fulltext (7).pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
1/255
Title Teacher learning in communities of practice: improving teachingthrough analysis of classroom videos
Advisor(s) Yung, BHW
Author(s) Lo, Fei-yin.; ç˜Û Õ.
Citation
Issued Date 2012
URL http://hdl.handle.net/10722/173838
Rights The author retains all proprietary rights, (such as patent rights)and the right to use in future works.
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
2/255
Teacher Learning in Communities of Practice:
Improving Teaching through Analysis of Classroom Videos
Lo Fei Yin
Ph.D.
The University of Hong Kong
2012
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
3/255
Abstract of thesis entitled
Teacher Learning in Communities of Practice:
Improving Teaching through Analysis of Classroom Videos
Submitted by
Lo Fei Yin
for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
at The University of Hong Kong
in June 2012
Due to the new demands placed upon schools in our current learning society, teachers are
expected to learn continuously. However, not much is known about how teachers learn. Three
major problems are identified in the emerging literature. First, little is known about what
constitutes meaningful learning from the teachers’ own perspectives. Second, there is a lack of a
common framework for analysing and comparing findings across different studies on the
process of teacher learning. This is a major obstacle in advancing the field. Third, factors
affecting teacher learning are often studied in an isolated manner without acknowledging the
interaction among these factors. As a result, this fails to provide a holistic picture of how teacher
learning can be enhanced or impeded.
In view of the above, this study adopted a teacher perspective to investigate teacher learning and
the factors affecting it in a holistic manner, using an interpretive framework that can be applied
across different studies. The study was situated in the context of a year-long school-based
teacher professional development (TPD) programme. Seven teachers of two different schools
participated in the study. Teachers in each school formed a community of practice that made use
of classroom videos to improve their practice.
A case study approach was used to document the content and process of teacher learning, as
well as to illuminate how various factors interact to affect teacher learning within the two
communities. Data was collected from individual teacher interviews, teacher reflection tasks,
discussion in the TPD meetings and non-participant observation. The Interconnected Model of
Teacher Professional Growth (IMTPG) and Community of Practice (CoP) were adopted as the
interpretative frameworks for data analysis.
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
4/255
Besides gaining knowledge and skills, the teachers also exhibited affective and social learning.
More than half of the teachers considered affective learning (e.g., confidence in their own
identity as a good teacher) and social learning (e.g., building a trusting relationship with
colleagues) as the most important learning to them. The idiosyncratic and recursive nature of
teacher learning is consistent with existing literature. Three types of factors that have a bearing
on teacher learning were identified. First, the individual factors, which include the teacher’s will
to learn, level of reflectivity and time available for professional development. Second, the
communal factors, which include: (i) the ways in which members in a CoP engage with each
other (i.e., engagement), (ii) the ways in which members construct an image of themselves (i.e.,
imagination), and (iii) the ways in which members coordinate perspectives, interpretations, and
actions so that the CoP can realise higher goals (i.e., alignment). Third, the features of the TPD
programme that were reported by teachers as helpful in facilitating their learning, including the
multiple strategies adopted, videos, and facilitation from a university educator.
Implications for video-based TPD and for research on teacher learning were identified, in
particular, a need for more r esearch on teacher learning from the teachers’ own perspective in
order to better understand teachers’ authentic learning experiences and to build a more holistic
model of teacher learning.
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
5/255
Teacher Learning in Communities of Practice:
Improving Teaching through Analysis of Classroom Videos
by
Lo Fei Yin
B.Sc. CUHK
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirementsfor the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
at The University of Hong Kong
June 2012
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
6/255
i
Declaration
I declare that this thesis represents my own work, except where due acknowledgement is made,
and that it has not been previously included in a thesis, dissertation or report submitted to this
University or to any other institution for a degree, diploma or other qualifications.
Signed: _____________________
(Lo Fei Yin)
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
7/255
ii
AcknowledgementsI would like to express my sincere gratitude to the following people. First, heartfelt thanks must
be given to the participating teachers and the schools for their time, energy and support. Given
the busy work schedule under the new education reform, the teachers spared their leisure time towork on the tasks of the TPD and attend the TPD meetings. Without their sacrifices, this study
would not be possible.
My advisory committee, Dr. Tammy Kwan, Dr. Fung Ping Ng, and Dr. Benny Yung, offered me
their invaluable advice throughout this study. In particular, I owe an enormous debt of gratitude
to my supervisor, Dr. Benny Yung, for his patience, guidance and encouragement throughout the
whole process from data collection, data analysis, and thesis writing. His devotion in facilitating
the TPD meetings and teacher learning was immense to this study. It is a blessing for me to have been his student. I could not have found a more supportive and caring supervisor.
I am grateful to my colleagues in HKU for their comments and suggestions. We learn and grow
together professionally and personally. Special appreciation must be extended to Jennifer. The
videos and related materials used in Video Workshops of the TPD were adopted from her study.
Her work has laid a solid foundation for this study. Definitely I won’t forget her.
Finally I would also like to thank my family, in particular my mother and sister, and friends whohave been accompanying and supporting me through the ups and downs in the past years.
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
8/255
iii
Table of ContentsDeclaration .................................................................................................................................... i
Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... ii
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ iii
List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... viii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ix
List of Appendices ....................................................................................................................... x
Abbreviations and Conventions ................................................................................................ xi
Chapter 1 – Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Background ................................................................................................................... 1
1.1.1. Teacher Learning as a Research Issue ................................................................... 1
1.1.2. Gaps in the Research on Teacher Learning ........................................................... 1
1.1.3. Context of the Study .............................................................................................. 2
1.2. Research Questions ....................................................................................................... 3
1.3. The Interpretative Frameworks ..................................................................................... 3
1.3.1. Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth (IMTPG) ........................ 3
1.3.2. Community of Practice (CoP) ............................................................................... 5
1.4. Significance ................................................................................................................... 7
1.5. Outline of the Subsequent Chapters .............................................................................. 7
Chapter 2 – Literature Review ............................................................................................. 9
2.1. Research on Teacher Learning ...................................................................................... 9
2.1.1. Research on the Content of Teacher Learning....................................................... 9 2.1.1.1. Teacher learning as gaining knowledge and skills ................................ 9 2.1.1.2. Teacher learning in the affective domain ............................................ 11 2.1.1.3. Summary ............................................................................................. 12
2.1.2. Research on the Process of Teacher Learning ..................................................... 13
2.1.3. Research on Factors Affecting Teacher Learning ................................................ 17
2.1.3.1. Prior knowledge and beliefs ................................................................ 17 2.1.3.2. Teachers’ will to learn ......................................................................... 18 2.1.3.3. Level of reflection ............................................................................... 20 2.1.3.4. The context of school .......................................................................... 21
2.1.3.5.
