bloody run creek greenway redevelopment project

49
The Bloody Run Creek Greenway Redevelopment Project A Transformative Destination for the 21st Century Detroit Collaborative Design Center NTH Consultants, Ltd. Adi Shamir The Mannik & Smith Group, Inc. Urban Resource Alliance Zachary and Associates, Inc. Prepared for The Kresge Foundation & McCormack Baron Salazar Executive Summary 29 July 2011

Upload: christina-heximer

Post on 31-Mar-2016

244 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

The Bloody Run Creek Greenway Redevelopment Project, a greenway and development plan for daylighting a creek on Detroit's East Side, has the opportunity to become a major ecological public landscape and transformative destination for the City of Detroit.

TRANSCRIPT

  • The Bloody Run Creek Greenway Redevelopment Project

    Consultant Names Here

    A Transformative Destination for the 21st Century

    Detroit Collaborative Design CenterNTH Consultants, Ltd. Adi ShamirThe Mannik & Smith Group, Inc.Urban Resource AllianceZachary and Associates, Inc.

    Prepared for The Kresge Foundation & McCormack Baron Salazar

    Executive Summary29 July 2011

  • Executive Summaryfor The Kresge FoundationJuly 29, 2011 This document is a brief summary of our key fi ndings regarding the Bloody Run Creek Greenway Redevelopment Project including design intentions, market strategy, schedules, funding, economic benefi ts and other aspects of the project including immediate next steps required to move the project forward. We explore three scales of development for the Bloody Run Creek Greenway Project:

    1. The Master Plan (3500 acres) bridges the public Bloody Run Creek Greenway Project to the successful developments in the surrounding area while also creating new private development, such as renewable energy, food production including agriculture, multi-family and single family residential and loft housing, neighborhood and community activity centers including convenience and specialty retail, auto and medical related technology and research facilities, renovation and adaptive re-use of historic structures, and other complimentary uses that will service the community and act as a local and regional draw. The estimated overall project cost is $1 billion (2011) which could leverage about $3 billion in private development. This in turn brings signifi cant economic benefi t to Detroit through both temporary and permanent jobs, taxes, purchasing and rising land values. We propose that the Creek Greenway system be built over a period of 10 years with private development continuing in fi ve phases, or zones, for approximately 15 years thereafter.

    2. Phase 1 coincides with the Zone 1: Central/Eastern Market development zone (300 acres). The Phase 1 project provides the greatest visibility and impact to promote the overall project through the development of the Central Pond which is linked to Eastern Market, thereby tying these two areas together. Additionally, Central Pond extends to the Dequindre Cut through cascading ponds, and a dramatic waterfall feature then drops water into a canal within the Cut, discharging into the Detroit River. The work in this phase also includes separation of sewers, rehabilitation of existing historic bridges and construction of new bridges, as well as streetscaping of the major streets. The estimated cost of Phase 1 is $200 million that could be used to leverage up to $500 million in private development.

    3. The Demonstration Project (30 acres) is a project within Phase I that integrates into ongoing work at the Eastern Market and the Dequindre Cut and will initiate the development. This Demonstration Project is further broken into two phases, identifi ed as D1, a $15 million project, and D2. D1 includes the fi rst cascading pond directly east of the Dequindre Cut, the waterfall feature into the Cut, the fi rst segment of the canal in the Cut, and sewer separation of Division St. from Orleans to Gratiot. Acquisition and redevelopment of four warehouses located on the east and west sides of the Cut between Wilkins and Gratiot are also included in the Demonstration Project. The proposed Bloody Run Greenway Redevelopment Project is a transformative venture for the City of Detroit, and we hope that you are as excited by its potential as we are. Sincerely, Consultant Team Detroit Collaborative Design CenterNTH Consultants, Ltd.Adi ShamirThe Mannik & Smith Group, Inc.Urban Resource AllianceZachary and Associates, Inc.

  • Introduction

    The Bloody Run Creek Greenway Redevelopment Project has the opportunity to become a major ecological public landscape and transformative destination for the City of Detroit through daylighting the long-buried Creek. Located east of Detroits Central Business District and Midtown, the site is connected to major assets and districts through its interstate and non-motorized linkages, and its future connectivity to the Woodward Light Rail System. Further, the Greenway can play an important role in Detroits redevelopment strategy by serving as a catalyst for economic and physical development. In this context, the transformation of Bloody Run Creek will enrich the lives of all who visit and use the greenway, as well as enhance the attractiveness of Detroit for businesses, families, and individuals.

    A Transformative Destination for 21st Century Detroit

  • Aerial view of Bloody Run Creek Greenway and surroundings

  • Introduction

    The SiteFormerly a community of dense housing and industrial job centers east of Downtown, Midtown, and the Cultural District, Detroits Near East Side today is one of the most vacant regions of the city. Despite its loss of population and industry, the area is still home to the rich cultural, natural, and community assets of Eastern Market, the Dequindre Cut, and the Riverfront as well as strong neighborhoods such as Lafayette Park, McDougall-Hunt, and Farnsworth. A lesser-known asset, the remnants of Bloody Run Creek, trickles through Elmwood Cemetery.

    At a size comparable to Belle Isle and New Yorks Central Park, the Bloody Run Creek Greenway Redevelopment Project would afford a wide spectrum of uses, appealing to an broad range of users. Its large scale offers an extraordinary resource for people who are interested in outdoor recreation activities kayaking, jogging, cycling, rollerblading, picnicking, golfi ng, horseback riding, fi shing, boating, and gardening. The site also offers opportunities for farming, research, food production, energy creation, education, markets, and festivals as well as more traditional private land uses. The Bloody Run Creek development connects to and expands the proposed city-wide greenway network.

    R

    WINDSOR CBD

    I-75

    WO

    OD

    WA

    RD

    GRAT

    IOTOT

    JEFFERSONJEFFERS

    JEFFERRSON

    E. G

    RA

    ND

    BLV

    DE

    . GR

    AN

    D B

    LVD

    EG

    RA

    ND

    BLV

    DE

    GR

    AN

    DB

    LVDD

    .

