constructing migrants’ rights
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
1/160
!!
Constructing+Migrants+Rights++++++++++++++++Shifting(Paradigms(and(Human(Rights(Innovations(in(Argentine(Migration(and(Refugee(
Legislation+
Undergraduate*Honors*Thesis,*Global*Studies**
University*of*North*Carolina*at*Chapel*Hill*Author:+Kelsey+Jost6Creegan++
+
Abstract:+This+thesis+examines+the+passage+of+Migration+Law+25.871+&+Refugee+Law+2.15+in+Argentina.+The
laws+marked+a+ sharp+paradigm+shift+ in+Argentinas+migration+ policy,+moving+away+ from+a+ policy+ crafted+in+th
paradigm+ of+ national+ security+ under+ the+ 197+ + 1983+ dictatorship+ towards+ one+ centered+ on+ a+ human+ righ
discourse.+This+project+aimed+to+identify+the+international+and+domestic+factors+that+influenced+this+incorporatio
of+a+human+rights+discourse,+and+to+determine+if+the+socialization+of+human+rights+norms+may+lead+states+not+only+t
adopt+international+norms,+but+also+to+appropriate+the+human+rights+discourse+and+apply+it+to+internal+policy+not+ye
regulated+on+the+international+scale.+In+light+of+Argentinas+authoritarian+past,+the+research+also+examined+whether
political+learning;+may+have+played+a+specific+role+in+this+case.+
+
The+ investigation+consisted+of+ interviews+ with+ government+representatives,+ civil+ society+members+ &+academic
Findings+ indicate+ that+ domestic+ factors+ were+ more+ significant+ than+ international+ factors,+ debunking+ top6dow
models+of+the+diffusion+of+human+rights+discourse.+The+research+reveals+that+a+twenty6year+fight+on+the+part+of+ci
society+organizations+was+the+key+impetus+in+ultimately+provoking+a+change+in+law.+These+groups+used+themes+o
history+and+conceptions+of+national+identity+as+rhetorical+tools+in+constructing+arguments+for+a+change.+This+long
term+effort+was+ultimately+successful,+however,+only+because+of+the+particular+political+climate+created+by+the+2001
economic+crisis.+Of+particular+ import+were+the+effects+that+the+crisis+ had+in+ shaking+up+the+political+status+quo+
thereby+opening+the+way+for+the+election+of+Nestr+Kirchner,+whose+administration+brought+an+agenda+of+huma
rights+and+Latin+American+regionalism.+
+
!
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
2/160
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
3/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 1!
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS!....................................................................................................................!2!
ABBREVIATIONS!..................................................................................................................................!4!
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION!.........................................................................................................!5!
CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND!.........................................................................................................!14!ARGENTINE POLITICAL CONTEXT!......... ......... .......... .......... ......... .......... ......... .......... .......... ......... .......... .......!14!
AUTHORITARIANISM AND DEMOCRACY IN THE 20THCENTURY!..............................................................!18 !
HISTORICAL FACTORS:NEOLIBERAL REFORM AND ECONOMIC CRISIS!......................................!21!MIGRATION AND MIGRATION POLICY IN ARGENTINA!.........................................................................!26 !REFUGEE!LAW!..........................................................................................................................................................!40 !
THE FORMATION OF ALAW!...............................................................................................................................!41 !
CHAPTER 3: LITERATURE REVIEW!..........................................................................................!43!
HUMAN RIGHTS AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY!.................................................................................................!44 !HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA!................................................................................................................!51 !
HUMAN RIGHTS IN ARGENTINA!........................................................................................................................!54 !
MIGRANTS RIGHTS AS HUMAN RIGHTS:THENEXT FRONTIER?!............................................................!62 !
CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH METHODS!..........................................................................................!70!RESEARCH PARAMETERS!.................................................................................................................................!70 !
Location!....................................................................................................................................................................!70!
Timeline!....................................................................................................................................................................!72 !
STUDY!.......................................................................................................................................................................!73 !Participants!.............................................................................................................................................................!73 !
Interview format!....................................... ........................................ ......................................... .............................!74!Interview Questions!..............................................................................................................................................!75!
Additional Research!.............................................................................................................................................!76!
Post-Field Work and Analysis!..........................................................................................................................!77!
CHAPTER 5: FINDINGS!....................................................................................................................!78!ACTION AND STRENGTH OF NONGOVERNMENTAL ACTORS!.......... .......... ......... .......... ......... .......... .......... ..!79!
HISTORY AND CONCEPTS OF IDENTITY!..........................................................................................................!95 !
TIMING AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT!..............................................................................................................!106 !
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS!.......................................................................................................!131!
APPENDICES!......................................................................................................................................!138!APPENDIX 1!.........................................................................................................................................................!138!APPENDIX 2!.........................................................................................................................................................!143!APPENDIX!3!..........................................................................................................................................................!144!
APPENDIX 4!.........................................................................................................................................................!146!
BIBLIOGRAPHY!...............................................................................................................................!150!
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
4/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!2!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project would not have been possible without the help of so many people, to whom Iam truly grateful. The process of investigating, writing, and editing this thesis has trulybeen a culmination and a highlight of my undergraduate career at UNC-Chapel Hill, and I
am forever indebted to those who made this wonderful experience possible.
Firstly, I quite simply cannot express the depth of my gratitude to my advisor, Dr. NiklausSteiner, and to my second reader, Dr. Martin Sueldo. In the way that Dr. Steinerapproaches thesis advising is evident his love and dedication to teaching and, particularly,to the teaching of undergraduates. I am so grateful for the gift of his time, for his patiencewith my procrastination and his thoughtful listening to my many rambling thoughts, as Istruggled to articulate ideas that were of yet mere seedlings. I am so grateful for the help ofDr. Sueldo in designing and implementing my research; without his insight and assistancein making sure that my project was linguistically and culturally attuned to the specific site
of Argentina, I am positive that my interviews would not have been nearly as successful,and his insight in analyzing my results was extremely helpful. I also thank Dr. MichalOsterweil for her dedicated instruction of the Global Studies thesis seminar. Her kindguidance was instrumental to the development of all of our projects. Her patience andunderstanding of the challenges that this process can present made it much lessoverwhelming.
I am also grateful to the comments and critiques of my peers in Global Studies, as theirthoughtful reading of my drafts molded the project into what it is today. I owe a particulardebt to my thesis buddy, Lindsay Rosenfeld, and to Elizabeth Willis: for hours spent
working in solidarity, for all the times that they listened to my babble, for their trueinvestment in my work and their genuine excitement when I came across something Ithought was of value to the project, even when I could not yet articulate why. Whats more,for their laughter, hugs and smiles, all of which got me through the rough spots and stress. Iam also grateful to Cora Went, who as my roommate in Buenos Aires served as a friend,confidante, travel buddy, and email-editor.
I am so grateful to all of my interviewees, who generously donated their time and theirknowledge to this project. I was overwhelmed by peoples willingness to take the time tocontribute to my research. I owe a particular gratitude to the staff and former staff of theFundacin Comisin Catlitca Argentina de Migraciones, as it was my internship at thisorganization that sparked the idea for this project.
I must also thank the staff of the Global Detention Project, who taught me research skillsthat were integral to my work. I am grateful to the staff of The Argentina Independent, whoallowed me to explore my research while working as a journalism intern with their paper. Iam also forever indebted to the numerous teachers and professors who have touched my
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
5/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 3!
life in a variety of ways. In addition those mentioned above, numerous professors played anintegral role in helping this project to develop. I am grateful to Dr. Hannah Gill, as throughethnographic research in her class on Latino migrant perspectives I discovered mymethodology for the research in this project. I am also grateful to many professors of theUNC Spanish department, who have helped me to develop Spanish skills and greater
appreciation and understanding for the cultures of Latin America.