Collaboration among teachers ............................................................. 21
2.1.3.6. Presence of a facilitator ....................................................................... 22 2.1.3.7. Video as a learning tool ....................................................................... 23 2.1.3.8. Summary ............................................................................................. 24
2.2. The Interpretive Frameworks ...................................................................................... 25
2.2.1. The Need for Two Interpretive Frameworks ....................................................... 25
2.2.2. IMTPG for Analysing the Path of Teacher Learning .......................................... 26
2.2.2.1. The four domains ................................................................................ 26 2.2.2.2. The mediating processes ..................................................................... 28 2.2.2.3. The change environment ..................................................................... 29
2.2.3. CoP for Analysing Teacher Learning in Different Communities ........................ 30
2.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 34
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
9/255
iv
Chapter 3 – The Video-based TPD Programme ............................................................... 35
3.1. Rationale for the TPD Design ..................................................................................... 35
3.1.1. Professional Development through E xamining One’s Own Practices ................ 35
3.1.2. Professional Development through the Use of Exemplary Cases ....................... 35
3.1.3. Professional Development through the Use of Videos ........................................ 36 3.1.4. Summary ............................................................................................................. 37
3.2. An Overview of the TPD Programme ......................................................................... 37
Chapter 4 - Research Methodology ................................................................................... 39
4.1. Research Approach ...................................................................................................... 39
4.2. Participants .................................................................................................................. 40
4.3. Data Collection ............................................................................................................ 40
4.3.1. Overview of the Research Activities ................................................................... 41
4.3.2. Sources of Data and Research Instruments ......................................................... 42
4.3.2.1. Questionnaires ..................................................................................... 42 4.3.2.2. Reflection tasks ................................................................................... 43 4.3.2.3. Semi-structured interviews .................................................................. 44 4.3.2.4. Meetings in the TPD programme ........................................................ 45
4.3.3. Summary ............................................................................................................. 46
4.4. Treatment and Analysis of Data .................................................................................. 48
4.5. Reporting of Data and Findings .................................................................................. 49
4.6. Validity, Reliability and Ethics .................................................................................... 50
4.6.1. Validity ................................................................................................................ 50
4.6.2. Reliability ............................................................................................................ 51 4.6.3. Ethical Issues ....................................................................................................... 52
4.7. Generalisability, Generativity and Exemplarity of Findings ....................................... 52
Chapter 5 – Teacher Learning in Bright Future College ................................................. 54
5.1 Background Information of the School ....................................................................... 54
5.1.1 The School and the Students ............................................................................... 54
5.1.2 Department of Integrated Science ....................................................................... 54
5.2 Ben .............................................................................................................................. 55
5.2.1 Background Information ..................................................................................... 55
5.2.2 Most Important Learning .................................................................................... 55
5.2.3 A Recursive Journey on Lesson Planning and Assessing Students ..................... 55
5.2.3.1 Prior beliefs and practices .................................................................... 55 5.2.3.2 The recursive learning journey ............................................................. 56 5.2.3.3 Factors contributing to Ben’s learning ................................................. 65
5.2.4 Summary ............................................................................................................. 66
5.3 Felix ............................................................................................................................. 67
5.3.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 67
5.3.2 Most Important Learning .................................................................................... 67
5.3.3 A Learning Journey in Search of Self-Actualisation ........................................... 68
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
10/255
v
5.3.3.1 Prior beliefs and practice ...................................................................... 68 5.3.3.2 The invigorating learning journey ........................................................ 68 5.3.3.3 Factors contributing to Felix’s learning ................................................ 72
5.3.4 Summary ............................................................................................................. 73
5.4 Chloe ........................................................................................................................... 73
5.4.1 Background Information ..................................................................................... 73 5.4.2 Most Important Learning .................................................................................... 74
5.4.3 A Reliant/Reactive Journey on Listening to Students’ Voices ............................. 74
5.4.3.1 Prior beliefs and practice ...................................................................... 74 5.4.3.2 The reliant/reactive learning journey ................................................... 75 5.4.3.3 Factors Contributing to Chloe’s Learning ............................................ 80
5.4.4 Summary ............................................................................................................. 81
5.5 Summary of the Most Important Learning to Teachers in BFC .................................. 81
5.6 A CoP with a High Level of Learning Energy ............................................................ 82
5.6.1 A Joint Enterprise ................................................................................................ 82 5.6.2 Mutual Engagement ............................................................................................ 85
5.6.3 A Shared Repertoire ............................................................................................ 88
5.6.4 Summary of the Characteristics of the CoP in BFC ............................................ 91
Chapter 6 – Teacher Learning in Sunset Valley High School .......................................... 93
6.1. Background Information of the School ....................................................................... 93
6.1.1. The School and the Students ............................................................................... 93
6.1.2. Department of Integrated Science ....................................................................... 93
6.2. Sam .............................................................................................................................. 94
6.2.1. Background Information ..................................................................................... 94
6.2.2. Most Important Learning .................................................................................... 94
6.2.3. A Learning Journey of Restoring Confidence and Reconstructing Identity ........ 94
6.2.3.1. Prior beliefs and practices ................................................................... 94 6.2.3.2. The undulating learning journey ......................................................... 95 6.2.3.3. Factors contributing to Sam’s learning .............................................. 100
6.2.4. Summary ........................................................................................................... 101
6.3. Victor ......................................................................................................................... 102
6.3.1. Background Information ................................................................................... 102
6.3.2. Most Important Learning .................................................................................. 102 6.3.3. A Refreshing and Empowering Learning Journey ............................................ 102
6.3.3.1. Prior beliefs and practices ................................................................. 102 6.3.3.2. The refreshing learning journey ........................................................ 103 6.3.3.3. Factors contributing to Victor’s learning ........................................... 107
6.3.4. Summary ........................................................................................................... 108
6.4. Hugo .......................................................................................................................... 109
6.4.1. Background Information ................................................................................... 109
6.4.2. Most Important Learning .................................................................................. 109
6.4.3. A Journey of Acquiring Skills for Critical Lesson Analysis .............................. 110 6.4.3.1. Prior beliefs and practices ................................................................. 110
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
11/255
vi
6.4.3.2. The practice-prominent learning path ............................................... 110 6.4.3.3. Factors contribut ing to Hugo’s learning ............................................ 113
6.4.4. Summary ........................................................................................................... 114
6.5. Stone .......................................................................................................................... 114
6.5.1. Background Information ................................................................................... 114
6.5.2. Most Important Learning .................................................................................. 114
6.5.3. Rediscovery of the Importance of Patience in Teaching ................................... 115
6.5.3.1. Prior beliefs and practices ................................................................. 115 6.5.3.2. A doubtful and questionable learning journey................................... 115 6.5.3.3. Factors hindering Stone’s learning .................................................... 119
6.5.4. Summary ........................................................................................................... 120
6.6. Summary of the Most Important Learning of Teachers in SVHS ............................. 120
6.7. An Unstable CoP ....................................................................................................... 121
6.7.1. A Yet-to-develop Joint Enterprise ..................................................................... 121
6.7.2. Unequal Mutual Engagement ............................................................................ 122 6.7.3. An Unevenly Shared Repertoire........................................................................ 125
6.7.4. Summary of the Characteristics of the CoP in SVHS ....................................... 126
Chapter 7 – Looking across the Cases ............................................................................. 128
7.1. What Teachers Learn ................................................................................................. 128
7.1.1. Knowledge and Skills ........................................................................................ 129
7.1.2. Affects and Emotions ........................................................................................ 131
7.1.3. Social Learning ................................................................................................. 133
7.1.4.