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    CA

    DILLA

    C

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    I-994

    I-94

    I-75I-75I-75

    EQ

    UIN

    DR

    E C

    UT

    EQ

    UIN

    DR

    E C

    UT

    DE

    DE

    D

    RIVERWALKRIVERWALK

    M-10-

    Project Boundary

    Mixed Use District

    Residential District

    Energy and Production District

    Linkages

    FARNSWORTHO

    LAAFAYETTEAFAYETTEELPARK

    TENTERTAINMENTN DISTRICTRI

    TECHTOWN

    EEAYNEWWAWWAUNIVEUU

    MEDICALICCENTERNT

    Woodw

    ard Light Rai

    gR

    ali

    ht g

    GREEK-TOWN

    GMGM

    HENRYHENRY FORD

    ELMWOOD

    MIDTOWNLOOP

    HARBORTOWNWN

    RIVERFROONTOEAST

    WWDOWNTOWNWNOW

    ROW RONTEST RIVERFRO TWWEST RIVERFRONT

    NEWCCENTERCENTERCENTERRRR

    GM ASSEMBLY I-94 INDUSTRIAL PARK/URENAISSANCE ZONES

    VILLAGES

    KETTERING

    GOLD COAST

    BELLE ISLE

    NORTHEND

    BOSTON EDISON

    HAMTRAMCK

    WOODBRIDGEOODBRIDGEE

    NORTH CORKTOWNCORKTOWN

    CORKTOWNCORKTOWN

    Context Diagram

  • JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTEE. G

    RA

    ND

    BLV

    D.

    CH

    EN

    E

    I-375

    I-75

    I-94

    I-94

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    KERCHEVAL

    CHARLEVOIX

    DETROIT RIVER

    MACK

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    PALMER

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    GRAT

    IOT

    I-375

    GRAT

    IOT

    MACK

    WILKINS

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    VERNOR

    LVDE GRAND BLLVDGRAND BLE. GRAND BLVDLVDE GRAND BLE

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTEE. GR

    AN

    D B

    LVD

    .

    CH

    ENE

    I-375

    I-75

    I-94

    I-94

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    KERCHEVAL

    CHARLEVOIX

    DETROIT RIVER

    MACK

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    PALMER

    MT. ELLIO

    TM

    T. ELLIOT

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    GRAT

    IOT

    I-375

    GRAT

    IOT

    MACK

    WILKINS

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    VERNOR

    Map 1 illustrates vacant properties as gray Map 2 iIlustrates vacant properties as green

    One Simple MoveVacant Land Open SpaceViewing vacant land and buildings as open space.

  • Historical Underpinnings

    Historical Signifi canceBloody Run Creek was originally known as Rivieres Parent by the French until in 1763 a major battle between the British Army and native Americans led by the famous Chief Pontiac resulted in the death of a number of British Soldiers. On that day Parents Creek ran red with blood and the name Bloody Run Creek was adopted by the local inhabitants.

    The original alignment of Bloody Run Creek extended from its outlet in the Detroit River near the west end of Belle Isle generally north-northwest past current I-94 where it branched out, and along the French ribbon farms that were positioned to take advantage of the waterfront access.

    As the City of Detroit grew in the second half of the 19th century, and the science of sanitary engineering developed, much of the surfaces within the watershed were paved and the surrounding area sewered. As the construction of sewers increased, the Bloody Run Creek was used to divert sewer overfl ows during severe storm events, which led to health issues and the accumulation of debris. In 1880, coinciding with massive cholera outbreaks throughout the area, the City of Detroit decided to bury the creek through a process of installing 5-foot diameter sewers and culverts and fi lling over the creek. The creek was completely fi lled by the 20th Century, except the section through Elmwood Cemetery, where the Creek is still visible.

    Historic Image of Bloody Run Creek at Elmwood CemeterySource: Burton Historical Library

    Early 19th Century Map of Detroit

  • 1825 Map of DetroitHistoric Image of Bloody Run CreekSource: Burton Historical Library

    In 1880, coinciding with massive cholera outbreaks throughout the area, the City of Detroit decided to bury the creek through a process of installing 5-foot diameter sewers and culverts and fi lling over the creek. The creek was completely fi lled by the 20th Century, except the section through Elmwood Cemetery, where the Creek is still visible today.

  • Historical Underpinnings

    Rediscovering Bloody Run CreekOver the years several schemes have proposed the daylighting of Bloody Run Creek. In 1993, Schervish Vogel Merz proposed to the then new Mayor Dennis Archer that a state park be developed that opens the creek as an incentive for new development. Although well received, the scope of the project3000 acreswas beyond the citys ability to contemplate. In 1995, Stephen Vogel and the Detroit Collaborative Design Center at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Architecture presented Unearthing Detroit that proposed the daylighting of Bloody Run Creek as part of the exhibition Empowering the City: New Directions in Urban Architecture. Further, the city-sponsored Community Reinvestment Strategy in 1997 illustrated the daylighting of Bloody Run Creek as a part of the long term strategy for the lower east side. No process of implementation of this strategy has ever been put forward until now.

    Historic Map of Detroit French ribbon farmsSource: 1935 clarifi cation of a 1749 French Map. Clements Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (Map Division 6-N-3).

  • JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTEE. G

    RA

    ND

    BLV

    D.

    CH

    EN

    E

    I-375

    I-75

    I-94

    I-94

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    KERCHEVAL

    CHARLEVOIX

    DETROIT RIVER

    MACK

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    PALMER

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    GRAT

    IOT

    I-375

    GRAT

    IOT

    MACK

    WILKINS

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    VERNOR

    1890 Creek

    1846 Creek

    19th Century map of Detroits creeks and streams

    Historic creek alignments

    Pontiacs Tree: Tradition says that an old whitewood tree, standing on the south side of Jefferson Avenue just beyond Adair Street, was wit-ness to the battle of Bloody Run Creek, and the tree for many years was called The Pontiac Tree after Chief Pontiac.

  • Project Vision

    Detroit has the opportunity to redefi ne the 21st Century city.

    The VisionDetroit is in a unique position of crisis and opportunity. It is at a turning point in history based on its economic and physical reality. Detroit has the opportunity to create a new 21st Century city centered on the quality of life for all of its citizens and catalyzed by the transformative Bloody Run Creek Greenway Redevelopment Project.

    The Bloody Run Creek Greenway is envisioned as a new kind of public ecological landscape: a productive landscape that offers a generous and beautiful large-scale public landscape for recreation, culture, education, and ecology, creating a unique place of interaction with the creek and the land. As a productive landscape, the Greenway will provide jobs and become a model for sustainable design and management practices.

  • JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTEE. G

    RA

    ND

    BLV

    D.

    CH

    EN

    E

    I-375

    I-75

    I-94

    I-94

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    KERCHEVAL

    CHARLEVOIX

    DETROIT RIVER

    MACK

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    PALMER

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    ST. AU

    BIN

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    McD

    OU

    GA

    LL

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    GRAT

    IOT

    I-375

    GRAT

    IOT

    MACK

    WILKINS

    CANFIELD

    (TO MIDTOWN LOOP)

    WARREN

    FERRY

    VERNOR

    UAW

    Lafayette Park

    ChenePark

    Tricentennial StatePark

    Mt. ElliotPark

    Faygo

    TrinityCemetery

    EasternMarket

    Pepsi

    Incinerator

    Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly Plant(General Motors)

    McDougall-Hunt

    FarnsworthNeigborhood

    Botanical Gardens

    Reservoir

    Poletown Ponds + Bird Sanctuary

    Upper Woods

    Nurseries

    Productive Gardens

    Landfi ll Park

    Woods & Water

    Packard Canal

    Gratiot Parkway

    Eco-Park

    Fitness Loop

    Central Pond

    Waterfall

    Cascading Ponds

    Dequindre Cut Greenway

    Wetlands

    Farmscape

    Lower Woods

    Linear Park

    Rapids Run

    Green Energy C

    orridor

    Green Energy C

    orridor

    Promenade

    Riverwalk

    Headwaters

  • 1.

