harvey ’s creek trail/greenway feasibility/master...

Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway

Feasibility/Master Plan

June 29, 2012

Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway

Feasibility/Master Plan

June 29, 2012

Prepared for:

Prepared by:

7075 Lovers Lane

Kempton, PA 19529 (610) 703-2564

wenviro.com

_____________________________ George A. White III Environmental Consultant

Table of Contents

Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway Feasibility/Master Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter/Section Page 1.0 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Study Purpose ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Demand for and Potential Use of Trail .................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Background Information 3.1 Description of Study Area ...................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Regional History .................................................................................................... 3-1 4.0 Existing Conditions 4.1 Current Trail System ............................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Existing Land Use ................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Topography ............................................................................................................. 4-3 4.4 Natural Features ...................................................................................................... 4-5 4.5 Wildlife Habitat ...................................................................................................... 4-5 4.6 Key Destinations ..................................................................................................... 4-5 4.7 Property Ownership ............................................................................................... 4-6 4.8 Environmental Contamination ................................................................................ 4-6 5.0 Trail Planning Process 5.1 Trail Planning Consultants ...................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Geographic Information System (GIS) Database ................................................... 5-1 5.3 Public Participation ................................................................................................. 5-1 5.4 Development of the Trail Master Plan .................................................................... 5-7 6.0 Proposed Trail / Greenway System 6.1 Proposed Trail / Greenway Overview ......................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section I ................................................................................. 6-5 6.3 Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section II .............................................................................. 6-12 6.4 Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section III ............................................................................ 6-19 6.5 Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section IV ............................................................................ 6-25 7.0 Design Standards 7.1 Trails ..................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Trail Intersections ................................................................................................... 7-5 7.3 Auxiliary Structures ................................................................................................ 7-7 7.4 Trail Signage ........................................................................................................... 7-8 7.5 Accessibility .......................................................................................................... 7-10

Table of Contents


8.0 Trail Operation, Maintenance and Security Plan 8.1 Ownership/Maintenance/Management Options...................................................... 8-1 8.2 Trail Maintenance ................................................................................................... 8-3 8.3 Trail Security .......................................................................................................... 8-5 8.4 Potential Roles of Public and Non-Public Agencies .............................................. 8-5 8.5 Areas for In-Kind Contributions from Involved Entities. ....................................... 8-7 9.0 Financial Feasibility Analysis 9.1 Required land acquisition or purchase of easements ................................................. 9-1 9.2 Cost estimates for developing the trail and for proposed facilities ............................ 9-2 9.3 Phased implementation plan .................................................................................... 9-6 10.0 References ..................................................................................................................... 10-1 Appendices Meeting Minutes .............................................................................................. Appendix A Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Index (PNDI) Receipts ................................... Appendix B List of Tables & Figures Figure 2-1: Regional Key Map ....................................................................................... 2-5 Figure 2-2: Map of Study Area ....................................................................................... 2-6 Figure 4-1: Existing Trail System ................................................................................... 4-4 Table 4-1: Rare Species Identified within the Study Area by the PNDI ........................ 4-5 Table 4-2: Key Destinations with the Study Area .......................................................... 4-5 Figure 6-1: Proposed Trail Corridors (topo) ................................................................... 6-2 Figure 6-2: Proposed Trail Corridors (aerial photo) ....................................................... 6-3 Figure 6-3: Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section I ................................................................. 6-4 Figure 6-4: Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section II .............................................................. 6-11 Figure 6-5: Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section III ............................................................. 6-18 Figure 6-5: Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section IV ............................................................ 6-24 Figure 7-1: Typical Trail Detail (dirt surface) ................................................................ 7-2 Figure 7-2: Typical Trail Detail (hard surface) ............................................................... 7-3 Figure 7-3: Typical Pavement Marking for Bicycle Lanes ............................................ 7-4 Figure 7-4: Typical Signing & Marking for Road Crossings ......................................... 7-5 Table 8-1: Typical Trail Maintenance Tasks .................................................................. 8-4 Table 8-2: Common Maintenance Tasks for Volunteers ................................................ 8-7 Table 9-1: Cost Estimates - Section I of the Harvey’s Creek Trail ................................ 9-2 Table 9-2: Cost Estimates - Section II of the Harvey’s Creek Trail ............................... 9-3 Table 9-3: Cost Estimates - Section III of the Harvey’s Creek Trail.............................. 9-4 Table 9-4: Cost Estimates - Section IV of the Harvey’s Creek Trail ............................. 9-5

Acknowledgements


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnerships Program, Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund, under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. We gratefully acknowledge the agencies and organizations that provided additional financial assistance for the development of this Plan: Luzerne County Eastman Kodak Company and The Conservation Fund Edith Reynolds Trust

Early on in the trail planning process a steering committee was developed to guide the planning process. The committee consisted of representatives from various organizations including state, county and local municipal governments, area businesses, non-profit organizations, local watershed groups, school district, local health care organizations and many others. We gratefully acknowledge the numerous individuals and groups that served on the Steering Committee who provided their time and invaluable assistance. Their insights and guidance greatly expanded the perspective, resources, technical integrity and community applicability of the Plan and were greatly appreciated. Those who attended meetings and provided guidance include: Name Organization

Sen. Lisa Baker PA State Senate Rep. Karen Boback PA House of Representatives Jim Brozena Luzerne County Flood Protection Authority Tracey Carr Dallas Borough Gale Conrad Plymouth Township Vincent Cotrone River Front Parks Mark Cross Pennsylvania American Water Lee Curry NEPA Mountain Bike Association Mary Ellen Demchak Plymouth Township Jacqueline Dickman Earth Conservancy Lee Eckert Dallas Borough Dale Freudenberger Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Frank Galicki Dallas School District Joseph Gibbons Luzerne County Steven Grzymski Plymouth Township Ben Hardy PA DCNR Bureau of Forestry Bobby Hivish Kingston Township Terry Hough PA DCNR Glenn Howell Dallas Township Lance Kittelson Susquehanna Warrior Trail Council Francis Kopko Harvey's Lake Borough Nicholas Lylo PA DCNR Bureau of Forestry Julie McMonagle Anthracite Scenic Trails Association James McGovern Lake Lehman School District Rep. Gerald Mullery PA House of Representatives Rep. Phyllis Mundy PA House of Representatives Lonnie Piatt Lake Township Lorne Possinger PA DCNR J Carlene Price Lake Township Andrew Reilly Redevelopment Authority of Luzerne County James Reino Kingston Township Judy Rimple Anthracite Scenic Trails Association

Acknowledgements


Denise Rittinger Jackson Township Jon Rogers Lehman Township Michelle Schasberger Wyoming Valley Wellness Trail Partnership Kathleen Sebastian Kingston Township Bob Skulsky Greater Hazleton Area Civic Partnership Karen Soifer Borton Lawson Larry Spaciano Dallas Area Municipal Authority David Sutton Lehman Township Susan Sutton Harvey's Lake Borough Mike Tribendis Jackson Township Douglas Trumbower Lake Township Joseph Ulozas PA DCNR Bureau of Forestry Phillip Walter Dallas Township John Wilkes Jackson Township Sen. John Yudichak PA State Senate

Chapter 1: Executive Summary

Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway Feasibility/Master Page 1-1

CHAPTER 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) received funding to prepare a Trail/Greenway Plan for the proposed Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway. Several local and regional planning efforts have identified recreation within Luzerne County as a high priority. Several recreational facilities including the Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the Back Mountain Trail, Back Mountain Recreation Park, Moon Lake Park, the Lackawanna Forestry Tract, recently acquired Theta Lands along Harvey’s Creek and Pennsylvania State Forest lands are heavily utilized by both local residents and tourists. However, these recreational areas are physically isolated from each other. The Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway was proposed as a way to connect these existing recreational facilities through a trail/greenway corridor network thereby supporting the goals of several recreational planning efforts in Luzerne County as well as promoting the goals of the Pocono Forest and Waters Conservation Landscape to conserve local natural and outdoor recreational resources and contribute to communities’ economic and physical health. STUDY AREA The Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway Plan study area is located in the Harvey’s Creek Watershed in central Luzerne County within the municipalities of Dallas and Harvey’s Lake Boroughs and Dallas, Jackson, Kingston, Lake, Lehman and Plymouth Townships. The Harvey’s Lake Watershed is 3,629 acres in size and is located in the Upper Susquehanna - Lackawanna Watershed. Harvey’s Creek is a 14.5-mile-long tributary of the Susquehanna River and joins the Susquehanna River at the village of West Nanticoke, across the river from the City of Nanticoke. The proposed Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway will not only serve the local residents of the study area municipalities but additionally the residents of the Greater Wyoming Valley, as well as, tourist visiting the region. The Trail/Greenway Plan proposes a trail alignment that will connect to two existing trails, the Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the Back Mountain Trail, as well as, provide connections to other recreational facilities and key destinations such as the Back Mountain Recreation Area, Moon Lake Park, Pennsylvania American Water property, Pennsylvania State Forest Lackawanna Tract and area schools and colleges. This trail/greenway will ultimately compliment the growing network of over 100 miles of trails in Luzerne County. PUBLIC INPUT PEC organized and hosted a public meeting on June 29, 2011 at the Penn State Wilkes-Barre Campus in order to provide information on the background and scope of the project, discuss the potential benefits to the local communities of trail and greenway development and solicit input from the community regarding the project. The Consultant provided PEC with ownership information on 300 properties within the study area to whom PEC directly mailed information regarding the first public meeting. A Trail Steering Committee was selected by PEC. Members of the steering committee included representatives from impacted municipalities, local trail organizations, Pennsylvania State Forest, local non-profits, local business leaders, neighborhood and community groups and local residents. The steering committee met over the course of the project. A series of three (3) meetings were held at which the consultant and PEC provided progress updates on the plan and



solicited insight and guidance from the steering committee regarding the priorities and issues of the local community. A portable GIS system was used by the Consultant to provide interactive GIS presentations during the committee meetings. This technology provided instantaneous access to invaluable information needed to make key decisions in the trail planning process. The committee provided local insight into regional issues that impacted the project. Key destinations, preferred trail routes, and other key decisions were made by the steering committee. Various representatives from the Harvey’s Creek area as well as community organizations participated in the planning process through the steering committee meetings. Therefore, the steering committee determined it was not necessary to conduct extensive key person interviews. However, PEC conduct key person interviews with the five (5) individuals. A major component of the Plan was to determine what the priorities of local citizens were with regards to the trail including potential trail alignments, trail amenities, connections and other general issues and concerns regarding the development of the trail. This goal was accomplished by distributing a public survey during the planning process for the project. Public surveys were distributed via a variety of means including distribution by steering committee members to their respective service populations. PEC also direct mailed three hundred (300) surveys to a random sample of property owners residing within the study area. PEC also utilized the web site based survey tool, Survey Monkey, to distribute the public survey to an e-mail distribution list. Two local media outlets that attended the first public meeting and subsequently published articles regarding the trail/greenway planning efforts also included the URL link to the survey within their respective articles written about the project. PEC also distributed the survey at a series of public events focused on trails and alternative transportation. Twenty-Two (22) surveys were received. The final public meeting was held on June 27, 2012 at the Penn State Wilkes-Barre Campus. The purpose of the final public meeting was to present the draft final trail/greenway plan to the public. PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM In reviewing potential trail routes which best met the project goals, it was found that the southern portion of the trail was the most difficult to plan. Due to the steep slopes of Larksville Mountain and the ravine surrounding Harvey’s Creek, a feasible route was difficult to find. Several routes along Harvey’s Creek and Route 29 were explored. However, none were determined to be viable for the proposed trail. GIS review of the Luzerne County parcel mapping, topography and aerial photos identified a property on the southern slope of Larksville Mountain which had been conserved through the North Branch Land Trust. A review of the PAMAP LiDar Topography of this property, followed by a site walk found that there are existing woods roads on this property which can be used to reach the top of the mountain. Once to the top of the mountain, the remaining trail route developed smoothly. Existing and planned trails within the State Forest were used to link the proposed trail route to the Harvey’s Creek Flume. This historic structure had been used to transport drinking water from the Pike’s Creek Reservoir and Harvey’s Creek to a mountain top reservoir above Plymouth. The grade of this flume is very gradual and makes an ideal route for the trail as it heads north. The flume runs through portions of the State Forest, Moon Lake Park and PA American Water property.



After leaving the flume, the trail will run north through the State Forest as it follows the forested valley along Harvey’s Creek. Above Route 118, the trail route will run along the edges of an existing pasture and enter into the Back Mountain Recreation Area. Following the Rec Area’s existing trail system, the trail will pass over a hill and turn east to follow an existing pipeline right of way to the towards the Luzerne County Fairgrounds. Continuing east towards Dallas, the trail’s route will pass through a forested section of privately owned property and onto and undeveloped street right of way. After passing through a commercial complex, the trail will cross Route 415 and lead towards it’s terminus at the Back Mountain Trail on the campus of Misericordia University. For the sake of this report, we have divided the trail into four sections. Key destinations have been selected as the beginning and ending points of each of the sections, which allows each section to be developed independently. The four sections of the Harvey’s Creek Trail System are: Section I: Susquehanna Warrior Trail to Pikes Creek Reservoir Section II: Pikes Creek to Back Mountain Recreation Area Section III: Back Mountain Recreation Area to Back Mountain Trail Section IV: Lehman Connector Trail (Penn State Campus to Back Mt. Rec. Area) TRAIL OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SECURITY There are several examples of potential entities or organizational structures which could fulfill the role for trail ownership, maintenance and/or management. The most appropriate structure may involve one or a combination of the following:

• Formation of a Non-Profit Organization • Creation of an Authority • Creation of a Commission • Creation of a Council of Governments • Volunteer and “Friends” Group • Ownership by the ASTA, SWTC • Ownership by Pennsylvania DCNR Bureau of Forestry

Chapter 2: Introduction


CHAPTER 2: INTRODUCTION 2.1 Study Purpose Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) received funding to prepare a Trail/Greenway Plan for the proposed Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway. Several local and regional planning efforts have identified recreation within Luzerne County as a high priority. Several recreational facilities including the Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the Back Mountain Trail, Back Mountain Recreation Park, Moon Lake Park, the Lackawanna Forestry Tract, recently acquired Theta Lands along Harvey’s Creek and Pennsylvania State Forest lands are heavily utilized by both local residents and tourists. However, these recreational areas are physically isolated from each other. The Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway was proposed as a way to connect these existing recreational facilities through a trail/greenway corridor network thereby supporting the goals of several recreational planning efforts in Luzerne County as well as promoting the goals of the Pocono Forest and Waters Conservation Landscape to conserve local natural and outdoor recreational resources and contribute to communities’ economic and physical health. PEC applied for and received a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) that partially funded the planning efforts for this project. The goal of this project has been to define in sufficient detail the wishes of the community and its priorities as they relate to the trail/greenway alignment and amenities, estimate trail/greenway construction and maintenance costs, and lay the foundation for the entity(s) which will ultimately be responsible for the development and maintenance of the trail. 2.2 Demand for and Potential Use of Trail

2.2.1 Project Service Area The Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway Plan study area is located in the Harvey’s Creek Watershed in central Luzerne County within the municipalities of Dallas and Harvey’s Lake Boroughs and Dallas, Jackson, Kingston, Lake, Lehman and Plymouth Townships (See Figures 2-1 and 2-2). The Harvey’s Lake Watershed is 3,629 acres in size and is located in the Upper Susquehanna - Lackawanna Watershed. Harvey’s Creek is a 14.5-mile-long tributary of the Susquehanna River and joins the Susquehanna River at the village of West Nanticoke, across the river from the City of Nanticoke. The proposed Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway will not only serve the local residents of the study area municipalities but additionally the residents of the Greater Wyoming Valley, as well as, tourist visiting the region. The Trail/Greenway Plan proposes a trail alignment that will connect to two existing trails, the Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the Back Mountain Trail, as well as, provide connections to other recreational facilities and key destinations such as the Back Mountain Recreation Area, Moon Lake Park, Pennsylvania American Water property, Pennsylvania State Forest Lackawanna Tract and area schools and colleges. This trail/greenway will ultimately compliment the growing network of over 100 miles of trails in Luzerne County.

2.2.2 Community Character Dallas Borough According to the US 2010 Census the current population of Dallas Borough is 2,804 residents and consists of a total land area of approximately 2.2 square miles resulting in a population density of 1,274.5 persons per square mile. Dallas Borough was created by a charter granted April 21, 1879, from land entirely within Dallas Township. The Borough was formed in 1817 and was named for Alexander J. Dallas,



who was the 6th United States Secretary of the Treasury. The Borough was a station stop on the Harvey’s Lake Branch of the Lehigh Valley Railroad. Dallas Borough has a very well established downtown commercial center. The borough is served by the Dallas Area School District (DASD). Recreational facilities owned and operated by the borough include the Kenneth A. Young Memorial Park on Burndale Road and the Bicentennial Charles D. Lemmond Tots Lot Park on Huntsville Road. The borough offers a very active summer youth recreational program. Other outdoor recreational facilities are maintained by the Dallas Area School District. The Back Mountain Memorial Library is also located within the borough. State Route 309 and State Route 415 are the major transportation corridors of the borough. Business growth in Dallas Borough was realized in the development of shopping centers along State Routes 309 and 415. This business expansion however came at the expense of the traditional shopping district at the center of the Borough. Dallas Borough prepared the Dallas Borough Downtown Master Plan in 2009 in an effort to revitalize and restore the former luster once enjoyed by the downtown. Dallas Township According to the US 2010 Census the current population of Dallas Township is 8,994 residents and consists of a total land area of approximately 24 square miles resulting in a population density of 374.8 persons per square mile. Dallas Township was formed in 1817 from territory taken from Kingston Township and was also named for Alexander J. Dallas, who was the 6th United States Secretary of the Treasury. The Township is also served by the Dallas Area School District. The recreational amenities in the township include the Dallas Township Park on Old Tunkhannock Road, Pine Branch Park and the Dallas Township Recreational Area. Private recreational facilities in the Township include the Irem Temple Country Club and Golf Course and a private campground on Lower Demunds and Camp Ground Hill Roads. The Township is also served by a variety of recreational facilities provided by the Dallas Area School District. State Route 309, State Route 415 and State Route 118 are the major highway corridors traversing the township. Harvey’s Lake Borough According to the US 2010 Census the current population of the Harvey’s Lake Borough is 2,791 residents and consists of a total land area of approximately 6.3 square miles resulting in a population density of 443.0 persons per square mile. Harvey’s Lake Borough was named after Benjamin Harvey, who founded the borough in 1781 and was a member of the Sons of Liberty, an eminent colonial-era group that eventually defeated the notion of Great Britain's Stamp Act. Harvey inadvertently stumbled upon a six-hundred-sixty-acre lake that now bears his name. Harvey’s Lake is the largest natural lake by volume contained entirely in Pennsylvania. As early as 1853, Harvey’s Lake was a popular summer resort for residents of the valley. The picnic grounds which eventually became Hanson's Amusement Park a popular local attraction that provided rides, amusements, boat rides and dances for its many visitors was a result of the construction of the Lehigh Valley Railroad in 1891. Harvey’s Lake attracted thousands of summer visitors enjoying numerous water activities. By the early and mid 1960s the lake began developing environmental problems which are currently being addressed by a variety of



organizations. In 1968 the lake was incorporated into Harvey’s Lake Borough, and The Borough of Harvey’s Lake officially came into existence on January 1, 1968. Presently the Borough is overwhelmingly residential, but the opportunities for boating, fishing and swimming continue to draw residents and visitors. The Borough is served by the Lake-Lehman School District. State Route 415 is the main transportation corridor within the borough. Jackson Township According to the US 2010 Census the current population of the Jackson Township is 4,646 residents and consists of a total land area of approximately 13.3 square miles resulting in a population density of 349.3 persons per square mile. Jackson Township was formed in 1844 from territory taken from Plymouth Township and was named for Andrew Jackson. Two communities within Jackson Township are Chase and Huntsville. The Township is also served by the Lake Lehman School District. Jackson Township owns and operates the Jackson Township Recreation Park. The Lands at Hillside Farms, a 19th Century, 412-acre, nonprofit educational dairy farm whose mission is to teach life choices that are healthy, sustainable, conservation-minded and practical, is located on the border of Jackson and Kingston Township. The Lands holds a variety of summer camp programs. State Route 29 is the major transportation corridor in the Township. Kingston Township According to the US 2010 Census the current population of the Kingston Township is 6,999 residents and consists of a total land area of approximately 14 square miles resulting in a population density of 499.9 persons per square mile. Kingston Township was one of the eleven Susquehanna Townships into which Luzerne County was divided in 1790 and was also one of the original formed under the authority of Connecticut and the Susquehanna Land Company. It is said that Kingston Township derived its name from Kingston, R.I., and was originally called "Kingstown. Kingston Township is located in the Back Mountain Area of Luzerne County. It is primarily a residential community which serves the economic, cultural, employment center, and government center which is concentrated in the City of Wilkes-Barre. The Township also has a significant commercial core which is concentrated along the Route 309 corridor. Kingston Township is served by the Dallas Area School District. Francis Slocum State Park, a major state recreational facility which serves the entire region is located within Kingston Township. The Township owns and operates the Center Street Park and maintains a very active summer recreational program. The township has a formal Recreation Commission, which is an advisory board appointed by the Board of Supervisors which oversees special events held in the Township. State Route 309 is the primary transportation corridor in the Township. Lake Township According to the US 2010 Census the current population of the Lake Township is 2,049 residents and consists of a total land area of approximately 27.5 square miles resulting in a population density of 74.5 persons per square mile.



