The Tactical Grob

By Claude F. Bloodgood III

Edited by Tartajubow

Note: This booklet does not contain the complete games included in Bloodgood’s originally published work

on the Grob Attack.

Part 1 (The Gambit Accepted)

Grob's Attack is a basic gambit unlike anything

else in modern chess theory. Every basic concept

of development and piece placement must be

discarded once 1. g4 has been played, and this

applies to the player with Black even more than to

the player with White. Accepting the gambit pawn

in the Grob is accepting immediate problems, but

it has been my experience that players facing this

for the first time are most likely to do just that. For

practical purposes, this is the logical introduction

to the Grob.

1. g4 d5

2. Bg2 Bxg4

3. c4

This simple position occurs very frequently. Black

has four main lines of play from this point, each

with its own peculiar problems. 3...dxc4? is

obviously no answer, so Black not only can't take

the second pawn, but must defend his d-pawn

even though it cannot be held. The first three lines

considered are attempts to hold the center by

defending the black d-pawn: Variation "A" with

3... c6; Variation "B' with 3... Nf6!?; Variation "C"

with 3... e6. The fourth line, Variation "D" with 3...

e5!? is an attempt to avoid the problems of

defending the d-pawn, but it has not fared well in

practice.

Variation "A" (3...c6 4. cxd5!)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 Bxg4!? 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5!

[4.Qb3 Qc7 5.cxd5 cxd5 (5...e6 6.h3! Bf5 7.e4

Bg6 8.dxe6! fxe6 9.Qxe6+ etc.) 6.Nc3 and now:

6...d4? a) 6...e6? 7.Qa4+ with 8. QxB next; b)

6...Nc6! 7.Nxd5 Qd7 8.Qa4 Rc8 9.d3 e5 (9...e6

10.Qxg4 exd5 11.Qxd7+ Kxd7 12.Bh3+ with

White winning a R for B)) 10.Bd2 Nd4 11.Qxd7+

(11.Qxa7? Nc2+) 11...Bxd7 12.Kd1 with equal

chances-H. Grob.; 7.Nb5 Qb6 8.Bxb7 Be6

(8...Qxb7? 9.Nd6+ exd6 10.Qxb7 Black Resigned;

C. Bloodgood- J. Boothe, 1972) 9.Qf3 Qxb5

10.Bxa8 Nf6 11.Qb7 with an easy win- H. Grob.]

4...Nf6

[4...Qc7 5.Nc3 Nf6 6.h3 (6.Qb3!? and if 6...e6 ,

7.h3!) 6...Bd7 7.e4 e6 8.dxe6 Bxe6 9.d4 Nbd7

10.Nge2 g6 11.Be3 Bg7 12.0–0 0–0 13.Rc1 Bc4

(13...Qa5 14.Bd2 Qb6) 14.b3 Bxe2 15.Qxe2 Qa5

16.e5 Ne8 17.Ne4 Nc7!? (17...Qd8 with ...Nb6-

Nd5 following) 18.Nd6! Rab8 19.Nxb7 1–0

Grob,H-Chevalier,D/corr 1964 (19) with an easy

win.; 4...Qb6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Qc2 Nf6 7.a4 a5 8.d3

cxd5 9.Nxd5 Nxd5 10.Bxd5 Bc5 11.Be3 (11.Qc4?

Qb4+ relieves some of the pressure on Black)

11...Bxe3 12.fxe3 Bd7 (12...Qxe3? 13.Qc4 Qd4

14.Bxf7+ Kd8 15.Qb3 with advantage to White)

13.Nf3 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Clark,J/corr Zugzwang

1975 (23) with some advantage to White.; After

4...cxd5 5.Qb3 come several lines of interest

5...Nf6 (5...Qc7 6.Nc3 Nf6 7.Nxd5 Nxd5 8.Bxd5

Nc6 9.Bxf7+ Kd8 (compare this with the position

after 9... Kd8 in Bloodgood-Ebright below) 10.Nf3

Qd7 11.Ng5 Nd4 12.Qd3 Bxe2 13.Qxd4! 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Christy,W/Norfolk Open 1957 (13)

(if 13... Qxd4 14. Ne6+); 5...e6? 6.Qa4+ 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Bowlby,R/corr 1974 (6) Black

resigned.) 6.Nc3 e6 7.Qxb7 Nbd7 8.d4 Rb8

(8...a5! 9.Bf4 Rc8 10.h3 Bf5 11.Qb3 Rc4 12.Nb5?

a4! 13.Qxc4 dxc4 14.Nc7+ Ke7 15.d5 e5 16.0–0–0

Qxc7 17.d6+ Qxd6 18.Rxd6 Kxd6 19.Bd2 Be7

20.Nf3 h6 21.Rd1 Ke6 22.Bc3 Ne4 23.Be1 a3

24.e3 Ndc5 25.bxa3 Nd3+ White resigned 0–1

Grob,H-Gubler,E./corr) 9.Qxa7 Bd6 10.Qa6 Rb6

11.Qd3 1–0 Grob,H-Wegmueller,A/corr 1963 (11)

with advantage to White.; 4...Qa5 5.Qb3 Qb6

6.Qg3 (6.dxc6! and the white queen cannot be

taken because of 6...Qxb3 (, so 6...Nxc6 7.Qxb6

axb6 8.Na3 with advantage to White.) 7.cxb7!)

6...Nf6 7.Nc3 Bd7 8.e4 Na6 9.Nge2 Rd8 10.0–0

cxd5 11.exd5 g6 12.d3 Nb4 13.Be3 Qa6 14.d4

Bf5 15.Nf4 h5 16.h4 Bh6 17.Rfd1 Nc2 18.Rac1

Nxe3 19.fxe3 g5! 20.hxg5 Rg8 21.e4 Rxg5

22.Qe3 Bh7 23.Rf1 Kf8 24.Kh1 Kg8 25.e5 Ng4

26.Qd2 Kh8 with equal chances.]

5.Qb3

[5.Nc3 is not as good as the text because it allows

5...Bd7 A line of note continues 6.Qb3 Qc8 7.d4

e6 8.e4 exd5 9.exd5 Be7 10.Bf4! cxd5 11.Nxd5

Nxd5 12.Bxd5 with White standing much the

better; analysis by H. Grob. Black has better

moves in this line.] 5...Qc7 'See Bloodgood-

Shepard, Variation "B", for 5... Qd7.' [5...Qb6

6.dxc6! Nxc6 (6...Qxb3? 7.cxb7 Qxb7 8.Bxb7 with

material advantage; C. Bloodgood-J. Turenchalk,

IPC EKO–1), ) 7.Qxb6 axb6 8.Nc3 e5? (8...Nd4!?

is Black's best chance) 9.b3 Nd4 10.Kd1 Bb4?

(10...Nxb3 11.Rb1 Nxc1 12.Rxc1 Bc5 or 12...

Bc8) 11.Bxb7 Ra7 12.Nd5 Nxd5 13.Bxd5 0–0

14.Bb2 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Hassan,B/corr APCT

1974 (14) with Black having nothing for the pawn.;

5...Qc8 6.Nc3 e6 7.h3! Bh5 8.dxe6 fxe6 9.Na4 b6

10.d4 Nd5 11.e4 Nf6 12.Bf4 Bf7 13.Bg3 e5!?

14.d5 cxd5? 15.exd5 Bd6 16.Ne2 0–0 17.0–0

Nbd7 18.Rac1 Qb7 19.Nd4 exd4 20.Bxd6 Rfe8

21.Rc7 Qa6 22.Qd1 Rad8 23.Qxd4 Nc5 24.Bxc5

bxc5 25.Nxc5 Qd6 26.Rxf7 Kxf7 27.Nb7 Qd7

28.Nxd8+ Rxd8 29.Rd1 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Moore/Virginia 1972 (29) with an easy endgame

win for White.]

6.Nc3 e6

[6...Nxd5 7.Nxd5 cxd5 8.Bxd5 Bc8 9.Bxf7+ Kd8

10.Nf3 Nc6 11.Bg8! Bd7? 12.Qf7 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Ebright,D/corr APCT 1975 (15) with

a material advantage.] 7.h3! [7.dxc6 Nxc6 8.d3 a6

9.Be3 Be7 10.Bb6 Qd7 11.Nh3 e5 12.Ng5 0–0

13.Nce4? (13.Nf3 with about equal chances)

13...Nxe4 14.Nxe4 Be6 15.Qc2 Bd5! 0–1

Bloodgood,C-Buntin,L/IPC IST-2 1975 (25) with

advantage to Black.]

7...Bh5 [7...Bf5 8.e4 Bg6 9.dxe6! fxe6 10.Qxe6+

favors White also.]

8.dxe6 fxe6 9.Qxe6+

White has much the better of this.

Variation "B" (3...Nf6!? 4. cxd5 Nxd5)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 Bxg4!? 3.c4 Nf6!?

This seemingly logical line of defense leads to

complications almost immediately. There is much

to be explored here, but from what has been

played, White obtains an advantage in this

variation.

4.cxd5

[4.Qb3 e6 5.Qxb7 Nbd7 6.cxd5 exd5 (6...Rb8

transposes into Variation "C") 7.Qb3 (7.Nc3? Nc5!

and the white Queen is trapped, e.g. if 8.Qb4 (or

if 8.Qc6+ Bd7; or if 8.Qb5+ c6 9.Qxc6+ Bd7 - H.

Grob) 8...Nd3+) Black now gets good counterplay

with 7...Nc5 8.Qc2 Qd7 9.Nc3 Bf5 etc.]

4...Nxd5

[4...Qd7? 5.Qb3 c6 6.Nc3 e6 (6...Nxd5 7.Nxd5

cxd5 8.Bxd5 with threats against both Black's b7

pawn and f7 pawn) 7.h3! Bh5 (7...Bf5 8.e4 Bg6

9.dxe6! fxe6 10.d4 White has a distinct

advantage) 8.dxe6! fxe6 (8...Qxe6? 9.Qxb7 wins)

9.Nf3 Nd5 10.Ne5 Qc7 11.d4 Nd7 (11...Nxc3

12.Qxe6+ is better for White) 12.e4 Nxe5

(12...Nxc3 13.Qxe6+!) 13.dxe5 (13.Bf4? Nd3+!; or

13.exd5!? Nd3+ with Black getting some

counterplay) 13...Nb4 (13...Nxc3 14.Qxe6+ Be7

15.bxc3 Bf7 16.Qf5 0–0 17.e6 Bg6 18.Qg4 Qa5

19.Bd2 Rad8 is unclear.) 14.Qxe6+ Be7 15.0–0

Nc2 (15...Bf7!?) 16.Rb1 Nd4 17.Qc4 Nf3+

(17...Qxe5!? 18.f4 Qc5 19.Qxc5 Bxc5 20.Kh1 0–0–

0 is better for Black) 18.Bxf3 Bxf3 19.Bf4 0–0–0

20.Rbc1 a6? (20...g5! 21.Bg3 h5) 21.Nd5! Rxd5

(not 21...Qd7? 22.Nb6+) 22.exd5 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Shepard/corr 1975 (22) with

advantage to White.]

5.Qb3 c6

[5...e6? 6.Qa4+ wins.]

6.Qxb7 Nd7

[6...Nb6? 7.Bxc6+ Bd7 (7...N8d7 is no better)

8.Bxd7+ Qxd7 (8...N8xd7!? avoiding the queen

trade would have been better) 9.Qxd7+ N8xd7

10.b3 e6 11.Bb2 delaying Blacks KB development

11...Nf6 12.Nf3 Nbd5 13.Rg1 Rc8 14.Nc3 Nb4?

(14...Nf4 followed by ...Ng6 and ...Be6) 15.Rc1 a6

16.a3 Nbd5 17.Nxd5 Rxc1+ 18.Bxc1 Nxd5 19.Bb2

f6 20.Rg4 Kf7 21.Ra4± ½–½ Bloodgood,C-

Carpenter,H/corr. 1975/Megacorr (33) with an

easy engame win.; 6...Qc7? 7.Qxa8 Nb6 8.Bxc6+

Bd7 9.Qb7 (9.Bxd7+? Kxd7! and the White queen

is lost or White is mated) 9...Qxc6 10.Qxc6

(10.Qxb8+ Bc8 with Black threatening Qxc1 mate

and Qxh1) with a material advantage-H. Grob.) ]

7.Bxd5

[7.Qxc6? Rc8 with mate threatened if the White

queen moves.]

7...Rb8

[7...cxd5 8.Qxd5 Nb6 9.Qg2 Rc8 10.Nc3 Bd7

11.b3 Bc6 12.Nf3 e6 13.Bb2 Bxf3 14.Qxf3 Be7

15.Ne4 0–0? Black can't afford this! 15...f6 was

best, 16.Rg1 f6 17.Qg4 Rf7 18.Qxe6 Qd7

19.Qxd7 Nxd7 20.Rc1 Rxc1+ 21.Bxc1 Ne5

22.Bb2 Bb4 23.a3 Ba5 24.b4 Bb6 25.h4 Nc4

26.Bxf6 Nxa3 27.h5 Nb5 28.h6 g6 29.Bg7 Rc7

30.Kd1 a5 31.Nf6+ Kf7 32.Nd5 Rb7 33.Nxb6

Rxb6 34.bxa5 Ra6 35.Rg5 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Halley,R/Washington D.C. 1958 (35) Black

resigned.]

8.Bxf7+

[8.Qxc6? Rc8 etc.]

8...Kxf7 9.Qxa7 g6

[9...e5 10.f3 Bc5 11.Qa4 Bd4 12.Nc3 Qf6 13.Ne4

Qf4? 14.d3 is a queen trap of interest because it

occurs in a line where Black appears to have

good counterplay.]

10.b3 Bg7 11.Nc3 Rf8

[11...Nb6 12.Bb2 Ra8? 13.Qb7 Bd7 14.a4 Nd5

15.Nf3 Rf8 16.e4 Nxc3 17.Bxc3 Bxc3 18.dxc3

Kg8 19.Ne5 Be8 20.Nxc6 Qd7 21.Nxe7+ 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Acevedo,A/Norfolk 1958 (21)]

12.Bb2 Kg8

[12...Bh5]

13.Qa4 Ne5 14.Nd1 Ra8

The black defenses are tied to a very precariously

situated Knight, but White has to be careful

because Black commands most of the board. C.

Bloodgood- K. Stevens, 1960, continued

15.Qe4 Bf5 16.Qg2 Qc7 17.Nc3 Rfb8 18.Rc1

Nc4 19.Ba1 Bxc3 20.Bxc3 Nd6 21.h4 h5 22.Be5

Rb6 23.Nh3 Rxa2 24.Nf4 Kf7 25.Rg1 Ke8

26.Nd5 Qb7 27.Nxb6 Qxb6 28.Qxc6+ Qxc6

29.Rxc6 Kd7 30.Rc1 Black Resigned.

Variation "C" (3...e6 4. Qb3 Qc8)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 Bxg4!? 3.c4 e6

This variation differs from 3...c6 in that Black

sacrifices some co-ordination of his pieces for

more choice in which pawn he will return.

4.Qb3

[4.cxd5 This frequently transposes to Variation

"A". Several independent lines also are possible:

4...exd5 5.Qb3 Qc8 (5...c6 6.Qxb7 Nd7 7.Nc3

(7.Qxc6? Rc8 and Black threatens mate if the

queen moves) 7...Qc8 8.Qxc8+ Rxc8 9.d4 Bb4

10.Bd2 Ngf6 11.a3 Bxc3 12.Bxc3 0–0 13.Nf3 c5

14.dxc5 Nxc5 15.Ne5 Be6 16.Bb4 Nb3 17.Rd1

Rfd8 (17...Rfe8 is better) 18.Rg1 Rc2? (18...Nd7

19.Nxd7 Rxd7 20.e3 Rdc7 21.Bc3 with White

maintaining the pressure on Black's d-pawn,)

19.Be7 Rdc8 20.Bxf6 gxf6 21.Be4+ Kh8 22.Bxc2

Rxc2 23.Nd3 Nd4 24.Nf4 Nb3 25.Nh5 Bf5 26.Nxf6

Bg6 27.f4 Kg7 28.Nxd5 Kf8 29.Ne3 Rxb2 30.f5

Bh5 31.Rg2 f6 32.Rd7 Rb1+ 33.Nd1 Nc1 34.Rxh7

Bf7 35.Rgg7 Bc4 36.Rxa7 Kg8 37.Rhc7 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Casteen,D/Norfolk 1960 (37))

6.Bxd5 Nc6 7.Bxf7+ Ke7 8.Bxg8 Rxg8 9.Qxg8

Nd4 10.Qc4 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Waymire,W/Norfolk

1960 (10) Black resigned.]

4...Qc8

[4...Nf6 5.Qxb7 Nbd7 6.cxd5 Rb8 7.Qc6 Rb6

8.Qa4 exd5 (8...Bc5! 9.a3 exd5 10.d4 Be7 11.Nc3

c6 with equal chances; Grob) 9.Bxd5 Nxd5

10.Qxg4 N7f6 11.Qg3 Rc6 12.Nc3 Nxc3 13.dxc3

Qd5 14.Nf3 Rd6 15.Bg5 Ne4 16.Qh4 f6 17.Be3 g5

18.Qh5+ Kd8 19.0–0 g4 20.Qxd5 Rxd5 21.Rfd1

Rxd1+ 22.Rxd1+ Kc8 23.Nd4 Bc5 24.Kg2 Rg8

25.f3 gxf3+ 26.Kxf3 Ng5+ 27.Bxg5 fxg5 28.h3 h5

29.e4 Rf8+ 30.Nf5 a5 31.Rd5 Bb6 32.Kg3 Rf7

33.Nd4 Rg7 34.Ne6 Rg8 35.Nxg5 c6 36.Rf5 Bd8

37.Kh4 Rh8 38.Kg3 Rg8 39.h4 Kd7 40.Kf4 Bc7+

41.e5 Re8 42.Ne4 Ke6 43.Rf6+ Kd5 44.Nd6 Bxd6

45.Rxd6+ Kc5 46.Rd2 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Branson,S/Norfolk 1959 (46); 4...Nd7 5.cxd5 Nc5

6.Qe3 Be7 7.Nc3 Nf6 8.d4 Ncd7 9.h3 Bf5 10.dxe6

Bxe6 11.Bxb7 favors White; Grob] 5.cxd5 c6

6.dxc6 Nxc6 7.Qa4

[7.Nc3 Nf6 8.d3 Bb4 9.Bd2 e5 10.Rc1 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Rhodes,C/corr APCT 1975 (10)

with advantage to White.]

7...Nf6 8.Bxc6+ bxc6

[8...Qxc6 9.Qxc6+ bxc6 10.b3 Bc5 11.Bb2 0–0

12.Nc3 Nd5 13.0–0–0 a5 14.Na4 Ba7 15.f3 Bh5

16.h4 favors White.]

9.d3 Bh5 10.Bd2 Bc5

[10...Be7 11.Nc3 Nd5 12.0–0–0 0–0 13.Ne4 c5

14.Kb1 Bg6 15.Rc1 Bxe4 16.dxe4 Nb6 17.Qc2

Rb8 with counter play.]

11.Nc3 0–0 12.Ne4 Bb6 13.Rc1 Nxe4

[13...Ng4? 14.Rxc6 Qd7 15.Rc4 Qxa4 16.Rxa4 f5

17.f3 fxe4 18.fxg4 Bxg4 19.Rxe4 Bf2+ 20.Kd1 Bf5

21.Rf4 Bg6 22.Nf3 with White a pawn up.]

14.dxe4 c5 15.Be3 f5!?

[15...a5 16.Qb5 Qc7 17.Bxc5 Bxc5 18.Rxc5 Qe7

19.Rxh5 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Cacalano,A/Norfolk

1959 (19) Black resigned.]

16.b4 Be8 17.Qb3 f4 18.Bxc5

White has a clear advantage.

Variation "D" (3...e5 4. cxd5

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 Bxg4!?

[2...e5 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Qb3 Ne7 6.Nc3 e4

7.d3 exd3 8.Bf4 Na6 9.0–0–0 Nc5 10.Qb5+ Nc6

11.Nxd5 Qa5 12.Nc7+ 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Sanderson,T/corr 1973/Megacorr (12)]

3.c4 e5

Black's purpose in playing 3...e5 is to avoid the

compications arising after any direct attempt to

hold the gambit pawn; since the pawn cannot be

held anyway, this would seem best, but has not

proven successful in practice.