    4.

    2.

    3.

    5.R

    WINDSOR CBD

    I-75

    WO

    OD

    WA

    RD

    I-75GR

    ATIO

    T

    GRAT

    GRAT

    IOTOT

    MACKMAC

    WILKINSNS

    JEFFERSONJEFFERS

    JEFFERRSON

    E. G

    RA

    ND

    BLV

    DE

    . GR

    AN

    D B

    LVD

    EG

    RA

    ND

    BLV

    DE

    GR

    AN

    DB

    LVDD

    .

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    CA

    DILLA

    C

    FORESTF

    WARREN

    CANFIELDANFIELD

    LAYFAYEETTEYE

    ONVERNORORRNOORVERNVERNOORVERNOORRNVERNOOR

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    I-994

    I-94

    I-75I-75I-75

    EQ

    UIN

    DR

    E C

    UT

    EQ

    UIN

    DR

    E C

    UT

    DE

    DE

    D

    RIVERWALKRIVERWRIVERWALK

    M-10-

    Project Boundary

    Mixed Use District

    Residential District

    Energy and Production District

    Linkages

    FARNSWORTHWOFARA O

    LAAFAYETTEAFAYETTEELPARK

    EASTERNRNEE NMARKETKE

    ELMWOODCEMETERY

    MCDOUGALL -MCDOUGALL -MMMCMHUNTHUNT

    TENTERTAINMENTN DISTRICTRI

    TECHTOWN

    STATEAYNEWWAWWA EE RSITYUNIVEUU ER Y

    MEDICALICCENTERNT

    CULTURALUCENTERT

    Woodw

    ard Light Rai

    gR

    ali

    ht g

    GREEK-TOWN

    GMGM

    HENRYHENRY FORD

    AAAAUTO TECH ECCAURESEARCH & DESIGNRESEARCH & DESIGNARCH & DESIGNRESEARCH & DESIGNRESEARCH & DESIGNDDRCH & DESIGNRCH & DESIGN& D& DD NARCH & DESIGN

    ELMWOOD

    MEDICALMEDICAL DIRESEARCHRESEARCH/H/ARESEARCH/

    TECH.EC

    MIDTOWNLOOP

    HARBORTOWNWN

    RIVERFRORIVERFROONTONTOOEASTST

    DOWNTOWNWNOW

    ROW RONTEST RIVERFRO TWWEST RIVERFRONT

    OWOMMIDTOWNOM

    NEWCCENTERCENTERCENTERR

    GM ASSEMBLY PLANT

    I-94 INDUSTRIAL PARK/URENAISSANCE ZONES

    VILLAGES

    KETTERING

    GOLD COASTGOLD COAS

    BELLE ISLE

    NORTHEND

    BOSTON EDISON

    HAMTRAMCK

    WOODBRIDGEOODBRIDGEE

    NORTHCORKTOWNCORKTOWN

    CORKTOWNCORKTOWN

    Context and Linkages Analysis Diagram

    The Vision & Guiding PrinciplesCore principles have been established that will guide the design, planning, and implementation of The Bloody Run Creek Greenway Redevelopment Project. The Guiding Principles for the project include the following:

    The Project will be a bold, visionary, and transformative project that will catalyze the Citys redevelopment efforts.

    The Project will connect and strengthen the fabric of the community through its accessibility, inclusiveness, and connections to the city.

    The Project will champion environmental sustainability through its utilization of innovative green technologies.

    The Project will generate jobs.

    The Project will set new standards for landscape, environmental, and architectural design.

  • A catalyst for future development and dynamic quality of life.

  • In order to collect the storm water runoff from the entire site, the current storm water is separated from the sanitary sewer system through a new storm sewer. The existing storm sewer connections to the combined sewer are removed or abandoned in place.

    The ponds improve water quality by fi ltering solids from the fl ow. Plantings near the ponds act as wetlands and fi lter out other items from the run-off before it reaches the creek.

    In order to help maintain a consistent fl ow throughout the proposed creek between rain events, storage or holding ponds and reservoirs are required. Flows are held in these areas through the use of dams and weirs.

    The ponds improve water quality by fi ltering solids from the fl ow. Plantings near the ponds act as wetlands and fi lter out other items from the run-off before it reaches the creek.

    After the ponds and native plantings fi lter the storm water, clean water is released into the creek. This process reduces the amount of storm runoff reaching the Detroit Wastewater treatment plant.

    Collect

    Clean

    Store

    Release

    Clean

    Hydrologic Concept

    SanitarySewer

    Local Storm Sewer

    RetentionPond

    Bloody RunCreek Channel

    DaylightingGiven the current social and economic challenges within urban areas, a popular and effective method of decreasing municipal sewer treatment costs while improving the environment and the beauty of a city is the process of daylighting former natural drainage features such as creeks and streams. Daylighting is a term describing projects whose goal is to uncover and/or re-establish previously existing creeks, rivers, ponds, and lakes that have been eliminated in the modern era. The idea is to re-establish the waterways either along their old channel or in new alignments.

  • 585

    580

    590

    595

    600

    600

    605

    610

    615

    620

    620

    630

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTEE. G

    RA

    ND

    BLV

    D.

    CH

    EN

    E

    ST. AU

    BIN

    RIV

    AR

    D

    I-375

    I-75

    I-94

    I-94

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    KERCHEVAL

    CHARLEVOIX

    DETROIT RIVER

    MACK

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    From Forest Ave. and Pennsylvania St.

    PALMER

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    McD

    OU

    GA

    LL

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    GRAT

    IOT

    I-375

    GRAT

    IOT

    MACK

    WILKINS

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    FOREST

    VERNOR

    2B

    2C

    2D

    2A3A

    AREA 3

    Leg 1A

    Leg 1B

    Leg 3

    Leg 2

    3B

    +30

    H.P.*

    +20

    +0

    +0

    +17

    +40

    +40

    3C

    AREA 2

    AREA 4* See NTH Consultants, LTDs

    Drainage Area Diagram for Extent of Area 4 Watershed

    Aditional Sewer SeparationTo North

    pment

    k

    urce

    By uncovering Bloody Run Creek, Detroit can reduce the strain on its sewer system through a reduction in runoff collection and transport to the City of Detroit Wastewater Treatment Plant by 3 billion gallons per year. This in turn reduces the cost of water treatment due to a decreased quantity of storm water collected. Further, by exposing the water to air, sunlight, vegetation, and exposed soils, the water quality can be improved through natural fi ltration of pollutants. Such bioremediation provides an environmentally friendly and aesthetically pleasing asset for existing residents while creating an amenity for new residents and businesses. In addition to the benefi ts of the water feature itself, the physical process of daylighting creates local jobs through uncovering and maintaining the restored waterway as well as reducing future maintenance costs, as it is much cheaper and easier to perform maintenance and repairs to a creek or stream than an underground sewer.