Lake Township was formed from in 1841 from territory taken from Lehman and Monroe Townships. It was named Lake Township due to the fact that Harvey’s Lake is contained within the township. Lake Township is served by the Lake Lehman School District. The Township is served by multiple recreational facilities provided by the School District. Routes 29 and 415 are the major transportation corridors within the Township. Lehman Township According to the US 2010 Census the current population of the Lehman Township is 3,508 residents and consists of a total land area of approximately 40 square miles resulting in a population density of 87.7 persons per square mile. Lehman Township was taken from Dallas Township in 1829 and named in honor of Dr. William Lehman. Lehman Township is served by the Lake Lehman School District. Although Lehman Township does not provide any recreational facilities itself, it is home to a variety of private recreational facilities including the Huntsville Country Club and the Lehman Golf Course. Additionally, the township is served by multiple recreational facilities provided by the Lake Lehman School District as well as by the Penn State Wilkes-Barre Campus. The Back Mountain Recreational Complex is also located within the township and is owned by Back Mountain Recreation, Inc. (BMR) a charitable, non-profit corporation dedicated to the conservation of open space and the development of recreational facilities in the Back Mountain. The Back Mountain Recreation Complex located along Outlet Road contains numerous athletic fields, basketball courts and a series of hiking trails. Pikes Creek Reservoir owned by the Pennsylvania American Water Company provides fishing opportunities. State Routes 29 and 118 are the major transportation corridors within the Township. Plymouth Township According to the US 2010 Census the current population of the Plymouth Township is 1,812 residents and consists of a total land area of approximately 17.5 square miles resulting in a population density of 103.5 persons per square mile. Plymouth Township dates back to December 28, 1768. The Susquehanna Company at Hartford on that day, by resolution, formed the five townships of which Plymouth was one, each five miles square. It was eventually enlarged in 1790 to include what is now Plymouth and Jackson townships, and was one of the eleven townships of the county. The Township was further divided as Jackson Township was formed and part of Hunlock in 1877. Plymouth Township is served by the Greater Nanticoke Area School District. Moon Lake Park is a 648 acre park with a lake, trails and extensive natural areas. Lackawanna State Forest is located within the Township and provides for a variety of recreational opportunities including biking and hiking. State Routes 11 and 29 are the major transportation corridors within the Township.

LUZERNE

BRADFORD

WAYNE

SUSQUEHANNA

SCHUYLKILL

COLUMBIA MONROE

CARBON

SULLIVAN

WYOMING

LACKAWANNA

LEHIGH

NORTHAMPTON

LYCOMING

NORTHUMBERLAND

BERKS

MONTOUR

PIKE

DAUPHIN

0 10 205Miles

µ

STUDY AREA

FIG. 2-1:REGIONAL KEY MAP


Northern Luzerne Co., PA

6/29/12 1 in = 10 miles

Moon Lake

Penn State

Back Mt. Rec

Lehman School

Pikes Creek Res.

Luzerne Co. FairDallas High School

Lackawanna St. Forest

Frances Slocum State Park

LAKE

LEHMAN

DALLAS

PLYMOUTH

JACKSON KINGSTON

HARVEYS LAKE

DALLAS

0 2 41Miles

µ

FIG. 2-2:MAP OF STUDY AREA



6/29/12 1 in = 2 miles



2.2.3 Population Information and Demographic Patterns (current and projected). According to the 2010 U.S. Census, the total population of the study area is 33,603 residents. From 2000 to 2010 four of the municipalities within the study area had population decreases and four municipalities had population increases with a net gain population increase over the entire study area of 3%.

Population

Municipality 2000 2010 Change %

Change Dallas Borough 2,557 2,804 247 9.7% Dallas Township 8,179 8,994 815 10.0% Harvey’s Lake Borough 2,888 2,791 -97 -3.4% Jackson Township 4,453 4,646 193 4.3% Kingston Township 7,145 6,999 -146 -2.0% Lake Township 2,110 2,049 -61 -2.9% Lehman Township 3,206 3,508 302 9.4% Plymouth Township 2,097 1,812 -285 -13.6% TOTAL 32,635 33,603 968 3.0%

According to the 2010 US Census data the majority of the study area residents, approximately 32% are between the ages of 45-64. This trend is also reflected within most of the municipalities with the exception of Dallas and Jackson Townships where the majority of residents fall within the 20-44 age range. The median age of the study area residents is 44 years and the median age for the residents of the municipalities ranges from 42 to 46 years. There are 12,446 total households in the study area and the average household size is 2.44 persons per household.

Municipality Study Area

DATA Dallas Boro

Dallas Twp

Harvey’s Lake Boro

Jackson Twp

Kingston Twp

Lake Twp

Lehman Twp

Plymouth Twp Total

# Age 19 and Under 708 2,157 563 602 1,697 490 842 364 7,423 # Age 20-44 804 2,419 799 2,005 1,786 577 965 520 9,875 # Age 45-64 819 2,406 994 1,537 2,435 684 1,131 587 10,593 # 65 and Over 473 2,012 435 502 1,081 298 570 341 5,712 Median Age 42 44 46 42 45 44 44 46 44.0 Total Households 1,137 3,333 1,215 983 2,815 809 1,374 780 12,446 Average HH Size 2.44 2.33 2.30 2.60 2.48 2.53 2.55 2.32 2.44

A review of the working age population for the study area indicates that the majority, approximately 86% of the study area residents drive alone to work daily. This trend is also reflected within each of the respective municipalities with a range of 74% to 90% of municipal residents driving alone to work. Harvey’s Lake Borough residents do have the highest percentage of residents that carpool to work, approximately 21% as compared to the study area population which has an average of 10% of residents that carpool to work. Although the majority of residents drive to work the average travel time to work for study area residents was only 24 minutes with the average drive time to work for the individual municipalities ranging



from 21 to 29 minutes. Almost none of the study area residents use public transportation to get to work and a very small percentage of residents use other means such as walking to get to work.

Municipality Study Area

Commuting to Work Data Dallas Boro

Dallas Twp

Harvey’s Lake Boro

Jackson Twp

Kingston Twp

Lake Twp

Lehman Twp

Plymouth Twp Total

% Car, truck, van-drove alone 90.6% 84.0% 74.4% 87.6% 88.9% 87.5% 82.6% 88.6% 85.5% % Car, truck, van-carpooled 3.1% 11.0% 20.8% 9.6% 7.6% 7.0% 13.1% 8.8% 10.1%

% Public transportation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% % Walked 1.4% 3.1% 0.5% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 1.5%

% Other means 0.0% 0.4% 1.4% 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.5% % Worked at home 5.0% 1.6% 2.8% 0.2% 1.8% 5.4% 3.0% 2.0% 2.3%

Total workers 16 yrs and over 1,431 3,783 1,540 1,447 3,794 1,012 1,585 834 15,426 Mean travel time to work (min)* 21.9 22.0 28.0 20.8 21.7 29.1 29.2 22.3 24.4

*2000 Census Data

2.2.4 Profile of Potential Trail Users The Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway is located in the Harvey’s Creek Watershed in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania in the municipalities of Dallas and Harvey’s Lake Borough and Dallas, Jackson, Kingston, Lake, Lehman and Plymouth Townships. This trail/greenway will not only serve the local municipal residents, residents of the Greater Wyoming Valley but tourists visiting the region. Increasingly residents are placing growing demands on their elected officials to provide more amenities in their communities including recreational opportunities. Trails and greenways offer additional avenues of recreation by providing residents with a safe, free means for walking, running, biking and traveling from their communities to parks and other areas in their communities. Initially the majority of the users of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway will most likely be local residents using the trail for recreational purposes; however there is great potential for visitors to come from outside the area to explore the region. Studies have concluded that walking and biking trails will typically be used the heaviest during the months of May through October. While this may be the case, the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway will provide ample opportunity for usage during the winter months for a wide range of activities including, cross-country skiing and snow shoeing due to the trail/greenway alignments located in State Forest and other more rural settings. Based on the results of the surveys conducted for this Plan and a review of the 2010 US Census data for the study area, trail use by local residents will likely be those between the ages of 45-64. Due to the rural more rugged setting for the majority of the trail it will likely be primarily used for recreational purposes. However as the growing system of trails in the greater Wyoming Valley and the surrounding counties becomes connected it is possible that the trail will see usage by tourists visiting the area. There are numerous existing trails in Luzerne County on the west side of the Susquehanna River including the Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the Back Mountain Trail. The Plan for the



Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway proposes direct connections to these two existing trails. Users of these trails would then have a direct connection between them via the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway. The Pennsylvania Environmental Council also recently completed trail/greenway plans for the Greater Kingston Area and the City of Wilkes-Barre. The Greater Kingston Trail/Greenway Plan proposes a vast network of trails on the west side of the Susquehanna River that will also connect to the Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the Back Mountain Trail, as well as, the Back Mountain Trail extension, the Susquehanna River Levee Trail and the West Side Trail, thereby creating a network of over 100 miles of trails. The City of Wilkes-Barre Trail/Greenway plan proposes a system of trails that will connect existing trails on the east side of the Susquehanna River including the Luzerne County National Recreation Trail, Susquehanna River Levee Trail and the Black Diamond Trail (part of the D&L National Heritage Trail) to the proposed and existing Greater Kingston Area trails via the Carey Avenue Bridge, the Market Street Bridge and the Pierce Street Bridge thereby providing connections to the trails on the west side of the Susquehanna River. The Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources prepared the 2009-2013 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). The plan included a statewide assessment of outdoor recreation needs, as well as, an action plan for future steps to help enhance outdoor recreation. 12,800 Pennsylvania residents were surveyed and asked to describe their overall recreation habits and perceptions, and a total of 2,648 surveys were completed and returned representing a 21% response rate. According to the results of the survey conducted for the SCORP, “Pennsylvanians recreate outdoors frequently, as well as in diverse ways. Survey respondents averaged 20 visits to outdoor recreation areas over the past year, and nearly a quarter said they participated in outdoor recreation more than 10 hours per week.” 31% of respondents indicated that they expected to increase their outdoor recreational activity over the next five years. Although respondents indicated that they are willing to travel considerable distances to experience the outdoors most of their recreational activity typically takes place at close to home venues. Walking, driving for pleasure, bicycling and jogging were reported as the most popular uses of trails and roads by the SCORP survey. When asked what kinds of recreational facilities should be provided more widely, or in greater numbers, respondents cited bicycle lanes more often (69%) than any other type of recreational resource as well, 55% of survey participants indicated a desire for more bicycle paths or trails. The survey found that areas managed by local and county government account for the largest portion (43%) of away-from home outdoor recreation activity. State managed areas, such as state parks, state forests and state game lands, provided a setting for 27% of activity. Once again reinforcing that the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway will be widely used. The Pennsylvania Environmental Council in partnership with the Wyoming Valley Wellness Partnership conducted bicycle and pedestrian counts on the Back Mountain Trail in 2009. The trail counter does not distinguish between bicyclists and pedestrians but does reflect general usage of the trail. According to counts taken from June through October there were approximately 14,500 total trail users with an average of 690 trail users per week. During the weekends the data shows a consistent usage over the course of the day indicating that on the weekend the trail is most likely being used for recreational purposes.



If these trends continue and can be extrapolated to the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway then this trail will likely see usage by bicyclists and pedestrians for recreational purposes with consistent usage throughout the weekends.

Chapter 3: Background Information


CHAPTER 3: BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3.1 Description of Study Area The Study area is located to the northwest of the City of Wilkes-Barre (See Figures 2-1 and 2-2). The Susquehanna River and US Route 11 form the southern limits of the Study Area. The Harvey’s Creek Watershed, on the western side of the Study Area is a rural area. The area’s rugged terrain has significantly limited development throughout this region. The scenic beauty of the mountains and river valleys in the area has also lead to the preservation of a significant amount of land in the region. Pennsylvania American Water is also a major landowner in this area. Their landholdings provide a buffer around Pike’s Creek Reservoir, an important source of the region’s water supply. Approximately seventy percent of the proposed trail runs through undeveloped parks and watershed properties. Much of the privately owned land in the area is currently in agricultural uses or remains forested. The eastern side of the Study Area is more developed suburbs of Wilkes-Barre. Dallas and Kingston Township have developed along the Route 309 corridor while Harvey’s Lake developed as a vacation community. 3.2 Regional History The region surrounding the Susquehanna River in NE Pennsylvania is referred to as the Wyoming Valley. The Native Americans in this area referred to the Great Plains on both sides of the river as “Maugh-wau-wa-me,” which the early English settlers, somehow, translated into Wyoming. The region has a very long and colorful history dating back to the 17th Century. Much of the Wyoming Valley’s history is centered on the mining of anthracite coal. Anthracite coal, cleaner and hotter burning than any coal available from any other source, fueled the American Industrial Revolution. Hundreds of thousands of immigrants came to establish new lives in the Wyoming Valley. These immigrants and their descendents have given the valley an incredibly rich and diverse culture. The churches, neighborhoods, schools, gathering places, restaurants, and taverns located throughout this county are a lasting testament to the rich mixture of immigration that came into the Wyoming Valley. From 1834 until the end of the Civil War, the valley’s anthracite headed south to Baltimore and Philadelphia on an ever-increasing series of local and regional canals. In 1858, the North Branch Extension Canal was completed from Pittston to New York State allowing the valley’s coal to move into New York State and New England. By 1875 anthracite coal from the Wyoming Valley/Luzerne County represented half the anthracite produced in the Commonwealth. That dominant place in the market was never challenged through the end of the coal era. The Lehigh and Susquehanna River Railroad was completed in 1846 and quickly forced the canal industry into extinction. The railroad moved Wyoming Valley anthracite from its various coal fields to White Haven. Upon leaving White Haven, an extensive rail network delivered the Wyoming Valley’s “black diamonds” to a market throughout the eastern United States. Additional rail lines were constructed to move materials including lumber, ice and other goods throughout the region. Many of these rail lines have been abandoned, but are now being rediscovered through the Rail to Trail program which is developing across Northeastern Pennsylvania.

Chapter 3: Background Information


The Harvey’s Creek Flume, an earthen and concrete channel runs through the Study Area and is being used for portions of the proposed trail. This historic structure has been used to supply water from Harvey’s Creek and Pike’s Creek Reservoir to the Plymouth Reservoir.

Chapter 4: Existing Conditions


CHAPTER 4: EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.1 Current Trail Systems Thanks to the hard work and diligence of numerous regional trail organizations and local governments, there are several existing trail systems in the region (See Figure 4-1). However, several gaps within these trail systems have significantly limited the potential use of these trails. Once these gaps have been completed, the Luzerne County Trails System will become a destination for trail users through the Mid-Atlantic region. To follow is a brief summary of the existing trails:

Luzerne County Levee Trail System

This eight foot wide paved trail runs along the top of the Susquehanna River Levee. There are approximately 12 miles of trail in total, in four different “reaches” on both the east and west sides of the river. This trail is open to walkers, joggers, bikers, dog-walkers, and roller-bladers. In winter, it is used by cross-country skiers and sled-riders. Benches and kiosks along the trail offer a place to rest and learn about the Wyoming Valley. This trail also includes connections to key bridges: the Market Street, and Pierce Street bridges in Wilkes-Barre and the Carey Avenue Bridge in Hanover Township and Plymouth Borough, allowing bicyclists and pedestrians to cross the river.

The Susquehanna River Levee trail system includes engineering and heritage kiosks designed by the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor. The four reaches of the Levee Trail are: the First Resident’s Path/Forty Fort Reach, the Anthracite Heritage Walk/Kingston Reach, the Riverside Ramble/Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Reach, and the Plymouth Passage/Plymouth Reach.

Riverside Ramble/Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Reach This is a 4 mile stretch of trail on the East side of the Susquehanna, going through the City of Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. Between the County Courthouse and Wilkes University the trail will run through Wilkes-Barre’s River Common, then go on-street connection before connecting with the east side Levee trail system in south Wilkes-Barre. The trail provides connections to the Market Street, Pierce Street and Carey Avenue bridges. The Market Street and Pierce Street bridges access the Kingston Reach of the Levee trail. The Carey Avenue bridge provides access to the Borough of Plymouth and the Plymouth Reach of the Levee trail.

Luzerne County National Recreation Trail

Phase 1 of the Luzerne County National Recreation Trail is open, running 1.8 miles from Pittston’s Riverfront Park to Port Griffith. The trail is packed gravel, and can be used by bikers, walkers, joggers, and dog-walkers, and cross-country skiers in winter. When complete, the Luzerne County National Recreation Trail will be 16 miles long, running along an active freight line on the east side of the Susquehanna River. In Wilkes-Barre, the trail will end at the Train Station where trail users can continue on the Black Diamond Trail or one of the local trails. Phase III of the Luzerne County National Recreation Trail will go north from Pittston to Old Forge.

Black Diamond Trail (D&L Heritage Corridor)

Once complete, the Delaware and Lehigh Trail will be a 165-mile linear trail from Wilkes Barre to Bristol, PA. The trail follows the route that anthracite coal took from mine to



market. It winds through northern mountains and along the banks of the Lehigh and Delaware Rivers through northeast Pennsylvania, the Lehigh Valley and through Bucks County. It is the spine of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor, a State Heritage Park and National Heritage Corridor. The 16 mile unimproved “rail-trail” between Wilkes-Barre and White Haven is known as the Black Diamond Trail. The Black Diamond trail is owned by Anthracite Scenic Trails Association, and will be developed in partnership with the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor. The Wilkes-Barre Train Station will be the starting point of this regional trail.

Ridge to River Trail

A Feasibility Plan was completed in 2004 to provide a trail within Wilkes-Barre City and Wilkes-Barre Township which will create an on street, on sidewalk linkage between the Black Diamond Trail and the existing Luzerne County Levee Trail System. As shown in Figure 4-1, the trail will use South Street to pass through much of the City.

West Side Trail

The West Side Trail is a 19 mile trail system through the boroughs of Exeter, Wyoming, West Wyoming and West Pittston. This diverse trail includes urban sections of sidewalks and other sections which are off-road in natural settings. Along this section residents can shop or enjoy the eateries and this section provides a safe route to school. The more natural section runs along the river front, Hicks Creek and the railroad tracks. The West Side Trail connects to the Luzerne County Levee Trail and will connect to the Luzerne County National Recreation Trail.

Back Mountain Trail

When complete, the Back Mountain Trail will feature 13 miles of winding scenic routes running parallel to Toby’s Creek from Harvey’s Lake to the Borough of Luzerne. The trail will mainly follow the route of a Lehigh Valley Rail line that was originally developed by an ice merchant in the 1880’s. This trail is in the scenic and rapidly developing Back Mountain community.

Susquehanna Warrior Trail

As currently proposed, the Susquehanna Warrior Trail is an 18.5 mile route located parallel to State Route 11 and the Susquehanna River. The trail runs from the Pennsylvania Power and Light (PPL) Riverlands Park in Salem Township north to Larksville Borough. This nearly flat trail will have a packed gravel surface for cyclists, walkers and nature lovers and six (6) trail heads. Phase 1, approximately 10 miles in length, between the PPL Riverlands Park to three miles north of Shickshinny is currently open.

Kingston Area Trail / Greenway Feasibility / Master Plan Completed by the Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) in December of 2010, the Kingston Area Trail / Greenway Feasibility / Master Plan proposed two major new trails for the area: The Kingston Area Trail and the Back Mountain Trail Extension. Access to and from key destinations from these main trails will be accomplished through a series of smaller connector trails. The trail network will capitalize on the vast network of railroad right of ways using both abandoned and active lines. Sidewalk improvements and on-street bicycle lanes have been proposed for many of the connector trails.



City of Wilkes-Barre Trail / Greenway Feasibility / Master Plan Completed by the Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) in January of 2011, the City of Wilkes-Barre Trail / Greenway Feasibility / Master Plan proposes nine new trails for the area which will provide access to key destinations, bridge gaps in current trails and create a cohesive network of trails throughout the City of Wilkes-Barre.

4.2 Land Use The Study area is located to the northwest of the City of Wilkes-Barre. The Susquehanna River and US Route 11 form the southern limits of the Study Area. The Harvey’s Creek Watershed, on the western side of the Study Area is a rural area. The area’s rugged terrain has significantly limited development throughout this region. The scenic beauty of the mountains and river valleys in the area has also lead to the preservation of a significant amount of land in the region. Pennsylvania American Water is also a major landowner in this area. Their landholdings provide a buffer around Pike’s Creek Reservoir, an important source of the region’s water supply. Approximately seventy percent of the proposed trail runs through undeveloped parks and watershed properties. Much of the privately owned land in the area is currently in agricultural uses or remains forested. The eastern side of the Study Area is more developed suburbs of Wilkes-Barre. Dallas and Kingston Township have developed along the Route 309 corridor while Harvey’s Lake developed as a vacation community. 4.3 Topography The proposed trail route will begin at the Susquehanna Warrior Trail which runs along the northern shoreline of the Susquehanna River. At this point, the elevation is approximately 520 feet above sea level. As the trail travels north, it ascends Larksville Mountain where is will reach its maximum altitude of 1400 feet. After crossing over Larksville Mountain, the trail will follow Harvey’s Creek north past Pike’s Creek Reservoir towards Route 118. Much of the route through the river valley will follow the Harvey’s Creek Flume. This flume had been used to transport drinking water from the Pike’s Creek Reservoir and Harvey’s Creek to a mountain top reservoir above Plymouth. The grade of this flume is very gradual and makes an ideal route for the trail as it heads north. Above Route 118, the trail route will leave the Harvey’s Creek valley and enter into the Back Mountain Recreation Area. Following the Rec Area’s existing trail system, the trail will pass over a hill and turn east towards the Back Mountain Trail in Dallas. The topography of this portion of the route is much more rolling passing over several gradual hill slopes.

Moon Lake

Penn State

Back Mt. Rec

Lehman School

Pikes Creek Res.