4.cxd5

[Another line of play here is 4.Qb3 Qc8 (4...Bc8

5.cxd5 Nf6 6.Nc3 c6 7.d3 Na6? (7...Qc7 is better,)

8.dxc6 Nc5 9.Qb5 a6 10.cxb7+ axb5 11.bxa8Q 1–

0 Stroemer,D-Patterson,P/corr 1972 (11) with a

quick win for White.) 5.Nc3 c6 6.cxd5 Nf6

(6...cxd5? 7.Bxd5 and Black loses quickly,) 7.d3

Bc5 (7...Nxd5? 8.Nxd5 Be6 9.e4! cxd5 10.exd5

gives White a pawn while doing nothing to ease

Black's position) 8.Bg5 Qf5 (8...Bxf2+ 9.Kxf2 Qf5+

10.Nf3 Bxf3 11.Bxf3 Qxg5 12.Qxb7 wins for

White-Grob,) 9.Be3 Bxe3 10.fxe3 Qd7 (10...Qc8

is suggested by Grob,) 11.Nf3 Bxf3 12.Bxf3 0–0

13.Rg1 Na6? as cramped as Black's position was,

this was no answer...an idea would be 13...a5

followed by Ra6, 14.dxc6! bxc6 15.Qc4 Nb8 16.0–

0–0 Re8 17.Rg3 Qe6 18.Qa4 Rc8 19.Ne4 Nbd7

20.Rdg1 Ne8 21.Ng5 Qd6 22.Qh4 h6 23.Ne4

Qf8? (23...Qe6 was Black's only chance) 24.Qxh6

g6 25.Rxg6+! fxg6 26.Rxg6+ Ng7 27.Ng5 Qc5+

28.Kb1 1–0 Grob,H-Spichtig/corr 1964 (28) Black

resigned.]

4...c6

[4...Nf6 5.Qb3 Qc8 6.Nc3 Na6? (6...c6 transposes

to Grob-Spichtig,) 7.d6! c6 8.Nb5 cxb5 9.Qxb5+

Bd7 10.Qxe5+ Kd8 11.d4! with a strong attack.

11...Qc4 (11...Bc6? 12.d5 Bd7 13.Bg5 Nb4

14.Rc1 Nc2+ 15.Kd1 Ba4 16.Bxf6+ gxf6 17.Qxf6+

Ke8 18.b3 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Stroemer,D/Virginia

1972 (18) Black resigned.) 12.Bg5 Qb4+ 13.Kf1

Bxd6 14.Bxf6+ gxf6 15.Qxf6+ Kc7 16.Rc1+ Kb6

17.Rc3 Ka5 18.Rb3 Qc4 19.Qg5+ Bb5 20.Bd5

Qc2 21.Rxb5+ Kxb5 22.Bb3+ 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

McKay,J/Norfolk USO Invitational 1961 (22) Black

resigned.]

5.Qb3 Qc7

[5...Qb6!? 6.dxc6! appears to favor White 6...Nxc6

(6...Qxb3 7.cxb7 Qxb7 8.Bxb7 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Davis (8) Black resigned.) 7.Qxb6 axb6 8.Nc3

Nd4 9.Kd1 Bb4? (9...Nf6 is better,) 10.Nd5 Bd6

11.Nxb6 Rb8 (11...Ra7 12.Nc4 Bc7 13.a4 Nf6

14.d3 with White having better endgame

prospects,) 12.b3 Nf6 13.Bb2 0–0 14.Nc4 Bc7

15.f4 Nc6 16.fxe5 Nd7 17.d4 Rfd8 18.d5 Ncxe5

19.d6 Nxc4 20.dxc7 Nxb2+ 21.Ke1 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Porter,R/Norfolk 1959 (21) Black

resigned.]

6.Nc3 Nf6 7.d3 Bc5

[P. Patterson-R. Martin, 1973, continued 7...Na6?

8.dxc6 Nc5 9.Qb5 a6 10.cxb7+ axb5 11.bxa8Q+

with an easy win for White.; C. Bloodgood-

Sanderson, 1973, continued 7...Nxd5 8.Nxd5

cxd5 9.Bxd5 Bc8 10.Bd2 Nc6 11.Rc1 Bd6 12.Ba5

Qd7 13.Bxc6 bxc6 14.Nf3 Rb8 15.Qc3 with Black

losing a pawn in a pressure position.]

8.Be3 Bxe3 9.fxe3 0–0

[The only real alternative is 9...Nxd5 10.Nxd5

cxd5 11.Bxd5 Bc8 12.Nf3 which definitely favors

White.]

10.e4

White has two sets of connected doubled pawns,

which are serious threats in the center, e.g. two

connected passed would not be easy for Black to

cope with. [10.dxc6 Nxc6 11.Nb5 Qb6 12.Nd6

Qxb3 13.axb3 Bc8 ½–½ Bloodgood,C-

Sternberg,P/Norfolk 1958 (13) with Black

equalizing.]

10...Na6 11.Nf3 Nc5

[11...Bxf3 12.Bxf3! with the e-pawn held to

support White's center pawns.]

12.Qc2 Rfd8 13.b4

White has the better chances!

Part 2 (The Long Diagonal Reinforced)

1.g4 d5

2.Bg2 c6

This solid defensive line is an attempt by Black to

move the game into positional situations rather

than meet the tactical possiblilities resulting from

2...Bxg4!? White has several playable

alternatives now: Variation "A1" covers the

"Double Gambit" 3. c4; Variation "B1" covers the

"Short Spike' 3. h3; and Variation "C1" covers the

"Spike" 3. g5.

Variation "A1" (3. c4!? dxc4 4. b3!?)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.c4!? dxc4

[3...Bxg4 transposes to Part 1.]

4.b3!?

This is a risky gambit for White to play, but it is far

from simple for Black to refute. [4.Na3 Bxg4

5.Nxc4 Nd7 6.d4 e5 (6...e6 7.Qb3 Qc7 8.e4 Ngf6

9.f3 Bh5 10.Ne2 with an unclear position;

Sontheim) 7.dxe5 (7.Nxe5 Nxe5 8.dxe5 Qa5+

9.Bd2 Qxe5 10.Bf3! ; H. Grob) 7...Bb4+!? 8.Kf1?

(8.Bd2! is sharper, e.g. 8...Qe7 9.f4 0–0–0 with

equal chances; H. Grob) 8...Nxe5 9.Bd2 Nxc4

10.Bxb4 Qxd1+ 11.Rxd1 Bd7 12.b3 Nb6 13.Bc3

f6 14.e4 0–0–0 0–1 Grob,H-Wettstein,M/corr 1966

(14) With Black standing better.; 4.h3 h5 5.g5 e5

6.h4 Be6 7.Qc2 Nd7 8.g6? (Grob suggests 8.Bh3

) 8...f5! 9.e4 Qf6 0–1 Grob,H-Stuber,F/corr 1965

(9) with Black having much the better of this.]

4...cxb3

[4...Bxg4 5.bxc4 (better than 5.Bb2 cxb3 6.Qxb3

Qb6!; Grob suggests 5.Na3 cxb3 6.Qxb3 Qb6

7.Qg3 Bf5 8.Nf3! Nd7 9.0–0 Ngf6 10.d3 Rc8

11.Rb1 where Black has 2 pawns, but a bad

defensive position; and now:) 5...e6 (5...Qd4

6.Nc3 (6.Qb3? Qxa1 (6...Nd7! 7.Bb2 Qb6 8.d4 e6

9.Nf3 Ngf6 10.Nbd2 Qxb3 11.axb3 Bb4 12.Kd1 0–

0 favors black; H. Grob) 7.Qxb7 Bd7 8.Nf3 Qxa2

9.Nc3 Qa1 10.0–0! with White regaining the rook, )

6...Qxc4 7.Ba3 Nf6 8.Rc1 (8.Rb1 is worth a try)

8...Qa6 9.Qb3 Nbd7 10.d4 Be6 11.Qb2 g6 12.e4

Bg7 13.Nf3 Qb6 14.Qd2 Qd8 15.d5 Nxe4 16.Nxe4

Bxd5 17.Nc3 Bc4 ½–½ Grob,H-Kast/corr 1964

(54) and despite the draw result, Black stands

decidedly better.) 6.Qb3 Qc7 7.h3 Bf5 8.e4 Bg6

9.d4 Nd7 10.f4! (Not 10.Nc3? e5 11.d5 Nc5 0–1

Grob,H-Gubler/corr 1964 (59) etc.) 10...Be7

11.h4 Ngf6 12.Nc3 Nh5 13.Nce2 f6 14.Bd2 (Grob

suggests 14.e5!? fxe5 15.fxe5 b5 breaks the white

pawn center to White's disadvantage) 14...e5

15.f5 Bf7 16.d5 Nc5 (16...g6 17.fxg6 hxg6 18.Nf3

Nc5 19.Qc2 Rd8 is unclear; H. Grob E. Gubler,

Correspondence) 17.Qc2 g6 18.fxg6 hxg6 19.a4

(19.Rc1! is better) 19...Rd8 ½–½ Grob,H-

Gulber/corr 1964 (71) with equal chances.;

4...Qd4 is not as good for Black. 5.Nc3 Bxg4

(5...Qxg4? 6.Bh3 Qg6 7.Bxc8 Qg2 8.Bxb7 Qxh1

9.Kf1!) 6.Rb1 Nf6 (6...cxb3 7.Qxb3 b6 8.Nb5 Qd7

9.d3 with 9...Bf5 next) 7.bxc4 Qd7 8.Qb3 b6 9.c5!

-- (9...bxc5 10.Qxb8+!; or 9...b5 10.Nxb5!) ]

5.Qxb3 e5

[5...Qd4 6.Nc3 Qb6! (6...Qxg4? 7.Bh3! as in

previous note) 7.Qa4 Na6 8.Rb1 Qc7 9.d4 with

some attack for the pawn.; 5...Bxg4 6.Qxb7 Nd7

7.Bxc6 Rc8 8.Nc3=]

6.Nc3

[Also to be considered is 6.Bb2 and now: 6...Bd6

7.Nf3 Nd7 8.d4 exd4 9.Bxd4 Ngf6 10.h3 Qe7

11.0–0 Nc5 12.Qc2 Ne6 13.e3 Nd5 14.Nc3 Nxd4

15.Nxd4 Nxc3 16.Qxc3 0–0 17.Qb3 h5 18.gxh5

Qe5 19.f4 0–1 Grob,H-Freytag,D/corr 1966 (19)

19...Qxh5 20.Rf3 Be7 21.f5! -- (21...c5? 22.Ne2)

]

6...Qb6

[6...h5 7.Nf3 Bd6 8.Ne4 hxg4 9.Nfg5 Nh6

10.Nxd6+ Qxd6 11.Ne4 Qc7 (11...Qd5? 12.Nf6+)

12.Ba3 Nf5 13.Qd3 Rh6 14.h3 g3 15.fxg3 b6

16.0–0 Nd4 17.Nd6+? (17.Rxf7! with Rf1 following

and a sharp attack) 17...Rxd6 18.Qh7 Be6! 0–1

Grob,H-Levi/corr 1964 (33) with Black winning in

33.; 6...Nf6 7.g5 Nfd7 8.Nf3 Nc5 9.Qc2 Bd6

10.Ne4 (10.h4 Qe7 11.Bb2 Nba6 12.Ne4 Nxe4

13.Qxe4 Be6 14.Qb1 f6 15.d4 Bd5 16.gxf6 gxf6

17.dxe5 Bxe5 18.Bxe5 Bxf3 19.Bxf3 Qxe5

20.Bh5+ Qxh5 21.Qxb7 Qa5+ 22.Kf1 Nc7 0–1

Richter,K-Becker,A/Bad Oeynhausen 1938/HCL

(52) and Black won) 10...Nxe4 11.Qxe4 Qe7

12.Bb2 Be6 (12...Nd7 13.d4 with attack) 13.Qe3

f6 14.d4 Bd5 15.gxf6 gxf6 16.dxe5 Bxf3 17.Bxf3

Bxe5 18.Bh5+ Kd8 19.0–0–0+ Kc7 20.Ba3 Qe6

21.Bd6+ Kc8 22.Bxe5 fxe5 23.Rhg1 Qe7 24.f4 e4

25.Qc3 Qf8 26.Rg7 1–0 Grob,H-Denecke,T/corr

1964 (26) Black resigned.; 6...f6 7.g5 Nd7

threatening 8... Nc5 followed by 9... Be6 8.gxf6

Ngxf6 9.Nf3 Bd6 (or 9...Nc5 10.Qc2) 10.Ng5 Qe7

11.d4 h6 12.Nf3 (12.Ne6? Nb6) 12...e4 13.Nd2

(13.Nh4? Nf8!) 13...Nb6 14.Nc4 Bf5 and White is

down a pawn with problems.]

7.Qc2 Bxg4 8.Rb1 Qc7

[8...Qa6? 9.Qe4 Be6 10.Qxe5 -- with 11.Qc7

next.]

9.Nd5! Qc8 10.Ne3 Be6

White has little for the two pawns.

Variation "B1" (3. h3 e5 4. d3)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3

The "Short Spike" is a fluid system in which White

has several interesting means of disrupting the

black defenses. The obvious threat of g5

discourages development of the black Knight at

f6, and any attempt to attack this pawn structure

to neutralize the threat has the effect of

simultaneously weakening the black defenses.

Should Black not play aggressively, the are still

gambit possibilities for White which render the

long diagonal a melting pot of double-edged

tactics. 3...e5 [3...h5 4.g5 (4.e4 dxe4 5.Nc3 hxg4

6.hxg4 Rxh1 7.Bxh1 Qc7 8.Bxe4 Qh2 9.Kf1 Nf6

10.f3 e5 11.Qe2 Qg3 12.Qg2 ½–½ Plattner-

Grob,H/corr 1964 (12) With a drawish position;)

4...e5 5.h4 f5 6.d3 g6 7.b3 Rh7 8.Bb2 Qc7 9.Nd2

Be6 10.e3 Nd7 11.Ne2 Rf7 12.f4 Bd6 13.0–0 Qb6

14.d4 e4 15.Rb1 c5 16.c4 Qc6 17.Rc1 Qb6

18.cxd5 Bxd5 19.Nc3 Bc6? (19...Qc6 with

counterchances; H. Grob) 20.Nc4 Qc7 21.d5 1–0

Grob,H-Nussle/corr 1966 (21) winning a piece.;

3...g5 4.Nf3 (4.d4!? h6 5.e3 Bg7 6.Nd2 Nd7 7.Ne2

(Grob suggests the improvement 7.e4 dxe4

8.Nxe4 Ndf6 in this line.) 7...e5 8.c3 f5 9.Ng3 Ne7

10.gxf5 0–0! ½–½ Grob,H-Ottomann/corr 1966

(10) and Black has the advantage;) 4...h5! (4...h6

5.d4 Nd7 6.Nc3 Bg7 7.e4 dxe4 8.Nxe4 Ngf6

9.Ng3 0–0 10.c3 Nb6 11.Qc2 Nbd5 12.Bd2 ½–½

Giertz,N-Burk,D/corr 1977 (12) favors White;)

5.gxh5 (Not 5.Nxg5!? e5! 6.d3 f6 7.Nf3 hxg4

8.hxg4 Rxh1+ 9.Bxh1 Bxg4 Which is better for

Black; H. Grob) 5...Rxh5 6.d3 Bg7 7.Nbd2

(7.Nxg5? Rxg5 8.Bxg5 Bxb2!) 7...f5 8.d4 e5 9.e4

exd4 10.Nxd4 g4 11.Nxf5 Bxf5 12.exf5 Qe7+

13.Kf1 Rxf5 14.hxg4 Rf7 15.Nf3 Nd7 16.Bg5 Ngf6

17.Nd4 0–0–0 18.Qd3 Re8 19.Rh3 Qb4 20.Bd2

Qxb2 21.Bc3 Qa3 22.Re3 Ref8 23.Rae1 Nc5

24.Qg6 Nfe4 25.Bxe4 Nxe4 26.Qe6+ Kb8

27.Nxc6+ Ka8 28.Qxd5 Rf4 29.Na5 Rb8 30.Bxg7

Ng3+ 31.Kg2 Qb4 32.Rd1 1–0 Grob,H-

Marti,H/corr 1966 (32) Black resigned.; 3...e6 4.d3

(4.e4 Nf6 5.e5 Nfd7 6.Nf3 c5 7.c3 Nc6 8.d4 f6

9.exf6 Nxf6 with counterplay; H. Grob) 4...Bd6

(4...Nf6!? 5.e4 dxe4 6.g5! with threats; H. Grob)

5.Nf3 (5.Nd2? h5!) 5...Nd7 (5...Ne7 6.e4 is

suggested by Grob,) 6.Nbd2 h5 7.g5 f6 8.h4 e5

9.e4 Qc7 10.exd5 cxd5 11.c3 Nc5 12.Qc2 Bg4

13.d4 e4 14.dxc5 exf3 15.cxd6 fxg2 16.Rg1 Qxd6

17.Qg6+ Kd8 18.f3 Qh2 19.Kf2 Qxh4+ 20.Kxg2

Qxg5?? (20...Bh3+) 21.Qxg5 fxg5 22.fxg4 h4

23.Nf3 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Fuller,H/VAPEN Chess

Game 1973 (23) Black resigned.; 3...f5 4.g5

(4.e3!? e5 5.Nf3 Bd6 6.Nh2 Nh6 7.b3 ½–½

Bloodgood,C-Kenney,E/corr RPCC 1975 (7) with

double-edged complications;) 4...e5 5.d3 h6 6.h4

f4 7.e4 hxg5 8.h5 g4 9.exd5 f3 10.Bxf3 gxf3

11.dxc6 Nxc6 12.Qxf3 Qf6 13.Qg3 Bd6 14.Bg5

Qf5 15.Nc3 Qg4 16.Qxg4 Bxg4 17.Nb5 Bb8

18.Kd2 Rxh5 19.Rxh5 Bxh5 20.Re1 a6 21.Nc3

Nf6 22.f4 Ng4 23.Nf3 Bc7 24.Nd5 Ba5+ 25.c3 Kf7

26.Nxe5+ Ngxe5 27.fxe5 Re8 28.Bf4 Ke6 29.Ne3

b5 30.Kc2 Bg6 31.Rg1 Ne7 32.Bg5 Bh7 33.Kd2

b4 34.d4 bxc3+ 35.bxc3 Nc6 36.Nc4 Bc7 37.Re1

Kd5 38.Ne3+ Ke6 39.d5+ Kxe5 40.dxc6 Kd6

41.Nf5+ Bxf5 42.Rxe8 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Bostic,L/Virginia 1964 (42) Black resigned.;

3...Nf6 4.c4!? (4.g5 is best) 4...dxc4 5.Na3 Be6

6.Qa4!? (6.Qc2! Qd4 7.Nf3 Qe4 8.Qa4! with

initiative) 6...Bd5! (6...Qd4 7.d3! or; 6...b5 7.Nxb5

cxb5 8.Qxb5+ Qd7 9.Qb7 Nc6 10.Bxc6 etc.) 7.f3

b5!? 8.Qc2 e5 9.b3 (9.Qf5 is worth trying.)

9...cxb3 10.axb3 Bd6 11.Bb2 0–0 12.e4 Be6 13.f4

(13.h4!) 13...exf4 14.Nxb5 (14.e5!) 14...cxb5

15.g5 Nh5 16.e5 Nd7 17.exd6 Rc8 18.Qd1 Re8

19.Kf2 Qxg5 20.Nf3 Qg3+ 21.Kf1 Nc5 22.Ne5

Nd3 23.Bd4 f3µ 0–1 Bloodgood,C-Driscoll,P/corr.

1975 (23) with a solid advantage to Black.]

4.d3

[4.e4 Ne7 5.d3 Ng6 6.exd5 Nh4 7.Kf1 Nxg2

8.Kxg2 cxd5 9.Qf3!? (9.Nf3 Nc6 10.Re1 is

suggested by Bloodgood) 9...Be6 10.Nc3 Nc6

11.a3 Be7 (11...Nd4 12.Qd1) 12.Nge2 0–0 13.Ng3

Nd4 14.Qd1 Bh4 (14...f5) 15.Nce2 f5 16.Nxd4

exd4 17.f3 Qd6 18.f4 fxg4 19.hxg4 Bxg3 20.Kxg3

g5 21.Qf3 gxf4+ 22.Bxf4 Qd7 23.Rh6 Rae8

24.Rah1 Rf7 25.R1h5 Rg7 26.Rg5 Rf8 27.Rxg7+

Kxg7 28.Be5+ Kg8 29.Rf6 Rf7 30.Qf4 b6 31.Qh6

Bxg4 32.Rg6+ 1–0 Grob,H-Richard/corr 1966 (32)

Black resigned.]

4...Bc5

[4...Ne7 5.Nf3 Ng6 6.Nc3 Be7 7.e4 d4 (7...Be6!)

8.Ne2 Nh4 (8...c5 9.Ng3 Nh4 10.Nxh4 Bxh4

11.Nf5 Bxf5 12.exf5 Nc6 13.0–0 Be7 14.Qe2 Qc7

15.f4 with initiative; H. Grob-Unknown) 9.Nxh4

Bxh4 10.Ng3 g6 (10...Bxg3 11.fxg3 with 0–0 next.)

