global methane emissions washington d.c., 29 march 2016

13
© OECD/IEA 2015 Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

Upload: others

Post on 21-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© O

ECD

/IEA

201

5

Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

Page 2: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

Key questions

What is the global outlook for natural gas and methane emissions?

What is the role of methane emissions in the climate change debate?

What is the IEA planning on doing on methane emissions from oil and gas?

Page 3: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

Plain sailing for natural gas?

World natural gas demand by scenario

Global gas demand grows in all scenarios; in the New Policies Scenario demand of 5.2 tcm in 2040 brings gas towards parity with coal & oil in the global energy mix

2 000

3 000

4 000

5 000

6 000

bcm

Current Policies Scenario

New Policies Scenario

450 Scenario

1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040

Page 4: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

Gas retains a global foothold in a stronger climate policy scenario

Global fossil-fuel demand by scenario

Where it replaces more carbon-intensive fuels or aids the integration of renewables, natural gas can be a good fit for a gradually decarbonising energy system

2 000

2 500

3 000

3 500

4 000

4 500

5 000

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Mto

e

Oil

Coal Gas

New Policies Scenario (NPS)

Oil

Coal

Gas 450 Scenario (450S)

Page 5: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

0 20 40 60 80 100

US EPA, 2012

IEA, 2015

IPCC, 1997-2006

mln tons methane

What are the trends in methane emissions from oil and gas operations?

Global emission estimates vary widely – due to lack of data and

inconsistent measurement methods

Global methane emissions from oil and gas industry

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2013m

ln t

on

s C

H4

/bln

bo

e

gas

oil

US data suggests an overall declining trend in methane emission factors

over the last 20 years.

US methane emissions trend for oil and gas industry

Source: US EPA and EIA 2015

?

Page 6: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

Methane emissions: a credibility issue for natural gas?

Global methane emissions from the oil & gas sector by region in NPS

Fugitive methane emissions from the global oil & gas sector remain high, despite advances & pledges by some countries to reduce emissions

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2013 2020 2030 2040

Mt

CH

4

European Union

Africa

United States

China

Russia

Middle East

Rest of world

Page 7: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

The coverage of CP21 climate pledges is impressive…

Pledges submitted

Not submitted pledges

North America

6.1 Gt

South America

1.2 Gt

OECD Asia Oceania

2.2 Gt

Russia and Caspian

2.0 Gt

Europe

3.8 Gt

Africa

1.1 Gt

Middle East

2.0 Gt

1.7 Gt

Other Asia India

1.9 Gt

China

8.6 Gt

Pledges from countries that account for 95% of global energy-related GHG emissions; their full implementation would be consistent with a temperature rise of 2.7 °C

The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on maps included in this publication do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the IEA.

Page 8: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

…but what about methane emissions ?

The INDCs of four countries specifically mention methane emission:

USA: achieve a 40-45% reduction in methane emissions from 2012 levels by 2025 from oil and gas production

Canada, Mexico and Gabon: reduce methane emissions from oil and gas production

Page 9: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

COP21 Bridge Scenario: peak in GHG emissions in next 5 years

20

25

30

35

40

2015 2020 2025 2030

450

Scenario

Bridge

Scenario

INDC

Scenario

Gt

CO

2-e

q

Energy efficiency

49%

Reducing inefficient coal

Renewables investment

Upstream methane reductions

Fossil-fuel subsidy reform

17%

15%

10%

Bridge Scenario Savings by measure, 2030

9%

Global energy-related GHG emissions

IEA proposed five measures – shown in a “Bridge Scenario” – using only proven technologies & without harming economic growth

Page 10: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

Reducing Upstream Methane Emissions

Reductions are achievable with existing technologies but implementation will take time

Global oil and gas upstream methane emissions and required reductions

Page 11: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

What is the IEA planning to do next?

Global modeling of methane emissions has a high degree of uncertainty. Just like most organizations, the IEA relies on measurements and data collected by others.

In absence of new and more comprehensive data, focus will shift towards outlining best practices for policy recommendations.

The IEA seeks inputs from energy sector stakeholders in exploring the topic further.

Page 12: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© OECD/IEA 2015

Summary

Addressing climate change is imperative and reducing methane emissions is one of the key measures that can help secure a peak in global GHG emissions by 2020 and thus provide a reasonable chance of limiting global warming by 2degC.

Technologies for reducing methane emissions are available but action is required now to achieve a peak in emissions.

Challenges ahead:

The global and regional extent of methane emissions is still poorly understood.

How can we tackle the more difficult and costly emission sources?

Availability of cheap but reliable constant monitoring solutions?

What remote sensing technologies can be used globally to identify major sources and track progress?

The discussion and actions are progressing, albeit at a slow pace.

Page 13: Global Methane Emissions Washington D.C., 29 March 2016

© O

ECD

/IEA

201

5

www.worldenergyoutlook.org