four amino acid changes in hiv-2 protease confer class

1
Four Amino Acid Changes in HIV-2 Protease Confer Class-Wide PI Suscepbility Dana N. Raugi 1 , Robert A. Smith 1 , Mahew Coyne 1 , Julia Olson 1 , Kara Parker 1 , Selly Ba 2 , Papa Salif Sow 2 , Moussa Seydi 2 , and Geoffrey S. Golieb 1,3 ; for the University of Washington-Dakar HIV-2 Study Group Departments of 1 Medicine/Allergy & Infecous Diseases and 3 Global Health, University of Washington, Seale, Washington, USA 2 Service des Maladies Infeceuses Ibrahima Diop Mar, Centre Hospitalier Naonal Universitaire de Fann, Universite Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal Contact: Dana N. Raugi, Medicine/AID, Box 358061, University of Washington, Seale, WA 98109, [email protected], tel: 206-543-8729 pROD9 293T-17 HIV-2 CD4 CCR5 MAGIC-5A CPRG HIV-2 CD4 CCR5 MAGIC-5A HIV-2 ROD9 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 0 25 50 75 100 [Nelfinavir] (nM) % of no-drug control NL4-3 ROD9 ROD9 PR 4 Oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur atoms are depicted in Corey-Pauling-Koltun coloring, water molecules coordinated by amprenavir and the main-chain nitrogen atoms of I50 and I50’ are shown as red spheres. Doed black lines indicate potenal hydrophobic and C-H···O interacons and doed red lines indicate hydrogen bonds. Atomic distances are shown in angstroms. Abstract # 588 A B Sequence and Structure of HIV-2 Protease A. Amino acid alignment of HIV-1 NL4-3 and HIV-2 ROD9 proteases. (Adapted from Menendez- Arias and Tozser, Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 29:42). Idencal residues are marked with red asterisks. Grey boxes A, B, and C indicate the dimerizaon domain, acve site/carboxy- terminal triad, and flap region, respecvely. Yellow boxes indicate the residues mutated in this study: I32V, V47I, M76L, and I82V in HIV-2 ROD9 . B. Locaon of the engineered amino acid replacements in the crystal structure of wild- type HIV-2 protease complexed with amprenavir (PDB # 3S45). Acve site aspartate resi- dues are shown in green scks, amprenavir is shown in yellow, and mutated amino acids are shown in red. • HIV-2 is endemic in West Africa and has achieved limited spread elsewhere. It affects 1-2 million people worldwide. • Treatment of HIV-2 is complicated by intrinsic resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and the fusion inhibitor enfuvirde, as well as a low genec barrier to nucleoside/nucleode reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance. • Protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens are the mainstay of anretroviral therapy for HIV-2, but the virus exhibits some degree of resistance to the majority of protease inhibitors, except saquinavir, darunavir, and lopinavir. • The mechanisms for this resistance are largely unknown. • HIV-1 and HIV-2 proteases share just 40-50% sequence identy, but structural studies indicate that the acve sites differ by only four amino acids, at residues 32, 47, 76, and 82. • Site-directed mutagenesis to construct a full-length HIV-2 ROD9 molecular clone in which codons 32, 47, 76, and 82 were substuted to encode the amino acids found in wild-type HIV-1 (PRΔ4: I32V, V47I, M76L, I82V), as well as clones containing each individual substuon. • Plasmid DNA (WT HIV-1 NL4-3 , WT HIV-2 ROD9 , and mutant HIV-2 ROD9 ) was transfected into 293T/17 cells using chloroquine-mediated calcium phosphate coprecipitaon, and virus grown for 48 hours in the presence of protease inhibitors. Virus growth was assayed on MAGIC-5A indicator cells by β-galactosidase cleavage of chlorophenol red-β-D-galactopyranoside (CPRG). • 50% effecve concentraons (EC 50 ) values for each virus were obtained from dose response data against a no-drug control using sigmoidal regression in GraphPad Prism v 6.0f. • Modeling studies used published crystallographic structures of HIV-1 and HIV-2 complexed with amprenavir. The PRΔ4 protease was constructed by substung the amino acids in the HIV-2 structure and energy minimizing using YASARA. Structure manipulaons and comparisons were performed in Chimera. STUDY AIM To examine the contribuons of HIV-2 protease amino acids I32, V47, M76, and I82 to the virus’s intrinsic PI resistance. BACKGROUND METHODS Comparison of protein-amprenavir interacons in HIV-1, HIV-2, and HIV-2 PRΔ4 proteases reveals possible clues to binding differences HIV-1 (PDB # 3EKV) 4.3 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.3 4.0 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.2 4.8 3.3 2.6 3.0 2.6 3.4 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.5 3.2 HIV-2 (PDB # 3S45) 4.4 4.9 3.3 3.8 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.5 2.8 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.4 3.7 3.2 3.1 2.3 2.9 2.8 2.7 3.5 3.3 HIV-2 PRΔ4 (PDB # 3S45 w/ I32V, V47I, M76L, & I82V, energy minimized using YASARA) 3.1 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.6 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.1 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.0 2.8 3.2 4.0 3.2 3.0 2.7 3.0 RESULTS These studies were supported by grants to GSG from the Naonal Instutes of Health/Naonal Instute of Allergy and Infecous Diseases (NIH/NIAID; 2R01-AI060466), the UW Center For AIDS Research (CFAR, an NIH-funded program; P30 AI027757), and the UW Royalty Research Fund (A92723). We thank the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program for providing wild-type HIV-1 and HIV-2 strains. Addional UW-Dakar HIV-2 Study Group members include: Macoumba Toure, Ndeye Mery Dia Badiane, Louise Fortes, Cheikh T. Ndour, Jacques Ndour, Fatou Niasse, Fama Sall, Fatou Traore, Khadim Faye, Sophie Chablis, Marie Pierre Sy, Bintou Diaw, Mbaye Ndoye, Amadou Bale Diop, Marianne Fadam Diome (Clinique des Maladies Infeceuses Ibrahima Diop Mar, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Fann, Universite´ Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal); Alassane Niang, ElHadji Ibrahima Sall, Ousseynou Cisse, Jean Philippe Diaa, Raphael Bakhoum, Juliee Gomis, (Région Médicale de Ziguinchor, Ziguinchor, Casamance, Senegal), Stephen Hawes, Noelle Benzekri, Donna Kenney, Joshua Stern, Qinghua Feng, Kim Wong, John Lin, Steve Cherne, Nancy Kiviat, Brad Church, Alexandra Hernandez, Alexandra Montano, Kate Parker, Lindsey Blankenship, Mariah Oakes, Sally Leong, Vincent Wu (University of Washington, Seale, Washington). STRUCTURAL COMPARISON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONCLUSIONS • Substung four acve site amino acid residues in HIV-2 protease to the corresponding amino acids from HIV-1 results in a replicaon- competent virus which exhibits a paern of PI suscepbility comparable to that of HIV-1. • The four amino acid changes appear to work synergiscally to confer a greater level of PI suscepbility than the sum of each individual change. • HIV-2 resistance to amprenavir appears to result from a diminuon or loss of stabilizing interacons between protease and the THF and aniline groups of the inhibitor. Our data suggest the mutaons in PRΔ4 help stabilize amprenavir in the P2 and P2’ pockets of HIV-2 protease, possibly accounng for the increased suscepbility of HIV-2 PRΔ4 to amprenavir in culture. • These