    Primary Roads

    Surface Drainage

    Local Storm Sewer

    Collector Pipe

    Collector to Roads/Creek

    Supplemental Water Source

    Water Discharge Valve

    Creek/Retention Pond

    Sewer Separation Area

    Headwater Zones

    Landscape Coverage

    High Point (H.P.)

    Spot Elevation

    Contours (5 Intervals)

    Note: Dominant Soil Texture:Morain Fine

    Hydrologic Concept

  • Productive LandscapesSeveral estimates suggest that there are 40 square miles of undesignated open space (i.e. vacant land and buildings) within the city limits of Detroit. To be conservative, let us use 30 square miles and divide that into 800,000 inhabitants. These numbers reveal a potential for 1,045 square feet of open, green space per Detroiter. This suggests that Detroit has the potential to be the greenest city in the United States through the creation of productive landscapes: spaces that engage the public through the production of ideas, social exchange, products and services, and jobs. An example of a productive landscape is the Steel Winds Wind Farm in the suburb of Lackawanna, New York. Steel Winds returned the former Bethlehem Steel Factory to productive use by incorporating a wind farm and public park into the facility. Here energy is made; jobs are created; and people have a place to recreate.

    Green Energy Corridor

  • Detroit River to I-94: 3 miles with a 40 ft. grade change

    Key Plan

    What if innovative ecological technologies and practices formed new landscapes of production?

  • PocketForest

    Fishing Water Cascade

    PublicPlaza

    TrailUnderpass

    Key Plan

    Gratiot Parkway

    What if Gratiot became a public heritage parkway and welcoming entry into the City?

    Creek Cascade at Gratiot Crossing

  • A recreational and cultural circuit.A recreational and cultural circuit.

    What if native species fi ltered water to the Detroit River?

  • Fitness Green at Farnsworth Neighborhood

    BasketballCourt

    SolarField

    VegetatedStream Bank

    VistaPoint

    Kayaking Phyto-remediation

    StormwaterSeparation

    Key Plan

    What if phytoremediation gardens regenerated the site?

  • A meandering neighborhood asset.

  • Canal ScreenViewing Platform

    BoardwalkRamp toGarden Roof

    Theatre at Packard Canal

    Key Plan

    What if abandoned buildings became ecological destinations?

  • What if bike trails highlighted the Citys historic landmarks?

    History, Ecology and Recreation Combined.

  • Wetlands at Chene Street

    WindsTurbines

    Boardwalk WetlandsHabitat

    Key Plan

  • Boardwalk ParkDrive

    Picnic Shelterwith SolarHarvesting

    SleddingHill

    What if wetlands and urban life were combined?

  • WindsTurbines

    AgriculturalProduction

    Irrigation

    Nursery and Research Fields at Perrien Park

    Key Plan

    What if a neighborhood took part in producing its own energy, food, and culture?

  • Irrigation/DrainageChannel

    MarketPavilion

    TreeNursery

    The daylit creek as part of the irrigation system.

  • Implementation Strategy: Master Plan

    Master Plan ImplementationSignifi cant resources will be required to design, construct, and maintain the Bloody Run Creek Greenway. Thus, it is proposed that the project be divided into fi ve phases, at approximately $200 million each, and built over a period of ten years. A recommended implementation schedule is indicated in the following chart. The creek will be implemented over ten years and private development is assumed to continue another fi fteen years. As the foundation of the project, the creek development, shown as a blue bar, is the critical path of the schedule.

    Item

    1. Natural Features Construction Creek Creek Tributary Ponds Landscape Trails Professional Fees2. Thoroughfare Streetscape Features3. Special Landscape Features4. Raw Water Connection to DWSD System5. Renewable Energy Options Allowance6. Land Assembly Public Property Private Property

    Total Cost

    #/Unit

    37,100 L.F.18,600 L.F.45 EA820 AC43,400 L.F. 8450019,500 L.F.

    Cost

    $306,250,000$27,900,000$13,500,000

    $242,000,000$18,340,000

    $145,915,000$63,375,000$40,000,000$8,775,000

    $100,000,000

    N/A$52,000,000

    1,018,055,000

    Summary of Overall Creek and Greenway Development Costs

  • Master Plan Implementation Schedule 25 Years

    Development

    Zone 1 - Central/Eastern Market Pre-Construction/ Land Aquisition D-1 Creek & Public Infrastructure D-2 Creek & Public Infrastructure Remaining Creek & Public Infrastructure Other Public Infrastructure/ Landscape Features Private Development Non-Profi t Development

    Zone 2 - Northwest Pre-Construction/ Land Aquisition Creek & Public Infrastructure Other Public Infrastructure/ Landscape Features Private Development Non-Profi t Development

    Zone 3 - Northeast Pre-Construction/ Land Aquisition Creek & Public Infrastructure Other Public Infrastructure/ Landscape Features Private Development Non-Profi t Development

    Zone 4 - Southeast Pre-Construction/ Land Aquisition Creek & Public Infrastructure Other Public Infrastructure/ Landscape Features Private Development Non-Profi t Development

    Zone 5 - Riverfront Pre-Construction/ Land Aquisition Creek & Public Infrastructure Other Public Infrastructure/ Landscape Features Private Development Non-Profi t Development

    2011 20172014 20202012 20182015 20252013 20192016 2030 20352010

    Recovery Park(SHAR)

    y ParkAR)

    R

    Existing Creek

    1.

    1.

    2.

    6.

    3.

    2.

    4.

    6.

    5.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    10.

    11.

    12.

    13.

    14.

    17.18.

    19.

    24.

    23.

    15. 16.

    Stroh River Place

    Residential

    Infill Housing/Arts Village205 acres

    Mixed Use

    Eastern MktExpansion/

    Eco-Housing84 acres

    To Midtown Loop

    Mixed Use

    Medical/TechResearch & Design

    115 acres

    Energy & Production

    Pepsi30 acres

    Mixed Use

    Retail/Entertainment/

    Housing196 acres

    Residential

    Historic Rehab./Infill Housing

    98 acres

    Energy & Production

    RecoveryPark/Energy/

    Food Systems180 acres

    Mixed Use

    Canal Eco-Living/Food Systems/

    Adaptive Re-use154 acres

    Energy & Production

    Renewable Energy/Food Systems/

    Adaptive Re-use195 acres

    Mixed Use

    Eastern MarketFood Systems/

    Retail/Housing148 acres

    Residential

    Existing Housing 77 acres

    Residential

    Infill Housing/Historic Rehab.

