fortification in stample foodsdf

Upload: mary-mendoza

Post on 02-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    1/228

    DEVELOPMENT OF MICROENCAPSULATION-BASED

    TECHNOLOGIES FOR MICRONUTRIENT

    FORTIFICATION IN STAPLE FOODS

    FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

    By

    Yao Olive Li

    A dissertation submitted in conformity with the requirements

    for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

    Graduate Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry

    University of Toronto

    Copyright by Yao Olive Li 2009

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    2/228

    ii

    Development of Microencapsulation-based Technologies for Micronutrient

    Fortification in Staple Foods for Developing Countries

    Yao Olive Li

    Doctor of Philosophy, 2009

    Graduate Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry

    University of Toronto

    ABSTRACT

    A microencapsulation-based technology platform for effective delivery of multiplemicronutrients for food fortification has been developed. The technology, consisting of

    extrusion agglomeration followed by encapsulation through surface coating, has been

    successfully tested on three size scales in typical staple foods: as a surface treatment on salt

    and sugar, on 20-100m scale; in salt on a 300-1200 m scale; and on reconstituted rice on

    the 5-10 mm scale. The process results in effective delivery systems for one or more active

    ingredients with organoleptic properties that are unnoticeable to the average consumer.

    Particularly, salt double fortified with iodine and iron using the microencapsulated ferrous

    fumarate premix made by the extrusion-based agglomeration process had acceptable sensory

    properties and stability when stored at 40oC and 60% relative humidity (RH) for up to a year.

    In these tests >85% of iodine and >90% of ferrous iron were retained.

    Reconstituted Ultra Rice grains made by extrusion stabilized by internal gelation has

    resulted in improved grain integrity and a much simplified process, compared to the original,

    patented surface crosslinking technique. The most effective internal gelation system is

    composed of alginate, calcium sulphate (CaSO4), and sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) at a

    best ratio of 3%:3%:0.6% (w/w).

    It is feasible to incorporate folic acid into the existing fortification programs using the

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    3/228

    iii

    technology platform developed in this study. The results indicate that the potential

    interactions of folic acid with other added micronutrients or with the food vehicles could be

    prevented by incorporating folic acid as a premix made by the extrusion-based technology.

    Virtually no folic acid was lost after 9 months storage at 40oC and 60% RH when the folic

    acid premix was added into salt or sugar samples.

    The technical feasibility of the microencapsulation-based technology platform has been

    successfully demonstrated for micronutrient delivery in food vehicles of different size

    ranges, resulting in fortified staple foods with desired physical, chemical, nutritional, and

    organoleptic properties. The technology should be adaptable to formulating customized

    delivery systems of active ingredients for broader applications, and promises to bring

    immediate benefits in combatting micronutrient deficiencies, that will have far reaching

    effects in health and social development.

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    4/228

    iv

    DEDICATIONS

    I dedicate the culmination of my formal studies to my parents:

    Drs. Wentong Li & Shukun Chen

    I dedicate this thesis

    to my husband, Shujun,and my daughter, Grace

    for their love, patience, support, accommodation

    to myself

    as a great fortieth birthday gift

    and as a new start of my academic career in Canada

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    5/228

    v

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The over six years that I have spent here at University of Toronto in pursuit my Masters and

    doctorate degrees will always be a remarkable period of time in my life. There are so many

    people that I would like to express my appreciation for their helps in making my learning

    journey here such a great experience.

    First of all, I would like to express my greatest gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. L. L. Diosady,

    for his continuous guidance and support. His faith in my capability and the research freedom

    he gave to me enabled me to develop my professional skills over the course. The appreciable

    influence from him, a widely respected professor, has inspired me to re-start my dreamed

    career in academia in Canada. I am honoured to be your student!

    I am very grateful to my reading committee members, Dr. E. Acosta and Dr. B. Saville, who

    have imparted their knowledge, visions, and critical thinking onto me throughout my

    dissertation process. Your generous support and invaluable advices are well appreciated!

    I am also thankful to my oral committee members, Dr. Y. L. Cheng and Dr. E. Edwards, who

    provided me invaluable suggestions from my thesis structure to the technical contents; Dr. V.

    Rao and Dr. T. Oshinowo as my chairs of the two oral defenses, who initiated insightful

    discussions between me and the exam committees; Dr. D. Rousseau from Ryerson

    University as my external appraiser, who reviewed my thesis carefully and provided me

    constructive criticisms in helping me improve my thesis. I surely learned a lot from all of

    you during the two oral exams, which made me truly understand the meaning of the title of a

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    6/228

    vi

    doctorate.

    Parts of the research work were financially sponsored by the Micronutrient Initiative (MI)

    and the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH). I would then acknowledge

    the financial and technical support from the organizations and the staffs, particularly with Mr.

    Venkatesh Mannar and Dr. Annie Wesley from MI, and Dr. Ted Greiner and Ms. Shirley

    Jankowski from PATH.

    During my six years research many people from U of T or other academic institutions have

    kindly offered me the technical assistances in conducting certain analyses and measurements.

    I have to say thank you to: Mr. Dan Mathers and Ms. Ying Lei Wania from the ANALEST in

    the Department of Chemistry, Mr. Sal Boccia from the Microanalysis Centre of the

    Department of Material Science and Engineering, Dr. Rana Sodhi from the Surface Interface

    Ontario in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Mr. Dave Sohn

    from Professor Yu-ling Chengs research group, Dr. Supratim Ghosh and Dr. Misael

    Miranda from Professor Derick Rousseaus research group at the University of Ryerson.

    Over the course many undergraduate students and visiting scholars have involved in my

    research projects, and it was great experience to work together with them. Special thanks go

    to Adrew Barquin, Pauline Rabier, and Haeyeon Lee for their contributions to my

    experimental work.

    I am especially thankful to the members of the Food Engineering Group, in particular

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    7/228

    vii

    Professor Toks Oshinowo and Mr. Bih King Chen, for their great support and suggestions. I

    value the friendship of Judy Ue, Jessica Yuan, Katarina Rutkowski, Narongechai

    Prapakorenwerzya, Crystal Lo, and Divya Yadava. Thank you for the insightful discussions

    between us, and the joy and sadness that we experienced together over the past years.

    Finally, I would dedicate all I have achieved to my family my parents, my husband and my

    daughter. Without your unconditional love, support, and patience, I could not have come to

    thus far.

