haynesville re-frac study

24
Todd Bush Principal, Energent Group [email protected] http://www.energentgroup.com @EnergentGroup HAYNESVILLE RE-FRAC STUDY THE ENERGY FORUM HOUSTON, TX

Upload: energent-group

Post on 19-Aug-2015

54 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

Todd BushPrincipal, Energent Group

[email protected]

http://www.energentgroup.com @EnergentGroup

HAYNESVILLE RE-FRAC STUDYTHE ENERGY FORUM

HOUSTON, TX

Page 2: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

2

TODAY’S DISCUSSION

• About Energent Group • Landscape for 2015• Company perspectives• Re-frac study goals• Initial findings

Page 3: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

3

ABOUT ENERGENT GROUPEnergent Group is a market research firm focused on well life-cycle & frac market intelligence. We help sales & marketing teams commercialize new products, work with up-to-date operator data, & track well completions in top U.S. shale

plays.

FEATURED IN

DATARESEARCH SOFTWARE

Page 4: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

4

HAYNESVILLE HISTORY

1) EIA

Jan-07

Apr-07Jul-0

7

Oct-07

Jan-08

Apr-08Jul-0

8

Oct-08

Jan-09

Apr-09Jul-0

9

Oct-09

Jan-10

Apr-10Jul-1

0

Oct-10

Jan-11

Apr-11Jul-1

1

Oct-11

Jan-12

Apr-12Jul-1

2

Oct-12

Jan-13

Apr-13Jul-1

3

Oct-13

Jan-14

Apr-14Jul-1

4

Oct-14

Jan-15

Apr-15Jul-1

5 -

50

100

150

200

250

300

-

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

Total production Rig count

Page 5: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

5

REFRAC POTENTIAL BUT TOO EARLY?Using the Haynesville play as their testing grounds for refracs before they move to other plays like the Eagle Ford. Refracing a small portion of the wellbore and that the technology needs to advance before it is brought to a larger scale

Identified more then 270 potential candidates in the Haynesville with a current natural gas breakeven price of $3.00/Mcf looking to achieve a breakeven price of $2.35/Mcf in the future

About 100 wells in their scope for potential refracs which were drilled between 2010 and 2012 that used a completion technique that used longer stage spacing and less proppant per foot

Has not pursed refrac opportunities and believes economics of drilling new wells are better as drilling costs head lower

Page 6: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

6

HAL & SLB SEE U.S. DEMAND

• Successful refracs which have been used in 12 basins around the world

• Have seen an increase in demand for use in the U.S

• The economics are appealing to not only them but their clients as well and their technology was built with refracing in mind

• Identified 10,000 wells in the U.S. and has high-graded 2,000 of them – Willing to cover the cost of

the refrac and get paid off of production

– Relying on their expertise and technological developments they have made

• Looking at group of wells to refrac instead of single well candidates

Page 7: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

7

APPROACH TO HAYNESVILLE STUDY

PurposeDetermine operators, service companies, and suppliers involved in re-fracs in the Haynesville

ScopeExamine 40 initial completions and re-fracs in the Haynesville to understand economics, performance, and products

Initial Findings• Most re-fracs utilize less proppant • Many show ROI within 12 months• Production uplift varies across

operators & material used

Page 8: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

8

WORKING ASSUMPTIONS• Selected Haynesville

due to operator activity and vintage of horizontal completions

• Find cases where initial completion and refrac identified

• Sample size of 40 wells with historical data

Well Cost Assumptions:• Stage• Proppants (sand, rcs, &

ceramic)• Water• ChemicalsData Available:• Original Well Costs• Frac job (dates, stages,

proppants, etc.)• Production volumes• Lateral length

Page 9: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

9

REFRAC LOCATIONS BY OPERATOR

1) Energent data, Loouisiana DNR, FracFocus

Page 10: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

10

SAMPLE WELL COSTS

Original Well Cost $7.9 MM $9.4 MM $10.3 MM

Estimated Refrac Cost $1.7 MM $1.1 MM $1.2 MM

Percent of Original Cost 22% 12% 12%

Using $1.5 MM for estimated refrac costs for presentation. Report estimates refrac based on stages, water, proppant, and

chemicals costs.

