amplitude
varies in the frequency-time space. Because the wavelet
function ψ is in general complex, the wavelet transform
Wn(s) is also complex. The transform can then be divided
into the real part, R{Wn(s))}, and the imaginary part, I{W
n(s)},
or amplitude, |Wn(s)|, and phase, tan-1[I{W
n(s)}/R{W
n(s)}].
The resulting plot of the amplitude |Wn(s)| is a contour map
of amplitude in frequency-time domain. In this process
of constructing a scalogram, the scale factor s is properly
converted to frequency f. For the CWT analysis, here, we
employed the Morlet wavelet as the wavelet function,
consisting of a plane wave modulated by a Gaussian as
below:
1
0'
*' ])'([)(
N
nnn s
tnnxsW
2/4/10
20)( eei
(2)
where η is a dimensionless time parameter and ω0 is a
dimensionless frequency. For this work, we took ω0 = 10, as
this choice offers a good trade-off between the frequency
and temporal resolutions for the time series analyzed herein
(Debret et al. 2007).
For this work, we employ the wavelet analysis to
determine the time evolution of the wave activities
associated with the different climatic proxies, offering
specific information regarding which wave cycles are
dominant or subdominant in which time intervals. This
is in contrast to the simple power spectral analysis, which
provides only frequencies of the major wave power peaks.
3. DERIVED CYCLES FROM THE WAVELET ANALYSIS
The wavelet results for the 14C, 10Be, and 18O records are
summarized in Fig.1, and the major periods determined
from the wavelet analysis are listed in Table 2. In Fig.1, the
original data are also shown above each of the scaolograms.
In addition, the plots on the right of each scalogram
represent the wavelet amplitudes averaged over the entire
time period. To compare these with the spectral results
obtained by other authors, we listed the major peaks derived
from spectral analysis of the 14C and 10Be records in Table 3.
Table 1. Tree rings and ice core records used in this study.
Record Nuclide Source Time Span (BP year) Reference
INTCAL09GRIPGRIP
NGRIPGISP2
14C10Be18O18O18O
Tree RingsGreenland ice coreGreenland ice coreGreenland ice coreGreenland ice core
Past 10500Past 9300Past 10000Past 10000Past 10000
Reimer et al. (2009)Steinhilber et al. (2009)
Vinther et al. (2006)Vinther et al. (2006)Stuiver et al. (1995)
INTCAL09: International raidiocarbon age calibration data 2009, GRIP: Greenland ice core project, NGRIP: North Greenland ice core project, GISP2: Greenland summit ice sheet project 2.
337 http://janss.kr
Eun Hee Lee et al. Holocene Climate Variability
The wavelet results of Fig. 1 and Table 2 show that the
spectral features and major periodicities of 14C and 10Be records
are similar to each other, while the variations of the 18O records
are quite different from them. In addition, each and every
cycle shows a climate signal in a different time interval with
the different amplitude, and its period is also varying with the
selected records and observation sites, respectively.
In the wavelet results of 14C and 10Be, the most significant
cycle is certainly Hallstatt cycle of ~2180-2310 years in the
Holocene time frame. However, the ~970, ~500-520, ~350-
360, and ~210-220 year cycles also show distinct signals in
their respective time intervals. In particular, the de Vries
cycle of ~210-220 years shows strong amplitude in the
intervals that coincide with the occurrence of grand solar
minima. Meanwhile, the Eddy cycle of ~970 years is mostly
prominent before the mid-Holocene.
On the other hand, the climate cycles derived from the 18O records show different characteristics depending on the
observation sites. The Eddy cycle of ~900-1000 years is the
most significant one in the records of NGRIP and GISP2 ice
cores but it is not in the record of GRIP, while all of the three
records indicate that it is dominant in the early half of the
Holocene. The ~1910-1920 year and ~550 year cycles are
significant in the records of GRIP and GISP2 ice cores but they
are much weaker or hard to identify in the record of NGRIP.
Table 3 shows the periods of major spectral peaks for 14C and 10Be derived by other researchers. These previous
results were all obtained from the simple spectral analysis
rather than a wavelet method. To compare these previous
results with ours for the most representative cycles such as
Hallstatt, Eddy, and de Vries cycles, we have summarized
both results in Table 4.
a) Production rate of 14C (INTCAL09)
b) Total Solar Irradiance data of 10Be (GRIP)
c) δ18O (GRIP)
a) Production rate of 14C (INTCAL09)
b) Total Solar Irradiance data of 10Be (GRIP)
c) δ18O (GRIP)
a) Production rate of 14C (INTCAL09)
b) Total Solar Irradiance data of 10Be (GRIP)
c) δ18O (GRIP)
d) δ18O (NGRIP)
e) δ18O (GISP2)
Fig. 1. Wavelet results for the 14C, 10Be and 18O records along with the original data shown above each scalogram. The abscissa of the scalograms refers to years before present (BP). The plots on the right side of each scalogram refer to the wavelet amplitudes averaged over the entire time period and provide major peak periods to help visual identification when a major wave activity is identifiable in the scalograms. White lines refer to cone of influence.