11.Bd2 Na6 12.0–0 Nc7 13.Ne2 f5 14.exf5 gxf5

15.gxf5 Bxf5 16.Ng3 Bg6 17.Qg4 Rf8 18.Rae1! 1–

0 Grob,H-Schurch/corr 1964 (18) Black resigned.;

4...h6 5.Nd2 (5.Nf3 Qc7 6.c4 dxc4 7.dxc4 e4

8.Nd4 Qe5 9.a3 Nf6 10.Nc3 Bd6 11.Be3 a6

12.Nb3 Nbd7 13.Qd4! 1–0 Grob,H-

Frankenstein/corr 1966 (13) winning the d-pawn.;

Another line continues 5.e4 Bd6 6.Nc3 d4 7.Nce2

b5!? 8.Ng3 Nf6 9.a3 g5 10.Nf5 Bxf5 11.exf5 Qc7

12.Ne2 Nbd7 13.Ng3 0–0–0 14.0–0 Rhe8 15.Bd2

Nc5 16.Qe1 Rd7 17.b3 Rde7 18.Ne4 with White

having some threats; H. Grob-M. Gafafer,

correspondence) 5...Nf6 6.c4 Be6 7.Qb3 Nbd7

8.Ngf3 (not 8.Qxb7? Nc5 9.Qxc6+ Bd7! with the

Queen lost.) 8...Qc7 9.Qc2 Bd6 10.a3 a5 11.b3

Bc5 12.e3 Qb6 13.0–0 d4? 14.exd4 Bxd4 15.Nxd4

exd4 (15...Qxd4 was better.) 16.f4! Nf8 17.f5 Bd7

18.c5 Qc7 19.Nc4! 1–0 Grob,H-Gahwiller/corr

1966 (35) threatening Bf4 followed by Nd6+ and

Re1 and White wins easily.]

5.Nf3

[5.Nc3 Be6 6.e4 Ne7 (better than 6...d4 7.Nce2)

7.Nf3 Ng6 8.exd5 cxd5 9.d4 (9.Qe2 and the

position is unclear; H. Grob) 9...exd4 10.Nxd4 Bb4

11.Qe2 Bxc3+ 12.bxc3 Qc8 13.0–0 0–0 14.Qd3

Nc6 15.f4 1–0 Grob,H-Scholl/corr 1965 (15) with

advantage to White.]

5...Qe7

[5...Nd7 6.e4 Ngf6 7.Qe2 Qc7 (7...Qe7!) 8.exd5

cxd5 9.d4 Bd6 10.dxe5 Bb4+ 11.c3 Ne4 12.0–0

(12.cxb4? Qxc1+!) 12...Be7 13.Bf4 g5 14.Bh2 Qc6

15.Nbd2 Ndc5 (15...Nxd2 is better.) 16.Nd4 Qg6

17.Nxe4 Nxe4 18.Qb5+ Kf8 19.Qxd5 1–0 Grob,H-

Sennhauser/corr 1966 (30) with an easy win for

White.; 5...Qb6!? 6.0–0 Nd7 (6...f6 is better.)

7.Nbd2 Ne7 8.e4 Ng6 9.exd5 cxd5 10.Qe1 0–0

11.Nb3 Bd6 12.d4 e4 13.Nfd2 Nf4 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Sokel,S/Norfolk 1959 (13) , after

which White won because of his opponent's

blunder, but Black clearly has the best of this.

Improvements on White's 10th and 12th moves

are probable.; 5...Qf6!? 6.Bg5 Qg6? (6...Qe6)

7.Qd2 f6 8.Bh4 Be6 9.g5 fxg5 10.Nxg5 h6?

11.Nxe6 Qxg2 12.Rf1 Bb6 13.Bg3 Qxh3

14.Nxg7+ Kf7 15.Bxe5 Nd7 16.Qf4+ Ngf6

(16...Ke7 17.Nf5+) 17.Nf5 Nxe5 18.Qxe5 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Winterfield,E/Norfolk 1957 (18)

Black resigned.]

6.d4 exd4 7.Nxd4

[Grob gives 7...Nf6 8.Nc3 Na6 9.a3 Ne4 10.Nxe4

dxe4 11.e3 with White following up with b4 and

Bb2.; C. Bloodgood-R. McSorley, 1959,

continued 7...Bxd4 8.Qxd4 Be6 9.Be3 Na6 10.Nc3

c5? 11.Qa4+ Bd7 12.Nb5 Nf6 13.Bf4! Bxb5

14.Qxb5+ Kf8 15.0–0–0 Rd8 16.g5 Ne4 17.Bxe4

Qxe4 18.Bc7 Nxc7 19.Qxc5+ Ke8 20.Qxc7 d4

21.e3 Qf3 22.exd4 Rd7 23.Rhe1+ Black

resigned.]

Variation "C1"( 3. g5 e5 4. h4!)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.g5

The "Spike" is a system which disrupts Black's

normal lines of development and creates

immediate problems for him. White has an

obvious kind-side attack and to counter this,

Black must react aggressively or literally expect to

be pushed off the board 3...e5 [Also playable is

3...g6 4.d3 Nd7 5.e4 Nc5 6.Nc3 Bg7 7.Nge2 dxe4

8.Nxe4 Nxe4 9.Bxe4 h6 10.f4 e5 11.fxe5 Bxe5

12.d4 Bg7 with an unclear position; analysis by H.

Grob.; After 3...Bf5 4.d3 Nd7? a) 4...e6 5.Nf3

(5.Nd2 Qb6 6.b3 Nd7 7.e4 dxe4 8.dxe4 Bg6 9.h4

Bc5!? 10.Qe2 f6? 11.h5 Bf7 12.g6 hxg6 13.hxg6

Rxh1 14.gxf7+ winning a piece; H. Grob-

UnknownThis trap is important since it can occur

frequently in the Spike.; 5.h4 Nd7? 6.e4! dxe4

7.dxe4 Qa5+ 8.Nc3 Bg6 9.h5 is another example.)

5...Nd7 6.Nbd2 Bd6 (6...Nc5 7.b4! Nd7 8.Bb2 f6

9.gxf6 Ngxf6 10.a3 Bd6 11.h3 Qe7 12.c4 e5

13.cxd5 Nxd5 14.Nc4 Nf4 15.Nxd6+ Qxd6 16.Bc1

0–0–0 17.Qc2 h6 18.b5 Rhe8 with equal chances;

H. Grob-A. Clausen, corr.) 7.e4 Bg4 8.Nb3 h6

9.h4 hxg5 10.hxg5 Rxh1+ 11.Bxh1 Ne5 12.d4

Ng6 13.e5 Be7 14.Qd2 c5 15.Nh2 Bf5 16.f4 c4

17.Nc5 Qc7 18.Na4 b5 19.Nc3 Qc6 ½–½

Kwiesielewicz,I-Grob,H/corr 1966 (54) with

advantage to Black.; b) 4...e5 5.Nc3 (5.h4 Qb6

(5...Qc7 6.e4 dxe4 7.dxe4 Be6 8.Qe2 Bc5 9.Bh3

Bxh3 10.Nxh3 Nd7 11.Nd2 0–0–0 12.Nb3 Bb6

13.Bd2 Nc5 14.Nxc5 Bxc5 15.0–0–0 ½–½ Grob,H-

Luterbuch/corr 1964 (15) 15...Qe7 16.f4 Qe6

17.Ng1 f6 18.f5 Qf7 19.Be3 with advantage to

White ; Or 5...Nd7 6.Bh3 Be6 7.Nc3 Bc5 8.e4

Bxh3 9.Nxh3 Ne7 10.Qf3 Nf8 11.Bd2 Ne6 12.Ne2

Qb6 13.0–0–0 Rf8 14.h5 f5 15.gxf6 Rxf6 16.Qg4

Qa6 17.Kb1 Qb6 18.f4 exf4 19.Nhxf4 Nxf4

20.Bxf4 Bd4 21.Nxd4 Qxd4 22.Qxg7 1–0 Grob,H-

Kessler/corr 1966 (22) Black resigned.) 6.e4 dxe4

7.dxe4 Be6 (7...Bxe4? 8.Bxe4 Qb4+ 9.Nc3) 8.Nd2

Bc5 9.Qe2 Ne7 10.Ngf3 Bg4 11.Nc4! Qc7 12.Be3

Bxe3 13.Qxe3 0–0 14.0–0–0 f5!? 15.Qb3! fxe4?

(15...Kh8) 16.Nfxe5! Bxd1 17.Nb6+ Nd5 18.Nxd5

cxd5 19.Qxd5+ Kh8 20.Rxd1 Nc6 21.Ng6+ hxg6

22.h5! Nb4 23.Qb3 Nxc2 24.Kb1 Qh2 25.Bxe4

Rxf2 26.Qxb7 Re8 27.h6 Rg8 (27...Qe5 28.hxg7+

Qxg7 29.Rh1+ Kg8 30.Qb3+ Kf8 31.Bxc2 and

Black's pieces are committed to the defense of his

king) 28.Rh1 Nd4! 29.hxg7+ Rxg7 30.Rxh2+ Rxh2

31.Qb8+ Rg8 32.Qxh2+ 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Trefzer,G/Norfolk 1958 (32) Black resigned.)

5...Bc5 (5...Nd7 6.e4 dxe4 7.dxe4 Be6 8.Be3 Qc7

9.Qf3 Ne7 10.Nge2 Ng6 11.h4 Bd6 12.h5 Nf4

13.0–0–0 Nxg2 14.Qxg2 0–0–0 with equal

chances.) 6.e4 Be6 7.Qe2 Ne7 8.h4 (not 8.exd5?

cxd5 9.Qxe5 Nbc6 10.Qxg7? Bd4 11.Qh6 Nb4

12.Kd1? Bg4+ Any 13 Nb5 traps the Queen.)

8...d4 9.Nd1 Bb4+ 10.c3 dxc3 11.bxc3 Ba5 12.Nf3

Nd7 13.h5 Qc7 14.Bd2 0–0–0 15.Bh3 g6

(15...Bxh3!) 16.Bxe6 fxe6 17.h6 Rhf8 (17...Nc5!?)

18.0–0 Nc5 19.Nb2 Rf7 20.Ne1 Rdf8 21.f3 Bb6

22.Kg2 a6 23.Nc4 Ba7 24.Ne3 Bb8 25.Ng4 Nd7

26.Be3 Nd5? unsound! 27.exd5! e4 28.f4 Rxf4

29.Bxf4 Rxf4 30.Rxf4 Qxf4 31.Qxe4 Qg3+ 32.Kf1!

exd5 33.Qg2 Qf4+ 34.Nf3 Nc5 35.Nf2 1–0

Grob,H-Weber/corr 1966 (35) Black resigned.;

5.e4! dxe4 6.dxe4 Bg6 7.h4 h5 8.f4 e6 9.Be3 Qc7

10.Qf3 Bd6 11.Nd2 Qa5 12.c3 ½–½ Grob,H-

Laux,T/corr 1965 (12) with White having much

the better position.]

4.h4!

[4.d3 Bg4 a) 4...Be6 5.Nc3 (5.h4 Bc5 6.Nf3 Nd7

7.e4 Qb6 8.Qe2 d4!? 9.Bh3 Ne7 10.Nbd2 Bxh3

11.Rxh3 Ng6 12.Nb3 Bb4+ 13.Kf1! 0–0–0 14.a3

Be7 15.h5 Ngf8 16.Bd2 Qc7 favors White; H.

Grob-Unknown ) 5...Bc5 6.e4 Ne7 7.h4 Nd7

8.Qe2 d4! 9.Nd1 Bd6 10.Bh3 Nf8 11.f4 exf4

12.Qf2 Qa5+ 13.Kf1 Qc5 14.a3 Bxh3+ 15.Rxh3

Ne6 16.b4 Qb6 17.Nb2 Qa6 18.Bd2 Ng6 19.Nf3

h6 20.e5 hxg5 21.Qg2! Be7 22.hxg5 0–0–0! ½–½

Grob,H-Bischoff/corr 1964 (31) with equality.; b)

4...Ne7 5.h4! Ng6 6.h5!? (6.e4) 6...Nf4 7.Bxf4 exf4

8.g6 hxg6 (8...Qg5? 9.gxf7+ Kxf7 10.Bf3!) 9.hxg6

Rxh1 10.gxf7+ Kxf7 11.Bxh1 Qh4 12.Bg2

(12.Bf3? Qh2 13.Kf1 Bh3+!) 12...Qh2 13.Kf1 Bg4!

14.Nd2 Bc5 15.Ndf3 Bxf3 16.Nxf3 Qh5 17.d4 Bd6

18.c3 Nd7 19.e3 Re8 20.Qd2 fxe3 21.fxe3 Bg3

22.Ke2 Nf6 23.Rf1 Ne4?! this is risky! 24.Qc1 Bh4

25.Rh1! Ng3+ 26.Kd2 Nxh1 27.Qxh1 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Evans,H/Norfolk 1958 (27) with

advantage to White.; 5.h3 Bh5 6.Bf3 Bxf3 ½–½

Grob,H-Denring/corr 1966 (14)(better is 6...Bg6

7.Nc3? Bb4! ½–½ Grob,H-Eggenberger,H/corr

1964 (7)) ]

4...Bd6

[4...Bc5 5.d3 d4? (not much better is 5...Qb6 6.e3

Ne7 7.Ne2 Be6 8.Nd2 Nd7 9.a3 0–0 10.Bh3 Bxh3

11.Rxh3 f5 12.Nb3 Qc7 13.d4 Bd6 14.dxe5 Nxe5

15.Nf4 Qd7 16.Nd4 N5g6 17.Nfe6 Rf7 18.b4 with

a solid advantage; H. Grob-Unknown) 6.Nf3 Qd6

7.Nbd2 Be6 8.Ne4 Qd5? (8...Qc7 9.Nxc5 Qa5+!)

9.Nfd2 Ke7 (answering the threat 10 Nf6+) 10.Kf1

Bb6 11.Nc4 Nd7? (Black is trying to avoid a

number of Queen traps and survive the attack.

Something has to fall) 12.Ned6! 1–0 Grob,H-

Sperling/London 1952 (12) Black resigned. 12...-

- (If 12...Qc5 13.b4 Qxb4 14.c3 dxc3 15.Ba3 c2

16.Qxc2 (and the Black Queen is lost.)) ; 4...Be6

5.d3 Bd6 6.e4 Ne7 7.Nc3 Nd7 8.Bh3 Bxh3 9.Nxh3

d4 10.Ne2 f5 11.exf5 Nxf5 12.Ng3 Nxg3

(12...Nxh4? 13.Qh5+ Ng6 14.Ne4! with attack!)

13.fxg3 Qe7 14.Qh5+ g6 15.Qg4 Rf8 16.Bd2 e4!

0–1 Grob,H-Roesler,M/corr 1964 (36) and Black

stands better. White can improve this!; 4...g6 5.d3

Bg7 (5...h5 6.e4 d4 7.Ne2 c5 8.f4 exf4 9.Bxf4 Nc6

10.Nd2 Be6 favors White; H. Grob-Unknown)

6.h5! gxh5 7.Rxh5 Bg4 8.Rh4 Bf5 9.e4 dxe4

10.Bxe4 Bxe4 11.Rxe4 Nd7 12.Be3 f5 13.Qh5+

Kf8 14.Rh4 h6? (14...f4) 15.g6 f4 16.Qf5+ Ngf6

17.Nc3 (17.Qe6? Qe7! 18.Qxe7+ Kxe7 19.Bd2

Rae8 0–1 Bloodgood,C-Lundy,L/Virginia 1968

(19) favors Black.) 17...fxe3 18.fxe3 Qb6 19.0–0–0

Qxe3+ 20.Kb1 Re8 21.Rf1 Nc5 22.Nf3 Kg8

23.Ne4 Ncxe4 24.Rxe4 Qc5 25.Rxe5 Rxe5

26.Nxe5 Qe7 27.Nf7 Nd5 28.Qc8+ Bf8 29.Nxh8

h5 30.a4 Qd6 31.Rf7 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Lundy,L/New Castle Delaware 1968 (31) Black

resigned. ; After 4...f5 : Mani-H. Grob, corr., cont.

5.d3 a) 5.gxf6? Nxf6 6.d3 (6.e3 is better) 6...Bc5

7.e3 (7.c3 Qb6!) 7...Be6 8.Ne2 Nbd7 9.d4 Bb6

10.Nd2 Qe7 11.Nb3 0–0–0 12.dxe5 Nxe5 13.Nf4

(13.Nbd4 was better) 13...Bf5 14.Nd4 Bxd4

15.Qxd4 b6 16.Qa4 Kb7 17.Bd2 Be4 18.0–0–0

Bxg2 19.Nxg2 Ne4 0–1 Grob,H-Kast,H/corr 1966

(32) with advantage to Black.; b) 5.d4 e4 6.Bf4

Bd6 7.Nh3 Ne7 8.h5 Be6 9.c3 Qc7 10.e3 Nd7

11.Nd2 c5 12.Rc1 b5 13.Bxd6 Qxd6 14.Nf4 c4

15.a3 a5 16.Nf1? (16.0–0! with 17. f3 following)

16...b4 17.axb4 axb4 18.Ng3 Nb6 19.Ra1 Rxa1

20.Qxa1 Bd7 21.0–0 0–0 ½–½ Grob,H-

Blatti/Barcelona 1966 (44) with counterplay.;

5...Bc5 6.e3 Bb6 7.b3 (7.d4 e4!) 7...Be6 8.Bb2

Nd7 9.Qe2 Ne7? (9...Qe7) 10.f4! Qc7 11.Nd2 0–0

12.h5 Rfe8 13.Nh3 c5 14.fxe5 Nxe5 15.Nf4 Qd6

16.0–0–0 with strong attack.] 5.d3 [Possibly better

is 5.e4 after which: H. Grob-E. Denring, corr.,

cont. 5...dxe4 (H. Grob-P. Silbering, corr., cont.

5...d4 6.d3 Be6 7.Ne2 Ne7 8.f4 g6 9.fxe5 Bxe5

10.Bf4 Nd7 11.Nd2 Qc7 12.Bxe5 Nxe5 13.Nxd4

Bg4 14.N4f3 Nxf3+ 15.Nxf3 Qg3+ 16.Kf1 0–0–0

17.Qe1 Qd6 18.Bh3 Bxh3+ 19.Rxh3 with

advantage to White.) 6.Nc3 f5 7.gxf6 (7.Nge2!?)

7...Nxf6 8.Nxe4 0–0 9.d3 Nxe4 10.Bxe4 Nd7

11.Bg5 Nf6 with some initiative for White.] 5...Ne7

[5...Be6 6.e4 Ne7 7.Nd2 (7.Nc3 f5!? 8.gxf6 gxf6

9.Qh5+ favors White; H. Grop-Unknown) 7...0–0!?

8.Bh3 Bxh3 9.Nxh3 f5!? (9...Nd7) 10.gxf6 Rxf6

11.exd5 Nxd5? (11...cxd5!) 12.Ne4 Rf7 13.Bg5

Be7 14.Qg4 Qa5+ 15.c3 Bxg5 16.Nhxg5 Rf8

17.Qe6+ Kh8 18.Nf7+ Kg8 (18...Rxf7 19.Qe8+

Rf8 20.Qxf8#) 19.Nh6+ Kh8 20.Qg8+ Rxg8

21.Nf7# 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Evans,B/Norfolk 1961

(21); 5...Bg4!? Grob gives this as best and cites

the following variation 6.Nd2 (6.Bh3 Bh5 7.c4

dxc4 8.dxc4 Bb4+ 9.Bd2 Na6 10.Nc3 Qd4 11.Qb3

Rd8 12.Rd1 Bxc3 13.Bxc3 Qxd1+ 14.Qxd1 Rxd1+

15.Kxd1 f6 16.f3 Ne7 with equality from his postal

play) 6...f5 7.f3 Bh5 8.e4 fxe4 9.dxe4 dxe4

10.Nxe4 Bb4+ 11.Bd2 Na6 12.c3 Ba5 13.Qb3!

Nc5 14.Qc4 Nd3+ 15.Kf1 Nxb2 16.Qe6+ Qe7

17.Nd6+ Kf8 18.Qf5+ Bf7 19.Nxf7 Qxf7 20.Qxf7+

Kxf7 21.Rb1 Nc4 22.Rxb7+ Kf8 23.Be1 Ne7

24.Ne2 Bb6 25.Bf2 Ne3+ 26.Bxe3 Bxe3 27.Ng3

Bf4 28.Ne4 Kf7 29.Bh3 Rhd8 30.Ke2 a5 31.Rhb1

Kf8 32.c4 a4 33.Bd7 h6 34.Nc5 Kf7 35.Be6+ Ke8

36.Nd7 Ng6? Black is very cramped, but a waiting

move was all that he could play. 37.h5! Nf8

38.Nf6+ gxf6 39.Bf7# 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Lewis,R/Norfolk 1961 (39)]

6.e4

The move is probably best, but a little exploration

here is overdue.

6...d4

[H. Grob-Brunner, corr., cont 6...Be6 7.h5 Nd7

8.Nc3 Qb6!? 9.Qf3 0–0 10.Bh3 Bxh3 11.Qxh3 Qc7

12.Nf3 Nc5 13.Nh4 in White's favor.; 6...0–0 7.Nc3

d4! 8.Nce2 f5 9.gxf6 Rxf6 10.h5 Qf8 11.f3 a5

12.Bg5 Rf7 13.a3? (13.Ng3!) 13...b5 14.Ng3 h6

15.Bd2 c5 in Black's favor.; 6...0–0 7.Nc3 Be6

8.Bh3! (8.h5 Nd7 9.Nf3 d4 10.Ne2 c5 11.Ng3 g6

12.Nh4 Qc8 13.b3 Rb8 14.Bh3 Bxh3 15.Rxh3 b5

16.Qg4!? Nb6! 0–1 Grob,H-Sempert/corr 1964

(36) with complications favoring Black) 8...Bxh3

9.Nxh3 d4 10.Ne2 f5!? 11.gxf6! Rxf6 12.Bg5 Rf7

13.Rg1 Nd7 14.Ng3 Qf8 (14...Nf6!) 15.Qg4 Nf6

16.Qe6! Bb4+ 17.Ke2 Re8 18.Qc4 Bd6 19.Bxf6

Black resigned.; 6...0–0 7.Nc3 Be6 8.Bd2 Nd7

(8...b6!? 9.Nce2 Nd7 10.Ng3 g6? 11.h5! wins for

White; H. Grob-Unknown, corr.) 9.h5 d4 10.Nce2

c5!? (10...Re8) 11.Bh3 Bxh3 12.Nxh3 b5 13.Ng3

f5 14.exf5 Nxf5 15.Qg4! wins for White.]