I am so thankful for the support of the Morehead-Cain Foundation, through which I havestudied at Carolina, completed internships with the FCCAM, GDP and The ArgentinaIndependent, and returned to Argentina in the winter of 2012 to finish interviews. It goeswithout saying that the support of the Morehead-Cain has opened doors that never wouldhave been available to me otherwise, but it is more than that: the unfailing faith and trust ofthe staff and incredible support in projects I proposed gave me the permission to dream of and then realize - adventures that I wouldnt have otherwise believed possible.
At the core of these thanks lies the deepest thanks of all, that to my incredible family. Tomy parents, who have selflessly worked to provide me with a never-ending range ofopportunities and experiences. Mom and dad, I will never find the words to express myimmense gratitude for everything you have given me. A foundation of love, kindness andtrust that made me believe no dream was ever too big. A childhood, adolescence, andyoung adulthood splitting at the seams with incredible educational opportunities andunimaginable travel experiences. And this year, a kind ear whenever I most needed it.These gifts you have given me will stay with me forever. To my brother, Nick; I am solucky to have a sibling I can call a best friend. The three of you have supported methroughout this project, listened to my breakdowns, discoveries and excitement, and
believed that I could do it even when I was sure I could not. I am also grateful to mygrandparents, whose sacrifices paved the way to the opportunities and gifts I have today.Mueti and Atti, your house full of books and incredible wealth of knowledge have inspiredin me an unquenchable thirst to continue studying, in the hopes that someday I will be ableto claim a sliver of the knowledge that you both have accumulated over a lifetime ofconstant curiosity. And to the rest of my family, who has always supported me and in thisproject has patiently listened to my confusing recounts of how my research was forming:you have all played a role in this project, and for that I am so grateful.
Thanks'to'the'many'cafs'that'allowed'me'to'sit'for'hours'with'a'caf'con'leche'and'
medalunas!''(photo'taken'by'author)'
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
6/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!4!
ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation Full Name (English and Spanish)
CELS Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales
Center for Legal and Social Studies
CEJIL Centro por Justicia y Derecho Internacional
Center for Justice and International Law
CTA Centro de Trabajadores Argentinos
Center for Argentine Workers
DNM Direccin Nacional de Migraciones
Argentine National Migration Bureau
FCCAM Fundacin Comisin Catlica Argentina deMigraciones
Fundation of the Argentine Catholic Comission
for Migration
IACHR Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
IOM International Organization for Migration
Organizacin internacional para la migracin
(OIM)
OAS Organization of American States
Organizacin de Estados Americanos
UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner forRefugees
Alto Comisionado de Las Nacionaes Unidas
para Refugiados (ACNUR)
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
7/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 5!
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The development of migrants rights is one of the last frontiers in the evolution of
international human rights standards. Since the end of World War Two, the international
human rights regime has gradually grown to encompass a broader understanding of human
rights and to better delineate the distinct needs of different populations. The notion of
universality in the international human rights regime would appear to transcend national
boundaries and questions of citizenship. Because human rights norms evolved within the
nationalistic context, however, they were initially crafted in the paradigm of the nation-
citizen relationship. Increasing migration flows, through which citizens are displaced from
their nation of belonging, have thereby presented one of the greatest challenges to a truly
global realization of human rights standards. As Javier de Lucas suggests:
Tackling the question [of migration and human rights] forces us to undertake a sort
of test about the consistency of our conception of human rights and the political
(and social) will to take those rights seriously, speaking of this penultimate
theoretical and practical human rights frontier that is the question of migrants
rights (de Lucas, p. 219).1
Ironically, the very states that have been central to the formation and promotion of
the international human rights regime often present some of the most restrictive migration
policies. As globalization has eased both communication and transportation, global
disparities have become more evident and potential migrants have greater mobility. In
response to growing waves of migration, however, many liberal democracies have
implemented increasingly restrictive migration policies that frame the issue of migration as
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1 All translations of Spanish sources, unless otherwise noted, are the work of the autor.
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
8/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!6!
a national security concern. Migration detention and deportation - often without judicial
review and/or sentencing limits and limited or barred access to public services have
become the hallmarks of the migration policies of modern liberal democracies in the Global
North. These increasingly restrictive migration policies have not stopped the flow of
migrants, and have instead resulted in the growth of large populations of undocumented
migrants in many migrant-receiving countries.
Migrants particularly those lacking documentation and asylum seekers have
come to be some of the most vulnerable populations in the global community2. At the
international level, the issue of migrants rights remains largely unresolved. The
Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families took
over twenty years to accumulate the number of ratifications necessary for it to enter into
force, the longest amount of time of any international human rights treaty to date. And even
now, the vast majority of countries party to the convention are migrant source countries,
with most significant migrant destination countries refusing to subject themselves to the
treaty norms. Increasing concerns over the treatment of migrants in destination countries
have provoked strong responses from source countries. The North-South dichotomy of
many migration patterns with countries in the Global North serving as destination
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2 For the purpose of this thesis, Undocumented migrants refers to both those migrants who initiallyentered the country with authorization but whose authorization has since expired, and those who enter thecountry without authorization. Asylum seekers refers to those migrants who are physically present withinthe state territory either with or without state authorization and who request authorization to remain inthe country for humanitarian reasons, on the basis that they meet the definition of a refugee as laid out bythe 1951 Refugee Convention. Refugees refers to those asylum seekers whose applications have beenaccepted and have been granted refugee status by the destination country.
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
9/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 7!
countries and those in the Global South acting as source countries3 has created further
controversy, as source countries argue that migration concerns cannot be separated from
those of global economic disparities.
The situation is further complicated by the reality that in an increasingly global
world, a growing number of countries can no longer be classified as either a destination
country or a source country. Instead, these nations lie at the crossroads of migration,
serving as both a destination often for regional migrants and a source often for
intercontinental migrants. Within the global discussion of migration, these nations have an
interesting role to play, as they are affected both by nationalistic questions of sovereignty
regarding the migration arriving at their shores and by normative concerns of the treatment
of migrants as it affects their citizens abroad. One country that lies at such an intersection is
Argentina.
For much of the twentieth century, Argentina was a significant destination country
for migration, initially originating from Europe and later increasingly from other Latin
American countries. A steady stream of regional migrants continues to enter the country
today. Since the 1970s, however, the country has become a source country for migration, as
Argentines first fled the military dictatorship of the 1970s and 1980s, and then the
economic difficulties of the post-authoritarian period that culminated in the economic crisis
of 1999-2002.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
3 In this thesis I will use the term Global North to refer to the advanced industrial economics, such asEurope and the United States, while Global South will refer to developing countries, including Argentina.
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
10/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!8!
Until 2004, migration policy in Argentina was defined by the Law 22.439, passed
under the 1976-1983 military dictatorship. This law known colloquially as the Videla
Law for General Jorge Rafael Videla, leader of the military dictatorship at the time the law
was passed was notoriously restrictive in nature. In this way, the legislation reflected
many of the restrictive policies of modern liberal democracies that are source countries for
migration: access to residency was extremely limited for unskilled workers, and detention
and deportation often without judicial review were employed as responses to steady
undocumented regional migration. Under this policy, a large and vulnerable population of
undocumented migrants developed.
The Videla Law continued in effect for over twenty years after Argentina returned
to democracy in 1983, and at times was applied even more harshly than it had been under
the authoritarian regime. In the second half of the 1990s, as Argentina spiraled towards the
economic meltdown that would come to be the 1999-2002 economic crisis which at its
worst moments saw 24% of the population unemployed and 56% of the population living
in poverty (Baer, pp. 44) high-ranking public officials increasingly used migrants as
scapegoats for social and economic woes. Throughout this period, there was no legislation
governing the provision of refugee status, which instead continued to be dictated by
executive decree.