OPERATOR A OPERATOR B OPERATOR C

Page 11: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

11

RED RIVER PARRISH REFRAC

-24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 -18 -17 -16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1

10

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

1,000,000

OPERATOR A

Actual (MCF) Forecast No Refrac

Prod

uctio

n M

CF

1) Refrac costs $1.5M2) NPV and IRR based on 24 months of uplift with no terminal value

Notes:• 40x increase in 1st month’s production• ~14 month payback• $228K NPV@10% (39.1% IRR)• Hybrid fluid with Nu Flow (FTSI)• 40% less water, 8% less proppant

Page 12: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

12

-24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 -18 -17 -16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1

10

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

OPERATOR B

Actual (MCF) Forecast No Refrac

Prod

uctio

n M

CFRED RIVER PARRISH REFRAC

1) Refrac costs $1.5M2) NPV and IRR based on 24 months of uplift with no terminal value

Notes:• 13x increase in 1st month’s production• Negative 24 month NPV with $1.5M refrac costs;

however, 13 month payback at $1M refrac cost• Actual costs expected to be much less due to water

and proppant volumes• Slickwater fluid (SLB)• 64% less water, 60% less proppant

Page 13: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

13

-24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 -18 -17 -16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1

10

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

OPERATOR C

Actual (MCF) Forecast No Refrac

Prod

uctio

n M

CFRED RIVER PARRISH REFRAC

1) Refrac costs $1.5M2) NPV and IRR based on 24 months of uplift with no terminal value

Notes:• 55x increase in 1st month’s production• Negative 24 month NPV with $1.5M refrac costs;

however, 10 month payback at $1M refrac cost• Actual costs expected to be much less due to water

and proppant volumes• Hybrid fluid (HAL)• 39% less water, 8% less proppant

Page 14: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

14

DE SOTO PARRISH REFRAC

1) Refrac costs $1.5M2) NPV and IRR based on 24 months of uplift with no terminal value

-24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 -18 -17 -16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1

10

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

OPERATOR B

Actual (MCF) Forecast No Refrac

Prod

uctio

n M

CF

Notes:• 10x increase in 1st month’s production• ~12 month payback• $325k NPV@10% (48.5% IRR)• Hybrid fluid with BioVert (HAL)• 41% less water, 33% increase in proppant

Page 15: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

15

$9.1M WITH 3.2M LBS PROPPANT

2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 -

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

7,000,000

8,000,000

Proppant Intensity (M lbs.)

Lateral Feet

Pro

pp

an

t (M

of

lbs

.)

2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 55000.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

Initial Well Cost ($M)

Lateral Feet

Cost

($M

)

Page 16: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

16

TOP QUARTILE SKEW REFRAC RETURNS

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 -

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

Stages

Number of Stages

Gas

Pro

ducti

on (m

cf)

Page 17: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

17

REFRACS CONTINUE TO BE ATTRACTIVE

Operator Strategy Economics Risks

• Some operators have made strategic choices to develop & execute refrac programs in Haynesville

• Several testing waters to understand plan forward

• Optimize entire field or single well

• Attractive economics compared to new well costs & timeframe

• Refracs show 2x – 10x production improvement

• Returns are dependent upon cost of refrac and well performance

• Candidate selection continues to be challenge

• High variability in production from sample

• Commodity prices may limit refrac returns

Top refrac jobs produce near 90 & 120 day IP rates, so expect more refracs discussed, tested, and evaluated

Page 18: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

Todd BushPrincipal, Energent Group

[email protected]

http://www.energentgroup.com @EnergentGroup

HAYNESVILLE RE-FRAC STUDYTHE ENERGY FORUM

HOUSTON, TX

Page 19: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

19

ResearchData

Software

PRODUCT CAPABILITIES

Page 20: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

CONFIDENTIAL 20

SPOT SHALE PLAY TRENDS

Page 21: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

CONFIDENTIAL 21

DISCOVER PROPPANT TRENDS

Analyze all operators and basins or a combination

Review raw sand, ceramic, and resin proppant per job

View nationwide proppant trends overtime across all basins

Page 22: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

CONFIDENTIAL 22

ONE-CLICK ANALYSIS OF OPERATOR

Analyze single operator – Pioneer selected

Identify key pressure pumpers relationships by basin or overall

Page 23: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

CONFIDENTIAL 23

SEARCH WELL AND FRAC DETAILS

Get answers to questions like “in the last year, how many HAL frac jobs in Wyoming used resin coated sand?”

Review frac job details to get single well view

Page 24: Haynesville Re-Frac Study

CONFIDENTIAL 24

PRODUCT LINES & PRICING

$3,000 - $50,000/month Varies depending on use $179 - $5,500/month

Provide retainer monthly, quarterly, and annual market

research services

Deliver daily and weekly shale data for Upstream companies

across US

Enable field and office workers to access drilling, completion,

& frac details

• Drilling activity• Well starts• Frac sand usage• Top operators• Top counties• Benchmarking• Play specific research

• Drilling permits• Rig activity• Rig equipment• Well completions• Wellbore details• Frac sand • Frac fluids • Oil & gas production1

• Monitor operators• Track suppliers• Review completion design and

results• Search for drilling and frac jobs• Integrate with internal workflow

1) In progress

DATARESEARCH SOFTWARE