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    8/228

    viii

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    ABSTRACT.........ii

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS......v

    TABLE OF CONTENTS....viii

    LIST OF FIGURES......xii

    LIST OF TABLES.....xv

    LIST OF APPENDICES xvii

    1 INTRODUCTION1

    2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES, SCOPE & APPROACHES...1

    2.1 Research Objectives7

    2.2 Research Scope8

    2.3 Research Approaches & Anticipated Outcomes..9

    3 RESEARCH BACKGROUND..13

    3.1 Micronutrient Deficiencies13

    3.2 Food Fortification..14

    3.2.1 Food Vehicle Selection15

    3.2.2 Fortification Techniques Used in Existing Programs..16

    3.2.3 Current Challenges in Food Fortification Programs17

    3.3 Microencapsulation18

    3.3.1 Microencapsulation Techniques..20

    3.3.2 Microencapsulation in the Food Industry27

    3.3.3 Coating Materials Used For Microencapsulation in the Food Industry..30

    3.3.4 Microencapsulation of Vitamins and Minerals32

    3.3.5 Microencapsulation Techniques Used in This Research Group..33

    4 RESEARCH APPROACH 1 - SALT GRAIN-SIZED IRON PREMIX MADE BYEXTRUSION & POLYMER COATING FOR SALT DOUBLE FORTIFICATION36

    4.1 Research Incentive and Hypothesis...36

    4.2 Experimental Materials & Methods..39

    4.2.1 Materials..39

    4.2.2 Equipment40

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    9/228

    ix

    4.2.3 Experimental Procedures.43

    4.2.4 Analytical Methods..45

    4.3 Results & Discussion.47

    4.3.1 Investigation on Extrusion...47

    4.3.1.1 Binder selection.48

    4.3.1.2 Optimization of the extrusion operation52

    4.3.2 Investigation on Colour-Masking Process...54

    4.3.2.1 Different techniques for applying TiO2.56

    4.3.2.2 Alternative colour-masking agents58

    4.3.3 Investigation on Encapsulation Using Glassy Polymer Coatings59

    4.3.3.1 Comparison between MethocelTM

    and Kollicoat

    61

    4.3.3.2 Comparison between pan coating and fluidized bed coating61

    4.3.4 Formulation Optimization...62

    4.3.4.1 Iron content in optimized formulations.64

    4.3.4.2 In vitro iron bioavailability in optimized formulations .65

    4.3.4.3 Iron premix integrity in pH 4 HCl solution...67

    4.3.4.4 Effect of formulation ingredients & processing techniques on density.70

    4.3.4.5 Physical characteristics of the microencapsulated iron premixes..71

    4.3.5 Stability Test in DFS Samples.72

    4.3.5.1 Iodine stability...72

    4.3.5.2 Ferrous iron stability..76

    4.3.6 Iodine and Iron Interaction in DFS..78

    4.3.7 Iodine Degradation Kinetics in DFS80

    4.4 Summary of Research Approach 182

    5 RESEARCH APPROACH 2 - ULTRA RICEAS MICRONUTRIENT DELIVERY

    VEHICLE USING LARGE PARTICLES..83

    5.1 Project Background & Research Incentive83

    5.2 Literature Review on Alginate Chemistry & Internal Gelation.85

    5.3 Experimental Strategy Towards Formulation Design88

    5.4 Experimental Materials & Methods ..89

    5.4.1 Materials..89

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    10/228

    x

    5.4.2 Experimental Methods.90

    5.5 Results & Discussion.93

    5.5.1 Preliminary Investigations...93

    5.5.1.1 Effect of different alginate sources on the internal gelation..94

    5.5.1.2 Effect of different calcium salts on the internal gelation...95

    5.5.1.3 Effect of different sequestrants on the internal gelation97

    5.5.1.4 Effect of different calcium-sequestrant ratios on the internal gelation..98

    5.5.1.5 Investigation of other ingredients & procedures for dough mixing..98

    5.5.2 Formulation Optimization.100

    5.5.2.1 Orthogonal experiment100

    5.5.2.2 Verification of the optimal ratios.103

    5.5.3 Test of the Optimized Gelation Systems in Nutrient Fortified Formulations110

    5.5.4 Texture Measurements on the Best Formulations..112

    5.5.5 Mechanism of Alginate-Calcium Interaction in the Ultra RiceSystem..115

    5.6 Summary of Research Approach 2..117

    6 RESEARCH APPROACH 3 - FOLIC ACID TESTS...120

    6.1 Research Incentive Folate Deficiency..120

    6.2 Literature Review on Folic Acid Chemistry122

    6.2.1 Physiochemical Properties.122

    6.2.2 Biological Functions..123

    6.2.3 Food Fortification with Folic Acid123

    6.2.4 Concerns Related to Folic Acid Fortification125

    6.2.5 Issues of Folate Bioavailability.125

    6.2.6 Stability of Folic Acid127

    6.3 Project Goals & Anticipated Challenges .130

    6.4 Experimental Materials & Methods 131

    6.4.1 Materials131

    6.4.2 Experimental Design.132

    6.4.3 Analytical Methods136

    6.5 Results & Discussion...138

    6.5.1 Folic Acid Fortification in Guatemalan Salt and Sugar.138

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    11/228

    xi

    6.5.1.1. Folic acid stability...139

    6.5.1.2. Iodine stability in Guatemalan iodized salt....140

    6.5.1.3. Vitamin A stability in Guatemalan vitamin A fortified sugar..141

    6.5.1.4. Colour Stability...142

    6.5.2 Folic Acid Fortification in Multiple Fortified Ultra Rice....143

    6.5.2.1 Ultra Riceappearance and colour stability....143

    6.5.2.2 Folic acid stability ...147

    6.5.3 Interactions of Folic Acid with Other Micronutrients...148

    6.6 Summary of Research Approach 3 .150

    7 CONCLUSIONS...152

    8 RECOMMENDATIONS .154

    9 REFERENCES.157

    10 NOMENCLATURE168

    11 APPENDICES.172

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    12/228

    xii

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Figure 2.1 Overview of the project scope 9

    Figure 3.1 Schematic relationship between the core material, the wall material,and the required technique used in microencapsulation systems

    19

    Figure 3.2 Microcapsules and microspheres 21

    Figure 3.3 Molecular structure and microstructure of beta-cyclodextrin 26

    Figure 4.0 Surface defects on encapsulated ferrous fumarate using fluidized-bedagglomeration and soy stearine as the coating material

    36

    Figure 4.1 Schematic process flow for making microencapsulated FeFum 37

    Figure 4.2 Ultra Power Series KitchenAidTMStand Mixer 40

    Figure 4.3 La Monferrina P12 Pasta Extruder and other components: die and

    cutter

    40

    Figure 4.4 Schematic diagram for Uni-Glatt top spray fluidized bed assembly 42

    Figure 4.5 Laboratory pan coating assembly 42

    Figure 4.6 Effect of binder materials on iron digestibility of the extrudedparticles

    65

    Figure 4.7 Effect of different coating materials on iron digestibility of themicroencapsulated premixes

    66

    Figure 4.8 Effect of each step of the encapsulation process on iron digestibility 67

    Figure 4.9 Effect of binders on particle integrity when dissolved in pH 4 HClsolution

    68

    Figure 4.10 Effect of each step of the encapsulation process on iron premixintegrity in pH 4 HCl solution

    69

    Figure 4.11 Iodine stability in DFS samples containing various FeFum forms powder, extruded and colour-masked particles, as well asencapsulated premixes, after one-year storage at 40oC and 60% RH

    74

    Figure 4.12 Relative iodine retention in the DFS samples containing different

    sources of FePP during 6 months storage at 40

    o

    C and 60% RH

    75

    Figure 4.13 Ferrous iron stability in various FeFum forms and in DFS samples,after 10 months storage at the ambient condition and one-year storageunder 40oC and 60%RH, respectively

    77

    Figure 4.14 Iodine-iron interaction in DFS correlation analysis between iodineand ferrous iron losses in the DFS samples containing various ironparticles after one year storage under 40oC and 60% RH

    79

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    13/228

    xiii

    Figure 4.15 Correlation of iodine degradation in the DFS samples with afirst-order degradation pattern

    80

    Figure 4.16 Apparent first order degradation kinetics of iodine in the DFSsamples made with various iron particles during one-year storageunder 40

    oC and 60% RH

    81

    Figure 5.1 Schematic process flow of Ultra Rice 83

    Figure 5.2 Structural characteristics of alginate and the egg-box structure formedby alginate-Ca gelation

    86

    Figure 5.3 Factors affecting alginate-Ca reaction 88

    Figure 5.4 Statistical analyses of the best level for each factor 103

    Figure 5.5 Comparison of grain appearance made with glutinous flour in placeof regular rice flour

    107

    Figure 5.6 Comparison between glutinous flour and regular rice flour using thebest ratio and addition of HPMC

    107

    Figure 5.7 Colour measurements of the four new formulations made with theoptimized internal gelation systems

    111

    Figure 5.8 Micronutrient fortified Ultra Riceformulations made with the

    optimized internal gelation systems111

    Figure 5.9 Two proposed models for alginate-calcium gelation in Ultra Rice

    :fish-net model for external/diffusion setting (left) and inter-lockmodel for internal setting (right)

    116

    Figure 5.10 Alginate-calcium gel structure made with external (left) and internal(right) gelation processes

    116

    Figure 6.1 Chemical structure of folic acid 122

    Figure 6.2 Chemical structure of folate 122

    Figure 6.3 Oxidative cleavage products of folates 128

    Figure 6.4 Cleavage products of folic acid under acidic and alkaline conditions 128

    Figure 6.5 Folic acid retentions in the fortified Guatemalan salt samples during 9months storage at 40oC and 60% RH

    139

    Figure 6.6 Folic acid retentions in the fortified Guatemalan sugar samples during9 months storage at 40

    oC and 60% RH

    140

    Figure 6.7 Iodine retentions in the fortified Guatemalan salt samples during 9

    months storage at 40oC and 60% RH

    141

    Figure 6.8 Vitamin A retentions in the fortified Guatemalan sugar samplesduring 9 months storage at 40

    oC and 60% RH

    142

    Figure 6.9 Colour stability of the Ultra Ricegrains made with various FePPsources

    144

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    14/228

    xiv

    Figure 6.10 Colour stability in the Ultra Ricegrains made with Dr LohmannFePP at different addition levels

    144

    Figure 6.11 Colour stability of Ultra Ricegrains with addition of TiO2as the

    colour-masking agent at different levels145

    Figure 6.12 Colour stability of Ultra Ricegrains made with higher levels of folic

    acid and FePP

    145

    Figure 8.1 Model premix system for salt fortification made by the extrusionagglomeration followed by polymer coatings

    155

    Figure 8.2 Model Ultra Rice

    premix made by extrusion using internal gelationand followed by polymer coatings for delivering multiplemicronutrients

    155

    Figure 8.3 Model Ultra Ricepremix made by extrusion using internal gelation,containing sub-capsules of microencapsulated premixes of iron andvitamin A made by extrusion-based technology platform

    156

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    15/228

    xv

    LIST OF TABLES

    Table 3.1 Applications of microencapsulation technology 19

    Table 3.2 Microencapsulated food ingredients 29

    Table 3.3 Commonly used coating materials for microencapsulation of foodingredients 31

    Table 4.1 List of chemicals used in the research approach 1 39

    Table 4.2 Effect of water content on extrusion operability 52

    Table 4.3 Surface defects on the final products caused by the loss of TiO2during coating

    56

    Table 4.4 Comparison of particle colour when TiO2was incorporated in thedough formulation before extrusion