Then, two years after the economic crisis, when the country was still feeling the
echoes of deep social unrest and uncertainty, a new migration law was passed that
completely altered the paradigm under which migration was regulated. The 2004 Migration
Law 25.871 not only revoked the Videla Law, but also goes above and beyond the
legislation of any traditional migrant receiving country to date: the law declares the right to
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
11/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 9!
migrate a human right, and grants migrants a wide range of rights and protections
regardless of their migratory status. Two years later, in 2006, the country adopted the
Refugee Law 26.165, which also employed a strong human rights discourse and surpassed
international standards in the area of refugee protection. As the majority of migrant
destination countries applied increasingly restrictive norms to the governance of migration,
Argentina codified the rights of migrants and asylum seekers in two laws4 that far exceeded
international human rights standards.
Whats more, this change in law was accompanied by significant alterations in
discourse and policy. The xenophobic discourses of decades passed virtually disappeared
from the public sphere. The discursive space of the political elite shifted, as politicians and
bureaucrats adopted the human rights discourse of the new Migration Law. A statement by
Argentine President Cristina Fernndez de Kirchner outlines this newly dominant political
paradigm:
We are all children or grandchildren of an immigrant. We have to echo our ownhistory and the identity of our country. We have to integrate immigrant populations
instead of discriminate against them. We must oppose the cultural subordination
that calls for laws against immigrants In times of economic crisis, xenophobic
attacks always arise that try to place the blame for the problem with immigrants. It
is part of the human condition to look for a scape goat, and this practice is
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 In this thesis, the terms Migration Law, 2004 Migration Law and Law 25.871 will refer to theMigration Law 25.871 passed in 2004. The terms Refugee Law, 2006 Refugee Law and Law 26.165will refer to the Refugee Law 26.165 passed in 2006. The terms Law 22.439, 1981 Migration Law andVidela Law will refer to the 1981 Migration Law passed in 1981 under the 1976 1983 militarydictatorship.
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
12/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!10!
dangerous because it has given rise to political movements that consecrate
atrocious violations of human rights.5
The Migration Law and Refugee Law have also been accompanied by institutional change
that demonstrates that the change in legislation both prompted and was indicative of a
wider policy shift.
The extreme paradigm shift in discourse and policy in Argentina that was marked
by the adoption of the 2004 Migration Law and the 2006 Refugee Law provokes the central
research question of this thesis. Ultimately, the goal of this thesis was establish the
international and domestic factors that influenced the incorporation of a human rights
discourse into these two laws, and thereby explore whether the case of these two laws in
Argentina demonstrates that the socialization of human rights norms may lead States not
only to adopt and implement international norms, but also to eventually appropriate the
human rights discourse and apply it to internal policy not yet regulated on the international
scale. I was particularly interested in this question with regards to migration and asylum
policy, and sought to understand what factors may influence a State to adopt policy that
recognizes the rights of these populations.
Some may question the choice of focusing on legislation, as laws often represent a
change in rhetoric without prompting a meaningful change in practice. I take the view of
Kathryn Sikkink, however, who argues for seriously considering the law, as both a
crystallization of state expectations and a vehicle for transforming state understandings and
practices (Sikkink 1996, p. 707). Examining pieces of legislation and the discourse therein
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5"Argentina*celebra*bicentenario*con*nueva*ley*de*migraciones*."*Pueblo'en'Linea,*5*April*2010.*Web.*15*Mar.*2012.*
http://spanish.peopledaily.com.cn/31614/6972337.html*!
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
13/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 11!
can allow us to explore how the State frames a certain issues and how the State wishes to
project itself. Whats more, legislation and the discourse that drives it creates
expectations of State behavior. Although the State may fulfill those obligations to varying
degrees, the written law ultimately has the power to transform the way that an issue is
understood.
Traditional scholarship has viewed the concept of universal human rights as a
challenge to state sovereignty, proposing that States adopt human rights discourse largely
in response to external international pressures. More recently, however, scholars have
explored the question of whether the very notion of sovereignty is changing. A study of the
new Migration Law therefore allows us to insert ourselves in that debate and to explore
what factors may motivate States to adopt human rights discourse regarding the protection
of a minority population, despite the absence of globally accepted human rights norms and
treaties in the area. In this light, the Refugee Law serves as a foil, in that international
norms do exist with regards to the treatment of asylum seekers and refugees. We might
therefore expect that a generous refugee law would be easier to pass than a generous
migration law, given the international pressure to respect the rights of refugees. And yet,
the Migration Law passed first in Argentina, with the Refugee Law passing two years later.
Argentina provides a particularly interesting case through which to study the
development of human rights discourse and policy because of the countrys unique history
with authoritarianism and transitional justice. From 1976 to 1983, Argentina passed
through a brutal military dictatorship. In the notorious dirty wars, the authoritarian
governing regime unleashed a reign of terror that featured torture, death and disappearance.
Human rights groups now estimate that between 20,000 and 30,000 people disappeared
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
14/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!12!
during this dictatorship (Brown, pp. 240-241). Following the transition to democracy,
Argentina conducted now world famous truth commissions and trials of formal military
leaders.
In light of Argentinas authoritarian past, I am also interested to see whether
political learning; in the post-authoritarian context may have played a specific role in the
Argentine case, and how authoritarian legacies influence the role of human rights dialogue
in the development of policy in post-authoritarian democracies. Given the polemic nature
of processes of transitional justice in post-authoritarian societies, these questions are
significant in that they explore whether the effectiveness of transitional justice and the
resulting strength and form of authoritarian legacies influence the future codification of
human rights-oriented policy.
By examining the current state of migration and asylum policy in post-authoritarian
Argentina, we may consider the factors that influence State to adopt human rights discourse
in legislation and in the norms of the political elite. The investigation that forms the basis of
this research consisted of a series of interviews with professionals involve in the fields of
migration and human rights in Argentina, including politicians, state bureaucrats, civil
society members and academics.
Chapter 2 will provide important background to the case, and is divided into two
parts: general political and economic background important to understanding processes ofpolicy formation today, and the history of migration and migration policy in Argentina.
Chapter 3 will incorporate an in-depth literature review, exploring the current conversation
on factors that may influence States to adopt human rights discourse. This chapter will also
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
15/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 13!
explore the themes of authoritarian legacies and political learning as well as the current
state of migrant rights in the field of human rights. Chapter 4 will provide information on
the research methods used in the development of this project, which will consist mainly of
interviews with policy stakeholders, including politicians, human rights activists, and
refugees and asylum seekers themselves. Chapter 5 will outline the findings of the work.
Finally, Chapter 6 will provide further analysis, conclusions and suggestions for further
research.
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
16/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!14!
CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND
Several historical and contextual factors are essential to understanding the
development and implementation of migration policy in Argentina today. First, because
this thesis focuses on policy formation, we must consider the specific context of the
Argentine political system and recent Argentine political history. In this regard, we will
consider in particular centralization, the power of the executive and the phenomenon of
Peronism in the modern Argentine political system. Additionally, with regards to political
history, we will consider the history of authoritarian rule in the country. Finally, as this
thesis focuses on migration and asylum policy, we will explore the demographic history of
migration to Argentina, the impact of this history on the formation of Argentine national
identity, and the trajectory of migration policy in the country since Independence.
ARGENTINE POLITICAL CONTEXT
Argentina is a federalist republic with twenty-three provinces and one autonomous
city, the capital of Buenos Aires. The conflict between centralized power concentrated in
Buenos Aires and the federalized power of the provinces has been ongoing since Argentina
gained independence from Spain in 1816 (CIA 2013). L.S. Rowe argues that, the conflict
between federal and unitary principles constitutes one of the most instructive chapters in
the history of many South American countries but in no country has this struggle been as
deeply significant as in the Argentine republic (Rowe 1921, p. 3). Indeed, Argentina is
one of the least centralized countries in the world, and the provinces hold all powers that
are not specifically relegated to the government under the Constitution. They also have
control over the provision of significant public services such as education and health, and
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
17/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 15!
are responsible for executing some national level policies, including social welfare
programs (Ardanaz, Leiras and Tommasi 2012, p. 2; 6)
While migration as a legislative issue is dealt with on a federal level, provincial
actors traditionally hold significant sway over the national policy-making process, even
with regards to issues that fall under the authority of the federal government. Often, the
president will negotiate with provincial actors to gain their support on a legislative issue,
using the bargaining chip of fiscal transfers, as the provinces all depend on federal funding.