Luzerne Co. Fair

Dallas High School


Frances Slocum State Park

0 2 41Miles

µ

FIG. 4-1:EXISTING TRAILS



6/29/12 1 in = 1.5 miles

Back MountainTrail

SusquehannaWarrior Trail

Luzerne Co.Levee Trail

West SideTrail

Luzerne Co.Levee Trail

Luzerne CountyNational Recreation

Trail

D&L BlackDiamond Trail

Kingston AreaTrail System

Wilkes-Barre AreaTrail System

EXISTING TRAIL SYSTEM- Current Trails

- Proposed Trails

- Possible Trails



4.4 Natural Features During the past 150 years, coal mining and industry reshaped much of the Wyoming Valley. However, the rugged land surrounding Harvey’s Creek remained fairly undisturbed. Forested mountains and high quality streams provide high quality habitat for a variety of species of flora and fauna. The presence of several protected species of plants and animals within the Harvey’s Creek watershed emphasizes the fact that this is a special area. 4.5 Wildlife Habitat The forested ravines which surround the lower portion of Harvey’s Creek provide high-quality habitat for many common species of wildlife as well as some less common species. The area hosts a wide variety of woodland flora and fauna. A review of the Pennsylvania Nature Diversity Index (See Appendix B for printout) revealed that this area is habitat for the following rare species: TABLE 4-1. Rare species identified within Study Area by the Pennsylvania Nature Diversity Index. Scientific Name Status Mammals Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis Federally Endangered Reptiles Timber Rattlesnake Talus horridus Species of Concern Insects Leonard's Skipper Hesperia leonardus Special Concern Species Plants Susquehanna Sand Cherry Prunus pumila var. susquehanae Special Concern Species The upper portion of Harvey’s Creek has been classified as a “High Quality, Cold Water Fishes” (HQ-CWF) water and has been identified as a “Trout Natural Reproduction Water”. As such, Harvey’s Creek is known for its high water quality and clarity. 4.6 Key Destinations Based upon discussions with the Steering Committee, Public Meetings, Opinion Surveys and Key Person Interviews key destinations were identified throughout the Study Area. An emphasis was placed upon existing parks, schools, community centers and trail systems. The following sites were identified as Key Destinations which would be beneficial to connect by the proposed trail system, the locations of these site are shown in Figure 4.1: TABLE 4-2. Key Destinations identified within the Study Area. Key Destination Municipality Susquehanna Warrior Trail Plymouth Township Lackawanna State Forest Plymouth, Jackson & Lehman Twps. Moon Lake Park & County Lands Plymouth, Jackson & Lehman Twps. Pikes Creek Reservoir & American Water Properties Plymouth, Jackson & Lehman Twps. Lehman Schools Lehman Township Penn State – Wilkes-Barre Campus Lehman Township Back Mountain Recreation Area Lehman Township Luzerne County Fair Grounds Lehman Twp & Dallas Boro Misercordia College Dallas Township Dallas High School Dallas Township Frances Slocum State Park Kingston Township Harveys Lake Harveys Lake Boro



4.7 Property Ownership The scenic beauty of the mountains and river valleys in the area has lead to the preservation of a significant amount of land in the region. Pennsylvania American Water is also a major landowner in this area. Their landholdings provide a buffer around Pike’s Creek Reservoir, an important source of the region’s water supply. Approximately seventy percent of the proposed trail runs through undeveloped parks and watershed properties. Much of the privately owned land in the area is currently in agricultural uses or remains forested. The eastern side of the Study Area is more developed suburbs of Wilkes-Barre. Dallas and Kingston Township have developed along the Route 309 corridor while Harvey’s Lake developed as a vacation community. 4.8 Environmental Contamination There are no indications that any of the area within the proposed trail corridor previously housed industrial development or has been contaminated by hazardous materials. If any potentially hazardous materials are found during the construction of the trail, work should stop immediately until the situation is evaluated by a qualified professional.

Chapter 5: Trail Planning Process


CHAPTER 5: TRAIL PLANNING PROCESS 5.1 Trail Planning Consultants

The development of the Harvey’s Creek Trail / Greenway Feasibility / Master Plan has been coordinated by the Northeastern Regional Office of the Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC). In January of 2011 PEC released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for consulting services on the project. White Environmental Services was selected from the applicants and a contract was executed in February of 2008. George White was designated as the Project Manager for this Trails / Greenways project.

5.2 Geographic Information System (GIS) Database

The Consultants developed a GIS database of the region using existing Luzerne County parcel mapping, PAMAP aerial photography, USGS Topography, NRCS soils mapping, and other pertinent data. Digital photos documenting proposed trail routes, structures, amenities, and surrounding points of interest throughout the project were taken and their locations were incorporated into the GIS Database. This GIS Database was used for mapping throughout the planning and design process.

5.3 Public Participation 5.3.1 Public Meetings

PEC organized and hosted a public meeting on June 29, 2011 at the Penn State Wilkes-Barre Campus in order to provide information on the background and scope of the project, discuss the potential benefits to the local communities of trail and greenway development and solicit input from the community regarding the project. The Consultant provided PEC with ownership information on 300 properties within the study area to whom PEC directly mailed information regarding the first public meeting. The final public meeting was held on June 27, 2012 at the Penn State Wilkes-Barre Campus. The purpose of the final public meeting was to present the draft final trail/greenway plan to the public. The Project Consultant attended these public meetings to provide technical assistance and answer questions. A brief demonstration of the Project’s GIS database was given followed by an open discussion about the project. Minutes from the public meetings have been included in Appendix A of this report.

5.3.2 Trail Steering Committee Meetings

A Trail Steering Committee was selected by PEC. Members of the steering committee included representatives from impacted municipalities, local trail organizations, Pennsylvania State Forest, local non-profits, local business leaders, neighborhood and community groups and local residents. The steering committee met over the course of the project. A series of three (3) meetings were held at which the consultant and PEC provided progress updates on the plan and solicited insight and guidance from the steering committee regarding the priorities and issues of the local community. A portable GIS system was used by the Consultant to provide interactive GIS presentations during the committee meetings. This technology provided instantaneous access to invaluable information needed to make key



decisions in the trail planning process. The committee provided local insight into regional issues that impacted the project. Key destinations, preferred trail routes, and other key decisions were made by the steering committee.

5.3.3 Key Person Interviews

Various representatives from the Harvey’s Creek area as well as community organizations participated in the planning process through the steering committee meetings. Therefore, the steering committee determined it was not necessary to conduct extensive key person interviews. However, PEC conducted key person interviews with the following five (5) individuals:

• Mike Dziak, President CEO, Earth Conservancy (EC) – EC leads communities in the reclamation of mine-scarred lands and streams, returning strong economic, environmental and social value by creating a well-planned vibrant valley protected by green ridge tops.

• Julie McMonagle, Vice President, Susquehanna Warrior Trail (SWT) / Back Mountain Trail – SWT builds and maintains an 18 ½ mile hiking and biking trail for the benefit of the public in the Southern Wyoming Valley of Luzerne County. The BMT builds and maintains hiking and biking trails in the Back Mountain Region of the study area.

• Paul Lumia, Executive Director, North Branch Land Trust - North Branch Land Trust is a conservation organization focused on helping landowners conserve their property and helping communities develop smart growth strategies for the benefit of their citizens.

• Joseph Gibbons, P.E., County Engineer, Luzerne County – The County Engineers Office primary duties include: technical review for County projects; administrative aspects of County projects; subdivision and land development review; design and construction of road and bridge projects ; and contract administration for County projects.

• Dale Freudenberger, Heritage Projects Manager/Anthracite Alliance Coordinator, Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor (D&L) – D&L is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit that is building the D&L Trail and fosters stewardship of historical, cultural and natural resources along the historic canals and railroads that transported anthracite coal from mine to market in Eastern Pennsylvania.

• Mark Cross, Manager-Production, Pennsylvania American Water (PAW) – PAW serves the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania providing more than 2 million people, in more than 370 communities, with a supply of high quality water and wastewater service.

• Kathleen Sebastian, Township Manager, Kingston Township – Kingston Township is located within the study area and serves a population of approximately 7,000 residents.

• J. Carlene Price, Secretary, Lake Township – Lake Township is located within the study area and serves a population of approximately 2,050 residents.



All of the interviewees agreed that a trail/greenway would benefit their respective organizations as well as their respective constituents. Many of the respondents indicated that providing trail opportunities and supporting trail connectivity is an important component to quality of life in the region. The respondents indicated that the development of the Harvey’s Creek trail will advance the goal of having an interconnected trail/greenway system throughout the Greater Wyoming Valley especially with its proposed connection to two existing trails and numerous key destinations. According to the respondents, the trail/greenway provides an opportunity for local citizens and visitors to recreate thereby improving overall community health, broadening local transportation options and improving the use of outdoor spaces that are connected through the system, as well as, benefiting our regional economy. All of the respondents regularly use and/or promote the existing trail facilities through their own personal usage, as well as, via their respective websites, special event programming and reaching out to various groups such as Boy and Girl Scouts, local schools, biking groups, etc. for potential volunteer projects on their respective trails. The respondents indicated that the type of trail surface and design would typically depend on the intended usage, type of trail (rural, suburban, urban) and further stated that maintenance issues are different depending on the type of trail surface. The terrain and surrounding area should dictate the surface. Some of the challenges faced by the respondents with regards to their trails included funding, maintenance, securing easements from adjacent landowners, ATV usage, vandalism, safety and littering. Most stated that they would like to see the following facilities/amenities for the trail/greenway: good signage (trail and interpretive), benches, mile markers, waste receptacles (trash and pet waste) and sufficient trail head parking. The respondents would like to see linkages/connections to Harvey’s Lake, Harvey’s Creek, Pennsylvania American Water Company right of way, historic sites, other recreational areas (i.e. State Forest, Back Mountain Recreation Complex, Moon Lake Park), local schools and colleges, municipal parks and clearly marked connections to existing trails. The respondents indicated that many of these sites could also serve as potential trail heads for the trail/greenway. As safety was a major concern for many of the interviewees they indicated various areas that would need further scrutiny while planning for the trail/greenway. Among those areas indicted as having safety concerns for a potential tail were alignments adjacent to or crossing the following routes 11, 29, 118 or 309. Some of the respondents did indicate that they currently have observed walkers and bikers along Routes 118, 29 and Lake Road. When asked as whether or not the respondents felt that their respective organizations would be interested in participating in the long-term management and maintenance of the trail all the respondents indicated that they would be supportive either through providing in-kind services, promotion or small financial contributions. In summary, the key persons offered valuable input towards how this plan targets where bicycle and pedestrian facilities should be located and recommending the proper facility type for those locations.



5.3.4 Public Survey A major component of the Plan was to determine what the priorities of local citizens were with regards to the trail including potential trail alignments, trail amenities, connections and other general issues and concerns regarding the development of the trail. This goal was accomplished by distributing a public survey during the planning process for the project. Public surveys were distributed via a variety of means including distribution by steering committee members to their respective service populations. PEC also direct mailed three hundred (300) surveys to a random sample of property owners residing within the study area. PEC also utilized the web site based survey tool, Survey Monkey, to distribute the public survey to an e-mail distribution list. Two local media outlets that attended the first public meeting and subsequently published articles regarding the trail/greenway planning efforts also included the URL link to the survey within their respective articles written about the project. PEC also distributed the survey at a series of public events focused on trails and alternative transportation. Twenty-Two (22) surveys were received. Recreational usage of existing trails seemed to be a common theme based on the survey responses received. 85.7% of the survey respondents indicated that they currently use trails for walking and running. Bike riding and observing nature were tied as the second most common use of existing trails by respondents (38%, respectively) and taking pets for walks and winter cross-country skiing were also a common use of existing trails (19% respectively). None of the respondents use existing trails as an avenue for alternative transportation such as shopping trips or commuting to school or work.

The survey respondents were questioned as to which amenities were important for inclusion in any trail/greenway that would be developed. The most requested feature for inclusion in the trail/greenway was benches (71% of responses) spaced approximately ½ to 1 mile apart. The need for fencing to be included in the development of the trail/greenway was not a priority for any of the respondents. Other amenities/features that were indicated as priorities by the survey respondents were parking at trailheads (66.7%), mile markers (61.9%), directional signage (57.1%) and waste receptacles (52.4%). Other amenities such as historical/interpretive signage, information kiosks, picnic areas, restroom facilities, pet waste disposal, shelters, fishing access areas, lighting, and emergency phones were also supported by the survey respondents but did not rank as high priorities in comparison to the previously



mentioned amenities. The majority of the survey respondents also indicated that the trail/greenway surface should be appropriate to the landscape and terrain (i.e. State Forest or roadway crossings).

The survey respondents were also questioned as to potential connections for the trail/greenway. Based on the data analysis, parks were the highest priority with regards to being connected to the trail/greenway (72.2%). The respondents also indicated that providing a connection to other trails (61%) and historic sites (61%) should be given priority in the development of the trail/greenway. The chart below provides a breakdown of the percentage of responses for potential connections listed in the public survey. As mentioned above the majority of the respondents indicated a need to connect the proposed trail to existing parks, other trails and historic sites. However respondents also favored connections, although to a lesser degree, to athletic fields, schools, residential areas, public buildings and businesses. Specific sites/areas that respondents indicted for potential connections for the Harvey’s Creek trail/greenway included the Battlefield location from the Battle of Rampart Rocks; Moon Lake Park, Lake Lehman Schools, Lake Noxen Elementary School, Rice Dam, the Back Mountain Recreation Complex and Maureen’s Ice Cream Shop along Harvey’s Creek and Rt. 29.



The survey respondents were also questioned as to possible locations for trail heads. The overwhelming majority of the survey respondents indicated that the trail/greenway should develop the trail locating trail heads primarily at existing parks (81.3%). However, respondents did support, to a lesser degree, trail heads at municipal parking lots (44%), schools (31.3%), and libraries (13%). The following specific potential trail head locations were also listed as other options for trail head siting by survey respondents: Lake Lehman Schools, the Back Mountain Recreational Complex on Outlet Road, Lake Noxen Elementary School and N. Mill Street and Poplar Street in Nanticoke.

Several trends can also be discerned from an analysis of the survey data. The majority of the respondents indicated that their community has an identified network of walking routes. Most respondents agreed that their community has parks, recreational facilities, shared open spaces and trails/paths that are within walking distance of their residence. Most respondents also felt that their community has various recreational facilities for use by people of all ages, thereby providing opportunities, as well as, different choices for physical activity. The majority of respondents indicated that the addition of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway was a good idea and would be a benefit for their communities. However, several respondents commented on the need for more information, education and promotion of the existing recreational and trail facilities in order to encourage more usage by the residents of the County. Also, the need for maintenance of existing recreational and trail facilities was a common comment by respondents. Survey respondents also indicated a need for trails to be connected so residents can travel to different areas of their communities’ safely on foot or by bicycle. Finally, the majority of survey respondents were in favor of their respective communities becoming part of a regional organization and using municipal tax dollars to maintain their parks, trails and greenways.



5.4 Development of the Trail Master Plan

5.4.1 Project Goals and Methodology A Kick-off meeting was held between the Consultant and representatives from PEC to define goals for the project and identify the most effective methods for achieving these goals. The existing regional trail system was discussed and a need for linkage of the various trail systems was identified. The GIS database and field investigations would identify potential routes to connect the existing trails and key destinations. These potential routes would then be reviewed by the Trail Steering Committee and Preferred Routes would be selected. The defined Goals and Methodology were then outlined at the Public Meeting and open for discussion. A general consensus was reached that the primary goal of this project was to provide linkage of the existing trail systems and provide access to key destinations.

5.4.2 Identification of Key Destinations & Trail Connections Based upon information from PEC, the Steering Committee and the Public Meeting, existing trails and key destinations within the Study Area were identified. The locations of the key destinations and the routes of existing and currently proposed trails were entered into the project’s GIS database.

5.4.3 Identification of Potential Trail Corridors Based upon key destinations, existing and proposed trails, existing right-of-ways, utility easements, public properties, and abandoned rail lines, the Consultants identified potential trail corridors within the study area. These corridors were reviewed by the Steering Committee and evaluated for their value in meeting the goals of the project.

5.4.4 Identification of Proposed Trail Route with Alternatives Potential trail corridors which were selected by the Trail Steering Committee were evaluated in the field by the Consultant. Site photographs of existing conditions were taken along these routes and the photos were “hot linked” into the GIS database for easy access during Steering Committee meetings and presentations. Where potential impediments to the trail were identified, alternative routes were identified for consideration by the Committee.

5.4.5 Identification of Property Owners The proposed trail system has been designed to take advantage of existing publicly owned parcels and right of ways. Much of the proposed trail alignment runs through existing State Forest and County Parkland. Therefore, the need to acquire easements from private land owners has been significantly reduced. Representatives from Pennsylvania American Water, a major land owner in the area, were interviewed to determine their interest in the proposed trail system. It was found that the water company was very supportive of the project. Therefore, a significant amount of the trail has been proposed on their property. Although agreements will be needed with each of the public entities involved, the acquisition of right of ways for the proposed trails will be much easier than if they were running through privately owned parcels. Ownership of parcels within the proposed trail corridor was identified based upon the Luzerne County’s GIS parcel data of the region. Whenever ownership of a parcel was unclear, the Consultants recommended the level of title search activity required to determine property ownership. The Consultants provided property owner contact information to PEC



so that they may contact the owners, if appropriate, to describe the project and determine the level of interest in supporting the project. Table 9-1 contains details about each of the properties which the proposed trail will cross, additional information about each property is also listed within each of the trail route narratives. Due to the preliminary nature of this study, most private property owners have not yet been contacted to discuss their willingness to participate in the project. However, a preliminary interview with the owner of one key parcel was contacted to confirm that they were willing to discuss granting an easement. The interview confirmed the possibility of running the trail through this parcel. 5.4.6 Physical Inventory and Assessment Based upon GIS data and field observations, the Consultant documented existing conditions within the proposed trail corridor and prepared mapping for presentation to the Steering Committee. Issues addressed included:

- Physiographic analysis - Natural features inventory - Wildlife - Structures (visual evaluation) - Infrastructure and utilities - Intersections and access points. - Environmental hazards (need assessment for Phase I)

5.4.7 Selection of Preferred Trail Route Based upon all available information including ownership and existing conditions the Consultants conferred with the Trail Steering Committee to select Preferred Trail Routes which best met the Project Goals. Whenever feasible, key destinations were linked into the trail routes and potential trailhead locations were identified.

5.4.8 Prepare a Trail Concept Plan Using the preferred trail route, the Consultants prepared a trail concept plan using the complied GIS database as a base. Issues that were addressed in the plan included:

- Trail location and any alternative routes - Proposed location of trailheads and related facilities - Areas for trail barriers and emergency access - Areas needing natural buffers and/or screening - Proposed linkages to parks, schools, and neighborhoods.

This plan was then reviewed and approved by the Trail Steering Committee.

5.4.9 Final Design and Report The Harvey’s Creek Trail / Greenway Feasibility / Master Plan and Report were prepared by the Consultants and submitted to the Pennsylvania DCNR for their review and approval. A second Public Meeting was held to present the plan and to discuss the recommendations made in the report. Based upon comments from the PA DCNR and the Public Meeting, final revisions were made to the Plan and Report and the final draft was submitted to PEC and the PA DCNR in both hard copy and digital format.

Chapter 6: Proposed Trail / Greenway System


CHAPTER 6: PROPOSED TRAIL / GREENWAY SYSTEM 6.1 Proposed Trail / Greenway Overview In reviewing potential trail routes which best met the project goals, it was found that the southern portion of the trail was the most difficult to plan. Due to the steep slopes of Larksville Mountain and the ravine surrounding Harvey’s Creek, a feasible route was difficult to find. Several routes along Harvey’s Creek and Route 29 were explored. However, none were determined to be viable for the proposed trail. GIS review of the Luzerne County parcel mapping, topography and aerial photos identified a property on the southern slope of Larksville Mountain which had been conserved through the North Branch Land Trust. A review of the PAMAP LiDar Topography of this property, followed by a site walk found that there are existing woods roads on this property which can be used to reach the top of the mountain. Once to the top of the mountain, the remaining trail route developed smoothly. Existing and planned trails within the State Forest were used to link the proposed trail route to the Harvey’s Creek Flume. This historic structure had been used to transport drinking water from the Pike’s Creek Reservoir and Harvey’s Creek to a mountain top reservoir above Plymouth. The grade of this flume is very gradual and makes an ideal route for the trail as it heads north. The flume runs through portions of the State Forest, Moon Lake Park and PA American Water property. After leaving the flume, the trail will run north through the State Forest as it follows the forested valley along Harvey’s Creek. Above Route 118, the trail route will run along the edges of an existing pasture and enter into the Back Mountain Recreation Area. Following the Rec Area’s existing trail system, the trail will pass over a hill and turn east to follow an existing pipeline right of way to the towards the Luzerne County Fairgrounds. Continuing east towards Dallas, the trail’s route will pass through a forested section of privately owned property and onto and undeveloped street right of way. After passing through a commercial complex, the trail will cross Route 415 and lead towards it’s terminus at the Back Mountain Trail on the campus of Misericordia University. For the sake of this report, we have divided the trail into four sections. Key destinations have been selected as the beginning and ending points of each of the sections, which allows each section to be developed independently. The four sections of the Harvey’s Creek Trail System are: Section I: Susquehanna Warrior Trail to Pikes Creek Reservoir Section II: Pikes Creek to Back Mountain Recreation Area Section III: Back Mountain Recreation Area to Back Mountain Trail Section IV: Lehman Connector Trail (Penn State Campus to Back Mt. Rec. Area)

0 1 2 30.5Miles

µ

FIG. 6-1:PROPOSED TRAIL CORRIDOR



6/29/12 1 in = 1 miles


- Proposed Trails

- Possible Trails

- Harvey's Creek Trail

PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM

0 1 2 30.5Miles

µ

FIG. 6-2:PROPOSED TRAIL CORRIDOR



6/29/12 1 in = 1 miles


- Proposed Trails

- Possible Trails

- Harvey's Creek Trail

PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM

Moon Lake


0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000Feet

µ

FIG. 6-3:TRAIL SECTION 1



6/29/12 1 in = 2,000 feet


- Proposed Trails

- Possible Future Trails

PROPOSED HARVEY'S CREEKTRAIL SYSTEM

- Privately Owned Land

- Public Land

- PA American Water Land

- Proposed Trailhead



6.2 Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section I: Susquehanna Warrior Trail to Pikes Creek Reservoir Section I is the southern portion of Harvey’s Creek Trail which will lead trail users from a proposed trailhead on the Susquehanna Warrior Trail north to and existing trailhead at Pikes Creek Reservoir. This first section of trail was the hardest to plan due to the steep slopes of Larksville Mountain and the ravine surrounding Harvey’s Creek. However by combining a small municipal road, a privately owned woods road, existing State Forest Service trails and the Harvey’s Creek Flume system a feasible route has been identified. This section of trail is the most important one in the system because it fulfills the project goal of linking the Susquehanna Warrior Trail with The Lackawanna State Forest, Moon Lake Park and Pikes Creek Reservoir. Route Description Harvey’s Creek Trail will begin at the Susquehanna Warrior Trail as it passes through the Garden Drive in on the southern side of Route 11. Connection to this regional trail is one of the main goals of this project. Preliminary site evaluations found that there is sufficient sight distance to cross Route 11 in this area. However, it will require a well-planned and engineered pedestrian crossing to provide trail users safe passage across the highway (See Photo 3).