7.Nd2

[7.Bh3 Bxh3 8.Nxh3 0–0 9.Qg4 Qd7? (9...Qc8!)

10.Qg3 ½–½ Grob,H-David/corr 1965 (10) in

White's favor.]

7...Bb4 8.a3 Ba5 9.b4 Bc7 10.Bh3 Ng6

[C.Bloodgood-B.Brown, 1969, cont. 10...Bxh3

11.Nxh3 0–0 12.f4 exf4 13.Qg4 f5 14.gxf6 Rxf6

15.Nf3!? (15.h5!) 15...Rg6 16.Nhg5 h6 17.h5 Rf6

18.Ne6 Black resigned.]

11.Nf1 Nf4?

[11...Bxh3!]

12.Bxf4 exf4 13.Qf3 0–0 14.Bxc8 Qxc8 15.Nh3

f5 16.Nd2 fxe4 17.Nxe4 Qf5 18.Kd2 Nd7

19.Rag1 Ne5 20.Nf6+ gxf6 21.gxf6+ Kh8

[21...Ng6!?]

22.Qg2 Qg6 23.Qxg6 hxg6 24.Ng5 Rxf6 25.h5

Kg7 26.h6+ Kh8 27.Kc1 a5 28.Ne4 Re6 29.Nc5

Re7 30.Nxb7 axb4 31.axb4 Ra1+ 32.Kb2 Rxg1

33.Rxg1 Kh7 34.Rh1 Ng4 0–1 Bloodgood,C-

Meyerhofer,E/Virginia 1967 (34) White resigned.

Part 3 (The Open Defense)

1.g4 d5

2.Bg2 e5

This basic line of play is both sharp and double-

edged. Black must be prepared for a tactical

battle, but one which is by no means one-sided.

The Variations considered in this part are: "A2" 3.

e4!?; "B2" 3. c4 Be6!?; "C2' 3. c4 d4; "D2" 3. c4

dxc4; and "E" 3. c4 c6. The final two lines above

are split into sub-variations because of their

importance.

Variation "A2"

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.e4!?

This is definitely not recommended!

3...dxe4 4.Bxe4 Nf6 5.Bf3

[5.f3? Nxe4 6.fxe4 Qh4+ with a strong attack for

Black.]

5...e4 6.Be2 Nc6 7.h4 Bc5

Black threatens 8...Qd4! This is obviously not

good for White.

Variation "B2" (3. c4 Be6!?)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 Be6!?

[This is no good for Black. Neither is 3...Bxg4!?

4.Qb3 Bc8 5.cxd5 Where White gains a solid

advantage.]

4.Qb3! Nd7

[4...b6 5.cxd5 Bxg4 6.Qg3 Nf6 7.Qxe5+]

5.cxd5 Bxg4 6.Qxb7 Rb8 7.Qc6 [7.Qxa7? Bc5

and Black has an attack.]

7...Bc5 8.Nc3 Rb6 9.Qa4

with White holding the pawn at the cost of the

initiative.

Variation "C2" (3. c4 d4)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 d4

This is an awkward line for Black which creates

more problems than it solves.

4.d3

[4.b4!? c6 5.h3 Be6? (5...Bxb4!) 6.Qb3 b5!?

(6...Qb6!) 7.d3 Be7 8.a4 bxc4 9.dxc4 Qb6 10.b5

1–0 Bloodgood,C-Campbell,W/corr Zugzwang

1975 (10) where White's advantage is due to

Black's weak play.]

4...c6

[Daconto-Fumo, Venice, 1971 ran 4...c5 5.h3

(Cuero-Roto, Ibercaja, 1993 5.Nh3 Ne7 6.0–0

Nec6 7.Bg5 Be7 8.Bxe7 Qxe7 9.e4 0–0 10.f4 exf4

11.Nxf4 Ne5 12.h3 Nbc6 13.a3 Be6 14.b3 Rab8

15.Ra2 b5 16.Nd2 bxc4 17.bxc4 Qd6 18.Qe2 Rb7

19.g5 Rfb8 20.Nd5 Rb2 21.Rxb2 Rxb2 22.Rb1

Rxb1+ 23.Nxb1 Qd8 24.h4 was eventually drawn)

5...Nc6 6.Nd2 f5 7.gxf5 Bxf5 8.Ne4 Nf6 9.Nxf6+

Qxf6 10.Qb3 Rb8 11.h4 h6 12.Bd2 Be7 13.0–0–0

0–0 14.Rf1 Qg6 15.Bd5+ Kh8 16.h5 Qd6 17.Nh3

Bxh3 18.Rxh3 Nb4 19.Bf3 b5 20.Rg3 bxc4

21.Qxc4 Qb6 22.Rfg1 Bf6 23.Be4 Nc6 24.Qc2

Nb4 25.Qc4 Nc6 26.Qc2 Rfc8? He should have

taken the draw. 27.Rg6 Nb4 28.Qc4 Nc6 29.Qf7

Qxb2+ 30.Kd1 Qb1+ 31.Bc1 Rb7 32.Rxh6+ gxh6

33.Qxf6+ wins]

5.e4 [5.h3 Be6!? a) 5...h6 6.Nf3 Bd6 7.Nbd2 Nf6

8.a3 a5 9.g5 hxg5 10.Nxg5 Na6 11.Nde4 Nxe4

12.Nxe4 Be7 13.e3 f5 14.Nd2 (14.Ng3 dxe3

15.fxe3 Bh4!) 14...dxe3 15.Nf3 e4 16.dxe4 Qxd1+

17.Kxd1 exf2 18.exf5 Bxf5 19.Ke2 1–0 Grob,H-

Wyss/corr 1965 (59) with White struggling to hold

equality.; b) 5...Ne7! 6.Nf3 Ng6 7.g5!? (7.e4 dxe3

8.Bxe3 f5! 9.gxf5 Bxf5 favors Black according to

Grob.) 7...f5! 8.gxf6 Qxf6 9.Bg5 Qf5 10.Bd2 Bd6

0–1 Bloodgood,C-Erwin,H/Virginia 1972 (10) with

advantage to Black.; 6.Nf3 Nd7 7.Ng5 Qe7 8.a3 f6

9.Nxe6 Qxe6 10.e3 dxe3 11.Bxe3 Bc5 12.Nc3 a5

13.Ne4 Bd4 14.Bxd4 exd4 15.0–0 ½–½ Grob,H-

Brechbuhler/corr 1965 (15) with White having the

better position.]

5...Nd7

[After 5...dxe3 6.Bxe3 Bloodgood-H. Erwin,

1972, cont. 6...f5 7.gxf5 Bxf5 8.Nf3 (not 8.d4?

Bxb1 9.Rxb1 Qa5+ ; Grob) 8...Bb4+ (8...Bxd3

9.Nxe5 Qa5+ 10.Nc3 Qxe5 11.Qxd3 with a good

position; Grob) 9.Nbd2 Qa5 (9...Qxd3 10.Nxe5!)

10.Qb3 (10.Qc2 with equality; Grob) 10...Nd7

11.a3? Bxd2+? 12.Bxd2 Qc7 13.0–0–0?? (13.Be3)

13...Nc5! 14.Qc3 Nxd3+ and White resigned.This

line is worth exploring for White.]

6.a3

[6.Nd2 Ne7 (6...Nc5 7.Nb1!) 7.Nf1 Ng6 8.Nf3

Bb4+ 9.Ke2 Nf6 10.h3 h6 11.Ng3 Qa5 12.a3 Bd6

13.Nf5 Bxf5 14.exf5 Nf4+ 15.Kf1 Nd7 (15...Nxg2!)

16.Bxf4 exf4 17.Qe1+ Qxe1+ 18.Rxe1+ 1–0

Grob,H-Wyss/corr 1967 (18) 18...Kd8 19.Nxd4

Kc7 (19...Be5 20.Nc2 Bxb2 21.Rb1! Grob) 20.b4

with a solid advantage for White.]

6...a5 7.Nd2 Nc5

[Grob-O. Hirzel, corr., cont. 7...Qb6 8.h3 Bd6

9.Nf1 Ne7 10.Ne2 Ng6 11.h4 h5 12.g5 Nc5

13.Nfg3 Qb3 14.Qxb3 Nxb3 15.Rb1 Nc5 16.Kd2

Nf4 17.Nxf4 exf4 18.Ne2 with equality.]

8.Nf1 h5!?

Perhaps Black does best with 8...N e7 to g6;

however the text is the most aggressive move at

Black's disposal.

9.gxh5

[9.g5! h4! 10.Bh3 Be7 11.Bxc8 Qxc8 12.Qf3 f6

13.g6 Nh6 14.Nh3 f5? (14...Nb3) 15.Bxh6 Rxh6

16.exf5 Bf6 17.Nd2 b5!? 18.cxb5 cxb5 19.0–0 Rb8

20.Rac1 b4 21.Ne4 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Erwin,H/Virginia 1972 (21) Black resigned.]

9...Qh4 10.Bf3 Nf6 11.Ng3 Ng4 12.h3 Nf6

13.Qe2 a4 14.Nf5? Bxf5 15.exf5 Bd6 16.h6 gxh6

(H. Erwin-D. Stroemer, 1972) with advantage to

Black.

Variation "D2" (3. c4 dxc4)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 dxc4 4.Qc2

This is definitely not a gambit pawn, e.g.[now

4.Qa4+ c6 5.Qxc4 forcibly regains it immediately.

; The gambit try 4.b3!? is not good, e.g. 4...Qd4!

5.Nc3 Qxg4 6.Bh3 Qg6 7.Bxc8 Qg2! with a

winning advantage for Black. At this point, two

important lines of defence are possible: Variation

"D2a" 4...c6; and Variation "D2b" 4...Qd4.]

See diagram next page

"D2a" (4... c6 5. Qxc4 Be6!)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 dxc4 4.Qc2 c6 5.Qxc4

Be6!

This is the only aggressive reply.

6.Qc3

[Grob-F. Bregger, corr., continued 6.Qa4 Bd5

(6...Nd7! followed by 7.-- Nb6) 7.Nf3 e4!?

(7...h5!) 8.Nd4 Qh4 9.h3 Qg5 10.Nc3 Nf6 11.Nf5!

Nbd7 12.d4 b5 13.Qd1! e3 14.Bxe3 Bxg2 15.Bxg5

Bxh1 16.f3 With a winning advantage for White.;

Not good is 6.Qe4 when Black replies 6...Nd7 with

7.-- Bd5 threatened.] 6...Bd6 [After 6...Nd7 7.h3

(not 7.d4 Qf6!) Grob-Dr. F. Veit, corr., continued

7...Ngf6 8.a3 a5 9.Qg3 (9.d3 Bb4 10.axb4 axb4

11.Rxa8 Qxa8 12.Qxb4 Qa1 wins for Black; Grob)

9...Bd6 10.Nc3 (10.d4? Qb6!) 10...Nc5 11.Qh4

(11.Rb1 Bb3!) 11...Nb3 (11...Qc7 12.d3 0–0

13.Be3 Ne8 14.Ne4 Nxe4 15.Bxe4 f5 16.gxf5 Bxf5

17.Bxf5 Rxf5 18.Qc4+ Kh8 19.Nf3 Be7? 20.Qe6!

Rh5 21.Rg1 Nf6? 22.Ng5! h6 23.Nf7+ Kh7

24.Nxh6 Rxh6 25.Bxh6 Kxh6 26.Qf5! 1–0 Grob,H-

Veit/corr 1966 (26)) 12.Rb1 Nd4 13.d3 Qc7

14.Nf3 Nc2+? (14...Nxf3+!) 15.Kf1 with advantage

for White.]

7.Nf3

[7.h3 f6 8.a3 (8.Na3 Qb6 9.Nc4 Qb4 10.Nxd6+

Qxd6 11.a3 Nd7 12.b4 Ne7 13.d3 with an unclear

position; Grob) 8...Qb6!? (8...Ne7) 9.b4!? (9.Nf3)

9...a5! 10.Nf3 axb4 11.axb4 Rxa1 12.Qxa1 Qxb4!

(12...Bxb4? 13.Nxe5!) 13.Ba3 Qc4 14.Nc3 Bxa3

15.Qxa3 Na6 16.0–0 Ne7 17.Rc1 Qb3 18.Qxb3

Bxb3 19.Rb1 Nc5 20.d4 exd4 21.Nxd4 Bc4

22.Nxc6 Nxc6 23.Bxc6+ bxc6? (23...Kf7) 24.Rb8+

Ke7 25.Rxh8 h6 26.f4 Ne6 27.e3 Nf8 28.h4 Kf7

29.Ne4 Bd5 30.Nd6+ Ke7 31.Nf5+ Kf7 32.h5 Ne6

33.Nxh6+ gxh6 34.Rxh6 c5 35.Rh8 c4 36.h6 Nf8

37.h7 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Baker,E/Virginia 1973

(37) Black resigned.]

7...Qc7

[7...f6 8.h3 Ne7 9.e4 Ng6 10.d3 Nd7 11.Be3 Nf4

12.Bf1 Qe7 13.Nbd2 Bb4 14.Qc2 Qf7 15.b3 Ng6

16.Qc1 0–0 17.Be2 c5 18.Qb2 Rac8 19.Rg1 Ba5

20.h4 Bc7 21.Rc1 Bb8 22.a4 Rfd8 23.h5 Nf4

24.Nh4 b6 25.Nc4 Bxc4 26.dxc4 Nf8 27.g5 N8e6

28.g6 hxg6 29.hxg6 Qb7 30.f3 Nd4 31.Bf1 Nxf3+

32.Nxf3 Qxe4 33.Kf2 Nxg6 34.Bh3 Rd3!?

35.Be6+ Kf8 36.Rce1 1–0 Roesler,C-Grob,H/corr

1966 (36) with a winning advantage.; 7...Nd7 8.h3

(8.d4? Qb6!) 8...Ne7 9.Na3 0–0!? (9...Qb6 10.Nc4

Qb4) 10.Nc4 Bc7 11.Ncxe5 Nxe5 12.Nxe5 Nd5

13.Qd4 Qf6 14.Nf3 Nf4 15.Qxf6 Nxg2+ 16.Kf1

gxf6 17.Kxg2 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Brenneman,M/Virginia 1973 (17) with a winning

advantage for White.]

8.h3 f6!

[8...Nd7 9.Ng5! Nc5 10.b4 Nd7 11.Nxe6 fxe6

12.Qb3 1–0 Grob,H-Ruegg/corr 1966 (45) with

advantage to White.; 8...Na6? 9.Ng5! Qd7!?

10.Nxe6 Qxe6 11.Bxc6+ Ke7 12.Bxb7 1–0

Grob,H-N. N./corr 1966 (12) with an easy win for

White.]

9.d4 Nd7 10.Nbd2

[10.Be3 Ne7! 11.-- with 11...Nd5 following.]

10...Ne7 11.e4! Ng6

[11...0–0 12.Nc4 Ng6 13.Nxd6 Qxd6 14.Be3 Rac8

(14...Nb6 15.b3 Nc8 16.Rd1 Qc7 17.0–0 Nd6

18.d5 Nxe4? 19.Qc2 1–0 Grob,H-N. N./corr 1966

(19) winning a piece) 15.Rd1 Qb8 16.0–0 exd4

17.Nxd4 Bf7 18.f4 c5 19.Nf5 Nb6 20.h4 Nc4 21.h5

1–0 Grob,H-Brechbuhler/corr 1966 (21) with a

winning advantage.; 11...a5 12.a3!? (12.Bf1 b5

13.a3 0–0 14.Qc2 b4 15.Bc4 favors White; Grob)

12...b5 13.d5 Bf7 14.0–0 0–0 15.dxc6 Nxc6

(15...b4!) 16.Qe3 Nd4? 17.Nxd4 Bc4? 18.Qc3?

Bxf1 19.Qxc7 Bxc7 20.Bxf1 b4 21.Ne6 Rfc8

22.Nxc7 Rxc7 23.axb4 Rca7 24.b5 Rb8 25.Nb3

a4 26.Be3 Raa8 27.Bc4+ Kf8 28.Nc5 Nxc5

29.Bxc5+ Ke8 30.Bd5 Ra5 31.Bc6+ Kf7 32.Bd6

Rc8 33.Bb4 Ra7 34.Bc5 Rac7 35.Rxa4 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Lawson,J/Virginia 1973 (35) Black

resigned.; Grob suggests 11...0–0–0 where Black

can contest the king's side more actively.]

12.Nc4 0–0–0 13.d5

White has some advantage, but this is very

minimal.

13...Bf7

[13...cxd5? 14.Nxd6+ is not particularly good for

Black, so 13...Bf7 is forced; after which:]

14.Nxd6+ Qxd6 15.dxc6

[15.Be3 is sharper]

15...Nc5! 16.cxb7+ Kb8 17.0–0! Nxe4 18.Qa5

Qd5

with an unclear position. (Grob-B. Brechbuhler,

corr. 1966)

Variation "D2b" (4... Qd4)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 dxc4 4.Qc2 Qd4 5.Nf3

Qxg4

[5...Qc5 6.Na3 Be6 7.Ng5 Bd5 8.e4 Bc6 9.Qxc4

with an unclear position; Grob.]

6.Rg1 Qe6

[6...f6 7.d3 (7.Nxe5 fxe5 8.Bc6+ Nxc6 9.Rxg4

Bxg4 is not good.) 7...cxd3 8.exd3 (8.Qxc7? Nc6!)

8...c6 9.Be3 Bb4+ 10.Nc3 Qe6 11.Nd2 f5!?

(11...Nd7!) 12.0–0–0 Nf6 13.Kb1 0–0 14.Rde1 Bxc3

15.Qxc3 Nd5 16.Qa3 b5 (16...Qf7) 17.Bd4! b4?

18.Rxe5 bxa3 19.Rxe6 Bxe6 20.Bxd5 Re8

21.Rxg7+ Kf8 22.Bxe6 Rxe6 23.Rxh7 Ke8

24.bxa3 Nd7 25.Kc2 a6 26.Nc4 Rb8 27.f4 Re2+

28.Kc3 Rxa2 29.Be5 Nxe5 30.fxe5 Rb5 31.h4 f4

32.Nd6+ Kf8 33.Nxb5 axb5 34.e6 Ke8 35.Rf7

Rxa3+ 36.Kd4 Ra4+ 37.Kc5 f3 38.h5 Rh4 39.d4

b4 40.d5! 1–0 Grob,H-David/corr 1966 (40) Black

resigned.]

7.Ng5

White has a strong attack!

7...Qf5!? 8.Qxc4! c6 9.Bh3!

Bloodgood- R. Traylor, 1973)Winning a piece.

Variation "E"

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 c6

This is the key line in Grob's Attack, and the

tactical aspects of the position are unlimited.

4.cxd5 cxd5

[An interesting counter is 4...h5!? 5.dxc6 Nxc6

6.gxh5 Nh6 7.d3 Bc5 8.Nc3 Ng4 9.Bxc6+ bxc6

10.Ne4 Qh4 11.Qa4! with advantage for White.]

5.Qb3 Ne7

[5...Be6? 6.Nc3! (6.Qxb7? Nd7 7.Bxd5? Rb8

8.Qc6 Ne7 And White loses the Bishop) 6...Nd7

(6...d4? 7.Qxb7! wins for White) 7.Bxd5 Nc5

8.Qb5+ Qd7 9.Bxe6 Nxe6 10.Qxe5 Rc8 11.Nf3

Ne7 12.d3 Nc6 13.Qe4 Be7 14.Be3 0–0 15.d4

Na5 16.Nd2 Nc4 17.Nxc4 with a winning

advantage for White. 17...Rxc4 1–0 Grob,H-

Chevalier,D/corr 1967 (17); 5...e4 6.Nc3 Ne7 7.d3

f5? (the Black pawn center cannot be held;

7...exd3 is the best) 8.gxf5 Nxf5 9.dxe4 dxe4

10.Bxe4 Nc6 11.Nf3 Nfd4 12.Qc4 Bf5 13.Bxf5

Nxf5 14.Qe6+ Nfe7 15.Bf4 1–0 Grob,H-

Hasler/corr 1966 (23) with a pawn and the attack.;

5...Qc7 6.Nc3 d4 7.Nd5 Qd7 8.d3 Nc6 9.Bd2 b6

10.Rc1 Bb7 11.Be4 Nge7 12.Nf3 f6 13.Nxe7 Nxe7

14.Bxb7 Qxb7 15.g5 Qd5 16.Qa4+ Qd7 17.Qa6

Nf5 18.Rg1 Bd6 19.gxf6 gxf6 20.Qc4 Qf7 21.Qc6+

Ke7 22.Qe4 Qh5 23.Ng5 fxg5 24.Qxf5 h6

25.Rxg5 Qf7 26.Qh3 Rag8 27.Rxe5+ Bxe5

28.Bb4+ Kf6 29.Rc6+ Kg7 30.Qg4+ Kh7 31.Qe4+

Rg6 32.h4 Qe8 33.Rxg6 Qxg6 34.Qxe5 Rc8

35.Kd2 Qg4 36.f3 Qd7 37.Bd6 Rd8 38.Qe4+

Kg8? (38...Kg7!) 39.Be7! 1–0 Grob,H-Lenherr/corr

1966 (39) Black resigned.; 5...Nf6 6.g5 Ne4 7.Nc3

Qxg5!? (7...Nxc3!) 8.Bxe4 (8.Kf1! Nxc3 9.dxc3

Qg6!? 10.Bxd5 Nc6 11.Nf3 f6 12.Rg1 Qh5

13.Qb5! Kd7 14.Bg5 fxg5 15.Nxe5+ Ke7 (15...Kd8

16.Nxc6+) 16.Nxc6+ Kf6 17.Ne5 Bh3+ 18.Ke1

Rd8 19.Bf7 Qh4 20.Nf3 Qe4 21.Nxg5 Qf5

22.Qxb7 Bc5 23.Ne4+ 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Boothe,J/Virginia 1973 (23) Black resigned.)