(Ardanaz, Leiras and Tommasi 2012, p. 6). As some provinces are more or less affected by
migration than others, it can be expected that legislators from different provinces maysupport drastically different legislation.
Map'of'Argentina,'divided'into'23'provinces'and'the'Capital'city'of'Buenos'Aires'
From:*http://geografiaHeducmedia.blogspot.com/2012/04/argentinaHdivisionHpolitica.html**
'
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
18/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!16!
The Argentine Constitution was signed in 1853, but has been amended and
suspended many times since; the most recent amendments were made in 1994, under the
Menm administration (Crespo 2009). The Constitution was most recently suspended
between 1976 and 1983, during the last military dictatorship, which will be further
discussed in this chapter (Encyclopedia of Nations).
In addition to the national Constitution, each province has its own constitution
(Crespo 2009). The republic operates on a civil law system that is based on Western
European legal systems. The president serves as both the Head of Government and the
Head of State. The executive branch is complemented by independent judiciary andlegislative branches. The seat of the judiciary branch is the seven-member Supreme Court,
which is appointed by the president and approved by the legislation. In 2006, the Argentine
Congress passed a bill that calls for the number of Supreme Court Justices to be reduced
from seven to five. The third branch of government is the legislature, composed of an upper
house called the Senate and a lower house called the Chamber of Deputies (CIA 2013).
The unit of the province is considered one constituent in all elections for Senators
and Deputies. Scholars argue that this basis of the province as a constituency makes the
province the locus of party competition and the base of political support for politicians and
parties (Ardanaz, Leiras and Tommasi 2012, p. 2; see therein De Luca, Junes and Tula
2002, Benton, 2009). This style of party system lends itself to a tumultuous political
system. Martn Ardanaz, Marcelo Leiras, and Mariano Tommasi argue that Argentinas
large political parties have been born and have recently developed in such a way that their
national governing coalitions are best described as little more than (potentially volatile)
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
19/160
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
20/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!18!
AUTHORITARIANISM AND DEMOCRACY IN THE 20TH CENTURY
From the 1930s through the 1980s, Argentina oscillated between democratic and
dictatorial regimes. In this period, there were no two democratic governments back-to-
back. This political and economic turmoil escalated particularly in the 1960s and 1970s, as
left-wing guerrilla groups in particular, the Montoneros and the ERP battled against a
government run by President Isabel Pern wife of former president Juan Pern and her
Argentine Anticommunist Alliance, known as the Triple A. (Vanden and Prevost, pp. 402
406; Brown, p. 240). According to Jonathon Brown by early 1976, public opinion
clamoredfor a military coup dtat (Brown, p. 240).
In 1976, the Argentine military did indeed a coup and took over the government,
creating ajunta co-directed by the head of the army, navy and air force. (Vanden and
Prevost, pp. 402 406). Although Argentina had been alternating between dictatorship and
democracy for much of the twentieth century, the military coup of 1976 marked the
entrance of a dictatorship that would come to be notorious for the brutality that it wieldedagainst its own citizens.
The military takeover was part of a larger trend in Latin America towards the
entrance of authoritarian rule. In the Cold War context, a wave of military coups swept the
region. National security ideology, with its assumption that authoritarian rule and human
rights violations were acceptable in the struggle against insurgencies and communism,
reigned. Lutz and Sikkink argue that the international environment provided cover and
impetus for the wave of repression in Latin America in the 1970s and 1980s. Many
countries had levels of state repression not previously witnessed since the colonial or
independence period (Lutz and Sikkink 2001, pp. 280-281).
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
21/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 19!
Tom Farer notes that even though many Latin American countries had experienced
authoritarian rule in varying degrees and with varying frequency since gaining
independence, the regimes that rose up in the 1960s and 1970s were distinct in that they did
not define themselves as brief interruptions in constitutional government induced by an
emergency but rather intended to suspend indefinitely both elected regimes and the
frequent companions of such regimes, freedom of speech and freedom of association.
Categorized as bureaucratic authoritarian, these regimes were organized, disciplined,
and determined, supported by their own arms and key segments of the middle and upper
class and were often staffed by a comparatively well-educated generation of officers(Farer 1996, pp. 1-2).
Perhaps nowhere did this repression come to be as notorious as Argentina.
Comparing this dictatorship to those in neighboring Chile and Brazil, Anthony Pereira
argues that the Argentine military junta was the most drastic of all and in institutional
termsthe most innovative and the most daring (Pereira 2005, p. 4). Upon taking power
in 1976, the military junta unleashed the Process of National Reorganization, known
commonly as El Proceso. Promising to combat inflation and eliminate the leftist
guerrillas, thejunta engaged in what is today referred to as an undeclared war a guerra
suciaagainst its own people (Arditti, p. 36). Economic themes were at the forefront of
politics; the junta largely justified its use of brutality as necessary measures in a war against
the Marxist threat. Referring to this alleged communist threat as a cancer, the military
implemented a widespread and far reaching campaign. The militarys mirrored reflected
that of military regimes in Paraguay, Uruguay, Brazil and Chile, all of which cooperated in
the now-notorious Plan Cndor.
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
22/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!20!
The Argentine Dirty War has become globally synonymous with cruelty and broad-
based human rights violations. The regime implemented a new methodology of
repression (Arditti, p. 37) and the use of torture, clandestine detention and rape was
widespread and systematic (Brown, p. 243). A new term entered into the quotidian
Argentine vocabulary: the desaparecidos, or disappeared, those people captured and
killed by the military whose bodies were subsequently disposed of in secret, leaving their
families without the closure of knowing the fate of their loved ones (Brown, p. 245). While
it is estimated that there were around 2,000 left wing guerillas at the time that the military
gained power, human rights groups calculate that between 20,000 and 30,000 peopledisappeared during the dictatorship (Brown, pp. 240-241).
Anthony Pereira provides an important analysis of the use of legality under the
military junta. This understanding is significant to the understanding of policy, legislation
and the judiciary in that period, which in turn is significant to understanding the legal
legacies of the regime. He argues, The Argentine regime, despite the rhetorical mildness
of its proclaimed ambition of national reorganization, was revolutionary in its disregard
for and violation of preexisting legality. There was more opposition within the Argentine
judiciary body towards the military dictatorship than there was in parallel institutions in
Chile and Brazil, where the judiciary largely supported and was thereby integrated into the
military system. Thus, the Argentine military ultimately surpassed these traditional state
institutions instead of working through them; Pereira defines this route as antilegalistic.
The use of disappearances, operating on a clandestine nature and evading the judiciary,
became a full-scale program and an official policy as the regime dispensed with legal
formalities almost entirely (Pereira 2005, pp. 119, 128- 129).
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
23/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 21!
HISTORICAL FACTORS: NEOLIBERAL REFORM AND ECONOMIC CRISIS
Another significant factor to consider in recent Argentine political history is the
neoliberal reform period of the 1990s and the 1999-2002 economic crisis. The economic
crisis is a defining moment in modern Argentine history, and its impacts were far-reaching
and long lasting in Argentine society. Today, many Argentines blame the crisis on
neoliberal policies pursued by the presidential administration of Carlos Menm in the
1990s. Miguel Teubal labels the economic a crisis of neoliberalism and particularly of
the severe structural adjustments applied in the 1990s and the beginning of the new
millennium under the Menem and De la Ra administrations (Teubal 2004, p. 173).