findings enhace our overall understanding of the genec basis of PI suscepbility, and demonstrate that acve site residues in protease are the primary determinants of intrinsic HIV-2 PI resistance. • HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease structures show similar orientaon of the inhibitor within the substrate binding cleſt. • Interacons between amprenavir and the amino acids in the P1 and P1’ sites, as well as the hydrogen bonding interacons between the catalyc aspartates at D25 and D25’ and the residues within the flap region, are conserved between HIV-1 and HIV-2. • Subtle differences occur in the P2 and P2’ sites, including the loss of a potenal C-H···π interacon between posion 47 and the aniline ring of amprenavir, increased distance between the main chain carbonyl of D30’ and the tetrahydrofuran (THF) group, and lengthening of the hydrogen bond between the D30 main chain carbonyl and the aniline amino group of amprenavir. • HIV-2 PRΔ4 shares common features with HIV-1 • In the energy-minimized predicons for HIV-2 PRΔ4, P1 and P1‘ interacons appear quite similar to wild-type HIV-2. • The side chain of V47’, main chain carbonyl oxygen of D30‘, and main chain nitrogen atoms on D29’ and D30‘ are in closer proximity to the THF moiety. • The substuon of the longer isoleucine side chain at posion 47 brings the side chain closer to the aniline ring, potenally restoring the C-H···π interacon noted in HIV-1. • The main chain carbonyl group of D30 is rotated approximately 40 degrees relave to wild-type HIV-2, resulng in a confirmaon similar to HIV-1 and shorter hydrogen bonding distance between the carbonyl oxygen and the aniline NH 2 of amprenavir. Amprenavir Atazanavir Darunavir Indinavir Lopinavir Nelfinavir Ritonavir Saquinavir Tipranavir 0.1 1 10 100 1000 EC 50 (nM) HIV-1 NL4-3 HIV-2 ROD9 HIV-2 ROD9-PR 4 HIV-2 PRΔ4 and HIV-1 are similarly suscepble to all FDA-approved PI Bars indicate mean EC 50 s of at least three independent dose-response experiments. Error bars represent standard deviaons. No single amino acid change confers more than 12-fold increase in PI suscepbility Data shown are mean EC 50 ± standard deviaon (fold change compared to wild-type HIV-2 ROD9 ) for at least three independent dose-response experiments. Drug Amprenavir 44 ± 13 >1000 550 ± 310 (1.8) 470 ± 220 (2.1) 660 ± 280 (1.5) >1000 (1.0) 23 ± 17 (>43) Atazanavir 3.6 ± 3.0 66 ± 44 51 ± 18 (1.3) 27 ± 3.4 (2.4) 5.3 ± 2.1 (12) 32 ± 5.9 (2.1) 1.1 ± 1.1 (60) Darunavir 9.0 ± 3.9 58 ± 32 12 ± 0.7 (4.8) 17 ± 3.3 (3.4) 28 ± 7.8 (2.1) 29 ± 2.4 (2.0) 2.2 ± 1.3 (26) Indinavir 36 ± 23 150 ± 64 46 ± 21 (3.3) 30 ± 25 (5.0) 15 ± 6.8 (10) 140 ± 140 (1.1) 16 ± 9.8 (9.4) Lopinavir 30 ± 27 105 ±59 38 ± 22 (2.8) 26 ± 8.7 (4.0) 120 ± 64 (1.0) 120 ± 98 (1.0) 21 ± 10 (5.0) Nelfinavir 39 ± 18 490 ± 280 370 ± 90 (1.3) 190 ± 86 (2.6) 99 ± 69 (4.9) 250 ± 130 (2.0) 47 ± 4.9 (10) Ritonavir 61 ± 46 580 ± 240 290 ± 94 (1.6) 510 ± 440 (1.3) 240 ± 190 (2.4) 620 ± 150 (1.0) 160 ± 100 (3.6) Saquinavir 33 ± 33 31 ± 18 19 ± 12 (1.6) 35 ± 7.7 (1.0) 25 ± 12 (1.2) 93 ± 71 (0.3) 12 ± 6.1 (2.6) Tipranavir 250 ± 82 >1000 >1000 (1.0) 260 ± 69 (>3.8) 500 ± 270 (2.0) >1000 (1.0) 120 ± 65 (>8.3) M76L I82V PR 4 HIV-2 NL4-3 HIV-1 ROD9 I32V V47I A B C B A 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 99 HIV-1 PQITLWQRPL VTIKIGGQLK EALLDTGADD TVLEEMNLPG RWKPKMIGGI GGFIKVRQYD QILIEICGHK AIGTVLVGPT QVNIIGRNLL TQIGCTLNF ** ** ** ** * ** * ******** * ** *** **** * ** * * * * * ** *** * * * ** HIV-2 PQFSLWKRPV VTAYIEGQPV EVLLDTGADD SIVAGIELGN NYSPKIVGGI GGFINTKEYK NVEIEVLNKK VRATIMTGDT PINIFGRNIL TALGMSLNL