After crossing Route 11, the trail will follow Poplar Street, a small Township road which has very little traffic (See Photos 4 & 5). The trail will follow this road 0.72 mile east along the base of Larksville Mountain. At this point, the trail will enter an undeveloped property owned by Wychock Realty, LLC. This property has been preserved through the North Branch Land Trust, but it remains in private ownership. Preliminary talks with the land owners indicated that they may be willing to grant an easement for

the trail. A series of old woods roads on this property can be used to begin the climb up Larksville Mountain (See Photo 6-6). The 0.44 mile of trail through the Wychock property will lead to the southern corner of Lackawanna State Forest (See Figure 3). Within the State Forest, 0.56 mile of trail will be built to link Harvey’s Creek Trail into a series of existing trails. The new section of trail will feature a series of switch-backs to allow for a gradual climb to the top of Navasink Mountain.

Photo 6-1: Harvey’s Creek Trail will begin at the Susquehanna Warrior Trail as it passes through the Garden Drive-in.

Photo 6-2: Harvey’s Creek Trail will begin at the Susquehanna Warrior Trail.



The existing State Forest trail system includes the use of a short section of the Harvey’s Creek Flume for a trail route. Following this historic water system, the Harvey’s Creek Trail will connect to an existing Forest Service Parking area on Mizdale Road. After crossing Mizdale Road, the proposed trail will follow the route of the flume through the State Forest and into Moon Lake County Park. Although this section of the flume does not currently contain a trail, its banks are ideal for creating a pathway. Several minor hiking and mountain bike trails from Moon Lake Park cross the flume, making them an ideal connection into the park. At the point where the flume crosses Pavlick Road, the ownership of the land changes from Moon Lake County Park to PA American Water. Under an agreement reached with PA American Water, the trail will continue along the flume towards Pikes Creek Reservoir. On the Water Company’s property the trail runs along Harvey’s Creek and then connects into the flume from Pikes Creek Reservoir. After crossing Route 29, the trail will connect into an existing parking area and trailhead for the Reservoir. The Route 29 crossing will require a well-planned and engineered pedestrian crossing to provide trail users safe passage across the highway.

Photo 6-3: Harvey’s Creek Trail will cross Route 11 and follow Poplar Street.

Photo 6-4: The trail will travel on Poplar Street to the Wychock property where the trail will begin to climb Larksville Mt.



Photo 6-5: Poplar Street is a small, lightly traveled Township road which runs along the base of Larksville Mountain.

Photo 6-6: Abandoned “woods roads” on the Wychock Property can be used to climb the southern side of the mountain.

Total Length of Section I: 6.6 miles Existing Surface: Existing Paved Township Road Existing dirt woods road Existing single track hiking & mt. biking trail Abandoned flume Surrounding Land Use / Land Cover: The Harvey’s Creek Watershed, on the western side of the Study Area is a rural area. The area’s rugged terrain has significantly limited development throughout this region. The scenic beauty of the mountains and river valleys in the area has also lead to the preservation of a significant amount of land in the region. Pennsylvania American Water is also a major landowner in this area. Their landholdings provide a buffer around Pike’s Creek Reservoir, an important source of the region’s water supply. Approximately seventy percent of the proposed trail runs through undeveloped parks and watershed properties. Much of the privately owned land in the area is currently in agricultural uses or remains forested. Ownership: As shown in Figure 6-3, most of the trail alignment for Section I is located on public property. Therefore the feasibility of constructing this section of the trail is very good. The owners of the property which this portion of the trail will be located on are: Susquehanna Warrior Trail PGW Co Trustee 1 PEI Court Wilkes Barre, PA 18711 Poplar Street Plymouth Township 925 W. Main Street Plymouth, PA 18651 Wychock property Wychock Realty LLL 10 Grove Street Mountaintop, PA 18707

Lackawanna State Forest Commonwealth of PA 400 Market Street, 7th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17105 Moon Lake Park Luzerne County 200 N. River Street Wilkes Barre, PA 18711 PA American Water PA American Water Co. 800 Hershey Park Drive Hershey, PA 17033



Photo 6-7: The Harveys Creek Flume will make an ideal route for the proposed trail system.

Proposed linkages: Susquehanna Warrior Trail Lackawanna State Forest Moon Lake Park Pikes Creek Reservoir. Erosion and drainage problems: No significant problems noted. Structures:

Susquehanna Warrior Trail: As currently proposed, the Susquehanna Warrior Trail is an 18.5 mile route located parallel to State Route 11 and the Susquehanna River. The trail runs from the Pennsylvania Power and Light (PPL) Riverlands Park in Salem Township north to Larksville Borough. This nearly flat trail will have a packed gravel surface for cyclists, walkers and nature lovers and six (6) trail heads. Phase 1, approximately 10 miles in length, between the PPL Riverlands Park to three miles north of Shickshinny is currently open. Poplar Street: Poplar Street is a small, lightly traveled Township road which runs along the base of Larksville Mountain. The steep side slope of the mountain has limited the width of the paved road to approximately 16 feet. Harvey’s Creek Flume: The Harvey’s Creek Flume, an earthen and concrete channel runs through the Study Area and is being used for portions of the proposed trail. This historic structure has been used to supply water from Harvey’s Creek and Pike’s Creek Reservoir to the Plymouth Reservoir. The grade of this flume is very gradual and makes an ideal route for the trail as it heads north.

Natural Features: Forested mountains and high quality streams in this area provide high quality habitat for a variety of species of flora and fauna. The presence of several protected species of plants and animals within the Harvey’s Creek watershed emphasizes the fact that this is a special area. The upper portion of Harvey’s Creek has been classified as a “High Quality, Cold Water Fishes” (HQ-CWF) water and has been identified as a “Trout Natural Reproduction Water”. As such, Harvey’s Creek is known for its high water quality and clarity.

Photo 6-8: Various water control structures from the Flume add to the scenic beauty of the area.



Alternative Routes: If it is determined that the proposed crossing of Route 11 is not feasible (See Figure 6-3 and Photo 6-3), then it may be possible to begin the trail further south in West Nanticoke. A signalized intersection on Route 11 could provide a safe crossing for trail users. Traveling through West Nanticoke it is possible to reach the eastern end of Poplar Street and follow that to the Wychock Property. Proposed Design:

- Pathway Surface • 0.72 mi. of paved roadway (Poplar St.) • 0.44 mi. of 8’ wide woods road (Wychock Property) • 0.56 mi. of new 3’ - 5’ wide dirt and gravel trail (State Forest) • 2.35 mi. of existing 3’ - 5’ wide dirt and gravel trail (State Forest) • 0.5 mi. of existing 4’ - 6’ wide Flume trail (State Forest) • 0.9 mi. of new 4’ - 6’ wide Flume trail (State Forest) • 1.14 mi. of new 4’ - 6’ wide Flume trail (PA American Water)

- Intersections and Access Points

• US Highway 11 o Excellent sight distance o High Traffic Volume o Traffic Study Needed o Delineated Crosswalk Needed o Signage Recommended

• Mizdale Road o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Signage Recommended

• Pavlick Road o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Signage Recommended

• State Highway 29 o Fair sight distance (shoulder clearing needed) o High Traffic Volume o Traffic Study Needed o Delineated Crosswalk Needed o Signage Recommended

Photo 6-9: Closer to Pikes Creek Reservoir, the flume becomes a concrete channel.



- Structures • None required for this section of trail.

- Auxiliary Facilities

• Restrooms o Currently available at Moon Lake Park

• Water o Currently available at Moon Lake Park

• Lighting o None recommended

• Parking / Trail Heads o New Trail Head with parking and signage recommended at intersection with

Susquehanna Warrior Trail. o Parking currently available at Mizdale Road and Pikes Creek Reservoir o New trailhead signage recommended at Mizdale Road and Pikes Creek Reservoir

• Barriers and Emergency Access o Balusters required to restrict access to trail from all road crossings.

• Natural Buffers and/or Screening o No screening is required on this section of trail.

Environmental Hazards: No previous industrial sites or waste dumps were identified within the trail corridor during this study. However, if any potential hazards are identified during design or development, a Phase I Environmental Assessment of the trail right of way is recommended.

Photo 6-10: Another view of the “community path” on the Mill Creek L

Photo 6-11: Another view of the “community path” on the Mill Creek L

Penn State

Back Mt. Rec

Lehman School

Pikes Creek Res.

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000Feet

µ




6/29/12 1 in = 2,000 feet


- Proposed Trails




- Public Land





6.3 Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section II: Pikes Creek Reservoir to Back Mtn. Recreation Area Section II is the middle portion of Harvey’s Creek Trail which will lead trail users from Pikes Creek Reservoir, through Lackawanna State Forest to the Back Mountain Recreation Area. While running through the PA American Water property on the southern end of this leg, the trail will follow the Harvey’s Creek Flume to its northern source, Rice Dam at Jackson Road. North of Rice Dam, the trail will follow Harvey’s Creek through the forested river valley within Lackawanna State Forest. The trail route will cross Route 118 and continue through the State Forest. After exiting the State Forest at its northern most point, the trail will cross Meeker Road and enter onto privately owned farmland. After crossing Outlet Road on the northern side of the farmland, trail users will enter into the Back Mountain Recreation Area. Existing trails within the Recreation Area will be used to continue the trails route to the Route Description Harvey’s Creek Trail Section II will begin at the trailhead at Pikes Creek Reservoir on Route 29. Preliminary site evaluations found that there is current insufficient sight distance and shoulder area to safely walk along Route 29 to cross over the Pikes Creek Reservoir outlet. Therefore, a bridge may be required over this concrete outlet structure (See Photo 13). Once across this waterway, the trail will follow a series of PA American Water service roads along the base of the dam and parallel to Route 29. The trail will then reconnect to the Harvey’s Creek Flume as it continues north through the river valley. As the trail follows the flume’s route north, it will re-enter Lackawanna State Forest. A preliminary field evaluation of the crossing of Fedor Road found that the sight distance may be limited due to topography and roadside vegetation. Therefore, an additional engineering and traffic study will be required to develop a safe pedestrian crossing.

As the trail approaches Jackson Road, the flume becomes a more structured feature with concrete sidewalls and a well-established bank (See Photo 15). The land on either side of Jackson Road is owned by PA American Water. The proposed crossing of Jackson Road will be an at-grade crossing with good sight distance. Rice Dam, the northern water source for the Harvey’s Creek Flume is located on the northern side of Jackson Road. Along with the dam are the control structures which directed water

Photo 6-12: Harvey’s Creek Trail Section II will begin at the trailhead at Pikes Creek Reservoir on Route 29

Photo 6-13: Pikes Creek reservoir outlet



into the flume and a small impoundment pond, all of which make this area a very scenic stop for trail users and an ideal location for interpretive signage explaining the flume system and region’s history. After looping around the southern side of the Rice Dam Pond, the trail will continue north along Harvey’s Creek into the State Forest. Mature Hemlocks and hardwoods cover the floor of river valley. A new, low impact trail will be established through this forest to allow trail users to experience this lush and tranquil area. The trail route will continue north along the Creek, roughly paralleling Fedor Road. An existing State Forest parking area along Fedor Road will be tied into the trail and serve as a trailhead. The trail will have to cross State Route 118 just east of the intersection with Fedor Road. Preliminary field evaluation of this crossing found that there is very good sight distance in both directions, therefore this proposed pedestrian crossing should be feasible. The trail continues north through the State Forest running along the northwestern edge of a large wetlands complex. This section of trail should provide an excellent opportunity to observe wildlife. At the northern most point of the State Forest, the trail will cross Meeker Road and enter onto privately owned farmland. In order to limit the impact of the trail on these properties, the proposed route runs along the outer edge of the fields. After crossing Outlet Road on the northern side of the farmland, trail users will enter into the Back Mountain Recreation Area. Total Length of Section II: 5.6 miles Existing Surface: Existing dirt maintenance road Abandoned flume Mature Forest

Surrounding Land Use / Land Cover: The majority of his section of trail runs through the valley along Harvey’s Creek. The mature forests, stream and wetlands of this area have been protected from development by the establishment of Lackawanna State Forest and protection by PA American Water. The northern end of this trail section runs through privately owned farmland before entering into the Back Mountain Recreation Area.

Photo 6-15: As the flume approaches Rice Dam the channel is cement lined.

Photo 6-14: This existing service road at Pikes Creek Reservoir will be used as part of the trail route.



Ownership: As shown in Figure 6-4, most of the trail alignment for Section II is located on public property. Therefore the feasibility of constructing this section of the trail is very good. The owners of the property which this portion of the trail will be located on are: PA American Water PA American Water Co. 800 Hershey Park Drive Hershey, PA 17033 Lackawanna State Forest Commonwealth of PA 400 Market Street, 7th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17105 1043 Meeker Road William Gordon Dawe PO Box 112 Lehman, PA 18627 96 Outlet Road William & Patricia Schlosser 902 Atherton Street Clarks Summit, PA 18411 Back Mt. Recreation Area Back Mt. Recreation Inc. PO Box 244 Lehman, PA 18627 Proposed linkages: Pikes Creek Reservoir Lackawanna State Forest Rice Dam Back Mountain Recreation Area Erosion and drainage problems: No significant problems noted. Structures:

Pikes Creek Reservoir Flume: The concrete outlet from Pikes Creek Reservoir (See Photo 6-13) provides water to the Harvey’s Creek Flume. Rice Dam: Rice Dam (See Photo 6-16), the northern water source for the Harvey’s Creek Flume is located on the northern side of Jackson Road. Along with the dam are the control structures which directed water into the flume and a small impoundment pond, all of which make this area a very scenic stop for trail users and an ideal location for interpretive signage explaining the flume system and region’s history.

Photo 6-16: Rice Dam on Harvey’s Creek is the northern water source for the flume system.

Photo 6-17: This is the small impoundment pond above Rice Dam.



Harvey’s Creek Flume: The Harvey’s Creek Flume, an earthen and concrete channel runs through the Study Area and is being used for portions of the proposed trail. This historic structure has been used to supply water from Harvey’s Creek and Pike’s Creek Reservoir to the Plymouth Reservoir. The grade of this flume is very gradual and makes an ideal route for the trail as it heads north.

Natural Features: Forested mountains and high quality streams in this area provide high quality habitat for a variety of species of flora and fauna. The presence of several protected species of plants and animals within the Harvey’s Creek watershed emphasizes the fact that this is a special area. The upper portion of Harvey’s Creek has been classified as a “High Quality, Cold Water Fishes” (HQ-CWF) water and has been identified as a “Trout Natural Reproduction Water”. As such, Harvey’s Creek is known for its high water quality and clarity. Alternative Routes: If it is determined that crossing through the privately owned properties between Meeker and Outlet Roads is not feasible, then it may be possible to travel east on Meeker Road into the village of Lehman where the trail can connect into the Lehman Connector Trail and continue on to the Back Mountain Recreation Area. Proposed Design:

- Pathway Surface • 0.69 mi. 8’ wide dirt road • 1.02 mi. of new 4’ - 6’ wide Flume trail • 3.28 mi. of new 3’ - 5’ wide woodland trail • 0.59 mi. of new 4’ - 6’ wide trail through pasture


• Fedor Road o Fair sight distance o Moderate Traffic Volume o Traffic Study Needed o Delineated Crosswalk Recommended o Signage Recommended

Photo 6-19: The trail will pass through this mature Hemlock and hardwood forest.

Photo 6-20: A small beaver pond along the route of Section II of the Harvey’s Creek Trail.



• Jackson Road

o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Delineated Crosswalk Recommended o Signage Recommended

• State Highway 118 o Good sight distance o Moderate Traffic Volume o Traffic Study Needed o Signage Recommended

• Meeker Road o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Signage Recommended

• Outlet Road o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Signage Recommended

- Structures

• A footbridge may be needed across the Pikes Creek Reservoir Flume

- Auxiliary Facilities • Restrooms

o Currently available at Back Mt. Recreation Area • Water

o Currently available at Back Mt. Recreation Area • Lighting

o None recommended • Parking / Trail Heads

o Parking currently available at Fedor Road and Back Mountain Recreation Area o New trailhead signage recommended at Fedor Road and Back Mountain

Recreation Area • Barriers and Emergency Access

o Balusters required to restrict access to trail from all road crossings. • Natural Buffers and/or Screening

o No screening is required on this section of trail.

Photo 6-21: View looking east along Route 118 from the proposed crossing location.



Environmental Hazards: No previous industrial sites or waste dumps were identified within the trail corridor during this study. However, if any potential hazards are identified during design or development, a Phase I Environmental Assessment of the trail right of way is recommended.

Photo 6-22: View looking across the privately owned pasture just north of Meeker Road.

Penn State

Back Mt. Rec

Lehman School

Luzerne Co. Fair

Dallas High SchoolMisercordia College

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000Feet

µ




6/29/12 1 in = 2,000 feet


- Proposed Trails




- Public Land





6.4 Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section III: Back Mt. Recreation Area to Back Mountain Trail Section III is the northern end of Harvey’s Creek Trail which will lead trail users from the Back Mountain Recreation area, through the Luzerne County Fairgrounds to the Back Mountain Trail on the campus of Misericordia University in Dallas. Due to the amount of privately-owned property which will be involved in this section of the trail, it is anticipated that this will be the most difficult section to complete. However, the connection of Harvey’s Creek Trail to the Back Mountain Trail will provide a valuable link to trail users and the regional trail system. By linking together the Susquehanna Warrior, the Back Mountain and Harvey’s Creek Trails, trail users will have the opportunity to travel a 35+ mile trail loop. Much longer routes would also be possible by connecting into other regional trails. This portion of the trail passes through a variety of ecosystems and landcover including pastures, hardwood forest, wetlands, commercial development and college campus. Route Description Harvey’s Creek Trail Section III will begin at the parking area for the Back Mountain Recreation Area. Additional signage can be added to create a trailhead at this location. Existing trails within the Recreation Area will be utilized to transport trail users to the northern corner of the park. From there, an existing gas pipeline right of way can be followed through privately owned properties to the northeast. Upon reaching Route 118, the trail will run parallel to that road until it reaches the intersection with Idetown Road (See Photo 25). A preliminary field evaluation found that there is sufficient sight distance at this point to create a safe road crossing. However, additional studies and design

will be required to create a safe road crossing. The trail will continue to parallel Route 118 on the southern side of the road until it reaches the Luzerne County Fairgrounds. An existing parking area on the western site of this site can be improved to create a trailhead. The trail will loop around the perimeter of the fairgrounds until it reaches the eastern access driveway on Reservoir Road.

Photo 6-23: The existing trail system in the Back Mt. Recreation Area will be used to pass through the park.

Photo 6-24: This existing right of way can be used to travel northeast from the Back Mt. Recreation Area.



Photo 6-25: The proposed trail route will cross Route 118 at its intersection with Idetown Road.

Exiting the fairgrounds, the trail will follow Reservoir Road south. This portion of the road is currently closed to thru traffic due to a damaged bridge. After crossing an un-named tributary of Huntsville Reservoir, the trail will turn northeast and enter a privately owned, forested hillside which overlooks a large open marsh. This area will provide excellent wildlife watching opportunities for trail users. The trail will follow an undeveloped road right of way through a forested area west of the Twin Stacks retail center. Following the driveways from the retail development north towards Route 415, the trail will cross this busy road and enter onto the grounds of an office complex. Continuing east, the trail will run behind an assisted living facility and across Lake Street to the campus of Misericordia University where it will connect into the Back Mountain Trail. Total Length of Section III: 4.5 miles Existing Surface: Existing Dirt Trail Gas pipeline ROW Fairgrounds Roadside Hardwood Forest Retail Development College Campus Surrounding Land Use / Land Cover: This section of trail runs through a more developed area than the other trail sections. The trail will pass through a diverse mixture of land use including farmland, fairgrounds, woodlands, a retail complex and a college campus. Approximately one half of the land for this section of trail is privately owned.

