health workforce mobility in the asia-pacific region ...challenge 4 – diversity in the context of...
TRANSCRIPT
Health Workforce Mobility in the Asia-Pacific Region:
Current Trends + Challenges for Australian Health
Workforce Planning
Lesleyanne Hawthorne
Professor – International Health Workforce
Canadian Health Workforce Conference –
Optimizing the Canadian Health Workforce
3-5 October 2016
Shaw Centre Ottawa
Policy Context: Transforming Global/ National Attitudes to High
Skilled Migration
Global bodies universally:
1. Endorse the value of high-skilled migration (win-win): UN, WHO,
IOM, ILO, ASEAN (etc) + the individual’s right to move
2. Aim to facilitate flows (in particular circular and return
migration)
BUT - Variation in national government attitudes to out-
migration:
1. Highly restrictive (eg Singapore)
2. Laissez-faire (eg India, China)
3. Over-production for export + remittance-generation (eg
Philippines)
Case study - Filipino nurses: Positions for 29,467 registered nurses nationally
Compared to 163,756 RNs overseas (85%)
Challenge 1: Growth in Scale of Health Migrant Arrivals to
Australia by Field (2006-11 Compared to 2001-05)
Field
2001-2005 Arrivals
2006-2011 Arrivals
Engineering 18,790 41,407 Accounting 26,145 35,423 IT 22,630 31,968 Education 15,400 29,464 Registered Nursing 14,233 26,328
Medicine 7,241 12,696
Pharmacy 1,798 3,005 Dentistry 1,063 2,343
Physiotherapy 755 1,556
Total (All Degrees) 192,940 347,611
1. Bilateral/multilateral agreements (eg EU, NAFTA)
2. International students (study-migration pathway)
3. Temporary sponsored migrants
4. Permanent skilled migrants
5. Partners of skilled migrants
6. Family and Humanitarian category migrants
Challenge 2: Global Competition to Attract and Retain ‘The Best’
Skilled Migrants (Which Entry Pathway to Prioritise?)
Challenge 3: Facilitating Labour Market Integration for
‘Traditional’ Points-Tested Skilled Migrants (as in Canada)
1. Migration mode:
Permanent
2. Selection strategy:
Points-testing dominant
3. Control:
Federal government
4. Employment access:
Integration support services
Migrant seeks work (‘independent’)
5. Issue:
Highly differentiated employment outcomes
Significant risk of de-skilling)
Work Rates @ 6 Months for Permanent Economic Migrants:
By Sub-Category 2009-11 (Government Data)
Visa Reporting
Category
Skilled
Job
Other
Job
Not
Working
Working
Full-time
Particip.
Rate
Unemploy. Median
Full-time
Earnings
6 Months Job ($'000)
Employer
Sponsored
90 7 3 92 98 0.5 71.3
Family/State
Sponsored
60 31 9 72 98 7 50.0
Offshore
Independent
75 12 12 76 97 10 74.6
Onshore
Independent
55 37 8 69 98 6 44.4
Skilled
Graduates
58 36 5 65 98 3 40.0
Other Skilled 47 33 20 61 86 7 43.0
All Skilled 68 24 8 75 96 5 52.0
Challenge 4 – Diversity in the Context of Employer Preference for OECD
Trained Migrants (Nursing Case Study 2014-15)
Permanent
(Government Selected)
1. Philippines (863)
2. India (689)
3. China (348)
4. UK (313)
5. Ireland (164)
6. Nepal (150)
7. Korea (124)
Total = 3,206 Total
Temporary
(Employer Selected)
1. UK (680)
2. India (600)
3. Philippines (480)
4. Ireland (400)
5. Canada (40)
6. Zimbabwe (40)
7. South Africa (30)
Total = 2,540 Total
Australian Employer Preference for OECD Training:
Top 15 Source Countries for New 457 Visa Grants: 2008-09 to
2014-15 (All Fields)
1. UK: 77,069
2. India: 69,568
3. Ireland: 27,275
4. USA: 24, 429
5. Philippines: 21,196
6. China: 17,541
7. Canada: 10,428
8. South Africa: 9,197
9. Germany: 8,458
10. France: 8,127
11. Malaysia: 6,126
12. Japan: 5,644
13. South Korea: 5,511
14. Italy: 5,480
15. Netherlands: 4,849
Impact of Employers on Selection:
Preference for OECD Trained Registered Nurses (Australia 2015)
Permanent
(Government Selected)
1. Philippines (863)
2. India (689)
3. China (348)
4. UK (313)
5. Ireland (164)
6. Nepal (150)
7. Korea (124)
Total = 3,206 Total
Temporary
(Employer Selected)
1. UK (680)
2. India (600)
3. Philippines (480)
4. Ireland (400)
5. Canada (40)
6. Zimbabwe (40)
7. South Africa (30)
Total = 2,540 Total
Challenge 5: Which Countries of Training to Target?