Summary ........................................................................................................... 135
7.2. Process of Teacher Learning ..................................................................................... 136
7.2.1. The Idiosyncratic Nature of Teacher Learning Process ..................................... 139
7.2.2. The Recursive Nature of Teacher Learning Process ......................................... 140
7.2.3. Learning Process Being Influenced by the Design of the TPD ......................... 142
7.2.4. Summary ........................................................................................................... 143
7.3. Factors Affecting Teacher Learning .......................................................................... 144
7.3.1. The Individual Factors ...................................................................................... 144
7.3.1.1. Will to learn ....................................................................................... 144
7.3.1.2. Level of reflectivity ........................................................................... 145 7.3.1.3. Availability of time ............................................................................ 146
7.3.2. The Communal Factors ..................................................................................... 147
7.3.3. A Holistic Picture of Factors Affecting Teacher Learning ................................ 149
7.4. Chapter Summary ...................................................................................................... 153
Chapter 8 – TPD Features Affecting Teacher Learning................................................. 154
8.1. A Metaphor of Growing Apples ................................................................................ 154
8.1.1. Sowing a Seed of Learning – Completing the Preparation Task Individually .. 155
8.1.2. Cultivating the Seed of Learning – Discussion in the Workshops .................... 155
8.1.3. Harvesting the Fruit of Learning – Completing the Follow-up Task ................ 157 8.1.4. The Farmer of Learning – the Facilitator .......................................................... 157
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
12/255
vii
8.1.5. Other Key Features of the Farming Metaphor .................................................. 157
8.2. The Affordances of Video ......................................................................................... 158
8.2.1. Increasing Awareness of Alternative Strategies and Classroom Situations ....... 159
8.2.2. Providing Exemplary Models of Teaching and Proof of Existence of Good
Practice ........................................................................................................................... 159
8.2.3. Promoting and Facilitating Reflection and Comparison ................................... 161
8.2.3.1. Critical reflection ............................................................................... 161 8.2.3.2. Meaningful comparison ..................................................................... 162
8.2.4. Fostering Community Building ......................................................................... 163
8.2.5. Summary ........................................................................................................... 165
8.3. Challenges of Using Videos in TPD .......................................................................... 165
8.4. The Roles of the TPD Facilitator .............................................................................. 168
8.4.1. Knowledge Enhancer ........................................................................................ 168
8.4.2.
Emotion Booster ................................................................................................ 171
8.4.3. Community Fosterer .......................................................................................... 172
8.4.4. Overview of the Contributory Roles of the TPD Facilitator ............................. 173
8.5. Summary of the Chapter ........................................................................................... 175
Chapter 9 – Conclusions & Implications ......................................................................... 177
9.1. Summary of the Results and Findings ....................................................................... 177
9.1.1. What Teachers Learned in the TPD programme ............................................... 177
9.1.2. Process of Teacher Learning ............................................................................. 178
9.1.3. Factors Affecting Teacher Learning .................................................................. 179
9.1.3.1. Individual factors ............................................................................... 180 9.1.3.2. Communal factors ............................................................................. 180 9.1.3.3. Factors related to the TPD and its design features ............................ 182 9.1.3.4. Towards a holistic picture of the factors affecting teacher learning .. 183
9.2. Implications and Suggestions for TPD ...................................................................... 185
9.2.1. Affective and Social Learning is as Important as Knowledge & Skills ............ 185
9.2.2. Opportunities to Revisit Important Learning .................................................... 186
9.2.3. The Essential Roles of Facilitation .................................................................... 186
9.3. Implications for Research on Teacher Learning ........................................................ 187
9.3.1.
Theoretical Frameworks for Studying Teacher Learning .................................. 187
9.3.2. Adopting a Teacher Perspective to Study Teacher Learning ............................. 188
9.4. Limitations of the Study ............................................................................................ 189
9.5. Suggestions for Future Research ............................................................................... 190
References ................................................................................................................................ 192
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
13/255
viii
List of FiguresFigure 1.1 Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth ............................................... 4
Figure 2.1 The Implicit Model of Teacher Professional Development ....................................... 14
Figure 2.2 Guskey’s Model of Teacher Change .......................................................................... 14
Figure 2.3 Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth ............................................. 15
Figure 2.4 Summary of the Use of the Two Frameworks ........................................................... 34
Figure 4.1 An Overview of the Research Design ........................................................................ 47
Figure 5.1 Ben’s Learning Path on Lesson Planning and Assessing Students ............................ 57
Figure 5.2 Felix’s Learning Path in Search of Self -Actualisation ............................................... 72
Figure 5.3 Chloe’s Learning Path on Listening to Students’ Voices ........................................... 80
Figure 6.1 Sam’s Learning Path on Regaining Confidence in Teaching and his Identity ......... 100
Figure 6.2 Victor’s Learning Path on Empowering to Keep Le arning ...................................... 107 Figure 6.3 Hugo’s Learning Path on Critical Lesson Analysis Skills ....................................... 113
Figure 6.4 Stone’s Learning Path on Waiting for Students’ Answers Patiently ........................ 119
Figure 7.1 Learning Paths of the Seven Participating Teachers ................................................ 137
Figure 7.2 The Refined Model of Teacher Learning ................................................................. 150
Figure 7.3 An Illustration of the Learning of Ben and Chloe Using the Refined Model .......... 151
Figure 7.4 An Illustration of the Learning of Sam and Stone Using the Refined Model .......... 152
Figure 9.1 The Refined Model of Teacher Learning ................................................................. 184
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
14/255
ix
List of TablesTable 2.1 Summary of the Definitions of the Four Domains ...................................................... 27
Table 2.2 An Inventory of Teachers’ Levels of Reflectivity ........................................................ 29
Table 2.3 Wenger’s Matrix of Community Dimensions .............................................................. 32
Table 2.4 Modified Wenger’s Matrix of Community Dimensions used in this Study ................ 33
Table 3.1 Summary of the Activities of Each Workshop/Meeting .............................................. 38
Table 4.1 Summary of the Information of the Participating Schools .......................................... 40
Table 4.2 Summary of the Information of the Participating Teachers ......................................... 40
Table 4.3 Summary of the TPD and Research Activities, as well as Data Collection Instruments
..................................................................................................................................................... 42
Table 5.1 Comparison of the Critical Features of a Good Tour Guide and Prominent Features of
Mr Mark’s Teaching .................................................................................................................... 69 Table 5.2 Summary of the Most Important Learning to Teachers in BFC .................................. 82
Table 5.3 Summary of BFC Teachers’ Perceptions of their Roles in the CoP ............................ 87
Table 5.4 Summary of the Characteristics of the CoP in BFC .................................................... 92
Table 6.1 A Table Extracted from a Student Worksheet used in the Research Lesson ................ 96
Table 6.2 Summary of the Most Important Learning to Teachers in SVHS .............................. 120
Table 6.3 Attendance of Teachers in SVHS .............................................................................. 121
Table 6.4 Summary of Teachers’ Perceptions of their Roles in the CoP ................................... 124
Table 6.5 Summary of the Characteristics of the CoP in SVHS ............................................... 127 Table 7.1 Teachers’ Most Important Learning ........................................................................... 128
Table 7.2 Characteristics of the Two Communities of Practice ................................................ 133
Table 7.3 Teachers’ Will to Learn .............................................................................................. 144
Table 7.4 Level of Reflectivity Exhibited by the Teachers ....................................................... 145
Table 8.1 Summary of the Affordances of Videos in Bringing about Teacher Learning ........... 165
Table 8.2 Summary of the Roles of a Facilitator in the TPD context ........................................ 174
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
15/255
x
List of AppendicesAppendix I – Details of the Video-based TPD Programme ...................................................... 203
Appendix II – Questions to Probe into School Context in Planning Meeting .......................... 217
Appendix III – Preparation Task for a Video Workshop ........................................................... 218Appendix IV – Follow-up Task for a Video Workshop ............................................................. 223
Appendix V – Video Workshop Questionnaire ......................................................................... 224
Appendix VI – Video Workshop Interview Protocol ................................................................ 225
Appendix VII – Follow-up Task for Lesson Planning Meeting ................................................ 228
Appendix VIII – Preparation Task for Lesson Analysis 1 Meeting........................................... 229
Appendix IX – Follow-up Task for Lesson Analysis 1 Meeting ............................................... 230
Appendix X – Preparation Task for Lesson Analysis 2 Meeting .............................................. 231
Appendix XI – Follow-up Task for Lesson Analysis 2 Meeting ............................................... 234Appendix XII – Lesson Study Questionnaire............................................................................ 235
Appendix XIII – Lesson Study Interview Protocol ................................................................... 236
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
16/255
xi
Abbreviations and Conventions
Abbreviations
CoP(s) Community of PracticeDC Domain of Consequence, IMTPGDP Domain of Practice, IMTPGED External Domain, IMTPGFT(s) Follow-up task(s) of the TPD programmeIS Integrated ScienceIMTPG Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional GrowthLA1/2 Lesson analysis 1/2 meeting in the TPD programmeLS Video-based lesson study in the TPD programmeLSIn(s) Lesson Study Interview(s)PD Personal Domain, IMTPGPT(s) Preparation task(s) of the TPD programmeTPD Teacher professional developmentVW(s) Video workshop(s) in the TPD programmeVWIn(s) Video Workshop Interview(s)
Referencing Conventions for Excerpts from Interviews/Meetings
As an example, (Ben, VWIn, 58:33) means that the excerpt is extracted from the VideoWorkshop Interview at time 58 min 33 sec.