To understand where the neoliberal reforms of the 1990s had their roots, one has to
understand the economic conditions under which Argentina made the transition to
democracy. As we have explored, economic themes were central to the dictatorships
rhetoric; the regime largely justified its use of brutality as necessary measures in a war
against communism. Less tangibly brutal than the notorious acts of kidnapping, torture andmurder conducted by the military, but undoubtedly also repressive was the economic policy
of the regime, designed to limit the historically strong workers movement and local
industry in favor of international investment (Arditti, pp. 36-37). These policies, part of a
regional push towards liberalization under the Washington Consensus (Amann, p. 235),
resulted in deindustrialization and debt dependency. While these economic practices
resulted in seeming prosperity in the first five years of military control, this growth was
propped up by inflation (Arditti, pp. 36-37), and the last three yeas of the regime featured
rapid economic collapse, which was further augmented by the Falklands War (Wijnholds
2003, p. 102). By the time the government transitioned to democracy, the economy was
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
24/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!22!
in a crisis unparalleled in the nations history (Blake 1998, p. 5).
The end of the dictatorship in 1983 and the transition to democracy heralded
significant change, but the dominant paradigm remained largely consistent. Indeed, in the
1990s, neoliberal policies similar to those pursued by thejunta assumed the status of a
new orthodoxy. Under the administration of President Ral Alfonsn (elected in 1983), the
government attempted to implement a series of stabilization policies (the Austral Plan, the
Primavera Plan) but ultimately these changes only led to new cycles of inflation (Wijnholds
2003, p. 103 104; Blake 1998, p. 6). When Carlos Menem was elected Argentinas
president 1989, he implemented radical reform with extensive market deregulation and
an active courting of foreign, especially U.S., investors (Amann, p. 236). In 1994,
Argentina came to an agreement with International Monetary Fund (IMF) that included, as
was customary, mandatory Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs).
Despite the difficulties that Argentina had with debt following the transition to
democracy, in in this period preceding the large-scale implementation of SAPs, Argentinas
economy remained the most prosperous and industrialized economy in Latin America.
Perhaps most significant in a region filled with disparate wealth distribution, until the
1990s 80% of Argentines were middle class, and workers and their bosses split the
nations income exactly in half (Jeter 2009, pp. 35-36). Despite these positive economic
indicators, however, the persistent presence of hyperinflation in 1989 led the government to
pursue drastic measures (Sader and Manrique, p. 193) and the adoption of the IMF
recommended SAPs. The SAPs promoted extreme privatization, extensive de-
regularization especially with regards to the labor market and an opening of the
country to the world financial markets(Teubal, p. 174).
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
25/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 23!
In 1991, Argentina implemented the Convertibility Plan, which responded to
hyperinflation by pegging the Argentine peso to the U.S. dollar (Teubal, p. 174). This plan
was part of a trend of IMF-supported currency stabilization programs in Latin America,
including Brazil and Mexico. These programs achieved rapid reductions in inflation; in
Argentina; for example, inflation rates went from over 300 per cent in 1989, to nonexistent
in 1996. This decrease in inflation meant a large increase in real income, which in turn lead
to an increase in domestic demand and economic growth. This economic growth in turn
gave investors incentive and confidence to return to Argentine markets and thus allowed
the country to eliminate debt by privatizing public assets (Kregel, pp. 3-4). Perhaps due tothis perceived success, Argentina maintained its convertibility peg longer than its peers
Mexico and Brazil, to the point where the program became an economic drag (Ko, p. 10;
Wijnholds 2003, p. 106).
And so in the short term, the SAPs lead to growth (Amann 2010, p. 236), and the
IMF heralded Argentina as a success story (Kregel, p. 1). In the long term, however, the
policies were revealed to be problematic, both economically and normatively.
First, the SAPs had severely negative economic outcomes, including a period of
euphoric growth that masked significant problems. Ultimately, these problems resulted in
economic suffering for a large part of the population, and a pattern of moral hazard and
irresponsible economic decisions that eventually lead to the 1999-2002 economic crisis.
The argument that the crisis was largely driven by the policies promoted by the SAPs is
widely supported by scholars, and the IMF itself has admitted some degree of failure in the
economic results of the SAPs and their culpability in creating the crisis (Conway). The
growth generated by the SAPs offered immediate, tangible improvements in economic life,
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
26/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!24!
but covered up structural problems including a continued dependency on debt and
uncompetitive domestic industry (Amann 2010, p. 237). Although foreign lenders returned,
the government did not achieve fiscal balance. Debt remained a reality of economic life,
and strict monetary policies made that debt harder to pay (Kregel, p. 3; Amann 2010, p.
237). To maintain the convertibility peg, Argentina was dependent on both the IMF and
private funders, and thus vulnerable to external shocks (Ko, p. 11).
Not only did dependency and debt make Argentina susceptible to external events,
this form of growth also created challenges for domestic industry. Domestic industry never
evolved into a strong competitor for foreign goods; the decrease in inflation rendered
Argentine products too expensive to sell abroad, and products shipped into the country
artificially cheap(Jeter 2009, p. 27; 45). Indeed, by 1997, the share of imported goods
and services in GDP had doubled to around a 12 percent, while the share of exports
remained substantially stable around 10 percent. Kregel categorizes this growth as debt-
led as opposed to export lead growth, and argues that it created a vicious cycle of
external financing crises (Kregel, pp. 2-3; 5).
In Argentina, these problems in policies promoted by the SAPs led to a series of
irresponsible economic decisions that ultimately resulted in a long-term recession and the
major economic breakdown of 1999-2002 (Kregel, pp. 2-3). The 1999-2002 crisis was
predicated by three years of recession (Wijnholds, p. 110). Leading up to the crisis, the
Argentine economy was rocked by a series of both external including the Asian financial
crisis, devaluation of Brazils currency and increase of the U.S. dollar and internal - tax
hikes changes, leading to a deflationary trap (Amann, p. 328; Ko, p. 11).
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
27/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 25!
Between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002, the country underwent a
massive devaluation, a world-historical record sovereign default on $95bn of debt, and a
collapse of the financial system (Weisbrot 2011). This crisis was the most profound
economic depression Argentina had ever faced. At the worst moments, 24 percent of the
population was unemployed and 56 percent was impoverished. Over the twenty years
following the implementation of the SAPs, the gap in income between the wealthiest
Argentines and the poorestwidened by a factor of 400. Economic collapse led to
extreme political uncertainty and a turnover of five presidents in ten days at the end of 2001
(Baer, pp. 44; 47). Furthermore, social indicators pointed to the deeply eroding effects ofeconomic depression. With impoverishment and desperation rampant, crime rates
skyrocketed by an estimated 300%, and other indicators of welfare such as marriage rates
and teenage pregnancy also worsened (Jeter, pp. 37- 39).
The economic breakdown had significant political consequences. The Unin Cvica
Radical (UCR), one of the two major political policies, suffered drastic losses in the next
election. Indeed, these losses were somewhat ironic as although President de la Ra, the
president that notoriously fled the Casa Rosada presidential offices in a helicopter, was a
member of the UCR, his predecessor, Carlos Menm, whose had initially implemented
many of neoliberal policies was largely considered to have led to the crisis, was a Peronist
(The Economist 2008).
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
28/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!26!
MIGRATION AND MIGRATION POLICY IN ARGENTINA
Now we will examine several topics that are more intimately related to the theme of
this particular investigation: the demographic and political histories of migration in
Argentina.
DEMOGRAPHIC HISTORY OF MIGRATION TO ARGENTINA
Since the arrival of the Spaniards and the beginning of the Conquest, Argentina has
experienced diverse waves of immigration that have formed the demographics of its
population. These migratory waves have also been the subjects of significant national
myths and have been important factors in the conceptualization of national identity.