    56

    Table 4.5 Comparison of different colour-masking agents 59

    Table 4.6 Formulation variables investigated in the optimization study 63

    Table 4.7 Formulation design of microencapsulated FeFum premixes made byextrusion and polymer coatings

    63

    Table 4.8 Total iron and ferrous iron contents in the 12 final formulations 64

    Table 4.9 Effect of coating materials on premix integrity in pH 4 HCl solution 68

    Table 4.10 Bulk density changes in iron particles after each processing step 70

    Table 4.11 Comparison of particle densities of various premixes and rawingredients

    71

    Table 4.12 Iodine first order degradation rate constant (k) and the storagehalf-life estimated for the DFS samples containing various FeFumparticles when stored at 40

    oC and 60% RH

    81

    Table 5.1 List of materials used in the formulations of Ultra Rice 89

    Table 5.2 Effects of different alginate sources on extrusion operability 94

    Table 5.3 Grain integrity and sensory properties of the simulated rice madewith different alginate sources

    95

    Table 5.4 Effects of different Ca sources on extrusion operability and grain

    integrity using the internal gelation process in the absence ofsequestrants

    96

    Table 5.5 Comparison of different Ca sources using the internal gelationprocess in the presence of STPP as a sequestrant

    97

    Table 5.6 Comparison of different sequestrants in the internal gelation processusing same alginate and Ca sources

    97

    Table 5.7 Effect of different CaSO4to sequestrant ratios on grain integrity 98

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    16/228

    xvi

    Table 5.8 A 3x3 orthogonal design for formulation optimization 101

    Table 5.9 Detailed experimental trials for orthogonal study 101

    Table 5.10 Results of the grain integrity tests in the formulations prepared by theorthogonal design

    102

    Table 5.11 Statistical analyses of orthogonal study results 102

    Table 5.12 Comparison of two best ratios of alginate/CaSO4/STPP usingalternative alginate sources

    103

    Table 5.13 Verification of the best ratio (alginate/CaSO4/STPP = 3/3/0.6) usingvarious alginate sources

    104

    Table 5.14 Investigation on increased concentration levels of alginate andCaSO4

    105

    Table 5.15 Verification of the best ratio with various calcium compounds 105

    Table 5.16 Verification of the best ratio with various sequestrant compounds 106

    Table 5.17 Effect of using glutinous rice flour on the grain properties 108

    Table 5.18 Effect of HPMC on enhanced grain integrity with the best gelationratio used

    108

    Table 5.19 Comparison of alternative blending processes on grain integrity withthe best ratio used

    109

    Table 5.20 Micronutrient retentions in the four new formulations made with theoptimized internal gelation systems

    112

    Table 5.21 Texture measurements on the Ultra Ricegrains made in the

    optimization study113

    Table 6.1 List of chemicals used in the study of folic acid fortification 131

    Table 6.2 Experimental design for incorporating folic acid in Guatemalan saltand sugar

    133

    Table 6.3 Experimental design for preparing folic acid fortified Ultra Riceformulations

    135

    Table 6.4 Folic acid concentration in the final formulations of the Guatemalanfortified salt and sugar samples for storage stability test under 40

    oC

    and 60% RH

    138

    Table 6.5 Folic acid retention in the Ultra Ricesamples made with various

    FePP sources and at different addition levels

    147

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    17/228

    xvii

    LIST OF APPENDICES

    Appendix 11.1.1 Analytical methods used in research approach 1 172

    Appendix 11.1.2 Preliminary observations on suitability of different binder

    materials

    174

    Appendix 11.1.3 Specifications of the three cereal flours used as binders in thestudy

    175

    Appendix 11.1.4 Preliminary investigation of dextrin and HPMC as secondarybinders

    176

    Appendix 11.1.5 Comparison of extrudability and product characteristicsbetween three cereal flours used in the study as binders

    177

    Appendix 11.1.6 Comparison on the effectiveness of TiO2 adhesion before andafter drying

    178

    Appendix 11.1.7 Comparison of surface morphology in the premixes made by

    different coating materials

    178

    Appendix 11.1.8 Development of standard protocols for encapsulation operationusing the fluidized bed and the pan coater

    179

    Appendix 11.1.9 Detailed composition of the 12 final microencapsulated FeFumpremixes

    183

    Appendix 11.1.10 Iron in vitro bioavailability test results of the optimizedformulations of microencapsulated FeFum premixes

    185

    Appendix 11.1.11 Particle integrity dissolution test results of the optimizedformulations of microencapsulated FeFum premixes

    186

    Appendix 11.1.12 Physical characteristics of the final premixes 187

    Appendix 11.1.13 SEM images of the final FeFum premixes (at ~5000magnification)

    188

    Appendix 11.1.14 Relative iodine retention in DFS samples containing variousFeFum particles during one year storage under 40oC and 60%RH

    189

    Appendix 11.1.15 Ferrous iron retention in formulated FeFum particles and inDFS samples, when stored at the ambient condition and thehigher conditions of 40oC & 60% RH, respectively

    190

    Appendix 11.1.16 Detailed data processing for analysing iodine-iron interaction inDFS

    191

    Appendix 11.2.1 Ranking scheme for measurement of grain integrity duringsoaking and cooking

    192

    Appendix 11.2.2 Texture measurement on cooked Ultra Rice

    grains for grainintegrity

    196

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    18/228

    xviii

    Appendix 11.2.3 Detailed compositions of the final 4 formulations used forverifying the optimal internal gelation systems in the actualnutrient-fortified formulations

    197

    Appendix 11.2.4 XPS and ToF-SIMS measurements on Ultra Rice 199

    Appendix 11.3.1 Folic acid determination protocols 203

    Appendix 11.3.2 Colour stability of the double or triple fortified Guatemalan saltor sugar samples after 3 months storage under 40

    oC and 60%

    RH

    209

    Appendix 11.3.3 Folic acid-containing multiple fortified Ultra Riceappearance 210

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    19/228

    1

    1 INTRODUCTION

    Micronutrient deficiencies are widespread health problems, especially in developing

    countries. The deficiencies in vitamin A, iron, and iodine have been identified as the greatest

    concern, as they affect over one third of the worlds population (WHO, 1995). In addition,

    these micronutrients interact with each other, i.e., synergistic effects between iodine

    deficiency disorder (IDD) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA), or between vitamin A

    deficiency (VAD) and IDA to deepen their negative impacts (Clydesdale & Weimer, 1985;

    Lonnerdal, 2004; Lynch, 1997; Zimmermann et al., 2004). Deficiencies typically coexist in

    children in developing countries (Zimmermann et al., 2000). Due to the beneficial metabolic

    interactions of iron, iodine and vitamin A (IVACG, 1998), it would be beneficial to develop a

    multiple nutrient delivery system to attack the problems simultaneously.

    Micronutrient deficiencies can be addressed by changes in the diet, supplementation, and the

    fortification of food with selected nutrients. While dietary modification is desirable, it is a

    long-range solution and may require changes in food preparation practices and social

    customs. Supplementation is an effective and rapid approach, but it requires appropriate

    medical infrastructure/administration and thus it is costly. Food fortification is a

    cost-effective intervention that does not require any conscious action by the consumer, andneeds no changes in the dietary habits of the target populations. Moreover, it is readily

    adapted into existing food production and distribution systems.

    Food fortification has been extensively used for many years as a cost-effective strategy for

    combating micronutrient deficiencies. Many fortification programs have been implemented

    worldwide, including universal iodization of salt and enrichment of B vitamins in wheat

    flour. Iodized salt now reaches some 70% of the world's population, significantly reducing

    the incidence of iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) over the past two decades (United

    Nations, 2008). The introduction of folic acid into cereal-grain products in over 40 countries

    has resulted in dramatically increased folate status and significant reduction in the risk of

    neural tube defects in newborns (Buttriss, 2005). Successful fortification programs may

    involve different social, technical, and political challenges, yet they all have some common

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    20/228

    2

    features, i.e., they are effective in reducing the prevalence of specific micronutrient

    deficiencies, they are economically viable, and the fortified products enjoy consumer

    acceptance.

    To meet these criteria, several technical factors need to be considered, including the

    selection of appropriate food vehicles and fortificant forms, as well as determination of

    fortification levels and appropriate quality assurance and quality control of the fortified food

    products. Among these, food vehicle selection is the primary factor that plays a key role in

    determining whether food fortification programs could be more beneficial compared to the

    other two strategies supplementation and dietary diversification. Obviously, the selection

    of an ideal carrier guarantees that the micronutrients reach the largest number of people and

    the fortification strategy remains as the best long-term approach and the cheapest way to

    initiate and maintain the desired micronutrient levels in the diet.