Referencing Conventions for Excerpts from Teacher Reflection Tasks
As an example, (Felix, LA2-FT) means that the excerpt is extracted from the follow-up task ofLesson Analysis 2 meeting.
Transcript Conventions used in the Interview/Meeting Excerpts
[ ] Words enclosed in square parentheses aid understanding and readability of the dialogue.
… Indicates a section of the dialogue from within the excerpt has been omitted.
(Felix, LA2-FT)
Source of the excerptTeacher’s Name
(Ben, VWIn, 58:33)
Source of the excerpt (VWIn, LSIn, VW1-4, LP, or LA1-2)
Teacher’s Name Time of the interviews/meetings atwhich the excerpt is extracted
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
17/255
Chapter 1 - Introduction
1
Chapter 1 – Introduction
This study investigates teacher learning in a community of practice that makes use of classroom
videos for improving teaching. This chapter explains the background, the aim and the
significance of the study and introduces the interpretive frameworks. It concludes with an
outline of the content in the subsequent chapters.
1.1. Background1.1.1. Teacher L earni ng as a Research I ssue
There is a general agreement in the educational research community about the important role of
teachers’ professional development (TPD) in improving education. However, there is no
consensus about how such a process occurs and how it can be analysed and promoted. This may
be because it was only in the last decade that the nature and development of teacher knowledge
began to be understood by educational researchers (Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001). Currently,
much emphasis is being placed on characterising both the ways in which teachers learn and the
factors that promote or hinder their learning. Not much is known about ‘how teachers learn’.
However, knowing how teachers learn could lead to improvements in teacher professional
development practices. The present study is a response to the call for more research in this area,
in particular, with a focus on how experienced teachers learn (Beijaard, Korthagen, & Verloop,
2007). Such a research agenda is highly relevant and significant in our current learning society
in which teachers are expected to learn continuously.
1.1.2. Gaps in th e Research on Teacher L earn in g
To further establish the significance of the present study, I briefly report below the gaps in the
research literature on teacher learning and how the present study can contribute to bridging
those gaps. A more detailed discussion is found in Chapter 2.
Studies on teacher learning can be grouped into three categories: the content of teacher learning,
the process of teacher learning, and the factors that affect teacher learning. Below is a list of
research gaps identified in the corresponding bodies of literature:
Studies on the content of teacher learning often focus on pre-determined teacher learning
outcomes and content from the perspectives of teacher educators or TPD developers, rather
than from the teacher perspective (Webster-Wright, 2009). The current study is an attempt to
fill this gap by asking teachers to report on their most important learning, and to reflect on
the process and impact of their learning from their own perspective as teachers.
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
18/255
Chapter 1 - Introduction
2
Little is known about how teachers, in particular experienced teachers, learn specific content
and how they change their cognition and/or behaviour (Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002;
Hoekstra, Beijaard, Brekelmans, & Korthagen, 2007; Putnam & Borko, 2000). The current
study addresses this gap by delineating the process of teacher learning with the use of the
Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth (IMTPG) proposed by Clarke &
Hollingsworth (2002).
The teacher learning process is rather complex (Gravani, 2007) and idiosyncratic in nature
(Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002). There is also a lack of a common framework to analyse
and describe the process of teacher learning (Justi & van Driel, 2006). This hinders the
synthesis of findings across different studies. This study contributes to the search for a
common analytic tool by adopting and combining the interpretive frameworks of Clarke &
Hollingsworth’s (2002) IMTPG and the Community of Practice (CoP) of Wenger (1998,
2003).
With regard to factors affecting teacher learning, most studies focus either on the factors
pertaining to individual teachers or the communal factors of the community to which the
teachers belong. The studies often consider these factors in an isolated manner without
acknowledging the potential effects of any possible interaction between them (Richardson
& Placier, 2001; Webster-Wright, 2009). Also, they fail to account for the dynamic nature of
the relationship between teacher learning and other various factors. The present study tries
to bridge this gap by considering both individual and communal factors in a holistic manner,
as well as exploring the interactive and dynamic relationship between teacher learning and
the factors affecting it.
In sum, the present study attempts to fill current gaps in the research by studying the content and
process of teacher learning from the teacher perspective. It considers both the individual factors
and communal factors in a holistic manner, and treats these as dynamic factors that may change
and interact with each other during the course of teacher learning.
1.1.3. Context of the Study
The context of this study is a school-based TPD project involving two secondary schools in
Hong Kong. The Integrated Science teachers in each school, with input from a science educator,
formed a CoP using classroom videos as a tool for their professional learning. The TPD
programme comprised: (i) analysis of exemplary videos in video workshops (VWs), and (ii)
analysis of teachers’ own videos in a video -based lesson study (LS). The use of video in the
design of the TPD is supported by the relevant literatures:
Imbedding teachers’ learning in their everyday work, or that of their colleagues, increasesthe likelihood that this learning will be meaningful (A. Lieberman, 1996).
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
19/255
Chapter 1 - Introduction
3
Research on lesson study revealed that in order to benefit from lesson study, teachers will
first need to learn how to apply ‘critical lenses’ to their examination of lessons (Fernandez,
Cannon, & Chokshi, 2003, p. 182).
Use of exemplary ca ses increases teachers’ exposure to alternatives, provides existence
proof of new practice and demonstration of actions (Black & Atkin, 1996). Teachers may
gain moral support and deepen their understanding by viewing exemplary cases.
Analysis of classroom video provides opportunities for teachers to acquire a new “analytic
mind set” to look at classroom teaching (Sherin, 2004, p. 13).
More details about the TPD design and activities can be found in Chapter 3.