d) δ18O (NGRIP)
e) δ18O (GISP2)
338http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.4.335
J. Astron. Space Sci. 31(4), 335-340 (2014)
Table 4 indicates that our wavelet results are overall
in good agreement with the previous spectral results for
each cycle. However, the period of each climate cycle is
variable in both analyses up to several percentages, in
particular for the Hallstatt cycle. Fig. 2 shows the amplitude
variations of the 18O records observed in the 3 different
sites in Greenland (GRIP, NGRIP and GISP2). In Fig. 2, our
visual inspection indicates that the climate variations of 18O
records of 3 different sites are similar, being consistent with
the wavelet results in Figs. 1(c-e). The ice core temperature
data of GISP2 follows the general trend. Clearly detailed
fluctuations are different among the observation sites but
the overall pattern is similar, including the abrupt drop
around 8200 BP and the major decline between ~10000BP
and ~11000BP. As well, we could confirm such similarity in
the periodic variation (represented in Fig. 1 and Table 3)
such as Eddy cycle which shows the dominant signals from
early to mid-Holocene in all the 3 different observation sites.
4. FEATURES OF THE HOLOCENE CLIMATE CYCLES
In 1982, Chuck Sonnet employed the power spectrum
analysis to demonstrate that there was a ~2000 year periodicity
in the rather limited 14C data available at that time. He and Paul
Damon called this the “Hallstatt cycle” and Sonnet’s result was
later validated using the 10Be data (Beer et al. 2012). After the
discovery of Hallstatt cycle, its properties were discussed by
Damon & Linick (1986), Damon (1988), Damon et al. (1990).
Subsequently, Vasiliev & Dergachev (2002) confirmed
the existence of amplitude modulation with a period of
~2400 years using the power spectrum, time spectrum, and
bispectrum analyses of 14C data. As well, McCracken et al.
(2005) deduced the 2300 year periodicity from the Fourier
analysis of 10Be data. Through this study, we derived the
Hallstatt cycle of 2180 and 2312 years from the 10Be and 14C data, and the similar cycles of ~1900, ~2500 and ~2750
years from the 18O data of GISP2, GRIP and NGRIP ice cores,
respectively.
Meanwhile, in the publications of Damon & Sonett (1991)
and Damon & Jirikowie (1992), the ~2400 year and ~210
year cycles are considered to be the fundamental ones with
most of the other secular cycles discovered in radiocarbon
data being harmonic components of the longest cycle
(Vasiliev & Dergachev 2002). Our results from the 14C and 10Be data also show that the Hallstatt and de Vries cycles
Table 3. Spectral peaks derived from the 14C and 10Be records.
Nuclide Time Span (BP) Periods of major peaks (years) Reference14C14C10Be14C & 10Be
Past 9300Past 8000Past 9300Past 9400
2275, 984, 714, 512, 350, 208, 150, 1302400, 940, 710, 570, 500, 420, 360, 230, 210, 1902300, 970, 705, 515, 350, 208, 150, 1302200, 1000, 506, 208, 150
Beer & McCracken (2009)Vasiliev & Dergachev (2002)McCracken et al. (2005)Abreu et al. (2012)
Notes. Abreu et al. (2012) derived the cycles from the solar modulation potential Ф using the 14C & 10Be records.
Table 2. Derived cycles from the wavelet analysis of the 14C, 10Be and 18O records used in this paper.
Nuclide Source Average periods of the major peaks (years)14C
10Be18O18O18O
INTCAL09 (Production rate)GRIP (Total Solar Irradiance)GRIP (δ18O)NGRIP (δ18O)GISP2 (δ18O)
2312, 1720, 971, 694, 521, 357, 218, 1412180, 1500, 976, 721, 496, 347, 208, 1372500, 1920, 1300, 925, 714, 547, 355, 272, 1742756, 1976, 994, 741, 592, 464, 297, 212, 1262521, 1908, 1134, 901, 546, 467, 324, 241, 160
INTCAL09: International raidiocarbon age calibration data 2009, GRIP: Greenland ice core project, NGRIP: North Greenland ice core project, GISP2: Greenland summit ice sheet project 2.
Table 4. Derived cycles from the wavelet and spectral analyses of the 14C and 10Be records.