8...dxe4 9.Nxe4 Qg2 10.Qb5+ Nc6 11.Ng3 a6

12.Qa4 (12.Qb6!?) 12...b5 13.Qe4 Qxe4 14.Nxe4

Nd4 15.Kd1 Bb7 16.f3 Rc8 17.b3 Bb4 18.Bb2 0–0

19.a3 Ba5 20.b4 Bb6 ½–½ Bloodgood,C-

Stroemer,D/Virginia 1972 (20) with counterplay.]

6.Nc3

While there are several lines which are playable

for Black at this point, there are also several which

appear playable, but which lose. Clearly bad are:

6...Be6?

[6...Qd7 7.Nxd5 Nxd5 8.Bxd5 Nc6 9.Nf3 Rb8

10.Rg1 Bd6 (10...Nd8!) 11.Ng5 0–0? (11...Nd8)

12.Qd3 g6 13.Qh3 h5 14.Qd3 Kg7 15.gxh5 Ne7

16.hxg6 Qf5 17.Be4 Qf6 18.Nh7 Qh4 19.gxf7+

Kxf7 20.Bg6+ Nxg6 21.Qxg6+ Ke7 22.Nxf8 Bc5

23.Qh7+ 1–0 Grob,H-Gaffar,A/corr 1966 (23)

Black resigned.; 6...Bxg4? 7.Qxb7 Nbc6 8.Nxd5

Rc8 9.Nxe7 Nxe7 10.Qxa7 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Erwin,H/Virginia 1972 (10) with a winning

advantage for White.]

7.Qxb7 Nbc6 8.Nb5 Rc8 9.Nf3 a6 10.Qxa6 Nb4?

11.Nd6+ Kd7 12.Nxe5+ Kc7 13.Nb5+ Kb8

14.Qa7# (Braune-Rupprecht, 1956)

The playable lines to be considered are:

Variation "E1" 6...d5, Variation "E2" 6... Nc6, and

Variation "E3" 6... e5!?

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 c6

This is the key line in Grob's Attack, and the

tactical aspects of the position are unlimited.

4.cxd5 cxd5

[An interesting counter is 4...h5!? 5.dxc6 Nxc6

6.gxh5 Nh6 7.d3 Bc5 8.Nc3 Ng4 9.Bxc6+ bxc6

10.Ne4 Qh4 11.Qa4! with advantage for White.]

5.Qb3 Ne7

[5...Be6? 6.Nc3! (6.Qxb7? Nd7 7.Bxd5? Rb8

8.Qc6 Ne7 And White loses the Bishop) 6...Nd7

(6...d4? 7.Qxb7! wins for White) 7.Bxd5 Nc5

8.Qb5+ Qd7 9.Bxe6 Nxe6 10.Qxe5 Rc8 11.Nf3

Ne7 12.d3 Nc6 13.Qe4 Be7 14.Be3 0–0 15.d4

Na5 16.Nd2 Nc4 17.Nxc4 with a winning

advantage for White. 17...Rxc4 1–0 Grob,H-

Chevalier,D/corr 1967 (17); 5...e4 6.Nc3 Ne7 7.d3

f5? (the Black pawn center cannot be held;

7...exd3 is the best) 8.gxf5 Nxf5 9.dxe4 dxe4

10.Bxe4 Nc6 11.Nf3 Nfd4 12.Qc4 Bf5 13.Bxf5

Nxf5 14.Qe6+ Nfe7 15.Bf4 1–0 Grob,H-

Hasler/corr 1966 (23) with a pawn and the attack.;

5...Qc7 6.Nc3 d4 7.Nd5 Qd7 8.d3 Nc6 9.Bd2 b6

10.Rc1 Bb7 11.Be4 Nge7 12.Nf3 f6 13.Nxe7 Nxe7

14.Bxb7 Qxb7 15.g5 Qd5 16.Qa4+ Qd7 17.Qa6

Nf5 18.Rg1 Bd6 19.gxf6 gxf6 20.Qc4 Qf7 21.Qc6+

Ke7 22.Qe4 Qh5 23.Ng5 fxg5 24.Qxf5 h6

25.Rxg5 Qf7 26.Qh3 Rag8 27.Rxe5+ Bxe5

28.Bb4+ Kf6 29.Rc6+ Kg7 30.Qg4+ Kh7 31.Qe4+

Rg6 32.h4 Qe8 33.Rxg6 Qxg6 34.Qxe5 Rc8

35.Kd2 Qg4 36.f3 Qd7 37.Bd6 Rd8 38.Qe4+

Kg8? (38...Kg7!) 39.Be7! 1–0 Grob,H-Lenherr/corr

1966 (39) Black resigned.; 5...Nf6 6.g5 Ne4 7.Nc3

Qxg5!? (7...Nxc3!) 8.Bxe4 (8.Kf1! Nxc3 9.dxc3

Qg6!? 10.Bxd5 Nc6 11.Nf3 f6 12.Rg1 Qh5

13.Qb5! Kd7 14.Bg5 fxg5 15.Nxe5+ Ke7 (15...Kd8

16.Nxc6+) 16.Nxc6+ Kf6 17.Ne5 Bh3+ 18.Ke1

Rd8 19.Bf7 Qh4 20.Nf3 Qe4 21.Nxg5 Qf5

22.Qxb7 Bc5 23.Ne4+ 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Boothe,J/Virginia 1973 (23) Black resigned.)

8...dxe4 9.Nxe4 Qg2 10.Qb5+ Nc6 11.Ng3 a6

12.Qa4 (12.Qb6!?) 12...b5 13.Qe4 Qxe4 14.Nxe4

Nd4 15.Kd1 Bb7 16.f3 Rc8 17.b3 Bb4 18.Bb2 0–0

19.a3 Ba5 20.b4 Bb6 ½–½ Bloodgood,C-

Stroemer,D/Virginia 1972 (20) with counterplay.]

6.Nc3

While there are several lines which are playable

for Black at this point, there are also several which

appear playable, but which lose. Clearly bad are:

6...Be6?

[6...Qd7 7.Nxd5 Nxd5 8.Bxd5 Nc6 9.Nf3 Rb8

10.Rg1 Bd6 (10...Nd8!) 11.Ng5 0–0? (11...Nd8)

12.Qd3 g6 13.Qh3 h5 14.Qd3 Kg7 15.gxh5 Ne7

16.hxg6 Qf5 17.Be4 Qf6 18.Nh7 Qh4 19.gxf7+

Kxf7 20.Bg6+ Nxg6 21.Qxg6+ Ke7 22.Nxf8 Bc5

23.Qh7+ 1–0 Grob,H-Gaffar,A/corr 1966 (23)

Black resigned.; 6...Bxg4? 7.Qxb7 Nbc6 8.Nxd5

Rc8 9.Nxe7 Nxe7 10.Qxa7 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Erwin,H/Virginia 1972 (10) with a winning

advantage for White.]

7.Qxb7 Nbc6 8.Nb5 Rc8 9.Nf3 a6 10.Qxa6 Nb4?

11.Nd6+ Kd7 12.Nxe5+ Kc7 13.Nb5+ Kb8

14.Qa7#

(Braune-Rupprecht, 1956)The playable lines to

be considered are:Variation "E1" 6...d5, Variation

"E2" 6... Nc6, and Variation "E3" 6... e5!?

Variation "E1" (6. Nc3 d4)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Qb3

Ne7 6.Nc3 d4

7.Nd5

[7.Bxb7? Bxb7 8.Qxb7 Nbc6 9.Nb5 (9.Ne4 Rb8

10.Qa6 Qd5!) 9...Rb8 10.Qa6 Rb6 11.Qa4 Qb8

12.Na3 Rb4 with the initiative for a pawn White

doesn't really want.] 7...Nbc6 [7...Be6 8.Qb5+

Nbc6 '?' (8...Nec6 9.e4 with equal chances; Grob)

9.Nxe7 Qxe7 '?' (better is 9...Bxe7 ) 10.Bxc6+

bxc6 11.Qxc6+ 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Brenneman,M/Virginia 1973 (11); 7...Nxd5 8.Bxd5

Qc7 9.Nf3 Bd6 '?' (9...h6 10.Rg1 Nc6 11.d3 Bb4+

12.Kd1 with an attack; Grob) 10.Ng5 0–0 11.Qd3

g6 12.Qh3 h5 13.Qd3 Kg7 14.gxh5 Bf5 15.Qf3 f6

'?' (15...Nc6) 16.Ne6+ 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Brogan,J/Virginia 1972 (16)]

8.Nxe7!

[The speculative 8.d3!? may be as good, but

8...Na5! 9.Qa4+ Bd7 leaves much to be desired.]

8...Qxe7

[Also playable is 8...Bxe7 ]

9.h3

[Probably better than 9.Qf3 which offers White no

more than equality.]

9...g6 10.a3

[Not good is 10.e3!? which depends on Black

errors.]

10...Be6 11.Bd5

This position is not at all clear, but the maze of

complications have been reduced to a managable

level.

11...Bxd5 12.Qxd5 Rd8 13.Qe4 Bg7 14.d3 0–0

15.g5 f5 '!?' 16.gxf6 Qxf6 17.Nf3 Qf7 18.Bg5 Bf6

19.h4 Rc8 20.h5 '!?' 20...Bxg5 21.hxg6 hxg6

22.Rg1 Bh6 23.Rxg6+ Bg7 24.Qg4 Rc7 25.Qh5

Ne7

'the Black King needs a little room.'

26.Qxe5 Qxg6 '??' 27.Qxc7 Rxf3 '!?' 28.exf3

Qg1+ 29.Ke2 Qxa1 30.Qxe7 Qxb2+ 31.Kf1 Qc1+

32.Kg2 Qb2 33.Qe8+

(Bloodgood- F. Monroe, 1973)

Variation "E2" (6...Nc6)

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Qb3

Ne7 6.Nc3 Nbc6 7.Nxd5

[7.Nf3 e4 8.Ng5 f6 9.d3 fxg5 10.Bxg5 Qb6

11.Qxb6 axb6 12.dxe4 dxe4 13.0–0–0 Bxg4

14.Bxe4 Ra5 15.Be3 Nc8 16.Bd5 Bb4 17.Rhg1

Bxc3 18.Rxg4 Bf6 19.Re4+ Kf8 20.Be6 N8e7

21.b4! Ra8! 22.Bxb6 g5 23.b5 Ne5 24.f4 gxf4

25.Rxf4 Kg7 26.Rg1+ N7g6 27.h4 h5 28.Bd4

Rad8 29.Kc2 (29.Bxe5! Bxe5 30.Rf7+ Kh6

31.Rxb7 with winning chances) 29...Rd6 30.Bf5

Ng4! with a material advantage for Black.

31.Bxf6+ Rxf6 32.Rf3 Rxf5 33.Rxg4 Rxf3

34.Rxg6+ Kxg6 35.exf3 Ra8 36.Kb3 b6 0–1

Sommerhalder,W-Grob,H/corr 1966 (36); 7.e3

Be6! 8.Qxb7? Rb8 9.Qa6 Nb4 10.Qa4+ Bd7

11.Qd1 d4 12.exd4 exd4 13.Ne4 Qc7 (not

13...d3? 14.Nd6#!) 14.Kf1 Bb5+ 15.d3 Nxd3 0–1

Erwin,H-Stroemer,D/corr 1973 (15) with a winning

advantage for Black.; 7.h3! (this solid move avoids

all the complications of 7 Nxd5) 7...Nd4 (7...d4

8.Nd5 Na5 9.Qf3 Ng6 10.h4 Bd6 with an unclear

position; Grob) 8.Qd1 a6 (8...f5 9.e3 Ndc6 10.d4

;Grob) 9.e3 Ndc6 10.d4 g6!? (10...exd4!) 11.dxe5

Nxe5 12.Nxd5 Bg7 13.Ne2 0–0 14.e4 b5 15.Bg5

f6 16.Be3 with a solid advantage for White.]

7...Nd4!

[7...Nxd5 8.Bxd5 Nd4 9.Qc4 (9.Bxf7+? Ke7!)

9...b5 transposes.]

8.Qc4 Nxd5

[8...b5!? 9.Nc7+ Kd7 10.Nxb5 Ba6 11.a4 Qc8?

(11...Rc8 12.Qa2 Nc2+ 13.Kd1 Nxa1 14.Qxa1

Bxb5 15.axb5 Qc7 16.Qb1 with an unclear

position; Grob) 12.Qxc8+ Rxc8 13.Nxd4! exd4

14.b4 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Sanderson,T/Virginia

1973 (14) with a winning advantage for white.]

9.Bxd5 b5

[Better than 9...Be6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Kf1! Rc8

12.Qd3 Qd5 13.Nf3 where Black has less than

equality.]

10.Bxf7+ Ke7 11.Qd5 Nc2+ 12.Kd1

[No good is 12.Kf1!? Nxa1 13.Qxa8 Qc7! with a

winning advantage for Black.]

12...Nxa1 13.Qxa8 Qc7! 14.Qe4!

[14.Bb3? Bb7! 15.Qxa7 Kd8 16.Nf3 Bc5 17.Ng5

Bxa7 18.Ne6+ Kd7 19.Nxc7 Bxh1 0–1 Jordt-

Saurmann/Stuttgart 1965 (19) with a winning

advantage for Black.]

14...Kxf7 [14...Bb7? 15.Qf5 Bc8 (15...Bxh1?

16.Qe6+ Kd8 17.Qe8#!) 16.Qb1 Kxf7 17.Nf3 Bxg4

18.Ng5+ with advantage for White; Grob]

15.f3

[Not good is 15.Nf3? Bb7! 16.Qf5+ Ke8 17.Qb1

(17.Nxe5? Qc2+! 18.Qxc2 Nxc2 with a winning

advantage for Black) 17...Bxf3 18.exf3 Qc6!

19.Qe4 Qxe4 20.fxe4 Bc5 21.f3 Rf8 22.Rf1 Bd4!

with a winning advantage for Black.; 15.Qf5+;

15.Qf3+ is good for equality, e.g. 15...Ke8 16.Qc3]

15...Be6 16.Qb1 Be7 17.Qxa1 Rc8 18.—

[Grob gives 18.Qb1 Kf8 19.b3 and states that

White can hold the position and the material.]

Variation "E3"

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Qb3

Ne7 6.Nc3 e4!?

While this line of play is very complicated, it is

also probably Black's best. 7.d3 exd3

[Bloodgood-Christy, 1972, continued 7...Nbc6

8.dxe4 Na5 9.Qb5+ Bd7 10.Qd3 dxe4 11.Bxe4

(11.Nxe4 Ng6 12.Bd2 Qb6 13.Qc3 Nc6 14.Be3

Qd8 15.0–0–0 Rc8 16.Kb1 Nge5 17.Nf3 (with

advantage for White; Grob-Unknown,Corr.)

11...Bc6 12.Nf3 Qxd3 13.Bxd3 Ng6 14.0–0 h5

15.g5 Rd8 16.Bxg6 fxg6 17.Ne5 with advantage

for White.]

8.Bf4!

[8.Nxd5 Nxd5 9.Bxd5 Bb4+! 0–1 Grob,H-

Bucher,R/corr 1966 (22) and White not only loses

his attack, but also has the worse of the

position.The text move is clearly best, and now

Black can lose quickly with several seemingly

playable moves, but also has several interesting

and highly complex lines that are probably good. ]

From the diagram position shown, the following

are not good:

8...dxe2?

[8...d4? 9.Nb5 d2+ (9...Na6? 10.Nd6+ Kd7

11.Qb5+ Nc6 12.Qf5+ Ke7 13.Qxf7# Grob-O.

Wisdemieer, Corr.) 10.Kf1 Be6 11.Qa4! Nec6

(11...Bd7 12.Nd6#) 12.Nc7+ Kd7 13.Nxa8 1–0

Grob,H-Sommerhalder,W/corr 1965 (13) with a

winning advantage for White.; 8...Nbc6? 9.Nb5!

(9.0–0–0 Qb6 10.Nb5 Qc5+ 11.Kb1 Qc2+ 12.Qxc2

dxc2+ 13.Kxc2 Nb4+ 14.Kb1 Na6 1–0 Beck-

Bleisch/Zurich 1964 (29) favors White;) 9...d2+

(9...Qa5+ 10.Kf1 Ng6 11.Nc7+ Kd8 12.Bg3 with

advantage for White) 10.Kf1 Na5? (10...Ng6)

11.Qa4 Ng6 12.Nc7+ Ke7 13.Nxd5+ Ke6 14.Bc7

Qd7 15.Qe4+ Ne5 16.Qxe5# 1–0 Grob,H-

Wiedemeier/corr 1965 (16); 8...Na6!? 9.0–0–0 Ng6

(9...Nc5 10.Qb5+ Nc6 11.Nxd5 Qa5 12.Nc7+ with

a winning advantage for White; Bloodgood-T.

Sanderson, 1973) 10.Bxd5 Qf6 (10...Nxf4

11.Qa4+! regaining the piece with an attack)

11.Be3 Bb4 12.Rxd3 Ne5 13.Rd4 Bc5 14.g5 Qf5

15.Rf4 Bxe3+ 16.fxe3 Qd7 17.Nf3 Nc5 18.Qc2 f6

19.gxf6 gxf6 20.Nxe5 fxe5 21.Bf7+ 1–0 Grob,H-

Langemann,E/corr 1965 (21) with a winning

advantage for White.]

9.Ngxe2 Ng6 10.Bxd5 Qd7 11.Bg3 Nc6

[11...Bd6? 12.Bxd6 Qxd6 13.Bxf7+]

12.0–0–0

[12.Nb5 Nge5!]

12...Bc5 13.Ne4

with a solid advantage for White. 13...Bb6

14.Bxf7+

(Grob- W. Kast, /corr 1965) The playable lines

are: Variation "E3a" 8...Ng6!?; Variation "E3b"

8...a6; Variation "E3c" 8... d2+!?

Variation "E3a"

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Qb3

Ne7 6.Nc3 e4 7.d3 exd3 8.Bf4 Ng6!?

This line is the weakest of the three for Black.

9.Bxd5 Nxf4 10.Qa4+

10. Bxf7 is not good.

10...Nd7 [10...Qd7? 11.Qxf4 dxe2 12.Ngxe2 Bd6?

(12...Nc6 13.0–0–0! with a sharp attack) 13.Bxf7+!

½–½ Grob,H-Huber/corr 1966 (13) with a winning

advantage for White.]

11.Qxf4 Nf6 12.Bf3!

[12.Qe5+ Qe7 13.Qxe7+ Bxe7 14.g5 Nxd5

15.Nxd5 Bd8 16.e4 Be6 17.Nf3 Bxd5 18.exd5

Ba5+! 0–1 Grob,H-Frankenstein/corr 1965 (30)

with some advantage for Black.]

12...d2+ 13.Kf1 Qb6

[Bloodgood-F. Leonard, 1973, continued 13...Bd6

14.Qxd2 0–0 15.g5 Ne8 16.Rd1 Qe7 17.Nb5 Bb8

18.Qd8 Qxd8 19.Rxd8 with a winning advantage

forWhite.]

14.Rd1 Qxb2 15.Qe3+

White hs the better of this, and possibly enough to

discourage this line for Black altogether.

15...Be6 16.Rxd2

(Grob-W. Blatti, corr 1964)with a solid advantage

for White.

Variation "E3b"

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Qb3

Ne7 6.Nc3 e4!? 7.d3 exd3 8.Bf4 a6

This is safe, but offers Black no more than

equality if he avoids the balance of the traps in his

path.

9.Rd1

[9.0–0–0 Nec6 10.Rxd3 d4 11.Bxb8 (11.h3!)