Elkin (2015) registration + protection study on IMGs:
Australia
Analysis of complaints data to Medical Boards
5,000 complaints analysed (PhD)
Significantly higher complaints against IMGs
Issues:
Racial prejudice? OR
Do ‘some groups of IMGs have more interactions with
patients that are of inferior quality’
So such interactions ‘expose patients to greater risk’?
Challenge 6: Who Should be Exempt from Host Country Exams?
(Australia’s Medical Council Competent Authority Pathway)
•Places of training: 55+ (growing!)
•Place of prior registration:
1.PLAB Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board
examination of the United Kingdom
2.MCC Medical Council of Canada Licensing Examination
3.USMLE United States Medical Licensing Examination
4.NZREX New Zealand Registration Examination
5.GMCUK General Medical Council–accredited medical
school in the United Kingdom
6.MCI Medical Council of Ireland–accredited medical school
in Ireland
•Places of training: 55+ (growing!) – never sit exams!
•Case study: Doctor qualified in China
Trend 1: Allow Employers to Select Permanent Skilled Migrants
On and Offshore (2011 Onshore Rates Rising to 91% by 2015)
Where are Permanent Skilled Migrants Selected by Employers
(All Health Fields)? Skilled Category 2008-09 to 2014-15
Impact of Employer Selection of Permanent Economic Migrants:
New Zealand Compared to Australia
NZ (past decade):
80-88% of permanent skilled migrants: Already working in NZ or
resident with NZ job offer when selected
Australia 2015-16
Skilled category: 128,550 (= around 34,000 primary applicants)
Employer-sponsored: 48,250
Independent points-tested: 43,990
Regional sponsorship: 28,850
Total (including special talent etc): 128.550
AND Temporary 457 visa: Fluctuates (around 177,000 resident
mid-2016)
Family: 60,885 + Humanitarian: 13,000 + 12,000 (Syria)
Trend 2: Let Market Forces Dictate Scale of Temporary
Sponsored Entry
1. Entry mode: Temporary labour dominates
Demand-driven
2. Scale of skilled migration: Unprecedented
Quota = Around 60-68% of permanent migrants
No quota = Temporary skilled migrants
Paradigm shifts:
Employer and State/ Province selection
Two-step + Three-step migration the new norm
Priority processing for sponsored migrants
3. Place of selection: On-shore
Trend 3: Maximise Workforce Distribution (Medicine Temporary
‘Area of Need’ Compared to Permanent Grants 2008-09 to 2014-15)
Year /
Total Number
Permanent
Medical Migrants
Number Selected
Temporary
Medical Migrants
Number Selected
2008-09
3,758 446 3,312
2009-10 1070 2,673
2010-11 508 2,927
2011-12 1037 3,299
2012-13 1289 2,855
2013-14 1134 2,440
2014-15
3,139 To March only 1076 2,063
TOTAL 6,560 19,569
Trend 4 – Ensure Responsiveness to Actual Employment Demand
(457 Temporary Visa Tap-On Tap-Off as Health Graduates Grow)
Field 2012-13 2014-15 Total 2008-09 to
2014-15
Non-Food Trades 13,541 6,016 62,716
IT 8,604 6,702 51,109
Health 6,517 3,230 41,335
Engineering 3,583 1,151 22,170
Education 2,345 1,499 11,174
Accounting 1,530 878 7,646
Total Fields 68,481 38,134 360,391
.
Tap-On Tap-Off – Recent Nurse Migration to Australia
Policy justification:
Responsiveness to employment demand and location
Guaranteed employment outcomes
Nursing (457 visa new grants):
2009-10 = 2,707 (and 4,073 in 2008-09!)