Cycle Name WA results (yr) SA results (yr)
HallstattEddy
de Vries
~2180-2312~971-976~208-218
~2200-2400~940-1000~208-210
Notes. WA: Wavelet analysis in this work, SA: Spectral analysis in previous studies
Fig. 2. Amplitude oscillations of 18O data observed in the 3 different sites in Greenland.
339 http://janss.kr
Eun Hee Lee et al. Holocene Climate Variability
are dominant during the Holocene, and the de Vries
cycle of ~210-220 years corresponds to the occurrence of
grand solar minima presented by Usoskin et al. (2007).
This feature was also indicated by Abreu et al. (2012) who
noticed that the amplitude of the ~210 year cycle is greatest
during the periods when grand solar minima are more
frequent. Related with this feature, there is an interesting
demonstration as follows: When the estimated solar
modulation function by Castagnoli & Lal (1980), ФCL80
is
filtered with a 1000-year running average, groups of deep
minima occur at 400 BP, 3100 BP, 5300 BP and 7300 BP.
Thus, these deep minima clusters occur with a periodicity
of (7300-400)/3 = 2300 years. That is, the ~2300 year
periodicity first detected by Sonnet was a consequence of
2300 year recurrence of clusters of grand minima (Beer et al.
2012). This is not precisely consistent with, but seems to be
overall in a qualitative agreement with our wavelet results
in Figs. 1a and 1b (i.e., ~ 500, ~2500, ~5300 and ~7300 BP).
In conclusion, therefore, we may infer that the Hallstatt and
de Vries cycles are in close relation with the appearance of
group of grand minima.
In addition, Eddy cycle also shows some difference
between wavelet and spectral analysis, and also among
the 14C, 10Be, and 18O records. Interestingly, however, all
the records of 14C, 10Be, and 18O reveal that Eddy cycle is
predominant during the early half of the Holocene.
5. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
In this paper, we focused on determining Holocene
climate cycles, especially on the centennial to millennial
time scales. Through our analyses, we confirmed most
major periodicities of centennial and millennial scales
which have been discussed in the previous studies. In
conclusion, this work reveals the following features:
1) The dominant cycles and features of 14C and 10Be data
show strong similarity and the same overall patterns
throughout the Holocene. But the climate variations
of 18O records show somewhat different characteristics
compared to 14C and 10Be.
2) The wavelet results of 14C and 10Be show that the most
conspicuous cycles are the ~2180-2310 and ~970 year
periodicities on the millennial scale, and the ~350-
360 and ~210-220 year cycles on the centennial scale.
In particular, the Hallstatt cycle of ~2180-2310 years
is significant throughout the Holocene, whereas the
Eddy cycle of ~970 years is conspicuous in the early
half of the Holocene
3) In contrast, 18O records show that the predominant
climate cycles are ~1900-2000 and ~900-1000 year
periodicities on the millennial scale, and the ~550-600
year cycle on the centennial scale. The period of ~1900,
~2500 and ~2750 years derived from the 18O records of
GISP2, GRIP and NGRIP ice cores, respectively, might
correspond to the Hallstatt cycles. The Eddy cycle
derived from the 3 different sites shows the period of
~900-1000 years in the early half of the Holocene
4) The de Vries cycle of ~210-220 years shows distinct
signals in the intervals centered on ~500, ~2500, ~5300
and ~7300 BP, being separated by ~ 2270 years on
average. Each of them coincides with the occurrence
of grand solar minima. Thus, it is likely that the
Hallstatt and de Vries cycles derived from the 14C and 10Be records are closely related with the appearance or
disappearance of grand solar minima, and also, there
is a link that implies a connection of the millennial
and centennial cycles between them. Therefore, it
seems that both of the Hallstatt and de Vries cycles are
directly connected with the solar activity.
5) On the other hand, abrupt event around 8200 BP
appeared in the 18O records, but did not show in the 14C and 10Be data. It is considered that it is probably not
related with solar forcing.
6) Lastly, this work indicates that the climate variations
such as the Hallstatt, Eddy, and de Vries cycles are
not only stationary oscillations, but also vary with
the proxy data, observational sites, and even analysis
methods to some extent.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the National Research
Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean government
(NRF-2013-R1A1A3012194), and the work at Chungbuk
National University was supported by a NSL grant (NRF-2011-
0030742) from the National Research Foundation of Korea.
SJP of Sejong University was supported by Mid-career
Researcher Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of
Education, Science, and Technology 2011-0028001.
REFERENCES
Abreu JA, Beer J, Ferriz-Mas A, McCracken KG, Steinhilber
F, Is there a planetary influence on solar activity?,
A&A 548, A88 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-
6361/201219997
340http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.4.335
J. Astron. Space Sci. 31(4), 335-340 (2014)
Beer J, McCraken KG, Evidence for solar forcing: some
selected aspects. In Climate and Weather of the
Sun-Earth system (CAWSES), eds. Tsuda T, et al.