11...Nb4! 12.Rd2 Rxb8 13.Nf3 Be6 14.Qd1 Qc7

(14...Qc8!) 15.Nxd4 1–0 Grob,H-

Sommerhalder,W/corr 1965 (49) with advantage

in an error-filled game.; 9.Nxd5 Nxd5 10.Bxd5

Bb4+ 11.Kf1! (Not 11.Qxb4 Qxd5 12.e4 Nc6! ;

Grob) 11...0–0 (11...dxe2+? 12.Nxe2 0–0 13.Rd1!

Qe7 14.h3 favors White; Grob) 12.Rd1 Qe7

13.Rxd3 Nc6 14.h3 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Monroe,F/Virginia 1973 (14) with advantage for

White.]

9...d4

[9...dxe2? 10.Ngxe2 Nbc6 11.Bxd5 Nxd5 12.Nxd5

Na5? 13.Qe3+ Be6 14.Nc7+ Qxc7 15.Bxc7 1–0

Grob,H-Fischer,W/corr 1966 (15) With a winning

advantage for White.; After 9...Nbc6 10.Rxd3 Na5

11.Qd1 Be6 (Bloodgood-R. Christy, 1972,

continued 11...Nc4 12.Bxd5 Nxd5 (12...Nxb2

13.Bc6+!) 13.Rxd5 Qe7 14.Qa4+ b5 15.Rxb5

axb5 16.Qxa8 with a winning advantage for

White.) 12.Nxd5 (12.Bxd5 is also good.) 12...Nxd5

13.Bxd5 Bb4+ 14.Kf1 Bxd5 15.Rxd5 Qb6 16.Re5+

1–0 Grob,H-Glauser,H/corr 1965 (35) with a solid

advantage for White.]

10.Rxd3 Nbc6

White has a clear advantage, but Black may be

able to gradually off-set this with good play.

11.e3

[Grob suggests 11.Bxc6+ Nxc6 12.Nf3 Bc5 with

open play for both sides]

11...Ng6!

[11...h6 12.Nge2 Ng6 13.Bxc6+ bxc6 14.Rxd4

with advantage for White.]

12.Bxc6+ bxc6 13.Rxd4 Qa5 14.Re4+ Be6!?

[14...Be7? 15.Bd6!]

15.Rxe6+! fxe6 16.Qxe6+ Ne7 17.Nge2 Rd8

18.Nd4 Qb6 19.0–0 Qxb2? 20.Ne4 Rxd4 21.exd4

Qxd4 22.Nd6+ Kd8 23.Nf7+ Ke8 24.Bc7 Qd7

25.Nd6+ (Bloodgood-H. Erwin,1973)

Variation "E3c"

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e5 3.c4 c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Qb3

Ne7 6.Nc3 e4!? 7.d3 exd3 8.Bf4! d2+!?

This line of play has proven very double-edged,

and may well be Black's best.

9.Kf1 Nbc6

[9...Qb6? 10.Nb5 Na6 11.Nd6+ Kd7 12.Nxf7 Qxb3

13.axb3 Rg8 14.Bxd2 1–0 Grob,H-

Gubelmann/corr 1964 (14) With advantage for

White.; 9...Ng6 10.Bxd5 (10.Bg3 d4 This position

is quite double edged! 11.Bxb7 (11.Nb5 Na6

12.Bd5 Qd7 13.Nf3 Bc5 14.Qc4 0–0 15.Ng5 Nh8

16.b4 Bb6 17.Be4 Ng6 18.Bd6 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

McKenna,R/corr APCT 1973 (18) with a strong

attack.) 11...Bxb7? 12.Qxb7 dxc3 13.bxc3 d1Q+

14.Rxd1 Qxd1+ 15.Kg2 Qd7 16.Qxa8 Qc6+

17.Qxc6+ Nxc6 18.Nf3 Bc5 19.Rd1 Ke7 0–1

Stroemer,D-Bloodgood,C/Virginia 1973 (19) with

a winning advantage for Black.) 10...Nxf4

11.Qa4+ Nd7 12.Qxf4 Nf6 13.Bf3 Bd6 14.Qxd2

Nxg4 15.Bxg4 Bxg4 16.Rd1 Qe7 17.Nb5 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Stroemer,D/Virginia 1973 (17) with

some advantage for White.; Bloodgood-H. Erwin,

1972, continued 9...d4? 10.Nb5 Na6 11.Nd6+

Kd7 12.Qb5+ Ke6 13.Qe5+ Kd7 14.Nxf7 With a

winning advantage for White.]

10.Bg3

Part 4 (Other lines after 1... d5)

Variation "A3"

1.g4 d5

After

2.Bg2 ,

Black has a number of playable alternatives which

for the most part have not been examined in any

detail. While Part 4 will serve s a general guide

for play against several of these, it is by no means

definitive. Variation A3 covers 2...e6 and

Variation B3 covers other second moves for

Black. [2.g5 e5 3.h4 Bc5 (3...h6!) 4.c3 Nc6 (4...d4

5.Bg2 with good play) 5.b4 Bd6 (5...Bb6 6.b5 --

followed by 7.d4 ) 6.Bg2 Nge7 7.b5 Na5 8.d3 c6

9.a4 a6 10.bxa6 Rxa6 11.Qc2 Bf5 12.Nd2 Ng6

13.Nb3 Nxb3 14.Qxb3 Rb6 15.Qc2 Qe7 16.e3 h5

17.Ne2 ½–½ Grob,H-Schnirel/corr 1964 (17)

17...Nxh4? (17...0–0) 18.Rxh4 Qxg5 19.Ng3! Bxd3

20.Qxd3 Qxh4 21.Nf5 Qf6 22.Nxd6+ Qxd6 favors

White.; Not so good is 2.h3!? f5! 3.g5 e5 where

Black can then play 4.-- g6 and 5.-- Bg7 with a

strong center which is well supported.; For

amusement, one should also consider the

consequence of 2.f3? e6 3.h4 Bd6 4.Rh3? Qxh4+!

5.Rxh4 Bg3#]

2...e6

This passive defense is tempting, and the

aggressive player may well wish to attempt to

break it open quickly, but it is not weak by any

means and should be treated with respect.

3.d3

[3.c4!? dxc4 4.b3? (4.Qa4+!) 4...cxb3? (4...Qd4!

5.Nc3 Qxg4) 5.Qxb3 c6 6.Bb2 f6 7.d4 Qb6 8.Qc2

Bb4+ 9.Nd2 Ne7 10.a3 Bxd2+ 11.Qxd2 c5

12.dxc5 Qxc5 13.Rc1 Qb6 14.g5 0–0 15.gxf6 gxf6

16.Nh3 e5 17.Rg1 Ng6 18.Be4 Kg7 (18...Bxh3?

19.Qh6 f5 20.Bd5+ With a mating attack) 19.Bxg6

hxg6 20.Qd3 with a winning attack. 20...Kf7

21.Qxg6+ Ke7 22.Bxe5 Bxh3 23.Bc3 Nc6

24.Qh7+ Rf7 25.Qxh3 Rd8 26.Rg3 Rd7 27.Re3+

Ne5 28.Bxe5 fxe5 29.Rxe5+ Kf6 30.Rf5+ 1–0

Grob,H-Kurz/corr 1965 (30)]

3...Bc5

[3...b6 4.c4 c6 5.Qa4 Bd7 6.Nc3 ½–½

Bloodgood,C-Bowlby,R/corr 1973 (6) with an

unclear position.; 3...Be7 4.Nf3 c6 (4...h5 5.g5!?)

5.Nc3 Qb6 6.e4 d4 7.Ne2 c5 8.Ne5 Nc6 9.Nxc6

bxc6 10.b3 e5 11.h3 Be6 (11...Bd7 was better;

Grob) 12.0–0 h6 13.f4 Bd6 14.f5 Bd7 15.Ng3 g5

16.fxg6 fxg6 17.Bd2 a5 18.a4! 0–0–0 19.Qe1

winning the a-pawn and leaving Black facing the

inevitable Queenside pawn onslaught.]

4.h4 Nc6 5.Nc3

White's king's side pressure is obvious, and must

be countered. To allow White a free hand on the

king's side invites disaster.

5...Bd7!?

[5...Nge7 6.e4 dxe4? (6...d4!) 7.Nxe4 Bb6 8.Nh3

Ng6 9.Nf4 e5? (9...Nxf4!) 10.Nh5 Nxh4?

11.Nxg7+ Kf8 12.Bh6 Nxg2+ 13.Kf1 Kg8 Queen

moves lose 14.Kxg2 Qd5 15.Qf3 Qd8 16.Nf6+ Kf8

17.Ne6+ 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Leonard,F/Virginia

1973 (17) Black resigned.]

6.e4 d4 7.Nce2 e5 8.Ng3 Nge7 9.Nf5 Nxf5

10.gxf5 f6 11.Qh5+ Ke7 12.a3 Qe8 13.Qxe8+

Raxe8 14.h5 h6 15.Nf3 Reg8 16.Nh4 Be8 17.Bf3

(H. Grob-Weidemeier, corr, 1965)with mounting

pressure.

See diagram next page

Variation "B3"

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 b5

Of the remaining alternative for Black at move

two, this is the line with the most possibilities.

Others are playable. [2...Nc6 3.c4! e6 (3...dxc4

4.Bxc6+! leaving Black with tripled isolated

pawns) 4.Qb3!? (4.d3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Bxd2+ 6.Qxd2

Nge7 7.Na3 Ng6 8.Nf3 with an unclear position;

H. Grob) 4...Na5!? (4...d4) 5.Qa4+ c6 6.cxd5 exd5

7.Nc3 Be6 (7...Bxg4 8.Nxd5!) 8.d4 Bd6 9.g5 Ne7

10.h4 Ng6 11.b4 Nc4 12.b5 Qb6 13.bxc6 bxc6

14.Nxd5!? Qxd4 15.Qxc6+ Kd8 16.Qxa8+ Kd7

17.Qb7+ Kd8 18.Rb1 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Waymire,W/Norfolk 1960 (18) Black resigned.;

2...c5 3.g5 (3.c4 d4 4.d3 Nc6 (4...e5 5.g5 Be7

6.h4 Nd7 7.e4 Bd6 8.Ne2 Ne7 9.Nd2 0–0 10.Ng3

Nb6 11.b3 Nc6 12.Nf5 Bxf5 13.exf5 f6 14.Be4!

fxg5 15.hxg5 Qxg5 16.Nf3 with a winning attack;

H. Grob-Unknown) 5.g5 e5 6.h4 (6.Nf3 b5 7.cxb5

Qa5+ 8.Nfd2 Qxb5 9.Nb3 Rb8 10.f3 Qa6 11.Kf2

with an unclear position.) 6...h5 7.Nd2 Nge7

8.Ne4 Ng6 9.Bh3 Bxh3 10.Rxh3 Be7 11.Nf3 b5

12.cxb5 Qa5+ 13.Nfd2 Qxb5 14.Nc4 Rd8 15.f3

Qa6 16.Kf2 ½–½ Grob,H-Sutton/corr 1966 (16))

3...e5 4.d3 Nc6 5.Nc3 Be6 6.h4 f6 7.e4 d4 8.Nce2

Qd7 9.f4 Bg4 10.f5 g6 11.Bh3 gxf5 12.Bxg4 fxg4

13.Ng3 h5 14.gxh6 Bxh6 15.N1e2 Bxc1 16.Nxc1

Nce7 17.Nb3 b6 18.Qe2 Ng6 19.Nf5 Nh6 20.Nxh6

Rxh6 21.Qf2 Nf4 22.0–0–0 Rb8? (22...0–0–0!)

23.Kb1 f5 24.exf5 Qxf5 25.Nd2 Kd7 26.Rde1 b5

27.Re4 Rh7 28.Rhe1 Re7 29.Nb3 Kd6 30.c3 Rf8

31.Rf1 Rg7 32.cxd4 cxd4 33.Qd2 Rff7 34.Qb4+ 1–

0 Grob,H-Wampfler/corr 1964 (34) With a winning

position.; 2...Nf6? 3.g5 Ne4 4.d3 Nxf2? (4...Nc5)

5.Kxf2 e5 6.c3 c6 7.h4 and Black has no

compensation for the Knight. 7...Bf5 8.Nf3 Nd7

9.h5 Be7 10.Qc2 h6 11.e4 dxe4 12.dxe4 Be6

13.gxh6 gxh6 14.Be3 b6 15.Nbd2 Rg8 16.Bh3

Bxh3 17.Rxh3 Qc7 18.Bxh6 Nf6 19.Nh2 Qd7

20.Qd3 1–0 Grob,H-Minder/corr 1965 (20);

2...Na6!? 3.c4 e6 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Qb3!? (5.h3 is

safer) 5...Be6! 6.Qxb7? (6.d4!) 6...Nb4 7.Na3 a6

8.d4 Rb8 9.Qa7 Qc8 0–1 Bloodgood,C-

Haack,S/corr 1975 (9) and the White Queen is

trapped.; 2...Nd7 3.d3 e6 (3...e5 4.e4 Bc5 5.g5

dxe4 6.dxe4 c6 7.Nf3 Qc7 8.Nc3 Nb6 9.Nh4 Ne7

10.Qf3 Be6 11.Bh3 with an awkward endgame

for Black; H. Grob) 4.e4 c6 5.Nc3 Nb6 6.h4 Bb4

7.Bd2 a5 8.Qe2 Ne7 9.f4 d4 10.Nd1 Bxd2+

11.Qxd2 Ng6 12.h5 Nh4 13.Nf3 Nxf3+ 14.Bxf3 e5

15.g5 f6!? 16.gxf6 Qxf6 17.f5 h6 18.Nf2 Bd7

19.Ng4 Qd6 20.0–0–0 and White has a solid

advantage.]

3.e4 dxe4 4.Bxe4 c6 5.h3 Nf6 6.Bg2 Be6 7.Nc3

b4 8.Ne4 Nxe4 9.Bxe4 Bd5 10.Qf3 e5

[or 10...Bxe4 11.Qxe4 Qd5]

11.d3 Nd7?

[11...Be7 with equality]

12.Bxd5 cxd5 13.Qxd5

with advantage to White.H. Grob-G. Pinter, corr.

Part 5: (1... e5)

Variation "A4"

1.g4 e5 2.Bg2

While 2 Bg2 d5 transposes to Part III, this defence

generally brings about a radical difference in the

basic motifs of attack.

Several lines not recommended for White include:

[2.c4? h5! 3.d4? (3.d3) 3...hxg4 4.dxe5 Nc6 5.Qd5

Rh5! 6.f4 Qh4+ 7.Kd1 d6 8.e4 dxe5 9.f5 Nf6

10.Qd3 Bxf5 11.exf5 Rd8 12.Qxd8+ Kxd8 13.Bd3

e4 0–1 Schraner-Grob,H/corr 1964 (13) White

resigned.;

2.e4? d5! 3.Qf3 (3.Bg2 Nf6!) 3...dxe4 4.Qxe4 Bd6

5.h3 Nc6 6.c3 f5 7.Qe2 (7.gxf5 Qf6) 7...Qe7 8.d3

g6 9.g5 Bd7 10.Bg2 0–0–0 11.h4 Qf7 12.Qf3 Re8

13.Nd2 Nd8 14.Ne2 Bc6 15.Qh3 Kb8 16.Nc4 Ne7

½–½ Schraner-Grob,H/corr 1963 (16) with

advantage to Black.;

2.d4!? e4? 3.c4 Qh4 4.h3 Bb4+ 5.Nc3 Bxc3+

6.bxc3 Qe7 7.Bf4 d6 8.e3 g5 9.Bg3 Be6 10.Rb1

Bc8 The second tempo lost in this game! 11.Be2

Nf6 12.h4 gxh4 13.Bxh4 Qe6 14.g5 Nfd7 15.Nh3

Rg8? (15...Nb6!) 16.Nf4 Qe7 17.Nd5 Qd8 18.g6

f6 19.gxh7 1–0 Grob,H-Rothschild,W/corr 1964

(19) Black resigned.]

2...h5

[2...Bc5 3.e3 (3.h3 Qh4 4.e3 Nf6? 5.d4 exd4?

6.exd4 Bd6 7.Nf3 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Mizesko,H/IPC CM-6 1975 (7) and the Black

Queen falls;) 3...Nc6 4.c3 (4.Nc3 d6 5.Na4 Bb6

6.Nxb6 axb6 7.h3 Nge7 8.d4 exd4 9.exd4 d5!

10.a3 0–0 11.Nf3 Ng6 12.0–0 Nce7 with equality;

H. Grob) 4...d5 5.d4 exd4 6.exd4 Qe7+ 7.Be3 Bb6

8.g5 f6 9.h4 f5 10.Nh3 Be6 11.Nf4 0–0–0 12.Nd2

h6? 13.Ng6 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Christy,R/Virginia

1972 (13) Black Resigned.;

2...Nc6 3.c4 Bc5

a) 3...Nge7 4.Nc3 Ng6 5.h3 Bc5 6.d3 b6 7.Nf3

Bb7 8.e3 Nce7 9.e4!? Nf4? (Grob suggests

9...c6 followed by 10.-- d5) 10.Bxf4 exf4

11.a3 Ng6 12.Qd2 c6 13.d4 Be7 14.Ne2 d5

15.cxd5 Qd6!? 16.dxc6 Bxc6 17.e5 Qe6

18.Rc1 Rc8? (18...Rd8!) 19.d5 1–0 Grob,H-

Mosiman/corr 1964 (19) and White wins a

piece.;

b) 3...d6 4.h3 Nf6 (4...Nge7 5.d3 Ng6 6.Nf3 Be7

7.Nc3 0–0 8.g5 f6 9.Nd5 fxg5 10.Nxe7+ Qxe7

11.Bxg5 Qf7 12.Be3 Nf4 13.Bf1 Qh5 14.Qd2

Bf5 15.0–0–0 Nxd3+? Simply an unsound

combination; Black had equality before this

move. 16.exd3 Qxf3? 17.Be2 Qg2 18.Rdg1 1–

0 Grob,H-Henneberger,W/corr 1964 (18) and

the Queen is trapped.) 5.d3 Be7 6.Nc3 0–0

7.Nf3 Re8 8.e4 Bf8 9.Be3 Ne7 10.g5 Nd7

11.h4 f5 12.exf5 Nxf5 13.Ne2 h6 14.Ng3 Nxe3

15.fxe3 c6 16.g6 Qe7 17.Ne4 Qe6 18.Neg5

Qe7 19.Ne4 ½–½ Grob,H-

Henneberger,W/corr 1942 (19) Drawn.; 4.e3

d6 5.a3 a5 (5...Nge7? 6.b4 Bb6 7.Bb2 Ng6

8.Be4 Qg5 9.h3 f5 10.Nf3 Qf6 11.g5 Qe7

12.Bxc6+ bxc6 13.h4 e4 14.h5 Nf8 15.h6 Ne6

16.hxg7 Nxg7 17.Bf6 Qf7 18.Nh4 Be6 19.c5

Bb3 20.Qc1 dxc5 21.Qc3 c4 22.Bxg7 0–0–0

23.Qf6 1–0 Grob,H-Rognon/corr 1964 (23)

Black resigned.) 6.Nc3 Bd7 7.h3 Nge7 8.Nge2

0–0 9.d4 exd4 10.exd4 Ba7 11.Be3 Ng6

12.Qd2 (12.Ng3 Nh4 13.Be4 f5 14.gxf5 Nxf5

15.Nxf5 Bxf5 16.Qd3 with equality; Grob)

12...Qc8 13.0–0–0 Nce7 (13...f5 with

counterplay) 14.Ng3 ½–½ Grob,H-Ruegg/corr

1965 (14) favors White.]

3.gxh5 Rxh5 4.e3 Rh8!

[4...Nf6 5.c4 c6 6.Nc3 d5! 7.cxd5 Rg5 8.Bf3 cxd5

9.Qa4+ Nc6 10.d3 Rg6 11.e4 d4 12.Nd5 Be6

13.Qb5 Qd7 14.Bd2 Bxd5 15.exd5 Nb4 16.Qxd7+

Kxd7 17.Bxb4 Bxb4+ 18.Kd1 ½–½ Hug,P-

Grob,H/corr 1964 (18) 18...Kd6!? (18...Bd6 with

equality) 19.Ne2 Nxd5? 20.Ng3 Rd8 21.Bh5! Rf6

22.Ne4+ with a material advantage.]

5.c4 f5

[5...c6 6.Nc3 Bb4 7.Nge2 Qg5 8.Ng3 f5 9.d4

Bxc3+ 10.bxc3 f4 11.exf4 exf4 12.Qe2+ Ne7

13.Qf3 Ng6 14.Ne4 Qe7 15.d5 Ne5 16.Qe2 d6

17.Bxf4 Bf5 18.Nxd6+ Qxd6 19.Bxe5 Qe7

20.Bxb8 Rxb8 21.Qxe7+ Kxe7 22.a4 Bd3 23.Bf1

Be4 24.Rg1 g6 25.Bg2 Bd3 26.c5 cxd5 27.Bxd5

Rxh2 28.0–0–0 Bf5 29.Rg2 Rxg2 30.Bxg2 g5

31.Rd5 Bd7 32.Rxg5 Bxa4 33.Rg7+ Kf6 34.Rxb7

Rxb7 35.Bxb7 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Monroe,F/Virginia 1973 (35) and White won in 53

moves.]