    Many foods or food ingredients have been considered for fortification, including cereal and

    grain products, milk and dairy products, fats and oils, infant formula and weaning foods,

    condiments such as salt, sugar, and monosodium glutamate (MSG), as well as a range of

    processed foods (Lofti et al., 1996). It is generally accepted that staple foods, such as salt,

    sugar, wheat flour, and rice, are good carriers for fortification, since they are regularly

    consumed by all of the target population at a fairly constant rate, and are relatively

    inexpensive so that all segments of the target population could afford them. The global salt

    iodization is an example of effective programs that improve human nutrition, mainly due to

    the attributes of the food vehicle salt. It is universally consumed and is open to a simple

    fortification technique, which makes the program affordable.

    Another important technical factor is the selection of appropriate forms of fortificants. Some

    vitamins and minerals could be simply added into selected food carriers in powder form,

    which involves solid-solid blending or solid-liquid mixing. These methods are

    straightforward and low in cost, but usually ineffective in protecting the micronutrients

    within the fortified foods. Moreover, the incorporation of these minor ingredients often

    causes undesirable sensory changes in the fortified foods, such as off-flavours or colours

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    21/228

    3

    caused either by the additives themselves or the interactions between the additives and the

    food vehicles. Ignoring sensory effects and physical/chemical properties leads to major

    concerns regarding product stability and consumer acceptance that may jeopardize the

    success of a fortification program. Therefore, appropriate technology must be used in

    delivering fortificants into fortified foods.

    A major challenge for food fortification programs is the development of stable forms of

    micronutrients that overcome the instability of vitamins and the reactivity of minerals. For

    instance, vitamin A is sensitive to almost all environmental factors, including light, heat,

    oxygen, and chemical interactions. The difficulty with iron is in finding an appropriate

    chemical form which is adequately absorbed and yet does not alter the appearance or taste of

    the food vehicle (Mannar & Gallego, 2002). In addition, the presence of reactive iron

    compounds significantly affects the stability of other vitamins added in the same food matrix.

    This makes it even more difficult to develop a multiple-fortified food, particularly with

    vitamin A and iron. Appropriate technologies are thus required to prevent possible

    interactions between added micronutrients and the food system, and subsequently ensure the

    stability, bioavailability, and desired sensory properties of the fortified food through

    production, distribution, retail, and food preparation.

    Previous experience in our research group with double-fortified salt and multiple-fortified

    rice has revealed that the best approach for delivering two or more micronutrients

    simultaneously in a stable and bioavailable form without interaction and degradation, is to

    microencapsulate them in an inert, but digestible matrix. Appropriate microencapsulation

    technology will maintain the active ingredients in a stable environment, separated from other

    food components and other added micronutrients.

    Under the direction of Professor L. L. Diosady, the Food Engineering Group at the

    University of Toronto developed microencapsulation-based technology for the double

    fortification of salt with iron and iodine. Initially, selected iodine compounds were

    encapsulated in modified starches, gelatin, and sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) by

    spray drying and fluidized bed coating. The encapsulation process was later adapted to

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    22/228

    4

    produce a coated iron premix, consisting of encapsulated ferrous fumarate (Canadian Patent

    2238925). R. Yusufali (2002) developed a two-step encapsulation process, starting with

    particle agglomeration followed by pan coating. Dextrin was used to mix with the selected

    iron or iodine compounds and the mixture was agglomerated into fine particles, which were

    then encapsulated by a colour-masking agent and a lipid coating. The double-fortified salt

    (DFS) prepared by this approach demonstrated good iodine stability (Yusufali, 2002).

    The process was tested on different scales in several countries under the sponsorship of the

    Micronutrient Initiative (MI). The field tests have shown that the DFS is effective in

    reducing the incidence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and iodine deficiency disorder

    (IDD); also it is acceptable in terms of organoleptic properties (Oshinowo et al., 2004 &

    2007).

    Another research activity in this research group is related to rice fortification via the

    so-called Ultra Rice technology, which involves producing reconstituted rice grains by

    extrusion. Specifically, the selected micronutrients, either vitamin A or iron-containing

    multiple nutrients are added into rice flour, blended with other components, including

    antioxidants, stabilizers, sodium alginate, water and shortening, to form rice dough, which is

    then extruded to form rice-shaped kernels. After extrusion, CaCl2solution is sprayed on the

    extruded rice grains, and the crosslinking reaction between calcium and alginate form the

    hard surface of the simulated rice, which is the core of the Ultra Ricetechnology. The rice

    grains thus produced, which have high concentrations of selected micronutrients, are then

    blended with normal market rice to achieve desired dietary intake levels.

    So far, two successful formulations of Ultra Ricegrains have been developed, one fortified

    with vitamin A and the other containing multiple micronutrients including iron, zinc and

    several B vitamins. This technology has also been field tested in several countries, and

    demonstrated acceptable results in terms of product stability, sensory properties, and clinical

    effectiveness (PATH, 2007).

    The Ultra Ricegrains made by extrusion are actually encapsulated forms of the selected

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    23/228

    5

    micronutrients with high concentrations, which are similar to those of microencapsulated

    iron premix added into iodized salt. These processes, compared to basic fortification

    techniques which involve mainly a powder-mixing process, have introduced a new concept,

    where the selected micronutrients are added as concentrated, encapsulated premixes with

    modified physical and chemical properties, favourable for adding into selected food carriers.

    This research experience has revealed that microencapsulation could protect the stability of

    micronutrients without greatly reducing their bioavailability when absorbed in the body.

    Microencapsulation can also improve the sensory properties of the fortified foods by hiding

    the undesirable colours and tastes from the fortificants and by preventing the interactions

    between the fortificants and the food carrier. The microencapsulation-based technology

    allows the fortificants to be delivered in appropriate forms that resemble the physical

    characteristics of the selected food vehicles, in terms of shape, size, colour, and appearance.

    We then hypothesize that microencapsulation-based approach is a feasible solution for

    multiple micronutrient fortification of a wide variety of staple foods. Staple foods are

    typically presented to the consumer as solids with particle sizes ranging from several

    hundred microns to several millimeters. To prevent particle segragation, which may result in

    potential under- or over-dosing, micronutrients must be added in forms that either stick to

    the food particles, or in agglomerated premixes that match the particle size, and if possible,

    the particle density of the food. Succesful food fortification processes require that the added

    micronutrients are evenly distributed and are unnoticeable to the consumer. Thus the

    complete delivery system must match the food in colour and appearance, and must not alter

    the food flavour. Therefore, the added micronutrients must be introduced in a form that

    achieves these criteria.

    Based on the above considerations, a two-step process based on extrusion agglomeration

    followed by surface coating was proposed as the basis of a flexible technology platform for

    effective delivery of multiple micronutrients. Specifically, the selected micronutrients could

    be agglomerated first to form particles with sizes matching that of the selected staple foods

    to ensure stable distribution, without segregation. The appropriately sized micronutrient

    particles could then be coated with appropriate polymer materials to obtain modified

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    24/228

    6

    physical/chemical properties, including improved organoleptic properties and enhanced

    stability, suitable for adding into the selected food matrices. The goal of the program,

    therefore, is to develop a technology platform and to demonstrate its feasibility for effective

    delivery of multiple micronutrients in the selected staple foods by using premixes on

    different size scales to suit a wide variety of food matrices.

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    25/228

    7

    2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES, SCOPE & APPROACHES

    2.1 Research Objectives

    As discussed earlier, the technologies of double fortified salt (DFS) and Ultra Rice have

    been field-tested in several countries and achieved acceptable results in terms of product

    stability, sensory properties for consumer acceptance, as well as clinical efficacy in reducing

    the prevalence of certain micronutrient deficiencies. However, there are several problems

    remaining in the current systems. In the case of microencapsulated ferrous fumarate for salt

    fortification, the iron premix has a porous texture and surface defects, which may result in

    unwanted interactions and sensory changes in the double fortified salt (DFS). Also the low

    density of the premix causes the iron particles to float on the surface of water, and then may

    be unintentionally removed by the cook as impurities during salt washing.

    The problems with Ultra Ricegrains are related to the marginally acceptable colour and

    somewhat brittle texture that is probably due to the imperfect crosslinking of

    alginate-calcium at the grain surface. The distribution of alginate during extrusion and

    calcium during the over-spraying process may not be uniform, which then directly affects

    their crosslinking at the grain surface and subsequently the grain integrity during washing

    and cooking.

    As indicated earlier, the overall objective of the research program is to develop a technology

    platform for the delivery of multiple micronutrients in a variety of staple foods. To achieve

    this goal, I proposed that processes based on extrusion agglomeration followed by polymer

    coating could form the basis of a flexible microencapsulation technology platform for

    effective delivery of reactive minor components in a variety of applications including not

    only food fortification but also in drug delivery, nutraceutical delivery in functional foods,

    and active ingredient delivery in agro-chemicals and cosmetic products. This assumption

    was based on the fact that extrusion has several advantages over the currently

    commercialized technique of fluidized-bed agglomeration, including high throughput and

    low operating cost. It was expected that extrusion could produce agglomerates with better

    physical properties, including denser texture and smoother surface, which would make the

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    26/228

    8

    ensuing encapsulation process more effective and efficient by better coverage with less

    coating material. Extrusion is flexible and can readily form particles with different particle

    sizes, ranging from several hundred microns to several millimeters, which ensures the

    premix particles can match the size of a wide variety of staple foods.