2014-15 = 814 Top source countries = India (29%), UK (26%),
Philippines (14%), Ireland (8%), China (5%)
Nursing (new permanent skilled migrant grants):
2009-10 = 1,700
2014-15 = 3,273 (pipeline harder to control)
Top source countries = UK (19%), India (18%), China (15%),
Philippines (14%), Nepal (6%)
Policy Impacts on Health Workforce Migration:
8 Years to 30 June 2015
Australia:
Temporary skilled migrants – 41,335
Permanent skilled migrants – 17,808
Total - 58,143
NZ:
Temporary skilled migrants – 28,895
Permanent skilled migrants – 10,053
Total - 38,948
Trend 5: More Flexible Pre-Registration Assessment (Case Study –
Medicine)
MCQ Exam (N=2,060, 62% pass)
Singapore: 100%
Germany: 91%
Malaysia: 87%
Sri Lanka: 80%
Iran: 75%
PNG: 75%
Fiji: 74%
South Africa: 74%
Egypt: 66%
Bangladesh: 65%
Myanmar: 63%
India: 62%
South Korea: 67%
Vietnam: 40%
Pakistan: 61%
Poland: 60%
China: 49%
Philippines: 46%
Romania: 33%
Clinical Exam (N=1,657, 35% pass)
Singapore 100%
Germany: 60%
Myanmar: 46%
South Africa: 45%
Vietnam: 45%
Malaysia: 44%
Pakistan: 41%
Bangladesh: 39%
Sri Lanka: 35%
China: 35%
Fiji: 33%
South Korea: 33%
Iran: 31%
Egypt: 30%
India: 34%
Philippines: 23%
Poland: 20%
Romania: 0%
PNG: 0%
Migrant Doctors 2008+:
Variable Registration Pathways
Specialists
? X
Fast
Me
diu
m
Slo
w
Impact of Diversity on English Language Pass Rates to 2011:
Australia + NZ Outcomes
53%
20%
40% 38% 39%
46%
37%
43%
19%
47%
34%
28%
32% 34%
52%
17%
62%
32%
38% 40% 41%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Ca
nd
ida
te p
as
s r
ate
(%
)
2005
2010
2011
Trend 6: Bridging Migrant Health Professionals into
Employment (Nursing)
•Model = Competency-based clinical training:
•Number: 36+ models (catering to up to 10,000 students)
•Providers: Universities, hospitals, private colleges
•Students: Permanent + temporary migrants
•Fees: Loans (permanent migrants), $12,000-$25,000 (students)
•Location: Urban and rural
•Options: Apply for migration
•Trainers: Potential to hire
•Outcome: Fullly registered or enrolled nurse status
Trend 7 – The Productivity Premium of Former International
Students
Potential merits:
Young
Self-funded education (economic ‘win-win’)
Host country language ability and qualifications
Acculturation
Length of future productivity – age relative to labour migrants
Demographic context by 2005:
‘Over the next couple of decades nothing will impact on
(member) economies more profoundly than demographic
trends and, chief among them, ageing’ (Chief Economist,
OECD)
Canadian Evidence in 2006:
Value of Canadian Qualifications to Health Employment
(Owusu & Sweetman 2015)
Field of Employment in
Canada (2006 Census)
Canada-
Born
Canada-
Trained
Canada-
Born
Foreign-
Trained
Foreign-
Born
Canada-
Trained
Foreign-
Born
Foreign-
Trained
Physician 89% 62% 87% 41%
Dentist 86% 36% 86% 31%
Registered Nurse 64% 53% 64% 45%
Impact of Demand by Field on Former International Students’
Full-Time Employment Rates @ 6 Months in Australia (2007-11):
After Completing Bachelor Degrees Compared to Domestic Students
Qualification Field Australian
Graduates
(Sample = 371,000)
International
Students
(Sample = 79,000)
Accounting 83% 35%
Business 76% 40%
IT 78% 42%
Engineering 86% 44%
Medicine 100% 99%
Dentistry 94% 96%
Pharmacy 98% 96%
Physiotherapy 94% 67%
Nursing 92% 71%
Australia’s Refinement of the Study-Migration Pathway to 2016:
Key Policy Measures
1. Enforce independent English language assessment:
Mandate higher levels in select fields
2. Focus on degrees and higher degrees:
NOT training college qualifications
3. Expand use of three-step migration: 2-4 year right to stay and secure work post-study
Solely for degree-qualified students
4. Increase demand-driven employer sponsored migration:
Student visa 457 visa Permanent skilled migration
Who is Most Likely to Participate in Two-Step Migration in
Australia: Temporary Foreign Workers or Former International
Students? (2014-15)
Temporary foreign workers (457 visa 4+ years):
Scale: 4,388 PA’s
Status: Professionals (89%), Trade workers (9%)
Former international students:
Scale = PA’s 6,136
Status: Professionals (74%), Trade workers (12%)
Skilled Migration Sub-Category Pathways:
Which Do Former International Students Use for Two-Step Migration?
(2008-09 to 2014-15)
Category 2008–09 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 Total
Skilled Independent 8,028 3,934 11,905 9,582 8,576 2,871 3,142 48,038
Skilled Regional 2,037 576 3,541 2,496 2,793 1,313 340 13,096
State/Territory Nominated
1,798 1,181 2,050 1,500 1,465 964 1,330 10,288
Employer Sponsored 565 332 1,204 1,902 2,213 1,474 1,291 8,981
Business Innovation and Investment
11 7 7 24 69 18 13 149
Distinguished Talent 15 18 5 17 29 16 20 120
Grand Total 12,454 6,048 18,712 15,521 15,145 6,656 6,136 80,672
Source: Based on Department of Immigration and Border Protection data, 2008-09 to 2014-15
Conclusion: Scale of Future Global and Regional Demand
for Migrant Health Professionals
Traditional population structure Emerging population structure