    104 acres

    Mixed Use

    Hub260 acres

    Residential

    Eco-Housing134 acres

    Residential

    LafayettePark

    183 acres

    Mixe

    d Use

    Parkw

    ay

    155 a

    cres

    Residential

    Elmwood403 acres

    Mixed Use

    Renewable Energy/Culture/

    Recreation/Housing212 acres

    Mixed Use

    Auto/Tech Research & Design

    284 acres

    Energy & Production

    Renewable Energy/Recreation

    43 acres

    Energy & Production

    Incinerator63 acres

    Mixed Use

    DPS75 acres

    Residential

    Infill-Housing/Historic Rehab.

    188 acresCentralPond

    Dequindre Cut

    ononfrofroEasEas oontntnnEE verfiverfstst RRiv

    CulturalCCCCenter/entee

    CCSSCCSSCCSSS

    MedicalMMMCenterCC

    GM Assembly PlantG

    OOld C

    onrail LineoonrailLi

    tMMMMMMMM EEMtMMt. M ottiolllElllioPPPPPPP rkkkkkrkrkrkkkkkrParrarr

    ridoridordoridord

    ridorC

    hene Cnene

    hd

    e Cori

    Chene

    Coridor

    Belle Isle

    dElmwooddCemetery

    MidtownMi wnMidtowMMMM

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    E. GR

    AN

    D BLV

    D.

    CH

    ENE

    I-375

    I-75

    I-94

    I-94

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    VERNOR

    MACK

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    GRAT

    IOT

    GRAT

    IOT

    MACK

    WILKINS

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    KERCHEVAL

    CHARLEVOIX

    PALMER

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    ST. AU

    BIN

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    McD

    OU

    GA

    LL

    Detroit Academy ofArts & Sciences

    Medbury Campus

    PlymouthEducationCenter

    CampbellElementary

    School

    EdisonPublic School

    Academy

    Pulford St.Elementary

    Heidelberg Project

    BuncheElementary

    School

    UAW-GM

    Harbortown

    Chene ParkRivard Park

    TricentennialState Park

    WoodwardAcademy

    MLK High School

    BerryElementary

    School

    Miller Middle School

    FriendsSchool

    Whitney Young Middle School

    Detroit Academy of Arts & Science

    St. StanislausRoman Catholic

    Church

    St. HyacinthRoman Catholic

    Church

    Sweetest Heart of Mary Church

    St. AlbertusRoman Catholic

    Church

    Sacred Heart

    Rectory

    Historic Trinity Lutheran Church

    St. John & St. Luke United Church of

    Christ

    St. Josephs Catholic Church

    NewHarmonyBaptist

    Capuchin Monastery

    Calvary Baptist

    Christ Church Detroit

    LutheranCemetery

    FRBC

    Faygo

    DouglassAcademy

    Milliken Park

    GlobeBuilding

    y p j

    2,000

    nter

    ion

    es

    in

    s

    2 3

    1 4

    5

    Development Zones

  • ckMack

    Implementation Strategy: Phase I

    Design & Engineering Elements

    CreekDequindre CutSewer SeparationLandscapeBridgesStreetscapeTrailsPublic Amenities/Landscape FeaturesEnergyTransportationLand AssemblyProfessional Fees/Pre-DevelopmentSubtotal

    Total

    Phase 1 Cost

    $13,325,000$18,260,000$42,314,000$12,947,500$7,500,000

    $44,924,000$3,547,500$8,400,000

    $11,475,000$13,130,000$5,550,000

    $36,274,600$217,647,600

    $209,463,600

    Phase 1 Creek Engineering and Construction Costs

    Eastern Market

    Dequindre Cut

    Central Pond

    WW kWilkins

    Wilkinss

    Wilkins

    Wilkins

    Wil

    Grat

    iot

    Grat

    iotttot

    Phase I ImplementationPhase 1 is built around Eastern Market and the many activities and projects that are underway or proposed in the market area. The Bloody Run Creek Greenway is a natural complement to this activity and therefore Phase I builds upon the strength of the Eastern Market.

    Phase I project scope

  • Phase 1 Implementation Schedule 10 Years

    Zone 1

    Pre-Developement Master Planning/ Design Market & Economic Feas. Funding Land Aquisition

    Creek Demonstration Project 1 Demonstration Project 2 Central Pond Fresh Water Supply Dequindre Cut Channel Sewer Separation

    Public Infrastructure Landscape Streetscape Bridges Trails Public Amenities Energy Transportation

    Private Development Dequindre Cut Bldgs. Gratiot Bldgs. Market Garden Housing Hub Mixed Use Dev.

    Non-Profi t Development Dequindre Cut Greening of Det. Gardens Midtown Loop Eastern Market Projects Eastern Market Sheds

    2011 20172014 20202012 20182015 20212013 20192016 2022

    View of Central Pond looking towards Downtown

  • Implementation Strategy: Demonstration Project

    Design & Engineering Elements

    CreekDequindre CutSewer SeparationLandscapeBridgesStreetscapeTrailsPublic Amenities/Landscape FeaturesEnergyTransportationLand AssemblyProfessional FeesSubtotal

    Total

    D1 Cost

    $1,000,000$4,860,000$1,800,000$2,072,500

    $2,436,000

    $127,500

    $500,000$55,000

    $2,570,200

    $15,421,200

    $15,421,200

    D2 Cost

    $1,000,000$1,000,000$6,950,000

    $500,000

    $4,755,000$345,000

    $25,000

    $250,000

    $2,965,000$17,790,000

    $17,790,000

    In order to launch the project, test its feasibility, and excite the stakeholders it is proposed that a small demonstration project be built. The Demonstration Project is broken down into two phases, identifi ed as DI, a $15 million project shown above, and D2.