Photo 6-26: The trail will run down this section of Reservoir Road



Ownership: As shown in Figure 6-5, approximately half of Section III is located on private property. Therefore this section of trail will require a significant amount of negotiating with property owners. The owners of the property which this portion of the trail will be located on are: Back Mt. Recreation Area Back Mt. Recreation Inc. PO Box 244 Lehman, PA 18627 Misericordia University Lake Rd Dallas, PA 18612 Luzerne County Fair Grounds Dallas Area Fall Fair Inc PO Box 393 Dallas, PA 18612-0393 375 W Center Hill Rd Frank H And Carol W Bevevino 375 W Center Hill Rd Dallas, PA 18612-1307 475 Center Hill Rd Lumia/Maslow Lp 475 W Center Hill Rd Dallas, PA 18612-1334

Center Hill Rd Richard And Marion Pearsall RR 4 Highland Acres Farm Dallas, PA 18612-9804 8 Huntsville Idetown Rd Harold Vernon Davis 8 Huntsville Idetown Rd Dallas, PA 18612-3314 50 Huntsville Idetown Rd Carl And Shirley P Cook 28 Idetown Rd Dallas, PA 18612 220 Lake St Ecumenical Enterprises Inc 1075 Memorial Hwy Dallas, PA 18612-1066 1101 Memorial Hwy Payne Printery Inc 1101 Memorial Hwy Dallas, PA 18612-9179

Memorial Hwy Richard And Banta Lynn Haas RR 1 Box 412a Harveys Lake, PA 18618-9774 541 Park Rd Thomas J Jr And Lila M J Park 541 Park Rd Dallas, PA 18612-2900 60 Peaceful Valley Rd Eugene P And Elaine M Janiczek 60 Peaceful Valley Rd Dallas, PA 18612-2920 Route 118 Thomas E Heffernan 17 Golf Course Rd Dallas, PA 18612 Route 415 James T Reese RR 5 Box 210c Dallas, PA 18612-9163

Proposed linkages: Back Mountain Recreation Area Luzerne County Fairgrounds Misericordia University Back Mountain Trail Erosion and drainage problems: No significant problems noted. Structures: There are no significant structures located along this section of trail Natural Features: This section of trail runs through a more developed area than the other trail sections. Northeast of the Fairgrounds, the trail will turn northeast and enter a privately owned, forested hillside which overlooks a large open marsh. This area will provide excellent wildlife watching opportunities for trail users.

Photo 6-27: The proposed trail route passes through the Twin Stacks retail complex.



Alternative Routes: Due to the amount of private property that is involved in this section of trail, alternative routes will need to be considered if uninterested property owners are encountered. Fortunately, much of the privately owned property is surrounded by other undeveloped properties, so realignments of the trail are feasible. Proposed Design:

- Pathway Surface • 0.84 mi. of existing trail (B.M. Rec Area) • 1.43 mi. of new 4’ - 6’ wide trail on pipeline ROW and road shoulder • 0.49 mi. of new 4’ - 6’ wide trail through Fairgrounds • 0.96 mi. of new 4’ - 6’ wide trail through woodlands • 0.26 mi of new 4’ to 6’ wide trail through retail complex • 0.50 mi of new 4’ to 6’ wide trail through college campus


• Peace Valley Road o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Signage Recommended

• State Highway 118 o Good sight distance o Moderate Traffic Volume o Traffic Study Needed o Delineated Crosswalk Recommended o Signage Recommended

• Huntsville-Idetown Rd o Municipal Road o Cross at STOP Sign o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Signage Recommended

• Reservoir Road o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Signage Recommended

• State Highway 415 o Good sight distance o Moderate Traffic Volume o Traffic Study Needed o Delineated Crosswalk Recommended o Signage Recommended

Photo 6-28: Harvey’s Creek Trail will intersect the Back Mountain Trail on the campus of Misericordia University.



• Lake Road o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Moderate Traffic Volume o Delineated Crosswalk Recommended o Signage Recommended

- Structures

• No Structures required for this section of trail


o Currently available at Back Mt. Recreation Area • Water

o Currently available at Back Mt. Recreation Area • Lighting

o None recommended • Parking / Trail Heads

o Parking currently available at Back Mountain Recreation Area o New trailhead signage recommended at Back Mountain Recreation Area, Luzerne

County Fairgrounds and Misericordia University • Barriers and Emergency Access


o No screening is required on this section of trail. Environmental Hazards: No previous industrial sites or waste dumps were identified within the trail corridor during this study. However, if any potential hazards are identified during design or development, a Phase I Environmental Assessment of the trail right of way is recommended.

Penn State

Back Mt. Rec

Lehman School

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500Feet

µ




6/29/12 1 in = 1,000 feet


- Proposed Trails




- Public Land





6.5 Harvey’s Creek Trail – Section IV: Lehman Connector Trail Section IV of Havey’s Creek Trail is the Lehman Connector Trail. This route will provide safe travel between Penn State’s Wilkes Barre Campus, the Lake Lehman Schools and the Back Mountain Recreation Area. This will also give trail users from the schools access to Harvey’s Creek Trail. Although much of this section runs through school property, there is not a delineated trail route for people to follow. The key portion of this trail route will be passing through the “town center” of Lehman and crossing Route 118. Although this report will review the potential route through this area, a more details planning and engineering study is needed to improve the configuration and use of this intersection. Route Description As shown in Figure 6-6, this section of Harvey’s Creek Trail will begin on Penn State’s Wilkes-Barre Campus on Old 115. After leaving the college’s campus, the trail will travel west along the roadway past the Lehman Township Municipal Building and then cross the road to enter onto the grounds of the Lehman Township Schools. The trail will travel north through the School District property and come out onto Market Street, a small residential street. (See Photo 30). At the western end of Market Street the trail will reach “Lehman Center”. A triangle is formed by the intersection of Market Street, Mountain View Drive and Route 118. Cook’s Variety Store is located on the southern end of this triangle and their customers often park in this area.

Photo 6-29: .Lehman Center at the intersection of Market Street, Mountain View Drive and Route 118.

Photo 6-30: Aerial view of the proposed trail route along Market Street.



Photo 6-32: Redesign of the area around Lehman Center could significantly improve the intersection.

Although this odd intersection configuration adds to the area’s quaintness, redesign of this area could create an intersection that would be safer for motorists and pedestrian friendly. After crossing Route 118, trail users would have access to an existing sidewalk along Firehouse Road which leads to the intersection with Outlet Road. The trail will follow Outlet Road to the entrance of the Back Mountain Recreation Area.

Total Length of Section IV: 1.5 miles Existing Surface: Existing Campus Sidewalks Shrub / Scrub Road Shoulder Grass School Grounds Roadway Existing Sidewalk Surrounding Land Use / Land Cover: This section of the trail will pass through the Penn State’s Wilkes-Barre Campus, the Lehman Township Municipal Building, the grounds of the Lake Lehman Schools and Lehman Center. Much of the area around these public facilities is currently developed with single family homes. Although this section of trail is more developed than some of the other sections of trail, it will be an important route for trail users moving between the schools and the Back Mountain Recreation Area.

Photo 31: View looking up Market Street towards the Lake Lehman Schools



Ownership: Most of the trail alignment for Section IV is located on public property or within public right of ways. Therefore the feasibility of constructing this section of the trail is very good. The owners of the property which this portion of the trail will be located on are:

Penn State University 416 Old Main University Park, PA 16802-1505 Lake Lehman School District PO Box 38 Lehman, PA 18627-0038

Lehman Township 1095 Mountain View Dr Dallas, PA 18612 Back Mt. Recreation Area Back Mt. Recreation Inc. PO Box 244 Lehman, PA 18627

Proposed linkages: Penn State – Wilkes Barre Campus Lake Lehman Schools Lehman Township Municipal Building Back Mountain Recreation Area Erosion and drainage problems: No significant problems noted. Structures: Lehman Center: A triangle is formed by the intersection of Market Street, Mountain View Drive and Route 118. Cook’s Variety Store is located on the southern end of this triangle and their customers often park in this area. Although this odd intersection configuration adds to the area’s quaintness, redesign of this area could create an intersection that would be safer for motorists and pedestrian friendly. Firehouse Road Sidewalk: An existing sidewalk is located on the western side of Firehouse Road between Route 118 and Outlet Road/ Natural Features: There are no significant natural features along this section of trail. Alternative Routes: Since the entire route of this section of trail runs through public land or public right of ways, the need for alternative routes is minimal. Flexibility in the routes through the Lake Lehman School District property will allow school officials to design a route which will best serve their student’s needs. As previously discussed, additional studies are needed for the area around Lehman Center needs to redesign this intersection to make it safer for motorists and more pedestrian friendly.

Photo 6-33: Lehman Center is located at the intersection of Market Street, Mountain View Drive and Route 118.



Proposed Design: - Pathway Surface

• 0.40 mi. of 6’ wide gravel trail (PSU & Lehman Twp.) • 0.60 mi. of 6’ wide gravel trail (Lake Lehman Schools) • 0.17 mi. of new sidewalk (Market Street) • 0.08 mi of existing sidewalk (Firehouse Road) • 0.18 mi. of new sidewalk (Outlet Street)


• Old 118 o Excellent sight distance o Moderate Traffic Volume o Delineated Crosswalk Needed o Signage Recommended

• Mill Street o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Crossing at STOP sign o Signage Recommended o Delineated Crosswalk Needed

• Mountain View Drive o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Crossing at STOP sign o Signage Recommended o Delineated Crosswalk Needed

• State Highway 118 o Good sight distance o Moderate Traffic Volume o Traffic Study Needed o Delineated Crosswalk Needed o Signage Recommended

• Outlet Road o Municipal Road o Good sight distance o Low Traffic Volume o Delineated Crosswalk Needed o Signage Recommended

- Structures

• None required for this section of trail.


o Currently available at PSU and Back Mt. Recreation Area.

Photo 6-34: Existing sidewalk along the western side of Firehouse Road.



• Water o Currently available at PSU and Back Mt. Recreation Area.

• Lighting o None recommended

• Parking / Trail Heads o Currently available at PSU, Lake Lehman Schools and Back Mt. Recreation Area. o New trailhead signage recommended at PSU, Lake Lehman Schools and Back Mt.

Recreation Area. • Barriers and Emergency Access


o No screening is required on this section of trail. Environmental Hazards: No previous industrial sites or waste dumps were identified within the trail corridor during this study. However, if any potential hazards are identified during design or development, a Phase I Environmental Assessment of the trail right of way is recommended.

Photo 6-35: Cook’s Variety Store is located adjacent to Lehman Center

Chapter 7: Design Standards


CHAPTER 7: DESIGN STANDARDS 7.1 Trails The following recommendations are not intended to replace or conflict with current guidelines and standards, but to supplement those guidelines. The following design standards are intended to survey as a guide for the future design the proposed trail system. 7.1.1 Surfaces

Several factors must be considered when choosing a trail surface including: • User acceptance and satisfaction • Accessibility • Cost to purchase and install materials • Cost of maintaining the surface • Life expectancy • Availability of material

In addition, a decision must be made on whether the surface is going to be a hard or soft surface. Hard Surfaces are more accommodating for multi-use trails and can withstand frequent use. However, they are more expensive to build. Soft surface trails are less expensive to build. However, they often do not hold up well under heavy use or varying weather conditions and require more maintenance. Since a large portion of this trail is located within the Lackawanna State Forest, it has been decided that much of the proposed trail system will be single-track earthen trail. However, on sections of the trail where heavier use is expected, such as the Leman Connector Trail, a hard surface trail appears to be the local choice for this project. Examples of hard surface trail systems include: Crushed stone: (limestone, sandstone, crushed rock) Crushed stone holds up well under heavy use and is more economical than asphalt. This trail surface can accommodate nearly every type of trail use, except inline skaters. Existing crushed stone trail systems in the region include the Back Mountain Trail, Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the D&L Trail System. Construction of this type of trail will consist of a minimum 2 inches of compacted #10 crushed stone over 6 inches of compacted 2RC stone. Asphalt: This trail surface is well suited for most user types including bicycle commuters and inline skaters. Although the cost to construct this trail surface is higher, it is more stable and has a life expectancy of seven to 15 years. Asphalt trails are often used in urban areas or near trailheads and access points where stability is important. Existing asphalt trail systems in the region include the West Side Trail and Luzerne County Levee Trail System. Due to its high cost, asphalt is currently recommended only on the sections of trail which require the greatest stability (i.e. steep slopes, levees, urban areas). If an “upgrade” to asphalt is desired for sections of trail in the future, the proposed crushed stone surface will provide an excellent base for the pavement. Construction of this type of trail will consist of a minimum 2 inches bituminous concrete over 4-6” of compacted 2A stone and geotextile. Concrete: Sidewalks can may be installed along some of the residential roadways and incorporated into the proposed trail system. A minimum of 4 inches pour-in-place (3,000 psi) concrete will be installed over 4-6 inches of compacted 2A stone. Reinforcement and



concrete thickness will be required at locations where vehicles will cross or use the walk. Provide a maximum 2% cross slope to move storm water off the surface. Boardwalks: In order to cross wetlands and areas of steep cross grade, sections of boardwalk may be incorporated into the proposed trail. However, due to their excessive price, boardwalks are only recommended in limited areas where no other trail surfaces are feasible. 7.1.2 Standard Trail As previous stated, since much of the proposed trail system is located within the State Forest, the trail surface will be minimal. State Forest Service personnel will clear and mark the trail within Lackawanna State Forest. Trail widths will vary depending upon topography, vegetation and existing features. In some areas, the trail width will be limited by the width of the berm adjacent to the Harvey’s Creek Flume. Ideally, objects should not protrude into any portion of the clear tread width of the trail. If an object must protrude into the travel space, it should not extend more than 4 inches. Furthermore, a minimum vertical clearance of 8 feet should be provided above the trail. If equestrian use of the trails is anticipated, the minimum vertical clearance should be increased to 12 feet. Due to the steep terrain in areas of the State Forest, portions of the trail may not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). All trail mapping should identify these non-compliant sections so that disabled trail users can plan ahead to avoid these more rugged sections of the trail.

Figure 7-1: Typical trail clearing with trailway and trailbed. Width to vary from 3 to 8 feet. US Forest Service



Figure 7-2: Typical hard-surface trail design with minimum clearances shown. Source: Iowa DOT

On sections of the trail where heavier use is expected, such as the Leman Connector Trail, and the northern end of Section III, a hard surface trail appears to be the local choice for this project. Due to economics, the preferred surface for a hard trail in these areas is crushed stone. However, in some areas an asphalt surface may be more desirable. The standard trail width proposed is 8 feet with a minimum of two feet of cleared shoulder on each side of the trail. This width will be sufficient for two way travel and save passage of slower trail users. Design considerations should be made to meet current ADA Standards. Maximum trail slopes should be limited as follows: • 8.3 percent for a maximum of 200 ft. • 10 percent for a maximum of 30 ft. • 12.5 percent for a maximum of 10 ft. Near the top and bottom of the maximum grade segments, the grade should gradually transition to less than 5 percent. In addition, rest intervals should be provided within 25 feet of the top and bottom of a maximum grade segment. The cross slope of the trail should not exceed 2 percent.

8’



Figure 7-3: Example of Pavement Markings for Bicycle Lanes on a Two-Way Street Source: US DOT

7.1.4 Sidewalks Existing sidewalks will be used for several trail segments in developed areas. Where feasible, improvements should be made to the increase the sidewalks to a minimum of 6 feet wide. All sidewalk improvements should include compliance with ADA requirements.

7.1.5 Bike Lanes

Cyclist should be discouraged from riding on the sidewalk. In conjunction with upgrades to the existing sidewalks, where feasible, bike lanes should be designated on the adjacent roadway to allow for safe cycling. Detailed traffic studies will be needed to determine the suitability of existing roadways for bike lanes. In some cases, road improvements may be required to accommodate these lanes.

Photo 7-1: Bicycle lane in an urban setting with curbside parking.



Photo 7-2: Example of a textured cross walk used to delineate a pedestrian crossing.

7.2 Trail Intersections The overarching goal is to design road and trail intersections that minimize risk for both trail users and motorists. Sight distance is probably one of the most important considerations when designing a trail/roadway intersection in order to provide the greatest amount of advance warning for motorists and trail users. A motorist must be able to see a trail user preparing to cross a roadway in time to yield or take evasive action. Likewise, trail users must be able to see oncoming traffic in time to safely cross a roadway. Although not always possible, having a clear view of trail users approaching an intersection will allow a motorist to recognize a potential conflict and take evasive action if the trail user, especially a bicyclist, darts out into the roadway. Crossings should be designed to be perpendicular to the roadway so trail users will be in a position where they can readily see approaching traffic from both directions. Warning signs are used to alert motorists to the presence of a crossing ahead. They are especially effective at mid-block crossings where pedestrians and trail users are not anticipated. 7.2.1 Crosswalks

At unmarked or uncontrolled trail intersections, bicyclists and pedestrians are required to yield to vehicles in the roadway. This requirement can be reinforced by placing STOP signs or yield signs on a trail approach to an intersection to specifically assign the right-of-way to vehicles in the roadway. Crosswalk markings have two functions: 1) to provide guidance for pedestrians who are crossing roadways, and 2) to alert road users of a pedestrian crossing point across roadways not controlled by highway traffic signals or STOP signs. If there is a need to assign right-of-way to trail users, STOP signs or YIELD signs and appropriate pavement marking should be used in conjunction with a marked crosswalk.

Recent traffic safety studies have concluded that marked crosswalks without other safety improvements should not be used under the following conditions:

• Where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph. • On a roadway with four or more lanes

without a raised median or crossing island that has (or will soon have) an ADT of 12,000 or greater.

• On a roadway with four or more lanes with a raised median or crossing island that has (or will soon have) an Average Daily Traffic of 15,000 or greater.

Figure 7-4: Example of Signing and Markings for a Multi-Use Trail / Roadway Crossing. Source: US DOT



Photo 7-3: Example of a pedestrian activated flashing signal roadway crossing. Source: Parks & Trails NY

7.2.2 STOP Signs / Traffic Lights

If trail users need to wait for long periods of time before acceptable gaps in traffic occurs, they will take greater risks by attempting to cross during unacceptable gaps. When the volume of vehicular traffic becomes so great that trail users have difficulty crossing the roadway, consideration should be given to assigning right-of-way to trail users. Assignment of right-of-way to trail users should also be considered when there are large volumes of trail users. Greater numbers of trail users increases the exposure to risk, even under normal traffic conditions. In addition, larger queues occur at crossings which increase the risk by having larger numbers of trail users crossing at the same time. Right-of-way can be assigned with the installation of a STOP signs or a Traffic Signal. Traffic Signals have an advantage over STOP signs in that it alternates right-of-way allowing less of an impact on the roadway capacity. Pedestrian-actuated signals can be installed to allow the signal to change right-of-way only when actuated. Traffic studies should be completed before these devices are used to assure that the capacity of the roadway is not unduly affected.

7.2.3 Flashing Signals (Cross Alert) A new warning system for trail crossings that is gaining popularity is a system of lights that is activated when trail users approach a sensor mounted on the system at a roadway crossing. The system consists of a red LED light and STOP sign on the trail for trail users and an amber, or yellow, Light Emitting Diode light and warning sign on the roadway to warn motorists. The system was designed not to alter the flow of vehicular traffic, but to only forewarn oncoming vehicles that trail users are near or in the crosswalk.



Photo 7-4: Refuge Islands provide a safe haven for pedestrians crossing busy intersections.

Photo 7-5: Example of bollards used on the Levee Trail to restrict access my motor vehicles.

7.2.4 Refuge Islands The task of crossing multiple lane roadways or even high volume two-lane roadways can be made much simpler and safer by providing a pedestrian refuge island in the middle of the road. The refuge island should be a minimum of six feet wide to allow the complete length of a bicycle to be within the refuge area. The crossing area in the refuge island should be slightly skewed towards oncoming traffic. This configuration will allow a trail user to focus their attention on oncoming traffic.

7.3 Auxiliary Structures 7.3.1 Barriers and Emergency Access

With the exception of maintenance, police, and emergency vehicles, motor vehicles are prohibited from multi-use trails. A ten-foot wide multi-use path is wide enough to be easily mistaken as a driveway or a street to the motorist, and vehicles can erroneously or deliberately enter a trail. The use of barriers at the entrance to a trail with a separate means of access for authorized vehicles is routinely used by trail designers. The barrier usually consists of a series of bollards spaced approximately five feet apart to allow a bicycle with a trailer or a wheelchair to pass through. Authorized vehicle access is often accommodated through a separate gate or by removing the center bollard. This type of barrier treatment effectively eliminates all motor vehicles except ATVs.



Photo 7-7: A prefabricated steel bridge similar to this one could be used to span the spillway from Pikes Creek Reservoir.

7.3.3 Bridges Preliminary site evaluations found that there is current insufficient sight distance and shoulder area to safely walk along Route 29 to cross over the Pikes Creek Reservoir outlet. A preliminary evaluation of this crossing indicated that the existing cement structure could be spanned by a prefabricated steel bridge. Additional engineering studies will be required to assure the structural stability of this structure.

7.4 Trail Signage Each of the existing trail systems in this area has its own distinctive style of signs. As part of the final design of this trail system, a comprehensive signage plan should be developed to tie together the various sign styles and format.

Photo 7-6: Concrete spillway flowing from Pikes Creek Reservoir.



7.5 Accessibility Everyone should have the opportunity to experience and enjoy the outdoors. To the maximum extent feasible, trails should be designed to accommodate the access needs of all designated users. Considering accessibility when designing trails and installing accessible built facilities such as ADA compliant restrooms, handicapped parking at Trail Heads, and lowered drinking fountains will permit more people to enjoy the outdoors. In addition, providing detailed information about existing path conditions and available facilities can help visitors select trails. Such trail information reduces the likelihood that a trail user will become stranded or endangered and can improve safety and visitor enjoyment. Because trails are transportation and recreation facilities, accessibility is mandated by the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which requires certain design standards for facilities to be in compliance with the law. ADA compliance is important to keep in mind as a trail enters the design and construction phases. On October 19, 2009 the United States Access Board published the Draft Final Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas to establish accessibility guidelines pursuant to the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA). Requirements proposed under these guidelines for Accessible Trails included:

Surface - The surface of trails and their related passing spaces and resting intervals shall be firm and stable.