1.2. Research Questions
While I feel obliged to provide readers with detailed information about the context of the study,
against which they can make better sense of the reported teacher learning, I must stress at the
outset that the present study is not an evaluation study of the effectiveness of the TPD
programme in bringing about teacher learning (though this is a major concern for the
programme developer i.e., my supervisor). Rather, my prime focus is on how and what teachers
learn in the context of this TPD programme, including any unintended learning outcomes. In
other words, I will look at teacher learning from the teachers’ own perspectives, rather than
comparing their learning outcomes against predetermined criteria laid down by the researcher.
Using a case study approach, this study looks closely at the nature and process of teacher
learning through their participation in a CoP that aims to improve teaching through analysis of
classroom videos. The following set of interrelated research questions guide the study:
1. What do teachers learn in the communities of practice?
2. How do teachers learn and what are the processes involved?
3. What are the factors that promote or impede teacher learning?
1.3. The Interpretative FrameworksThe present study adopts IMTPG developed by Clarke and Hollingsworth (2002) and Wen ger’s
(1998, 2003) CoP as the interpretive frameworks for analysis of teacher learning. A brief
introduction of the two frameworks follows, along with the reasons for their adoption. A more
detailed discussion is found in Chapter 2.
1.3.1. I nterconnected M odel of Teacher Professional Growth (I M TPG)
Previous literature on models of TPD paid little attention, if any, to the context in which
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
20/255
Chapter 1 - Introduction
4
teachers learn and the way in which a change in one aspect (e.g., teaching practice) was
transcended into another (e.g., teacher knowledge and beliefs). With reference to these
limitations, Clarke and Hollingsworth (2002) proposes IMTPG. The model is represented in
Figure 1.1 and briefly described below.
According to IMTPG, the teachers’ world is encompassed by four distinct domains: the Personal
Domain (PD) (teacher knowledge, beliefs and attitudes), the Domain of Practice (DP)
(professional experimentation), the Domain of Consequence (DC) (salient outcomes), and the
External Domain (ED) (sources of information, stimulus or support). The four domains are
connected by the mediating processes of enactment and reflection. Change in one domain may
lead to change in another domain through either enactment or reflection. Enactment, accordingto Clarke & Hollingsworth (2002), is not simply acting, but translation of a belief or a
pedagogical model into action; each action represents the enactment of something a teacher
knows, believes or has experienced. Reflection is “active, persistent and careful consideration”
(Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002, p. 954).
The multiplicity of possible pathways between the four domains reflects the complex,
idiosyncratic and dynamic nature of teacher learning. The model recognises not only that
teacher learning is non-linear but is also a continuous process involving teachers’ reflection andenactment. Its application across different studies may help to fill the gap of the lack of a
External Source of
Information or
Stimulus
Knowledge,
Beliefs and
Attitudes
Salient
Outcome
Professional
Experimentation
Personal Domain
External Domain
Domain of Practice
Domain ofConsequence
The Change
Environment
Figure 1.1 Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth
Enactment
Reflection
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
21/255
Chapter 1 - Introduction
5
common tool to analyse, discuss and hence compare the findings in different studies that are
conducted in different contexts (Justi & van Driel, 2006). In the present study, IMTPG is
adopted to delineate the path of teacher learning, and to identify the specific factors in the four
domains that promote or restrain teacher learning.
Despite its strong descriptive and explanatory power in accounting for the process of teacher
learning, IMTPG falls short of explaining the changing and evolving patterns of interaction
among teachers, and the mutual relation and trust formed among teachers as reflected in the data
of the current study. Clarke & Hollingsworth (2002) do briefly talk about how the social settings
in which teachers learn (i.e., the change environment in IMTPG) afford and constraint teacher
learning. However, they do not give enough attention to the characteristic features and dynamic
nature of the social settings and the mutual constitution of the individual and the social. Indeed,
as the data of the present study emerged, I discovered that the CoPs formed by the participating
teachers were evolving throughout the TPD programme as a result of teacher learning, and that,
in turn, had affected the learning of individual teachers. To fully explain my data, I turned to
look at literature on the situated perspective on learning and found Wenger’s (1998, 2003) CoP
framework most appealing.
1.3.2. Community of Practice (CoP)
Wenger’s (1998, 2003) Community of Practice (CoP) framework is grounded in a situated view
of learning in which individual development and social and cultural-historical activities and
practices are mutually constitutive; development occurs in the course of the individual’s
participation in social practice, which in turn contributes to the development of these social
practices and activities (Tsui, Edwards, Lopez-Real, & Kwan, 2009, p. 30). Based on his work
with Lave (Lave & Wenger, 1991), Wenger (1998) elaborates the theory more fully and
identifies three elements of CoP, namely mutual engagement, a joint enterprise and a shared
repertoire, which constitute the source of coherence of a community.
Mutual engagement exists because people are engaged in actions whose meanings they
negotiate with one another. A joint enterprise is the result of a collective process of negotiation
through mutual engagement in practice over time. A shared repertoire is a set of resources
shared within a community for the negotiation of meaning in the community. Wenger (2003)
further elaborates the above three elements into three dimensions of a CoP as follows (p.81):
Enterprise connotes the level of learning energy of the community, which must show
leadership in pushing its development along and maintain a spirit of inquiry.
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
22/255
Chapter 1 - Introduction
6
Mutuality indicates the depth of social capital of the community, in which members must
know and trust each other well enough to know how to interact productively and feel
comfortable speaking truthfully and addressing real problems together.
Repertoire denotes the degree of self-awareness of the community. Being reflective on its
repertoire (including the concepts, language and tools used) enables a community to
understand its own state of development from multiple perspectives, reconsider assumptions
and uncover hidden possibilities, and use this self-awareness to move forward.
To differentiate the different forms of participation in a CoP, Wenger (2003) identifies three
modes of belonging that can shape the social learning systems of the communities concerned
(pp.78 – 79):
Engagement is “doing things together, talking and producing artefacts. The ways in which
members engage with each other, and with the world, profoundly shape their experience of
who they are. They learn what they can do and how the world responds to their actions. ”
Imagination is members constructing “an image of themselves, of their communities, and of
the world in order to orient themselves, to reflect on their situation, and to explore
possibilities. ”
Alignment is about making sure that “local activities are sufficiently aligned with other
processes so that they can be effective beyond their own engagement. This is not a one-way
process of submitting to external authority, but a mutual process of coordinating
perspectives, interpretations, and actions so that the CoP can realise higher goals. ”
Wenger (2003) combines the three dimensions of a CoP and the three modes of belonging to
construct a matrix (see Chapter 2 for details) to illustrate how the modes of belonging affect the
dimensions of a CoP. This matrix framework is adapted for the analysis of the changes
occurring in the CoPs during the course of this study. The three dimensions of CoP are used to
describe the characteristic features of the CoPs formed by the participating teachers, whereas the
modes of belonging are considered as the factors that promote or impede the development of the
CoPs. This can complement the inadequacy of IMTPG in explaining the evolution of the change
environment and the mutual constitution of individual teacher learning and community building.
To summarise, the two frameworks are adopted to describe and explain the data in this study.
The IMTPG framework is used to delineate the learning path of individual teachers, whilst the
CoP framework is used to describe the evolving forms of the CoPs formed by the teachers and
teacher learning in relation to the CoPs. I believe, as will be demonstrated in later chapters, that
IMTPG and CoP frameworks can complement each other to provide a useful tool to capture and
explain the content and process of teacher learning, as well as the individual and communal
factors affecting it.