    The immediate objective of my research project was to improve the current systems, for

    producing microencapsulated ferrous fumarate premix and Ultra Rice, by developing

    alternate processing techniques to achieve better physical/organoleptic properties of the

    microencapsulated fortificants and to simplify the current procedures. In addition, these two

    systems could be used as models for testing the proposed technology platform for food

    fortification.

    2.2 Research Scope

    As depicted in Figure 2.1, the project scope was to explore the feasibility of using several

    staple foods and/or food ingredients as effective micronutrient carriers. This included salt,

    sugar, and rice. Salt is commonly consumed by all societies in the world, and it is almost

    always processed. Rice is the primary staple food in some 40 countries and nearly half of the

    worlds population (Juliano, 1993). Sugar is a commonly used staple in Latin America.

    Clearly, these foods are good choices for fortification.

    Micronutrients, including vitamin A, thiamine, folic acid, iron, zinc, and iodine, were

    selected on the basis of the prevalence of their deficiencies. These micronutrients were

    encapsulated individually and in combinations to attain desirable stability, release properties,

    and appearance when incorporated into various foods.

    To achieve the goal of the project, the potential interactions between the added ingredients

    and the delivery systems had to be identified before designing effective food fortification

    processes. The program targeted the development of a broadly applicable technology that

    would not only be useful in developing countries, but would be also applicable in typical

    Canadian processed food products, and thus prove to be of economic value in the

    marketplace.

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    27/228

    9

    Figure 2.1 Overview of the project scope

    2.3 Research Approaches & Anticipated Outcomes

    As indicated in Figure 2.1, many micronutrients and several staple foods were considered in

    the research scope. To develop a broadly applicable technology for effective delivery of

    these micronutrients by different food carriers, it was believed that the best approach would

    be to start with specific designs for individual applications. Therefore, three specific

    research projects were proposed in the study:

    1. Microencapsulation of ferrous fumarate (FeFum) premix for double fortification of

    salt, after agglomeration by extrusion to match the size of salt grains by polymer

    coating;

    2. Production of Ultra Rice

    grains as carriers of micronutrients by controlled

    reactions to form a stable alginate-calcium structure incorporating and protecting

    the added micronutrients;

    APPROACHES

    Microencapsulation: converting the selected vitamins andminerals to appropriate forms which fit into the selected foodvehicles;Multiple Fortification: incorporating several micronutrients intheir proper forms into the selected food vehicles.

    FOOD CARRIERS

    Staple foods or food ingredients:

    Salt, sugar, rice

    MICRONUTRIENTS

    Vitamins: A, B1, niacin, folic acid

    Minerals: iodine, iron, zinc

    OBJECTIVE

    To develop microencapsulation-based technologiesfor multiple nutrient fortification in staple foods

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    28/228

    10

    3. Folic acid fortification by incorporation into existing programs of salt iodization,

    vitamin A fortification of sugar, and iron fortification of Ultra Rice.

    The detailed experimental design for each approach and the anticipated outcomes are

    discussed in the following.

    Research approach 1 microencapsulated FeFum premix made by the extrusion-based

    technology platform

    Previously, microencapsulated FeFum premix was made by fluidized-bed agglomeration

    followed by a lipid coating. To overcome the shortcomings of the current process and

    premix product, I proposed to investigate alternate techniques and materials. Specifically,

    extrusion technology was proposed to replace the fluidized-bed agglomeration, and

    hydrophilic glassy polymers were proposed as improved coating materials. Extrusion is

    extensively used in the food industry and has several advantages over fluidized-bed

    agglomeration, as it could produce denser particles with fewer pores, regular shape, and

    better surface morphology. These improved particle properties could collectively make the

    following encapsulation step easier by allowing more uniform coverage with less coating

    material used. Hydrophilic glassy polymers have been widely used in oral drug delivery

    systems. They can provide excellent physical barriers in the dehydrated, glassy state, while

    upon water penetration they can achieve controlled release of the core ingredients by a

    swelling mechanism. Therefore, it seemed logical to apply this advance in drug delivery

    systems into food applications.

    Successful development of a microencapsulated FeFum premix using the proposed

    techniques could not only result in a stable salt double fortified with iodine and iron, but

    could also provide an effective model system for making microencapsulated particles

    ranging in size from two hundred microns to several millimeters that can incorporate one or

    more active ingredients simultaneously. Since the current procedure involves several steps,

    including granulation, colour-masking, and encapsulation, additional micronutrients could

    be added at different stages of processing to different particle layers to prevent direct

    interactions between incompatible micronutrients.

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    29/228

    11

    Research approach 2 Extending the extrusion-based technology platform for making

    reconstituted rice premix, Ultra Rice, using alginate-calcium internal gelation

    Ultra Rice is a product which agglomerates rice flour and added micronutrients to form

    reconstituted rice grains that will be indistinguishable from market rice by the average

    consumers. Currently the grains contain sodium alginate, which, when sprayed with calcium

    chloride, form a stable shell around the grain. We realized that if we could convert all of the

    alginate into the cross-linked Ca form, we could, in effect, form a large microencapsulating

    structure capable of carrying micronutrients, expanding the technology platform to a larger

    size scale. If we could control this reaction and combine it with the extrusion, we could

    greatly simplify the existing process and achieve better grain integrity and sensory

    properties. The objective of this phase of the work was to understand the Ca-alginate

    formation, and to develop a formulation and process that would form the desired

    cross-linked structure in the Ultra Riceextrusion process.

    Research approach 3 Testing of the developed technology platform using folic acid

    fortification incorporated into the existing programs

    Folic acid has been identified as the cause of harmful deficiency diseases that could be

    prevented by food fortification. Many dietary/nutrition surveys have revealed that most

    adults had inadequate serum folate levels, and folate deficiency was common particularly in

    elderly populations (Buttriss, 2005). Folate deficiency is clearly linked with the development

    of birth defects, several chronic diseases, certain cancers, and reduced cognitive functions in

    elderly (Cho et al., 2002; Rampersaud et al., 2002; Choi & Manson, 2000; Miller, 2004).

    Prior to mandated supplementation/fortification, it was estimated that folate deficiency

    would result in up to 5 neural tube defects (NTD) out of every 1000 pregnancies (Caudill,

    2004). Since mandated folic acid fortification of flour in North America, there has been a

    dramatic decrease in the incidence of this type of birth defects and of some types of cancer

    (Grosse et al., 2006). Folic acid fortification would be relatively inexpensive in developing

    countries if the fortification could be combined with existing technologies for the ongoing

    fortification programs that have universal coverage in affected areas: salt iodization, sugar

    fortification with vitamin A, salt double fortification with iron and iodine, and Ultra Rice

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    30/228

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    31/228

    13

    3 RESEARCH BACKGROUND

    3.1 Micronutrient Deficiencies

    Micronutrients are essential substances required by the body in small amounts to maintain

    its normal functions. Deficiencies in micronutrients have serious health consequences, such

    as learning disability, impaired work capability, reduced resistance to infection, illness, or

    even death. Various micronutrient deficiencies have occurred due to poor nutrition in many

    different regions and populations. Three micronutrients, vitamin A, iron, and iodine, have

    been identified as major concerns (WHO, 1995), as over one third of the worlds population

    is affected by the deficiencies of these three nutrients. Women and young children in

    developing countries are most vulnerable.

    Vitamin A deficiency (VAD)is a serious problem in developing countries, and can lead to

    partial or total blindness. It is also associated with increased risk of infectious morbidity and

    mortality (Levin et al., 1993). It is estimated that over one hundred million children in

    developing countries (nearly 40% of the developing worlds children) suffer from a sub

    clinical deficiency in vitamin A, and about one million such children would die each year

    due to complications arising from VAD (MI, 2004).

    Iron deficiency is the most common nutritional deficiency in the world (WHO, 2000). It has

    profound negative effects on human health and development, and it is the primary cause of

    anemia. Nearly two billion people suffer from iron deficiency anemia (IDA); among these,

    over 90% live in developing countries. IDA lowers work capacity and impairs immune

    response, which results in reduced resistance to infection and increased risk of maternal and

    fetal morbidity (Clydesdale & Weimer, 1985).

    Iodine deficiency disorder (IDD) is the worlds single most significant cause of

    preventable brain damage and mental retardation (WHO, 2000). It is responsible for

    impaired physical and mental development, resulting in significant reduction of intellectual

    capability in those affected during childhood. Nearly 20% of the developing worlds

    population is iodine deficient and more than 830 million people have goiter a visible

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    32/228

    14

    symptom of iodine deficiency due to swollen thyroid glands (Lotfi et al., 1996).