    Demonstration Project Implementation

    D1 Project scope

    Demonstration Project (D1 & D2) Creek Engineering and Construction Costs

    ng

    Adelaide

    Division

    Divisi n

    Alfred

    Alfred

    Alfred

    AlfrededA

    Winder

    Grat

    iot

    Exg.Parking

    Exg.Parking

    Wilkins

    Wilkins

    Wilkins

    St. Aubin

    St. Au

    Orleansns

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    O

    F

    G

    G

    G

    H

    H

    H

    I

    K

    NJ

    L

    M

    1

    2

    3

    4 FutureDevelopment

    Site

    1. Private Development/Adaptive Reuse2. Private Development/Adaptive Reuse3. Private Development/Adaptive Reuse4. Private Development/Adaptive Reuse

    A. Market Pond at Dequindre CutB. WaterfallC. Creek Channel (Gratiot to Wilkins)D. Division Sewer Separation (Orleans to St. Aubin) E. Landscape at Dequindre Cut (Gratiot to Wilkins)F. Landscape at Market PondG. Landscape Clean-up at adjacent propertiesH. Bridge RehabilitationsI. Division St. Streetscape (Orleans to St. Aubin)J. St. Aubin Streetscape & Entry (Gratiot to Division)K. Trails at Market PondL. Trails at Dequindre Cut (Gratiot to Wilkins)M. Geothermal Field at Dequindre CutN. Solar Lighting and SignalizationO. Bike Corrals & Racks (Multiple Locations)

  • The Demonstration Project includes a pond/water feature that fl ows into the Dequindre Cut as a waterfall and follows the new bike/pedestrian path for a block and a half to Gratiot Avenue. Eventually the creek will follow the Dequindre Cut to the Detroit River and provide the fi rst outlet for Bloody Run Creek. Water in this phase is provided by raw, untreated water from the Detroit River through intercepting a water pipe at Forest Avenue which runs through the Bloody Run Creek area.

    Demonstration Project Implementation Schedule - D1 & D2 5 Years

    Task

    D1 Development Schedule

    Pre-development Planning Land Acquisition Funding

    D2 Development Schedule

    Pre-development Planning Land Acquisition Funding

    Pre-construction Survey, Borings, Environ-

    mental Assessment Schematic Design &

    Engineering Construction Management Construction Documents Permitting Contractor Bidding &

    Negotiations

    Construction Cleanup & Demolition Creek Construction Sewer Separation Streetscapes Trails & Transportation Landscaping Energy

    Pre-construction Survey, Borings, Environ-

    mental Assessment Schematic Design &

    Engineering Construction Management Construction Documents Permitting Contractor Bidding &

    Negotiations

    Construction Cleanup & Demolition Creek Construction Sewer Separation Streetscapes Trails & Transportation Landscaping Energy

    20132012 20152011 2014 2016

    View of Cascading Ponds and connection to Dequindre Cut

  • Cost Estimate

    Cost EstimateThe Cost Estimate for the overall Creek Greenway development and the construction of associated landscape areas (Legs 1A-3, as illustrated on the opposite page) is estimated at $1,018,055,000 and is shown in the following charts. The costs are in 2011 dollars and include design and engineering fees.

    Excavation of creek channel

  • Item

    1. Natural Features Construction Creek Creek Tributary Ponds Landscape Trails Professional Fees2. Thoroughfare Streetscape Features3. Special Landscape Features4. Raw Water Connection to DWSD System5. Renewable Energy Options Allowance6. Land Assembly Public Property Private Property

    Total Cost

    #/Unit

    37,100 L.F.18,600 L.F.45 EA820 AC43,400 L.F. 8450019,500 L.F.

    Cost

    $306,250,000$27,900,000$13,500,000

    $242,000,000$18,340,000

    $145,915,000$63,375,000$40,000,000$8,775,000

    $100,000,000

    N/A$52,000,000

    $1,018,055,000

    Summary of Overall Creek and Greenway Development Costs

    I-994

    DETROIT RIVVER

    WARRWARRENREREN

    PALMERER

    GGRAT

    IOT

    RAGRG

    OTIOTIATOTIOATA

    GRAT

    IOTOTIOATA

    OTTTOTOTTOT

    UAW

    bly PlantDe sembly PlanDetroit-Hamtramck Asors)(General Moto

    galgMcDougall-tHunt

    hhrtrtworworwwwwssnsnsnrnararFaFa nsworthnsworthFarnFarnNeigborNeigborhood

    Leg 1a

    Leg 3

    Leg 2

    Leg 1b

    Key Map

    Leg

    1a

    1b

    2

    3

    Total

    Components

    CreekPondsTributariesCreekPondsTributariesCreekPondsTributariesCreekPondsTributariesRaw Water Connection

    Quantity

    9300 L.F.207200 L.F.11000 L.F.94200 L.F.8400 L.F.123600 L.F.8400 L.F.43600 L.F.1

    Cost

    $77,190,000$6,104,000

    $11,124,000$91,300,000$2,746,800$6, 489,000

    $69,720,000$3,662,400$5,562,000

    $68,040,000$1,220,800$5,562,000$8,240,000

    $442,000,000

    Summary for Creeks and Ponds within Creek Corridor

  • Site Strategy: Market and Land Use

    Market and Land Use StrategyThe market strategy for the Bloody Run Creek project entails looking at national trends in various employment sectors throughout the country and specically in the State of Michigan. These trends combined with the local market outlook and the surrounding context in which the Bloody Run Creek area is situated and will all factor into the creation of a market for private development attracted to the Bloody Run Creek development. These trends led to the site strategy map at the right that illustrates a possible land use scenario for the Bloody Run development. In addition to renewal energy and food production systems that are inherent to the concept of Bloody Run there is proposed Medical Center and General Motors Volt Assembly Plant related research, technology and manufacturing facilities, eco-housing development, retail development, and the infi ll and revitalization of existing viable neighborhoods such as McDougall-Hunt and Farnsworth.

    The adjoining chart also illustrates the private development program and costs (exclusive of renewable energy and food production systems). These proposed uses, like the greenway itself, has not been vetted with the community since the 1997 Community Reinvestment Strategy process. A robust community participation process is required to re-test these assumptions before the project moves forward.

  • Site S

    Underground Drain

    Primary Road

    Major Road

    Secondary Road

    Green Space

    Asset Buildings

    Residential

    Mixed Use

    Energy & Production

    Creek

    Key:

    Zone

    22, 3311

    1, 3, 44

    5

    2, 33444

    Private Development

    Mixed UseMedical/Tech/R&DAuto/Tech/R&DPackard Renewable Energy/Rec.Eastern Market Food SystemsEastern Market ExpansionVillage Hub 50% Residential 50% RetailGratiot CorridorCanal Eco-Living/Food Systems 20% Retail 80% ResidentialEast Riverfront Mid-Rise Housing Adaptive Reuse

    Subtotal

    ResidentialEco-LivingFarnsworth Infi ll/Historic RehabMcDougall-Hunt Infi ll/Historic RehabGrand Blvd. Infi ll/Historic Rehab (North)Grand Blvd. Infi ll/Historic Rehab (South)

    Subtotal

    Grand Total

    Net Acreage

    11528421214884260100100155154311231965050

    814 Acres

    13498205188104

    1,392 Acres

    2,450 Acres

    Building Area

    1,380,000 SF2,500,000 SF1,000,0001,008,0001,000,0001,000,000600,0001,000,000200,000800,0001,500,0005001,500,000

    13,980,000 SF

    320,000235,000492,000451,000249,000

    1,747,000 SF

    15,727,000 SF

    Total Cost

    $345,000,000$625,000,000$250,000,000

    $201,600,000

    $234,000,000$312,000,000$90,000,000

    $40,000,000

    $120,000,000

    $150,000,000$300,000,000

    $2,667,600,000

    $48,000,000$35,250,000$73,800,000$67,650,000$37,350,000

    $262,050,000

    $2,929,650,000

    Master Plan Development Program and Costs

    Master Plan Development Zones

    Recovery Park(SHAR)

    y ParkAR)

    R

    Existing Creek

    1.