Statistically, immigrants grew as a proportion of Argentinas total population from
the second half of the nineteenth century through World War I. At the peak of immigration
in 1914, immigrants represented nearly a third of the total population (Pacecca y Courtis
2008, pp. 9-10) and in 1920 they accounted for nearly half of the population of the city of
Buenos Aires (Oteiza and Novick, p. 3). In this period, more than 2.7 million people
immigrated to the new nation (Hines 2010, p. 474).
A'mural'entitled'La'Despedida''The'Farewell''that'recalls'Argentinas'historic'migration.'The'
painting'adorns'the'front'of'the'Our'Lady'of'Immigrants'Church'in'La'Boca,'Buenos'Aires'(photo'
taken'by'author)'
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
29/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 27!
Since World War I, however, the proportion of immigrants as a proportion of the
total population has gradually lowered. As of the 2010 Census, Argentinas estimated total
population was 40,117,096, and its foreign-born population was 1,800,000 , representing
4.5% of the total population (INDEC 2010). An astounding 60% of the foreign-born
population lives within the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires (CELS 2012, p. 325).
In Argentina there is an oft-quoted saying, the Argentines descended from the
boats, which suggests that all Argentines are descendants of European migrants. The vast
waves of European immigration at the start of the century were unquestionably influential
in the formation of modern Argentina. European migrants made up the vast majority of
migrants to the country during the greatest waves of immigration at the end of the 19th and
early 20th centuries.
0!
5!
10!
15!
20!
25!
30!
35!
1869! 1895! 1914! 1947! 1960! 1970! 1980! 1991! 2001! 2010!
Table'1''
Table 1: Argentina's Foreign Born Population as a Percentage of TotalPopulation (INDEC)
'
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
30/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!28!
A closer look at the historical statistics of migration to Argentina, however, also
reveals that this phrase leaves out other large populations that have immigrated to the
country throughout its history. Hidden behind the massive waves of European migrants
arriving at the turn of the twentieth century was a comparable small but steady stream of
migrants originating from neighbouring countries. In Argentina, migrants originating from
countries that border the nation are commonly referred to as migrantes limtrofes.
Regional migrants have hovered consistently around 2% of the total population throughout
most of Argentinas history. While the population of migrants from neighbouring countries
has not altered significantly over time as a proportion of the total population, it has come torepresent a much greater proportion of the foreign-born population. In 1914, migrants from
neighbouring countries made up only 8.6% of the foreign-born population. In 2010, they
constituted 68.9% of the foreign-born population.
0!
10!
20!
30!
40!
50!
60!
70!
80!
1869! 1895! 1914! 1947! 1960! 1970! 1980! 1991! 2001! 2010!
Table'2''
Limtrofe migrants (originating from a country that borders Argentina) as apercentage of the total foreign-born population (INDEC)
'
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
31/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 29!
CensusYear
TotalPopulation
Foreign-Born /
Total pop.
LimtrofeMigrants /Total pop.
Non-limtrofeMigrants /Total Pop.
LimtrofeMigrants /
Total Migrants
1869 1,737,076 12.1 2.4 9.7 19.7
1895 3,954,911 25.4 2.9 22.3 11.5
1914 7,885,237 29.9 2.6 27.3 8.6
1947 15,893,827 15.3 2.0 13.3 12.9
1960 20,010,539 13.0 2.3 10.7 17.9
1970 23,390,050 9.5 2.3 7.2 24.2
1980 27, 947, 446 6.8 2.7 4.1 39.6
1991 32,615, 528 5.0 2.5 2.4 50.2
2001 36,260,130 4.2 2.5 1.6 60.3
2010 40,117,096 4.5 3.1 1.4 68.9
THE HISTORY OF ARGENTINE MIGRATION POLICY
1810 1976
Given that migration has played such as key role in the development of Argentina,
perhaps it is not surprising that migratory policy has figured as a central policy of the
Argentine State since its independence in 1810. Indeed, migration and asylum policy have
been manipulated for political purposes throughout Argentinas political history.
Migration'Statistics'from'the'National'Census,'1869''2010'(INDEC).'
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
32/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!30!
Traditionally, immigration has been seen as a useful tool in populating the territory
of the country and in procuring the manpower necessary to develop it (Hines 2010, p. 474).
This openness towards migration is evident in famous statements made by important
Argentine statesmen in the nineteenth century. Juan B. Alberdi, whoseBases y puntos de
partida para la organizacin poltica de la Repblica Argentina (Basis and Points of
Departure for the Political Organization of the Argentine Republic) was the basis for the
1853 Constitution, stated, to govern is to populate. Early Argentine leaders were worried
about the sheer expanse of the countrys territory, which they viewed as empty and
wild. Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, the seventh president of Argentina, expressed thisconcern in his essay, Civilization and Barbarity:
The problem that afflicts the Argentine Republic is its extension: the desert thatsurrounds it on all sides the solitude, the under populated areas without a single
human inhabitant, are, in general, the unquestionable limits between one provinceand another. In those areas there is immensity all around: immense planes,
immense forests, immense rivers, the horizon always uncertain, getting confusedwith the earth In the North and the South the savages lie in wait; they wait until
moonlit nights to fall, as if a pack of hyenas, on the cattle that graze in the pasturesand against populations that cannot defend themselves.
A'memorial'to'Juan'Bautista'Alberdi'and'the'tomb'of'Domingo'Faustino'Sarmiento,'both'in'the'
Recoleta'Cemetery.'These'Argentine'founding'fathers'encouraged'migration'from'Europe'as'a'
means'of'developing'and'modernizing'the'Argentine'territory'(photos'taken'by'author)'
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
33/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 31!
Early Argentine politicians such as Alberdi and Sarmiento saw immigration or,
more specifically, European immigration as a means to populate and thereby gain control
of and develop this vast expense of territory.
In keeping with this positive view of the benefits that migration can provide
towards development, the Argentine Constitution of 1853 has a notably open view towards
migration; the foundational document recognizes the rights of migrants residing in
Argentina, and also obliges the government to encourage European migration in particular
(Oteiza and Novick, p. 4). One of the most significant sections of the Constitution in this
regard is the preamble, which states:
We, the representatives of the people of the Argentine Nation, gathered in GeneralConstituent Assembly by the will and election of the Provinces which compose it, in
fulfillment of pre-existing pacts, in order to form a national union, guaranteejustice, secure domestic peace, provide for the common defense, promote the
general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves, to our posterity,and to all men of the world who wish to dwell on argentine soil: invoking the
protection of God, source of all reason and justice: do ordain, decree, and establishthis Constitution for the Argentine Nation. (Argentine National Constitution,available in English at:
http://www.senado.gov.ar/web/interes/constitucion/english.php )
The section of this preamble that has been particularly significant with regards to migration
policy is the designation of rights to ourselvesour posterityand all men of the world
who wish to dwell on Argentine soil (Argentine Constitution); this phrase does not specify
citizens, but rather all men of the world who wish to dwell on argentine soil. Similarly,
sections 14, 18 and 19 outline certain rights to which all the inhabitants of the nation are
entitled. Additionally significant is section 20, which proclaims:
Foreigners enjoy within the territory of the Nation all the civil rights of citizens;they may exercise their industry, trade and profession; own real property, buy and
sell it; navigate the rivers and coasts; practice freely their religion; make wills andmarry under the laws. They are not obliged to accept citizenship nor to pay
extraordinary compulsory taxes. They may obtain naturalization papers residing
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
34/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!32!
two uninterrupted years in the Nation; but the authorities may shorten this term infavor of those so requesting it, alleging and proving services rendered to the
Republic. (Argentine National Constitution, available in English at:http://www.senado.gov.ar/web/interes/constitucion/english.php)
According to Enrique Oteiza and Susana Novick, this relatively generous view of
migration in the constitution was consolidate[ed] in subsequent decades, with government
decisions that finally opted for a wide opening, marking a clear preference in favor of
European immigration (Oteiza and Novick, p. 4).