Clear Tread Width - The clear tread width of trails shall be 36 inches minimum.

Passing Spaces - Trails with a clear tread width less than 60 inches shall provide passing spaces at intervals of 1000 feet maximum.

Obstacles - Tread obstacles on trails and their related passing spaces and resting intervals shall not exceed ½ inch in height measured vertically to the highest point.

Slopes - No more than 30 percent of the total length of a trail shall have a running slope steeper than 1:12. The running slope of any segment of a trail shall not be steeper than 1:8.

Cross Slope - Where the surface is concrete, asphalt, or boards, the cross slope shall not be steeper than 1:48. Where other trail surfaces are used, the cross slope on other surfaces shall not be steeper than 1:20.

Trail Signs - Trail signs should include the following information: • Length of the trail or trail segment • Surface type • Typical and minimum tread width • Typical and maximum running slope • Typical and maximum cross slope

Typically, problems in complying with ADA requirements for a trail design arise due to steep slope issues. Due to the steep terrain in areas of the State Forest, portions of the trail may not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). All trail mapping should identify these non-compliant sections so that disabled trail users can plan ahead to avoid these more rugged sections of the trail.

Chapter 8: Trail Operation, Maintenance and Security


CHAPTER 8: TRAIL OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SECURITY

8.1 Ownership/maintenance/management options There are several examples of potential entities or organizational structures which could fulfill the role for trail ownership, maintenance and/or management. The most appropriate structure may involve one or a combination of the following: Formation of a Non-Profit Organization A non-profit organization dedicated to trail ownership, maintenance and/or management could be formed that would have by-laws, officers, board members, etc. The Pennsylvania Association of Non-Profit Organizations (www.pano.org) and the corresponding Pennsylvania Nonprofit Handbook provide valuable advice if this option is to be explored., An advantage to the formation of a non-profit structure is that a non-profit organization is eligible to receive funding from local and regional foundations and donations to non-profit organizations can provide certain tax benefits to private donors. . Creation of an Authority The Municipality Authority Act of 1945 authorizes the creation of municipal authorities (termed joint authorities) by two or more local governments (Intergovernmental Cooperation Handbook, Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development, 1997). Joint authorities are most commonly used when major capital investments are necessary (i.e. sewage treatment, water supply, airports, bus transit systems and in some cases recreation). Joint Authorities cannot include members from non-profit organizations. Pros and cons of municipal authorities include: • Under the Municipalities Authority Act, authorities may sell bonds, receive grants, acquire

property, sign contracts and take similar actions; • Authorities are autonomous from local government thereby able to focus on a single

recreational function (i.e. pool, indoor facilities); • Joint authorities must be governed by board members who are appointed by elected officials

of the member municipalities. Often elected officials are not appointed to sit on the authority boards. Care must be taken to avoid a lapse in communication between the authority board and the member municipalities;

• Municipalities have no control over the authority. Care must be taken to avoid conflicts between the authority board and the member municipalities;

• Recreational authorities can experience difficulty in generating adequate funding and may end up reducing services, looking for local support or negotiating for increased funding from the municipalities that created them..

Creation of a Commission In 1972, the General Assembly enacted the Intergovernmental Cooperation Law to implement the provisions of Article IX, Section 5 of the new Pennsylvania Constitution, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Provision (Intergovernmental Cooperation Handbook, Department of Community and Economic Development, 1997). The Act, commonly referred to as Act 180, states, “A municipality may cooperate or agree in the exercise of any function, power or responsibility with one or more municipalities” (Act 180, Section 4). As in the case of the

http://www.pano.org/



authority a non-profit organization cannot be a member of a commission. Likewise, the steering committee could elect to create a commission with the interested municipalities. The language of Act 180 is very broad. If a municipality has the power to take an action or deliver a service under the provisions of its code or charter, it has the power to cooperate with other municipalities and non-profit organizations in doing so by forming an entity such as a commission. The exercise of this power is the responsibility of the municipal governing body (Intergovernmental Cooperation Handbook, PA Department of Community and Economic Development, 1997). Required features of an intergovernmental cooperation agreement are outlined in the handbook. Under Act 180, the steering committee may enter into an intergovernmental agreement and create a commission. The creation of a commission would provide far more flexibility than an authority and allow the municipalities and other members to dictate their own terms. Creation of a Council of Governments Act 180 also provides for the creation of a Council of Governments (COG). A COG differs from a commission and other ACT 180 agreements in the following ways: • A COG has broad responsibility and may study and propose new joint programs and projects

and coordinate other municipal activities rather than oversee one specific project; • Multiple existing or proposed ACT 180 agreements among COG municipalities can be

included under a COG; • No specific program must be undertaken; • A COG board or council is almost always composed of elected officials; and • Either elected or appointed officials may oversee other Act 180 programs. The creation of a COG could be the next step after the creation of a recreation commission. If the participating municipalities felt that other agreements under Act 180 might useful and wanted to expand their partnering activities among the municipalities, then the creation of a COG might be beneficial. Volunteer and “Friends” Group Often part of non-profits, but not always, groups of “trail friends” and volunteers often plan, build and manage trails, particularly soft-surface and hiking trails. For multi-use trails, volunteers often work in collaboration with agencies for expensive items such as bridges and storm repair, while performing day-to-day maintenance and special improvement projects. Again, the mix of involvement will depend on the nature of any specific trail segment, and the strengths of any particular group or groups. Ownership by the ASTA, SWTC The preferred alignment of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway indicates connections to two existing trails, the Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the Anthracite Scenic Trails Association’s Back Mountain Trail. It is possible that the Anthracite Scenic Trails Association and/or the Susquehanna Warrior Trail Council could be one of the lead entities to develop portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway system. Both organizations strongly support the development of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway and may be willing to undertake the development and operation and maintenance of portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway. However, both entities indicated that their trails are not completely constructed and their priorities at this time are to finish the remaining sections of their respective unconstructed trails.



Ownership by Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry The preferred alignment of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway also indicates connections to the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry Lackawanna Forestry District. The Forestry District currently maintains a trail system within the Lackawanna Forest and has plans for future trail construction. The Bureau of Forestry Lackawanna Forest District would be the lead entities to develop those portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway system the fall within the State Forest. Bureau of Forestry Lackawanna Forest District has indicated a willingness to undertake the development and operation and maintenance of those portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway that fall within their boundaries. 8.2 Trail Maintenance An ongoing maintenance and improvement program will ensure that the entire trail system is kept in optimal condition, and meets or exceeds existing standards. Landscaped areas along the trail will require some periodic maintenance, but good design can keep this to a minimum. Low maintenance and drought resistant trees, shrubs, and ground covers can also minimize upkeep activities. Like all transportation improvements, trail systems require funding and staff time for maintenance. Fortunately, several strategies and funding programs are available to reduce the burden to local agencies. Hundreds of trails around the state provide examples of successful management and maintenance strategies. While trail ownership and maintenance are closely correlated, it is also common for a trail to be owned by a government entity but maintained by volunteers. This is a win-win relationship. Most nonprofit trail groups avoid owning land due to liability concerns. The government, which has much more wherewithal to address legal issues, takes ownership in exchange for low-cost maintenance. This set-up is also beneficial in disaster situations such as hurricanes, since trails held by private nonprofits may not qualify for federal disaster aid. Nonprofit trail groups participate in the maintenance of more than three times as many trails as they own. This core group of volunteers are further augmented by scouts, community groups, persons sentenced to community service and others. A similar pattern can be seen in the payment for maintenance, where trail groups fund a significant share of maintenance through membership dues, donations, fundraising events, and local business and foundation grants, even though government entities actually own the trail. Table 8-1 provides a list of typical trail maintenance tasks, both routine and periodic which can be anticipated for the proposed trail system. It is assumed that all bike lanes and improved sidewalks will be maintained by the entity which currently maintains that roadway.



TABLE 8-1: Typical trail maintenance tasks and anticipated frequency. TASK FREQUENCY TRAIL SURFACE

Dirt Trail Direct water off the tread / Maintain drainage structures Quarterly or as Required Remove debris and obstacles Quarterly or as Required Maintain clearances Annual Maintain clear trail edges Annual Asphalt Trail

Repaving 15 years Coating or sealing 5 years Crack Sealing Annual Pavement markings maintenance and replacement Annual Pothole repair Annual or As Required Snow removal As Required Surface cleaning Quarterly

Crushed Stone Trail Resurface As Required Re-Grading Annual Pothole repair and other patches Annual or As Required Snow removal As Required Surface cleaning Quarterly

LANDSCAPING Keep trail-side land clear of trash and debris Weekly General maintenance of trailheads (litter clean-up, etc.) Weekly Mowing Weekly (in season) Leaf removal Monthly (in season) Tree pruning Annual Tree removal Annual Invasive species removal Biannual Planting new vegetation Biannual Application of herbicides or pesticides Biannual Clearing of drainage channels and culverts Annual or As Required Surface maintenance of parking areas Annual or As Required Landscaping/gardening at trailheads Biannual

FACILITIES & STRUCTURES Empty trash cans at trailheads and along trail Weekly Maintenance of stationary toilets at trailheads (clean, empty, etc.) Weekly Maintenance of portable toilets at trailheads (clean, empty, etc.) Weekly Maintenance of informational kiosks (repairs, etc.) Annual or As Required Maintenance of picnic tables, benches, etc. Annual or As Required Updating information in informational kiosks Monthly Repair/maintenance of signs Annual or As Required Maintenance of pavement markings Annual Patrols by police agency Daily Patrols by non-police agency (e.g. trail watch) Daily Recovery from illegal acts such as dumping and vandalism Weekly Maintenance of lighting Quarterly Maintenance of gates, bollards and fencing Annual or As Required Bridge, underpass and crossing inspection Annual Bridge redecking As Required Paint/stain/treat bridge deck or structure As Required General bridge maintenance Annual General underpass maintenance Annual Railroad grade crossing maintenance Annual Road grade crossing maintenance Annual



8.3 Trail Security Although studies show that trail crime is rare, it is nonetheless a legitimate concern for residents and trail users and should be treated accordingly. There are several methods for addressing such concerns and minimizing the potential for crime. Encouraging trail use is one way to help ensure trail safety, as the presence of other users helps to minimized undesirable behavior. In addition, trail users should exercise common sense when using trails after dark and remain aware of their surroundings at all times. Several other mitigation strategies help suppress criminal behavior and lessen the impact of incidents that do occur. In particular, trail design features and trail patrols are useful to keep in mind and recommendations for their implementation are included in this section. However since every trail environment is unique, trail managers should assess the need for these strategies on an individual basis.

Good trail design is an effective way of promoting trail safety. In most cases, the design of the trail should eliminate overgrown vegetation and tall shrubs in order to minimize hiding places along the trail and maintain long sight lines for users. Trail managers may also choose to place security lighting at trail heads and in parking lots to improve trail safety. Emergency phones or call boxes and emergency vehicle access are also important safety features for some trails. Additionally, keeping all trail corridors clean and well maintained increases the feeling of community ownership of the trail and reduces the incidents of minor crime such as litter, graffiti and vandalism. Prohibiting motorized use of the trail deters property crime.

Two-thirds of trails report vandalism of their signs, including graffiti, damage and theft. You should expect this to happen and be prepared. Here are some tips for combating vandalism:

• Repair or replace vandalized signs quickly to send a message that vandals will not deter the trail effort.

• Anchor signs and sign posts securely. • Use materials less subject to vandalism, such as metal versus wood posts. • Limit signs in remote areas or other areas where vandalism is a concern. • Cover unique or intricate signs with Lexan to protect them from direct contact.

8.4 Potential roles of public and non-public agencies Existing organizations in the region could also fulfill the role of public and non-public agencies that could move the trail project forward including: • Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry

Lackawanna District. Approximately 7 miles of proposed trail traverse the State Forest. The preferred alignment of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway also indicates connections to the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry Lackawanna Forestry District. The Forestry District currently maintains a trail system within the Lackawanna Forest and has plans for future trail construction. The Bureau of Forestry Lackawanna Forest District would be the lead entities to develop those portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway system the fall within the State Forest. Bureau of Forestry Lackawanna Forest District has indicated a willingness to undertake the development and operation and maintenance of those portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway that fall within their boundaries.

• Anthracite Scenic Trails Association (ASTA)/Back Mountain Trail. The Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway Plan proposes to connect to this trail at Misericordia University. ASTA is a



non profit volunteer group of trail enthusiasts who have joined together to promote and coordinate the acquisition and preservation of abandoned and out of service railroad rights of way throughout the Back Mountain. By transforming these rights of way into a network of linear parks, ASTA seeks to preserve and protect natural resources, historic landmarks, and scenic beauty; to promote appropriate forms of transportation; and ultimately, to connect with the developing state and national trails network. ASTA develops two trails in Luzerne County: The Back Mountain Trail - 5 miles and the Black Diamond Trail. ASTA raises funds to match grants for acquisition, design, construction, and maintenance. If interested, ASTA would be able to move forward with the development of portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway, by applying for design and engineering funding and construction dollars. ASTA may also be willing to undertake the operation and maintenance of all or portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway.

• The Susquehanna Warrior Trail Council (SWT). The Susquehanna Warrior Trail offers recreational opportunities extending 18.5 miles along the old Delaware Lehigh and Western Railroad beds from the PPL Riverlands Recreational Area to Larksville in Central Pennsylvania. The Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway proposes to connect to the SWT in West Nanticoke at the Garden Drive-In. If interested, SWT would be able to move forward with the development of portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway, by applying for design and engineering funding and construction dollars. SWT may also be willing to undertake the operation and maintenance of all or portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway.

• Pennsylvania American Water (PAW). The Pennsylvania American Water Company serves the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania providing more than 2 million people, in more than 370 communities, with a supply of high quality water and wastewater service. Portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway alignment traverse property owned by the Pennsylvania American Water Company and will utilize portions of the flume which is owned and maintained by PAW. PAW has indicted their interest in providing maintenance of those portions of the Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway that traverse their property.

The proposed roles of the entities would be determined once a structure is in place.



8.5 Areas for in-kind contributions from involved entities Table 8-2 below lists tasks which are commonly completed by Volunteer Groups as in-kind contributions for Trail Maintenance. TABLE 8-2: Common Maintenance Tasks for Volunteers.

VOLUNTEERS CAN MOST LIKELY… VOLUNTEERS MAY NOT BE ABLE TO… TO GET HELP WITH THIS TASK…

Keep the trail clear of trash and debris. Haul material to a disposal facility. Contact your local government or waste hauler.

Clear brush and trees. Dispose of the material. Borrow or rent a chipper.

Plant and maintain trees, shrubs and flowers and do most gardening and landscaping tasks. Provide the items to be planted.

Get donated or discounted plant materials from a local nursery or home center. Establish an inventory of donated hand tools.

Operate mowers, trimmers and chain saws. Supply their own tools. Establish an inventory of donated power tools.

Operate a tractor, loader or bobcat. Operate specialized heavy equipment like a dozer, grader or roller.

Ask your local road crew or hire a paid contractor. Make minor repairs to non-asphalt trails. Lay asphalt or operate a paving machine.

Keep drainage structures clear. Dig a trench and install pipes or culverts.

Perform surface cleaning of restrooms. Remove waste from portable toilets and restrooms. Hire a paid contractor.

Install signs, gates, bollards and fences. Manufacture same. Purchase using donated funds, or get donated or discounted materials from a lumber yard or home center. Build and install picnic tables, benches, kiosks

and other wood structures. Provide materials.

Bridge decking and minor bridge and tunnel maintenance.

Structural inspection and maintenance of bridges and tunnels.

Hire a professional engineer and paid contractor.

Source: RTC - “Rail-Trail Maintenance: Preparing for the Future of Your Trail”

Chapter 9: Financial Feasibility Analysis


CHAPTER 9: FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS 9.1 Land acquisition or easements required for proposed trail system The proposed trail system has been designed to take advantage of existing publicly owned parcels and right of ways. Much of the proposed trail alignment runs within land controlled by PA State Forest Service, Luzerne County, PA American Water or other public or non-profit organizations. Therefore, the need to acquire easements from private land owners has been significantly reduced. Although agreements will be needed with each of the public entities involved, the acquisition of right of ways for the proposed trails will be much easier than if they were running through privately owned parcels. Depending upon the property owner’s willingness to work with the trail developers and the size of the property involved, there are numerous methods in which to cross a privately owned parcel with a public trail. In some cases, landowners may be willing to donate smaller properties to a 501C3 non-profit group to take advantage of Income Tax deductions; in other cases it may be necessary to purchase the property. Some of the more common methods for acquiring land for a public trail are outlined below:

Purchase: Land can be purchased outright by either a nonprofit or a public entity. This option may be the simplest, but it can prove costly. Land Donations: A landowner can donate property to an agency or organization. Tax credits may be available for land donated for conservation purposes. Bargain Sale: Sale of a property at less than the fair market value. The difference between a bargain sale price and fair market value often qualifies as a tax-deductible charitable contribution. You can use this method to avoid high capital gains taxes. Easements: A landowner may grant a trail easement to a nonprofit organization or government to allow the nonprofit or government to construct or maintain a public trail on the private property. By donating or selling a trail easement, a landowner may provide their land for a public trail without having to subdivide the land or lose ownership and control of the land. The easement may address matters such as:

• Trail width and facilities • Pathway Material • Permitted Uses and Hours for Use • Liability

Land Lease: In these cases, the land is rented from the landowner for a set amount of time. Leases can come from a variety of sources, including railroads, utility companies and public entities. Access and Use Agreements Access and use agreements between a land owner and a greenway or trail operator specify how a portion of a property may be used. A landowner, for instance, may permit a hiking trail to be developed on his or her property but continue to use the property for forestry or farming. A landowner who opens his or her land for recreational use, without charging a fee is protected from liability by the Pennsylvania Recreational Use of Land and Water Act of 1994 (Pa. Stat. Ann. Tit. 68, §§ 477-1 to 477-8) and supporting



case law. The landowner may also be indemnified under a greenway or trail organization’s insurance program.

Due to the preliminary nature of this study, most of the private property owners have not yet been contacted to discuss their willingness to participate in the project. However, due to the importance of their property in the route of Section I, representatives from Wychock Realty, LLC were contacted to discuss the project. This property has been preserved through the North Branch Land Trust, but it remains in private ownership. Preliminary talks with the land owners indicated that they may be willing to grant an easement for the trail.

9.2 Cost estimates for developing the trail and for proposed facilities Since much of the land that this trail is running through is State Forest and County Parks, it is assumed that much of the preliminary trail clearing can be done by volunteer groups and State Forest Service Personnel. Thereby greatly reducing the cost of building the first two sections of trail. The northern sections of trail will be more expensive to build due to the use of “hard surface” trail beds in much of the area. However, since these sections of trail are passing through schools and public areas, additional grant funding may be available. Tables 9-1 thru 9-4 summarize the anticipated costs which will be incurred to build each section of the Harvey’s Creek Trail. Table 9-1. Cost estimates for developing Section I of the Harvey’s Creek Trail.

Trail/Section/Improvements Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

Section I - Susquehanna Warrior Trail to Pikes Creek Reservoir (6.6 miles)

Pathway Surface (Volunteer & State Forest Service Labor)

Improve 8’ wide woods road (Wychock Property) LF 2323 - -

Construct new 3’ - 5’ wide dirt and gravel trail (State Forest) LF 2956 - -

Construct new 4’ - 6’ wide Flume trail (State Forest) LF 4752 - -

Construct new 4’ - 6’ wide Flume trail (PA American Water) LF 6019 - -

Subtotal $0.00

Intersections and Access Points

US Highway 11

Thermoplastic Crosswalk, 2 "Crossing Ahead" Signs EA 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00

Trail Signage Each Approach-Street Name, STOP, Dismount Before Crossing LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00

Subtotal $4,000.00

Mizdale Road


Balusters required to restrict access to trail EA 4 $200.00 $800.00

Subtotal $1,800.00

Pavlick Road



Subtotal $1,800.00



State Highway 29




Shoulder Clearing to improve sight distance EA 1 $500.00 $500.00

Subtotal $4,900.00

Auxiliary Facilities

Trailhead Signage Kiosk - Warrior Trail, Mizdale Road and Pikes Creek Reservoir EA 3 $3,000.00 $9,000.00

Subtotal $9,000.00

Grand Subtotal

$21,500.00

Contingency

20% $4,300.00

Engineering

$5,160.00

GRAND TOTAL: SECTION I

$30,960.00

Table 9-2. Cost estimates for developing Section II of the Harvey’s Creek Trail.


Section II - Pikes Creek Reservoir to Back Mt. Recreation Area (5.6 miles)

Pathway Surface (Volunteer & State Forest Service Labor)

Improve existing 8’ wide dirt road LF 3642 - -

Construct new 4’ - 6’ wide Flume trail LF 5385 - -

Construct new 3’ - 5’ wide woodland trail LF 17318 - -

Construct new 4’ - 6’ wide trail through pasture LF 3115 - -

Subtotal $0.00


Fedor Road




Subtotal $4,800.00

Jackson Road




Subtotal $4,800.00

State Highway 118



Subtotal $1,800.00

Meeker Road






Subtotal $4,800.00

Outlet Road




Subtotal $4,400.00


Trailhead Signage Kiosk at Fedor Road and Back Mt. Recreation Area EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00

40' Prefabricated Steel Bridge EA 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00

Subtotal $36,000.00

Grand Subtotal

$56,600.00

Contingency

20% $11,320.00

Engineering

$13,584.00

GRAND TOTAL: SECTION II

$81,504.00

Table 9-3. Cost estimates for developing Section III of the Harvey’s Creek Trail.