    1.

    2.

    6.

    3.

    2.

    4.

    6.

    5.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    10.

    11.

    12.

    13.

    14.

    17.18.

    19.

    23.

    15. 16.

    Stroh River Place

    Residential

    Infill Housing/Arts Village205 acres

    Mixed Use

    Eastern MktExpansion/

    Eco-Housing84 acres

    To Midtown Loop

    Mixed Use

    Medical/TechResearch & Design

    115 acres

    Energy & Production

    Pepsi30 acres

    Mixed Use

    Retail/Entertainment/

    Housing196 acres

    Residential

    Historic Rehab./Infill Housing

    98 acres

    Energy & Production

    RecoveryPark/Energy/

    Food Systems180 acres

    Mixed Use

    Canal Eco-Living/Food Systems/

    Adaptive Re-use154 acres

    Energy & Production

    Renewable Energy/Food Systems/

    Adaptive Re-use195 acres

    Mixed Use

    Eastern MarketFood Systems/

    Retail/Housing148 acres

    Residential

    Existing Housing 77 acres

    Residential

    Infill Housing/Historic Rehab.

    104 acres

    Mixed Use

    Hub260 acres

    Residential

    Eco-Housing134 acres

    Residential

    LafayettePark

    183 acres

    Mixe

    d Use

    Parkw

    ay

    155 a

    cres

    Residential

    Elmwood403 acres

    Mixed Use

    Renewable Energy/Culture/

    Recreation/Housing212 acres

    Mixed Use

    Auto/Tech Research & Design

    284 acres

    Energy & Production

    Renewable Energy/Recreation

    43 acres

    Energy & Production

    Incinerator63 acres

    Mixed Use

    DPS75 acres

    Residential

    Infill-Housing/Historic Rehab.

    188 acresCentralPond

    Dequindre Cut

    ononfrofroEasEas oontntnnEE verfiverfstst RRiv

    CulturalCCCCenter/entee

    CCSSCCSSCCSSS

    MedicalMMMCenterCC

    GM Assembly PlantG

    OOld C

    onrail LineoonrailLi

    tMMMMMMMM EEMtMMt. M ottiolllEllioPPPPPPP rkkkkkrkrkrkkkkkrParrarr

    ridoridordoridord

    ridorC

    hene Cnene

    hd

    e Cori

    Chene

    Coridor

    dElmwooddCemetery

    MidtownMi wnMidtowMMMM

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    E. GR

    AN

    D BLV

    D.

    CH

    ENE

    I-375

    I-75

    I-94

    I-94

    E. GRAND BLVD.

    VERNOR

    MACK

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    JEFFERSON

    LAFAYETTE

    GRAT

    IOT

    GRAT

    IOT

    MACK

    WILKINS

    CANFIELD

    WARREN

    KERCHEVAL

    CHARLEVOIX

    PALMER

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    ST. AU

    BIN

    MT. E

    LLIOT

    McD

    OU

    GA

    LL

    Detroit Academy ofArts & Sciences

    Medbury Campus

    PlymouthEducationCenter

    CampbellElementary

    School

    EdisonPublic School

    Academy

    Pulford St.Elementary

    Heidelberg Project

    BuncheElementary

    School

    UAW-GM

    Harbortown

    Chene ParkRivard Park

    TricentennialState Park

    WoodwardAcademy

    MLK High School

    BerryElementary

    School

    Miller Middle School

    FriendsSchool

    Whitney Young Middle School

    Detroit Academy of Arts & Science

    St. StanislausRoman Catholic

    Church

    St. HyacinthRoman Catholic

    Church

    Sweetest Heart of Mary Church

    St. AlbertusRoman Catholic

    Church

    Sacred Heart

    Rectory

    Historic Trinity Lutheran Church

    St. John & St. Luke United Church of

    Christ

    St. Josephs Catholic Church

    NewHarmonyBaptist

    Capuchin Monastery

    Calvary Baptist

    Christ Church Detroit

    LutheranCemetery

    FRBC

    Faygo

    DouglassAcademy

    Milliken Park

    GlobeBuilding

    y p j

    2,000

    on

    es

    n

    s

    2 3

    1 4

    5

  • Economic Impact

    Economic ImpactThe economic impact of the construction of a public infrastructure project such as the Bloody Run Creek Greenway is signifi cant. The chart on the following page outlines part of the impact of this investment.

    As can be seen, over 5000 construction jobs will be generated by the public project, and the subsequent tax revenue for both the city and the state exceeds $37 million dollars.

    It is proposed that $1 billion in public investment yields approximately $3 billion in private investment even at the low densities suggested by the site strategy. Likewise, almost 16,000 permanent jobs with their resultant fi nancial impact will be created.

    Expansion of existing economic opportunities

  • It is proposed that $1 billion in public investment yields approximately $3 billionin private investment.

    Economic Impact

    Bloody Run Creek Greenway ConstructionAcresConstruction JobsConstruction PayrollConstruction Material Purchased

    Tax RevenuesDetroit Income Tax Michigan Income TaxMichigan Sales Tax

    Other Public Benefi tsReduction of 3 Billion GallonsReduction of Maintenance CostsRenewable EnergyExpenditures in CommunityRecreational Uses - RevenueAgricultural Uses

    Master Plan

    $1,000,000,000800 Acres5,000$400,000,000$250,000,000

    $7,200,000 $15,000,000$15,000,000

    Phase 1

    $200,000,00050 Acres1,000$80,000,000$50,000,000

    $1,500,000$3,000,000$3,000,000

    Demonstration Project (D1 & D2)

    $36,000020 Acres525$42,000,000$15,000,000

    $400,000$700,000$1,200,000

    Summary of Public Economic Impact

    Economic Impact

    Bloody Run Private InvestmentAcresConstruction Jobs Permanent JobsTotal Construction PayrollTotal Permanent Payroll

    Tax RevenuesDetroit Income Tax from ConstructionMichigan Income Tax from ConstructionMichigan Sales Tax

    Other Private Benefi tsNew Corporate and Individual Income Tax from New Business and Permanent JobsRenewable Energy Systems/ Sustainable Practice reduction of costsUrban Farming uses in underutilized parcels and economic stimulant for food processingAgricultural Uses

    Master Plan

    $3,000,000,0001,200 Acres15,00016,000$1,200,000,000$640,000,000

    $22,000,000$45,000,000$45,000,000

    Phase 1

    $475,000,00080 Acres2,5007,000$200,000,000$275,000,000

    $2,500,000$8,000,000$8.500,000

    Demonstration Project (D1 & D2)

    $60,000,00030 Acres525560$42,000,000$22,000,000

    $400,000$700,000$1,200,000

    Summary of Private Economic Impact

  • Funding

    FundingIt is envisioned that the primary funding sources for the Bloody Run Creek Greenway project will come from the following sources:

    National Foundations Federal programs including the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Housing and Urban Development Tax Increment Financing

    The matrix on the adjoining page indicates which components of the project will most likely fi t with which funding source. Initial discussions with federal agencies indicate general enthusiasm for the project. Making applications to these agencies will be one of the next steps action item.