The next significant document to regulate migration policy was the Ley
Avellaneda or Avellaneda Law which was sanctioned in 1876. This law remained in
place as the main piece of migratory legislation from 1876 through to 1981. Oteiza and
Novick argue this law formulated a clear policy of open doors, where the image of the
immigrant was associated with progress and civilization (Oteiza and Novick, p. 5).
Nevertheless, while migration has generally been seen in a positive light, the
twentieth century saw the gradual implementation of a series of laws that contradicted the
open sense of the Constitution and Avellaneda Law. Two significant pieces of legislation
were the Residence Law in 1902 and the Law of Social Defense in 1910. These laws were
largely a response to increasing social unrest and labor movements in the country, and were
generated on the assumption that Southern European migrants in particular were bringing
concepts of labor unions and agitation into the country. As such, both laws attempt to
control and eventually repress and expel those immigrants accused of taking part in
movements against the public order. Oteiza and Novick argue that here the image of the
immigrant is that of a being that is potentially dangerous. In particular, these laws were
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
35/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 33!
notable because they allowed the Executive branch to detain and/or deport migrants
without any judicial intervention (Oteiza and Novick, p. 5).
Ethnic discrimination has also strongly influenced perceptions of migration (Hines
2010, p. 474; Grimson 2005, p. 2); the central embodiment of this discrimination, as noted
by Mara Ins Pacecca and Corina Coutis, has been the predominance of an epic reading
of ancient European migration and a stigmatizing look at Latin American migration
(Pacecca y Coutis 2008, p. 7, authors translation).
As we explored above, from the 1930s onward, Argentina entered into an extensive
period of political turmoil. The political dynamics of a continuous oscillation between
democratic governments and military regimes had a significant impact with regard to
migration policy. Oteiza and Novick detail the pattern of migration policy during this
period:
The excessive legislation sanctioned by military regimes, and the migratory
amnesties put forth by all of the constitutional governments ( declared in thefollowing years: 1949, 1951, 1958, 1964, 1974, 1984, 1992) confirm the historicaltendency that shows military governments legislating through substantive laws
(which continue to in effect after the return to a democratic regime), and thedemocratic governments forming decrees of exception (amnesties), because they
are unable to sanction a new law (Oteiza and Novick, p. 6).
Despite efforts to the contrary, therefore, the main piece of migratory legislation for
much of Argentine history remained the Avellaneda Law, with executive administrative
decrees and amnesties marking the distinct perspectives of different regimes.
THE MILITARY JUNTA AND THE VIDELA LAW
In 1981, under the 1976 - 1983 military dictatorship, a new and restrictive
migration policy, Migration Law 22.439, was passed. This law is now known colloquially
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
36/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!34!
as the Ley Videla Videla Law - because it was approved under the authoritarian
government headed by General Jorge Rafael Videla. The law was intended to provide a
single and global text that would legislate all aspects of the migratory phenomenon. This
new legislation repealed the Avellaneda Law, thereby formally breaking with the
liberalist tradition in Argentine migration policy (Oteiza and Novick, pp. 6-7). Although
the liberal precepts of the Constitution and the Avellaneda Law had slowly been eroded by
the implementation of laws such as the Residence Law, Law of Social Defense, and the
legislation approved by a series of military dictatorships, the Videla Law codified a
restrictive policy unlike any previously seen in the country.
Under the dictatorship, migration was seen as a national security issue and policing
concern to be dealt with by the Minister of the Interior in the executive branch. The regime
thereby adopted a hardline approach to dealing with undocumented migrants in the country.
Additionally, as the authoritarian regime was highly nationalistic, the construction of
certain migrant populations as outsiders assisted in the construction of a narrow
conception of national identity, particularly in regards to ethnicity (Novick 2005, p. 7;
Ceriani Cernadas and Morales 2011, p. 9; Oteiza and Novick, p. 8).
Under this new legislation, there were few legal avenues for immigration, and
particularly few options for those immigrants who originated from neighboring countries
(Hines 2010, p. 472; 475). The Minister of the Interior had the ultimate power to interpret
the categories of admission and to establish entry requirements (Oteiza and Novick pp. 7-
8). The policy thereby resulted in the growth of a large population of undocumented
immigrants, whose lack of legal status left them in a state of particular vulnerability
(Pacecca y Courtis 2008, p. 42). Building off of legislation passed in the previous military
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
37/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 35!
dictatorship (1966 to 1970), the Videla Law forbid undocumented foreigners from
participating in paid tasks or activities. Whats more, public employees (including the
employees of public hospital and the educational system) as well as certain business people
(such as the owners of hotels), were actually required to denounce any person they should
find to be lacking documentation (Oteiza and Novick, p. 7).
The law gave the Minister of the Interior power of deportation in many cases,
without judicial oversight particularly for those foreigners who had been found guilty of a
crime that had a penalty of more than five years in prison, and those who had been accused
of participating in activities that affected social peace, national security, or public order.
Those migrants perceived to fall into either of these categories could be deported regardless
of their migratory status (Oteiza and Novick, p. 7). One can imagine the significance of
these two possibilities for deportation under the Process of National Reorganization.
Despite the restrictive policies of the Videla Law, the full name of the law was the
General Law of Migration and the Promotion of Immigration, and the legislation did
express desire to increase the population by attracting foreigners. Building off of a long
history of preference for European migrants, however, the law was particularly interested in
attracting migrants of European descent. (Oteiza and Novick, pp. 6-7).
1983 2003: DICTATORIAL NORMS IN DEMOCRACY
Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the history of the Videla Law is not its
initial passage, but rather its endurance after the return to democracy. Although many laws
were changed as a part of the transition following the fall of the junta most significantly
with a legislative overhaul in 1994 the Videla Law remained effective until the passage of
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
38/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!36!
the 2004 Migration Law (Hines 2010, p. 472). The law therefore outlived the authoritarian
period and was maintained through re-democratization, taking nearly 20 years to be
overturned. In this period, migrants continued to be highly stigmatized and manipulated as
the object of a political agenda.
In the two decades between 1983 and 2004, subsequent democratic administrations
modified the way that the Videla Law was implemented through executive decrees and the
use of amnesties. This pattern is similar to that already observed in the period between the
1930s and 1980s, when the alternation of democracy and dictatorship saw new laws
implemented by the dictatorships and emergency amnesties passed by democratic regimes.
Ral Alfonsn was the first democratically elected president in Argentina after the
1976 1983 military dictatorship. His administration was dominated by many issues other
than migration, including the trial of former military leaders, processes of transitional
justice and escalating inflation. The year after Alfonsn gained power, his government
launched an amnesty. The only law passed during the Alfonsn administration that dealt
expressly with migration was the 1988 Law 23.564, which served only to modify the
executive regulation of the Videla Law. For example, it adjusted fines for various
violations (Oteiza and Novick, pp.4; 8).
After Alfonsn, Carlos Menm was elected to the presidency. The Menm years
were marked by dual outlooks towards migration. On the one hand, in Menms first termat the beginning of the 1990s, the administration seems to have taken a realist approach to
migration issues, declaring an amnesty in 1992. As Menms second term unfolded,
however, high-ranking public officials in various offices began to use increasingly
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
39/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 37!
xenophobic rhetoric. Alejandro Grimson recounts that in the most extreme moments at the
close of the twentieth century there was a systematic campaign of migrant detention
(Grimson 2005, p. 9). One common interpretation of this rhetoric and practice is that as
neoliberal policies implemented by Menms administration began to show signs of failure
in what would ultimately become the 1999-2002, migrants were used as a scapegoat to
deflect negative attention.