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
23/255
Chapter 1 - Introduction
7
1.4. SignificanceThis study is of both practical and theoretical value. Practically, understanding how teachers
learn, what the impeding and promoting factors are, and how these factors interact among
themselves and relate to the process of teacher learning will provide valuable information for
teacher professional developers in designing their TPD programmes. Theoretically, the study
contributes to the literature on teacher learning in relation to the search for a common analytic
tool by adopting and combining IMTPG and CoP frameworks. It sheds light on how the two
frameworks can be combined to explain and describe the learning of teachers in TPD contexts.
More importantly, it contributes to the literature on teacher learning by building a holistic model
of teacher learning through investigating the content, process, and the factors of teacher learning
from the teacher perspective.
1.5. Outline of the Subsequent ChaptersIn this chapter, I have introduced the background, the gaps in research on teacher learning and
the interpretive frameworks adopted for this study. I have also explained the significance of this
study.
Chapter 2 provides a thorough and detailed review of the literature on teacher learning, and
explains in detail why IMTPG (Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002) and CoP (Wenger, 1998, 2003)
have been chosen and the adaptations made for the analysis of teacher learning in this study.
In Chapter 3, I describe the context of this study – the TPD programme – in order to provide
readers with the background information necessary for a better understanding and appreciation
of the findings on teacher learning reported in this study.
In Chapter 4, I describe and explain the methodology used. I also explain how the research
design takes into consideration of the issues of trustworthiness and other ethical considerations.
In Chapters 5 and 6, I report the results and findings in the form of case study reports, one for
each of the participating schools. Each begins with reports on the learning of individual teachers
(using the IMTPG), followed by information on the characteristics features of the CoP
concerned and its evolving changes during the course of study. The communal factors involved
are also reported here.
Chapter 7 compares and discusses the learning of the seven participating teachers and the
characteristic features of the two CoPs. The aim is to identify the similarities and differences in
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
24/255
Chapter 1 - Introduction
8
the content and learning paths of teachers and those of the two CoPs, as well as to detail the
influences of the individual and communal factors on teacher learning.
Chapter 8 analyses and discusses features of the TPD that had an impact on teacher learning and
details the ways in which the TPD factors affected the learning of teachers.
In Chapter 9, I conclude the thesis by summarising the findings reported in previous chapters,
discussing the implications and limitations, and providing suggestions for future research.
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
25/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
9
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
Section 2.1 of this chapter reviews the literature on teacher learning in three areas: the content
of teacher learning, the process of teacher learning, and the factors that affect teacher learning.
Section 2.2 introduces the theoretical frameworks that will guide the analysis of data collected
in this study.
2.1. Research on Teacher LearningIn the present study, teacher learning is referred to the changes in teacher knowledge (i.e.,
cognitive), skills, affects and/or emotions (i.e., affective), and the relationships between
colleagues and/or ways they work with each other (i.e., social learning or community building).
Teacher learning has emerged as an important research topic in the last decade (Fishman &Davis, 2006). It provides important information about teachers as they attempt to improve their
teaching (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999; Fischer, 2006). In my review of the literature, I
found that researchers mainly focused on three aspects: (i) the content/outcome of teacher
learning, (ii) the process of teacher learning, and (iii) the factors that affect teacher learning. As
the context of this study, the TPD programme, consisted of video workshops and video-based
lesson study, the following sections will briefly draw on the relevant literature on the use of
video for TPD and lesson study. To avoid replication to the later chapters, the discussion here
will be kept to a minimum. A more substantial amount of literature on the use of video andlesson study can be found in Chapter 8.
2.1.1. Research on th e Content of Teacher L earni ng
For the purpose of this review, the content of teacher learning refers to what teachers learn from
their daily teaching practice or their participation in teacher professional development (TPD). It
includes knowledge, skills, affects and emotions. Social learning/community building will be
discussed in a later section in this chapter.
2.1.1.1. Teacher learning as gaining knowledge and skills
Since the 1970s, cognitivism has been the dominant paradigm in psychology and also in
educational psychology (Fishman & Davis, 2006). The cognitive view of learning believes that
individuals acquire skills, knowledge and understanding in one setting, and subsequently are
able to apply these skills, knowledge and understandings elsewhere. The unit of analysis or
focus for learning is in the mind of the individual. This originates from the work of Jean Piaget
(1950, cited in Hoban, 2002), who believes that learning is a process of continually reworking
an individual’s knowledge based on personal experiences. This idea of learning is highlighted in
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
26/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
10
constructivism, which states that knowledge is not passively received but actively built up by
individuals. From the personal constructivist view of learning, teachers enter into TPD with
existing beliefs and knowledge. Through reflection, teachers relate new knowledge and concepts
to their prior knowledge and experience, thus adding meaning and understanding to the new
knowledge and concepts.
Studies of teacher development and/or teacher learning mostly focus on the knowledge teachers
need to have in order to teach effectively (Bransford et al., 2006). In particular, many
researchers consider the knowledge base of teachers an important area to look into (e.g.,
Berliner, 1986; Borko & Putnam, 1996; Freeman, 1989; Grossman, 1990, 1991; Grossman,
Wilson, & Shulman, 1989; Peterson, 1988; Shulman, 1986b, 1987). Shulman’s (1986a, 1986b,
1987) framework of teacher knowledge has been widely adopted by researchers in this field as
the basis for their studies. Shulman (1986a, 1986b, 1987) categorised seven types of knowledge
that he believes teachers should possess in order to teach: (i) subject matter knowledge; (ii)
general pedagogical knowledge; (iii) curriculum knowledge; (iv) pedagogical content
knowledge; (v) knowledge of students’ learning; (vi) knowledge of the educational context, such
as the school and the classroom; and (vii) knowledge of educational ends, purposes and values.
In sum, studies along the line of inquiry point to the importance of helping teachers to expand
and elaborate their professional knowledge base. That is, they treat this as one important
component of teacher learning (Borko & Putnam, 1995). Some studies on video-based TPD
have also focused on this area to help teachers develop their professional knowledge (e.g.,
Givvin, Lemmens, & Santagata, 2007; Lampert & Ball, 1998; Olivero, John, & Sutherland,
2004; Roth et al., 2011; Strickland & Doty, 1997). For instance, the study of Ruth et al (2011)
investigated elementary teacher’s development of science content knowledge through analysis
of science teaching practice using video cases.
There is a body of research studying how novice and expert teachers differ in terms of their
knowledge and skills (Berliner, 1988; Leinhardt & Greeno, 1986; Sabers, Cushing, & Berliner,1991). For example, Berliner and his colleagues (Berliner, 1988; Sabers, et al., 1991) compared
the interpretation of classroom situations among expert teachers, advanced-beginning teachers
(student teacher and high-quality first-year teachers), and novice teachers (no professional
training) by using tasks simulating different aspects of teaching. In one of the tasks, teachers
were asked to watch a lesson displayed simultaneously on three video screens showing the
lesson from different camera angles. The novice teachers and advanced-beginning teachers
found the video confusing and interpreted the classroom situation inconsistently. The expert
teachers, however, were quickly able to capture the complexity of the classroom situation,interpret and make hypotheses about student needs and the nature of the ongoing activity. The
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
27/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
11
researchers concluded that expert teachers had developed context-embedded and situated
knowledge of classroom activities and were more easily able to interpret what they saw.