6.Qc2 g6 7.Nc3 c6 8.Nge2 Nf6 9.d4 d6 10.Bd2

Be6 11.d5 cxd5 12.cxd5 Bf7 13.Qa4+ Nbd7

14.Rc1 a6 15.Ng3 Be7 16.0–0 b5 17.Qb3 Nc5

18.Qc2 e4 19.f3 exf3 20.Bxf3 b4 21.Na4 Rb8

22.Nxc5 dxc5 23.Qa4+ Qd7 24.Qxa6!?

[24.Qxd7+ with equality.]

24...Bxd5 25.e4 Bc6 26.Be2 Ra8 27.Qb6 fxe4

28.Be3 Nd5

R. Ott-H. Grob, corr,1965with the White Queen

trapped.

Part 6 (1...e5 2.d3)

Part 5 covers the alternatives for White on the

second move, and while White can safely play 2.

Bg2, the above move offers the first player a bit

more initiative. the variations after 2. d3 which are

covered here are: "A5" ... h6; "B5" 2... h5; "C5"

2... Nc6; "D5" 2... Be7; "E5" 2... Bc5; "F5" 2... d6;

"G5" 2... d5.

Variation "A5"

1.g4 e5 2.d3 h6 [

Not considered independently, but of interest is

2...g6 Grob-P. Weiland, corr., continued 3.e4 h6

4.Nc3 Bg7 5.Be3 c6 6.Bg2 Ne7 7.h3 d5 8.Bc5 d4

9.Nce2 Be6 10.Qd2 b6 11.Bxe7 Qxe7 12.Ng3

Nd7 13.a3 Rc8 14.N1e2 c5 15.0–0 ½–½ Grob,H-

Wieland/corr 1964 (15)]

3.e4

[3.h4 d5 4.e3 (4.e4!?) 4...Nf6 5.Be2 a6 6.Nd2 Nc6

7.Nf1 Bc5 8.Ng3 Be6 9.f4 exf4 10.exf4 Be7!?

(10...d4!) 11.c3 d4 12.c4! 1–0 Grob,H-

Steinbruchel/corr 1965 (26) with advantage to

White.; 3.Bg2 Nf6 4.h3 c6 5.e4 d5 6.Nd2 d4 7.Nc4

Nbd7 8.Nf3 Qc7 9.Nh4 g6?! (9...b5!) 10.g5! hxg5

11.Bxg5 Nh5 12.Qf3 Nf4!? 13.Bxf4 exf4 14.Qxf4

0–1 Bloodgood,C-Sanderson,T/Virginia 1973 (14)

with advantage to Black.]

3...Nc6 4.Nc3

[4.h4 d5 5.Bg2 d4 6.g5!? (6.Nd2 may be better)

6...hxg5 7.hxg5 Rxh1 8.Bxh1 f6? (8...Nge7 with

9.-- Ng6 and 10.-- Be7 following) 9.Qh5+ Kd7

(9...Ke7 10.Qh7!) 10.Qf7+ Nge7 11.gxf6 gxf6

12.Qxf6 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Leonard,F/Virginia

1973 (12) with a winning advantage to White.]

4...Nge7

[4...Nf6 5.h4 (5.Bg2 Bc5 6.h4 d5!? 7.g5! hxg5

8.hxg5 Rxh1 9.Bxh1 Ng4! 10.Nh3 d4 11.Nd5 Be6

12.f4! exf4 13.Bxf4 Bd6 14.Qf3 Nge5 15.Qh5 1–0

Bloodgood,C-Sarkis,A/Virginia 1973 (15) with

advantage to White.) 5...d5 6.Bg2 d4 7.Nd5 Nxg4!

0–1 Bloodgood,C-Sarkis,A/Virginia 1973 (7) with

advantage to Black.]

5.h4

[5.Bg2 Ng6 6.Nf3 d6 7.h3 Be7 8.Be3 with Black

quite cramped; Grob.]

5...d5

[5...g6 6.Bg2 Nd4 7.f4 d6 8.Be3 Nec6 9.Nd5 at

which point Black played 9...Bxg4? 1–0 Grob,H-

Hoffmann/corr 1964 (9) but White already had a

considerable advantage.]

6.Bg2 d4 7.Nd5 Be6 8.g5 hxg5 9.hxg5 Rxh1

10.Bxh1 Ng6 11.Qh5 Nf4?

[11...Qd7 followed by 12.-- 0–0–0]

12.Nxf4 exf4 13.Bxf4 Qd7 14.Nf3 0–0–0 15.Ne5

Nxe5 16.Bxe5 Bd6?

[16...Bg4!]

17.Bxg7!

[17.Bxd6 Qxd6 with Black simply trading]

17...Bg4 18.Qh6 Bf4 19.Bf6 Rg8 20.f3 Be6

21.Ke2

Bloodgood-R. Christy, 1972with a winning

advantage.

Variation "B5"

1.g4 e5 2.d3! h5

This line of play lacks sting! White should get an

advantage with proper play.

3.g5 h4

[3...Be7 4.h4 d5 5.Bg2 Bg4 6.Nd2 c6 7.Ngf3 Nd7

8.e4 d4 9.Bh3 Bxh3 10.Rxh3 f6!? (10...Qc7)

11.Nc4 b5 12.gxf6 Bxf6? (12...gxf6) 13.Nd6+ Ke7

14.Nf5+ Kf7 15.Ng5+ Bxg5 16.Bxg5 Qc7 17.Qf3

Ngf6 18.0–0–0 Raf8 19.Rg3! Kg8? (19...Rh7)

20.Nxg7! Ng4 21.Nf5 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Cacalano,A/Norfolk 1961 (21) with a winning

advantage to White.]

4.Bh3

[4.f4 exf4 5.Bxf4 d5 6.Bg2 c6 7.e4 Be6 8.Nc3 d4

9.Nce2 Be7 10.Qd2 h3! 11.Bf1 Bg4! 0–1

Bloodgood,C-Lewis,R/Norfolk 1960 (11) with

strong advantage to Black

this in several ways. First, the Black KRP is a

problem for the second player to defend. Add to

this the delays Black faces in developing his

King-side because of the "Spike" pawn while

White can free his pieces easily. 6...-- [6...Ne7

7.e4 Ng6 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Ne2 Nc6 10.c3 Qd7 11.Be3

Rf8 12.Nd2 0–0–0 13.0–0–0 Kb8 14.Qg2 f5 15.gxf6

Rxf6 16.Bg5 Rf7 17.Bxe7 Ncxe7!? (17...Ngxe7 is

better with the Queen-Knight better placed for a

Q-side attack) 18.c4! Rg8 and White ha some

advantage.]

Variation "C5"

1.g4 e5 2.d3 Nc6

This seemingly logical development does little to

counter-act White's basic King-side threats.

3.c4 d6

[3...d5!? 4.Bg2! (Not 4.cxd5 Qxd5!) 4...dxc4

5.Bxc6+ bxc6 6.Qa4!]

4.e4 h6

[Grob-Unknown, continued 4...g5? 5.Be3 Nh6

6.f3 Nd4 7.Nc3 c6 8.Qd2 f6 9.h4 Nf7 10.Bxd4

exd4 11.Nce2 c5 12.hxg5 fxg5 13.Ng3 Bg7 14.0–

0–0 with advantage to White.]

5.Nc3 Nge7 6.h4 Ng6 7.Bh3

Black is virtually committed to exchanging his

King-Knight, after which White has a strong

attack on the King-side.

7...Nf4 8.Be3 Nb4 9.Bxf4 exf4 10.Qa4+ Nc6

11.Nf3 Bd7 12.Qb3 b6 13.0–0–0 Be7 14.Nd5 Be6

15.Qb5 Bd7 16.g5 Bxh3 17.Rxh3 Qd7 18.Nxe7

Nxe7 19.Qxd7+ Kxd7 20.Re1 Ng6 21.h5 Ne7

22.Rh4 Raf8 23.Rxf4 hxg5 24.Nxg5 f6 25.Nf3 g6

26.h6 g5 27.Rg4 Ng6 28.Kd2 Rf7 29.Nd4 Rfh7

30.Nf5 Ne5 31.Rg3 Nf7 32.Rh3 c5 33.a4

Bloodgood-D. Stroemer, 1972

(16 g5 and 18 Nxe7!? are suspect!) ½–½

Variation "D5"

1.g4 e5 2.d3! Be7

This counters the threat of g5 very effectively, and

although this line has not been explored in any

detail, the potential is definitely there.

3.Nf3

[3.e4 d5 4.Qe2 d4 5.h3 Bg5 6.Nd2 Be6 7.Ngf3 Bf4

8.Nb3 Bxc1 9.Nxc1 Qd6 10.Qd2 Nd7 11.Ne2 Ne7

12.a3 ½–½ Grob,H-Bruckmann/corr 1965 (12)

with advantage to Black.]

3...d6 4.h3

[Not 4.g5? h6!]

4...f5

[Not so good is 4...h5 , when 5.g5! creates some

problems.]

5.g5

he position is certainly far from clear, but it is

equally apparent that Black will encounter some

difficulty on the King-side.

5...f4 6.h4 Bg4 7.Nbd2 h6 8.Bg2 hxg5 9.hxg5

Rxh1+ 10.Bxh1 Nc6!?

[10...Bxg5! 11.Nxg5 Qxg5 12.Ne4 Qh5 13.Kd2

Nc6 with advantage to Black.]

11.Ne4 Bxf3 12.Bxf3 Bxg5 13.Bh5+ Kd7 14.e3

Bh6 15.Qg4+ Ke7 16.exf4 Nd4 17.fxe5 Nxc2+

18.Kd1 Nxa1 19.Bxh6 gxh6 20.Qg7+

Bloodgood-H. Fuller, 1973Black resigned

Variation "E5"

1.g4 e5

[1...e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Rg1 h6 5.h4 Nc6 6.c3

Be7 7.g5 hxg5 8.hxg5 Ne4 9.g6 f6 10.Nbd2 f5

11.Nxe4 fxe4 12.Ne5 Nxe5 13.dxe5 Rh5 14.Bf4

Bg5 15.e3 Bxf4 16.Qxh5 1–0 Grob,H-

Schaufelberger,H/corr 1964 (16)] 2.d3 Bc5

This is Black's most aggressive reply and must be

treated with respect. Several lines of play are

good for White at this point.

3.h4

[3.e3 d5 4.Bg2 Be6 5.h4 Nc6 (5...c6!) 6.Nd2 Nge7

7.c4 dxc4!? (7...0–0) 8.dxc4 Qd3 9.Be4 Qd7 10.g5

0–0–0 11.a3 a6 12.Qa4 Nb8 13.Qc2 Ng6 14.b4

Be7 15.Bb2 h6 16.Ngf3 hxg5 17.h5 Nh4 18.Nxe5

Qd6? 19.c5 1–0 Bloodgood,C-Coakley,R/Virginia

1973 (19) Black resigned.;

An interesting gambit was introduced in Grob-

Hirael, corr., which continued 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.e4 Nf6

5.g5 Ng4 6.d4 exd4 (not 6...Nxd4? 7.Nxd4 with

the N at g4 hanging) 7.h3 Nge5 8.Nxe5 Nxe5 9.f4

Nc6 10.Bg2 with ample compensation for the

pawn.; Also good is 3.e3 d5 4.Bg2 after which:

Grob-H. Schaufelberger, corr., continued 4...Ne7

(4...f5? 5.gxf5 Bxf5 6.Qf3 Ne7 7.Qh5+ g6 8.Qh6

with a tactical finish; Grob) 5.c4 0–0 (5...dxc4

6.Qa4+ and 7 Qxc4 next) 6.cxd5 Nxd5 7.a3 c6

8.h4 f5 9.g5 f4 10.e4 Nc7 11.Nf3 Qd6 12.Qc2 Nd7

13.Nbd2 b5 14.b4 Bb6 15.Bb2 and White has the

initiative.]

3...d5 4.g5

[4.e3 f5 5.gxf5 Bxf5 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Qe2 Nc6 8.a3

Qd7 9.b4 Be7 10.Bb2 a6 11.Nd2 Nf6 1–0 Grob,H-

Debrunner/corr 1965 (38) with a sharp position

that is very double-edged.]

4...Bg4 5.c4! Ne7

5...dxc4 6.Qa4+ Bd7 7.Qxc4 Bb6 8.Bg2 Bc6 9.Nf3

Nd7 10.Bd2 Ne7 11.Bc3 Ng6 12.Qg4 Qe7 13.h5

Bxf3 14.Bxf3 Nf4 15.Bxb7 Rd8 16.Bc6 0–0!?

17.Bxd7 Qxd7 (17...Rxd7!) 18.Qxd7 Rxd7

19.Bxe5 Ne6 20.f4 f6 21.gxf6 gxf6 22.Rg1+ Kf7

23.Bc3 Nxf4 24.h6 Rg8 25.Rxg8 Kxg8 26.Bxf6

Kf7 27.Bg5 Ne6 28.Bd2 Nd4 29.Kd1 Re7 30.Nc3

Ba5 31.Ne4 Bxd2 32.Kxd2 a5 33.Rg1 Kf8 34.Rg5

a4 35.Ra5 a3 36.Rxa3 Re6 37.Ra8+ Ke7 38.Ng3

Rg6 39.Rh8 Rxg3 40.Rxh7+ Kd6 41.Rh8 Rh3

42.h7 Kc5 43.b4+ Kc6 44.Rd8 1–0 Bloodgood,C-

Monroe,F/Virginia 1973 (44) Black resigned.]

6.Bg2 Be6 7.Qb3 Bb6

White clearly has the initiative, but there are

complications.

8.Nc3 dxc4? 9.Qb5+ Nbc6 10.dxc4 a6 11.Qa4 0–

0 12.Bh3 Bxh3 13.Nxh3 f5 14.c5 Ba7 15.Qc4+

Kh8 16.h5 Nd4 17.Nd1 Qe8 18.h6 g6 19.f4 Rd8

20.fxe5 Nec6 21.Nf4 Nb4!? [21...Nxe5!?] 22.e6

Nbc2+ 23.Kf2 Nxa1 24.e3 Nc6 25.Qc3+ Nd4

26.exd4 Qe7 27.d5+ Kg8 28.Be3 b6 29.Nxg6

hxg6 30.h7+ Bloodgood- T. Sanderson,

1973Black resigned.

Variation "F5"

1.g4 e5 2.d3 d6

This passive line should offer White no problems.

Grob suggests:

3.e4 Nc6 4.h3 g6 5.Bg2 h5 6.g5 Nge7 7.Nc3 Be6

8.Nd5 Bg7 9.c3

with White standing better..

Variation "G5"

1.g4 e5 2.d3 d5

This effectively hinders the White thrust e4, while

also directly countering White's initiative on the

King-side. Not to be overlooked is the possiblility

of Black developing a Queen-side attack.

3.Bg2

[3.g5? Be7 (3...h6!? 4.Nf3 hxg5 5.Nxe5! f6? 6.Ng6

Rh6 7.Nxf8 with an advantage to White; Grob-

Unknown) 4.h4 h6 favors Black.]

3...c6

[3...a5!? 4.e4! dxe4 5.Bxe4 Nf6 (5...Qh4? 6.h3

Nf6? 7.Nf3 Bxg4 8.Nxh4 Bxd1 9.Kxd1 and White

wins a piece) 6.Bf3 Be7 7.Nc3 c6 8.h3 0–0 9.Nge2

Re8 10.Ng3 Bb4 11.Bg5 Be7 (11...h6!? 12.Bd2

Nh7 13.h4 Be7 14.g5 offering the pawn for an

open Rook-file; Grob) 12.Bxf6 Bxf6 13.Nce4 Bh4

14.Qd2 Bxg3 15.Nxg3 Nd7 16.0–0–0 c5 17.Kb1

Ra6 18.g5 Ree6 19.Bd5 Red6 20.Bc4 Ra7

21.Ne4 Rb6 22.Rdg1 Nf8 23.Nxc5 a4 24.Qe3 Ng6

25.h4 Qd4 26.Qxd4 exd4 27.Re1 Be6 28.Nxe6

fxe6 29.Bxe6+ Kh8 30.Bc8 Nf8 31.Re8 Kg8

32.Rhe1 Raa6 33.R1e7 h6 34.f4 1–0 Grob,H-

Rutter/corr 1965 (34) Black resigned.;

3...Bc5 4.g5 Nc6 5.Nc3 Be6 6.e4 Nge7 7.h4 Qd7

8.a3 0–0–0 9.exd5 (9.Bh3!?) 9...Nxd5 10.Ne4 Be7

11.Ne2 f5 12.N4c3 h6 13.Ng3? (13.g6!) 13...Nxc3

14.bxc3 Bd5 15.f3 f4 0–1 Grob,H-Tien/corr 1963

(15) with solid advantage to Black.;

After 3...Bxg4 4.c4 Bb4+ (4...c6 5.cxd5 cxd5

6.Qb3 Ne7 (Blocking in the King-bishop) 7.Qxb7

Nbc6 8.Bxd5 Qxd5 9.Qxa8+ Bc8 10.Nf3 Kd7

(unfortunately there is no Queen trap here)

11.Nc3 Qa5 12.Bd2 f6 13.Ne4 Qb5 14.b4! Nd5

15.a4 Qb6 16.b5 Ncb4 17.a5 Qc7 18.0–0 Nf4

19.Bxf4 exf4 20.b6 axb6 21.axb6 Qxb6 22.Ra7+

Kd8 23.Rc1 Nc2 24.Ra2 Ne3 25.Qxc8+ Ke7

26.Rc7+ 1–0 Grob,H-Kellenberger,S/corr 1965

(26) Black resigns.; And on 4...Be6 5.Qb3 b6

6.cxd5 Bd7 7.Nc3 a5 8.Be3 Bd6 9.Ne4 Bb4+

10.Nc3 Bd6 11.a3 a4 12.Qc4 with some

advantage; analysis by Grob.) 5.Nd2 c6 6.cxd5

Ne7 7.dxc6 Nbxc6 8.a3 Bxd2+ 9.Bxd2 0–0 10.Nf3

Qd7 11.Be3 f6 ½–½ Grob,H-Aebi/corr 1965 (11)]

4.e4

[4.h3 Ne7 5.Nf3 Ng6 6.Nc3 h6? (6...f5! with an

immediate advantage to Black) 7.e3 (7.e4!)

7...Bd6 8.e4 1–0 Grob,H-Stingelin/corr 1965 (41)

and while White has slightly the better position, its

meaning is wasted.]

4...Bc5! [After 4...dxe4 5.Bxe4 : 5...Nf6 (Better is

5...Be6 6.h3 Be7 7.Be3 Nf6 8.Nc3 Nbd7 9.Bf3

with an unclear position.) 6.Bf3 h6 (6...e4?

7.Qe2!) 7.Nc3 , etc] 5.Qe2 [The thrust 5.h4 is

risky, e.g. 5...dxe4 6.Bxe4 Nf6 7.Bf3 Qd4 8.Qe2

Bxg4 with a solid advantage to Black.]

5...d4

White has a very minimal edge, and the position is

quite double-edged.

6.g5 Be6 7.f4 exf4 8.Bxf4 Ne7 9.Nd2 Bb4 10.a3

Ba5 11.b4 Bb6 12.Bh3 Bxh3 13.Nxh3 0–0

14.Nc4 Bc7 15.0–0–0 Bxf4+ 16.Nxf4 Ng6 17.Rdf1

Nxf4 18.Rxf4 Nd7 19.Rhf1 Qe7 20.Qg4 Ne5

21.Nxe5 Qxe5 22.h4 a5 23.Rf5 Qe6 24.bxa5

Rxa5 25.Rxf7 Qxf7 26.Rxf7 Rxf7 27.Qc8+ Rf8

28.Qe6+ Kh8 29.Qe7 Rg8 30.h5 Raa8 31.e5 b5

32.e6 b4 33.Qxb4 Bloodgood-J. Boothe, 1973

Black resigned.

Part 7 (1... Various)

For all practical purposes, 1... d5 or 1... e5 are the

only moves which present White with any

immediate problems. This does not mean that

White need not be concerned with other possible

answers, for virtually any move can develop into a

serious test. The lines considered in this part are

simply not encountered as often, and Black is

generally conceding the initiative early in the

game. The variations considered here are: "A6"

1... Nf6; "B6" 1...h5; "C6" 1... g5; "D6" 1... g6; "E"

1... b5; "F6" 1... c5; "G6" 1... c6; "H6" 1... d6; and

"I6" 1... e6.

Variation "A6"

1.g4 Nf6!?

This is not very effective, and is not recommeded.

2.g5 Nd5

[2...Ne4? 3.d3 Nd6 4.Bg2 g6 5.c4 c5 6.Nc3 Bg7

7.e4 Nc6 8.Nge2 e5 9.Nd5 0–0 10.h4 Ne7?

(10...Ne8) 11.Nf6+ Kh8 12.Nc3 Ne8 13.Nxe8

Rxe8 14.h5 1–0 Grob,H-Monney,E/corr 1964 (29)

with a strong attack.; No better is 2...Nh5 3.d3 e5

4.e4 g6 (4...Nf4 5.Bxf4 exf4 6.Qg4!) 5.Be2 Ng7

6.Nf3 d6 7.d4 with an advantage for White; Grob.]