    There is evidence showing that the three deficiencies interact with each other. Clydesdale &

    Weimer (1985) reported that IDD and IDA have synergistic effects which lead to severe

    retardation of physical, mental, and social development. IDA interferes with thyroidal

    metabolism of iodine and may reduce the efficacy of iodine treatment for IDD by

    supplementation or fortification (Lonnerdal, 2004). Lynch (1997) reported there was a direct

    correlation between serum retinol and hemoglobin levels in several surveys. VAD may

    impair iron metabolism and aggravate iron deficiency anemia (IDA) (Zimmermann et al.,

    2004). In addition, Zimmermann et al. (2000) indicated that the three deficiencies often

    coexist in children in many developing countries. Due to the detrimental interactions of iron,

    iodine, and vitamin A deficiencies, a simultaneous attack by an effective multiple-nutrient

    delivery system will be required.

    In addition to the three key micronutrient deficiencies, significant populations are deficient

    in other micronutrients, including vitamin B1 (thiamine), B2 (riboflavin), B12

    (cyanocobalamin), folate, and zinc. These problems are more prevalent in rice-consuming

    populations (OMNI/USAID, 1998). Recently folate deficiency was recognized as a serious

    but readily treatable problem. Abundant evidence has linked this vitamin deficiency to

    severe birth defects and several chronic diseases. It is reported that folate deficiency was

    responsible for approximately 250,000 severe birth defects neural tube defects (NTD) -

    each year prior to mandated supplementation and/or fortification programs (Berry et al.,

    1999).

    3.2 Food Fortification

    Several interventions can be used to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies, including

    supplementation, dietary education/diversification, and food fortification. The uptake of

    essential micronutrients through a healthy, balanced diet is a desirable and sustainable

    approach for prevention of micronutrient deficiencies, but may not be sufficient to cure

    severe deficiency syndromes. It requires intensive cooperation and individual compliance,

    and depends on adequate supply of nutrient-rich foodstuffs and sufficient income to obtain

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    33/228

    15

    them. Direct supplementation is an effective, rapid strategy to combat micronutrient

    deficiencies, but it requires consistent, well-educated participation from individuals and

    well-established medical infrastructure from the governments. Due to its relatively high cost,

    it is usually used only as a short-term medical intervention. Food fortification is recognized

    as the most cost-effective measure to overcome micronutrient deficiencies. It is relatively

    simple and does not require active cooperation from the consumers.

    Food fortification has been used for over a century (Bonner et al., 1999). Many programs

    have been successfully implemented worldwide. It is well known that wheat flour has been

    fortified with B vitamins and minerals in North America, and salt has been used worldwide

    to provide iodine in the normal diet for more than two decades (Salt Institute Website).

    Despite these examples, the development and implementation of a successful food

    fortification program is generally constrained by technical, socio-economic, infrastructural,

    and political factors (Lofti et al., 1996). The major technical issues are 1) selection of

    appropriate food vehicles and micronutrient forms to be added, 2) determination of the

    appropriate addition levels and the methods/techniques to be used, and 3) ensuring product

    stability and bioavailability (Wirakartakusumah & Hariyadi, 1998). A successful

    fortification program should integrate all these technical considerations and ensure the final

    product meets the following three criteria:

    Clinical effectiveness: which requires that the fortified foods maintain the desirable

    micronutrient stability and bioavailability,

    Consumer acceptance: which requires that the final products be acceptable to the

    consumers, through education about its benefits, or more desirably through the foods

    attractive appearance and taste,

    Technical feasibility: which requires that the fortification technology can be

    implemented and maintained economically.

    3.2.1 Food Vehicle Selection

    Among the technical factors, the selection of the food vehicle is the key factor in developing

    an effective fortification program. An ideal food vehicle is regularly consumed by all of the

    target population at a relatively constant rate. Appropriate food vehicles will deliver the

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    34/228

    16

    selected micronutrients in such way that the added micronutrients retain their activity and

    bioavailability without adversely affecting the sensory properties of the final products during

    food production, distribution, retail, food preparation and consumption. Staple foods are

    most likely to meet these criteria. Salt is the ideal carrier as it is universally consumed and

    industrially processed. In urban settings rice is a good carrier, as it forms the basis of the diet

    of the urban poor. Other population-specific staple foods have been identified earlier,

    including noodles, sugar, oil, and monosodium glutamate (MSG).

    Numerous foods have been tested for fortification by a single nutrient and achieved

    desirable results, including iodine fortification of salt; vitamin A fortification of oils/fats,

    sugar, milk and dairy products; and iron fortification for wheat flour, breakfast cereals, bread,

    and weaning foods. Unfortunately, vehicles for multiple micronutrient fortification are more

    limited. A few acceptable examples include soy or fish sauce fortified with iron and iodine

    in the Philippines and Thailand, and commercially produced breakfast cereals fortified with

    iron and multi-B vitamins (Lofti et al., 1996; Wirakartakusumah & Hariyadi, 1998). Due to

    the complex nature of food systems and the many variables involved in the fortification

    processes, the selection of effective food vehicles for delivering multiple micronutrients

    needs to be carefully examined, with consideration of chemical and technical factors to

    prevent nutritional degradation.

    3.2.2 Fortification Techniques Used in Existing Programs

    Typically the techniques used in food fortification are rather simple, involving mainly

    mixing processes (Lofti et al., 1996). For example, solid-solid mixing is used for fortifying

    dry foods with small quantities of micronutrients in powder form, such as in the process of

    fortifying B vitamins and iron powder into wheat flour. For delivering fortificant to a liquid

    food matrix, such as milk and oil, solid-liquid mixing is used through dissolution or

    dispersion. Other techniques include liquid-liquid mixing, solid-solid adhesion, and coating

    by spraying the liquid fortificant on the dry food vehicle. Water-soluble fortificant may be

    carried by aqueous solutions, while fat-soluble ingredients by organic solvents. For example,

    salt iodization is achieved by spraying an aqueous solution containing iodine compounds,

    either potassium iodate or iodide, onto salt grains (Salt Institute website).

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    35/228

    17

    These basic methods work well for single fortification; however, when multiple

    micronutrients consist of fortificants with greatly different physical characteristics from the

    selected food carrier, the fortificants or food vehicle must be treated to ensure an acceptable

    product. For example, the selected micronutrients in powder forms may need to be

    granulated first to match the particle size of a granular food matrix to avoid particle

    segregation (Diosady et al., 2002). Processes may be required to hide the undesirable colour

    or taste of some vitamins and minerals. Moreover, there are potential interactions between

    the added fortificants and the food vehicle, which subsequently results in loss of the

    micronutrients and altered sensory properties of the end products (Hurrell, 2002; Rutkowski,

    2003; Li, 2005). Technical solutions are thus required to overcome or prevent these

    problems.

    3.2.3 Current Challenges in Food Fortification Programs

    As discussed earlier, the scope of the current program involves development of technology

    for delivering several vitamins and minerals in at least three typical staple foods salt, sugar,

    and rice. The selected food vehicles are all solids, where directly added powder ingredients

    would cause segregation during production and distribution, resulting in uneven distribution

    of the added micronutrients (Johnson et al., 2004). This may lead to potential under- or

    over-dosing when consumed. Therefore, proper modifications to the fortificants particle

    size distribution are required.

    The studied micronutrients present chemical challenges in the form of instability of vitamins

    and reactivity of minerals. Most vitamins, particularly vitamin A, are unstable under a

    number of chemical and physical conditions, such as presence of oxygen, acids, and

    reducing agents as well as humidity, heat, and light. The problem with minerals, particularly

    iron, is the difficulty in selecting an appropriate form which is adequately absorbed and yet

    does not alter theappearance or taste of the food vehicle (Manner & Gallego, 2002).

    Water-soluble iron compounds, mostly in the ferrous form, are more bioavailable, but they

    are also more reactive, often causing unacceptable colour and flavour changes in the food

    matrices. In contrast, insoluble iron compounds may not cause sensory changes but are often

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    36/228

    18

    so poorly absorbed as to be of little or no nutritional benefit (Hurrell, 2002). Therefore, iron

    bioavailability and organoleptic properties must be balanced in designing/developing iron

    fortified foods.

    Previous research revealed that reactive iron compounds significantly affect the stability of

    other micronutrients present in the same food matrix (Hurrell, 1999; Diosady et al., 2002;

    Rutkowski, 2003). This makes it even harder to develop iron-containing multiple

    fortification systems.

    3.3 Microencapsulation

    A promising approach to multiple fortification is to microencapsulate the selected

    micronutrients, especially iron, in an inert but digestible coating system to ensure that the

    micronutrients are effectively delivered in a stable and bioavailable manner without altering

    the organoleptic properties of the food vehicle. Proper microencapsulation techniques could

    also integrate colour/flavour masking and size enlargement to convert the selected powder

    materials into proper granular forms with desirable appearance and size.

    Generally, microencapsulation is defined as a technology of enveloping small solid particles,

    liquid droplets or gases in a coating matrix (Benita, 1996). The coated or entrapped material,

    also know as the core, fill, internal phase or payload, is usually the active ingredient which

    needs to be protected from the environment and/or released at a controlled rate. The coating

    material is called the capsule, wall, shell, membrane, carrier, encapsulant, or matrix (Benita,

    1996).