Upload: others

Post on 18-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Four Amino Acid Changes in HIV-2 Protease Confer Class-Wide PI SusceptibilityDana N. Raugi1, Robert A. Smith1, Matthew Coyne1, Julia Olson1, Kara Parker1, Selly Ba2, Papa Salif Sow2, Moussa Seydi2, and Geoffrey S. Gottlieb1,3;

for the University of Washington-Dakar HIV-2 Study GroupDepartments of 1Medicine/Allergy & Infectious Diseases and 3Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

2Service des Maladies Infectieuses Ibrahima Diop Mar, Centre Hospitalier National Universitaire de Fann, Universite Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal

Contact: Dana N. Raugi, Medicine/AID, Box 358061, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, [email protected], tel: 206-543-8729

pROD9

293T-17

HIV-2CD4

CCR5

MAGIC-5A

CPRG

HIV-2CD4

CCR5

MAGIC-5A

HIV-2ROD9

0.1 1 10 100 1000 100000

25

50

75

100

[Nelfinavir] (nM)

% o

f no-

drug

con

trol

NL4-3ROD9ROD9 PR 4

Oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur atoms are depicted in Corey-Pauling-Koltun coloring, water molecules coordinated by amprenavir and the main-chain nitrogen atoms of I50 and I50’ are shown as red spheres. Dotted black lines indicate potential hydrophobic and C-H···O interactions and dotted red lines indicate hydrogen bonds. Atomic distances are shown in angstroms.

Abstract # 588

A

B Sequence and Structure of HIV-2 Protease A. Amino acid alignment of HIV-1NL4-3 and HIV-2ROD9 proteases. (Adapted from Menendez-Arias and Tozser, Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 29:42). Identical residues are marked with red asterisks. Grey boxes A, B, and C indicate the dimerization domain, active site/carboxy-terminal triad, and flap region, respectively. Yellow boxes indicate the residues mutated in this study: I32V, V47I, M76L, and I82V in HIV-2ROD9.

B. Location of the engineered amino acid replacements in the crystal structure of wild-type HIV-2 protease complexed with amprenavir (PDB # 3S45). Active site aspartate resi-dues are shown in green sticks, amprenavir is shown in yellow, and mutated amino acids are shown in red.

• HIV-2 is endemic in West Africa and has achieved limited spread elsewhere. It affects 1-2 million people worldwide.• Treatment of HIV-2 is complicated by intrinsic resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide, as well as a low genetic barrier to nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance.• Protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens are the mainstay of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-2, but the virus exhibits some degree of resistance to the majority of protease inhibitors, except saquinavir, darunavir, and lopinavir.• The mechanisms for this resistance are largely unknown.

• HIV-1 and HIV-2 proteases share just 40-50% sequence identity, but structural studies indicate that the active sites differ by only four amino acids, at residues 32, 47, 76, and 82.

• Site-directed mutagenesis to construct a full-length HIV-2ROD9 molecular clone in which codons 32, 47, 76, and 82 were substituted to encode the amino acids found in wild-type HIV-1 (PRΔ4: I32V, V47I, M76L, I82V), as well as clones containing each individual substitution.• Plasmid DNA (WT HIV-1NL4-3, WT HIV-2ROD9, and mutant HIV-2ROD9) was transfected into 293T/17 cells using chloroquine-mediated calcium phosphate coprecipitation, and virus grown for 48 hours in the presence of protease inhibitors. Virus growth was assayed on MAGIC-5A indicator cells by β-galactosidase cleavage of chlorophenol red-β-D-galactopyranoside (CPRG).

• 50% effective concentrations (EC50) values for each virus were obtained from dose response data against a no-drug control using sigmoidal regression in GraphPad Prism v 6.0f.• Modeling studies used published crystallographic structures of HIV-1 and HIV-2 complexed with amprenavir. The PRΔ4 protease was constructed by substituting the amino acids in the HIV-2 structure and energy minimizing using YASARA. Structure manipulations and comparisons were performed in Chimera.

STUDY AIMTo examine the contributions of HIV-2 protease amino acids I32, V47,

M76, and I82 to the virus’s intrinsic PI resistance.