3.d4 e6 4.a3 Be7 5.e4 Nb6 6.f4

White clearly has the better chances.

Variation "B6"

1.g4 h5

An immediate challenge to White's K-side

ambition which is very double-edged.

2.g5

Of doubtful value is 2.gxh5!? which does nothing

for White and merely opens the Rook-file for

Black.

2...h4

[After 2...e5 3.d4 (3.h4 d5 4.Bg2 Ne7 5.c4 dxc4

6.Qc2 c6 7.Qxc4 Be6 8.Qc2! (8.Qc3 Ng6 9.d3

Qb6!) 8...Na6 9.a3 Qc7 10.d3 f5 (10...Nf5 11.Nf3

Nc5 12.Nbd2 a5 13.b3 f6 14.Bb2 a4 15.b4 Nb3

16.Nxb3 Bxb3 17.Qc3 Ne7 18.e4 Ng6 19.Bc1 Bd6

20.gxf6 gxf6 21.Bh3 Qf7 22.Be3 Ba2 23.Rg1 Rg8

24.Ke2 Rd8 with an unclear position; Grob-

Wettstein, corr.) 11.b4 0–0–0 12.Nc3 Nd5 13.Nxd5

(13.Nh3 Nxc3 14.Qxc3 Rd4 15.f4 Nxb4 16.fxe5

Qxe5 17.Nf4 Bc5 18.Rh3 Rxd3 19.Rxd3 Nxd3+

20.Qxd3 Qxa1 0–1 Grob,H-Wettstein,M/corr 1964

(20)) 13...Bxd5 14.Bxd5 Rxd5 15.Bb2 Nxb4!?

(This is not good as it opens lines to the Black

King.) 16.axb4 Bxb4+ 17.Kf1 ½–½ Grob,H-

Wettstein,M/corr 1966 (62) with a winning

advantage to White to White.) 3...exd4 4.Qxd4

Nc6 5.Qe4+ Qe7 6.Bg2 d6 7.Nc3 f5 8.Qxe7+

Ngxe7 9.h4 Bd7 10.Be3 0–0–0 11.Nh3 Be6 12.Nf4

Bf7 13.0–0 d5 14.Bc5 b6 15.Bxe7 Nxe7 16.Rad1

c6 ½–½ Bloodgood,C-Buntin,L/corr

1974/Megacorr (16) with some advantage to

White.]

3.d4 d6

[3...c5 4.d5 g6 5.e4 d6 6.h3 f5 7.f3 e5 8.dxe6

Bxe6 9.exf5 Bxf5 10.Bc4 Ne7 11.Nc3 Bg7 12.Nd5

Nxd5 13.Qxd5 (13.Bxd5 is less complicated.)

13...Qe7+ 14.Kd1 Nc6 15.c3 0–0–0 16.Rh2 Rde8

17.Re2 Qd7 18.Bf4 Ne5 19.Bxe5 Rxe5 20.Qf7

Qxf7 21.Bxf7 Rxe2 22.Kxe2 Be5 ½–½ Grob,H-

Wettstein,M/corr 1964 (22)]

4.Qd3 g6 5.Bg2 Nc6

[5...Bg7 6.h3 Nc6 7.c3 e5 8.d5 Nce7 9.e4 f5

10.gxf6 Bxf6 11.Nf3 Rh5 12.Be3 g5 13.Nh2! Ng6

14.Bf3 Rh7 15.Bg4! Nf4 16.Bxf4 exf4 17.Nd2 c5

18.dxc6 bxc6 19.0–0–0 Rc7 20.Rhe1 Kf8 21.Bxc8

Qxc8 22.Qxd6+ Be7 23.Qg6 Qxh3? ( a costly

"gift") 24.Ndf3 Rd8 25.Ne5 1–0 Grob,H-

Wettstein,M/corr 1964 (25) Black resigned.]

6.c3 Bd7 7.Na3

White has an advantage.

Variation "C6"

1.g4 g5!?

This allows White to hold the initiative for a long

time.

2.h4! e6

[Not 2...f6? 3.d4 Bh6 4.Nf3! ; Grob.]

3.Nf3!

[Grob-Unknown, continued 3.hxg5 Qxg5 4.e4 d6

5.d3 Qe7 6.g5 d5 7.Bg2 d4 8.f4 e5 after which

White obtains a lasting advantage with 9.f5 Grob-

Unknown]

3...Be7

[3...gxh4 4.Rxh4 is good for White.]

4.hxg5 Bxg5 5.Nxg5 Qxg5 6.e4 Nf6

This move seems sharper than it is; Grob.

7.d4

Black now has an awkwardly placed Queen and

nothing is seriously threatened. 7...-- [If 7...Qg6

8.f3 is good; or if 7...Qxg4? 8.Qxg4 Nxg4 9.e5 h5

10.f3 Nh6 11.Rxh5 and Black drops a piece.]

Variation "D6"

1.g4 g6

Should the Grob become a popular opening, this

defense will undoubtedly become a major line, but

for the present it is still among the seldom played

variations.

2.Bg2 h6

[Bloodgood-S. Patterson, APCT 75-r-7,

continued 2...Bg7 3.c4 d6 4.Nc3 Nf6 5.h3 (5.g5!)

5...0–0 6.d4 c6 7.Be3 a6 8.Qb3 Nbd7 9.Rd1

(9.Nf3!) 9...Qb6 10.Nf3 Qxb3!? (this is giving

White an open Queen/Rook-file with pawns

handy for levers) 11.axb3 with advantage to

White.]

3.e4 Bg7 4.d4 e6 5.Nf3 d5

[5...Nf6 6.Ne5 d6 7.Nd3!]

6.Nbd2 dxe4 7.Nxe4 Nf6

[7...f5 8.gxf5 gxf5 (8...exf5!) 9.Nc5 Nc6 10.c3 b6

11.Nh4! Qd6 12.Nd3 Bd7 13.Ng6 Rh7 14.Bf4! e5

15.Ngxe5 1–0 Grob,H-Bartschiger/corr 1967 (15)

with a winning attack.]

8.Nxf6+ Bxf6

The position is not clear.

Variation "E6"

1.g4 b5!?

This counter play on the long diagonal is hardly

good for Black.

2.Bg2 c6 3.a4! d5 [White handles 3...Qb6 with

4.axb5 Qxb5 5.Nc3; and 3...Qa5 with 4.b3

followed by Bb2.]

4.axb5 Nf6 5.c4!

White has much the better of this!

Variation "F6"

1.g4 c5

This line can transpose into a Sicilian Defense,

but it not likely to create the same problems for

White.

2.Bg2 Nc6 3.e4 e5 4.d3 Nge7 5.h4 d5 6.Nc3 --

[6...dxe4 7.Nxe4 b6 (7...Nd4!?) 8.Be3 Bb7 9.Ng3

Qd7 (9...Qc7!) 10.Be4 Nd5 11.Bd2 Be7 12.Bf5

Qc7 13.Nf3 which favors White.]

Variation "G6"

1.g4 c6

This is decidedly inferior to 1...d5.

2.c4

[2.Bg2 e6 3.d3 Nf6? (3...d5!) 4.g5 Ng4? (4...Ng8

was best.) 5.d4! c5 6.h3 1–0 Grob,H-

Hasselblatt/corr 1964 (21) and White wins the

piece.; 2.Bg2 d5 transposes to Part II.]

2...d5

[2...g5!? 3.d4 h6 4.e4 e6 5.d5 b6? (5...d6!) 6.Qd4

f6 7.d6 c5 8.Qd3 b5 9.e5 Bg7 10.Bg2 Nc6

11.Bxc6 dxc6 12.cxb5 Bb7 13.Be3! cxb5 14.f3 c4

15.Qg6+ Kf8 16.Bc5 1–0 Grob,H-Steucheli/corr

1964 (23) with a winning advantage.]

3.Qb3

[Not 3.cxd5? Qxd5 with 4.-- Bxg4 next.] 3...Qc7

[Or 3...dxc4 4.Qxc4 with a position similar to those

in Part II, Variation "A" without being down a

pawn.]

4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Nc3

[Not 5.Bg2 Qxc1+]

5...e6 6.d4

White has some advantage, and somewhat more

freedom for his pieces.

Variation "H6"

1.g4 d6

This is passive and while not exactly bad, it hardly

poses any major threats.

2.Bg2 e5

[2...a6 3.h3 h5 4.g5 e5 5.d3 f6 6.gxf6 Nxf6 7.Nf3

Be7 8.Ng5 h4 9.c4 Nh5 10.Ne4 Bf5 11.Qb3 ½–½

Grob,H-Gabreilli/corr 1964 (11) With a solid

advantage to White.;

2...c6 3.h3 h6 4.c4 e5 5.Nc3 Be6 (5...f5 is more

aggressive, but unlikely from a player choosing

such a passive line) 6.b3 Be7 7.Nf3 Nf6 8.d3

Nbd7 9.e4 d5 10.exd5 cxd5 11.Qe2 Bb4 12.Bd2

Qa5 13.Rc1 e4 14.dxe4 dxe4 15.Nxe4 Nxe4

16.Qxe4 Nc5 17.Qc2 Rd8 18.Bxb4 Qxb4+ 19.Qc3

Nd3+ 20.Kf1 1–0 Grob,H-Stoll/corr 1966 (49) and

White has a pawn with a better position.;

After 2...Nc6 3.h3 (Grob-St. Willi, Corr.,

Continued 3.g5 f6? (3...e5!) 4.h4 g6 5.d4 h6

6.Qd3 f5 7.f4 Qd7 8.d5 Nb4? (8...Nd8) 9.Qc3 a5

10.Qxh8 Nxc2+ 11.Kf1 Kf7 12.Qh7+ Bg7 13.h5

gxh5 14.Rxh5 Kf8 15.gxh6 e6 16.dxe6 Qe7

17.hxg7+ Black resigned.)

3...g6 4.d4 Bg7 5.c3 e6 6.e4 Nge7 7.Ne2 0–0

8.Be3 (This is better than an immediate 8.h4)

8...b6 9.Nd2 Bb7 10.Ng3 f5 11.f4 e5 12.dxe5

Nxe5 13.0–0 (13.fxe5 f4!) 13...Nd3 14.exf5 Bxg2

15.Kxg2 Qd7 16.Nf3 Qb5 17.Rb1 Nd5 18.Qd2

Rae8 19.Nd4 Nxe3+ 20.Qxe3 Qxb2+ 21.Rxb2

Rxe3 22.Re2 Bxd4 23.cxd4 Rxe2+ 24.Nxe2 gxf5

25.Kf3 fxg4+ 26.hxg4 1–0 Grob,H-Heinrich/corr

1965 (40) at which point Black can play 26...d5

with advantage.]

3.d3

[3.c4 c6 4.h3 f5 5.e3 g6 6.Nc3 Be6 7.Qb3 ½–½

Bloodgood,C-Jackson,R/corr 1972 (7) and White

stands a little better.]

3...c6 4.e4 d5 5.h3

Black has lost a tempo

5...d4!?

[5...g6!]

6.Nf3 f6 7.Nh4 g5?

[7...g6!]

8.Nf5 Ne7 9.h4 Ng6 10.hxg5 fxg5 11.Rh5 Nf4

12.Bxf4 exf4 13.Nd2 Bxf5

[13...Be6!] 14.exf5 h6?

[14...Bb4]

15.Qe2+

with a solid advantage to White.Grob-Suhner,

Corr.

Variation "I6"

1.g4 e6

This apparently Innocent defense is not simple for

White to handle, and several pitfalls must be

examined.

2.d3

[2.Bg2!? h5! 3.h3 hxg4 4.hxg4 Rxh1 5.Bxh1 Qh4

6.Bf3 Nf6 7.e4 d6 8.d4 e5 9.g5 Nh7 10.dxe5 Nxg5

11.Bxg5 Qxg5 12.Ne2 Qxe5 13.Nbc3 Nc6 14.Nd5

Kd8 15.Nec3 Nd4 16.Ne3 Nxf3+ 17.Qxf3 f6 18.0–

0–0 Be6 19.Kb1 Ke7 20.Ned5+ Kd7 21.Nf4 Bf7

22.Qg4+ Ke7 23.Ncd5+ Kd8 24.Ng6 Bxg6

25.Qxg6 c6 26.f4 Qe6 27.Ne3 Kc7 0–1

Bloodgood,C-Stroemer,D/Virginia 1972 (27) with

advantage to Black.;

2.d4!? d5! 3.Nf3 (better is 3.Bg2 c5 4.c3 Nc6

5.Nf3 Nf6 , and even then, Black has the initiative;

Grob; 3.c4! dxc4 4.Qa4+ Bd7 5.Qxc4 Bc6 6.Bg2

Nd7 favors White) 3...Nf6?

a) 3...c5! 4.e3 Nc6 5.h3 Nf6 6.Nbd2 h6 7.c3 Bd7

8.Bg2 Qc7 9.0–0 0–0–0 (9...Bd6 is

recommended by Grob) 10.dxc5 Bxc5 11.b4

Bd6 12.Bb2 Ne5 13.Nxe5 Bxe5 14.a4 Ne4

15.Nxe4 dxe4 16.Qb3 f5 17.b5 g5 18.a5 a6

19.c4 Bxb2 20.Qxb2 h5 21.gxf5 exf5 22.Rab1

Rh6 23.Qg7 Qd6 24.bxa6 Qxa6 25.f3 Rg6

26.Qb2 Bc6 27.fxe4 fxe4 28.Qe5 1–0 Grob,H-

Ruegg/corr 1964 (39) with advantage to

White.;

b) 3...c5! 4.c3 Nc6 5.Bg2 cxd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+ with

initiative for Black.; 4.Rg1 h6 5.h4 Nc6

(5...Nbd7!) 6.c3 Be7 7.g5 hxg5 8.hxg5 Ne4

9.g6 f6 10.Nbd2 f5 11.Nxe4 fxe4 12.Ne5 Nxe5

13.dxe5 Rh5!? 14.Bf4 Bg5? 15.e3! Bxf4

16.Qxh5 1–0 Grob,H-Schaufelberger,H/corr

1964 (16) with a winning advantage for

White.]

2...d5 3.Bg2

[3.Nc3 c5 (3...Bb4 4.Bd2!) 4.e4 Nc6 (4...dxe4

5.dxe4 Qxd1+ 6.Nxd1 Nf6 7.f3; 4...d4 5.Nce2 e5

6.Ng3 with K-side initiative; Grob.) ] 3...c5 4.c4

White has the initiative and potential threats on

both flanks!

4...d4 5.Qb3 Qc7 6.Nd2 Nc6 7.Ne4 Nf6 8.g5

Nxe4 9.Bxe4 Be7 10.h4 h6 11.Nh3 hxg5

12.hxg5 e5

13.Bg2 g6 14.Bd2 Qb6!? 15.0–0–0 Qxb3 16.axb3

a5 17.f4 Bxh3? 18.Rxh3 Rxh3 19.Bxh3 exf4

20.Bxf4 a4 21.bxa4 Rxa4 22.Kb1 f6? 23.gxf6

Bxf6 24.Rg1 Kf7 25.Bd7 Ra6 26.Bc8 Rb6

27.Bc7 Rb4 28.Rf1 Ke7 29.Rh1 Ne5 30.Bxe5

Bxe5? 31.Rh7+ Kd6 32.Bxb7 g5 33.Bd5 g4?

34.Rh6+ Kc7 35.Rc6+ Kd7 36.Rxc5 g3 37.Bc6+

Ke6 38.Bd7+ Kf6 39.Bh3 Bloodgood-T.

Sanderson, 1973; Black resigned.

OPENING INDEX

Part 1 (The Gambit Accepted)

Variation "A" (3...c6 4. cxd5!)

Variation "B" (3...Nf6!? 4. cxd5 Nxd5)

Variation "C" (3...e6 4. Qb3 Qc8)

Variation "D" (3...e5 4. cxd5

Part 2 (The Long Diagonal Reinforced)

Variation "A1" (3. c4!? dxc4 4. b3!?)

Variation "B1" (3. h3 e5 4. d3)

Variation "C1"( 3. g5 e5 4. h4!)

Part 3 (The Open Defense)

Variation "A2"

Variation "B2" (3. c4 Be6!?)

Variation "C2" (3. c4 d4)

Variation "D2" (3. c4 dxc4)

Variation "D2a" (4... c6 5. Qxc4 Be6!)

Variation "D2b" (4... Qd4)

Variation "E"

Variation "E1" (6. Nc3 d4)

Variation "E2" (6...Nc6)

Variation "E3" (6...e4!?)

Variation "E3a"

Variation "E3b"

Variation "E3c"

Part 4 (Other lines after 1... d5)

Variation "A3" 1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 e6

Variation "B3" 1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 b5

Part 5: (1... e5)

Variation "A4"

Part 6 (1...e5 2.d3)

Part 5 covers the alternatives for White on the second move, and while White can safely play 2. Bg2, the

above move offers the first player a bit more initiative. the variations after 2. d3 which are covered here are:

"A5" ... h6; "B5" 2... h5; "C5"

Part 7 (Various replies)

Variation "A6" (1.g4 Nf6!?)

Variation “B6” (1.g4 h5)

Variation "C6" (1.g4 g5!?)

Variation "D6" (1.g4 g6)

Variation "E6" (1.g4 b5!?)

Variation "F6" (1.g4 c5)

Variation "G6" (1.g4 c6)

Variation "H6" (1.g4 d6)

Variation “H7” (1.g4 e6)

Biography of Claude F. Bloodgood III

Claude Frizzel Bloodgood was born Klaus Frizzel Bluttgutt III on July 14, 1937 and died August 4, 2001. Bloodgood

was a controversial player. As a young man, he got into trouble with the law, and was arrested several times. He

received the death sentence being convicted of murdering his mother but later commuted.

While in prison, he was a very active player, playing a large number of correspondence games and rated games with

other inmates. Eventually by manipulating the ratings system in use at the time he became one of the highest rated

players in the U.S.

Bloodgood’s father, Claude Sr., had died, leaving his son $100. Bloodgood felt there was much more money due him

and that somehow his stepmother had cheated him of it. In the midst of the 1968 forgery trial, in full rage and before the

entire courtroom, Bloodgood threatened to kill her if he were convicted. He was convicted, served one year, and shortly

after his release in 1968 made good on his threat

While in prison, Bloodgood played thousands of correspondence games. At the same time he played thousands of rated

games against other inmates and published three books on chess openings the best known being The Tactical Grob.

The book had 184 of Bloodgood’s games using 1.g4. He also published The Nimzovich Attack: The Norfolk Gambis,

and The Blackburne-Hartlaub Gambit. These books were published by Kenneth Smith’s Chess Digest.

In prison Bloodgood set-up the Virginia Penitentiary Chess Program (VAPEN) in 1972. Powhatan inmates had the

opportunity to learn chess. In 1974, on the pretext of organizing details for sending a team of prisoners to an “outside”

chess tournament , Bloodgood and another convicted murderer were let out on a day-long furlough in the custody of a

single guard .

By the early 1990’s, Bloodgood had managed to reestablish himself as a trusted inmate and he resurrected VAPEN

chess program. With state money, Bloodgood purchased chess sets and registered about 50 prisoners with the USCF

and then began playing rated games. He also organized a few tournaments which were open to outsiders and so was able

to add some legitimacy to the ratings.

This continued for several years and by 1996 his rating was 2702 making Bloodgood the second-highest rated player in

the nation. It’s difficult to know Bloodgood’s true strength and it’s been estimated at anywhere between 2100 and 2400.

Bloodgood denied these accusations and said that he played chess in the only competitions available to him, prison

tournaments, and won almost every game because he was the strongest player in the prison system. As his rating rose,

he wrote the USCF to warn them that its system was prone to "closed pool" ratings inflation.

Of course the USCF ignored his letters until he qualified for the US Championship His rating caused a debate in the

USCF and they ultimately deleted his rating.

Bloodgood made a lot of wild claims. He claimed to have been born in 1924 and asked for a furlough based on old age.

He claimed to have been born in Germany or Mexico and asked to be extradited. He also claimed to have been a Nazi

spy during World War II. He often gave interviews, trying to convince the interviewer that he was completely innocent

of his crimes and a victim of mistaken identity. Bloodgood. He also made claims to have played many Hollywood

celebrities. He died in Powhatan Correctional Center of lung cancer on August 4, 2001.

During the period from 1957 to 1961 Bloodgood was a very active in the tournament scene of Virginia. His list of OTB

victories is impressive

Virginia Open (1957, 1958)

Norfolk Open (1958, 1959, 1960, 1961)

Norfolk Chess Club Championship (1957, 1958, 1959, 1961)

Norfolk USO Invitational (36 of 60 monthly tournaments)

Camp Elmore Championship (1957)

FMFLant Championship (1957)

Oceana NAS Open (1959)

In 1958 he was a key organizer for the All-Service Postal Chess Club (ASPCC) tournament. In speed chess Bloodgood

was practically unbeatable.

From 1997 until his death in 2001 he was confined to the Medical Unit in Powhatan Prison, suffering from a steadily

worsening lung condition. He told a reporter “I can’t walk four or five steps before I start wheezing like a son-of-a-

bitch.”

Despite his illness Bloodgood continued, propped up in bed or sitting in his wheelchair, to write and play

correspondence chess until three months before his death.

.