    Leveraging public and private funding sources

  • DEPARTMENTS/AGENCIES

    FederalHousing & Urban DevelopmentEnvironmental Protection AgencyNational TrustU.S. Army Corps of EngineersFederal Highway AdministrationU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceEconomic Development AdministrationU.S. Department of Energy

    StateMichigan Department of TransportationMichigan State Housing Development AuthorityMichigan Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Economic Development Corporation

    Local City of DetroitDetroit Department of TransportationDetroit Water and Sewerage DepartmentDetroit Economic Growth CorporationEconomic Development Corporation of the City of Detroit

    Foundations and other Private FirmsNational FoundationsDTE EnergyInvest Detroit

    PROGRAMS/INCENTIVES

    FederalNew Markets Tax CreditsLow Income Housing Tax CreditsFederal Historic Tax CreditsFederal Geothermal Tax Credits

    StateState Assistance Fund

    Local HOMECommunity Development Block Grant ProgramSection 108 Loan ProgramTax Increment FinancingCommercial Rehabilitation ExemptionObsolete Property Rehabilitation ExemptionNeighborhood Enterprise ZoneWayne County TURBO ProgramPayment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT)DTE Programs

    Planning/Predevelopment

    Aquisition & Relocation

    Public Infrastructure - Land

    Public Infrastructure - Water

    Alternative Energy

    Private Development

    Funding Matrix

  • Organization

    OrganizationA project of this size and scope requires an organization to oversee its development. It is proposed that this organization be an alliance of public and private stakeholders including the City of Detroit and private entities that have a strong stake in the project including corporations such as General Motors, community representatives such as the McDougall-Hunt neighborhood and non-profi ts such as the Eastern Market Corporation. A diagram of the proposed organization is shown on the following page.

    View of expanded woods and greenway connection to Midtown

  • City of Detroit

    Bloody RunDevelopment Alliance

    Executive Project DirectorMcCormack Baron Salazar

    Urban Resource Alliance, NTH Consultants, Ltd.,The Mannik & Smith Group, Inc., Zachary and Associates

    Community/Public Interest

    Corporate/ Private Interests

    Real EstateDevelopment

    Detroit CollaborativeDesign Center

    Legal Counsel

    Project Management Team

    Project Manager

    Marketing & Finance

    Energy & Environment

    Construction Management

    Design & Engineering

  • Land Assembly

    Land AssemblyLand assembly is key to any project, especially one of this scale. Every attempt has been made to route the creek through vacant land or unoccupied buildings. Where occupied residential buildings exist in the creek path, it is either rerouted or, if required and with the owners permission, the residence is moved into a viable block or neighborhood within the project area. About 40% of all vacant property is publicly-owned. A summary of property required for acquisition is shown in the following charts. The estimated costs for assembling the parcels is based on recent history in the city and are conservative costs.

    Aerial view showing current neighborhood properties

  • Area

    D1D2

    Publicly Owned

    2 Parcels2 Parcels

    4 Parcels

    Privately Owned

    0 Parcels17 Parcels

    17 Parcels

    Cost

    NA$850,000

    $850,000

    Area

    Phase 1

    Publicly Owned

    80 Parcels

    80 Parcels

    Privately Owned

    144 Parcels

    144 Parcels

    Cost

    $7,200,000

    $7,200,000

    Area

    Leg 1ALeg 1BLeg 2Leg 3

    Publicly Owned

    384 Parcels205 Parcels319 Parcels64 Parcels

    972 Parcels

    Privately Owned

    499 Parcels281 Parcels435 Parcels55 Parcels

    1,270 Parcels

    Cost

    $52,650,000

    Master Plan Land Assembly Costs

    Phase I Land Assembly Costs

    Demonstration Project Land Assembly Costs

    I-994

    Leg 1a

    Leg 3

    Leg 2

    Leg 1b

    Master Plan Key Map

    RIO

    PELLE

    OR

    LEAN

    S

    RUSSELL

    DEQ

    UIN

    DR

    E

    ST. AU

    BIN

    CH

    ENE

    DU

    BOIS

    GR

    AN

    DY

    MIT

    CH

    ELL

    JOSEPH

    CA

    MPA

    U

    GA

    LL

    ELMW

    OO

    D

    GRAT

    IOT

    ANTIETAM

    VERNOR

    MACK

    HALE

    SCOTT

    PIERCE

    ERSKINE

    WILKINS

    WATSON

    BREWSTER

    ALFRED

    DIVISION

    ADELAIDE

    ST. JOSEPH

    Privately OwnedVacant Properties

    Phase 1 CreekAlignment

    Vacant Parcels

    Parcels w/ Structures

    Detroit Recreation Department Properties

    Detroit Public SchoolSites

    Privately Owned Vacant Commercial Structures

    Publicly Owned Vacant Properties

    Water and Greenway Boundary

    Privately Owned HousesGood Condition

    Privately Owned HousesFair Condition

    Privately Owned HousesPoor Condition

    Privately Owned HousesDemo Condition

    Source: Data Driven Detroit, 2010Wayne State University Capstone Team, 2010

    Source: SEMCOG, 2008

    Phase 1 Property Ownership Map

  • Next Steps

    Next StepsThere is a comprehensive list of next steps that are found in the working notebook. In general, however, the immediate focus should be on constructing the Demonstration Project (DI and D2). The following steps are necessary to build D1:

    Engage a community process to confi rm consensus on the overall concept as well as the Demonstration Project. Secure City of Detroit approval to proceed with D1 and to make the city owned land available for the project. Secure planning and construction funding. Finalize the design and engineering of D1 and related planning. Perform all required engineering testing, surveys and approvals for the project including geo-technical and environmental testing. Meet with building owners of potential adaptive reuse projects and determine interest in potential redevelopment. Determine construction delivery process.

  • Demonstration Project (D1 & D2)