Oteiza and Novick analyze the Menm administrations practices with regards to
migration in great depth, in their article, Poltica migratoria y derechos humanos en un
contexto de ajustes y reformas neoliberales. Argentina: 1989 1999 (Gobierno de
Menm). They observe that during the 1990s, Argentina was going through significant
social changes. As previously noted, the demographic composition of the foreign-born
population had altered. European migration to Argentina was way down as compared to the
beginning of the twentieth century, while migration from neighboring countries remained
consistent. In addition, other migratory groups, including Peruvians, Chinese, Taiwanese
and Koreans, began to have a more significant presence. Finally, emigration from
Argentina had increased. What had begun as political emigration under the dictatorship was
now becoming an economic emigration (Oteiza and Novick, p.2).
The Videla Law remained in power throughout the Menm administration. When
the Constitution was reformed in 1994, no changes were made to the articles that related to
migration policy. Several international human rights treaties adopted at the time of the
constitutional reform. Under Argentine law, these treaties hold constitutional weight.
(Oteiza and Novick, pp. 4-5).
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
40/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!38!
In the notorious height of the economic crisis, when Argentina passed through five
presidents in merely a week, migration was hardly a central concern. Indeed, for all that
migrants had been a focus as the crisis escalated, when the worst of the crisis hit, this
xenophobic rhetoric faded in the face of vast and deep-reaching economic meltdown.
THE KIRCHNERS: A NEW PARADIGM IN MIGRATION AND ASYLUM POLICY
As we have seen, the replacement of theLey General de migraciones y Fomento de
la Inmigracin No. 22.439by the Law 25.871,Ley de Migraciones(see Argentine Republic
2004) was only one in a long history of transitions in Argentine migratory policy (Pacecca
y Courtis 2008, pp. 41-43; Hines 2010, pp. 479 - 480). Historically, migration policy in
Argentina has reflected societal trends and dominant socio-political currents.
Compared with the Videla Law, the new Migration Law represents an enormous
paradigm shift because of its progressive character. Of utmost importance, it recognizes the
right to migrate as a human right (Argentine Republic 2004, art. 4; Novick 2005, p. 15):
The right to migrate is essential and inalienable to each individual and the
Argentine Republic gaurentees this right on the basiss of the principles of equality
and universality (Argentine Republic 2004, art. 4)
In its 2012 Annual Report, the Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS) a
well-respected human rights NGO in Argentina noted that the imposition of the new
Migration Law significantly changed the form of regulating the rights of migrants in
Argentina. The CELS notes that with the passage of the 2004 Migration Law, Argentina
moved from the model of police management with regards to [migration], founded in the
doctrine of national security as enshrined in the Videla Law to a model of
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
41/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 39!
management that recognizes migration as a human right and, whats more, obliges the State
to establish mechanisms to regularize migration, guarantees access to the judiciary in all
detention or deportation proceedings and eliminates differentiation between nationals and
foreigners with regards to access to rights (CELS 2012, p. 326).
Whereas under the Videla Law, detention and deportation figured prominently as
responses to undocumented migration, under the new law, the focus shifted to
regularization, and the use of detention is very restricted. While before were few legal
avenues for immigration, access to social services was restricted, and neither the protection
of migrants rights nor the prevention of discrimination was mentioned, under the 2004
Migration Law, there are more legal avenues for migration, particularly for migrants from
neighboring countries, constitutional rights and human rights are extended to all
immigrants in the country, including rights to social services, education, justice,
employment social security, and family reunification (Argentine Republic 2004, art. 5;
Ceriani Cernadas and Morales 2011, p. 11). Additionally, the law grants all migrants
regardless of their legal status the right to education, health and social assistance
(Argentine Republic 2004, art. 7-8; Hines 2010, p. 481; Pacecca y Courtis 2008, pp. 44
47; CELS, p. 3). Barbara Hines notes that there was even a semantic transition between the
laws, with the rejection of the term illegal in favor of irregular (Hines 2010, p. 490).
The fulfillment of the 2004 Migration Law came with the publication of its
administrative regulation in the form of an executive in 2010. This decree established more
concrete guidelines for the implementation of the law (Ceriani Cernadas y Morales 2011, p.
6; CELS 2010, p. 1) (see Argentine Republic 2010). In 2007, Argentina ratified the
International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
42/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!40!
Their Families, and the National Ombudsman created the Migrant Commission, which
provides legal aid (CELS 2012, pp. 327 - 328).
REFUGEE!LAW!!
As a special component of migration policy, the topic of refugee law is of particular
relevance to the discussion of authoritarian legacies because many members of society
and indeed, many politicians in Argentina were themselves exiles during the authoritarian
period. In violation of international norms and despite the fact that the country had ratified
the international Refugee Convention in 1951 and its additional protocol in 1967 (Pacecca
and Courtis, p. 48), the Argentine military junta along with contemporary dictatorial
powers in neighboring states did not respect international asylum practices. The
Southern Cone dictatorships during this period were known to return asylum seekers to
neighboring regimes as component of the notorious cooperative Operation Condr.
The first change in refuge policy came immediately following the return to
democracy, as in 1984 the country created the CEPARE, or the Committee of Eligibility
for Refugees, the group formally charged with the evaluation asylum cases (Pacecca and
Courtis, p. 48). Argentina was part of a greater regional movement towards better
protection of refugees and asylum seekers, as exemplified by treaties such as the
aforementioned Cartagena Declaration on Refugees (1984) and the Mexico Plan of Action
(2004), to both of which Argentina is a party.
In 2006, Argentina passed the Ley 26.165,Ley General de Reconocimiento y
Proteccin al Refugiado (Law of Recognition and Protection of Refugees). This law came
as the culmination of steps taken throughout the re-democratization period to better protect
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
43/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 41!
the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Argentina. It formally codifies rights for these
populations and legally establishes the process by which asylum cases are evaluated
(Pacecca and Courtis, p. 48). The Refugee Law establishes the CONARE, or National
Commission for Refugees, which is charged with deciding on asylum cases and made up of
five representatives of different government ministries and two members that have a voice
but not a vote, UNHCR and a domestic NGO (Pacecca and Courtis, p. 48). The committee
uses as a basis for evaluating cases the 1951 Refugee Convention, the 1967 Protocol, and
the Cartagena Declaration on Refugees (Pacecca and Courtis, p. 48).
As of April 2013, the executive decree providing administrative regulation for the
Refugee Law had still not been released. When the National Ombudsman created the
Migrant Commission in 2007, they also created the Commission on the Assistance and
Protection of Refugees, which gives refugees legal counsel when they interact with the
judiciary system (CELS 2012, p. 328). The Commission also has increasingly taken on
different areas of social support for the refugee population. The exact nature of this support,
however, is one of the sticking issues in the process of forming the executive decree and
thus has not yet been formally codified.
THE FORMATION OF A LAW
In order to fully understand what factors influenced the passages of these two laws,
it is important to consider how these laws came to be. In his book, Migration: A Human
Right, Senator Gustinianni, the socialist legislator who proposed the new Migration law,
explains that the Commission on Population and Human Resources of the Chamber of
Deputies began to focus on reforming the migration law as its principal task since he took
over its leadership in 2000. Senator Gustinianni remembers, We were conscious that if for
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
44/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
!42!
two decades of democracy the Argentine Parliament had not sanctioned a new migration
law it was not because the law was a forgotten question or because the legislature
considered it unimportant. He observes that there had been many positive attempts that
got stalled along the way because in debates on migration policy outdated, xenophobic,
discriminatory and authoritarian tendencies routinely arose. As we have discussed, the
question of migration policy had long been a controversial one in Argentina. Part of the
reason that historically migration policy has more often been modified through decrees or
administrative regulations rather than through new legislation was that the creation of new
legislation represented an enormous huge political challenge. (Gustinianni 2004, p. 14).The 2004 Migration Law was passed as a closed legislation without debate in the Congress.
-
7/30/2019 Constructing Migrants Rights
45/160
Kelsey Jost-CreeganSenior Honors ThesisCurriculum in Global Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill
! 43!
CHAPTER 3: LITERATURE REVIEW
Despite Argentinas long history of migr