gravitational lensing

44
Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 1 Lecture 7: Strong Gravitational Lensing 1. Light Deflection by Masses 2. The Lense Equation 3. Lense Models and Geometric Lense Solutions 4. Caustics and Critical Lines 5. Gravitational Lensing by Galaxy Clusters

Upload: rebecca-webb

Post on 23-Apr-2017

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 1

Lecture 7: Strong Gravitational Lensing

1.  Light Deflection by Masses 2.  The Lense Equation 3.  Lense Models and Geometric Lense Solutions 4.  Caustics and Critical Lines 5.  Gravitational Lensing by Galaxy Clusters

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 2

HST image of Abell 1689

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 3

First „Gravitational Arc“ discovered in the Galaxy Cluster A370

Abell 370 at z = 0.375

Background galaxy at z = 0.725

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 4

Discovery of Gravitational Lenses

•  Consideration of Newtonian light deflection of stars: Soldner (1804)

•  Deduced from equivalence principle: Einstein (1911); in GR Faktor 2 ! (1915)

•  Light deflection observed at the sun (eclipse) δ = 1.7“ Dyson et al. 1920 •  Zwicky 1937 suggests galaxies as gravitational lenses and lense-telescopes •  Refsdal 1964 suggestion measurement of H0 through the time difference in the light path of multiple images of lensed galaxies

•  First gravitational lense discovered (multiple imafes of a QSO) Walsh et al. 1979

QSO 0957+561 δ = 6“ •  Radio Einstein ring Hewitt et al. (1987)

•  First gravitationally lensing galaxy cluster discovered, A370 Soucail (1987)

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 5

Interest in Gravitational Lenses

•  Gravitational lenses can act as light amplifiers „gravitational lense telescopes“

•  An analysis of the lensing effect allows to determine the mass of the lense (galaxy, galaxy cluster, or microlensing object) •  Dependence of the lense equation on cosmologiocal parameters allows cosmological parameter constraints froma detailed lensing analysis ( (i) H0 from light path diffferences, Ωm and Λ from the cosmological model dependence of the diameter distance)

• Gravitational lensing studies of the LSS provides a „direct“ measure of the dark matter distribution

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 6

Light Deflection of a Point Mass

Classical treatment of the gravitational deflection of a massive particle with velocity v = c. We have already solved this problem in the consideration of two body relaxation :

The General Relativistic result is:

In GR the deflection angle is twice as large as in the classical case (this is due to the space curvature near the the deflecting mass)

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 7

Thin Mass Sheet Approximation

•  Light deflection by a massive object e.g. a galaxy cluster Simplification: the deflection happens only over a very short distance compared to the total light path of the light rays deflection considered in the „lense plane“

•  We only observe small deflection angles such that the process of multiple deflection is simply additive. •  The mass distribution of the lense is projected into the lense plane:

•  the deflection is then determined by the surface mass distribution in the lense plane:

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 8

Light Deflection of an Azimutally Symmetric Mass Distribution

For an azmutially symmetric mass distribution in the lense plane (e.g projected sperically symmetric distribution) the light deflection at impact parameter ξ is the same as for a point mass with the same mass value in the center of symmetry :

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 9

The Lense equation

observer lense

source

Dls Dol Dos

image

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 10

The Lense Equation II

Definition of the critical mass density :

Example : lense with constant surface mass density

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 11

Nomenclature

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 12

Defining a Deflection Potential Analogy to Electrostatics

Electrostatics in analogy (but 3dim. instead of 2dim. :

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 13

Image Distortion and Magnification

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 14

Magnification

The magnification of the image is given by the determinant of the magnification matrix :

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 15

Caustic and Critical Line for Spherically Symmetric Lense

Caustic (source plane) critical lines (image plane)

Tangential critical line (caustic) is yellow, radial critical line (caustic) is blue [from Hattori et al. 1999]

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 16

Caustic and Critical Line for Elliptical Lenses

The source near the cusp in the caustic gets strongly magnified

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 17

Caustic and Critical Line for Elliptical Lenses

Case 1:

Case 2:

From Hattori et al. 1999

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 18

Lense with Homogeneous Mass Distribution

observer source

The critical homogenous lense provides an ideal focus for a definite focal length - the observer only sees a very extended object

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 19

Einstein Ring

For symmetrical elnses:

for θs = 0

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 20

Prinzipal of the Gravitational Lensing

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 21

Lensing Equation for a Point Mass

Reformulation of the lense equation by means of θE :

Two images of the source :

Parity of the images: Positive in both cases

image1 source image2

1 2 1 2 1 2

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 22

Imaging of a Point Mass Lense

θE

x

B+

B-

Q

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 23

Magnification and Light Amplification

θ- θ+ Q M

Magnification + light amplification = „magnification“

The surface brightness is conserved in the lensing process

for µ is negative change of parity

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 24

Singular Isothermal Sphere

Mass distribution of the SIS :

Einstein Radius :

Multiple images are only: observed when the source lays inside the Einstein radius

With magnification :

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 25

Condition for Strong Lensing in Clusters

Einstein radius for galaxy clusters :

Critical density for strong lensing :

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 26

Goemetric Construction of the Imaging Process

Two determining equation have to be fullfiled:

α(θ)

θ

The solution is given by the intersection of the two curves

B1

Q B2

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 27

Refsdal & Surdej 1994, Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 117

Geometrical construction for the Point Mass Lense

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 28

Construction for the SIS-Lense

Refsdal & Surdej 1994, Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 117

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 29

For the Mass Distribution of a Spiral Galaxy

Refsdal & Surdej 1994, Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 117

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 30

Construction for the Homogeneous Distribution

Refsdal & Surdej 1994, Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 117

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 31

Model-Lensen for a Laboratory Experiment

(a) Point mass, (b) SIS potential, (c) spiral galaxy , (d) homogeneous disc (e) truncated homogeneous disc

Refsdal & Surdej 1994, Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 117

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 32

Typical Lensed Images

a,b) slightly asymmetricSIS Lense (partial Einstein ring),

(c,d) two images merge into one

caustics images

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 33

Typical Images

(e,f) configuration with two images

(g,h) two images, where one is a merged image of originally three images of a four image lense

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 34

Lensing Effect

Effect of the Black Hole of the Mass of Jupiter in the middle of the Washington Mall

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 35

Abell 2218

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 36

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 37

Abell 2218

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 38

A 2218 used as Gravitational Telescope

Spektrum einer sternbildenden Galaxie bei z= 5.6

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 39

Abell 2390

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 40

Abell 2390

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 41

. Abell 370

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 42

The Giant Arc in Abell 370

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 43

Example: Lensing and X-ray Mass of the Cluster A2390

HST fom Kneib, Pello

Hans Böhringer LMU Lecture Observational Cosmology II (§ 7) SS 2010 44

Comparion of the Mass Determination for Abell 2390

From CHANDRA [Allen et al. 2000]

X-ray data from ROSAT & ASCA