Section III - Back Mt. Recreation Area to Back Mountain Trail (4.5 miles)

Pathway Surface

Construct new 4’ - 6’ wide trail on pipeline ROW and road shoulder LF 7550 $5 $37,750.00

Construct new 4’ - 6’ wide trail through woodlands LF 5068 $7 $35,476.00

Construct new 8’ wide gravel trail through college campus LF 2640 $20 $52,800.00

Subtotal $126,026.00


Peace Valley Road



Subtotal $1,800.00

State Highway 118



Subtotal $1,800.00

Huntsville-Idetown Rd




Subtotal $4,800.00



Reservoir Road


Subtotal $1,000.00

State Highway 415




Subtotal $4,400.00

Lake Road




$4,400.00


Trailhead Signage Kiosk at Luzerne Co. Fairgrounds and Misericordia University EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00

Subtotal $6,000.00

Grand Subtotal

$150,226.00

Contingency

20% $30,045.20

Engineering

$36,054.24

GRAND TOTAL: SECTION III

$216,325.44

Table 9-4. Cost estimates for developing Section IV of the Harvey’s Creek Trail.


Section IV - Lehman Connector Trail (1.5 miles)

Pathway Surface

Construct new 8’ wide gravel trail (PSU & Lehman Twp.) LF 2112 $20 $42,240.00

Construct new 8’ wide gravel trail (Lake Lehman Schools) LF 3168 $20 $63,360.00

Construct new sidewalk (Market Street) LF 900 $64 $57,600.00

Repair existing sidewalk (Firehouse Road) LF 425 $10 $4,250.00

Construct new sidewalk (Outlet Street) LF 950 $64 $60,800.00

Subtotal $228,250.00


Old 118




Subtotal $4,800.00

Mill Street






Subtotal $4,800.00

Mountain View Drive




Subtotal $4,800.00

State Highway 118




Subtotal $4,800.00

Outlet Road




Subtotal $4,800.00


Trailhead Signage Kiosk at PSU and Lake Lehman Schools EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00

Subtotal $6,000.00

Grand Subtotal

$258,250.00

Contingency

20% $51,650.00

Engineering

$61,980.00

GRAND TOTAL: SECTION III

$371,880.00

9.3 Phased implementation plan The Harvey’s Creek Trail is broken down into four proposed sections. Each trail section has an established destination at each end. Therefore, each section of trail can be developed independently of the others. However, existing conditions and land ownership will make the southern two sections of trail easier and less expensive to build. Therefore, it is logical to begin the project with Sections I and II. Once the first two sections are completed the other two sections become much more important and desirable in the regional trail system. Based upon existing trail connections, land acquisition feasibility, and construction costs, implementation of the Harvey’s Creek Trail Master Plan is recommended as follows:

PHASE I: Susquehanna Warrior Trail to Pikes Creek Reservoir The connection between the Susquehanna Warrior Trail, Lackawanna State Forest, Moon Lake County Park and Pikes Creek Reservoir will be a huge benefit for local trail users and the regional trail system. This trail will provide a unique opportunity for people to enjoy the beauty of Harvey’s Creek and learn the history behind the Harvey’s Creek Flume. Existing users groups will be able to access new areas and travel between key destinations.



The majority of the land that this section of the trail passes through is currently publicly owned or under the ownership of PA American Water. Therefore, right of way acquisition is not a significant issue and much of the work to establish the trail bed can be completed by volunteer groups and State Forest Service Personnel. PHASE II: Pikes Creek to Back Mountain Recreation Area Once that Section I of the trail has been completed, continuing the trail north through the State Forest to the Back Mountain Recreation Area is a logical next step. Once again, the majority of the trail will run through State Forest, so right of way acquisition and construction costs should not be significant issues. PHASE III: Lehman Connector Trail (Penn State Campus to Back Mt. Rec. Area) The Lehman Connector Trail will provide access to the trail system to a multitude of potential users from Penn State’s Wilkes-Barre campus and the Lake Lehman Schools. In addition, it will provide an important link between the schools and the Back Mountain Recreation Area.

PHASE IV: Back Mountain Recreation Area to Back Mountain Trail The completion of Section IV of the Harvey’s Creek Trail would allow for the connection of the Susquehanna Warrior, Back Mountain, Luzerne Levee and Harvey’s Creek Trails to form a massive trail system. Numerous loop routes could be developed to allow trail users to take long one-day or multiple-day trips and return to their beginning point.

Chapter 10: References


CHAPTER 10: REFERENCES A & E Group, Inc. Black Diamond Trail “Ridge to River” Connector Feasibility Study. Wilkes-Barre, PA. December 30, 2004. Allegheny Trail Alliance. Trail Towns, Capturing Trail-Based Tourism: A guide for communities in Pennsylvania. 2005. American Trails Website (www.americantrails.org/resources/statetrails/PAstate.html). Back Mountain Trail Website (http://course.wilkes.edu/bmt/). Chester County Planning Commission. Trail & Path Planning: A Guide for Municipalities. 2007 Greenways Michiana Regional and Trails Visioning Charrette. Michiana Greenway Plan Resources and Guidelines. Greenways, Inc. The Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties Open Space, Greenways and Outdoor Recreation Master Plan. April, 2004. Heritage Conservancy. Implementing a Municipal Open Space Program: A Guide for Pennsylvania’s Municipalities. Undated. Parks and Trails New York. Road and Trail Intersection Safety, An examination of present practice Recommendations for future actions. September, 2007. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Creating Sustainable Community Parks: A Guide to Improving Quality of Life by Protecting Natural Resources. January, 2007. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Financing Municipal Recreation and Parks, A Resource Guide for Recreation, Parks and Conservation. 2005. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Pennsylvania Outdoors: The Keystone for Health Living; 2009-2013 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan. September, 2009. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. The Pennsylvania Trail Design Manual for Off-highway Recreational Vehicles. April, 2004. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. Pennsylvania’s Traffic Calming Handbook. January, 2001. Pennsylvania Environmental Council. Creating Connections: The Pennsylvania Greenways and Trails How-To Manual. 1998 Pennsylvania Environmental Council. City of Wilkes-Barre Trail / Greenway Feasibility / Master Plan. December, 2010.

http://www.americantrails.org/resources/statetrails/PAstate.html



Pennsylvania Environmental Council. Northeastern Pennsylvania, Bicycling & Hiking Map. 2009 Pennsylvania Environmental Council. Greater Kingston Area Trail / Greenway Feasibility / Master Plan. January 2011. Pennsylvania Greenway Partnership Commission. Pennsylvania Greenways, An Action Plan for Creating Connections. June, 2001. Pennsylvania Rails to Trails Website (www.dcnr.state.pa.us/rails/index.html). Pennsylvania Recreation and Park Society, Inc. Multi-Municipal Cooperation for Recreation and Parks. 2006 Rail Trail Council of Northeastern Pennsylvania Website (www.nepa-rail-trails.org). Rails to Trails Conservancy Website (www.railstotrails.org). Rails to Trails Conservancy. Perkiomen Trail 2008 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis. December, 2008. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Pine Creek Rail Trail 2006 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis. December, 2006. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Rail-Trail Maintenance & Operation: Ensuring the Future of Your Trail – A Survey of 100 Rail-Trails. July, 2005. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Rail-Trails and Safe Communities: The Experience on 372 Trails. January, 1998. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Rails-with-Trails: A Preliminary Assessment of Safety and Grade Crossings. November, 2005. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Rails with Trails: Design, Management and Operating Characteristics of 61 Trails Along Active Railroads. November, 2000. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Secrets of Successful Rail-Trails. Undated. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Trails & Greenways: Advancing the Smart Growth Agenda. September, 2002. The Pennsylvania Greenways Partnership Commission. Pennsylvania Greenways, An Action Plan for Creating Connections. June, 2001. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Technology & Development Program. Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook - 2007 Edition (0723-2806-MTDC). July 2007

http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/rails/index.html

http://www.nepa-rail-trails.org/

http://www.railstotrails.org/



U.S. Department of Transportation. Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access. Part I of II: Review of Existing Guidelines and Practices. July, 1999. U.S. Department of Transportation. Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access. Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide. September, 2001. U.S. Department of Transportation. Evaluation of Safety, Design, and Operation of Shared-Use Paths. March, 2006. U.S. Department of Transportation. Manual Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, Part 9 Traffic Controls for Bicycle Facilities. 2003. U.S. Department of Transportation. Rails-with-Trails: Lessons Learned Literature Review, Current Practices, Conclusions. August, 2002. U.S. Department of Transportation. The Effects of Traffic Calming Measures on Pedestrian and Motorist Behavior. August, 2001 Wyoming Valley Wellness Trails Partnership. Luzerne County Trails, Fall 2007: Existing, Proposed, and Under Construction. 2007 Wyoming Valley Wellness Trails Partnership. State of the Luzerne County Trail System. 2007 York County Department of Parks and Recreation, Heritage Rail Trail County Park 2001 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis, June, 2002.

APPENDIX A

Meeting Minutes

Harvey’s Creek Trail/Greenway Plan Project

Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Attendees Janet Sweeney Pennsylvania Environmental Council Angela Vitkoski Pennsylvania Environmental Council George White White Environmental Services Karen Soifer A+E Group/local resident Mike Nerozzi Representative Karen Boback Ben Hardy DCNR Bureau of Forestry Nicholas Lylo DCNR Bureau of Forestry Joe Ulozas DCNR Bureau of Forestry WELCOME/INTRODUCTIONS Janet Sweeney introduced herself and Angela Vitkoski of the Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) and George White from White Environmental Services the consultant for the project. She then asked that everyone in attendance introduce themselves. PROJECT OVERVIEW Ms Sweeney informed the committee that PEC received funding from a Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) grant and matching funds from the Luzerne County Office of Community Development and the Edith Reynolds Trust to prepare the trail plan. PEC hired, through a competitive bid process, White Environmental Services, based on input from the steering committee, key person interviews and public survey results, will prepare the site analysis, conduct inventory and mapping, develop a proposed trail route, develop trail construction and management cost estimates all of which will make up the plan report. Mr. White also recently completed two other trail master planning projects for PEC including the Greater Kingston Area Trail Plan and the City of Wilkes-Barre Trail Plan. A project scope of work/schedule was distributed to the committee members. The scope of work for the project includes the following:

• develop project goals and an assessment of the demand for and potential use of the proposed trail by analyzing existing demographic data and studies

• conduct a public participation process including steering committee meetings, two public meetings, public and municipal surveys and key person interviews

• map the study area, conduct a physical inventory and assessment examining natural, cultural and historic features, existing infrastructure and utilities, etc. and develop a trail concept plan

• prepare a draft and then final trail plan that includes trail operation and maintenance, financial feasibility, preferred trail alignment

It is anticipated that the project will take approximately twelve months to complete. There will be three to five steering committee meetings during this timeframe. The next steering committee meetings are scheduled for June, August, October and December. An initial public meeting will be scheduled for May and a final public meeting in January. One of the main goals for this project will be to connect the newly acquired state forest lands, Moon Lake and other key destinations with the growing trail system in the Greater Wyoming Valley as well as

the emerging trail system in the Back Mountain. Goals and objectives for the plan will be further defined through the public participation process. The study area covers eight municipalities including Dallas and Harvey’s Lake Boroughs and Dallas, Jackson, Kingston, Lake, Lehman and Plymouth Townships. This project has a somewhat reduced scope than a typical trail plan due to funding constraints therefore there may be some issues or requests that arise that just may not be able to be addressed. However if future funding is obtained to support the project these issues/requests will be revisited. The project focus is to provide key connections to destinations including state forest lands, parks and other trails. Input from the steering committee, public surveys and key person interviews will help to further refine and identify other key connections and destinations. According to Ms. Sweeney in order to identify potential trail users we will need to define the type of trail and type of connections we would like. This will help define potential trail users. Issues that will be explored during the planning process that will further help to define potential trail users include the type of trail preferred (e.g. motorized or non-motorized trail, equestrian), what type trail surface is preferred and appropriate (wood chips, crushed stone, etc) and what connections are preferred (parks, schools, shopping, trails, etc.). REVIEW OF THE PRELIMINARY GIS DATABASE Mr. White then demonstrated the capabilities of the GIS and presented the preliminary GIS data developed to date. He explained that the GIS is not only maps but databases attached to the maps which make it an incredibly powerful planning tool. The data gathered to date includes parcel data obtained from Luzerne County; exempt lands and open space (i.e. Earth Conservancy properties), utilities (i.e. Pennsylvania American Water, pipelines, power lines, flume), state forest and park lands, school and church properties, as well as existing and proposed trails. The existing trails include the Susquehanna Warrior Trail, Back Mountain Trail, West Side Trail, Levee Trail, and Luzerne County National Recreation Trail. The proposed trail systems were obtained from the recently completed Greater Kingston Area Trail Plan and the City of Wilkes-Barre Trail Plan. The GIS also has LiDAR contours, USGS and historic USGS base mapping. Mr. White demonstrated the capabilities of the GIS and gave an overview of the entire study area and discussed very preliminary options for a potential trail alignment. The steering committee offered many comments and provided valuable information regarding existing conditions in the study area as well as a variety of other potential options for a trail alignment. From a preliminary evaluation and field scoping, one major obstacle/concern will be finding a safe crossing/connection from the Susquehanna Warrior Trail across Rt. 11 at Rt. 29 in order to connect to the study area. Steering committee comments included the following: There is an old road in Avondale coming off of St Mary’s Nativity Cemetery in Plymouth Township; this could be a potential trail head location with a connection to the state forest. Any trail sections adjacent to the creek would be flood prone. There may be some issues with flooding in some places on the east side of the creek and the potential area where a trail might go disappears and becomes very steep in places.

There is an old road that goes along the creek up to Maureen’s Ice Cream Shop but then it disappears. There is an undeveloped 6 acre property in the study area that could provide an opportunity for the trail alignment and this should be explored further. PEC should contact the Earth Conservancy, Pennsylvania American Water Company, Luzerne County and PENNDOT to discuss their respective holdings within the study area and conduct key person interviews. If the study finds it necessary to have a crossing of Rt 118 this would also be a difficult crossing. There may be some legal/liability issues with using the flume and that should be looked into further. However the flume does provide an opportunity to tie into Moon Lake and the existing mountain bike trails within the park. The steering committee wants to tie the trail into Lake Lehman High School. The Theta property provides trail alignment and trail head opportunities. Ideally this trail should connect to the Susquehanna Warrior Trail and the Back Mountain Trail. PUBLIC PARTCIPATION PROCESS The project will follow the standard DCNR public participation process including public and steering committee meetings as well as surveys and key person interviews. A municipal survey and a public survey are currently being developed. PEC is studying options for distribution of the public survey including distribution in a local Representative’s newsletter, posting on websites, etc. The steering committee was asked to think about some ways to distribute the public survey. PEC is also exploring the possibility of creating a project website where maps, surveys, project news, etc. can be displayed. Key person interviews are an integral part of the public participation process. Key person interviews are typically individuals from government agencies, planning commissions, park, and recreation departments, environmental groups, local recreation-oriented businesses and landowners. The steering committee was asked to assist in the key person interview process. If a steering committee member knows of anyone, as it relates to this project, who should be interviewed as part of the key person interview process, they were asked to supply the persons name and all available contact information to PEC. If any steering committee member knows of someone they would like to discuss this project with and interview, they can do so using the Key Person Interview Form that will be distributed to all steering committee members. NEXT STEPS Next meeting will be in June, PEC will send out a meeting notice with a date, time and place. ADJOURN Meeting ended at 7:30 pm


Public Meeting Minutes June 29, 2011

6:30 pm Penn State Wilkes-Barre Campus

Attendees Janet Sweeney Pennsylvania Environmental Council Angela Vitkoski Pennsylvania Environmental Council George White White Environmental Services Karen Soifer A+E Group/local resident Julie McMonagle Anthracite Scenic Trails Association Geri Glaer Times Leader Michelle Schasberger KAZ/Live Well Luzerne Ben Hardy DCNR Bureau of Forestry Joe Ulozas DCNR Bureau of Forestry James Adamskide Local Citizen WELCOME/INTRODUCTIONS Janet Sweeney introduced herself and Angela Vitkoski of the Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) and Julie McMonagle from the Anthracite Scenic Trails Association and George White from White Environmental Services the consultant for the project. PROJECT OVERVIEW The study area for this project covers eight municipalities including Dallas and Harvey’s Lake Boroughs and Dallas, Jackson, Kingston, Lake, Lehman and Plymouth Townships. According to Ms. Sweeney one of the main goals for this project will be to come up with a plan to connect the newly acquired state forest lands, Moon Lake and other key destinations with the growing trail system in the Greater Wyoming Valley as well as the emerging trail system in the Back Mountain. The Harveys Creek Trail/Greenway Plan is an opportunity to study various potential trail routes including through the Lackawanna State Forest, to connect with Moon Lake Park as well as other connections to schools, recreational facilities and other trails such as the Susquehanna Warrior Trail (SWT) and the Back Mountain Trail (BMT). According to Ms. Sweeney, PEC applied for and received a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) that will partially fund this planning project. Other funding came from the Luzerne County Office of Community Development and the Edith Reynolds Trust. PEC, through a competitive RFP process, hired White Environmental Services to conduct the Plan. WES and Rettew Associates recently completed the Greater Kingston Trail/Greenway Plan and the City of Wilkes-Barre Trail/Greenway Plan.

PEC is responsible for conducting the public participation process for this project. The public participation process is designed to determine the needs and concerns of the local community relating to the trail/greenway. There will be two public meetings, this is the first meeting, the second public meeting will be held towards the end of the project to present the draft Plan. There will also be steering committee meetings held throughout the planning process. The steering committee will have approximately 2 to 3 meetings throughout the planning process. The first steering committee meeting was held in April. These meetings are typically held in the evenings in order to accommodate everyone’s schedules and they will be held in different locations around the study area. The steering committee will provide valuable local knowledge and expertise to guide the planning process. The public participation process also involves surveying the local municipalities and the general public. Surveys have already been sent out to the municipalities that make up the study area and another survey has already been sent out to a random sample of approximately 300 local residents. The survey is also available on-line as a link on the PEC website. PEC will also be conducting key person interviews. We are anticipating that the schedule for this project will be approximately twelve (12) months. Ms. Sweeney then introduced Julie McMonagle, Executive Director of the Anthracite Scenic Trails Association and also a Board Susquehanna Warrior Trail Council. Ms. McMonagle informed the group that there has been a tremendous amount of trail activity in Luzerne County over the last 10 – 15 years. There is approximately 50 miles of trails already existing in Luzerne County. This work has been done mostly through non-profit organizations to develop these trails. It is a very slow process, for example Ms. McMonagle has worked with the Susquehanna Warrior Trail for over 12 years and it took about 10 years to go from this stage, feasibility to actual construction of the trail. The Anthracite Scenic Trail Association has been working on developing the Back Mountain Trail for the last 20 years and it is five miles right now with plans to extend up to Ricketts Glen. The community needs to be aware that this can be a very lengthy process. What PEC is doing now with this plan will provide a guide book to creating connections to these existing trails. She also stated that there is a lot of usage on these trails. There is a trail counter located on the BMT and last year at this time there was approximately 900 users during one week and she expects that this is even greater now. Also, Ms. McMonagle stated that trail development creates economic and health benefits for the area. Julie then introduced George White from White Environmental Services the consultant for the Harveys Creek Trail/Greenway Plan. Mr. White then went through a brief overview of the planning process. Mr. White demonstrated the capabilities of the GIS and gave an overview of the entire study area and discussed very preliminary options for a potential trail alignment. He explained that the data gathered to date includes parcel data obtained from Luzerne County; exempt lands and open space (i.e. Earth Conservancy properties), utilities (i.e. Pennsylvania American Water, pipelines, power lines,

flume), state forest and park lands, school and church properties, as well as existing and proposed trails. Mr. White showed the existing and proposed trail systems on the GIS. The existing trails included the Susquehanna Warrior Trail, Back Mountain Trail, West Side Trail, Levee Trail, and Luzerne County National Recreation Trail and the proposed trail systems were obtained from the recently completed Greater Kingston Area Trail Plan and the City of Wilkes-Barre Trail Plan. According to Mr. White, the first component of the planning process is to identify key destinations. In the Harveys Creek study area there is a lot of public land including, the Lackawanna State Forest, Moon Lake Park, Pikes Creek Reservoir, Penn State Campus and the Lehman and Dallas Area Schools, Back Mountain Recreation Area and the Luzerne County Fairgrounds. The first draft corridor/trail alignment is designed to try to connect these “dots” (key destinations). According to Mr. White, from a preliminary evaluation and field scoping, one major obstacle/concern will be finding a safe crossing/connection from the Susquehanna Warrior Trail across Rt. 11 at Rt. 29 in order to connect to the study area. The Lackawanna State Forest is currently proposing several trails on their property that we would like to tie into. It is like a giant jigsaw puzzle as we look at one connection and find out that it is not feasible we go on to another options. The planning process has just begun and we are hoping to ideas from the public and craft a project that will be relevant. We try to come up with as many alternatives as possible. Need a strong steering committee with a lot of local knowledge to help us through these tough issues. We do not want to adversely impact any property owners we certainly don’t want to put a trail somewhere where there is no support or interest. Comments from the attendees: The North Branch Land Trust (NBLT) puts out a quarterly newsletter that could perhaps be used as an option to inform the public about the trail plan. Potter Street in Plymouth may be an option to get up the mountain. George also showed the NBLT property on the GIS. It could be an option but it is very steep. Unless we could work across the grade. Potential area to cross in Plymouth Twp behind the cemetery. That is an easier place to cross. Potter St in Plymouth an area that was just reclaimed. Unfortunately it puts the user on the wrong side of the creek. What is the goal for this trail? This trail is going to be a mix and provide various options for different users…basic rail trail to the serious user. It is very varied terrain.