    Microencapsulation was originally developed by Barrett K. Green of the National Cash

    Register Corp. (NCR) in 1950s, with a process called coacervation to create carbonless

    paper (Benita, 1996). The process involved a soluble polymer, such as gelatin, induced to

    come out of solution and form a shell around dispersed droplets of an oil at the interface

    with a water medium. The gelatin shell is hardened by the addition of glutaraldehyde, and

    the microscopic beads are collected and dried (Clark, 2002). Since then, many technologies

    for preparing microparticles have been developed for applications (Table 3.1) in

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    37/228

    19

    pharmaceutical, food, cosmetic, chemical, and printing industries (Madene et al., 2006).

    Table 3.1 Applications of microencapsulation technology

    Figure 3.1 Schematic relationship between the core material, the wall material, and therequired technique used in microencapsulation systems

    As shown in Figure 3.1, the design of a microencapsulated system generally involves a core

    material, a wall material, and an appropriate technique/process required to coat or entrap the

    Wall materialCore ingredient

    Microparticles with desired properties

    Technique/Process

    Application Microencapsulated actives References

    PharmaceuticalOral, topical or transdermal, parenteral

    drugs

    Wang, et al., 2003; Lamprecht, et al.,

    2000; Carafa, et al., 2004; Kshirsagar,

    2000; Chen, et al., 1999; Park e t al., 2005

    BiologicalCells, vaccines, hormons, antigens,

    plasmid DNAs, enzymes

    Sefton, et al., 2000; Cleland, et al., 1997;

    Lee, et al., 1997; Tinsley-Bown, et al.,

    2000; Hao, et al., 2001; Genta, et al.,

    2001

    Food

    Acidulents, flavours, artificial

    sweeteners, colourants, enzymes,

    microorganisms, probiotics, leavening

    agents, antioxidants, preservatives,vitamins, minerals, amino acids,

    essential oils

    Kirby, 1991; Gibbs, et al., 1999;

    Gouin, 2004; Schrooyen, 2001;

    Desai, et al., 2005

    Agro-chemical Pesticides, herbicides Tsuji, 2001

    Cosmetic and

    personal care

    Vitamin E, fragrances, perfumes, plant

    extracts

    Dingler, 1999; Schmitt, et al., 1998;

    Benita, 1996

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    38/228

    20

    core by the wall material. The core material is the key factor that needs to be protected or

    released at a defined rate, while the wall material and process/technique play an important

    role in the physical and chemical properties of the formed microparticles, such as particle

    size, permeability, porosity, density (bulk and particle density), flowability, integrity,

    reactivity/stability, release properties, and bioavailability. For each active ingredient, the

    appropriate choice of process and wall materials depends on the end use of the

    microencapsulated particles. For example, microencapsulated flavours for extrusion-based

    processed foods should be heat resistant and insoluble while in the barrel so the flavour is

    protected against thermal degradation and flash-off at the exit of the die (Bhandari et al.,

    2001).

    In the current project, various vitamins and minerals were selected as core ingredients. The

    goal of the development program for a microencapsulation system is to find an effective

    combination of appropriate wall materials and encapsulation techniques, which could

    present the selected micronutrients in stable, bioavailable, and organoleptically desirable

    forms suitable for food fortification. In the following sections the literature on available

    techniques of microencapsulation and coating materials is discussed.

    3.3.1 Microencapsulation Techniques

    Current microencapsulation techniques can be classified based on the microparticle

    formation mechanism. These include physical or mechanical processes (such as spray drying,

    spray chilling/cooling, extrusion, and fluidized bed coating), and chemical processes (such

    as coacervation, co-crystallization, molecular inclusion, and interfacial or in-situ

    polymerization). In some cases, a combination of processes is used, for example in

    formation of a single or double emulsion followed by spray drying (Madene et al., 2006).

    The formed microparticles are categorized as either microcapsules or microspheres (Figure

    3.2), based on the structure, or more precisely, the mutual position of the core and the shell.

    In a microcapsule, the active ingredient is a continuous, concentrated phase and enveloped

    by a protective layer of coating material. Usually a two-step process will be needed to

    produce microcapsules, including the formation of the core particles followed by a coating

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    39/228

    21

    process. In contrast, in a microsphere, the active substance is dispersed in the structure and

    entrapped within the matrix material, which sometimes only involves a single-step of

    entrapment (Adamiec et al., 2004). Microcapsules or microspheres may have diameters

    ranging from a few microns to a few millimeters.

    Figure 3.2 Microcapsules and microspheres (adapted from Gibbs et al., 1999)

    Physical/mechanical processes

    Spray drying is a commonly used method of drying a liquid feed through a hot gas. The

    liquid feed is pumped through an atomiser device that produces fine droplets into the main

    drying chamber. Typically, the hot gas is air, but when sensitive materials are processed or

    oxygen-free drying is required, nitrogen gas is used instead. It is a well-established

    technology involving commercially available equipment. It is extensively used to produce

    powdery particles ranging in size from 1 m to 150 m, which contain value-added

    ingredients, such as fragrances or flavours. The advantages of this process are relatively low

    in cost and ease of scale up. The microparticles prepared by the technique can quickly

    release the core ingredients without leaving any shell debris, due mainly to the high water

    solubility of the shell materials used. However, the suitable shell materials for this process

    are limited. Also, the concerns of solvent flammability and toxicity severely restrict the use

    of organic solvents for conventional spray drying operations. Other limitations of this

    technique include a generally low payload (

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    40/228

    22

    a cooling medium and subsequently solidified into powder form (Madene et al., 2006). This

    is probably the least expensive process, which can be used to convert liquid hydrophilic

    ingredients into free flowing powders with improved heat stability and delayed release in

    wet environments. However, as a matrix encapsulation process, rather a true core/shell

    encapsulation, it leads to a significant proportion of unprotected active ingredients on the

    particle surface or sticking out of the wall material, which subsequently affects the

    effectiveness of the encapsulation.

    Freeze drying, also called lyophilization, is one of the most useful processes for drying

    thermo-sensitive ingredients in aqueous solutions that are unstable. It involves the

    sublimation/removal of water content from dissolved or dispersed solids. The food industry

    widely uses the technology to preserve plant or animal products in dehydrated powder forms.

    In the case of microencapsulation operation, it can be used to dehydrate and convert food

    emulsions into powders. The technique is relatively simple and can provide better particle

    properties compared to spray drying and drum/tray drying, such as resistance to oxidation

    and intact shape of microcapsules (Madene et al., 2006). Nonetheless, it normally requires a

    long processing time for dehydration, ~20 hours depending on the materials and the loads

    (Desai & Park, 2005a).

    Fluidized bed coatinginvolves suspending a bed or column of solid particles in a moving

    gas stream, usually air, and a liquid coating formulation is sprayed onto the individual

    particles. The freshly coated particles are cycled into a zone where the coating formulation is

    dried either by solvent evaporation or cooling. Three types of fluidized beds are available, as

    top-spray, tangential-spray, and bottom-spray. They vary in the nozzles location or

    configuration used to apply the coating solution. This technique is generally an efficient way

    to apply a uniform layer of shell materials onto solid particles. Basically all kinds of shell

    materials can be used in this process, such as polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and

    emulsifiers. In addition, it is highly thermal efficient due to good gas-solid contact in which

    optimal heat and mass transfer rates could be reached. On the other hand, its limitations are

    also obvious; it can be only used for encapsulating solid particles, and the particle size of the

    end products cannot be less than ~10 m (Gouin, 2004).

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    41/228

    23

    Extrusion was first introduced as an encapsulation process by Swisher in 1957 to coat

    volatile and unstable flavours (Madene et al., 2006; Gibbs et al., 1999). Essential oils were

    dispersed in glassy carbohydrate matrices (such as corn syrup solids and glycerin) at >100oC,

    and then extruded into a dehydrating liquid such as isopropyl alcohol. The solidified

    material was then separated into small pieces and vacuum-dried. This process was later

    modified to encapsulate microorganisms and enzymes at low temperatures (Gouin, 2004).

    The active ingredients were mixed with plasticized composite matrices, such as starch/fat or

    starch/polyethylene glycol. The dry mixture was converted to a wet paste by incorporating

    ~20% (w/w) water and then extruded. The exiting rope was cut into pieces between 500 m

    to 1000 m and air-dried. This technique can provide virtually full protection to the core

    ingredients by the surrounding wall materials. Also, the use of glassy polymers can provide

    an essentially impermeable barrier against oxygen, which enables prolonged shelf life of the

    end product. However, this process can only produce large particles, typically >500 m,

    which greatly limits its applications. In addition, the suitable shell materials or binders are

    limited to glassy carbohydrates and carbohydrate derivatives (Gibbs et al., 1999).