BACKGROUND

METHODS

Comparison of protein-amprenavir interactions in HIV-1, HIV-2, and HIV-2 PRΔ4 proteases reveals possible clues to binding differences

HIV-1(PDB # 3EKV)

4.3 3.43.6

3.53.5

3.3

4.0

3.3

3.3

3.2

3.2

4.8

3.3

2.6

3.02.6

3.4

2.92.6

2.93.1

3.5 3.2

HIV-2(PDB # 3S45)

4.4 4.9

3.3

3.83.7

3.23.7

3.5

3.43.5 2.8

3.1 2.8

2.9

3.4

3.73.2

3.1

2.3

2.9

2.8

2.7

3.53.3

HIV-2 PRΔ4(PDB # 3S45 w/ I32V, V47I, M76L, & I82V,

energy minimized using YASARA)

3.1

3.83.8

3.53.7

3.7

3.6 4.0 3.7

3.6

3.5

3.43.1

3.5

3.1

2.9

3.0

2.8

3.2

4.03.2

3.02.7

3.0

RESULTS

These studies were supported by grants to GSG from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH/NIAID; 2R01-AI060466), the UW Center For AIDS Research (CFAR, an NIH-funded program; P30 AI027757), and the UW Royalty Research Fund (A92723). We thank the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program for providing wild-type HIV-1 and HIV-2 strains. Additional UW-Dakar HIV-2 Study Group members include: Macoumba Toure, Ndeye Mery Dia Badiane, Louise Fortes, Cheikh T. Ndour, Jacques Ndour, Fatou Niasse, Fatima Sall, Fatou Traore, Khadim Faye, Sophie Chablis, Marie Pierre Sy, Bintou Diaw, Mbaye Ndoye, Amadou Bale Diop, Marianne Fadam Diome (Clinique des Maladies Infectieuses Ibrahima Diop Mar, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Fann, Universite´ Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal); Alassane Niang, ElHadji Ibrahima Sall, Ousseynou Cisse, Jean Philippe Diatta, Raphael Bakhoum, Juliette Gomis, (Région Médicale de Ziguinchor, Ziguinchor, Casamance, Senegal), Stephen Hawes, Noelle Benzekri, Donna Kenney, Joshua Stern, Qinghua Feng, Kim Wong, John Lin, Steve Cherne, Nancy Kiviat, Brad Church, Alexandra Hernandez, Alexandra Montano, Kate Parker, Lindsey Blankenship, Mariah Oakes, Sally Leong, Vincent Wu (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington).

STRUCTURAL COMPARISON

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CONCLUSIONS• Substituting four active site amino acid residues in HIV-2 protease to the corresponding amino acids from HIV-1 results in a replication- competent virus which exhibits a pattern of PI susceptibility comparable to that of HIV-1.

• The four amino acid changes appear to work synergistically to confer a greater level of PI susceptibility than the sum of each individual change.

• HIV-2 resistance to amprenavir appears to result from a diminution or loss of stabilizing interactions between protease and the THF and aniline groups of the inhibitor. Our data suggest the mutations in PRΔ4 help stabilize amprenavir in the P2 and P2’ pockets of HIV-2 protease, possibly accounting for the increased susceptibility of HIV-2 PRΔ4 to amprenavir in culture.

• These findings enhace our overall understanding of the genetic basis of PI susceptibility, and demonstrate that active site residues in protease are the primary determinants of intrinsic HIV-2 PI resistance.

• HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease structures show similar orientation of the inhibitor within the substrate binding cleft. • Interactions between amprenavir and the amino acids in the P1 and P1’ sites, as well as the hydrogen bonding interactions between the catalytic aspartates at D25 and D25’ and the residues within the flap region, are conserved between HIV-1 and HIV-2. • Subtle differences occur in the P2 and P2’ sites, including the loss of a potential C-H···π interaction between position 47 and the aniline ring of amprenavir, increased distance between the main chain carbonyl of D30’ and the tetrahydrofuran (THF) group, and lengthening of the hydrogen bond between the D30 main chain carbonyl and the aniline amino group of amprenavir.