Did we do a slope index for the area? Not really but just looking at the topographic maps it is obvious that there are a lot of steep slopes in this study area. We may have to go outside of the study area to deal with the slope issue and access. Power lines run up the mountain and traverse the state forest in some sections. The power line route is approximately three (3) miles. Perhaps not the most scenic but could be an alternative. Has anyone ever negotiated with power companies for trail easements? After further discussion regarding the project the meeting adjourned at 8:00 pm


Steering Committee Meeting Minutes August 23, 2011

Attendees Janet Sweeney Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) Angela Vitkoski Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) George White White Environmental Services (WES) Ben Hardy DCNR Bureau of Forestry Nicholas Lylo DCNR Bureau of Forestry Mr White began the meeting with a discussion regarding a property along Poplar Street. According to George there is a property posted as a conservation property of the North Branch Land Trust (NBLT). This property may provide an opportunity to access the State Forest area and the trails planned in the State Forest. The property is adjacent to a back entrance to a cemetery. PEC and WES drove the area earlier in the week on August 19th. Discussion ensued regarding this potential option. The property does not directly connect to RT. 11 but is across from Canal Park and connects to West Poplar Street which is a 15 foot wide Township Road that then connects to Rt. 11. The Susquehanna Warrior Trail alignment currently does extend to Canal Park. The Garden Drive-In is also located in the same vicinity. There is a turn lane located there that could be perhaps be retro fit with to include a turning lane to our access point. The property would connect to the timber road in the State Forest. According to the Foresters, this is a “driveable” road and is part of the planned loop trail in the State Forest. The committee decided that this should be our first priority option for connection to the State Forest lands, if NBLT is amenable. It was determined that the property abuts the State Forest Tract. The adjacent cemetery could also provide a potential connection along its edge and perhaps they would give an easement so the trail could connect to the State Forest. This option would avoid a whole winding piece and instead bring us out by Mizdail Road and the flume. Discussion arose regarding the potential for having to go outside the study area. Mr. Hardy suggested that a nice option would be for people to park at the state owned rest stop on Rt. 11 right across from PENNDOT shed. Take Gameland 224 all the way over cross a few private properties and then go straight up to the State Forest. This would keep you all the way on the Rt. 11 side, however it is outside the study area. There is an existing powerline and probably some old logging roads on the Gamelands. We would have to check out to see what a potential crossing could be. We are trying to get from the SWT and the trail goes past a PFBC boat launch area. The Gamelands are approximately 600 acres. It was determined after examining this area using the GIS database that the

property does not go along as far as originally thought and it does not go up to the State Forest. So after some further discussion it was determined that this would not offer any better opportunities, so the Steering Committee determined it was not a good option. Mr. Lylo stated the NBLT property is still our best option because it would connect into the State Forest trail system that is already laid out. He does not want to create any more corridors as there are existing options such as the timber road, powerlines, flume, and State Forest planned trails. Nothing would have to done there really other than some crossings and best management practices to reduce erosion. The Committee reiterated that if we could go from the NBLT property with some switch backs to the timber sale road that would be our first option. The Committee also identified a big empty lot located at the bottom of West Poplar Street which is used for flea market parking that occurs at the Garden Drive-In as a potential trail head. It was also noted that the SWT ends right before the parking lot of the drive-in. Mr. White indicated that Pennsylvania American Water is very interested in the project but we need to have a further discussion with them regarding the details of the project. However, it is positive that there is initial support from the agency. There are some details to look into regarding the flume that runs across State Forest property. Mr. Lylo will look into this issue. The issue of mountain bike usage was discussed. Mountain bikers have been using the trails already and there is a connection from Moon Lake Park to the flume. We need to be cognizant of this user group as there may be potential conflicts with other user groups. However it was noted that mountain bikers tend to prefer a more technical trail, and we are looking at a shared use non-motorized trail system. The issue of horseback riding was also discussed. The Forest Service currently permits horses on their property. However horse usage requires a different kind of trail maintenance especially at stream crossings and wetlands. DCNR would not rule out horseback riders right away but would want to wait until we further define our trail type and targeted users. There is a lot of infrastructure required for horseback riding trails. Mr. White stated that as we look at the alignment we will ask the question ”is this an appropriate place for horse”. If it ends up being so, then we will definitely generate a lot of interest, as there are many horseback riders in the area. As always we have to be very cognizant of the different users. The discussion that followed included a “step by step” potential path/alignment route:\-

• Follow the flume up to PAW owned Pikes Creek Reservoir. • Cross SR. 29 again (would have to address pedestrian crossing at state highway) • Once across SR. 29 then the alignment is back on county lands.

• Old Township Road was abandoned, but we believe it is currently owned by State, Water Company and a few private landowners. So perhaps the alignment would have to circumvent this road.

• There is a key parcel that is owned by Penn State University located between the county owned lands and State Forest lands this option needs to further examined.

• Once at Rt. 118, the challenge will be crossing it as it has been observed that vehicles are generally traveling very fast on this road.

• Provide a connection to the Back Mountain Recreation Center • Provide a connection or a spur to Lehman Campus and Penn State

Discussion turned toward crossing Rt. 11 again and the NBLT property still seems to be the best option. It was determined that as our highest priority next step action item, PEC would contact Paul Lumia to conduct a key person interview and ask him about the property. It was decided that PEC would contact NBLT to discuss this potential and if they would be amenable to allowing us to use the property for access. PEC will contact Paul Lumia at NBLT to discuss the project and the status of the property. The meeting adjourned at 5:00 pm


Steering Committee Meeting Minutes April 25, 2012

Attendees Janet Sweeney Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) Angela Vitkoski Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) George White White Environmental Services (WES) Ben Hardy DCNR Bureau of Forestry Nicholas Lylo DCNR Bureau of Forestry Karen Soifer Borton Lawson Michelle Schasberger Live Well Luzerne/Luzerne County Bikes and Walks Ms Sweeney began the meeting with a discussion regarding the follow-up she and Mr. White conducted regarding the property along Poplar Street. Ms. Sweeney stated that PEC contacted North Branch Land Trust (NBLT) regarding the property. NBLT provided PEC with the contact information regarding the owner of the property. Ms. Sweeney and Mr. White held a conference call with the owner to discuss the trail and our interest in his property as an access point from Poplar Street through the property to the State Forest. The owner gave his permission for them to walk the property. Ms. Sweeney, Mr. White and Rylan Kocher of NBLT walked the property. It is beautiful and there are paths already on the property. The paths, though in need of maintenance, were pretty easy to follow. The paths crossed the southern end of the property at a diagonal with a reasonable grade which ended at the gas line that runs along the boundary of the State Forest. Ms. Vitkoski informed the committee that she recently spoke with Lance Kittleson of the Susquehanna Warrior Trail. He informed her that the Susquehanna Warrior Trail alignment currently does extend to the Garden Drive-In and they will be constructing another section up to Plymouth Township. SWT is aware of our trail project and very much in support of the project. The committee went back to a discussion regarding the NBLT property and potential access points based on the property boundary lines. The property does not directly connect to RT. 11 but is across from Canal Park and connects to West Poplar Street which is a 15 foot wide Township Road that then connects to Rt. 11. In our conversation with the landowner he indicated that he and his family currently hunt on the property, but mainly the back half of the property. Mr. Lylo stated that the PA Bureau of Forestry could offer as an option, an easement corridor on the property. There are many details that could be worked out between the landowner and PA BOF. If BOF would be the easement holder there are many benefits including the longevity of the organization (PA BOF, has been around for years and years) and the many resources they have to maintain, enforce, and patrol on the easement.

The question of trail head locations for this portion of the trail arose. There is currently a parking area/big empty lot located at the bottom of West Poplar Street which is used for flea market parking that occurs at the Garden Drive-In as a potential trail head. A committee member indicated that there is a cross-walk and pedestrian activated signal at the intersection of Rt. 11 and Rt. 29 and there is Canal Park as a potential parking area. Mr. White indicated that Pennsylvania American Water is very interested in the project. PEC and the Consultant met with PAW to discuss the project and also obtain permission from PAW to walk their property. PAW indicated reservations regarding a trail near the treatment facility so we discussed other options that would avoid this facility. PAW suggested the spillway as an option and their parking facility for the Reservoir as a trail head. However crossing Rt. 29 at this location is not the best option, due to site distance and vehicular speeds. Currently there is only foot access allowed around the Lake, and it is only for fishing. PAW indicated that they prefer that they maintain any trails that may be developed on their property. The issue of mountain bike usage was discussed. Mountain bikers have been using the trails already from connections from Moon Lake Park to the flume. Therefore the physical tie in to Moon Lake Park already exists with proximity and existing mountain bike trails. PAW is fine with our potential trail alignment continuing from the Reservoir up to Rice Dam. PA BOF has a parking lot near Rice Dam which could be used as a trail head if we can tie it in to the trail alignment. It was stated that the more parking areas/trail heads we have for this trail the better. Some committee members envision this trail could serve as an option for a series of little hikes as well as providing the connection between the SWT and the BMT. The next obstacle is crossing Rt. 118. This is another roadway where the vehicles traveling at a very high speed. It was suggested that we contact PENNDOT regarding the highway crossings on SR 29, SR 11, SR 118. Back Mountain Recreation Complex has a series of trails developed by an Eagle Scout for a project. We could tie into this system of trails. We may have to cross Rt 118 again and then connect into the back entrance into the Luzerne County Fairgrounds. Discussion arose about not crossing Rt. 118, but after further analyses it was determined that between the slope, crossing a stream and wetlands and a series of houses it proved to not be a good option. A committee member suggested that if we could provide an alternative for the school cross-country teams that would be a valuable resource for the community as it would be a safer alternative for the students then the current route they utilize for the sport. The meeting adjourned at 6:00 pm

APPENDIX B

PA Natural Diversity Index (PNDI) Reports

PNDI Project Environmental Review Receipt Project Search ID: 20120712363232

Page 1 of 5

1. PROJECT INFORMATIONProject Name: Harveys Creek Trail - Section 1Date of review: 7/12/2012 8:36:21 AMProject Category: Recreation,Trails & Trailheads (parking, etc.)Project Length: 19648.8 feetCounty: Luzerne Township/Municipality: Plymouth Twp,JacksonQuadrangle Name: NANTICOKE ~ ZIP Code: 18621,18634,18708Decimal Degrees: 41.250515 N, -76.027021 WDegrees Minutes Seconds: 41° 15' 1 N, W

2. SEARCH RESULTSAgency Results ResponsePA Game Commission No Known Impact No Further Review Required

PA Department of Conservationand Natural Resources

Potential Impact FURTHER REVIEW IS REQUIRED,See Agency Response

PA Fish and Boat Commission Avoidance Measure See Agency Response

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Avoidance Measure See Agency Response

As summarized above, Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) records indicate there may be potentialimpacts to threatened and endangered and/or special concern species and resources within the project area. Ifthe response above indicates "No Further Review Required" no additional communication with the respectiveagency is required. If the response is "Further Review Required" or "See Agency Response," refer to theappropriate agency comments below. Please see the DEP Information Section of this receipt if a PA Departmentof Environmental Protection Permit is required.


Page 2 of 5

RESPONSE TO QUESTION(S) ASKEDQ1: "Will the entire project area (including any discharge), plus a 300 feet buffer around the project area, alloccur in or on an existing building, parking lot, driveway, road, road shoulder, street, runway, paved area,railroad bed, maintained (periodically mown) lawn, crop agriculture field or maintained orchard?"Your answer is: 2. No

Q2: How many acres of tree removal, tree cutting or forest clearing will be necessary to implement all aspects ofthis project? [Round acreages up to the nearest acre (e.g., 0.2 acres = 1 acre).]Your answer is: 2. 1 to 10 acres

Q3: Will the entire project occur within an existing building, parking lot, driveway, road, street, or maintained(periodically mowed) lawn?Your answer is: 2. No

3. AGENCY COMMENTSRegardless of whether a DEP permit is necessary for this proposed project, any potential impacts to threatenedand endangered species and/or special concern species and resources must be resolved with the appropriatejurisdictional agency. In some cases, a permit or authorization from the jurisdictional agency may be needed ifadverse impacts to these species and habitats cannot be avoided.

These agency determinations and responses are valid for two years (from the date of the review), and arebased on the project information that was provided, including the exact project location; the project type,description, and features; and any responses to questions that were generated during this search. If any of thefollowing change: 1) project location, 2) project size or configuration, 3) project type, or 4) responses to thequestions that were asked during the online review, the results of this review are not valid, and the review mustbe searched again via the PNDI Environmental Review Tool and resubmitted to the jurisdictional agencies. ThePNDI tool is a primary screening tool, and a desktop review may reveal more or fewer impacts than what is listedon this PNDI receipt. The jursidictional agencies strongly advise against conducting surveys for the specieslisted on the receipt prior to consultation with the agencies.

PA Game CommissionRESPONSE: No Impact is anticipated to threatened and endangered species and/or special concernspecies and resources.

PA Department of Conservation and Natural ResourcesRESPONSE: Further review of this project is necessary to resolve the potential impacts(s). Please sendproject information to this agency for review (see WHAT TO SEND).

DCNR Species: (Note: The PNDI tool is a primary screening tool, and a desktop review mayreveal more or fewer species than what is listed below. After desktop review, if a botanicalsurvey is required by DCNR, we recommend the DCNR Botanical Survey Protocols, availablehere: http://www.gis.dcnr.state.pa.us/hgis-er/PNDI_DCNR.aspx.)Scientific Name: Sensitive Species**Common Name: Current Status: Special Concern Species*Proposed Status: Endangered


Page 3 of 5

Scientific Name: Hesperia leonardusCommon Name: Leonard's SkipperCurrent Status: Special Concern Species*Proposed Status: Special Concern Species*

Scientific Name: Prunus pumila var. susquehanaeCommon Name: Current Status: Special Concern Species*Proposed Status: Threatened

PA Fish and Boat CommissionRESPONSE: Avoidance Measure: Maintain a 300-foot buffer between the proposed activity and talus, screeslopes, rocky outcrops, or any boulder fields on the subject property.

As the project proponent or applicant, I certify that I will implement the above Avoidance Measure:

___________________________(Signature)

SPECIAL NOTE: If you agree to implement the above Avoidance Measure, no further coordination withthis agency regarding threatened and endangered species and/or special concern species and resourcesis required. If you are not able to comply with the Avoidance Measures, you are required to coordinate with thisagency - please send project information to this agency for review (see "What to Send" section).

PFBC Species: (Note: The PNDI tool is a primary screening tool, and a desktop review mayreveal more or fewer species than what is listed below.)Scientific Name: Sensitive Species**Common Name: Current Status: Special Concern Species*Proposed Status: Special Concern Species*

U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceRESPONSE: Avoidance Measure: Cut trees between November 16 and March 31 (this measure isnecessary to avoid killing or injuring endangered bats). Where possible, retain shagbark hickory trees, dead anddying trees, and large diameter trees (> 12 inches d.b.h.) to serve as roost trees for bats. Where possible, alsoretain forested riparian corridors and forested wetlands.


___________________________(Signature)

SPECIAL NOTE: If you agree to implement the above Avoidance Measure, no further coordination with


Page 4 of 5

this agency regarding threatened and endangered species and/or special concern species and resourcesis required. If you are not able to comply with the Avoidance Measures, you are required to coordinate with thisagency - please send project information to this agency for review (see "What to Send" section).

* Special Concern Species or Resource - Plant or animal species classified as rare, tentatively undetermined orcandidate as well as other taxa of conservation concern, significant natural communities, special concernpopulations (plants or animals) and unique geologic features.** Sensitive Species - Species identified by the jurisdictinal agency as collectible, having economic value, orbeing susceptible to decline as a result of visitation.

WHAT TO SEND TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES

If project information was requested by one or more of the agencies above, send the following informationto the agency(s) seeking this information (see AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION).

Check-list of Minimum Materials to be submitted:

____SIGNED copy of this Project Environmental Review Receipt____Project narrative with a description of the overall project, the work to be performed, current physicalcharacteristics of the site and acreage to be impacted.____Project location information (name of USGS Quadrangle, Township/Municipality, and County)____USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangle with project boundary clearly indicated, and quad name on the map

The inclusion of the following information may expedite the review process.____A basic site plan(particularly showing the relationship of the project to the physical features such aswetlands, streams, ponds, rock outcrops, etc.)____Color photos keyed to the basic site plan (i.e. showing on the site plan where and in what direction eachphoto was taken and the date of the photos)____Information about the presence and location of wetlands in the project area, and how this was determined(e.g., by a qualified wetlands biologist), if wetlands are present in the project area, provide project plans showingthe location of all project features, as well as wetlands and streams

4. DEP INFORMATIONThe Pa Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) requires that a signed copy of this receipt, along with anyrequired documentation from jurisdictional agencies concerning resolution of potential impacts, be submitted withapplications for permits requiring PNDI review. For cases where a "Potential Impact" to threatened andendangered species has been identified before the application has been submitted to DEP, the applicationshould not be submitted until the impact has been resolved. For cases where "Potential Impact" to specialconcern species and resources has been identified before the application has been submitted, the applicationshould be submitted to DEP along with the PNDI receipt. The PNDI Receipt should also be submitted to theappropriate agency according to directions on the PNDI Receipt. DEP and the jurisdictional agency will worktogether to resolve the potential impact(s). See the DEP PNDI policy at http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us.


Page 1 of 4

1. PROJECT INFORMATIONProject Name: Harveys Creek Trail - Section 2Date of review: 7/12/2012 8:46:51 AMProject Category: Recreation,Trails & Trailheads (parking, etc.)Project Length: 20593.0 feetCounty: Luzerne Township/Municipality: Plymouth Twp,Jackson,LehmanQuadrangle Name: HARVEYS LAKE ~ ZIP Code: 18621,18708Decimal Degrees: 41.288964 N, -76.043157 WDegrees Minutes Seconds: 41° 17' 20 N, W



No Known Impact No Further Review Required

PA Fish and Boat Commission No Known Impact No Further Review Required




Page 2 of 4

RESPONSE TO QUESTION(S) ASKEDQ1: How many acres of tree removal, tree cutting or forest clearing will be necessary to implement all aspects ofthis project? [Round acreages up to the nearest acre (e.g., 0.2 acres = 1 acre).]Your answer is: 2. 1 to 10 acres




PA Department of Conservation and Natural ResourcesRESPONSE: No Impact is anticipated to threatened and endangered species and/or special concernspecies and resources.

PA Fish and Boat CommissionRESPONSE: No Impact is anticipated to threatened and endangered species and/or special concernspecies and resources.



___________________________(Signature)

SPECIAL NOTE: If you agree to implement the above Avoidance Measure, no further coordination withthis agency regarding threatened and endangered species and/or special concern species and resourcesis required. If you are not able to comply with the Avoidance Measures, you are required to coordinate with this


Page 3 of 4

agency - please send project information to this agency for review (see "What to Send" section).








Page 1 of 4

1. PROJECT INFORMATIONProject Name: Harveys Creek Trail - Section 3Date of review: 7/12/2012 8:53:02 AMProject Category: Recreation,Trails & Trailheads (parking, etc.)Project Length: 21188.2 feetCounty: Luzerne Township/Municipality: LehmanQuadrangle Name: HARVEYS LAKE ~ ZIP Code: 18612,18708Decimal Degrees: 41.319720 N, -76.028823 WDegrees Minutes Seconds: 41° 19' 11" N, -76° 1' 43.8" W








Page 2 of 4

RESPONSE TO QUESTION(S) ASKEDQ1: How many acres of tree removal, tree cutting or forest clearing will be necessary to implement all aspects ofthis project? [Round acreages up to the nearest acre (e.g., 0.2 acres = 1 acre).]Your answer is: 2. 1 to 10 acres








___________________________(Signature)

SPECIAL NOTE: If you agree to implement the above Avoidance Measure, no further coordination withthis agency regarding threatened and endangered species and/or special concern species and resourcesis required. If you are not able to comply with the Avoidance Measures, you are required to coordinate with this


Page 3 of 4

agency - please send project information to this agency for review (see "What to Send" section).








Page 1 of 3

1. PROJECT INFORMATIONProject Name: Harveys Creek Trail - Section 4Date of review: 7/12/2012 8:58:22 AMProject Category: Recreation,Trails & Trailheads (parking, etc.)Project Length: 12399.0 feetCounty: Luzerne Township/Municipality: Dallas Boro,Lehman,Dallas TwpQuadrangle Name: HARVEYS LAKE ~ ZIP Code: 18612,18708Decimal Degrees: 41.332740 N, -75.990886 WDegrees Minutes Seconds: 41° 19' 57 N, W





U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service No Known Impact No Further Review Required

As summarized above, Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) records indicate no known impacts tothreatened and endangered species and/or special concern species and resources within the project area.Therefore, based on the information you provided, no further coordination is required with the jurisdictionalagencies. This response does not reflect potential agency concerns regarding impacts to other ecologicalresources, such as wetlands.


Page 2 of 3






U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceRESPONSE: No impacts to federally listed or proposed species are anticipated. Therefore, no furtherconsultation/coordination under the Endangered Species Act (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.is required. Because no take of federally listed species is anticipated, none is authorized. This response does notreflect potential Fish and Wildlife Service concerns under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act or otherauthorities.


harvey ’s creek trail/greenway feasibility/master...

Documents