    Coextrusion is a relatively new technique for encapsulation. It creates fibers consisting of

    active ingredients within fluid, high-viscosity, glassy shell materials. These fibers can be

    chopped to form microcylinders, or when the viscosity is low and the surface tension of the

    fluid is high these extrudates would thermodynamically break up into tiny droplets, forming

    microcapsules. The typical coextrusion systems include stationary nozzle coextrusion,

    centrifugal coextrusion, or slightly altered spinning disk coextrusion. In the former two

    processes, concentric nozzles are used to pump the core material through the inner nozzle

    and the shell formulation through the annulus, allowing true core-shell morphologies.

    Spinning disk coextrusion involves a suspension of the core material dispersed in the carrier

    material. The mixture is then extruded through the rotating disc in such a way that the excess

    coating fluid is atomized and separated from the coated particles (SwRI website).

    This technique can be treated as true encapsulation, which gives the microcapsules unique

    properties allowing release of the core ingredients at a defined rate (Gouin, 2004). The high

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    42/228

    24

    operating cost and specific requirements of the equipment greatly limit the application of

    this technique. In addition, the core and shell materials must be mutually immiscible liquids,

    (i.e., polar liquids like aqueous solutions in the core require hot melt shell materials like

    waxes; whereas with water-immiscible oils as the core, an aqueous polymer solution that can

    gel rapidly is required for the shell) (SwRI website).

    Chemical processes

    Coacervation is a separation process involving two liquid phases in a colloidal system

    (IUPAC, 1997). It starts with an aqueous colloid solution in an appropriate solvent.

    According to the nature of the colloid, when the environmental conditions changes, such as

    pH change, the solubility of the colloid is reduced and a large part of the colloid can be

    separated out into a new phase. The original one phase system becomes two phases, one is

    rich and the other is poor in colloid concentration. The colloid-rich phase in a dispersed state

    appears as amorphous liquid droplets called coacervate droplets, which form the wall

    material of the resultant capsules. This concept initiated the development of

    microencapsulation technology by B. K. Green in 1957.

    The first coacervative capsules developed by B.K. Green for carbonless paper were made

    using gelatin as a wall in an "oil-in-water" system. Later developments could produce

    "water-in-oil" systems for highly polar and water soluble cores. The process involves three

    steps: particle or droplet formation, coacervative wall formation, and capsule isolation. It is

    considered as a true microencapsulation technique, as the core material is completely

    entrapped by the matrix.

    Although this technique has a very high payload, >99% (Gouin, 2004), and the formed

    particles are able to achieve sustained or controlled release of the core ingredients, its high

    operating cost and complexity restrict its commercial utilization.

    Gelation involves the formation of gelled microcapsules or microspheres using techniques

    such as cooling, crosslinking, or a chemical reaction. A well-known system is

    alginate-calcium crosslinked beads, which were initially developed for immobilization of

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    43/228

    25

    live cells and enzymes. It has been rapidly adapted to many other applications due mainly to

    its extreme ease of preparation on a lab-scale and mild processing conditions. Unfortunately,

    the process is difficult to scale up and the operation is costly. In addition, the obtained

    microcapsules are very porous and allow fast and easy diffusion of water and other fluids in

    and out of the matrix. Such good permeability is desired for carrying live cells or enzymes

    but is not suitable for protecting most active ingredients.

    Liposome entrapment was originally used in the pharmaceutical industry, and in recent

    years it has been used in many other applications, such as food-based delivery systems. The

    processcan be achieved by dispersing a bilayer-forming polar lipid, such as lecithin, in an

    aqueous medium containing dissolved active ingredients. The formed particles are typically

    spherical in shape with a relatively narrow size range from several nanometers to several

    hundreds nanometers. Liposomes may contain a single or multiple layers of amphiphilic

    polymolecular membranes, which closely resemble the natural structure of cell membranes.

    Generally, liposomes are kinetically stable, i.e., they are only stable for a short period of

    time, similarly to emulsions. Because of this, many principles and techniques of emulsion

    formation can be also applied to the development of liposomes (Taylor & Davidson, 2005).

    Other technical issues with this technique include that the process is hard to scale up.

    Moreover, liposomes are usually in aqueous forms, which impart great stability of

    water-soluble materials in high water activity applications, but limit their usefulness when

    the coated ingredients need to be in a dry state.

    Molecular inclusionis an advanced technique that is highly specific. It generally refers to

    the supra-molecular association of a ligand (the core material) into a cavity-bearing substrate

    (the shell material) (Gouin, 2004). Particularly, beta-cyclodextrin, an enzymatically

    modified starch molecule, is used in this molecular-level technique. Cyclodextrins are

    hollow truncated cone-shaped molecules with an inner diameter of approximately 5-8 A

    (Figure 3.3), sufficient for inclusion of one or more volatile flavour molecules or essential

    oil compounds (Desai & Park, 2005a). The guest molecules, which are apolar, can be

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    44/228

    26

    entrapped within the hydrophobic internal cavity by hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces,

    or entropy-driven hydrophobic effect. In contrast, its hydrophilic external part requires water

    as the suspension medium. When the water molecules in the center of the cyclodextrin are

    replaced by less polar molecules, the complex is precipitated (Gibbs et al., 1999).

    Figure 3.3 Molecular structure and microstructure of beta-cyclodextrin (adapted from

    Yuliani et al., 2004)

    The microparticles obtained from this technique have unique, sustained release properties

    and thermal/chemical stability of the active ingredients entrapped. However, the relatively

    high cost of the shell material, cyclodextrin, and the low yield of the end product greatly

    restrict its current commercial applications (Gouin, 2004).

    Other chemical techniques include co-crystallization, solvent evaporation/extraction from

    emulsions, and interfacial or in-situ polymerization. These methods have been reported in a

    small number of studies with limited applications. Co-crystallization has been used to

    incorporate aroma compounds into supersaturated sucrose syrup at the time of spontaneous

    crystallization under the condition of high temperature (>120oC) and low moisture (95-97 o

    Brix). Due to its relative simplicity, co-crystallization may evolve into an economical and

    flexible process in the future (Madene et al., 2006). Solvent evaporation/extraction is

    applied to convert droplets formed by emulsification to solid particles. The mechanism of

    solvent elimination from the emulsion droplets is not well known, but considered to havegreat influence on the particle morphology and release behaviour (Rosca et al., 2004). These

    techniques are primarily used in the development of drug delivery systems, but attract some

    interest from food scientists and technologists recently. Interfacial or in-situ

    polymerization involves the formation of capsule shell on the emulsion droplet/particle

    surface by indirect or direct polymerization. Interfacial polymerization occurs based on the

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    45/228

    27

    classical Schotten-Baumann reaction between an acid chloride and a compound containing

    an active hydrogen atom, such as an amine or alcohol, esters, urea, and urethane. In-situ

    polymerization, without the presence of reactants in the core material happens when

    monomers are directly added to the system. Both polymerization methods are used for the

    encapsulation of herbicides and pesticides with rare applications in food (Gibbs et al., 1999;

    Benita, 1996).

    As discussed above, all techniques have pros and cons. Generally, physical techniques are

    less expensive and easy to scale-up, but have the drawbacks of relatively low payloads and

    imperfect particle properties. In contrast, chemical processes are costly and involve

    complicated concepts, but typically can provide well-defined particle structures and desired

    controlled release properties. Chemical processes are often reported in formulating drug

    delivery systems or for making value-added products. For most applications in the food

    industry, physical processes are used.

    As our program is focused on developing countries, technical/economic feasibility becomes

    the main consideration, i.e., low cost of the process, availability of equipment, and ease of

    implementation into existing production lines. It would be preferable therefore to

    concentrate on physical/mechanical processes. In some cases chemical methods will be

    required, as in making Ultra Ricegrains using internal gelation.

    3.3.2 Microencapsulation in the Food Industry

    Many well developed microencapsulation techniques and numerous wall materials have

    been used in food since the 1980s, which results in many food ingredients being

    microencapsulated, as shown in Table 3.2. Different techniques and shell materials will be

    reviewed in the following sections.

    There are a number of reasons for the food industrys use of microencapsulation

    technologies, including:

    Encapsulation or entrapment can protect the active ingredients from degradation due to

    environmental conditions, such as heat, moisture, air, and light;

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    46/228

    28

    The physical properties of original core materials can be modified to make it easy for

    handling, e.g., liquid ingredients can be converted to free-flowing powders;

    Evaporation or leakage of the core material to the outside environment can be reduced

    or controlled, with components such as the volatile flavouring agents;

    The unpleasant taste or appearance of some food ingredients can be masked;

    Several active ingredients can be segregated within a food matrix in separate forms,

    which prevents undesirable interactions between them;

    The food ingredients can be tailored to either release slowly or at a certain point within

    the process of the digestive system.

    Many of these approaches are applicable to our program.

  • 8/10/2019 Fortification in Stample Foodsdf

    47/228

    29

    Table 3.2 Microencapsulated food ingredients (Kirby, 1991; Gibbs et al. 1999, Gouin, 2004; Schrooyen e

    Food ingredients Examples Functions or properties Purposes for microencapsulation

    Acidulants Adipic, fumaric,citric, lactic and

    ascor