• HIV-2 PRΔ4 shares common features with HIV-1 • In the energy-minimized predictions for HIV-2 PRΔ4, P1 and P1‘ interactions appear quite similar to wild-type HIV-2. • The side chain of V47’, main chain carbonyl oxygen of D30‘, and main chain nitrogen atoms on D29’ and D30‘ are in closer proximity to the THF moiety. • The substitution of the longer isoleucine side chain at position 47 brings the side chain closer to the aniline ring, potentially restoring the C-H···π interaction noted in HIV-1. • The main chain carbonyl group of D30 is rotated approximately 40 degrees relative to wild-type HIV-2, resulting in a confirmation similar to HIV-1 and shorter hydrogen bonding distance between the carbonyl oxygen and the aniline NH2 of amprenavir.

Amprena

vir

Atazan

avir

Daruna

vir

Indina

vir

Lopin

avir

Nelfina

vir

Ritona

vir

Saquin

avir

Tipran

avir

0.1

1

10

100

1000

EC50

(nM

) HIV-1NL4-3HIV-2ROD9HIV-2ROD9-PR 4

HIV-2 PRΔ4 and HIV-1 are similarly susceptible to all FDA-approved PI

Bars indicate mean EC50s of at least three independent dose-response experiments. Error bars represent standard deviations.

No single amino acid change confers more than 12-fold increase in PI susceptibility

Data shown are mean EC50 ± standard deviation (fold change compared to wild-type HIV-2ROD9) for at least three independent dose-response experiments.

Drug

Amprenavir 44 ± 13 >1000 550 ± 310 (1.8) 470 ± 220 (2.1) 660 ± 280 (1.5) >1000 (1.0) 23 ± 17 (>43)Atazanavir 3.6 ± 3.0 66 ± 44 51 ± 18 (1.3) 27 ± 3.4 (2.4) 5.3 ± 2.1 (12) 32 ± 5.9 (2.1) 1.1 ± 1.1 (60)Darunavir 9.0 ± 3.9 58 ± 32 12 ± 0.7 (4.8) 17 ± 3.3 (3.4) 28 ± 7.8 (2.1) 29 ± 2.4 (2.0) 2.2 ± 1.3 (26)Indinavir 36 ± 23 150 ± 64 46 ± 21 (3.3) 30 ± 25 (5.0) 15 ± 6.8 (10) 140 ± 140 (1.1) 16 ± 9.8 (9.4)Lopinavir 30 ± 27 105 ±59 38 ± 22 (2.8) 26 ± 8.7 (4.0) 120 ± 64 (1.0) 120 ± 98 (1.0) 21 ± 10 (5.0)Nelfinavir 39 ± 18 490 ± 280 370 ± 90 (1.3) 190 ± 86 (2.6) 99 ± 69 (4.9) 250 ± 130 (2.0) 47 ± 4.9 (10)Ritonavir 61 ± 46 580 ± 240 290 ± 94 (1.6) 510 ± 440 (1.3) 240 ± 190 (2.4) 620 ± 150 (1.0) 160 ± 100 (3.6)Saquinavir 33 ± 33 31 ± 18 19 ± 12 (1.6) 35 ± 7.7 (1.0) 25 ± 12 (1.2) 93 ± 71 (0.3) 12 ± 6.1 (2.6)Tipranavir 250 ± 82 >1000 >1000 (1.0) 260 ± 69 (>3.8) 500 ± 270 (2.0) >1000 (1.0) 120 ± 65 (>8.3)

M76L I82V PR 4HIV-2

NL4-3HIV-1

ROD9 I32V V47I

A B C B A 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 99HIV-1 PQITLWQRPL VTIKIGGQLK EALLDTGADD TVLEEMNLPG RWKPKMIGGI GGFIKVRQYD QILIEICGHK AIGTVLVGPT QVNIIGRNLL TQIGCTLNF ** ** ** ** * ** * ******** * ** *** **** * ** * * * * * ** *** * * * ** HIV-2 PQFSLWKRPV VTAYIEGQPV EVLLDTGADD SIVAGIELGN NYSPKIVGGI GGFINTKEYK NVEIEVLNKK VRATIMTGDT PINIFGRNIL TALGMSLNL