(TERRAPUB, Tokyo, 2009), 201-216.
Beer J, McCraken KG, von Steiger R, Cosmogenic Radionuclides
(Springer, London, 2012), 298-324. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-642-14651-0
Bond GC, Lotti R, Iceberg discharges into the North
Atlantic on millennial time scales during the last
glaciations, Science 267, 1005-1010 (1997). http://dx.doi.
org/10.1126/science.267.5200.1005
Bütikofer J, Millennial scale climate variability during
the last 6000 years - tracking down the Bond cycles,
Diploma thesis. University of Bern, 1-124 (2007).
Castagnoli G, Lal D, Solar modulation effects in terrestrial
production of carbon-14, Radiocarbon 22, 133-158
(1980).
Dansgaard W, Johnsen SJ, Clausen HB, Dahl J, Gundestrup
NS, et al., Evidence for General Instability of Past
Climate from a 250-kyr Ice-Core Record, Nature 364,
218-220 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/364218a0
Damon PE, Production and decay radiocarbon and its
modulation by geomagnetic field-solar activity changes
with possible implications for global environment,
in Secular Solar and Geomagnetic Variations in the
Last 10000 years, eds. Stephenson FR, Wolfendale AW
(Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988), 267-285.
Damon PE, Cheng S, Linick TW, Fine and hyperfine
structure in the spectrum of secular variations of
atmospheric 14C, Radiocarbon 31, 704-718 (1990).
Damon PE, Jirikowie JL, Radiocarbon evidence for low
frequency solar oscillation, in Rare Nuclear Processes,
ed. Povinec P, Proc. 14th Europhysics Conf. on Nuclear
Physics (Word Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore,
1992), 177-202.
Damon PE, Linick TW, Geomagnetic-heliomagnetic
modulation of atmospheric radiocarbon production,
Radiocarbon 28, 266-278 (1986).
Damon PE, Sonett CP, Solar and terrestrial components of
the atmospheric 14C variation spectrum, in The Sun in
time, eds. Sonett CP, Giampapa MS, and Mathews MS
(University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1991), 360-388.
Debret M, Mout-Roumazeilles V, Grousset F, Desmet M,
Mcmanus JF, et al., The origin of the 1500-year climate
cycles in Holocene North-Atlantic records, Clim. Past 3,
569-575 (2007).
Dergachev VA, Raspopov OM, Damblon F, Jungner H,
Zaitseva GI, et al., Natural climate variability during the
Holocene, Radiocarbon 49, 837-854 (2007).
McCracken KG, Beer J, McDonald FB, The long-term
variability of the cosmogenic radiation intensity at
Earth as recorded by the cosmogenic nuclides, in The
solar system and beyond, ten years of ISSI, eds. Geiss J,
Hultqvist B (ESA Publication, the Netherlands, 2005),
83-98.
Mayewski PA, Rohling EE, Stager JC, Karlen W, Maasch
KA, et al., Holocene Climate Variability, Quaternary
Research 62, 243-255 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.yqres.2004.07.001
Reimer PJ, Baillie MGL, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, et al.,
IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration
curves, 0-50 cal BP, Radiocarbon 51, 1111-1150 (2009).
Sarnthein M, Van Kreveld S, Erlenkeuser H, Grootes PM,
Kucera M, et al., Centennial-to-millennial-scale
periodicities of Holocene climate and sediment injections
off the western Barents shelf, 75 degrees N, Boreas 32, 447-
461 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.2003.
tb01227.x
Steinhilber F, Beer J, Frohlich C, Total solar irradiance
during the Holocene, GRL 36, L19704 (2009). http://
dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040142
Stuiver M, Pieter MG, Thomas FB, The GISP2 delta 18O
climate record of the past 16,500 years and the role of the
sun, ocean, and volcanoes, Quaternary Research 44, 341-
354 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/qres.1995.1079
Torrence C, Compo GP, A practical guide to wavelet analysis,
Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 79, 61-78 (1998). http://dx.doi.
org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.
CO;2
Usoskin IG, Solanki SK, Kovaltsov GA, Grand minima and
maxima of solar activity: new observational constraints,
A&A 471, 301-309 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-
6361:20077704
Vasiliev SS, Dergachev VA , The 2400-year cycle in
atmospheric radiocarbon concentration bispectrum
of 14C data over the last 8000 years, ANGEO 20, 115-120
(2002). http://dx.doi.org /10.5194/angeo-20-115-2002
Vinther BM, Clausen HB, Johnsen SJ, Rasmussen SO,
Andersen KK, et al., A synchronized dating of three
Greenland ice cores throughout the Holocene, JGR 111,
D13102 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006921