In view of the difference between expert teachers’ and novice teachers’ ability to captur e the
complexity of classroom situations and interpret student needs, one line of research on the use
of video for TPD purposes investigates a different type of knowledge and skills in teachers,
namely ‘professional vision’ or the ability to notice pedagog ically significant events (see for
example, Eilam & Poyas, 2006; Rosaen, Lundeberg, Cooper, Fritzen, & Terpstra, 2008; Sherin
& Han, 2004; Sherin & van Es, 2005; van Es, 2004). In the studies of Sherin & van Es (2005)
and van Es (2004), groups of pre-service and in- service teachers’ developed their ability to
notice classroom interactions in the context of video clubs. The results suggested that teachers
changed their focus from pedagogy to student thinking, identified significant interactions,
discussed the classroom events from evaluation to interpretation, and increased the use of
evidence from the videos. In other words, the teachers’ ability to notice what is happening in
their classroom increased with the use of videos. In the study of Eilam & Poyas (2006), besides
the shift of perspectives, teachers also increased their ability to identify and interpret implicit
and explicit factors and interrelations in teaching-learning processes. The video-mediated
activities also enhanced the teachers’ capacity to link perceived teaching-learning processes to
theoretical knowledge.
2.1.1.2. Teacher learning in the affective domain
Affective learning (Krathwohl, Bloom, & Masia, 1964) does not receive as much attention as
knowledge and skills learning in the teacher learning literature, even though teaching has been
recognised as an emotional practice (Hargreaves, 1998). Little is known about the process of
teacher affective learning and its role in teaching and teacher development. Sutton & Wheatley
(2003) point out that surprisingly little is known about the role of emotions in learning to teach,
the way in which the socio- cultural context of teaching interacts with teachers’ emotions, and to
what extent emotional experiences are an integral part of teacher learning. Hence, we need a better understanding of how emotional responses mediate learning, and how they emerge from
learning (Bransford, et al., 2006, p. 29).
Indeed, the study of emotions in teaching and learning is on the rise (Nias, 1996; Sutton &
Wheatley, 2003; van Veen & Lasky, 2005) . However, research on teachers’ affective learning in
the TPD context is rare. Graven’s study (Graven, 2004) is a rare example. In analysing the data
on teacher learning from an in-service teacher training programme, Graven found, to her
surprise, that confidence emerged as a crucial recurring phenomenon in both teacher descriptionand explanation of their learning. Based on her data, Graven suggested that confidence relates to
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
28/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
12
learning as mastery in the practice of being a professional teacher. For teachers, mastery
involved:
Confidence in what they learned and the meaning they constructed in changing
developments in their profession.
Confidence in their ability to participate in the various practices and communities Confidence in their ability to access resources to supplement their learning Confidence in their identity as professional competent teachers Confidence in accepting that there was still much more to learn, and the willingness and
confidence to become a life-long learner
According to Graven (2004), confidence is both a product and a process of learning. It is the
product of the result of learning as well as the process that stimulates or motivates teachers to
learn continuously. The five aspects of confidence in Graven’s stu dy echo with the idea of
personal development given by Bell & Gilbert (1996). Bell & Gilbert assert that personal
development involves teachers accepting an aspect of their teaching as problematic, dealing
with restraints and attending to the feelings and concerns of changing their practice and beliefs
about science education, and feeling empowered to be responsible for their own development.
They further argue that personal development is important in the process in that personal and
social development are intertwined, personal development precedes professional development,
and the pace of personal development influences the pace of professional development.
It is rare for research in video- based TPD to focus explicitly on developing teachers’ confidence
or other affective learning, although a few studies do report teacher learning in the affective
domain (e.g., Gunning & Mensah, 2011; Yoon et al., 2006). For example, in the study of
Gunning and Mensah (2011), reviewing videos helped to boost pre-service el ementary teachers’
self-efficacy and confidence to try new teaching practices as the videos provided the teachers
with vicarious experiences, in which they could witness peers modelling situational
competencies and visualise themselves in similar situations. Similar findings are also observedin studies for practicing teachers who reviewed and reflected on their own teaching videos. The
teachers who used videos to reflect on their practice showed a significant greater increase in
their science teaching efficacy than those who did not use videos (McConnell et al., 2008).
2.1.1.3. Summary
Research on the content of teacher learning is usually conducted from the researcher’s
perspective. The learning content is often studied in relation to the intended learning outcomes
that are pre-determined by the teacher educators or developers of TPD, instead of by the
teachers themselves. It does not explain which content is more useful and meaningful for
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
29/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
13
teachers (i.e., from their own perspective) and how teachers learn to cope with the complexity of
their work by using this newly learned content. Indeed, research on the content of teacher
learning from teachers’ own perspective is relatively rare. Webster -Wright (2009) argues that
more research on teacher learning from the teacher perspective is needed in order to unveil the
authentic learning experience of teachers. The present study attempts to fill this gap. Hence, at
the end of each of the professional learning activities in this study, teachers will be asked to
reflect on questions such as: What are the most impressive things in this meeting and why?
Have you gained any new insights from this meeting? If yes, what are they? What is the
implication/impact of these insights on you and/or your teaching?
Certainly, by focusing on the content of what teachers learned, these kinds of studies allow
researchers and teacher educators to understand the ends of teacher learning. However, they do
not help us to understand the processes that teachers go through to reach those ends (Feiman-
Nemser & Remillard, 1996). In order to help us to understand how teachers reach these ends
and learn to use the content of teacher learning in their work, the process and the nature of
teacher learning both need to be examined in detail, along with the factors that can influence
teacher learning (Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002; Feiman-Nemser & Remillard, 1996; Hoban,
2002). However, limited research has been conducted to explore this area of research (Beijaard,
et al., 2007; Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002; Putnam & Borko, 2000). The present study aims to
fill this research gap by addressing the following research questions: What do teachers learn as a
result of the participation in learning communities? What are the factors and processes involved?
2.1.2. Research on the Pr ocess of Teacher Learni ng
As Gravani and John (2005) suggest, how teachers learn should be as important as what they
learn. Recently, researchers began to emphasise the importance of understanding the process of
how teachers learn in the hope of applying the research findings in facilitating and optimising
teacher learning both in initial teacher education and the further professional development of
teachers (Beijaard, et al., 2007; Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002). Since the research literature onthe process of teacher learning is relatively new, the current study also reviews literature on the
process of teacher change and TPD if it is related to the learning process through which teachers
move towards expertise.
Based on their review of the literature, Clark & Hollingsworth (2002) claim that early literatures
on the process of teacher learning tended to treat teacher learning as a linear process with
specific starting and ending points. For example, they note that many teacher education
programmes att empt to change teachers’ beliefs and attitudes, expecting that a change in beliefsand attitudes will lead to changes in classroom practices and, ultimately, changes in student
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
30/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
14
learning outcomes as the goal of TPD. Often this goal is implicitly, rather than explicitly, spelt
out. Hence, they refer to this as the implicit model of teacher professional development (see
Figure 2.1).
Guskey (1986) argues that the assumption that a change of teachers’ beliefs and attitudes can
lead to a change in their classroom practices might be inaccurate since, from the research on
teacher change, TPD programs seldom result in significant change in teachers’ attitudes or
beliefs and/or classroom practices. He puts forward an alternative model (see Figure 2.2), which
suggests that significant changes in beliefs and attitudes are likely to take place only after
changes in student learning outcomes are evident. Changes in teachers’ beliefs and attitudes are
primarily a result , rather than a cause , of change in the learning outcomes of students (Guskey,
1986). In other words, evidence of improvement in student learning outcome becomes the key
element for the change of teachers’ beliefs and attitudes.
Although the two models discussed above differ in the sequence of the change process and the
reasons for the change taking place, the common feature is that they both assume that the
process of teacher change/teacher learning is linear and has specific starting and ending points.
Arguably, teachers are individuals with different past experiences, different existing knowledge
and beliefs, and different teachers may learn best in different ways.
More recent studies suggest that the process of teacher learning, rather than being viewed as a
Professional
Development
Change inStudent
LearningOutcomes
Change inTeachers
ClassroomPractice
Change inTeachersBeliefs &Attitudes
Figure 2.2 Guskey’s Model of Teacher Change
Professional
Development
Change inTeachers’
ClassroomPractice
Change inTeachers’
Knowledgeand Beliefs
Change inStudent
LearningOutcome
Figure 2.1 The Implicit Model of Teacher Professional Development
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
31/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
15
linear, step-by-step event, should be seen as a complex process (Gravani, 2007) that may be
cyclic with multiple entry points (Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002; Zwart, Wubbels, Bergen, &
Bolhuis, 2007). In other words, these two models may not be able to adequately represent the
idiosyncratic and dynamic nature of the process of teacher learning. Moreover, they do not take
into consideration the context where teachers learn and how a change in one aspect (e.g.,
practice) is transcended into another one (e.g., knowledge/beliefs). With reference to the
limitations of these two models, Clarke & Hollingsworth (2002) propose the Interconnected
Model of Teacher Professional Growth (IMTPG). Their model is represented in Figure 2.3 and
briefly described below.
According to this model, the teachers’ world is constituted by four distinct domains that changethrough mediating processes of ‘reflection’ and ‘enactment’ (represented as arrows linking the
domains. The multiplicity of possible pathways between the four domains reflects the
complexity of teachers’ learning processes. That is, this model recognises not only that teacher
learning is non- linear but also a continuous process involving teachers’ reflection and enactment.
Justi & van Driel (Justi & van Driel, 2005, 2006) demonstrated the fruitfulness of using IMTPG
as an analytical tool in studying the process through which five beginning science teachers
developed their knowledge on the use of models and modelling in science teaching. After
External Source of
Information or
Stimulus
Knowledge,
Beliefs and
Attitudes
Salient
Outcome
Professional
Experimentation
Personal Domain
External Domain
Domain of Practice
Domain ofConsequence
The Change
Environment
Figure 2.3 Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth
Enactment
Reflection
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
32/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
16
attending a special course on the use of models and modelling in teaching science, the teachers
chose one of the aspects discussed as the basis of research projects that they conducted in their
own classes. As part of their research projects, the teachers collected classroom data (for
instance, written materials produced by their students, video recordings of classroom
discussions) that they analysed for reflective reports. They then presented their reports during a
final group meeting a bout their research. Data regarding teachers’ learning were collected
during the study through questionnaires and individual teacher interviews, as well as through
written materials produced by teachers during the professional learning meetings and the
discussions that took place during these meetings.
Using IMTPG as the analytic tool, Justi and van Driel (2006) were able to abstract from the data
nine pictorial representations of the teacher’s learning process regarding the use of models and
modelling in science teaching for each of the five teachers. A total of 45 pictorial representations
of teachers’ learning process were drawn. Results showed that only two teachers (two
representations) expressed the same change sequence for the development of pedagogical
content knowledge on the purpose of the use of teaching models. Thirty-two representations
involved three or more relationships between the four domains; of these relationships sometimes
‘reflective relationships’ predominated, sometimes ‘enactment relationships’ predominated, and
sometimes no one particular relationship predominated.
Overall, the study indicated that the learning process of teachers is rather complex and
idiosyncratic. More importantly, Justi and van Driel (2006) have successfully demonstrated the
crucial role of using IMTPG in their analysis of the teachers’ knowledge growth. The four
domains of IMTPG and the subsequent establishment of relationships between the four domains
allowed the researchers to analyse the data in a way that promoted their understanding of the
processes of each teacher’s knowledge development. By identifying relationships between the
four domains, IMTPG made it possible for the researchers to understand each teacher’s
development in a detailed way.
Zwart et al (2007), also adopted IMTPG to analyse the learning process of teachers in their
study. The learning trajectories of eight experienced teachers in four coaching dyads were traced
and analysed over a one-year reciprocal peer coaching arrangement. Data sources included
audiotapes of coaching conferences, semi-structured learning interviews conducted by phone,
and digital diaries with teacher reports of their learning experiences. Thirty-four pictorial
representations of the teacher learning processes were identified. The researchers studied the
entry points, the ending points and the pattern of the pictorial representations. They found thatall four domains had been the entry point for the learning of the eight teachers, not necessarily
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
33/255
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
34/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
18
teachers who need a strong sense of self-belief if they are to survive (Day, Stobart, Sammons, &
Kington, 2006). It is found that the self efficacy of beginning teachers is more likely to be
reinforced in a supportive environment of openness and trust. Such a collegial approach,
however, requires shared understanding, values and goals developed through sustained contact
among individuals who participate in joint productive or co-joint activities (Lasky, 2005).
Nonetheless, there is no guarantee that teacher learning will definitely take place, even in a
supportive and conducive environment such as the one described above. For example,
Kwakman (2003) studied the degree of teacher participation in several professional learning
activities at the teachers’ work place and found that powerful opportunities for teachers to learn
went unused. In other words, professional learning is not self-evident and there are clearly
occasions when teachers simply do not learn. This brings us to the next individual/personal
factor affecting teacher learning.
2.1.3.2. Teachers’ will to learn
The phenomenon of “not learning” can possibly be explained by various personal and
contextual factors. In Van Eekelen, Vermunt and Boshuizen’s (2006) study, they chose to focus
on a personal factor that has received very little attention from researchers, namely, teachers’
“will to learn”. They considered a “will to learn” a necessary prerequisite for teacher learning,
not just a conducive learning environment. Teachers must take an active role in order to learn,
and a “will to learn” typically precedes such active involvement.
In Van Eekelen et al.’s (2006) study, they asked the question: Which behaviours of experienced
teachers within the workplace indicate the presence or absence of a will to learn? They carried
out the research with 15 teachers in a school. First, they conducted a semi-structured interview
with each of the teachers, followed by an observation study, and a retrospective interview based
on the observations. The observation study and the interviews were conducted to collect
samples of situations in which teachers may learn, and to have teachers reflect upon thosesituations and determine whether they learned something. Teachers were asked for their
thoughts on why they had or had not learned in each case.
The following behaviours were found to be indicative of a will to learn among the teachers:
having the ambition to explore new practices; being open to experiences and other people; being
pro-active; being able to attribute successes and mistakes to internal causes; asking critical
questions about on their performance; undertaking action to learn; and being able to recognise
learning processes and results. Using the data from the observation study and interviews, theresearchers differentiated the participating teachers into three groups based on the different
-
8/17/2019 FullText (7).pdf
35/255
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
19
manifestations of their will to learn: (i) teachers who do not see the need to learn; (ii) teachers
who wonder how to learn; and (iii) teachers who are eager to learn. The researchers believed
that the manifestations can help teacher educators and TPD developers to identify the presence
or absence of a will to learn in teachers and thus to understand and facilitate teachers’ learning
in a mor e individual and unique manner. Hence, this method of differentiating teachers’ will to
le